DOCSLIB.ORG

The Feasibility of Excluding Alien Redfin Perch from Macquarie Perch Habitat in the Hawkesbury-Nepean Catchment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Feasibility of Excluding Alien Redfin Perch from Macquarie Perch Habitat in the Hawkesbury-Nepean Catchment The feasibility of excluding alien redfin perch from Macquarie perch habitat in the Hawkesbury-Nepean Catchment James T. Knight Industry & Investment NSW Port Stephens Fisheries Institute Locked Bag 1, Nelson Bay, NSW, 2315 Australia Threatened Macquarie perch Alien redfin perch Project No. HN 0507 B6D June 2010 Industry & Investment NSW – Fisheries Final Report Series No. 121 ISSN 1837-2112 The feasibility of excluding alien redfin perch from Macquarie perch habitat in the Hawkesbury-Nepean Catchment. June 2010 Author: James T. Knight Published By: Industry & Investment NSW (now incorporating NSW Department of Primary Industries) Postal Address: Port Stephens Fisheries Institute, Locked Bag 1, Nelson Bay, NSW, 2315 Internet: www.industry.nsw.gov.au © Department of Industry and Investment (Industry & Investment NSW) and the Hawkesbury-Nepean Catchment Management Authority This work is copyright. Except as permitted under the Copyright Act, no part of this reproduction may be reproduced by any process, electronic or otherwise, without the specific written permission of the copyright owners. Neither may information be stored electronically in any form whatsoever without such permission. DISCLAIMER The publishers do not warrant that the information in this report is free from errors or omissions. The publishers do not accept any form of liability, be it contractual, tortuous or otherwise, for the contents of this report for any consequences arising from its use or any reliance placed on it. The information, opinions and advice contained in this report may not relate to, or be relevant to, a reader’s particular circumstance. ISSN 1837-2112 Note: Prior to July 2004, this report series was published by NSW Fisheries as the ‘NSW Fisheries Final Report Series’ with ISSN number 1440-3544. Then, following the formation of the NSW Department of Primary Industries the report series was published as the ‘NSW Department of Primary Industries – Fisheries Final Report Series’ with ISSN number 1449-9967. The report series is now published by Industry & Investment NSW as the ‘Industry & Investment NSW – Fisheries Final Report Series’ with ISSN number 1837-2112 Contents i TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS.................................................................................................................................I LIST OF TABLES.......................................................................................................................................... II LIST OF FIGURES........................................................................................................................................ II LIST OF APPENDICES................................................................................................................................ II ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS..........................................................................................................................III NON-TECHNICAL SUMMARY ................................................................................................................IV 1. BACKGROUND ..................................................................................................................................... 6 2. MACQUARIE PERCH IN THE HAWKESBURY-NEPEAN CATCHMENT ................................ 9 3. TECHNIQUES FOR EXCLUDING REDFIN PERCH FROM MACQUARIE PERCH HABITAT IN THE WARRAGAMBA DAM STUDY AREA.............................................................................. 13 3.1. Physical exclusion ....................................................................................................................... 13 3.2. Behavioural systems.................................................................................................................... 15 3.3. Comparison of exclusion devices ................................................................................................ 17 4. EFFECTS OF AN EXCLUSION DEVICE ON THE LOCAL FISH POPULATIONS................. 22 5. LOCATION OF AN EXCLUSION DEVICE WITHIN THE STUDY AREA................................ 27 5.1. Background and site assessment methodology............................................................................ 27 5.1.1. Exclusion site location.................................................................................................................. 27 5.1.2. Existing infrastructure.................................................................................................................. 27 5.1.3. River geomorphology.................................................................................................................... 30 5.1.4. Hydrology..................................................................................................................................... 30 5.2. Results and discussion................................................................................................................. 30 6. APPROVALS REQUIRED TO CONSTRUCT AN EXCLUSION DEVICE ................................. 33 7. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS .............................................................................. 35 8. REFERENCES...................................................................................................................................... 36 9. APPENDICES....................................................................................................................................... 