<<

Section 1.13

1.13 Coordinate Transformation of Components

This section generalises the results of §1.5, which dealt with vector coordinate transformations. It has been seen in §1.5.2 that the transformation for the components of a vector are ui = Qij u′j , where [Q] is the transformation . Note that these Qij ’s are not the components of a tensor – these Qij 's are mapping the components of a vector onto the components of the same vector in a second – a (second-order) tensor, in general, maps one vector onto a different vector. The

ui = Qij u′j is in matrix element form, and is not to be confused with the for vectors and .

1.13.1 Relationship between Vectors

Consider two coordinate systems with base vectors ei and e′i . It has been seen in the context of vectors that, Eqn. 1.5.9,

ei ⋅e′j = Qij ≡ cos(xi , x′j ) . (1.13.1)

Recal that the i’s and j’s here are not referring to the three different components of a vector, but to different vectors (nine different vectors in all).

Note that the relationship 1.13.1 can also be derived as follows:

ei= Ie i =() e′′ k ⊗ e ki e

=()e′′k ⋅ ee ik (1.13.2)

= Qike′ k

Dotting each side here with e′j then gives 1.13.1. Eqn. 1.13.2, together with the corresponding inverse relations, read

ei = Qij e′j , e′i = Q jie j (1.13.3)

Note that the components of the [Q] are the same as the components of the change of tensor 1.10.24-25.

1.13.2 Tensor Transformation Rule

As with vectors, the components of a (second-order) tensor will change under a change of coordinate system. In this case, using 1.13.3,

Tij ei ⊗ e j ≡ Tpq′ e′p ⊗ e′q

= Tpq′ Qmpem ⊗ Qnqen (1.13.4)

= QmpQnqTpq′ em ⊗ en

Solid Mechanics Part III 110 Kelly Section 1.13

so that (and the inverse relationship)

Tij = QipQ jqTpq′ , Tij′ = Q piQqjTpq Tensor Transformation Formulae (1.13.5) or, in matrix form,

[T] = [Q][T′][Q T ], [T′] = [Q T ][T][Q] (1.13.6)

Note: • as with vectors, second-order tensors are often defined as mathematical entities whose components transform according to the rule 1.13.5. • the transformation rule for higher order tensors can be established in the same way, for

example, Tijk′ = QQQT pi qj rk pqr , and so on.

Example (Mohr Transformation)

Consider a two-dimensional space with base vectors e1 , e 2 . The second order tensor S can be written in component form as

= ⊗ + ⊗ + ⊗ + ⊗ S S11e1 e1 S12e1 e 2 S 21e 2 e1 S 22e 2 e 2

Consider now a second coordinate system, with base vectors e1′, e′2 , obtained from the first by a θ . The components of the transformation matrix are

e ⋅e′ e ⋅e′   cosθ cos(90 +θ ) cosθ − sinθ  ′ 1 1 1 2 Qij = ei ⋅e j =   =   =   e ⋅e′ e ⋅e′ cos(90 −θ ) cosθ sinθ cosθ  2 1 2 2      and the components of S in the second coordinate system are [S′] = [Q T ][S][Q], so

S11′ S12′   cosθ sinθ S11 S12 cosθ − sinθ    =     S′ S′ − sinθ cosθ S S sinθ cosθ  21 22    21 22  

For S symmetric, S12 = S 21 , and this simplifies to

2 2 S11′ = S11 cos θ + S 22 sin θ + S12 sin 2θ 2 2 S 22′ = S11 sin θ + S 22 cos θ − S12 sin 2θ The Mohr Transformation (1.13.7)

S12′ = (S 22 − S11 )sinθ cosθ + S12 cos 2θ ■

1.13.3 Isotropic Tensors

An isotropic tensor is one whose components are the same under arbitrary rotation of the basis vectors, i.e. in any coordinate system.

Solid Mechanics Part III 111 Kelly Section 1.13

All scalars are isotropic.

There is no isotropic vector (first-order tensor), i.e. there is no vector u such that

ui = Qij u j for all orthogonal [Q] (except for the zero vector o). To see this, consider the particular orthogonal transformation matrix

 0 1 0   [Q] = −1 0 0 , (1.13.8)  0 0 1

which corresponds to a rotation of π / 2 about e3 . This implies that

T T [u1 u2 u3 ] = [u2 − u1 u3 ]

or u1 = u2 = 0 . The matrix corresponding to a rotation of π / 2 about e1 is

1 0 0   [Q] = 0 0 1 , (1.13.9) 0 −1 0

which implies that u3 = 0.

