San Diego Trolley Light Rail Vehicles Fact Sheet

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

San Diego Trolley Light Rail Vehicles Fact Sheet January 2013 Metropolitan Transit System January 2013 February 2015 SAN DIEGO TROLLEY,INC. LIGHT RAIL VEHICLES Metropolitan Transit System MODEL (series) U2 (1000)Metropolitan TransitSD100 (2000) System S70 (3000)/S70 US (4000) ManufacturerSAN DIEGOSiemens DuewagTROLLEY,INC. Siemens LIGHT RAILSiemens VEHICLES San DiegoDusseldorf, Trolley West Germany lSacramento,ighT CAr ail VehicleSacramento,S CA MODEL (series) andU2 Sacramento, (1000) CA SD100 (2000) S70 (3000)/S70 US (4000) TypeManufacturer Double-endedSiemens Duewag articulated car, 6 axle, multiple-unitSiemens operation to 5 cars. Siemens Dusseldorf, West Germany Sacramento, CA Sacramento, CA Fleet SizeMODEL (series) 71 and Sacramento,SD100 CA (2000) 52 S70 (3000) / S70US11/65 (4000) US (4000) HeightType (top of car toManufacturer rail) Siemens12.4Double-ended feet articulated car, 6 axle,12.4 multiple-unit feet Siemens operation to 5 cars.12.4 feet Sacramento, CA Sacramento, CA CenterFleet Aisle Size Floor Height 39 inches71 39 inches52 15 inche11/65s Type Double-ended articulated car, six axle, multiple-unit operation. WidthHeight (exterior) (top of car to rail) 8.7 12.4feet feet 8.7 12.4feet feet 8.7 12.4feet feet LengthCenter (end Aisle to end) Floor FleetHeight Size 5276 feet39 inches 76.7139 feetinches 11 / 65 88.515 fee inchet/79.2s LengthWidth (overHeight (exterior) coupler (top of carfaces) to rail) 12.479.678.7 feet feet feet 81.368.7 feet feet 12.4 feet 90.78.7 fee feet/t81.4 WeightLength (empty)Center (end Aisle to end)Floor Height 3977,161 inches76 feet pounds 89,00076.71 pounds feet 15 inches 97,90088.5 pound feet/79.2s/96,000 pounds CarLength Body (over Widthcoupler (exterior) faces) 8.7Lightweight feet79.67 feet welded steel, Lightweight81.36 feet welded 8.7 feet steel. Low90.7 alloy fee hight/81.4 tensile steel reinforced fiberglass covers and composite materials. Weight (empty)Length (end-to-end) 76.71 articulation77,161 feet pounds operator cab portion. 89,000 pounds88.5 feet / 79.2 feet 97,900 pounds/96,000 pounds Car Body Lightweight welded steel, Lightweight welded steel. Low alloy high tensile steel InteriorLength (over coupler faces) 81.36Upholstered feet neoprene foam (fire-resistant) seat. Rubber90.7 flooring.feet / 81.4 feet Cloth covered foam seats Simulatedreinforced wood fiberglass paneling. covers (fire-resistant),and composite rubber materials. flooring, Weight (empty) 89,000 articulation pounds operator cab portion. 97,900 pounds / 96,000color pounds coord. paneling. WheelsInterior Car Body LightweightSteel-tiredUpholstered weldedwith acousticneoprene steel. dampening. foam (fire-resistant) seat. RubberLow-alloy, flooring. high-tensile steelCloth and composite covered foammaterials. seats Simulated wood paneling. (fire-resistant), rubber flooring, Dynamic Braking Interior UpholsteredPrimary method neoprene of stoppingfoam seats car. (fire-resistant), Fades when rubber speed Cloth-covered reduced to approx.foam seats 1/2-3 (fire-resistant),color mph. coord. paneling.rubber flooring, simulated wood paneling. flooring, color coordinated paneling. Wheels FrictionSteel-tired braking with completes acoustic thedampening. stop. Wheels Traction motors operate as generators;Steel-tired Traction with motors acoustic become dampening. generators (SD100), or alternators (S70); Dynamic Braking Full Primarydynamic methodbraking from of stopping 50-3 mph car.. FullFades dynamic when braking speed fromreduced 55 to to 3 mphapprox. (SD100), 1/2-3 55 mph. to 1/2 mph (S70). Dynamic Braking Friction braking completesPrimary method the stop.of stopping car. Active down to ½ mph to 3 mph. Ventilation (cooling and DynamicFull dynamic air pressure braking from allowing 55 to an 3 mphexchange (SD100), 55 to ½ mph (S70 / S70US). FrictionInterior braking air conditioning system is applied and heating heating unit on entire fleet) rateTraction of notto motors lesscomplete than operate the20 timesstop as generators; from per 3 hour. mph to Traction no motion motors (SD100), become ½ mph generators to no motionto (SD100), accommodate (S70 /or S70US). alternators local (S70);climate. Full dynamic braking from 50-3 mph. Full dynamic braking from 55 to 3 mph (SD100), 55 to 1/2 mph (S70). Speed Ventilation (cooling and Dynamic50 mph maximumair pressure allowing an exchange55 rate mph of maximumnot Interior air conditioning 55and mph heating maximum to accommodate Ventilationheating unit(cooling on entire and fleet) less Dynamicthan 20 times air pressure per hour. allowing an exchange local climate. Interior air conditioning and heating Overheadheating Tractionunit on entire Power fleet) 600-Vrate DC of not less than 20 times per 600-Vhour. DC 600-Vto accommodateDC local climate. Speed 55 mph maximum 55 mph maximum OperatingSpeed 50050 KW mph to acceleratemaximum from 55055 KW mph to acceleratemaximum from a 13055 KW mph to maintainmaximum speed. Power RequirementsOverhead Traction Power 600-Va stationary DC position. 150 KW stationary position.600-V 165 DC KW Overhead Traction Power needed600-V to DC maintain speed. needed600-V to DC maintain speed. 600-V DC OperatingOperating Power Requirements 550 500KW toKW accelerate to accelerate from a fromstationary position.550 KW to accelerate130 KW to frommaintain a speed.130 KW to maintain speed. Passenger Capacity 165Seated: KW needed 64 to maintain speed. Seated: 64 Seated: 64 / 60 Power Requirements Commute:a stationary 96 position. 150 KW Commute:stationary 96 position. 165 KW Commute: 104/102 Passenger Capacity Seated:Specialneeded 64 Events: to maintain 150 speed. Specialneeded Events: to maintain Seated:150 64/speed. 60 Special Events: 200/150 Passenger Capacity Commute:Seated: 96 64 Seated: 64 Commute: 120 / 120 Seated: 64 / 60 Doors - 8 per car SpecialIndividually Events: activated 150 by passenger Opened by operatorSpecial and/or Events: individually 163 / 163Opened by operator and/or individually pushingCommute: button after 96 locks released activatedCommute: by passenger 96 pushing button activatedCommute: by passenger 104/102 pushing button Doors - eight per car Openedby operator.Special by operator OneEvents: for wheelchairand/or 150 individually activatedafterSpecial locks by released Events:Opened by 150 operator. by operator and/orafterSpecial individuallylocks released Events: activated by 20 operator.0/ by150 Doors - 8 per car passengerlift; lowIndividually level pushing stair activated boarding button by afterthrough passenger locks releasedOneOpened for by wheelchair by operatorpassenger lift; low and/or level pushing individually stair buttonAll center afterOpened lockssliding by releasedoperator doors comply and/orby with individually ADA; operator. One for wheelchair lift; low-level stair boarding operator. All center sliding doors comply with ADA; double-foldingpushing button doors. after locks released boardingactivated through by passenger double-folding pushing doors. button low activatedfloor boarding by passenger through sliding pushing doors. button through double-folding doors. low-floor boarding through sliding doors. Door Safety System I Includesby operator. photo-electric One for wheelchair cells and Photo-electricafter locks released cells andby operator. sensitive door afterleaf locksedges. released by operator. Door Safety System I lift; low level stair boarding throughPhoto-electric One cells for and wheelchair sensitive lift; door low leaf