DOCSLIB.ORG

Wreck: Gericault and the Body in Pieces

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Wreck: Gericault and the Body in Pieces Art Appreciation Lecture Series 2019 Being human: The figure in art Géricault’s The Raft of the Medusa Mark Ledbury 12 / 13 June 2019 Lecture summary: This lecture examines one of the great works of nineteenth-century Art, Géricault’s Raft of the Medusa, 200 years after the painting was first seen. It explores Gericault’s fascination with bodies, but also the political and cultural impact of a painting in its time and beyond. The wreck of the Medusa through incompetence and fear , the subsequent appalling suffering of the occupants of the Raft, caused scandal in the France of the recently restored Monarchy , and Gericault used both his fascination with human and animal bodies and his training in neo-classical studios to very powerful effect in a painting of enormous scale, ambition and effort. Slide list: 1. Théodore Géricault, The Raft of the Medusa, (Oil on canvas, 1817-19, 4,91 m. x 7,16 m, Paris: Louvre) 2. Horace Vernet, Portrait of Géricault, (Oil on Canvas, 1822 or 3, New York, Metropolitan Museum) 3. J-A-D Ingres, Grande Odalisque (1812-18, Oil on Canvas, Paris: Louvre) 4. A-L Girodet, Pygmalion (1818-19, Oil on Canvas, Paris: Louvre) 5. Achille Etna Michallon, The Death of Roland (oil on canvas, 1818, Paris: Louvre) 6. Géricault, Horse Studies,(Graphite on Paper, c.1812-14, Getty Museum, Los Angeles) 7. Géricault, Charging Chasseur, or An Officer of the Imperial Horse Guards Charging 1812, Oil on Canvas, Paris, Louvre 8. Géricault, Wounded Cuirassier leaving the Battle (1814, Oil on Canvas, Paris: Louvre) 9. Géricault, Abduction of a nymph by a Satyr, (Graphite on Paper, Paris: Louvre) 10. Géricault, Hercules and Anteaus? , c.1816, Ink on Paper, University of Sydney Art Collection 11. Géricault, Sketch for the Race of the Riderless Horses, 1817, Oil and pen and ink on paper laid on canvas, Los Angeles, Getty Museum 12. Géricault, The Start of the Race of the Riderless Horses, (oil sketch, Baltimore: Walters Art Gallery) 13. Géricault, The Kiss. ca. 1816 – 1817, Charcoal, wash and gouache on brown paper. Madrid, Museo Thyssen-Bornemisza 14. P-J de Loutherbourg, A Shipwreck off a Stormy Coast, (c1762, Oil on Canvas, Sydney, AGNSW) 15. Thomas Gaugain after James Northcote, Portraits....The Wreck of the Centaur (1784, Stipple and Etching, British Museum, London) 16. JMW Turner, A Shipwreck (exh.1805), Oil on Canvas, Tate, London 17. Charles Burney, A performance of the Eidophuisikon (Pencil and wash, 1782, British Museum) 18. Géricault, mutiny on the raft (pencil sketch, c.1818, Amsterdam, Museum) 19. Géricault, Mutiny on the Raft, (drawing chalk and wash, c.1818, Fogg Art Museum, Harvard University) 20. Géricault, Scene of Cannibalism on the Raft (Chalks, Graphite, wash, c.1818, Paris: Louvre) 21. Géricault, The Rowboat arrives to rescue the survivors of the raft (pencil on paper, c.1818, Paris, Louvre) 22. Géricault, Study for the Married couple on the raft, (Pencil on Paper, Fogg Art Museum, Harvard) 23. Géricault, Study of Feet and Hands, 1818-19, Oil on canvas, Musée Fabre, Montpellier Proudly sponsored by: 24. Géricault, Limb Study, (1818 Rouen, Musée des Beaux Arts) 25. Géricault, Compositional drawings for The Raft of the Medusa (Pencil, 1818, Paris: Louvre) 26. P-N Guérin, The Return of Marcus Sextus (1799, Oil on Canvas Paris: Louvre) 27. Michelangelo, Last Judgement from the Sistine Chapel, (Fresco, 1536-41, Sistine Chapel, Rome) 28. Jacques-Louis David, The Lictors Bringing Home to Brutus the Bodies of his Dead Sons (1789, Paris,Louvre) 29. Jacques-Louis