FEASIBILITY AND OPTION ANALYSIS district shooting facility Gympie Regional Council recreation open space and sport specialists

This report has been prepared by: Version control: ROSS Planning Pty Ltd Version Date Document Author Reviewer Recipient ABN 32 508 029 959 1 26.11.14 Initial draft Dion Collins Carly Prenzler Marcus Matthews Upper floor, 63 Bay Terrace Wynnum QLD 4178 2 01.12.14 Draft Dion Collins Marcus Matthews PO Box 5660 3 03.12.14 Draft (post Dion Collins Marcus Matthews Manly QLD 4179 Councillor workshop) Telephone: (07) 3901 0730 4 17.02.15 Final (post Dion Collins Marcus Matthews Fax: (07) 3893 0593 pubic review) 5 06.03.15 Final Dion Collins Marcus Matthews

© 2015 ROSS Planning Pty Ltd This document may only be used for the purpose for which it was commissioned and in accordance with the terms of engagement for the commissions. Unauthorised use of this document in any form whatsoever is prohibited. Table of contents

1. Executive summary 1 6. Environmental considerations 19 1.1 Introduction and purpose 1 6.1 Legislative context 19 1.2 Existing situation 1 6.2 Local environmental context 23 1.3 Demand for development 1 1.4 Design options 1 7. Access and infrastructure 1.5 Feasibility considerations 2 considerations 25 1.6 Direction 2 7.1 Access and transport 25 7.2 Site embellishments 25 2. Proposed development 3 7.3 Utilities 25 2.1 Background 3 2.2 Proposal 3 8. Impacts of shooting 27 2.3 Shooting sport trends 4 8.1 Environmental impacts 2.4 Industry engagement 5 of shooting 27 8.2 Noise impacts of shooting 27 3. The site 13 8.3 Impacts on existing users 28 3.1 Site overview 13 3.2 The site in context 14 9. Directions 29 9.1 Council direction 29 4. Land use planning 9.2 Site feasibility 29 considerations 15 9.3 Indicative costs 31 4.1 Sustainable Planning Act 15 9.4 Tenure considerations 32 4.2 Planning scheme 15 9.5 Alternate approaches 32

5. Previous research 10. Appendix 33 considerations 17 Appendix A - Traffic considerations report 5.1 Difficult-to-locate sports study 17 Appendix B - Noise impact study 5.2 Fraser Coast Shooting Complex Appendix C - Quantity survey Issues and Options Paper 17 5.3 Fraser Coast Shooting Complex Revised Layout 17 5.4 Comino Rifle Range Field Investigations Report 18 1 Executive summary 1.1 Introduction and purpose 1.4 Design options For more than fifteen years there has been a push within Gympie (led by the If Council’s preference is to relocate the existing Gympie- Cooloola Range Complex Association) to develop a mutli-disciplinary shooting based shooting clubs and to see the development of a complex that provides quality facilities and long-term tenure to shooting groups. consolidated facility, opportunity exists for the southern end of Curra State Forest to meet this need. In February 2014, the Minister for National Parks, Recreation, Sport and Racing wrote to Council providing in-principle support for the provision of land from the Potentially, a consolidated facility would require the Curra State Forest for the development of a shooting range complex dependent following ranges: on reaching acceptable outcomes regarding: † 1000m range - Service Rifle Club † Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry’s preference for the † 200m range - Small Bore Rifle and Silhouette Club facility to be located centrally within the State Forest † 300m range - Pistol Club † potential impacts on existing recreation uses † range to accommodate five down-the-line layouts (and † securing tenure two overlaying skeet layouts) - Clay Target Club † Native Title † range to accommodate walk-throughs and three † development approvals. skeet layouts - Sporting Clays Club. This study examines demand for a multi-disciplinary shooting complex within It is important to note that each of these individual Gympie and the potential for Curra State Forest to accommodate such a facility. facilities would operate as stand-alone ranges. As such, they would all require suitable amenities, and club facilities. (There may be some opportunity for ancillary 1.2 Existing situation facility sharing between the Small Bore Rifle and Silhouette Club and Sporting Clays Club at the northern end of the complex and the Pistol Club, Service Rifle Club Shooting groups and Clay Target Club at the southern end of the complex † Three clubs located on Council-owned land near to the Gympie town centre depending on ultimate facility detailed design). − Gympie Clay Target Club − Gympie Small Bore Rifle and Silhouette Club Additionally, the recently established Shooters Union − Gympie Pistol Club (Qld Branch) are looking to develop a 500m range in the Rv. DATE REVISIONS REC. APPR . A Gympie area and could potentially be accommodated at

† A club located at Sexton on privately-owned land (through private 21/11/14 PRELIMINARY ISSUE - [SD] arrangement) the site subject to additional detailed design. − Gympie Sporting Clays Club † A club without a home and conducting modified shoots at the Pistol Club Small Bore − Gympie Service Rifle Club Rifle and Silhouette Curra State Forest A3 - A1 - SCALE

1:200 1:100 Sporting SURVEYED:

Curra State Forest is an active timber harvesting site. It also has permanently CHECKED: CS DESIGNER: CF (AHD)RL: PSM No: marked apiary sites (although at the time of writing none had existing permits). Clays Additionally, public recreation along the roads and trails within the Curra State Forest is an existing (and historical) use. Uses include walking, horse riding, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES Mail: Unit 24/18, Maroochywaters Drive, Maroochydore, QLD 4558 Phone: (+61) 0411501727 email: [email protected] LANDSCAPE DESIGN STUDIO

mountain biking, motorbiking and 4WDing. SUNSHINE COAST OFFICE @

1.3 Demand for Maroochydore. development Demand for development has been established through: † consideration of previous studies and other background documents Pistol † consultation − with Council, potential user groups and peak shooting bodies, nearbySKETCH DESIGN PLAN Service councils, state government agencies and additional stakeholders Rifle † consideration of the long-term future of the Belmont shooting facility1. Clay Clear demand exists for the development of a full bore (full template) rifle Target range. Additionally, need may exist for a sporting clays facility if they are to be moved out of their current facility. If Council offered long-term tenure to the user groups at the pistol, clay target and small bore rifle and silhouette facilities, there would be no demand for RP-366 L001 Project Number. additional (or alternate) facilities of this nature. Sheet No. - Revision

1 This study has found no evidence of any planned closure of the facility Rv.A

1 GYMPIE REGIONAL COUNCIL 1.5 Feasibility 1.6 Direction It is highly encouraging that the State Government has provided in- considerations principle support for the development of a shooting complex within the Curra State Forest. The project considered the feasibility of all While the southern end of the Curra State Forest has the physical areas within the State Forest. As outlined throughout this report, for dimensions required to accommodate the proposed users, there are a range of reasons the southern section of the State Forest (referred constraints associated with the site, including: to as the Corella area) is the preferred location for any further †† existing uses development consideration. −− timber harvesting However, given the significant costs involved with any shooting facility −− apiculture development, Council’s first decision needs to be the future direction −− recreation track and trail use of the three existing clubs within Gympie. While Council was of the †† topographical considerations understanding that all of the shooting groups were keen to relocate −− the area is far from level and finding suitable lengths to to a consolidated venue, this is not the clubs’ preference if long-term develop ranges without significant earthworks is somewhat tenure can be provided at the existing facilities. difficult †† environmental considerations If Council prefers for the clubs to relocate from their existing facilities −− creeks and gullies that meanders across the site within Gympie opportunity exists to develop two shooting ‘hubs’ −− potential for important flora and faunal ecosystems within the southern end of the Curra State Forest. †† access considerations −− there are no sealed roads leading directly to the proposed At the northern end of the preferred parcel (near the intersection of sites Wood and Dead Horse Roads) facilities for the Small Bore Rifle and −− it is likely to be difficult to regulate inappropriate access to Silhouette Club and Sporting Clays Club can be developed. the ranges Facilities for the Service Rifle Club, Pistol Club and Clay Target †† additional considerations Club could be developed toward the southern end of the area. −− there is no electricity connected to the site This represents the best location to resolve competing interests in −− there is no water connection at the site. relation to land use and feasibility (cost effectiveness) of providing a While there are other areas within the State Forest that have the shooting facility. dimensions to potentially accommodate a future multi-disciplinary complex, given the difficulty accessing these areas and topographical Queensland Police Service - Weapons Licensing indicate that constraints of providing suitable range layouts without significant the proposed shooting templates for the consolidated facility are investment in bulk earthworks, they are not considered to be as appropriate. attractive. If a new home is only required for the Service Rifle Club, opportunity In order to replicate as much as possible the driving times and road exists for development at the Curra State Forest or at a private conditions for the existing Gympie-based facilities and to provide facility (either through land purchase or a leasing arrangement). quality facilities with opportunities for continued growth (particularly in junior ranks), the southern end of Curra State Forest is preferred. Ideally, access to each range should be via sealed road and within 15-20 minutes total drive from Gympie township. Locations within the State Forest that require 15 minutes or more travel along unsealed roads are not considered attractive.

2 District shooting facility - Feasibility and option analysis 2 Proposed development 2.1 Background 2.2 Proposal The Gympie Pistol Club, Gympie Small Bore Rifle and Silhouette Club and Gympie Clay Target Club operate from Council-owned land at Araluen Cooloola Range Complex (adjacent to Gympie’s urban footprint). The Clay Target Club and Small In 2003, the Cooloola Range Complex Association (CRCA) Bore Rifle and Silhouette Club are located at Lot 17 RP221336, with the submitted a study to the (then) Minister for Environment Pistol Club at Lot 19 RP226325. Shooting clubs have used this area for outlining potential for a multi-disciplinary shooting facility in the more than 100 years. southern section of the Curra State Forest (the Corella area). The Association has remained committed to this project and the In more recent times, the facility has been fragmented with the forced Curra State Forest as the preferred location since this time. relocation of the Gympie Service Rifle Club to allow for railway deviation and the development of the Gympie North Railway Station. Much of the The proposal now involves developing a suite of ranges to meet former rifle range has been redeveloped as a network of tracks and trails the needs of the existing and former groups: for walking, mountain biking and horse riding and is subject to a lease to † Gympie Pistol Club the Coolola Trail Care Alliance (through to February 2023). † Gympie Clay Target Club The Gympie Sporting Clays are located at an attractive facility on private † Gympie Sporting Clays land at Sexton (Lot 109 LX315). † Gympie Small Bore Rifle and Silhouette Club † Gympie Service Rifle Club (that does not currently have a The current proposal is to develop a single multi-disciplinary shooting home). complex with long-term security of tenure. In more recent times, the Shooters Union (Qld Branch) have become affiliated with the CRCA and are also seeking a venue. State Government support In February 2014, the Minister for National Parks, Recreation, Sport and Racing wrote to Council providing in-principle support for the provision of land from the Curra State Forest for the Context map showing existing shooting locations, development of a shooting range complex. Importantly, the Gympie township and the Curra State Forest letter notes that Council is to be the proponent of the facility. The letter also notes that the support for this site and subsequent development is dependent on consultation and planning reaching acceptable outcomes regarding: † Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry’s preference for the facility to be located centrally within the Sporting Clays State Forest † potential impacts on existing recreation uses † securing tenure † Native Title † development approvals. Curra State Finally, the letter indicates that the State is not in a position to Forest provide a direct project funding contribution at this time. Councillor support Council acknowledges that previous planning processes have failed to protect the existing shooting facilities and perceives merit in developing a hub of shooting facilities in the one location. Additionally, Council perceives the preferred location 1 Pistol as the southern section of the Curra State Forest . Small Bore and Silhouette If a new facility is to be developed, Council wish to deal with and Clay Target tenure and management issues with one over-arching body (the CRCA). In addition to granting suitable tenure arrangements, Gympie Council sees its facility development role as assisting the user groups to gain appropriate road access to the site (subject to a Council resolution to this effect). Finally, if the existing Gympie-based clubs relocate, their facilities (and the wider Victory Heights facility) will be retained for community purposes. 1 pending the outcomes of this Feasibility and Option Analysis

3 GYMPIE REGIONAL COUNCIL 2.3 Shooting sport trends Participation The Australian Bureau of Statistics conducted an annual participation in Exercise, Recreation and Sport Survey (ERASS) until 2010. No surveys including shooting sports participation have been conducted since this time. Between 2004 and 2010, ERASS reports fluctuating participation in shooting sports in both Queensland and Australia. In Queensland, participation peaks of 22,300 and 24,700 were identified in 2006 and 2010 respectively. In contrast, nation-wide increases were noted in 2008 and 2010 with a 2010 participation of 133,100. Interestingly, most sports represented at the Olympics note Sporting Clays tower located along Wide Bay Creek increases in Olympic years or the years immediately following an Olympics. Generally, this does not appear to be reflected in shooting sport participation. These participation trends are difficult to interpret in terms of the potential future membership of the Gympie-based clubs. While the clubs report steady membership bases at present (see Section 2.4), they may experience fluctuations in future years. Facilities Traditional sports, such as cricket, football and basketball display a range of facility-related trends that influence future development and design considerations. For example, in recent years there has been a move toward synthetic fields, field lighting and out-of- season competitions. However, there are few clear directions being displayed for shooting sports. Those noted include: †† constructing new ranges and range upgrades without first seeking suitable guidance from the Weapons Licensing Branch †† shooting clubs and councils not securing appropriate agreements with adjoining landowners when safety templates Covered firing platform at the Pistol Club extend beyond the primary land parcel.

Views from the Small Bore Rifle and Silhouette Club

4 District shooting facility - Feasibility and option analysis 2.4 Industry engagement - existing situation and future directions Interviews were conducted with key representatives from all of the existing shooting groups (and their representative peak bodies) and the local field archery club. Additionally, interviews were conducted with the Cooloola Trail Care Alliance and Multi Terrain Bike Orienteers as peak bodies representing mountain bike-related and other passive (pedestrian and equine) users. Shooting-related bodies Cooloola Range Complex Association Gympie Pistol Club The Cooloola Range Complex Association Inc. was formed in 20001 Current location to drive the planning and development of a new multi-disciplinary shooting complex within the Gympie area. The Association currently The Gympie Pistol Club is located at Belvedere Road, Veteran. includes the following affiliates: † Gympie Pistol Club Membership considerations † Gympie Clay Target Club The club has approximately 200 members and has enjoyed steady † Gympie Sporting Clays growth throughout 2013 and 2014. Very few members are juniors. † Gympie Small Bore Rifle and Silhouette Club † Gympie Service Rifle Club Current facilities † Shooters Union (Qld Branch) † † Firearm Owners Association of Australia 90m range, 50m range, two 25m ranges, all ranges are lit † † Firearm Designers Theamic Association 25m and 50m ranges have covered firing platforms † † Qld Indoor Air Rifle Association. amenities, clubroom, office, outdoor covered area, storage areas and safe room Local club background Usage The Service Rifle Club was removed from their home at the Victory † members can shoot everyday (if a Range Officer is present) Range to allow the development of railway line in the mid-1990’s. † shoots every Wednesday and Saturday afternoon/evening The Small Bore Club was also removed from the Victory Range † regular shoots on Sundays (before establishing their own home adjoining the Clay Target Club). † irregular use by Scout Groups and for Come and Try days In 2002, Council wrote to the three shooting clubs surrounding † host an annual 2-day Halloween shoot and a 2-day International Victory Heights explaining that their leases would be limited to short- Practical Shooting Confederation shoot term with an alternative site preferred. The Pistol Club, Clay Target Club and Small Bore Rifle and Silhouette Club each now hold leases Facilities required at a new venue that expire on 30 June 2021. † lit range up to 300m in length † covered firing platform and club facilities (approx. 75m wide) With the Service Rifle Club without a home, the Sporting Clays † access to mains power and water Club based on private land and ongoing ‘murmuring’ regarding the † suitable parking, toilets and showers to accommodate camping long-term tenure of the three remaining clubs in the Victory Heights (and regular large events) locality, the Association has conducted wide ranging consultation and government promotion to further the possibility of a new multi- Relocation considerations disciplinary facility. Given that the club has little desire to relocate, it expects that The Association prepared a lengthy study in 2003. The study Council will lead provision of suitable infrastructure (just as it would if included a preferred complex layout within the southern section of it forced relocation on any other formal sport in the Council area). the Curra State Forest between Wood and Dead Horse Roads.

Belvedere Road

Pistol Club Road Creek Sandy

1 with a name change from Cooloola Range Complex Management Committee to the current name in 2002

5 GYMPIE REGIONAL COUNCIL Gympie Small Bore Rifle and Silhouette Gympie Clay Target Club Current location Current location The Gympie Small Bore Rifle and Silhouette Club is located at 62 The Clay Target Club is located at 64 Banks Pocket Road, Araluen Banks Pocket Road, Araluen (adjoining the Clay Target Club). (adjoining the Small Bore Rifle and Silhouette Club). Membership considerations Membership considerations The club has enjoyed recent significant growth with 170 members Club membership in late 2014 was 28 (and stable). late in 2014. Approximately 30 of these members are juniors. Current facilities Current facilities †† three down-the-line layouts with double traps †† 90m lit and turfed range (north north-east orientation) †† amenities with toilets and showers †† 24 station covered firing line †† attractive two-storey clubhouse (105 year old relocated school †† clubroom, office, scorer’s oomr and armoury, storage container building) †† toilet and shower block (shared with the Clay Target Club) †† storage container (for targets and ammunition) †† entire facility and the firing platform are locked and well-signed †† utility shed Usage Usage †† Friday afternoon - junior coaching †† monthly shoots (on a Sunday) †† Friday evening - competition shoot †† some members like to practice the day before the monthly shoot †† every second Saturday - competition shoot †† host the two-day Gold City competition (attracts approximately †† members have keys to the facility and practice on most days 60 competitors) †† police practice - 12 times per year †† Cooloola Christian College - 3 days of shooting for school sport Facilities required at a new venue †† irregular use by church groups and businesses †† five down-the-line layouts (preferably with at least two lit) and †† host one round of the single-day Norgrove Shield event each 2 skeet layouts (this would provide opportunities for the club year (attracts approximately 50 competitors) to host zone titles (100 competitors), state titles (200-300 competitors) and police nationals (150 competitors) Facilities required at a new venue †† lead retrieval facilities (e.g. raised mesh fence with shallow †† lit and turfed range to 200m with 40 station covered firing line concrete drain and sumps) †† separate area to develop a 10m indoor air rifle range †† electricity (especially given that the traps are controlled by †† access to mains power and water and all weather 2WD access computer) and water †† suitable toilets and showers †† small club facility, storage and amenities (with toilets and Relocation considerations showers) Relocation considerations Ideally, the club does not wish to move and would prefer long-term tenure in its existing location. The club has developed everything The club has no desires to leave their current location (particularly at their facility through volunteer labour and accessing State not to a location with no power, water or sealed access roads). The Government grants. Council has not contributed to the facility. In proposed relocation is not feasible without significant support from fact, if the club is forced from its current location and required to State and local government. fund all new developments, preference would be to simply fold.