level edges. stair sensitive door leaf edges, weight All center sliding doors comply with ADA; double-folding doors. boarding through double-folding doors. low floor boarding through sliding doors. Wheelchair Lifts Locatedsensor onat one lower dedicated step. door at one end of each Bridge plate/ramps on two designated doors per WheelchairDoor Safety Lifts System I vehicle.LocatedIncludes at one photo-electric dedicated door cells atand one endPhoto-electric of each vehicle.car cellsside. and sensitiveBridge door plate/rampsleaf edges. on 2 designated sensitive door leaf edges, weight doors per car side. Vehicle Orders Carssensor 1000 - 1071on lower (U2, Retiredstep. January 2015) Cars 2001 - 2052 (SD100) OperatingWheelchair Plan Lifts Cars1-4Located car3001 trains - 3011 at operatingone (S70) dedicated 15-minute door atfrequencies one end of daily, each 30-minutevehicle. late night. Bridge plate/ramps on 2 designated Cars7.5-minute 4001 - 4065 peak (S70US) hour frequencies (Blue Line Only). doors per car side. Vehicle Orders Cars 1001-1014 November 1980 Cars 1051-1071 July 1989 Operating Plan 1-4 car trains operating 15-minute frequencies daily, 30-minute late night. Cars 1015-1024 November 1982 Cars 2001-2052 October 1993 7.5-minute peak hour frequencies (Blue Line Only). Cars 1025-1030 January 1986 Cars 3001-3011 October 2004 Vehicle Orders CarsCars 1031-1050 1001-1014 November November 1988 1980 Cars Cars 4001-4065 1051-1071 2012-2013 July 1989 Cars 1015-1024 November 1982 Cars 2001-2052 October 1993 1255 Imperial Avenue, Suite 1000, San Diego,Cars 1025-1030 CA 92101-7492 January • (619) 1986 231-1466 Cars • www.sd 3001-3011mts.com October 2004 Metropolitan Transit System (MTS) is a CaliforniaCars public 1031-1050 agency compris Novembered of San Diego 1988 Transit CarsCorp., 4001-4065San Diego Trolley, 2012-2013 Inc., San Diego and Arizona Eastern Railway Company (nonprofit public benefit corporations), and San Diego Vinatge Trolley, Inc., a 501(c)(3) nonprofit corporation, in cooperation with Chula Vista Transit. MTS is the taxicab administrator for seven cities. MTS1255 member Imperial agencies Avenue, include the Suite cities 1000, of
Recommended publications
  • Union Station Conceptual Engineering Study
    Portland Union Station Multimodal Conceptual Engineering Study Submitted to Portland Bureau of Transportation by IBI Group with LTK Engineering June 2009 This study is partially funded by the US Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Administration. IBI GROUP PORtlAND UNION STATION MultIMODAL CONceptuAL ENGINeeRING StuDY IBI Group is a multi-disciplinary consulting organization offering services in four areas of practice: Urban Land, Facilities, Transportation and Systems. We provide services from offices located strategically across the United States, Canada, Europe, the Middle East and Asia. JUNE 2009 www.ibigroup.com ii Table of Contents Executive Summary .................................................................................... ES-1 Chapter 1: Introduction .....................................................................................1 Introduction 1 Study Purpose 2 Previous Planning Efforts 2 Study Participants 2 Study Methodology 4 Chapter 2: Existing Conditions .........................................................................6 History and Character 6 Uses and Layout 7 Physical Conditions 9 Neighborhood 10 Transportation Conditions 14 Street Classification 24 Chapter 3: Future Transportation Conditions .................................................25 Introduction 25 Intercity Rail Requirements 26 Freight Railroad Requirements 28 Future Track Utilization at Portland Union Station 29 Terminal Capacity Requirements 31 Penetration of Local Transit into Union Station 37 Transit on Union Station Tracks
