DOCSLIB.ORG

Language Poetry, Non-Narrative & Word Salad

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Language Poetry, Non-Narrative & Word Salad Ron Silliman Language Poetry, Non-narrative & Word Salad [blog note on B.A.’s Lip Service, etc. 2002] Sunday, October 13, 2002 Saturday, October 12, 2002 Tom Bell writes: Ron, Is there room on your blog for a consideration of “asyntactical tactics of Language poetry?” (p. 13 in O’Leary’s Gnostic Contagion: Robert Duncan and the Poetry of Illness?). This struck me as a misapprehension that is probably common but I’m not sure why as I can’t tell if the ‘a’ in asyntactical is to be read like the ‘a’ in agnostic or the ‘a’ in atheistic. Actually, I don’t think either applies? I can’t say that I know Leary’s text, but I’ve heard that charge before. It’s one of my Top 10 Myths about Language Poetry: § Language poetry is non-narrative § Language poetry is a- (or anti-) syntactical (alternate version: language poetry = word salad) § Language poetry is academic § Language poetry is poetry written to prove a theory § Language poetry is New Criticism with a human face § Language poetry has no humor § Language poetry has no interest in people § Language poetry began in 1978 § Language poetry is anything written since 1978 (alternate versions: since 1970; since 1990) § Language poetry is anything “I don’t understand” Some of these of course are simply silly. Of the 40 writers included in In the American Tree, exactly eight have (or have had) tenure track positions in college-level literature programs. Of those eight, three (Watten, Perelman, Davidson) were hired as modernists rather than as poets, while David Bromige was hired onto the Sonoma State faculty before anybody there had ever heard the dread phrase “language- centered writing.” This leaves exactly four human beings who could plausibly have been hired in part for their accomplishments as poets related to the social phenomenon that is langpo: Bernstein at Buffalo, Hejinian only very recently at Berkeley, and Susan & Fanny Howe, both now retired. More language poets work in the computer industry, frankly.* [* Count them: Kit Robinson, Alan Bernheimer, James Sherry, Tom Mandel and myself.] But to tackle the non-narrative & word salad canards, lets take a look at some recent work from Bruce Andrews’ Lip Service, a “recasting” of Dante’s Paradiso. This passage comes from “Moon I,” the first piece in the second section of this book: Charm Master, let’s say I repeat mere outline of somehow pumps look I lose in looks ’to become’ & ‘to appear’ are the same a contrario goof, a spell behaved souvenir pinch painted wardens scared to fake redress by projective graphic lids laid eyes on – what opals, what clovers, eye-level stress imagery sale cipher fitted to inwards as if into the distance: simulcrayon scopafidelity. Andrews describes his process on the back cover of the Coach House volume in very straightforward terms: Its ‘christmases of the heart in syllables’ take Dante’s thematic cues & path through ten concentric planetary bodies to rechoreograph several years’ worth of poetic raw material of mine — on love, erotic intimacy, gender socialization & the body. Dante’s topics & tercents & punctuation give its 100 parts their internal shape, with a drastic constructivism of syntax, with denotations & fluidities magnetizing its word-to-word attractions or pushes & pulls as ‘valedictory honeymoon burns in the pagination’. What Lip Service is not, then, is either free writing or a homophonic translation of Paradiso. Its actual relation to Dante’s work is at the level of structure — akin perhaps to Joyce’s use of Homer’s poem in Ulysses but with one eye toward the exoskeletal features of the text. Without going into the thematic correspondences between Dante’s work and Lip Service, the passage above – picked primarily because I want to think a little about that remarkable last line — seems to me perfectly readable. It is neither asyntactic nor non-narrative. Built out of Andrews’ reservoir of “poetic raw material,” one could conceivably argue that it is a hodge-podge of found language, jumbled together into an aesthetically pleasing shape. But a closer reading reveals – constantly, throughout the entire text — that more is going on. The opening line of this passage is an address to a named Other & addresses, in fact, the form of the poem itself (with the articles removed a la Ginsberg). The next line appears to shift context entirely & in fact does. Doing so, the language moves away from comment toward prosody, thus it also pumps. But that is as much a comment on the form as was the prior line. The third line shifts again. As it does, it invokes two other aspects of language — its role as embodiment of voice, thus insinuating character, and as depicter of the visual. The line is a good example, actually, of Andrews’ sense of humor, which generally has a lighter or more mellow touch in Lip Service than the biting sarcasm of his earlier writing. The humor is couched precisely in the alliteration of the line itself: “look I like lose in looks.” Looking here may lead to a sense of presence — we hear a voice, perfectly identifiable with that first line to the Charm Master – but we don’t see so much as we hear. The fourth line in the passage can be read as a direct comment on the problem: you appear, therefore you are. The italicized phrase in the sixth line is a metacomment on the entire passage, joining (by no coincidence) Italian to a noun associated with Allen Ginsberg. Andrews is invoking multiple lines of simultaneous heritage here. The phrase that is not italicized (i.e. in roman type) is itself further metacomment – with a soft pun echoing out from spell to an absent spelling. Metacommentary, the use of one line as a kind of an equivalence with its predecessor, but composed in such a fashion as to also (déjà toujours) further the argument, is a fundamental poetic process, proceeding forward by operating precisely along what Roman Jakobson used to characterize as the vertical axis of language. While it is not identical to metaphor, the process is not far removed. The four terms of the next line “souvenir pinch painted wardens” can be read as a single complex noun phrase and as four characterizations of a writer’s relation to the use of appropriated language. A halfway attentive reader will even hear the joke in the term wardens, that old double meaning of parole. The line which follows is also a complex phrase, one that invokes multiple approaches to contemporary writing: § as trauma testimony (scared) § as sincerity (to fake), a concept that insinuates both Zukofsky’s test of poetry as well as the mock humility of American Poetry Review free verse § as identarian advocacy (redress) § as both – and the contradiction here is not accidental – persona (by projective) and voice-as-breath-as-persona (Black mountain projectivism) § as sight, depiction (graphic) § as object, closed containers of content (lids), with of course that back-pun towards sight hidden in the suggested “eyelids” The following directly addresses language’s relationship to sight — one of the most interesting and still under-theorized linguistic dimensions we have — but ends it with a term (stress) that also invokes metrics & does so after bringing in the visual domain not a specifics but as categories (what X, what Y). The line after this — “imagery sale cipher fitted to inwards as if” – is the most polemic in this passage, suggesting as it does that visual details are in fact mechanisms by which the language of the written pulls the reader into a mode of subjective acceptance. The next-to-last-line here, “into the distance,” follows, suggesting that this interiority is thus projected outward as if real or objective. Which brings us to our pair of neologisms: simulcrayon