Land South West of Station Road, West Rainton ADDRESS

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Land South West of Station Road, West Rainton ADDRESS + Planning Services COMMITTEE REPORT APPLICATION DETAILS APPLICATION NO: CMA/4/112 Residential development of up to 150 dwellings, small scale community hub comprising use classes A1 and/or A2, A3, A4 and A5 of up to 950sq.m. and FULL APPLICATION use class D1 of up to 950 sq.m. with open space, DESCRIPTION : hard and soft landscaping, associated infrastructure and off site highway improvements (outline, all matters reserved except access). Tees Valley Housing NAME OF APPLICANT : Land south west of Station Road, West Rainton ADDRESS : Sherburn ELECTORAL DIVISION : Ann Rawlinson, Senior Planning Officer CASE OFFICER : 03000 261393 [email protected] DESCRIPTION OF THE SITE AND PROPOSALS The Site 1. The application site comprises approximately 11.35 hectares of agricultural land bordered by hedgerows to the south western edge of West Rainton, abutting Station Road. To the north west of the site is the east coast mainline and the adjoining settlement of Leamside, to the south west is agricultural land and to the south east is the A690, leading to Durham and Sunderland. The site is triangular in shape extending from Rainton Gate/Lambton View to the east, down to Leamside to its western side, with the site sloping from east to west. The eastern/south eastern boundary is lower than the existing 3 storey properties at Rainton Gate which back onto the site. Off-site the ground slopes to the south allowing views towards Durham. 2. A public right of way extends through the centre of the site, along a raised field line from Station Road to the north into the agricultural fields and a wooded area to the south, connecting to a network of routes to the south and west. The existing landscape includes hedgerows to the south east corner. There are occasional small trees and bushes along the field line and also along the grass verge alongside Station Road. 3. West Rainton is located approximately 6.9km to the north east of Durham city centre and approximately 2.5km to the south east of Houghton-le-Spring. It is situated 1.5km to the southwest of the Sunderland City administrative boundary. The surrounding area is predominantly agricultural and residential, with supporting community facilities scattered through the village. As set out in the City of Durham Local Plan, the site is beyond the identified settlement boundary, which is defined by Station Road, and is situated directly to the north/east of the Durham Green Belt. The site is located to the north and east of an area of landscape value and to the northeast of a site of nature conservation importance. There are 4 designated heritage assets located within 1km of the site. The site itself contains no heritage assets, landscape or ecological designations. The Proposal 4. The application is for outline planning permission with all matters, except access, reserved for consideration at a later date. An illustrative master plan has been submitted to support the application which sets out how the applicant intends to develop the design ethos of the scheme. The application seeks approval in principle for the following elements: • Up to 150 residential dwellings comprising 3 (20%), 4, and 5 bedroomed detached and semi-detached houses; • 20% affordable housing (30no.) with 75% social rented and 25% intermediate housing comprising 15 no. bungalows suitable for older people; • 950sq.m of use classes A1 (shops) and/or A2 (financial and professional services), A3 (cafe/restaurant) A4 (pub), or A5 (hot food takeaway); • 950 sq.m. of use class D1 (non-residential uses, potentially a new or relocated doctors surgery and/or community facilities); • A ‘landscape-led’ design approach focusing on a core concept of ‘green fingers’ running throughout the scheme incorporating; open amenity green space, semi-natural green space, informal play space, perimeter landscaping belts, hedgerows and tree planting; • Pond features (SUDS); • Off-site highway improvements. 5. Vehicular access would be taken into the site in two locations off Station Road to the north of the site, approximately one third and two thirds down the site from east to west. Pedestrian access would be taken at these points also. The access point to the north west has been moved slightly southwest during the course of consideration of the application. An existing footpath through the centre of the site from Station Road would be retained. 6. The off-site highway works proposed are; improvements to the Chantry Place/Station Road junction: a signalised junction at the A691/ Chantry Way which would include a pedestrian facility and necessitate narrowing of the central reserve (east side) and potential widening of the High Street/ A691 Carrville junction (subject to further junction modelling outcome). 