DOCSLIB.ORG

Solutions for Quantitative Proteomics

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Solutions for Quantitative Proteomics mass spectrometry Thermo Scientific Solutions for Quantitative Proteomics A leader in quantitative proteomics, we supply complete solutions that redefine the limits of quantitative proteomics and help you exceed your research goals. Part of Thermo Fisher Scientific Quantitative Proteomics Redefining Quantitative Proteomics TO UNDERSTAND the functions of individual proteins Discovery-based analyses identify and their place in complex biological systems, it is often and quantify necessary to measure changes in protein abundance With discovery-based quantitative analyses, the goal is relative to changes in the state of the system. As such, to both identify proteins and measure their abundance modern proteomics has evolved from an almost changes across multiple sample sets. Several discovery- exclusively qualitative technique into one that spans a based techniques have been developed, including continuum of qualitative and quantitative approaches. stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture Traditionally, quantitative measurements of protein (SILAC), chemical labeling with isobaric mass tags, abundance were done by Western blotting. However, and label-free.1, 2, 3 Western blotting almost always requires a priori knowledge of the system and the expected changes in Targeted analyses are fast and sensitive order to obtain an appropriate target antibody. Antibodies Targeted analyses can be performed once candidate are often not available, not specific, or very expensive. proteins are identified by either discovery-based MS Antibodies for site-specific modifications can be even experiments or alternate, a priori information. Target ed more difficult to obtain. In addition, Western blotting is analyses provide improved quantitation sensitivity (LOQ) sample intensive, has limited linear dynamic range, and, combined with increased speed of analyses, enable and typically only a single target is quantified in each analysis of expanded sample sets to assess the validity Western blot. of the candidate proteins. Spiking biological samples Alternatively, liquid chromatography coupled to with proteotypic, isotopically labeled peptide standards mass spectrometry (LC-MS) has emerged as a powerful makes possible the absolute quantitation of each technology for system-wide identification and quantitation protein or post-translational modification of interest. of proteins. It can be used for both discovery-based (untargeted) and targeted determination of changes Choosing the most appropriate quantitative proteomics in protein abundance. It can also be used to measure technique depends on experimental demands and changes in the abundance of protein-specific post- instrumental capabilities. This brochure is intended to translational modifications (PTMs), facilitating location assist the decision-making process. of the modified residue. Quantitative MS analyses require less sample than Western blotting and can detect and quantify multiple analytes in a single experiment. Number Samples Precision Technique Type (per LC-MS run) (% CV) Benefits Drawbacks Instruments Discovery-based (untargeted quantitative analysis coupling protein identification with quantitation) Label- Relative 1 < 30 • Applicable to any sample type • Each sample runs individually (low throughput) Orbitrap Free • Cost-efficient sample preparation • Requires extremely reproducible LC separations • Minimal sample handling • Requires multiple technical replicates TMT Relative 2 to 6 < 20 • Applicable to any sample type • Requires extensive fractionation or long Orbitrap • Multiplexing increases MS throughput chromatographic gradients with HCD Ion Trap with PQD or Trap-HCD SILAC Relative 2 or 3 < 20 • Least susceptible to inter-sample variations in • Only readily applicable to cell cultures Orbitrap sample handling and preparation • Increases MS spectral complexity • Multiplexing increases MS throughput Targeted (analysis of predetermined peptides from discovery-based experiments or literature) HR/AM- Relative 1 < 20 • Uses the same MS system as discovery quantitation • Requires reproducible LC separations Orbitrap SIM or • Easy method development using Pinpoint software Absolute iSRM Relative 1 < 10 • Up to 15,000 SRM transitions per run • Requires reproducible LC separations TSQ triple or • Simultaneous protein quantitation and confirmation