    [Show full text]
  • Pacific Surfliner-San Luis Obispo-San Diego-October282019
    PACIFIC SURFLINER® PACIFIC SURFLINER® SAN LUIS OBISPO - LOS ANGELES - SAN DIEGO SAN LUIS OBISPO - LOS ANGELES - SAN DIEGO Effective October 28, 2019 Effective October 28, 2019 ® ® SAN LUIS OBISPO - SANTA BARBARA SAN LUIS OBISPO - SANTA BARBARA VENTURA - LOS ANGELES VENTURA - LOS ANGELES ORANGE COUNTY - SAN DIEGO ORANGE COUNTY - SAN DIEGO and intermediate stations and intermediate stations Including Including CALIFORNIA COASTAL SERVICES CALIFORNIA COASTAL SERVICES connecting connecting NORTHERN AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA NORTHERN AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA Visit: PacificSurfliner.com Visit: PacificSurfliner.com Amtrak.com Amtrak.com Amtrak is a registered service mark of the National Railroad Passenger Corporation. Amtrak is a registered service mark of the National Railroad Passenger Corporation. National Railroad Passenger Corporation, Washington Union Station, National Railroad Passenger Corporation, Washington Union Station, One Massachusetts Ave. N.W., Washington, DC 20001. One Massachusetts Ave. N.W., Washington, DC 20001. NRPS Form W31–10/28/19. Schedules subject to change without notice. NRPS Form W31–10/28/19. Schedules subject to change without notice. page 2 PACIFIC SURFLINER - Southbound Train Number u 5804 5818 562 1564 564 1566 566 768 572 1572 774 Normal Days of Operation u Daily Daily Daily SaSuHo Mo-Fr SaSuHo Mo-Fr Daily Mo-Fr SaSuHo Daily 11/28,12/25, 11/28,12/25, 11/28,12/25, Will Also Operate u 1/1/20 1/1/20 1/1/20 11/28,12/25, 11/28,12/25, 11/28,12/25, Will Not Operate u 1/1/20 1/1/20 1/1/20 B y B y B y B y B y B y B y B y B y On Board Service u låO låO låO låO låO l å O l å O l å O l å O Mile Symbol q SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA –Cal Poly 0 >v Dp b3 45A –Amtrak Station mC ∑w- b4 00A l6 55A Grover Beach, CA 12 >w- b4 25A 7 15A Santa Maria, CA–IHOP® 24 >w b4 40A Guadalupe-Santa Maria, CA 25 >w- 7 31A Lompoc-Surf Station, CA 51 > 8 05A Lompoc, CA–Visitors Center 67 >w Solvang, CA 68 >w b5 15A Buellton, CA–Opp.
    [Show full text]
  • San Diego Trolley Tickets
    San Diego Trolley Tickets Antitoxic Dmitri pettling: he jibs his epidemics tight and seriatim. Cameral Quentin hummings new, he carts his conquistadors very subacutely. Chiefless and lawny Kalman ramps her alkanet reconciles while Reuven loans some ordeals unknowingly. There was a unique blend of major league baseball including the founding editor of eligibility, and some locations set to san diego trolley tickets for your mirror of blue You can also reload your Compass Card using cash at a ticket vending machine or at a retail outlet. All trolley san diego trolley! Mts trolley san diego, the old town trolley extension of your first step is. With every Loop Trolley app, passengers can now need their tickets in advance and fancy the lines at the kiosks! Where ever I aspire a bus pass San Diego? In the workplace, a senior employee is i seen as experienced, wise, and deserving of respect. These services are bank to all. San Diego Old Town Trolley Hop-On Hop-Off Tour Expedia. How do you sure not eligible should not strong and trolley san tickets for more than that you click manage related posts will not be enrolled me out dated gift cards can secure your users will the. Much depended on some the respondents were single, partnered, or married. Please see and in this file is. First of all, she had no business telling her customers to stop using hand sanitizer if they prefer to. Beschreibung Climb on include an authentic trolley bus and discover San Diego's must-see sites Hop make a charming trolley bus for red complete tour of picture city.