Banks Pocket Road Small Bore & Silhouette

Clay Target

Views across a down-the-line layout and up to the clubhouse

6 District shooting facility - Feasibility and option analysis Gympie Sporting Clays Club Gympie Service Rifle Club Current location Current location The Gympie Sporting Clays Club is located on private property on The club currently shoots at the Gympie Pistol Club. The club was Sexton Road, Sexton. formerly based at Victory Heights before being forced to relocate to allow for railway development approximately 20 years ago. Membership considerations Membership considerations The club maintains a membership base of between 30 and 40. The club has approximately 200 members and is growing slowly. Current facilities Current facilities The shooting facilities run along the bank of Wide Bay Creek. Eight ‘walk-through’ stations, three skeet stations and two towers are Club members shoot 22 silhouette and 22 target and pistol at the available. Additional shooting ground is available beyond the skeet Pistol Club. ground over the creek. Usage Ancillary facilities include: †† rifle shoots are conducted monthly † † large shed with both closed and open bays †† pistol shoots are conducted monthly †† toilets †† storage container Facilities required at a new venue † † utility shed †† chasing a 1000m range with the capacity to host State- and Usage National-level events †† the facility would be used for weekly shoots † † club shoot one Sunday per month (10-15 shooters) †† additionally, use on most days would be expected for member † † host a two-day State Selection Shoot annually (attracts practice and for locals sighting-in guns approximately 100 competitors) †† preferred ancillary facilities include: † † host the two-day State Championships every four years (attracts −− power, water, small club facility, storage between 100 and 200 competitors) Facilities required at a new venue Development considerations †† similar layout to existing The club is keen for Council to provide suitable access to the site. †† preference for larger amenities block with showers The club would then construct the range using its own means. Ideally, the club would look to relocate the butts from the Victory Relocation considerations Heights range to the new facility (as they remain in fair condition and have historical significance for the club). The club is keen to stay at its current picturesque facility as long as possible. It is important to note that a facility nearer to Gympie will actually be further away from home than the current facility for approximately half of the existing members. The club has minimal means to assist financially with relocation. All current funds are channelled into rebuilding the existing facility after recent flood damage.

Sporting Clays

Sexton Road Tower and skeet Walk-throughs

Wide Bay Creek

The Victory Heights site is now home to a network of tracks and trails

7 GYMPIE REGIONAL COUNCIL Gympie-Kilkivan Rifle Club Shooters Union of Queensland Current location The Union (club) was formed in 2005 as a key umbrella organisation representing shooters and as a weapons licensing body. The group The Gympie-Kilkivan Rifle Club is located at Blight Street, Kilkivan. supports the proposed development within the Curra State Forest and notes that a quality multi-disciplinary shooting complex has Current facilities the potential to attract regular use and derive significant economic benefit to the region. The club uses an 800m1 range. However, the template only allows for 2 targets, limiting the number of shooters that can train and Additionally, the club would like to see a 500m range developed to compete at the facility. support its 170 Gympie-based members. These members currently use ranges at the Sunshine Coast, Bundaberg and Maryborough. Potential impacts from shooting facility development in Gympie Queensland Police Service (Gympie The club holds little concern that it will lose members to Gympie (it weapons training) is simply too far for locals to drive for regular ‘club’ shoots). However, the club fully supports the concept of a quality 1000m rifle range The local police service use the Small Bore Rifle and Silhouette Club being developed that can host events. for weapons training up to 20 times each year. Being conducted during the day on weekdays, this police use fits well with club use The club is concerned that Council may look to disband the Gympie- (generally on Friday afternoons/evenings and on weekends). Kilkivan club and to consolidate all of the clubs within the new facility. Full bore rifle training is conducted at Kilkivan and Wondai, although preference would be for this to be undertaken at a new facility within the Gympie area. Opportunity may exist to conduct regular simunition Gympie Sporting Shooters Association training at a new facility if a suitable indoor area was available (e.g. Current locations large meeting room similar in size to a 1-2 bay garage). Importantly, the police service has no desire to develop nor operate Association members currently shoot at Tin Can Bay, Fraser Coast, its own stand-alone range. Preference will always be to be a casual Imbil and Amamoor. With weekly shoots, the Tin Can Bay facility is hirer of an existing facility(ies). the most heavily used by the Association. Potential impacts from shooting facility Queensland Sporting Clays Association development in Gympie The Association indicates that the Gympie club has a strong base, quality facility and runs a range of shoots. While the Association It is expected that members will continue to support the existing supports the club’s preference to remain in its current location, it smaller facilities rather than use any new facility in Gympie. notes the need to plan for relocation to a site with long-term tenure. North Arm Rifle Club Queensland Rifle Association The Association fully supports the development of a 1000 yard range Current location (with long-term tenure) being developed in the Gympie Region. Such The club is one of the key users of the Davison Range Target Sports a facility would meet a current unmet demand in Gympie but also Complex located between Yandina and Eumundi. provide a quality facility to attract events. The Association notes that there is no formal direction that the two Current facilities rifle ranges at Belmont are to be closed nor relocated. The club can shoot up to 700 yards and is certified for up to six targets (although it is currently seeking expansion out to eight). Queensland Clay Target Association The Association is pleased with the quality of facility that the club Potential impacts from shooting facility has developed in Gympie and appreciates that the club is reluctant development in Gympie to relocate. The club recently hosted a high class event and is prospering because it is throwing quality targets. If the club is forced The club is long-established and has no plans to relocate from its to relocate, the Association supports an expansion to five down-the- existing facility. Indeed, the club celebrated its centenary at the line layouts to allow for zone and (potentially) state level events. location in November 2014. However, the club acknowledges that many rifle ranges have Queensland Target Sports been closed across Queensland in recent times and supports the The Association understands the Gympie-based club’s desire to development of a facility within Gympie where long-term tenure can remain in their current location given the quality of the facilities be assured. Ideally, such a facility would include a 1000m range with they have developed. However, if the club is to be relocated they at least fifteen targets. should be given access to at least a 100m range (200m if the club is 1 Rifle events are shot over range lengths measured in both yards or meters considering centrefire rifle matches). Additionally, the club may like to depending on the style of match consider electronic targets if they are to be moved to a new facility.

8 District shooting facility - Feasibility and option analysis Archery group Gympie Field Archers Current location The club leases Council-owned property in Imbil. Membership considerations The club has approximately 160 members and has seen continued increases across recent years. These increases are the result of successful Come and Try days and regular promotion with local schools. Facility considerations The club has developed quality field archery facilities within Imbil and sees this as the current and future home of field archery for the region. However, there are currently no target archery (olympic-style) ranges in the region. The club is keen to develop a target archery facility within Gympie. A suitable facility would require a range of up to 90m. Potentially, if any of the existing shooting clubs within Gympie were to relocate, opportunity may exist for the Archery Club to develop a target archery facility at the site. Gympie Field Archers in action

9 GYMPIE REGIONAL COUNCIL Mountain bike-related groups Cooloola Trail Care Alliance Multi Terrain Bike Orienteers Queensland Existing considerations Previous uses Cooloola Trail Care Alliance (CTCA) notes that there are approximately Mutli Terrain Bike Orienteers Queensland (MTBO) conduct a range of 125km (80km are currently trafficable) of tracks and trails within the events across natural areas in Queensland. In 2013, MTBO hosted Curra State Forest. The southern section of the Forest has an intense the national championships in the Gympie area. One of the events network of trails with 30km of wide tracks and 15km of single at the championships was conducted in the southern and central track. This area is also valued as a public recreation venue given sections of the Curra State Forest. The championships attracted 110 its close proximity to town, existing (and potential) trail network and competitors. undulating landform. In order to develop a quality map, MTBO members conducted a Potential impact from shooting facility number of site visits and surveying exercises in advance of the event. The development of a district level shooting facility anywhere Curra State Forest proved to be an ideal location. The interconnected within the Forest would require the land to be excised from network of loops provided a challenging course. publicly accessible land that, amongst other things, serves a public recreation focus. Because the existing trail assets across Future uses Curra State Forest are not uniformly distributed, the quantum of Because competitors tend to recall key features and tracks within loss of recreation trails will depend on the selected location of the each natural area (rather than rely solely on orienteering skills), shooting facility and the collective area of range templates to be MTBO tends to rotate events between facilities on a 2-3 year basis. accommodated. It is hoped that Curra State Forest can host another event in 2015 or Additional considerations: 2016. †† impacts on access to other sections of the Forest and adjacent private land Potential impacts from shooting facility †† facility impacts on neighbouring residential amenity (and development intensifying residential and rural-residential footprint) †† difficulty in managing inappropriate access to the shooting If significant shooting facilities are developed in the southern section facility (and culture of some forest users of ignoring signage and of the Curra State Forest, MTBO would conduct a desktop analysis restrictions on access) of the central and northern sections of the Forest to ascertain †† potential opportunity for the trail-using community to be whether a suitable network of trails was available. However, MTBO compensated for the loss in quality tracks and trails. has indicated that the density of trails required for this form of orienteering is not likely to exist outside the southern section of the Forest. In this instance, an alternate venue would need to be sought (potentially outside the Gympie region).

Trailhead signage - Victory Heights MTB orienteers plan their next moves

10 District shooting facility - Feasibility and option analysis Government engagement Member for Gympie (and Chair - State Department of National Parks, Recreation, Development, Infrastructure and Industry Sport and Racing (Queensland Parks and Committee) Wildlife Service) Project background Project background The proposal to develop a regionally significant multi-disciplinary Recreation use of Curra State Forest is managed by the Queensland shooting complex in Gympie (and specifically in the southern section Parks and Wildlife Service (QPWS, of the Department of National of the Curra State Forest) has been ‘in motion’ for more than 15 Parks, Recreation, Sport and Racing). years. The Department has indicated its in-principle support for the It is accepted that the Gympie region has a strong ‘gun-loving’ development of a multi-disciplinary shooting complex within community. This should be built upon with the development of a high the Curra State Forest. However, it is acknowledged that there quality facility where olympians can train and international events are currently a range of existing recreation uses. Ideally, the can be hosted. Department’s preference is to meet the needs of both the shooting community and the existing recreation users within the Forest. Project opportunities Project considerations There is clear advantage in considering development within the Curra State Forest where limited urban or peri-urban encroachment The Department acknowledges that the shooting community aims to is expected. Additionally, the area is already impacted by a railway develop a facility in the southern section of the State Forest where line and will be further impacted by the proposed new highway the recreation uses are currently most intense. From a safety point- alignment. of-view, it is highly unlikely that the existing uses and shooting uses can co-exist in this area. There are a number of shooting complexes across the State currently facing tenure pressure given urban encroachment and other issues A full environmental impact assessment would be expected from the (e.g. change in Department of Defence priorities). Gaining long-term proponent at the point that the project was put forward for formal tenure within the Curra State Forest can position Gympie as the approval. preferred shooting venue for a number of disciplines. Granting long-term tenure to Council for development of this nature The long-term future of the State’s premier shooting complex at within a State Forest is far more achievable than within either a Belmont is considered uncertain given its location within an urban Regional or National Park. area. The proposed Gympie facility has the potential to attract many of the events currently conducted at Belmont. Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Once tenure certainty is guaranteed for the project, state and federal Forestry (Forest Products) government funding support is predicted. Additionally, there is scope for local Regional Organisation of Councils (e.g. Wide Bay Burnett The commercial uses (timber harvesting, quarry material supply and ROC) to encourage member councils to contribute to the project grazing) of the Curra State Forest are managed by Forest Products given its regional nature. (within the Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry. A high class facility is expected to attract regular events and can be a Existing uses significant economic driver for the region. The southern section of the Curra State Forest (forest management Department of National Parks, Recreation, unit GYMG70007) is a current harvesting area. There are no current stock grazing permit holders or known quarry resources in this Sport and Racing (Sport and Recreation section of the Forest. Services) GYMG70007 is a productive dry sclerophyll forest and is considered one of the more productive areas with the entire Forest. It is a Project considerations particularly commercially appealing harvest area given the preferred species, appropriate access (including during wet weather) and One of the key drivers for the project espoused by a range of generally trafficable terrain. key local stakeholders is the ‘impending’ closure of the Belmont Shooting Range given its location adjoining an urban area. However, There are seven permanently marked apiary sites within this potential has never been discussed by key State Government GYMG70007. Additionally, there are a range of roads and tracks officers nor has any long-term feasibility of the facility ever been that traverse the southern end of the Forest that are important for investigated. management and fire control purposes. Indeed, the State is currently looking to invest further in the facility as it will be hosting the shooting disciplines for the 2018 Commonwealth Games.

11 GYMPIE REGIONAL COUNCIL Neighbouring local government Project considerations † Some suggestion that shrapnel lodged in trees is a safety engagement concern when sawing logs and processing timber2 † Concern that the apiary sites within the southern section will be Fraser Coast Regional Council impacted by the proposed shooting facility In line with previous planning, Council is looking to further † Concern controlling both inappropriate and necessary access to consolidate shooting disciplines at the Fraser Coast Shooting the forest areas within the shooting facility Complex (Churchill Mine Road) by assisting to relocate clubs † Preference for the proposed shooting facility to be located within from alternate areas. Opportunity may exist for Council to receive GYMG70003 or GYMG70004 (in the north-west corner of the significant funding support from New Hope Group who are State Forest) given: considering mining activities adjoining the shooting facility. − amphitheatre-style terrain − timber harvesting has been completed in these areas and the remaining forest is less productive Noosa Shire Council − steeper terrain in these areas resulting in fewer access With limited financial resources and no suitable land parcels, Council points (limiting inappropriate access) is not in a position to consider developing significant shooting − no apiary sites within GYMG70003 and only three in facilities. Indeed, Council fully supports the development of quality GYMG70004 facilities in Gympie that may attract patronage from the Noosa Shire. − no known significant quarry resources − less access tracks and roads of significance for fire and North Burnett Regional Council management activities in these sites − neighbours to these sites are generally rural landowners. Council supports local shooting clubs in their endeavours. It has no Therefore, there are less buildings and other assets at risk plans to develop upgraded or additional facilities. from wildfire events relative to GYMG70007. Somerset Regional Council Department of Environment and Heritage Council has no desire (nor demand) to develop additional shooting Protection facilities. The Department indicates that Council should consider completing South Burnett Regional Council a pre-design application through the Department of State Development, Infrastructure and Planning as the initial step in the No shooting facility upgrades nor new developments are planned. development approach. Sunshine Coast Council If the shooting complex is approved the site will need to be listed on the Environment Management Register as shooting is a notifiable Council continues to support the recommendations of its Difficult-to- activity (for contamination purposes). Locate Sports Study1. This Study outlined the need to further assess the feasibility of a multi-discipline facility in the Curra State Forest. Department of Natural Resources and Interestingly, the study further recommends a joint approach with Gympie Regional Council receiving support from Wide Bay Regional Mines Council (sic) and Sunshine Coast Council. Once the State and Council looked to enter into any long-term tenure agreement over the proposed land in the State Forest, the 1 Council’s Social Policy Branch and Tredwell Management, 2009 Department would conduct research to determine whether Native Title over the proposed land parcel had been extinguished. If it has not, the Department will need to consider whether development as a shooting facility is a valid use of the State Forest or whether Summary of engagement the land may need to be excised. Specifically, opportunity may † State Government has provided Council with in-principle exist to examine whether the use does not represent a higher or support for the provision of land within the Curra State greater impact than the original intended purpose of the reserve Forest for the development of a shooting complex (considerations in line with Native Title Act 1993, Section 24J). † Council has yet to resolve its level of resource commitment for the development of any potential facility † four existing clubs would prefer to stay in their existing facilities rather than to relocate to the Curra State Forest † 2 This suggestion was refuted by a manager of a local timber processing Gympie Service Rifle Club is seeking a home within the Gympie area business who suggested that brass and lead fragments are often † the southern end of the Curra State Forest includes a softer than hardwood timbers. Further, Gympie Timbers harvested network of tracks and trails the former Victory Rifle Range on two occasions without incident. † Fraser Coast Regional Council is considering consolidating and potentially upgrading shooting facilities However, these views may not be shared by all sawmillers and the at the Fraser Coast Shooting Complex. opinions on milling trees with potential shrapnnel appear mixed.

12 District shooting facility - Feasibility and option analysis 3 The site 3.1 Site overview The subject site, for the purpose of this feasibility study, is referred to as the Corella area within the Curra State Forest. The figure on the adjoining page shows the location of the State Forest relative to the Gympie township. Site name Curra State Forest (Corella) Address Greenhalgh Road, Corella Property description SF700 on FTY1491. Also referred to as GYMG70007 (for DAFF purposes) Tenure State Forest Management Queensland Parks and Wildlife Service Site area Curra State Forest - 4830 hectares Corella area - approximately 680 hectares (represented by GYMG70007 in the adjoining map) Planning Scheme Environmental Management designation and Conservation Zone Infrastructure and utilities Roads - The site has three unsealed roads that traverse it. Dead Horse Road and Wood Road are located in the southern end of the State Forest (and form the boundaries of the Corella site). Bradys Road is located centrally within the State Forest and generally runs in a north-south direction. Additional unsealed management and maintenance tracks are spread across the site. Other than the apiary markers, there is no infrastructure within the site. Map of Curra State Forest produced by DAFF. There are no connections to The individual land parcel designations are potable water, electricity nor used by State Government agencies for facility sewerage within the site. management purposes Surrounding land uses Bordering the far southern end of the site is an area of private residences zoned rural residential. The remainder of the State Forest is surrounded by land zoned rural (as depicted in the map on page 16). A train line forms the boundary in the far south-west corner of the site. Additionally, the proposed new highway alignment is expected to cut through the western side of the State Forest from the south for approximately half the length of the State Forest.