David, The Death of Socrates, (1787, Oil on Canvas, Metropolitan Museum of Art) 30. Géricault, The Derby on Epsom Downs (Oil on Canvas, 1821, Paris: Louvre) 31. Géricault, The Farrier (lithograph, published 1821, London:British Museum) 32. Géricault, The Coal Wagon (Lithograph, published 1821, Melbourne, NGV) 33. Géricault, The Monomania of Envy (c.1821, Oil on Canvas, Lyon, MBA) 34. Géricault, Portrait of a Man Suffering from Delusions of Military Command, 1822, oil on canvas, 81 x 65 cm (Sammlung Oskar Reinhart, Winterthur, Germany) 35. Géricault, The Lime Kiln, (Oil on canvas, 1823, Paris: Louvre) 36. Etex (Sculptor) Monument to Géricault, Pere Lachaise cemetary, Paris, c.1840 37. Frank Stella, Raft of the Medusa (Part I)_, 1990. Aluminum and steel, New York, Whitney 38. Martin Kippenberger, Exhibition, The Raft of the Medusa, New York, 2014 39. Banksy, Raft of the Medusa Mural (Calais, now destr.) 2014. References: Eitner, Lorenz. Géricault’s Raft of the Medusa. London: Phaidon distributed in the USby Praeger, New York, 1972. Alhadeff, Albert. The Raft of the Medusa: Géricault, Art, and Race. Munich ; Prestel, 2002. Clement, Charles. Géricault : A Biographical and Critical Study. [S.l.]: DA Capo, 1974. Eitner, Lorenz E. A. Géricault: His Life and Work. London: Orbis Publishing, 1983. Eitner, Lorenz, and Théodore Géricault. Géricault : [Catalogue of the Exhibition Held at the] Los Angeles County Museum of Art, October 12-December 12, 1971; the Detroit Institute of Arts, January 23-March 7, 1972; Philadelphia Museum of Art, March 30-May 14, 1972. (Los Angeles: Los Angeles County Museum of Art, 1971. Grigsby, Darcy Grimaldo. Extremities: Painting Empire in Post-Revolutionary France. London: Yale University Press, 2002. Nochlin, Linda. “Géricault, or the Absence of Women.” October 68 (1994): 45–59. https://doi.org/10.2307/778696. Snell, Robert. Portraits of the Insane: Theodore Gericault and the Subject of Psychotherapy. Karnac Books, 2016. Boime, Albert. “Portraying Monomaniacs to Service the Alienist’s Monomania: Géricault and Georget.” Oxford Art Journal 14, no. 1 (January 1, 1991): 79–91. Savigny, J. B. Henry, and Alexander Corréard. Narrative of a Voyage to Senegal in 1816 Undertaken by Order of the French Government, Comprising an Account of the Shipwreck of the Medusa, the Sufferings of the Crew, and the Various Occurrences on Board the Raft, in the Desert of Zaara, at St. Louis, and at the Camp of Daccard. to Which Are Subjoined Observations Respecting the Agriculture of the Western Coast of Africa, from Cape Blanco to the Mouth of the Gambia. Project Gutenberg ebook, 2004. Vaughan, William,. Romanticism and Art. Rep Sub. Thames & Hudson, 1994. Craske, Matthew. Art in Europe, 1700-1830: A History of the Visual Arts in an Era of Unprecedented Urban Economic Growth. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, 1997. Eisenman, Stephen F. Nineteenth Century Art: A Critical History. Thames & Hudson, 2011. Patrick Noon, Crossing the Channel: British and French Painting in the Age of Romanticism (London : New York : Distributed in the U.S. and Canada by Harry N. Abrams: Tate, 2003). Sells, Christopher. "After the 'Raft of the Medusa': Gericault's Later Projects." The Burlington Magazine 128, no. 1001 (1986): 563-71. Johnson, Lee. "The 'Raft of the Medusa' in Great Britain." The Burlington Magazine 96, no. 617 (1954): 249-54 Miles, Jonathan, The Wreck of the Medusa: The Most Famous Sea Disaster of the Nineteenth Century. (NEw York, Atlantic Monthly Press, 2006) For access to all past lecture notes visit: https:// www.artgallery.nsw.gov.au/members/current-members/member-events/being- human-figure-art/ .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2007 Newsletter
