CoC-PHA Crosswalk

The purpose of the CoC-PHA Crosswalk is to assist Continuums of Care (CoCs) with providing information for question 1C-4 of the FY 2015 CoC Application, which asks about Public Housing Agencies’ (PHAs) progress on serving homeless households for the five largest PHAs that are located within a CoC’s geography during the period of October 1, 2014 to March 31, 2015. The following report identifies the PHAs located within each CoC’s geography, as well as the following elements:  HCV units—the total number of vouchers for which the PHA is authorized to provide  PH units—the total number of Public Housing units the PHA operates  ACC units—the combined total number of units the PHA can provide, either through vouchers or hard units (ACC = HCV + PH). The report highlights in gray the five largest PHAs that are located within the CoC’s geography. HUD recognizes that the CoC may have relationships with other PHAs within its geography, so for the purposes of question 1C-4, CoCs are to report on the five largest PHAs or five PHAs with whom they have relationships. If there are fewer than five PHAs within a CoC’s geography, the CoC should report on all PHAs listed in the report. Note other unique circumstances that may apply to a CoC:  Merged or Divided CoCs: If one or more CoCs merged into a single CoC, or if one CoC divided into multiple CoCs as of FY 2015 Registration, those current changes are reflected in this report. Although the report is a snapshot of FY 2014, CoCs’ current status must be consistent with the CoCs submitting FY2015 applications.

Questions: If you have any questions about the Crosswalk Report, please submit a question to the Ask A Question (AAQ) Portal on the HUDExchange website: https://www.hudexchange.info/get- assistance/my-question/.

CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Alabama

AL-500 Birmingham/Jefferson, St. Clair, Shelby Counties CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of the Birmingham District AL001 5223 60.51% 3409 39.49% 8632 Jefferson County Housing Authority AL086 1678 90.02% 186 9.98% 1864 Fairfield Housing Authority AL010 466 62.22% 283 37.78% 749 HA BESSEMER AL125 543 92.98% 41 7.02% 584 Housing Authority of the Town of Calera AL085 0 0.00% 574 100.00% 574 HA COLUMBIANA AL072 79 16.74% 393 83.26% 472 Tarrant Housing Authority AL013 87 19.91% 350 80.09% 437 HA LEEDS AL069 182 55.15% 148 44.85% 330 Ragland Housing Authority AL108 0 0.00% 180 100.00% 180 Pell City Housing Authority AL106 0 0.00% 125 100.00% 125 Vincent Housing Authority AL089 0 0.00% 62 100.00% 62 Housing Authority of the Town of Montevallo AL079 0 0.00% 58 100.00% 58

AL-501 Mobile City & County/Baldwin County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units MOBILE HOUSING BOARD AL002 4167 84.78% 748 15.22% 4915 The Housing Authority of the City of Prichard AL169 2598 96.33% 99 3.67% 2697 MOBILE COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY AL202 95 8.50% 1022 91.50% 1117 HA FOLEY AL165 279 49.21% 288 50.79% 567 Housing Authority of the City of Chickasaw AL166 0 0.00% 90 100.00% 90 HA BAY MINETTE AL164 0 0.00% 88 100.00% 88

Page 1 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Alabama

AL-502 Florence/Northwest Alabama CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units HACKLEBURG HOUSING AUTHORITY AL076 0 0.00% 901 100.00% 901 FLORENCE H/A AL054 691 92.01% 60 7.99% 751 Housing Authority of Hamilton, Alabama AL053 72 9.77% 665 90.23% 737 HA RUSSELLVILLE AL060 90 12.31% 641 87.69% 731 Haleyville Housing Authority AL056 0 0.00% 626 100.00% 626 Sheffield Housing Authority AL068 338 68.15% 158 31.85% 496 Housing Authority of Boston AL074 0 0.00% 451 100.00% 451 Housing Authority of Red Bay AL051 0 0.00% 320 100.00% 320 Winfield Housing Authority AL058 0 0.00% 240 100.00% 240 Housing Authority of the City of Tuscumbia AL059 0 0.00% 209 100.00% 209 Housing Authority of Guin, Alabama AL071 0 0.00% 161 100.00% 161 PHIL CAMPBELL HOUSING AUTHORITY AL090 53 33.54% 105 66.46% 158 Bear Creek Housing Authority AL081 0 0.00% 30 100.00% 30 Housing Authority of the City of Moulton, AL AL080 0 0.00% 24 100.00% 24

AL-503 Huntsville/North Alabama CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units The Housing Authority of the City of Huntsville AL047 1597 72.62% 602 27.38% 2199 Housing Authority of the City of Decatur AL048 1050 51.88% 974 48.12% 2024 Housing Authority of the City of Athens, Al AL067 0 0.00% 396 100.00% 396 Regional HA of Lawrence, Cullman & Morgan Counties AL187 0 0.00% 300 100.00% 300

Page 2 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Alabama

AL-503 Huntsville/North Alabama CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of the City of Hartselle AL087 0 0.00% 141 100.00% 141 Triana Housing Authority AL182 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

AL-504 Montgomery City & County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of the City of Montgomery AL006 2878 81.12% 670 18.88% 3548 City of Union Springs Housing Authority AL070 0 0.00% 183 100.00% 183 HA TALLASSEE AL172 68 40.48% 100 59.52% 168 Housing Authority of the City of Prattville, AL AL131 40 50.00% 40 50.00% 80 Housing Authority of the Town of Fort Deposit AL193 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

AL-505 Gadsden/Northeast Alabama CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units ANNISTON HA AL004 258 21.81% 925 78.19% 1183 Housing Authority of the City of Fort Payne AL011 111 25.64% 322 74.36% 433 Greater Gadsden AL049 112 26.92% 304 73.08% 416 HA JACKSONVILLE AL139 214 57.22% 160 42.78% 374 Rainsville Housing Authority AL168 0 0.00% 353 100.00% 353 Housing Authority of the City of Attalla AL009 0 0.00% 298 100.00% 298 Collinsville Housing Authority AL083 0 0.00% 145 100.00% 145

Page 3 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Alabama

AL-505 Gadsden/Northeast Alabama CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of the Town of Hobson City AL133 0 0.00% 88 100.00% 88 CROSSVILLE HOUSING AUHTORITY AL082 0 0.00% 60 100.00% 60 HA PIEDMONT AL110 0 0.00% 42 100.00% 42 Altoona Housing Authority AL102 0 0.00% 34 100.00% 34 Housing Authority of the City of Centre, Al AL140 0 0.00% 14 100.00% 14

AL-506 Tuscaloosa City & County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units HA TUSCALOOSA AL077 1882 96.91% 60 3.09% 1942 HA NORTHPORT AL152 419 95.88% 18 4.12% 437

AL-507 Alabama Balance of State CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units The Guntersville Housing Authority AL014 174 9.17% 1723 90.83% 1897 Housing Authority of the City of Dothan AL007 751 56.38% 581 43.62% 1332 Selma Housing Authority AL008 1092 91.00% 108 9.00% 1200 HA MIDLAND CITY AL124 50 4.46% 1072 95.54% 1122 South Central Alabama Regional HA AL192 897 94.72% 50 5.28% 947 HA OPELIKA AL061 515 58.59% 364 41.41% 879 HA CULLMAN AL052 183 27.44% 484 72.56% 667

Page 4 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Alabama

AL-507 Alabama Balance of State CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Albertville Housing Authority AL121 397 67.63% 190 32.37% 587 EUFAULA HOUSING AUTHORITY AL118 432 77.84% 123 22.16% 555 HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF OZARK AL073 434 82.67% 91 17.33% 525 HA MONROEVILLE AL173 46 8.80% 477 91.20% 523 Cottonwood Housing Authority AL104 0 0.00% 499 100.00% 499 HA TROY AL177 423 85.11% 74 14.89% 497 HA AUBURN AL050 280 63.06% 164 36.94% 444 BOAZ HOUSING AUTHORITY AL075 368 85.58% 62 14.42% 430 Sumiton Housing Authority AL176 0 0.00% 422 100.00% 422 Housing Authority of the City of Lafayette AL159 0 0.00% 401 100.00% 401 Housing Authority of the City of Jasper AL012 293 75.13% 97 24.87% 390 Washington County Housing Authority AL117 0 0.00% 377 100.00% 377 Housing Authority of the City of Alexander City AL174 265 70.67% 110 29.33% 375 Housing Authority of the City of Brent AL151 0 0.00% 374 100.00% 374 GORDO HOUSING AUTHORITY AL138 146 45.48% 175 54.52% 321 Housing Authority of the City of Aliceville AL098 0 0.00% 316 100.00% 316 WALKER COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY AL129 196 64.90% 106 35.10% 302 HA ATMORE AL154 100 33.33% 200 66.67% 300 HA OPP AL112 100 34.36% 191 65.64% 291 ENTERPRISE HOUSING AUTHORITY AL115 190 67.86% 90 32.14% 280 HA CORDOVA AL055 0 0.00% 275 100.00% 275 Housing Authority of the City of GREENVILLE AL155 181 69.35% 80 30.65% 261

Page 5 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Alabama

AL-507 Alabama Balance of State CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of Reform AL066 0 0.00% 240 100.00% 240 TUSKEGEE HOUSING AUTHORITY AL160 158 73.49% 57 26.51% 215 HA ANDALUSIA AL127 0 0.00% 213 100.00% 213 Housing Authority of the City of Demopolis, AL AL109 0 0.00% 211 100.00% 211 LINEVILLE HOUSING AUTHORITY AL114 55 26.83% 150 73.17% 205 Top of Alabama Regional Housing Authority AL189 0 0.00% 192 100.00% 192 HA SCOTTSBORO AL099 175 91.15% 17 8.85% 192 EVERGREEN HOUSING AUTHORITY AL181 160 86.96% 24 13.04% 184 HA ELBA AL107 119 66.48% 60 33.52% 179 Housing Authority of the Town of New Brockton AL149 0 0.00% 178 100.00% 178 Housing Authority of the City of Heflin AL096 0 0.00% 173 100.00% 173 Housing Authority of the City of Lanett, AL AL062 0 0.00% 170 100.00% 170 Housing Authority of the City of Florala AL111 0 0.00% 170 100.00% 170 Housing Authority of the City of Linden AL120 0 0.00% 164 100.00% 164 H A ONEONTA AL063 50 31.25% 110 68.75% 160 Housing Authority of the Town of Ashland AL136 0 0.00% 151 100.00% 151 UNIONTOWN HOUSING AUTHORITY AL171 50 33.33% 100 66.67% 150 Sylacauga Housing Authority AL057 0 0.00% 147 100.00% 147 YORK HOUSING AUTHORITY AL116 100 76.92% 30 23.08% 130 Housing Authority of the City of Vernon, AL AL084 0 0.00% 126 100.00% 126 HA ARAB AL091 69 57.50% 51 42.50% 120 Brundidge Housing Authority AL126 0 0.00% 120 100.00% 120

Page 6 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Alabama

AL-507 Alabama Balance of State CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of the City of Talladega, AL AL105 30 27.78% 78 72.22% 108 Housing Authority of the Town of Clayton AL158 0 0.00% 102 100.00% 102 HA ASHFORD AL144 0 0.00% 100 100.00% 100 Housing Authority of the Town of Hanceville AL093 0 0.00% 100 100.00% 100 STEVENSON HOUSING AUTHORITY AL167 0 0.00% 98 100.00% 98 Abbeville Housing Authority AL101 0 0.00% 97 100.00% 97 HA SAMSON AL128 0 0.00% 91 100.00% 91 Housing Authority of the City of Fayette AL137 0 0.00% 80 100.00% 80 Housing Authority of the Town of Slocomb AL143 0 0.00% 76 100.00% 76 Housing Authority of the Town of Berry AL078 0 0.00% 72 100.00% 72 Housing Authority of the City of Clanton AL150 0 0.00% 70 100.00% 70 Housing Authority of the City of Dadeville AL178 0 0.00% 70 100.00% 70 Housing Authority of the Town of Parrish AL153 0 0.00% 68 100.00% 68 Housing Authority of the City of Brewton AL156 0 0.00% 66 100.00% 66 Housing Authority of the City of Eutaw AL146 0 0.00% 63 100.00% 63 Housing Authority of the City of Roanoke, AL AL065 0 0.00% 60 100.00% 60 Housing Authority of the City of Goodwater AL132 0 0.00% 60 100.00% 60 Housing Authority of the City of Hartford AL103 0 0.00% 53 100.00% 53 Childersburg Housing Authority AL122 0 0.00% 50 100.00% 50 Housing Authority of the City of Sulligent, AL AL119 0 0.00% 50 100.00% 50 Housing Authority of the City of Brantley AL145 0 0.00% 50 100.00% 50 Housing Authority of the City of Carbon Hill AL064 0 0.00% 50 100.00% 50

Page 7 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Alabama

AL-507 Alabama Balance of State CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of the City of Headland, AL AL123 0 0.00% 46 100.00% 46 Housing Authority of the City of Georgiana AL094 0 0.00% 44 100.00% 44 Housing Authority of the City of Livingston AL175 0 0.00% 41 100.00% 41 Housing Authority of the City of Columbia AL100 0 0.00% 40 100.00% 40 Housing Authority of the City of Greensboro AL157 0 0.00% 40 100.00% 40 Housing Authority of the City of Bridgeport AL147 0 0.00% 40 100.00% 40 HA MILLPORT AL095 0 0.00% 34 100.00% 34 Housing Authority of the Town of Kennedy AL141 0 0.00% 33 100.00% 33 Housing Authority of the City of Luverne, AL AL088 0 0.00% 32 100.00% 32 Housing Authority of the City of Newton AL142 0 0.00% 14 100.00% 14 Housing Authority of the City of Daleville AL179 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Housing Authority of Greene County, AL AL190 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Housing Authority of the City of Valley AL199 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Housing Authority of the Town of Blountsville, AL AL134 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Housing Authority of the City of Marion, AL AL161 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Page 8 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Alaska

AK-500 Anchorage CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Alaska Housing Finance Corporation AK001 0 0.00% 5136 100.00% 5136 Alaska Housing Finance Corporation AK901 4652 100.00% 0 0.00% 4652

Page 9 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Arizona

AZ-500 Arizona Balance of State CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Williams Housing Authority AZ041 47 0.76% 6103 99.24% 6150 Yuma City Housing Authority AZ035 1179 100.00% 0 0.00% 1179 Winslow Public Housing Authority AZ008 128 12.43% 902 87.57% 1030 Pinal County Housing Authority AZ010 584 78.60% 159 21.40% 743 Housing Authority of Cochise County AZ034 568 100.00% 0 0.00% 568 Yuma County Housing Department AZ013 401 88.91% 50 11.09% 451 Flagstaff Housing Authority AZ006 371 87.09% 55 12.91% 426 Eloy Housing Authority AZ021 183 44.74% 226 55.26% 409 Nogales Housing Authority AZ023 192 52.75% 172 47.25% 364 Mohave County Housing Authority AZ043 297 100.00% 0 0.00% 297 Douglas Housing Authority AZ037 193 100.00% 0 0.00% 193 Gila County Housing Authority AZ045 53 100.00% 0 0.00% 53

AZ-501 Tucson/Pima County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing and Community Development Tucson AZ004 4625 100.00% 0 0.00% 4625 Pima County Housing Authority AZ033 827 100.00% 0 0.00% 827 South Tucson Housing Authority AZ025 132 30.34% 303 69.66% 435

Page 10 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Arizona

AZ-502 Phoenix, Mesa/Maricopa County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units City of Phoenix Housing Department AZ001 6296 97.60% 155 2.40% 6451 City of Glendale Housing Authority AZ003 1054 41.19% 1505 58.81% 2559 City of Mesa Housing Authority AZ005 1534 85.27% 265 14.73% 1799 Housing Authority of Maricopa County AZ009 1562 90.24% 169 9.76% 1731 Tempe Housing Authority AZ031 1082 100.00% 0 0.00% 1082 Scottsdale Housing Agency AZ032 735 100.00% 0 0.00% 735 Chandler Housing & Redevelopment Division AZ028 486 67.41% 235 32.59% 721 Arizona Department of Housing AZ901 160 100.00% 0 0.00% 160 Peoria Housing Authority AZ038 0 0.00% 30 100.00% 30 Arizona Behavioral Health Corporation AZ880 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Page 11 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Arkansas

AR-500 Little Rock/Central Arkansas CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of the City of Little Rock AR004 2183 88.60% 281 11.40% 2464 North Little Rock Housing Authority AR002 1392 100.00% 0 0.00% 1392 Housing Authority of the City of Benton, AR AR175 703 87.77% 98 12.23% 801 Housing Authority of the City of Brinkley AR059 154 38.69% 244 61.31% 398 Jacksonville Housing Authority AR170 362 90.95% 36 9.05% 398 Housing Authority of the City of McRae AR098 0 0.00% 393 100.00% 393 Pulaski County Housing Agency AR252 315 100.00% 0 0.00% 315 Cabot Public Housing Agency AR219 299 100.00% 0 0.00% 299 Lonoke County Housing Authority AR041 243 81.27% 56 18.73% 299 Searcy Housing Authority AR035 138 57.26% 103 42.74% 241 Housing Authority of the City of McCrory AR118 0 0.00% 187 100.00% 187 Housing Authority of the City of Augusta AR123 0 0.00% 150 100.00% 150 Housing Authority of the City of Judsonia AR090 0 0.00% 122 100.00% 122 Housing Authority of the City of Kensett AR146 0 0.00% 121 100.00% 121 Housing Authority of the City of Des Arc AR040 0 0.00% 121 100.00% 121 Housing Authority of the City of England AR148 0 0.00% 116 100.00% 116 Housing Authority of the City of Cotton Plant AR172 0 0.00% 102 100.00% 102 Clarendon Housing Authority AR052 25 30.12% 58 69.88% 83 DeValls Bluff Housing Authority AR135 54 100.00% 0 0.00% 54 Housing Authority of the City of Beebe AR106 0 0.00% 34 100.00% 34 Housing Authority of the City of Bald Knob AR084 0 0.00% 20 100.00% 20

Page 12 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Arkansas

AR-501 Fayetteville/Northwest Arkansas CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units NW Regional Housing Authority AR010 676 87.11% 100 12.89% 776 Fayetteville Housing Authority AR181 622 100.00% 0 0.00% 622 Harrison Housing Authority AR200 507 100.00% 0 0.00% 507 Siloam Springs Housing Authority AR163 503 100.00% 0 0.00% 503 Springdale Housing Authority AR104 153 79.27% 40 20.73% 193 Housing Authority of the City of Decatur AR095 0 0.00% 92 100.00% 92 Housing Authority of the City of Fayetteville AR097 0 0.00% 16 100.00% 16

AR-503 Arkansas Balance of State CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Memphis Housing Authority TN001 6973 90.27% 752 9.73% 7725 Jonesboro Urban Renewal HA AR131 1342 98.10% 26 1.90% 1368 Housing Authority of the City of Texarkana AR015 646 55.36% 521 44.64% 1167 Hot Springs Housing Authority AR031 658 92.16% 56 7.84% 714 West Memphis Housing Authority AR024 523 76.13% 164 23.87% 687 Mississippi County Public Facilities Board AR213 640 100.00% 0 0.00% 640 St. Francis County Housing Authority AR224 588 100.00% 0 0.00% 588 Arkadelphia Housing Authority AR012 194 33.11% 392 66.89% 586 Paragould Housing Authority AR121 467 95.11% 24 4.89% 491 Little River County Housing Authority AR020 50 12.22% 359 87.78% 409 Phillips County Public Housing Agency AR223 403 100.00% 0 0.00% 403

Page 13 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Arkansas

AR-503 Arkansas Balance of State CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of the County of Poinsett AR023 0 0.00% 376 100.00% 376 Lawrence County Public Housing Agency AR177 375 100.00% 0 0.00% 375 Russellville Housing Authority AR066 166 45.36% 200 54.64% 366 Housing Authority of the City of Paris AR032 0 0.00% 364 100.00% 364 Housing Authority of the City of Conway AR006 301 83.84% 58 16.16% 359 Housing Authority of the City of Gurdon AR049 0 0.00% 298 100.00% 298 Trumann Housing Authority AR034 144 49.32% 148 50.68% 292 Housing Authority of the County of Sevier AR022 0 0.00% 292 100.00% 292 Lee County Housing Authority AR225 291 100.00% 0 0.00% 291 Wynne Housing Authority AR039 232 84.67% 42 15.33% 274 Housing Authority of the City of Marianna AR027 0 0.00% 268 100.00% 268 Hope Housing Authority AR068 180 69.23% 80 30.77% 260 Housing Authority of the City of Morrilton AR026 0 0.00% 246 100.00% 246 CONWAY COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY AR161 236 100.00% 0 0.00% 236 Housing Authority of the County of Howard AR025 0 0.00% 206 100.00% 206 Pope County Public Facilities Board AR211 202 100.00% 0 0.00% 202 Housing Authority of the City of Newport AR028 0 0.00% 198 100.00% 198 Housing Authority of the City of Helena AR050 0 0.00% 173 100.00% 173 Housing Authority of the City of Hickory Ridge AR093 0 0.00% 169 100.00% 169 Blytheville Housing Authority AR005 0 0.00% 154 100.00% 154 Johnson County Public Housing Agency AR215 150 100.00% 0 0.00% 150 Logan County Housing Authority AR033 123 100.00% 0 0.00% 123

Page 14 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Arkansas

AR-503 Arkansas Balance of State CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Pocahontas Public Housing Agency (BRAD) AR247 120 100.00% 0 0.00% 120 Housing Authority of the City of Prescott AR037 78 66.10% 40 33.90% 118 Poinsett County Housing Agency AR232 111 100.00% 0 0.00% 111 Housing Authority of the City of Osceola AR021 0 0.00% 111 100.00% 111 Scott County Public Housing Agency AR240 107 100.00% 0 0.00% 107 Franklin County Public Housing Agency AR241 100 100.00% 0 0.00% 100 Housing Authority of the City of Clarksville AR051 0 0.00% 88 100.00% 88 Yell County Public Facilities Board AR265 87 100.00% 0 0.00% 87 Pike County Housing Authority AR045 62 72.09% 24 27.91% 86 Housing Authority of the City of Luxora AR079 0 0.00% 86 100.00% 86 Housing Authority of the City of Wilson AR054 0 0.00% 84 100.00% 84 Housing Authority of the City of Booneville AR038 0 0.00% 70 100.00% 70 Housing Authority of the City of Marmaduke AR112 0 0.00% 70 100.00% 70 Housing Authority of the City of Pocahontas AR063 0 0.00% 68 100.00% 68 Housing Authority of the City of Monette AR070 0 0.00% 64 100.00% 64 Housing Authority of the City of Batesville AR071 0 0.00% 60 100.00% 60 Housing Authority of the City of Dell AR078 0 0.00% 59 100.00% 59 Earle Housing Authority AR264 57 100.00% 0 0.00% 57 Housing Authority of the City of Coal Hill AR102 0 0.00% 56 100.00% 56 Housing Authority of the City of Earle AR064 0 0.00% 52 100.00% 52 Housing Authority of the City of Ola AR091 0 0.00% 50 100.00% 50 Housing Authority of the City of Rector AR069 0 0.00% 48 100.00% 48

Page 15 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Arkansas

AR-503 Arkansas Balance of State CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of the City of Dardanelle AR055 0 0.00% 40 100.00% 40 Housing Authority of the City of Forrest City AR099 0 0.00% 40 100.00% 40 Housing Authority of the City of West Helena AR060 0 0.00% 40 100.00% 40 Housing Authority of the City of Atkins AR141 0 0.00% 34 100.00% 34 Housing Authority of the City of Malvern AR094 0 0.00% 34 100.00% 34 Housing Authority of the City of Waldron AR044 0 0.00% 28 100.00% 28 Housing Authority of the City of Lake City AR088 0 0.00% 26 100.00% 26 Housing Authority of the City of Newark AR089 0 0.00% 26 100.00% 26 Housing Authority of the City of Leachville AR075 0 0.00% 24 100.00% 24 Housing Authority of the City of Dover AR085 0 0.00% 22 100.00% 22 Housing Authority of the City of Amity AR046 0 0.00% 20 100.00% 20 Housing Authority of the City of Ozark AR101 0 0.00% 20 100.00% 20 Housing Authority of the City of Parkin AR072 0 0.00% 18 100.00% 18 Housing Authority of the City of Caraway AR092 0 0.00% 16 100.00% 16 Housing Authority of the City of Manila AR080 0 0.00% 14 100.00% 14 Housing Authority of the City of Mount Ida AR076 0 0.00% 14 100.00% 14 Housing Authority of the City of Heber Springs AR113 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Housing Authority of the City of Hoxie AR047 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Page 16 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Arkansas

AR-505 Southeast Arkansas CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Drew County Public Facilities Board AR210 267 10.08% 2381 89.92% 2648 Housing Authority of the City of Pine Bluff AR017 804 81.71% 180 18.29% 984 Camden Housing Authority AR016 531 66.13% 272 33.87% 803 Stuttgart Housing Authority AR166 456 82.01% 100 17.99% 556 Lake Village Housing Authority AR152 230 100.00% 0 0.00% 230 Ashley County Housing Authority AR214 220 100.00% 0 0.00% 220 McGehee Public Facilities Board AR257 193 100.00% 0 0.00% 193 Housing Authority of the City of Stephens AR065 0 0.00% 182 100.00% 182 Housing Authority of the City of Carthage AR081 0 0.00% 171 100.00% 171 Star City Housing Authority AR042 55 37.16% 93 62.84% 148 Housing Authority of the City of Magnolia AR018 0 0.00% 148 100.00% 148 Desha Co. Residential Housing Fac Board AR266 148 100.00% 0 0.00% 148 Housing Authority of the Town of Haynesville LA096 0 0.00% 97 100.00% 97 Housing Authority of the City of Dumas AR043 0 0.00% 92 100.00% 92 Warren Housing Authority AR082 67 77.01% 20 22.99% 87 Housing Authority of the City of Rison AR111 0 0.00% 66 100.00% 66 Housing Authority of the City of McGehee AR053 0 0.00% 64 100.00% 64 Housing Authority of the City of Sparkman AR073 0 0.00% 50 100.00% 50 Housing Authority of the City of Crossett AR087 0 0.00% 40 100.00% 40 Housing Authority of the City of Gould AR083 0 0.00% 40 100.00% 40

Page 17 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. California

CA-500 San Jose, Santa Clara City & County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE COUNTY SANTA CLARA CA059 11076 100.00% 0 0.00% 11076 HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF SAN JOSE CA056 6445 100.00% 0 0.00% 6445

CA-501 San Francisco CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of the City & County of SF CA001 8581 74.34% 2962 25.66% 11543

CA-502 Oakland, Berkeley/Alameda County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Oakland Housing Authority CA003 13140 65.34% 6971 34.66% 20111 ALAMEDA COUNTY HSG AUTH CA067 6186 100.00% 0 0.00% 6186 CITY OF ALAMEDA HOUSING AUTHORITY CA062 1845 92.30% 154 7.70% 1999 BERKELEY HOUSING AUTHORITY CA058 1935 99.79% 4 0.21% 1939 HSG AUTH OF THE CITY OF LIVERMORE CA074 723 100.00% 0 0.00% 723 Dublin Housing Authority CA142 0 0.00% 511 100.00% 511 Housing Authority of the City of Pleasanton CA081 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Page 18 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. California

CA-503 Sacramento City & County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units County of Sacramento Housing Authority CA007 12002 93.28% 865 6.72% 12867 City of Sacramento Housing Authority CA005 0 0.00% 555 100.00% 555 CALIFORNIA DEPT OF HSG AND COMM DEV CA913 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 CALIFORNIA DEPT OF HSG AND COMM DEV CA912 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

CA-504 Santa Rosa, Petaluma/Sonoma County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units COUNTY OF SONOMA CA085 2820 100.00% 0 0.00% 2820 CITY OF SANTA ROSA CA088 1769 100.00% 0 0.00% 1769 LAKE COUNTY HOUSING COMMISSION CA144 224 100.00% 0 0.00% 224

CA-505 Richmond/Contra Costa County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of the County Contra Costa CA011 6816 99.56% 30 0.44% 6846 Housing Authority CA010 1750 59.79% 1177 40.21% 2927 CITY OF PITTSBURG HSG AUTH CA060 1108 100.00% 0 0.00% 1108

Page 19 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. California

CA-506 Salinas/Monterey, San Benito Counties CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units COUNTY OF MONTEREY HSG AUTH CA033 4534 88.76% 574 11.24% 5108 Housing Authority of the City of Soledad CA049 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