scopafidelity. The first jokingly characterizes the omnipresence of immanence’s lush visuality — it’s just there, everywhere. The second suggests that the allegiance of the visual world is to a state that could be characterized as psychotropic or drugged. It projects us, and is as much an element of ideology in the Althusserian sense of that term as any aural or vulgarly political paradigm. It constitutes the field of our interior lives. None of this is rocket science. I haven’t even broached the question of Dante and the layers of meaning waiting at that level. But I’ve performed this sort of reading exercise before with texts by writers as diverse as Charles Bernstein & Rae Armantrout. Andrews is using poetry to make an argument here, quite like Dante, and the exposition is hardly impenetrable. Nor is his thesis so revolutionary that it should cause a reader to stumble. None of it requires the kind of mind-numbing detail that I’ve laid out here — a casual reader should be able to sense almost all of this just perusing the text. Any college senior, regardless of major, who can’t pick up 80 percent of it just by reading the passage above ought to demand a refund of his or her tuition – because this isn’t scholarship, it’s literacy. And the inability to do this suggests a pretty sad state of affairs. I am amazed, therefore, and invariably depressed, whenever I see — as I do too often in even our most famous literary critics & in more than a few poets — that this basic level of reading competence appears to be missing. It’s almost a form of aphasia, as though the reader were a citizen of the cinematic city of Pleasantville before the advent of color. Thus I take Andrews’ suggestion that the vocabulary of color itself, and all the other linguistic minutiae of the “reality effect,” including voice, projection, even character, are a part of this conspiracy to make idiots of us all quite seriously.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Poetry Project Newsletter
    THE POETRY PROJECT NEWSLETTER www.poetryproject.org APR/MAY 10 #223 LETTERS & ANNOUNCEMENTS FEATURE PERFORMANCE REVIEWS KARINNE KEITHLEY & SARA JANE STONER REVIEW LEAR JAMES COPELAND REVIEWS A THOUGHT ABOUT RAYA BRENDA COULTAS REVIEWS RED NOIR KEN L. WALKER INTERVIEWS CECILIA VICUÑA POEMS DEANNA FERGUSON CALENDAR BRANDON BROWN REVIEWS AARON KUNIN, LAUREN RUSSELL, JOSEPH MASSEY & LAUREN LEVIN TIM PETERSON REVIEWS JENNIFER MOXLEY DAVID PERRY REVIEWS STEVE CAREY JULIAN BROLASKI REVIEWS NATHANAËL (NATHALIE) STEPHENS BILL MOHR REVIEWS ALAN BERNHEIMER DOUGLAS PICCINNINI REVIEWS GRAHAM FOUST ERICA KAUFMAN REVIEWS MAGDALENA ZURAWSKI MAXWELL HELLER REVIEWS THE KENNING ANTHOLOGY OF POETS THEATER ROBERT DEWHURST REVIEWS BRUCE BOONE $5? 02 APR/MAY 10 #223 THE POETRY PROJECT NEWSLETTER NEWSLETTER EDITOR: Corina Copp DISTRIBUTION: Small Press Distribution, 1341 Seventh St., Berkeley, CA 94710 The Poetry Project, Ltd. Staff ARTISTIC DIRECTOR: Stacy Szymaszek PROGRAM COORDINATOR: Corrine Fitzpatrick PROGRAM ASSISTANT: Arlo Quint MONDAY NIGHT COORDINATOR: Dustin Williamson MONDAY NIGHT TALK SERIES COORDINATOR: Arlo Quint WEDNESDAY NIGHT COORDINATOR: Stacy Szymaszek FRIDAY NIGHT COORDINATORS: Nicole Wallace & Edward Hopely SOUND TECHNICIAN: David Vogen BOOKKEEPER: Stephen Rosenthal ARCHIVIST: Will Edmiston BOX OFFICE: Courtney Frederick, Kelly Ginger, Nicole Wallace INTERNS: Sara Akant, Jason Jiang, Nina Freeman VOLUNTEERS: Jim Behrle, Elizabeth Block, Paco Cathcart, Vanessa Garver, Erica Kaufman, Christine Kelly, Derek Kroessler, Ace McNamara, Nicholas Morrow, Christa Quint, Lauren Russell, Thomas Seeley, Logan Strenchock, Erica Wessmann, Alice Whitwham The Poetry Project Newsletter is published four times a year and mailed free of charge to members of and contributors to the Poetry Project. Subscriptions are available for $25/year domestic, $45/year international. Checks should be made payable to The Poetry Project, St.