7. The application has been amended from 250 dwellings to 150 dwellings after concerns were raised by officers regarding the appropriateness of 250 additional houses to the role, function, scale and character of West Rainton as a settlement. 8. The application is reported to the County Planning Committee as it represents major development with a site area of more than 4 hectares. PLANNING HISTORY 9. Planning permission was granted at appeal for residential development in 1991 and the permission renewed by the Durham City Council in 1994 and again in 1997 but was never implemented and so has lapsed. Permission was granted as Durham City did not have a favourable housing land supply at the time. In 2000 a detailed planning application for 193 dwellings was refused by the Durham City Council because of the greenfield nature of the site rather than it being a brownfield site and its incursion into the open countryside. A subsequent application for 308 dwellings in 2002 was withdrawn. PLANNING POLICY NATIONAL POLICY 10. The Government has consolidated all planning policy statements, guidance notes and many circulars into a single policy statement, the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF). The overriding message is that new development that is sustainable should go ahead without delay. It defines the role of planning in achieving sustainable development under three topic headings – economic, social and environmental, each mutually dependant. The presumption in favour of sustainable development set out in the NPPF requires local planning authorities to approach development management decisions positively, utilising twelve ‘core planning principles’. 11. In accordance with paragraph 215 of the National Planning Policy Framework, the weight to be attached to relevant saved local plan policy will depend upon the degree of consistency with the NPPF. The greater the consistency, the greater the weight. The relevance of this issue is discussed, where appropriate, in the assessment section of the report. The following elements of the NPPF are considered relevant to this proposal: 12. NPPF Part 1 – Building a strong, competitive economy . The Government is committed to securing economic growth in order to create jobs and prosperity, building on the country’s inherent strengths, and to meeting the twin challenges of global competition and a low carbon future. 13. NPPF Part 4 – Promoting sustainable transport. Transport policies have an important role to play in facilitating sustainable development but also in contributing to wider sustainability and health objectives. Smarter use of technologies can reduce the need to travel. The transport system should be balanced in favour of sustainable transport modes. Encouragement should be given to solutions which support reductions in greenhouse gas emissions and reduce congestion. 14. NPPF Part 2 – Ensuring the vitality of town centres. Town centres are recognised as being at the heart of communities, with the pursuit of their viability and vitality as being paramount. Planning applications for main town centre uses should be located in town centres firstly, then in edge of centre locations. Only when these are not available should out of centre locations be considered. 15. NPPF Part 6 – Delivering a wide choice of high quality homes . To boost significantly the supply of housing, applications should be considered in the context of the presumption in favour of sustainable development. Local Planning Authorities should seek to deliver a wide choice of high quality homes, widen opportunities for home ownership and create inclusive and mixed communities. 16. NPPF Part 7 – Requiring Good Design . The Government attaches great importance to the design of the built environment, with good design a key aspect of sustainable development, indivisible from good planning. Planning policies and decisions must aim to ensure developments; function well and add to the overall quality of an area over the lifetime of the development, establish a strong sense of place, create and sustain an appropriate mix of uses, respond to local character and history, create safe and accessible environments and be visually attractive. 17. NPPF Part 8 – Promoting Healthy Communities . The planning system can play an important role in facilitating social interaction and creating healthy, inclusive communities. Developments should be safe and accessible; Local Planning Authorities should plan positively for the provision and use of shared space, local services and community facilities to enhance the sustainability of community and residential environments. An integrated approach to consider the location of housing, economic uses and services should be adopted. 18. NPPF Part 10 – Meeting the challenge of climate change, flooding and coastal change.
