DOCSLIB.ORG

Auction Rate Securities 1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Auction Rate Securities 1 Auction Rate Securities 1 Auction Rate Securities (ARS) were marketed by broker-dealers to investors, including individuals, corporations and charitable foundations as liquid, short-term, cash-equivalent investments similar to traditional commercial paper. The securities, however, were long-term floating rate bonds or preferred stock with floating rate coupons which gave them a superficial similarity to short-term investments. ARS’s liquidity and similarity to short-term investments were entirely dependent on the presence of sufficient orders to buy outstanding ARS at periodic auctions in which they were bought and sold subject to a contractual ceiling on the interest rate the issuer would have to pay. If the interest rate that would clear the market was greater than this maximum rate, the auctions “failed” and existing holders of the securities were forced to hold securities they wanted to sell and had previously thought were liquid. If the demand for an ARS was too low to clear the market, broker dealers sponsoring the auction could place bids just below the maximum interest rate to clear the auction. The lower the public demand for an issue, the larger the quantity broker dealers had to buy to avoid a failed auction. Participating broker dealers had better information than public investors about the creditworthiness of the ARS issuers and were the only parties with information about the broker dealers’ holdings and inclination to abandon their support of the auctions. In addition, brokerage firms involved in the auctions knew of temporary maximum rate waivers negotiated with the issuers and the ratings agencies that allowed auctions that would have failed in late 2007 to continue to clear. This severe asymmetry of information made public investors in ARS vulnerable to the brokerage firms’ strategic behavior. In this paper, we explain what auction rate securities were, how they evolved, how their auctions worked, and why their flaws caused them to become illiquid securities. I. Introduction Auction Rate Securities (ARS) were long-maturity floating rate securities issued by municipalities, closed-end mutual funds, structured finance trusts and corporations. Their coupon payments were determined within limits by supply and demand in periodic Dutch 1 © 2010 Securities Litigation and Consulting Group, Inc., 3998 Fair Ridge Drive, Suite 250, Fairfax, VA 22033. www.slcg.com . The primary authors can be contacted at [email protected] or 703-865-4020, [email protected] or 703-246-9381 and [email protected] or (336) 655-8718. We received helpful comments from Guohua Li, Joshua Mallett and Joseph Prendergast. 2 auctions held at intervals of 7, 14, 21, 28 or 35 days. 2 At each auction, buyers and sellers were constrained to pay par value for the securities but could bid on the interest rate that would be paid by the issuer until the next auction. When an auction cleared, buyers paid the par value of the bonds, and received the (auction) market clearing interest rate at the next auction if there were sufficient buyers. 3 As long as the ARS could be sold at the auctions, investors effectively held a short-term security. ARS were marketed by broker-dealers as liquid investments, alternatives to money markets, and cash-equivalent investments, but the design of the securities exposed investors to significant liquidity risk. In particular, ARS did not have a “put” feature that granted investors an option to force the issuer to buy the bond back at par, as is the case with true short-term securities such as variable rate demand notes or tender option bonds. It was only the continued success of the periodic auctions that created the appearance that these long- term securities were short-term securities. 4 In a successful auction, a single market clearing coupon rate was determined that equated the amount of securities participants were willing to buy to the amount of securities participants were willing to sell. If there were insufficient buyers to clear the market at any coupon rate below the “maximum rate” specified in the security’s prospectus, the auction failed and the coupon was set to the maximum rate. This restriction on how high the coupon rate could be was economically equivalent to setting a floor on the price at which the bonds could be sold in the auction. In 2007 and 2008, the ARS were recognized to be worth less than this effective minimum price, the auctions failed and investors were stuck holding securities they couldn’t sell. Moreover, the way the maximum rate was determined was often complex and opaque. Thus, many investors would not have been able to tell when market clearing coupon rates were getting close to the maximum rate and therefore when auctions were close to failing. 