CA-507 Marin County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units HOUSING AUTHORITY OF COUNTY OF MARIN CA052 2145 88.89% 268 11.11% 2413

CA-508 Watsonville/Santa Cruz City & County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units SANTA CRUZ COUNTY HSG AUTH CA072 4291 100.00% 0 0.00% 4291 CITY OF HOLLISTER CA122 344 100.00% 0 0.00% 344

CA-509 Mendocino County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units MENDOCINO COUNTY CA084 1149 100.00% 0 0.00% 1149

Page 20 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. California

CA-510 Turlock, Modesto/Stanislaus County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units COUNTY OF STANISLAUS HOUSING AUTH CA026 4691 90.91% 469 9.09% 5160 Housing Authority of the City of Riverbank CA017 0 0.00% 1223 100.00% 1223

CA-511 Stockton/San Joaquin County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units COUNTY OF SAN JOAQUIN HOUSING AUTH. CA024 4981 96.18% 198 3.82% 5179

CA-512 Daly City/San Mateo County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of the County of San Mateo CA014 4322 98.18% 80 1.82% 4402 City of South San Francisco Housing Authority CA015 0 0.00% 90 100.00% 90

CA-513 Visalia/Kings, Tulare Counties CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Tulare County Housing Authority CA030 2876 78.84% 772 21.16% 3648 KINGS COUNTY HOUSING AUTH CA053 688 100.00% 0 0.00% 688

Page 21 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. California

CA-514 Fresno City & County/Madera County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority City of Fresno CA006 7084 87.25% 1035 12.75% 8119 Housing Authority of Fresno County CA028 5652 88.84% 710 11.16% 6362 THE HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF MADERA CA069 791 89.18% 96 10.82% 887 MARIPOSA COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY CA127 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

CA-515 Roseville, Rocklin/Placer, Nevada Counties CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units CITY OF ROSEVILLE CA128 647 100.00% 0 0.00% 647 PLACER COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY CA149 325 100.00% 0 0.00% 325

CA-516 Redding/Shasta, Siskiyou, Lassen, Plumas, Del Norte, Modoc, Sierra Counties CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF REDDING CA106 1568 100.00% 0 0.00% 1568 COUNTY OF SHASTA HSG AUTH CA096 952 100.00% 0 0.00% 952 COUNTY OF TEHAMA CA154 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

CA-517 Napa City & County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF NAPA CA073 1345 91.50% 125 8.50% 1470

Page 22 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. California

CA-518 Vallejo/Solano County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF VALLEJO CA055 2305 100.00% 0 0.00% 2305 CITY OF VACAVILLE CA125 1193 100.00% 0 0.00% 1193 City of Fairfield CA065 882 100.00% 0 0.00% 882 CITY OF BENICIA HSG AUTH CA041 372 51.88% 345 48.12% 717 SUISUN CITY HOUSING AUTHORITY CA066 318 81.54% 72 18.46% 390 COUNTY OF SOLANO HSG AUTH CA131 251 100.00% 0 0.00% 251

CA-519 Chico, Paradise/Butte County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units COUNTY OF BUTTE HSG AUTH CA043 2140 83.24% 431 16.76% 2571 COUNTY OF PLUMAS HOUSING AUTHORITY CA070 632 100.00% 0 0.00% 632

CA-520 Merced City & County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units COUNTY OF MERCED HOUSING AUTHORITY CA023 2750 72.12% 1063 27.88% 3813

CA-521 Davis, Woodland/Yolo County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of the County of Yolo CA044 1737 98.58% 25 1.42% 1762

Page 23 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. California

CA-522 Humboldt County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units COUNTY OF HUMBOLDT HSG AUTH CA086 1292 78.49% 354 21.51% 1646 CITY OF EUREKA HSG AUTH CA025 0 0.00% 647 100.00% 647

CA-524 Yuba City/Sutter County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Regional Hsg Authority of Sutter & Nevada Co. CA048 1170 100.00% 0 0.00% 1170 YUBA COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY CA107 449 100.00% 0 0.00% 449

CA-525 El Dorado County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units COMM SERVICE DEPT EL DORADO COUNTY CA151 374 100.00% 0 0.00% 374

CA-600 Los Angeles City & County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of the City of Los Angeles CA004 48818 96.53% 1753 3.47% 50571 Housing Authority of the County of Los Angeles CA002 23442 93.59% 1605 6.41% 25047 Housing Authority of the City of Santa Monica CA111 1092 100.00% 0 0.00% 1092 City of Compton Housing Authority CA071 803 77.43% 234 22.57% 1037 Housing Authority of the City of Burbank CA105 1014 100.00% 0 0.00% 1014

Page 24 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. California

CA-600 Los Angeles City & County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of the City of Inglewood CA082 1002 100.00% 0 0.00% 1002 Housing Authority of the City of Baldwin Park CA120 899 92.02% 78 7.98% 977 Housing Authority of the City of Pomona CA123 899 100.00% 0 0.00% 899 Hawthorne Housing CA126 711 100.00% 0 0.00% 711 Housing Authority of the City of Norwalk CA118 705 100.00% 0 0.00% 705 Housing Authority of the City of Torrance CA121 690 100.00% 0 0.00% 690 Housing Authority of the City of South Gate CA119 654 100.00% 0 0.00% 654 Housing Authority of the City of Redondo Beach CA103 593 100.00% 0 0.00% 593 Pico Rivera Housing Assistance Agency CA117 517 100.00% 0 0.00% 517 Culver City Housing Authority CA110 384 100.00% 0 0.00% 384 Housing Authority of the City of Hawaiian Gardens CA136 132 100.00% 0 0.00% 132 Housing Authority of the City of Lomita CA139 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

CA-601 San Diego City and County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units San Diego Housing Commission CA063 14882 98.86% 172 1.14% 15054 Housing Authority of the County of San Diego CA108 11370 100.00% 0 0.00% 11370 City of Oceanside Community Development Comm CA132 1373 100.00% 0 0.00% 1373 CDC of National City CA116 1123 98.94% 12 1.06% 1135 Carlsbad Housing & Neighborhood Services CA077 703 100.00% 0 0.00% 703 Housing Authority of the City of Encinitas CA155 136 100.00% 0 0.00% 136

Page 25 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. California

CA-602 Santa Ana, Anaheim/Orange County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Orange County Housing Authority CA094 10520 98.86% 121 1.14% 10641 City of Anaheim Housing Authority CA104 6261 100.00% 0 0.00% 6261 Housing Authority of the City of Santa Ana CA093 2699 100.00% 0 0.00% 2699 Housing Authority of the City of Garden Grove CA102 2337 100.00% 0 0.00% 2337

CA-603 Santa Maria/Santa Barbara County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of the County of Santa Barbara CA021 3679 98.61% 52 1.39% 3731 Housing Authority of the City of Santa Barbara CA076 2266 100.00% 0 0.00% 2266

CA-604 Bakersfield/Kern County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of the County of Kern CA008 3668 97.40% 98 2.60% 3766 City of Wasco Housing Authority CA046 0 0.00% 179 100.00% 179

CA-606 Long Beach CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units City of Long Beach Housing Authority CA068 6746 96.51% 244 3.49% 6990

Page 26 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. California

CA-607 Pasadena CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of the City of Pasadena CA079 1442 96.65% 50 3.35% 1492

CA-608 Riverside City & County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of the County of Riverside CA027 8961 92.20% 758 7.80% 9719

CA-609 San Bernardino City & County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of the County of San Bernardino CA019 8974 95.45% 428 4.55% 9402 Housing Authority of the City of Upland CA009 624 46.60% 715 53.40% 1339 Housing Authority of the City of Needles CA022 20 4.60% 415 95.40% 435

CA-611 Oxnard, San Buenaventura/Ventura County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of the County of Ventura CA092 2532 100.00% 0 0.00% 2532 Housing Authority of the City of Oxnard CA031 1798 95.23% 90 4.77% 1888 Housing Authority of the City of San Buenaventura CA035 1501 85.04% 264 14.96% 1765 Housing Authority of the City of Santa Paula CA075 577 64.90% 312 35.10% 889 Housing Authority of the City of Port Hueneme CA032 279 36.47% 486 63.53% 765

Page 27 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. California

CA-612 Glendale CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of the City of Glendale CA114 1592 100.00% 0 0.00% 1592

CA-613 Imperial County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Imperial Valley Housing Authority CA143 1677 29.60% 3988 70.40% 5665 Housing Authority of the City of Calexico CA039 244 76.49% 75 23.51% 319

CA-614 San Luis Obispo County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of the City of San Luis Obispo CA064 2112 100.00% 0 0.00% 2112 Housing Authority of the City of Paso Robles CA050 0 0.00% 496 100.00% 496

Page 28 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Colorado

CO-500 Colorado Balance of State CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of the County of Montezuma CO079 262 9.08% 2622 90.92% 2884 Housing Authority of the City of Pueblo CO002 1530 92.22% 129 7.78% 1659 Grand Junction Housing Authority CO051 1075 93.80% 71 6.20% 1146 Fort Collins Housing Authority CO041 1059 97.25% 30 2.75% 1089 Housing Authority for the Town of Cheyenne Wells CO026 0 0.00% 707 100.00% 707 Loveland Housing Authority CO034 565 86.79% 86 13.21% 651 Housing Authority of the City of Greeley CO035 446 75.72% 143 24.28% 589 Garfield County Housing Authority CO095 434 100.00% 0 0.00% 434 Housing Authority of Weld County CO090 427 100.00% 0 0.00% 427 Delta Housing Authority CO040 226 59.47% 154 40.53% 380 Housing Authority of the Town of Aguilar CO015 0 0.00% 337 100.00% 337 Housing Authority of the City of Walsenburg CO003 0 0.00% 199 100.00% 199 Housing Authority of the City of Alamosa CO004 0 0.00% 198 100.00% 198 Montrose County Housing Authority CO087 192 100.00% 0 0.00% 192 Las Animas Housing Authority CO024 124 100.00% 0 0.00% 124 Housing Authority of the City of Lamar CO006 107 86.99% 16 13.01% 123 Trinidad Housing Authority CO005 83 73.45% 30 26.55% 113 Holyoke Housing Authority CO023 0 0.00% 110 100.00% 110 Housing Authority of the City of Brush CO044 0 0.00% 110 100.00% 110 La Junta Housing Authority CO031 102 100.00% 0 0.00% 102 Housing Authority of the Town of Yuma CO009 0 0.00% 86 100.00% 86 Burlington Housing Authority CO030 0 0.00% 86 100.00% 86

Page 29 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Colorado

CO-500 Colorado Balance of State CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Conejos County Housing Authority CO038 0 0.00% 75 100.00% 75 Center Housing Authority CO043 25 45.45% 30 54.55% 55 Housing Authority of the Town of Keenesburg CO020 0 0.00% 52 100.00% 52 Housing Authority of Antonito CO008 0 0.00% 50 100.00% 50 Rocky Ford Housing Authority CO045 50 100.00% 0 0.00% 50 Housing Authority of the Town of Limon CO012 0 0.00% 50 100.00% 50 Otero County Housing Authority CO101 46 100.00% 0 0.00% 46 Costilla County Housing Authority CO037 0 0.00% 44 100.00% 44 Housing Authority of the Town of Kersey CO018 0 0.00% 44 100.00% 44 Housing Authority of the City of Salida CO013 0 0.00% 42 100.00% 42 Julesburg Housing Authority CO021 0 0.00% 41 100.00% 41 Fort Morgan Housing Authority CO011 0 0.00% 40 100.00% 40 Larimer County Housing Authority CO103 35 100.00% 0 0.00% 35 Housing Authority of the City of Fort Lupton CO029 0 0.00% 31 100.00% 31 Housing Authority of the City of Wray CO022 0 0.00% 30 100.00% 30 Housing Authority of the Town of Holly CO007 0 0.00% 29 100.00% 29 Housing Authority of the City of Sterling CO025 0 0.00% 25 100.00% 25 Housing Authority of the Town of Haxtun CO017 0 0.00% 20 100.00% 20 Wellington Housing Authority CO014 0 0.00% 18 100.00% 18 Colorado Bluesky Enterprises, Inc. CO888 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Page 30 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Colorado

CO-503 Metropolitan Denver Homeless Initiative PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of the City and County of Denver CO001 6689 88.13% 901 11.87% 7590 Colorado Division of Housing CO911 6596 100.00% 0 0.00% 6596 Jefferson County Housing Authority CO072 1532 98.02% 31 1.98% 1563 Adams County Housing Authority CO058 1460 100.00% 0 0.00% 1460 Aurora Housing Authority CO052 1388 97.06% 42 2.94% 1430 Lakewood Housing Authority CO049 1411 100.00% 0 0.00% 1411 Boulder Housing Partners CO016 842 97.45% 22 2.55% 864 Boulder County Housing Authority CO061 834 100.00% 0 0.00% 834 Longmont Housing Authority CO070 509 92.71% 40 7.29% 549 Arvada Housing Authority CO050 508 100.00% 0 0.00% 508 Englewood Housing Authority CO048 393 100.00% 0 0.00% 393 Littleton Housing Authority CO036 288 83.48% 57 16.52% 345 Housing Authority of the City of Brighton CO019 240 92.31% 20 7.69% 260 Sheridan Housing Authority CO057 177 100.00% 0 0.00% 177 Louisville Housing Authority CO059 0 0.00% 13 100.00% 13 Center for People with Disabilities CO889 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Colorado Housing Finance Authority CO921 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

CO-504 Colorado Springs/El Paso County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of the City of Colorado Springs CO028 2290 97.86% 50 2.14% 2340

Page 31 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Colorado

CO-504 Colorado Springs/El Paso County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of the City of Fountain CO071 240 100.00% 0 0.00% 240

Page 32 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Connecticut

CT-502 Hartford CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Connecticut Department of Housing CT901 7758 100.00% 0 0.00% 7758 City of Hartford Housing Authority CT051 4917 100.00% 0 0.00% 4917 Housing Authority of the City of Hartford CT003 2237 47.75% 2448 52.25% 4685

CT-503 Bridgeport, Stamford, Norwalk/Fairfield County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of the City of Bridgeport CT001 2838 76.89% 853 23.11% 3691 Housing Authority Of The City Of Norwalk CT002 680 38.20% 1100 61.80% 1780 Housing Authority of the City of Stamford CT007 1434 85.31% 247 14.69% 1681 Greenwich Housing Authority CT019 343 48.38% 366 51.62% 709 Housing Authority of the Town of Stratford CT027 280 55.45% 225 44.55% 505 Fairfield Housing Authority CT052 171 100.00% 0 0.00% 171 New Canaan Housing Authority CT054 0 0.00% 17 100.00% 17

CT-505 Connecticut Balance of State CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of the Town of Brooklyn CT066 0 0.00% 8367 100.00% 8367 Housing Authority of the City of New Haven CT004 4479 84.80% 803 15.20% 5282 Waterbury Housing Authority CT006 2593 83.54% 511 16.46% 3104 Housing Authority of the CIty of New Britain CT005 851 52.02% 785 47.98% 1636

Page 33 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Connecticut

CT-505 Connecticut Balance of State CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Middletown Housing Authority CT009 1364 84.51% 250 15.49% 1614 West Haven Housing Authority CT029 1146 77.64% 330 22.36% 1476 Housing Authority of the City of Meriden CT011 726 54.06% 617 45.94% 1343 Vernon Housing Authority CT028 437 41.54% 615 58.46% 1052 Housing Authority of the City of Danbury CT020 802 78.02% 226 21.98% 1028 Housing Authority of the City of Ansonia CT015 732 80.53% 177 19.47% 909 Housing Authority of the Town of West Hartfor CT039 670 77.10% 199 22.90% 869 Willimantic Housing Authority CT010 506 58.43% 360 41.57% 866 Norwich Housing Authority CT018 514 61.12% 327 38.88% 841 Manchester Housing Authority CT026 504 62.61% 301 37.39% 805 Bristol Housing Authority CT023 679 84.56% 124 15.44% 803 Milford Redevelopment and Housing Partnership CT030 266 38.22% 430 61.78% 696 East Hartford Housing Authority CT013 431 63.95% 243 36.05% 674 New London Housing Authority CT022 0 0.00% 546 100.00% 546 Torrington Housing Authority CT031 305 80.05% 76 19.95% 381 Winchester Housing Authority CT025 0 0.00% 317 100.00% 317 Hamden Housing Authority CT042 305 100.00% 0 0.00% 305 Derby Housing Authority CT017 278 100.00% 0 0.00% 278 Naugatuck Housing Authority CT047 249 93.26% 18 6.74% 267 Windsor Locks Housing Authority CT032 127 51.42% 120 48.58% 247 Plainfield Housing Authority CT058 197 100.00% 0 0.00% 197 Housing Authority of the Town of Windsor CT048 158 100.00% 0 0.00% 158

Page 34 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Connecticut

CT-505 Connecticut Balance of State CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Mansfield Housing Authority CT038 149 100.00% 0 0.00% 149 Putnam Housing Authority CT024 34 24.46% 105 75.54% 139 Housing Authority of the Town of Enfield CT008 136 100.00% 0 0.00% 136 Wallingford Housing Authority CT067 114 100.00% 0 0.00% 114 Farmington Housing Authority CT041 90 100.00% 0 0.00% 90 Portland Housing Authority CT036 86 100.00% 0 0.00% 86 Killingly Housing Authority CT061 85 100.00% 0 0.00% 85 Housing Authority of the Town of Seymour CT035 0 0.00% 48 100.00% 48 East Haven Housing Authority CT063 46 100.00% 0 0.00% 46 Wethersfield Housing Authority CT053 46 100.00% 0 0.00% 46 South Windsor Housing Authority CT033 35 100.00% 0 0.00% 35 Housing Authority of the Town of Glastonbury CT040 33 100.00% 0 0.00% 33 Newington Housing Authority CT049 30 100.00% 0 0.00% 30 Canton Housing Authority CT068 14 100.00% 0 0.00% 14 Bloomfield Housing Authority CT056 0 0.00% 11 100.00% 11

Page 35 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Delaware

DE-500 Delaware Statewide CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Delaware State Housing Authority DE004 0 0.00% 2870 100.00% 2870 Wilmington Housing Authority DE001 1726 85.66% 289 14.34% 2015 New Castle County Housing Authority DE005 1825 100.00% 0 0.00% 1825 Delaware State Housing Authority DE901 955 100.00% 0 0.00% 955 Newark Housing Authority DE003 209 29.15% 508 70.85% 717 Dover Housing Authority DE002 190 77.24% 56 22.76% 246

Page 36 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. District of Columbia

DC-500 District of Columbia CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units D.C Housing Authority DC001 14389 89.90% 1616 10.10% 16005 Community Connections DC880 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Page 37 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Florida

FL-500 Sarasota, Bradenton/Manatee, Sarasota Counties CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units SARASOTA HOUSING AUTHORITY FL008 1489 82.72% 311 17.28% 1800 MANATEE COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY FL105 1276 97.03% 39 2.97% 1315 HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF BRADENTON FL023 199 82.92% 41 17.08% 240 VENICE HOUSING AUTHORITY FL064 0 0.00% 80 100.00% 80 CITY OF BRADENTON FL101 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

FL-501 Tampa/Hillsborough County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units TAMPA HOUSING AUTHORITY FL003 8162 84.38% 1511 15.62% 9673 PLANT CITY HOUSING AUTHORITY FL034 187 82.38% 40 17.62% 227 HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY-BOCC FL089 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

FL-502 St. Petersburg, Clearwater, Largo/Pinellas County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF ST. PETERSBURG FL002 3581 54.11% 3037 45.89% 6618 PINELLAS COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY FL062 3426 84.36% 635 15.64% 4061 CLEARWATER HOUSING AUTHORITY FL075 1265 96.20% 50 3.80% 1315 DUNEDIN HOUSING AUTHORITY FL061 0 0.00% 331 100.00% 331 TARPON SPRINGS HOUSING AUTHORITY FL058 0 0.00% 115 100.00% 115 Boley Center for Behavioral Healthcare FL888 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Page 38 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Florida

FL-503 Lakeland, Winterhaven/Polk County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF LAKELAND FL011 1480 91.98% 129 8.02% 1609 LAKE WALES HOUSING AUTHORITY FL071 172 65.65% 90 34.35% 262 WINTER HAVEN HOUSING AUTHORITY FL139 211 80.84% 50 19.16% 261 HOUSING AUTHORITY OF BARTOW FL026 55 34.59% 104 65.41% 159 HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF MULBERRY FL054 0 0.00% 130 100.00% 130 POLK COUNTY HOUSING AGENCY FL143 110 100.00% 0 0.00% 110

FL-504 Daytona Beach, Daytona/Volusia, Flagler Counties CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of City of Daytona Beach FL007 1324 76.49% 407 23.51% 1731 DeLand Housing Authority FL072 749 57.93% 544 42.07% 1293 Housing Authority of New Smyrna Beach FL022 253 50.50% 248 49.50% 501 Ormond Beach Housing Authority FL024 219 46.20% 255 53.80% 474 Housing Authority of the County of Flagler FL030 347 81.26% 80 18.74% 427 County of Volusia Dept. of Community Services FL113 322 100.00% 0 0.00% 322

FL-505 Fort Walton Beach/Okaloosa, Walton Counties CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Fort Walton Beach Housing Authority FL069 820 74.82% 276 25.18% 1096 Crestview Housing Authority FL046 212 20.50% 822 79.50% 1034

Page 39 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Florida

FL-505 Fort Walton Beach/Okaloosa, Walton Counties CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Walton County Housing Authority FL110 374 100.00% 0 0.00% 374 DeFuniak Springs Housing Authority FL039 0 0.00% 60 100.00% 60 Niceville Housing Authority FL052 0 0.00% 39 100.00% 39

FL-506 Tallahassee/Leon County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Tallahassee Housing Authority FL073 2215 94.62% 126 5.38% 2341 Wakulla County Housing FL096 250 100.00% 0 0.00% 250 Housing Authority of the City of Apalachicola FL036 0 0.00% 57 100.00% 57 Jefferson County Board of County Commissioner FL140 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

FL-507 Orlando/Orange, Osceola, Seminole Counties CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Orlando Housing Authority FL004 4027 30.19% 9314 69.81% 13341 Orange County Housing & Community Development FL093 1195 100.00% 0 0.00% 1195 Seminole County Housing Authority FL033 359 64.22% 200 35.78% 559 OSCEOLA COUNTY HOUSING AGENCY FL201 202 100.00% 0 0.00% 202 The Housing Authority of the City of Sanford FL016 0 0.00% 200 100.00% 200 Housing Authority of the City of Winter Park FL082 0 0.00% 5 100.00% 5

Page 40 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Florida

FL-508 Gainesville/Alachua, Putnam Counties CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Gainesville Housing Authority FL063 1549 98.41% 25 1.59% 1574 Alachua County Housing Authority FL070 781 81.95% 172 18.05% 953 Palatka Housing Authority FL057 340 60.07% 226 39.93% 566 Levy County Housing Authority FL049 142 87.65% 20 12.35% 162 Gilchrist County Housing Authority FL051 0 0.00% 111 100.00% 111 Union County Housing Authority FL042 0 0.00% 70 100.00% 70 Suwannee County Housing Authority FL050 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

FL-509 Fort Pierce/St. Lucie, Indian River, Martin Counties CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF FORT PIERCE FL041 844 87.37% 122 12.63% 966 HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF STUART FL045 102 27.20% 273 72.80% 375 INDIAN RIVER CO BD OF CO COMM FL132 345 100.00% 0 0.00% 345

FL-510 Jacksonville-Duval, Clay Counties CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Jacksonville Housing Authority FL001 7188 95.09% 371 4.91% 7559 Macclenny Housing Authority FL065 0 0.00% 1117 100.00% 1117 Housing Authority of City of Fernandina Beach FL037 62 41.33% 88 58.67% 150 Baker County Housing Assistance Program FL102 147 100.00% 0 0.00% 147

Page 41 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Florida

FL-511 Pensacola/Escambia, Santa Rosa Counties CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units City of Pensacola Housing Office FL092 2429 100.00% 0 0.00% 2429 Area Housing Commission FL006 0 0.00% 751 100.00% 751 Milton Housing Authority FL053 342 92.93% 26 7.07% 368

FL-513 Palm Bay, /Brevard County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units HOUSING AUTHORITY OF BREVARD COUNTY FL020 2052 81.04% 480 18.96% 2532 HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF TITUSVILLE FL025 682 89.27% 82 10.73% 764 HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF COCOA FL019 149 26.85% 406 73.15% 555 MELBOURNE HOUSING AUTHORITY FL056 0 0.00% 420 100.00% 420

FL-514 Ocala/Marion County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Ocala Housing Authority FL032 1329 97.79% 30 2.21% 1359

FL-515 Panama City/Bay, Jackson Counties CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Northwest Florida Regional Housing Authority FL015 1046 89.33% 125 10.67% 1171 Panama City Housing Authority FL018 468 58.87% 327 41.13% 795

Page 42 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Florida

FL-515 Panama City/Bay, Jackson Counties CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of Springfield FL035 446 89.20% 54 10.80% 500 Housing Authority of the City of Marianna FL031 117 38.61% 186 61.39% 303 Holmes County Housing Authority FL202 194 100.00% 0 0.00% 194 Washington County Board of Commissioners FL109 155 100.00% 0 0.00% 155 Chipley Housing Authority FL038 0 0.00% 50 100.00% 50

FL-517 Hendry, Hardee, Highlands Counties CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units HOUSING AUTHORITY OF AVON PARK FL012 0 0.00% 590 100.00% 590 PUNTA GORDA HOUSING AUTHORITY FL060 341 100.00% 0 0.00% 341 ARCADIA HOUSING AUTHORITY FL055 0 0.00% 150 100.00% 150 HENDRY COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY FL123 43 100.00% 0 0.00% 43

FL-518 Columbia, Hamilton, Lafayette, Suwannee Counties CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Columbia County Housing Authority FL125 0 0.00% 142 100.00% 142 Housing Authority of the City of Live Oak FL027 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Page 43 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Florida

FL-519 Pasco County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Pasco County Housing Authority FL104 1499 94.93% 80 5.07% 1579

FL-520 Citrus, Hernando, Lake, Sumter Counties CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of the City of Eustis FL040 0 0.00% 826 100.00% 826 Hernando County Housing Authority FL137 390 68.66% 178 31.34% 568 Lake County Housing Agency FL106 485 100.00% 0 0.00% 485 Citrus County Housing Services FL147 233 100.00% 0 0.00% 233 Brooksville Housing Authority FL074 0 0.00% 205 100.00% 205

FL-600 Miami-Dade County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units MIAMI DADE PUBLIC HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEV FL005 15178 96.18% 603 3.82% 15781 HIALEAH HOUSING AUTHORITY FL066 4800 97.48% 124 2.52% 4924 HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH FL017 3123 87.41% 450 12.59% 3573 HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF HOMESTEAD FL068 1618 100.00% 0 0.00% 1618 MIAMI HSG CONSERVATION FL145 136 100.00% 0 0.00% 136 Carrfour Supportive Housing, Inc. FL881 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Page 44 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Florida

FL-601 Ft Lauderdale/Broward County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units BROWARD COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY FL079 5777 92.11% 495 7.89% 6272 HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF FORT LAUDERDALE FL010 2941 90.24% 318 9.76% 3259 HOUSING AUTHORITY OF POMPANO BEACH FL028 1096 89.25% 132 10.75% 1228 HA HOLLYWOOD FL136 761 100.00% 0 0.00% 761 HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF DEERFIELD BEACH FL081 482 73.81% 171 26.19% 653 DANIA BEACH HOUSING AUTHORITY FL116 499 84.01% 95 15.99% 594

FL-603 Ft Myers, Cape Coral/Lee County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CTIY OF FORT MYERS FL047 2094 93.15% 154 6.85% 2248 HA LEE COUNTY FL128 271 100.00% 0 0.00% 271

FL-604 Monroe County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units MONROE COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY FL144 200 8.17% 2248 91.83% 2448 HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF KEY WEST FL013 254 40.71% 370 59.29% 624