Recommended publications
  • Cabinet Date Wednesday 25 May 2011 Time 9.30 Am Venue Council Chamber
    Cabinet Date Wednesday 25 May 2011 Time 9.30 am Venue Council Cham ber - Council Offices, Spennymoor Public Question and Answer Session 9.30 a.m. to 10.00 a.m. An opportunity for local people to have a 30 minutes informal question and answer session with Cabinet Members. Cabinet Business 10.00 a.m. onwards Part A Items during which the Press and Public are welcome to attend. Members of the Public can ask questions with the Chairman's agreement. 1. Minutes of the Meetings held on 13 April and 21 April 2011 (Pages 1 - 8) 2. Declarations of interest, if any. Key Decisions 3. Partnership Agreement with County Durham and Darlington Foundation Trust for the Provision of Integrated Children's Services - Report of Corporate Director, Children and Young People's Services [Key Decision CYPS/04/10] (Pages 9 - 14) 4. Amendments to the Home-School / College Transport Policy - Report of Corporate Director Children and Young People's Services [ Key Decision CYPS/3/11] [MTFP Decision CYPS15(a) and (b)] (Pages 15 - 144) Ordinary Decisions 5. Review of Infrastructure Support to the Voluntary and Community Sector in County Durham - Report of Assistant Chief Executive (Pages 145 - 152) 6. County Durham Partnership Update Report - Report of Assistant Chief Executive (Pages 153 - 164) 7. Implications for Durham County Council of the Government's Policy Programme - Report of Assistant Chief Executive (Pages 165 - 194) 8. Data Protection Policy - Report of Assistant Chief Executive (Pages 195 - 228) 9. Implementing "Fulfilling and Rewarding Lives" - the Statutory Guidance for Local Authorities and NHS Bodies regarding the implementation of the Autism Act (2009) - Joint Report of Corporate Director Adults, Wellbeing and Health and Corporate Director, Children and Young People's Services (Pages 229 - 236) 10.
    [Show full text]
  • 111020-Ceplanning-Item5a-Tiana Lane, Item
    Planning Services COMMITTEE REPORT APPLICATION DETAILS APPLICATION NO: DM/20/02163/FPA FULL APPLICATION Erection of a single storey dwelling DESCRIPTION: NAME OF APPLICANT: Chantelle Morrison Tiana Lane, Pittington Road, Rainton Gate, Houghton- ADDRESS: le-Spring, DH5 9RG ELECTORAL DIVISION: Sherburn John Russell (Senior Policy Officer) CASE OFFICER: Tel: 03000 263 428 Email: [email protected] DESCRIPTION OF THE SITE AND PROPOSALS The Site 1. The application site comprises of an area of greenfield land approximately 1,815.60 square metres located within the green belt off Pittington Road, Rainton Gate, Houghton-le-Spring. The site lies behind and on the very edge of a sporadic group of houses fronting along Pittington Road. The site in question has detailed planning history including enquiries for various uses and refusal for full planning permission for a detached bungalow, which was also dismissed at appeal by the Planning Inspectorate in 1997. 2. The application site falls outside of existing defined settlement boundaries within the County Durham Plan. Therefore, as this site is outside of existing defined settlement boundaries it would be classed as development in the open countryside. This is in addition to the site being located within the Durham City Green Belt. The Durham City Green Belt was designated in the County Structure Plan Review (adopted 1999) with boundaries established in 2004 through the Durham City Plan (adopted 2004). Policy 20 in the County Durham Plan defines the Green Belt boundary on the proposals map and sets out policy restrictions. 3. The existing housing development in effect forms ribbon/linear development.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report and Accounts 2017 - 2018
    Durham Scout County Council Annual Report and Accounts 2017 - 2018 13 Contents Contents Welcome from the County Chair..................................................................................................................... 3 Annual Report 2017-18 .................................................................................................................................... 4 Trustees’ Annual Report ................................................................................................................................. 11 Report of the Independent Auditors to the Trustees of Durham Scout County Council ............ 19 2018 - 19: The Start of a New Chapter ..................................................................................................... 22 Statements of Financial Activities ................................................................................................................ 27 Balance Sheet..................................................................................................................................................... 28 Notes to the Financial Statements ............................................................................................................... 29 2 Annual Report Welcome from the County Our finances are well managed, our risks are identified, understood and mitigated to an Chair acceptable position, and we operate in compliance with both Scout Association It gives me great pleasure to present our requirements and those of the Charity Trustee’s