13 GYMPIE REGIONAL COUNCIL 3.2 The site in context The Curra State Forest has a dense covering of vegetation with many small creeks and gullies traversing the landscape. The land is highly undulating Curra and has rocky outcrops in the central- State west and north-west sections. Forest The southern end of the State Forest is approximately 6.5km north of the Gympie Central Business District and extends to the north approximately 12.5km. The State Forest is an existing timber harvest area for sawlogs, poles, girders, landscaping timbers and miscellaneous products. The Corella area in the south is considered productive dry sclerophyll and has re-harvest potential Corella in approximately 15 to 20 years. area There are twenty-three registered apiary sites across the State Forest with seven of these located in the Corella area (GYMG70007) in the south.

Gympie

14 District shooting facility - Feasibility and option analysis

0 5

kilometres Scale: 1:154,200 Land use planning 4 considerations (c) Uses which do not compromise the significant values 4.1 Sustainable Planning of the area, such as ecotourism and outdoor recreation, may be supported where a demonstrated community need exists and the use does not detrimentally affect the Act environmental values of the area. The Sustainable Planning Act (SPA) 2009 establishes the planning (d) Natural features such as creeks, gullies, waterways, context that sets the framework for development in Queensland. wetlands and native vegetation are protected and SPA puts in place the timeframes, planning approval process and appropriate buffers are established. development application requirements that need to be adhered to when submitting an application for the proposed development. (e) Adverse impacts on ecological features and processes are avoided. A development application is required under Chapter 6 of the SPA and other approvals for an assessable development under Schedule (f) Structures that are not designed to be relocated or 3 of the SP Regulation. sacrificed if threatened by natural hazards are inappropriate. The most significant component of SPA and the SP Regulation that effect this proposal relate to the IDAS process. The proposed Implications for proposed shooting development development will be impact assessable development under SPA. Clearly, the development of covered firing lines and club facilities and the significant clearing required for range development are not consistent with the purpose and requirements of this zoning. For the 4.2 Gympie Regional proposed development to proceed, the required parcel of land would need to have its tenure formally changed (potentially excised from Planning Scheme 2013 the State Forest) and Council would, subsequently, need to consider changing the zoning of that land parcel (an optimal approach). The table below provides a summary of the implications of the Alternatively, consideration could be given to a Material Change Gympie Regional Council’s Planning Scheme for the Curra State of Use and assessment of a development application (that would Forest Site. require public notification under the Sustainable Planning Act 2009). Zone Environmental Management and It should be noted that DAFF (Forest Products) has a strong Conservation Zone preference for the land tenure to stay as State Forest in order for it to remain in production and available to supply future timber resources Assessment type Impact assessable committed under long-term supply agreements. Anecdotally, it would Overlays † Bushfire Hazard appear that the proposed shooting groups would be pleased to work − High Risk Area closely with DAFF to ensure that opportunities for continued logging − Medium Risk Area could be pursued and managed (as they have been at the previous † Conservation Significant Area Victory Range site). With regards to the Environmental Management and Conservation The adjoining map also indicates the zoning of the land surrounding Code, Section 6.2.17 specifies: the State Forest. As previously indicated, with the vast majority of adjoining land zoned rural, limited additional development is (1) The purpose of the zone is to provide for areas identified as expected within close proximity of the proposed shooting site. supporting significant biological diversity and ecological integrity. (2) The local government purpose is to provide areas of land for the permanent preservation and protection of areas of environmental 4.3 Additional and cultural values, including national parks, environmental parks and beach protection buffer areas from development that degrades its natural state or adversely affects its landscape, cultural heritage, considerations or conservation values. DNPRSR (QPWS) note the change in fire management requirements (3) The purpose of the code will be achieved through the following that may be necessary with the proposed use in the Curra State overall outcomes: Forest. (a) Areas identified as having significant values for Currently, burning is undertaken as required to uphold conservation biological diversity, water catchment, ecological values and promote timber production. However, if the existing functioning, beach protection or coastal management, and recreation use is enhanced (as proposed) this burning regime may historical or cultural values are protected from need to be increased for wildfire mitigation and reduced fuel loads. development. Depending on the ultimate tenure arrangements, there is potential (b) Low intensity development based on appreciation for the ‘new’ land manager to be responsible for fire management in of the significant values of the area may be facilitated any excised portion. This may include the construction of fire breaks where a demonstrated community need exists and is and suitable fuel load reduction practices. consistent with a management plan for the area.

15 GYMPIE REGIONAL COUNCIL Extract from Council’s Planning Scheme 2013 Zoning Maps

Curra State Forest (Environmental Management and Conservation Zone) Rural Zone

Rural Residential Zone

Summary of land use planning considerations † the proposed project is not consistent with the current zoning of the State Forest. Excision of land and zone changes are likely to be required for the project to proceed

16 District shooting facility - Feasibility and option analysis Previous research 5 considerations A range of background documents exist that influence the potential proposed shooting complex development. 5.1 Sunshine Coast Difficult-to-Locate Sports Study 2009-20281 The purpose of the study was to identify potential and existing sites and facilities for the development of difficult-to-locate sports venues, precincts or networks on the Sunshine Coast. Additionally, the study provides guidelines for the ongoing protection and enhancement of difficult-to-locate activities on the Sunshine Coast. While the study notes the importance of protecting the Davison and Cooloolabin ranges, a key direction is the need for a shooting precinct (with the Curra State Forest noted as a preferred site). Specifically, the study recommends the following high priority action: The establishment of a national standard shooting precinct (including full bore) in the Curra State Forest to provide for the long term greater demands for the Sunshine Coast, Gympie and Wide Bay Greater Region. Clearly, this recommendation provides support for the current proposal. However, it should also be noted that this recommendation reflects the desire of Sunshine Coast Council to find a home for shooting sports (a known difficult-to-locate sport) outside its own boundaries. Additionally, the study notes that need for a national standard facility is somewhat born from uncertainty surrounding the long-term viability of the Belmont facility2. 5.2 Fraser Coast Shooting Complex Issues and Options Paper3 Leading the development of this Paper was ongoing tenure issues facing the Maryborough Clay Target Club, Maryborough Small Bore Rifle Club and Maryborough and District Rifle Club. Additionally, the potential development of the Colton Mine was expected to impact the existing facilities. The Paper presents an analysis of the existing and proposed future issues surrounding development of the Fraser Coast Shooting Complex. The project involved developing layout options and relocation costs based on the extent of mining undertaken. Ultimately, the Paper recommends that Council, the Fraser Coast Shooting Complex and Northern Energy Corporation (the mining body at the time) work closely together to ascertain specific facility impacts from mining operations and opportunities for restitution. Interestingly, five years on from this project no mining has commenced and the status quo of the Shooting Complex remains. 5.3 Fraser Coast Shooting Complex Revised Layout4 Northern Energy Corporation sought a revised layout to the Fraser Coast Shooting Complex that allowed for future mining operations. At the time of report development, the mining lease overlapped the Fraser Coast SSAA rifle and pistol ranges and the identified reserves area overlapped the Sporting Clays facility. The proposed new layout included relocated facilities for the SSAA pistol and rifle facilities and the Sporting Clays facility. Further, the layout highlighted that opportunity existed for the development of a full bore rifle range and clay target facility within the wider complex. Indicative costs for relocating the existing users (not the additional full bore rifle and clay target facilities) was approximately $2m.

1 Council’s Social Policy Branch and Tredwell Management, 2009 2 a notion not supported by any evidence through the findings of this current project 3 ROSS Planning, 2009 4 ROSS Planning, 2011. Complete for Northern Energy Corporation

17 GYMPIE REGIONAL COUNCIL 5.4 Comino Rifle Range Field Investigations Report In 2000, a Department of Natural Resources Project Officer conducted a range of site investigations for a district shooting facility (template of 1km x 3km). Specifically, the officer was to focus on State Forests in the immediate Gympie area. (Although two freehold parcels were also briefly examined for comparative purposes). The report identified one location as potentially suitable for the development of a district shooting facility - the Curra State Forest. The specific location preferred is in the central mid-north of the State Forest along Bradys Road given its buffering from adjoining land uses, potential for north-south range alignment, previous logging activity and travel time from Gympie. Further, the report notes the need for additional investigation given the significant vegetation clearing required, distance to services, poor road access, existing recreation uses and harvesting requirements.

Approximate location of the rifle range proposed in the Comino Report, 2000 (blue rectangle) Approximate location of the shooting complex proposed in this study (red ellipse)

0 1

kilometres Scale: 1:52,860 Summary of previous research † Fraser Coast Regional Council may look to develop a facility similar to that proposed at Gympie † The Curra State Forest has been identified in previous planning as a preferred site for a district shooting facility

18 District shooting facility - Feasibility and option analysis Environmental 6 considerations 6.1 Legislative context The text below describes the relevant pieces of environmental legislation that may be triggered by the development of a shooting facility within the Curra State Forest. It describes the legislation, the approval type and description and any implications. Federal legislation State legislation Environment Protection and Biodiversity Environmental Protection Act 1994 Conservation Act 1999 (Cth) The objective of the Environmental Protection Act 1994 (EP Act) is to minimise the impact of development on all aspects and parameters The objective of the Environment Protection and Biodiversity of the natural environment. Conservation Act (EPBC Act) is to protect and manage Nationally Environmentally Significant (NES) flora, fauna, ecological All persons are obliged under this Act to ensure they do not cause communities and heritage places. any environmental harm unless all practical measures to avoid that harm have been taken. All persons and organisations have a general All persons and organisations are obliged under this Act to ensure environmental duty to protect environmental values placed upon they and their activities do not significantly impact on matters of NES them at all times. as listed under this act. Activities must, therefore, consider and effectively mitigate all A referral must be made to the Commonwealth Government if possible impacts on natural water bodies, soil health and stability, air actions have a significant impact on matters listed in Part 3 of the and noise pollution and native flora and fauna. EPBC Act. The EP Act is supported by the following regulations and policies that Approval type place controls on specific environmental aspects; †† EPBC Controlled Action Approval. †† Environmental Protection and Other Legislation Amendment Regulation (No. 1) 2013 Approval description †† Environmental Protection (Air) Policy 2008 †† Environmental Protection (Noise) Policy 2008 Under s130 of the EPBC Act the Minister will determine if the †† Environmental Protection Regulation 2008 action is a controlled action for which approval can be granted. The †† Environmental Protection (Waste Management) Regulation approval is granted under s133 of the EPBC Act. 2000 Under the EPBC Act, a person must not take an action that has, will †† Environmental Protection (Water) Policy 2009. have, or is likely to have a significant impact on any of the matters of NES without approval from the Australian Government Environment Implications for the Curra State Forest Minister or the Minister’s delegate. The proposed development is likely to have negative environmental impacts on both the flora and fauna within the site, due to land Implications for the Curra State Forest degradation, primarily as a result of clearing. Further, impacts To date, there have been no detailed environmental assessments include erosion and sediment runoff. undertaken for the Curra State Forest. The implications for a Furthermore, the Environmental Protection (Noise) Policy 2008 gives shooting facility within the Forest will need to be determined by acoustic quality objectives for enhancing or protecting environmental undertaking a detailed environmental assessment. values. These values include human health and wellbeing, health and biodiversity of ecosystems and community amenity. With regards to the health and biodiversity of ecosystems, the regulation stipulates a (noise) “sensitive receptor” includes “protected area, or an area identified under a conservation plan under the Nature Conservation Act 1992 as a critical habitat or an area of major interest”. While the Curra State Forest does not fall within a protected area nor does it fall under a conservation plan, the intent of this statement is potentially relevant to this site and therefore the impacts of noise from shooting operations on wildlife needs to be considered under this piece of legislation. The current tenure of the site is State Forest. While the Nature Conservation Act 1992 (NC Act) and Vegetation Management Act (VM Act) does not apply to clearing of vegetation in a State Forest, and is exempt development under the SPA if the site remains a State Forest, the future tenure of the site may need to be reviewed, and subsequently these two Acts are included here to provide the potential implications.

19 GYMPIE REGIONAL COUNCIL Nature Conservation Act 1992 Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Act 2003 This Act seeks to protect designated natural areas and the native The Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Act 2003 and Torres Strait Islander flora and fauna that are likely to inhabit and depend on those areas. Cultural Heritage Act 2003 (the Acts) require anyone who carries out a land-use activity to exercise a duty of care. Land users must take It is unlawful to take, use, keep or interfere with a cultural or natural all reasonable and practicable measures to ensure their activity does resource of a protected natural area. Outside of protected natural not harm Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander cultural heritage. areas, it is unlawful to kill, injure or otherwise take protected wildlife without approval. Many species of native plants and almost all The duty of care applies to any activity where Aboriginal or Torres vertebrate native animals in Queensland are protected wildlife under Strait Islander cultural heritage is located. This includes cultural the Act, including birds, reptiles and mammals (other than dingoes). heritage located on freehold land and regardless of whether or not it has been identified or recorded in a database. The Nature Conservation (Wildlife) Regulation 2006 prescribes and classes native wildlife species as either: Sections of the Curra State Forest have been extensively logged, and †† extinct in the wild as such, these areas can be classified as Category 4 under the Duty †† least concern of Care Guidelines (see below): †† endangered †† vulnerable Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Act 2003 - Duty of †† near threatened. care guidelines Approval type: These guidelines recognise that it is unlikely that Aboriginal cultural †† permit to take native wildlife heritage will be harmed where: †† species management program. †† the current or proposed activity is on an area previously subject to significant ground disturbance and the activity will impact Approval description: only on the area subject to the previous disturbance. Under s97(2) of the NC Act, a person, other than an authorised person, must not take, use, keep or interfere with the wildlife in an Areas previously subject to Significant Ground area that is identified under a conservation plan without a licence. Disturbance (Category 4) † S332 of the Nature Conservation (Wildlife Management) Regulation † 5.4 Where an activity is proposed in an area, which has 2006 prohibits the tampering with an animal breeding place that is previously been subject to Significant Ground Disturbance it is being used by a protected animal to incubate or rear the animal’s generally unlikely that the activity will harm Aboriginal cultural offspring unless a Species Management Program is in place. In this heritage and the activity will comply with these guidelines. † section, tamper with an animal breeding place, means damage, † 5.5 In these circumstances, subject to the measures set out in destroy, mark, move or dig up the breeding place. paragraphs 5.6 - 5.12, it is reasonable and practicable that the activity proceeds without further cultural heritage assessment. Implications for the Curra State Forest †† 5.6 In some cases, despite an area having been previously subject to Significant Ground Disturbance, certain features of To date, there have been no detailed environmental assessments the area may have residual cultural heritage significance. These undertaken for the Curra State Forest. The implications for a features are set out in paragraph 6.0 of the guidelines. shooting facility within the Forest will need to be determined through Should Council decide to proceed with the proposed shooting undertaking a detailed environmental assessment. development, the following actions are recommended to take place: †† Undertake a search of the cultural heritage register to assist Council/State in their consideration of the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultural heritage values of the site †† Depending upon the outcome of the search, Council/State may be required to undertake a cultural heritage study or survey - either as part of or preceding the development of a Cultural Heritage Management Plan. Native Title One of the requirements associated with the Minister for National Parks, Recreation, Sport and Racing’s support of the proposal, was reaching suitable outcomes regarding native title. The Department of Natural Resources and Mines note that upon development application the Department would assess whether Native Title over the proposed land parcel had been extinguished. If not, they will consider whether shooting facility development is a valid use of the State Forest or whether the land needs to be excised. Opportunity may exist to examine whether the use does not represent a higher or greater impact than the original intended purpose of the reserve (considerations in line with Native Title Act 1993, Section 24J). 20 District shooting facility - Feasibility and option analysis Forestry Act 1959 Vegetation Management Act 1999 The Curra State Forest is administered under the Forestry Act 1959. The Vegetation Management Act 1999 (VM Act) centres around the clearing of remnant vegetation in Queensland with the purpose The Forestry Act is : An Act to provide for forest reservations, the to ensure the biological diversity and natural ecological processes management, silvicultural treatment and protection of State forests, within the states’ natural areas are maintained, and the negative and the sale and disposal of forest products and quarry material, the biological impacts associated with land clearing are minimised. The property of the Crown on State forests, timber reserves and on other VM Act does not itself regulate vegetation management. Instead, the lands; and for other purposes. trigger and process for assessment, together with the offence for Relevant clauses of the Act with regard to the Curra State Forest and clearing without approval, are contained in the Sustainable Planning the proposed shooting facility/complex include: Act 2009 (SPA). The Act provides for the preparation of maps to identify areas of conservation value, areas vulnerable to degradation 34. Use of State forests and remnant vegetation. The Act also provides for policies against which applications for clearing vegetation are assessed. (1) The chief executive in addition to all other powers conferred by this Act may from time to time for the purposes of the use and The Act also provides the system for classifying vegetation in management of State forests— “regional ecosystems” (RE’s). RE’s are assigned conservation and biodiversity status under the Vegetation Management Regulations j) promote and encourage the use of a State forest or any part or 2000 based on their current extent in a bioregion including parts thereof for recreational purposes. endangered, of concern and least concern. 35. Granting of permit for land within State forest Approval type: (1) With respect to any land comprised in any State forest the chief †† Notice of clearing of regrowth vegetation (VM Act) executive may from time to time grant, subject to such provisions, †† Development Approval for Operational Works (Clearing native reservations and conditions as the chief executive thinks fit— vegetation) (under the SPA). (a) permits to occupy for a term fixed by the chief executive Approval description: (occupation permits); s7 of the SPA defines development to be: Special leases of land within State forests (a) carrying out building work (5) A term lease under the Land Act 1994 may be granted over (b) carrying out plumbing and drainage works land in a State forest and for the purpose of this subsection such (c) carrying out operational work land shall be deemed to be land reserved and set apart for public (d) reconfiguring a lot purposes, and the provisions of that Act so far as they are not (e) making a material change of use. inconsistent with so much of this Act as relates to State forests shall s238 of the SPA requires that a Development Approval is necessary extend and apply to all such special leases accordingly. for assessable development. Schedule 3 of the SP Regulation Additionally, it needs to be noted that the Vegetation Management identifies types of assessable development. Act does not apply to the clearing of vegetation in a state forest, ss19V and 19W of the VM Act prohibit the clearing of regulated under the Forestry Act 1959. regrowth vegetation unless it is done in accordance with the Vegetation Clearing Code. Implications for the Curra State Forest The Department of State Development, Infrastructure and Planning’s Development Assessment Mapping has triggered the site for Native Vegetation Clearing, Category B on the regulated vegetation management map. As the maps on the adjoining page highlight, the Curra State Forest site is entirely covered by remnant vegetation. Additionally, while much of the State Forest is designated as of least concern regional ecosystem, small areas along the creeks and gullies in the southern section (including the proposed Corella site) are noted as of concern regional ecosystem with essential habitat. Specifically, the Corella site is noted as including RE 12.3.11 - of concern palustrine wetland. Further, the essential habitat noted in this area is for phascolarctos cinerreus (common name koala). The status of the koala under the Nature Conservation Act 1992 is vulnerable. Given these triggers, on-ground assessment as part of an environmental impact assessment may be considered.

