M* EGISTER VOLUME 20 1934 NUMBER 226

Washington, Saturday, November 19, 1955

TITLE 7— AGRICULTURE meeting; the recommendation and sup­ CONTENTS porting information for regulation dur­ Chapter IX— Agricultural Marketing ing the period specified herein was Agricultural Marketing Service Pase Service (Marketing Agreements and promptly submitted to the Department Proposed rule making: Orders), Department of Agriculture after such meeting was held; the provi­ Milk; sions of this section, including its effec­ Greater Kansas City mar- [Nav^l Orange Reg. 61 ] tive time, are identical with the aforesaid keting area______8576 P art 914—Navel Oranges G rown in recommendation of the committee, and St. Louis, Mo., marketing Arizona and D esignated P art of Cali­ information concerning such provisions area______8574 fornia and effective time has been disseminated Rules and regulations: among handlers of such navel oranges; Limitations of shipments and LIMITATION OF HANDLING it is necessary, in order to effectuate the handling: § 914.361 Navel Orange Regulation declared policy of the act, to make this Grapefruit______8557 €1—(a) Findings. (1) Pursuant to the section effective during the period herein Lemons______!_____ ' 8558 marketing agreement, as amended, and specified; and compliance with this sec­ Oranges (2 documents) _ 8555, 8557 Order No. 14, ás amended (7 CFR Part tion will not require any special prepara­ Tangerines______8558 914; 19 P. R. 2941), regulating the han­ tion on the part of persons subject Agriculture Department dling of navel oranges grown in Arizona thereto which cannot be completed on or and designated part of California, effec­ See Agricultural Marketing Serv­ before the effective date hereof. ice. tive September 22, 1953, under the ap­ (b) Order. (1) The quantity of navel plicable provisions of the Agricultural oranges grown in Arizona and desig­ Air Force Department Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as nated part of California which may be Rules and regulations: amended C7 U. S. C. 601 et seq.), and handled during the period beginning at Aviation cadet training______8567 upon the basis of the recommendation 12:01 a. m., P. s. t., November 20, 1955, Civil Aeronautics Administra­ and information submitted, by the Navel and ending at 12:01 a. m., P. s. t., No­ tion Orange Administrative Committee, es­ vember 27, 1955, is hereby fixed as fol­ tablished under the said amended mar­ Rules and regulations: lows: Civil airways, designation of; keting agreement and order, and upon (1) District 1: 244,088 cartons; other available information, it is hereby alteration-______8559 (ii) District 2: Unlimited movement; Control areas, zones, and re­ found that the limitation of handling of (iii) District 3: Unlimited movement; such navel oranges, as hereinafter pro­ porting points ; alterations__ 8559 (iv) District 4: Unlimited movement. Minimum en route IFR alti­ vided, will tend to effectuate the declared (2) Navel oranges handled pursuant policy of the act. tudes; miscellaneous amend­ to the provisions of this section shall be ments______8559 (2) It is, hereby further found that itsubject to any size restrictions applicable is impracticable and contrary to the Restricted areas; West Molokai, thereto which have heretofore been Island of Molokai, T. H_____ 8559 public interest to give preliminary notice, issued on the handling of such oranges engage in public rule-making procedure, and which are effective during the period Civil Aeronautics Board and postpone the effective date of this specified herein. Notices: section until 30 days after publication (3) As used in this section, “handled,” American Airlines, Inc., and thereof in the F ederal R egister (60 Stat. “District 1,” “District 2,” “District 3,” Flying Tiger Line, Inc.; pre­ 237; 5 U. S. C. 1001 et seq.) because the and “District 4” have the same meaning hearing conference on peti­ time intervening between the date when as when used in said amended marketing tion to modify minimum information upon which this section is agreement and order; and “carton” rates______8585 based became available and the time means the standard one-half orange, Hearings: when this section must become effective Foreign air carrier charter in order to effectuate the declared policy grapefruit, or lemon box set forth as service investigation_____ 8585 of the act is insufficient, and a reasonable standard container number 58 in section Northwest Airlines, Inc.; time is permitted, under the circum­ 828.83, as amended, of the Agricultural Pittsburgh-Cleveland and stances, for preparation for such effec­ Code of California. Detroit restriction case___ 8585 tive time; and good cause exists for (Sec. 5, 49 Stat. 753, as amended; 7 U. S. O. Proposed rule making: making the provisions hereof effective as 608c) Air taxi certification and opera­ hereinafter set forth. The Navel Orange Dated: November 18, 1955. tion rules______8580 Administrative Committee held an open Landing limitations outside meeting on November 17,1955, after giv­ [seal] S. R . Sm it h , continental United States; ing due notice thereof, to consider supply Director, Fruit and Vegetable weather reporting facilities and market conditions for navel oranges Division, Agricultural Mar- and requirements______8579 and the need for regulation; interested keting Service. Commerce Department persons were afforded an opportunity to [F. R. Doc. 55-9392; FUed, Nov. 18, 1955; See Civil Aeronautics Administra- submit information and views at this 11:35 a. m.] tion; Foreign Commerce Bureau. 8555 8556 RULES AND REGULATIONS CONTENTS— Continuée! CONTENTS— Continued Federal Power Commission—« Paga Securities and Exchange Com- Page FEDERAL|pREGISTER Continued mission •V ¡Junto»34 ’¿y Notices—Continued Rules and regulations: Hearings, etc.—Continued Securities Act of 1933; summary Published daily, except Sundays, Mondays, Dlouhy, Francis N_------. . . 8583 prospectus prepared by inde­ and days following official Federal holidays, Florida Power Corp------8583 pendent organizations—____ 8566 by the Federal Register Division, National Hale, Victor, and Grover Treasury Department ‘Archives and Records Service, General Serv­ Lowe______8584 ices Administration, pursuant to the au­ See Customs Bureau; Internal Horner, J. Robert______8584 Revenue Service. thority contained in the Federal Register Act, Lateral Gas Pipeline Co. and approved July 26, 1935 (49 Stat. 500, as Wage and Hour Division amended; 44 U. S. C., ch. 8B), under regula­ Iowa Electric Light and tions prescribed by the Administrative Com­ Power Co______— 8583 Notices: . mittee of the Federal Register, approved by Montana-Dakota Utilities Co. 8584 Learner employment certifi­ the President. Distribution is made only by cates; issuance to various the Superintendent of Documents, Govern­ Food and Drug Administration industries______8582 ment Printing Office, Washington 25, D. C. Rules and regulations: T h e F ederal R egister will be furnished by Pesticide chemicals, tolerances: mail to subscribers, free of postage, for $1.50 Allethrin residues------:------8567 CODIFICATION GUIDE per month or $15.00 per year, payable in Ferbam, zineb, and ziram A numerical list of the parts of the Code advance. The charge for individual copies residues______8567 of Federal Regulations affected by documents (minimum 15 cents) varies in proportion to published in this issue. Proposed rules, a$ the size of the issue. Remit check or money Foreign Commerce Bureau opposed to final actions, are identified as order, made payable to the Superintendent Rules and regulations: su ch . of Documents, directly to the Government Export regulations; licensing Printing Office, W ashington 25, D. C. policies and related special Title 7 Page The regulatory material appearing herein provisions ; export clearance Is keyed to the Code of F ederal R egulations, Chapter IX: which is published, under 50 titles, pursuant and destination control; Part 903 (proposed)______8574 to section 11 of the Federal Register Act, as am endm ents, extensions, Part 913 (proposed)______8576 amended August 5, 1953. The Code of F ed­ transfers; denial or suspen­ Part 914_____ 8555 eral R egulations is sold by the Superin­ sion of export privileges----- . 8564 Part 933 (3 documents)__ 8557,8558 tendent of Documents. Prices of books and Part 953__ 8558 pocket supplements vary. Health, Education, and Welfare There are no restrictions on the re­ Department Title 14 publication of material appearing in the See Food and Drug Administra­ Chapter I: F ederal R egister, or th e Code of F ederal tion. Part40 (proposed)______—___■ 8579 R egulations. Internal Revenue Service Part 42 (proposed)______8580 Part 45 (proposed)______8580 Proposed rule making: Alcohol and tobacco tax divi­ Part 47 (proposed)__ ___ 8580 CFR SUPPLEMENTS sion; labeling and advertising Chapter II: (For use ¿luring 1955) Part 600__ 8559 of distilled spirits..------8574 Part>601______8559 The following Supplement is now Interior Department Part 608:______8559 available: See Land Management Bureau; Part 610______8559 National Park Service; Recla­ General Index ($1.25) Title 15 mation Bureau. Chapter HE: All of the Cumulative Pocket Interstate Commerce Commis­ Part 373______— 8564 Supplements and revised books sion Part 379______8564 Notices: Part 380______8564 of the Code of Federal Regula­ Fourth section applications for Part 382______8564 tions (as of January 1, 1955) relief______8585 Title 17 are now available with the Labor Department Chapter H: exception of Titles 1—3 See Wage and Hour Division. Part 230-1____ 8566 Order from Superintendent of Documents, Land Management Bureau Title 19 Government Printing Office, Washington Rules and regulations: Chapter I: 25, D. C Public land orders: Part 12______8566 Alaska______8573 Title 21 California______8572 Chapter I: CONTENTS— Continued National Advisory Committee Part 120 (2 documents)______8567 for Aeronautics Title 27 Customs Bureau Page Rules and regulations: Chapter I: Rules and regulations: Contract disputes and appeals. 8572 Part 5 (proposed)______8574 Merchandise, special classes; claims for liquidated dam­ National Park Service Title 32 ages______8566 Notices: Chapter v n : Delegations of authority: Part 874__ 8567 Defense Department Regional director; appeal----- 8582 Chapter XII: See Air Force Department. Assistant directors et al.; con­ Part 1220___ 8572 Federal Communications Com­ tracts______t------— 8582 Title 43 mission Reclamation Bureau Chapter I: Rules and regulations: Notices: Appendix (Public land orders): Radio broadcast services; tele­ Belle Fourche Project, South 225 (revoked in part by PLO vision broadcast stations__ _ 8574 Dakota; order of revocation. 8582 1253)______8573 Central Utah Project, Utah; 1252 ______8572 Federal Power Commission 1253 ______8573 Notices : first form reclamation with­ Hearings, etc.: drawal.____ :______—. 8580 Title 47 California Electric Power Co. 8583 Central Valley Project, Cali­ Chapter I: Continental Oil Co______8583 fornia; order of revocation.. 8581 Part 3_____ :______..____— — 8574 Saturday, November 19/1955 FEDERAL REGISTER 8557 [Grapefruit Reg. 2311 (i> Any seeded grapefruit, grown in Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as P art 933—O ranges, G rapefruit, and the State of Florida, which are not ma­ amended C7 U. S. C. 601 et seq.), and T angerines G rown in F lorida ture and do not grade at least U. S. No. 1 upon the basis of the recommendations Russet; of the committees established under the LIMITATION OF SHIPMENTS (ii) Any seedless grapefruit, grown in aforesaid amended marketing agree­ § 933.753 Grapefruit Regulation 231— Regulation Area I, which are not mature ment and order, and upon other avail­ (a) Findings. (1) Pursuant to the mar­ and do not grade at least U. S. No. 1 able information, it is hereby found that keting agreement, as amended, and Russet; the limitation of shipments of all Florida Order No. 33, as amended (7 CFR Part (iii) Any seedless grapefruit, grown in oranges, as hereinafter provided, will 933), regulating the handling of oranges, Regulation Area II, which are not ma­ tend to effectuate the declared policy of grapefruit, and tangerines grown in the ture and do not grade at least U. S. No. 2; the act. State of Florida, effective under the ap­ (iv) Any seedless grapefruit, grown in (2) It is hereby further found that it plicable provisions of the Agricultural Regulation Area n , which are mature is impracticable and contrary to the Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as and which grade U. S.-No. 2 or U. S. public interest to give preliminary no­ amended (7 U. S. C. 601 et seq.), and No. 2 Bright unless such seedless grape­ tice, engage in public rule-making pro-, upon the basis of the recommendations fruit (a) are in the same container with cedure, and postpone the effective date of the committees established under the seedless grapefruit which grade at least of this section until 30 days after pub­ aforesaid amended marketing agreement U. S. No. 1 Russet and (b) are not in ex­ lication thereof in the F ederal R egister and order, and upon other available in­ cess of 50 percent, by count, of the num­ (60 Stat. 237; 5 U. S. C. 1001 et seq.) formation, it is hereby found that the ber of all seedless grapefruit in such because the time intervening between limitation of shipments of grapefruit, as container; the date when information upon which hereinafter provided, will tend to effec­ (v) Any seeded grapefruit, grown in this section is . based became available tuate the declared policy of the act. th# State of Florida, which are of a size and the time when this section must (2) It is hereby further found that itsmaller than a size that will pack 70 become effective in order to effectuate is impracticable and contrary to the pub­ grapefruit, packed in accordance with the declared policy of the act is insuffi­ lic interest to give preliminary notice, the requirements of a standard pack, in cient; a reasonable time is permitted, engage in public rule-making proce­ a standard nailed box; or under the circumstances, for prepara­ dure, and postpone the effective date of (vi) Any seedless grapefruit, grown in tion for such effective time; and good this section until 30 days after publica­ the State of Florida, which are of a size cause exists for making the provisions hereof effective not later than November tion thereof in the F ederal R egister smaller than a size that will pack 96 (60 Stat. 237; 5 U. S. C. 1001 et seq.) be­ grapefruit, packed in accordance with 21, 1955. Shipments of all oranges, ex­ cause the time intervening between the the requirements of a standard pack, in cept Temple oranges, grown in the State date when information upon which this a standard nailed box. of Florida, are presently subject to reg­ section is based became available and the (2) As used in this section, “handler,”ulation by grades and sizes, pursuant time when this section must become ef­ “ship,” “Growers Administrative Com­ to the amended marketing agreement fective in order to effectuate the declared mittee,” “Regulation Area I,” and “Regu­ and order, and will so continue until policy of the act is insufficient; a rea­ lation Area H,” shall have the same November 21, 1955; the recommendation sonable time is permitted, under the meaning as when used in said amended and supporting information for contin­ circumstances, for preparation for such marketing agreement and order; the ued regulation subsequent to November effective time ; and good cause exists for terms “U. S. No. 1 Russet,” “U. S. No. 2,” 20, 1955, was promptly submitted to the making the provisions hereof effective “U. S. No. 2 Bright,” “standard pack,” Department after an open meeting of not later than November 21,1955. Ship­ and “standard nailed box” shall have the the Growers* Administrative Committee ments of grapefruit, grown in the State same meaning as when used in the re­ on November 15; such meeting was held of Florida, are presently subject to regu­ vised United States Standards for Flor­ to consider recommendations for regula­ lation by grades and sizes, pursuant to ida Grapefruit (§§ 51.750 to 51.790 of tion, after giving due notice of such thé amended marketing agreement and this title); and the term “mature” shall meeting, and interested persons were af­ order, and will so continue until Novem­ have the same meaning as set forth in forded an opportunity to submit their ber 21, 1955; the recommendation and section 601.16 Florida Statutes, Chapters Views at this meeting; the provisions of supporting information for continued 26492 and 28090, known as the Florida this section, including the effective time regulation subsequent to November 20, Citrus Code of 1949, as supplemented by hereof, are identical with the aforesaid 1955, was promptly submitted to the De­ section 601.17 (Chapters 25149 and recommendation of the committee, and partment after an open meeting of the 28090) and also by section 601.18, as information concerning such provisions Growers Administrative Committee on amended on June 2, 1955 (Chapter and effective time has been disseminated November 15; such meeting was held to 29760). among handlers of such oranges; it is consider recommendations for regula­ (Sec. 5, 49 Stat. 753, as amended; 7 U. S. C. necessary, in order to effectuate the de­ 608c) clared policy of tjie act, to make this tion, after giving due notice of such section effective during the period here­ meeting, and interested persons were af­ Dated: November 16, 1955. inafter set forth so as to provide for the forded an opportunity to submit their continued regulation of the handling of views at this meeting; the provisions of [seal] S. R . S m it h , Director, Fruit and Vegetable all oranges, and compliance with this this section, including the effective time section will not require any special prep­ hereof, are identical with the aforesaid Division, Agricultural Mar­ keting Service. aration on the part of the persons subect recommendation of the committee, and thereto which cannot be completed by information concerning such provisions [P. R. Doc. 55-9336,“ Filed, Nov. 18, 1955; the effective time hereof. and effective time has been disseminated 8:53 a. m.] (b) Order. (1) During the period be­ among handlers of such grapefruit; it is ginning at 12:01 a. m., e. s. t., November necessary, in order to effectuate the de­ 21,1955, and ending at 12:01 a. m., e. s. t., clared policy of the act, to make this December 5,1955, no handler shall ship: section effective during the period here­ [Orange Reg. 285] , (i) Any oranges, including Temple inafter set forth so as to provide for the art ranges rapefruit and oranges, grown in the State of Florida, continued regulation of the handling of P 933—O , G , T angerines G rown in F lorida which do not grade at least U. S. Ño. 1 grapefruit; and compliance with this Russet; or section will not require any special prep­ LIMITATION OF SHIPMENTS (ii) Any oranges, except Temple aration on the part of persons subject § 933.754 Orange Regulation 285— oranges, grown in the State of Florida, thereto which cannot be completed by (a) Findings. (1) Pursuant to the mar­ which are of a size smaller than 21%e the effective time hereof. keting agreement, as amended, and inches in diameter, which shall be the (b) Order. (1) During the period be­Order No. 38, as amended (7 CFR Part largest measurement at a right angle to ginning at 12:01 a. m., e. s. t., November 833), regulating the handling of oranges, a straight line running from the stem 21, 1955, and ending at 12:01 a. m., grapefruit, and tangerines grown in the to the blossom end of the fruit, except e. s. t., December 5, 1955, no handler State of Florida, effective under the that a tolerance of 10 percent, by count, shall ship: applicable provisions of the Agricultural of oranges smaller than such minimum] 8558 RULES AND REGULATIONS diameter shall be permitted, which toler­ ments of tangerines, grown in the State (See. 5, 49 Stati 753, as amended; 7 U. S. C. ance shall be applied in accordance with of Florida, are presently subject to reg­ 608c) the provisions for the application of ulation by grades and sizes, pursuant to Dated: November 16, 1955. tolerances, specified in the United States the amended marketing agreement and Standards for Florida Oranges and order, and will so continue until Novem­ [ se a l ] S . R . S m it h , Tangelos (§§ 51.1140 to 51.1186 of this ber 21, 1955; the recommendation and Director, Fruit and Vegetable title, 20 F. R. 7205) : Provided, That in supporting information for continued Division, Agricultural Mar­ determining the percentage of oranges regulation subsequent to November 20, keting Service. in any lot which are smaller than 21%e 1955, was promptly submitted to the [F. R. Doc. 55- 9334; Filed, Nov. 18, 1955; inches in diameter, such percentage shall Department after an open meeting of 8:52 a. m.] be based only on those oranges in such the Growers Administrative Committee lot which are of a size 2!%6 inches in on November 15; such meeting was held diameter and smaller. to consider recommendations for regula­ <2) As used in this section, the terms tion, after giving due notice of such [Lemon Reg. 616] “handler,” “ship,” and “Growérs Admin­ meeting, and interested persons were P art 953—L emons G rown in California istrative Committee” shall each have the afforded an opportunity to submit their and Arizona ~ views at this meeting; the provisions same meaning as when used in said limitations of shipm ents amended marketing agreement and of this section, including the effective order; and the terms “Ü. S. No'. 1 Rus­ time hereof, are identical with the afore­ § 953.723 Lemon Regulation 616—(a) set” shall have the same meaning as said recommendation of the committee, Findings. (1) Pursuant to the market­ when used in the United States Stand-, and information concerning such provi­ ing agreement, as amended, and Order ards for Florida Oranges and Tangelos sions and effective time has been dis­ No. 53, as amended (7 CFR Part 953; (§§51.1140 to 51.1186 of this title, 20 seminated among handlers of such 20 F. R. 2913), regulating the handling F. R. 7205). tangerines; it is necessary, in order to of lemons grown in the State of Cali­ effectuate the declared policy of the act, fornia or in the State of Arizona, effec­ (Sec. 5. 49 Stat. 753, as amended; 7 U. S. C. to make this section effective during the tive under the applicable provisions of 608c) period hereinafter set forth so as to the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Dated: November 16, 1955. provide for the continued regulation of Act of 1937, as amended (7 U. S. C. [seal] S. R . S m it h , the handling of tangerines; and com­ 601 et seq.), and upon the basis of Director, Fruit and Vegetable pliance with this section will not require the recommendation and information Division, Agricultural Mar­ any special preparation on the part of submitted by the Lemon Administrative keting Service. persons subjeet thereto which cannot be Committee, established under the said completed on or before the effective amended marketing agreement and [F. R. Doc. 55-9335; Filed, Nov. 18, 1955; time hereof. order, and upon other available infor­ 8:53 a. m.] (b) Order. (1) During the period be­ mation, it is hereby found that the lim­ ginning at 12:01 a. m., e. s. t., November itation of the quantity of Such lemons 21,1955, and ending at 12:01 a. m., e. s. t„ which may be handled, as hereinafter November 28,1955, no handler shall ship: provided, will tend to effectuate the de­ [Tangerine Reg. 162] (1) Any tangerines, grown in the State clared policy of the act. P art 933—O ranges, G rapefruit, and of Florida, that do not grade at least (2) It is hereby further found that it T angerines G rown in F lorida U. S. No. 1 Russet; or is impracticable and contrary to the pub­ (ii) Any tangerines, grown in the lic interest to give preliminary notice, LIMITATION OF SHIPMENTS _ State of Florida, that are of a size smaller engage in public rule-making procedure, § 933.755 Tangerine Regulation 162-*- than the size that will pack 176 tanger­ and postpone the effective date of this (a) Findings. (1) Pursuant to the ines, packed in accordance with the re­ section until 30 days after publication marketing agreement, as amended, and quirements of a standard pack, in a thereof in the F ederal R egister (60 Stat. Order No. 33, as amended (7 CFR Part half-standard box (inside dimensions 237; 5 U. S. C. 1001 et seq.) because the 933), regulating the handling of oranges, 9% x 9yz x 19Va inches; capacity 1,726 time intervening between the date when grapefruit, and tangerines grown in cubic inches). information upon which this section is' the State of Florida, effective under the (2) During the period beginning'at based became available and the time applicable provisions of the Agricultural 12:01 a. m., e. s. t., November 28, 1955, when this section must become effective Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as and ending at 12:01 a. m., e. s. t., Decem­ in order to effectuate the declared policy amended (7 U. S. C. 601 et seq.), and ber 5, 1955, no handler shall ship: of the act is insufficient, and a reasonable upon the basis of the recommendations (i) Any tangerines, grown in the State time is permitted, under the circum­ of the committees éstablished under the of Florida, that do not grade at least stances, for preparation for such effec­ aforesaid amended marketing agree­ U. S. No. 1 Russet; or tive time; and good cause exists for mak­ ment and order, and upon other avail­ (ii) Any tangerines, grown in the ing the provisions hereof effective as able information, it is hereby found that State of Florida, that are of a size . hereinafter set forth. Shipments of the limitation of shipments of tange­ smaller than 2%G inches in diameter, lemons, grown in the State -of California rines, as hereinafter provided, will tend measured midway at á right angle to a or in the State of Arizona, are currently to effectuate the declared policy of the straight line running from the stem to subject to regulation pursuant to said act. the blossom end of the fruit, except that amended marketing agreement and or­ (2) It is hereby further found that it isa tolerance of 10 percent, by count, of der; the recommendation and support­ impracticable and contrary to the public tangerines smaller than such minimum ing information for regulation during interest to give preliminary notice, en­ size shall be permitted, which tolerance the period specified herein was promptly gage in public rule-making procedure, shall be applied in accordance with the submitted to the Department ajter an and postpone the effective date of this provisions for the application of toler­ open meeting of the Lemon Administra­ section until 30 days after publication ances, specified in the revised United tive Committee on November 16, 1955, thereof in the F ederal R e g is t e r (60 Stat. States Standards for Florida Tangerines such meeting was held, after giving due 237; 5 U. S. C. 1001 et seq.) because the (§§ 51.1810 to 51.1836 of this title). notice thereof to consider recommenda­ time intervening between the date when (3) As used in this section, “handler,” tions for regulation, and interested per­ information upon which this section is “ship,” and “Growers Administrative sons were afforded an opportunity to based became available and the time Committee” shall have the same mean­ submit their views at this meeting; the when this section must become effective provisions of this section, including its in order to effectuate the declared policy ing as when used in said amended mar­ effective time, are identical with the of the act is insufficient; a reasonable keting agreement and order; and the aforesaid recommendation of the com­ time is permitted, under the circum­ terms “U. S. No. 1 Russet” and “standard mittee, and information concerning such stances, for preparation for such effec­ pack” shall have the same meaning as provisions and effective time has been tive time; and good cause exists for when used in the revised United States disseminated among handlers of such making the provisions hereof effective S t a n d a r d s for Florida Tangerines lemons; it is necessary, in order to ef­ not later than November 21,1955. Ship­ (,§§ 51.1810 to 51.1836 of this title). fectuate the declared policy, of the act, Saturday, November 19, 1955 FEDERAL REGISTER 8559 to make this section effective during the [Arndt. 65] (Sec. 205, 52 Stat. 984, as amended; 49 U. S. C. period hereinafter specified; and com­ 425. Interprets or applies sec. 601, 52 Stat. P art 601-^D esignation o f Control pliance with this section will not require 1107, as amended; 49 U. S. C. 551) any special preparation on the1 part of Areas, Control Zones, and R eporting P oints This amendment shall become effec­ persons subject thereto which cannot be tive 0001 e. s. t., November 25, 1955. completed by the effective time thereof. alterations (b) Order. (1) The q u a n t it y of The control area and control zone [ s e a l ] S . A . K e m p , lemons grown in the State of California alterations appearing hereinafter have Acting Administrator or in the State of Arizona which may been coordinated with the civil opera­ of Civil Aeronautics. be handled during the period beginning tors involved, the Army, the Navy and - [F. R. Doc. 55-9327; Filed, Nov. 18, 1955; at 12:01 a. m., P. s. t., November 20,1955, the Air Force, through the Air Coordinat­ 8:51 a. m.] and ending at 12:01 a. m., P. s. t., Novem­ ing Committee, Airspace Panel, and are ber 27, 1955, is hereby fixed as follows: adopted to become effective when indi­ (1) District 1 : Unlimited movement; cated in order to promote safety. Com­ (ii) District 2: 162,750 cartons; pliance with the notice, procedures, and [Arndt. 143] (iii) District 3: 13,950 cartons. effective date provisions of section 4 of P art 608—R estricted Areas (2) As used in this section, “handled,” the Administrative Procedure Act would alteration; molokai, haw ah “District 1,” “District 2,” and “District be impracticable and contrary to public 3” shall have the same meaning as when interest and therefore is not required. The restricted area alteration appear­ used in the said amended marketing ing hereinafter has been coordinated Part 601 is amended as follows: with the civil operators involved, the agreement and order; and “carton” 1. Section 601.1391 is added to read: means the standard one-half orange, Army, the Navy and the Air Force, grapefruit or lemon box set forth as § 601.1391 Control area extension through the Air Coordinating Commit­ standard container number 58 in section