41 Exclusion of redfin perch from Macquarie perch habitat, J.T. Knight Project No. HN 0507 B6D ii Contents LIST OF TABLES Table 1a. The suitability of available physical exclusion devices for preventing the upstream dispersal of redfin perch in the tributaries of Warragamba Dam.............................................................. 18 Table 1b. The suitability of available behavioural exclusion devices for preventing the upstream dispersal of redfin perch in the tributaries of Warragamba Dam............................................... 19 Table 2. Fish species recorded in the Warragamba Dam catchment study area by I&I NSW between 1993 and 2007 and their associated movement behaviours....................................................... 24 Table 3. Criteria used to score each survey site for its suitability for the installation of a redfin perch exclusion device. ....................................................................................................................... 29 Table 4. Assessment of each survey site for its suitability for the installation of a redfin perch exclusion device. ....................................................................................................................... 31 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. The Hawkesbury-Nepean catchment depicting the study area surrounding Warragamba Dam and the currently known distribution of redfin perch and Macquarie perch. ...................... 7 Figure 2. Redfin perch Perca fluviatilis Linnaeus. ..................................................................................... 8 Figure 3. The eastern and western form of Macquarie perch...................................................................... 9 Figure 4. Currently known distribution of Macquarie perch and redfin perch within the Warragamba Dam study area.......................................................................................................................... 10 Figure 5. Typical rocky habitat inhabited by Macquarie perch in Wheeny Creek.................................... 11 Figure 6. Location of I&I NSW survey sites used to assess the fish species inhabiting Warragamba Dam and its feeder tributaries that may be affected by the installation of a redfin perch exclusion device. ....................................................................................................................... 23 Figure 7. Locations of sites 1 – 7 within the Warragamba Dam catchment study area investigated for their suitability for the installation of a redfin exclusion device. The currently known distributions of Macquarie perch and redfin perch within the study area are also shown. ........ 28 Figure 8. Site 5a located at Rucksack Ridge Ford, Kedumba River. ........................................................ 32 Figure 9. Site 7 located at the Kedumba River Crossing. ......................................................................... 32 LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix 1. Fish species recorded in the Warragamba Dam study area by I&I NSW. Data sourced from the I&I NSW Freshwater Fish Research Database.................................................................... 41 Appendix 2. Details of sites assessed in the Warragamba Dam catchment area for the installation of a redfin perch exclusion device.................................................................................................... 42 Appendix 3. Summary statistics for the flow regimes of the Kedumba, Cox’s, Nattai, and Little Rivers. .... 43 Appendix 4. Photographs of sites surveyed between the 25 – 27th September 2007 that were determined to be unsuitable for the installation of a redfin perch exclusion device..................................... 46 Project No. HN 0507 B6D Exclusion of redfin perch from Macquarie perch habitat, J.T. Knight Acknowledgements iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This project was funded by the Hawkesbury-Nepean Catchment Management Authority (Project: HN 0507 B6D). The author wishes to thank the Industry & Investment NSW staff who assisted with this project. Dr Bob Creese and Peter Gallagher
Load more

Recommended publications
  • GBMWHA Summary of Natural & Cultural Heritage Information
    GREATER BLUE MOUNTAINS WORLD HERITAGE AREA Summary of Natural & Cultural Heritage Information compiled by Ian Brown Elanus Word and Image for NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service November 2004 CONTENTS 1. Introduction 2 2. Essential Facts 3 3. World Heritage Values 5 4. Geography, Landscape and Climate 6 5. Geology and Geomorphology 8 6. Vegetation 13 7. Fauna 15 8. Aboriginal Cultural Heritage 16 9. Non-Aboriginal Cultural Heritage 18 10. Conservation History 20 11. Selected References 24 Summary of Natural and Cultural Heritage Information Greater Blue Mountains World Heritage Area November 2004 1 1. INTRODUCTION This document was prepared as a product of the Interpretation and Visitor Orientation Plan for the Greater Blue Mountains World Heritage Area. It is intended primarily as a summary reference of key information for use by those who are preparing public information and interpretation for the world heritage area. It is not intended to be fully comprehensive and anyone requiring detailed information on any topic is encouraged to refer to the list of selected references and additional material not listed. It is also recommended that all facts quoted here are checked from primary sources. A major source for this document was the Greater Blue Mountains World Heritage Area Nomination (see reference list), which is a very useful compendium of information but of limited availability. All other key sources used in compiling this summary are listed in the references, along with some other useful documents which were not consulted. Some items of information contained here (eg. total area of wilderness and comparisons with other east coast wilderness areas) have been derived from original research for this project.