The only isotropic second-order tensor is αI ≡ αδ ij , where α is a constant, that is, the spherical tensor, §1.10.12. To see this, first note that, by substituting αI into 1.13.6, it can be seen that it is indeed isotropic. To see that it is the only isotropic second order tensor, first use 1.13.8 in 1.13.6 to get

 T22 − T21 − T23  T11 T12 T13  ′ = −  =   [T ]  T12 T11 T13  T21 T22 T23  (1.13.10)     − T32 T31 T33  T31 T32 T33 

which implies that T11 = T22 , T12 = −T21 , T13 = T23 = T31 = T32 = 0 . Repeating this for

1.13.9 implies that T11 = T33 , T12 = 0 , so

T11 0 0  =   [T]  0 T11 0     0 0 T11 

or T = T11I . Multiplying by a does not affect 1.13.6, so one has αI .

The only third-order isotropic tensors are scalar multiples of the permutation tensor,

E = ε ijk (ei ⊗ e j ⊗ e k ). Using the third order transformation rule, Tijk′ = Q piQqj QrkTpqr ,

Solid Mechanics Part III 112 Kelly Section 1.13

one has ε ijk′ = Q piQqj Qrk ε pqr . From 1.10.16e this reads ε ijk′ = (det Q)ε ijk , where Q is the tensor, with components Qij . When Q is proper orthogonal, i.e. a rotation tensor, one has indeed, ε ijk′ = ε ijk . That it is the only isotropic tensor can be established by carrying out a few specific rotations as done above for the first and second order tensors.

Note that orthogonal tensors in general, i.e. having the possibility of being reflection tensors, with det Q = −1, are not used in the definition of isotropy, otherwise one would have the less desirable ε ijk′ = −ε ijk . Note also that this issue does not arise with the second order tensor (or the fourth order tensor –see below), since the above result, that αI is the only isotropic second order tensor, holds regardless of whether Q is proper orthogonal or not.

There are three independent fourth-order isotropic tensors – these are the tensors encountered in §1.12.1, Eqns. 1.12.4-5,

I, I, I ⊗ I

For example,

QipQ jqQkr Qls (I ⊗ I)pqrs = QipQ jqQkr Qlsδ pqδ rs = (QipQ jp )(Qkr Qlr ) = δ ijδ kl = (I ⊗ I)ijkl

The most general isotropic fourth order tensor is then a of these tensors:

C = λI ⊗ I + µ I + γ I Most General Isotropic Fourth-Order Tensor (1.13.11)

1.13.4 Invariance of Tensor Components

The components of (non-isotropic) tensors will change upon a rotation of base vectors. However, certain combinations of these components are the same in every coordinate system. Such quantities are called invariants. For example, the following are examples of scalar invariants {▲Problem 2}

a ⋅a = ai ai

a ⋅Ta = Tij ai a j (1.13.12)

trA = Aii

The first of these is the only independent scalar of a vector. A second-order tensor has three independent scalar invariants, the first, second and third principal scalar invariants, defined by Eqn. 1.11.17 (or linear combinations of these).

Solid Mechanics Part III 113 Kelly Section 1.13

1.13.5 Problems

1. Consider a coordinate system ox1 x2 x3 with base vectors ei . Let a second coordinate

system be represented by the {e′i } with the transformation law e′ = −sinθe + cosθe 2 1 2 e′3 = e3

(a) find e1′ in terms of the old set {ei } of basis vectors (b) find the orthogonal matrix [Q] and express the old coordinates in terms of the new ones

(c) express the vector u = −6e1 − 3e 2 + e3 in terms of the new set {e′i } of basis vectors. 2. Show that

(a) the of a tensor A, trA = Aii , is an invariant.

(b) a ⋅Ta = Tij ai a j is an invariant. 3. Consider Problem 7 in §1.11. Take the tensor U = F T F with respect to the basis

{nˆ i } and carry out a coordinate transformation of its tensor components so that it is

given with respect to the original {ei } basis – in which case the matrix representation for U given in Problem 7, §1.11, should be obtained.

Solid Mechanics Part III 114 Kelly