Name and location Description by geographical Designated Time of Controlling TITLE 14— CIVIL AVIATION (Chart) coordinates altitudes designation agency Chapter 11—Civil Aeronautics Admin­ MOLOKAI (R-325) 5-mile radius centered at latitude Unlimited___ Continuous day­ Hawaiian Sea istration, Department of Commerce (Hawaiian Islands). 21°09'00" N., longitude 157°16'45" light hours Frontier. W. excluding that portion over­ only. [Arndt. 65] lapping Civil Airway Red 87. P art 600—D esignation of Civil Airways (Sec. 205, 52 Stat. 984, as amended; 49 U. S. C. 1. Section 610.13 Green civil airway 3 alteration; herndon, va., to 425. Interprets or applies sec. 601, 52 Stat. is amended to read in part: HARRISBURG, PA. 1007, as amended; 49 U. S. C. 551) The civil airway alteration appearing This amendment shall become effective Mini- hereinafter has been coordinated with on December 15, 1955. From— To— mum the civil operators involved, the Army, alti­ [ se a l ] F. B. L e e , tude the Navy and the Air Force, through the Administrator of Civil Aeronautics. Air Coordinating Committee, Airspace Ogden, Utah,1 LFR__ Ft. Bridger, Wyo., 12,000 Panel, and is adopted to become effective [F. R. Doc. 55-9304; Filed, Nov. 18, 1955; LFR. when indicated in order to promote 8:45 a. m.] safety. Compliance with the notice pro­ 111,000'—Minimum crossing altitude at Ogden LFR, cedures, and effective date provisions of eastbound. section 4 of the Administrative Pro­ 2. Section 610.15 Green civil airway 5 cedure Act would be impracticable and [Arndt. 93] is amended to read in part: contrary to public interest and therefore P art 610—M inim um en R oute IFR is not required. Altitudes Mini­ Pkrt 600 is amended as follows: From— mum Section 600.6223 is added to read: MISCELLANEOUS AMENDMENTS T o - alti­ The minimum en route IFR altitudes tude § 600.6223 VOR Civil airway No. 223 appearing hereinafter have been coor­ {Herndon, Va., to Harrisburg, Pa.). Jackson, Tenn., L F R .. Fairview INT, Tenn.. 2,500 dinated with interested members of the Fairview INT, Tenn... Nashville, Tenn., 3,000 From the Herndon, Va., omnirange sta­ industry in the regions concerned inso­ LFR. tion to the Harrisburg, Pa., omnirange Nashville, Tenn., LFR. Lebanon INT, Tenn.. 3,000 station. far as practicable. The altitudes are Lebanon INT, Tenn... Smithville, Tenn., 3,500 adopted without delay in order to pro­ LFR. (Sec. 205, 52 Stat. 984, amended; 49 U. S. C. vide for safety in air commerce. Com­ 425. Interprets or applies sec. 302, 52 Stat. 3. Section 610.106 Amber civil airway 985, as amended; 49 U. S. C. 452) pliance with the notice, procedures, and effective date provisions of section 4 of 6 is amended to read in part: This amendment shall become effec­ the Administrative Procedure Act would tive 0001 e. s. t. November 25,1955. be impracticable and contrary to the Mini­ mum [seal] S. A. K em p, public interest, and therefore is not re­ From— To— alti­ Acting Administrator quired. tude of Civil Aeronautics. Part 610 is amended as follows: (Listed Jacksonville, Fla., 1,600 [F. R. Doc. 55-9326; Filed, Nov. 18, 1955; items to be placed in appropriate se­ LFR. 8:51 a. m.] quence in the sections indicated). 8560 RULES AND REGULATIONS

4. Seption 610.108 Amber civil airway 10. Section 610.662 Blue civil airway 15. Section 610.6004 VOR civil airway 8 is amended to read in part: 62 is amended to delete: 4 is amended by adding:

Mini­ Mini­ mum Mini­ mum From— To— mum From— T o - alti­ alti­ From— T o - tude alti­ tude tude Detroit, Mich., LFR_ White Lake INT, 2,500 Santa Barbara, Calif., Bradley INT, Calif... 7,000 Topeka, Kans., VOR, Bonner Springs INT, 2,400 LFR. Mich. White Lake INT, Flint, Mich., ILS/ 2,200 via S alter. Kans., via S alter. Mich. LOM. Bonner Springs INT, Blue Springs, Mo., »4,000 Flint, Mich., ILS/ Saginaw, Mich., LF/ 2,200 Kans., via S alter. VOR, via Salter. LOM. RBN. Blue Springs, Mo., Columbia, Mo., *4,000 5. Section 610.216 Red civil airway 16 Saginaw, Mich., LF/ Gladwin, Mich., LF/ 2,000 VOR, via S alter. VOR, via Salter. RBN. RBN. Gladwin, Mich., LF/ Traverse City, Mich., 2,500 RBN. LFR. 13,000'—Minimum terrain clearance altitude. 3 2,400'—Minimum terrain clearance altitude. Mini­ mum From— To— alti­ 11. Section 610.1001 Direct routes— tude U. S. amended by adding: 16. Section 610.6004 VOR civil airway 4 is amended tn rpnri in nart. • Tallahassee, Fla. LFR. Albany, Ga., L F R ... 1,600 Mini- From— To— mum alti­ Mini­ tude mum fi Spp.t.inn fi10 91Q R.p.ti. ninil a irm a il 19 From— T o - alti­ tude is amended by adding: Int. Seattle, Wash., Int. Olympia, Wash., 5,000 VOR 247° T rad. and VOR'013° T rad. Olympia, Wash., and NW crs. Seat­ Seattle, W ash./V O R .. Cumberland INT, Mini­ VOR 013° T rad. tle, Wash., LFR. Wash.: From— To— mum 10,000 alti­ North west-bound ... 4,000 tude 12. Section 610.6001 VOR civil airway Cumberland INT»- . Ranger Creek INT, 10,000 Ranger Creek INT, 10,000 Traverse City1, Mleh., Gladwin, Mich., LF/ 2,500 Wash. T LFR. RBN. Mini­ Tieton INT, Wash___ Selah INT, Wash.: • Gladwin, Mich., LF/ Saginaw, Midi., LF/ 2,000 Southeast-bound. 5.000 RBN. RBN. mum From— T o - alti­ Northwest-bound ... 7.000 Saginaw, Mich., LF/ Flint, Mich., ILS/ 2,200 Selah INT, Wash____ 4,500 RBN. LOM. tude Seattle, Wash.,» VOR, Carbonado INT, 6.000 Flint, Mich., ILS/ White Lake INT, 2,200 ■ via S alter. ■ Wash.,4 via S alter. LOM. Mich. Carbonado INT, Mud Lake INT, Whitè Lake INT, Detroit, Mich., LFR. 2,500 Myrtle Beach, S. 0., Wilmington, N. O., 1.400 Wash., via S alter. Wash., via S alter.: Mich. VOR. VOR. Wilmington, N. C., New Bern, N. C., 1.400 10,000 - VOR. VOR. ______8,500Westbound New Bern, N. C., Williamston, N. O., 1,200 Mud Lake INT,Wash., Ranger Creek INT, 10,000 VOR. VAR. via S altar. Wash., via S alter. 7. Section 610.230 Red civil airway 30 Williamston, N. C., Harrelsville INT, Va. « 1,200 Ranger Creek INT, Tieton INT, Wash., 10,000 is amended to read in part: VAR. . Wash., via S alter. via S alter. Harrelsville INT, Va— Norfolk, Va. ILS 1,500 Tieton INT, Wash., Selah INT, Wash.,* localizer. via S alter. via S alter: Southeast-bound___ 5.000 Mini­ Norfolk, Va., ILS Whitehurst INT, Va. 1,500 North west-bound... 7.000 mum localizer. Selah INT, Wash., via Yakima, Wash. VOR, 4,500 From— To— alti­ S alter. via S alter. tude Excelsior INT, Mo., Tina INT, Mo., via *3,000 11,100'—Minimum terrain clearance altitude. via-N alter. N alter. 13. Section 610.6002 VOR civil airway Bay Minette, Ala., Crestview, Fla., LFR . 1.400 : LF/RBN. 2 is amended by adding » 6,000'— Minimum crossing altitude at Seattle VOR, Crestview, Fla., L FR .. Marianna INT, Fla—. 1.400 soutneast-bound. Marianna INT, Fla__ Tallahassee, Fla., 1,500 * 7,000'—Minimum crossing altitude at Selah INT, LFR. Mini­ northwest-bound. From— T o - mum * 3,000'—Minimum crossing altitude at Seattle VOR, alti­ southbound. tude 4 8,500'—Minimum crossing altitude at Carbonado

is amended to read in part: Seattle, Wash.,» VOR Cumberland -INT, 6 2,400'—Minimum terrain clearance altitude. via S alter. Wash., via S alter.: 10,000 Mini­ NW-bound...... 4,000 17. Spot,ion 610.fi005 VOR r.inil airway Cumberland INT, Ranger Creek INT, 10,000 From— To— v mum Wash., via S alter. Wash., via S alter. 5 is amended by adding: alti­ Ranger Creek INT, Thorp INT, Wash., 10,000 tude Wash., via S alter. via S alter. Thorp INT, Wash., Ellensburg, Wash.* Mini­ Miami, Fla., L FR ___ Tamiami INT, Fla__ 1,100 via S alter. VOR via S alter.: mum Tamiami INT, Fla___ Ft. Myers, Fla., LF/ 1,200 7,000 From— To— * alti­ RBN. 10,000 tude Ft. Myers, Fla., LF/ Tampa, Fla., LFR__ 1,200 RBN. 16,000'—Minimum crossing altitude at Seattle VOR, Columbus, Ohio,VOR, Mansfield, Ohio, VOR, 2,500 southeast-bound. via E alter. via E alter. 16,700'—Minimum " crossing altitude at Ellensburg 9. Section 610.613 Blue civil airway 13 VOR, westbound. is amended to read in part: 14. Section 610.6004 VOR civil airway 4 is amended.to delete: 18. Section 610.6005 VOR civil airway 5 is amended to read in nart : Mini- From— To— alti­ mum tude From— T o - alti­ Mini­ tude mum From— T o - alti­ Texarkana, Ark., LFR. Hartford INT, Ark.L. 3.800 tude Hartford INT, Ark.1... Van Buren, Ark., LF/ 3.800 Kansas City, Mo., »4,000 RBN. . VOR, via Salter. VOR, via S alter. Jacksonville, Fla., Alma, Ga.,VOR, via 1,600 VOR, via W alter. W alter. 1 6,000'—Minimum reception altitude. 12,400'—Minimum terrain clearance altitude. Saturday, November 19, 1955 FEDERAL REGISTER 8561 19. Section 610.6006 VOR civil airway 23. Section 610.6011 VOR civil airway 28. Section 610.6014 VOR civil airway 6 is amended by adding: 11 is amended to read in part: 14 is amended to read in part:

Mini- mum Mini- From— T o - mum Mini­ From— T o - From— mum tude alti­ T o - alti­ tude tude Ogden, Utah, > VOR, Fort Rridger, Wyo., 13,000 via N alter. ' y OR, via N alter. Houston, Tex., VOR__ Humble INT, Tex.1__ 1,600 Roswell, N. Mex., Caprock INT, N. 2 7,0Q0 Humble INT, Tex Cleveland INT, Tex.2. 1,600 VOR. Mex.* Cleveland INT, Tex__ Lufkin, Tex., VOR__ 1,600 Caprock INT, N. Mex. Whiteface INT, Tex.8. 2 7,000 1 11,000'—Minimum crossing altitude at Ogden VOR, Whiteface INT, Tex__ Lubbock, Tex., VOR. 2 7,000 oaotbound. Roswell, N. Mex., Kenna INT, N. 2.8,000 1 2,300'—Minimum reception altitude. VOR, via N alier. Mex.,8 via N alter. 20. Section 610.6006 VOR civil airway * 3,000'—Minimum reception altitude.- Kenna INT, N. Mex., Pep INT, Tex.,‘ via »8,000 via N alter. N alter. 6 is amended to read In part: 24. Section 610.6012 VOR civil airway Pep INT, Tex., via N Lubbock, Tex., VOR 2 8,000 alter. via N alter. 12 is amended' by adding: Tulsa, Okla., VOR, via Neosho, Mo.; VOR, 2,000 Mini­ S alter. via S alter. : * mum From— To— alti­ tude Mini- From— mum 17,500'—Minimum reception altitude. To— alti­ * 5,500'—Minimum terrain clearance altitude. tude 8 9,500'—Minimum reception altitude. Sacramento, ’ "Calif:,~ Foisom INT, Caiif-~— 3,900 8 9,000'—Minimum reception altitude. VOR. 811,300'—Minimum reception altitude. Folsom INT, Calif.... Coloma INT, Calif.,1.. 9,500 Columbus, Ohio, VOR, Wheeling, W. Va., >3,600 Coloma IN T, Calif__ Reno, Nev.,2 VOR___ 13,000 via N alter. VOR, via N alter. Sacramento, Calif.,8 Mt. Lola INT, Calif., 11,000 VOR, via N alter. via N alter. 29. Section 610.6016 VOR civil airway Mt. Lola INT, Calif., Reno, Nev., VOR, 11,000 1 á,5QP'—Minimum terrain clearance altitide. 16 is amended to read in part: via N alter. via N alter. Ogden, Utah,8 VOR... Fort Bridger, Wyo., 12,000 VOR. 25. Section 610.6012 VOR civil airway Sidney, Nebr., VOR.. Ogallala INT, Nebr.. 6,100 12 is amended to read in part: Mini- Ogallala INT, Nebr..^ North Flatte, Nebr., ‘ 5,600 From— mum VOR. To— alti­ Sidney, Nebr., VOR, North Platte, Nebr., 6,100 tude via N alter. VOR, via N alter., Mini­ From— T o - mum alti­ Graham, Tenn., VOR.. Nashville, Tenn., 3,000 19,500'—Minimum crossing altitude at Coloma INT, tude VOR. northeast-bound. 2 12,000'—Minimum crossing altitude at Ueno VOR, southwest-bqund. . Santa Barbara, Calif., Fillmore, Calif., VOR. 8,000 8 3,000'—Mmimum -crossing altitude at Saeraœent© VOR. VOR, northeast-bound. Gage, Okla., VOR, via Aetena INT, Okla., 3,500 30. Section 610.6019 VOR civil airway 8 11,000'—Minimum crossing attitude at Ogden VOR, N alter. via N alter. 19 is amended to read in part: east bound. " £*,. \ Aetena INT, Okla., Rago INT, Kans., via <4,600 V. * 5,400'—Minimum terrain clearance altitude. via N alter. N alter. Rago INT, Kans., via Wichita, Kans., VOR, 3,400 21; Section 610.6007 VOR civil airway N alter. via N alter. Mini- Excelsior INT, Mo., Tina INT, Mo., via »8,000 From— mum 7 is amended to read in part: via N alter. N alter. T o - alti­ tude Mini­ 13,500'—Minimum terrain clearance altitude. mum ' * 2,400'—Minimum terrain clearance altitude. Raton, N. Mex., VOR.. Pueblo, Colo., V O R .. 11,000 From— To— ' alti­ tude 26. Section 610.6013 VOR civil airway 13 is amended by adding: Cross City, Fla., VOR, Lobster INT, Fla., via >2,000 31. Section 610.6020 VOR civil airway via W alter. W alter. 20 is amended by adding: Lobster IN T, Fla., via St; Marks INT, Fla.,8 «2,000 W alter. via W alter. Mini­ St. Marks IN T, Fla., Tallahassee, Fla., 1,600 From— To— mum alti­ Mini­ via W alter. VOR, via Walter. tude Marianna, Fla., VOR.. Shady Grove INT, ‘ 2,500 From— T o - mum Fla.8 alti­ tude Shady Grove INT, Fla. Montgomery. Ala., ‘ 2,000 Houston, Tex., VOR, Daisetta INT, Tex..1 1,600 VOR. via E alter. via E alter. Daisetta INT, Tex., Lufkin, Tex., VOR, »4,000 Houston, Tex., VOR... Crosby INT, Tex.,< via E alter. 1,600 11,500'—Minimum terrain clearance altitude. via E alter. via N alter. via N alter. 2 2,000'—Minimum reception altitude. Crosby INT, Tex., Beaumont, Tex., 21,900 21JOOO'—Minimum terrain clearance altitude. via N alt«'. VOR, via N alter. * 3,500'—Minimum reception altitude. 14,000'—Minimum reception altitude. Houston, Tex., VOR, High Island INT, 1,500 * 1,800'—Minimum terrain clearance altitude. 21,500'—Minimum terrain clearance altitude. via S alter. Tex.,8 via S alter. High Island INT, Tex., Waterway INT, Tex., 8 3,000 27. Section 610.6013 VOR civil airway via S alter. via S alter. 22. Section 610.6010 VOR civil airway Waterway INT, Tex., Lake Charles, La., 2,000 10 is amended to read in part: 13 is amended to read in part: via S alter. VOR, via S alter. Atlanta, Ga., VOR, Norcross, Ga., VOR, 3,000 via N alter. via N alter. Mini- Mini­ Norcross, Ga., VOR, Homer INT, Ga., 2,500 via N alter. via N alter. T o - mum mum From— alti­ From— t o - alti­ Homer INT, Ga^ via Clemson INT, S. C., ‘ 4,500 tude tude N alter. via N alter. Clemson INT, S. O., Spartanburg, S. C., ‘ 4,500 via S alter. VOR, via S alter. Pueblo, Colo., VOR, Lamar, Colo., VOR, 6,000 Houston, Tex., VOR__ Humble INT, Tex.<__ 1,600 via N alter. via N alter. 6,400 Humble INT, Tex...... Cleveland INT, Tex.2. 1,600 Excelsior INT, Mo., via Kirksville, Mo., VOR, 1 3,000 Cleveland INT, Tex__ Lufkin, Tex., VOR__ 1,600 * 1,900'—Minimum reception altitude. S alter. via S alter: * 1,600'—Minimum terrain clearance altitude. * 3,000'—Minimum reception altitude. 4 2,300'—Minimum reception altitude. * 1,400'—Minimum terrain clearance altitude. 12,400'—Minimum terrain clearance altitude. 13,OOP'—Minimum reception altitude. * 3,200'—Minimum terrain clearance altitude. 8562 RULES AND REGULATIONS

32. Section 610.6020 VOR civil airway 38. Section 610.6068 VOR civil airway 43. Section 610.6083 VOR civil airway 20 is amended to read in part: 68 is amended to read in part: 83 is amended to read in part:

Mini­ Mini­ mum Mini­ From— To— mum From— To— mum alti­ alti­ From— To— alti- • tude tude tude

Beaumont, Tex., VOR. Lake Charles, La., 1,400 Corona, N. Mex., Roswell, N. Mex., 9,000 VOR. VOR. VOR. Carlsbad, N. Mex., Roswell, N. Mex., 5.000 9,000 VOR. • VOR. Lake Charles, La., Lafayette, La., VOR— 1,300 Corona, N. Mex., 9.000 VOR. Roswell, N. Mex., Hagerman INT, N. i 6,000 Roswell, N. Mex., VOR. Mex.1 VOR, via E alter. VOR, via E alter. Hagerman INT, N. Hobbs, N. Mex., 6,000 Mex.1 VOR. Junction, Tex., VOR— Boeme INT, Tex____ *3,600 33. Section 610.6022 VOR civil airway 2,800 22 is amended to read in part: Boeme INT, Tex____ San Antonio, Tex., 44. Section 610.6088 VOR civil airway VOR. 88 is amended to read in part: Mini­ 16,500'—Minimum reception altitude, » ' From— ' To— mum i S.éOO'—Minimum terrain clearance altitude. Mini­ alti­ mum tude 39. Section 610.6070 VOR &oil airway From— To— alti­ 70 is amended to react in part: tude Marianna, Fla., VOR— Tallahassee, Fla., 1,500 VOR. Mini­ White Oak INT, Okla.. Waco INT, Mo.1.. . __ *6,500 1,500 Waco INT, Mo...... A villa INT, Mo_____ *6,500 Mobile, Ala., VOR___ McDavid INT, Fla— >3,000 From— To— mum McDavid, INT, Fla__ Crestview, Fla., VOR. *1,500 * alti- A villa INT, Mo_____ Springfield, Mo.,VOR. 2,600 ■- tude 1 1,500'—Minimum terrain clearance altitude. 17,000'—Minimum reception altitude. 11,400'—Minimum terrain clearance altitude. Galveston, Tex., VOR. Lake Charles, La. 13,000 12,600'—Minimum terrain clearance altitude. VOR.

34. Section 610.6023 VOR civil airway * 1,400'—Minimum terrain clearance altitude. 45. Section 610.6097 VOR civil airway 23 is amended to read in part; 97 is amended to read in part: 40. Section 610.6074 VOR civil airway Mini- 74 is amended to read in part: mum Mini­ From— To— From— To— mum tude Mini­ alti­ mum tude From— T o - alti­ Portland, Oreg., VOR— Seattle, Wash., VOR— 5.000 tude Ranier INT, Wash___ Seattle, Wash., VOR, 3.000 Lobster INT, Fla____ St. Marks INT, Fla.1. *2,000 northbound only. St. Marks INT, Fla__ Tallahassee, Fla., , 1,500 Tulsa, Okla., VOR, Salina INT, Okla., 2,000 VOR. via N alter. via N alter. Cross City, Fla., VOR, Lobster INT, Fla., *2,000 Salina INT, Okla., via Fort Smith, Ark., >4,000 via E alter. via E alter. N alter. VOR., via N alter. Lobster INT, Fla., via St. Marks INT, Fla.,1 *2,000 35. Section 610.6027 VOR civil airway E alter. via E alter. 27 is amended to read in part: St. Marks INT, Fla., T a lla h a s s e e , Fla., 1,500 12,600'—Minimum terrain clearance altitude. via E alter. VOR, via E alter.

Mini­ 41. Section 610.6076 VOR civil airway mum 76 is amended to read in part: 12,000'—Minimum reception altitude. : From— T o - alti­ * 1,000'—Minimum terrain Clearance altitude. tude * 1,500'—Minimum terrain clearance altitude. Mini­ mum Santa Barbara, Calif.,1 Paso Robles, Calif., 8,000 From— To— alti­ 46. Section 610.6106 VOR civil airway VOR. VOR. tude Via yr altar 7,000 106 is amended to read in part: Kingsland INT, Tex.1.. Lake " Travis INT, »3,000 18,000'—Minimum crossing altitude at Santa Barbara Tex.* Mini­ VOR, northwest-bound. Austin, Tex., VOR__¿ McDade INT, Tex.4.. 2,000 mum McDade INT, Tex.4... Sealy INT, Tex.____ 8 3,700 From— To— alti­ Austin, Tex., VOR, Smithville INT, Tex.8 2,000 tude 36. Section 610.6048 VOR civil airway via S alter. via S alter. 48 is amended to read: Smithville INT, Tex., Eagle Lake, Tex., 7 3,000 via S alter. VOR, via S alter. Walnut Grove INT, Clara INT, W..Va.__ 1 5,000 W. Va. Clara INT, W. Va...... Morgantown, W. Va., 4,000 Mini-. 15,000'—Minimum reception altitude. VOR. „ From— To— mum * 3,600'—Minimum reception altitude. Morgantown, W. Va., Johnstown, Pa., V OR, 4.500 alti­ * 2,500'—Minimum terrain clearance altitude. VOR, via N alter. via N alter. tude 4 2,800'—Minimum reception altitude. 81,700'—Minimum terrain clearance altitude. 8 2,300'—Minimum reception altitude. Burlington, Iowa, Peoria, Hl., VOR...... 1,-900 7 2,000'—Minimum terrain clearance altitude. 7 3,000'—Minimum terrain clearance altitude. VOR. Peoria, 111., VOR...... Pontiac, ID., VOR.__ 2,200 42. Section 610.6077 VOR civil airway 77 is amended by adding: 47. Section 610.6115 VOR civil airway 115 is amended to read in part: 37. Section 610.6059 VOR civil airway 59 is amended to read in part: Mini­ From— To— mum Mini­ alti­ mum tude From— alti­ Mini­ tude mum From— T o - alti­ St. Joseph, Mo., VOR.. Lamoni, Iowa, VOR... 2,400 tude Lamoni, Iowa, VOR.... Osceola INT, Iowa1__ 2.300 3,500 Osceola INT, Iowa____ Des Moines, Iowa, 2.300 Knoxville, Tenn., Rutledge INT, Tenn.. VOR. VOR. Charleston, W. Va., 6,000 Springfield, 111., VOR.. Peoria, Hl., VOR...... 2,000 Rutledge INT, Tenn— Peoria, 111., VOR...... Bradford, 111., VOR— 2,000 VOR. 14,300'—Minimum reception altitude. Saturday, November 19, 1955 FEDERAL REGISTER 8563 48. Section 610.6116 VOR civil airway 54. Section 610.6183 VOR civil airway 59. Section 610.6194 VOR civil airway 116 is amended to read in part: 183 is amended to read in part: 194 is amended to read in part:

Mini­ Mini­ mum Mini­ From— To— From— To— mum From— mum alti­ alti­ To— alti­ tude tude tude

Excelsior INT, Mo...... 1 3,000 Santa Barbara, Calif.,1 Bakersfield, Calif., 9,000 Charlotte, N. C., VOR. Norwood INT, N. C .. Quincy, 111., VOR____ Peoria, 111.", VOR 2,000 VOR. VOR. •3,000 Peoria, 111., V O R .. __ Joliet, 111., VOR Norwood INT, N. C... Moncure INT, N. C__ 1 3,500 2,000 Moncure INT, N. C ... Raleigh, N. C., VOR. 1,600 18,000'—Minimum crossing altitude at Santa Barbara 12,400'—Minimum terrain clearance altitude. VOR, northeast-bound. 1 1,800'—Minimum terrain clearance altitude. 49. Section 610.6140 VOR civil airway 60. Section 610.6198 VOR civil airway 140 is amended by adding: 55. Section 610.6185 VOR civil airway 185 is amended by adding: 198 is amended to read in part: Mini­ Mini­ From— To— mum Mini­ mum alti­ From— T o - mum From— To— tude alti­ alti­ tude tude - Amarillo, Tex., VOR__ Sayre, Okla., VOR__ 4.700 San Antonio, , Tex., Smithville INT, Tex.1 2,500 Via N alter—,__ «__ 4.700 Augusta, Ga., VOR, Int. Augusta, Ga., 1,800 VOR, via N alter. Sayrfe, Okla., VOR Oklahoma City, Okla., via W alter. 345° mag. rad. and via N alter. >8,200 Smithvflle INT, Tex., Round Top INT Tex., 2 3,000 VOR. kS crs. Greenville, via N alter. Via N alter...... 2 3,500 S. G., ILS localizer, via N alter. Oklahoma City, Okla., Drumright INT,' Okla. 3.700 via W alter. VOR. Int. Augusta, Ga., 345° Greenville, S. C., ILS 4.000 12,300'—Minimum reception altitude. Drumright INT, Okla. Tulsa, Okla., V O R ... 3,100 -mag. rad. and S crs localizer, via W Greenville, S. C,, IBS alter. 21,700'—Minimum terrain clearance altitude. localizer, via W alter. 13,000'—Minimum terrain clearance altitude. Greenville, S. C., ILS Int. N crs. Greenville 4.000 61. Section 610.6199 VOR civil airway 2 3,300'—Minimum terrain clearance altitude. localizer, via W alter. S. C., iLs localizer 199 is amended to read in part: era. and Asheville, 50. Section 610.6140 VOR civil airway N. C., 190° mag. rad., via W alter. Mini- 140 is amended to read in part: Int. N era.. Greenville, Asheville* N. C., 6.000 S. C., ILS localizer, VOR, via W alter. From— To— mum crs. and Asheville, Mini­ N. C., 190° mag. rad., tude From— To— mum via W alter. alti­ ♦San Francisco, Calif.,1 Los Banos INT, Calif. 7,000 tude VOR. 56. Section 610.6190 VOR civil airway Tulsa, OMa., V0R_..__ Salina IN T Okla...... 2,000 190 is amended by adding: Salina INT, O kla'...:.. Fayetteville, Ark., 2,600 14,500'—Minimum crossing altitude at San Francisco VOR. VOR, eastbound. Montebello; Va., VOR. C&sanova INT, Va.1.. 6,000 Casanova IN T , Va.__ Herndon, Va., V OR.. 3.000 Mini­ 62. Section 610.6205 VOR civil airway Graham, Tenn., VOR* Nashville.Tenn., V O R, 3.000 From— T o - mum 205 is added to read: via S alter. via S alter. alti­ tude 14,000'—Minimum reception altitude, Mini­ Gage, Okla., V O R ....J 'Ponca City, Okla., 1 3,500 From— To— mum VOR. alti- ' 51. Section 610.6155 VOR civil airway Ponca City, Okla., Waco INT, Mo.2____ •7,000 tude 155 is amended to read in part: VOR. Waco INT, Mo Avilla INT, Mo 2 6,500 Avilla INT, M o_____ Springfield, Moi VOR. 2,600 Springfield, Mo., VOR. Bolivar INT, Mo.1__ 2,500 Springfield, Mo., VOR. Farmington, Mo., Bolivar INT, Mo Holden INT, Mo____ 2,400 Mini­ *4,600 Holden INT, Mo mum VOR. Blue Springs, Mo., 2 4,000 From— To— Farmington,Mo.,VOR- Evansville, Ind., VOR. 2,500 VOR. alti­ Blue Springs, Mo., Kansas City, Mo., 2 4,000 tude VOR. VOR. 12,500'—Minimum terrain clearance, altitude. Springfield, Mo., VOR, Schell City INT, Mo.,2 2,500 via W alter. Gordonsville, Va., Casanova INT, Va.1.. * 7,000'—Minimum reception altitude. via W alter. 3.000 * 2,600'—Minimum terrain clearance altitude. Schell City INT, Mo., Blue Springs, Mo., 2 4,000 VOR. viaW alter. Casanova INT, Va Front Royal, Va., 4.000 * 2,800'—Minimum terrain clearance altitude. VOR, via W alter. VOR. 57. Section 610.6194 VOR civil airway 15,000'—Minimum reception altitude. * 2,400'—Minimum terrain clearance altitude. 14,000'—Minimum reception altitude. 194 is amended to delete: * 4,000'—Minimum reception altitude. 52. Section 610.6161 VOR civil airway 63. Section 610.6207 VOR civil airway 161 is amended to read in part:- Mini­ 207 is added to read: From— mum " To— alti­ tude Mini­ Mini­ mum From— To— From— To— mum alti­ Rocky Mount, N. C., Boykins INT, Va.___ 1,500 alti-’ tude VOR. tude

