'Equivocal Positions': the Influence of William Rothenstein, C.1890-1910

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

'Equivocal Positions': the Influence of William Rothenstein, C.1890-1910 ‘EQUIVOCAL POSITIONS’: THE INFLUENCE OF WILLIAM ROTHENSTEIN, c.1890-1910 SAMUEL SHAW PH.D THE UNIVERSITY OF YORK HISTORY OF ART AUGUST 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract 3 Abbreviations 4 List of Illustrations 5 Acknowledgements 8 Introduction: Vattetot 1899 9 1. „Laying Down the Law‟: Managing the Instinct to Influence, c.1890-1899 21 2. „The ideal shop‟?: Exhibiting Spaces, c.1890-1911 67 3. „Work of a certain character‟: Rothenstein‟s critical position, c.1900-1910 128 4. „Still the importance personage‟: Identity and Influence, c.1900-1910 181 Coda: „A little of a revolutionary‟: Rothenstein on and after 1910 229 Bibliography 1. Primary Sources: Unpublished 240 2. Primary Sources: Published 241 3. Secondary Sources 247 Illustrations 258 2 ABSTRACT This thesis explores the influence of the artist Sir William Rothenstein (1872-1945) between the years 1890 and 1910. A talented draughtsman and painter, Rothenstein was also an energetic social networker, a keen critic, an influential force in the foundation of several societies and – in the case of the Carfax – a commercial gallery. This study employs a wide range of sources to trace these achievements, and explains why Rothenstein‟s life and work have tended to resist critical interpretation. This study argues that Rothenstein grappled constantly with the notion of being influential. To draw out these tensions, Rothenstein‟s relationships with several artists (Charles Ricketts, Max Beerbohm, Charles Conder, Augustus John and Mark Gertler) are explored in depth. Significant aspects of his identity – his status as a middle-class Anglo-German Jew, for instance, or resident of Hampstead – are also considered. It is argued throughout that the complexity and ambiguity of Rothenstein‟s identity and close relationships were fuelled by a desire to carefully control his instinct to influence. The Carfax Gallery, co-founded by Rothenstein in 1898, went on to hold important exhibitions of contemporary British art. This thesis offers the first detailed account of the gallery‟s origins and subsequent position within the rapidly-changing London art market of the late-nineteenth and early-twentieth century. Rothenstein claimed that the gallery was founded to support „work of a certain character‟; through a close examination of Rothenstein‟s writings (including his 1900 study Goya) and art works, significant attributes of this elusive character are revealed. I explore, amongst others, the turn-of-the-century popularity of artists such as Rembrandt, Puvis de Chavannes, Honoré Daumier, Jean-François Millet and Rodin. If a hint of the equivocal remains, this is seen to be justified: Rothenstein sought a critical position that could not, ultimately, be pinned down. This study not only represents the first major attempt to engage with the early career of William Rothenstein, but confirms the artist‟s importance to a range of wider issues, through which we may develop new ways of thinking about a much neglected period of British art. 3 ABBREVIATIONS In the text: N.E.A.C. – New English Art Club In the footnotes: HGTN – Houghton Library, Harvard TA – Tate Archives, London BL – British Library 4 LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS 1. George Charles Beresford, William Rothenstein, c.1902 [National Portrait Gallery online catalogue] 2. William Rothenstein, A Doll‟s House, 1899-1900 [Tate Gallery online catalogue] 3. Charles Conder, Frontispiece to Balzac‟s „La Fille aux yeux d‟or‟, 1896 [Galbally (2002) 142] 4. William Rothenstein, Le Grand-I-Vert (Night) 1899 [Witt Library, Courtauld Institute] 5. William Rothenstein, The Browning Readers, 1900 [Bridgeman Art Library] 6. William Rothenstein, Mr Charles Ricketts and Mr Charles Hazelwood Shannon, 1897 [Tate Gallery online catalogue] 7. Max Beerbohm, Will Rothenstein Laying Down the Law, c.1895 [Beckson and Lago (1975)] 8. Max Beerbohm, The New English Art Club, 1906/7 [Tate Gallery online catalogue] 9. William Orpen, The