Page 45 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Florida

FL-605 West Palm Beach/Palm Beach County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units WEST PALM BEACH HOUSING AUTHORITY FL009 3245 94.33% 195 5.67% 3440 PALM BEACH COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY FL080 2595 92.98% 196 7.02% 2791 DELRAY BEACH HOUSING AUTHORITY FL083 1111 84.29% 207 15.71% 1318 HA BOCA RATON FL119 621 100.00% 0 0.00% 621 RIVIERA BEACH HOUSING AUTHORITY FL076 0 0.00% 374 100.00% 374 PAHOKEE HOUSING AUTHORITY FL021 76 37.62% 126 62.38% 202 Housing Partnership Inc. FL880 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

FL-606 Naples/Collier County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Collier County Housing Authority FL141 466 100.00% 0 0.00% 466

Page 46 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Georgia

GA-500 Atlanta CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of the City of ATLANTA Georgia GA006 19754 93.82% 1302 6.18% 21056 CITY OF ATLANTA, Dept. of Housing and Community Devel GA269 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

GA-501 Georgia Balance of State CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of the City of Macon GA007 3070 83.90% 589 16.10% 3659 Housing Authority of the City of Jonesboro GA228 1877 98.95% 20 1.05% 1897 NORTHWEST GA HOUSING AUTHORITY GA285 567 43.05% 750 56.95% 1317 Housing Authority of the City of Americus GA062 716 62.42% 431 37.58% 1147 Northeast Georgia Housing Authority GA284 0 0.00% 942 100.00% 942 Housing Authority of the GA009 750 82.06% 164 17.94% 914 TRI-CITY HOUSING AUTHORITY GA283 0 0.00% 705 100.00% 705 Housing Authority of the City of Newnan GA095 85 16.13% 442 83.87% 527 Housing Authority of the City of Waycross GA028 0 0.00% 494 100.00% 494 Housing Authority of the City of Griffin GA061 0 0.00% 480 100.00% 480 Housing Authority of the City of Lavonia GA094 0 0.00% 434 100.00% 434 Housing Authority of the City of Cedartown GA025 0 0.00% 420 100.00% 420 Housing Authority of the City of Quitman GA085 0 0.00% 387 100.00% 387 Housing Authority of the City of Eatonton GA072 0 0.00% 383 100.00% 383 Housing Authority of the City of Valdosta GA100 0 0.00% 383 100.00% 383 FLINT AREA CONSOLIDATED GA280 0 0.00% 357 100.00% 357

Page 47 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Georgia

GA-501 Georgia Balance of State CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of the City of LaGrange GA026 0 0.00% 355 100.00% 355 Housing Authority of the City of Gainesville GA059 0 0.00% 328 100.00% 328 Housing Authority of the City of McDonough GA182 0 0.00% 325 100.00% 325 Housing Authority of the City of Sandersville GA199 0 0.00% 321 100.00% 321 Housing Authority of the City of Albany GA023 61 19.37% 254 80.63% 315 Housing Authority of the City of Statesboro GA132 0 0.00% 306 100.00% 306 Housing Authority of the City of Thomasville GA024 0 0.00% 304 100.00% 304 Housing Authority of the City of Harlem GA169 0 0.00% 300 100.00% 300 Housing Authority of the City of Winder GA183 0 0.00% 290 100.00% 290 Housing Authority of the City of Fort Oglethorpe GA246 0 0.00% 288 100.00% 288 Housing Authority of the City of Cordele GA063 0 0.00% 284 100.00% 284 Housing Authority of the City of Menlo GA244 0 0.00% 280 100.00% 280 Housing Authority of the City of Comer GA103 0 0.00% 261 100.00% 261 Housing Authority of the City of Moultrie GA060 0 0.00% 250 100.00% 250 Housing Authority of the County of Stewart GA118 0 0.00% 249 100.00% 249 Housing Authority of the City of Cave Spring GA130 0 0.00% 244 100.00% 244 Housing Authority of the City of Clayton GA115 0 0.00% 237 100.00% 237 Housing Authority of the City of Carrollton GA116 193 83.19% 39 16.81% 232 Housing Authority of the City of Nahunta GA263 0 0.00% 231 100.00% 231 Housing Authority of the City of Sylvania GA152 0 0.00% 224 100.00% 224 Housing Authority of the City of Dublin GA069 0 0.00% 221 100.00% 221 Housing Authority of the City of West Point GA065 0 0.00% 214 100.00% 214

Page 48 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Georgia

GA-501 Georgia Balance of State CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of the City of Nashville GA092 0 0.00% 212 100.00% 212 Housing Authority of the City of Camilla GA096 0 0.00% 211 100.00% 211 Housing Authority of the City of Tallapoosa GA097 0 0.00% 210 100.00% 210 Housing Authority of the City of McRae GA084 0 0.00% 202 100.00% 202 Housing Authority of the City of Warrenton GA127 0 0.00% 200 100.00% 200 Housing Authority of the City of Royston GA090 0 0.00% 186 100.00% 186 Housing Authority of the City of Monroe GA073 0 0.00% 185 100.00% 185 Housing Authority of the City of Hawkinsville GA089 0 0.00% 185 100.00% 185 Housing Authority of the City of Eastman GA080 0 0.00% 174 100.00% 174 Housing Authority of the City of Waynesboro GA086 0 0.00% 168 100.00% 168 Housing Authority of the City of Fort Gaines GA167 0 0.00% 165 100.00% 165 ETOWAH AREA CONSOLIDATED GA281 0 0.00% 163 100.00% 163 Housing Authority of the City of Fitzgerald GA070 0 0.00% 159 100.00% 159 Housing Authority of the City of Buford GA091 0 0.00% 159 100.00% 159 Housing Authority of the City of Nicholls GA113 0 0.00% 159 100.00% 159 Housing Authority of the City of Social Circle GA147 0 0.00% 157 100.00% 157 Housing Authority of the City of Ringgold GA216 0 0.00% 154 100.00% 154 Housing Authority of the City of Milledgeville GA200 0 0.00% 152 100.00% 152 Housing Authority of the City of Swainsboro GA131 0 0.00% 148 100.00% 148 Housing Authority of the City of Colquitt GA198 0 0.00% 142 100.00% 142 Housing Authority of the County of Douglas GA106 0 0.00% 141 100.00% 141 Housing Authority of the City of Lincolnton GA211 0 0.00% 141 100.00% 141

Page 49 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Georgia

GA-501 Georgia Balance of State CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of the City of Ellijay GA176 0 0.00% 132 100.00% 132 Housing Authority of the City of Calhoun GA119 0 0.00% 130 100.00% 130 Housing Authority of the City of Greenville GA224 0 0.00% 122 100.00% 122 Housing Authority of the City of Mount Vernon GA238 0 0.00% 120 100.00% 120 Housing Authority of the City of Jesup GA066 0 0.00% 116 100.00% 116 Housing Authority of the City of Douglas GA076 0 0.00% 115 100.00% 115 Housing Authority of the City of Blackshear GA134 0 0.00% 114 100.00% 114 Housing Authority of the City of Baxley GA071 0 0.00% 114 100.00% 114 Housing Authority of the City of Greensboro GA105 0 0.00% 110 100.00% 110 Housing Authority of the City of Washington GA144 0 0.00% 110 100.00% 110 Housing Authority of the City of Rochelle GA175 0 0.00% 110 100.00% 110 Housing Authority of the City of Sylvester GA104 0 0.00% 110 100.00% 110 Housing Authority of the City of Pelham GA098 0 0.00% 103 100.00% 103 Housing Authority of the City of Senoia GA204 0 0.00% 100 100.00% 100 Housing Authority of the City of Danielsville GA126 0 0.00% 100 100.00% 100 Housing Authority of the City of Blakely GA114 0 0.00% 98 100.00% 98 Housing Authority of the City of Thomson GA128 0 0.00% 98 100.00% 98 Housing Authority of the City of Edison GA162 0 0.00% 90 100.00% 90 Housing Authority of the City of Conyers GA184 0 0.00% 89 100.00% 89 Housing Authority of the City of Union City GA197 0 0.00% 89 100.00% 89 Housing Authority of the City of Soperton GA239 0 0.00% 88 100.00% 88 Housing Authority of the City of Adel GA088 0 0.00% 86 100.00% 86

Page 50 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Georgia

GA-501 Georgia Balance of State CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of the County of Screven GA141 0 0.00% 86 100.00% 86 Housing Authority of the City of Loganville GA171 0 0.00% 80 100.00% 80 Housing Authority of the City of Bowdon GA207 0 0.00% 80 100.00% 80 Housing Authority of the City of Perry GA252 0 0.00% 80 100.00% 80 Housing Authority of the City of Roberta GA223 0 0.00% 80 100.00% 80 Housing Authority of the City of Alamo GA178 0 0.00% 79 100.00% 79 Housing Authority of the City of Reidsville GA220 0 0.00% 77 100.00% 77 Housing Authority of the City of Covington GA245 0 0.00% 74 100.00% 74 Housing Authority of the City of Glenwood GA194 0 0.00% 72 100.00% 72 Housing Authority of the City of Vidalia GA145 0 0.00% 70 100.00% 70 Housing Authority of the City of Boston GA117 0 0.00% 70 100.00% 70 Housing Authority of the City of Fort Valley GA205 0 0.00% 68 100.00% 68 SOUTHEAST GEORGIA CONSOLIDATED HOUSING AUTHOR GA282 0 0.00% 67 100.00% 67 Housing Authority of the City of Crawfordville GA192 0 0.00% 66 100.00% 66 Housing Authority of the City of Cairo GA083 0 0.00% 66 100.00% 66 Housing Authority of the County of Harris GA161 0 0.00% 64 100.00% 64 Housing Authority of the City of Gibson GA190 0 0.00% 61 100.00% 61 Housing Authority of the City of Sparta GA210 0 0.00% 60 100.00% 60 Housing Authority of the City of Ashburn GA087 0 0.00% 60 100.00% 60 Housing Authority of the City of Chatsworth GA206 0 0.00% 55 100.00% 55 Housing Authority of the City of Alma GA133 0 0.00% 55 100.00% 55 Housing Authority of the City of Tennille GA195 0 0.00% 50 100.00% 50

Page 51 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Georgia

GA-501 Georgia Balance of State CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of the City of Buchanan GA124 0 0.00% 50 100.00% 50 Housing Authority of the City of Villa Rica GA107 0 0.00% 50 100.00% 50 Housing Authority of the City of Jasper GA201 0 0.00% 48 100.00% 48 Housing Authority of the City of Madison GA193 0 0.00% 48 100.00% 48 Housing Authority of the City of Arlington GA111 0 0.00% 44 100.00% 44 Housing Authority of the City of Vienna GA208 0 0.00% 44 100.00% 44 Housing Authority of the City of Ocilla GA168 0 0.00% 44 100.00% 44 Housing Authority of the City of Warner Robins GA160 0 0.00% 43 100.00% 43 Housing Authority of the City of Manchester GA108 0 0.00% 42 100.00% 42 Housing Authority of the City of Canton GA213 0 0.00% 40 100.00% 40 Housing Authority of the City of Barnesville GA177 0 0.00% 38 100.00% 38 Housing Authority of the City of McCaysville GA241 0 0.00% 32 100.00% 32 Housing Authority of the City of Monticello GA203 0 0.00% 31 100.00% 31 Housing Authority of the City of Commerce GA125 0 0.00% 30 100.00% 30 Housing Authority of the City of Ellaville GA214 0 0.00% 30 100.00% 30 Housing Authority of the City of Newton GA109 0 0.00% 25 100.00% 25 Housing Authority of the City of Hampton GA110 0 0.00% 24 100.00% 24 Housing Authority of the City of Claxton GA166 0 0.00% 24 100.00% 24 Housing Authority of the City of Norcross GA209 0 0.00% 24 100.00% 24 Housing Authority of the City of Buena Vista GA179 0 0.00% 24 100.00% 24 Housing Authority of the City of Metter GA189 0 0.00% 24 100.00% 24 Housing Authority of the City of Louisville GA157 0 0.00% 23 100.00% 23

Page 52 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Georgia

GA-501 Georgia Balance of State CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of the City of Summerville GA153 0 0.00% 23 100.00% 23 Housing Authority of the City of Jefferson GA163 0 0.00% 21 100.00% 21 Housing Authority of the City of Abbeville GA186 0 0.00% 20 100.00% 20 Housing Authority of the City of Unadilla GA217 0 0.00% 20 100.00% 20 Housing Authority of the County of Lee GA129 0 0.00% 20 100.00% 20 Housing Authority of the City of Byron GA243 0 0.00% 20 100.00% 20 Housing Authority of the City of Hazlehurst GA137 0 0.00% 20 100.00% 20 Housing Authority of the City of Doerun GA112 0 0.00% 20 100.00% 20 Housing Authority of the City of LaFayette GA170 0 0.00% 20 100.00% 20 Housing Authority of the City of Hogansville GA135 0 0.00% 16 100.00% 16 Housing Authority of the City of Cumming GA196 0 0.00% 16 100.00% 16 Housing Authority of the City of Jackson GA185 0 0.00% 14 100.00% 14 Housing Authority of the City of Union Point GA191 0 0.00% 14 100.00% 14 Housing Authority of the City of Dahlonega GA174 0 0.00% 14 100.00% 14 Housing Authority of the City of Shellman GA229 0 0.00% 12 100.00% 12 Housing Authority of the City of Homerville GA172 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Housing Authority of the City of Lawrenceville GA093 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Housing Authority of the City of Thomaston GA247 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Housing Authority of the City of Glennville GA139 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Housing Authority of the City of Hinesville GA221 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Housing Authority of the City of Dallas GA148 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Housing Authority of the City of Cuthbert GA226 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Page 53 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Georgia

GA-501 Georgia Balance of State CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of the City of Lumber City GA155 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Housing Authority of the City of Woodbury GA230 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Housing Authority of the City of Franklin GA233 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Housing Authority of the City of Tifton GA101 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Housing Authority of the City of Grantville GA218 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Housing Authority of the City of Elberton GA074 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Housing Authority of the City of Bremen GA254 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Housing Authority of the City of Millen GA142 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Housing Authority of the City of Hartwell GA081 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Housing Authority of the City of Dawson GA067 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Housing Authority of the County of Houston GA268 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Housing Authority of the City of Lyons GA120 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

GA-502 Fulton County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of Fulton County GA264 847 95.49% 40 4.51% 887 Housing Authority of the City of Roswell GA099 0 0.00% 532 100.00% 532 Housing Authority of the City of College Park GA232 408 83.95% 78 16.05% 486 Housing Authority of the City of East Point GA078 480 100.00% 0 0.00% 480 Housing Authority of the City of Fairburn GA180 0 0.00% 90 100.00% 90 Housing Authority of the City of Palmetto GA187 0 0.00% 75 100.00% 75

Page 54 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Georgia

GA-503 Athens-Clarke County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of the City of Athens GA003 0 0.00% 1717 100.00% 1717

GA-504 Augusta-Richmond County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of the City of Augusta GA001 4072 71.80% 1599 28.20% 5671

GA-505 Columbus-Muscogee/Russell County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of the City of Columbus GA004 2403 100.00% 0 0.00% 2403 PHENIX CITY HOUSING AUTHORITY AL005 772 35.43% 1407 64.57% 2179

GA-506 Marietta/Cobb County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of the City of Marietta GA010 2038 87.58% 289 12.42% 2327 CITY OF MARIETTA GA266 657 100.00% 0 0.00% 657

Page 55 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Georgia

GA-507 Savannah/Chatham County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of Savannah GA002 2811 71.25% 1134 28.75% 3945

GA-508 DeKalb County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Georgia Residential Finance GA901 16898 100.00% 0 0.00% 16898 Housing Authority of the County of Dekalb, GA GA237 4484 99.23% 35 0.77% 4519 Housing Authority of the City of Decatur GA011 793 41.52% 1117 58.48% 1910 Housing Authority of the City of Lithonia GA188 96 44.04% 122 55.96% 218

Page 56 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Hawaii

HI-500 Hawaii Balance of State CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units County of Hawaii HI002 1805 100.00% 0 0.00% 1805 County of Maui HI004 1464 100.00% 0 0.00% 1464 Kauai County Housing Agency HI005 1345 100.00% 0 0.00% 1345

HI-501 Honolulu City and County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units City and County of Honolulu HI003 4616 100.00% 0 0.00% 4616 Hawaii Public Housing Authority HI901 3681 100.00% 0 0.00% 3681 Hawaii Public Housing Authority HI001 0 0.00% 47 100.00% 47

Page 57 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Idaho

ID-500 Boise/Ada County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Idaho Housing and Finance Association ID901 3505 100.00% 0 0.00% 3505 Ada County Housing Authority ID021 763 27.34% 2028 72.66% 2791 Boise City Housing Authority ID013 1282 96.83% 42 3.17% 1324 Idaho Housing and Finance Association ID020 0 0.00% 10 100.00% 10

ID-501 Idaho Balance of State CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Southwestern Idaho Cooperative Housing Authority ID016 876 92.41% 72 7.59% 948 Housing Authority of the City of Pocatello ID005 680 94.44% 40 5.56% 720 Housing Authority of the City of American Falls ID012 0 0.00% 160 100.00% 160 Twin Falls Housing Authority ID001 0 0.00% 142 100.00% 142 Nampa Housing Authority ID002 0 0.00% 75 100.00% 75 Housing Authority of the City of Buhl ID010 0 0.00% 50 100.00% 50 Housing Authority of the City Jerome ID011 0 0.00% 40 100.00% 40

Page 58 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Illinois

IL-500 McHenry County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units McHenry County Housing Authority IL116 977 92.08% 84 7.92% 1061

IL-501 Rockford/Winnebago, Boone Counties CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Rockford Housing Authority IL022 1842 64.77% 1002 35.23% 2844 Winnebago County Housing Authority IL083 516 64.18% 288 35.82% 804 Housing Authority of the County of Boone IL122 238 42.05% 328 57.95% 566

IL-502 Waukegan, North Chicago/Lake County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of the County of Lake, IL. IL056 2918 86.77% 445 13.23% 3363 Housing Authority of the City of Waukegan IL026 848 89.93% 95 10.07% 943 Housing Authority of the City of North Chicago, IL IL107 542 76.02% 171 23.98% 713

IL-503 Champaign, Urbana, Rantoul/Champaign County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of Champaign County IL006 1813 78.59% 494 21.41% 2307

Page 59 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Illinois

IL-504 Madison County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Madison County Housing Authority IL015 1087 72.61% 410 27.39% 1497 Housing Authority - City of Alton IL055 0 0.00% 620 100.00% 620 Granite City Housing Authority IL005 0 0.00% 354 100.00% 354

IL-506 Joliet, Bolingbrook/Will County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of Joliet IL024 1330 39.63% 2026 60.37% 3356 Kendall Housing Authority IL137 160 100.00% 0 0.00% 160 Grundy County Housing Authority IL027 0 0.00% 126 100.00% 126

IL-507 Peoria, Pekin/Fulton,Tazewell, Peoria, Woodford Counties CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Peoria Housing Authority IL003 1967 72.80% 735 27.20% 2702 Fulton County Housing Authority IL084 260 38.07% 423 61.93% 683 Woodford County Housing Authority IL104 240 61.54% 150 38.46% 390 Housing Authority of East Peoria IL124 295 100.00% 0 0.00% 295 Housing Authority of the City of Pekin IL044 0 0.00% 134 100.00% 134

Page 60 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Illinois

IL-508 East St. Louis, Belleville/St. Clair County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units The Housing Authority of City of East St. Louis IL001 0 0.00% 21281 100.00% 21281 St. Clair County Housing Authority IL030 2593 91.24% 249 8.76% 2842

IL-509 DeKalb City & County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority Of The County Of DeKalb IL089 564 52.71% 506 47.29% 1070

IL-510 Chicago CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Chicago Housing Authority IL002 51471 98.30% 891 1.70% 52362 Housing Authority Cook County IL025 12909 96.65% 448 3.35% 13357 Habitat Property Management Corp IL802 0 0.00% 347 100.00% 347 Illinois Housing Development Authority IL901 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

IL-511 Cook County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of the Village of Oak Park IL103 442 87.35% 64 12.65% 506 Maywood Housing Authority IL054 449 100.00% 0 0.00% 449 Housing Authority of the Town of Cicero IL130 232 100.00% 0 0.00% 232

Page 61 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Illinois

IL-511 Cook County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of Park Forest IL136 177 100.00% 0 0.00% 177

IL-512 Bloomington/Central Illinois CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units The Housing Authority Of The City Of Danville, IL IL011 680 49.96% 681 50.04% 1361 Menard County Housing Authority IL028 514 53.43% 448 46.57% 962 Kankakee County Housing Authority IL039 708 78.58% 193 21.42% 901 Housing Authority of the City of Bloomington, IL IL051 445 66.82% 221 33.18% 666 Mason County Housing Authority IL042 150 23.55% 487 76.45% 637 Housing Authority of the County of Vermilion, Ill. IL036 108 32.14% 228 67.86% 336 Housing Authority of the County of McLean, Ill. IL117 316 100.00% 0 0.00% 316 Logan County Housing Authority IL040 62 21.02% 233 78.98% 295 DeWitt County Housing Authority IL031 0 0.00% 265 100.00% 265 Housing Authority of the County of Ford IL034 50 19.16% 211 80.84% 261 Livingston County Housing Authority IL094 73 35.96% 130 64.04% 203 Housing Authority of Piatt County IL128 0 0.00% 60 100.00% 60

IL-513 Springfield/Sangamon County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Springfield Housing Authority IL004 1974 85.34% 339 14.66% 2313

Page 62 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Illinois

IL-514 Dupage County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units DuPage Housing Authority IL101 2759 100.00% 0 0.00% 2759

IL-515 South Central Illinois CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of Calhoun County IL049 0 0.00% 725 100.00% 725 Housing Authority of the County of Jersey IL074 195 40.97% 281 59.03% 476 Housing Authority of Christian County, Illinois IL038 173 42.82% 231 57.18% 404 Macoupin County Housing Authority IL047 0 0.00% 354 100.00% 354 Housing Authority of the County of Shelby, IL. IL087 30 12.20% 216 87.80% 246 Housing Authority of the County of Cumberland, IL. IL070 15 6.17% 228 93.83% 243 Montgomery County Housing Authority IL037 89 38.86% 140 61.14% 229 Clay County Housing Authority IL065 0 0.00% 147 100.00% 147 Housing Authority of the County of Clark, IL. IL069 30 24.59% 92 75.41% 122 Housing Authority of Greene County IL072 0 0.00% 105 100.00% 105 Effingham County Housing Authority IL062 0 0.00% 77 100.00% 77 Housing Authority of Edgar County IL120 75 100.00% 0 0.00% 75 Housing Authority County of Coles IL100 0 0.00% 50 100.00% 50

Page 63 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Illinois

IL-516 Decatur/Macon County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Decatur Housing Authority IL012 1123 54.23% 948 45.77% 2071

IL-517 Aurora, Elgin/Kane County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of Elgin IL092 1094 87.52% 156 12.48% 1250 Aurora Housing Authority ofthe City of Aurora IL090 893 76.39% 276 23.61% 1169

IL-518 Rock Island, Moline/Northwestern Illinois CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Moline Housing Authority IL020 234 10.82% 1928 89.18% 2162 Housing Authority of the City of Freeport IL029 0 0.00% 1002 100.00% 1002 Housing Authority of the City of Rock Island IL018 415 46.06% 486 53.94% 901 Grtr Metro. Area Hsng Auth of Rock Island County IL010 347 39.66% 528 60.34% 875 Housing Authority for LaSalle County IL014 536 66.50% 270 33.50% 806 The Housing Authority of Henry County IL009 185 27.57% 486 72.43% 671 Knox County Housing Authority IL085 280 52.53% 253 47.47% 533 Whiteside County Housing Authority IL032 285 82.61% 60 17.39% 345 Housing Authority of the County of JoDaviess IL082 41 15.59% 222 84.41% 263 Lee County Housing Authority IL035 42 16.54% 212 83.46% 254 Ogle County Housing Authority IL095 141 65.28% 75 34.72% 216

Page 64 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Illinois

IL-518 Rock Island, Moline/Northwestern Illinois CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Bureau County Housing Authority IL086 71 34.98% 132 65.02% 203 Carroll County Housing Authority IL081 0 0.00% 106 100.00% 106 Mercer County Housing Authority IL131 35 100.00% 0 0.00% 35

IL-519 West Central Illinois CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Quincy Housing Authority IL016 145 26.13% 410 73.87% 555 Housing Authority of Adams County IL046 0 0.00% 362 100.00% 362 Warren County Housing Authority IL091 100 28.17% 255 71.83% 355 Housing Authority of the County of McDonough IL076 125 44.80% 154 55.20% 279 Morgan County Housing Authority IL079 180 77.92% 51 22.08% 231 The Housing Authority of the County of Cass IL. IL102 0 0.00% 198 100.00% 198 Housing Authority of the County of Brown IL099 0 0.00% 178 100.00% 178 Pike County Housing Authority IL071 0 0.00% 158 100.00% 158 Scott County Housing Authority IL073 0 0.00% 146 100.00% 146 Hancock County Housing Authority IL097 0 0.00% 62 100.00% 62 Henderson County Housing Authority IL115 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Page 65 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Illinois

IL-520 Southern Illinois CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Randolph County Housing Authority IL052 50 5.76% 818 94.24% 868 Housing Authority of the County of Jackson, IL. IL053 557 69.54% 244 30.46% 801 Housing Authority of the County of Williamson IL050 163 20.40% 636 79.60% 799 Housing Authority of Gallatin County IL060 0 0.00% 683 100.00% 683 Alexander County Housing Authority IL007 0 0.00% 450 100.00% 450 Housing Authority of the County of Bond IL078 0 0.00% 419 100.00% 419 Housing Authority of Marion County IL057 277 69.25% 123 30.75% 400 Housing Authority Of The County of Wayne, Illinois IL088 70 20.00% 280 80.00% 350 Housing Authority of the County of Hardin IL066 0 0.00% 346 100.00% 346 Housing Authority - County of Saline IL043 128 39.51% 196 60.49% 324 Housing Authority of Pope County IL058 0 0.00% 308 100.00% 308 Housing Authority Of The County Of Wabash, IL. IL093 0 0.00% 237 100.00% 237 Hamilton County Housing Authority IL118 0 0.00% 200 100.00% 200 Housing Authority of Jefferson County IL059 99 50.51% 97 49.49% 196 Housing Authority of Johnson County IL063 0 0.00% 187 100.00% 187 Housing Authority of the City of Marion, Illinois IL126 120 66.67% 60 33.33% 180 Housing Authority of the County of Franklin IL061 65 38.46% 104 61.54% 169 Housing Authority of Pulaski County IL045 0 0.00% 126 100.00% 126 Housing Authority of the County of Union IL067 0 0.00% 115 100.00% 115 Housing Authority of the County of Richland IL096 80 72.73% 30 27.27% 110 Edwards County Housing Authority IL080 0 0.00% 90 100.00% 90 White County Housing Authority IL068 0 0.00% 88 100.00% 88

Page 66 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Illinois

IL-520 Southern Illinois CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of Mt. Vernon, Illinois IL123 64 100.00% 0 0.00% 64 Massac County Housing Authority IL041 0 0.00% 50 100.00% 50 Perry County Housing Authority IL048 0 0.00% 44 100.00% 44 Housing Authority of the County of Lawrence, IL. IL108 0 0.00% 23 100.00% 23 Illinois Dept. of Commerce & Economic Opport. IL911 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Page 67 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Indiana

IN-500 South Bend, Mishawaka/St. Joseph County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of South Bend IN015 2124 70.33% 896 29.67% 3020 Housing Authority of the City of Mishawaka IN020 307 26.31% 860 73.69% 1167 Housing Authority of the County of St. Joseph IN100 224 100.00% 0 0.00% 224

IN-502 Indiana Balance of State CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of the City of Evansville IN016 1937 50.04% 1934 49.96% 3871 Fort Wayne Housing Authority IN003 3099 95.03% 162 4.97% 3261 Housing Authority of the City of Hammond IN010 898 31.31% 1970 68.69% 2868 Housing Authority of the City of Gary Indiana IN011 1654 60.45% 1082 39.55% 2736 Housing Authority of the City of Peru IN091 212 9.34% 2058 90.66% 2270 Housing Authority of the City of Anderson IN006 1227 69.05% 550 30.95% 1777 Housing Authority of the City of Bloomington IN022 1364 78.71% 369 21.29% 1733 Housing Authority of the City of Terre Haute IN021 916 74.59% 312 25.41% 1228 Housing Authority of the City of New Albany IN012 408 33.39% 814 66.61% 1222 Housing Authority of the City of Lafayette IN071 1215 100.00% 0 0.00% 1215 Vincennes Housing Authority IN002 372 33.04% 754 66.96% 1126 Housing Authority of the City of Muncie IN005 864 86.40% 136 13.60% 1000 Kokomo Housing Authority IN007 689 69.46% 303 30.54% 992 Housing Authority of the City of East Chicago IN029 694 78.51% 190 21.49% 884 Housing Authority of the City of Huntingburg IN028 0 0.00% 809 100.00% 809