    [Show full text]
  • The Poetry Project Newsletter
    THE POETRY PROJECT NEWSLETTER $5.00 #212 OCTOBER/NOVEMBER 2007 How to Be Perfect POEMS BY RON PADGETT ISBN: 978-1-56689-203-2 “Ron Padgett’s How to Be Perfect is. New Perfect.” —lyn hejinian Poetry Ripple Effect: from New and Selected Poems BY ELAINE EQUI ISBN: 978-1-56689-197-4 Coffee “[Equi’s] poems encourage readers House to see anew.” —New York Times The Marvelous Press Bones of Time: Excavations and Explanations POEMS BY BRENDA COULTAS ISBN: 978-1-56689-204-9 “This is a revelatory book.” —edward sanders COMING SOON Vertigo Poetry from POEMS BY MARTHA RONK Anne Boyer, ISBN: 978-1-56689-205-6 Linda Hogan, “Short, stunning lyrics.” —Publishers Weekly Eugen Jebeleanu, (starred review) Raymond McDaniel, A.B. Spellman, and Broken World Marjorie Welish. POEMS BY JOSEPH LEASE ISBN: 978-1-56689-198-1 “An exquisite collection!” —marjorie perloff Skirt Full of Black POEMS BY SUN YUNG SHIN ISBN: 978-1-56689-199-8 “A spirited and restless imagination at work.” Good books are brewing at —marilyn chin www.coffeehousepress.org THE POETRY PROJECT ST. MARK’S CHURCH in-the-BowerY 131 EAST 10TH STREET NEW YORK NY 10003 NEWSLETTER www.poetryproject.com #212 OCTOBER/NOVEMBER 2007 NEWSLETTER EDITOR John Coletti WELCOME BACK... DISTRIBUTION Small Press Distribution, 1341 Seventh St., Berkeley, CA 94710 4 ANNOUNCEMENTS THE POETRY PROJECT LTD. STAFF ARTISTIC DIRECTOR Stacy Szymaszek PROGRAM COORDINATOR Corrine Fitzpatrick PROGRAM ASSISTANT Arlo Quint 6 WRITING WORKSHOPS MONDAY NIGHT COORDINATOR Akilah Oliver WEDNESDAY NIGHT COORDINATOR Stacy Szymaszek FRIDAY NIGHT COORDINATOR Corrine Fitzpatrick 7 REMEMBERING SEKOU SUNDIATA SOUND TECHNICIAN David Vogen BOOKKEEPER Stephen Rosenthal DEVELOpmENT CONSULTANT Stephanie Gray BOX OFFICE Courtney Frederick, Erika Recordon, Nicole Wallace 8 IN CONVERSATION INTERNS Diana Hamilton, Owen Hutchinson, Austin LaGrone, Nicole Wallace A CHAT BETWEEN BRENDA COULTAS AND AKILAH OLIVER VOLUNTEERS Jim Behrle, David Cameron, Christine Gans, HR Hegnauer, Sarah Kolbasowski, Dgls.
    [Show full text]
  • LANGUAGE POETRY Entry for the Greenwood Encyclopedia of American Poetry (2005)
    Craig Dworkin: LANGUAGE POETRY Entry for The Greenwood Encyclopedia of American Poetry (2005) The discrepancy between the number of people who hold an opinion about Language Poetry and those who have actually read Language Poetry is perhaps greater than for any other literary phenomenon of the later twentieth century. For just one concrete indicator of this gap, a primer on "The Poetry Pantheon" in The New York Times Magazine (19 February, 1995) listed Paul Hoover, Ann Lauterbach, and Leslie Scalapino as the most representative “Language Poets” — a curious choice given that neither Hoover nor Lauterbach appears in any of the defining publications of Language Poetry, and that Scalapino, though certainly associated with Language Poetry, was hardly a central figure. Indeed, only a quarter-century after the phrase was first used, it has often come to serve as an umbrella term for any kind of self-consciously "postmodern" poetry or to mean no more than some vaguely imagined stylistic characteristics — parataxis, dryly apodictic abstractions, elliptical modes of disjunction — even when they appear in works that would actually seem to be fundamentally opposed to the radical poetics that had originally given such notoriety to the name “Language Poetry” in the first place. The term "language poetry" may have first been used by Bruce Andrews, in correspondence from the early 1970s, to distinguish poets such as Vito Hannibal Acconci, Carl Andre, Clark Coolidge, and Jackson Mac Low, whose writing challenged the vatic aspirations of “deep image” poetry. In the tradition of Gertrude Stein and Louis Zukofksy, such poetry found precedents in only the most anomalous contemporary writing, such as John Ashbery's The Tennis Court Oath, Aram Saroyan's Cofee Coffe, Joseph Ceravolo's Fits of Dawn, or Jack Kerouac's Old Angel Midnight.