Play Scene from „Hamlet‟, 1899 [Upstone (2005) 80] 10. William Orpen, The Selecting Jury of the New English Art Club, 1909 [National Portrait Gallery online catalogue] 11. Anonymous, Last Jury of the New English Art Club at the Dudley Gallery, 1904 [Jenkins and Stephens (2004) 205] 12. William Rothenstein, The Saturday Review: Illustrated Supplement, 1896 [Bridgeman Art Library] 13. William Rothenstein, Max Beerbohm, 1898 [National Portrait Gallery online catalogue] 14. William Rothenstein, L‟Homme qui sort (The Painter Charles Conder), 1892 [Galbally and Pearce (2003) 10] 15. William Rothenstein, Group Portrait, 1894 [Bridgeman Art Library] 16. Charles Shannon, E J Van Wisselingh: A Portrait Sketch, 1895 [British Museum online catalogue] 5 17. William Rothenstein, Robert Baldwin Ross, c.1900 [National Portrait Gallery online catalogue] 18. William Rothenstein, Hablant Espagnol, 1895 [Brown University Library: http://dl.lib.brown.edu/] 19. William Rothenstein, Laurence Binyon, 1898 [National Portrait Gallery online catalogue] 20. William Rothenstein, Vézélay, 1896 [Wellington (1923) Pl.2] 21. William Rothenstein, The Quarry (or The Old Quarry, Hawksworth) 1904 [Bridgeman Art Library] 22. Charles Conder, Yport, 1892 [Galbally and Pearce (2003) 113] 23. William Rothenstein, Nature‟s Ramparts (or Cliffs at Vaucottes), 1908 [W Rothenstein (1937c) 224] 24. Charles Conder, Newquay (Towan Beach), 1906 [Galbally and Pearce (2003) 137] 25. William Rothenstein, Tree in Winter, Iles Farm, 1916 [Wellington (1923) Pl.22] 26. William Rothenstein, Dame Margery Perham, 1919 [National Portrait Gallery online catalogue] 27. Wyndham Lewis, Self Portrait with Pipe, 1938 [Edwards (2008) 30] 28. William Rothenstein, Reading the Book of Esther, 1907 [Wellington (1923) Pl.8] 29. Harold Gilman, Mrs Mounter at the Breakfast Table, c.1917 [Tate Gallery online catalogue] 30. William Rothenstein, Eli the Thatcher, 1913 [Wellington (1923) Pl.19] 31. Rembrandt van Rijn, Philosopher in Meditation, 1632 [Bridgeman Art Library] 32. William Rothenstein, The Butcher‟s Shop Under the Trees, 1899 [Tate Gallery online catalogue] 33. William Orpen, The English Nude, 1900 [Bridgeman Art Library] 34. Augustus John, Merikli, 1902 [Jenkins and Stephens (2004) 65] 35. William Rothenstein, Auguste Rodin, 1906 [Tate Gallery online catalogue] 36. Charles Conder, Women bathing, Swanage, 1900 [Galbally and Pearce (2003) 128] 37. William Orpen, Crisis at the New English Art Club, 1904, 1930 [Jenkins and Stephens (2004) 205] 6 38. 26 Church Row, Hampstead [photographed by the author] 39. William Rothenstein, Mother and Child, 1903 [Tate Gallery online catalogue] 40. William Rothenstein, An Interior, 1903 [Witt Library, Courtauld Institute] 41. William Rothenstein, Mother and Child, c.1901 [Sotheby‟s online catalogue] 42. William Rothenstein, Spring - The Morning Room, 1910 [Bridgeman Art Library] 43. William Rothenstein, Eric Gill and Alice Rothenstein, c.1914 [National Portrait Gallery online catalogue] 44. George Charles Beresford, Alice Rothenstein, c.1901 [National Portrait Gallery online catalogue] 45. William Rothenstein, The Princess Badroulbadour, 1908 [Tate Gallery online catalogue] 46. William Rothenstein, Joseph Conrad, 1903 [National Portrait Gallery online catalogue] 47. Alfred Wolmark, Israel Zangwill, 1925 [National Portrait Gallery online catalogue] 48. William Rothenstein, Aliens at Prayer, 1905 [Wellington (1923) Pl.7] 49. William Rothenstein, Jews Mourning in a Synagogue, 1906 [Tate Gallery online catalogue] 50. Jacob Kramer, The Day of Atonement, 1919 [Bridgeman Art Library] 7 Acknowledgements Initial thanks must go to the Arts and Humanities Research Council, whose funding made this study possible in the first place – and to the University of York, for providing the right environment in which to bring it to completion. I have visited a range of museums, libraries and archives during the course of my research. Particular thanks must go to all the staff at the Houghton Library, Harvard – and to Sandra Martin of Manchester City Art Gallery. Various members of William Rothenstein‟s family have generously allowed me to see their collections of paintings and drawings. I