2 In financial markets, Dutch auctions are also known as uniform-price or single-price auctions. In these auctions, each winning bid is filled at the lowest winning price (or highest winning yield). See Back and Zender (1993). 3 “Auction Rate Securities,” California Debt and Investment Advisory Commission, August 2004. 4 Adrian D’Silva, Haley Gregg and David Marshall, “Explaining the Decline in the Auction Rate Securities Market,” Chicago Fed Letter, November 2008. Auction Rate Securities 3 Prior to 2007, auction failures were infrequent. In August 2007, the market’s assessment of the risk in auction rate securities increased and some auctions failed as the interest rate that would clear the auction exceeded the maximum rates issuers and underwriters agreed would be paid. In the last half of 2007, the financial condition of monoline bond insurance companies that had guaranteed subprime mortgage backed securities deteriorated. These insurers also guaranteed municipal bonds, many of which were issued in ARS form. With the capital adequacy of the monoline insurers in doubt, investors increased their assessment of credit risk in municipal ARS. In addition, as financial conditions worsened generally, investors increased the liquidity premium they required to hold all but the safest, most liquid securities. In February 2008 the auction market failed en masse . As a result, the majority of ARS investors were unable to liquidate their holdings when they needed cash and suffered sizeable damages. The auction failures were not the result of dramatic contemporaneous market events. The design of auction rate securities and the manipulated implementation of the auctions led to auction failures. The coupon rates determined in ARS auctions were limited to a maximum rate (or cap) defined in each security’s prospectus. If the credit or liquidity risk of a particular ARS warranted a higher coupon rate than the maximum rate, the auction would fail. McConnell and Saretto (2008) found empirical evidence that auctions failed because of “maximum rates” that constrained the ARS coupons to be below what was required to compensate investors. Also, the broker-dealers that underwrote, distributed and remarketed ARS propped up auctions by bidding when the demand for particular ARS was too low to clear the auction at interest rates below the maximum rate allowed in the ARS’s prospectus.5 The repeated undisclosed involvement of the broker-dealers allowed auctions to clear that would have otherwise failed and gave ARS an artificial appearance of liquidity. In late 2007 and early 2008, broker-dealers saw their inventories of auction rate securities increase dramatically as the brokerage firms had to buy more and more of the securities to keep the auctions from failing. The issuers of some auction rate securities 5 In 2006, 15 broker-dealers settled with the SEC. The SEC found that the broker-dealers intervened in auctions to prevent auctions from failing without adequately disclosing their interventions, and that investors may have been unaware of the liquidity or credit risks associated with ARS because the broker- dealers prevented auctions from failing. See “15 Broker-Dealer Firms Settle SEC Charges Involving Violative Practices in the Auction Rate Securities Market,” SEC Press Release 2006-83. Securities Litigation and Consulting Group, Inc. © 2010. dealers resulted thein collapse of the ARS market Figure 1. Figure the reports on AAA-rated, studentyield loan asset substantiallyinterest rates less than what req was when market auctions failed, student loan auction r while many auction rate securities issuers were for permanently adjusted the maximum formulas to rate a the of higher quality ARS would gradually rede have increased gradually auctionsand the poorestof ARS 7 6 investors would been have to the able observe ARS g not the brokerageit for were firms’ non-public and withdrew their support for auctions there pre a was the brokeragefor the firms to force auctions to cl temporarily maximum waived without rates; wai these Bloomberg Ticker: BBALYL5 Index. In a Federal Reserve Board paper, Han and (2008 Li 0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7% When auctions some failed, investors suffered signi Absent manipulation the auctions,of interest rates Jan -07 SL AssetSL yields Securities Backed Feb -07 Mar -07 