    [Show full text]
  • The Native Vegetation of the Nattai and Bargo Reserves
    The Native Vegetation of the Nattai and Bargo Reserves Project funded under the Central Directorate Parks and Wildlife Division Biodiversity Data Priorities Program Conservation Assessment and Data Unit Conservation Programs and Planning Branch, Metropolitan Environmental Protection and Regulation Division Department of Environment and Conservation ACKNOWLEDGMENTS CADU (Central) Manager Special thanks to: Julie Ravallion Nattai NP Area staff for providing general assistance as well as their knowledge of the CADU (Central) Bioregional Data Group area, especially: Raf Pedroza and Adrian Coordinator Johnstone. Daniel Connolly Citation CADU (Central) Flora Project Officer DEC (2004) The Native Vegetation of the Nattai Nathan Kearnes and Bargo Reserves. Unpublished Report. Department of Environment and Conservation, CADU (Central) GIS, Data Management and Hurstville. Database Coordinator This report was funded by the Central Peter Ewin Directorate Parks and Wildlife Division, Biodiversity Survey Priorities Program. Logistics and Survey Planning All photographs are held by DEC. To obtain a Nathan Kearnes copy please contact the Bioregional Data Group Coordinator, DEC Hurstville Field Surveyors David Thomas Cover Photos Teresa James Nathan Kearnes Feature Photo (Daniel Connolly) Daniel Connolly White-striped Freetail-bat (Michael Todd), Rock Peter Ewin Plate-Heath Mallee (DEC) Black Crevice-skink (David O’Connor) Aerial Photo Interpretation Tall Moist Blue Gum Forest (DEC) Ian Roberts (Nattai and Bargo, this report; Rainforest (DEC) Woronora, 2003; Western Sydney, 1999) Short-beaked Echidna (D. O’Connor) Bob Wilson (Warragamba, 2003) Grey Gum (Daniel Connolly) Pintech (Pty Ltd) Red-crowned Toadlet (Dave Hunter) Data Analysis ISBN 07313 6851 7 Nathan Kearnes Daniel Connolly Report Writing and Map Production Nathan Kearnes Daniel Connolly EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report describes the distribution and composition of the native vegetation within and immediately surrounding Nattai National Park, Nattai State Conservation Area and Bargo State Conservation Area.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 38 No 2 Autumn 2013
    Volume 38 Issue 2 Berowra Waters from the Great North Walk, A pleasant day walk. Autumn 2013 Wouldn’t you like to be here? Hiking in the Zanskar region of Ladakh, from Padum to Lamayuru. Photo: Nina Gallo Pagodas, Capertee region. Photo: Michael Keats, The Bush Club Walk Safely—Walk with a Club T h e Bushwalker The Official Publication of Bushwalking NSW Inc Volume 38, Issue 2, Autumn 2013 ISSN 0313 2684 Editor: Roger Caffin From the editor’s desk. [email protected] Graphic Design & Assembly: AME CHANGE: The Confederation is now known as Bushwalking Barry Hanlon NSW. There is an optional ‘Incorporated’ at the end, but that is just Proofreader: Roy Jamieson Na legalism and is not needed in ordinary use. However, I imagine that we will continue to refer to ‘the Confederation’ for quite some time as Confederation Officers: it is convenient. President: David Trinder Administration Officer: [email protected] Website: www.bushwalking.org.au Articles for Publication Address all correspondence to: We are always happy to receive pictures for the Inside Front Cover. If you would like to PO Box 119, Newtown, NSW 2042 see yours published, send them in. Note that I need the originals, straight from the camera and uncropped and unretouched, so we can set them up for the printing process. We need high resolution for large pictures. In particular, photos embedded in DOC files are not accepted, and neither are scans of standard photographic prints - with Bushwalking NSW Inc represents the possible exception of historical items where the print is all that exists.