    Spring 2007 Collecting China Interdisciplinary symposium expands dialog on Chinese art objects The Newsletter of the University of Delaware Department of Art History 1 Contents Spring 2007 Editor in Chief and Photo Editor: From the Chair From the Chair | 3 Undergraduate Student Linda Pellecchia News | 15 Titles Editor: David M. Stone No doubt, you’ve noticed that the Art History newsletter has changed its Art History Club | 15 Art Director: Don Shenkle look and now has a name, Insight. The department, launched more than Undergraduate Awards | 15 Editorial Coordinator: forty years ago, has fl ourished and Insight allows us to spread the news Connee McKinney of our extraordinary record of accomplishments. Some news builds on Secretarial Assistance: Eileen Larson, traditional strengths. Other items refl ect exciting new directions. Our Deb Morris, Tina Trimble focus on American art will expand next year with the arrival of a new Graduate Student News | 16 “Collecting ‘China’” — Insight is produced by the Department colleague in the history of African American art and another in the 19th An International Gem | 4 Graduate Awards | 16 of Art History as a service to alumni and 20th-century art of the United States. Our curriculum has, on the Graduate Student News | 16 and friends of the Department. We are other hand, expanded globally beyond America and Europe. We now Graduate Degrees Granted | 17 always pleased to receive your opin- teach the arts and architecture of Africa, Asia, and Latin America. Art News from Alumni | 18 ions and ideas. Please contact Eileen History undergraduate and graduate students have garnered prestigious Larson, Old College 318, University of grants and awards.
    [Show full text]
  • MF-Romanticism .Pdf
    Europe and America, 1800 to 1870 1 Napoleonic Europe 1800-1815 2 3 Goals • Discuss Romanticism as an artistic style. Name some of its frequently occurring subject matter as well as its stylistic qualities. • Compare and contrast Neoclassicism and Romanticism. • Examine reasons for the broad range of subject matter, from portraits and landscape to mythology and history. • Discuss initial reaction by artists and the public to the new art medium known as photography 4 30.1 From Neoclassicism to Romanticism • Understand the philosophical and stylistic differences between Neoclassicism and Romanticism. • Examine the growing interest in the exotic, the erotic, the landscape, and fictional narrative as subject matter. • Understand the mixture of classical form and Romantic themes, and the debates about the nature of art in the 19th century. • Identify artists and architects of the period and their works. 5 Neoclassicism in Napoleonic France • Understand reasons why Neoclassicism remained the preferred style during the Napoleonic period • Recall Neoclassical artists of the Napoleonic period and how they served the Empire 6 Figure 30-2 JACQUES-LOUIS DAVID, Coronation of Napoleon, 1805–1808. Oil on canvas, 20’ 4 1/2” x 32’ 1 3/4”. Louvre, Paris. 7 Figure 29-23 JACQUES-LOUIS DAVID, Oath of the Horatii, 1784. Oil on canvas, approx. 10’ 10” x 13’ 11”. Louvre, Paris. 8 Figure 30-3 PIERRE VIGNON, La Madeleine, Paris, France, 1807–1842. 9 Figure 30-4 ANTONIO CANOVA, Pauline Borghese as Venus, 1808. Marble, 6’ 7” long. Galleria Borghese, Rome. 10 Foreshadowing Romanticism • Notice how David’s students retained Neoclassical features in their paintings • Realize that some of David’s students began to include subject matter and stylistic features that foreshadowed Romanticism 11 Figure 30-5 ANTOINE-JEAN GROS, Napoleon at the Pesthouse at Jaffa, 1804.