quadrupole Absolute of identity • Suitable for determining the absolute quantity of a protein in a complex biological matrix • Easy method development using Pinpoint software Discovery-based and targeted quantitation techniques all have specific applications and advantages 2 SILAC Improves the Throughput of Discovery-Based Quantitative MS Analyses and Increases Accuracy of Results STABLE-ISOTOPE LABELING BY AMINO ACIDS form. Because labeled and unlabeled samples are KEY POINTS IN CELL CULTURE (SILAC) is a powerful and widely combined during the initial steps of sample preparation, used method of identifying and quantifying relative SILAC minimizes the quantitative error inherent in Advantages: changes in complex protein samples. It can be applied to handling separate samples in parallel. In addition, the • 2-3 samples complex biomarker discovery and systems biology studies mixing of samples permits a variety of enrichment • Reduced sample as well as to isolated proteins and protein complexes. techniques including immunoprecipitation. These can handling decreases As its name implies, SILAC involves labeling protein improve the detection of abundance changes for both variability samples in vivo by substituting an isotopically heavy low-abundance proteins and post-translational • Data analysis using form of an amino acid for the naturally occurring light modifications such as phosphorylation or glycosylation. Proteome Discoverer software Disadvantages: SILAC WORKFLOW • Cell cultures only Cell Cultures • High-resolution MS 2-3 samples grown in light- and heavy-labeled amino acid media (FT or Orbitrap technology) required Thermo Scientific Pierce SILAC protein quantitation kits contain all of the reagents needed for comparing two or three sample types in a wide variety of mammalian cell lines. They are compatible with many Thermo Scientific protein/peptide enrichment technologies. 3 Quantitative Proteomics TMT Labeling Increases the Number of Samples Analyzed, and Peptides Identified and Quantified, in a Single Analysis ISOBARIC CHEMICAL TAGS are a more universal TMT WORKFLOW alternative to SILAC for simultaneous identification and Cell Culture or Tissue quantitation of proteins in multi-sample sets. They 2-6 samples can facilitate relative quantitation of a wide variety of samples including cells, tissues, and biological fluids. Thermo Scientific Tandem Mass Tag (TMT) reagents are isobaric mass tags consisting of an MS/MS reporter group, a spacer arm, and an amine-reactive KEY POINTS group. Amine-reactive groups covalently bind to peptide Advantages: N-termini or to lysine residues. Each tag fragments • 2-6 samples during MS/MS, producing unique reporter ions. • Any sample type Protein quantitation is accomplished by comparing the intensities of the reporter ions. • Ion trap- or Orbitrap- based instruments • Data analysis using Proteome Discoverer software High-resolution HCD-MS/MS improves quantitative precision in TMT® analyses The ability to generate low-m/z reporter ions and to distinguish them from isobaric interferences is essential for consistent, precise TMT quantitation. This is best accomplished using HCD fragmentation combined with the high-resolution-at- low-m/z detection that is available on Orbitrap™-based systems. TMT kits are available in 2-plex for comparing two samples in small profiling studies. They are also available in 6-plex for comparing up to six samples in complex analyses with multiple conditions (e.g. time courses, dose responses, replicates, and multiple-sample comparisons). TMT kits can be combined with many Thermo Scientific peptide enrichment technologies. 4 Label-Free Quantitation Enables Exploration of the Proteome in Greater Depth LABEL-FREE DIFFERENTIAL ANALYSIS has gained Each of the highly complex samples found in a typical KEY POINTS popularity for discovery-based quantitative proteomics. label-free differential analysis study is run individually. It requires no specific sample preparation and accom- Therefore, meticulous sample handling, sample prepa- Advantages: modates large numbers of diverse samples. Label-free ration, reproducible chromatography between technical • Unlimited number quantitation involves extracting peptide chromatograms and biological replicates, and sensitive, high-resolution, of samples from LC-MS/MS runs and integrating peak areas over accurate-mass MS are all essential. Thermo Scientific • Any sample type the chromatographic time scale. Typically favored for