    [Show full text]
  • A Case Study of the Kowmung River at Cedar Ford, Australia
    International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning Vol. 16, No. 3, June, 2021, pp. 497-501 Journal homepage: http://iieta.org/journals/ijsdp Application of Deep Learning Method for Daily Streamflow Time-Series Prediction: A Case Study of the Kowmung River at Cedar Ford, Australia Sarmad Dashti Latif1*, Ali Najah Ahmed2 1 Civil Engineering Department, College of Engineering, Komar University of Science and Technology, Sulaimany 46001, Kurdistan Region, Iraq 2 Institute for Energy Infrastructure (IEI), Universiti Tenaga Nasional (UNITEN), Kajang 43000, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia Corresponding Author Email: [email protected] https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsdp.160310 ABSTRACT Received: 12 May 2020 Sustainable management of water supplies faces a comprehensive challenge due to global Accepted: 9 December 2020 climate change. Improving forecasts of streamflow based on erratic precipitation is a significant activity nowadays. In recent years, the techniques of data-driven have been widely Keywords: used in the hydrological parameter’s prediction especially streamflow. In the current research, streamflow prediction, artificial a deep learning model namely Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), and two conventional intelligence, deep learning, machine machine learning models namely, Random Forest (RF), and Tree Boost (TB) were used to learning, LSTM, random forest, tree boost predict the streamflow of the Kowmung river at Cedar Ford in Australia. Different scenarios proposed to determine the optimal combination of input predictor variables, and the input predictor variables were selected based on the auto-correlation function (ACF). Model output was evaluated using indices of the root mean square error (RMSE), and the Nash and Sutcliffe coefficient (NSE). The findings showed that the LSTM model outperformed RF and TB in predicting the streamflow with RMSE and NSE equal to 102.411, and 0.911 respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Macquarie Perch Refuge Project – Final Report for Lachlan CMA Author: Luke Pearce, Fisheries Conservation Manager, NSW DPI, Albury
    Published by NSW Trade & Investment, Department of Primary Industries First published May 2013 Title: Macquarie Perch Refuge Project – Final Report for Lachlan CMA Author: Luke Pearce, Fisheries Conservation Manager, NSW DPI, Albury. Print: ISBN 978 1 74256 500 2 Web: ISBN: 978 1 74256 501 9 Acknowledgements I thank the Lachlan Catchment Management Authority for providing the funding for the project. I would like to acknowledge the following staff, Fin Martin and Geoff Minchin for their input, assistance, advice and support on this project. The following staff in Fisheries NSW who worked on the project and made it possible; John Pursey, Dean Gilligan, Trevor Daly, Allan Lugg, Sarah Fairfull, Justin Stanger, Tim McGarry, Martin Asmus, Matthew McLellan, Lachie Jess and Antonia Creese. I thank the Recreational Fishing Trust for their ongoing support and funding for the Macquarie Perch captive breeding program; without it there would not be fish to stock into the refuge site. I would also like to acknowledge the Central Acclimatisation Society, in particular Karl Schaerf and Peter Byron for their ongoing support of the project and threatened native fish. TRIM reference: PUB13/61 Jobtrack 12067 © State of New South Wales through the Department of Trade and Investment, Regional Infrastructure and Services, 2013. You may copy, distribute and otherwise freely deal with this publication for any purpose, provided that you attribute the NSW Department of Primary Industries as the owner. Disclaimer: The information contained in this publication is based on knowledge and understanding at the time of writing (May 2013). However, because of advances in knowledge, users are reminded of the need to ensure that information upon which they rely is up to date and to check currency of the information with the appropriate officer of the Department of Primary Industries or the user’s independent adviser.