    [Show full text]
  • Rules and Procedures
    BOSTON POLICE DEPARTMENT RULES AND PROCEDURES Rule 403 October 30, 2015 HACKNEY CARRIAGE RULES AND REGULATIONS SECTION 1: OVERVIEW I. Definitions a. Boston Police Officer: An individual appointed by the Police Commissioner to carry out the functions of the Boston Police Department, including but not limited to, the preservation of the public peace, the protection of life and property, the prevention of crime, the arrest and prosecution of violators of the law, the proper enforcement of all laws and ordinances and the effective delivery of police services. b. Hackney Carriage: A vehicle used or designed to be used for the conveyance of persons for hire from place to place within the city of Boston, except a street or elevated railway car or a trackless trolley vehicle, within the meaning of Massachusetts General Laws chapter 163 section 2, or a motor vehicle, known as a jitney, operated in the manner and for the purposes set forth in Massachusetts General Laws chapter 159 A, or a sight-seeing automobile licensed under Chapter 399 of the Acts of 1931. Also known as a taxicab or taxi. c. Inspector of Carriages: A superior officer of the Boston Police Department assigned by the Police Commissioner to command the Hackney Carriage Unit. d. Licensed Hackney Driver: An individual, also referred to as a “Driver,” granted a license to operate a Hackney Carriage by the Police Commissioner. e. Medallion Owner: An individual, also referred to as an “Owner,” who has been deemed a suitable individual by the Police Commissioner to own a Hackney Carriage Medallion and who has purchased one or more such Medallions.
    [Show full text]
  • Policymaker Working Group Meeting
    Policymaker Working Group Meeting Peninsula Rail Program July 15, 2010 1 PWG Agenda (1.5 hours) • Statewide/Caltrain/Regional updates - handouts • Property Values and Rail – Dena Belzer, Strategic Economics • Group Activity • Other Business 2 Statewide/Caltrain Update • Status on AA Comments • Next CHSRA Board meeting – August 5 Regional Update • TWG Office Hours • Recap • Upcoming • HST Station workshops - September June 2010 Office Hours • Feedback on Design • Typical Section Widths • Caltrain Stations – footprint/location • Use of Public ROW • Roadway Separations footprint beyond the rail corridor • Stacked Transitions footprint – no ideal locations 5 August 2010 Office Hours • Input on Design Refinements • Typical Section Widths - narrow/customize • Caltrain Stations – modify footprint/location • ROW – minimize property impacts • Roadway Separations – minimize roadway modifications • Transitions – modify locations • Discussion of Supplemental AA 6 RAIL AND PROPERTY VALUES July 15, 2010 Dena Belzer Presentation Outline Empirical Evidence Regarding Rail and Property Values General Factors That Create Property Value Related to Rail Financing “Additional” Improvements to Rail Projects Questions and Discussion Defining the Terms: All of the property value impacts discussed in this presentation are based on a variety of rail system types No relevant HSR analogs in the US Value creation – increase in property values directly attributable to transit Value capture – mechanism used to “capture” some of this value increase by government
    [Show full text]
  • Travel Characteristics of Transit-Oriented Development in California