    [Show full text]
  • PUBLIC FOUNDATION GREATER Educational Resource DES MOINES ART TEMPLE CHESS & POETRY GARDEN by SIA ARMAJANI
    PUBLIC FOUNDATION GREATER Educational Resource DES MOINES ART TEMPLE CHESS & POETRY GARDEN BY SIA ARMAJANI ABOUT THE ART AND THE ARTIST Dedicated in May 2016, this installation was a gift to the people of Des Moines by the family of Bennett Webster, an attorney who died in 2002 and who was a devotee of the game of chess. Chess is a game of deliberation, thoughtful planning, and strategy in which the two players anticipate one another’s moves and are constantly interacting with each other. Temple Chess and Poetry provides a space for both social engagement and contemplation. It is composed of multiple parts: three chess tables, a larger table for gathering around, benches, and a small garden in whose iron fence are embedded lines of poetry by Language poet Barrett Watten (b.1948), a friend of the artist. Enjoy simply sitting here quietly, talking with a friend, or bring your own chess pieces for playing the game in the thoughtful aura created by this work of public art. It is installed in an intimate space between two major buildings in downtown Des Moines: the Temple for the Performing Arts (thus, the “Temple” portion of the title) and the Des Moines Public Library. The artist highly esteems libraries as an important — and free — source of information necessary for the proper functioning of a democracy. Siah Armajani (b.1939) specializes in installations that have a strong architectural component, but with a twist: they require the viewer to become a participant. In fact, he does not consider them complete until viewers become participants and “activate” the work of art.
    [Show full text]
  • Parting with Description
    PARTIN G WITH D ES CR IPTION Recall , for a specific examp le, the case of Sergei Iuukeiev, th e "Wo lf~ I.'·u'l1 1 ,'" as presented by Freud and elaborated by Abra ham and Torok. According to Craig Dworkin the psychologists ' explicat ions. Pankei ev's symptoma tic d ream-work co n­ structs a memo ry, but not o ne that is mimetic: a route permitting one tol forget l(lith total recall. Instead of following a referential logic, suc h memo­ Le fou est la victime de la n' hellion des mots . ries follow a log ic of the signifier. Indeed, as Freud and his successo rs have - Edmond JalXs, "je bdris rna demeure: pcernes 19H - 19S7~ explicitly argued (Freud 19 59, Lacan 1975, Abraham and To rok 1976, Derrida 1977 ). that son of unconscious structuring is itself essenria ll~ a form of wr iting. "Sirnularion witho ut refe rence dissolves the o ld connection The insubordi nation of words ... has shown that rbe theoretical between madness and illoess in order to esta blish an entirelydifferent con­ critique of the world of power is inseparable from a practice thai destroys il. necrion. betwee n madness and writing" (Kittler 1990, 308): a state ofwrit­ ing called obsession. Moreover, the psycho patho logy o f writing. as we sha ll -c-Mustapha Khayari, see, is all to the poinr in Wrding Isall Aid to Memory. As Mac Wellm an ob­ MUS xtc esca pu{s: prHace a un dicrionnaire siruariennisre" serves with regard to Heiinian's book: "it may go unn oticed that at the core of a ll her easy-going rumination lies the threat of madness, despa ir, suicide, and other d isso lutio ns of being " (l HP 7:20:6)." Indeed.