Page 68 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Indiana

IN-502 Indiana Balance of State CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of the City of Elkhart IN026 727 93.56% 50 6.44% 777 Housing Authority of the City of Charlestown IN025 70 9.43% 672 90.57% 742 Housing Authority of the City of Michigan City IN019 371 55.37% 299 44.63% 670 Housing Authority of the City of Crawfordsvil IN047 477 75.36% 156 24.64% 633 Delaware County Housing Authority IN004 256 41.63% 359 58.37% 615 Housing Authority of the City of Richmond IN009 273 44.39% 342 55.61% 615 Columbus Housing Authority IN058 579 100.00% 0 0.00% 579 Housing Authority of the City of Jeffersonville IN023 410 74.28% 142 25.72% 552 Housing Authority of the City of Marion, IN IN041 471 100.00% 0 0.00% 471 Mount Vernon Housing Authority IN037 203 51.92% 188 48.08% 391 Housing Authority of the County of Fayette IN073 376 100.00% 0 0.00% 376 New Castle Housing Authority IN050 306 85.96% 50 14.04% 356 Knox County Housing Authority IN067 334 100.00% 0 0.00% 334 Housing Authority of the City of Goshen IN101 320 100.00% 0 0.00% 320 Seymour Housing Authority IN056 158 50.16% 157 49.84% 315 Bloomfield Housing Authority IN032 50 16.61% 251 83.39% 301 Housing Authority of the City of Elwood IN079 301 100.00% 0 0.00% 301 Sullivan Housing Authority IN034 0 0.00% 288 100.00% 288 Housing Authority of the City of Logansport IN092 283 100.00% 0 0.00% 283 Housing Authority of the City of Angola IN039 0 0.00% 270 100.00% 270 Housing Authority of the City of Bedford IN031 168 64.62% 92 35.38% 260 Housing Authority of the City of Tell City IN018 67 25.97% 191 74.03% 258

Page 69 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Indiana

IN-502 Indiana Balance of State CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of the City of Decatur IN062 178 70.63% 74 29.37% 252 Rockport Housing Authority IN024 0 0.00% 250 100.00% 250 Brazil Housing Authority IN035 115 49.36% 118 50.64% 233 Linton Housing Authority IN055 219 100.00% 0 0.00% 219 Noblesville Housing Authority IN080 185 100.00% 0 0.00% 185 Housing Authority of the City of Greencastle IN094 184 100.00% 0 0.00% 184 Cannelton Housing Authority IN043 179 100.00% 0 0.00% 179 Fulton County Housing Authority IN069 175 100.00% 0 0.00% 175 Housing Authority of the City of Warsaw IN060 175 100.00% 0 0.00% 175 Washington Housing Authority IN030 0 0.00% 167 100.00% 167 Housing Authority of the City of Union City IN086 161 100.00% 0 0.00% 161 Rockville Housing Authority IN048 133 100.00% 0 0.00% 133 Housing Authority of the City of Greensburg IN078 115 100.00% 0 0.00% 115 Greendale Housing Authority IN090 0 0.00% 104 100.00% 104 Housing Authority of the City of Kendallville IN036 0 0.00% 84 100.00% 84 Housing Authority of the City of Rome City IN089 0 0.00% 50 100.00% 50 Fremont Housing Authority IN085 0 0.00% 50 100.00% 50 Housing Authority of the City of Jasonville IN077 50 100.00% 0 0.00% 50 Housing Authority of the City of Portland IN084 50 100.00% 0 0.00% 50 Housing Authority of the City of Sellersburg IN083 0 0.00% 40 100.00% 40 Housing Authority of the County of Jennings IN104 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Marshall County Housing Authority IN103 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Page 70 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Indiana

IN-503 Indianapolis CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Indianapolis Housing Agency IN017 8514 97.72% 199 2.28% 8713 Indiana Housing and Community Development Au IN901 5201 100.00% 0 0.00% 5201

Page 71 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Iowa

IA-500 Sioux City/Dakota, Woodbury Counties CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units City of Sioux City Housing Authority IA018 1200 93.82% 79 6.18% 1279 Siouxland Regional Housing Authority IA136 353 100.00% 0 0.00% 353 South Sioux City Housing Agency NE175 294 100.00% 0 0.00% 294 Northeast Nebraska Joint Housing Authority NE180 73 100.00% 0 0.00% 73 Emerson Housing Authority NE073 0 0.00% 60 100.00% 60

IA-501 Iowa Balance of State CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units City of Iowa City Housing Authority IA022 1272 81.17% 295 18.83% 1567 Cedar Rapids Housing Services IA024 1265 100.00% 0 0.00% 1265 Southern Iowa Regional Housing Authority IA117 1070 95.62% 49 4.38% 1119 Eastern Iowa Regional Housing Authority IA126 983 89.04% 121 10.96% 1104 Waterloo Housing Authority IA050 1056 96.00% 44 4.00% 1100 City of Dubuque IA087 1063 100.00% 0 0.00% 1063 Region XII Regional Housing Authority IA122 928 100.00% 0 0.00% 928 Davenport Housing Commission IA045 776 95.57% 36 4.43% 812 Fort Dodge Municipal Housing Agency IA107 665 94.33% 40 5.67% 705 Area XV Multi-County Housing Agency IA124 422 72.01% 164 27.99% 586 Low Rent Housing Agency of Clinton IA098 424 75.71% 136 24.29% 560 Northwest Iowa Regional Housing Authority IA129 522 100.00% 0 0.00% 522 Iowa Northland Regional Housing Authority IA132 313 61.49% 196 38.51% 509

Page 72 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Iowa

IA-501 Iowa Balance of State CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Mason City Housing Authority IA108 494 100.00% 0 0.00% 494 City of Marshalltown Rent Assistance Program IA125 464 100.00% 0 0.00% 464 Shenandoah Low Rent Housing Agency IA019 0 0.00% 434 100.00% 434 Muscatine Municipal Housing Agency IA049 376 88.26% 50 11.74% 426 Upper Explorerland Regional Housing Authority IA130 407 100.00% 0 0.00% 407 Southeast Iowa Regional Housing Authority IA128 267 66.92% 132 33.08% 399 Low Rent Housing Agency of Burlington IA015 325 81.66% 73 18.34% 398 North Iowa Regional Housing Authority IA127 398 100.00% 0 0.00% 398 Afton Housing Commission IA003 0 0.00% 359 100.00% 359 Low Rent Housing Agency of Knoxville IA119 263 75.79% 84 24.21% 347 Cedar Falls Housing Commission IA113 326 100.00% 0 0.00% 326 Ottumwa Housing Authority IA004 237 92.22% 20 7.78% 257 Oskaloosa Municipal Housing Agency IA100 230 100.00% 0 0.00% 230 Charles City Hsg and Redev Authority IA002 197 86.78% 30 13.22% 227 Evansdale Municipal Housing Authority IA038 126 55.75% 100 44.25% 226 Albia Housing Agency IA114 96 43.44% 125 56.56% 221 Fort Madison Housing Authority IA047 70 31.82% 150 68.18% 220 Keokuk Housing Authority IA030 171 85.07% 30 14.93% 201 Low Rent Housing Agency Of Onawa IA014 0 0.00% 201 100.00% 201 Low Rent Housing Agency Of Missouri Valley IA029 0 0.00% 198 100.00% 198 Warren County Housing Authority IA120 171 100.00% 0 0.00% 171 Grinnell Low Rent Housing Authority IA084 166 100.00% 0 0.00% 166

Page 73 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Iowa

IA-501 Iowa Balance of State CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Centerville Municipal Housing Agency IA042 98 66.22% 50 33.78% 148 Corning Housing Commission IA001 0 0.00% 148 100.00% 148 Low Rent Housing Agency of Spirit Lake IA057 142 100.00% 0 0.00% 142 Rock Rapids Municipal Housing Agency IA046 0 0.00% 134 100.00% 134 Low Rent Housing Agency of Emmetsburg IA056 99 100.00% 0 0.00% 99 Low Rent Housing Agency oF Decorah IA054 86 100.00% 0 0.00% 86 Municipal Housing Agency Of Manning IA021 0 0.00% 81 100.00% 81 Lenox Low Rent Housing Agency IA032 0 0.00% 74 100.00% 74 Low Rent Housing Agency Of Farragut IA010 0 0.00% 71 100.00% 71 Low Rent Housing Agency Of Waverly IA013 0 0.00% 62 100.00% 62 Low Rent Housing Agency Of Bancroft IA028 0 0.00% 53 100.00% 53 Tabor Low Rent Housing Agency IA012 0 0.00% 48 100.00% 48 Chariton Housing Authority IA016 0 0.00% 46 100.00% 46 Low Rent Housing Agency Of Mount Ayr IA026 0 0.00% 42 100.00% 42 Low Rent Housing Agency Of Red Oak IA044 0 0.00% 42 100.00% 42 Clarinda Low Rent Housing Agency IA034 0 0.00% 34 100.00% 34 Low Rent Housing Agency Of Leon IA027 0 0.00% 26 100.00% 26 Essex Low Rent Housing Agency IA025 0 0.00% 26 100.00% 26 Lone Tree Housing Commission IA006 0 0.00% 24 100.00% 24 Low Rent Housing Agency Of Sioux Center IA011 0 0.00% 20 100.00% 20 Stanton Housing Commission IA005 0 0.00% 20 100.00% 20 Low Rent Housing Agency Of Hamburg IA007 0 0.00% 20 100.00% 20

Page 74 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Iowa

IA-501 Iowa Balance of State CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Low Rent Housing Agency Of Sidney IA008 0 0.00% 20 100.00% 20 Malvern Low Rent Housing Agency IA009 0 0.00% 20 100.00% 20 Low Rent Housing Agency Of Winterset IA017 0 0.00% 12 100.00% 12 Bettendorf Low Rent Housing Agency IA123 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Villisca Low Rent Housing Agency IA079 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Mid Iowa Regional Housing Authority IA133 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

IA-502 Des Moines/Polk County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Des Moines Municipal Housing Agency IA020 3424 99.16% 29 0.84% 3453 Central Iowa Regional Housing Authority IA131 1008 100.00% 0 0.00% 1008

Page 75 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Kansas

KS-501 Kansas City/Wyandotte County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Kansas City, KS Housing Authority KS001 1501 66.86% 744 33.14% 2245 Bonner Springs Housing Authority KS009 0 0.00% 72 100.00% 72

KS-502 Wichita/Sedgwick County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Wichita Housing Authority KS004 2573 95.83% 112 4.17% 2685 Sedgwick County Housing Authority KS169 342 100.00% 0 0.00% 342 Sedgwick Housing Authority KS066 0 0.00% 105 100.00% 105

KS-503 Topeka/Shawnee County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Topeka Housing Authority KS002 1315 98.50% 20 1.50% 1335

KS-505 Overland Park, Shawnee/Johnson County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Johnson County Housing Authority KS162 1447 100.00% 0 0.00% 1447 Olathe Housing Authority KS043 509 80.79% 121 19.21% 630

Page 76 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Kansas

KS-507 Kansas Balance of State CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority KS158 0 0.00% 4263 100.00% 4263 Lawrence/Douglas County Housing Authority KS053 762 97.69% 18 2.31% 780 South Central KS Area Agency On Aging (Cowley Co.) KS166 648 100.00% 0 0.00% 648 Bird City Housing Authority KS003 0 0.00% 578 100.00% 578 Leavenworth Housing Authority KS068 469 88.66% 60 11.34% 529 LYON COUNTY/ECKAN HOUSING AUTHORITY KS159 499 100.00% 0 0.00% 499 Salina Housing Authority KS038 347 79.41% 90 20.59% 437 Pittsburg Housing Authority KS149 429 100.00% 0 0.00% 429 North Central Flint Hills Area Agency on Aging KS167 404 100.00% 0 0.00% 404 Ford County Housing Authority KS165 401 100.00% 0 0.00% 401 Pleasanton Housing Authority KS052 0 0.00% 369 100.00% 369 Crawford County KS161 332 100.00% 0 0.00% 332 Manhattan Housing Authority KS063 252 78.26% 70 21.74% 322 Housing Authority of the City of Colby KS005 0 0.00% 315 100.00% 315 Chanute Housing Authority KS062 25 9.73% 232 90.27% 257 Paola Housing Authority KS039 0 0.00% 191 100.00% 191 South Hutchinson Housing Authority KS016 0 0.00% 190 100.00% 190 Ellis County Housing Authority KS170 187 100.00% 0 0.00% 187 Dodge City Housing Authority KS006 134 72.83% 50 27.17% 184 NEK-CAP, Inc. KS168 177 100.00% 0 0.00% 177 Wellington Housing Authority KS037 0 0.00% 162 100.00% 162 Jetmore Housing Authority KS047 0 0.00% 161 100.00% 161

Page 77 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Kansas

KS-507 Kansas Balance of State CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units North Newton Housing Authority KS015 0 0.00% 144 100.00% 144 Humboldt Housing Authority KS061 0 0.00% 139 100.00% 139 Liberal Housing Authority KS072 0 0.00% 136 100.00% 136 Wamego Housing Authority KS042 0 0.00% 130 100.00% 130 Housing Authority of the City of Herington KS KS100 0 0.00% 118 100.00% 118 Great Bend Housing Authority KS041 82 71.93% 32 28.07% 114 Hays Housing Authority KS091 78 76.47% 24 23.53% 102 Blue Rapids Housing Authority KS030 0 0.00% 101 100.00% 101 Strong City Housing Authority KS070 0 0.00% 100 100.00% 100 Garden City Housing Authority KS071 0 0.00% 100 100.00% 100 Fort Scott Housing Authority KS040 0 0.00% 97 100.00% 97 Newton Housing Authority KS073 72 78.26% 20 21.74% 92 Phillipsburg Housing Authority KS036 0 0.00% 92 100.00% 92 Kinsley Housing Authority KS023 0 0.00% 89 100.00% 89 Sabetha Housing Authority KS054 0 0.00% 84 100.00% 84 Luray Housing Authority KS026 0 0.00% 78 100.00% 78 Atchison Housing Authority KS017 32 41.03% 46 58.97% 78 Marion Housing Authority KS032 0 0.00% 76 100.00% 76 Seneca Housing Authority KS010 0 0.00% 65 100.00% 65 Linn Housing Authority KS014 0 0.00% 62 100.00% 62 Sterling Housing Authority KS028 0 0.00% 62 100.00% 62 Washington Housing Authority KS007 0 0.00% 60 100.00% 60

Page 78 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Kansas

KS-507 Kansas Balance of State CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Ulysses Housing Authority KS058 0 0.00% 54 100.00% 54 Waterville Housing Authority KS060 0 0.00% 50 100.00% 50 Holton Housing Authority KS008 0 0.00% 50 100.00% 50 Frontenac Housing Authority KS131 0 0.00% 50 100.00% 50 Russell Housing Authority KS027 0 0.00% 46 100.00% 46 Osborne Housing Authority KS020 0 0.00% 42 100.00% 42 Anthony Housing Authority KS018 0 0.00% 42 100.00% 42 Burrton Housing Authority KS078 0 0.00% 42 100.00% 42 Norton Housing Authority KS034 0 0.00% 41 100.00% 41 Housing Authority of Medicine Lodge KS057 0 0.00% 40 100.00% 40 Valley Falls Housing Authority KS056 0 0.00% 40 100.00% 40 Parsons Housing Authority KS044 0 0.00% 40 100.00% 40 Beloit Housing Authority KS019 0 0.00% 40 100.00% 40 Gaylord Housing Authority KS051 0 0.00% 40 100.00% 40 Hillsboro Housing Authority KS096 0 0.00% 40 100.00% 40 Minneapolis Housing Authority KS033 0 0.00% 38 100.00% 38 Junction City Housing Authority KS105 0 0.00% 36 100.00% 36 Atwood Housing Authority KS022 0 0.00% 34 100.00% 34 Downs Housing Authority KS086 0 0.00% 30 100.00% 30 Greenleaf Housing Authority KS083 0 0.00% 30 100.00% 30 Howard Housing Authority KS079 0 0.00% 30 100.00% 30 Mankato Housing Authority KS141 0 0.00% 30 100.00% 30

Page 79 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Kansas

KS-507 Kansas Balance of State CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Horton Housing Authority KS011 0 0.00% 30 100.00% 30 Columbus Housing Authority KS143 0 0.00% 29 100.00% 29 City of Clay Center KS031 0 0.00% 28 100.00% 28 Nicodemus Housing Authority KS081 0 0.00% 25 100.00% 25 Halstead Housing Authority KS112 0 0.00% 24 100.00% 24 Housing Authority of the City of Goodland KS055 0 0.00% 24 100.00% 24 Oakley Housing Authority KS021 0 0.00% 24 100.00% 24 Florence Housing Authority KS094 0 0.00% 24 100.00% 24 Belleville Housing Authority KS095 0 0.00% 24 100.00% 24 Winfield Housing Authority KS132 0 0.00% 24 100.00% 24 St. Francis Housing Authority KS076 0 0.00% 24 100.00% 24 Solomon Housing Authority KS152 0 0.00% 24 100.00% 24 Lincoln Housing Authority KS121 0 0.00% 24 100.00% 24 Neodesha Housing Authority KS069 0 0.00% 20 100.00% 20 Lindsborg Housing Authority KS065 0 0.00% 20 100.00% 20 Hill City Housing Authority KS082 0 0.00% 20 100.00% 20 Cawker City Housing Authority KS113 0 0.00% 20 100.00% 20 Chapman Housing Authority KS147 0 0.00% 20 100.00% 20 Augusta Housing Authority KS029 0 0.00% 20 100.00% 20 Galena Housing Authority KS045 0 0.00% 20 100.00% 20 Stafford Housing Authority KS142 0 0.00% 20 100.00% 20 Oberlin Housing Authority KS012 0 0.00% 18 100.00% 18

Page 80 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Kansas

KS-507 Kansas Balance of State CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Girard Housing Authority KS077 0 0.00% 18 100.00% 18 Hanover Housing Authority KS013 0 0.00% 17 100.00% 17 Moundridge Housing Authority KS059 0 0.00% 16 100.00% 16 Cherryvale Housing Authority KS155 0 0.00% 16 100.00% 16 Iola Housing Authority KS049 0 0.00% 14 100.00% 14 Lyons Housing Authority KS025 0 0.00% 12 100.00% 12 Agra Housing Authority KS050 0 0.00% 12 100.00% 12 Housing Authority of the City of Hoxie KS080 0 0.00% 9 100.00% 9 Hutchinson Housing Authority KS163 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Page 81 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Kentucky

KY-500 Kentucky Balance of State CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Kentucky Housing Corporation-State Agency KY901 5592 100.00% 0 0.00% 5592 Housing Authority of Salyersville/Magoffin Co. KY177 0 0.00% 3603 100.00% 3603 Housing Authority of Frankfort KY003 480 26.92% 1303 73.08% 1783 Cumberland Valley Regional Housing Authority KY160 1374 93.22% 100 6.78% 1474 Covington CDA KY133 1194 100.00% 0 0.00% 1194 Housing Authority of Hopkinsville KY011 580 57.43% 430 42.57% 1010 Boone County Fiscal Court KY135 998 100.00% 0 0.00% 998 Housing Authority of Somerset KY008 322 35.70% 580 64.30% 902 Housing Authority of Henderson KY012 738 85.02% 130 14.98% 868 Housing Authority of Newport KY015 585 67.47% 282 32.53% 867 Appalachian Foothills Housing Agency Inc KY161 780 100.00% 0 0.00% 780 City of Richmond Section 8 Housing Program KY132 735 100.00% 0 0.00% 735 Campbell County Department of Housing KY136 673 100.00% 0 0.00% 673 Pike County Housing Authority KY121 598 90.33% 64 9.67% 662 Ashland Planning and CDA KY142 616 100.00% 0 0.00% 616 Housing Authority of Glasgow KY026 338 55.23% 274 44.77% 612 Bowling Green CDA KY171 606 100.00% 0 0.00% 606 Housing Authority of Harrodsburg KY062 0 0.00% 598 100.00% 598 Housing Authority of Georgetown KY061 399 71.12% 162 28.88% 561 City of Paducah KY137 554 100.00% 0 0.00% 554 Lake Cumberland Housing Agency Inc KY163 514 100.00% 0 0.00% 514 Housing Authority of Maysville KY017 108 21.26% 400 78.74% 508

Page 82 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Kentucky

KY-500 Kentucky Balance of State CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of Danville KY014 0 0.00% 482 100.00% 482 Paris-Bourbon County Community Dev. Agency KY140 472 100.00% 0 0.00% 472 Housing Authority of Mayfield KY040 289 61.62% 180 38.38% 469 Housing Authority of Madisonville KY007 253 54.06% 215 45.94% 468 Housing Authority of Winchester KY018 0 0.00% 463 100.00% 463 Housing Authority of Corbin KY010 0 0.00% 455 100.00% 455 Housing Authority of Owensboro KY009 289 65.24% 154 34.76% 443 Housing Authority of Cynthiana KY021 203 49.15% 210 50.85% 413 Pineville/Bell County Community Dev Agency KY141 401 100.00% 0 0.00% 401 Housing Authority of Paris KY013 0 0.00% 394 100.00% 394 Campbellsville Housing and Redevelopment Authority KY047 274 71.73% 108 28.27% 382 Housing Authority of Liberty KY073 0 0.00% 373 100.00% 373 Housing Authority of Lyon County KY025 0 0.00% 367 100.00% 367 Housing Authority of Floyd County KY157 301 82.02% 66 17.98% 367 Housing Authority of Pikeville KY107 341 100.00% 0 0.00% 341 Housing Authority of Owingsville KY106 0 0.00% 336 100.00% 336 Laurel County Section 8 Housing KY169 330 100.00% 0 0.00% 330 Housing Authority of Flemingsburg KY060 0 0.00% 328 100.00% 328 Housing Authority of Albany KY046 0 0.00% 300 100.00% 300 Danville Community Development Agency KY138 297 100.00% 0 0.00% 297 Housing Authority of Bardstown KY071 169 61.45% 106 38.55% 275 Housing Authority of Russellville KY023 0 0.00% 273 100.00% 273

Page 83 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Kentucky

KY-500 Kentucky Balance of State CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of Mount Sterling KY020 0 0.00% 265 100.00% 265 Housing Authority of Prestonsburg KY035 144 54.55% 120 45.45% 264 Housing Authority of Richmond KY016 0 0.00% 260 100.00% 260 Housing Authority of Springfield KY056 69 27.71% 180 72.29% 249 Housing Authority of Lebanon KY022 72 29.75% 170 70.25% 242 Housing Authority of Murray KY030 0 0.00% 237 100.00% 237 Housing Authority of Greensburg KY053 118 51.75% 110 48.25% 228 Housing Authority of Paintsville KY027 87 38.33% 140 61.67% 227 Housing Authority of Middlesborough KY019 0 0.00% 225 100.00% 225 Housing Authority of Williamsburg KY031 0 0.00% 222 100.00% 222 Housing Authority of Pineville KY039 0 0.00% 222 100.00% 222 Housing Authority of Covington KY002 0 0.00% 211 100.00% 211 Housing Authority of Cadiz KY042 0 0.00% 206 100.00% 206 Housing Authority of Cumberland KY029 0 0.00% 206 100.00% 206 Housing Authority of Martin KY038 0 0.00% 199 100.00% 199 Barbourville Urban Renewal & CDA KY150 198 100.00% 0 0.00% 198 Housing Authority of Central City KY070 0 0.00% 197 100.00% 197 Housing Authority of Paducah KY006 0 0.00% 186 100.00% 186 Housing Authority of Dawson Springs KY075 0 0.00% 181 100.00% 181 HA of Lawrence County KY086 130 76.47% 40 23.53% 170 Housing Authority of Nicholasville KY034 0 0.00% 160 100.00% 160 Housing Authority of Monticello KY048 0 0.00% 156 100.00% 156

Page 84 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Kentucky

KY-500 Kentucky Balance of State CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of Ashland KY074 0 0.00% 150 100.00% 150 Housing Authority of Morehead KY032 0 0.00% 150 100.00% 150 Housing Authority of Barbourville KY028 0 0.00% 140 100.00% 140 Housing Authority of Columbia KY064 0 0.00% 134 100.00% 134 Housing Authority of Hickman KY037 0 0.00% 124 100.00% 124 Housing Authority of Irvine KY036 0 0.00% 118 100.00% 118 Housing Authority of Elizabethtown KY054 0 0.00% 111 100.00% 111 Housing Authority of Owenton KY098 0 0.00% 108 100.00% 108 Housing Authority of Fulton KY043 0 0.00% 104 100.00% 104 Housing Authority of Radcliff KY087 0 0.00% 102 100.00% 102 Housing Authority of McCreary County KY081 0 0.00% 100 100.00% 100 Housing Authority of Burkesville KY055 0 0.00% 96 100.00% 96 Housing Authority of Hazard KY024 0 0.00% 94 100.00% 94 Housing Authority of Providence KY085 0 0.00% 88 100.00% 88 Housing Authority of Harlan KY077 0 0.00% 85 100.00% 85 Housing Authority of Bowling Green KY063 0 0.00% 83 100.00% 83 Housing Authority of Sturgis KY094 0 0.00% 81 100.00% 81 Housing Authority of Manchester KY066 0 0.00% 76 100.00% 76 Housing Authority of Morgantown KY041 0 0.00% 75 100.00% 75 Housing Authority of Princeton KY072 0 0.00% 73 100.00% 73 Housing Authority of Stanton KY080 0 0.00% 71 100.00% 71 Housing Authority of Berea KY090 0 0.00% 70 100.00% 70

Page 85 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Kentucky

KY-500 Kentucky Balance of State CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of Williamstown KY069 0 0.00% 70 100.00% 70 Housing Authority of Dayton KY129 0 0.00% 66 100.00% 66 Housing Authority of Tompkinsville KY050 0 0.00% 62 100.00% 62 Housing Authority Vanceburg KY084 0 0.00% 60 100.00% 60 Housing Authority of Shelbyville KY089 0 0.00% 60 100.00% 60 Housing Authority of Todd County KY170 0 0.00% 59 100.00% 59 Housing Authority of Irvington KY101 0 0.00% 57 100.00% 57 Housing Authority of Catlettsburg KY033 0 0.00% 54 100.00% 54 Housing Authority of Hodgenville KY083 0 0.00% 52 100.00% 52 Housing Authority of Franklin KY099 0 0.00% 50 100.00% 50 Housing Authority of Eminence KY078 0 0.00% 50 100.00% 50 Housing Authority of McKee KY147 0 0.00% 48 100.00% 48 Housing Authority of Morganfield KY093 0 0.00% 46 100.00% 46 Housing Authority of Olive Hill KY092 0 0.00% 46 100.00% 46 Housing Authority of Beaver Dam KY122 0 0.00% 45 100.00% 45 Housing Authority of Benton KY091 0 0.00% 40 100.00% 40 Housing Authority of Stanford KY079 0 0.00% 40 100.00% 40 Housing Authority of Falmouth KY059 0 0.00% 40 100.00% 40 Housing Authority of Greenville KY100 0 0.00% 36 100.00% 36 Housing Authority of Mount Vernon KY097 0 0.00% 32 100.00% 32 Housing Authority of Whitesburg KY044 0 0.00% 32 100.00% 32 Housing Authority of Versailles KY049 0 0.00% 32 100.00% 32

Page 86 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Kentucky

KY-500 Kentucky Balance of State CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of London KY065 0 0.00% 32 100.00% 32 Housing Authority of Beattyville KY058 0 0.00% 31 100.00% 31 Housing Authority of Jackson KY045 0 0.00% 30 100.00% 30 Housing Authority of Carrollton KY057 0 0.00% 30 100.00% 30 Housing Authority of Horse Cave KY067 0 0.00% 30 100.00% 30 Housing Authority of Knott County KY096 0 0.00% 30 100.00% 30 Housing Authority of Lancaster KY052 0 0.00% 26 100.00% 26 Housing Authority of Scottsville KY104 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 2 Housing Authority of Dry Ridge KY158 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Housing Authority of Martin County KY149 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