21 GYMPIE REGIONAL COUNCIL Extract from the Regulated Vegetation Management Map highlighting Curra State Forest status as remnant vegetation

Category B area (Remnant vegetation)

The entire State Forest is mapped as remnant vegetation notwithstanding that the southern section (Corella area) has been substantially logged and will continue to be logged into the future.

Extract from the Vegetation Management Supporting Map highlighting Curra State Forest status as largely of least concern regional ecosystem, with areas of of concern regional ecosystem and essential habitat

Category A or B area containing endangered RE

Category A or B area containing of concern RE

Category A or B area that is a least concern RE

Essential habitat on the essential habitat map

22 District shooting facility - Feasibility and option analysis 6.2 Local environmental context Gympie Regional Council policies Gympie Regional Council Environment Strategy 2012-2017 The purpose of the document is to establish an Environment Strategy for Gympie Regional Council that will guide Council to: †† improve the protection of the natural environment †† increase the awareness of the changing environment and put in place a system for Council to reduce its ecological footprint †† promote a shared responsibility for the natural environment †† improve Council’s operations and management of its properties †† minimise waste and promote recycling and reuse †† improve the quality of the water in the natural environment †† develop action plans for each environmental theme relating to Council operations †† will provide a system to monitor and evaluate the performance of the Environment Strategy and Action Plans. The Strategy focuses on six themes: †† Biodiversity †† Climate †† Education †† Planning †† Waste †† Water. Implications for the Curra State Forest The Strategy focuses primarily on Council-owned properties, and as such has no direct implications on the Curra State Forest site.

Typical landscapes within the southern section of the Curra State Forest

23 GYMPIE REGIONAL COUNCIL Planning Scheme assessment (flora and fauna) As previously indicated, to date, there have been no detailed environmental assessments undertaken for the Curra State Forest. The impact on existing flora and fauna from a shooting facility within the Forest will need to be determined by undertaking a detailed environmental assessment. The Curra State Forest is zoned Environmental Management and Conservation under Council’s Planning Scheme and is mapped as being a ‘conservation significant area’ in the associated overlay mapping (as indicated in the Zone Code extract below).

Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Conservation significant areas PO9 Development avoids or AO9.1 Development occurs outside the overlay area. minimises adverse impacts on areas of conservation or significance. AO9.2 Development is compatible with the values of the conservation significant area. Bushfire PO10 Development maintains AO10.1 Development is not located in areas identified the safety of people and as a High or Medium bushfire hazard area. property, including the function of community infrastructure, or during and immediately after AO10.2 Road access for fire-fighting appliances and bushfire events firebreaks are provided through a perimeter road that separates the use from areas of bushfire hazard and that road has a minimum cleared width of 20 metres; In line with the Planning Scheme, development of a shooting facility (use defined as outdoor sport and recreation) within the Curra State Forest would need to have regard to the intent of the Environmental Management and Conservation Zone. All uses within this zone are subject to impact assessment. The development is unable to demonstrate compliance with the acceptable outcomes as outlined (e.g. those outlined in the table above) and, as such, any proposal for a shooting facility would need to consider alternate outcomes to demonstrate that it can comply with the higher order requirements of the Planning Scheme. Additionally, the Department of State Development, Infrastructure and Planning’s Development Assessment Mapping has triggered the site for Native Vegetation Clearing, Category A and B on the regulated vegetation management map. Soil The proposed site for development is not covered by Council’s acid sulphate soil overlay. Water courses and drainage Summary of While Council’s Planning Scheme overlay mapping does not identify water courses within environmental the Curra State Forest, there are a number of dry and wet creeks and gullies that traverse considerations the site. The Lower Mary River adjoins the site to the east and west. † a detailed flora and fauna survey and associated impact assessment are likely to be required before the Fire and flood proposed project can be progressed As highlighted in the Zone Code extract above, the site is covered by Council’s Bushfire further through the development Hazard overlay and contains portions of the site within both the Medium and High Risk process Areas. The site is not covered by Council’s Flood Plain Overlay.

24 District shooting facility - Feasibility and option analysis Access and infrastructure 7 considerations 7.1 Access and transport In order to assess the suitability of the proposed site, a review of the expected travel routes and existing road conditions has been undertaken. The largest residential catchment is to the south of the site and it is expected that the majority of members are likely to access the site from Old Maryborough Road and North Deep Creek. Other routes are described below: † access from the north and west is expected to be from the Bruce Highway via Rammutt Road to Old Maryborough Road and onto either Wood Road or Tamaree Road and onto North Deep Creek Road † access from the south-east is expected to be via Gympie Connection Road, north to Sandy Creek Road and onto North Deep Creek Road † access from the south-west is expected to be via Gympie Connection Road north to Old Maryborough Road and onto either Wood Road or Tamaree Road and onto North Deep Creek Road. A detailed review of these access routes is included in Appendix A. The proposed Cooroy to Curra Bruce Highway Realignment is located adjacent to the Curra State Forest. As part of the realignment, Wood Road will be dissected between the North Coast Railway and North Deep Creek Road. Additionally, Bannister Road will also be impacted upon. A new road is proposed between Tamaree Road, east of the North Coast Railway and Tallowood Court. An extension of this service road to the north could provide adequate access to the southern section of the shooting facility. The proposed shooting facility is accessible via a number of suitable roads. It is recommended that a full safety audit review of each road connection be undertaken to determine any required safety improvements and hazard reduction measures. The network could benefit significantly from line marking, priority signage control at intersections and additional delineation. The traffic generated to the site from predicted shooting events is considered to be relatively low and, therefore, the impact to the operational performance of the road network is not expected to be significant. The majority of movements generated from the site will occur on weekends and outside peak hour periods. Access to and within the shooting site will require substantial road construction improvements. The existing condition of Wood Road is currently inadequate. All works for Wood Road should comply with the requirements for a rural road and also Table SC6.2 Road Width, Pavement Design and Pavement Marking Criteria. Gympie Regional Council Standard Drawing R-07 indicates a typical cross section which includes a minimum 7.0m wide two coat bitumen seal. Site permeability The Corella section of the Curra State Forest is largely surrounded by a number of unsealed roads. Additionally, there is an extensive network of tracks and trails across the site. As a result, managing permeability into the shooting facilities (and shooting templates) will be difficult. While significant signage and areas of strategically placed fencing and gates will provide some deterrence, the site is likely to be too large for complete fencing. Further, close liaison between the shooting user groups and DAFF will be required to maintain necessary access for timber harvesting and apiculture. 7.2 Site embellishments The Corella site is a large greenfield site comprising approximately 95% site cover of native vegetation. The seven permanently marked apiary sites are the only known infrastructure within this section of the State Forest. 7.3 Utilities The site is not currently connected to any services. Water and power connections to and within the site would need to be provided should the site be developed (particularly the need for water for amenities and fire management purposes). This would require extensive service infrastructure development. Power is available from Tamaree Road and Bannister Road in the south (approximately 2km from the southern hub) and along Wood Road and North Deep Creek Road to the north of the Corella area (approximately 1km from the northern hub).

Summary of access and infrastructure considerations † significant road upgrades would be required to provide suitable 2WD access to the shooting ranges † managing inappropriate access to the shooting complex will be difficult † it will be a costly (but necessary) exercise providing mains power and water to the shooting facility

25 GYMPIE REGIONAL COUNCIL Typical section of Wood Road within the Curra State Forest

Extract from the Department of Transport and Main Roads proposed Bruce Highway Upgrade Maps 16 and 17, Nov 2012

The proposed realignment of the Cooroy to Curra Bruce Highway is likely to impact the Corella section of the Curra State Forest. Potentially, the realignment may provide additional buffer between the proposed shooting complex and the rural residential development adjoining to the south-west. Further, current alignment show a service road between Tamaree Road and Tallowood Court. Potentially, extension of this road may provide access to the southern shooting hub.

26 District shooting facility - Feasibility and option analysis 8 Impacts of shooting 8.1 Potential 8.2 Potential noise environmental impacts impacts of shooting To determine the impact of the proposed shooting complex on of shooting surrounding noise-sensitive receivers, a noise impact study has been prepared. The sport of shooting has limited environmental impacts. There are those that perceive that shooters will shoot at anything on a range Based upon the analysis presented within this report (included in (including animals that may venture across the range). However, this Appendix B), it has been identified that: is far from the case with most range orders clearly articulating stiff †† to satisfy the default noise criteria contained in Section 440ZC penalties for such behaviours. Additionally, many shooting ranges are of the Environmental Protection Act 1994, the peak noise designated (by range officers) as faunal sanctuaries (or reserves). emissions from the shooting complex should not exceed 95dBZ during the daytime and evening. However, the significant clearing required to develop shooting ranges †† Noise modelling conducted using the methodology contained (and their associated ancillary facilities) can have clear and marked in ISO 9613-2 has found that the 95dBZ noise emission level environmental impacts. In areas, such as the Curra State Forest, contours during the daytime and evening periods are unlikely to that are undulating and have a dense vegetation cover, significant impact upon nearby noise-sensitive uses. disturbance will result during the construction of the range. †† Other potential noise producing activities such as vehicle However, once the range is developed there will be no additional movements, PA systems, crowd noise, entertainment noise environmental impact outside the range footprint. and mechanical plant are unlikely to be an issue. This is due to Environmental disturbance may include: the separation distances and topography of the site between †† erosion and soil loss - particularly high in steep and mid-slope potential source locations and noise-sensitive premises regions. Low wet areas may also be susceptible to erosion. providing sufficient noise attenuation. † Erosion occurring on slopes can affect vegetation communities, † The noise modelling has a large level of uncertainty due to including the undercutting and loss of vegetation as well as soil limitations in the calculation method, uncertainties in the gullying into the natural drainage corridors source data and uncertainties regarding the bulk earthworks †† edge effect disturbance, habitat fragmentation and islands. required during the construction of the shooting ranges. It is Barriers to wildlife movement can also be created recommended that field testing is conducted after the bulk †† the removal of native vegetation can open up ecosystems to earthworks have been conducted. This testing would take into invasion by weed species which have higher establishment rates account all of the screening provided by the berms, vegetation and are much hardier than native species. and topography of the site as well as the directivity of the firearms. The Corella section of the State Forest appears prone to erosion in †† If the field testing indicates that shooting activities are likely to places. Impacts to soil structure, as a result of erosion, may result exceed the emission criteria, acoustically lined barriers and/or in sediment run-off as well vegetation loss, thereby impacting the shooting enclosures can be designed and constructed to further ecological values of the site. reduce the noise levels. In addition, noise management plans The site supports a range of native wildlife, comprises dense could be implemented to reduce the impact of any shooting vegetation and forms an important core habitat and faunal activities that is found to cause annoyance. movement corridor. Possible disturbances from clearing, such as causing fragmentation and barriers to faunal movement may have significant negative impacts on the ecological functioning of the site. Noise impacts on humans Much of the surrounding land is zoned rural. Small pockets of rural residential land (on Lorikeet Drive, Forest Ridge Drive and Tallowood Court) are near to the southern shooting hub. The northern hub may impact a small number of properties on Wood Road and North Deep Creek Road. As noted above, it is expected that the impact on these properties will be minimal. It is important to note that the State’s premier multi-disciplinary shooting complex at Belmont adjoins an urban area and has hundreds of residences within 1.5km of key firing points. Indeed, there are approximately 30 residential properties within only 200m of firing points (and yet, as this report has identified, there is no direction from the land managers for the future of the facility to be reconsidered). Noise mitigation will need to be addressed in detailed design and ultimate facility layout.

Signage at the entrance to the Fraser Coast Shooting Complex - a fauna sanctuary

27 GYMPIE REGIONAL COUNCIL Noise impacts on wildlife 8.3 Potential impacts on Noise can potentially be a threat to native wildlife and can negatively affect species populations. Animals depend on acoustic stimuli for communication, navigation, mating and foraging functions1, whereby existing users high levels of noise by shooting can mask these acoustic signals, There are a range of current (and historical) users of the Corella essential to the functioning of many species. section of the Curra State Forest. The potential impacts on each of these user groups as a result of the proposed shooting facility The impact of noise generated on the site from shooting could development are outlined below. potentially result in: † native wildlife abandoning their habitats † disruptions to breeding (increased mortality, lowered Timber harvesting reproduction and juvenile survival) † loss of potential product through clearing, consideration is to † hearing impairments be given to the need for tree densities to mitigate noise impacts † inability to hear prey or to hunt for prey (during periods of noise- and buffers associated with buildings and other infrastructure emitting use). † need for DAFF and timber harvesters to liaise closely with shooting user groups to manage access to the forestry (within the shooting templates). This matter can be dealt with through any lease arrangements Apiculture † potential need to move apiary sites away from ranges and/or shooting templates † need for DAFF and apiculturalists to liaise closely with shooting user groups to manage access to the apiary sites (within the shooting templates). This matter can be dealt with through any lease arrangements Recreation users † loss of the tracks and trails network in the far southern end of the State Forest. (It is acknowledged that for the same reasons that this specific site is attractive as a shooting venue (e.g. close to town, more gently undulating terrain) also makes it attractive as a site for recreation) † Council to consider development of additional tracks and trails (particularly single track) as identified in the Tracks and Trails Plan. Notwithstanding that mountain bike users (and other trail users) have exclusive access to a significant network of trails at the Victory Heights site (leased to CTCA).

Summary of shooting impacts † Environmental impacts (erosion, loss of vegetation and wildlife disturbance) from clearing. These can be limited if ranges are well-located and range building specialists oversee construction † Limited impact expected to humans nor wildlife as a result of noise created from the shooting facility † Limited impact on timber harvesting and apiculture † Significant impact on existing recreation users of the Corella site. Potential need for tracks and trail replacement elsewhere as part of the roll out of the Tracks and Trails Plan 1 An overview of research on the Effects of Noise on Animals, Brown, 1998

28 District shooting facility - Feasibility and option analysis 9 Directions

State Forest (e.g. limited impacts on timber harvesting, apiculture 9.1 Council direction and nearby land uses; potential for some environmental impacts; significant loss of existing recreation tracks and trails; resources Before the question of feasibility of development within the Curra required for suitable access and utilities), it is considered a feasible State Forest can be addressed, clear directions on a number of key and preferred site for shooting facility development. Council issues are required. The key strengths of the site are its proximity close to the Gympie township, more amenable topographical features compared with A need for relocation? the central and northern sections of the State Forest (and thus If the sites of the three existing Gympie-based shooting clubs (Pistol reduced bulk earthworks required for range development), ability Club, Clay Target Club and Small Bore Rifle and Silhouette Club) are to align most ranges in a somewhat north-south direction, history to be retained by Council as community land (facilities) consideration of disruption to the existing ecosystems through timber harvesting, should be given to whether there is a need to relocate these groups general separation between shooting ranges and nearby land that have clearly expressed a desire to remain in their current uses and potential to include additional shooting disciplines in a locations. controlled area (e.g. south of Wood Road, GYMG70007) should a future need develop. In each case, the clubs have devoted significant volunteer resources and fundraising to develop quality facilities with which they have an Additionally, previous studies have identified that no other State understandable strong attachment. If suitable long-term tenure could Forest land near to Gympie is suitable. be established this would greatly limit the numbers of clubs needing The adjoining layout highlights the approach to developing two to be catered for in any new facility. Only the Service Rifle Club would hubs of shooting disciplines within the Corella. Weapons Licensing be seeking a new home in the short-term, while the Sporting Clays (Queensland Police Service) have provided in-principle advice that Club may require a new home in the medium- to long-term and the the layout is appropriate given the existing topography and proposed Shooters Union are now seeking a facility. shooting matches.

Council funding support Clubs Ranges Ancillary Facilities Regardless of whether or not the Curra State Forest is deemed a Northern hub feasible site for development, the ultimate feasibility of developing a † district-level shooting facility may rest upon Council’s desire and/or Small Bore Rifle and 200m x 50m Covered firing area ability (or not) to allocate significant resources to the development. Silhouette (lit) for the full 50m † As is noted in Section 9.3, the development of a quality facility as Incorporate 10m has been proposed for more than 15 years will come at significant indoor air rifle range † cost. The vast majority of the shooting clubs potentially involved in Meeting room, the new facility have limited resources to fund such a development. canteen, storage, armoury, office The wider ‘shooting community’ has espoused a desire to take † Simple amenities the lead role in developing the new shooting facilities themselves. † Storage shed However, most of the individual clubs have expended significant Gympie Sporting 8 walk † Meeting room, volunteer enthusiasm and endeavour in the development of their Clays throughs canteen, simple existing facilities and may find it difficult to once again achieve (additional amenities this. Further, while the clubs may have an ability to clear ranges, area for skeet) † Storage shed undertake works required to develop stop butts and oversee the construction of simple covered firing platforms and club facilities, Southern hub the development of suitable access roads and the provision of power Pistol 300m x 75m † Covered firing area and water require specialist skills and significant funds. (lit) for the full 75m † Meeting room, canteen, storage, 9.2 Site feasibility armoury, office † The Curra State Forest has long been identified as the shooting Simple amenities † community’s preferred venue for a new multi-disciplinary facility. Storage shed While the Comino Report suggested a more central location within Clay Target 250m x 150m † Meeting room, the State Forest, the Corella Range Complex Association has always (5 DTL layouts, canteen, simple preferred the southern section of the State Forest - Corella (and 2 lit and 2 amenities hence the name of the Association). skeet overlays) † Storage shed It is clear that the most difficult-to-locate shooting discipline is full Service Rifle 1000m x 50m† Meeting room, bore rifle. With a full field template of approximately 3km x 1km canteen, simple finding suitable land is difficult. In essence, with a well-planned amenities layout the other shooting disciplines can largely fit in and around this † Storage shed full field shooting template to create a multi-disciplinary venue. Note: depending on ultimate facility layout, opportunity may exist While this report highlights a number of constraints associated with for ancillary facility sharing in the northern hub shooting facility development in the Corella (southern) section of the

29 GYMPIE REGIONAL COUNCIL Rv. DATE REVISIONS REC. APPR . Facility design A Cleared shooting range considerations 21/11/14 PRELIMINARY ISSUE - [SD] (solid rectangular shapes) †† the two hubs have been Shooting range safety template located to limit the distance for utility delivery †† the hubs have also been located nearest to existing access roads to limit additional costs associated with road Small Bore Rifle and development Sporting † Silhouette † every attempt has been Clays made to locate ranges A3 - A1 - according to best-fit SCALE 1:200 1:100 landforms. For example, SURVEYED: the clay target firing line CHECKED: CS DESIGNER: CF (AHD)RL: PSM No: has been designed along Wood Road the top of a contour. Similarly, sporting clays walk-throughs have been placed along a contour line LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES Mail: Unit 24/18, Maroochywaters Drive, Maroochydore, QLD 4558 Phone: (+61) 0411501727 email: [email protected] wherever possible Dead Horse Road LANDSCAPE DESIGN STUDIO †† ranges have been SUNSHINE COAST OFFICE designed as near to north-south as possible, while clay target has been aligned near to their current alignment at@ Maroochydore. Araluen †† significant clearing will be required to construct the service rifle, pistol Proposed highway and small bore rifle and alignment silhouette ranges (as indicated in the solid rectangular shapes in Service the adjoining layout). Rifle Additional clearing will be required for the clay target facility with limited clearing Pistol required for the sporting SKETCH DESIGN PLAN clays facility Clay †† the indicative budget Target includes a significant allowance for fencing across the complex to manage access.