Apr -07 May -07 Student Loan Loan Student Index ABS Jun -07 Jul -07 Aug -07 Sep -07 Oct -07 Nov -07 Dec -07 Jan -08 7 and revealed the flawed design of the ARS product. Feb -08 yields. Securities Auction SL Rate and indicative 4 ) found that the withdrawal of support broker- by Mar -08 ear. When ear. the brokerage firms ultimately Apr -08 touired investors. compensate 1 Figure ced to interestpay ced rates above at or backed securitiesbacked (“SL ABS”). increasing intervention increasing in the auctions, cipitous drop in liquidity investors. for If May -08 securitiesate (“SL ARS”) issuers paid would have failed early.would failed issuershave Then emed theemed securities or would have radually radually become riskier illiquid. and 110% of 30-Day of 30-Day 110%AA CP llow the auctions to clear. Jun -08 itvers would been have more costly Jul -08 paid at the auctions would have Aug -08 damages.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Short Sellers and Financial Misconduct 6 7 ∗ 8 JONATHAN M
    jofi˙1597 jofi2009v2.cls (1994/07/13 v1.2u Standard LaTeX document class) June 25, 2010 19:56 JOFI jofi˙1597 Dispatch: June 25, 2010 CE: AFL Journal MSP No. No. of pages: 35 PE: Beetna 1 THE JOURNAL OF FINANCE • VOL. LXV, NO. 5 • OCTOBER 2010 2 3 4 5 Short Sellers and Financial Misconduct 6 7 ∗ 8 JONATHAN M. KARPOFF and XIAOXIA LOU 9 10 ABSTRACT 11 12 We examine whether short sellers detect firms that misrepresent their financial state- ments, and whether their trading conveys external costs or benefits to other investors. 13 Abnormal short interest increases steadily in the 19 months before the misrepresen- 14 tation is publicly revealed, particularly when the misconduct is severe. Short selling 15 is associated with a faster time-to-discovery, and it dampens the share price inflation 16 that occurs when firms misstate their earnings. These results indicate that short sell- 17 ers anticipate the eventual discovery and severity of financial misconduct. They also convey external benefits, helping to uncover misconduct and keeping prices closer to 18 fundamental values. 19 20 21 22 SHORT SELLING IS A CONTROVERSIAL ACTIVITY. Detractors claim that short sell- 23 ers undermine investors’ confidence in financial markets and decrease market 24 liquidity. For example, a short seller can spread false rumors about a firm 25 in which he has a short position and profit from the resulting decline in the 1 26 stock price. Advocates, in contrast, argue that short selling facilitates market 27 efficiency and the price discovery process. Investors who identify overpriced 28 firms can sell short, thereby incorporating their unfavorable information into 29 market prices.
    [Show full text]
  • Asset Securitization
    L-Sec Comptroller of the Currency Administrator of National Banks Asset Securitization Comptroller’s Handbook November 1997 L Liquidity and Funds Management Asset Securitization Table of Contents Introduction 1 Background 1 Definition 2 A Brief History 2 Market Evolution 3 Benefits of Securitization 4 Securitization Process 6 Basic Structures of Asset-Backed Securities 6 Parties to the Transaction 7 Structuring the Transaction 12 Segregating the Assets 13 Creating Securitization Vehicles 15 Providing Credit Enhancement 19 Issuing Interests in the Asset Pool 23 The Mechanics of Cash Flow 25 Cash Flow Allocations 25 Risk Management 30 Impact of Securitization on Bank Issuers 30 Process Management 30 Risks and Controls 33 Reputation Risk 34 Strategic Risk 35 Credit Risk 37 Transaction Risk 43 Liquidity Risk 47 Compliance Risk 49 Other Issues 49 Risk-Based Capital 56 Comptroller’s Handbook i Asset Securitization Examination Objectives 61 Examination Procedures 62 Overview 62 Management Oversight 64 Risk Management 68 Management Information Systems 71 Accounting and Risk-Based Capital 73 Functions 77 Originations 77 Servicing 80 Other Roles 83 Overall Conclusions 86 References 89 ii Asset Securitization Introduction Background Asset securitization is helping to shape the future of traditional commercial banking. By using the securities markets to fund portions of the loan portfolio, banks can allocate capital more efficiently, access diverse and cost- effective funding sources, and better manage business risks. But securitization markets offer challenges as well as opportunity. Indeed, the successes of nonbank securitizers are forcing banks to adopt some of their practices. Competition from commercial paper underwriters and captive finance companies has taken a toll on banks’ market share and profitability in the prime credit and consumer loan businesses.