KY-501 Louisville-Jefferson County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Louisville Metro Housing Authority KY001 10577 92.87% 812 7.13% 11389

KY-502 Lexington-Fayette County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of Lexington KY004 2857 76.47% 879 23.53% 3736

Page 87 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Louisiana

LA-500 Lafayette/Acadiana Regional CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of the City of Lafayette LA005 1798 54.04% 1529 45.96% 3327 Housing Authority of the Parish of St. Landry LA067 721 97.56% 18 2.44% 739 Housing Authority of Crowley LA029 403 64.90% 218 35.10% 621 Housing Authority of the City of Morgan City LA036 138 35.84% 247 64.16% 385 St. Martin Parish Police Jury LA178 342 100.00% 0 0.00% 342 Housing Authority of Rayne LA028 0 0.00% 331 100.00% 331 City of New Iberia LA165 322 100.00% 0 0.00% 322 Southwest Acadia Consolidated Housing Authority LA091 0 0.00% 318 100.00% 318 Housing Authority of the Town of Gueydan LA035 0 0.00% 300 100.00% 300 Housing Authority of South Landry LA073 0 0.00% 262 100.00% 262 Housing Authority of the Town of Church Point LA032 88 36.07% 156 63.93% 244 Iberia Parish Government LA189 229 100.00% 0 0.00% 229 St. Mary Parish Council LA220 200 100.00% 0 0.00% 200 Housing Authority of New Iberia LA027 0 0.00% 200 100.00% 200 Housing Authority of Kaplan LA026 0 0.00% 200 100.00% 200 Housing Authority of the City of Breaux Bridge LA059 0 0.00% 191 100.00% 191 Ville Platte City LA192 153 100.00% 0 0.00% 153 Housing Authority of the Town of Mamou LA031 20 13.99% 123 86.01% 143 Housing Authority of City of Opelousas LA055 0 0.00% 128 100.00% 128 Evangeline Parish Police Jury LA182 124 100.00% 0 0.00% 124 Housing Authority of the Village of Parks LA084 0 0.00% 122 100.00% 122 Housing Authority of the Town of Berwick LA056 0 0.00% 121 100.00% 121

Page 88 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Louisiana

LA-500 Lafayette/Acadiana Regional CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of Ville Platte LA030 0 0.00% 120 100.00% 120 Housing Authority of the Town of Basile LA058 0 0.00% 98 100.00% 98 Rayne City LA174 93 100.00% 0 0.00% 93 Housing Authority of the City of Eunice LA025 0 0.00% 86 100.00% 86 Housing Authority of the Town of Patterson LA070 0 0.00% 60 100.00% 60 Housing Authority of the Town of Youngsville LA100 0 0.00% 52 100.00% 52 St. Martinville City LA173 50 100.00% 0 0.00% 50 Housing Authority of Duson LA130 0 0.00% 50 100.00% 50 Housing Auth. of The Town of St. Martinville LA040 0 0.00% 49 100.00% 49 Jeanerette Public Housing Agency LA168 41 100.00% 0 0.00% 41 Housing Authority of the Town of Erath LA047 0 0.00% 40 100.00% 40 Housing Authority of the City of Abbeville LA034 0 0.00% 24 100.00% 24 Housing Authority of the Town of Delcambre LA065 0 0.00% 18 100.00% 18

LA-502 Shreveport, Bossier/Northwest Louisiana CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units HOUSING AUTHORITY OF SHREVEPORT LA002 3361 77.41% 981 22.59% 4342 Bossier Parish Section 8 LA190 855 100.00% 0 0.00% 855 Housing Authority of Homer LA089 0 0.00% 517 100.00% 517 Housing Authority of the City of Minden LA037 137 44.77% 169 55.23% 306 Housing Authority of the Town of Logansport LA077 0 0.00% 276 100.00% 276

Page 89 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Louisiana

LA-502 Shreveport, Bossier/Northwest Louisiana CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units DeSoto Parish Police Jury LA230 212 100.00% 0 0.00% 212 Webster Parish Police Jury LA213 177 100.00% 0 0.00% 177 Housing Authority of the Town of Cotton Valley LA117 0 0.00% 166 100.00% 166 Housing Authority of the City of Bossier City LA042 0 0.00% 152 100.00% 152 Housing Authority of the Town of Oil City LA108 0 0.00% 150 100.00% 150 Caddo Parish Commission LA184 141 100.00% 0 0.00% 141 Housing Authority of Vivian LA088 0 0.00% 100 100.00% 100 Housing Authority of the Town of Arcadia LA045 0 0.00% 68 100.00% 68 Housing Authority of the Town of Mansfield LA112 0 0.00% 60 100.00% 60 Housing Authority of Gibsland LA098 0 0.00% 58 100.00% 58 Red River Parish Police Jury LA163 45 100.00% 0 0.00% 45 Community Support Programs, Inc. LA888 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

LA-503 New Orleans/Jefferson Parish CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of New Orleans LA001 17999 96.44% 665 3.56% 18664 Housing Authority of Jefferson Parish LA013 4730 88.91% 590 11.09% 5320 St. Bernard Parish Government LA187 539 100.00% 0 0.00% 539 Housing Authority of Westwego LA011 0 0.00% 137 100.00% 137 Pilgrim Rest Community Development Agency LA889 90 100.00% 0 0.00% 90 New Orleans - DHAP Phase 2 & 3 Only LA996 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Page 90 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Louisiana

LA-503 New Orleans/Jefferson Parish CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Slidell - DHAP Phase 2 & 3 Only LA997 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Jefferson Parish - DHAP Phase 2 & 3 Only LA999 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

LA-504 Baton Rouge CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of East Baton Rouge LA003 3942 82.57% 832 17.43% 4774 Louisiana Housing Authority LA903 1565 100.00% 0 0.00% 1565 Housing Authority of the City of Donaldsonville LA043 0 0.00% 306 100.00% 306 Baton Rouge City LA219 279 100.00% 0 0.00% 279 City of Port Allen LA199 141 100.00% 0 0.00% 141 Plaquemine City LA179 134 100.00% 0 0.00% 134 Housing Authority of the Town of White Castle LA093 0 0.00% 129 100.00% 129 Ascension Parish Section 8 Program LA009 109 100.00% 0 0.00% 109 City of Donaldsonville LA202 102 100.00% 0 0.00% 102 West Baton Rouge Parish Council LA204 80 100.00% 0 0.00% 80 New Roads City LA205 50 100.00% 0 0.00% 50 Iberville Parish Government LA214 48 100.00% 0 0.00% 48 Town of White Castle LA266 16 100.00% 0 0.00% 16 Housing Authority of the Town of New Roads LA113 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Page 91 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Louisiana

LA-505 Monroe/Northeast Louisiana CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of Monroe LA006 1548 83.77% 300 16.23% 1848 Housing Authority of Ruston LA054 0 0.00% 690 100.00% 690 Ouachita Parish Police Jury LA171 552 100.00% 0 0.00% 552 West Monroe Housing Authority LA186 463 100.00% 0 0.00% 463 Housing Authority of the Town of Delhi LA114 40 9.13% 398 90.87% 438 Housing Authority of Farmerville LA052 0 0.00% 300 100.00% 300 Ruston City LA232 290 100.00% 0 0.00% 290 Housing Authority of Newellton LA169 251 100.00% 0 0.00% 251 Housing Authority of the Town of Winnsboro LA109 0 0.00% 193 100.00% 193 Housing Authority of the Town of Grambling LA097 150 87.21% 22 12.79% 172 Morehouse Parish Police Jury LA258 158 100.00% 0 0.00% 158 East Carroll Parish Police Jury LA195 142 100.00% 0 0.00% 142 Housing Authority of the Parish of Caldwell LA125 114 82.01% 25 17.99% 139 Lincoln Parish Police Jury LA212 135 100.00% 0 0.00% 135 Housing Authority of the Town of Lake Providence LA102 0 0.00% 126 100.00% 126 Union Parish Police Jury LA196 114 100.00% 0 0.00% 114 Housing Authority of the Town of Jonesboro LA061 0 0.00% 106 100.00% 106 Claiborne Parish Section 8 LA246 84 100.00% 0 0.00% 84 Bienville Parish Police Jury LA241 81 100.00% 0 0.00% 81 Housing Authority of the Town of Rayville LA105 0 0.00% 80 100.00% 80 West Carroll Parish Police Jury Housing Assistance LA233 73 100.00% 0 0.00% 73 Housing Authority of the Town of East Hodge LA127 0 0.00% 66 100.00% 66

Page 92 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Louisiana

LA-505 Monroe/Northeast Louisiana CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Tallulah City LA242 55 100.00% 0 0.00% 55 Jackson Parish Police Jury LA248 18 100.00% 0 0.00% 18 Franklin Parish Police Jury LA229 13 100.00% 0 0.00% 13 East Carroll Parish Housing Authority LA262 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

LA-506 Slidell/Southeast Louisiana CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of City of Slidell LA103 612 85.96% 100 14.04% 712 Tangipahoa Parish Council LA207 394 100.00% 0 0.00% 394 Housing Authority of Hammond LA104 354 100.00% 0 0.00% 354 Housing Authority of the City of Denham Springs LA101 184 55.09% 150 44.91% 334 Bogalusa Housing Authority LA024 100 40.00% 150 60.00% 250 Housing Authority of City of Covington LA238 159 100.00% 0 0.00% 159 Washington Parish Housing Authority LA217 155 100.00% 0 0.00% 155 Housing Authority of the Town of Pontchatoula LA075 65 48.87% 68 51.13% 133 Town of Independence HA LA099 55 73.33% 20 26.67% 75 Kentwood LA206 69 100.00% 0 0.00% 69 St. Bernard Parish - DHAP Phase 2 & 3 Only LA998 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Page 93 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Louisiana

LA-507 Alexandria/Central Louisiana CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of the City of Alexandria LA023 1114 76.62% 340 23.38% 1454 Housing Authority of the City of Natchitoches LA115 450 95.74% 20 4.26% 470 Housing Authority of Rapides Parish LA129 372 92.54% 30 7.46% 402 Housing Authority of Natchitoches Parish LA166 334 84.77% 60 15.23% 394 Housing Authority of Vernon Parish LA128 66 27.05% 178 72.95% 244 Housing Authority of Grant Parish LA120 113 55.67% 90 44.33% 203 Housing Authority of the Town of Bunkie LA062 0 0.00% 202 100.00% 202 Housing Authority of the City of Leesville LA111 56 28.57% 140 71.43% 196 Pineville Housing Authority LA057 168 88.42% 22 11.58% 190 HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE TOWN OF COLFAX LA122 50 29.76% 118 70.24% 168 Housing Authority of the Town of Simmesport LA072 0 0.00% 148 100.00% 148 Avoyelles Parish Police Jury LA132 140 100.00% 0 0.00% 140 Housing Authority of the Town of Olla LA124 0 0.00% 116 100.00% 116 Winn Parish Police Jury LA257 92 100.00% 0 0.00% 92 Housing Authority of Jena LA142 0 0.00% 92 100.00% 92 Catahoula Parish Police Jury LA222 66 100.00% 0 0.00% 66 Housing Authority of the Town of Cottonport LA071 0 0.00% 56 100.00% 56 Concordia Parish Police Jury LA159 54 100.00% 0 0.00% 54 Housing Authority of Winnfield LA123 0 0.00% 45 100.00% 45 Housing Authority of the Town of Marksville LA038 0 0.00% 36 100.00% 36 Housing Authority of Ferriday LA076 0 0.00% 26 100.00% 26

Page 94 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Louisiana

LA-508 Houma-Terrebonne, Thibodaux CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of the City of Kenner LA012 1322 86.86% 200 13.14% 1522 Housing Authority of St. Charles Parish LA094 395 57.16% 296 42.84% 691 Terrebonne Ph.Consolid.Govt.,Federal Programs Division LA211 534 100.00% 0 0.00% 534 Lafourche Parish Housing Authority LA253 271 100.00% 0 0.00% 271 St. John the Baptist Parish Housing Authority LA181 260 100.00% 0 0.00% 260 Thibodaux City LA194 255 100.00% 0 0.00% 255 Housing Authority of St. James Parish LA092 0 0.00% 134 100.00% 134 Housing Authority of the City of Thibodaux LA044 0 0.00% 120 100.00% 120 Housing Authority of St. John the Baptist Parish LA095 0 0.00% 120 100.00% 120 Assumption Parish Police Jury LA215 108 100.00% 0 0.00% 108 Housing Authority of Lafourche Parish LA080 0 0.00% 90 100.00% 90 Housing Authority of the City of Houma LA090 0 0.00% 54 100.00% 54

LA-509 Louisiana Balance of State CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units HOUSING AUTHORITY OF LAKE CHARLES LA004 1986 77.64% 572 22.36% 2558 Calcasieu Parish Human Services Department LA172 574 100.00% 0 0.00% 574 Housing Authority of the Town of Lake Arthur LA041 0 0.00% 437 100.00% 437 Housing Authority of Oakdale LA033 120 43.48% 156 56.52% 276 Housing Authority of Sabine Parish LA074 108 49.54% 110 50.46% 218 Town of Kinder LA247 172 100.00% 0 0.00% 172

Page 95 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Louisiana

LA-509 Louisiana Balance of State CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of the City of Sulphur LA063 108 65.85% 56 34.15% 164 Housing Authority of the Town of Elton LA066 0 0.00% 146 100.00% 146 Jefferson Davis Parish Section 8 LA188 132 100.00% 0 0.00% 132 Housing Authority of the Town of Welsh LA039 0 0.00% 124 100.00% 124 Housing Authority of the City of DeRidder LA086 38 32.20% 80 67.80% 118 Housing Authority of the Town of Vinton LA046 50 46.30% 58 53.70% 108 Housing Authority of the Town of Kinder LA069 0 0.00% 106 100.00% 106 Housing Authority of the City of DeQuincy LA106 0 0.00% 78 100.00% 78 Housing Authority of the Town of Iowa LA231 0 0.00% 50 100.00% 50 Village of Fenton Housing Authority LA261 0 0.00% 40 100.00% 40 Housing Authority of the Town of Oberlin LA068 0 0.00% 30 100.00% 30 Housing Authority of the City of Jennings LA118 0 0.00% 28 100.00% 28 Housing Authority of the Town of Merryville LA082 0 0.00% 16 100.00% 16

Page 96 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Maine

ME-500 Maine Balance of State CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Maine State Housing Authority ME901 4340 100.00% 0 0.00% 4340 Augusta Housing Authority ME030 381 9.29% 3721 90.71% 4102 Lewiston Housing Authority ME005 1238 86.63% 191 13.37% 1429 Fort Fairfield Housing Authority ME002 132 11.61% 1005 88.39% 1137 Waterville Housing Authority ME008 394 41.04% 566 58.96% 960 The Housing Authority of the City of Westbroo ME015 705 89.13% 86 10.87% 791 Auburn Housing Authority ME007 590 75.26% 194 24.74% 784 Sanford Housing Authority ME011 593 87.72% 83 12.28% 676 Brunswick Housing Authority ME006 423 70.50% 177 29.50% 600 Housing Authority City of Bangor ME009 440 78.43% 121 21.57% 561 South Portland Housing Authority ME020 389 71.64% 154 28.36% 543 Presque Isle Housing Authority ME004 75 14.65% 437 85.35% 512 Bath Housing Authority ME019 134 27.92% 346 72.08% 480 Ellsworth Housing Authority ME027 377 100.00% 0 0.00% 377 Old Town Housing Authority ME018 209 68.30% 97 31.70% 306 Caribou Housing Agency ME025 193 100.00% 0 0.00% 193 Brewer Housing Authority ME021 133 72.68% 50 27.32% 183 Van Buren Housing Authority ME001 101 55.49% 81 44.51% 182 Biddeford Housing Authority ME028 156 100.00% 0 0.00% 156 Southwest Harbor Housing Authority ME022 0 0.00% 115 100.00% 115 Tremont Housing Authority ME026 0 0.00% 50 100.00% 50 Mount Desert Housing Authority ME024 0 0.00% 22 100.00% 22

Page 97 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Maine

ME-500 Maine Balance of State CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Bar Harbor Housing Authority ME023 0 0.00% 18 100.00% 18 Saco Housing Authority ME031 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

ME-502 Portland CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Portland Housing Authority ME003 1809 90.72% 185 9.28% 1994

Page 98 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Maryland

MD-500 Cumberland/Allegany County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of the City of Cumberland MD005 0 0.00% 1180 100.00% 1180 Housing Authority of the City of Frostburg MD008 0 0.00% 330 100.00% 330 Housing Authority Of Allegany County MD030 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

MD-501 Baltimore CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority Of Baltimore City MD002 19024 97.89% 410 2.11% 19434 Baltimore County, MD MD033 6133 100.00% 0 0.00% 6133

MD-502 Harford County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Harford County Housing Agency MD025 1194 100.00% 0 0.00% 1194 Havre de Grace Housing Authority MD012 0 0.00% 61 100.00% 61

MD-503 Annapolis/Anne Arundel County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF ANNAPOLIS MD001 384 3.29% 11271 96.71% 11655 MD Dept. Of Housing and Community Development MD901 2338 100.00% 0 0.00% 2338 Housing Commisson Of Anne Arundel County MD018 1991 96.79% 66 3.21% 2057

Page 99 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Maryland

MD-504 Howard County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Howard County Housing Commission MD023 944 100.00% 0 0.00% 944

MD-506 Carroll County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Carroll County Housing & Community Dev MD032 649 100.00% 0 0.00% 649 City Of Westminster Housing Office MD027 293 100.00% 0 0.00% 293

MD-507 Cecil County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Cecil County Housing Agency MD029 634 100.00% 0 0.00% 634 Elkton Housing Authority MD016 40 27.03% 108 72.97% 148

MD-508 Charles, Calvert, St.Mary's Counties CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of St. Mary's County, MD MD021 1313 94.87% 71 5.13% 1384 County Commissioners Charles County MD024 909 100.00% 0 0.00% 909 Housing Authority of Calvert County MD022 339 87.15% 50 12.85% 389

Page 100 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Maryland

MD-509 Frederick City & County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Frederick Housing Authority MD003 710 43.24% 932 56.76% 1642

MD-511 Mid-Shore Regional CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units ST. Michaels Housing Authority MD013 20 6.73% 277 93.27% 297 Queen Anne's County Housing Authority MD034 136 60.18% 90 39.82% 226 Housing Authority of the Town of Easton MD019 139 72.77% 52 27.23% 191 Housing Authority of Cambridge MD010 0 0.00% 60 100.00% 60

MD-512 Hagerstown/Washington County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Hagerstown Housing Authority MD006 884 89.11% 108 10.89% 992 Housing Authority of Washington County MD028 578 88.51% 75 11.49% 653

MD-513 Wicomico, Somerset, Worcester Counties CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Wicomico County Housing Authority MD014 383 50.39% 377 49.61% 760 Housing Authority Of Crisfield MD009 23 10.80% 190 89.20% 213

Page 101 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Maryland

MD-600 Prince George's County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of Prince Georges County MD015 5798 97.48% 150 2.52% 5948 College Park Housing Authority MD017 0 0.00% 934 100.00% 934 Glenarden Housing Authority MD011 0 0.00% 60 100.00% 60

MD-601 Montgomery County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units HOUSING OPPRTY COM OF MONTGOMERY CO MD004 7044 94.31% 425 5.69% 7469 Rockville Housing Enterprises MD007 359 78.21% 100 21.79% 459

Page 102 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Massachusetts

MA-500 Boston CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Department of Housing & Community Development MA901 20945 100.00% 0 0.00% 20945 Boston Housing Authority MA002 14199 85.36% 2435 14.64% 16634

MA-502 Lynn CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Lynn Housing Authority MA023 1407 46.41% 1625 53.59% 3032

MA-503 Cape Cod Islands CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Barnstable Housing Authority MA046 314 58.47% 223 41.53% 537 Falmouth Housing Authority MA047 319 100.00% 0 0.00% 319 Yarmouth Housing Authority MA095 249 100.00% 0 0.00% 249 Bourne Housing Authority MA110 76 60.80% 49 39.20% 125 Dennis Housing Authority MA138 98 100.00% 0 0.00% 98 Sandwich Housing Authority MA181 28 100.00% 0 0.00% 28

MA-504 Springfield/Hampden County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Holyoke Housing Authority MA005 1389 40.52% 2039 59.48% 3428

Page 103 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Massachusetts

MA-504 Springfield/Hampden County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Springfield Housing Authority MA035 2884 90.63% 298 9.37% 3182 Chicopee Housing Authority MA008 393 27.12% 1056 72.88% 1449 West Springfield Housing Authority MA078 251 100.00% 0 0.00% 251 Westfield Housing Authority MA050 240 100.00% 0 0.00% 240

MA-505 New Bedford CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units New Bedford Housing Authority MA007 1899 83.22% 383 16.78% 2282

MA-506 Worcester City & County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Worcester Housing Authority MA012 2191 89.21% 265 10.79% 2456 Clinton Housing Authority MA021 0 0.00% 1195 100.00% 1195 Milford Housing Authority MA069 556 93.29% 40 6.71% 596 Leominster Housing Authority MA086 399 100.00% 0 0.00% 399 Fitchburg Housing Authority MA037 219 62.57% 131 37.43% 350 Shrewsbury Housing Authority MA041 173 79.72% 44 20.28% 217 Southbridge Housing Authority MA076 125 100.00% 0 0.00% 125 Gardner Housing Authority MA127 102 100.00% 0 0.00% 102 Oxford Housing Authority MA106 87 100.00% 0 0.00% 87

Page 104 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Massachusetts

MA-506 Worcester City & County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Warren Housing Authority MA105 66 100.00% 0 0.00% 66 Holden Housing Authority MA082 59 100.00% 0 0.00% 59 Winchendon Housing Authority MA039 35 59.32% 24 40.68% 59 Athol Housing Authority MA100 58 100.00% 0 0.00% 58 Webster Housing Authority MA123 44 100.00% 0 0.00% 44 Auburn Housing Authority MA159 0 0.00% 8 100.00% 8 The Bridge of Central Massachusetts MA188 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

MA-507 Pittsfield/Berkshire, Franklin, Hampshire Counties CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units North Adams Housing Authority MA034 371 17.02% 1809 82.98% 2180 Pittsfield Housing Authority MA029 580 49.83% 584 50.17% 1164 Northampton Housing Authority MA026 770 76.62% 235 23.38% 1005 Franklin County Regional Housing Authority MA094 579 100.00% 0 0.00% 579 Greenfield Housing Authority MA096 526 96.69% 18 3.31% 544 Amherst Housing Authority MA085 413 81.78% 92 18.22% 505 Ware Housing Authority MA088 99 100.00% 0 0.00% 99 Williamstown Housing Authority MA066 97 100.00% 0 0.00% 97 Adams Housing Authority MA051 95 100.00% 0 0.00% 95 Stockbridge Housing Authority MA080 41 100.00% 0 0.00% 41 Berkshire County Regional Housing Authority MA187 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Page 105 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Massachusetts

MA-508 Lowell CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Lowell Housing Authority MA001 1171 10.19% 10318 89.81% 11489 Middlesex North Resources Center, Inc. MA881 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Community TeamWork, Inc. MA882 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

MA-509 Cambridge CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Cambridge Housing Authority MA003 3146 77.35% 921 22.65% 4067

MA-510 Gloucester, Haverhill, Salem/Essex County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Salem Housing Authority MA055 1088 100.00% 0 0.00% 1088 Gloucester Housing Authority MA025 633 85.20% 110 14.80% 743 Newburyport Housing Authority MA032 102 16.97% 499 83.03% 601 Methuen Housing Authority MA081 558 100.00% 0 0.00% 558 Beverly Housing Authority MA044 420 85.71% 70 14.29% 490 Haverhill Housing Authority MA087 462 100.00% 0 0.00% 462 Saugus Housing Authority MA099 150 52.45% 136 47.55% 286 Peabody Housing Authority MA054 262 100.00% 0 0.00% 262 North Andover Housing Authority MA107 133 58.08% 96 41.92% 229 Danvers Housing Authority MA118 145 70.39% 61 29.61% 206

Page 106 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Massachusetts

MA-510 Gloucester, Haverhill, Salem/Essex County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Rockport Housing Authority MA073 153 100.00% 0 0.00% 153 Andover Housing Authority MA084 127 89.44% 15 10.56% 142 Amesbury Housing Authority MA116 84 100.00% 0 0.00% 84 Salisbury Housing Authority MA174 58 100.00% 0 0.00% 58 Ipswich Housing Authority MA056 55 100.00% 0 0.00% 55 Groveland Housing Authority MA132 0 0.00% 40 100.00% 40 Bridgewell MA880 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

MA-510, 513, 516 & 518 Shared Jurisdiction PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Woburn Housing Authority MA019 288 30.70% 650 69.30% 938 Chelmsford Housing Authority MA108 562 100.00% 0 0.00% 562 Everett Housing Authority MA027 365 100.00% 0 0.00% 365 Wakefield Housing Authority MA074 331 100.00% 0 0.00% 331 Acton Housing Authority MA057 155 58.05% 112 41.95% 267 Melrose Housing Authority MA063 240 100.00% 0 0.00% 240 Dracut Housing Authority MA043 68 28.81% 168 71.19% 236 Concord Housing Authority MA098 85 45.95% 100 54.05% 185 Wayland Housing Authority MA101 78 42.62% 105 57.38% 183 Watertown Housing Authority MA093 156 100.00% 0 0.00% 156 Natick Housing Authority MA092 102 67.11% 50 32.89% 152

Page 107 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Massachusetts

MA-510, 513, 516 & 518 Shared Jurisdiction PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Wilmington Housing Authority MA061 11 7.48% 136 92.52% 147 Winchester Housing Authority MA125 143 100.00% 0 0.00% 143 Marlborough C.D.A. - Housing Division MA070 135 100.00% 0 0.00% 135 Lexington Housing Authority MA067 68 51.13% 65 48.87% 133 Reading Housing Authority MA075 125 100.00% 0 0.00% 125 Tewksbury Housing Authority MA139 110 100.00% 0 0.00% 110 Burlington Housing Authority MA112 93 100.00% 0 0.00% 93 Hudson Housing Authority MA091 69 100.00% 0 0.00% 69 Billerica Housing Authority MA077 65 100.00% 0 0.00% 65 Maynard Housing Authority MA137 0 0.00% 50 100.00% 50 Holliston Housing Authority MA165 49 100.00% 0 0.00% 49 Belmont Housing Authority MA042 47 100.00% 0 0.00% 47 North Reading Housing Authority MA089 22 100.00% 0 0.00% 22 American Training by Chelmsford Housing MA883 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

MA-511 Quincy, Brockton, Weymouth, Plymouth City and County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Brockton Housing Authority MA024 1780 95.24% 89 4.76% 1869 Quincy Housing Authority MA020 845 89.42% 100 10.58% 945 Plymouth Housing Authority MA059 513 100.00% 0 0.00% 513 Weymouth Housing Authority MA045 225 76.79% 68 23.21% 293

Page 108 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Massachusetts

MA-511 Quincy, Brockton, Weymouth, Plymouth City and County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Rockland Housing Authority MA133 154 82.80% 32 17.20% 186 Middleborough Housing Authority MA060 154 100.00% 0 0.00% 154 Abington Housing Authority MA079 86 67.19% 42 32.81% 128 Bridgewater Housing Authority MA126 69 54.33% 58 45.67% 127 Hanson Housing Authority MA155 25 20.00% 100 80.00% 125 Pembroke Housing Authority MA111 83 67.48% 40 32.52% 123 Hingham Housing Authority MA119 25 100.00% 0 0.00% 25 Halifax Housing Authority MA121 14 100.00% 0 0.00% 14 Duxbury Housing Authority MA071 13 100.00% 0 0.00% 13 Brockton Area Multi Services Inc. MA884 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Scituate Housing Authority MA049 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

MA-515 Fall River CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Fall River Housing Authority MA006 2431 58.14% 1750 41.86% 4181

MA-516 Massachusetts Balance of State CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Lawrence Housing Authority MA010 998 28.76% 2472 71.24% 3470 Malden Housing Authority MA022 977 68.04% 459 31.96% 1436