Railway corridor RP-366 L001 Project Number. Sheet No. - Revision N

0m 1000m Rv.A

30 District shooting facility - Feasibility and option analysis 9.3 Indicative costs Quantity surveyor-prepared indicative costs have been developed for each of the five shooting facilities with additional costs involved with utility connection and access roads apportioned to each facility. Total costs are expected to be approximately $4.6m and are summarised below (and presented in more detail in Appendix C). The costs reflect the facilities desired by the clubs. In most instances, the number (or size) of ranges is slightly larger than the existing facilities as a result of the clubs’ desires to be relocated to an upgraded facility. The costs include provision of power and water and upgrades to the road network. It should be noted that these costs include upgrading the existing roads as unsealed rather than being developed as sealed roads. The costs presented exclude regulatory and statutory fees, financing costs, costs of further analysis and assessment required to support the development process, costs of complying with conditions imposed by land authorities, infrastructure provision and charges and related development costs. Clearly, there are significant costs involved with developing a multi-disciplinary shooting complex from ‘scratch’. The figures presented here reflect likely costs without any volunteer assistance. The reality is that each of the existing shooting clubs have developed their current facilities with significant volunteer support and this is likely to also be the case if a new facility was to be developed.

Clubs Description Cost Clubs Description Cost Southern hub Northern hub Pistol Site preparation 141,613 Small Bore Rifle Site preparation 65,548 Amenities block (attached) 41,472 and Silhouette Amenities block (attached) 41,472 General accommodation 53,200 General accommodation 46,000 Firing line 257,500 Indoor range 63,000 Shields 40,000 Firing line 150,000 All weather vehicle access 50,000 Storage shed 12,600 Site power, water tanks and 65,500 All weather vehicle access 25,000 pumps Site power, water tanks and 44,500 Total $649,285 pumps Clay Target Site preparation 229,311 Total $448,120 Amenities block (attached) 41,472 Gympie Sporting Site preparation 64,116 General accommodation 192,720 Clays Amenities block (attached) 41, 472 DTL Trap house and 97,500 General accommodation 292,720 shooting lanes Operational sporting assets by others DTL Skeet layouts 54,000 Skeet layouts 81,000 Target bunkers 20,000 All weather vehicle access 25,000 Storage shed 21,000 Site power, water tanks and 42,000 All weather vehicle access 50,000 pumps Site power, water tanks and 62,000 Total $546,308 pumps Site fencing 548,250 Total $768,003 Subtotal $3,725,558 Service Rifle Site preparation 417,900 Fees and charges 466,695 Amenities block (attached) 41,472 Subtotal $4,191,253 General accommodation 192,720 Contingency 419,125 Operational sporting assets 5,000 TOTAL $4,610,378 All weather vehicle access 50,000 Note: depending on ultimate facility layout, opportunity may exist Site power, water tanks and 58,500 for ancillary facility sharing in the northern hub pumps Total $765,592

31 GYMPIE REGIONAL COUNCIL 9.4 Tenure considerations 9.6 Recommended This report has demonstrated that the proposed shooting facility development within the Curra State Forest cannot progress without consideration of alternate tenure overall options arrangements. The Department of National Parks, Recreation, Sport and Racing (QPWS) outlines two preferred methods of authorising occupation of the State Forest This report has raised a number of key issues that by Council. need to be resolved by Council in order to progress. † Depending on the outcomes of these discussions, Occupation Permit - As the name implies, this authorisation is a permit to occupy potential options relating to the development of the land provided under the Forestry Act. This form of permit is managed by QPWS shooting facilities include: and is generally a short- to medium-term arrangement (of 5 to 15 years). † Land Act Term Lease - Under this lease arrangement, the portion of land required † Retain status quo is excised (revoked) and returned to the Department of Natural Resources and − provide long-term leases to the three Mines (DNRM) as unallocated state land. DNRM would then negotiate a longer- Gympie-based clubs and accept that term lease (of at least 30 years) with Council. the Service Rifle Club will continue to be without a suitable facility The Land Act Term Lease is the preferred model given the potential impact of shooting − indicative cost - nil facility development on the State Forest and the likelihood of securing a longer-term † Retain status quo and assist to develop a lease. facility for the Service Rifle Club (other than Council could consider re-zoning this portion of land so that the development of a within the Curra State Forest) shooting facility could be deemed a consistent use or assess a Material Change of Use − provide long-term leases to the three application through the development process. Gympie-based clubs and either purchase or lease private land for the development of a suitable range for the Service Rifle Club 9.5 Alternate approaches − indicative cost - dependent on the As detailed throughout this report, the Pistol Club, Clay Target Club, Small Bore Rifle availability of suitable land and leasing and Silhouette Club and Sporting Clays Club are all currently pleased with their arrangements existing facilities. They have invested heavily in their facilities, enjoy stable or growing † Retain status quo and assist to develop a memberships and would prefer not to be relocated (especially to a facility further facility for the Service Rifle Club in the Curra away from town, with unsealed road access and where it is costly to access power and State Forest (Corella area) water). − provide long-term leases to the three Gympie-based clubs and liaise with In contrast, the Service Rifle Club has not had access to a suitable home for many relevant State Government agencies years. Essentially, meeting the needs of this club is considered one of the key drivers to secure a lease to facilitate the of the overall project. development of a suitable range for the There has also been suggestion that a high-level multi-discipline facility in Gympie Service Rifle Club could prove particularly successful given the potential for the State’s premier facility − indicative cost - approximately $1.1m at Belmont to close1. Proponents of a higher level facility of this nature outline the † Assist the Cooloola Range Complex potential economic benefits that can be attributed to hosting regular events. However, Association to develop a multi-disciplinary as previously outlined, there is no concrete evidence that there are any plans to shooting facility within the Curra State Forest close down nor downsize the facilities at Belmont. While it is true that other shooting (Corella area). Liaise with relevant State facilities across the State have been closed due to encroaching urbanisation, the land Government agencies to secure a suitable around the Belmont facility is largely fully developed (and there are many houses in lease. very close proximity to the firing lines already) and yet the State is investing in further − indicative cost - approximately $4.6m development at the facility as it will be hosting the shooting events for the 2018 † Retain status quo in the short- to medium- Commonwealth Games. term yet seek State Government surety as to the long-term future of the Belmont shooting If the clubs located at Council-managed land are provided with secure long-term tenure facility and the Sporting Clays club can attract further surety at its facility, Council need only to − maintaining an option to develop a multi- assist find a home for the Service Rifle Club. disciplinary facility to replace the Belmont facility if it is to be closed A number of opportunities may exist to provide a suitable location for the club: − indicative cost - nil. † developing a single facility within the Curra State Forest (Corella area described Council may consider the level of financial and within this report) in-kind support potentially available given the † purchase of private land within 30 minutes drive to Gympie significant works and costs included in some † lease of a portion of private land within 30 minutes drive to Gympie (potentially options. through an Expression of Interest process). Each of these alternatives deserve further investigation once Council determines its stance on the future of the existing clubs. 1 This was also the key premise to the Sunshine Coast’s Difficult-to-Locate Sports Study’s recommendation regarding developing a national-level facility in Gympie (Curra State Forest)

32 District shooting facility - Feasibility and option analysis 10 Appendix Appendix A - Traffic considerations report Appendix B - Noise impact study Appendix C - Quantity survey

33 GYMPIE REGIONAL COUNCIL Appendix A - Traffic considerations report

34 District shooting facility - Feasibility and option analysis

Traffic Report Proposed District Shooting Facility Curra State Forest For Gympie Regional Council C/- Ross Planning

Project: 14596 Date: November 2014 Versions: DA – DRAFT 01

14596 Traffic Report District Shooting Facility Gympie Regional Council November 2014

Proposed District Shooting Facility Curra State Forest

Project Date Issue Dianne Hayes RPEQ 7086 14596 November 2014 P-01a

Project No: 14596 November 2014

Status: Preliminary Issue no: 01a

RoadPro Development (previously Hayes Traffic Engineering) PO Box 303 Coolum Beach Qld 4573 Phone: 0403 889 039 [email protected] Dianne Hayes RPEQ 7086

(c) Copyright RoadPro Development

This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of the commissioning party and unless otherwise agreed in writing by RoadPro Development, no other party may copy, reproduce, distribute, make use of, or reply on the contents of the report. No liability is accepted by RoadPro Development for any use of this report, other than for the purposes for which it was originally prepared and provided.

2 14596 Traffic Report District Shooting Facility Gympie Regional Council November 2014

Table of Contents

1. INTRODUCTION ...... 4

2. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ...... 5

3. EXISTING FACILITIES ...... 6

4. TRAVEL ROUTES ...... 7

5. EXISTING CONDITIONS ...... 8

6. RECOMMENDATIONS ...... 15

Appendix A – Proposed Development

Appendix B – Aerial of Existing Shooting Clubs

Appendix C – Road Width Requirements of Gympie Regional Council

Appendix D – Bruce Highway Realignment Maps

3 14596 Traffic Report District Shooting Facility Gympie Regional Council November 2014

1. INTRODUCTION

RoadPro Development has been commissioned by Ross Planning to prepare traffic engineering advice for the proposed District Shooting Facility in Curra State Forest for Gympie Regional Council. The proposal seeks a feasibility study and options analysis to provide suitable access to the site for a variety of integrated shooting facilities.

This report has been produced to assess the existing road conditions, the proposed access locations and future upgrade requirements to support the facility.

Site

Figure 1 – Map of Proposed Site.

4 14596 Traffic Report District Shooting Facility Gympie Regional Council November 2014

2. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT

The proposed development seeks an investigation into an integrated district shooting facility. A copy of the proposed plans is provided below and has also been provided in Appendix A. Further details regarding the facility are outlined in the Ross Planning Report. The following activities are proposed for the site;

 Sporting Clays  Small bore and silhouette  Pistol  Service Rifle Range; and  Clay Target.

Figure 2 – Proposed Concept Layout

5 14596 Traffic Report District Shooting Facility Gympie Regional Council November 2014

3. EXISTING FACILITIES

In order to assess the feasibility of a new district shooting facility, a review of the existing facilities has been undertaken and the distance from the existing sites to the proposed new site. Table 1 list below the clubs and membership and an aerial map shown in Appendix B

Table 1- Existing Shooting Facilities To Proposed Site Club Current membership Current Location Travel Distance Time Gympie Small 170 members with approx. 50 62 Banks Pocket Bore Rifle and 10.3km 25mins competitors at events Road, Araluen Silhouette Club Gympie Clay 28 members with approx. 20 64 Banks Pocket 10.3km 25mins Target Club at Sunday shoots Road, Araluen Gympie Pistol Belvedere Road, 200 Members 13.7km 29mins Club Veteran Gympie 40 members with approx. 10‐ Sexton Road, 34.5km 49mins Sporting Clays 15 at shoots Sexton Gympie Service 200 members with approx. 40 Belvedere Road, 13.7km 29mins Rifle Club at shoots Veteran

Photograph 1 – Gympie Pistol Club at Belvedere Road.

6 14596 Traffic Report District Shooting Facility Gympie Regional Council November 2014

4. TRAVEL ROUTES

In order to assess the suitability of the site, a review of the proposed travel routes and existing road conditions has been undertaken. A site visit has been undertaken to review the surrounding road network and assess the potential routes to access the site.

The largest residential catchment is to the south of the site and it is expected that the majority of members are likely to access the site from Old Maryborough Road and North Deep Creek. Other routes are described below;

 Access from the north and west is expected to be from the Bruce Highway via Rammutt Road to Old Maryborough Road and onto either Wood Road or Tamaree Road and onto North Deep Creek Road.  Access from the southeast is expected to be via Gympie Connection Road, north to Sandy Creek Road and onto North Deep Creek Road.  Access from the southwest is expected to be via Gympie Connection Road north to Old Mayborough Road and onto either Wood Road or Tamaree Road and onto North Deep Creek Road.

Site

Figure 3 – Proposed Routes to Access the Site

7 14596 Traffic Report District Shooting Facility Gympie Regional Council November 2014

5. EXISTING CONDITIONS

To determine the feasibility of the site a review of access routes has been undertaken. Access to the site is currently possible via three locations;  Wood Road near Old Maryborough Road  Wood Road near North Deep Creek Road  Forestry Track (Dead Horse Road) off North Deep Creek Road; and  Bannister Road

Access for members travelling from the north and west will be via Brice Highway and the intersection with Rammutt Road.

The intersection of the Bruce Highway and Rammutt Road is channelized with protected left and right turning lanes. Rammutt Road is sealed and provides direct access to a number of rural residential properties. It has a posted speed limit of 60km/h and line marking near the Bruce Highway. Approximately 500m northwest of the Bruce Highway, Rammutt Road becomes posted at 80 km/h with no line marking and limited shoulder width for the remainder of the road to the intersection with Old Maryborough Road.

Photograpph 2 – Aerial View of Rammutt Road intersection with the Bruce Highway

8 14596 Traffic Report District Shooting Facility Gympie Regional Council November 2014

Photograph 3 – Rammutt Road

Old Maryborough Road north of Rammutt Road is a single lane sealed carriageway with gravel shoulders. It is posted at 80km/h until Caulfield Road after which the posted speed limit becomes 100km/h.

Photograph 4 – Old Maryborough Road

Old Maryborough Road passes under the North Coats Railway just north of Albrecht Road. The height clearance is 5.6m.

9 14596 Traffic Report District Shooting Facility Gympie Regional Council November 2014

Photograph 5 – Old Maryborough Road Railway Underpass

Old Maryborough Road intersects with Wood Road at the top of a crest. There is limited sight visibility at this location due to the vertical and horizontal alignment of the road.

Photograph 6 – Old Maryborough Road approach to the intersection with Wood Road

Wood Road is a poorly formed gravel track with significant vegetation either side. Sections of the road have been washed away and there is significant scouring creating uneven wheel paths and exposed aggregate.

10 14596 Traffic Report District Shooting Facility Gympie Regional Council November 2014

Photograph 7 – Wood Road

Photograph 8 – Wood Road

Access from the South will be via Gympie Connection Road to Sandy Creek Road and onto North Deep Creek Road. North Deep Creek Road is posted at 80km/h.

Photograph 9 – North Deep Creek Road

11 14596 Traffic Report District Shooting Facility Gympie Regional Council November 2014

Photograph 10 – North Deep Creek Road

Sections of North Deep Creek Road to the north appeared to be recently upgraded with improved conditions to the shoulders.

Photograph 11 – North Deep Creek Road

Tamaree Road connects Old Maryborough Road to North Deep Creek Road. It has a 6.5-7.5m sealed carriageway. There are 2 floodways along Tamaree Road with the western most floodway signed under Give Way control due to the constrained 4.6m width. There is also a railway level crossing with active control including flashing lights and boom gates. Photographs of the existing conditions are shown below.

12 14596 Traffic Report District Shooting Facility Gympie Regional Council November 2014

Photograph 12 – Floodway 4.6m wide on Tamaree Road

Photograph 13 – Level Crossing on Tamaree Road

13 14596 Traffic Report District Shooting Facility Gympie Regional Council November 2014

6. FUTURE ROAD PLANNING

The proposed Cooroy to Curra Bruce Highway Realignment is located adjacent to the Curra State Forest. As part of the realignment Wood Road will be dissected between the North Coast Railway and North Deep Creek Road. Details of the proposed alignment are shown in Appendix D.

Figure 4 – Bruce Highway Realignment

As part of the proposal Bannister Road will also be impacted upon. A new road is proposed between Tamaree Road, east of the North Coast Railway and Tallowood Court. An extension of this service road to the north could provide adequate access to the southern section of the shooting facility.

Figure 5 – Bruce Highway Realignment

14 14596 Traffic Report District Shooting Facility Gympie Regional Council November 2014

7. RECOMMENDATIONS

The proposed district shooting facility is accessible via a number of suitable roads. It is recommended that a full safety audit review of each road connection be undertaken to determine any required safety improvements and hazard reduction measures. The network could benefit significantly from line marking, priority signage control at intersections and additional delineation.

The traffic generated to the site is considered to be relatively low and therefore the impact to the operational performance of the road network is not expected to be significant. The majority of movements generated from the site will occur on weekends and outside peak hour periods.

Access to the site and within the site will require substantial road construction improvements. The existing condition of Wood Road is currently inadequate. All works for Wood Road should comply with the requirements for a rural road and also Table SC6.2 Road Width, Pavement Design and Pavement Marking Criteria. Gympie Regional Council Standard Drawing R-07 indicates a typical cross section which includes a minimum 7.0m wide 2 coat bitumen seal. (Please refer to Appendix C).