    [Show full text]
  • Art List by Year
    ART LIST BY YEAR Page Period Year Title Medium Artist Location 36 Mesopotamia Sumerian 2600 Standard of Ur Inlaid Box British Museum 36 Mesopotamia Sumerian 2600 Stele of the Vultures (Victory Stele of Eannatum) Limestone Louvre 38 Mesopotamia Sumerian 2600 Bull Headed Harp Harp British Museum 39 Mesopotamia Sumerian 2600 Banquet Scene cylinder seal Lapis Lazoli British Museum 40 Mesopotamia Akkadian 2254 Victory Stele of Narum-Sin Sandstone Louvre 42 Mesopotamia Akkadian 2100 Gudea Seated Diorite Louvre 43 Mesopotamia Akkadian 2100 Gudea Standing Calcite Louvre 44 Mesopotamia Babylonian 1780 Stele of Hammurabi Basalt Louvre 45 Mesopotamia Assyrian 1350 Statue of Queen Napir-Asu Bronze Louvre 46 Mesopotamia Assyrian 750 Lamassu (man headed winged bull 13') Limestone Louvre 48 Mesopotamia Assyrian 640 Ashurbanipal hunting lions Relief Gypsum British Museum 65 Egypt Old Kingdom 2500 Seated Scribe Limestone Louvre 75 Egypt New Kingdom 1400 Nebamun hunting fowl Fresco British Museum 75 Egypt New Kingdom 1400 Nebamun funery banquet Fresco British Museum 80 Egypt New Kingdom 1300 Last Judgement of Hunefer Papyrus Scroll British Museum 81 Egypt First Millenium 680 Taharqo as a sphinx (2') Granite British Museum 110 Ancient Greece Orientalizing 625 Corinthian Black Figure Amphora Vase British Museum 111 Ancient Greece Orientalizing 625 Lady of Auxerre (Kore from Crete) Limestone Louvre 121 Ancient Greece Archaic 540 Achilles & Ajax Vase Execias Vatican 122 Ancient Greece Archaic 510 Herakles wrestling Antaios Vase Louvre 133 Ancient Greece High
    [Show full text]
  • Jacques-Louis David
    Jacques-Louis David THE FAREWELL OF TELEMACHUS AND EUCHARIS Jacques-Louis David THE FAREWELL OF TELEMACHUS AND EUCHARIS Dorothy Johnson GETTY MUSEUM STUDIES ON ART Los ANGELES For my parents, Alice and John Winter, and for Johnny Christopher Hudson, Publisher Cover: Mark Greenberg, Managing Editor Jacques-Louis David (French, 1748 — 1825). The Farewell of Telemachus and Eucharis, 1818 Benedicte Gilman, Editor (detail). Oil on canvas, 87.2 x 103 cm (34% x 40/2 in.). Elizabeth Burke Kahn, Production Coordinator Los Angeles, The J. Paul Getty Museum (87.PA.27). Jeffrey Cohen, Designer Lou Meluso, Photographer Frontispiece: (Getty objects, 87.PA.27, 86.PA.740) Jacques-Louis David. Self-Portrait, 1794. Oil on canvas, 81 x 64 cm (31/8 x 25/4 in.). Paris, © 1997 The J. Paul Getty Museum Musee du Louvre (3705). © Photo R.M.N. 17985 Pacific Coast Highway Malibu, California 90265-5799 All works of art are reproduced (and photographs Mailing address: provided) courtesy of the owners, unless otherwise P.O. Box 2112 indicated. Santa Monica, California 90407-2112 Typography by G&S Typesetters, Inc., Library of Congress Austin, Texas Cataloging-in-Publication Data Printed by C & C Offset Printing Co., Ltd., Hong Kong Johnson, Dorothy. Jacques-Louis David, the Farewell of Telemachus and Eucharis / Dorothy Johnson, p. cm.—(Getty Museum studies on art) Includes bibliographical references (p. — ). ISBN 0-89236-236-7 i. David, Jacques Louis, 1748 — 1825. Farewell of Telemachus and Eucharis. 2. David, Jacques Louis, 1748-1825 Criticism and interpretation. 3. Telemachus (Greek mythology)—Art. 4. Eucharis (Greek mythology)—Art. I. Title.