solutions for label-free differential analysis are complete • Data analysis using shotgun proteomics, the label-free approach has been and integrated. Thermo Scientific EASY-nLC systems SIEVE software incorporated into large-scale biomarker discovery studies use a split-free design to achieve exceptional stability Disadvantages: measuring disease-related changes. It has demonstrated and reproducibility. They easily couple to all Thermo • Multiple technical high reproducibility and linearity at both peptide and Scientific mass spectrometers, including the Orbitrap- replicates protein levels.3 based systems that have the high resolution necessary • Reproducible for successful label-free quantitation. chromatography Thermo Scientific SIEVE software enables
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Standard Flow Multiplexed Proteomics (Sflompro) – an Accessible and Cost-Effective Alternative to Nanolc Workflows
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.02.25.964379; this version posted February 25, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. Standard Flow Multiplexed Proteomics (SFloMPro) – An Accessible and Cost-Effective Alternative to NanoLC Workflows Conor Jenkins1 and Ben Orsburn2* 1Hood College Department of Biology, Frederick, MD 2University of Virginia Medical School, Charlottesville, VA *To whom correspondence should be addressed; [email protected] Abstract Multiplexed proteomics using isobaric tagging allows for simultaneously comparing the proteomes of multiple samples. In this technique, digested peptides from each sample are labeled with a chemical tag prior to pooling sample for LC-MS/MS with nanoflow chromatography (NanoLC). The isobaric nature of the tag prevents deconvolution of samples until fragmentation liberates the isotopically labeled reporter ions. To ensure efficient peptide labeling, large concentrations of labeling reagents are included in the reagent kits to allow scientists to use high ratios of chemical label per peptide. The increasing speed and sensitivity of mass spectrometers has reduced the peptide concentration required for analysis, leading to most of the label or labeled sample to be discarded. In conjunction, improvements in the speed of sample loading, reliable pump pressure, and stable gradient construction of analytical flow HPLCs has continued to improve the sample delivery process to the mass spectrometer. In this study we describe a method for performing multiplexed proteomics without the use of NanoLC by using offline fractionation of labeled peptides followed by rapid “standard flow” HPLC gradient LC-MS/MS.
    [Show full text]
  • Relative Quantitation of Protein Digests Using Tandem Mass Tags and Pulsed-Q Dissociation (PQD)
    Application Note: 452 Relative Quantitation of Protein Digests Using Tandem Mass Tags and Pulsed-Q Dissociation (PQD) Jae Schwartz, Terry Zhang, Rosa Viner, Vlad Zabrouskov, Thermo Fisher Scientific, San Jose, CA, USA Introduction LC Separation and MS Analysis Key Words Quantitation of differentially expressed proteins is one of LC Separation • LTQ XL™ the most challenging areas in proteomics. A variety of HPLC: Thermo Scientific Surveyor equipped with quantitation methods have been developed, including Micro AS autosampler • PQD isotope labeling approaches like ICAT®1, SILAC2, iTRAQ™3, Columns: PicoFrit™ column (10 cm x 75 µm i.d.), (New Objective, Inc., Cambridge, MA) • Proteomics AQUA4, and Tandem Mass Tag® (TMT®)5. In contrast to MS-based quantitation methods, iTRAQ- and TMT-labeled Sample: Inject 2 µL TMT-labeled digest mixture • Quantification peptides are identified and quantitated by MS/MS. Pulsed-Q Mobile Phases: A: 0.1% Formic acid in water B: 0.1% Formic acid in acetonitrile • TMT Dissociation (PQD)6,7 has been developed to facilitate quantitating of the low-mass reporter ions in MS/MS spectra Gradient: 10% B 10 minutes, 10% – 30% in 120 minutes of iTRAQ- or TMT-labeled peptides. The PQD technique Flow: 300 nL/min on column enables the detection of low-mass fragments in MS/MS mode MS Analysis including y1- and b1-type fragment ions, and also allows Mass Spectrometer: Thermo Scientific LTQ XL equipped with a the quantitation of peptides using the TMT reporter ions nanospray ion source 8 which appear in the 100 m/z range. Spray Voltage: 2.0 kV Capillary Temperature: 160 °C Goal Full MS: 300-1600 m/z To demonstrate the benefits of the PQD-based quantitation Isolation: 3 Da of isobarically labeled peptides in protein digests.