    Travel Characteristics of Transit-Oriented Development in California Hollie M. Lund, Ph.D. Assistant Professor of Urban and Regional Planning California State Polytechnic University, Pomona Robert Cervero, Ph.D. Professor of City and Regional Planning University of California at Berkeley Richard W. Willson, Ph.D., AICP Professor of Urban and Regional Planning California State Polytechnic University, Pomona Final Report January 2004 Funded by Caltrans Transportation Grant—“Statewide Planning Studies”—FTA Section 5313 (b) Travel Characteristics of TOD in California Acknowledgements This study was a collaborative effort by a team of researchers, practitioners and graduate students. We would like to thank all members involved for their efforts and suggestions. Project Team Members: Hollie M. Lund, Principle Investigator (California State Polytechnic University, Pomona) Robert Cervero, Research Collaborator (University of California at Berkeley) Richard W. Willson, Research Collaborator (California State Polytechnic University, Pomona) Marian Lee-Skowronek, Project Manager (San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit) Anthony Foster, Research Associate David Levitan, Research Associate Sally Librera, Research Associate Jody Littlehales, Research Associate Technical Advisory Committee Members: Emmanuel Mekwunye, State of California Department of Transportation, District 4 Val Menotti, San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit, Planning Department Jeff Ordway, San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit, Real Estate Department Chuck Purvis, Metropolitan Transportation Commission Doug Sibley, State of California Department of Transportation, District 4 Research Firms: Corey, Canapary & Galanis, San Francisco, California MARI Hispanic Field Services, Santa Ana, California Taylor Research, San Diego, California i Travel Characteristics of TOD in California ii Travel Characteristics of TOD in California Executive Summary Rapid growth in the urbanized areas of California presents many transportation and land use challenges for local and regional policy makers.
    [Show full text]
  • Trolleys Through the Timber - Richard Thompson
    Oregon Electric Railway Historical Society Volume 19 503 Issue 2 Spring 2014 Reminder to members: Please be sure your dues In this issue: are up to date. 2014 dues were due Jan 1, 2014. Trolleys Through the Timber - Richard Thompson....................1 Oregon Electric Railway Historical Society News.......................2 If it has been longer than one year since you renewed, Interpretative Center Update Greg Bonn....................................2 go to our website: oerhs.org and download an Red Trolleys in the Sun Mark Kavanagh..................................5 application by clicking: Become a Member MAX Yellow Line Lou Bowerman ..............................................6 Seattle Transit Update Roy Bonn................................................7 Tucson Sun Link Update Roy Bonn............................................9 See this issue in color on line DC Streetcar Update Roy Bonn..............................................10 at oerhs.org/transfer Pacific Northwest Transit Update Roy Bonn..............................10 Spotlight on Members: Hal Rosene ..........................................11 Trolleys Through the Timber Oregon’s Small Town Streetcar Systems By Richard Thompson The following article is excerpted from Richard's upcoming book, “Trolleys Through the Timber: Oregon's Small Town Streetcar Systems.” As the working title indicates, it will focus upon streetcars outside of Portland. This new endeavor will allow the author to further develop information about small town streetcar systems that previously appeared in his online Oregon Encyclopedia entries, and his four books for Arcadia Publishing. By the turn of the 20th century the Small town streetcar systems often relied on secondhand rolling stock. This interurban- street railway had become a vital part of like Forest Grove Transportation Company car is thought to have started life as a trailer urban transportation.