    [Show full text]
  • James Sherry
    JAMES SHERRY SUMMARY James Sherry is the author of 10 books of poetry and prose. He is editor of Roof Books and president of the Segue Foundation, Inc. in New York City. Born in Philadelphia in 1946, Mr. Sherry graduated Reed College in 1968 with a Woodrow Wilson fellowship. In 1976 he began Roof Magazine and started Segue Foundation in 1977. He worked for several years as a freelance writer and in 1980 began working in technology for IBM and various Wall Street firms. In 2011 he joined the Occupy Alternative Bank subgroup and remains active in that group. He lives in New York City with his wife, Deborah Thomas, publisher of Extra!, the magazine of Fairness And Accuracy in Reporting (FAIR). They have one son, Ben, 21 years old. BOOKS -Four For (Buffalo, NY: Meow Press, 1995), poetry, 20pp. -Our Nuclear Heritage (Los Angeles, CA: Sun & Moon Press, 1991), prose, 262pp. -Doscapade (New York: Hot Bird 1991), poetry, 10 pp. -The Word I Like White Paint Considered (Windsor, VT: Awede Press, 1986), poetry, 20pp. -Lazy Sonnets (Hartford CT: Potes and Poets Press, 1986, originally published by Gibralter Press, 1971), poetry, 26pp. -Popular Fiction (New York, NY: ROOF Books, 1985), prose, 82pp. -Converses (Windsor, VT: Awede Press, 1983), poetry, 72pp. -Integers (New York, NY: DTW, 1980), poetry 12pp -In Case (Los Angeles, CA: Sun & Moon Press, 1980), prose, 52pp. -Part Songs (New York, NY: Segue Press, 1978), poetry, 30pp. ANTHOLOGIES: -Annual Survey of American Poetry: 1986, editorial board (Great Neck, New York, Roth Publishing, 1986), 279 pp. -Boundary 2, vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Hélène Aji (Le Mans)
    From Poetry & Autobiography to Poetry & “Autothanatography” by Hélène Aji (Le Mans) The project for this issue started in a questioning about the possible bridges between poetry today and Romantic poetry. How to think beyond the now consensual but also constructed oppositions that helped the Modernists define themselves against their anxiety-inducing immediate predecessors? In the line of Marjorie Perloff’s 21st-Century Modernism, one is urged to this re-reading of the 19th and of the 20th and 21st centuries. Thus comes to be examined one of the major post-Romantic assessments of Romanticism which foregrounds the centrality of self and the imperialistic posture of the individual. Constructing personal experience into collective wisdom and conferring general relevance to the self’s idiosyncrasies are some of the projects and processes underpinning the Romantic autobiographical poem from William Wordsworth’s Prelude to Walt Whitman’s Leaves of Grass. Even if such an approach can be (and has been) argued and questioned, this supremacy of the individual, and more specifically of the poetic self, finds itself brought to important consequences with Thoreau and Emerson’s ideals of ‘self-reliance’ and solitary meditation. In Transcendentalism, but not just there, assessing the self in seclusion (or even in confinement with Emily Dickinson) is paradoxically meant to lead to a better, more accurate and more lucid, understanding of the world and man’s condition. The self’s poetic autobiography would thus coincide with collective destiny and its narrative stand as an allegory for communal fate. It is precisely this presupposed osmosis between individual experience and general existential issues which lies at the origins of the Modernist ostentatious rejection of Romanticism.