    [Show full text]
  • Targeted Quantitative Proteomics Using Selected Reaction Monitoring
    Targeted Quantitative Proteomics Using Selected Reaction Monitoring (SRM)- Mass Spectrometry Coupled with an 18O-labeled Reference as Internal Standards Jong-Seo Kim, Errol Robinson, Boyd L. Champion, Brianne O. Petritis, Thomas L. Fillmore, Ronald J. Moore, Liu Tao, David G. Camp II, Richard D. Smith, and Wei-Jun Qian Biological Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA Methods Results Effect of Q1 resolution Reproducibility 18O labeling efficiency Overview Patient Samples Conclusions Group A: • To address the need of stable isotope Group B: • The utility of 18O-labeled “universal” O area ratio O area Trypsin 18 Red error bars: label-free peak area ratio labeled internal standards for accurate (= each 16O area / average 18O area) reference as internal standards for targeted O/ digestion 16 18 quantification, we introduce the use of an 16 Green error bars: each pair area ratio of O/ O quantitative proteomics has been Patient peptide 18 Pooled reference ratio O area O-labeled reference as comprehensive samples sample 18 successfully demonstrated 16 18 LC-SRM-MS O/ Concentration ratio ( O/ O) internal standards for accurate SRM-MS- 18O labeling 16 – A linear dynamic range of quantification Concen. based quantification instead of using labeled 18 0.01 0.02 0.04 0.1 0.2 1 5 10 25 50 100 4 O-labeled “universal” Ratio ~ 10 in relative concentration synthetic peptides. reference 16O/18O 6.1 12.5 13.7 13.8 5.5 7.7 16.8 2.8 4.6 4.2 1.6 pairs – Better reproducibility than label-free 18 Label • O-labeling efficiency for most peptides is 39.2 23.4 47.5 26.5 19.3 10.6 31.2 3.2 10.7 4.8 3.5 Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Quantitative Proteomics Reveals the Selectivity of Ubiquitin-Binding Autophagy Receptors in the Turnover of Damaged Lysosomes by Lysophagy
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.07.19.452535; this version posted July 19, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. Quantitative proteomics reveals the selectivity of ubiquitin-binding autophagy receptors in the turnover of damaged lysosomes by lysophagy Vinay Eapen1,*, Sharan Swarup1,*, Melissa Hoyer1,*, Joao Paolo1 and J. Wade Harper 1 1Department of Cell Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston MA 02115 *, Equal Contribution Send correspondence to: [email protected] ABSTRACT Removal of damaged organelles via the process of selective autophagy constitutes a major form of cellular quality control. Damaged organelles are recognized by a dedicated surveillance machinery, leading to the assembly of an autophagosome around the damaged organelle, prior to fusion with the degradative lysosomal compartment. Lysosomes themselves are also prone to damage and are degraded through the process of lysophagy. While early steps involve recognition of ruptured lysosomal membranes by glycan-binding Galectins and ubiquitylation of transmembrane lysosomal proteins, many steps in the process, and their inter-relationships, remain poorly understood, including the role and identity of cargo receptors required for completion of lysophagy. Here, we employ quantitative organelle capture and proximity biotinylation proteomics of autophagy adaptors, cargo receptors, and Galectins in response to acute lysosomal damage, thereby revealing the landscape of lysosomal proteome remodeling during lysophagy. Among proteins dynamically recruited to damaged lysosomes were ubiquitin-binding autophagic cargo receptors.
    [Show full text]
  • Mass Spectrometry and Proteomics Using R/Bioconductor
    Mass spectrometry and proteomics Using R/Bioconductor Laurent Gatto CSAMA - Bressanone - 25 July 2019 1 / 40 Slides available at: http://bit.ly/20190725csama These slides are available under a creative common CC-BY license. You are free to share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) for any purpose, even commercially . 2 / 40 On the menu Morning lecture: 1. Proteomics in R/Bioconductor 2. How does mass spectrometry-based proteomics work? 3. Quantitative proteomics 4. Quantitative proteomics data processing and analysis Afternoon lab: Manipulating MS data (raw and identification data) Manipulating quantitative proteomics data Data processing and DE 3 / 40 4 / 40 1. Proteomics and mass spectrometry packages, questions and workow in Bioconductor. 5 / 40 2. How does mass spectrometry work? (applies to proteomics and metabolomics) 6 / 40 Overview 7 / 40 How does MS work? 1. Digestion of proteins into peptides - as will become clear later, the features we measure in shotgun (or bottom-up) proteomics are peptides, not proteins. 2. On-line liquid chromatography (LC-MS) 3. Mass spectrometry (MS) is a technology that separates charged molecules (ions, peptides) based on their mass to charge ratio (M/Z). 8 / 40 Chromatography MS is generally coupled to chromatography (liquid LC, but can also be gas- based GC). The time an analytes takes to elute from the chromatography column is the retention time. 9 / 40 An mass spectrometer is composed of three components: 1. The source, that ionises the molecules: examples are Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionisation (MALDI) or electrospray ionisation (ESI).