Excelsior INT, Mo Lawson TNT, Mo 2,400 Denver, Colo., VOR ... Int. Denver, Colo., 7,500 Lawson INT, Mo Jameson INT, Mo.1__ 2 2,900 VOR 002° mag. rad. 58. Section 610.6194 VOR civil airway and Cheyenne, 194 is amended by adding: Wyo., VOR 084° ' 3,000'—Minimum reception altitude. mag. rad. 2,400'—Minimum terrain clearance altitude. Mini­ 53. Section 610.6171 VOR civil airway From— mum 64. Section 610.6208 VOR civil airway 171 is amended to read in part: T o - alti­ tude. 208 is added to read:

Mini­ Raleigh, N. C., V OR.. Rocky Mount, N. C., 1,700 Mini­ From— T o - mum VOR. From— T o - mum. alti­ Rocky Mount, N. C., Harrelsville INT, Va. 1,400 alti-" tude VOR. tude Harrelsville INT, V a... Norfolk, Va., ILS lo­ 1,500 Joliet, Hl., VOR calizer. Sycamore INT, 111___ 2,000 Norfolk, Va., ILS local­ Whitehurst INT, Va. 1,600 Thermal, Calif., V O R - Needles, Calif., VOR.. •10,000 Sycamore INT, ÏÜ Janesville, Wis., VOR. 2,100 izer. 16,500'—Minimum terrain clearance altitude. 8564 RULES AND REGULATIONS 65. Section ,610.6211 VOR civil airway diversion en route prohibited. To be de­ ing the commodity or commodities de­ 211 is added to read; livered by shipping or airline company con­ scribed in the export license application. cerned to govt-designated godown. Over­ The copy of the Hong Kong Import Li­ side delivery not permitted. Release from cense attached to the application for Mini- godown subject to approval of export license. mum a validated license shall include thereon From— /To— 2. Part 373, Licensing Policies and Re­ one of the following stamped endorse­ tude lated Special Provisions, is amended by ments which shall bear the signature adding a new section to read as follows: of an official of the Hong Kong Cotulla, Tex., VOR__ Junction, Tex., VOR. 14,000 § 373.6 Return of unused quota. As Government: (a) For consumption in Hong Kong. 13,500'—Minimum terrain clearance altitude. soon as a licensee decides that he does not intend to export the entire licensed Diversion en route prohibited. Re-export 66. Section 610.6213 VOR civil airway not permitted except under special license amount of a commodity subject to a and subject in addition to general or spe­ 213 is added to read: quantitative quota he shall promptly re­ cific concurrence of government of supply­ quest reduction of the quantity covered ing country concerned. Mini- by the license to the amount he actually (b) For re-export to ------— mum From— To— intends to export. The request for re­ tude duction shall be made by submitting to (Approved destination) the Bureau of Foreign Commerce a Form Diversion en route prohibited. To be de­ livered by shipping or airline company con­ Rocky Mount, N. C., Boykins, INT, Va___ 1,500 IT- dr FC-763, in accordance with the VOR. procedure set forth in § 380.2 of this sub­ cerned to Govt, designated godown. Over­ side delivery not permitted. Release from chapter. If none of the commodities godown subject to approval of export license. (Sec. 205, 52 Stat. 984, as amended; 49 U. S. C. covered by-the license is to be exported, (c) For local consumption in Hong Kong. 425. Interpret or apply sec. 601, 52 Stat. the license shall be returned to the BFC 1007, as amended; 49 U. S. C. 551) for cancellation in accordance with • (ii) Where the Hong Kong Import Li­ § 372.14 of this subchapter. cense covers commodities for which These rules shall become effective more than one export license applica­ December 1, 1955. 3. Section 373.68 Cambodia, Laos, and tion is submitted, the Import License [s e a l ] F . B . L e e , Viet-Nam (the area formerly known as shall be attached to the first such appli­ Administrator of Civil Aeronautics. Indo-China) is amended to read as cation. Each subsequent application follows: [F. R. Doc. 55-9137; Piled, Nov. 18, 1955; shall include the following certification: 3:45 a. m.] § 373.68 Cambodia, Laos, and Viet- I (we) certify that I (we) have not sub­ Nam (the area formerly known as Indo- mitted applications, including the present China) . All license applications (Form application, against the Hong Kong Import TITLE 15— COMMERCE AND IT- or FC-419), Ultimate Consignee and License N o. ______in excess of the total quantity authorized thereon. This Import FOREIGN TRADE Purchaser Statements (Form IT- or License was submitted in support of Appli­ FC-842 or 843, see § 373.65), and destina­ c a tio n N o .______— Chapter III— Bureau of Foreign Com­ tion control statements (see § 379.10 (c) merce, Department of Commerce of this subchapter) which make refer­ ence to Indo-China shall also specify (BFC Case No. or if Case No. is unknown, Subchapter B— Export Regulations which of the following areas are re- the Applicant’s Reference No., date of sub­ [7th Gen. Rev. of Export Regs., Arndt. 4511 ferred to: mission of the application- to which the Import License was attached, and Sched­ P art 373—L ic e n s in g P o l ic ie s and (a) Communist controlled areas of ule B Nos. shown on that application) R elated S p e c ia l P r o v is io n s Viet-Nam and Laos. (b) Cambodia and the non-Com- Note: BFC Case No. Inclusion. When­ P art 379—E x p o r t C learance and munist controlled areas of Viet-Nam and ever possible, the BFC Case Number should D e s t in a t io n C o n tr o l be indicated on the certification set forth Laos. above since failure to supply the BFC Case P art 380—A m e n d m e n t s , E x t e n s io n s , 4. Section 373.69 Confirmation ofNumber may result in delay in processing T r a n s fe r s country of ultimate destination and veri­ the application. P art 382—D e n ia l or S u s p e n s io n o f fication of actual delivery for Hong Kong (2) Multiple transaction import li­ E x p o r t P r iv il e g e s is amended in the following particulars: cense. Exporters may submit to the a. Paragraph (b) Documents is Bureau of Foreign Commerce the dupli­ - miscellaneous a m e n d m e n t s amended to read as follows: cate copy of the Hong Kong Import 1. Section 373.2 Confirmation of coun­ (b) Documents. For export control License issued by the Government of try of ultimate destination and verifica­ Hong Kong, appropriately endorsed as tion of actual delivery is amended in the purposes, an endorsed Import License (Form 3) issued by the Hong Kong Gov­ provided in subparagraph (1) (i) of this following particulars: paragraph, covering all proposed ex­ a. Paragraph (a) Scope is amended by ernment to importers in Hong Kong is the equivalent document to the Import portations of a commodity or commod­ adding to the list of countries in sub­ Certificate XForm IT- or FC-826) issued ities, regardless of value, including division (ii) of subparagraph (1), the to U. S. importers. C & I Form 229, De­ commodities based on export orders country name: “Belgian Congo.” livery Verification, and C & I Form 42, amounting to less than $500. However, This part of the amendment shall be­ Landing Certificate, as issued by the to be acceptable, the multiple transac­ come effective as of January 2, 1956. Government of Hong; Kong to importers tion Import License must indicate either b. The Explanatory Statements and in Hong Kong, are the equivalent docu­ a specific validity period or a specific Interpretations at the end of this section ments of the Delivery Verification (Form quantity or value. The exporter shall is amended by revising the last unnum­ IT- or FC-908) issued to U. S. importers submit/the Import License bearing the bered paragraph of the answer to Ques­ (see § 368.1 of this subchapter). official authentication of the Hong tion 5 to read as follows: b. Paragraph (c) Submission of im­ Kong governmental authorities, together In some cases, an importer in Hong Kong port license is amended to read as with one additional copy for each Bu­ may obtain an Import License from his gov­ reau of Foreign Commerce processing ernment when the commodities to be ex­ follows: ported from the United States to Hong Kong code to which the Import License ap­ (c) Submission of import license— plies and a listing of such processing are destined to be reexported to another (1) Single transaction import license. country. The Import License covering such codes. Each subsequent application for a transaction will be endorsed: (i) The applicant shall attach to his license application, covering a proposed export license submitted against a mul­ For re-export to ______!T— _____ exportation described in paragraph (a) tiple transaction Import License shall of this section, the duplicate copy of the bear on the face of the application one (Approved destination) Import License, bearing the official au­ of the following certifications (depend­ ing on whether a quantity is shown on 1 This amendment was published in Cur­ thentication of the governmental au­ rent Export Bulletin No. 758, dated Novem­ thorities in Hong Kong, issued to the the Import License) signed by the appli­ ber 17,1955. named importer or his agent and cover­ cant: Saturday, November 19, 1955 FEDERAL REGISTER 8565 I (we) certify that I (we) have not sub­ modity subject to a quantitative quota he Bureau of Foreign Commerce, Depart­ mitted applications including the present shall promptly submit to the Bureau of For­ ment of Commerce, Washington 25, D. C. application against the Hong Kong Import eign Commerce a request for an amendment License N o. ------in excess of the total reducing the quantity covered by the license However, certain types of amendments quantity authorized thereon. to the amount he actually intends to export described in subparagraph (2) of this (see §373.6). If none of the commodities paragraph may be requested from those or (if no quantity is shown on the Im­ covered by the license is to be exported, the field offices of the Department of Com­ port License): - license shall be returned to the Bureau of merce listed below: This application is supported by the Hong Foreign Commerce. Kong multiple transaction Import License Where no filing dates are •announced. B oston. M iam i. N o . ______Applications for licenses to export commodi­ C hicago. New Orleans. ties for which no specified filing dates are C leveland. New Y ork. c. Paragraph (d) Submission of Hong announced may be submitted at any time D etro it. Philadelphia. Kong landing certificate is retitled and (see § 372.5 (c)). El Paso. Portland, Oreg. amended to read as-follows: Intransit shipment. Export applications H ouston. San Francisco. (d) Submission of verification of de­ for commodities requiring a validated license Jacksonville. S av an n ah . when moving in transit through the United Los Angeles. S eattle. livery. (1) The Bureau of Foreign States may be submitted at any time and Commerce may require verification of are not subject to specified filing dates (see Subparagraph (3) Amendment re­ delivery in the form of a Hong Kong Note following § 372.6 (d)). quests on which field offices may not Delivery Verification or Landing Certif­ take action is amended by amending icate, for any exportation to Hong Kong This part of the amendment shall be­ subdivision (ii) and adding a new sub­ for which a validated license is granted, come effective December 19, 1955. division (vii) to read as follows: including commodities not listed on the 6. Section 379.10 Destination control, Positive List. Where a verification of paragraph (c) Statement regarding ulti­ (ii) Requests for amendment of li­ delivery is required, the face of the ex­ mate destination on declaration, bill of censes where the intended port of exit port license will bear the stamped words lading, and commercial invoice, subpara­ is not known to the licensee. “Delivery Verification Required, see at­ graph (T) is amended by adding a foot­ * * * * * tached Form IT- or FC-863.” Where a note reference 1 at the end of each (vii) Decrease in quantity of com­ Form IT- or FC-863 is attached to a destination statement and the following modity included in § 373.71. license forwarded by the Bureau of For­ footnote: eign Commerce to an agent or freight 1 For shipments to C^pibodia, Laos or Viet- c. Paragraph (g) Procedure for sub­ forwarder of the licensee, it shall be the Nam, the country area designations shown mitting requests for amendments, sub- responsibility of the agent Jo notify the in § 373.68 of this subchapter shall be used. paragraph (3) Signature is amended by licensee that a verification of delivery is revising the first sentence thereof to read 7. Section 380.2 Amendments or alter­ as follows: “The signature of the li­ required. ations of licenses is amended in the fol­ (2) Where verification of delivery is lowing particulars: censee, or an officer or duly authorized required on a shipment, the U. S. ex­ a. Paragraph (d) Changes by amend­ agent of the licensee, shall be placed on porter shall submit the Hong Kong De­ ment is amended by adding a new sub- the original 1 of Form IT- or FC-763, livery Verification (C* & I Form 229) paragraph (9) to read as follows: in the space provided.” to the Bureau of Foreign Commerce. In instances where the Bureau of Foreign (9) Decrease in quantity of commod­ 1 Notwithstanding instruction No. 5 on the Commerce requires verification of de­ ity included in § 373.71. reverse side of Form IT- or FC-763, the du­ livery and the Hong Kong Government b. Paragraph (f) Where to file is plicate copy need not be signed. does not issue their Delivery Verification amended in the following particulars: 8. Section 382.51 Table of compliance form, the U. S. exporter shall obtain a Subparagraph (1) General is amended orders currently in effect denying ex­ Landing Certificate (C & I Form 42) to read as follows: port privileges, paragraph (b) Table of from the Hong Kong importer and sub­ (1) General. All requests for amend­ compliance orders is amended by adding mit this certificate to the Bureau of For­ ments to licenses may be filed with the eign Commerce in lieu of the Delivery the following entries: Verification form. Effective F ed era l (3) The requirement that a verifica­ Name and address Expiration date date of of order Export privileges affected Register tion of delivery be submitted for a par­ order citation ticular commodity is canceled auto­ matically if, subsequent to the issuance Bierma, Sipke N., Keizersgracht 10-28-55 10-28-56 General and validated licenses, 20 F. R. 8224, of a license, the commodity is author­ 702, Amsterdam, Netherlands. (Duration.)'1 all commodities, any destina­ 11-2-55. tion, also exports to Canada. ized by the Bureau of Foreign Commerce Chemische In d u strie, “ D en 10-27-55 10-27-57. ___ do______20 F. R. 8202, to be shipped to Hong Kong under Gen­ Haag,” N. V., Le van der Kun- (Duration.)* 11-1-55. straat 55-57, The Hague, Neth­ eral License GHK. erlands. d. Paragraph (e) Applicability of IC/ Continental Import and Export 10-28-55 10-28-56...... do. 20 F. R. 8224, Co., N. V., Stadhouderskade (Duration.)* 11-2-55. DV provisions in § 373.2 is amended to 51, Amsterdam Z, Netherlands. read as follows: de Pesters, Jhr. C. A.,. Adjunct 10-27-55 10-27-67...... do 20 F. R. 8202, Managing Director, Chemische (Duration.)* 11-1-55. (e) Applicability of IC/DV provisions Industrie, “Den Haag,” N. V., Le van der Kunstraat 55-57, in § 373.2. The provisions of § 373.2 (a) The Hague, Netherlands. (2), the note following § 373.2 (c), (d), Fisher, P., 46-47 Chancery Lane, 9-29-55 Until further n o -____ do. 20 F. R. 7383, (e), (f), (g), and (h), and the note and London, W. C. 2, England. tice. 10-4-55. Gintz, F., 46-47 Chancery Lane, 9-29-55 ...... do______do. 20 F. R. 7383, explanatory statements and interpreta­ London, W. C. 2, England. 10- 4-55. ., tions following § 373.2 Ch), shall be Lijnzaad, D., N. V., Transport (10-27-55) (Duration)* General and validated licenses, 20 F. R. 82i>6, en Handelmaatschappij, 58 Cool- all commodities, any destina­ 11- 2-55. equally applicable to license applications singel, Boursgebouw, Rotter­ tion, also exports to Canada. and validated export licenses to Hong dam, Netherlands. (No actual period of suspen­ Kong. sion. On probation from 10-27-55 for duration of ex­ port controls.) 5. Section 373.71 Supplement 1; Time Lijnzaad, Dirk, 7 Duinweg, Was- (10-27-55) .....d o ., ....d o __..... ______») F. R. 8226, schedules for submission of applications senaar, Netherlands. 11-2-55. for licenses to export certain Positive Nedimtrans, N. V., 58 Coolsin- (1Ö-27-55)____do___ !____ .....d o . 20 F. R. 8226, gel, Boursgebouw, Rotterdam, 11-2-55. List commodities is amended by deleting Netherlands. the footnote reference, in the heading Noord-Hollandsche, Handelsasso- 10-28-55 10-28-56. General and validated licenses, 20 F. R. 8224, ciatie, N. V., Keizersgracht 702, (Duration.)* all commodities, any destina- 11-2-55. and the footnote, and adding a note at Amsterdam, Netherlands. « tion, also exports to Canada. the end of the schedule to read as fol­ Pesters, Jhr. O. A. de. Adjunct 10-27-55 10-27-57. ___do______20 F. R. 8202, Managing Director, Chemische (Duration.)* 11-1-55. lows: Industrie, “Den Haag,” N. V., Le van der Kunstraat 65-57, Note: Return of unused quotas. As soon, The Hague, Netherlands. as a licensee determines that he will not export the entire licensed amount of a com- ' secüo^s k expiration date of a period of suspension held in abeyance. See explanation In paragraph (a) (l) oí this 8566 RULES AND REGULATIONS (5) The summary prospectus- shall in­ F ederal Effective Expiration date clude on the front thereof substantially Name and address date of Export privileges affected R egister order of order . citation the following statement: Information contained herein is based Stemmier, Carl Herman Ferdi­ 10-27-55 10-27-57...... General and validated licenses, 20 F. R. 8202, upon a registration statement filed under nand, Manager and Director, (Duration.)* all commodities, any destina­ 11-1-65. the Federal Securities Act of 1933 which is Stemmler-Imex," N. V., Leid- tion, also exports to Canada. subject to correction and amendment. These seplein - Hirschgebouw, Post securities may not be sold nor may offers Box 649, Amsterdam, Nether- lands. » to buy them be accepted prior to the time Zemanek & Co., Ltd., 46-47 9-29-55 Until further no­ 20 F. R. 7383, when the registration statement becomes Chancery Lane, London, W. O. tice. 10-4-55. effective. Further and more complete in­ 2, England. formation is contained in the prospectus which must be furnished to purchasers. ♦This is the expiration date of a period of suspension held in abeyance. See explanation in paragraph (a) (1) of this section. The summary prospectus may also con­ tain any statement or legend required This amendment shall become effec­ Qard to all persons to whom the original by state law or administrative authority. tive as of November 17, 1955, except as document was furnished by the statis­ (b) A summary prospectus used pur­ otherwise specifically provided. tical service together with a notice that the original bulletin or card should no suant to this section shall be subject to (Sec. 3, 63 Stat. 7, as amended; 50 TJ. S. C. the suspension power of the Commission App. 2023. E. O. 9630, 10 F. R 12245, 3 CFR, longer be used. In adopting this rule under section 10 (b) of the act, but need 1945 Supp., E. O. 9919, 13 P. R. 59, 3 CPR, it is assumed that this practice will be not be fifed with the Commission as part 1948 Supp.) continued. The text of § 230.434 is as follows: of any registration statement or other­ L oring K. M acy, wise. Director, § 230.434 Summary prospectus pre­ Bureau of Foreign Commerce. pared by independent organizations, (a) On September 20, 1955, the Commis­ £F. R. Doc. 55-9325; Piled, Nov. 18, 1955; A bulletin, card or other document which sion published notice that it had under 8:50 a. m.] summarizes information contained in a consideration the adoption of a proposed form of prospectus (hereinafter called § 230.434 (Rule 434) and all interested a “preliminary prospectus”) filed as a persons were invited to submit their TITLE 17— COMMODITY AND part of the registration statement and views and comments on the proposed rule on or before October 15, 1955. The SECURITIES EXCHANGES containing the information specified in paragraph (a) of § 230.433 (Rule 433), foregoing action adopting Rule 434 shall Chapter II— Securities and Exchange shall be deemed to be a summary pros­ become effective immediately. Commission pectus which meets the requirements of (Sec. 19, 48 Stat. 85; 15 U. S. C. 77s.) section 10 of the act for the purpose of P art 230—G eneral R ules and R egula­ section 5 (b) (1) thereof prior to the By the Commission.' tion s, S ecurities Act of 1933 effective date of the registration state­ [ se a l ] O rval L. DuBois, SUMMARY PROSPECTUS PREPARED BY ment, provided the following conditions Secretary. INDEPENDENT ORGANIZATIONS are met: N ovember 8, 1955. (1) Such summary prospectus is pre­ The Securities and Exchange Com­ [F. R. Doc. 55-9322; Filed, Nov. 18, 1955; mission announced today the adoption pared by an independent organization 8:50 a. m.] of § 230.434 (Rule 434) which specifies primarily engaged in publishing statis­ the conditions under which a bulletin or tical and financial manuals with respect card prepared by certain independent to securities generally, as distinct from TITLE T9— CUSTOMS DUTIES statistical services, primarily engaged in particular classes, issuers or localities, publishing statements and financial in­ and in circulating to subscribers statisti­ Chapter I— Bureau of Customs, formation for .distribution to subscribers cal and financial information and sum­ Department of the Treasury maries. and summarizing information contained [T. D. 53946] in a preliminary prospectus might be (2) The issuer of the securities to deemed a summary prospectus meeting which the prospectus relates is required P art 12— S pecial Classes of the requirements of section 10 of the act to file reports pursuant to sections 13 or M erchandise for the purpose of section 5 (b) (1) prior 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. MEAT AND MEAT-FOOD PRODUCTS; to the effective date of the registration in spectio n ; bond; release statement. This rule implements sec­ (3) No consideration is paid directly tion 10 (b) of the act under the amend­ or indirectly by such issuer, any under­ Section 12.8, Customs Regulations, ment made by Public Law 577, 83d Con­ writer or dealer participating or pro­ amended to delegate authority to collec­ gress, which authorizes the Commission posing to participate in the distribution, tors of customs to settle certain claims to adopt rules and regulations deemed or any affiliate of any of the foregoing, for liquidated damages under bonds. necessary or appropriate in the public for the preparation of the summary: In order to expedite the disposition of interest or for the protection of inves­ Provided, however, That nothing herein claims for liquidated damages under tors to permit the use of a summary shall prevent the payment of the usual bonds for failure to comply with the re­ prospectus for the purposes of subsec­ subscription price, or the regular pur­ quirements of the Meat Inspection tion (b) (1) of section 5 which omits in chase price of reprints or copies. Branch, Agricultural Research Service, part or summarizes information in the (4) The summary prospectus shall be Department of Agriculture, and also to preliminary prospectus filed as part of dated, shall contain a fair summary of correctly state the name of that Branch, the registration statement. The rule is information contained lirlhe latest form section 12.8 of the Customs Regulations adopted pursuant to sections 10 (b), 10 of preliminary prospectus which has is hereby amended by designating the (d), and 19 (a) of the Securities Act of been filed as part of the registration matter in the present section following 1933. statement at the time when the sum­ the headnote as paragraph (a), by sub­ It is understood to be the policy of mary prospectus is issued by the organi­ stituting “Meat Inspection Branch” for such statistical services preparing bul­ zation preparing it, shall not stress the “Animal Inspection and Quarantine letins or cards for sale in bulk to under­ favorable a§ against the unfavorable Branch” each place where it appears, writers and dealers for distribution, aspects of the issuer or the security, and and by adding a new paragraph (b) promptly to prepare a revised bulletin shall not include or be accompanied by reading as follows: or card if a material amendment to the any rating, recommendation, or other preliminary prospectus is filed with the expression of opinion as to the merits of (b) Liquidated damages assessed for Commission and the previously pub­ the issuer or the security. The sum­ breach of bonds taken under this section, lished bulletin or card is no longer a mary may contain the name and address if not in excess of $20,000, and if a writ­ fair summary of information contained of the organization issuing it, and the ten application for relief is filed, may be in the amended preliminary prospectus, name and address of the person dis­ canceled by the collector of customs upon and to .transmit such revised bulletin or tributing it. the payment of less than the full amount Saturday, November 19, 1955 FEDERAL REGISTER 8567 as he shall deem appropriate, or without rooms, mustard greens, radish, ruta­ § 120.115 Tolerance far residues of the payment of any amount, as may be bagas, turnips. zineb. A tolerance of 7 parts per million deemed appropriate, but the collector (b) Allethrin is not exempted from is established for residues of zineb (zinc shall not act under this paragraph unless the requirement of a tolerance when ethylenebisdithiocarbamate) in or on the officer in charge of the local office of used at time of or after harvest. mushrooms. the Meat Inspection Branch, Agricul­ tural Research Service, Department of Any person who will be adversely § 120.116 Tolerances for residues of Agriculture, is in full agreement with the affected by the foregoing order may, at ziram. (a) A tolerance of 7 parts per proposed action. If there is no local in­ any time prior to the thirtieth day from million is established for residues of spector of the Meat Inspection Branch, the effective date thereof, file with the ziram (zinc dimethyldithiocarbamate), the collector shall not act unless he has~ Hearing Clerk, Department of Health, calculated 'as zinc ethylenebisdithiocar­ obtained the full agreement of the Meat Education, and Welfare, Room 5440, 330 bamate, in or on strawberries. Inspection Branch in Washington. Independence Avenue SW., Washington (b) A tolerance of 0.1 part per million 25, D. C;, written objections thereto. is established for residues of ziram (zinc (R. S. 161, 251, sec. 624, 46 Stat. 759; 5 Objections shall show wherein the per­ dimethyldithiocarbamate), calculated as U. S. C. 22, 19 U. S. C. 66, 1624. Interprets son filing will be adversely affected by zinc ethylenebisdithiocarbamate, in or or applies sec. 623, 46 Stat. 759, as amended; this order, specify with particularity the on almonds and pecans. 19 U. S. O. 1623) provisions of the order deemed objec­ Approved: November 14, 1955. tionable and reasonable grounds for the Any person who will be adversely af­ objections, and request a public hearing fected by the foregoing order may, at [ se a l] R a l p h K e l l y , any time prior to the thirtieth day from Commissioner of Customs. upon the objections. Objections may be accompanied by a memorandum or brief the effective date thereof, file with the D avid W. K en d a ll, in support thereof. All documents shall Hearing Clerk, Department of Health, Acting Secretary of the Treasury. be filed in quintuplicate. Education, and Welfare, Room 5440, 330 Independence Avenue SW., Washington [F. R. Doc. 55-9323; Filed, Nov. 18, 1955; Effective date. This order shall be 25, D. C., written objections thereto. 8:50 a. m.] effective upon publication in the F ederal Objections shall show wherein the per­ R e g is t e r . son filing will be adversely affected by (Sec. 701, 52 Stat. 1055; 21 U. S. C. 371. this order, specify with particularity .the TITLE 21— FOOD AND DRUGS Interprets or applies sec. 408, 68 Stat. 412; 21 provisions of the order deemed objec­ U. S. C. 346a) tionable and reasonable grounds for the Chapter I— Food and Drug Admin­ objections, and request a public hearing istration, Department of Health, Dated: November 14, 1955. upon the objections. Objections may be Education, and Welfare [ s e a l ] J o h n L . H arvey , accompanied by a memorandum or brief P art 120—T o le r a n c e s and E x e m p t io n s Acting Commissioner in support thereof. All documents shall of Food and Drugs. F rom T o l e r a n c e s fo r P e s t ic id e C h e m ­ be filed in quintuplicate. ic a l s i n o r o n R a w A gricultural [F. R. Doc. 55-9317; Filed, Nov. 18, 1955; (Sec. 701, 52 Stat. 1055; 21 U. S. C. 371. Inter­ C o m m o d it ie s 8:48 a. m.] pret or apply sec. 408, 68 Stat. 512; 21 U. S. C. 346a) EXEMPTION FROM REQUIREMENT OF A TOLER­ ANCE FOR RESIDUES OF ALLETHRIN - Dated: November 14, 1955. A petition was filed with the Food and P art 120—T o le r a n c es and E x e m p t io n s [ se a l ] J o h n L . H a r v ey , Drug Administration requesting an ex­ F ro m T o le r a n c es f o r P e s t ic id e C h e m ­ Acting Commissioner emption from the requirement of a toler­ ic a l s i n or o n R a w A gricultural of Food and Drugs. C o m m o d it ie s ance for residues of allethrin used in the [F. R. Doc. 55-9318; Filed, Nov. 18, 1955; production of growing crops. TOLERANCES FOR RESIDUES OF FERBAM, 8:49 a.‘ m.] The Secretary of Agriculture has not ZINEB, and z ir a m certified that this pesticide chemical is useful in the production of all growing Petitions were filed with the Food and TITLE 32*—NATIONAL DEFENSE crops. He has certified that it is useful Drug Administration requesting the es­ in the production of vegetables for which tablishment of tolerances for residues of Chapter VII— Department of the exemption from the requirement of a ferbam, zineb, and ziram in or on certain Air Force tolerance is granted by this order. raw agricultural commodities. After consideration of the data sub­ The Secretary of Agriculture has certi­ Subchapter G— Personnel mitted in the petition and other relevant fied that these pesticide chemicals are P art 874—A v ia t io n C adet T r a in in g useful for the purposes for which toler­ material which show that a tolerance is AVIATION CADETS— AIR FORCE not necessary to protect the public ances are being established. health, and by virtue of the authority After consideration of the data sub­ In Part 874, §§874.1 to 874.13 are vested in the Secretary of Health, Edu­ mitted in the petitions and other relevant rescinded and the following substituted cation, and Welfare by the Federal Food, material which show that the tolerances therefor: Drug, and Cosmetic Act (sec. 408 (d) established in this order will protect the Sec. (2), 68 Stat. 512; 21 U. S. C. 346a (d) public health, and by virtue of the au­ 874.1 G eneral. (2) ) and delegated to the Commissioner thority vested in the Secretary of Health, 874.2 Requirements. of Food and Drugs by the Secretary (21 Education, and Welfare by the Federal 874.3 Waivers of minor offenses. CFR 120.7 (g) ; 20 F. R. 759), the regu­ Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (sec. 408 874.4 Application. lations for tolerances and exemptions (d) (2), 68 Stat. 512; 21 U. S. C. 346a 874.5 Processing. from tolerances for pesticide chemicals (d) (2) ) and delegated to the Commis­ 874.6 Information to be furnished appli­ sioner of Food and Drugs by the Secre­ ca n ts. in or on raw agricultural commodities 874.7 Selection and assignment. (21 CFR Part 120; 20 F. R. 1473) are tary (21 CFR 120.7 (g) ; 20 F. R. 759), 874.8 Termination and reassignment. amended by adding the following new the regulations for tolerances and ,