    [Show full text]
  • Statement of Consultation Minerals, Waste and Low Carbon Technical Consultation Reports Contents
    The County Durham Plan Statement of Consultation Related to Minerals Technical Consultation Reports (December 2010), Waste and Low Carbon Technical Consultation Reports (May 2011) Contents 1. INTRODUCTION 5 The Role of the Statement of Consultation 5 Durham County Council Statement of Community 6 Involvement Future consultation on the County Durham Plan 6 2. CONTINUOUS ENGAGEMENT CONSULTATION 9 Who was consulted? 9 How were the public and other stakeholders consulted? 9 How the representations were taken into account 10 A. RESPONSES TO TECHNICAL CONSULTATION REPORT 'TOWARDS A MINERALS DELIVERY STRATEGY FOR 12 COUNTY DURHAM' Question 1 - Residual Need 12 Question 2 - Aggregate Landbanks 15 Question 3 - Magnesian Limestone 18 Question 4 - Carboniferous Limestone 24 Question 5 - Dolerite 25 Question 6 - Sand and Gravel 26 Question 7 - High Grade Dolomitic Limestone 28 Question 8 - Agricultural Lime 31 Question 9 - Brickmaking Raw Materials 37 Question 10 - Surface Mined Coal and Fireclay 40 Question 11 - Natural Building and Roofing Stone 41 Question 12 - Silca Sand 42 Question 13 - Vein Minerals 43 Question 14 - East Durham Limestone Plateau 44 Statement of Consultation Minerals, Waste and Low Carbon Technical Consultation Reports Contents Question 15 - West Durham Coalfield and Wear Lowlands 59 Question 16 - Tees Lowlands 64 Question 17 - North Pennines 67 Question 18 - Dales Fringe 71 B. RESPONSES TO TECHNICAL CONSULTATION PAPER 75 'ENERGY MINERALS' Question 1 - Issues and Options for Surface Coal Mining 75 Question 2 and 3 - Should the County Durham Plan contain a policy for surface mined coal extraction and 78 fireclay extraction? How can it be improved? Question 4 - Planning constraints in the exposed coalfield 82 Question 5 - Use of a GIS based constraints map 85 Question 6 - What are your views on the application of a 88 constraints based approach? Question 7 - Conventional Oil and Gas Development 91 Question 8 - Coal Bed Methane 91 Question 9 - Methane from Coal Mines 92 Question 10 - Underground Coal Gasification 93 C.
    [Show full text]
  • 20. East Rainton
    20. EAST RAINTON East Rainton is a former mining village which lies on the main road in a north easterly direction between Durham and Sunderland. It is one of five places with Rainton as their place names. Travelling from Houghton-le-Spring to Durham, one passes through Rainton Bridge, East Rainton, Middle Rainton, West Rainton and finally Rainton Gate. Rainton first appears as ‘Raegnwalds Tun’ a farming settlement or estate established in the early 900s by Raegnwald, whose father, Franco, was one of the seven monks who escorted St Cuthbert’s coffin from Lindisfarne to Chester-le-Street in AD 883, a hundred years before it was brought to Durham city. By the 12th century two distinct settlements had emerged – ‘Raintona et alia Raintona’ – East and West Rainton. At this time the place name was spelt in a bewildering variety of ways, e.g. Reinington, Renigton and Rainton. In the Middle Ages Rainton (both East and West) belonged to Durham Priory who had a manorial farm and park there. The appointment of a park keeper is recorded in 1338 and in 1508 Prior Thomas had a grant of free warren from Bishop Bainbridge. By the 19th century the Dean and Chapter of Durham were Lords of the Manor and the Marquis of Londonderry is the chief landowner (Robert Surtees: The History and Antiquities of the County Palatine of Durham 1816-1840) The old Durham-Sunderland road, running past East Rainton, also probably dates back to the Middle Ages. It has been improved over the centuries, beginning in the 1700s when it became a turnpike road, which is still commemorated by the name of the hamlet, Rainton Gate, where one of the road’s toll gates was located, and culminating more recently in its transformation into the dual-carriageway A690.
    [Show full text]