would like to thank the Spiegelbergs, Lucy Carter and David Ward for their gracious hospitality. In the University of York and beyond I have benefited from contact with various academics. It would be impossible to name them all: special thanks must go, nonetheless, go to my supervisor, David Peters Corbett, whose wise counsel has been utterly invaluable throughout. I would also like to thank my family and friends. The first, in particular, have had to suffer more than most my endless rambling on about William Rothenstein. I cannot pretend that this will now end; I must thank them, nevertheless, for putting up with it so far – and for the constant love and support they have provided over the last three years. Lastly, thanks to my wife Sarah – for everything. 8 INTRODUCTION Vattetot, 1899 A walking intelligence of a distinctly uncommon sort – He‟s a sort of sizer-up of all the art work being done everywhere. He never flatters, is quite sincere, and so has (consciously or unconsciously) acquired a great influence. [Muirhead Bone on William Rothenstein, c.1902].1 These awful doubts that come on one after action! [William Rothenstein to Robert Ross, 1899].2 In the summer of 1899, the artist William Rothenstein holidayed at Vattetot-sur-mer, on the Normandy Coast.3 He and his new wife, Alice, had enjoyed their honeymoon there earlier in the year; now they were returning with friends and family in tow.4 Alice‟s younger sister
Recommended publications
  • The Chimera of the Philosopher King
    Roberto R. Aramayo The Chimera of the Philosopher King Around the Kantian Distinction between Moral Politician and Political Moralist: The Dilemmas of Power, or the Frustrated Love Affair between Ethics and Politics Dialectica Kantiana Hermeneutica Kantiana CTK E-Books Digital Library of Kantian Studies (DLKS) Biblioteca Digital de Estudios Kantianos (BDEK) Series Translatio Kantiana (TK) Quaestiones Kantianae (QK) Hermeneutica Kantiana (HK) Dialectica Kantiana (DK) Esta biblioteca digital se integra en la revista Con-Textos Kantianos International Journal of Philosophy (CKT-IJP) ISSN: 2386-7655 Diseño del logo de la colección CTK E-Books: Armando Menéndez e-mail: [email protected] Página web: www.con-textoskantianos.net © Roberto Rodríguez Aramayo, 2019 © De la traducción, Damián Bravo Zamora, 2019 © CTK E-Books, Ediciones Alamanda, Madrid, 2019 Diseño y maquetación: Nuria Roca ISBN: 978-84-949436-3-8 La edición electrónica de este libro es de acceso abierto y se distribuye bajo los términos de una licencia de uso y distribución Creative Common Attribution (CC BY-NC-ND International 4.0) que permite la descarga de la obra y compartirla con otras personas, siempre que el autor y la fuente sean debidamente citados, pero no se autoriza su uso comercial ni se puede cambiar de ninguna manera. Ediciones Alamanda General Zabala, 5 E-28002 Madrid CTK E-Books▐ Serie Hermeneutica Kantiana Roberto R. Aramayo The Chimera of the Philosopher King Around the Kantian Distinction between Moral Politician and Political Moralist: The Dilemmas of Power, or the Frustrated Love Affair between Ethics and Politics Traducción de Damián Bravo Zamora Índice PREAMBLE .................................................................................. 11 I. THE GYGES SYNDROME ........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The London Group Open – Exhibiting Artists
    The London Group Open 2017 Part One: 8 - 17 November 2017 Part Two: 22 November - 1 December 2017 The Cello Factory 33-34 Cornwall Road, London SE1 8TJ 2pm - 6pm daily The UK’s longest-running and most prestigious artists’ collective, The London Group, is delighted to announce the artists selected from open call, to exhibit alongside its members, in rd the 83 London Group Open. The exhibition is a wonderful opportunity for the selected artists to raise their profile, win cash and material prizes, and exhibit their work to the public alongside the Group’s esteemed members. From a wide range of submissions, The London Group Selection Committee – which consists of existing members – carefully selected 79 artists to each exhibit a work across two exhibitions at The Cello Factory, London from 8 – 17 November 