(b) Definitions—(1) Aviation cadet cessfully completing the flying training (2) Marital status. Applicants must training program. Includes all aircrew course will be commissioned Second be unmarried at the time of application training courses whose graduates are Lieutenants, Reserve of the Air Force, in and must agree in writing to remain un­ awarded the aeronautical rating of pilot the same manner as are aviation cadets. married for the duration of the training or aircraft observer and are tendered (12) Student. Unless otherwise spec­ program. Unmarried civilian appli­ appointments as commissioned officers of ified herein, the term “student” used cants may have no more than one de­ the Air Force. alone applies to both aviation cadets and pendent unless eligible to enlist in grade (2) Airmen applicants. Male enlisted aviation students. E-4 or higher. personnel of the Air Force who are in the (13) Air Force Academy and Aircrew (3) Base or residence, (i) Civilian active military service of .the United Examining Center. An Air Force base, applicants must be residing at time of States and airmen of the Air Force Re­ centrally located with respect to source application, in the continental United serve who are assigned to Air Force of applicants and having facilities ade­ States, Alaska, Hawaii, Puerto Rico, or Reserve Programs in Training Cate­ quate for final examination of such ap­ the Panama Canal Zone. gories A, B—1, B-2, C, or D as outlined plicants.. The following basés have been (ii) Airmen may apply and undergo in §§ 861.1 to 861.14 of this chapter. All designated as Air Force Academy and processing at any time unless pro­ other airmen of the Air Force Reserve Aircrew Examining Centers: hibited under paragraph (d) of this not serving on extended active duty may section. (i) Barksdale APB, Shreveport, Louisiana. (4) Educational qualifications. The apply as civilian applicants. (il) Bolling APB, Washington, D. C. (3) Air National Guard applicant. (Ill) Chanute APB, Rantoul, Illinois. minimum educational requirement is Enlisted personnel of the Air National (iv) Davis-Monthan APB, Tucson, Ari­ high school graduate level. Civilian ap­ Guard who apply for aviation cadet zona. plicants must have completed high training under the separate Air National (v) Ellington APB, Houston, Texas. school as evidenced by a diploma or cer­ Guard quota. (vi) Ellsworth AFB, Rapid City, South tificate of graduation. Airmen and (4) Civilian applicants. United D akota. prior service applicants not graduated (vii) Great Palls APB, Great Falls, Mon­ from high school may apply if they have States male citizens who are not in the ta n a . active military service. The term (viii) Hill APB, Ogden, Utah. completed the entire battery of USAFI “civilian” includes members of reserve (ix) Keesler AFB, Biloxi, Mississippi. high school level GED tests with a mini­ components of armed forcés, other than (x) Langley APB, Hampton, Virginia. mum standard score of 35 on any one or those Air Force Reserve Airmen defined (xi) Lowry APB, Denver, Colorado. with an average standard score of not in subparagraph (2) of this paragraph (xii) MacDill APB, Tampa, Florida. less than 45 on all five tests as evidenced and airmen of the Air National Guard, (xiii) McChord AFB, Tacoma, Washing­ by a USAFI certificate. Documentary Who are neither in nor alerted for active to n . evidence of highest education level (xiv) March APB, Riverside, California. achieved will be required with applica­ military service. (xv) Maxwell AFB, Montgomery, Alabama. (5) “Tentatively qualified" applicant. (xvi) Mitchel APB, Hempstead, Long tion. An applicant who has successfully com­ Island, New York. (5) Eligibility for enlistment. All pleted the aviation cadet preliminary (xvii) Moody APB, Valdosta, Georgia. applicants must be eligible to enlist or examinations. (xviii) bffutt APB, Omaha, Nebraska. reenlist in the Air Force under the provi­ (6) “Fully qualified" applicant. An (xix) Olmsted APB, Middletown, Pennsyl­ sions of §§871,1 to 871.7 of this applicant who has successfully completed vania. subchapter. (xx) Parks AFB, Pleasanton, California. (6) Moral character. Applicants all qualifying examinations and who (xxi) Randolph APB, San Antonio, Texas. has been furnished written notification (xxil) Sampson APB, Geneva, New York. must be of good moral .character and of his eligibility to compete for selection (xxiii) Scott APB, Belleville, Illinois. must possess other personal qualities by the Commander, Flying Training Air (xxlv) Self ridge APB, Mt. Clemens, Michi­ desired in a commisisoned officer. Force. gan. (7) Medical standards. All appli­ (7) "Selected applicant". A f u l l y (xxv) . Sewart APB, Smyrna, Tçnnessee, cants must meet the medical standards qualified applicant who has received (xxvi) Shaw AFB, Sumter, South Carolina. for flying training as outlined in perti­ written notice of his selection and class (xxvii) Sheppard APB, Wichita Palls, nent regulations. Waiver of sub-stand­ Texas. assignment. (xxviii) Tinker AFB, Oklahoma City, ard medical findings will not be granted. (8) Aviation cadet preliminary exam­ O klahom a. (b) Ineligibility. The following per­ ination (medical). A Class I or Class IA ' (xxix) Travis APB, Fairfield, California. sons are ineligible to apply for this Medical Examination. (xxx) Walker APB, Roswell, New Mexico. training: (9) Aviation cadet preliminary test (xxxi) Westover AFB. Chicopee Falls, (1) An airman based within the con­ (.written). A written examination for Massachusetts. tinental United States who has been the purpose of determining the tentative (xxxii) Wright-Patterson APB, Dayton, alerted for overseas assignment. O hio. (2) An airman based in an overseas qualification of applicants who are (xxxiii) Ramey AFB, Aquadilla, Puerto otherwise eligible for aviation cadet Rico. area who has been reported on rotation training in accordance with paragraph (xxxiv) PEAMCOM Air Base, Tachikawa, forecast for return to the zone of interior. (c) of this section. Honshu, Japan. (3) A person not eligible for enlist­ (10) Final qualifying examination. (xxxv) Albrook AFB, Balboa, Canal Zone. ment or reenlistment in the Air Force in A series of tests used for final qualifica­ (xxxvi) Clark APB, Luzon, Philippine accordance with §§ 871.1 to 871.7 of this tion of aviation cadet applicants. Re­ Islan d s. subchapter. (xxxvii) Elmendorf APB, Anchorage, (4) For pilot training, a person who sults of these tests determine aptitude A laska. for pilot and/or aircraft observer train­ (xxxviii) Ernest Harmon AFB, Stephen- holds or has held the aeronautical rating ing as well as officer quality. ville, Newfoundland. of pilot or comparable rating in any of (11) Aviation students. Noncommis­ (xxxix) Hickam APB, Honolulu, Oahu the Armed Forces of the United States. sioned officers of the Air Force who at­ Island, T. H. . (Army aviator is not comparable.) Such tend the aviation cadet training pro­ (xl) Third Air Force Hq, Victoria Park Es­ a person, if otherwise qualified, may ap­ gram in their enlisted grades (E-5 tate, South Ruislip, Middlesex, England. ply for aircraft observer training. through E -7). The eligibility require­ (xli) Weisb^den Air Base, Weisbaden, (5) For aircraft observer training, a ments for training as an aviation stu­ G erm any. person who holds or has held the aero­ dent are the same as for aviation cadet § 874.2 Requirements—(a) Eligibil­ nautical rating of aircraft observer or training, except that applicants must be ity—.(l) Age and citizenship. Appli­ comparable rating in any of the Armed serving in a noncommissioned officer cants must be United States male citi­ Forces of the United States. Such a grade at the time of application. Avia­ zens between 19 and 26% years of age at person, if otherwise qualified, may apply tion students undergoing aviation cadet the time of application. Selected appli­ for pilot training. training receive all pay and allowances cants must be enrolled in a specific fly­ (6) A person eliminated or disen- of their respective grades; however, they ing training class prior to their 27th rolled from a course of training leading receive identical training, quarters mess­ birthday. Applicants below age 21 must to commissoned status conducted by any ing facilities, and treatment accorded secure the written consent of parents or of the Armed Forces or servce academies aviation cadets. Aviation students suc­ guardian in accordance with § 874.4. of the United States unless recom- Saturday, November 19, 1955 FEDERAL REGISTER 8569

mended by the eliminating authority for (19) Applicants who have previously The following person was named in the further training leading to a commission. applied for aviation cadet training and certificate as a minor child: ______• (7) A person eliminated from a flying who were disqualified or not selected, age ___— ... training course conducted by any of the within a period of 1 year from the date (3) Evidence of college work com­ Armed Forces of the United States unless of last written examination either pre­ pleted, where applicable, in the form of recommended by the eliminating au­ liminary or final. an official transcript of scholastic credits thority for further aircrew training. § 874.3 Waivers of minor offenses. earned, a diploma, or statement signed (8) A person in the active military (a) A civilian applicant may submit a by an official" of the school in which the service of the United States other than request for waiver of a minor offense to applicant matriculated. the Air Force. any USAF recruiting detachment or sta­ (4) Evidence of having completed (9) A member of a Reserve Force of tion. An airman applicant may submit high school, where applicable,. as evi­ the United States who has been alerted a request for waiver to his commander. denced by a diploma or certificate of for active military service with any of Each request for waiver will contain graduation, or, if applicable, a certificate the Armed Forces other than the Air complete information in regard to the from the United States Armed Forces In­ Force. offense and circumstances involved and stitute indicating standard scores of not (10) A person currently enrolled in a will be considered on its own merits as less than 35 on any one or an average training program conducted by any of substantiated by the following: standard score" of not less than 45 on all the Armed Forces of the United States (1) Copy of court record if applicant five tests of the United States Armed leading to commissioned status,, unless has a record of conviction by any mili­ Forces Institute high school level Gen­ his application is approved and further tary or civilian court. eral Educational Development tests. training is recommended by an author­ (2) Detailed statement by the appli­ (5) A loyalty certificate: Each appli­ ized, official of the parent service con­ cant concerning the offense and circum­ cant will be required to complete DD ducting the training. stances involved. Form 98, “Loyalty Certificate for Per­ (11) An airman who is enrolled in or (3) Any additional documentary evi­ sonnel of the Armed Forces.” If, after selected for enrollment in a foreign lan­ dence substantiating the applicant’s proper instruction, the applicant fails to guage training course or a formal tech­ statement or justifying the request, such complete the certificate in its entirety or nical training course leading to the as statements from other persons,, rec­ completes it with qualifications or makes award of an Air Force Specialty Code or ords of outstanding achievements, entries thereon which provide reason to upgrading of skill level in Air Force awards, and so forth. believe that his appointment would not Specialty Code. This restriction does (b) Request for waiver will not bebe clearly consistent with interests of not apply to airmen who will become submitted until the applicant has been national security, the applicant will be over age for this training while enrolled released from all restraint, probation, requested to complete five copies of DD in such a course- or parole for a minimum period of 6 Form 398, “Statement of Personal His­ (12) An airman who is undergoing months, or until 6 months has expired tory,” and an FBI Applicant Fingerprint court-martial proceedings.. from date of conviction. Card. £13) A person who is undergoing (6) Members of Reserve Forces of the board action directed toward the reso­ § 874.4 Application—(a) AF Form 56. United States will attach a statement in­ lution of information indicating that the Application will be accomplished by dicating service number, military status applicant possess undesirable personal completing AF Form 56 in duplicate. at time of application, and Reserve as­ qualities,.or a person concerning whom The applicant’s attention will be di­ signment. a personnel security clearance has been rected to item V (B) of AF Form 56 (7) Data Processing Control sheet, AF denied or revoked. whereby he agrees that, on completion Form 338. (14) A person who has a record of of the training course, he will accept (c) Applications from students enrolled conviction by any type of court-martial an appointment as a Reserve Officer of in their senior year of college. Applica­ or civilian court, other than for a minor the Air Force for an indefinite term and tions from students enrolled in their traffic violation, except that, if appro­ will serve in the active military service senior year of -college submitted within priate, a request for waiver of a minor as a commissioned officer for a period 135 days of scheduled graduation date offense not considered prejudicial to the of 3 years after graduation unless sooner will be processed as college graduate ap­ performance of duty as an officer may relieved by competent authority. In plicants.- Applications from these per­ be sent to the Commander, Flying Train­ the case of a minor (below age 21 years) sons will include a statement from the ing Air Force, Waco, Texas, for consid­ such agreement shall be signed with the student attesting to the fact that he is eration in accordance with § 874.3. A consent of his parents or guardian. enrolled in his senior year of college and waiver will not be granted for an offense The signature of parents or guardian giving the date he is scheduled to grad­ that involves moral turpitude. Requests will be notarized by a notary public or uate. for waiver will not be submitted if moral other person authorized to perform turpitude is clearly evident. notarial acts. § 874.5 Processing—(a) Preliminary— (15) An airman who has pending an (b) Content. Each application will (1) ATI applicants. All applicants, in application for hardship discharge or contain: order to qualify for ayiation cadet train­ who is under investigation for any type (1) Evidence of date of birth whiching, must attain passing scores on all of offense. may be in the form of a birth certificate; tests administered for the type training (16) a person who is or ever has been: an authenticated copy thereof, or any desired in addition to meeting the re­ (i) A conscientious objector. other documentary evidence which is quired medical standards. Applicants (ii) Affiliated or sympathetic with an considered sufficient in establishing the may apply for either pilot or aircraft organization, movement, or group advo­ applicant’s date of birth. observer training or for both programs cating a subversive policy or seeking to 72) Evidence of citizenship, if the ap­ indicating their preference. If an ap­ alter the Government of the United plicant is not a citizen by birth, in the plicant who applies for both programs is States by unconstitutional means or form of a certificate, signed by an officer, found disqualified for the training of his seeking to deny the constitutional rights notary public, or other person author­ first choice he will be automatically con­ jof others unless or until the applicant ized by law to administer oaths, giving sidered for his second choice. If an has had a final determination favorable the following information: applicant declines to indicate a second to him by Headquarters USAF in accord­ I certify that I have this date seen the choice but is found qualified for the ance with §§ 886.1 to 886.21 of this sub­ original certificate of naturalization num­ alternate training, he may be considered chapter. b e r _____ !__ (or certified copy of court order for the alternate training, providing (17) A Selective Service Registrant establishlishing citizenship) stating that upon notification, he indicates his ac­ who has been ordered to report for active __—______w as ceptance in writing or his application-is military service with any of the Armed (Full name) changed accordingly and initialed by the admitted to United States Citizenship by applicant. Forces other than the Air Force. t h e ______C o u rt o f :______(18) Minor applicants (below age 21) , (District or County) (2) Civilians. A civilian applicant will without the written consent of parents o n normally apply at a USAF Recruiting or guardian. (State) (Date) Station or Detachment. In remote areas 8570 RULES AND REGULATIONS applicants may apply at the nearest Air applicants will be instructed that the (2) Other services. Members of Re­ Force base. two copies of the completed SF 88 fur­ serve Forces, other than airmen of the (3) Airmen, (i) Airmen will submitnished them must be submitted to the Air Force Reserve as defined, in para­ applications to their immediate com­ enlisting agency. graph (b) (2) of § 874.1, who are neither manders. (3) Enlistment. After notification of in nor alerted for active military service (ii) Airmen who have applications selection and class assignment, selected may apply for aviation cadet training pending for aviation cadet or aviation civilian applicants will be required to en­ and will be processed as civilian appli­ student training will not be assigned to list in the Regular Air Force for a period cants. Those persons selected for train­ oversea shipments nor assigned to tech­ of 2 years in the grade of basic airman ing may be enlisted in the Regular Air nical training schools. (E -l) unless authorized under current Force in accordance with §§871.1 to (b) Final—(1) General. Each tenta­ enlistment directives to enlist in a higher 871.7 of this subchapter after notification tively qualified applicant referred to an grade. They will be appointed as avia­ of their selection. The policy in §§ 871.1 Air Force Academy and Aircrew Exam­ tion cadets upon arrival at the Air Force to 871.7 of this subchapter pertaining to ining Center for findl processing will be Pre-Flight Training School. enlistment of personnel of Reserve Forces administered the Air Force Officer Qual­ (4) Changes affecting status of ac­ other than the Air Force will apply. ifying Test, a complete medical exami­ cepted applicants. Applicants notified § 874.7 Selection and assignment— nation for flying training as prescribed of their acceptance by the Commander, (a) Selection of applicants. Fully qual­ in pertinent regulations, and such other Flying Training Air Force, need not take ified and accepted applicants will be examinations as may be directed by any further action regarding their ap­ selected for training by the Commander, Headquarters USAF. If, at any time plications unless requested to do so. Flying Training Air Force, in the follow­ during the processing, an applicant is However, Flying Training Air Force ing order of priority: determined to have a medical defect must be informed of any changes which (1) College graduates with baccalau­ which is unquestionably disqualifying affect an applicant, such as: reate degrees or higher. for both pilot and aircraft observer (i) Enlistment in the Regular Air (2) Persons having completed two or training, processing of that applicant Force. more years of college (60 semester hours will cease and disposition as a disquali­ (ii) For airmen, advancement to non­ or 90 quarter hours) but less than a fied applicant will be made. commissioned officer grade which would baccalaureate degree. permit assignment to training as an (3) All others, based on results of ex­ § 874.6 Information to be furnished aviation student. applicants—(a) General. Each appli­ aminations taken and by date of (iii) Change of address. qualification. cant who successfully completes the (iv) Modification of physical status final processing will, prior to his depar­ (b) Airmeninthe active military serv­ ture from the examining center, be ad­ which would be disqualifying for flying ice—(. 1) Reassignment. Reassignment vised that he is fully qualified, subject training. of airmen will be in grade held, on a to administrative and medical review by (v) Change in marital status. permanent change of station basis. Se­ the Commander, Flying Training Air (vi) Change of desire for training. lected applicants who applied for avi­ Force. Selections will be based on the (vii) Receipt of notification from the ation cadet training while assigned to results of the examinations completed Selective Service System ordering the military units based in oversea areas together with the overall qualifications applicant into the active military service will be returned to the zone of interior of each applicant. Each applicant will of the United States or alerting him for for aviation cadet training only after be advised in writing of his status by such service. completing one-half of their oversea the Commander, Flying Training Air (viii) Receipt of orders to enter the tour. Force, as soon as possible but not later active military service by a fully quali­ (2) Extension of enlistment. An air­ than 4 weeks from receipt of applica­ fied applicant who is a member of a Re­ man of the Regular Air Force selected tion. Applicants who are not selected serve Force of the United States other for aviation cadet training who does not within a period of 1 year will be notified than the Air Force. have 16 months of service remaining in and their personal documents will be (5) College seniors applying as college his current enlistment contract as of the returned. If eligible, a nonselected ap­ graduates. Applications of students en­ class starting date will be required to ex­ plicant may reapply after 1 year has rolled in their senior-year of college who tend his enlistment contract to include elapsed from the date of his last pre­ apply for aviation cadet training within such period prior to departure from his liminary testing. 135 days of their scheduled graduation unit of assignment. An airman of the (b) Qualified applicants—(1) Draft date will be processed as other applicants Regular Air Force who has been notified deferment for “selected” civilian appli­ and those found fully qualified will be in writing that he is “fully qualified” for cants. A draft-eligible civilian appli­ advised to furnish, upon graduation, a aviation cadet training but who has not cant who is subsequently notified of his copy of their college transcript to the been selected for a specific training acceptance for aviation cadet training Commander, Flying Training Air Force, Class may, immediately following dis­ will be furnished a 4-month draft de­ in order that they may receive selection charge upon normal expiration of term ferment by the Commander, Flying priority as college graduates. Imme­ of service, be reenlisted for a period of Training Air Force. If an applicant is diately upon receipt of college transcript 2 years pending assignment to a training ordered to report to active military serv­ the Commander, Flying Training Air class. In the event airman fails to com­ ice by the Selectiye Service System be­ Force, will furnish the applicant with a plete the course of training, he may, fore his deferment is issued or after his tentative class assignment. upon request, be separated from the deferment expires his application for (c) Disqualified applicants. Disqual­ service in accordance with § 874.8 (a) aviation cadet training will be canceled ified applicants will be advised as soon (3). since such persons are not assigned for as possible of the reason for disqualifica­ (3) Reserve airmen. Reserve airmen service with the Air Force. There are tion. An applicant who fails to attain selected for aviation cadet training will no provisions of law which authorize the the minimum qualifying score on the be discharged from their Reserve status transfer of military personnel between Air Force Officer Qualifying Test will not upon enlisting in the Regular Air Force. the separate military departments of the be furnished information as to scores Enlistment in the Regular Air Force will Department of Defense. made on the tests but only that he failed be for a period of 2 years. (2) Medical status. A report of med­to attain the minimum, qualifying score. (4) Appointment, On arrival at the ical examination (SF 88) must be ac­ If disqualified because of failure to pass Air Force Pre-Flight School the airman complished within 90 days of the date will be appointed an aviation cadet un­ the Air Force Officer Qualifying Test, he less eligible to undergo flying training of application for aviation cadet train­ may reapply for aviation cadet training as an aviation student as defined in para­ ing. At time of entry into training, the 1 year from the date of disqualification report of medical examination must not graph (b) (11) of § 874,1. be more than 1 year old. If the date of provided he is otherwise qualified. (c) Civilian applicants. The Com­ the report of medical examination has (d) Reserve personnel—(1) Air Force. mander, Flying Training Air Force, will expired, the selected applicant will be re­ Eligible Air Force Reserve personnel may furnish draft deferments (DD Form 44), quired to undergo a second medical ex­ apply and will be processed as outlined in letters of acceptance, and class assign­ amination. Fully qualified civilian § 874.5 (a) (3). ments to fully qualified and selected ap- Saturday, November 19, 1955 FEDERAI REGISTER 8571 plicants. Letters of acceptance will au­ time of elimination his desire either to (4) Medical. Students eliminated thorize selected applicants to enlist in complete his enlistment contract of to be from training because of substantiated the Regular Air Force for a period of 2 immediately separated from the service. medical disqualification may reapply, if years. After enlisting, the selected ap­ Should he elect to complete his enlist­ a subsequent medical examination indi­ plicant who has received class assign­ ment contract, he will not be permitted cates that the previous disqualification ment instructions will be assigned to the to request separation from the Air Force has been corrected or no longer exists. Air Force Pre-Flight Training School. at a later date because of his elimina­ However, the former student must meet On arrival at the Pre-Flight Training tion. Eliminated students who request all other requirements for appointment School, he will be appointed an aviation separation and who have remaining and must have been recommended for cadet by the Commandant. An appli­ obligated service as outlined in §§ 864.31 reinstatement by the eliminating au­ cant who declines to accept appoint­ to 864.43 of this chapter, will be trans­ thority. ment as an aviation cadet after enlist­ ferred to the Air Force Reserve. (5) Resignation. A student who re­ ing for a 2-year period will be disposed (b) Student relieved from training— signs from the training program will not of in the same manner as an eliminated (1) Reassignment. Eliminated or dis­ be reinstated. cadet. However,' such a person will be qualified students, other than those sep­ (6) Emergency leave. Under such advised that he will not be considered arated from the Service in accordance regulations as may be issued by the at a future date for a direct commission with paragraph (a) (3) of this section, Commander, Air Training Command, a in the Air Force or for training leading will be reassigned as follows: Student may be granted emergency leave to a commission in the Air Force without (1) Eliminées who reported to aviation in instances of a severe personal hard­ prior approval of the Chief of Staff, cadet training from civilian statut or ship. In such an instance, he will be USAF. In addition, he will be informed from overseas commands, other than held over for succeeding classes, if nec­ that since his enlistment was subsequent from units of Strategic Air Command or essary. The length of time involved or to June 19, 1951, he is obligated for an Military Air Transport Service, will be the number of “hold overs” granted any additional 6 years of Reserve service with reassigned within Air Training Com­ one student will be determined by the the Air Force following the completion mand. Commander, Air Training Command. of his 2-year enlistment contract in the (ii) Those who were previously as­ (7) Reinstated students. The phase Regular Air Force. Upon completing the signed to overseas units of Strategic Air of training to which eligible students 2 years of service in the Regular Air Command or Military Air Transport may be reinstated will be determined by Force, he will-be processed under perti­ Service will be reported to the appro­ the Commander, Flying Training Air nent regulations for separation from priate headquarters for reassignment to Force. active military service. the airman’s former command. § 874.9 Graduates—(a) Appointment (d) National agency check—(1) For (iii) Those who were previously as­ as Reserve Officer of the Air Force—(1) selected airmen applicants. Immedi­ signed to major air commands with sta­ Tendering appointment. Students who ately upon determination that an air­ tion assignment within the zone of successfully complete the prescribed man applicant will be selected, the Com­ interior will be reported to the head­ basic flying training course and who are mander, Flying Training Air Force, Will quarters of that command for assign­ ment. mentally, morally,* and physically quali­ request the airman’s commander to ini­ fied will be tendered appointments as tiate a National Agency Check for the (2) Service credited. Periods of serv­ second lieutenant Reserve of the Air applicant, if the applicant’s records do ice as an aviation cadet or aviation stu­ Force for an indefinite term. Each grad - not show a record of one having been dent will be credited as time spent in the uate, so appointed, will be ordered into accomplished or initiated. airman grade held at time of appoint­ active military service and will serve for (2) For civilian applicants. The ment as an aviation cadet or designation a continuous period of 3 years from the Commandant, USAF Pre-Flight Train­ as an aviation student and will be cred­ date of graduation from basic flying ing School will, when the applicant is ited in computing the service remaining training unless sooner relieved by orders appointed to the gra4e of aviation cadet, under the original enlistment contract. of competent authority. Each graduate initiate a National Agency Check. (3) Extended enlistments. If appli­ cable, the extension required by para­ will be awarded the aeronautical rating § 874.8 Termination and reassign­ graph (b) <2) of § 874.7 will be canceled appropriate to his training and concur­ ment—(a) Termination of training— (1) in accordance with §§ 871.1 to 871.7 of rently will be ordered to participate in Suspension. When the faculty board of this subchapter. Regular and frequent aerial flights. an Air Force school determines that an (4) Discharge. If an airman is elimi­ (2) Graduates who decline to accept aviation cadet or aviation student is no nated during the extension period, he appointment. A graduate who declines longer qualified to continue in his course lyill be separated from the service. Such to accept an appointment as a Reserve of training," the commandant or Air an airman will be given time to reenlist officer of the Air Force will be disposed Force supervisor, as applicable, will sus­ as specified in current enlistment direc­ of as ah eliminted student. His appoint­ pend the student from training. Upon tives. ment as an aviation cadet, or status as final approval of the faculty board pro­ (c) Reinstatement of former stu­ an aviation student, will be terminated as ceedings, the commandant will termi­ dents—(1) Flying deficiency. A student outlined in § 874.8 (a), and he will be nate the student’s appointment as an eliminated from training because of fly­ reassigned within the Air Force in ac­ aviation cadet or status as an aviation cordance with § 874.8 (b). student. ing deficiency will not be considered for (2) Grade. In the case of aviation reinstatement into the same course of (b) Discharge. .When . commissioned cadets eliminated from training, the training. An application may be sub­ in accordance with paragraph (a) of this mitted for other flying training if the section, the student will be discharged commandant will appoint the eliminated eliminated student is recommended by student to the airman grade helc^ im­ from his airman status. The comman­ the eliminating authority and is other­ dant will prepare a discharge certificate mediately prior to appointment as an wise qualified. aviation cadet. (2) Academic deficiency. Students and report of separation as of the day (3) Discharge from the Air Force. eliminated from training because of aca­ preceding the date of appointment as a The commandant will afford an elimi­ demic deficiency will not be reinstated commisioned officer. The discharge cer­ nated aviation cadet, whose current en­ at a later date Unless recommended for tificate and report of separation will not listment was specifically for aviation further officer training by the faculty be delivered to the graduate until after cadet training, and who, at the time of board. They must also have substan­ the oath (AF Form 133) as commis­ enlistment, had completed a tour of ac­ tially improved their educational quali­ sioned officer has been administered. tive service (6 months or more in dura­ fications and at least 1 year must elapse tion) required by the Universal Military from the date of termination of student [ s e a l ] E . E . T o r o , Training and Service Act, as amended, Colonel, U. S. Air Force, status before reapplication. Air Adjutant General. the opportunity to request discharge (3) Military deficiency. Students from the Air Force. The eliminated eliminated from training because of [ip. R. Doc. 55-9303; Filed, Nov. 18, 1955; student must indicate in writing, at the ^military deficiency will not be reinstated. 8:45 a. m.] No. 226------3 8572 RULES AND REGULATIONS