Figure 6 – Rural Road Requirements

15 14596 Traffic Report District Shooting Facility Gympie Regional Council November 2014

Appendix A

Proposed Facility

16 Rv. DATE REVISIONS REC. APPR . A 21/11/14 PRELIMINARY ISSUE - [SD]

5m contours Small Bore and Sporting Silhouette Clays A3 - A1 - SCALE 1:200 1:100 SURVEYED: CHECKED: CS DESIGNER: CF (AHD)RL: PSM No:

Wood Road LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES Mail: Unit 24/18, Maroochywaters Drive, Maroochydore, QLD 4558 Phone: (+61) 0411501727 email: [email protected] Dead Horse Road LANDSCAPE DESIGN STUDIO SUNSHINE COAST OFFICE @ Maroochydore.

Proposed highway alignment

Service Rifle

Pistol SKETCH DESIGN PLAN Clay Target

Railway corridor RP-366 L001 Project Number. Sheet No. - Revision N

0m 1000m Rv.A

26 District shooting facility - Feasibility and option analysis 14596 Traffic Report District Shooting Facility Gympie Regional Council November 2014

Appendix B

Aerial of Other Club Locations

17

14596 Traffic Report District Shooting Facility Gympie Regional Council November 2014

Appendix C

Gympie Regional Council Requirements

18  7DEOH6& 5RDG:LGWK*UDGHV3DYHPHQW'HVLJQ 3DYHPHQW0DUNLQJ&ULWHULD &ROXPQ &ROXPQ &ROXPQ &ROXPQ &ROXPQ &ROXPQ &ROXPQ &ROXPQ &ROXPQ &ROXPQ &ROXPQ &ROXPQ &ROXPQ   

6WUHHW  5RDG 1RRIORWV 5HVHUYH &DUULDJH 9HUJH *UDGH   'HVLJQ 8QERXQG $& WKLFNQHVV 7RWDO %DVHFRXUVH 6XEEDVH 3DYHPHQW W\SH ZLGWK ZD\ :LGWK (6$V 3DYHPHQW 0LQ  PP  SDYHPHQW 0DUNLQJV $EVROXWH ZLGWK P  PLQ  P  0LQ  WKLFNQHVV 0LQ  PP  0LQ  P  0LQ  PP     $EVROXW 'HVLUHG0D[    &%5 705 &%5 705 &HQWU (GJH H0D[ 7\SH 7\SH H

8UEDQ$UWHULDO       [       

 /DQH [  6KOGU       P  [  P  5XUDO$UWHULDO       [  FRDWFKLS     

*\PSLH5HJLRQDO&RXQFLO3ODQQLQJ6FKHPH433YHUVLRQ 2FWREHU  3DJH 

*\PSLH5HJLRQDO&RXQFLO3ODQQLQJ6FKHPH433YHUVLRQ 2FWREHU  3DJH 14596 Traffic Report District Shooting Facility Gympie Regional Council November 2014

Appendix D

Bruce Highway Realignment Maps

19 466,000 466,500 467,000 467,500 468,000 468,500

700FTY1491 10RP802525 6RP802526

Tallowood Court d 15RP802525 3RP191231 a 5RP802526 o

R

l

3MPH40837 5RP191231 e r 1MPH23639 11RP802525 u La 3RP802526 1MPH31653 1MPH40837 351SP121982 2RP802526 1MCH5576 1MPH14211 2MPH40837 2MPH31653 ve Dri 12SP197546 3MCH809057

e 13RP802525 BMCH5420 dg 11SP197546 Ri North st De re e o 1RP228930 1MPH40428 p F TAMAREE CREEK C 4MPH40461 r e T e a k m R a o

Bannister Road 1MPH30197 re a 7,110,000 e d 7,110,000 FSP223763 R 3MPH33084 o a 12RP858760 d 1MPH33084 4SP224737 2MPH40461

1SP233511

50SP223763 2SP248812 Tamaree Road 13RP858760 5SP224737 1SP197544

2MPH33084 4SP233511 11MCH5356 M 3SP197544 cke nzie 1MPH35596 maree Road Ta Road 1MPH40461 2SP233511 1MPH6276 12MCH5356 2MPH23621 1MPH35339 B 5SP231334 ru ce H 3SP167388 2SP167388 ig 1MPH31504 hw Garowme Road a d y a o EMCH5451 3SP231334 R 14MCH5356 y 1MCH805213 1MPH35421 oe l 11SP202484 C

7,109,500 7,109,500 Mckenzie Road Mckenzie ad 1MPH5979 W 6SP231334 o 2MPH35421 R 13MCH5356 a t h t s l 1SP207652 a e N 3MPH35421 2MPH23745 L 1MPH23745 a 10SP202484 n 17MCH5356 Knight Road e

2MPH32069 4MPH35421 1MPH6043 5MPH35421 TAMAREE1MPH23743 CREEK 565MPH30942

6CP850475 TAMAREE HMCH5450 2MPH30942 1CP850475

1MPH33240

M 397MPH33513 557MCH5039 a 1MPH6211 1MPH24325 y JMCH5547 2MPH33240 fie ld Ces Rivers Road 33RP857412 R oa NORTH DEEP CREEK d 1MPH34925 7,109,000 7,109,000 1MPH6245 3MPH33240 1MPH40326 3MPH40326 8SP184249 29RP857412 1SP233315 Hazel Road 4MPH33240 7SP184249 546RP865215 31RP857412 1RP896296 10RP865215 Quinlan Road 392SP121981 5370MPH35353

60SP124228 11RP865215 1CP847787 2CP847787 22CP847787 1MPH32693 30RP857412 36RP857412 32RP857412 VETERAN 35RP857412 North Deep Creek Road

3MPH40090 26CP847787 34RP857412

2SP173660 3CP847787 57USL37363 1SP173660 2RP896296

28RP857412 590MPH35007 Nash Road 6CP847787 1MPH40200

4MPH40090 7CP847787 5SP118468

2MPH34724 9CP847787 7,108,500 8CP847787 Sovereign Drive 7,108,500 7SP118468 296MPH40200 CMCH5297

25SP103052 3SP118468 27SP103052 33SP103052 455MCH4778 35SP103052

23SP103052 31SP103052 4SP118468 752SP233315 5MPH40090 8MCH5361

7MCH5361 3MPH40396 1MPH23811 2MPH40200 lace Guinea Court 2SP118468 do P 12CP847788 a 24SP103052 r 6MPH40090 37SP103052 lla A 415MCH4698 22SP103052 43SP118468

14CP847788 3MPH40200

42SP118468 45SP118468 7MPH40090 30SP103052

4MPH40396 16CP847788 11MPH40266 6MCH5361

44SP118468

32SP103052

464MCH4812 38SP118468 2MPH40089 58SP124228

40SP118468 18CP847788 10MPH40266 North Deep Creek Road

4MCH5361

Maroske Road 46SP118468 3MPH40284

40SP164966 8MPH40090 7,108,000 7,108,000 3MPH40089 35SP164966 9MPH40266 2MPH40284 1MPH40090

5MPH40396 Maroske Road Balaclava Road 32SP164966 1MPH23837 1MPH40089 749MCH5343 7MPH40266 8MPH40266 30SP164966 1MPH6476

6MPH40266 Azure Avenue 748MCH5343 5MPH40266

526SP240975

27SP164966 18MCH5573 4SP242462 4MPH31023 1MPH5826 d

a 3MPH23451

o

R 26SP164966 750MCH5339 1MPH5877 2SP237332 h 16MCH5573 3MPH40266 s 747MCH5343 a 15MCH5573

N

2MPH5949 BANKS CREEK BANKS 14MCH5573 2SP242462

1MPH6227 1SP242462 5MPH31023 3MPH5597

1MPH6133 POCKET 81USL37366 13MCH5573

745MCH5343 1SP170138 23SP164239 56SP164239 2MPH5597 BANKS CREEK

2MPH23375 539MCH4999 d ARALUEN Belvedere Road a

7,107,500 o White Tail Drive 7,107,500 R 1MPH5949 s 744MCH5343 1MPH6094 e 21SP164239 v 1MPH23450 Gro 7MPH40669 3MPH23592 19RP809228

1MPH23322 Blue Wing Boulevarde 2MPH23592 9SP168748 53SP164239 4SP161985 Belvedere Road 6MPH40669 4MPH40669 VETERAN

1MPH33784 2MPH23322 6MCH128 742MCH5342

1SP185685 F Markallan Road 2MPH23388 isher Road 3MPH40669 2MPH23490 401SP125681 4MPH23322 d a 19RP226325 o 1MPH23426 741SP237333 R Kath Road 1MPH6462 Granzien Road 1MPH23490 k 11SP208682 3MPH23490 764MCH5342 e

e

486RP882040 r

1MPH40669

C

y d

1SP237333 18RP226325 n a S Granzien Road

Groves Road 7,107,000 Nash Road 7,107,000

466,000 466,500 467,000 467,500 468,000 468,500

Legend: refer to the Key Plan Brianna Court

1:7,500 (at A2) Department of Transport and Main Roads Revision B 0 125 250 375 500 Date 26 Nov 2012

Metres Department of Infrastructure and Transport Map Projection: Universal Transverse Mercator Bruce Highway Upgrade (Cooroy to Curra) Horizontal Datum: Geocentric Datum of Australia o Grid: Map Grid of Australia 1994, Zone 56 Project Overview Map 16 G:\41\24401\GIS\Maps\C2CPlanningStrategy\41_24401_C2CPlanStrat_A2RevC_Legend.mxd © 2012. While GHD has taken care to ensure the accuracy of this product, GHD, DNRM, GA and TMR, make no representations or warranties about its accuracy, completeness or suitability for any particular purpose. GHD, DNRM, GA and TMR cannot accept liability of any kind (whether in contract, tort or otherwise) for any expenses, losses, damages and/or costs (including indirect or consequential damage) which are or may be incurred as a result of the product being inaccurate, incomplete or unsuitable in any way and for any reason. Based on or contains data provided by the State of Queensland 2012. In consideration of the State permitting use of this data you acknowledge and agree that the State gives no warranty in relation to the data (including accuracy, reliability, completeness, currency or suitability) and accepts no liability (including without limitation, liability in negligence) for any loss, damage or costs (including consequential damage) relating to any use of the data. Data must not be used for direct marketing or be used in breach of the privacy laws. © The State of Queensland 2012. Data source: DNRM: Cadastre, Watercourse, Place Names, Suburbs (2012), Roads (2010), Railway (2007), GA: Watercourse (2007), Ergon Energy: Powerline Infrastructure (2012), TMR: Project Footprint, Road Design, Land Requirements. Created by: SM CURRA CREEK (SOUTH BRANCH)

d a o R od CORELLA Wo

464,000 464,500 465,000 465,500 466,000 466,500

CORELLA CREEK KENNY CREEK

1MPH23914 7,113,000 7,113,000

1MPH6454

Wood Road

1MPH7125 7,112,500 7,112,500

2CP854214

700FTY1491 1CP854214 CORELLA

1MPH32506

1MPH5475

2MPH32318 2MPH23534 7,112,000 7,112,000 1MPH32318

1MPH5063 2MPH31917

CURRA CREEK (SOUTH BRANCH)

1MPH31917

NORTH DEEP CREEK

7,111,500 1MPH23379 7,111,500 1MPH5848 B r u 1MPH31688 c 5CP881252 e

H i g h w a y

1MPH23462

d a

o

R

5MPH14195 h g u o r o b y r a 351SP121982

7,111,000 M 7,111,000 7MPH14195 d l

12RP858766 O

13RP858766

3MCH5357

11RP858766

1MPH23699 14RP858766 Caulfield Road 10RP858766

1SP181038

15RP858766

7RP802525 8RP858763 2SP181038 9RP802525 1RP858763 Parakeet Court 17RP858765 18RP858765 2RP858763 10RP802525 7RP858763

1MPH14195 7,110,500 6RP802526 1MPH14211 7,110,500 3RP858763 ive

r 73SP241377 6RP858763 D 20RP858765 et 29SP220182 20SP241377 e 22RP858765 ik 2MPH30972 5RP858764 Tallowood Court Lor 15RP802525 5RP802526 23RP858765 4RP858764

67SP241377 11RP802525 24RP858764 3RP802526

25RP858764 2RP802526 4MPH33481 26RP858764 1MPH23776 64SP241377 rive 39SP223763 D e 13RP802525 dg Ri 3MPH33481 st TAMAREE re

19SP215964 o 1RP228930 F TAMAREE CREEK 1MPH40428

18SP215964 T 28RP858764 a 2MPH33481 17SP215964 m 2SP215947 a re Bannister Road

7,110,000 e 7,110,000 1MPH30886 R o CHATSWORTH a d 4SP224737 1MPH30197 1MPH32739 FSP223763 1SP233511

2SP248812 Tamaree Road 5SP224737 50SP223763 1SP197544 23SP215964

1MPH33481 55SP223763 4SP233511 22SP215964 11MCH5356 24SP208250 GSP223763 3MPH24551 M 3SP197544 ck Rycott Road enzie 392SP121981 are Road Tam e Road 1MPH35339 2SP233511

Daybreak Court 1MPH31504 B 5SP231334 ru ce Hi gh Rammutt Road 464,000 464,500 465,000 465,500 466,000 466,500 w ay

Legend: refer to the KeyOld Maryborough Plan Road

d Road Mckenzie oa R ash N 1:7,500 (at A2) Department of Transport and Main Roads Revision B 0 125 250 375 500 Date 26 Nov 2012

Metres Department of Infrastructure and Transport Map Projection: Universal Transverse Mercator Bruce Highway Upgrade (Cooroy to Curra) Horizontal Datum: Geocentric Datum of Australia o Grid: Map Grid of Australia 1994, Zone 56 Project Overview Map 17 G:\41\24401\GIS\Maps\C2CPlanningStrategy\41_24401_C2CPlanStrat_A2RevC_Legend.mxd © 2012. While GHD has taken care to ensure the accuracy of this product, GHD, DNRM, GA and TMR, make no representations or warranties about its accuracy, completeness or suitability for any particular purpose. GHD, DNRM, GA and TMR cannot accept liability of any kind (whether in contract, tort or otherwise) for any expenses, losses, damages and/or costs (including indirect or consequential damage) which are or may be incurred as a result of the product being inaccurate, incomplete or unsuitable in any way and for any reason. Based on or contains data provided by the State of Queensland 2012. In consideration of the State permitting use of this data you acknowledge and agree that the State gives no warranty in relation to the data (including accuracy, reliability, completeness, currency or suitability) and accepts no liability (including without limitation, liability in negligence) for any loss, damage or costs (including consequential damage) relating to any use of the data. Data must not be used for direct marketing or be used in breach of the privacy laws. © The State of Queensland 2012. Data source: DNRM: Cadastre, Watercourse, Place Names, Suburbs (2012), Roads (2010), Railway (2007), GA: Watercourse (2007), Ergon Energy: Powerline Infrastructure (2012), TMR: Project Footprint, Road Design, Land Requirements. Created by: SM 463,000 463,500 464,000 464,500 465,000 465,500

1MPH23906 7,116,000 7,116,000

1MPH14173

4MPH23906

CURRA CREEK

CURRA CREEK 7,115,500 7,115,500 RYAN CREEK

1MPH23630 CURRA 7,115,000 7,115,000

d a o R s y 700FTY1491 d ra B

1MPH14134

CORELLA CREEK

B r u c e

7,114,500 H 7,114,500 i g h w a y 7,114,000 7,114,000

B 108MCH1009 ra d y s R o a d

Ha rve y S idi ng R o a d 39M37868

DONALDSON GULLY

O

7,113,500 ld 7,113,500 M ar yb 38RP891878 or ou gh R o ad CURRA CREEK (SOUTH BRANCH)

2CP891877 d a o R od CORELLA Wo CORELLA1MPH23323

CORELLA CREEK 44SP122237 KENNY CREEK 7,113,000 7,113,000 55SP121983 1RP891875 1MPH6454 9USL37807

3CP891874

1MPH7125 Wood Road

463,000 463,500 464,000 464,500 465,000 465,500

Legend: refer to the Key Plan

1:7,500 (at A2) Department of Transport and Main Roads Revision B 0 125 250 375 500 Date 26 Nov 2012

Metres Department of Infrastructure and Transport Map Projection: Universal Transverse Mercator Bruce Highway Upgrade (Cooroy to Curra) Horizontal Datum: Geocentric Datum of Australia o Grid: Map Grid of Australia 1994, Zone 56 Project Overview Map 18 G:\41\24401\GIS\Maps\C2CPlanningStrategy\41_24401_C2CPlanStrat_A2RevC_Legend.mxd © 2012. While GHD has taken care to ensure the accuracy of this product, GHD, DNRM, GA and TMR, make no representations or warranties about its accuracy, completeness or suitability for any particular purpose. GHD, DNRM, GA and TMR cannot accept liability of any kind (whether in contract, tort or otherwise) for any expenses, losses, damages and/or costs (including indirect or consequential damage) which are or may be incurred as a result of the product being inaccurate, incomplete or unsuitable in any way and for any reason. Based on or contains data provided by the State of Queensland 2012. In consideration of the State permitting use of this data you acknowledge and agree that the State gives no warranty in relation to the data (including accuracy, reliability, completeness, currency or suitability) and accepts no liability (including without limitation, liability in negligence) for any loss, damage or costs (including consequential damage) relating to any use of the data. Data must not be used for direct marketing or be used in breach of the privacy laws. © The State of Queensland 2012. Data source: DNRM: Cadastre, Watercourse, Place Names, Suburbs (2012), Roads (2010), Railway (2007), GA: Watercourse (2007), Ergon Energy: Powerline Infrastructure (2012), TMR: Project Footprint, Road Design, Land Requirements. Created by: SM Appendix B - Noise impact study

35 District shooting facility - Feasibility and option analysis

GYMPIE REGION SHOOTING COMPLEX CURRA STATE FOREST

ACOUSTIC SERVICES NOISE IMPACT STUDY

Prepared For:

Project No: 14415 Date: 26 November 2014 Issue No: A

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY It is proposed to develop a Gympie Region shooting complex in the vicinity of the Curra State Forest. This shooting complex would group five separate shooting ranges into a single location. The local authority is the Gympie Regional Council (GRC). To determine the impact of the shooting complex on surrounding noise-sensitive receivers Council has requested that a noise impact study is prepared for the proposed development. Based upon the analysis presented within this report, it has been concluded that:  To satisfy the default noise criteria contained in Section 440ZC of the Environmental Protection Act 1994, the peak noise emissions from the shooting complex should not exceed 95dBZ during the daytime and evening.  Based upon a review of the complex design and aerial photographs of the site and surrounding area, the noise emissions due to shooting activities need to be assessed to demonstrate that the proposed activities will not significantly impact upon surrounding residences. Other potential noise producing activities such as vehicle movements, PA systems, crowd noise, entertainment noise and mechanical plant are unlikely to be an issue. This is due to the separation distances and topography of the site between potential source locations and noise-sensitive premises providing sufficient noise attenuation.  Noise modelling conducted using the methodology contained in ISO 9613-2 has found that the 95dBZ noise emission level contours during the daytime and evening periods are unlikely to impact upon nearby noise-sensitive uses.  The noise modelling has a large level of uncertainty due to limitations in the calculation method, uncertainties in the source data and uncertainties regarding the bulk earthworks required during the construction of the shooting ranges. It is recommended that field testing is conducted after the bulk earthworks have been conducted. This testing would take into account all of the screening provided by the berms, vegetation and topography of the site as well as the directivity of the firearms.  If the field testing indicates that shooting activities are likely to exceed the emission criteria, acoustically lined barriers and/or shooting enclosures can be designed and constructed to further reduce the noise levels. In addition, noise management plans could be implemented to reduce the impact of any shooting activities that is found to cause annoyance.