Page 109 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Massachusetts

MA-516 Massachusetts Balance of State CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Medford Housing Authority MA015 987 73.60% 354 26.40% 1341 Revere Housing Authority MA014 470 40.21% 699 59.79% 1169 Framingham Housing Authority MA028 983 85.70% 164 14.30% 1147 Chelsea Housing Authority MA016 515 50.19% 511 49.81% 1026 Dedham Housing Authority MA040 461 82.32% 99 17.68% 560 Braintree Housing Authority MA053 480 92.49% 39 7.51% 519 Norwood Housing Authority MA109 341 85.89% 56 14.11% 397 Needham Housing Authority MA065 120 60.91% 77 39.09% 197 Milton Housing Authority MA147 144 100.00% 0 0.00% 144 Stoughton Housing Authority MA117 48 38.71% 76 61.29% 124 Medway Housing Authority MA157 0 0.00% 103 100.00% 103 Walpole Housing Authority MA140 95 100.00% 0 0.00% 95 Holbrook Housing Authority MA072 82 100.00% 0 0.00% 82 Bellingham Housing Authority MA090 30 100.00% 0 0.00% 30 Millis Housing Authority MA154 21 77.78% 6 22.22% 27 Wellesley Housing Authority MA135 11 100.00% 0 0.00% 11

MA-517 Somerville CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Somerville Housing Authority MA031 1193 95.98% 50 4.02% 1243 Arlington Housing Authority MA048 422 89.22% 51 10.78% 473

Page 110 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Massachusetts

MA-518 Brookline, Newton CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Brookline Housing Authority MA033 619 66.92% 306 33.08% 925 Waltham Housing Authority MA013 450 69.88% 194 30.12% 644 Newton Housing Authority MA036 441 89.82% 50 10.18% 491

MA-519 Attleboro, Taunton/Bristol County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Taunton Housing Authority MA017 1071 91.46% 100 8.54% 1171 Dartmouth Housing Authority MA172 197 100.00% 0 0.00% 197 North Attleborough Housing Authority MA170 104 100.00% 0 0.00% 104 Easton Housing Authority MA122 101 100.00% 0 0.00% 101 Attleboro Housing Authority MA018 96 100.00% 0 0.00% 96 Mansfield Housing Authority MA134 64 100.00% 0 0.00% 64 Swansea Housing Authority MA169 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Page 111 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Michigan

MI-500 Michigan Balance of State CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Bath Charter Township Housing Commission MI194 25 0.58% 4259 99.42% 4284 Calumet Housing Commission MI057 0 0.00% 833 100.00% 833 Port Huron Housing Commission MI039 578 85.25% 100 14.75% 678 Greenville Housing Commission MI023 107 15.99% 562 84.01% 669 Benton Harbor Housing Commission MI010 201 40.69% 293 59.31% 494 Cheboygan Housing Commission MI030 120 25.92% 343 74.08% 463 Hancock Housing Commission MI063 40 10.00% 360 90.00% 400 Montcalm Housing Commission MI186 318 92.98% 24 7.02% 342 Grayling Housing Commission MI047 130 39.51% 199 60.49% 329 Baldwin Housing Commission MI050 180 60.00% 120 40.00% 300 Sturgis Housing Commission MI069 0 0.00% 257 100.00% 257 Iron County Housing Commission MI119 169 66.27% 86 33.73% 255 Lapeer Housing Commission MI100 122 49.00% 127 51.00% 249 Saint Louis Housing Commission MI061 155 62.25% 94 37.75% 249 Mount Pleasant Housing Commission MI074 50 21.74% 180 78.26% 230 Dowagiac Housing Commission MI120 128 57.66% 94 42.34% 222 Iron Mountain Housing Commission MI013 0 0.00% 220 100.00% 220 Gladstone Housing Commission MI077 0 0.00% 218 100.00% 218 Benton Township Housing Commission MI032 75 36.95% 128 63.05% 203 Belding Housing Commission MI025 0 0.00% 198 100.00% 198 Lake Linden Housing Commission MI104 0 0.00% 198 100.00% 198 Algonac Housing Commission MI114 0 0.00% 196 100.00% 196

Page 112 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Michigan

MI-500 Michigan Balance of State CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Boyne City Housing Commission MI084 60 31.75% 129 68.25% 189 South Haven Housing Commission MI082 0 0.00% 175 100.00% 175 Gladwin City Housing Commission MI095 0 0.00% 168 100.00% 168 Ontonagon Housing Commission MI042 0 0.00% 164 100.00% 164 Alma Housing Commission MI121 64 41.83% 89 58.17% 153 Laurium Housing Commission MI054 0 0.00% 151 100.00% 151 Sault Ste Marie Housing Commission MI036 50 33.56% 99 66.44% 149 Bronson Housing Commission MI016 0 0.00% 148 100.00% 148 Manistique Housing Commission MI049 59 40.69% 86 59.31% 145 Menominee Housing Commission MI087 61 42.96% 81 57.04% 142 Bay City Housing Commission MI024 0 0.00% 140 100.00% 140 Rogers City Housing Commission MI079 0 0.00% 138 100.00% 138 Mackinac County Housing Commission MI158 0 0.00% 132 100.00% 132 Baraga Housing Commission MI019 25 19.84% 101 80.16% 126 East Jordan Housing Commission MI118 0 0.00% 123 100.00% 123 Schoolcraft County Housing Commission MI178 35 28.46% 88 71.54% 123 Luce County Housing Commission MI132 110 100.00% 0 0.00% 110 L'Anse Housing Commission MI108 0 0.00% 109 100.00% 109 Cadillac Housing Commission MI060 25 23.81% 80 76.19% 105 Reed City Housing Commission MI020 90 85.71% 15 14.29% 105 Paw Paw Housing Commission MI088 0 0.00% 102 100.00% 102 Niles Housing Commission MI076 0 0.00% 102 100.00% 102

Page 113 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Michigan

MI-500 Michigan Balance of State CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Bessemer Housing Commission MI012 0 0.00% 101 100.00% 101 Marysville Housing Commission MI161 0 0.00% 100 100.00% 100 Coldwater Housing Commission MI056 0 0.00% 98 100.00% 98 Evart Housing Commission MI112 25 26.32% 70 73.68% 95 Saint Clair Housing Commission MI052 30 32.97% 61 67.03% 91 Alpena Housing Commission MI022 0 0.00% 89 100.00% 89 Saint Joseph Housing Commission MI046 0 0.00% 88 100.00% 88 Escanaba Housing Commission MI083 0 0.00% 80 100.00% 80 Saranac Housing Commission MI124 0 0.00% 75 100.00% 75 Iron River Housing Commission MI090 0 0.00% 69 100.00% 69 Hillsdale Housing Commission MI103 0 0.00% 65 100.00% 65 Bangor Housing Commission MI181 0 0.00% 62 100.00% 62 Big Rapids Housing Commission MI041 0 0.00% 60 100.00% 60 East Tawas Housing Commission MI102 0 0.00% 60 100.00% 60 Kingsford Housing Commission MI091 0 0.00% 52 100.00% 52 Charlevoix Housing Commission MI182 0 0.00% 50 100.00% 50 Ironwood Housing Commission MI018 0 0.00% 50 100.00% 50 Wakefield Housing Commission MI015 0 0.00% 50 100.00% 50 Ionia Housing Commission MI117 20 41.67% 28 58.33% 48 Covert Public Housing Commission MI189 0 0.00% 47 100.00% 47 Rapid River Housing Commission MI187 0 0.00% 40 100.00% 40 Middleville Housing Commission MI183 0 0.00% 40 100.00% 40

Page 114 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Michigan

MI-500 Michigan Balance of State CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Manistee Housing Commission MI078 0 0.00% 39 100.00% 39 Houghton Housing Commission MI107 0 0.00% 34 100.00% 34 Hermansville Housing Commission MI192 0 0.00% 30 100.00% 30 Caseville Housing Commission MI191 0 0.00% 24 100.00% 24 Bay County Housing Department MI166 0 0.00% 24 100.00% 24

MI-501 Detroit CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Detroit Housing Commission MI001 6067 94.80% 333 5.20% 6400

MI-502 Dearborn, Dearborn Heights, Westland/Wayne County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Plymouth Housing Commission MI045 1882 94.62% 107 5.38% 1989 River Rouge Housing Commission MI008 249 16.68% 1244 83.32% 1493 Westland Housing Commission MI139 1238 100.00% 0 0.00% 1238 Taylor Housing Commission MI089 978 93.41% 69 6.59% 1047 Inkster Housing Commission MI027 751 72.28% 288 27.72% 1039 Livonia Housing Commission MI055 909 90.36% 97 9.64% 1006 Dearborn Housing Commission MI003 96 17.58% 450 82.42% 546 Hamtramck Housing Commission MI004 0 0.00% 442 100.00% 442

Page 115 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Michigan

MI-502 Dearborn, Dearborn Heights, Westland/Wayne County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Romulus Housing Commission MI072 0 0.00% 424 100.00% 424 Lincoln Park Housing Commission MI051 293 82.54% 62 17.46% 355 Ecorse Housing Commission MI007 0 0.00% 300 100.00% 300 Melvindale Housing Commission MI048 134 69.07% 60 30.93% 194 Rockwood Housing Commission MI081 0 0.00% 122 100.00% 122 Highland Park Housing Commission MI105 0 0.00% 70 100.00% 70 Wayne Housing Commission MI029 0 0.00% 38 100.00% 38 Allen Park Housing Commission MI053 0 0.00% 29 100.00% 29

MI-503 St. Clair Shores, Warren/Macomb County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Roseville Housing Commission MI037 309 36.27% 543 63.73% 852 Clinton Township Housing Commission MI040 23 7.42% 287 92.58% 310 Eastpointe Housing Commission MI044 171 61.29% 108 38.71% 279 St Clair Shores Housing Commission MI059 90 41.86% 125 58.14% 215 Sterling Heights Housing Commission MI157 40 45.45% 48 54.55% 88 Mount Clemens Housing Commission MI028 0 0.00% 76 100.00% 76 New Haven Housing Commission MI180 0 0.00% 44 100.00% 44

Page 116 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Michigan

MI-504 Pontiac, Royal Oak/Oakland County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Pontiac Housing Commission MI005 770 54.84% 634 45.16% 1404 Ferndale Housing Commission MI096 975 90.45% 103 9.55% 1078 Royal Oak Township Housing Commission MI033 0 0.00% 375 100.00% 375 Southfield Housing Commission MI097 334 100.00% 0 0.00% 334 South Lyon Housing Commission MI021 0 0.00% 195 100.00% 195 Madison Heights Housing Commission MI188 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

MI-505 Flint/Genesee County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Flint Housing Commission MI009 1018 73.34% 370 26.66% 1388

MI-506 Grand Rapids/Wyoming/Kent County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Grand Rapids Housing Commission MI073 3190 96.29% 123 3.71% 3313 Wyoming Housing Commission MI115 1122 98.25% 20 1.75% 1142 Kent County Housing Commission MI198 481 100.00% 0 0.00% 481 Rockford Housing Commission MI093 90 54.88% 74 45.12% 164

Page 117 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Michigan

MI-508 Lansing, East Lansing/Ingham County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Michigan State Housing Development Authority MI901 28451 100.00% 0 0.00% 28451 Lansing Housing Commission MI058 1834 88.00% 250 12.00% 2084 Ingham County Housing Commission MI168 0 0.00% 64 100.00% 64

MI-509 Washtenaw County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Ann Arbor Housing Commission MI064 1639 90.80% 166 9.20% 1805 Ypsilanti Housing Commission MI026 0 0.00% 734 100.00% 734

MI-510 Saginaw City & County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Saginaw Housing Commission MI006 1257 86.27% 200 13.73% 1457

MI-512 Grand Traverse, Antrim, Leelanau Counties CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Traverse City Housing Commission MI080 208 80.31% 51 19.69% 259 Elk Rapids Housing Commission MI116 0 0.00% 110 100.00% 110

Page 118 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Michigan

MI-513 Marquette, Alger Counties CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Munising Housing Commission MI094 25 26.32% 70 73.68% 95 Negaunee Housing Commission MI068 0 0.00% 71 100.00% 71 Marquette Housing Commission MI070 50 100.00% 0 0.00% 50 Ishpeming Housing Commission MI101 0 0.00% 41 100.00% 41

MI-514 Battle Creek/Calhoun County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Battle Creek Housing Commission MI035 780 74.71% 264 25.29% 1044 Albion Housing Commission MI014 0 0.00% 30 100.00% 30

MI-515 Monroe City & County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Bedford Township Housing Commission MI156 0 0.00% 153 100.00% 153 Dundee Housing Commission MI142 0 0.00% 97 100.00% 97 Monroe Housing Commission MI011 0 0.00% 89 100.00% 89 Luna Pier Housing Commission MI098 0 0.00% 60 100.00% 60

Page 119 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Michigan

MI-516 Norton Shores, Muskegon City & County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Muskegon Heights Housing Commission MI031 50 14.29% 300 85.71% 350 Muskegon Housing Commission MI066 189 70.26% 80 29.74% 269

MI-517 Jackson City & County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Jackson Housing Commission MI038 475 53.49% 413 46.51% 888

MI-523 Eaton County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Potterville Housing Commission MI167 25 21.93% 89 78.07% 114 Housing Services Mid-Michigan MI880 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Page 120 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Minnesota

MN-500 Minneapolis/Hennepin County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units PHA in and for the City of Minneapolis MN002 5196 81.84% 1153 18.16% 6349 HOUSING AUTHORITY OF ST LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA MN144 268 45.35% 323 54.65% 591 HRA IN AND FOR THE CITY OF BLOOMINGTON MN152 551 100.00% 0 0.00% 551 RICHFIELD HRA MN216 231 100.00% 0 0.00% 231 Plymouth Housing & Redevelopment Authority MN170 210 100.00% 0 0.00% 210 HRA OF HOPKINS, MINNESOTA MN078 0 0.00% 88 100.00% 88 HRA OF THE CITY OF MOUND, MINNESOTA MN074 0 0.00% 61 100.00% 61

MN-501 St. Paul/Ramsey County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Public Housing Agency of the City of St Paul MN001 4391 41.26% 6252 58.74% 10643 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL MN163 6204 99.61% 24 0.39% 6228 SOUTH METRO HUMAN SERVICES MN802 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 MENTAL HEALTH RESOURCES MN801 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

MN-502 Rochester/Southeast Minnesota CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units SOUTH CENTRAL MULTI COUNTY HRA MN219 691 100.00% 0 0.00% 691 OLMSTED COUNTY HRA MN151 532 100.00% 0 0.00% 532 MANKATO EDA MN063 430 91.49% 40 8.51% 470

Page 121 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Minnesota

MN-502 Rochester/Southeast Minnesota CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units HRA of WINONA, MINNESOTA MN006 165 37.50% 275 62.50% 440 RICE COUNTY HRA MN193 329 74.94% 110 25.06% 439 SOUTHEAST MN MULTI-COUNTY HRA MN197 387 100.00% 0 0.00% 387 NEW ULM ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MN128 124 43.82% 159 56.18% 283 HRA IN AND FOR THE CITY OF ALBERT LEA, MINNESOTA MN077 155 67.10% 76 32.90% 231 HRA OF RED WING, MINNESOTA MN090 169 80.86% 40 19.14% 209 HRA of ST. JAMES, MINNESOTA MN031 0 0.00% 203 100.00% 203 Housing & Redevelopment Authority of Austin MN085 177 89.85% 20 10.15% 197 BLUE EARTH COUNTY EDA MN167 72 47.37% 80 52.63% 152 HRA of MONTGOMERY, MINNESOTA MN033 0 0.00% 136 100.00% 136 LE SUEUR COUNTY HRA MN171 118 100.00% 0 0.00% 118 OWATONNA HRA MN220 113 100.00% 0 0.00% 113 Housing & Redevelopment Authority Of Faribault MN157 0 0.00% 103 100.00% 103 FARIBAULT COUNTY HRA MN200 93 100.00% 0 0.00% 93 Housing & Redevelopment Authority Of Janesville MN208 0 0.00% 81 100.00% 81 HRA OF THE CITY OF BLUE EARTH, MINNESOTA MN022 0 0.00% 80 100.00% 80 MOWER COUNTY HRA MN191 40 58.82% 28 41.18% 68 HRA of LE SUEUR, MINNESOTA MN039 0 0.00% 60 100.00% 60 HRA OF WASECA, MINNESOTA MN087 0 0.00% 40 100.00% 40 HRA OF NEW RICHLAND, MINNESOTA MN097 0 0.00% 39 100.00% 39 Housing & Redevelopment Authority Of Dodge Center MN206 0 0.00% 38 100.00% 38 HRA of ST. PETER, MINNESOTA MN046 0 0.00% 35 100.00% 35

Page 122 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Minnesota

MN-502 Rochester/Southeast Minnesota CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units North Mankato Housing and Redevelopment Autho MN019 0 0.00% 35 100.00% 35 HRA OF SLEEPY EYE, MINNESOTA MN060 0 0.00% 20 100.00% 20 HRA of FAIRMONT, MINNESOTA MN054 0 0.00% 19 100.00% 19

MN-503 Dakota, Anoka, Washington, Scott, Carver Counties CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units WASHINGTON COUNTY HRA MN212 90 3.01% 2898 96.99% 2988 DAKOTA COUNTY CDA MN147 2331 95.49% 110 4.51% 2441 SCOTT COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AGENCY MN184 386 96.98% 12 3.02% 398 HRA OF THE CITY OF SOUTH ST PAUL, MINNESOTA MN010 302 89.88% 34 10.12% 336 CARVER COUNTY CDA MN211 0 0.00% 105 100.00% 105 HRA OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS MN105 0 0.00% 91 100.00% 91 SCOTT CARVER DAKOTA CAP AGENCY MN803 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

MN-504 Northeast Minnesota CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units HRA of AITKIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA MN037 31 9.63% 291 90.37% 322 ITASCA COUNTY HRA MN154 248 83.50% 49 16.50% 297 HRA OF CLOQUET, MINNESOTA MN073 155 75.61% 50 24.39% 205 KOOCHICHING COUNTY HRA MN153 128 76.19% 40 23.81% 168

Page 123 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Minnesota

MN-504 Northeast Minnesota CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units HRA OF INTERNATIONAL FALLS, MINNESOTA MN023 0 0.00% 58 100.00% 58 HRA of GRAND RAPIDS, MINNESOTA MN057 0 0.00% 42 100.00% 42 HRA OF MOOSE LAKE, MINNESOTA MN091 0 0.00% 40 100.00% 40 HRA of TWO HARBORS, MINNESOTA MN024 0 0.00% 32 100.00% 32 HRA of CARLTON, MINNESOTA MN055 0 0.00% 30 100.00% 30

MN-505 St. Cloud/Central Minnesota CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units HRA of ST. CLOUD, MINNESOTA MN038 944 95.16% 48 4.84% 992 HRA IN AND FOR THE CITY OF BRAINERD, MINNESOTA MN032 320 91.43% 30 8.57% 350 STEARNS COUNTY HRA MN172 251 81.23% 58 18.77% 309 TODD COUNTY HRA MN180 162 89.01% 20 10.99% 182 HRA OF CITY OF DELANO, MINNESOTA MN062 0 0.00% 179 100.00% 179 CASS COUNTY HRA MN188 137 84.57% 25 15.43% 162 HRA of WADENA, MINNESOTA MN018 74 50.34% 73 49.66% 147 MORRISON COUNTY HRA MN179 131 100.00% 0 0.00% 131 HRA of BRAHAM, MINNESOTA MN052 0 0.00% 120 100.00% 120 HRA OF MORA, MINNESOTA MN101 81 72.97% 30 27.03% 111 HRA OF LINDSTROM, MINNESOTA MN102 0 0.00% 101 100.00% 101 Cambridge Economic Development Authority MN067 58 65.91% 30 34.09% 88 HRA OF STAPLES MN075 0 0.00% 74 100.00% 74

Page 124 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Minnesota

MN-505 St. Cloud/Central Minnesota CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units HRA OF LONG PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA MN088 0 0.00% 74 100.00% 74 HRA of LITTLE FALLS, MINNESOTA MN042 0 0.00% 68 100.00% 68 HRA OF PEQUOT LAKES, MINNESOTA MN095 0 0.00% 60 100.00% 60 HRA of WALKER, MINNESOTA MN025 0 0.00% 58 100.00% 58 HRA OF CITY OF MELROSE, MINNESOTA MN065 0 0.00% 45 100.00% 45 HRA of PINE CITY, MINNESOTA MN059 0 0.00% 45 100.00% 45 HRA OF CASS LAKE, MINNESOTA MN100 0 0.00% 43 100.00% 43 HRA of SAUK CENTRE, MINNESOTA MN028 0 0.00% 36 100.00% 36 HRA OF PRINCETON, MINNESOTA MN064 0 0.00% 30 100.00% 30 HRA OF PINE RIVER, MINNESOTA MN092 0 0.00% 24 100.00% 24 HRA OF CROSBY, MINNESOTA MN082 0 0.00% 20 100.00% 20

MN-506 Northwest Minnesota CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units NW MN MULTI-COUNTY HRA MN158 652 96.31% 25 3.69% 677 HRA of BEMIDJI, MINNESOTA MN009 183 38.05% 298 61.95% 481 EDHA of EAST GRAND FORKS MN045 317 83.42% 63 16.58% 380 CROOKSTON HOUSING AND EDA MN021 188 77.69% 54 22.31% 242 HRA OF WARREN, MINNESOTA MN076 0 0.00% 176 100.00% 176 CLEARWATER COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY MN186 107 100.00% 0 0.00% 107 HRA OF RED LAKE FALLS, MINNESOTA MN071 0 0.00% 83 100.00% 83

Page 125 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Minnesota

MN-506 Northwest Minnesota CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units HRA of BAGLEY, MINNESOTA MN047 0 0.00% 70 100.00% 70 HRA Of VILLAGE OF GREENBUSH, MINNESOTA MN086 0 0.00% 60 100.00% 60 HRA OF BAUDETTE, MINNESOTA MN113 0 0.00% 49 100.00% 49 THIEF RIVER FALLS HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUT MN027 0 0.00% 40 100.00% 40 HRA OF WARROAD, MINNESOTA MN061 0 0.00% 30 100.00% 30 HRA of PARK RAPIDS, MINNESOTA MN043 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

MN-508 Moorhead/West Central Minnesota CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units CLAY COUNTY HRA MN164 360 82.76% 75 17.24% 435 HRA OF HENNING, MINNESOTA MN083 0 0.00% 361 100.00% 361 HRA of FERGUS FALLS, MINNESOTA MN008 185 60.66% 120 39.34% 305 DOUGLAS COUNTY HRA MN192 249 100.00% 0 0.00% 249 HRA OF DETROIT LAKES, MINNESOTA MN107 167 86.98% 25 13.02% 192 OTTER TAIL COUNTY HRA MN177 140 84.85% 25 15.15% 165 MOORHEAD PUBLIC HOUSING AGENCY MN017 95 60.90% 61 39.10% 156 STEVENS COUNTY HRA MN182 128 100.00% 0 0.00% 128 BECKER COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MN190 74 72.55% 28 27.45% 102 HRA of GLENWOOD, MINNESOTA MN056 0 0.00% 92 100.00% 92 HRA of MORRIS, MINNESOTA MN030 0 0.00% 78 100.00% 78 BRECKENRIDGE HRA OF BRECKENRIDGE, Minnesota MN072 0 0.00% 76 100.00% 76

Page 126 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Minnesota

MN-508 Moorhead/West Central Minnesota CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units GRANT COUNTY HRA MN169 51 71.83% 20 28.17% 71 HRA of PERHAM, MINNESOTA MN020 0 0.00% 66 100.00% 66 HRA of ALEXANDRIA, MINNESOTA MN035 0 0.00% 56 100.00% 56 HRA OF BARNESVILLE, MINNESOTA MN068 0 0.00% 33 100.00% 33

MN-509 Duluth/St. Louis County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units HRA of DULUTH, MINNESOTA MN003 1472 85.38% 252 14.62% 1724 HRA of VIRGINIA, MINNESOTA MN007 582 89.54% 68 10.46% 650 HRA of CHISHOLM, MINNESOTA MN005 0 0.00% 300 100.00% 300 HRA of ELY, MINNESOTA MN053 0 0.00% 123 100.00% 123 THE HRA OF HIBBING, MINNESOTA MN004 0 0.00% 109 100.00% 109 HRA of EVELETH, MINNESOTA MN011 0 0.00% 95 100.00% 95 HRA OF GILBERT, MINNESOTA MN117 0 0.00% 50 100.00% 50 HRA OF COOK, MINNESOTA MN096 0 0.00% 30 100.00% 30

MN-511 Southwest Minnesota CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units HRA of WORTHINGTON, MINNESOTA MN034 250 65.79% 130 34.21% 380 KANDIYOHI COUNTY HRA MN168 328 100.00% 0 0.00% 328

Page 127 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Minnesota

MN-511 Southwest Minnesota CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units HRA of PIPESTONE, MINNESOTA MN049 53 23.35% 174 76.65% 227 HRA of BENSON, MINNESOTA MN014 0 0.00% 178 100.00% 178 MCLEOD COUNTY HRA MN203 121 76.10% 38 23.90% 159 HRA of REDWOOD FALLS, MINNESOTA MN036 0 0.00% 145 100.00% 145 HRA of TRACY, MINNESOTA MN040 0 0.00% 145 100.00% 145 HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTH. OF CHIPP. CO. MN173 129 100.00% 0 0.00% 129 HRA OF JACKSON, MINNESOTA MN089 0 0.00% 119 100.00% 119 HRA of LUVERNE, MINNESOTA MN048 0 0.00% 102 100.00% 102 HRA OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA MN103 0 0.00% 101 100.00% 101 PUBLIC HOUSING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MARSHAL MN041 0 0.00% 98 100.00% 98 Housing & Redevelopment Authority Of Lincoln MN183 0 0.00% 93 100.00% 93 MEEKER COUNTY HRA MN178 69 79.31% 18 20.69% 87 RENVILLE COUNTY HRA MN161 84 100.00% 0 0.00% 84 SWIFT COUNTY HRA MN166 83 100.00% 0 0.00% 83 HRA of MONTEVIDEO, MINNESOTA MN026 0 0.00% 76 100.00% 76 Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Yellow MN174 73 100.00% 0 0.00% 73 HRA OF CLARKFIELD, MINNESOTA MN069 0 0.00% 61 100.00% 61 HRA of MADISON, MINNESOTA MN029 0 0.00% 60 100.00% 60 HRA OF WINDOM, MINNESOTA MN080 0 0.00% 59 100.00% 59 HRA OF COTTONWOOD, MINNESOTA MN098 0 0.00% 50 100.00% 50 BIG STONE COUNTY HRA MN176 34 72.34% 13 27.66% 47 HRA of MOUNTAIN LAKE, MINNESOTA MN058 0 0.00% 34 100.00% 34

Page 128 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Minnesota

MN-511 Southwest Minnesota CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units HRA IN AND FOR THE CITY OF WILLMAR, MINNESOTA MN051 0 0.00% 32 100.00% 32 HRA OF LITCHFIELD, MINNESOTA MN070 0 0.00% 23 100.00% 23 HRA OF LAKE BENTON, MINNESOTA MN108 0 0.00% 20 100.00% 20

Page 129 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Mississippi

MS-500 Jackson/Rankin, Madison Counties CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Mississippi Regional Housing Authority No. VI MS058 5023 96.36% 190 3.64% 5213 The Housing Authority of the City of Jackson MS103 784 72.59% 296 27.41% 1080 The Housing Authority of the City of Canton MS061 0 0.00% 90 100.00% 90 Housing Authority of the City of Vicksburg MS086 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 The Housing Authority of the City of Hazlehurst MS094 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

MS-501 Mississippi Balance of State CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Mississippi Regional Housing Authority No. IV MS019 2478 81.09% 578 18.91% 3056 Mississippi Regional Housing Authority No. V MS030 1747 63.46% 1006 36.54% 2753 Tennessee Valley Regional Housing Authority MS006 1580 84.22% 296 15.78% 1876 South Delta Regional Housing Authority MS095 1688 95.48% 80 4.52% 1768 Mississippi Regional Housing Authority No. VII MS057 1565 92.00% 136 8.00% 1701 The Housing Authority of the City of McComb MS003 0 0.00% 1232 100.00% 1232 The Housing Authority of the City of Meridian MS004 211 18.81% 911 81.19% 1122 North Delta Regional Housing Authority MS128 754 87.57% 107 12.43% 861 The Housing Authority of the City of Hattiesburg MS001 0 0.00% 624 100.00% 624 The Housing Authority of the City of Iuka MS075 0 0.00% 480 100.00% 480 The Housing Authority of the City of Laurel MS002 0 0.00% 435 100.00% 435 The Housing Authority of the City of Baldwyn MS085 0 0.00% 430 100.00% 430 The Housing Authority of the City of Natchez MS105 0 0.00% 408 100.00% 408