    [Show full text]
  • Dubbo Zirconia Project
    Dubbo Zirconia Project Aquatic Ecology Assessment Prepared by Alison Hunt & Associates September 2013 Specialist Consultant Studies Compendium Volume 2, Part 7 This page has intentionally been left blank Aquatic Ecology Assessment Prepared for: R.W. Corkery & Co. Pty Limited 62 Hill Street ORANGE NSW 2800 Tel: (02) 6362 5411 Fax: (02) 6361 3622 Email: [email protected] On behalf of: Australian Zirconia Ltd 65 Burswood Road BURSWOOD WA 6100 Tel: (08) 9227 5677 Fax: (08) 9227 8178 Email: [email protected] Prepared by: Alison Hunt & Associates 8 Duncan Street ARNCLIFFE NSW 2205 Tel: (02) 9599 0402 Email: [email protected] September 2013 Alison Hunt & Associates SPECIALIST CONSULTANT STUDIES AUSTRALIAN ZIRCONIA LTD Part 7: Aquatic Ecology Assessment Dubbo Zirconia Project Report No. 545/05 This Copyright is included for the protection of this document COPYRIGHT © Alison Hunt & Associates, 2013 and © Australian Zirconia Ltd, 2013 All intellectual property and copyright reserved. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study, research, criticism or review, as permitted under the Copyright Act, 1968, no part of this report may be reproduced, transmitted, stored in a retrieval system or adapted in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise) without written permission. Enquiries should be addressed to Alison Hunt & Associates. Alison Hunt & Associates RW CORKERY & CO. PTY. LIMITED AUSTRALIAN ZIRCONIA LTD Dubbo Zirconia Project Aquatic Ecology Final September 2013 SPECIALIST CONSULTANT STUDIES AUSTRALIAN ZIRCONIA LTD Part 7: Aquatic Ecology Assessment Dubbo Zirconia Project Report No. 545/05 SUMMARY Alison Hunt & Associates Pty Ltd was commissioned by RW Corkery & Co Pty Limited, on behalf of Australian Zirconia Limited (AZL), to undertake an assessment of aquatic ecology for the proposed development of the Dubbo Zirconia Project (DZP), which would be located at Toongi, approximately 25 km south of Dubbo in Central West NSW.
    [Show full text]
  • Mid Coxs River Subcatchment
    Mid Coxs River Mid Coxs Appendix 4.2 Appendix Subcatchment summaries Subcatchment Mid Coxs River Subcatchment River Mid Coxs The Mid Coxs River subcatchment is located in the far-west section of the Hawkesbury Nepean catchment. It is characterised by narrow granite valleys and contains the World Heritage listed Jenolan Caves Karst Conservation Reserve. The subcatchment has signifi cant areas in reserved land in its lower reaches in the Kanagra Boyd National Park, part of the Greater Blue Mountains World Heritage Area. The subcatchment is highly valued for its recreational values by local and regional communities. Flows in the Mid Coxs River are impacted by impoundment at Lake Lyell. In the upper area of the subcatchment, there is signifi cant rural development, and pine plantations in the tributary headwaters both of which have altered the vegetation of this subcatchment. The impacts of these activities need to be well managed to prevent degradation of the near intact reaches downstream. There is a major Landcare association, the Lithgow Oberon Landcare Association, and numerous Landcare groups working in the subcatchment, as well as weed control and mapping programs undertaken by the National Parks and Wildlife Service. HAWKESBURY NEPEAN RIVER HEALTH STRATEGY 53 54 54 Reach Management Recommendations – Mid Coxs River Subcatchment Reach Name Reach Riparian Land Reach Values Reach Threats Reach management recommendations Description Management (Planning, Education, Works, Monitoring, Institutional) Category Megalong Conservation • Develop
    [Show full text]
  • Extraction of Sand from the Colo River and Processing of Sand on Portion 37, Lower Colo Road, Colo
    .. ";0Cl4 ~ /,blf/(' Report to the Honourable Bob Carr Minister for Planning and Environment An Inquiry pursuant to Section 119 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, 1979, into a development application EXTRACTION OF SAND FROM THE COLO RIVER AND PROCESSING OF SAND ON PORTION 37, LOWER COLO ROAD, COLO John Woodward, Chairman COMMISSIONER OF INQUIRY September 1985 f \, F i i S Y D N E Y ,:j it September 1985 ( !'. 1, . TO MINISTER FOR PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENT j \ On 18th January 1985, you directed that an inquiry be ,I. '/ held in accordance with Section 119 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, by a Commission of Inquiry ( with respect to a development application to dredge sand from the Colo River adjacent to portion 37, Lower Colo, in the Shire of Hawkesbury. You commissioned me to conduct ) the inquiry into the proposed development and to report \., my findings and recommendations to you . The public inquiry was held at Sydney commencing on 30th July, 1985. During the course of the inquiry adjournments were granted to allow certain parties further time to prepare their submissions to the inquiry. Field visits were conducted in the presence of the parties to the proposed dredging site on the Colo River, to adjoin­ ing lands and to nearby properties held by obj ectors to the development and to other vantage points in the area. The public sessions of the inquiry concluded on 14th August 1985. This report is made to you pursuant to the provisions of the Act and sets ")tit my findings and recommendations on the issues raised ,during the course of the inquiry.