Gympie Region Shooting Complex Project Number: 14415 Curra State Forest Date: 26 November 2014 Acoustic Services - Noise Impact Study Issue: A

GYMPIE REGION SHOOTING COMPLEX 14415 CURRA STATE FOREST

Acoustic Services – Noise Impact Study

This register identifies each issue of and each amendment to this document by Revision No, Page No, the details of each amendment and date of issue.

SPECIFICATION AMENDMENT REGISTER

Section & Page Issue/ Project Rev. No Author Checked Date No. Amendment Engineer

MH MH A - Original Issue - 26/11/2014

BRISBANE Ground Floor, 42 Doggett Street, Fortitude Valley QLD 4006 www.floth.com.au POSTAL PO Box 2231, Fortitude Valley BC QLD 4006 PHONE +61 7 3252 0977 FAX +61 7 3252 2499 EMAIL [email protected] ABN 23 808 082 432 SYDNEY BRISBANE PERTH JAKARTA

Gympie Region Shooting Complex Project Number: 14415 Curra State Forest Date: 26 November 2014 Acoustic Services - Noise Impact Study Issue: A

CONTENTS

1. INTRODUCTION ...... 1

2. SITE AND SURROUNDING AREA ...... 2

3. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ...... 4

4. NOISE ASSESSMENT REQUIREMENTS ...... 9

5. NOISE EMISSION CRITERIA ...... 10

6. NOISE MODELLING METHODOLOGY ...... 11 6.1 SOFTWARE ...... 11 6.2 NOISE MODELLING SCENARIOS ...... 11 6.3 TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION ...... 11 6.4 ATMOSPHERIC EFFECTS ...... 11 6.5 NOISE RECEIVER LOCATIONS ...... 11 6.6 SOURCE NOISE LEVELS ...... 11 6.7 UNCERTAINTY IN THE MODEL PREDICTIONS ...... 12

7. PREDICTED NOISE EMISSION LEVELS ...... 13

8. MINIMISING RISK ...... 14

9. CONCLUSIONS ...... 15

APPENDIX A: NOISE MODELLING RESULTS

Gympie Region Shooting Complex Project Number: 14415 Curra State Forest Date: 26 November 2014 Acoustic Services - Noise Impact Study Issue: A

1. INTRODUCTION It is proposed to develop a Gympie Region shooting complex in the vicinity of the Curra State Forest. The site location is indicated in Figure 1. This shooting complex would group five separate shooting ranges into a single location.

Site Location

N

Figure 1: Site location

The local authority is the Gympie Regional Council (GRC). To determine the impact of the shooting complex on surrounding noise-sensitive receivers Council has requested that a noise impact study is prepared for the proposed development.

Gympie Region Shooting Complex Page: 1 Project Number: 14415 Curra State Forest Date: 26 November 2014 Acoustic Services - Noise Impact Study Issue: A

2. SITE AND SURROUNDING AREA A map showing the site location and surrounding features is presented in Figure 2. It can be seen in this figure that the site is bounded by an existing railway corridor and proposed highway corridor to the south, local access roads to the east and north and freehold land and a local access road to the west.

N

Figure 2: Site (highlighted in green) and surrounding area

It can be seen in Figure 3 that the site presently contains densely vegetated forest and several off-road access tracks and trails. To the south of the rail corridor there are a number of residences, while additional residences are located to the east, north and southwest of the site.

Gympie Region Shooting Complex Page: 2 Project Number: 14415 Curra State Forest Date: 26 November 2014 Acoustic Services - Noise Impact Study Issue: A

N

Site

Figure 3: Aerial photograph of site and surrounding area

Gympie Region Shooting Complex Page: 3 Project Number: 14415 Curra State Forest Date: 26 November 2014 Acoustic Services - Noise Impact Study Issue: A

3. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT An indicative plan of the proposed shooting complex is presented in Figure 4. It can be seen in this figure that a number of shooting activities are proposed for the complex.

Figure 4: Proposed layout of the shooting facility

Gympie Region Shooting Complex Page: 4 Project Number: 14415 Curra State Forest Date: 26 November 2014 Acoustic Services - Noise Impact Study Issue: A

It can be seen in Figure 4 that the Service Rifle range will require an area 1,000m long and 50m, while the small bore rifle and silhouette will require an area of 200m long and 70m wide. Table 1 presents a summary of the shooting clubs and events that are likely to be held at the complex. It can be seen in this table that in addition to their regularly scheduled events, there would also be special events held by most of the clubs at the complex. Table 1: Summary of shooting clubs and events

Club Name Club Shooting Frequency Special Events

Gympie Small Bore Every Fri afternoon and evening (50 Host one 1-day event each Rifle and Silhouette shooters) year (approx. 50 competitors) Club Every second Saturday (50 shooters) (170 members) Members also have access for practice. Likely 1-2 people shooting on most days

Gympie Clay Target One Sunday per month (20 shooters) One 2-day shoot each year Club (approx. 60 competitors) Some members like to practice on the (28 members) Saturday the day before the monthly shoot

Gympie Pistol Club Every Wed and Sat Two 2-day shoots each year. (up to 150 competitors) (200 members) Most Sundays Members can shoot everyday (but rare occurrence)

Gympie Sporting One Sunday per month (10-15 shooters) One 2-day shoot each year Clays (100 competitors) (40 members) One 2-day shoot every 4 years (State Champs) (150 competitors)

Gympie Service Rifle The club currently shoots at the Pistol Nil Club Club on a 90m range two times each month (40 shooters) (200 members)

For each of the clubs listed in Table 1 the likely activities to be conducted at the complex include: 1. Gympie Clay Target:  DTL single and double rise  Single and double barrel  Skeet 2. Gympie Sporting Clays:  Sporting clays (simulated field)  Compak sporting clays  FITASC sporting clays  English sporting clays  Skeet

Gympie Region Shooting Complex Page: 5 Project Number: 14415 Curra State Forest Date: 26 November 2014 Acoustic Services - Noise Impact Study Issue: A

3. Gympie Pistol Club  Air pistol match  Black powder pistol  Centre fire pistol  IPSC pistol  Practical pistol course match  Rapid fire pistol  Silhouette pistol air  Silhouette pistol rimfire 50m  Service pistol  Single action match  Air rifle match  Bowling pin match  Free pistol  NRA pistol action match  Police and service  Rimfire/smoothbore rifle matches  Silhouette rifle rimfire 50m  Standard pistol match 4. Gympie Service Rifle:  Service rifle  Service rifle silhouette  Field rifle  Practical rifle  Big bore prone  Big bore “F” class  300m prone  300m 3 P  1,000m bench rest  Bench rest fly  Bench rest heavy varmint  Bench rest light varmint  Bench rest hunting class  Muzzle loading – MLACI  Muzzle loading long range black powder  Muzzle loading black powder black cartridge  Muzzle loading rendezvous  Level action classic

Gympie Region Shooting Complex Page: 6 Project Number: 14415 Curra State Forest Date: 26 November 2014 Acoustic Services - Noise Impact Study Issue: A

 Level action open  3 position rifle centrefire  3 position rifle rimfire  4 position rifle centrefire  4 position rifle rimfire  Miscellaneous rimfire matches  Bug game rifle  Air rifle field  Air rifle target  Air rifle silhouette  Service shotgun  Practical shotgun  Western action  Western action long rifle  Colonial action  Colonial action long rifle  Metallic silhouette centrefire  Metallic silhouette rimfire  Black powder cartridge silhouette  100m pistol silhouette rimfire  200m pistol silhouette centrefire  100m pistol silhouette field  100m – 500m long range pistol  Hunting pistol 5. Gympie Small Bore Rifle and Silhouette:  90m soft target  50m UIT  20m soft target  90m metallic silhouette  70m metallic silhouette  55m metallic silhouette  35m metallic silhouette  .22 rimfire pistol  10m and 20m air rifle  10mm air pistol  90m rifle bench rest paper targets  50m rifle bench rest paper targets  20m rifle bench rest paper targets

Gympie Region Shooting Complex Page: 7 Project Number: 14415 Curra State Forest Date: 26 November 2014 Acoustic Services - Noise Impact Study Issue: A

 35m rifle bench rest silhouette  55m rifle bench rest silhouette  70m rifle bench rest silhouette  90m rifle bench rest silhouette  .22 rimfire field rifle 4 position  .22 rimfire target rifle 3 position  .22 rimfire bench rest silhouette For the above events, all of the clubs would operate during the daytime (6am to 6pm), with the Gympie Small Bore Rifle and Silhouette Club, Gympie Clay Target Club and the Gympie Pistol Club likely to operate during the evening as well.

Gympie Region Shooting Complex Page: 8 Project Number: 14415 Curra State Forest Date: 26 November 2014 Acoustic Services - Noise Impact Study Issue: A

4. NOISE ASSESSMENT REQUIREMENTS Based upon a review of the complex design and aerial photographs of the site and surrounding area, the noise emissions due to shooting activities will need to be assessed to demonstrate that the proposed activities will not significantly impact upon surrounding residences. Other potential noise producing activities such as vehicle movements, PA systems, crowd noise, entertainment noise and mechanical plant are unlikely to be an issue. This is due to the separation distances and topography of the site between potential source locations and noise-sensitive premises.

Gympie Region Shooting Complex Page: 9 Project Number: 14415 Curra State Forest Date: 26 November 2014 Acoustic Services - Noise Impact Study Issue: A

5. NOISE EMISSION CRITERIA The Gympie Regional Council does not have any specific noise emission criteria for shooting ranges. As such, reference has been made to Section 440ZC of the Environmental Protection Act 1994 (EPAct), which contains the default noise emission limits for outdoor shooting ranges. Section 440ZC states that: (1) A person must not operate, or permit the operation of, an outdoor shooting range, between 6am and 6pm on any day, if the noise from the operation is more than – (a) For a range that is normally used at least 5 days a week – 95dBZ Peak Hold; or (b) For a range that is normally used 4 days a week – 100dBZ Peak Hold; or (c) For a range that is normally used no more than 3 days a week – 105dBZ Peak Hold. (2) A person must not operate, or permit the operation of, an outdoor shooting range, between 6pm and 10pm on any day, if the noise from the operation is more than – (a) For a range that is normally used at least 5 evenings a week – 85dBZ Peak Hold; or (b) For a range that is normally used 4 evenings a week – 90dBZ Peak Hold; or (c) For a range that is usually used no more than 3 evenings a week – 95dBZ Peak Hold. (3) For this section, noise from an outdoor shooting range is measured by working out the arithmetic average of the noise levels of whichever of the following happens first during the measurement period – (a) At least 40 individual gunshots; (b) At least 20 individual gunshots in any 30-minute period. (4) In this section – Used means used for an activity that includes shooting. Examples of a range being used – 1. A shooting match conducted at the range 2. A defence personnel or police officer training session, that includes shooting, conducted at the range Based upon the shooting event frequencies presented in Table 1 it can be seen that:  The complex is likely to be used between 6am and 6pm at least 5 days a week;  Evening use of the complex would occur for no more than 3 evenings a week. Based upon the above assertions, the noise emission limit for the complex would be 95dBZ Peak Hold for both periods of 6am to 6pm and 6pm to 10pm.

Gympie Region Shooting Complex Page: 10 Project Number: 14415 Curra State Forest Date: 26 November 2014 Acoustic Services - Noise Impact Study Issue: A

6. NOISE MODELLING METHODOLOGY

6.1 SOFTWARE Noise emissions from the site have been predicted using the SoundPLAN computer program. SoundPLAN is an integrated software package for noise and air pollution evaluation developed in Germany by Braunstein + Berndt GmbH. It has been configured to predict the noise emissions from the site in accordance with International Standard ISO 9613-2 Acoustics – Attenuation of Sound during Propagation Outdoors – Part 2: General Method of Calculation. As acknowledged in International Standard ISO 17201-3-2010 Acoustics – Noise from Shooting Ranges – Part 3: Guidelines for Sound Propagation Calculations that ISO 9613-2 neither applies to shooting sound nor accounts for changes in sound pressure time history during propagation. Additionally, ISO 9613-2 does not adequately account for meteorological effects on sound propagation over distances greater than 1km.

6.2 NOISE MODELLING SCENARIOS Two noise modelling scenarios have been prepared for the site. Both scenarios calculate the maximum peak sound pressure levels emitted from the complex for all shooting activities expected to occur during the daytime and evening, respectively: 1. Operation of all shooting venues during the daytime. 2. Operation of the small bore rifle, clay target and pistol range during the evening. For both scenarios, the natural ground level contours have been used in the absence of any information regarding the bulk earthworks to be undertaken at the sire. In addition, open-field conditions have been assumed at each firing position. In all instances a firing position located 1.5m above ground level has been used.

6.3 TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION The topographic contours across the site and surrounding area have been supplied by Ross Planning. Due to the large size of the site and surrounding area, a ground elevation contour interval of 5.0m has been used in the model.

6.4 ATMOSPHERIC EFFECTS The calculations have assumed a temperature of 25oC and 60% humidity. The calculation method adopted in ISO 9613-2 predicts the A-weighted sound pressure level under meteorological conditions favourable to propagation from the source to the receiver. These conditions are for downwind propagation at a wind speed between approximately 1m/s and 5m/s, or equivalently, propagation under a well-developed moderate ground-based temperature inversion, such as those that occur during the night-time.

6.5 NOISE RECEIVER LOCATIONS Grid noise maps have been defined for highset receivers located 4.2m above ground level to take into account the potential for highset or split-level residences in the surrounding area. A grid spacing of 5.0m has been used for the receivers.

6.6 SOURCE NOISE LEVELS The source levels for shooting activities used in the SoundPLAN model are summarised in Table 2. These data have been obtained from tests previously conducted for another outdoor shooting range located in Queensland. To obtain the sound power levels the noise emissions were measured at a distance of 35m from the shooting point and hemispherical propagation used to determine the equivalent sound power level for a point source. As the sound level meter only measured the overall peak noise level, the sound spectrum between 31.5Hz and 8kHz inclusive has been based upon the measured Lmax levels adjusted to the equivalent Lpeak level. The overall levels contained in Table 2 have been compared against the typical peak levels presented in the literature and good agreement has been found1.

1 For example refer to Swallow, JC, Hemingway, J & Yung P (1999), “Shooting Ranges and Sound”, Royal Canadian Mounted Police, Canada.

Gympie Region Shooting Complex Page: 11 Project Number: 14415 Curra State Forest Date: 26 November 2014 Acoustic Services - Noise Impact Study Issue: A

Table 2: Typical source levels used in the SoundPLAN model

Peak Noise Level in dBZ at Frequency Hz Overall Activity Example Firearm (dBZ) 31.5 63 125 250 500 1k 2k 4k 8k

Small bore rifle 22 rifle 114 129 133 131 146 154 153 154 147 159

Clay target Shotgun 136 145 147 149 158 160 159 155 151 165

Pistol 44 magnum 132 143 147 145 154 160 159 155 152 164

Sporting clays Shotgun 136 145 147 149 158 160 159 155 151 165

Service rifle 44 magnum rifle 135 145 148 147 157 160 158 156 152 165

The source levels presented in Table 2 have all been assumed to be omnidirectional, even though the sound from a typical rifle and shotgun is directional, with the sound pressure level in front of the barrel being around 10dB higher than behind the firearm.

6.7 UNCERTAINTY IN THE MODEL PREDICTIONS It should be acknowledged that there are a number of uncertainties associated with the modelling predictions. These uncertainties include:  Source noise levels – the source noise levels have been obtained for a representative firearm within each category. It is possible that firearms could be used that are noisier than those contained in Table 2. However, it is noted that Section 440ZC of the EPAct states that the noise from an outdoor shooting range is measured by working out the arithmetic average of either 40 individual gunshots or 20 individual gunshots in any 30-minute period. As such, the source levels can be considered to be representative of the typical average source level for each firearm type.  Directivity of the noise sources – the noise from firearms such as rifles and shotguns is directional. As previously stated the source levels have been assumed to be omnidirectional in the noise model. This assumption has been made as no information is available regarding barriers, screening and hardstands that are likely to be placed near-to the shooting locations. These constructions are likely to result in reflections of the noise emissions that may or may not contribute to the overall directivity of the noise emissions. By assuming omnidirectional sources a conservative approach has been taken.  Height of noise sources – a source height of 1.5m above ground level has been used for all of the noise sources. In some instances, the source height will be higher or lower than 1.5m depending upon the shooting activity. A source height of 1.5m is considered to be representative of the average source height for all activities.  Topography – there will need to be some bulk earthworks to construct the shooting complex. This will result in the creation of berms that may provide additional acoustic screening of shooting noise. These berms have not been able to be modelled as their locations and heights are presently unknown.  Screening due to vegetation – the site and parts of the surrounding area are covered with forest. The presence of trees and shrubs is likely to provide additional attenuation of the noise emissions that has not been accounted for in the model. In addition, shock interactions with branches and tree trunks have the potential to alter the spectral content of the noise emissions. This alteration cannot be accounted for in the noise modelling. Wind speed and direction – the application of ISO 9613.2 assumes downwind propagation at a wind speed between approximately 1m/s and 5m/s. This is a physical impracticality and as such may result in the over- prediction of the noise emission levels at the receivers. There may be strong wind gradients from time to time that will result in higher noise levels at receivers downwind of the site and lower noise levels upwind of the site.