Chapter XII— National Advisory fact. It is the responsibility of the con­ <3) The contractor and the contract­ Committee for Aeronautics tracting officer to exercise his own ing officer, or their representatives, may judgment in making his findings of fact offer at a hearing such evidence or argu­ P art 1220-—C o n tr a ct D is p u t e s and and in reaching his decision. ment as they deem appropriate, subject A p p e a l s Sec. § 1220.4 Appeal by contractor—(a) to the exercise of reasonable discretion 1220.1 In tro d u c tio n . Notice of appeal. An appeal from a by the presiding officer as to the extent 1220.2 NACA Board of Contract Appeals. finding of fact or decision of a contract­ and manner of presenting such argu­ 1220.3 Action by contracting officer. ing officer shall be made by notice of ment. 1220.4 Appeal by contractor. appeal in writing, addressed to the (4) Provision shall be made for an 1220.5 Preparation of appeal file. NACA Executive Secretary, and shall adequate record of the hearings. It 1220.6 Proceedings of NACA Board of Con­ shall be discretionary with the Board tract Appeals. be mailed or filed with the contracting 1220.7 Pinal decision. officer within the time allowed by the as to whether a summary record or ver­ 1220.8 Effective date. contract. The notice of appeal shall batim transcript or recording will be specify the portion of the findings of made. A copy of the summary or trans­ Authority : § § 1220.1 to 1220.8 issued un­ der R. S. 161; 5 U. S. C. 22, interpret or apply fact or decision from which the appeal cript shall be furnished to the contrac­ 62 Stat. 21, as amended; 41 U. S. C. 151. is taken, the reasons why the findings tor. or decision are deemed erroneous, and (c) Deliberations and findings of § 1220.1 Introduction—(a) Purpose. the relief sought by the appeal. A sug­ Board. Deliberations of the Board shall The regulations in this part establish an gested form of notice of qppeal is at­ be made in executive session. No record NACA Board of Contract Appeals and tached as Appendix A.1 shall be made of such deliberations nor prescribe administrative procedures for (b) Appeal brief. A brief in support of the vote of a particular member un­ hearing, considering, and deciding dis­ of the appeal may be submitted with less such member desires to submit a putes and appeals arising under NACA the notice of appeal or within 30 days minority opinion. The Board shall base contracts. after the mailing or filing of such notice. its findings on the complete record. (b) Authority. The Armed Services The finding of the Board shall be in Procurement Act of 1947, 62 Stat. 21, as § 1220.5 Preparation of appeal file— writing, shall indicate whether reached amended (41 U. S. C. 151), and NACA (a) Documents to be filed by contract­ by unanimous decision, and shall be General Administrative Directive No. ing officer, Within 15 days after receipt signed by all members of the Board. 1-49, May 19, 1949, vest in the NACA of a notice of appeal, the contracting The findings of the Board, together with Executive Secretary authority to make officer shall transmit the appeal file to the NACA Board of Contract Appeals. the complete record of the case, shall be final decisions on all appeals arising un­ sent to the NACA Executive Secretary. der the disputes clause of NACA con­ The appeal file shall consist of the no­ tracts. tice of appeal and any supporting § 1220.7 Final decision. The NACA briefs, and copies of all pertinent docu­ Executive Secretary shall review the § 1220.2 NACA Board of Contract ments, including the following: complete record of the case and shall Appeals■—(a) Establishment., There is (1 ) The findings of fact and the deci­ render a final decision in writing, a copy hereby established an NACA Board of sion from which the appeal is taken, of which shall be furnished to the con-* Contract Appeals. The functions of this - (2) The invitation for bids, the con­ tractor and the contracting officer. Board shall be to : tract, pertinent plans, specifications, and (1) Review appeals arising under § 1220.8 Effective date. The regula­ amendments, and tions in this part shall be effective NACA contracts. (3) Correspondence and other data (2) Conduct hearings, where neces­ material to the appeal. November 14, 1955. sary. Issued at Washington, D. C., Novem­ (3) Submit reports of findings and § 1220.6 Proceedings of NACA Board ber 14, 1955. of Contract Appeals—(a) Review and recommendations to the NACA Execu­ J. P . V ic t o r y , tive Secretary for his final decision. consideration of record. The Board shall review and consider the record Executive Secretary. (b) Membership. (1) The NACA presented to it and shall take whatever [F. R. Doc. 55r-9324;. Filed, Nov., 18, 1955; Board of Contract Appeals shall consist action is necessary to insure a full and 8:50 a. m.] of the NACA Legal Adviser, who shall be fair consideration of the case. A hear­ designated the permanent Board mem­ ing will be held if requested by the con­ ber, and at least two ad hoc members to TITLE 43— PUBLIC LANDS: be appointed by the NACA Executive tractor or determined by the Board to Secretary. be necessary. Requests for a hearing INTERIOR shall be submitted with the notice of ap­ (2) No person directly involved in the peal or within 30 days thereafter. Chapter I—-Bureau of Land Manage­ awarding or administration of the con­ ment, Department of the Interior tract in dispute shall be appointed to the (b) Hearings, (j.) Hearings will be Board of Contract Appeals. held at NACA Headquarters, Washing­ Appendix— Public Land Orders ton, D. C., unless the Board determines § 1220.3 Action by contracting offi­ that the holding of the hearing else­ [Public Land Order 1252] cer. NACA contracting officers shall where will best serve the interests of the [Sacramento 048400] follow the procedure outline in this sec- parties concerned. C a l if o r n ia taon in resolving disputes on questions of (2) Hearings shall be conducted in an fact arising under NACA contracts con­ orderly manner and in a serious, busi­ RESERVING PUBLIC LANDS IN CONNECTION taining the standard disputes clause or ness-like atmosphere of dignity and WITH TOPAZ LAKE PUBLIC FISHING AREA similar provisions: decorum and shall be expedited as much By yirtue of the authority vested in the (a) Statement of facts from contrac­ as possible. Attendance shall be limited > President and pursuant to Executive tor. Whenever a dispute arises which is to persons officially concerned with the Order No. 10355 of May 26,1952, and the not disposed of by mutual agreement, hearing, including representatives of the act of March 10, 1934, as amended by thé contracting officer shall request the contractor and contracting officer and the act of August 14, 1946 (48 Stat. 401; contractor to furnish a full statement of any witness while actually testifying. 60 Stat. 1080; 16 U, S. C. 661-666C), it the pertinent facts and the reasons in Testimony shall be given under oath or is ordered as follows: support of the contractor’s contention, affirmation. Rules of evidence shall not Subject to valid existing rights, the with a reference to the contract provi­ be binding on the Board, but reasonable following-described public lands in Cali­ sions relied upon in support of such restrictions shall be imposed as to the fornia are hereby withdrawn from all contention. relevancy, competency, and materiality forms of appropriation under the public- (b) Decision by contracting officer. of matters considered. land laws, including the mining but not The contracting officer executing the the mineral-leasing laws, and reserved contract shall in- each instance decide »Filed as part of the original document. Copies available upon request to NACA under the jurisdiction of the Depart­ the dispute and furnish directly to the Board of Contract Appeals, National Advi­ ment of the Interior for use of the De­ contractor a statement in writing of his sory Committee for Aeronautics, 1512 H partment of Fish and Game of the State decision, together with his findings of Street NW., Washington 25, D. C. of California in connection with the Saturday, November 19, 1955 FEDERAL REGISTER 8573 Topaz Lake Public Pishing Area, under The tracts described contain 8.36 acres. F airbanks Meridian such conditions as may be prescribed by 2. The following-described lands re­ T ■ 7 S R 5 E the Secretary of the Interior: Provided, leased from withdrawal are patented sec, i, s e %",’ e i/2s w % , SWV4SWV4; That the Bureau of Land Management, lands: Sec. 11, Ey2NEi4, SE%; sec. 12, wy 2Nwy4, NE%NW^4; its permittees and licensees, shall have F airbanks Meridian Sec. 13, Si/2SE%, SE%SW%: the use of the lands when trailing live­ T. 7 S., R. 5 E., Sec. 14, Ny2NE}4; stock and as may be needed to secure Sec. 12, lo ts 1, 2, a n d 9; Sec. 24, NWÎ4NE14, NE%NW%. access to water for such livestock: Sec. 13, lots 1, 2, 5, 6, a n d 7; T. 7 S., R. 6 E., Sec. 14, lots 2, 3, S%NE&. Mount Diablo Meridian Sec. 6, SW>4, SWy4SE}4> unsurveyed; Sec. 7, NE*4, SE&SWyi. W ^SE^, NE% T. 9 N., R. 22 E., The areas described aggregate 300.13 SE%; Sec. 2, W%NW%, NW%SW%. acres. Sec. 18, lots 3, 4, 11, 12, 16, 17, S^SW ^ T. 10 N., R. 22 E., 3. Subject to valid existing rights, the SWy4NEy4, N W 14NE 1/4 , NE 14NW 14, Ei/2 Sec. 34, SW%NE^, NW&SE^. following-described public lands, which swy4, Nwy4SE%. The areas described aggregate 200.40 are a portion of the lands released from The areas described aggregate 1,760.89 acres. withdrawal by paragraph 1 of this order, acres. This order shall be subject to existing are hereby withdrawn from all forms of 7. Subject to any valid existing rights withdrawals for reclamation purposes so appropriation under the public-land and the requirements of applicable law, far as they affect any of the above- laws, including the mining and the min­ the surveyed public lands described in described lands. eral-leasing laws, and reserved as fol- paragraphs 5 and 6 hereof are hereby lows : opened to filing of applications, selec­ v Wesley A. D’Ewart, (a) For townsite purposes to be here­ Assistant Secretary of the Interior. tions, and locations in accordance with after disposed of under applicable town- the following: N o v em be r 15, 1955. site laws: a. Applications and selections under [F. R. Doc. 55-9305; Piled, Nov. 18, 1955; F airbanks Meridian the nonmineral public-land laws may be 8:45 a. m.J m ij g g jjj presented to the Manager mentioned Sec. 13, lots 3, 4, NE&SE^. below, beginning on the date of this order. Such applications and selections The tracts described contain 73.24 will be considered as filed on the hour [P u b lic L an d O rder 12531 acres. and respective dates shown for the vari­ (b) Under the jurisdiction of the De­ [Fairbanks 012594] ous classes enumerated in the following partment of the Interior for recreation paragraphs: [Mlsc. 1966031] and other public purposes: (1) Applications by persons having [Misc. 21193701 F airbanks Meridian prior existing valid settlement rights, A la ska » T . 7 S., R. 6 E., preference rights conferred by existing . Sec. 18, lo ts 1, 2, a n d 10. laws, or equitable claims subject to al­ PARTIALLY REVOKING. PUBLIC LANB ORDER lowance and confirmation will be ad­ NO. 225 OF APRIL 21, 1944 ¡ WITHDRAWING The tracts described contain 36.37 judicated on the facts presented in sup­ PORTIONS OF RELEASED LANDS FOR VARIOUS acres. port of each claim or right. All appli­ PUBLIC PURPOSES 4. The following-described lands re­ cations presented by persons other than leased from withdrawal by this order, By virtue of the authority vested in those referred to in this paragraph will shall not become subject to the initiation be subject to the applications and claims the President by section 1 of the act of of any rights or to any disposition under June 25, 1910 <36 Stat. 847; 43 U. S. C. mentioned in this paragraph. 141) and sections 2380 and 2381 of the the public-land laws until it is so pro­ . (2) All valid applications under the Revised Statutes (43 U. S. C. 711, 712) vided by an order of classification to be Homestead, Alaska Home Site, and Small and otherwise, and pursuant to Execu­ issued by an authorized officer, opening Tract Laws by qualified veterans of tive Order No. 10355 of May 26, 1952, it such lands to application under the World War H or of the Korean Conflict, is ordered as follows: Small Tract Act of June 1,1938 (52 Stat. and by others entitled to preference 1. Public Land Order No. 225 of April609; 43 U. S. C. 682a) as amended, with a rights under the act of September 27, 21, 1944, temporarily withdrawing lands 91-day preference-right period for filing 1944 (58 Stat. 747; 43 U. S. C. 279-284 as in Alaska from settlement, location, sale, such applications by veterans of World amended), presented'prior to 10:00 a. m. or entry, for classification, which was on December 21, 1955, will be considered War II, the Korean Conflict, and other as simultaneously filed at that hour. partially revoked by Public Land Order qualified persons entitled to preference No. 537 of December 15, 1948, is hereby Rights under such preference right ap­ under the act of September 27, 1944 (58 plications filed after that hour and be­ revoked so far as it affects the following- Stat. 747; 43 U. S. C. 279-284) as described lands: fore 10:00 a. m. on March 21, 1956, will amended: be governed by the time of filing. Birch Lake F airbanks Meridian 8. Subject to any valid existing rights Latitude 64° 19' N., longitude 146°40' W. and the requirements of applicable law, All lands within one-half mile of Birch T. 7 S., R. 6 E„ the unsurveyed public lands released Lake, including all islands, embracing among Sec. 12, lots 3, 4, and 5. from withdrawal by paragraph 6 of this other lands the following surveyed sub­ T 7 S R 6 E Sec. 7, lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, NE%NW}4. order, are hereby opened to filing of divisions: applications, selections, and locations as Fairbanks Meridian The areas described aggregate 273.99 are allowable on unsurveyed lands in T. 7 S., R. 5 E., acres. accordance with the following: Sec. 13; 5. The SW1/4NE1/4SW1/4SW1/4 and the a. Subject to the applications and Sec. 14, lo ts 2, 3, a n d NE% ; SEy4NW 1/4s w 1/4sw y4 (part of lot 5) claims described in paragraph b (1) be­ Sec. 24, NW%NEV4 and NE^NW 1/*. sec. 12, T. 7 S., R. 5 E., containing 5 acres, low, the lands beginning 10:00 a. m. on The areas described aggregate ap­ are included in an application for with­ December 21, 1955, will be subject to proximately 2,300 acres, including 1,888 drawal filed by thé Territorial Depart­ settlement under the Homestead and acres of public land and 300 acres of ment of Lands, Alaska (Fairbanks Alaska Home Site Laws by qualified vet­ non-public land. 012594), with respect to which lands, erans of World War H or of the Korean Excepting, however, the following-de­ applications under the public-land laws Conflict, and by others entitled to pref­ scribed tract, which shall remain within will be suspended in accordance with 43 erence rights under the act of September the withdrawal created by Public Land CFR 295.10 until action on the applica­ 27, 1944 (58 Stat. 747; 43 U. S. C. 279-284 Order No. 225: tion for withdrawal has been taken, as amended). Beginning 10:00 a. m. on Fairbanks Meridian 6. The following public lands are re­ March 21,1956, any remaining lands will be subject to settlement under those laws T. 7 S., R. 5 E„ stored to disposition under the public- Sec. 12, lots 7, 8, 10, a n d 1 1 . land laws by this order: by other qualified persons. 8574 RULES AND REGULATIONS