    [Show full text]
  • W.T. Trueman August 2007
    Native Fish Australia Technical Report #2 A REVIEW OF ATTEMPTS AT THE ARTIFICIAL PROPAGATION OF THE MACQUARIE PERCH Macquaria australasica WITH RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FUTURE ACTION W.T. Trueman August 2007 Native Fish Australia Technical Report #2 A REVIEW OF ATTEMPTS AT THE ARTIFICIAL PROPAGATION OF THE MACQUARIE PERCH Macquaria australasica WITH RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FUTURE ACTION W.T. Trueman August 2007 Published by: Native Fish Australia (Victoria) Inc PO Box 162 DONCASTER VIC 3108 Australia E-mail: [email protected] Web: http://www.nativefish.asn.au Copyright © 2007 Apart from fair dealing for the purposes of private study, research, criticism or review as permitted under the Copyright Act, no part of this publication may be reproduced by any means without the permission of the author or Native Fish Australia (Victoria) Incorporated. All photos in this report are those of the author unless otherwise acknowledged. Cover Photo: Adult Macquarie perch. (Photo courtesy Stephen Kerris.) Artificial Propagation Of The Macquarie Perch Macquaria australasica W.T.Trueman Table of Contents Table of Contents ................................................................................................................................... i Preface................................................................................................................................................... ii Introduction ............................................................................................................................................2
    [Show full text]
  • National Recovery Plan for the Trout Cod Maccullochella Macquariensis
    National Recovery Plan for the Trout Cod Maccullochella macquariensis Trout Cod Recovery Team Published by the Victorian Government Department of Sustainability and Environment (DSE) Melbourne, 2008. © State of Victoria Department of Sustainability and Environment 2008 This publication is copyright. No part may be reproduced by any process except in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968. Authorised by the Victorian Government, 8 Nicholson Street, East Melbourne. ISBN 1 74152 410 5 This is a Recovery Plan prepared under the Commonwealth Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999, with the assistance of funding provided by the Australian Government. This Recovery Plan has been developed with the involvement and cooperation of a range of stakeholders, but individual stakeholders have not necessarily committed to undertaking specific actions. The attainment of objectives and the provision of funds may be subject to budgetary and other constraints affecting the parties involved. Proposed actions may be subject to modification over the life of the plan due to changes in knowledge. Disclaimer This publication may be of assistance to you but the State of Victoria and its employees do not guarantee that the publication is without flaw of any kind or is wholly appropriate for your particular purposes and therefore disclaims all liability for any error, loss or other consequence that may arise from you relying on any information in this publication. An electronic version of this document is available on the Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts website www.environment.gov.au For more information contact the DSE Customer Service Centre 136 186 Citation: Trout Cod Recovery Team 2008a.