Gympie Region Shooting Complex Page: 12 Project Number: 14415 Curra State Forest Date: 26 November 2014 Acoustic Services - Noise Impact Study Issue: A

7. PREDICTED NOISE EMISSION LEVELS The noise emission levels have been predicted for two scenarios as described in Section 7.2. For all scenarios highset receivers located 4.2m above ground level have been used. The predicted noise emission levels are presented in Appendix A. Figure 5 presents the daytime noise emission contours for shooting activities, while Figure 6 presents the evening noise emission contours for shooting activities. For both scenarios it can be seen that the 95dBZ contour is mainly located within the site boundaries. During the daytime the 95dBZ contour does intrude into the railway corridor located to the south of the site. In this situation and the other situations where the 95dBZ contour does extend offsite there are no known noise- sensitive uses located in those areas It should be noted that the noise prediction results are specific to the currently proposed layout of the complex. If the layout changes the noise modelling may need to be revised to account for these changes.

Gympie Region Shooting Complex Page: 13 Project Number: 14415 Curra State Forest Date: 26 November 2014 Acoustic Services - Noise Impact Study Issue: A

8. MINIMISING RISK As stated earlier in this report the use of the ISO 9613-2 methodology to predict shooting noise emissions introduces some uncertainty into the calculation results. Even though the modelling does indicate that the 95dBZ emission limit as specified in Section 440ZC of the EPAct will be achieved, these is still the possibility that this emission limit will be exceeded at nearby noise-sensitive premises and/or annoyance caused by the shooting activities. To guarantee that the noise emission from the shooting complex achieve compliance with the criteria it will be necessary to conduct field testing after the bulk earthworks have been conducted. This testing will be able to take into account all of the screening provided by the berms, vegetation and topography of the site as well as the directivity of the firearms. If the field testing indicates that shooting activities are likely to exceed the emission criteria, acoustically lined barriers and/or shooting enclosures can be designed and constructed to further reduce the noise levels. In addition, noise management plans could be implemented to reduce the impact of any shooting activities that is found to cause annoyance.

Gympie Region Shooting Complex Page: 14 Project Number: 14415 Curra State Forest Date: 26 November 2014 Acoustic Services - Noise Impact Study Issue: A

9. CONCLUSIONS Based upon the analysis presented in this report, it has been concluded that:  To satisfy the default noise criteria contained in Section 440ZC of the Environmental Protection Act 1994, the peak noise emissions from the shooting complex should not exceed 95dBZ during the daytime and evening.  Based upon a review of the complex design and aerial photographs of the site and surrounding area, the noise emissions due to shooting activities will need to be assessed to demonstrate that the proposed activities will not significantly impact upon surrounding residences. Other potential noise producing activities such as vehicle movements, PA systems, crowd noise, entertainment noise and mechanical plant are unlikely to be an issue. This is due to the separation distances and topography of the site between potential source locations and noise-sensitive premises providing sufficient noise attenuation.  Noise modelling conducted using the methodology contained in ISO 9613-2 has found that the 95dBZ noise emission level contours during the daytime and evening periods are unlikely to impact upon nearby noise-sensitive uses.  The noise modelling has a large level of uncertainty due to limitations in the calculation method, uncertainties in the source data and uncertainties regarding the bulk earthworks required during the construction of the shooting ranges. It is recommended that field testing is conducted after the bulk earthworks have been conducted. This testing would take into account all of the screening provided by the berms, vegetation and topography of the site as well as the directivity of the firearms.  If the field testing indicates that shooting activities are likely to exceed the emission criteria, acoustically lined barriers and/or shooting enclosures can be designed and constructed to further reduce the noise levels. In addition, noise management plans could be implemented to reduce the impact of any shooting activities that is found to cause annoyance.

Gympie Region Shooting Complex Page: 15 Project Number: 14415 Curra State Forest Date: 26 November 2014 Acoustic Services - Noise Impact Study Issue: A

APPENDIX A: NOISE MODELLING RESULTS

Gympie Region Shooting Complex Project Number: 14415 Curra State Forest Date: 26 November 2014 Acoustic Services - Noise Impact Study Issue: A

Figure 5: Noise emission level contours for daytime shooting activities

Gympie Region Shooting Complex Project Number: 14415 Curra State Forest Date: 26 November 2014 Acoustic Services - Noise Impact Study Issue: A

Figure 6: Noise emission level contours for evening shooting activities

Gympie Region Shooting Complex Project Number: 14415 Curra State Forest Date: 26 November 2014 Acoustic Services - Noise Impact Study Issue: A

Appendix C - Quantity survey

36 District shooting facility - Feasibility and option analysis David A. McCulloch PO Box 5109 Torquay. Qld. 4655. Ph/fax 0741255228 mob 0423875376 [email protected]

Hoverley Pty Ltd – Quantity Surveyor & Building Cost Consultant Monday, 24 November 2014

Dion Collins Ross Planning PO Box 5660, Manly. Q. 4179. 0409003836 [email protected]

Re: Gympie Shooting Facilities

Please find attached our preliminary elemental concept plan estimate for the aforementioned prepared from the following documents provided:

Preliminary layout Ross Planning Scope of Work Photos

Exclusions

 Diversion of site services not identified  Alterations, demolition of existing buildings  Works external to the site boundary  Asbestos removal  Regulatory and Statutory fees  Financing Costs  Professional, consultant and legal fees - other than those allowances included  Cost of complying with conditions imposed by relevant authorities  Head works and related development costs  Fit out  All other works not described  Site allowance and other negotiated Union imposed construction costs if any

Allowances included for power and water are provisional at this time given site locations and delivery route, methodology are not able to be determined.

As this proposed project is in the very early concept phase we suggest that as design develops, further estimates are prepared. We have made certain assumptions concerning the likely finishes to be adopted.

We have compiled a list of the items for relocation/reconstruction for the various associations and provide spreadsheets detailing our estimates hereafter.

Hoverley Pty. Ltd. David A. McCulloch (A.A.I.Q.S.) (Dip. Q.S. Q.I.T. 1982) Page | 1 Relocation Cost Plan Budgets Gympie Shooting Facilities 24-Nov-14 Relocation of All Facilities Description Amount

Site Fencing Allow ances - All Sites $548,250

Gympie Small Bore Rifle and Silhouette Club $448,120

Gympie Clay Target Club $768,003

Gympie Pistol Club $649,285

Gympie Sporting Clays $546,308

Gympie Service Rifle Club $765,592

Subtotal $3,725,558 Fees and charges $465,695 Subtotal $4,191,253 Contingency - 10% $419,125 Estimated Relocation Cost excluding GST $4,610,378 GST $461,038 Estimated Relocation Cost including GST $5,071,416

Thanks for the opportunity to provide this service, please contact David McCulloch should you require any additional information (0741255228).

Yours Faithfully,

Hoverley Pty. Ltd. David A. McCulloch (A.A.I.Q.S.) (Dip. Q.S. Q.I.T. 1982) Page | 2 Relocation Cost Plan Budgets Gympie Small Bore Rifle and Silhouette Club 24-Nov-14 62 Banks Pocket Road, Araluen Description Amount

TOTAL $448,120.00 Site Preparation $65,548.00

Clear trees, clear and grub site - allow for 10m w ide clearing around - area required 50m w ide x 200m long (no restrictions on clearing - disposal on site) Excavate over site (excludes rock) to provide relatively level surface for range - similar to existing facility - cut to fill or push to mound - max depth 2.4m - NO allow ance for retaining structures - felled trees are an option

Amenities Block - Attached $41,472 Amenities block - prefabricated steel framed and clad shed w ith security provisions to w indow s and doors, internal compliant w alls and ceilings - male and female show er and toilet and basin - Unisex facilities, w ater tanks and septic system - Nominally 3.6m x 4.8m

General Accommodation Component - Attached $46,000 Proprietary prefabricated zincalume steel framed and clad shed (meeting room, canteen, storage, armoury and scorer’s room) w ith security provisions to w indow s and doors, roller doors, internal gyprock w alls and ceilings energy efficient compliant construction, lighting and pow er, septic and w ater tank facilities - Nominally 8m x 4.5m Sundries

Indoor Range $63,000 Proprietary prefabricated zincalume steel framed and clad shed w ith security provisions to w indow s and doors, roller doors, internal impact resistant w alls and ceilings - energy efficient compliancy, lighting and pow er - Nominally 14m x 4.5m

Firing Lines $150,000 Mounds construction Steel framed roofed structure - zincalume finish - steel support posts Concrete slab on ground Steel and timber w ork bench rests Lighting and pow er circuitry and sw itching Compressed air reticulation and connection to rotating targets Light tow ers and lights including pow er circuit and breakers

Storage Shed - Mid-range $12,600.00 Proprietary prefabricated zincalume finish steel framed and clad shed w ith security provisions to w indow s and doors - on concrete slab

General Site Power, Water Tanks and Pumps $44,500.00 Rainw ater harvesting - 6 x 5000 litre tanks and reticulation pipe w ork Pump, covers, controllers, valves, etc... Sundries - tanks and component bases, etc... Contribution to site pow er delivery - approx 1klm from access point - poles and overhead service anticipated

All Weather Vehicle Access $25,000 Contribution to gravel access track to all facilities for pedestrians and vehicles, from nominated site access point

Hoverley Pty. Ltd. David A. McCulloch (A.A.I.Q.S.) (Dip. Q.S. Q.I.T. 1982) Page | 3 Relocation Cost Plan Budgets Gympie Clay Target Club 24-Nov-14 62 Banks Pocket Road, Araluen Description Amount

TOTAL $768,003.00 Site Preparation $229,311.00 Clear trees, clear and grub site - allow for 10m w ide clearing around - area required 250m x 150m (no restrictions on clearing - disposal on site) Excavate over site (excludes rock) to provide relatively level surface for range - similar to existing facility - cut to fill or push to mound - max depth 2.4m - NO allow ance for retaining structures - felled trees are an option

Amenities Block - Attached $41,472 Amenities block - prefabricated steel framed and clad shed w ith security provisions to w indow s and doors, internal compliant w alls and ceilings - male and female show er and toilet and basin - Unisex facilities, w ater tanks and septic system - Nominally 3.6m x 4.8m

General Accommodation Component - Attached $192,720 Proprietary prefabricated zincalume steel framed and clad shed (meeting room, canteen, storage, scorer’s room) w ith security provisions to w indow s and doors, roller doors, internal gyprock w alls and ceilings energy efficient compliant construction, lighting and pow er, septic and w ater tank facilities - Nominally 20m x 10m less amenities allow ances Sundries

DTL Trap House and Shooting Lanes $97,500 190mm natural concrete block w aterproof trap houses w ith core filled and reinforce w alls over concrete slab on ground and footings, concrete or steel sheeted and framed roof slab and secure hinged access door to firing line - services installation Structure, lighting, pow er and circuitry for 2 DTL lanes

DTL Skeet Layouts $54,000 Skeet house budgets advised by Club

Target Bunkers $20,000 Mounds construction Allow ance based on replicating existing structure or equivalent

Storage Shed $21,000.00 Proprietary prefabricated zincalume finish steel framed and clad shed w ith security provisions to w indow s and doors - on concrete slab

All Weather Vehicle Access $50,000 Contribution to gravel access track to all facilities for pedestrians and vehicles, from nominated site access point

General Site Power, Water Tanks and Pumps $62,000.00 Rainw ater harvesting - 4 x 5000 litre tanks and reticulation pipe w ork Pump, covers, controllers, valves, etc... Sundries - tanks and component bases, etc... Contribution to site pow er delivery - approx 2klm from access point - poles and overhead service anticipated

Hoverley Pty. Ltd. David A. McCulloch (A.A.I.Q.S.) (Dip. Q.S. Q.I.T. 1982) Page | 4 Relocation Cost Plan Budgets Gympie Pistol Club 24-Nov-14 Belvedere Rd, Veteran Description Amount

TOTAL $649,285.00 Site Preparation $141,613.00 Clear trees, clear and grub site - allow for 10m w ide clearing around - area required 300m x 75m (no restrictions on clearing - disposal on site) Excavate over site (excludes rock) to provide relatively level surface for range - similar to existing facility - cut to fill or push to mound - max depth 2.4m - NO allow ance for retaining structures - felled trees are an option

Amenities Block - Attached $41,472 Amenities block - prefabricated steel framed and clad shed w ith security provisions to w indow s and doors, internal compliant w alls and ceilings - male and female show er and toilet and basin - Unisex facilities, w ater tanks and septic system - Nominally 3.6m x 4.8m

General Accommodation Component - Attached $53,200 Proprietary prefabricated zincalume steel framed and clad shed (meeting room, canteen, storage, armoury and scorer’s room) w ith security provisions to w indow s and doors, roller doors, internal gyprock w alls and ceilings energy efficient compliant construction, rear w all masonry, lighting and pow er, septic and w ater tank facilities - Nominally 8m x 4.5m Sundries

Firing Lines (all lit) $257,500 Mounds construction - if required Steel framed roofed structure - zincalume finish - steel support posts Concrete slab on ground Steel and timber w ork bench rests, screens, etc.. Covered target structure - to match existing Lighting and pow er circuitry and sw itching Compressed air reticulation and connection to rotating targets Light tow ers and lights including pow er circuit and breakers

Shields (as existing to 10m w ide x 75m long area) $40,000.00 Precast concrete panel construction to all 3 sides - nom 3000 high inlcuding footing/bracing

All Weather Vehicle Access $50,000 Contribution to gravel access track to all facilities for pedestrians and vehicles, from nominated site access point

General Site Power, Water Tanks and Pumps $65,500.00 Rainw ater harvesting - 6 x 5000 litre tanks and reticulation pipe w ork Pump, covers, controllers, valves, etc... Sundries - tanks and component bases, etc... Contribution to site pow er delivery - approx 2klm from access point - poles and overhead service anticipated

Hoverley Pty. Ltd. David A. McCulloch (A.A.I.Q.S.) (Dip. Q.S. Q.I.T. 1982) Page | 5 Relocation Cost Plan Budgets Gympie Sporting Clays 24-Nov-14 Sexton Rd, Sexton (on private property) Description Amount

TOTAL $546,308.00 Site Preparation $64,116.00 Clear trees, clear and grub site - allow for 10m w ide clearing around - area required 100m x 100m (no restrictions on clearing - disposal on site) Excavate over site (excludes rock) to provide relatively level surface for range - similar to existing facility - cut to fill or push to mound - max depth 2.4m - NO allow ance for retaining structures - felled trees are an option

Amenities Block - Attached $41,472 Amenities block - prefabricated steel framed and clad shed w ith security provisions to w indow s and doors, internal compliant w alls and ceilings - male and female show er and toilet and basin - Unisex facilities, w ater tanks and septic system - Nominally 3.6m x 4.8m

General Accommodation Component - Attached $292,720 Proprietary prefabricated zincalume steel framed and clad shed (meeting room, canteen, storage) w ith security provisions to w indow s and doors, roller doors, internal gyprock w alls and ceilings energy efficient compliant construction, lighting and pow er, septic and w ater tank facilities - Nominally 30m x 10m less amenities allow ances Sundries

General Structures/Operational Sporting Assets by others Allow ance for operational assets Structure, lighting, pow er and circuitry for operational equiipment

Skeet Layouts $81,000 Skeet house budgets allow ance

All Weather Vehicle Access $25,000 Contribution to gravel access track to all facilities for pedestrians and vehicles, from nominated site access point

General Site Power, Water Tanks and Pumps $42,000.00 Rainw ater harvesting - 4 x 5000 litre tanks and reticulation pipe w ork Pump, covers, controllers, valves, etc... Sundries - tanks and component bases, etc... Contribution to site pow er delivery - approx 1klm from access point - poles and overhead service anticipated

Hoverley Pty. Ltd. David A. McCulloch (A.A.I.Q.S.) (Dip. Q.S. Q.I.T. 1982) Page | 6 Relocation Cost Plan Budgets Gympie Service Rifle Club 24-Nov-14 No Current Facility Description Amount

TOTAL $765,592.00 Site Preparation $417,900.00 Clear trees, clear and grub site - allow for 10m w ide clearing around - area required 1000m x 50m (no restrictions on clearing - disposal on site) Excavate over site (excludes rock) to provide relatively level surface for range - similar to existing facility - cut to fill or push to mound - max depth 4m - NO allow ance for retaining structures - felled trees are an option

Amenities Block - Attached $41,472 Amenities block - prefabricated steel framed and clad shed w ith security provisions to w indow s and doors, internal compliant w alls and ceilings - male and female show er and toilet and basin - Unisex facilities, w ater tanks and septic system - Nominally 3.6m x 4.8m

General Accommodation Component - Attached $192,720 Proprietary prefabricated zincalume steel framed and clad shed (meeting room, canteen, storage) w ith security provisions to w indow s and doors, roller doors, internal gyprock w alls and ceilings energy efficient compliant construction, lighting and pow er, septic and w ater tank facilities - Nominally 20m x 10m less amenities allow ances Sundries

General Structures/Operational Sporting Assets $5,000 Construct firing mounds every 100yards, construct stop butt and construct target stands Target stands Structure, lighting, pow er and circuitry for operational equiipment

All Weather Vehicle Access $50,000 Contribution to gravel access track to all facilities for pedestrians and vehicles, from nominated site access point

General Site Power, Water Tanks and Pumps $58,500.00 Rainw ater harvesting - 2 x 5000 litre tanks and reticulation pipe w ork Pump, covers, controllers, valves, etc... Sundries - tanks and component bases, etc... Contribution to site pow er delivery - approx 2klm from access point - poles and overhead service anticipated

Hoverley Pty. Ltd. David A. McCulloch (A.A.I.Q.S.) (Dip. Q.S. Q.I.T. 1982) Page | 7 recreation open space and sport specialists

ROSS Planning Pty Ltd ABN 32 508 029 959 Upper floor, 63 Bay Terrace Wynnum QLD 4178 PO Box 5660 Manly QLD 4179 Telephone: (07) 3901 0730 Fax: (07) 3893 0593