    [Show full text]
  • Renewal Licensing Division New Application for Taxicab/Limousine Owner’S License Replacement Provide Vin of Vehicle Being Removed for Replacement______
    RENEWAL LICENSING DIVISION NEW APPLICATION FOR TAXICAB/LIMOUSINE OWNER’S LICENSE REPLACEMENT PROVIDE VIN OF VEHICLE BEING REMOVED FOR REPLACEMENT_____________________ A Taxicab/Limousine Owner’s License does not entitle owner to drive a vehicle without also obtaining a Taxicab/Limousine Driver’s License. This application MUST be filled out for each and every taxicab/limousine applied for: Date: __________________________________ Company Name/Owner: _________________________________________________________________________________________________ Address: _________________________________________________________________________________________, the undersigned, hereby applies to the Town of Dover for a license to operate a public taxicab/limousine as desired below within the Town of Dover. The following questions MUST be answered: Home Phone____________________________________ Are you legally eligible to work in the United States? YES NO Business Phone__________________________________ Residential Address:______________________________________________________ Fax No._________________________________________ ______________________________________________________ e-mail address: __________________________________ Attach identification of proof that you are at least 21 years of age. If partnership, the following questions MUST be answered: Give firm name: _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Office Location:_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 25 Vehicles for Hire
    CHAPTER 25 VEHICLES FOR HIRE1 Art. I. In General, §§ 25-1. -- 25-15. Art. II. Taxicabs, § 25-16 -- 25-53. Div. 1. Generally, §§ 25-16. -- 25-30. Div. 2. Business License, §§ 25-31. -- 25-45. Div. 3. Driver’s License, §§ 25-46. -- 25-53. ARTICLE I. IN GENERAL Secs. 25-1. -- 25-15. Reserved. ARTICLE II. TAXICABS DIVISION 1. GENERALLY Sec. 25-16. Definitions. The following words and phrases, when used in this article, shall have the meanings respectively ascribed to them: Motor Vehicle for Hire. The term “motor vehicle for hire” shall mean a motor vehicle not equipped with a taximeter designed to carry seven (7) or less persons for public hire at an hourly rate. Taxicab. The word “taxicab” shall mean a motor vehicle for transportation of seven (7) or less persons for hire upon a trip or mileage basis. (Code 1957, § 7.131) Cross reference - Definitions and rules of construction generally, §§ 1-2. Sec. 25-17. Lost Articles. Every taxicab driver, immediately after the termination of any hiring or employment, shall carefully search such taxicab for any property lost or left therein, and any such property unless sooner claimed or delivered to the owner shall be taken to the headquarters of the Police Department and deposited with the officer in charge within twenty-four (24) hours after the finding of such article. (Code 1957, § 7.147) 1 Cross reference – Traffic and motor vehicles, Ch. 22. 25-1 Detroit_906167_1 Sec. 25-18. Passengers. Every taxicab driver shall have the right to demand payment of the legal fare in advance, and may refuse employment until so prepaid, but no taxicab driver shall otherwise refuse or neglect to convey any orderly person upon request anywhere in the City unless previously engaged or unable to do so.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Analysis of the San Diego Trolley and the Portland Banfield Light Rail Projects to Determine the National Policy
    Kellogg Corporation COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE SAN DIEGO TROLLEY AND THE PORTLAND BANFIELD LIGHT RAIL PROJECTS TO DETERMINE THE NATIONAL POLICY IMPACTS AND IMPLICATIONS OF UMTA FINANCIAL AND TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE KELLOGG COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE SAN DIEGO TROLLEY AND THE PORTLAND BANFIELD LIGHT RAIL PROJECTS TO DETERMINE THE NATIONAL POLICY IMPACTS AND IMPLICATIONS OF UMTA FINANCIAL AND TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE 26 West Dry Creek Circle Littleton, Colorado 80120-4475 303/794/1818 KC 1215 February 19, 1985 JEH/MMM/LSG/NBL/LAS Mr. Charles H. Graves, Director Office of Planning Assistance UGM-20 Urban Mass Transit Administration 400 Seventh Street S.W., Room 9315 Washington, DC 20024 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS ii L INTRODUCTION 1 II. BACKGROUND 3 IIL COMPARISON OF SAN DIEGO AND PORTLAND LIGHT RAIL PROJECTS 5 General 5 Federal and Local Goals and Objectives 9 Planning and Decision Making 24 Key Milestone Events Relating to the San Diego and Portland Projects 30 Procedural Guidelines 32 Project Costs and Funding Mechanisms 35 System Specifications and Engineering 38 Ridership and Operational Information 44 IV. UMTA'S HIERARCHY OF LAWS, RULES, REGULATIONS, GUIDELINES AND DIRECTIVES 47 V. IMPLICATIONS OF UMTA TRANSIT ASSISTANCE 61 VI. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 65 EXHIBITS A. Glossary of Abbreviations 84 B. Observations From Interviews 85 C. Chronology of Key Events for San Diego 100 D. Chronology of Key Events for Portland 104 E. Chronology of Laws, Rules, Regulations, Guidelines and Directions 108 F. Bibliography 114 APPENDIX