    [Show full text]
  • Caroline Murat: Powerful Patron of Napoleonic France and Italy
    Brigham Young University BYU ScholarsArchive Theses and Dissertations 2014-07-10 Caroline Murat: Powerful Patron of Napoleonic France and Italy Brittany Dahlin Brigham Young University - Provo Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd Part of the Art Practice Commons BYU ScholarsArchive Citation Dahlin, Brittany, "Caroline Murat: Powerful Patron of Napoleonic France and Italy" (2014). Theses and Dissertations. 4224. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd/4224 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Caroline Murat: Powerful Patron of Napoleonic France and Italy Brittany Dahlin A thesis submitted to the faculty of Brigham Young University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Heather Belnap Jensen, Chair James Swensen Mark Magleby Department of Visual Arts Brigham Young University June 2014 Copyright © 2014 Brittany Dahlin All Rights Reserved ABSTRACT Caroline Murat: Powerful Patron of Napoleonic France and Italy Brittany Dahlin Department of Visual Arts, BYU Master of Arts Caroline Bonaparte Murat created an identity for herself through the art that she collected during the time of her reign as queen of Naples as directed by her brother, Napoleon, from 1808- 1814. Through the art that she both commissioned and purchased, she developed an identity as powerful politically, nurturing, educated, fashionable, and Italianate. Through this patronage, Caroline became influential on stylish, female patronage in both Italy and France. Caroline purchased and commissioned works from artists such as Jean-August-Domonique Ingres, François Gérard, Elizabeth Vigée LeBrun, Antonio Canova and other lesser-known artists of the nineteenth century.
    [Show full text]
  • All at Sea: Romanticism in Géricault's Raft of the Medusa
    All at Sea: Romanticism in Géricault's Raft of the Medusa Galven Keng Yue Lee All at sea. We – receptacles, tentacles Of ingestion and Assemblage. A mass of ever-dying, ever-living Vapid waves. All at sea. ~ Galven Keng Yue Lee Plate 1: Théodore Géricault, Raft of the Medusa, 1819, oil on canvas, 491 x 716 cm. Source: Musée du Louvre, Paris. Fair use is claimed for not-for-profit educational & scholarship purposes. Abstract Théodore Géricault’s painting, Raft of the Medusa, has long been regarded as a quintessentially Romantic painting. Yet it was unprecedented when it was exhibited at the 1819 Salon by its raw and direct appeal to the viewer’s 1 The ANU Undergraduate Research Journal emotions, and represented an early stage in French Romantic painting. In this paper, I argue that the painting was an original, logical outcome of the social and political turbulence that plagued French society in the early nineteenth century and which also impinged itself on the personal circumstances of Géricault’s life. It is through this general malaise and sense of crisis that the painting can not only be seen as an authentic product of its time, but also one that reflected the distinctly personal nature of the Romantic painting, through the intense personal involvement and identification of Géricault with its creation and subsequent legacy. Romanticism in Géricault’s Raft of the Medusa Théodore Géricault’s Raft of the Medusa is a stunning piece that strikes the viewer with its intense, emotional representations of hope and hopelessness. The pointless suffering of the denizens of the raft eradicate any pretensions to heroic achievement or tragic sacrifice; only the surging waves of the ocean respond without sympathy to their cries for salvation from a suffering which has only brought them to the pits of unheroic despair—drawing us within the vacant expression of the older man in the left foreground clutching onto the limp body of a younger male, possibly his son.
    [Show full text]
  • The Raft of the Medusa the Story of a Painting, the Painting of a Story
    The Raft of the Medusa The story of a painting, the painting of a story Scheme of Work Suitable for KS4 pupils Written and Designed by David Herbert Drama and Education Consultant [email protected] [Image of The Raft of the Medusa available at <www.louvre.fr/en/oeuvre-notices/raft-medusa>] [For copyright reasons some visual images included in the original Resource Pack have been omitted here.] Contents Introduction..................................................................................p.3 Aims of the Scheme.....................................................................p.4 Tasks............................................................................................p.4 • The word “trapped” • Outline