Page 130 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Mississippi

MS-501 Mississippi Balance of State CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units The Housing Authority of the City of Clarksdale MS007 0 0.00% 389 100.00% 389 The Housing Authority of the City of Columbus MS076 0 0.00% 388 100.00% 388 The Housing Authority of the City of Aberdeen MS071 0 0.00% 330 100.00% 330 The Housing Authority of the City of Holly Springs MS062 0 0.00% 290 100.00% 290 The Housing Authority of the City of Booneville MS065 0 0.00% 276 100.00% 276 The Housing Authority of the City of Greenwood MS107 260 100.00% 0 0.00% 260 The Housing Authority of the City of West Point MS059 0 0.00% 235 100.00% 235 The Housing Authority of the City of Senatobia MS090 0 0.00% 212 100.00% 212 The Housing Authority of the City of Tupelo MS077 0 0.00% 201 100.00% 201 Mississippi Regional Housing Authority No. II MS016 189 100.00% 0 0.00% 189 The Housing Authority of the City of Water Valley MS078 0 0.00% 154 100.00% 154 The Housing Authority of the City of Sardis MS081 0 0.00% 154 100.00% 154 The Housing Authority of the City of Okolona MS070 0 0.00% 151 100.00% 151 The Housing Authority of the City of Brookhaven MS060 0 0.00% 150 100.00% 150 Housing Authority of the City of Hughes AR061 0 0.00% 145 100.00% 145 Oxford Housing Authority MS093 0 0.00% 122 100.00% 122 The Housing Authority of the City of Starkville MS047 0 0.00% 120 100.00% 120 The Housing Authority of the City of Shelby MS089 0 0.00% 120 100.00% 120 The Housing Authority of the City of Winona MS082 0 0.00% 112 100.00% 112 The Housing Authority of the City of Walnut MS080 0 0.00% 82 100.00% 82 The Housing Authority of the City of Mound Bayou MS110 0 0.00% 78 100.00% 78 The Housing Authority of the City of Corinth MS072 0 0.00% 76 100.00% 76

Page 131 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Mississippi

MS-501 Mississippi Balance of State CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units The Housing Authority of Attala County MS117 0 0.00% 70 100.00% 70 The Housing Authority of the City of Waynesboro MS068 0 0.00% 67 100.00% 67 The Housing Authority of the City of Summit MS084 0 0.00% 65 100.00% 65 The Housing Authority of the City of Forest MS111 0 0.00% 61 100.00% 61 The Housing Authority of the City of Richton MS067 0 0.00% 50 100.00% 50 The Housing Authority of the City of Louisville MS079 0 0.00% 34 100.00% 34 The Housing Authority of the City of Amory MS083 0 0.00% 30 100.00% 30 The Housing Authority of the City of Pontotoc MS096 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 The Housing Authority of the City of Yazoo City MS063 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 The Housing Authority of the City of Itta Bena MS121 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

MS-503 Gulf Port/Gulf Coast Regional CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Mississippi Regional Housing Authority No. VIII MS040 7769 96.95% 244 3.05% 8013 The Housing Authority of the City of Biloxi MS005 701 36.66% 1211 63.34% 1912 Bay Waveland Housing Authority MS301 380 58.10% 274 41.90% 654 The Housing Authority of the City of Waveland MS101 0 0.00% 186 100.00% 186 The Housing Authority of the City of Bay St. Louis MS064 0 0.00% 160 100.00% 160 The Housing Authority of the City of Long Beach MS109 0 0.00% 100 100.00% 100 The Housing Authority of the City of Picayune MS066 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Page 132 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Missouri

MO-500 St. Louis County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of St. Louis County MO004 6497 100.00% 0 0.00% 6497 Housing Authority of the City of Kirkwood MO187 0 0.00% 275 100.00% 275 Housing Authority of the City of Olivette MO132 0 0.00% 200 100.00% 200 Wellston Housing Authority MO138 0 0.00% 130 100.00% 130 Housing Authority of the City of Hillsdale MO220 0 0.00% 56 100.00% 56 Housing Authority of the City of Pagedale MO218 0 0.00% 22 100.00% 22

MO-501 St. Louis CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units St. Louis Housing Authority MO001 6982 78.38% 1926 21.62% 8908

MO-503 St. Charles City & County, Lincoln, Warren Counties CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of the City of St. Charles MO006 265 26.93% 719 73.07% 984 Housing Assistance Prog of St Charles County MO227 715 100.00% 0 0.00% 715

MO-600 Springfield/Greene, Christian, Webster Counties CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Springfield Housing Authority MO058 777 96.28% 30 3.72% 807

Page 133 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Missouri

MO-600 Springfield/Greene, Christian, Webster Counties CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Dallas County Public Housing Agency-OACAC MO216 588 100.00% 0 0.00% 588 Republic Housing Authority MO077 0 0.00% 86 100.00% 86

MO-602 Joplin/Jasper, Newton Counties CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of the City of Joplin, MO MO188 540 95.41% 26 4.59% 566 ESCSWA dba Jasper Cty Public Housing Agency MO215 354 100.00% 0 0.00% 354 Webb City Housing Authority MO061 0 0.00% 80 100.00% 80 Neosho Housing Authority MO062 0 0.00% 29 100.00% 29

MO-603 St. Joseph/Andrew, Buchanan, DeKalb Counties CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units St. Joseph Housing Authority MO003 970 72.44% 369 27.56% 1339 ABCD Housing Agency MO219 227 100.00% 0 0.00% 227

MO-604 Kansas City, Independence, Lee's Summit/Jackson County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of Kansas City, Missouri MO002 7947 97.86% 174 2.14% 8121 Independence Housing Authority MO017 1647 84.59% 300 15.41% 1947

Page 134 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Missouri

MO-604 Kansas City, Independence, Lee's Summit/Jackson County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Lee's Summit Housing Authority MO030 649 81.23% 150 18.77% 799 Community Housing Network MO880 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

MO-606 Missouri Balance of State CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units ST. FRANCOIS COUNTY PUBLIC HOUSING AGENCY MO203 2335 100.00% 0 0.00% 2335 LINCOLN COUNTY PUBLIC HOUSING AGENCY MO199 2094 100.00% 0 0.00% 2094 White River Regional Housing Authority AR197 1654 100.00% 0 0.00% 1654 Housing Authority of the City of Columbia, MO MO007 1167 83.30% 234 16.70% 1401 St. Clair County Housing Authority MO197 1291 100.00% 0 0.00% 1291 FRANKLIN COUNTY PUBLIC HOUSING AGENCY MO205 1030 100.00% 0 0.00% 1030 Housing Authority of the City of Illmo MO057 0 0.00% 766 100.00% 766 Phelps County Public Housing Agency MO206 756 100.00% 0 0.00% 756 Howell County Public Housing Agency MO217 690 100.00% 0 0.00% 690 Grundy County Public Housing Agency MO196 682 100.00% 0 0.00% 682 HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF SIKESTON MO008 349 52.25% 319 47.75% 668 Marshall Housing Authority MO016 103 16.32% 528 83.68% 631 Housing Authority of the City of Charleston MO012 0 0.00% 575 100.00% 575 Housing Authority of the City of Jefferson MO009 231 52.26% 211 47.74% 442 Lafayette County Housing Authority MO204 418 100.00% 0 0.00% 418 Boone County Public Housing Agency MO198 401 100.00% 0 0.00% 401

Page 135 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Missouri

MO-606 Missouri Balance of State CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of the City of Mexico MO010 151 37.84% 248 62.16% 399 Pulaski County Housing Authority MO207 394 100.00% 0 0.00% 394 Ripley County Public Housing Agency MO212 367 100.00% 0 0.00% 367 Housing Authority of the City of Sedalia, MO MO074 270 76.70% 82 23.30% 352 Liberty Housing Authority MO210 343 100.00% 0 0.00% 343 Housing Authority of the City of Fulton MO014 110 32.93% 224 67.07% 334 Scotland County Public Housing Agency MO200 329 100.00% 0 0.00% 329 Housing Authority of the City of Holcomb MO035 0 0.00% 304 100.00% 304 Housing Authority of the City of Hayti Heights MO223 0 0.00% 296 100.00% 296 Nevada Housing Authority MO133 88 30.45% 201 69.55% 289 Housing Authority of the City of West Plains MO037 205 72.95% 76 27.05% 281 Housing Authority of the City of Moberly MO011 0 0.00% 278 100.00% 278 Housing Authority of the City of Caruthersville MO036 0 0.00% 273 100.00% 273 Housing Authority of the City of Bowling Green MO125 0 0.00% 253 100.00% 253 Housing Authority of the City of Kirksville MO145 200 81.97% 44 18.03% 244 Chillicothe Housing Authority MO065 89 38.03% 145 61.97% 234 Ray County Housing Authority MO213 231 100.00% 0 0.00% 231 Excelsior Springs Housing Authority MO053 166 76.85% 50 23.15% 216 Housing Authority of the City of Poplar Bluff MO013 0 0.00% 200 100.00% 200 Housing Authority of the City of Melbourne AR103 0 0.00% 197 100.00% 197 Lawson Housing Authority MO073 0 0.00% 195 100.00% 195 Housing Authority of the City of Houston MO040 83 43.92% 106 56.08% 189

Page 136 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Missouri

MO-606 Missouri Balance of State CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Nodaway County Housing Authority MO190 187 100.00% 0 0.00% 187 Housing Authority of the City of Rolla MO149 160 86.49% 25 13.51% 185 Housing Authority of the City of Hannibal MO129 168 92.31% 14 7.69% 182 Clay County Public Housing Agency AR176 170 100.00% 0 0.00% 170 Housing Authority of the City of Salem MO052 0 0.00% 166 100.00% 166 Carrollton Housing Authority MO107 86 53.09% 76 46.91% 162 Housing Authority of the City of Cameron MO078 0 0.00% 162 100.00% 162 Housing Authority of the City of Bloomfield MO019 0 0.00% 158 100.00% 158 Housing Authority of the City of New Madrid MO064 50 33.33% 100 66.67% 150 Housing Authority of the City of Lancaster MO147 0 0.00% 150 100.00% 150 Mound City Housing Authority MO033 0 0.00% 136 100.00% 136 Brunswick Housing Authority MO059 0 0.00% 135 100.00% 135 Housing Authority of the City of Cabool MO209 46 35.94% 82 64.06% 128 Aurora Housing Authority MO071 0 0.00% 128 100.00% 128 Maryville Housing Authority MO072 88 68.75% 40 31.25% 128 Housing Authority of the City of Mammoth Spring AR086 0 0.00% 124 100.00% 124 Brookfield Housing Authority MO075 0 0.00% 120 100.00% 120 Smithville Housing Authority MO041 0 0.00% 119 100.00% 119 Slater Housing Authority MO069 0 0.00% 118 100.00% 118 Housing Authority of the City of Hornersville MO029 0 0.00% 116 100.00% 116 Housing Authority of the City of Hayti MO020 0 0.00% 116 100.00% 116 Housing Authority of the City of Mountain Grove MO060 0 0.00% 107 100.00% 107

Page 137 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Missouri

MO-606 Missouri Balance of State CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Higginsville Housing Authority MO110 0 0.00% 105 100.00% 105 Housing Authority of the City of Macon MO111 0 0.00% 105 100.00% 105 Housing Authority of the City of Yellville AR122 0 0.00% 100 100.00% 100 Housing Authority of the City of Vandalia MO179 0 0.00% 100 100.00% 100 Housing Authority of the City of Wardell MO063 0 0.00% 100 100.00% 100 Lanagan Housing Authority MO048 0 0.00% 100 100.00% 100 Housing Authority of the City of Cardwell MO027 0 0.00% 98 100.00% 98 Housing Authority of the City of Potosi MO021 0 0.00% 94 100.00% 94 Bethany Housing Authority MO067 0 0.00% 93 100.00% 93 Housing Authority of Southwest City MO051 0 0.00% 90 100.00% 90 Housing Authority of the City of Salem AR074 0 0.00% 88 100.00% 88 Housing Authority of the City of Festus MO221 0 0.00% 85 100.00% 85 Weston Housing Authority MO193 82 100.00% 0 0.00% 82 Housing Authority of the City of Alton MO156 0 0.00% 78 100.00% 78 Housing Authority of the City of Chaffee MO066 0 0.00% 77 100.00% 77 Housing Authority of the City of Bernie MO024 0 0.00% 75 100.00% 75 Marionville Housing Authority MO081 0 0.00% 75 100.00% 75 Princeton Housing Authority MO103 0 0.00% 70 100.00% 70 Branson Housing Authority MO045 0 0.00% 69 100.00% 69 Housing Authority of the City of Ava MO192 30 45.45% 36 54.55% 66 Richmond Housing Authority MO070 0 0.00% 64 100.00% 64 Housing Authority of the City of Glasgow MO039 0 0.00% 64 100.00% 64

Page 138 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Missouri

MO-606 Missouri Balance of State CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of the City of Senath MO023 0 0.00% 60 100.00% 60 Housing Authority of the City of Clarkton MO025 0 0.00% 56 100.00% 56 Housing Authority of the City of East Prairie MO076 0 0.00% 56 100.00% 56 Housing Authority of the City of Morehouse MO092 0 0.00% 50 100.00% 50 Housing Authority of the City of Boonville MO054 0 0.00% 50 100.00% 50 Pineville Housing Authority MO050 0 0.00% 48 100.00% 48 Housing Authority of the City of Kennett MO018 0 0.00% 46 100.00% 46 Marceline Housing Authority MO046 0 0.00% 46 100.00% 46 Tarkio Housing Authority MO032 0 0.00% 45 100.00% 45 Housing Authority of the City of Gideon MO044 0 0.00% 40 100.00% 40 Clinton Housing Authority MO031 0 0.00% 37 100.00% 37 Richland Housing Authority MO068 0 0.00% 37 100.00% 37 Lexington Housing Authority MO096 0 0.00% 35 100.00% 35 Plattsburg Housing Authority MO043 0 0.00% 34 100.00% 34 Housing Authority of the City of Steele MO022 0 0.00% 32 100.00% 32 Housing Authority of the City of Sainte Genevieve MO191 0 0.00% 32 100.00% 32 Housing Authority of the City of Fayette MO056 0 0.00% 30 100.00% 30 Osceola Housing Authority MO038 0 0.00% 30 100.00% 30 Noel Housing Authority MO049 0 0.00% 30 100.00% 30 Housing Authority of the City of Malden MO028 0 0.00% 30 100.00% 30 Housing Authority of the City of Memphis MO146 0 0.00% 30 100.00% 30 Housing Authority of the City of Portageville MO042 0 0.00% 30 100.00% 30

Page 139 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Missouri

MO-606 Missouri Balance of State CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of the City of Norwood MO189 0 0.00% 30 100.00% 30 Housing Authority of the City of Mansfield MO090 0 0.00% 27 100.00% 27 Housing Authority of the City of Thayer MO098 0 0.00% 27 100.00% 27 Anderson Housing Authority MO047 0 0.00% 24 100.00% 24 Housing Authority of the City of Dexter MO034 0 0.00% 24 100.00% 24 Lebanon Housing Authority MO079 0 0.00% 24 100.00% 24 Housing Authority of the City of Campbell MO026 0 0.00% 22 100.00% 22 Warrensburg Housing Authority MO194 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 New Madrid Public Housing Agency MO208 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Housing Authority of the City of Oran MO080 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Housing Authority of the City of Imboden AR057 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Page 140 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Montana

MT-500 Montana Statewide CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Montana Department of Commerce MT901 4102 100.00% 0 0.00% 4102 Missoula Housing Authority MT033 774 42.20% 1060 57.80% 1834 Housing Authority of Billings MT001 654 57.17% 490 42.83% 1144 Great Falls Housing Authority MT002 265 42.88% 353 57.12% 618 Helena Housing Authority MT004 381 69.15% 170 30.85% 551 Housing Authority of Butte MT003 109 22.95% 366 77.05% 475 Dawson County Housing Authority MT029 0 0.00% 176 100.00% 176 Richland County Housing Authority MT006 100 62.50% 60 37.50% 160 Housing Authority of the City of Anaconda MT005 0 0.00% 81 100.00% 81 Housing Authority of Glasgow MT007 0 0.00% 50 100.00% 50 Whitefish Housing Authority MT015 16 44.44% 20 55.56% 36 City of Ronan Housing Authority MT036 36 100.00% 0 0.00% 36

Page 141 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Nebraska

NE-500 Nebraska Balance of State CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Hall County Housing Authority NE003 481 73.66% 172 26.34% 653 Hastings Housing Authority NE150 477 100.00% 0 0.00% 477 Scotts Bluff County Housing Authority NE078 410 96.24% 16 3.76% 426 McCook Housing Authority NE123 77 23.55% 250 76.45% 327 Alliance Housing Authority NE141 187 70.57% 78 29.43% 265 Norfolk Housing Agency NE157 254 100.00% 0 0.00% 254 Kearney Housing Authority NE004 133 52.99% 118 47.01% 251 Beemer Housing Authority NE099 0 0.00% 248 100.00% 248 West Central Nebraska Joint Housing Authority NE179 215 100.00% 0 0.00% 215 Beatrice Housing Authority NE114 204 100.00% 0 0.00% 204 Fremont Housing Authority NE100 164 90.11% 18 9.89% 182 York Housing Authority NE094 99 54.70% 82 45.30% 181 Niobrara Housing Authority NE077 0 0.00% 162 100.00% 162 Goldenrod Regional Housing Agency NE181 137 100.00% 0 0.00% 137 Lexington Housing Authority NE010 122 91.04% 12 8.96% 134 Columbus Housing Authority NE104 100 85.47% 17 14.53% 117 Wood River Housing Authority NE091 0 0.00% 100 100.00% 100 Chappell Housing Authority NE115 0 0.00% 85 100.00% 85 Oakland Housing Authority NE103 0 0.00% 84 100.00% 84 Loup City Housing Authority NE008 0 0.00% 81 100.00% 81 Cozad Housing Authority NE083 59 75.64% 19 24.36% 78 Central Nebraska Jt Housing Authority NE182 76 100.00% 0 0.00% 76

Page 142 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Nebraska

NE-500 Nebraska Balance of State CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Genoa Housing Authority NE093 0 0.00% 75 100.00% 75 Gresham Housing Authority NE011 0 0.00% 75 100.00% 75 Broken Bow Housing Authority NE117 0 0.00% 68 100.00% 68 David City Housing Authority NE025 0 0.00% 66 100.00% 66 Stanton Housing Authority NE029 0 0.00% 60 100.00% 60 North Loup Housing Authority NE131 0 0.00% 59 100.00% 59 Clarkson Housing Authority NE027 0 0.00% 59 100.00% 59 Neligh Housing Authority NE022 0 0.00% 58 100.00% 58 Gothenburg Housing Authority NE120 25 45.45% 30 54.55% 55 Alma Housing Authority NE024 0 0.00% 54 100.00% 54 Fairmont Housing Authority NE064 0 0.00% 49 100.00% 49 Ord Housing Authority NE005 0 0.00% 49 100.00% 49 Syracuse Housing Authority NE015 0 0.00% 40 100.00% 40 Nelson Housing Authority NE082 0 0.00% 40 100.00% 40 Coleridge Housing Authority NE039 0 0.00% 40 100.00% 40 Hooper Housing Authority NE049 0 0.00% 40 100.00% 40 Wayne Housing Authority NE109 0 0.00% 40 100.00% 40 Albion Housing Authority NE040 0 0.00% 40 100.00% 40 Chadron Housing Authority NE143 40 100.00% 0 0.00% 40 Crete Housing Authority NE041 25 64.10% 14 35.90% 39 Fairbury Housing Authority NE030 0 0.00% 39 100.00% 39 Lyons Housing Authority NE088 0 0.00% 38 100.00% 38

Page 143 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Nebraska

NE-500 Nebraska Balance of State CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Ravenna Housing Authority NE108 0 0.00% 35 100.00% 35 Benkelman Housing Authority NE016 0 0.00% 35 100.00% 35 Red Cloud Housing Authority NE006 0 0.00% 34 100.00% 34 Imperial Housing Authority NE021 0 0.00% 34 100.00% 34 Edgar Housing Authority NE033 0 0.00% 33 100.00% 33 Ansley Housing Authority NE111 0 0.00% 30 100.00% 30 Ainsworth Housing Authority NE035 0 0.00% 30 100.00% 30 Creighton Housing Authority NE034 0 0.00% 30 100.00% 30 Hay Springs Housing Authority NE046 0 0.00% 30 100.00% 30 Nebraska City Housing Authority NE012 0 0.00% 29 100.00% 29 Pawnee City Housing Authority NE028 0 0.00% 29 100.00% 29 St. Edward Housing Authority NE059 0 0.00% 28 100.00% 28 St. Paul Housing Authority NE050 0 0.00% 28 100.00% 28 Stromsburg Housing Authority NE017 0 0.00% 26 100.00% 26 Wymore Housing Authority NE018 0 0.00% 26 100.00% 26 Bassett Housing Authority NE071 0 0.00% 26 100.00% 26 Wilber Housing Authority NE047 0 0.00% 25 100.00% 25 Henderson Housing Authority NE038 0 0.00% 25 100.00% 25 Bridgeport Housing Authority NE106 0 0.00% 25 100.00% 25 Curtis Housing Authority NE097 0 0.00% 24 100.00% 24 Plattsmouth Housing Authority NE074 0 0.00% 23 100.00% 23 Sutherland Housing Authority NE096 0 0.00% 23 100.00% 23

Page 144 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Nebraska

NE-500 Nebraska Balance of State CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Burwell Housing Authority NE026 0 0.00% 23 100.00% 23 Hemingford Housing Authority NE102 0 0.00% 23 100.00% 23 Humboldt Housing Authority NE014 0 0.00% 22 100.00% 22 Grant Housing Authority NE020 0 0.00% 20 100.00% 20 Minden Housing Authority NE051 0 0.00% 20 100.00% 20 Cambridge Housing Authority NE070 0 0.00% 20 100.00% 20 Newman Grove Housing Authority NE037 0 0.00% 20 100.00% 20 Gibbon Housing Authority NE110 0 0.00% 20 100.00% 20 North Platte Housing Authority NE125 0 0.00% 20 100.00% 20 Clay Center Housing Authority NE019 0 0.00% 20 100.00% 20 Falls City Housing Authority NE095 0 0.00% 20 100.00% 20 Blair Housing Authority NE092 0 0.00% 20 100.00% 20 Harvard Housing Authority NE068 0 0.00% 20 100.00% 20 Weeping Water Housing Authority NE085 0 0.00% 20 100.00% 20 Tekamah Housing Authority NE072 0 0.00% 20 100.00% 20 Verdigre Housing Authority NE032 0 0.00% 20 100.00% 20 Tilden Housing Authority NE067 0 0.00% 20 100.00% 20 Aurora Housing Authority NE090 0 0.00% 20 100.00% 20 Gordon Housing Authority NE107 0 0.00% 19 100.00% 19 Sargent Housing Authority NE053 0 0.00% 19 100.00% 19 Indianola Housing Authority NE075 0 0.00% 18 100.00% 18 Oshkosh Housing Authority NE076 0 0.00% 18 100.00% 18

Page 145 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Nebraska

NE-500 Nebraska Balance of State CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Auburn Housing Authority NE065 0 0.00% 18 100.00% 18 Friend Housing Authority NE063 0 0.00% 18 100.00% 18 Tecumseh Housing Authority NE098 0 0.00% 18 100.00% 18 Lynch Housing Authority NE043 0 0.00% 17 100.00% 17 Deshler Housing Authority NE036 0 0.00% 17 100.00% 17 Bayard Housing Authority NE086 0 0.00% 17 100.00% 17 Oxford Housing Authority NE069 0 0.00% 17 100.00% 17 Blue Hill Housing Authority NE031 0 0.00% 16 100.00% 16 Schuyler Housing Authority NE023 0 0.00% 16 100.00% 16 Cairo Housing Authority NE101 0 0.00% 15 100.00% 15 Shelton Housing Authority NE057 0 0.00% 15 100.00% 15 Greeley Housing Authority NE042 0 0.00% 10 100.00% 10

NE-501 Omaha, Council Bluffs CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Omaha Housing Authority NE001 4545 93.42% 320 6.58% 4865 Bellevue Housing Authority NE174 275 19.04% 1169 80.96% 1444 Douglas County Housing Authority NE153 1008 95.36% 49 4.64% 1057 Municipal Housing Agency of Council Bluffs IA023 687 97.86% 15 2.14% 702

Page 146 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Nebraska

NE-502 Lincoln CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Lincoln Housing Authority NE002 3016 88.45% 394 11.55% 3410

Page 147 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Nevada

NV-500 Las Vegas/Clark County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Southern Nevada Regional Housing Authority NV018 10570 81.86% 2342 18.14% 12912

NV-501 Reno, Sparks/Washoe County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units CITY OF RENO HOUSING AUTHORITY NV001 2747 100.00% 0 0.00% 2747 LASSEN COUNTY CA152 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

NV-502 Nevada Balance of State CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units NEVADA RURAL HSG AUTH NV905 1463 100.00% 0 0.00% 1463

Page 148 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. New Hampshire

NH-500 New Hampshire Balance of State CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of the Town of Salem NH017 0 0.00% 7750 100.00% 7750 Keene Housing NH010 687 92.59% 55 7.41% 742 Dover Housing Authority NH003 317 42.95% 421 57.05% 738 Portsmouth Housing Authority NH004 406 60.78% 262 39.22% 668 Laconia Housing & Redevelopment Authority NH007 407 63.69% 232 36.31% 639 Concord Housing Authority NH005 245 59.18% 169 40.82% 414 Berlin Housing Authority NH011 285 74.80% 96 25.20% 381 Housing Authority of the City of Rochester NH NH008 182 52.30% 166 47.70% 348 Somersworth Housing Authority NH006 183 65.12% 98 34.88% 281 Lancaster Housing Authority NH015 68 30.09% 158 69.91% 226 Claremont Housing Authority NH012 140 73.68% 50 26.32% 190 Newmarket Housing Authority NH013 72 40.22% 107 59.78% 179 Exeter Housing Authority NH014 169 100.00% 0 0.00% 169 Lebanon Housing Authority NH009 163 100.00% 0 0.00% 163 Derry Housing & Redevelopment Authority NH022 100 100.00% 0 0.00% 100 Northumberland Housing Authority NH016 15 100.00% 0 0.00% 15

NH-501 Manchester CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Manchester Housing & Redevelopment Authority NH001 2037 75.47% 662 24.53% 2699

Page 149 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. New Hampshire

NH-502 Nashua/Hillsborough County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units New Hampshire Housing Finance Agency NH901 3498 100.00% 0 0.00% 3498 Nashua Housing Authority NH002 856 65.14% 458 34.86% 1314 Harbor Homes, Inc. NH888 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Page 150 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. New Jersey

NJ-500 Atlantic City & County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority and Urban Redevelopment Age NJ014 1049 43.60% 1357 56.40% 2406 Pleasantville Housing Authority NJ059 245 75.38% 80 24.62% 325 Buena Housing Authority NJ202 0 0.00% 262 100.00% 262

NJ-501 Bergen County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Bergen County Housing Authority NJ067 3586 98.38% 59 1.62% 3645 Housing Authority of the Borough of Lodi NJ011 477 27.03% 1288 72.97% 1765 Hackensack Housing Authority NJ028 0 0.00% 715 100.00% 715 Englewood Housing Authority NJ055 609 89.69% 70 10.31% 679 Fort Lee Housing Authority NJ071 490 87.50% 70 12.50% 560 Cliffside Park Housing Authority NJ070 347 89.66% 40 10.34% 387 Edgewater Housing Authority NJ075 154 65.81% 80 34.19% 234 Garfield Housing Authority NJ034 0 0.00% 152 100.00% 152

NJ-502 Burlington County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Burlington Housing Authority NJ020 0 0.00% 1223 100.00% 1223 Burlington County Housing Authority NJ215 628 100.00% 0 0.00% 628 Florence Housing Authority NJ038 0 0.00% 473 100.00% 473

Page 151 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. New Jersey

NJ-502 Burlington County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Beverly Housing Authority NJ018 0 0.00% 90 100.00% 90