b. Applications and selections under claiming preference rights based upon ing. At the conclusion of the hearing the nonmineral public-land laws may be valid settlement-, statutory preference, a reasonable opportunity will be afforded presented to the Manager mentioned be­ or equitable claims must enclose prop­ interested parties for examination of the low, beginning on the date of this order. erly corroborated statements in support record and for'the submission of briefs. Such applications and selections will be of their applications, setting forth all Substance of proposal: To amend sec­ considered as filed on the hour and re­ facts relevant to their claims. Detailed tion 21, class 4 (27 CFR 5.21 (d) ) and spective dates shown for the various rules and regulations governing applica­ other pertinent sections of the régula-' classes enumerated in the following tions which may be filed pursuant to this tions to require a grape distillate, pro­ paragraphs: notice can be found in Title 43 of the duced in the United ^States or imported (1) Applications by persons having Code of Federal Regulations. and not aged for at least 2 years, to be preference rights conferred by existing Inquiries concerning the lands shall designated as “wine spirits”, “grape dis­ laws or equitable claims subject to allow­ be addressed to the Manager, Land Office, tillate”, “immaturé brandy”, “young ance and confirmation will be adjudi­ Bureau of Land Management, Fairbanks, brandy”, “substandard brandy”, “brandy cated on the facts presented in support Alaska. ___ , years and/or months old”, or some of each claim or right. All applications W e s l e y A. D ’E w a r t , similar designation, with or without such presented by persons other than those Assistant Secretary of the Interior. further statement of composition as may referred to in this paragraph will be sub­ N o v em ber 15, 1955. be required; or, in the alternative, to ject to the applications and claims men­ amend section 21, class 4 (27 CFR 5.21 tioned in this paragraph. [F. R. Doc. 55-9306; Filed, Nov. 18, 1955; (d) ) and other pertinent sections of the (2) All valid applications under the 8:46 a. m.] regulations to authorize the use of the Small Tract Laws by qualified veterans designation “aged brandy” and/or “ma­ of World War n or of the Korean Con­ ture brandy”, or some other designation flict, and by others entitled to preference TITLE 47— TELECOMMUNI­ or device to indicate that the product has rights under the act of September 27, CATION been matured, on labels and in advertis­ 1944 (58 Stat. 747; 43 U. S. C. 279-284 ing in the case of grape brandy aged for as amended), presented prior to 10:00 Chapter I— Federal Communications not less 2 years, and to prohibit the use a. mv on December 21, 1955, will be con­ Commission of these designations on labels and in sidered as simultaneously filed at that advertising in the case of brandy aged hour. Rights under such preference [Docket No. 11094] for less than 2 years. right applications after that hour and [Rules Amdt. 3-60] before 10:00 a. m. on March 21, 1956, [ s e a l ! D w ig h t E . A v is , will be governed by the time of filing. P art 3— R adio B roadcast S e r v ic es Director, Alcohol and Tobacco 9. All valid applications and selections TELEVISION BROADCAST STATIONS Tax Division, Internal Reve­ under the non-mineral public-land laws, nue Service. other than those coming under para­ The Commission’s Report and Order in graphs 7 (a) (1) and (2) and 8 (b) (1) the above-entitled matter, adopted [F. R. TDoc. 55-9348; Filed, Nov. 18, 1955; and (2) above, presented prior to 10:00 November 3, 1955 (FCC 55-1096), pub­ 8:54 a. m.] a. m. on March 21, 1956, will be' consid­ lished in the F ederal R e g is t e r November ered as simultaneously filed at that hour. 9, 1955 at page 8384, is corrected in the Rights under such applications and se­ following respects: DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE lections filed after that hour will be 1. In paragraph (a) of § 3.691, the last Agricultural Marketing Service governed by the time of filing. two words are changed to read, “the re­ 10. The lands have been open to appli­ quirements of this subpart.”. I 7 CFR Part 903 1 cations and offers under the mineral­ 2. In paragraph (d) of § 3.692, the [Docket No. AO 10-A19] leasing laws and to location for metallif­ date “December 12, 1955” is inserted fol­ erous minerals. They will be open to lowing the words “prior to”. H a n d l in g o f M il k i n S t . Louis, Mo., M a r k e t in g A rea location for non-metalliferous minerals (Sec. 4, 48 Stat. 1066, as amended; 47 U. S. C. under the United States mining laws be­ 154. Interpret or apply sec. 303, 48 Stat. NOTICE OF RECOMMENDED DECISION AND ginning at 10:00 a. m. on March 21,1956. 1082, as amended; 47 U. S. C. 303) OPPORTUNITY TO FILE WRITTEN EXCEP­ 11. Persons claiming veterans prefer­ TIONS W ITH RESPECT TO PROPOSED ence rights under paragraphs 7 (a) (2) F ederal C ommunications C o m m is s io n , AMENDMENTS TO TENTATIVE MARKETING and 8 (b) (2) above must enclose with AGREEMENT AND TO ORDER, AS AMENDED their applications proper evidence of [se a l ] M ary J a n e M o r r is , military or naval service, preferably a Secretary. Pursuant to the provisions of the Agri­ complete photostatic copy of the certifi­ [F. R. Doc. 55-9328; Filed, Nov. 18, 1955; cultural Marketing Agreement Act of cate of honorable discharge. Persons 8:51 a. m.] 1937, as amended (7 U. S. C. 601 et seq.), and the applicable rules of practice and procedure, as amended, governing the formulation of marketing agreements and marketing orders (7 CFR Part 900), notice is hereby given of the filing with PROPOSED RULE MAKING the Hearing Clerk of the recommended decision of the Deputy Administrator, DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY terested parties will be afforded oppor­ Agricultural Marketing Service, United tunity to be heard, in person or by States Department of Agriculture, with Internal Revenue Service authorized representative, with refer­ respect to proposals to amend the ten­ ence to the proposal, the substance of tative marketing agreement and the or­ [ 27 CFR Part 5 ] which is stated below, to amend Regula­ der, as amended, regulating the handling A l c o h o l and T obacco T ax D i v i s i o n ; tions No. 5 (27 CFR Part 5), relating to of milk in the St. Louis, Missouri, mar­ L a b e lin g and A d v e r t is in g o p D i s ­ labeling and advertising of distilled keting area. Interested parties may file t il l e d S p i r i t s spirits. written exceptions to this decision, with Written data, views or arguments rele­ the Hearing Clerk, United States De­ NOTICE OP HEARING vant and material to this proposal may partment of Agriculture, Washington 25, Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the be submitted in duplicate for incorpora­ D. C., not later than the close of business provisions of section 5 of the Federal tion into the record of hearing (1) by the 3rd day after publication of this de­ Alcohol Administration Act (49 Stat. mailing the same to the Director, Alcohol cision in the F ederal R e g is t e r . Excep­ 981 as amended; 27 U. S. C. 205), of a and Tobacco Tax Division, Internal tions should be filed in quadruplicate. public hearing to be held on .December Revenue Service, Washington 25, D. C., Preliminary statement. The hearing, 1, 1955, at 10 a. m., at Room 3303, In­ provided that they are received prior to on the record of which the proposed ternal • Revenue Building, Washington, the termination of the hearing, or (2) amendment to the tentative marketing D. C., at which time and place all in- by presenting the same at the said hear­ agreement and to the order, as amended, Saturday, November 19, 1955 FEDERAL REGISTER 8575 was formulated, was held at St. Louis, stantial proportion of producers on the nounced. However, no proposal to use Missouri, on October 25, 1955, pursuant St. Ijouis market do not have sufficient such a basis of adjustment was made at to notice thereof which was issued Octo­ cooler capacity to refrigerate all of their the hearing. Such adjustment devices ber 19, 1955 (20 P. R. 7967). {milk at the same time, so that the cur­ require determination of a normal rela­ The sole material issue of the hearing rent practice is to remove the nights' tionship for each month of the year. related to the pricing of Class I milk. milk from the cooler in order to cool the While the record shows the actual rela­ Findings and conclusions. Based upon mornings’ milk. Present temperature tionships that have occurred each month the evidence presented at the hearing requirements can be met by this system for several years, it fails to show the and the record thereof it is found and but continuous refrigeration will be re­ factors which might have caused them to concluded that: quired to meet the lower 50 degree de­ vary from the normal pattern from time 1. No change should be made in thelivery requirement. / to time. Class I price differential on the basis of Truck refrigeratioh may be required to Some additional responsiveness to cur­ this record; adjustment of the Class I maintain temperatures while milk is en- rent conditions can be provided by ad­ price on the basis of the ratio of re­ route from farms to plants. Much of justing the 12-month mover now pro­ ceipts from producers to Class I sales the St. Louis milk supply is collected on vided in the order so as to give more should be modified to reflect a combina­ stub routes from which cans are trans­ significant effect to changes in recent.. tion of changes in recent months with ferred to larger trucks for movement to months. A proposal was made at the the 12-month average utilization, and the city. Increased hauling costs to hearing to use the amount of change through August 1956 an increased rate producers were predicted as a result of in the 12-month supply-demand ratio in of adjustment for such changes should the investments that will be required of recent months as an additional basis for be provided. milk haulers. price adjustment. Under this proposal The Class I price of the St. Louis order Proponents of increased differential the 12-month ratio would be adjusted is determined by adding to a basic for­ contend that the necessity for additional by the amount that it had changed mula price 70 cents for April through capital investment by a large percentage within the most recent three-month pe­ June, $1.45 for September through No­ of producers supplying the market at a riod. The adjusted ratio so computed vember, and $1.15 for other months, ad­ time when sales are increasing faster would be compared with the 125 percent justed on the basis of the extent to which than production creates a situation re­ standard of the order to determine the the ratio of producers’ receipts to Class quiring a substantial price increase. amount of price change. I sales in a recent 12-month period varies They claim that many producers without Such a provision would, in effect, give from 125 percent. The rate of adjust-» adequate cooling capacity will nQt add recognition to the amount by which ment per percentage point of such varia­ the necessary equipment under present utilization in the three most recent tion is 1 cent for April through June, pricing provisions but will either (1) months included in the 12-month aver­ 3 cents for September through Novem­ seek other markets with less stringent age has changed from that in the same ber and 2 cents for a.11 other months. requirements, (2) reduce production to three months a year previous. By giv­ Producers proposed that the differen­ the cooling capacity of their present ing added weight to supply relationships tials added to the basic formula price be equipment or (3) discontinue produc­ in this recent period the responsiveness increased. One cooperative association tion. A number of secondary markets in of the adjuster to current conditions will proposed that the present $0.70, $1.15 the Illinois portion of the milkshed be substantially enhanced. As indicated and $1.45 be increased to $0.90, $1.40» which have not heretofore required in previous decisions and testimony in and $1.70, respectively. Two other asso­ Grade A milk will require such milk in this record, alignment of the St. Louis ciations proposed that these differentials the near future under the terms of a Class I price with that of the Chicago be $0.90, $1.60, and $1.90. recently enacted State law; temperature market is necessary because of the con­ During the past year Class I sales in requirements for such markets will not, siderable volumes of milk that move the St. Louis market have increased however, be as low as 50 degrees. Some from Chicago to St. Louis. The supply- more rapidly than have receipt? of milk St. Louis producers could sell Grade A demand adjustment of the Chicago order from producers. For September 1955 milk to Illinois plants without the addi­ now contains a provision similar to that Class I sales exceeded those of Septem- tional investment necessary for them to proposed at the hearing. Adoption of br 1954 by 5.1 percent while producer continue delivery to St. Louis. such a provision in the St. Louis order receipts had increased only 2.35 percent The extent to which the St. Louis milk will tend to restore and preserve the over those of a year earlier. September supply will be affected by this situation alignment of - prices between the two 1955 production represented 100.3 per­ cannot be determined, however, from markets. cent of Class X sales for that month. For this record; neither can the amount or For the period through August 1956 an each of the first nine months of 1955 duration of price change necessary to increase in the rate of adjustment should except July comparison with the same maintain the supply at an adequate be made so that more substantial price month a year earlier shows that sales level. The extent and duration of price adjustments will result during the initial have increased substantially more than change should be determined by the period of effectiveness of the increased has production. As a result, for the 12 changes that occur in the relationship temperature requirements. While nor­ months ending with September 1955 pro­ of supply to sales. It is evident, how­ mal seasonal increases in production may ducer receipts, are 121.3 percent of Class ever, that price changes brought about be expected to prevent any shortage of I sales, whereas for the 12 months end­ by the present supply-demand adjuster supply for Class I needs in the coming ing with September 1954 this ratio was of the order occur much more slowly spring and early summer months, it is 125.4 percent. Since this 12-month ratio than changes in supply-sales relation­ important that production be maintained is the factor used in adjusting the Class ships. With respect to the increased at a level that will not result in a serious I price, a 12-cent increase is in effect temperature requirements of the St. shortage of supply in the fall months of for November 1955, based on the 121.3 Louis ordinance, it is to be expected that 1956. An increase in the rate of adjust­ ratio for the period through September. the maximum impact on the volume of ment of from 1 cent to 4 cents per per­ Upward adjustments ranging from 2 milk supply will be within a short period centage point of variation for months of cents to 9 cents have occurred each of the effective date of enforcement. April through June 1956, and from 2 month from February through October. This impact will not, however, be re­ cents to 5 cents for other months through Effective in January 1956, the city of flected to any substantial extent in the August 1956 will provide wider price St. Louis will require that milk be de­ 12-month relationship until consider­ changes in response to changes in sup­ livered to plants at a temperature of 50 able time after it has occurred. An ad­ ply-sales relationships. Such price degrees Fahrenheit., The present tem­ justment more responsive to current changes appear appropriate for this perature requirement at time of delivery conditions should be employed. period in view of the likelihood that at is 70 degrees. Numerous producers Supply-demand adjustments most this time need for long term capital in­ testified to the effect that meeting the responsive to current conditions base vestments may influence producers’ de­ temperature requirements soon to be­ price adjustments on the supply-sales cisions to a greater than normal extent. come effective would require substantial ratio in recent months, usually the two Rulings on “proposed findings and con­ additional investment in refrigeration most recent months for which data are clusions. Written arguments and pro­ equipment. It is claimed that a sub­ available when the price is to be an­ posed findings and conclusions submitted 8576 PROPOSED RULE MAKING on behalf of interested persons concern­ resultant figure to the nearest whole per­ cated close to the corporate limits of ing issues on which decision is herein cent. Kansas City, Missouri, and directly north recommended were considered, along Filed at Washington, D. C., this 18th (across the Missouri River) from Kansas with the evidence in the record, in mak­ day of November 1955. City, Kansas. It was proposed that the ing the findings and reaching the con­ northern boundary of the marketing clusions herein set forth. To the extent [s e a l ! R o y W. L e n n a r t s o n , area in Platte County be State Highway that the proposed findings and conclu­ Deputy Administrator. 92, which presently constitutes most of sions differ from the findings and con­ (P. R. Doc. 55-9369; Filed, Nov. 18, 1955; the northern boundary of the marketing clusions contained herein, the specific or 10:49 a. m.] area as it extends eastward in Clay implied requests to make such findings County, Missouri. It was also proposed are denied because of the reasons stated that all of Platte City, through which in support of the findings and con­ State Highway 92 passes, be included. clusions in this decision. [ 7 CFR Part 713 1 The proposed boundary lies 2 to 5 miles General findings, (a) The proposed north of the present boundary. marketing agreement and the order, as ... [Docket No. AO-23-A15J The city of Kansas City, Missouri, has amended, and as hereby proposed to be H a n d l in g o f M il k i n G reater K ansas purchased a tract of 4,590 acres of land further amended, and all of the terms C it y M a r k e t in g A rea in Platte County and is constructing on and conditions thereof, will tend to effec­ it the Mid-Continent International Air­ tuate the declared policy of the act ; NOTICE OF RECOMMENDED DECISION AND port. This tract of land lies partly within (b) The parity prices of milk as deter­ OPPORTUNITY TO FILE WRITTEN EXCEP­ and partly beyond the present marketiiig mined pursuant to section 2 of the act TIONS THERETO WITH RESPECT TO PRO­ area. Contracts totaling 26.5 million are not reasonable in view of the price POSED MARKETING AGREEMENT AND PRO­ dollars have been awarded for construc­ of feeds, available supplies of feeds and POSED AMENDMENTS TO ORDER, AS tion to be completed by mid-1956. Addi­ other economic conditions which affect AMENDED tional expenditures of approximately 20 market supply of and demand for milk Pursuant to the provisions of the million dollars are proposed. One facil­ in the marketing area, and the minimum Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act ity now under construction is expected to prices specified in the proposed market­ of 1937, as amended (7 U. S. C. 601 et employ 4,000 persons at the start of ing agreement and the order, as amend­ seq.), hereinafter referred to as the act, operations and 10,000 persons ultimately. ed, and as hereby proposed to be further and the applicable rules of practice and Certain of these operations are presently amended, are such prices as will reflect procedure, as amended, governing pro­ performed at the Kansas City Municipal the aforesaid factors, insure a sufficient ceedings to formulate marketing agree­ Airport in the marketing area. quantity of pure and wholesome milk ments and marketing orders (7 CFR Part Kansas City producers and handlers and be in the public interest ; and 900), notice is hereby given of the filing consider this development to be a part (c) ' The proposed order, as amended,with the Hearing Clerk of the recom­ of the economic life of Kansas City and and as hereby proposed to be further mended decision of the Deputy Admin­ that the potential milk sales outlets to amended, will regulate the handling of istrator, Agricultural Marketing Service, be created in this area by municipal ac­ milk in the same manner as, and will be United States Department of Agriculture, tion should be subject to the same rules applicable only to persons in the respec­ with respect to a proposed marketing as prevail in the territory now included tive classes of industrial and commercial agreement and proposed amendments to in the marketing area. They predict activity specified in a marketing agree­ the order, as amended, regulating the that employment opportunities at this ment upon which a hearing has been handling of milk in the Greater Kansas point, approximately 15 miles from the held. City marketing area. center of Kansas City, will stimulate res­ Recommended marketing agreement Interested parties may file written ex­ idential development in a continuous and order, amending the order, as ceptions to the decision with the Hearing area extending from Kansas City to amended. The following amended order Clerk, United States Department of Agri­ points beyond the airport. is recommended as the detailed and ap­ culture, Washington 25, D. C., not later Present milk sales in the additional propriate means by which the foregoing than the close of business on the 10th area proposed for consideration at the conclusions may be carried out. The day after publication of this decision in hearing are almost entirely in Platte recommended marketing agreement is the F ederal R e g is t e r . Exceptions should City, for which present population is esti­ not included in this decision because the be filed in quadruplicate. mated to be approximately 900 people. regulatory provisions thereof would be Preliminary statement. The hearing Three Kansas City handlers and two identical with those contained in the on the record of which the proposed handlers from St. Joseph, Missouri, now amended order. marketing agreement and order were sell milk in Platte City. The volume of 1. Add to § 903.51 (a) (2) the follow­ formulated was conducted at Kansas sales claimed by Kansas City handlers ing proviso: “Provided, That for the City, Missouri, on September 7-8, 1955, appeared to be about equal to that months of April 1956 through June 1956, pursuant to notice thereof which was claimed by St. Joseph handlers. In no such rate shall be 4 cents, and for all issued on August 16,1955 (20 F. R. 6052). case does the present volume of sales rep­ other months from the effective date The material issues of the hearing re­ resent any significant proportion of any hereof through August 1956 such rate lated to: handler’s total business. The plants of shall be 5 cents.” (1) Extension of the marketing area; St. Joseph handlers would not qualify as 2. Amend § 903.51 (a) (3) to read as (2) Pool plant qualifiactions; pool plants on the basis of present dis­ follows: (3) Obligations of handlers operating tribution in the area proposed and these nonpool plants; (3) For each month calculate a utili­ handlers would therefore be regulated zation percentage by (i) dividing the net (4) Extension of the surplus disposal under the provisions applicable to oper­ pounds of Class I milk disposed of from area; and ators of nonpool plants discussed else­ all pool plants (except non-Grade A ( 5 ) Location adj ustments to producers where in this decision if the hearing no­ milk disposed of outside the marketing and handlers. tice proposal on marketing area should area and allocated to other source milk), Findings and conclusions. The follow­ be adopted and present sales volumes plus the Class I milk disposed of in the ing findings and conclusions are based continued. marketing area from nonpool plants, all on the evidence received at the hearing It is concluded that the major- part of for the 12-month period ending with the and the record thereof: the area proposed should be included in beginning of the preceding month, into 1. Marketing area. The marketingthe marketing area because of the close the total pounds of producer milk during area should be expanded by the addition association of Kansas City interests with of a portion of Carroll Township, Platte the airport and the development in pro­ such 12-month period, (ii) multiplying County,’Missouri. This addition should gress there. Increased importance of by 100, (iii) adding or subtracting, re­ not, however, include the town of Platte Platte City as a market for milk appears spectively, any amount by which such City. to depend largely upon speculation as to result is greater or less than the com­ The Greater Kansas City marketing the trend and direction of housing de­ parable result as computed for the third area presently includes four townships velopment that may be stimulated by the month preceding, and (iv). rounding the in Platte County, Missouri, that are lo­ airport. It is therefore concluded that Saturday, November 19, 1955 FEDERAL REGISTER 8577 expansion of the marketing area to in­ normally somewhat lower than 50 per­ in the six spring and summer months. clude Platte City should not be made on cent. Certain producers proposed at the The specific months have been changed the basis of this record. The record fails hearing that route operating plants be slightly to conform to changes in the to show that competition between Kan­ defined as those which, among other seasonal pattern of use recognized in sas City and St. Joseph for the present things, have Class T utilizations of 30 other features of the order. While there volume of sales in Platte City has created percent for four spring months, 40 per­ was testimony in the record to the effect any marketing problems. cent for December, January, and Febru­ that credit for shipments should be re­ 2. Pool plant qualifications. Theary, and 45 percent for all other months. stricted to those needed for Class I use, standards which determine the plants Such a definition would appear to meet the matter was hot sufficiently developed that participate in the marketwide pool the particular operations of the Kansas to provide a basis for action. Bulk re­ should be revised. City market. However, a specification ceipts from other plants are included in The Kansas City order presently pro­ of Class I usage of 30 percent in the four the base on which route operating plants vides three standards by which plants spring months and 40 percent in all other percentages are computed. This will approved by health authorities may months will accomplish the same objec­ deter to some extent movements made qualify thgir receipts for inclusion in the tive but with less complication and such without regard to need. marketwide pool of the order: a provision should be adopted. 3. Obligations of nonpool handlers. (1) Route operating plants, which In addition to these requirements with The Kansas City order presently requires qualify by disposing of 15 percent or more respect to total Class I disposition, the that a handler who disposes of Class I of their receipts as Class I milk in the order should continue to require sub­ milk on routes in the marketing area marketing area; stantial Class I disposition in the mar­ from a plant which is approved, but non­ (2) Supply plants, which qualify for keting area as identification with the pool, shall pay into the pool the differ­ current status in September through trade of the area. Seasonal variation of ence between the Class I and Class II February by shipping 30 percent or more this requirement does not appear neces­ values of all milk so disposed of. No of their receipts to route operating pool sary if such variation is provided in the handler has operated in such a manner plants and may retain pool plant status total Class I percentage required. Dis­ as to be subject' to this provision since in March through August following by position of 20 percent of a plant’s re­ its inclusion in the order in 1951. As being a pool plant in each of such earlier' ceipts on routes in the marketing area indicated elsewhere in the decision, un­ months; will provide adequate identification with der the expansion of the marketing area (3) Cooperative plants, for which no the trade of the area. A route operating originally proposed two handlers from plant performance standards apply, but plant having more than 80 percent of its St. Joseph, Missouri, would have been the association operating the plant must business outside the marketing area or subject to this provision if they main­ supply three-fourths or more of its mem­ in other outlets should not be considered tained their present distribution. The ber milk direct to the pool plants of as being an essential part of the market­ proposal to increase requirements for other handlers. ing area supply. pool plant participation makes it more Where the same handler operates more A plant which has.met such pool plant likely that the provision will become than one plant, aggregate performance requirements in any month should con­ effective. While this decision with re­ determines the pool plant status of all tinue to be a pool plant in the following spect to each of these issues would not plants of the multiple plant operation. month. Such a provision will promote cause any handler who maintains present It was proposed that route operating stability by limiting frequent changes distribution and relative receipts and plants should be required to dispose of from pool to nonpool status with conse­ sales volumes to be affected by the pro­ 20 to 25 percent (seasonally varied) of quent uncertainty concerning the extent vision, the record clearly indicates in­ their receipts on routes in the marketing of regulation from one month to the creased probability of such a situation. area and that as a further requirement next. In opposing extension of the market­ total Class I sales, both within and with­ In connection with pool plant determi­ ing area St. Joseph handlers contended out the marketing area, should be not nation when milk is transferred between that the present provisions would place less than 30-45 percent (also varied sea­ approved plants in packaged form credit, them at a prohibitive competitive disad­ sonally) of such receipts. It was further as route sales in the marketing area, vantage with respect to sales in the proposed to delete the present provision should be attributed to the plant at marketing area. These handlers and for supply plants. which the milk is packaged. In the the manager of the cooperative associa­ Additional specification should be in­ Kansas City market the packaging plant tion with which they have arrange­ cluded in the route operating plant normally arranges for the milk supply ments for their milk supply claim that definition. A route operating plant and must carry the reserve milk supply they buy milk from the association on a which confines its distribution to the required for such sales. classified price plan which uses the marketing area need have Class I dispo­ The proposal to delete any provision Kansas City order classification and sition for only 15 percent of its receipts. whereby an independently operated sup­ prices, except for a Class I price adjust­ A plant with such a small proportion of ply plant may qualify as a pool plant ment of 15 cents as compared to the its business as Class I milk is not pri­ should not be adopted. There are pres­ 16-cent location adjustment which marily engaged in the distribution of ently four receiving plants in the Kansas would apply under the present order. fluid milk and accordingly should not be City market. Two handlers each operate The record indicates some , exceptions to considered to be a route operating plant.t two such plants as the principal sources this pricing scheme and indicates that It is concluded that a requirement with of supply for their route operating plants, the lack of systematic audits may result respect to tqtal Class I use should be and these plants are, consequently, in the classified price plan not being added to the present requirement with pooled as parts of multiple plant opera­ fully effective at all times. Nevertheless, respect to Class I sales in the marketing tions which qualify under the percent­ it is clear that it cannot be assumed that area, and that the latter requirement ages applicable to route operating plants. in the Kansas City area a continuing should be increased from 15 to 20 per­ Since no independently operated supply supply of milk of quality suitable for the cent of receipts. plants have operated in the Kansas City day-to-day distribution associated with Typically, a route operating plant has market it was contended that no provi­ route operations will be available under a substantial proportion of its receipts sion for such plants need be retained in all circumstances to a nonpool handler used as Class I milk each month. In the order. Nevertheless, some provision at the Class n price. many markets, all route operating plants should be in the order in the event such The nonpool handler must presently maintain Class I utilizations of greater a plant should enter the market. report to the market administrator his than 50 percent of their receipts from In view of the increased requirements receipts and utilization of milk in order producers, and a provision is included in herein adopted for route operating that his status and pool obligations may many orders specifying that such a plant plants, it is appropriate that the shipping be determined. The payments he makes shall be one which, among other things, requirement -for supply plants be in­ to dairy farmers for milk approved for maintains a Class I utilization each creased from 30 to 50 percent of receipts fluid use are also ascertainable. The month of 50 percent or more of its re­ in the short season and that six-month amount, if any, by which the sum of ceipts of producer milk. In this market, short season compliance be retained as these payments is less than the pool Class I utilization in some plants is a qualification for retention in the pool obligation that would be computed under 8578 PROPOSED RULE MAKING full regulation, represents the maximum liver to country plants receiving the subject to the proposed marketing agree­ payment necessary to prevent any com­ least money in relation to other pro­ ment and order, as hereby proposed to be petitive advantage to the nonpool han­ ducers at the time at which there was further amended. The briefs contained dler. It is concluded that the payment the greatest need for their milk, and vice proposed findings, conclusions, and argu­ required of nonpool handlers should be versa. For these reasons the proposal ments with respect to the provisions of the lesser of the amount so computed or should be denied. the proposed amendments. Every point that presently required. Retention of A handler proposal would substitute covered in the briefs was carefully con­ the present payment provision as a ceil­ air miles for highway miles as the basis sidered along with the evidence in the ing to that determined by comparison of measurement and provide adjustments record in making the findings and reach­ of payments for milk with its. use value only beyond 55 air miles. The purpose ing the conclusions hereinbefore set at order prices will provide adequate of these proposals was to remove one forth. To the extent that the findings protection to the pool. In addition the plant from the area to which adjust­ and conclusions proposed in the briefs nonpool handler should pay administra­ ments apply without affecting the status are inconsistent with the^ findings and tive costs of the order on the same basis of another plant in another part of the conclusions contained herein, the request as pool handlers. Determination of pay­ milkshed. At the first plant the handler to make such findings or to reach such ments in relation to use value will entail currently is paying producers without conclusions is denied on the basis of the complete audits by the market adminis­ deducting the location adjustment. It facts found and stated in connection trator. was testified that competition of the with the conclusions in this recom­ The provisions herein adopted will af­ Topeka market (for which the Class I mended decision. ford necessary protection to the regula­ price is the same as Kansas City) re­ Recommended marketing agreement tory plan and will recognize the pay­ quired payment of this 16-cent premium and amendment to the order. The fol­ ments that nonpool handlers make at this location. By deleting provision lowing order, amending the order, as through choice or for competitive for adjustments, the handler hoped to amended, is recommended as the detailed reasons to dairy farmers supplying milk transfer to the pool the cost of this and appropriate means by which the qualified for fluid use. premium with respect to his Class H milk foregoing conclusions may be carried out. 4. Surplus disposal area. The area at this plant. While location adjust­ The proposed marketing agreement is within which milk and skim milk may be ments to handlers apply equally in all not included in this decision because the moved to nonpool plants for Class II use directions in order to equalize the mini­ regulatory provisions thereof would be should be enlarged. This area is pres­ mum costs that handlers operating dis­ identical with those contained in the ently 150 highway miles from the ap­ tant plants are required to incur in com- order, as amended, and as hereby pro­ proved plant at which the milk is . parison with those who receive milk at posed to be further amended. received (or from which it is diverted). plants in the marketing area, it is not 1. Amend § 913.6 to read as follows: expected that competitive conditions are Handlers proposed that this distance be § 913.6 Greater Kansas City market­ 200 miles in order that certain additional identical in all areas of a milk shed. When competition from other markets ing area. “Greater Kansas City market­ manufacturing plants might be within ing area’’, hereinafter called “marketing the defined area. The record shows the is of a nature to affect the adequacy of the market supply, examination of the area”, means all of the territory in Jack- desirability of measurement of distance son County, Missouri; that part of Clay from a common central point so that a Class I price structure may be warranted. Otherwise, it is to be expected that the County, Missouri, south of Highway 92, common surplus area is available to all beginning at the Platte .County and Clay handlers. For this purpose a distance milk supply of the market will develop in County line, east to the west section line of 250 miles from the City Hall in Kansas 'these areas in which the price proves of section 26 in Washington TbWnship, City, Missouri, is appropriate. most attractive to producers in compari­ north to the north section line of said 5. Location adjustments. No changes son with alternative outlets. Location section 26, east to the Clay County and should be made on the basis of this rec­ adjustments need not and cannot be ad­ Ray County Line; Lee, Waldron, May ord with respect to location adjustments justed to equalize competition which may and Pettis Townships, and that portion to producers or to handlers. arise from other markets. The proposal of Carroll Township lying south of a line The Kansas City order presently pro­ should be denied. extending from the* northeast corner of vides that 16 cents per hundredweight General findings.' (a) Thè proposed Lee Township east to the intersection of may be deducted from the uniform prices marketing agreement and the order, as State Highway 92 and U. S. Highway 71, to be paid producers delivering their amended, and as hereby proposed to be thence along State Highway 92 to Platte milk to plants located from 50 to 70 miles further amended, and all of the terms County and Clay County line, all in from the City Hall in Kansas City, Mis­ and conditions thereof will tend to effec­ Platte County, Missouri; Wyandotte souri. A credit of 16 cents is given tuate the declared policy of the act; County, Kansas; Shawnee and Mission handlers cm milk received at such plants (b) The parity prices of milk as de­ Townships in Johnson County, Kansas; and used as Class I milk; other rates are termined pursuant to section 2 of the and Delaware, Leavenworth, and that provided for plants more than 70 miles act are not reasonable in view of the part of Kickapoo and High Prairie Town­ from the City Hall but the only plants price of feeds, available supplies of feeds ships east of the 95th principal meridian presently affected are in the 16-cent and other economic conditions which in Leavenworth County, Kansas. zone. affect market supply and demand for A producer organization proposed that milk in the marketing area, and the 2. Amend § 913.10 to read as follows: the producer location adjustment apply minimum prices specified in the proposed § 913.10 Pool plant. “Pool plant” only on Class I milk, thus being restricted marketing agreement and the order, as means any approved plant-other than in total amount to the credit received by amended, and as hereby proposed to be that of a producer-handler : the handler at the same plant. Nearly further amended, are such prices as will (a) Which during the current or im­ all the members of this organization reflect the aforesaid factors, insure a mediately preceding delivery period: deliver their milk to a plant in the 55-70 sufficient quantity of pure and whole­ (1) Disposes of as Class I milk on mile zone. The location adjustment to some milk, and be jn the public interest; routes in the marketing area, an amount producers is intended to measure the and equal to 20 percent or more of such advantage the producer receives in being (c) The proposed order, as amended, plant’s total receipts of milk from dairy able to deliver his milk at a point nearer and as hereby proposed to be further farmers qualified to become producers his farm than is the marketing area. amended, will regulate the handling of (as defined in § 913.7) and in bulk from Under the marketwide pooling of the milk in the same manner as and will be other approved plants; and also Greater Kansas City order all producers applicable only to persons in the respec­ (2) During the same delivery period wherever situated share equally in the tive classes of industrial and commercial disposes of, as Class I milk in total an Class I sale of the market. The proposal activity specified in a marketing agree­ amount equal to not less than the ap­ would seek to adjust the prices reflecting ment upon which a hearing has been plicable percentage of such receipts, as this equal sharing by an amount that held. follows: would vary with the Class I utilization Rulings on proposed findings and con­ (i) March through June, 30 percent; of a single plant. Furthermore, the pro­ clusions. Briefs were filed on behalf of (ii) July through February, 40 per­ posal would result in producers who de- producer organizations and handlers cent; / Saturday, November 19, 1955 FEDERAL REGISTER 8579 (3) For the purposes of calculatingginning with Class I milk, receipts of such communications will be available the percentages specified in subpara­ skim milk and butterfat at such nonpool after January 24, 1956, for examination graphs (1) and (2) of this paragraph: plant direct from dairy farmers who the by interested persons at the Docket Sec­ (i) Milk in packaged form transferred market administrator determines con­ tion of the Board, Room 5412, Depart­ from one approved plant to another stitute the regular source of supply for ment of Commerce Building, Washing­ approved plant shall be credited as Class fluid usage of such nonpool plant in ton, D. C. I disposition on routes by the transferor markets supplied by such plant. Part . 40 of the Civil Air Regulations plant and an equal volume shall be ex­ 4. Amend § 913.61 to read as follows: contains the certification and operation cluded from the Class I disposition of rules for scheduled air carriers conduct­ the transferee plant; and § 913.61 Handler operating an ap­ ing interstate operations. Part 41, on (ii) The combined receipts and dis­ proved plant which is not a pool plant. the other hand, contains the regulations position of the multiple plant operation Each handler who operates an approved applicable to scheduled air carriers op­ shall be used in the case of each handler plant which is not a pool plant but from erating outside the continental limits of who disposes of any milk on a route in which Class I milk is disposed of on the United States. However, § 40.1 of the marketing area and also operates routes in the marketing area shall, in Part 40 permits the Administrator to more than one approved plant ; lieu of the payments required by § 913.80 authorize air carriers whose operations (b) Which during any delivery pe­ through § 913.89, pay to the market ad­ are essentially domestic in character to riod of August through January trans­ ministrator on or before the 25th day operate on routes extending .beyond the fers in bulk to a plant described in after the end of the delivery period as continental limits of the United States paragraph (a) of this section an amount follows: in accordance with the provisions of of milk equal to 50 percent or more of (a) For the producer-settlement fund, Part 40 in lieu of the provisions of Part such plant’s receipts of milk from dairy the lesser of the amounts resulting from 41 in order to permit continuity of op­ farmers qualified to become producers the following computations: erating procedures throughout the air (as defined in § 913.7). Any such plant (1) From the value of all skim milk carriers’ systems. which is a pool plant in each of the de­ and butterfat disposed of as Class I milk Currently effective § 40.35 of Part 40 livery periods of August through Janu­ on routes* in the marketing area at the requires air carriers to show that suffi­ ary shall be a pool plant for each of Class I price applicable at the location cient weather reporting services are the following delivery periods of Febru­ of such handler’s plant, deduct the value available en route to insure necessary ary through July regardless of the quan­ of such skim milk and butterfat at the weather reports and forecasts prepared tity of milk then disposed of to other Class II price; or and releasd by the United States Weather pool plants, if a written request for pool (2) Any plus amount remaining after Bureau or by a source approved by the plant status for such six-month period deducting from the value that would Weather Bureau. However, reports pre­ is received from the operator of such have been computed pursuant to § 913.70 pared by the United States Weather plant by the market administrator be­ if such handler had operated a pool plant Bureau or a source approved by the fore February 1* or the gross payments made by such han­ Weather Bureau lire not normally avail-, (c) Which is operated by a coopera­ dler for milk received during the delivery able for areas under the jurisdiction of tive association and 75 percent or more period from dairy farmers whose milk other nations. of the milk delivered during the deliv­ waS approved for fluid use; and Currently effective § 40.406 of Part ery period by producers who are mem­ (b) As his pro rata share of the ex­ 40 prescribes the take-off and landing bers of such association is received at pense of administration hereof, an weather minimum requirements for IFR the pool plants of other handlers. amount equal to that which would have flight. These requirements include pro­ 3. Amend § 913.44 (c) and (d) to readbeen computed pursuant to § 913.89 had visions allowing pilots to “take-a-look” as follows: such handler operated a pool plant. to determine whether conditions at the (c) As Class I milk if transferred or . Filed at Washington, D. C., this 16th airport are at or above prescribed diverted in the form of milk, skim milk day of November 1955. weather minimums and, if so, to continue or cream to a nonpool plant located more to approach and land. Authority to [ s e a l ] R o y W . L e n n a r t s o n , “take-a-look” is limited to airports than 250 miles from the City Hall in Deputy Administrator. Kansas City, Missouri, by the shortest served by ILS and GCA in operative con­ highway distance as determined by the [P. R. Doc. 55-9337; Piled, Nov. 18, 1955; dition or to airports at which certain market administrator, except that (1) 8:53 a. m.] instrument approach procedures are cream so-transferred may be classified commenced when wheather conditions as Class n milk if its utilization as Class above prescribed minimums exist but H milk is established through the opera­ CIVIL. AERONAUTICS BOARD which a later report indicates are below minimum requirements. Part 41, on the tion of another Federal order for an­ [ 14 CFR Part 40 ] other milk marketing area; or (2) cream other hand, prohibits air carriers from so transferred with prior notice" to the W e a t h er R e p o r t in g F a c il it ie s and R e ­ “taking-a-look” only at airports at which market administrator, and With each q u ir e m e n t s C o v e r in g L a n d in g L i m i ­ United States Weather Bureau reports container labeled or tagged with a cer­ t a t io n s O u t s id e C o n t in e n t a l U n it e d indicate below minimum conditions exist. tificate of the transferor that such cream S ta t es At airports outside the United States is sold as “Grade C cream for manufac­ which do not possess a United States turing only”, may be classified as Class NOTICE OP PROPOSED RULE MAKING Weather Bureau reporting service, a II milk, subject to such verification of Pursuant to authority delegated by the pilot may in his discretion “take-a-look.” alternate utilization as the market ad­ Civil Aeronautics Board to the Bureau of If he finds that weather conditions at ministrator may make. Safety Regulation, notice is hereby given the airport are at or above prescribed (d^ As Class I milk, if transferred or that the Bureau will propose to the weather minimums, he may complete the diverted in the form of milk, swim milk Board amendments to Part 40 of the approach and land. or cream to a nonpool plant located not Civil Air Regulations as hereinafter set The inapplicability of § 40.35 to air more than 250 miles from the City Hall forth. carrier operations outside the United m Kansas City, Missouri, by shortest Interested persons may participate in States and the inconsistency between highway distance as .determined by the the making of the proposed rules by sub­ Parts 40 and 41 with respect to “take-a- market administrator, unless the market mitting such written data, views, or look” restrictions apear to have been an administrator is permitted to audit the arguments as they may desire. Com­ oversight. The Bureau proposes, there­ records of receipts and utilization at such munications should be submitted in du­ fore, to recommend to the Board the honpool plant, in which case the classi­ plicate to the Civil Aeronautics Board, amendment of § 40.35 to provide for the fication of all skim milk and butterfat attention Bureau of Safety Regulation, use of weather reports prepared by received at such nonpool plant shall be Washington 25, D. C. In order to in­ sources other than those approved by the aetermined and the skim milk and but- sure their consideration by the Board United States Weather Bureau on routes r „ transferred from the pool plant before taking further action on the pro­ extending beyond the continental limits hall be allocated to the highest use re­ posed rules, communications must be of the United States on which operations naming after subtracting in series be- received by January 20, 1956. Copies of are conducted pursuant to § 40.1. The No. 226------4 8580 PROPOSED RULE MAKING