    [Show full text]
  • Auction Rate Securities Issue Brief
    C ALIFORNIA DEBT AND ISSUE BRIEF INVESTMENT ADVISORY California Debt and Investment Advisory Commission August 2004 C OMMISSION AUCTION RATE SECURITIES Douglas Skarr CDIAC Policy Research Unit The Auction Rate Securities market has Securities must carefully evaluate the current expanded significantly in the public finance environment, their objectives, and consider how sector since 2001. Nationwide, issuance of this debt will be managed over the long term. auction rate securities, including the public finance area, grew from $100 billion in the This Issue Brief provides an overview of the first quarter of 2002 to $200 billion by the end market, mechanics, costs, benefits and risks of the fourth quarter of 2003. Public finance associated with Auction Rate Securities. has become the fastest-growing sector to use auction rate securities, with total issuance I. DEFINITION AND PURPOSE projected to grow at double-digit rates in the Auction Rate Securities (ARS) are long term, future (see Figure 1). variable rate bonds tied to short term interest rates. ARS have a long term nominal maturity Figure 1 – ARS Issues Outstanding with interest rates reset through a modified ARS Outstanding 2002-2003 Dutch auction, at predetermined short term 250 intervals, usually 7, 28, or 35 days. They trade 200 at par and are callable at par on any interest payment date at the option of the issuer. 150 Interest is paid at the current period based on 100 the interest rate determined in the prior auction ($)In Billions period. 50 0 Although ARS are issued and rated as long term Q1- Q2- Q3- Q4- Q1- Q2- Q3- Q4- 2002 2002 2002 2002 2003 2003 2003 2003 bonds (20 to 30 years), they are priced and Total Municipal traded as short term instruments because of the liquidity provided through the interest rate reset The use of auction rate financing is becoming mechanism.
    [Show full text]
  • Hybrid Securities
    Analysis MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL GUIDE 2015/16 CAPITAL MARKETS Hybrid securities: an overview Ze'-ev D Eiger, Peter J Green, Thomas A Humphreys and Jeremy C Jennings-Mares Morrison & Foerster LLP global.practicallaw.com/1-517-1581 The history of hybrid securities may well be divided into two x The main bank regulatory requirements and how these differ by periods: pre-financial crisis and post-financial crisis. Before the jurisdiction. crisis, hybrid issuances by financial institutions including banks and insurance companies, and corporate issuers, which are generally x The main tax considerations and how these differ by jurisdiction. utilities, were quite significant. Such product structuring efforts x The accounting considerations. resulted in a vast array of hybrid products, such as trust preferred securities, real estate investment trust (REIT) preferred securities, x The ratings considerations. perpetual preferred securities and paired or stapled hybrid x How hybrid securities can be offered and how and to whom they structures. Following the financial crisis, regulators have been are usually marketed. focused on enhancing the regulatory capital requirements applicable to financial institutions and ensuring that there is Format greater transparency regarding financial instruments. Regulatory reform will continue to affect the future of hybrid capital. While Hybrid securities include: financial institutions have focused in recent years on non- x Certain classes of preferred stock. cumulative perpetual preferred stock and contingent capital instruments, "traditional" hybrids, such as trust preferred x Trust preferred securities (for non-bank issuers). securities, remain popular with corporate issuers. x Convertible debt securities (for non-bank issuers). This article provides a brief overview of the principal structuring, x Debt securities with principal write-down features.
    [Show full text]
  • Derivative Securities
    2. DERIVATIVE SECURITIES Objectives: After reading this chapter, you will 1. Understand the reason for trading options. 2. Know the basic terminology of options. 2.1 Derivative Securities A derivative security is a financial instrument whose value depends upon the value of another asset. The main types of derivatives are futures, forwards, options, and swaps. An example of a derivative security is a convertible bond. Such a bond, at the discretion of the bondholder, may be converted into a fixed number of shares of the stock of the issuing corporation. The value of a convertible bond depends upon the value of the underlying stock, and thus, it is a derivative security. An investor would like to buy such a bond because he can make money if the stock market rises. The stock price, and hence the bond value, will rise. If the stock market falls, he can still make money by earning interest on the convertible bond. Another derivative security is a forward contract. Suppose you have decided to buy an ounce of gold for investment purposes. The price of gold for immediate delivery is, say, $345 an ounce. You would like to hold this gold for a year and then sell it at the prevailing rates. One possibility is to pay $345 to a seller and get immediate physical possession of the gold, hold it for a year, and then sell it. If the price of gold a year from now is $370 an ounce, you have clearly made a profit of $25. That is not the only way to invest in gold.