    [Show full text]
  • Carlaharryman Gp1.Pdf
    An Experiment in Collective Autobiogrqphy The EÑE EE 3l I'f qn Frqnci¡ co, 1975-1980 Bob Perelman Barrett \ffatten Steve Benson Carla Harrymán Tom Nlandel Ron Silliman Kit Robinson Lyr Hejinian Rae Armantrout Ted Pearson 978-0979C198-0-7M tt$tz"gs t lilrr¡ t crl t o this seernirtg episternolo¡¡ical cornpul- their tlrerrres rvould linger irr abundance. Governments siorr" I <'¿rn onll'v.orttler antl suslrer:t. Where is ¿r con- ¿rnd nrctli¿r reprothrr:e these f¿rnt¿rsies: the nrothers of I rol ¡ro¡rulation to conrparc us" or rnvscll, to, as I tlead softlicrs are politicnl subjccts rvhonr [hr-- st¿rtc rtconst ruct it'/ had bct-tcr not betray! Oh ves. ther there is the rrert rlilcrnnra, u'hcn thc archaic liurt¿rsv is nriretl in rvith T 111¡11. gun<k'r rrlations. Ámeric¿rn \t-omel} are visiblr' soldiers, ¿urd soltlier-*' fathers nr¿rl- have perfbrrnctl a \ ot \\t) T kne$- eaoh other then. What rnalernal role irt theit Jrarerrtirrg. Sut:h arnbiguitics rlo rorr lhinh'/ Is nrt'rccollcct.ion sorrnd- tentl to evatle t.lre tclcvision scrccn t--r cn if' thc\ rc- irrg irct:urate, too ¡rartial? llorv rvas it the rrrain irr public consciorr -.uess. s:un(' fi)r you? Ilolt r.as it difTerent? This piece w¿is very dif1i<'rrlt firr rrre to begirr. In thc 1970s u-ornen l.err''rr't allo'rved ¿r-\ nr¿ur\ roles in the militarv ¿rs ther- are no\\. T have alr.avs been opposetl to tllc rlrilitarr irr Love, Di¡cord, Arymmetry ant' lbrrrr.
    [Show full text]
  • On Whose Authority? Organs
    Poetry Flash147 June 1985 Berkeley, CA can't be thinkers-and still remain real poets with real sex On Whose Authority? organs. It's the same myth from two different perspectives. GEORGE LAKOFF and it's a self-serving myth. Who does it serve to say that □ passions and ideas cannot mix? Why, those with passions WRITING/ TALKS. Edited by Bob Perelman, Southern Illinois and no ideas and those with ideas and no passions. University Press: Carbondale and Edwardsville, /985. 295 pp . The plain truth is that myth is false. Most of the really $/4. 95 paper. outstanding artists I've met-whether sculptors, or The open text, by definition, is open to the world and composers, or poets-have brains commensurate with their particularly to the reader. It invites participation, rejects the art. That should come as no surprise. Good artists aren't authority of the writer over the reader and thus, by analogy. dopes. They read. They think. They talk to one another the authority implicit in the other (social, economic. cultural) about ideas. They know what they are doing. And they hierarchies ... Reader and writer engage in a collaboration know a lot more than that. It's about time that fact was from which ideas and meanings are permitted to evolve. The writer relinquishes total control and challenges authority as a institutionalized in a genre. pri11ciple and control as a motive. Enough generalities. Let's open the book and turn to THIS PASSAGE FROM LYN HEJINIAN'S ESSAY, •·The Middle"-"where what's enlarged (subjective) and "The Rejection of Closure" is one of the many gems in what's reduced (external) by speaking gather." Speaking Perelman's collection.
    [Show full text]
  • Steve Evans Field Notes, October 2003–June 2004
    Steve Evans Field Notes, October 2003–June 2004 “Red as the Daily Worker and twice as sore,” just like Barbara Stanwyck’s tonsils in the screwball comedy Ball of Fire, issue three of The Poker hit the mails—the bookstands being denied it by the corporate behemoths that monopolize the delivery of print culture in our time, freezing out small publishers while eroding the nonprofit model of freely disseminated literacy proposed by public libraries—in the last week of October 2003. Since that fall issue, much more has transpired—in the world of poetry, in the world at large—than can be adequately addressed in the following pages, but a quick and partial treatment seems to me both possible and, given the medium, desirable. For while books and anthologies seek to arrest time—or better, to abolish one temporal register (the non-literary quotidian) so that another, textually immanent one, can be inaugurated— journals take time as their medium, unfolding within it episodically and creating thereby a kind of percussive temporality consisting of beat (new issue) and interval (the time between). But how are the activities of the interlude between the last Poker and the one you hold in your hands now to be measured? How does one proceed in the attempt to sound out such an interval? There are many ways to answer, but for this first effort in what is projected to be a regular Poker feature, I’ve chosen four dissimilar strategies that range from the essayis- tic, on one end of the spectrum, to the baldly deictic, on the other.