Bureau proposes that these “other" in lieu thereof the référencé “§ 40.35 with the operating rules of proposed Part sources shall be approved by the Admin­ (a)”. 47 rather than those of current Part 42. istrator. ■ . „ These amendments are proposed un­ This proposal is being circulated as the The Bureau also proposes to amend der the authority of Title VI of the Civil first step in the rule-making process in § 40.406 by prohibiting pilots from “take- Aeronautics Act of 1938, as amended, the hope that it will serve to narrow or a-look” only when the latest United and may be changed in the light of com­ eliminate the areas of substantive dif­ States Weather Bureau report or a re­ ments received in response to this notice ference between interested persons as to port from a source authorized by the of proposed rule making. the adequacy or the desirability of the Weather Bureau indicates the ceiling or (Sec. 205, 52 Stat. 984; 49 U. S. C. 425. Inter­ proposed rules. visibility to be less than the prescribed pret or apply secs. 601-610, 52 Stat. 1007-1012, The Bureau desires that all persons minimum. as amended,* 49 U. S. C. 551-560) who will be affected by the requirements In view of the foregoing, notice is of this proposal be given an opportunity hereby given that it is proposed to Dated at Washington, D. C., November to participate in the consideration of amend Part 40 of the Civil Air Regula­ 10, 1955. these rules and to submit such comment tions : By the Bureau of Safety Regulation. as they may desire not only in the final 1. By amending § 40.35 to read as fol­ [ s e a l ] J o h n M . C h a m b e r l a in , rule-making stage, but throughout the lows: -> Director. entire rule-making process. Draft Re­ § 40.35 Weather reporting facilities. lease No. 55-24 requires that comment be [F. R. Doc. 55-9329; Filed, Nov. 18, 1955; submitted on or before February 15,1956. The air carrier shall show that sufficient 8:51 a. m.] weather reporting services are available If the nature of the comment is such that along the route to insure weather reports a discussion between the Board’s staff and forecasts necessary for the opera­ and interested members of the public tion. Forecasts used to control flight [14 CFR Parts 42, 45, 47 ] would be of constructive assistance in movements shall be prepared from the further development of the proposed weather reports made in accordance with A ir T a x i C ertification and rules, all interested parties will be in­ paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section O p e r a t io n R u l e s " vited to participate in such a discussion as appropriate. n o t ic e o f p r o po se d r u l e m a k in g to be held in Washington, D. C. Notice of the time and place of such a meeting, (a) Except as provided in paragraph Notice is hereby given that the Bureau (b) of this section, weather reports used together with advance documentation, of Safety Regulation is instituting rule- will be circulated to persons who have to control flight movements shall be making proceedings by circulating Civil those prepared by the United States signified their interest prior to February Air Regulations Draft Release No. 55-24 15, 1956. Weather Bureau, or by a source author­ to persons on the Bureau’s current dis­ ized by the Weather Bureau. Since it is intended that the rule as tribution list. Other interested persons finally evolved as a result of the forego­ (b) For operations authorized in ac­ may secure a copy of this draft release cordance with § 40.1 to be conducted out­ ing procedure will be published in its upon request made to the Civil Aero­ entirety as a notice of proposed "rule side the continental limits of the United nautics Board, attention Bureau of States, weather reports used to control making, interested persons who do not Safety Regulation, Washington 25, D. C. care to participate in the rule-making flight movements may be those prepared It has become apparent that a distinct by any source approved by the Admin­ proceedings at this stage will have a difference exists between the operation further opportunity for commenting istrator. of large and small aircraft currently gov­ thereon. 2. By amending § 40.406 (a) to read as erned by regulations in Part 42 of the The foregoing procedure is proposed follows: Civil Air Regulations, and that the reg­ under the authority of sec. 4 of the Ad­ ulations applicable to each should be § 40.406 Take-off and landing ministrative Procedure Act, and Title VI divided into two separate parts. Ac­ of the Civil Aeronautics Act of 1938, as weather minimums; IFR. (a)* Except as cordingly, this draft release proposes to amended. provided in paragraphs (c) and (d) of revise those regulations in current Part this section, irrespective of any clearance (Sec. 205, 52 Stat. 984; 49 U. S. C. 425. In­ 42 which apply to small aircraft and in­ terpret or apply secs. 601-610, 52 Stat. 1007- which may be obtained from air traffic corporate them into a new Part 47. This 1012, as amended; 49 U. S. G. 551-560) control, no airplane shall take off or land new part would govern the certification under IFR when the ceiling or ground and operation of air taxi operators and Dated at Washington, D. C., November visibility reported by a source authorized also the operation of Part 45 commercial 9,1955. in accordance with §40.35 (a) is less than operators who use aircraft of 12,500 By the Bureau of Safety Regulation. pounds or less in their operations. The that approved for the airport when used Bureau will propose an appropriate [s e a l ] J o h n M . C h a m b e r l a in , as a regular airport. amendment to Part 45 to require com­ Director. 3. By amending § 40.406 (b) by delet­ mercial operators using small aircraft to [F. R. Doc. 55-9330; F iled, Nov. 18, 1955; ing the reference “§ 40.35” and inserting conduct their operations in accordance 8 :5 1 a .m .]

NOTICES

Salt Lake Base and",Meridian, Utah T. 12 S., R. 1 E., DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Sec. 9: Lot 2 and SEJ/4; T. 2 S., R. 1 E., Sec. 16: E y2 and SE&SW^; Bureau of Reclamation Sec. 36: NE'14 and E%SE&.. Sec. 21: EVs and NE&NW^; T. 5 S., R. 1 E., C e n t ra l U ta h P r o je c t , U ta h Sec. 28: Lots 1, 2, and 4, and NE^SE1^; Sec. 29: That portion unsurveyed. Sec. 34: NE%SW% and N&SEft. FIRST FORM . RECLAMATION WITHDRAWAL T. 10 S., R. 1 E., T . 13 S., R . 1 E., Sec. 12: SEÎ4SE14; Sec. 3: Lot 1A. D e c e m b e r 17, 1954. Sec. 13: SW%NE%, SE^NW ^, E^SW ^. T. 7 S., R . 2 E., Pursuant to the authority delegated NE 14 SE 14 and W&SEJi. Sec. 4: That portion unsurveyed; by Department Order No. 2515 of April T. 11 S., R . 1 E., Secs. 5 and 8 : Unsurveyed; 7, 1949, I hereby withdraw the follow- Sec. 10: L ots 7, 8 a n d 9; Secs. 9, 10, 13, and 14: Those portions un­ Sec. 15: Lots 1 to 4,. inclusive, W%NE% surveyed; ing-described lands from public entry, a n d EÎ4 NWÎ4 ; Sec. 15: Lot 1 and that portion unsur­ under the first form of withdrawal, as Sec. 22: Lots 1 to 4, inclusive, SW%NE%, veyed; provided by Section 3 of the Act of June SE%NW%, E&SWÎ4 and W&SE&j Secs. 16, 17 and 20 to 24 inclusive, unsur­ 17, 1902 (32 Stat. 388): Sec. 28: S&NEV4 and Ny2SE%. veyed; Saturday, November 19, 1955 FEDERAL REGISTER 8581 Sec. 25: Lots 2 and 3, SKKSWft and that The above areas contain approxi­ 4. No application for the lands de­ portion unsurveyed; mately 30,566.39 acres. scribed in paragraph 3 may be allowed Sec. 26: Lots 1 to 4 inclusive, and th at por­ tion unsurveyed; F loyd E. Dom iny, under the homestead, desert land, small Sec. 27: Lot 1 and that portion unsur­ Acting Assistant Commissioner. tract, or any other nonmineral public- veyed; land law unless the lands have already Secs. 28 and 29: Unsurveyed; [68235] been classified as valuable or suitable for Sec. 32: L ots 5 to 8 inclusive, and that November 14, 1955. such type of application, or shall be so portion unsurveyed; classified upon the consideration of an Secs. 33 and 34: Those portions unsurveyed. I concur. The records of the Bureau of Land Management will be noted application. Any application that is filed T. 8 S., R. 2 E., Will be considered on its merits. The Séc. 5: That portion unsurveyed. accordingly. T. 9 S., R. 2 E., E dward W oozley, lands will not be subject to occupancy Sec. 27: Wi/2SW%; Director, or disposition until they have been See. 28* 9 Bureau of Land Management. classified. Sec. 31: N % Sy2SE% a n d S%S%S%SiS&: 5. Subject to any existing valid rights Sec. 32: NE%NE%, S&NE&. EftSW ft and [P. R. Doc. 55-9268; Piled, Nov. 18, 1955; and the requirements of applicable law, an d SEÌ^; 8:45 a. m.] the lands described in paragraphs 3, are Sec. 33; hereby opened to filing of applications, Sec. 34: wy 2W%. selections, and locations in accordance T. 10 S., R. 2 E., With the following: Sec. 5: Lots 1 to 4 inclusive, and Central Valley P roject, California S % i a. Applications and selections under Sec. 6 : Lots 5 to 10 inclusive, SE^NEy., ORDER OF REVOCATION the nonmineral public land laws may SE^NW’A and E%SE %; be presented to the Manager mentioned Sec. 7: Lots 5 to 10 inclusive, E%NE^ and O ctober 28, 1955. below, beginning on the date of this NEVkSE%; Pursuant to the authority delegated by order. Such applications and selections Sec. 8: Ny2 a n d SW*4. Departmental Order No. 2765 of July 30, will be considered as filed on the hour T. 7 S., R . 3 E., 1954 (19 F. R. 5004), I hereby revoke and respective dates shown for the vari­ Secs. 18, 19, and 30: Those portions unsur­ Departmental Orders of March 11, 1936, veyed. ous classes enumerated in the following T. 9 S., R. 3 E., and July 7, 1936, insofar as said orders paragraphs: Sec. 15: Ey2; affect the following described lands; (1) Applications by persons having Sec. 16. provided, however, that such revocation prior existing valid settlement rights, T. 5 S., R. 4 1 , shall not affect the withdrawal of any preference rights conferred by existing Sec. 3: NE%SE%. other lands by said orders or affect any laws, or equitable claims subject to al­ T. 8 S., R. 4 E., other orders withdrawing or reserving lowance and confirmation will be ad­ Sec. 35: SE^NW ^. the lands hereinafter described; T. 9 S., R. 4 E., judicated on the facts presented in Sec. 9: Lots 1 and 2, NW ^NE^, NW14, Mount Diablo Meridian, California support of each claim or right. All ap­ plications presented by persons other N^NE^SW^, SW^NE^SW >4 a n d T. 32 N., R. 5 W., NW»4SW%. Sec. 14. Lot 1, SW14NE14, W%SWi4SE»4 than those referred to in this paragraph T. 6 E., R. 5 E., NE14, wy2NWi4NEy4, wy2NE%NW»^ will be subject to the applications and Sec. 7: Lots 1 to 4 Inclusive, and E%E%; NE14, NWy4SE%NWy4NEV4, S&SE& claims mentioned in this paragraph. Secs. 8 a n d 17; NW%NE%, NE^NWy4, Ny2N%SE}4 (2) All valid applications under the Sec. 18: Lots 1 to 4 inclusive, and E%E%. Nwy4, swy4Nw%, wy2sw&, n e ]4Sw »4. Homestead and Desert Land Laws by T. 8 S., R. 5 E., Nwy4SEi/4, swy4NEy4SEy4, swy4SEy4 qualified veterans of World War II or Sec. 16: E ^E ^ and Wy2Wy2; n e %s e ]4, s ^ n w ^ n e ^ s e ^ , Nwy4 of the Korean Conflict, and by others Sec. 17: NE*4 and S y2; Nwy4NEy4SEy4.. Sec. 18: Lot 3, E^SW ^ and S^SE ^; entitled to preference rights under the Sec. 19: L ot 4, Ny2NE%, SW^NE^, E y2 The above areas aggregate 369.84 act of September 27, 1944 (58 Stat. 747; Wy2, NW&SE^ and Sy2S E ^ ; acres. 43 U. S. C. 279-284 as amended), pre­ Sec. 20: N y2i SW&, W ^NE^SE^ and W y2 S. W . Crosthwait, sented prior to 10:00 a. m. on December SE%; Acting Commissioner. 20, 1955, will be considered as simulta­ Sec. 2 1 : Ny2NEi/4, SE»4NE^, NW ^NW ^, neously filed at that hour. Rights un­ w^sw^Nwy,, sy2NE»/4swiA, Ey2sw ^ [1578415] der such preference right applications SW%, SE&SW^ and SE^; Sec. 29: SW&SW^. N ovember 14,1955. filed after that hour and before 10:00 T. 9 S., R. 5 1 , 1. I concur. The records of the Bu­ a. m. on March 20,1956, will be governed Sec. 5: Lots 1 to 4 inclusive, S%Ny, and reau of Land Management will be noted by the time of filing. sy2; accordingly. (3) All valid applications and selec­ T. 2 S„ R. 6 E„ 2. Portions of the lands have been tions under the nonmineral public land Sec. 30: Lot 4 and SE&SW1^; classified and opened to application laws, other than those coming under Sec. 32: Sy2NEÎ4, SE&NW^ and NW& under the Small Tract Act of June 1,1938 paragraphs (1 ) and (2) above, presented SE 14. prior to 10:00 a. m. on March 20, 1956, T. 3 S., R. 21 E., (52 Stat. 609; 43 U. S. C. 682a) as Sec. 23: N E ^ S W 1^; amended. Additional lands are deemed will be considered as simultaneously Sec. 24: Ny2SW»4 and SE^SW ^; suitable for such classification and will filed at that hour. Rights under such Sec. 25: N W ^ N W ^ , Sy2NW% and SW%; be so classified by an order of an author­ applications and selections .filed after Sec. 27:. Ny2NE»4 , S E ^ N E ft, N W & , ized officer of the Bureau of Land that hour will be governed by the time SW14 a n d SE 14 SE 1,4; Management. of filing. Sec. 33: L ots 1 a n d 2, NE% and Ny2S E ^ ; b. The lands will be open to location Sec. 34: Lot 4 and NW ^NW ii. 3. The following-described lands are under the United States mining laws, T. 4 S., R. 21 E., located near Buckeye and Redding, beginning 10:00 a. m., on March 20,1956. Sec. 3: SE^NW ^ and NW^SW^; Shasta County, California. A paved road Persons claiming veteran’s preference Sec. 4: L ots 2 a n d 3, a n d S W & S E ^ . passes near the lands and other roads T.4S..R. iw„ serve them. The topography is rough rights under Paragraph a (2) above must Sec. 2 1 : L ot 3, Sy2NE% and sy2; and adverse to small tract development, enclose with their applications proper Sec. 27: L ots 1 to 4 inclusive, a n d Ey2S W ^ . and many are covered by mining claims: evidence of military or naval service, T- 5 S., R. 1 w ., preferably a complete photostatic copy Sec. 24: L ots 2 a n d 4. Mount Diablo Meridian of the certificate of honorable discharge. T- 10 S., R. 1 w ., T. 32 N., R. 5 W., Persons claiming preference rights based Sec. 35: S%S%';- Sec. 14, sy2SE14NW1/4SE14, Ey2NE%NWy4 upon valid settlement, statutory prefer­ Sec. 36 : L ots 1 to 16 inclusive. SE14, W y2 N W14 NE 1,4 SE 1,4, SE14NW14 ence, or equitable claims must enclose T- H S., R. 1 w ., NE14SE14, SW14NE14SE14, SW14SE14 properly corroborated statements in Sec. l : L ots 3 and 4, sy2NWi4, SWt4 and NE *4 SE y4, W i/2 SE 14 NW % NE y4. SE14 support of their applications, setting SWÎ4SEÎ4* SEy4NW%NEy4, Ey2swi4NEy4, se& forth all facts relevant to their claims. Sec. 12: Ny2NEi4, SW ^NE^, Ny2NW^ NW&SW&NEft, W^SW^SE^NE^. Detailed rules and regulations governing and SE^NW ^. The tracts described contains 65 acres. applications which may be filed pursuant 8582 NOTICES

to this notice can be found in Title 43 of (Secretary’s Order No. 2509, as amended; 17 factory production workers for normal labor the Code of Federal Regulations. F. R. 6793) turnover purposes (men’s cotton work pants, Inquiries regarding the lands shall be ■etc:). [ se a l ] C onrad L . W ir t h , Shane M anufacturing Co., Inc., 2015 West addressed to the Manager, Land Office, ^ Director. Bureau of Land Management, Sacra-« Maryland Street, Evansville, Ind., effective [F. R. E>oc. 55-9321; Filed, Nov. 18, 1955; 11-16—55 to 11-15—56; 10 percent of the total mento, California. 8:49 a. in.] number of factory production workers for E dw ard W o o z l e y , normal labor turnover purposes (cotton work clothes). Director, Steiner-Lobman Dry Goods Co., 230 Com­ Bureau of Land Management. DEPARTMENT OF IABOR merce Street, Montgomery, Ala., effective [F. R. Doc. 55-9307; Filed, Nov. 18, 1955; Wage and Hour Division 11-2-55 to 11-1-56; 5 learners for normal 8:46 a. m.] labor turnover purposes (men’s and boys’ L earner E m p l o y m e n t C ertificates bib overalls, dungarees, work pants).