    [Show full text]
  • (Equity Shares, Debentures, Bonds) DOS Avail Nomination for All Your
    SHARE & DEBENTURE HOLDERS (Equity Shares, Debentures, Bonds) DOS 9 Avail nomination for all your investments without fail 9 Convert your physical certificates in to demat form by opening demat a/c 9 Provide your PAN card details in case of transfer / transmission of shares in physical form 9 Keep track of your investments on regular basis 9 Be alert to any public announcements on the shares of the companies that you have invested 9 Be aware that an intermediary or its staff making a recommendation, is required to disclose their interest/ position in that scrip 9 Read the Annual Report and enclosed explanatory statements, if any, before attending General Meetings 9 In case of any grievance, contact the compliance officer of the company / Debenture Trustee (DT) Be aware that listed companies, Registrar and Share Transfer Agents (RTA) and DTs are required to have a dedicated Email ID for registering your complaints 9 Approach SEBI, if grievance is not redressed by the Company / DT 9 Be aware that investor complaints against listed companies are displayed on the website(s) of SE 9 Be aware that the details of disposal of arbitration proceedings are displayed on the website(s) of SE DON’TS 8 Do not invest with borrowed money 8 Do not expect unrealistic / guaranteed returns 8 Do not be influenced by advertisement / advices / rumours / unauthentic news promising unrealistic gains and windfall profits in mass media 8 Do not be guided by astrological predictions on share prices and market movements 8 Do not fall prey to market rumours / ‘hot
    [Show full text]
  • Securitization Continues to Grow As a Funding Source for the Economy, with RMBS
    STRUCTURED FINANCE SECTOR IN-DEPTH Structured finance - China 25 March 2019 Securitization continues to grow as a funding source for the economy, with RMBS TABLE OF CONTENTS leading the way Summary 1 China's securitization market Summary continues to grow, providing an increasing share of debt funding for The share of debt funding for the Chinese economy provided by securitization continues the economy 2 to grow, driven in large part by the growing issuance of structured finance deals backed by Securitization market is evolving as consumer debt such as residential mortgages and auto loans. funding needs change, with consumer debt a growing focus 4 » China's securitization market continues to grow, providing an increasing share RMBS and auto ABS issuance of debt funding for the economy. Securitization accounted for 4.6% of total debt growing, but credit card, micro-loan and CLO deals in decline 5 capital market new issuance for the Chinese economy in 2018, up from 3.7% in 2017. Market developments support further At the end of 2018, the total value of outstanding securitization notes stood at RMB2.7 growth 10 trillion, making China the largest securitization market in Asia and the second largest in Moody’s related publications 12 the world behind the US. However, while it continues to grow, securitization still provides a relatively small share of total debt financing for the Chinese economy compared with Contacts what occurs in the US and other more developed markets. Gracie Zhou +86.21.2057.4088 » Securitization market is evolving as funding needs change, with consumer debt a VP-Senior Analyst growing focus.
    [Show full text]
  • The Demand for Swiss Banknotes: Some New Evidence Katrin Assenmacher1, Franz Seitz2 and Jörn Tenhofen3*
    Assenmacher et al. Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics (2019) 155:14 Swiss Journal of https://doi.org/10.1186/s41937-019-0041-7 Economics and Statistics ORIGINAL ARTICLE Open Access The demand for Swiss banknotes: some new evidence Katrin Assenmacher1, Franz Seitz2 and Jörn Tenhofen3* Abstract Knowing the part of currency in circulation that is used for transactions is important information for a central bank. For several countries, the share of banknotes that is hoarded or circulates abroad is sizeable, which may be particularly relevant for large-denomination banknotes. We analyze the demand for Swiss banknotes over a period starting in 1950 to 2017 and use different methods to derive the evolution of the amount that is hoarded. Our findings indicate a sizeable amount of hoarding, in particular for large denominations. The hoarding shares increased around the break-up of the Bretton Woods system, were comparatively low in the mid-1990s, and have increased significantly since the turn of the millennium and the recent financial and economic crises. Keywords: Currency in circulation, Cash, Demand for banknotes, Hoarding of banknotes, Banknotes held by non-residents JEL Classification: E41; E52; E58 1 Introduction Piskorski (2006), for instance, show that the link between In many economies, demand for cash is growing despite money and inflation or output in the United States (US) an increasing share of electronic payments driven by con- becomes stronger if domestic monetary aggregates are tinuous innovations in payment technology.1 In Switzer- corrected for foreign holdings of US dollars. Central banks land, similar to some other countries, the increase in also have an interest in monitoring cash developments the demand for banknotes has even accelerated since the because of their role in operating the payment system.