of story • Stages of Degeneration • Props • Lyrics to the song • News report Evaluation....................................................................................p.8 The Written Portfolio....................................................................p.9 Sources......................................................................................p.10 • The Raft of the Medusa story • Stages of Degeneration Portfolio Worksheets..................................................................p.13 • Drama Coursework – Stages of Degeneration • Storyboarding • Trapped evaluation Skills to allow students to explore in more depth.......................p.17 Reading List...............................................................................p.18 2 Introduction This scheme of work has been written and designed
    [Show full text]
  • S&S Icono-Diagnosis: a Challenge Between Medicine And
    S&S Senses Sci 2019: 6 (2) 747-752 doi: 10.14616/sands- 2019-6-747752 Article Icono-diagnosis: a challenge between medicine and art Vito Franco Former Professor of Pathology - Università degli Studi di Palermo Correspondence: Prof. Vito Franco - Email: [email protected] Received: 23 May 2019; Accepted: 27 May 2019; Published: 30 June 2019 Abstract. The representation of human body in paintings and sculptures can be analysed with a medical look in order to find out any kind of diagnosable disease. This activity has been designed as icono-diagnosis. Many types of genetic and acquired medical conditions have been diagnosed in fine art works by several authors and recorded in the medical literature. The present report illustrates some examples and, tentatively, classifies main pathologic conditions in art representations. Keywords: Icono-diagnosis, fine arts, paintings, sculptures, diseases. Introduction and context Icono-diagnosis represents the retrospective image-based diagnosis of pathologies on figurative arts. The term was coined in 1983 by A. Pontius, a clinical professor of psychiatry at Harvard Medical School, who studied the Cook islands’ prehistoric art, searching for the diagnosis of Crouzon’s malformation (craniofacial dysostosis type I which is characterized by craniosynostosis, hypertelorism, exophthalmia, external strabismus, “parrot-beaked nose”, short upper lip, hypoplastic maxilla and a relative mandibular prognathism determining a mid-facial hypoplasia aspect (1). However, earlier medical literature reported several example of this practise in paintings and sculptures (2) with the translation from the images to a certain pathologic condition, just as two different languages. www.sensesandsciences.com Franco Sci 2019; 2: 747-752 A medical diagnosis in the artistic field can be provided only via a thorough direct visual evaluation and assessment of the canvas or the sculpture (3).
    [Show full text]
  • GRADUATE PROGRAM in the HISTORY of ART Williams College/Clark Art Institute
    GRADUATE PROGRAM IN THE HISTORY OF ART Williams College/Clark Art Institute Summer 2003 NEWSLETTER The Class of 2003 at its Hooding Ceremony. Front row, from left to right: Pan Wendt, Elizabeth Winborne, Jane Simon, Esther Bell, Jordan Kim, Christa Carroll, Katie Hanson; back row: Mark Haxthausen, Ben Tilghman, Patricia Hickson, Don Meyer, Ellery Foutch, Kim Conary, Catherine Malone, Marc Simpson LETTER FROM THE DIRECTOR CHARLES w.: (MARK) HAxTHAUSEN Faison-Pierson-Stoddard Professor of Art History, Director of the Graduate Program With the 2002-2003 academic year the Graduate Program began its fourth decade of operation. Its success during its first thirty years outstripped the modest mission that shaped the early planning for the program: to train for regional colleges art historians who were drawn to teaching careers yet not inclined to scholarship and hence having no need to acquire the Ph.D. (It was a different world then!) Initially, those who conceived of the program - members of the Clark's board of trustees and Williams College President Jack Sawyer - seem never to have imagined that it would attain the preeminence that it quickly achieved under the stewardship of its first directors, George Heard Hamilton, Frank Robinson, and Sam Edgerton. Today the Williams/Clark program enjoys an excellent reputation for preparing students for museum careers, yet this was never its declared mission; unlike some institutions, we have never offered a degree or even a specialization in "museum studies" or "museology." Since the time of George Hamilton, the program has endeavored simply to train art historians, and in doing so it has assumed that intimacy with objects is a sine qua non for the practice of art history.