    [Show full text]
  • Iodoacetyl Tandem Mass Tags for Cysteine Peptide Modification, Enrichment and Quantitation Ryan D
    Iodoacetyl Tandem Mass Tags for Cysteine Peptide Modification, Enrichment and Quantitation Ryan D. Bomgarden 1, Rosa I. Viner 2, Karsten Kuhn 3, Ian Pike 3, John C. Rogers 1 1Thermo Fisher Scientific, Rockford, IL, USA; 2Thermo Fisher Scientific, San Jose, CA, USA; 3Proteome Sciences, Frankfurt, Germany Overview FIGURE 2. iodoTMT reagents and labeling reaction. A) Mechanism of FIGURE 6. cysTMT and iodoTMT reagent labeling of S-nitrosylated proteins. iodoTMT reagent reaction with cysteine -containing proteins or peptides. B) A549 cell lysates (A) and BSA (B) were blocked with MMTS (lanes 1 –8, Purpose: To develop an iodoacetyl Tandem Mass Tag (iodoTMT) reagent for Structure of iodoTMTsixplex reagents for cysteine labeling, enrichment, and 10–15) or untreated (lanes 9, 16) before 500 mM nitro-glutathione (NO) irreversible cysteine peptide labeling, enrichment, and multiplexed quantitation. isobaric MS quantitation. treatment and TMT reagent labeling in the presence or absence of ascorbate and copper sulfate (CuSO ). Proteins were separated by SDS -PAGE and Methods: Reduced sulfhydryls of protein cysteines were labeled with 4 analyzed by anti-TMT antibody Western blotting or Coomassie stain. iodoTMTzero and/or iodoTMTsixplex reagents. Labeled peptides were enriched A using an immobilized anti -TMT antibody resin before mass spectrometry (MS) A cysTMT iodoTMT analysis. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10111213141516 Results: We developed an iodoTMT reagent set to perform duplex isotopic or sixplex isobaric mass spectrometry (MS) quantitation of cysteine-containing peptides. IodoTMT reagents showed efficient and specific labeling of peptide Anti-TMT cysteine residues with reactivity similar to iodoacetamide. Using an anti-TMT Western Blot Cell Lyate antibody, we characterized the immunoaffinity enrichment of peptides labeled with iodoTMT reagents from complex protein cell lysates and for detection of S-nitrosylated cysteines.
    [Show full text]
  • Quantitative Assay of Targeted Proteome in Tomato Trichome
    Takemori et al. Plant Methods (2019) 15:40 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13007-019-0427-7 Plant Methods METHODOLOGY Open Access Quantitative assay of targeted proteome in tomato trichome glandular cells using a large-scale selected reaction monitoring strategy Ayako Takemori1, Taiken Nakashima2, Hisashi Ômura3, Yuki Tanaka4, Keisuke Nakata1, Hiroshi Nonami1,5,6 and Nobuaki Takemori4,6* Abstract Background: Glandular trichomes found in vascular plants are called natural cell factories because they synthesize and store secondary metabolites in glandular cells. To systematically understand the metabolic processes in glandular cells, it is indispensable to analyze cellular proteome dynamics. The conventional proteomics methods based on mass spectrometry have enabled large-scale protein analysis, but require a large number of trichome samples for in-depth analysis and are not suitable for rapid and sensitive quantifcation of targeted proteins. Results: Here, we present a high-throughput strategy for quantifying targeted proteins in specifc trichome glandular cells, using selected reaction monitoring (SRM) assays. The SRM assay platform, targeting proteins in type VI trichome gland cells of tomato as a model system, demonstrated its efectiveness in quantifying multiple proteins from a lim- ited amount of sample. The large-scale SRM assay uses a triple quadrupole mass spectrometer connected online to a nanofow liquid chromatograph, which accurately measured the expression levels of 221 targeted proteins con- tained in the glandular cell sample recovered from 100 glandular trichomes within 120 min. Comparative quantitative proteomics using SRM assays of type VI trichome gland cells between diferent organs (leaves, green fruits, and calyx) revealed specifc organ-enriched proteins. Conclusions: We present a targeted proteomics approach using the established SRM assays which enables quantif- cation of proteins of interest with minimum sampling efort.