    [Show full text]
  • Immutep Limited
    Not for release to U.S. wire services or distribution in the United States or to U.S. Persons ASX/Media Release (Code: ASX: IMM; NASDAQ: IMMP) 21 June 2021 Immutep secures commitments for A$60 million through a two-tranche institutional placement to expand its clinical development and manufacturing program into late-stage settings Key Highlights • Immutep has secured commitments for A$60 million via a two-tranche institutional placement which was supported by multiple institutional investors in Australia and offshore • Immutep will offer an SPP for eligible shareholders of Immutep to seek to raise a further ~A$5 million • Ongoing strength of Immutep’s clinical data for efti (presented at SITC 2020, SABCS 2020 and ASCO 2021) provides the opportunity to seek to expand the clinical portfolio including a Phase III clinical trial • Moving efti manufacturing towards commercial scale • Preparing Immutep’s autoimmune disease candidate, IMP761 for IND stage • The institutional placement improves Immutep’s financial flexibility, providing a $108m1 cash balance and extending its cash runway to the end of CY2023 SYDNEY, AUSTRALIA - Immutep Limited (ASX: IMM; NASDAQ: IMMP) (Immutep or Company), is pleased to announce that it has received commitments for a A$60 million via a two-tranche placement of new ordinary shares in Immutep (New Shares) to professional, institutional and sophisticated investors (Placement). Immutep CEO, Marc Voigt said: “Never has there been a more exciting time to be the leading LAG-3 biotech, following the recent industry validation of this promising new immune checkpoint. Efti has continued to report compelling results from multiple clinical trials over the last year, including from key patient subgroups in our AIPAC study.
    [Show full text]
  • The Guide to Securities Lending
    3&"$)#&:0/%&91&$5"5*0/4 An Introduction to Securities Lending First Canadian Edition An Introduction to $IPPTFTFDVSJUJFTMFOEJOHTFSWJDFTXJUIBO Securities Lending JOUFSOBUJPOBMSFBDIBOEBEFUBJMFEGPDVT Mark C. Faulkner, Managing Director, Spitalfields Advisors Spitalfields Managing Director, Mark C. Faulkner, First Canadian Edition 5SVTUFECZNPSFUIBOCPSSPXFSTXPSMEXJEFJOHMPCBMNBSLFUT QMVTUIF64 BOE$BOBEB $*#$.FMMPOJTDPNNJUUFEUPQSPWJEJOHVOSJWBMMFETFDVSJUJFTMFOEJOH TFSWJDFTUP$BOBEJBOJOTUJUVUJPOBMJOWFTUPST8FMFWFSBHFOFBSMZZFBSTPG EFBMFSBOEUSBEJOHFYQFSJFODFUPIFMQDMJFOUTBDIJFWFIJHIFSSFUVSOTXJUIPVU Mark C. Faulkner, Managing Director DPNQSPNJTJOHBTTFUTFDVSJUZ 0VSTUSBUFHZJTUPNBYJNJ[FSFUVSOTBOEDPOUSPMSJTLCZGPDVTJOHJOUFOUMZPOUIF Spitalfields Advisors TUSVDUVSFBOEEFUBJMTPGFBDIMPBO5IBUJTXIZXFPGGFSBMFOEJOHQSPHSBNUIBUJT USBOTQBSFOU SJTLDPOUSPMMFEBOEEPFTOPUJNQFEFZPVSGVOETUSBEJOHBOEWBMVBUJPO QSPDFTT4PZPVDBOFYDFFEFYQFDUBUJPOT ■ (MPCBM$VTUPEZ ■ 4FDVSJUJFT-FOEJOH ■ 0VUTPVSDJOH ■ 8PSLCFODI ■ #FOFmU1BZNFOUT ■ 'PSFJHO&YDIBOHF &OBCMJOH:PVUP 'PDVTPO:PVS8PSME XXXDJCDNFMMPODPN XXXXPSLCFODIDJCDNFMMPODPN $*#$.FMMPO(MPCBM4FDVSJUJFT4FSWJDFT$PNQBOZJTBMJDFOTFEVTFSPGUIF$*#$BOE.FMMPOUSBEFNBSLT ______________________________ An Introduction to Securities Lending First Canadian Edition Mark C. Faulkner Spitalfields Advisors Limited 155 Commercial Street London E1 6BJ United Kingdom Published in Canada First published, 2006 © Mark C. Faulkner, 2006 First Edition, 2006 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted,
    [Show full text]