    [Show full text]
  • Government Gazette of the STATE of NEW SOUTH WALES Number 112 Monday, 3 September 2007 Published Under Authority by Government Advertising
    6835 Government Gazette OF THE STATE OF NEW SOUTH WALES Number 112 Monday, 3 September 2007 Published under authority by Government Advertising SPECIAL SUPPLEMENT EXOTIC DISEASES OF ANIMALS ACT 1991 ORDER - Section 15 Declaration of Restricted Areas – Hunter Valley and Tamworth I, IAN JAMES ROTH, Deputy Chief Veterinary Offi cer, with the powers the Minister has delegated to me under section 67 of the Exotic Diseases of Animals Act 1991 (“the Act”) and pursuant to section 15 of the Act: 1. revoke each of the orders declared under section 15 of the Act that are listed in Schedule 1 below (“the Orders”); 2. declare the area specifi ed in Schedule 2 to be a restricted area; and 3. declare that the classes of animals, animal products, fodder, fi ttings or vehicles to which this order applies are those described in Schedule 3. SCHEDULE 1 Title of Order Date of Order Declaration of Restricted Area – Moonbi 27 August 2007 Declaration of Restricted Area – Woonooka Road Moonbi 29 August 2007 Declaration of Restricted Area – Anambah 29 August 2007 Declaration of Restricted Area – Muswellbrook 29 August 2007 Declaration of Restricted Area – Aberdeen 29 August 2007 Declaration of Restricted Area – East Maitland 29 August 2007 Declaration of Restricted Area – Timbumburi 29 August 2007 Declaration of Restricted Area – McCullys Gap 30 August 2007 Declaration of Restricted Area – Bunnan 31 August 2007 Declaration of Restricted Area - Gloucester 31 August 2007 Declaration of Restricted Area – Eagleton 29 August 2007 SCHEDULE 2 The area shown in the map below and within the local government areas administered by the following councils: Cessnock City Council Dungog Shire Council Gloucester Shire Council Great Lakes Council Liverpool Plains Shire Council 6836 SPECIAL SUPPLEMENT 3 September 2007 Maitland City Council Muswellbrook Shire Council Newcastle City Council Port Stephens Council Singleton Shire Council Tamworth City Council Upper Hunter Shire Council NEW SOUTH WALES GOVERNMENT GAZETTE No.
    [Show full text]
  • Hobby's Outreach
    HOBBY'S OUTREACH Newsletter ef: BLUE MOUNTAINS HISTORICAL SOCIETY Inc. ISSN 1835-3010 P 0Box17, WENT\VORTH FAILS NSW 2782 Telephone: (02) 4757 3824 Hobby's Reach, 99 Blaxland Road, Wentworth Falls, NSW Email: [email protected] !Volume 20 Number3 August - September 20081 5 APRIL 2008 MEETING Contributed lry Colin Slade Continued from June-July issue The Garden Palace and The International Exhibition Sydney 1879 ,,,,":(a, -i-e-c-e-14~ 'f 111-i:J,'l"fll, !""""""'"" ,.,,1,7(e-~ During the first three days of the Exhibition some eighteen thousand visitors (excluding exhibitors and officials) passed -.... through the gates and an uneasy doubt was felt among the Commissioners as to the popular appeal of the Show. But Saturday 27 September, the first 'Shilling Day', banished all apprehension as 30,000 visitors crowded the Garden Palace and applauded a repeat performance of the Exhibition Cantata and the Hallelujah Chorus. The Sydney tram system owes its origins to the Exhibition. The first tram lines were laid from the nearest railway station at Redfern to Hunter Street to bring visitors in a double-decked carriage driven by a newly built steam tram. After the Exhibition this tram line was doubled all the way and extended to the eastern, southern and western suburbs. Among the many exhibits, only to name but a few from all over the world, included a Turkish Bazaar, Japanese Tea House, 116 samples of tea from different countries, Emerson's Oyster Saloon, a Maori House, Austro-Hungarian Wme and Beer Tasting Hall. A Fijian house, for a time inhabited by dancing natives claiming to have been cannibals, The Australian Dairy (a glass of fresh, cold milk for a penny), 20 kingdoms, republics and colonies were represented.
    [Show full text]