is s u a n c e to v a rio u s in d u s t r ie s Glove Industry, Learner Regulations Notice is hereby given that pursuant (29 CFR 522.60 to 522.65, as amended B e l l e F o u r c h e P r o je c t , S o u t h D akota to section 14 of theFair Labor Standards April 19, 1955, 20 F. R. 2304).' ORDER OF REVOCATION Act of 1938, as amended (52 Stat. 1068, Newton Glove M anufacturing Co., Newton, N. C., effective 11-21-55 to 11-20-56; 10 per­ Correction as amended; 29 U. S. C. and Sup. 214) and Part 522 of the regulations issued cent of the total number of machine stitchers In F. R. Document 55-8570, appearing for normal labor turnover purposes (cotton thereunder (29 CFR Part 522), special work gloves). in the issue for Tuesday, October 25, certificates authorizing the employment 1955, on page 8020, make the following of learners at hourly wage rates lower Hosiery Industry Learner Regulations change: Line 3 of the land description than the minimum wage rates applicable (29 CFR 522.40 to 522.43, as amended for Black Hill Meridian, South Dakota, under section 6 of the act have been April 19, 1955, 20 F. R. 2304). should read “Sec. 12, W1/2NE1/4, NW ^.” issued to the firms listed below. The Villa' Rica Hosiery Mills, Villa Rica, Ga„ employment of learners under these cer­ effective 11—18—55 to 11—17—56; 5 percent, of tificates is limited to the terms and the total number of factory • production conditions therein contained and is sub­ workers for normal labor turnover purposes National Park Service ject to the provisions of Part 522. The (seamless). [Order 14, Amdt. 3] effective and expiration dates, occupa­ Independent Telephone Industry tions, wage rates, number or proportion Learner Regulations (29 CFR 522.70 to R e g io n a l D ir e c t o r of learners and learning periods for cer­ 522.74, as amended April 19, 1955, 20 DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY WITH RESPECT tificates issued under general learner F. R. 2304). * - v TO APPEAL regulations (§§ 522.1 to 522.12) are as Hooper Telephone CoM Hooper, Nebr., ef­ indicated below; conditions provided in fective 11-7-55 to 11-6-56. N o v em ber 1,1955. certificates issued under special industry Section 3 of Order No. 14, issued De­ regulations are as established in these Regulations Applicable to the Employ­ cember 1, 1954 (19 F. R. 8824), is regulations. ment of Learners (29 CFR 522.1 to 522.12, amended to read as follows: Apparel Industry Learner Regulations as amended February 28, 1955, 20 F, R. (29 CFR 522.20 to 522.24, as amended 645). S e c . 3. Appeal. Except in matters re­ lating to contracts for construction, sup­ April 19, 1955, 20 F. R. 2304). Nali’i Fashions, Ltd., Pier 7, Honolulu, plies, or services, any party aggrieved by Ahoskie Manufacturing Co., Sunset Drive, Hawaii; effective 11-7-55 to 11-6-56; 2 learn­ Ahoskie, N. C., effective 10-31-55 to 2-29-56; ers for normal labor turnover purposes in any action or decision of a Regional the occupation of sewing machine operating, Director or the Superintendent, National 70 learners for plant expansion purposes (children’s outerwear). for 480 hours at 70 cents per hour for the Capital Parks, ghall have a right of ap­ first 320 hours of employment and 72 y2 Benjamin & Johnes, Inc., 413 South Clin­ cents per hour for the remaining 160 hours peal to the Director. Any such appeal ton Avenue,' Dunn, N. C., effective 11-5—55 shall be in writing and shall be sub­ (children’s outer play clothes and sports­ to 11-4-56; 10 learners for normal labor w e a r). mitted to the Director within 30 days turnover purposes (foundation garments). after receipt by the aggrieved party of Duquesne Manufacturing Co., 852 Stanton Regulations Applicable to the Employ­ notice of the action taken or decision Avenue, New Kensington, Pa., effective 11- ment of Student-Workers (29 CFR 527.1 made by the Regional Director or the 15-55 to 11-14-56; 10 learners for normal to 527.9, October 14, 1955, 20 F. R. 7737) Superintendent, National Capital Parks, labor turnover purposes (cotton dresses, as the case may be. brunch coats, etc.).' Atlantic Union College, Main Street, South Honea Path Shirt Co., Simpsonville, S. C., Lancaster, Mass., effective 10-31-55 to 8-31- (Secretary’s Order No. 2640; 39 Stat. 535; effective 11—1—55 to 10-31-56; 10 percent of 56; 15 learners in the print shop industry in 16 U. S. C., 1952 ed., sec. 2.) the total number of factory production the occupations of compositor, pressman, workers for normal labor turnover purposes bindery worker and related skilled and semi­ [ s e a l ] C onrad L . W ir t h , (men’s sport shirts). skilled occupations for 500 hours at 65 cents Director. Kentucky Pants Co., 117 North Race an hour and 500 hours at 70 cents an hour; Street, (Glasgow, Ky., effective 11-15-55 to 20 learners in bookbindery industry in occu­ [F. R. Doc. 55-9320; Filed, Nov. 18, 1955; 11-14-56; 10 percent of the .total number pations of bookbinder, bindery worker and 8:49 a. m.] of factory production workers for normal related skilled and semiskilled occupations labor turnover purposes (work pants). for 360 hours at 65 cents an hour ancj 300 hours at 70 cents an hour. Monroe Trouser Manufacturing Co., Inc., Newbury Park Academy, Newbury Park, Smithville, Miss., effective 11-1-55 to 10-31- [O rder 21] Calif., effective 10-26-55 to 8-31-56; 12 56; 10 percent of the total number of fac­ learners in the broom shop in the occupa­ tory production workers for normal labor A s s is t a n t D ir e c t o r s e t a l. tions of broom maker, stitcher, sorter winder, turnover purposes (men’s and boys’ handle painter and related skilled and semi­ tro u s e rs ). DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY WITH skilled occupations for 200 hours at 65 cents RESPECT TO CONTRACTS Newport News Children’s Dress Co., 824 an hour and 200 hours at 70 cents an hour. South 39th Street, Newport News, Va., effec­ N o v em ber 1, 1955. tive 11-17-55 to 11-16—56; 10 percent of the Each certificate has been issued upon The Assistant Directors, and officers total number of factory production workers the employer’s representation that em­ for normal labor turnover purposes (chil­ ployment of learners at subminimum designated by them to serve as Acting dren’s and girls’ dresses and play suits). Assistant Directors in their absence, may rates is necessary in order to prevent J. H. Rutter-Rex Manufacturing Co., Inc., curtailment of opportunities for em­ enter into contracts, irrespective of the Franklinton, La., effective 11-15-55 to amount involved, for construction, sup­ 11-14-56; 10 percent of the total number of ployment, and that experienced workers factory production workers for normal labor for the learner occupations are not avail­ plies, or services, in conformity with able. The certificates may be canceled applicable regulations and statutory re­ turnover purposes (cotton work pants). Salant and Salant, Inc., South First Street,* in the manner provided in the regula­ quirements and subject to the avail­ Union City, Tenn.-, effective 11-13-55 to tions and as indicated in the certificates. ability of appropriations. 11-12-56; 10 percent of the total number of Any person aggrieved by the issuance Saturday, November 19, 1955 FEDERAL REGISTER 8583 of any of these certificates may seek a Electric Light and Power Company, for resale (Applicant to Warren Petro­ review or reconsideration thereof within Docket No. G-2320. leum Corporation to Lone Star Gas Com­ fifteen days after publication of this Take notice that Lateral Gas Pipeline pany or-El Paso Natural Gas Company) notice in the F ederal R e g is t e r pursuant Company (Lateral), and Iowa Electric as indicated in the following tabulation: to the provisions of Part 522. Light and Power Company (Ipwa Elec­ Docket No.; Purchaser and Sale Date; tric) , Applicants, Iowa corporations with Field; County and State Signed at Washington, D. C., this 10th their principal place of business at Cedar day of November 1955. G-5795; Lone Star Gas Company (5-26- Rapids, Iowa, filed on April 22, 1955, a 51);. Golden Trend; Garvin, Okla. M il t o n B r o o k e , joint petition to amend the Commis­ G-5796; Lone Star Gas Company (5-26- Authorized Representative sion’s Order issued on July 12,1954, issu­ 51); Golden Trend; Garvin, Okla. of the Administrator. ing a certificate of public convenience G-5799; Lone Star Gas Company (6-29- and necessity which authorized Lateral 49); Southwest Maysville; Garvin, Okla. [P. R. Doc. 55-9308; Piled, Nov. 18, 1955; G-5800; Lone Star Gas Company (6-29— 8:46 a. m.] to construct and operate certain fa­ 49); Southwest Maysville; Garvin, Okla. cilities. G-5833; El Paso Natural Gas Company (3- Applicants, by said joint petition, seeks 13-53); Skaggs area, Warren-McKee Pool; FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION authorization which would authorize Lee, N. Mex. Lateral to construct and operate a town G—5834; El Paso Natural Gas Company (3— [Docket No. E-6646] border station near the City of Villisca, 13-53); Skaggs area, Warren-McKee Pool; C a l ifo r n ia E l e c t r ic P o w e r C o . Iowa, for the purpose of delivering nat­ Lee, N. Mex. ural gas to Iowa Electric for local dis­ G-5837; Lone Star Gas Company (12-13- NOTICE OF ORDER AUTHORIZING ISSUANCE 48); Southwest Maysville; Garvins Okla. OF PROMISSORY NOTES tribution by it in the aforementioned G-5838; Lone Star Gas Company (12-13- city, subject to the jurisdiction of the 48); Southwest Maysville; Garvin, Okla. N o v em ber 15,1955. Commission and as more fully repre­ G-5839; Lone Star Gas Company (10-20- Notice is hereby given that on No­ sented in the joint petition which is on 44); Graham Field; Carter, Okla. vember 2, 1955, the Federal Power Com­ file with the Commission and open for G-5840; Lone Star Gas Company (10-20- mission issued its order adopted Novem­ public inspection. 44); Graham Field; Carter, Okla. ber 2, 1955, authorizing issuance of Take further notice that, pursuant to G-5857; Lone Star Gas Company (5-26- promissory notes in the above-entitled the authority contained in and subject 51); Golden Trend; Garvin, Okla. matter. to the jurisdiction conferred upon the G—5858; Lone Star Gas Company (5-26— Federal Power Commission by sections 7 51); Golden Trend; Garvin, Okla. [seal] L e o n M . F u q u a y , G-5859; Lone Star Gas Company (12-12- Secretary. and 15 of the Natural Gas Act, and the 51); Golden Trend; Garvin, Okla. Commission’s rúíes of practice and pro­ G-5860; Lone Star Gas Company (12-12- [P. R. Doc. 55-9309; Piled, Nov. 18, 1955; cedure, a hearing will be held on De­ 51); Golden Trend; Garvin, Okla. 8:47 a. m.] cember 8, 1955r at 9:30 a. m., e. s. t., in G—5861; Lone Star Gas Company (12-12- a hearing room of the Federal Power 51); Golden Trend; Garvin, Okla. Commission, 441 G. Street NW., Wash­ G-5862; Lone Star Gas Company (12-12- [Docket No. E-6647] 51); Golden Trend; Garvin, Okla. ington, D. C., concerning the matters G-5863; Lone Star Gas Company (12-12- F l o r id a P o w e r C o r p . involved in and the issues presented by 51); Golden Trend; Garvin, Okla. such application: Provided, however, G-5864; Lone Star Gas Company (12-12- NOTICE OF ORDER AUTHORIZING ISSUANCE That the Commission may, after a non- 51); Golden Trend; Garvin, Okla. OF PROMISSORY NOTE contested hearing, dispose of the pro­ G-5865; Lone Star Gas Company (12-12- 51); Golden Trend; Garvin, Okla. N o v em ber 15, 1955. ceedings pursuant to the provisions of section 1.30 (c) (1) or (c) (2) of the G—5866; Lone Star Gas Company (12-12- Notice is hereby given that on No­ Commission’s rules of practice and pro­ 51); Golden Trend; Garvin, Okla. vember 3,1955, the Federal Power Com­ G-5867; Lone Star Gas Company (12-26- mission issued its order adopted No­ cedure. 51); Golden Trend; Garvin, Okla. vember 2, 1955, authorizing issuance of Under the proceddre herein provided G-5868; Lone Star Gas Company (12-26- promissory notes in the above-entitled for, unless otherwise advised, it will be 51) ; Golden Trend; Garvin, Okla. unnecessary for Applicants to appear or G-5875; Lone Star Gas Company (8-11- _ matter. be represented at the hearing. 52) ; Golden Trend; Garvin, Okla. [ seal] L e o n M . F u q u a y * G-5876; Lone Star Gas Company (8-11- Secretary. [ se a l] L e o n M . F u q u a y , 52); Golden Trend; Garvin, Okla. Secretary. G-5877; Lone Star Gas Company (8-11- [F. R. Doc. 55-9310; Filed, Nov. 18, 1955; P. R. Doc. 55-9312; Piled, Nov. 18, 1955; 52); Golden Trend; Garvin, Okla. 8:47 a. m'.] 8:47 a. m.] G-5878; Lone Star Gas Company (8-11- 52); Golden Trend; Garvin, Dkla. G-5879; Lone Star Gas Company (10-1- [Project No. 1990] 55); Golden Trend; Garvin, Okla. G—5880; Lone Star Gas Company (10-1- F r a n c is N . D l o u h y [Docket No. G-5795 etc.] 55); Golden Trend; Garvin, Okla. NOTICE OF ORDER ISSUING PRELIMINARY C o n t in e n t a l O il C o . G-5881; Lone Star Gas Company (11—3— 52); Golden Trend; Garvin, Okla. PERMIT n o t ic e o f applications and date o f G-5882; Lone Star Gas Company (11-3— N ov em ber 15,1955. HEARING 52); Golden Trend; Garvin, Okla. <3-5883; Lone Star Gas Company (12-11- Notice is hereby given that on Novem­ N o v em ber 15,1955. : 52) ; Golden Trend; Garvin, Okla. ber 9, 1955, the Federal Power Commis­ In the matters of Continental Oil Co., 0-6884; Lone Star Gas Company (12-11- sion issued its order adopted November Docket Nos. G-5795, G-5796, G-5799, 52); Golden Trend; Garvin, Okla. 2, 1955, issuing preliminary permit in G-5800, G-5833, G-5834, G-5837 to G-6337; El Paso Natural Gas Company the above-entitled matter. G—5840, incl., G-5857 to G-5868, incl., (3-13-53); Monument Field; Lea, N. Mex. [seal] L e o n M . F u q u a y , G-5875 to G-5884, incl., G-6337. These related matters should be heard Secretary. Take notice'that .there have been filed on a consolidated record and disposed of [F. R. Doc. 55-9311; Piled, Nov. 18,' 1955; with the Federal Power Commission ap­ as promptly as possible under the ap­ 8:47 a. m.] plications by Continental Oil Company plicable rules and regulations and to (Applicant), for certificates of public that end: convenience and necessity pursuant to Take further notice that, pursuant to [Docket Nos. G-2318, G-2320] section 7 of the Natural Gas Act au­ the authority contained in and subject thorizing service as hereinafter de­ to the jurisdiction conferred upon the Lateral G as P i p e l i n e Co. and I o w a scribed, subject to the jurisdiction of the Federal Power Commission by sections 7 E le c tr ic L ig h t and P o w e r C o . Commission, all as more fully repre­ and 15 of the Natural Gas Act, and the NOTICE OF DATE OF HEARING sented in the applications which are on Commission’s rules of practice and pro­ file with the Commission and open for cedure, a hearing will be held on De­ N o v em ber 15, 1955. public inspection. cember 19, 1955, at 9:45 a. m., e. s. t., in In the matters of Lateral Gas Pipe- Applicant produces natural gas and a hearing room of the Federal Power nne Compahy, Docket No. G-2318; Iowa sells natural gas in interstate commerce Commission, 441 G Street NW., Wash- 8584 NOTICES ington, D. C., concerning the matters of Montana-Wyoming as of June 30, the applicable rules and regulations and involved in and the issues presented by 1955, was $9,924,644. The depreciation to that end: such applications: Provided, however, reserves accrued at 4 percent annually Take further notice that, pursuant to That the Commission may, after a non- against this plant is $1,733,339 making a the authority contained in and subject contested hearing, dispose of the pro­ net investment of $8,191,305. to the jurisdiction conferred upon the ceedings pursuant to the provisions of This matter is one that should be dis­ Federal Power Commission by sections section 1.30 (c) (1) or (c) (2) of the posed of as promptly as possible under 7 and 15 of the Natural Gas Act, and Commission’s rules of practice and pro­ the applicable rules and regulations and the Commission’s rules of practice and cedure. Under' the procedure herein to that end: procedure, a hearing will be held on provided for, unless otherwise advised, Take further notice that, pursuant to December 20, 1955, at 9:30 a. m., e. s. t., it will be unnecessary for Applicants to the authority contained in and subject in a hearing room of the Federal Power appear to be represented at the hearing. to the jurisdiction conferred upon the Commission, 441 G Street NW., Wash­ Protests or petitions to intervene may Federal Power Commission by sections 7 ington, D. C., concerning the matters be filed with the Federal Power Commis­ and 15 of the Natural Gas Act, and the involved in and the issues presented by sion, Washington 25, D. C., in accord­ Commission’s rules of practice and pro­ such application : Provided, however, ance with the rules of practice and pro­ cedure, a hearing will be held on De­ That the Commission may, after a non- cedure (18 CFR 1.8 or 1.10) on or before cember 16, 1955, at 9:30 a. ir., e. s. t., contested hearing, dispose of the pro­ December 5, 1955. Failure of any party in a hearing room of the Federal Power ceedings pursuant to the provisions of to appear at and participate in the hear­ Commission, 441 G Street NW., Wash­ section 1.30 (ç) (1) or (c) (2) of the ing shall be construed as waiver of and ington, D. C., concerning the matters in­ Commission’s rules of practice and pro­ concurrence in omission herein of the volved in and the ■ issues presented by cedure. Under the procedure herein intermediate decision procedure in cases such application: Provided, however, provided for, unless otherwise advised, where a request therefor is. made. That the Commission may, after a non- it will be unnecessary for Applicant to contested hearing, dispose of the pro­ appear or be represented at the hearing. [ s e a l ! L e o n M . F u q u a y , ceedings pursuant to the provisions of Protests or petitions to intervene may Secretary. section 1.30 (c) (1) of the Commission’s be filed with the Federal Power Com­ [P. R. Doc. 55-9313; Piled, Nov. 18, 1955; rules of practice and procedure. mission, Washington 25, D. C., in accord­ 8:47 a .m .] Protests or petitions to intervene may ance with the rules of practice and pro­ be filed with the Federal Power Commis­ cedure (18 CFR 1.8 or 1.10) on or before sion, Washington 25, D. C., in accord­ December 5, 1955. Failure of any party ance with rules of practice and pro­ to appear at and participate in the hear­ [Docket No. G-9305] cedure (18 CFR 1.8 or 1.10) on or before ing shall be construed as waiver of and M o n ta n a -D akota U t i l it ie s C o . December 1, 1955. Failure of any party concurrence in omission herein of the to appear at and participate in the hear­ intermediate decision procedure in cases NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND DATE ing shall be construed as waiver of and where a request therefor is made. OF HEARING concurrence iii omission herein of the [ s e a l ] L e o n M. F u q u a y , N o v em ber 15,1955. intermediate decision procedure in cases Secretary. Take notice that the Montana-Dakota where a request therefor is made. Un­ der the procedure herein provided for, [F. R. Doc. 55-9315; F iled, Nov. 18, 1955; Utilities Company, Applicant, a Dela­ 8:48 a. m.] ware corporation whose address is 831 unless otherwise advised, it will be un­ Second Avenue South, Minneapolis 2, necessary for Applicant to appear or be Minnesota, filed on September 7, 1955, represented at the hearing. an application for a certificate of public [ se a l ] L e o n M . F uqtjay, [Docket No. G-9438] convenience and necessity to acquire on Secretary. December 31,1955, all of the facilities of J. R o b er t H o r n e r the Montana-Wyoming Gas Pipe Line [F. R. Doc. 55-9314; Filed, Nov. 18, 1955; NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND DATE OF 8:48 a. m.] Company, which facilities are now leased HEARING and operated by Applicant under the Commission’s jurisdiction. Supplement N o v em ber 15, 1955. to the application was filed on September Take notice that J. Robert Horner 9,1955. [Docket No. G—9400] (Applicant), an individual whose ad­ The facilities proposed to be acquired V ic t o r H a le and G ro ver L o w e dress is P. O. Box 225, Clarksburg, West by Applicant included: Virginia, filed ah application on October (1) Approximately 340 miles of 12%- n o t ic e o f application and date o f 5, 1955, for a certificate of public con­ inch natural gas transmission line ex­ HEARING venience and necessity, pursuant to tending north and east from Worland section 7 of the Natural Gas Act, au­ Field, Washkie County, Wyoming, to a N o v em ber 15, 1955. thorizing Applicant to render service as connection with Applicant’s system at Take notice that Victor Hale and hereinafter described, subject to the ju­ its Cabin Creek compressor station in Grover Lowe, hereinafter referred to as risdiction of the Commission, all as more Fallon County, Montana, together with Applicant, a partnership whose address fully represented in the application the Worland Compressor Station, dehy­ is Prestonsburg, Kentucky, filed an ap­ which is on file with the Commission and dration and sulphur removal plant in the plication on September 26, 1955, for a open for public inspection. Worland Field. certificate of public convenience and Applicant proposes to sell natural gas (2) The 880 horsepower compressor necessity, pursuant to section 7 of the produced from the Marple, Reger and units added to the Worland Compressor Natural Gas Act, authorizing Applicant Rinehart Leases, Warren District, Up­ Station after 1949. to render service as hereinafter de­ shur .pounty, West Virginia, to E q u ita b le (3) A 2,640 horsepower compressor scribed, subject to the jurisdiction of the Gas Company at 20 cents per Mcf, for station and appurtenant facilities lo­ Commission, all as more fully repre­ transportation in interstate commerce cated near Hardin, Montana, along the sented in the application which is on for resale. above-mentioned Wörland-Cabin Creek file with the Commission and open for This matter is one that should be dis­ 12 inch line. public inspection. posed of as promptly as possible under Applicant has simultaneously applied Applicant proposes to sell natural gas the applicable rules and regulations and to the Commission under section 204 (a) produced from the Willard Prater et al. to that end: of the Federal Power Act, at Docket No. Lease, Middle Creek, Floyd County, Ken­ Take further notice that, pursuant to E-6643 for authority to issue common tucky, to Kentucky West Virginia Gas the authority contained in and subject stock and assume first mortgage bonds Company at 15 cents per Mcf for trans­ to the jurisdiction conferred upon the for the purpose of acquiring the prop­ portation in interstate commerce for Federal Power Commission by sections erty of Montana-Wyoming. resale. 7 and 15 of the Natural Gas Act, and the The original cost of the facilities in­ This matter is one that should be dis­ Commission’s rules of practice and pro­ volved herein as recorded on the books posed of as promptly as possible under cedure, a hearing will be held on De- Saturday, November 19, 1955 FEDERAL REGISTER 8585 cember 20, 1955, at 9:35 a. m., e. s. t., in tion 302.14 of the Procedural Regula­ the matters of fact or of law which he a hearing room of the Federal Power tions under Title I of the Civil Aeronau­ desires to advance. Any person filing Commission, 441 G Street NW., Wash­ tics Act, as amended. such a statement may participate in the ington, D. C., concerning the matters in­ Dated at Washington, D. C., Novem­ hearing in accordance with section volved in and the issues presented by ber 15, 1955. 302.14 of the Board’s Rules of Practice such application: Provided, however, in Economic Proceedings. That the Commission may, after a non- [ s e a l ] F r a n c is W . B r o w n , contested hearing, dispose of the pro­ Chief Examiner. Dated at Washington, D. C., Novem­ ber 16, 1955. ceedings pursuant to the provisions of [F. R. Doc. 55-9331; Filed, Nov. 18, 1955; section 1.30 (c) (1) or (c) (2) of the 8:52 a. m.] [ s e a l ] F r a n c is W . B r o w n , Commission’s rules of practice and pro­ «• Chief Examiner. cedure. Under the procedure herein [F. R. Doc. 55-9332; Filed, Nov. 18, 1955; provided for, unless otherwise advised, it . 8:52 a. m.] will be unnecessary for Applicant to ap­ [Docket No. 7173] pear or be represented at the hearing. F o r e ig n A ir C a rrier C h a r t e r S er v ic e Protests or petitions to intervene may I nvestigation be filed with the Federal Power Com­ [Docket No. 1705] mission, Washington 25, D. C., in ac­ NOTICE OP HEARING cordance with the. rules of practice and In the matter of a proceeding to A m e r ic a n A ir l in e s , I n c ., and F l y in g procedure (18 CFR 1.8 or 1.10) on or be­ amend the permits held by various for­ T ig e r L i n e , I n c .; P e t it io n t o M o d if y fore December 5, 1955. Failure of any eign air carriers so as to provide that M in im u m R a tes party to appear at and participate in said carriers may make charter trips NOTICE OF PREHEARING CONFERENCE the hearing shall be construed as waiver without regard to points named in their Notice is hereby given that a prehear­ of and concurrence in omission herein permits, under regulations prescribed by ing conference in the above-entitled of the intermediate decision procedure the Board. matters is assigned to be held on Novem­ in cases where a request therefor is Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the ber 22, 1955, at 10 :00 a. in., e. s. t., in made. Civil Aeronautics Act of 1938, as Room 2062, Commerce Building, Four­ amended, particularly sections 1 "(21), 2, [seal] L e o n M . F u q u a y, teenth Street and Constitution Avenue Secretary. 205 (a), 401 (f), 402 (g), 801, and 1002 NW., Washington, D. C., before Exam­ (b) of said act, and the applicable regu­ iner F. Merritt Ruhlen. [P. R. Doc. 55-9316; Filed, Nov. 18, 1955; lations thereunder, that a public hear­ 8:48 a. m.] ing in the above-entitled proceeding is Dated at Washington, D. C., November assigned to be held on December 5, 1955, 15, 1955. at 10:00 a. m., e. s. t., in Room No. E-206, CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD [ se a l ] F r a n c is W . B r o w n , Temporary Building No. 5, Sixteenth Chief Examiner. [Docket No. 4294] Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, D. C., before Examiner Paul [F. R. Doc. 55-9333; Filed, Nov. 18, 1955; No r th w est A ir l in e s , I n c .; P it t s b u r g h - N. Pfeiffer. 8:52 a. m.] Cleveland and D e t r o it R e s t r ic t io n Without limiting the scope of the Case issues raised by the Board’s order of in­ n o t ic e o p h e a r in g vestigation instituting this proceeding, INTERSTATE COMMERCE In the matter of the application. of particular attention will be directed to COMMISSION Northwest Airlines, Inc., for amendment the following matters and questions: of its certificate of public convenience (1) Does the public interest require F o u r t h S e c t io n A pplications and necessity for route No. 3 to effect the alteration, modification, or amend­ f o r R e l ie f removal of restriction or modification ment of section 402 permits now held by . N o v em ber 16, 1955. thereof, on turn-around service between or which may be issued to the foreign air Protests to the granting of an appli­ Detroit and Cleveland, on the one hand, carrier parties to this proceeding so as cation must be prepared in accordance and Pittsburgh, on the other. to provide that such carriers may operate with Rule 40 of the General Rules of Pursuant to the provisions of the Civil charter trips without regard to the Practice (49 CFR 1.40) and filed within Aeronautics Act of 1938, as amended, points named in their permits under 15 days from the date of publication of notice is hereby given that a hearing in regulations prescribed by the Board? this notice in the F ederal R e g is t e r . the above-entitled proceeding is as­ (2) Does the public interest require signed to be held on December 13,x1955, the promulgation of regulations to gov­ tONG-AND-SHORT HAUL at 10:09 a. m., e. s. t., in Room E-210, ern the performance of charter trips by FSA No. 31312: Sorghum grains to Temporary Building No. 5, Sixteenth foreign air carriers, and if so, in what Texas. Filed by F. C. Kratzmeir, Agent, Street and Constitution Avenue NW., form should said regulations be issued? for interested rail carriers. Rates on Washington, D. C. before Examiner (a) In what manner should “charter sorghum grains, whole, broken, chop­ James S. Keith, trip” be defined? ped, cracked, crushed, or ground, car­ Without limiting the scope of the is­ (b) Should off-route charter service loads from points in Oklahoma and Kan­ sues presented in said proceeding, par­ be limited to a fixed number of trips per sas to points in Texas. ticular attention will be directed to the calendar period? Grounds for relief: Motor carrier com­ following question: (c) Should performance of off-route petition and to permit storage in transit. Do the public convenience and neces­ charters require prior Board approval, Tariff: Supplement 112 to Agent sity require the modification of the re­ and if so, what standards should apply Kratzmeir’s I. S. C. 3941. striction in Northwest’s certificate for thereto? FSA No. 31313: Motor-rail rates—Chi­ route No. 3 which prevents Northwest For further details regarding this pro­ cago and North Western Ry. Co., et al. from providing turn-around service be­ ceeding, interested parties are referred Filed by Chicago and North Western tween Detroit and Cleveland, on the one to Board Order No. E-9217, adopted IV^ay Railway Company for interested rail car­ hand, and Pittsburgh, on the other? 19, 1955, the Prehearing Conference Re­ riers. Rates on motor truck trailers or Notice is further given that any per­ port served June 30, 1955, and other semi-trailers, loaded, transported on flat son other than the applicant and inter­ documents contained in the formal cars from points in Illinois, Minnesota, veners of record desiring to be heard docket in this proceeding on file in the and Wisconsin to points in official ter­ hi this proceeding may file with the Docket Section of the Civil Aeronautics ritory. Board on or before December 13, 1955, Board1. Grounds for relief: Motor carrier com­ a statement setting forth the issues of Notice is hereby further given that petition. fact and of law raised by this proceed- any person not a party of record desir­ Tariff: Chicago and North Western hig which he desires to controvert and ing to be heard in this proceeding must Railway I. C. C. 11319. such person may appear and participate file with the Board on or before Decem­ FSA No. 31314: Petroleum coke "bri­ ln the hearing in accordance with sec- ber 5, 1955, a statement setting forth quettes from Superior, Wis. Filed by 8586 NOTICES

W. J. Prueter, Agent, for interested rail FSA No. 31318: Grain and grain prod­ Grounds for relief : Rail competition, carriers. Rates on petroleum coke bri­ ucts from Texas to St. Joseph, Mo. circuity, and grouping. quettes, carloads from Superior, Wis., to Piled by W. J. Prueter, Agent, for inter­ Tariff: Supplement 129 to Agent points in Minnesota, North Dakota, and ested rail carriers. Rates on grain, grain Spaninger’s I. C. C. 1101. South Dakota. products and related articles, also seeds, FSA No. 31322: Sulphuric acid from Grounds for relief: Market competi­ carloads from points in Texas to St. Pulaski, Va., to Amco, Ga. Piled by R. E. tion and circuity. Joseph, Mo., and stations in Iowa, Mis­ Boyle, Jr., Agent, for interested rail car­ Tariff: C. M. St. P. & P. R. R. tariff. souri, and Nebraska. riers. Rates on sulphuric acid, tank-car I. C. C. No. B-7767 and four other tariffs. Grounds for relief: Circuity. loads from Pulaski, Va., to Amco, Ga. PSA No. 31315: Iron and steel articles Tariff: Supplement 6 to Chicago, Bur­ Grounds for relief: Short-line dis­ to Iowa and Nebraska. Filed by W. J. lington & Quincy Railroad tariff I. C. C. tance formula, circuity, and market Prueter, Agent, for interested rail car­ No. 20293. competition. riers. Rates on iron and steel articles, PSA No. 31319: Iron or steel pipe from Tariff: Supplement 103 to Agent carloads from points in Illinois, Missouri Washington C. H„ Ohio, to Southwest. Spaninger’s I .C. C. 1357. and Wisconsin to Council Bluffs, Iowa, Piled by P. C. Kratzmeir, Agent, for in­ FSA No. 31323: Cheese from Harrods- Omaha, and South Omaha, Nebr. terested rail carriers. Rates on pipe, burg, Ky., to the South. Piled by R. E. Grounds for relief: Rail and truck steel or wrought iron, and related arti­ Boyle, Jr., Agent, for interested rail car­ competition and circuity. cles, carloads from Washington C. H., riers. Rates on Cheese, carload from Tariff: Supplement 46 to Agent Prue- Ohio, to points in the Southwest. Harrodsburg, Ky., to points in southern ter’sl. C. C.A-4038. Ground for relief: Market competi­ territory. PSA No. 31316: Logs from Virginia to tion. Ground for relief: Short-line dis­ North Carolina. Piled by R. E. Boyle, Tariff: Supplement 48 to Agent Kratz- tance formula, circuity, and market Jr., Agent, for interested rail carriers. meir’s I. C. C. 4116. competition. Rates on logs, native wood, Canadian PSA No. 31320: Roofing or building Tariff: Supplement 3 to Agent Span­ wood, or Mexican pine, carloads from materials from Stephens, Ark. Piled by inger’s I. C. C. 1497. Norfolk and Western Railway stations in P. C. Kratzmeir, Agent, for interested Virginia to High Point, Thomasville, and rail carriers. Rates on roofing and FSA No. 31324: Perlite rock from Statesville, N. C. building materials and roofing slate, Socorro, N. Mex., to New Jersey. Piled Grounds for relief: Short-line distance straight or mixed carloads from Ste­ by F. C. Kratzmeir, Agent, for interested formula and circuity. phens, Ark., to Mississippi River cross­ rail carriers. Rates on perlite rock, Tariff: Supplement 95 to Agent Span- ings, points in southern territory and broken, crushed or ground, carloads inger’s I. C. C. 1297. Louisiana. from Socorro, N. Mex., to Hillside and PSA No. 31317: Lumber from the Grounds for relief: Market competi­ Paterson, N. J. South to Portsmouth, Ohio. Piled by tion and circuity. Ground for relief: Short-line distance R. E. Boyle, Jr., Agent, for interested Tariffs: Supplement 261 to Agent formula and circuity. rail carriers. Rates on lumber and re­ Kratzmeir’s I. C. C. 3908; Supplement 3 Tariff: Supplement 113 to Agent lated articles, carloads from Atlantic to Agent Kratzmeir’s I. C. C. 4148. PSA No. 31321: Lumber from the Kratzmeir’s I. C. C. No. 4139. Coast Line Railroad stations to Ports­ South to Western Canada. Piled by By the Commission. mouth, Ohio. R. E. Boyle, Jr., Agent, for interested Grounds for relief: Rail competition [seal] Harold D. McCoy, rail carriers. Rates on lumber and re­ Secretary. and circuity. lated articles, carloads .from points in Tariff: Supplement 74 to Agent.C. A. southern territory to points in western [P. R. Doc. 55-9310; Piled, Nov. 18, 1955; Spaninger’s I. C. C. No. 1230. Canada. 8:49 a. m.J