  • Transaction Fees Transactions in Stocks with a Per Share Stock Price Less Than $1.00
    Text of Proposed Rule Change New text is underscored; deleted text is in [brackets] New York Stock Exchange Price List 2011 * * * * * Transaction Fees Regular Session Trading1 Transactions in stocks with a per share stock price less than $1.00 Equity per Share Charge - per transaction - when adding liquidity to the NYSE in any stock with a per share stock price below $1.00 (displayed and non- displayed)………………............................................. No Charge At the opening or at the opening only orders – per share2………………………………………………… The lesser of (i) 0.3% of the total dollar value of the transaction and (ii) $0.0005 per share Executions at the close (except market at-the-close and limit at-the-close orders)……………………….. No Charge Credit per Share - for executions of orders in any stock with a per share stock price below $1.00 sent to the floor broker for representation on the NYSE when adding liquidity to the NYSE Display Book system………………................................................... $0.0004 Routing Fee – per share in any stock with a per share stock price below $1.00 ……………………………. The lesser of (i) 0.3% of the total dollar value of the transaction and (ii) the Routing Fee that would be applicable if the stock did not have a price below $1.00 1 Does not apply to transactions by members acting as a Designated Market Maker for own account. Equity per Share Charge3 - per transaction (charged to both sides) – for all market at-the-close and limit at-the-close, in each case in any stock with a per share stock price below $1.00………………………
    [Show full text]
  • Incentives and Tranche Retention in Securitisation: a Screening Model
    Incentives and Tranche Retention in Securitisation: A Screening Model Ingo Fender (Bank for International Settlements) and Janet Mitchell (National Bank of Belgium and CEPR)y First draft: November, 2008z This draft: May, 2009 Abstract This paper examines the power of di¤erent contractual mechanisms to in‡uence an originator’schoice of costly e¤ort to screen borrowers when the originator plans to securitise its loans. The analysis focuses on three potential mechanisms: the originator holds a “vertical slice”, or share of the portfolio; the originator holds the equity tranche of a structured …nance transaction; the originator holds the mezzanine tranche, rather than the equity tranche. These mechanisms will result in di¤ering levels of screening, and the di¤erences arise from varying sensitivities to a systematic risk factor. Equity tranche retention is not always the most e¤ective mechanism. The equity tranche can be dominated by either a vertical slice or a mezzanine tranche if the probability of a downturn is likely and if the equity tranche is likely to be depleted in a downturn. In addition, a vertical slice is unlikely to dominate both the equity tranche and the mezzanine tranche, unless the vertical slice is very "thick". Monetary and Economic Department, Bank for International Settlements, Central- bahnplatz 2, 4002 Basel, Switzerland, tel: +41 61 280 8415, email: [email protected] yFinancial Stability Department, National Bank of Belgium, Boulevard de Berlaimont 14, B-1000 Brussels, Belgium, tel: +32 2 221 3459, email: [email protected] zThe views expressed in this paper remain those of the authors and do not necessarily re‡ect those of the BIS or the NBB.
    [Show full text]