2017 and 22 November – 1 December 2017. Part 1: 8 - 17 November 2017 Jonathan Alibone Belinda Bailey Rosalind Barker Maria Bouquet Day Bowman Anita Bryan Stephen Calcutt Adrienne Cameron Stephen Carley Tom Cartmill Michael Coombs Shona Davies, Dave Monaghan and Jon Klein Richard Dickson Jo Evans Jane Eyton Garry Flinders Chloe Fremantle Nicholas Gentilli Lyndsey Gilmour David Gould Ashley Greaves Gudrun Sigridur Haraldsdottir Joshua Hilton Beverley Isaacs Aubrey Laret Jockel Liess Rebekah Miller Blake O'Donnell Sarah Pager Sumi Perera Angela Smith Louise Whittles Emma Witter Eleanor Wood LJ Wright Part 2: 22 November – 1 December 2017 Susan Absolon Jackie Berridge Jo Brown Stephen Buckeridge Sara Choudhrey Liz Collini Richard Colson Tim
    [Show full text]
  • The Leeds Arts Club and the New Age: Art and Ideas in a Time of War by Tom Steele Thank You Very Much Nigel, That's a Very Generous Introduction
    TRANSCRIPT Into the Vortex: The Leeds Arts Club and the New Age: Art and Ideas in a Time of War by Tom Steele Thank you very much Nigel, that's a very generous introduction. Thank you for inviting me back to the Leeds Art Gallery where I spent so many happy hours. As Nigel said, the book was actually published in 1990, but it was a process of about 5 or 6 year work, in fact it's turned into a PHD. I've not done a lot of other work on it since, I have to say some very very good work has been done on Tom Perry and other peoples in the meantime, and it's grievously in danger of being the new edition, which I might or might not get around to, but maybe somebody else will. Anyway, what I'm going to do is to read a text. I'm not very good at talking extensively, and it should take about 40 minutes, 45 minutes. This should leave us some time for a discussion afterwards, I hope. Right, I wish I'd thought about the title and raw text before I offered the loan up to the gallery, because it makes more sense, and you'll see why as we go along. I want to take the liberty of extending the idea of war to cover the entire decade 1910-1920, one of the most rebellious and innovative periods in the history of British art. By contrast, in cultural terms, we now live in a comparatively quiet period.
    [Show full text]
  • Auckland City Art Gallery
    Frances Hodgkins 14 auckland city art gallery modern european paintings in new Zealand This exhibition brings some of the modern European paintings in New Zealand together for the first time. The exhibition is small largely because many galleries could not spare more paintings from their walls and also the conditions of certain bequests do not permit loans. Nevertheless, the standard is reasonably high. Chronologically the first modern movement represented is Impressionism and the latest is Abstract Expressionism, while the principal countries concerned are Britain and France. Two artists born in New Zealand are represented — Frances Hodgkins and Raymond Mclntyre — the former well known, the latter not so well as he should be — for both arrived in Europe before 1914 when the foundations of twentieth century painting were being laid and the earlier paintings here provide some indication of the milieu in which they moved. It is hoped that this exhibition may help to persuade the public that New Zealand is not devoid of paintings representing the serious art of this century produced in Europe. Finally we must express our sincere thanks to private owners and public galleries for their generous response to requests for loans. P.A.T. June - July nineteen sixty the catalogue NOTE: In this catalogue the dimensions of the paintings are given in inches, height before width JANKEL ADLER (1895-1949) 1 SEATED FIGURE Gouache 24} x 201 Signed ADLER '47 Bishop Suter Art Gallery, Nelson Purchased by the Trustees, 1956 KAREL APPEL (born 1921) Dutch 2 TWO HEADS (1958) Gouache 243 x 19i Signed K APPEL '58 Auckland City Art Gallery Presented by the Contemporary Art Society, 1959 JOHN BRATBY (born 1928) British 3 WINDOWS (1957) Oil on canvas 48x144 Signed BRATBY JULY 1957 Auckland City Art Gallery Presented by Auckland Gallery Associates, 1958 ANDRE DERAIN (1880-1954) French 4 LANDSCAPE Oil on canvas 21x41 J Signed A.