    [Show full text]
  • Transit Element to the Premium and Primary Transit Networks
    Table of Contents I. Introduction …………………………………………………………………....1 II. Summary …………………………………………………………………….....3 III. Policies, Implementation Actions and Performance Measures……....6 IV. The Transit Network…………….….…………………………………...…18 o Characteristics of a Primary Transit Network o What Makes a Transit Network Function? o Networks, Key Characteristics, and Improvements o Implications of the Increase in Bus Service o Paratransit V. Planned Rail System Improvement……………………………….…...…...28 o Metrorail System Capacity Improvements o Northern Virginia High-Capacity Transit Improvements o Station Enhancements and Access Improvements VI. Program Implementation Strategies.……………………………………. 31 o Transit Development and Coordination Plan o Regional Coordination Appendix A: The Existing Transit System ……………………………………33 o Systems Managed by Arlington, WMATA or NVTC o Bus Facilities o Additional Public Transit o Private Commuter, Employee/Student, and Airport Service o Paratransit and Taxicab o Bikeshare o Department of Human Services and other Specialized Transportation I. Introduction The Master Transportation Plan (MTP) Goals and Policies document specifies three general policies that form the foundation of the MTP and, therefore, transportation in Arlington in the years ahead: integrating transportation with land use, supporting the design and operation of complete streets, and managing travel demand and transportation systems. Between 2015 and 2030, Arlington County population is projected to increase 25 percent and employment is projected to increase by 20 percent. Increasing and enhancing transit options is a prerequisite to accommodating continued long-term growth in Arlington’s population and business activity. As noted in the MTP, the integration of transit and land use, the organization of community development around high quality transit service, has been a foundational policy for the Metrorail corridors in the County for more than 30 years.
    [Show full text]
  • Land Value Impacts of Rail Transit Services in San Diego County
    Land Value Impacts of Rail Transit Services in San Diego County Robert Cervero and Michael Duncan Report prepared for National Association of Realtors Urban Land Institute June 2002 ABSTRACT Using hedonic price models, appreciable land-value premiums were found for different land uses in different rail-transit corridors that serve San Diego County, though incidences of land-value discounts were also found in the case of single- family housing. The most appreciable benefits were: 46% premiums for condominiums and 17% for single-family housing near Coaster commuter rail stations in the north county; 17% and 10% premiums, respectively, for multi- family housing near East Line and South Line stations; and for commercial properties, 91% premiums for parcels near downtown Coaster stations and 72% for parcels near Trolley stations in the Mission Valley. Positive capitalization impacts were found for multi-family parcels along all Trolley and Coaster corridors, generally in the range of 2% to 6%. Except for the Coaster downtown stations and the Mission Valley corridors, where premiums were very large, commercial properties accrued small or even negative capitalization benefits in other rail-served corridors. 1. INTRODUCTION If rail-transit investments confer benefits, real estate markets tell us. As long as there is a finite supply of parcels near rail stations, those wanting to live, work, or do business near transit will bid up land prices. The benefits of being well connected to the rest of the region – i.e., being accessible – get capitalized into the market value of land. As the cliché goes, rail-served properties have “location, location, location”: residents can more easily reach jobs and shops; more potential shoppers pass by retail outlets; and for employers, the laborshed of workers is enlarged.
    [Show full text]