    [Show full text]
  • A.P. Art History Simplified Timeline Through 1900 Note: These Are Approximate Dates
    Marsha K. Russell 1 St. Andrew's Episcopal School, Austin, TX A.P. Art History Simplified Timeline through 1900 Note: These are approximate dates. Remember periods and styles overlap. Prehistory Paleolithic: up to about 10,000 BCE • Venus/Goddess of Willendorf • Lascaux Cave Paintings • Altamira Cave Paintings Neolithic in England: about 2,000 BCE • Stonehenge Mesopotamia/Near East (ignore time lapses) Sumerian: ~3500 - 2300 BCE • Standard of Ur • Ram offering stand • Bull-headed lyre • Bull holding a Vase • Ziggurats Akkadian: ~2300 - 2200 BCE • Victory Stele of Naram-Sin Neo Sumerian: ~2200 - 2000 BCE • Gudea statues Babylonian: ~1900 - 1600 BCE • Stele of Hammurabi Assyrian: ~900 - 600 BCE • Lamassu (Winged Human-Headed Bull) • Lion Hunt Bas Reliefs Egypt Predynastic: 3500 - 3000 BCE • Palette of Narmer Old Kingdom: ~3000 - 2200 BCE • Khafre • Menkaure and Khamerernebty • Seated Scribe • Ti Watching a Hippo Hunt • Prince Rahotep and his wife Nofret • Pyramid of King Djoser by Imhotep Middle Kingdom: ~2100 - 1600 BCE • Rock-cut tomb New Kingdom: ~1500 - 40 BCE (includes the Amarna Period 1355 – 1325 BCE) • Funerary Temple of Hatshepsut • Temple of Ramses II • Temple of Amen-Re at Karnak • Akhenaton • Akhenaton and His Family Marsha K. Russell 2 St. Andrew's Episcopal School, Austin, TX Aegean & Greece Minoan: ~2000 - 1500 BCE • Snake Goddess • Palace at Knossos • Dolphin Fresco • Toreador Fresco • Octopus Vase Mycenean: ~1500 - 1100 BCE • "Treasury of Atreus" with its corbelled vault • Repoussé masks • Lion Gate at Mycenae • Inlaid dagger
    [Show full text]
  • Art Appreciation Name ______Final Presentation Project-SEE and CONNECT-200 Points
    Art Appreciation Name _____________________________________ Final Presentation Project-SEE AND CONNECT-200 Points Share your observations and what you SEE and CONNECT about art. This addresses the Communi- cation, Critical Thinking, Teamwork, and Social Responsibility requirements of a CORE course. There will be no formal final exam. (if that’s okay? ;^>) Don’t forget: Kindness, Curiosity, and Connection. • Each will be assigned to a Team determined by Ms. Millis. • Ms. Millis will set up a discussion forum for each Team. • Each will select ONE work from the following lists, Chapters 18-21. (Ms. Millis will present Ch. 17. • Each selection will be accompanied by one to two connections from the text OR Houston. • Each Team will create a short PPT of the works for that Chapter AND present the information to the class. Beginning next week. The presentation will be uploaded to Eagle Online. • Each Team will prepare a FIVE QUESTION QUIZ to be given at the end of the class that day. • Each Team will cite their sources at the end of their PPT and Ms. Millis will create a template AND an example of what the PPT should include. April 15-Chapter 17: The Ancient World-Ms. Millis April 22-Chapter 18: The Age of Faith April 29-Chapter 19: Renaissance through Baroque May 6-Chapter 20: 18th and 19th Centuries May 13-Chapter 21: 1900 to the Present See & Connect Clearly deficient Below average Average work; Above Exceptionally fine work; Total Grading Rubric- presentation, style work; noticeably good, average work; superior presentation, & content with weak with unexceptional superior in one vis.
    [Show full text]
  • Un Cuadro, Una Silla Uncuadrounasilla.Wordpress.Com
    Un cuadro, una silla uncuadrounasilla.wordpress.com By Rubén Cervantes Garrido Crevices of modernity 13 March 2016 I arrived at the Ingres exhibition at the Prado with my eyes wide open, willing to arrive at an idea of the artist I could fully call my own; an idea which would fix his position in my particular history of art, that history which is every aficionado’s own, made according to personal taste and experience; a history that, however similar to the one in books, is never entirely like it. I looked at things I liked and things I didn’t, what seduced me and what left me indifferent, and I reached the conclusion that Ingres is one of the strangest artists there are. Having previously discarded the easy accusations of academic and cold painter, I searched for an Ingres who some of my professors at university had argued was one of Picasso’s greatest references. It’s easy to imagine Ingres as the Academy’s pet, the incarnation of a dying style among the Gériaults, Delacroix and Courbets. He received accusations of being old-fashioned as early as 1806 (he was twenty-six) when the critics defined his monumental Napoleon I On His Imperial Throne as “Gothic”. There is an Egyptian-like severity in this Napoleon, though its obsessive eye for detail reminds one, as Robert Rosenblum so accurately observed, to the Van Eycks’ God the Father in the Ghent Altarpiece. Before such a painting, with its impressive height and width, taste is a minor matter. I don’t know why there is a railing protecting it at the Prado, but it makes it look like the entrance to a private chapel in a church, enhancing its authority.
    [Show full text]