    [Show full text]
  • Charles Ricketts' Illustrations for Two of Oscar Wilde's Poems in Prose
    3 FAITHFUL INFIDELITY: CHARLES RICKETTS' ILLUSTRATIONS FOR TWO OF OSCAR WILDE'S POEMS IN PROSE Jeremiah Romano Mercurio (University of St Andrews) Abstract The artist, collector, and critic Charles Ricketts (1866–1931) has often been characterised as a reactionary voice in early-twentieth-century debates about modern art. Although he responded conservatively to modern-art developments such as those embodied by the term 'Post-Impressionism', his work in book design and illustration exemplifies progressive strategies of decoration that reconfigure the relationship between author and illustrator as one of collaborative authorship. Ricketts' illustrations are autonomous narratives that not only reproduce the meanings of the texts they represent, but also parody and elaborate on them. Moreover, Ricketts' book designs and illustrations represent a complex resistance to and working out of Oscar Wilde's views on art, language, and orality. Wilde regarded visual art as inferior to language because the latter can embody the graphic and is free from the former's fixity in time and materiality. Ricketts' illustrational strategies are designed, not only to reinforce his own autonomy, but also to disprove Wilde's description of visual art as limited compared with language. Ricketts' progressive strategies of design are epitomized by his unpublished illustrations for Wilde's Poems in Prose (1894), a text which dramatises the centrality of voice to Wilde's poetic endeavour and allows Ricketts directly to challenge Wilde's denigration of the visual arts. By focusing on two representative examples, Ricketts' drawings for 'The Disciple' and 'The House of Judgment', and by providing close readings of both image and text, this piece traces Ricketts' illustrational methods and reveals their debts to Wilde's own theories of orality, language, and visual arts, charting Ricketts' divergences from Wilde's texts and highlighting the critical dialogue implicit in the illustrations.
    [Show full text]
  • Christiana Herringham (8 December 1852–25 February 1929) Meaghan Clarke
    Christiana Herringham (8 December 1852–25 February 1929) Meaghan Clarke Artist, writer, and suffragist, Christiana Herringham (Fig. 1) is primarily known as one of the founders of the National Art Collections Fund in 1903, along with the art writers Roger Fry, D. S. MacColl, and Claude Phillips, with the goal of acquiring works for the nation. Herringham had studied at the South Kensington School of Art and exhibited her early work at the Royal Academy. She married the physician Wilmot Herringham in 1880; Fig. 1: Christiana Herringham, c. 1906–11, photograph, Archives, Royal Holloway, University of London. 2 they had two sons. In 1899 she published the first English translation of Cennino Cennini’s Il libro dell’arte with notes on medieval artistic materials and methods. The latter derived largely from her own scientific experi- ments to replicate the techniques and recipes of early Renaissance tempera (egg yolk mixed with pigment). In 1901 she was one of a group of artists who exhibited ‘modern paintings’ in tempera at Leighton House, London, forming the Society of Painters in Tempera later that year. Society members exhibited again at the Carfax Gallery, London in 1905 and Herringham edited the Papers of the Society of Painters in Tempera, 1901–1907, which included her analysis of paintings in the collection of London’s National Gallery. TheBurlington Magazine was founded in 1903 and she served on its consultative committee. She published regularly with the journal over the next decade on a range of topics that encompassed the market for old masters, Albrecht Dürer, the proposed restoration of the basilica of San Marco, Venice, and Persian car- pets.
    [Show full text]
  • Copyright Statement
    COPYRIGHT STATEMENT This copy of the thesis has been supplied on condition that anyone who consults it is understood to recognise that its copyright rests with its author and no quotation from the thesis and no information derived from it may be published without the author’s prior consent. i ii REX WHISTLER (1905 – 1944): PATRONAGE AND ARTISTIC IDENTITY by NIKKI FRATER A thesis submitted to the University of Plymouth in partial fulfilment for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY School of Humanities & Performing Arts Faculty of Arts and Humanities September 2014 iii Nikki Frater REX WHISTLER (1905-1944): PATRONAGE AND ARTISTIC IDENTITY Abstract This thesis explores the life and work of Rex Whistler, from his first commissions whilst at the Slade up until the time he enlisted for active service in World War Two. His death in that conflict meant that this was a career that lasted barely twenty years; however it comprised a large range of creative endeavours. Although all these facets of Whistler’s career are touched upon, the main focus is on his work in murals and the fields of advertising and commercial design. The thesis goes beyond the remit of a purely biographical stance and places Whistler’s career in context by looking at the contemporary art world in which he worked, and the private, commercial and public commissions he secured. In doing so, it aims to provide a more comprehensive account of Whistler’s achievement than has been afforded in any of the existing literature or biographies. This deeper examination of the artist’s practice has been made possible by considerable amounts of new factual information derived from the Whistler Archive and other archival sources.