    [Show full text]
  • Bait Correlation Improves Interactor Identification by Tandem Mass Tag
    Bait correlation improves interactor identification by Tandem Mass Tag-Affinity Purification-Mass Spectrometry Liangyong Mei‡,†,a , Maureen R. Montoya‡,a, Guy M. Quanrud a, Minh Tran a, Athena Villa-Sharma a, Ming Huangb, and Joseph C. Genereux a,b* aDepartment of Chemistry, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521 bEnvironmental Toxicology Graduate Program, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521 *To whom correspondence should be addressed: Joseph C. Genereux, 501 Big Springs Rd, Riverside, CA 92507. [email protected], 951-827-3759. 1 ABSTRACT The quantitative multiplexing capacity of isobaric Tandem Mass Tags (TMT) has increased the throughput of affinity purification mass spectrometry (AP-MS) to characterize protein interaction networks of immunoprecipitated bait proteins. However, variable bait levels between replicates can convolute interactor identification. We compared the Student's t-test and Pearson's R correlation as methods to generate t-statistics and assessed the significance of interactors following TMT-AP-MS. Using a simple linear model of protein recovery in immunoprecipitates to simulate reporter ion ratio distributions, we found that correlation-derived t-statistics protect against bait variance while robustly controlling Type I errors (false positives). We experimentally determined the performance of these two approaches for determining t-statistics under two experimental conditions: irreversible prey association to the Hsp40 mutant DNAJB8H31Q followed by stringent washing, and reversible association to 14-3-3z with gentle washing. Correlation-derived t-statistics performed at least as well as Student’s t-statistics for each sample, and with substantial improvement in performance for experiments with high bait level variance. Deliberately varying bait levels over a large range fails to improve selectivity but does increase robustness between runs.
    [Show full text]
  • Novel Insights Into Quantitative Proteomics from an Innovative
    Novel Insights into Quantitative Proteomics from an Innovative Bottom-Up Simple Light Isotope Metabolic (bSLIM) Labeling Data Processing Strategy Nicolas Sénécaut, Gelio Alves, Hendrik Weisser, Laurent Lignières, Samuel Terrier, Lilian Yang-Crosson, Pierre Poulain, Gaëlle Lelandais, Yi-Kuo Yu, Jean-Michel Camadro To cite this version: Nicolas Sénécaut, Gelio Alves, Hendrik Weisser, Laurent Lignières, Samuel Terrier, et al.. Novel Insights into Quantitative Proteomics from an Innovative Bottom-Up Simple Light Isotope Metabolic (bSLIM) Labeling Data Processing Strategy. Journal of Proteome Research, American Chemical Society, 2021, 20 (3), pp.1476-1487. 10.1021/acs.jproteome.0c00478. hal-03266586 HAL Id: hal-03266586 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03266586 Submitted on 21 Jun 2021 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial - NoDerivatives| 4.0 International License pubs.acs.org/jpr Article Novel Insights into Quantitative Proteomics from an Innovative Bottom-Up Simple Light Isotope Metabolic (bSLIM) Labeling Data Processing Strategy Nicolas Sénécaut, Gelio Alves, Hendrik Weisser, Laurent Lignieres,̀ Samuel Terrier, Lilian Yang-Crosson, Pierre Poulain, Gaellë Lelandais, Yi-Kuo Yu, and Jean-Michel Camadro* Cite This: J.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Label-Free Quantification
    SeqAn and OpenMS Integration Workshop Temesgen Dadi, Julianus Pfeuffer, Alexander Fillbrunn The Center for Integrative Bioinformatics (CIBI) Mass-spectrometry data analysis in KNIME Julianus Pfeuffer, Alexander Fillbrunn OpenMS • OpenMS – an open-source C++ framework for computational mass spectrometry • Jointly developed at ETH Zürich, FU Berlin, University of Tübingen • Open source: BSD 3-clause license • Portable: available on Windows, OSX, Linux • Vendor-independent: supports all standard formats and vendor-formats through proteowizard • OpenMS TOPP tools – The OpenMS Proteomics Pipeline tools – Building blocks: One application for each analysis step – All applications share identical user interfaces – Uses PSI standard formats • Can be integrated in various workflow systems – Galaxy – WS-PGRADE/gUSE – KNIME Kohlbacher et al., Bioinformatics (2007), 23:e191 OpenMS Tools in KNIME • Wrapping of OpenMS tools in KNIME via GenericKNIMENodes (GKN) • Every tool writes its CommonToolDescription (CTD) via its command line parser • GKN generates Java source code for nodes to show up in KNIME • Wraps C++ executables and provides file handling nodes Installation of the OpenMS plugin • Community-contributions update site (stable & trunk) – Bioinformatics & NGS • provides > 180 OpenMS TOPP tools as Community nodes – SILAC, iTRAQ, TMT, label-free, SWATH, SIP, … – Search engines: OMSSA, MASCOT, X!TANDEM, MSGFplus, … – Protein inference: FIDO Data Flow in Shotgun Proteomics Sample HPLC/MS Raw Data 100 GB Sig. Proc. Peak 50 MB Maps Data Reduction 1
    [Show full text]
  • Integrated Identification and Quantification Error Probabilities For
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/357285; this version posted June 28, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. Integrated identification and quantification error probabilities for shotgun proteomics Matthew The1 and Lukas K¨all1 1Science for Life Laboratory, School of Engineering Sciences in Chemistry, Biotechnology and Health, Royal Institute of Technology { KTH, Box 1031, 17121 Solna, Sweden June 27, 2018 Abstract Protein quantification by label-free shotgun proteomics experiments is plagued by a multitude of error sources. Typical pipelines for identifying differentially expressed proteins use intermediate filters in an attempt to control the error rate. However, they often ignore certain error sources and, moreover, regard filtered lists as completely correct in subsequent steps. These two indiscretions can easily lead to a loss of control of the false discovery rate (FDR). We propose a probabilistic graphical model, Triqler, that propagates error information through all steps, employing distributions in favor of point estimates, most notably for missing value imputation. The model outputs posterior probabilities for fold changes between treatment groups, highlighting uncertainty rather than hiding it. We analyzed 3 engineered datasets and achieved FDR control and high sensitivity, even for truly absent proteins. In a bladder cancer clinical dataset we discovered 35 proteins at 5% FDR, with the original study discovering none at this threshold. Compellingly, these proteins showed enrichment for functional annotation terms. The model executes in minutes and is freely available at https://pypi.org/project/triqler/.
    [Show full text]
  • Quantitative Proteomics Reveals the Protective Effects of ESD Against
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.15.204552; this version posted July 15, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 1 Quantitative proteomics reveals the protective effects of ESD against 2 osteoarthritis via attenuating inflammation and modulating immune 3 response 4 5 Ying Hao1,4,#, Yang Wu1,#, Shanglong Wang2,#, Chungguo Wang3, Sihao Qu1, Li Li2, Guohua Yu1, 6 Zimin Liu2, Zhen Zhao4, Pengcheng Fan5,*, Zengliang Zhang2,6,*, Yuanyuan Shi1,* 7 1 School of Life Sciences, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing 102488, China 8 2 Chenland Nutritionals, Inc, Irvine, CA, 92614, USA 9 3 Beijing Research Institute of Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, 10 Beijing 100029, China 11 4 Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, 12 10065, USA 13 5 State Key Laboratory of Proteomics, National Center for Protein Sciences (Beijing), Institute of 14 Lifeomics, Beijing 102206, China 15 6 Traditional Chinese Medicine College, Inner Mongolia Medical University, Jinshan 16 Development Zone Hohhot, Inner Mongolia 010110，China 17 18 #These authors contributed equally to this work as co-first authors. 19 *Correspondence to: Yuanyuan Shi, [email protected]; Zengliang Zhang, 20 [email protected]; Pengcheng Fan, [email protected]. 21 22 Abstract 23 Epimedium, Salvia miltiorrhiza, and Dioscorea nipponica Makino (ESD) have been combined to 24 treat osteoarthritis (OA) for a long time.
    [Show full text]