    [Show full text]
  • The University of Arizona Poetry Center Rare Book Holdings
    UAPC Rare Book Holdings | Page 1 of 236 The University of Arizona Poetry Center Rare Book Holdings - Last Updated 1/14/2020 This computer-generated list is accurate to the best of our knowledge, but may contain some formatting issues and/or inaccuracies. Thank you for your understanding . Author Title Publisher/Year Subject Special Norman Macleod issue; [Columbus, Ohio, Golden Goose Press 1952] Macleod, Norman. Selections from his new poetry and prose. Spirit photography : a fireside book [S.l. : Cuneiform Press 2012] Wit and humor in art‐‐Specimens. of gurus. Artists&apos; books‐‐Specimens. Robinson Jeffers : ave, vale. [s.l.] : J Bransten et al 1962. Jeffers, Robinson,‐‐1887‐1962‐‐ Appreciation. Fifty‐nine English phrases to learn by [Seattle : Wave Books 2011.] heart. Cold Mountain Press Poetry Post Austin Cold Mountain Press 1973‐1975. Card Series. Overherd at the river's hip : 15 Buffalo, NY : Little Scratch Pad Editions 2008. Buffalo (N.Y.‐‐Poetry. Buffalo poets : poems in conversation. The United States Songster. Cincinnati, OH UP James 1838. Flowers of piety : devotions and Dublin : John Arigho & Sons [1912?] Catholic Church‐‐Prayers and prayers compiled from approved devotions. sources. The Reaper. Evansville Robert McDowell and Mark Jarman Dancing Star, #26. Indiana University 2002. The Phoenix Nest, 1593. London F Etchells and H Macdonald 1926. Sunlight and shade; being poems London, Cassell 1883. and pictures of life and nature. UAPC Rare Book Holdings | Page 2 of 236 TrenchArt : material. Los Angeles : Les Figues Press 2005. American literature‐‐21st century. TrenchArt : tracer : aesthetics. Los Angeles : Les Figues Press c2008. Poetry, Modern‐‐21st century. Aesthetics.
    [Show full text]
  • Robert Creeley Papers, 1950-2011 M0662
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/tf7b69n911 Online items available Guide to the Robert Creeley Papers, 1950-2011 M0662 Machine-readable finding aid created by Stephan Potchatek and Steven Mandeville-Gamble; Diana Kohnke. Department of Special Collections and University Archives 1998 Green Library 557 Escondido Mall Stanford 94305-6064 [email protected] URL: http://library.stanford.edu/spc Guide to the Robert Creeley M0662 1 Papers, 1950-2011 M0662 Language of Material: English Contributing Institution: Department of Special Collections and University Archives Title: Robert Creeley papers creator: Creeley, Robert, 1926-2005 Identifier/Call Number: M0662 Physical Description: 443.5 Linear Feet(612 boxes, 3 cartons, 32 flat boxes, 1 oversize box, 2 cassette boxes; 55 audiocassettes, 16 reel to reel cassettes, 16 sound discs, 2 videocassettes, 4 film reels.) Date (inclusive): 1950-1997 For current information on the location of these materials, please consult the Library's online catalog. 1926 Robert White Creeley born in Arlington, Massachusetts, May 21 to Oscar Slate and Genevieve Jules Creeley 1928 Left eye injured in accident 1930 Father died. Family moves to West Acton 1940 Entered Holderness School 1943 Entered Harvard College 1944-1945 Served in the American Field Service in India and Burma 1945 Returned to Harvard 1946 First published poem. Married Ann MacKinnon. 1947 Left Harvard without a degree 1948 Son David born 1948-1951 Lived in Littleton, NH where he bred pigeons 1950 Son Thomas born. Began correspondence with Charles Olson. Became American editor for Ranier Gerhardt's Fragmente 1951 Lived outside Aix-en-Province, France 1952 Daughter Charlotte born.
    [Show full text]