    [Show full text]
  • Critical Introduction to Volume 1 of the Dial (1889)
    Critical Introduction to Volume 1 of The Dial (1889) The unsigned “Apology” located on the final page of the first Dial brought out Figure 1. Pictorial Initial "U" Designed by Charles Ricketts for John Gray’s “The Great Worm” by Charles Ricketts and Charles Shannon in August 1889 outlined the editorial defense (apologia) for the eccentric publication: “The sole aim of this magazine is to gain sympathy with its views” (36). The views expressed in this first number were those of a very limited group indeed: four young men based in central London. In addition to co-editors Ricketts and Shannon, who between them produced most of the magazine’s contents, Reginald Savage contributed a single artwork and a series of brief “Notes” on current exhibitions and John Gray provided a fairy tale and a critical essay. Like its Pre-Raphaelite predecessor the Germ (1850), the Dial sought to set the visual and verbal arts in dialogue with each other. Artists illustrated the literary efforts of their colleagues, Ricketts designed textual ornaments for specific pieces of writing (fig. 1), and the magazine as whole engaged with ideas of design. While the Dial might have shared the Germ’s subtitle, “Thoughts Towards Nature in Art and Literature,” its approach is more fantastic, mythical, and decorative. Indeed, the magazine’s artistic vision extends 1 beyond the English Pre-Raphaelites to include the art and literature of the Continent, particularly that of France. The “Apology” concludes with the acknowledgement that “we are out of date in our belief that the artist’s conscientiousness cannot be controlled by the paying public” (36).
    [Show full text]
  • A Rocky Gorge, South of France SOLD REF: 2525 Artist: ALBERT RUTHERSTON
    A Rocky Gorge, South of France SOLD REF: 2525 Artist: ALBERT RUTHERSTON Height: 25 cm (9 3/4") Width: 34.5 cm (13 1/2") Framed Height: 43 cm - 16 1/1" Framed Width: 52 cm - 20 1/2" 1 Sarah Colegrave Fine Art By appointment only - London and North Oxfordshire | England +44 (0)77 7594 3722 https://sarahcolegrave.co.uk/a-rocky-gorge-south-of-france 24/09/2021 Short Description ALBERT RUTHERSTON, RWS (1881-1953) A Rocky Gorge, South of France Watercolour and bodycolour Framed 25 by 34.5 cm., 9 ¾ by 13 ½ in. (frame size 43 by 52 cm., 17 by 20 ½ in.) Provenance: The artist and by descent to Gloria, Countess Bathurst. Born Albert Daniel Rothenstein, he was the youngest of the six children of Moritz and Bertha Rothenstein, German-Jewish immigrants who had settled in Bradford, Yorkshire in the 1860s. He and his siblings proved to be a hugely talented and artistic family, his elder brother became Sir William Rotherstein (1872-1945), the artist and director of the Royal College of Art; two of his other siblings, Charles Rutherston and Emily Hesslein, both accumulated major modern British and French art collections and his nephew Sir John Rothenstein was direct of the Tate Gallery. He was educated at Bradford Grammar School before moving to London in 1898 to study at the Slade School of Art where he became close friends with Augustus John and William Orpen. He met Walter Sickert during a painting holiday in France in 1900 and by introducing Sickert to Spencer Gove became instrumental in the beginning of the Camden Town Group.
    [Show full text]
  • Walter Sickert and the Sickert Family Collection in Islington
    From Munich to Highbury: Walter Sickert and the Sickert family collection in Islington Islington Council’s Walter Sickert family collection contains the paintings, drawings and etchings found in Sickert’s studio at the time of his death, along with an archive of his photographs and personal papers. Most of this material was deposited with Islington Libraries by the Sickert Trust (1947-1950) in recognition of the significance of Islington in the artist’s life. The collection reflects Sickert’s enduring reputation as an artist, writer, teacher and eccentric. Sickert’s Islington works are featured in this exhibition, which also shows other trademark Walter Sickert in 1923. subjects, including figure studies, music halls and the streets and buildings of Dieppe and London. For the most part, these artworks are not finished works but they show how Sickert recorded his visual impressions in preparatory sketches that were the very source and foundation of his art. The collection also includes paintings by members of Sickert’s family and by his wife, Thérèse Lessore, and these too are displayed here. Walter Sickert. Cicely Hey. Etching. 1922-1924 (circa). 20 x 17.5 cm. Walter Sickert’s palette. Walter Richard Sickert (1860–1942) The Sickert family Walter Sickert was born in Munich on 31 May 1860. His father was Oswald Sickert, a Danish artist. His mother, Eleanor Henry, was the illegitimate daughter of an Irish dancer and an Englishman, Richard Sheepshanks, the Astronomer Royal. Oswald and Eleanor Sickert married in 1859 and Walter Sickert was the first of their six children. The family moved to England in 1868.
    [Show full text]
  • Elements of Innovators' Fame
    Elements of Innovators’ Fame: Social Structure, Identity and Creativity Mitali Banerjee Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy under the Executive Committee of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences Columbia University 2017 © 2017 Mitali Banerjee All rights reserved Abstract Elements of Innovators’ Fame: Social Structure, Identity and Creativity Mitali Banerjee What makes an innovator famous? This is the principal question of this dissertation. I examine three potential drivers of the innovators’ fame – their social structure, creativity and identity. My empirical context is the early 20th century abstract artists in 1910-25. The period represents a paradigmatic shift in the history of modern art, the emergence of the abstract art movement. In chapter 2, I operationalize social structure by an innovator’s local peer network. I find that an innovator with structurally and compositionally diverse local network is likely to be more famous than the one with a homogenous local network. I find no statistical evidence for creativity as a link between social structure and fame. Instead, the evidence suggests that an innovator’s creative identity and access to promotional opportunities are the key drivers of her fame. In Chapter 3, I find that the creativity identity resulting from an innovator’s creative trajectory can lead to obscurity despite early fame and acclaim. The drastic change in the nature of a producer’s output can dilute her identity and cost her her niche. In combination with her peer network characteristics, these dynamics can mean obscurity even for talented and prolific innovators. In chapter 4, I undertake a large-scale analysis of the relationship between creativity and fame.
    [Show full text]
  • Charles Ginner, A.R.A
    THOS. AGNEW & SONS LTD. 6 ST. JAMES’S PLACE, LONDON, SW1A 1NP Tel: +44 (0)20 7491 9219. www.agnewsgallery.com Charles Ginner, A.R.A. (Cannes 1878 – 1952 London) St. Just in Cornwall – A landscape with cottages Signed ‘C. GINNER’ (lower left) Pen and ink and watercolour on paper 9 ¾ x 11 ¾ in. (25 x 30 cm.) Provenance Gifted by the Artist to Mrs. Frank Rutter. The Fine Art Society, 1985. Henry Wyndham Fine Art Ltd, London. Private Collection. Exhibited London, St George's Gallery, Charles Ginner and Randolph Schwabe, March 1926 (details untraced). London, The Fine Art Society, Charles Ginner, 7th - 25th October 1985, cat. no.13, illustrated. Literature Charles Ginner, List of Paintings, Drawings, etc. of Charles Ginner, Book II, 1919-1924, p. 135. Primarily a townscape and landscape painter, Charles Ginner grew up in France where his father, a doctor, practised, but settled in London in 1910. He was heavily influenced by Vincent van Gogh, Paul Gauguin and Paul Cézanne. In 1909, Ginner visited Buenos Aires, Argentina, where he held his first one-person show, which helped to introduce post-Impressionism to South America. Thos Agnew & Sons Ltd, registered in England No 00267436 at 21 Bunhill Row, London EC1Y 8LP VAT Registration No 911 4479 34 THOS. AGNEW & SONS LTD. 6 ST. JAMES’S PLACE, LONDON, SW1A 1NP Tel: +44 (0)20 7491 9219. www.agnewsgallery.com He was a friend of Harold Gilman and Spencer Gore and through them was drawn into Walter Sickert’s circle, becoming a founder member of the Camden Town Group in 1911 and the London Group in 1913.
    [Show full text]