NJ-503 Camden City & County/Gloucester, Cape May, Cumberland Counties CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Gloucester County Housing Authority NJ204 1928 94.84% 105 5.16% 2033 Housing Authority of the City of Camden NJ010 1424 86.62% 220 13.38% 1644 Gloucester City Housing Authority NJ218 0 0.00% 953 100.00% 953 Cape May Housing Authority NJ062 0 0.00% 600 100.00% 600 Vineland Housing Authority NJ063 466 82.33% 100 17.67% 566 Bridgeton Housing Authority NJ049 203 45.41% 244 54.59% 447 Glassboro Housing Authority NJ051 232 75.82% 74 24.18% 306 Millville Housing Authority NJ061 191 69.20% 85 30.80% 276 Ocean City Housing Authority NJ053 0 0.00% 268 100.00% 268 Haddon Housing Authority NJ064 0 0.00% 266 100.00% 266 Borough of Clementon Housing Authority NJ073 69 31.22% 152 68.78% 221 Collingswood Housing Authority NJ079 0 0.00% 170 100.00% 170 Wildwood Housing Authority NJ080 0 0.00% 99 100.00% 99 Township of Pennsauken Housing NJ118 77 100.00% 0 0.00% 77 Cherry Hill Housing Authority NJ115 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Page 152 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. New Jersey

NJ-504 Newark/Essex County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Newark Housing Authority NJ002 6758 83.62% 1324 16.38% 8082 East Orange Housing Authority NJ050 1410 88.74% 179 11.26% 1589 Housing Authority of the City of Orange NJ025 741 61.96% 455 38.04% 1196 Montclair Housing Authority NJ086 321 100.00% 0 0.00% 321 Irvington Housing Authority NJ037 240 82.76% 50 17.24% 290 BLOOMFIELD TOWNSHIP HA NJ099 270 100.00% 0 0.00% 270 West Orange Housing Authority NJ108 120 100.00% 0 0.00% 120

NJ-506 Jersey City,Bayonne/Hudson County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority City of Jersey City NJ009 3626 66.48% 1828 33.52% 5454 North Bergen Housing Authority NJ004 457 21.64% 1655 78.36% 2112 Bayonne Housing Authority NJ012 252 26.50% 699 73.50% 951 Union City Housing Authority NJ026 693 76.83% 209 23.17% 902 Guttenberg Housing Authority NJ036 198 22.97% 664 77.03% 862 West New York Housing Authority NJ030 462 62.52% 277 37.48% 739 Hoboken Housing Authority NJ015 326 54.88% 268 45.12% 594 Weehawken Housing Authority NJ077 350 78.65% 95 21.35% 445 Secaucus Housing Authority NJ083 250 100.00% 0 0.00% 250 Harrison Housing Authority NJ016 0 0.00% 195 100.00% 195 Garden State Episcopal CDC NJ882 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Page 153 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. New Jersey

NJ-507 New Brunswick/Middlesex County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Perth Amboy Housing Authority NJ006 920 61.09% 586 38.91% 1506 New Brunswick Housing Authority NJ022 903 65.77% 470 34.23% 1373 Woodbridge Housing Authority NJ033 405 47.04% 456 52.96% 861 Carteret Housing Authority NJ047 464 57.35% 345 42.65% 809 Edison Housing Authority NJ043 375 75.15% 124 24.85% 499 South Amboy Housing Authority NJ035 111 30.83% 249 69.17% 360 Old Bridge Housing Authority NJ110 204 77.27% 60 22.73% 264 Highland Park Housing Authority NJ044 145 59.18% 100 40.82% 245 Sayreville Housing Authority NJ106 174 100.00% 0 0.00% 174

NJ-508 Monmouth County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Long Branch Housing Authority NJ008 866 26.84% 2361 73.16% 3227 Monmouth County PHA NJ095 1889 100.00% 0 0.00% 1889 Asbury Park Housing Authority NJ007 347 44.54% 432 55.46% 779 Neptune Housing Authority NJ048 318 41.51% 448 58.49% 766 Keansburg Housing Authority NJ060 249 33.33% 498 66.67% 747 Housing Authority of the Township of Middleto NJ081 245 47.12% 275 52.88% 520 Red Bank Housing Authority NJ046 260 50.78% 252 49.22% 512 Freehold Housing Authority NJ069 0 0.00% 354 100.00% 354 Belmar Housing Authority NJ057 0 0.00% 180 100.00% 180

Page 154 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. New Jersey

NJ-508 Monmouth County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Highlands Housing Authority NJ041 0 0.00% 50 100.00% 50 Collaborative Support Programs of NJ NJ880 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Community Enterprises Corporation NJ881 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

NJ-509 Morris County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Morris County Housing Authority NJ092 634 82.55% 134 17.45% 768 Morristown Housing Authority NJ023 184 24.15% 578 75.85% 762 Dover Housing Authority NJ068 248 74.47% 85 25.53% 333 Boonton Housing Authority NJ052 159 56.79% 121 43.21% 280 Madison Housing Authority NJ105 190 100.00% 0 0.00% 190

NJ-510 Lakewood Township/Ocean County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Lakewood Township Residential Assistance Prog NJ214 1058 100.00% 0 0.00% 1058 Housing Authority of the Township of Lakewood NJ054 763 83.39% 152 16.61% 915 Brick Housing Authority NJ065 142 41.40% 201 58.60% 343 Berkeley Housing Authority NJ056 25 33.33% 50 66.67% 75

Page 155 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. New Jersey

NJ-511 Paterson/Passaic County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of the City of Passaic NJ013 1828 53.65% 1579 46.35% 3407 Paterson Housing Authority NJ021 2352 86.82% 357 13.18% 2709 Passaic County Public Housing Agency NJ090 835 100.00% 0 0.00% 835 Clifton Housing Authority NJ089 264 100.00% 0 0.00% 264 Housing Authority of the City of Paterson NJ091 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

NJ-512 Salem County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Salem Housing Authority NJ058 30 12.66% 207 87.34% 237 Penns Grove Housing Authority NJ074 35 53.85% 30 46.15% 65

NJ-513 Somerset County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Franklin Housing Authority NJ042 230 58.97% 160 41.03% 390 Somerville Housing Authority NJ097 170 100.00% 0 0.00% 170 Manville Housing Authority NJ112 90 100.00% 0 0.00% 90

Page 156 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. New Jersey

NJ-514 Trenton/Mercer County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units STATE OF NJ DEPT. OF COMM. AFFAIRS NJ912 21894 100.00% 0 0.00% 21894 Princeton Housing Authority NJ027 0 0.00% 504 100.00% 504 Trenton Housing Authority NJ005 0 0.00% 467 100.00% 467 Hamilton Township HA NJ212 222 100.00% 0 0.00% 222 Hightstown Housing Authority NJ045 0 0.00% 90 100.00% 90 N.J. HSG. AND MORTGAGE FINANCE AGCY NJ902 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

NJ-515 Elizabeth/Union County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Elizabeth Housing Authority NJ003 1133 53.49% 985 46.51% 2118 Plainfield Housing Authority NJ039 844 87.10% 125 12.90% 969 Housing Authority City of Linden NJ066 357 41.51% 503 58.49% 860 Rahway Housing Authority NJ032 188 24.97% 565 75.03% 753 Union County Housing Authority NJ113 371 100.00% 0 0.00% 371 Union Township Housing Authority NJ109 163 100.00% 0 0.00% 163 Summit Housing Authority NJ017 0 0.00% 71 100.00% 71

NJ-516 Warren, Sussex, Hunterdon Counties CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Hunterdon County Division of Housing NJ084 427 58.41% 304 41.59% 731

Page 157 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. New Jersey

NJ-516 Warren, Sussex, Hunterdon Counties CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Warren County Housing Authority NJ102 666 100.00% 0 0.00% 666 Phillipsburg Housing Authority NJ024 0 0.00% 259 100.00% 259 Phillipsburg DCD NJ088 210 100.00% 0 0.00% 210 Newton Housing Authority NJ076 0 0.00% 99 100.00% 99

Page 158 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. New Mexico

NM-500 Albuquerque CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units City of Albuquerque Housing Authority NM001 4161 96.93% 132 3.07% 4293 Bernalillo County Housing Department NM057 2131 100.00% 0 0.00% 2131

NM-501 New Mexico Balance of State CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Eastern Regional Housing Authority NM063 1892 97.23% 54 2.77% 1946 Mesilla Valley Public Housing Authority NM003 1612 87.94% 221 12.06% 1833 Santa Fe Civic Housing Authority NM009 1125 100.00% 0 0.00% 1125 Western Regional Housing Authority NM067 911 97.02% 28 2.98% 939 Clovis Housing and Redevelopment Agency, Inc. NM002 608 70.62% 253 29.38% 861 Housing Authority of the City of Sunland Park NM075 0 0.00% 751 100.00% 751 Housing Authority of the City of Raton NM008 0 0.00% 639 100.00% 639 El Camino Real Housing Authority NM077 591 100.00% 0 0.00% 591 Housing Authority of the County of San Juan NM066 355 100.00% 0 0.00% 355 Housing Authority of the City of Gallup NM006 63 19.09% 267 80.91% 330 Housing Authority of the County of Santa Fe NM050 285 89.91% 32 10.09% 317 Housing Authority of the City of Truth or Consequences NM020 170 55.19% 138 44.81% 308 Housing Authority of the City of Alamogordo NM004 0 0.00% 267 100.00% 267 Housing Authority of the City of Tucumcari NM033 140 58.33% 100 41.67% 240 Housing Authority of the County of San Miguel NM049 0 0.00% 200 100.00% 200 Housing Authority of San Miguel County NM061 177 100.00% 0 0.00% 177

Page 159 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. New Mexico

NM-501 New Mexico Balance of State CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Town of Bernalillo Dept of Housing Services NM035 0 0.00% 169 100.00% 169 Housing Authority of the City of Las Vegas NM007 0 0.00% 156 100.00% 156 Housing Authority of the County of Dona Ana NM062 0 0.00% 125 100.00% 125 Housing Authority of the City of Grants NM030 98 83.76% 19 16.24% 117 Housing Authority of the Village of Wagon Mound NM032 0 0.00% 90 100.00% 90 Housing Authority of the City of Lovington NM023 0 0.00% 70 100.00% 70 Housing Authority of the City of Artesia NM021 0 0.00% 56 100.00% 56 Housing Authority of the County of Taos NM038 0 0.00% 53 100.00% 53 Housing Authority of the Village of Pecos NM054 0 0.00% 50 100.00% 50 Housing Authority of the Town of Springer NM022 0 0.00% 50 100.00% 50 Housing Authority of the Town of Bayard NM024 0 0.00% 47 100.00% 47 Housing Authority of the Village of Cuba NM071 0 0.00% 40 100.00% 40 Housing Authority of the Village of Cimarron NM048 0 0.00% 34 100.00% 34 Housing Authority of the City of Eunice NM027 0 0.00% 32 100.00% 32 Housing Authority of the County of Rio Arriba NM039 25 100.00% 0 0.00% 25 Housing Authority of the Village of Fort Sumner NM025 0 0.00% 22 100.00% 22 Housing Authority of the Town of Clayton NM055 0 0.00% 21 100.00% 21 Santa Clara Housing Authority NM029 0 0.00% 20 100.00% 20 Housing Authority of the Village of Chama NM047 0 0.00% 16 100.00% 16 Housing Authority of the Village of Los Lunas NM070 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Housing Authority of the City of Lordsburg NM034 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Housing Authority of the Town of Mountainair NM069 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Page 160 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. New Mexico

NM-501 New Mexico Balance of State CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of the Village of Maxwell NM026 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Page 161 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. New York

NY-500 Rochester, Irondequoit, Greece/Monroe County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Rochester Housing Authority NY041 8897 92.59% 712 7.41% 9609 Village of Fairport NY406 497 100.00% 0 0.00% 497

NY-501 Elmira/Steuben, Allegany, Livingston, Chemung, Schuyler Counties CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Hornell Housing Authority NY067 134 54.47% 112 45.53% 246 Elmira Housing Authority NY030 0 0.00% 241 100.00% 241 Village of Elmira Heights NY402 59 100.00% 0 0.00% 59 Town of Horseheads NY432 35 100.00% 0 0.00% 35

NY-502 Auburn/Cayuga County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Auburn Housing Authority NY066 394 71.38% 158 28.62% 552

NY-503 Albany City & County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units NYS Housing Trust Fund Corporation NY904 46182 100.00% 0 0.00% 46182 Albany Housing Authority NY009 2807 81.39% 642 18.61% 3449 Cohoes Housing Authority NY022 327 48.16% 352 51.84% 679

Page 162 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. New York

NY-503 Albany City & County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Watervliet Housing Authority NY025 215 71.43% 86 28.57% 301 Village of Green Island NY535 46 100.00% 0 0.00% 46

NY-504 Cattaraugus County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units City of Salamanca NY403 174 100.00% 0 0.00% 174 Olean Housing Authority NY093 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

NY-505 Syracuse/Onondaga, Oswego Counties CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Syracuse Housing Authority NY001 3846 47.70% 4217 52.30% 8063 Village of Manlius NY527 699 100.00% 0 0.00% 699 City of Oswego, Office of Community Dev. NY027 489 100.00% 0 0.00% 489 City of Fulton NY504 440 100.00% 0 0.00% 440 Village of North Syracuse Housing Authority NY107 271 100.00% 0 0.00% 271

NY-507 Schenectady City & County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Schenectady Municipal Housing Authority NY028 1387 73.86% 491 26.14% 1878

Page 163 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. New York

NY-507 Schenectady City & County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Amsterdam Housing Authority NY060 443 76.64% 135 23.36% 578

NY-508 Buffalo, Niagara Falls/Erie, Niagara, Orleans, Genesee, Wyoming Counties CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units City of Buffalo NY409 5214 100.00% 0 0.00% 5214 Town of Amherst NY091 4990 100.00% 0 0.00% 4990 Buffalo Municipal Housing Authority NY002 472 18.50% 2079 81.50% 2551 Niagara Falls Housing Authority NY011 0 0.00% 1264 100.00% 1264 Buffalo Municipal Housing Authority NY449 972 100.00% 0 0.00% 972 City of Niagara Falls NY404 967 100.00% 0 0.00% 967 City of North Tonawanda NY405 603 100.00% 0 0.00% 603 Lackawanna Municipal Housing Authority NY029 0 0.00% 479 100.00% 479 Batavia Housing Authority NY052 0 0.00% 341 100.00% 341 Lockport Housing Authority NY070 188 65.73% 98 34.27% 286 Kenmore Municipal Housing Authority NY400 0 0.00% 50 100.00% 50

NY-510 Ithaca/Tompkins County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Ithaca Housing Authority NY054 992 52.13% 911 47.87% 1903 Cortland Housing Authority NY021 306 49.84% 308 50.16% 614

Page 164 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. New York

NY-511 Binghamton, Union Town/Broome, Otsego, Chenango, Delaware, Cortland Counties CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Binghamton Housing Authority NY016 821 76.94% 246 23.06% 1067 Ilion Housing Authority NY059 270 50.47% 265 49.53% 535 Town of Union Community Development NY505 522 100.00% 0 0.00% 522 Village of Walton NY541 409 100.00% 0 0.00% 409 Herkimer Housing Authority NY019 52 13.30% 339 86.70% 391 Oneonta Housing Authority NY068 80 27.40% 212 72.60% 292 Village of Cobleskill NY532 263 100.00% 0 0.00% 263 Norwich Housing Authority NY065 203 80.24% 50 19.76% 253 St. Johnsville Housing Authority NY098 102 57.63% 75 42.37% 177 Little Falls Housing Authority NY109 142 100.00% 0 0.00% 142 Village of Canajoharie NY413 60 100.00% 0 0.00% 60

NY-512 Troy/Rensselaer County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Hoosick Housing Authority NY501 215 8.89% 2203 91.11% 2418 Troy Housing Authority NY012 925 85.97% 151 14.03% 1076 Rensselaer Housing Authority NY033 98 25.79% 282 74.21% 380

Page 165 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. New York

NY-513 Wayne, Ontario, Seneca, Yates Counties CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Newark Housing Authority NY089 377 55.20% 306 44.80% 683 Geneva Housing Authority NY044 0 0.00% 162 100.00% 162

NY-514 Jamestown, Dunkirk/Chautauqua County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Jamestown Housing Authority NY017 268 30.84% 601 69.16% 869 Dunkirk Housing Authority NY063 0 0.00% 40 100.00% 40 Southern Tier Environments for Living NY889 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

NY-516 Clinton County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Plattsburgh Housing Authority NY018 191 52.19% 175 47.81% 366 Town of Jay NY522 42 100.00% 0 0.00% 42

NY-518 Utica, Rome/Oneida, Madison Counties CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units City of Utica NY443 1285 100.00% 0 0.00% 1285 Rome Housing Authority NY034 684 94.48% 40 5.52% 724 Village of New Hartford NY552 374 100.00% 0 0.00% 374

Page 166 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. New York

NY-518 Utica, Rome/Oneida, Madison Counties CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Utica Housing Authority NY006 175 54.01% 149 45.99% 324 Oneida Housing Authority NY102 106 62.35% 64 37.65% 170 Canastota Housing Authority NY521 135 100.00% 0 0.00% 135 Boonville Housing Authority NY534 30 100.00% 0 0.00% 30

NY-519 Columbia, Greene Counties CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Hudson Housing Authority NY061 131 26.68% 360 73.32% 491 Catskill Housing Authority NY032 0 0.00% 146 100.00% 146

NY-520 Franklin County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Harrietstown Housing Authority NY087 135 23.20% 447 76.80% 582 Tupper Lake Housing Authority NY081 0 0.00% 282 100.00% 282 Malone Housing Authority NY080 0 0.00% 90 100.00% 90 Lake Placid Village, Inc. NY517 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Page 167 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. New York

NY-522 Jefferson, Lewis, St. Lawrence Counties CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Ogdensburg Housing Authority NY039 50 1.94% 2528 98.06% 2578 Watertown Housing Authority NY010 0 0.00% 849 100.00% 849 Massena Housing Authority NY031 0 0.00% 80 100.00% 80 West Carthage Housing Authority NY414 0 0.00% 25 100.00% 25 Wilna Housing Authority NY058 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Canton Housing Authority NY097 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

NY-523 Glens Falls, Saratoga Springs/Saratoga, Washington, Warren, Hamilton Counties CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Glens Falls Housing Authority NY079 728 80.62% 175 19.38% 903 Mechanicville Housing Authority NY015 180 21.92% 641 78.08% 821 Saratoga Springs Housing Authority NY020 90 19.15% 380 80.85% 470 Gloversville Housing Authority NY048 221 47.42% 245 52.58% 466 Town of Colonie NY408 424 100.00% 0 0.00% 424 Town of Rotterdam NY516 245 100.00% 0 0.00% 245 Fort Plain Housing Agency NY530 242 100.00% 0 0.00% 242 Village of Ballston Spa NY562 159 100.00% 0 0.00% 159 City of Johnstown NY433 132 100.00% 0 0.00% 132 Town of Stillwater NY561 129 100.00% 0 0.00% 129 Town of Guilderland NY422 110 100.00% 0 0.00% 110 Village of Scotia NY512 106 100.00% 0 0.00% 106

Page 168 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. New York

NY-523 Glens Falls, Saratoga Springs/Saratoga, Washington, Warren, Hamilton Counties CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Village of Corinth NY538 91 100.00% 0 0.00% 91 Village of Highland Falls NY125 84 100.00% 0 0.00% 84 Town of Coeymans NY557 81 100.00% 0 0.00% 81 Whitehall Housing Authority NY073 73 100.00% 0 0.00% 73 Town of Glenville NY513 60 100.00% 0 0.00% 60 Town of Bethlehem NY427 59 100.00% 0 0.00% 59 Town of Clifton Park NY416 59 100.00% 0 0.00% 59 Village of Waterford NY630 55 100.00% 0 0.00% 55 Town of Niskayuna NY430 46 100.00% 0 0.00% 46 Town of Waterford NY503 45 100.00% 0 0.00% 45 Town of Schodack NY431 43 100.00% 0 0.00% 43 Town of Hadley NY421 33 100.00% 0 0.00% 33 Town of Nassau NY564 31 100.00% 0 0.00% 31 Town of Wilton NY424 31 100.00% 0 0.00% 31 Town of Corinth NY519 28 100.00% 0 0.00% 28 Town of Knox NY447 20 100.00% 0 0.00% 20 Dolgeville Housing Authority NY417 20 100.00% 0 0.00% 20 Town of Duanesburg NY428 15 100.00% 0 0.00% 15

Page 169 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. New York

NY-600 New York City CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units New York City Housing Authority NY005 99037 99.12% 878 0.88% 99915 NYC Dept of Housing Preservation and Dev NY110 34823 100.00% 0 0.00% 34823 NYS Housing Finance Agency Starrett City NY913 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 NYS Housing Finance Agency NY912 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

NY-601 Poughkeepsie/Dutchess County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units City of Poughkeepsie NY137 785 100.00% 0 0.00% 785 The City of Beacon Housing Authority NY049 309 45.24% 374 54.76% 683 Poughkeepsie Housing Authority NY062 147 38.58% 234 61.42% 381 Town of Poughkeepsie Sect 8 Hsg NY568 112 100.00% 0 0.00% 112

NY-602 Newburgh, Middletown/Orange County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of Newburgh NY051 431 68.41% 199 31.59% 630 Port Jervis CDA NY134 327 100.00% 0 0.00% 327 Village of Kiryas Joel HA NY158 322 100.00% 0 0.00% 322 Port Jervis Housing Authority NY099 0 0.00% 50 100.00% 50

Page 170 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. New York

NY-603 Nassau, Suffolk Counties CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Town of Islip Housing Authority NY077 1044 77.33% 306 22.67% 1350 Town of Babylon NY130 881 100.00% 0 0.00% 881 Town of Brookhaven, Dept. of Housing & Human NY149 797 100.00% 0 0.00% 797 Village of Hempstead HA NY085 475 71.43% 190 28.57% 665 Town of Huntington Housing Authority NY035 573 88.29% 76 11.71% 649 Housing Authority of Long Beach NY050 389 74.24% 135 25.76% 524 Freeport Housing Authority NY023 211 40.73% 307 59.27% 518 Town of Hempstead Dept. of Urban Renewal NY892 423 100.00% 0 0.00% 423 Glen Cove Public Housing Authority NY069 0 0.00% 352 100.00% 352 Glen Cove CDA NY121 340 100.00% 0 0.00% 340 North Hempstead Housing Authority NY086 225 66.57% 113 33.43% 338 Town of Southampton NY141 321 100.00% 0 0.00% 321 Village of Rockville Centre NY159 303 100.00% 0 0.00% 303 Town of Hempstead Housing Authority NY046 0 0.00% 293 100.00% 293 North Fork Hsg Alliance Inc NY152 285 100.00% 0 0.00% 285 Riverhead Housing Development Corproration NY127 196 100.00% 0 0.00% 196 Town of East Hampton NY154 189 100.00% 0 0.00% 189 Village of Patchogue CDA NY128 173 100.00% 0 0.00% 173 Town of Oyster Bay Housing Authority NY055 0 0.00% 146 100.00% 146 Rockville Centre HA NY100 0 0.00% 140 100.00% 140 Town of Smithtown NY155 111 100.00% 0 0.00% 111 Village of Greenport Housing Authority NY146 87 100.00% 0 0.00% 87

Page 171 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. New York

NY-603 Nassau, Suffolk Counties CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Village of Great Neck Housing Authority NY144 0 0.00% 60 100.00% 60 Village of Island Park HA NY120 40 100.00% 0 0.00% 40 Village of Farmingdale HA NY151 20 100.00% 0 0.00% 20 Village of Sea Cliff NY147 20 100.00% 0 0.00% 20 Mercy Haven Inc. NY888 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Transitional Services of NY for Long Island, NY893 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Family and Children's Association NY894 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Options for Community Living NY891 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

NY-604 Yonkers, Mount Vernon/Westchester County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units The Municipal Hsng Authority City Yonkers NY003 3249 1.82% 175470 98.18% 178719 Tuckahoe Housing Authority NY008 0 0.00% 1827 100.00% 1827 City of New Rochelle Housing Authority NY113 1165 100.00% 0 0.00% 1165 North Tarrytown Housing Authority NY026 0 0.00% 1018 100.00% 1018 City of Peekskill NY123 726 100.00% 0 0.00% 726 White Plains Housing Authority NY042 400 61.73% 248 38.27% 648 Town of Mamaroneck HA NY117 647 100.00% 0 0.00% 647 New Rochelle Housing Authority NY088 345 68.32% 160 31.68% 505 Village of Ossining Section 8 Program NY094 254 59.91% 170 40.09% 424 Greenburgh Housing Authority NY057 303 75.19% 100 24.81% 403

Page 172 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. New York

NY-604 Yonkers, Mount Vernon/Westchester County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Mount Kisco Housing Authority NY038 0 0.00% 386 100.00% 386 Tarrytown Municipal Housing Authority NY013 0 0.00% 337 100.00% 337 Town of Eastchester NY111 255 100.00% 0 0.00% 255 Tuckahoe HA, Village of NY165 175 100.00% 0 0.00% 175 Port Chester Housing Authority NY014 0 0.00% 160 100.00% 160 Town of Yorktown NY132 152 100.00% 0 0.00% 152 Village of Mount Kisco NY176 109 100.00% 0 0.00% 109 Village of Port Chester NY118 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Village of Pelham HA NY116 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Village of Mamaroneck HA NY101 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Peekskill Housing Authority NY082 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 White Plains Housing Authority/Section 8 NY115 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

NY-606 Rockland County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Town of Ramapo Housing Authority NY084 642 69.56% 281 30.44% 923 Village of Spring Valley HA NY148 815 100.00% 0 0.00% 815 Village of New Square PHA NY138 670 89.93% 75 10.07% 745 Village of Nyack HA NY114 236 100.00% 0 0.00% 236 Village of Spring Valley Housing Authority NY056 0 0.00% 115 100.00% 115 Village of Kaser NY160 92 100.00% 0 0.00% 92

Page 173 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. New York

NY-607 Sullivan County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Monticello Housing Authority NY071 554 60.61% 360 39.39% 914 Woodridge Housing Authority NY064 0 0.00% 102 100.00% 102

NY-608 Kingston/Ulster County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Kingston Housing Authority NY045 359 21.52% 1309 78.48% 1668 Town of Saugerties P H A NY529 180 100.00% 0 0.00% 180 Ellenville Housing Authority NY103 144 100.00% 0 0.00% 144 Kingston CDA NY139 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Page 174 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. North Carolina

NC-500 Winston-Salem/Forsyth County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of the City of Winston-Salem NC012 4433 70.31% 1872 29.69% 6305 Piedmont Triad Regional Council NC166 842 100.00% 0 0.00% 842

NC-501 Asheville/Buncombe County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of the City of Asheville NC007 1612 90.26% 174 9.74% 1786

NC-502 Durham City & County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units The Housing Authority of the City of Durham NC013 2758 79.09% 729 20.91% 3487

NC-503 North Carolina Balance of State CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Eastern Carolina Regional Housing Authority NC010 0 0.00% 2400 100.00% 2400 Housing Authority of the City of Lumberton NC014 596 32.73% 1225 67.27% 1821 Economic Improvement Council, Inc. NC145 1595 100.00% 0 0.00% 1595 Housing Authority of the City of Concord NC008 541 34.11% 1045 65.89% 1586 Isothermal Planning & Development Commission NC161 1393 100.00% 0 0.00% 1393 Housing Authority of the City of Kinston NC004 803 58.10% 579 41.90% 1382

Page 175 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. North Carolina

NC-503 North Carolina Balance of State CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of the Town of Laurinburg NC018 530 41.34% 752 58.66% 1282 The Graham Housing Authority NC059 1005 82.72% 210 17.28% 1215 Housing Authority of the City of New Bern NC005 0 0.00% 1132 100.00% 1132 Western Piedmont Council of Governments NC159 1074 100.00% 0 0.00% 1074 Housing Authority of the City of Greenville NC022 746 71.32% 300 28.68% 1046 Rocky Mount Housing Authority NC019 266 26.23% 748 73.77% 1014 Mountain Projects, Inc. NC152 1008 100.00% 0 0.00% 1008 Housing Authority of the City of Wilson NC020 661 65.71% 345 34.29% 1006 Statesville Housing Authority NC072 704 71.40% 282 28.60% 986 Asheboro Housing Authority NC081 783 81.73% 175 18.27% 958 Roanoke-Chowan Regional Housing Authority NC118 882 95.04% 46 4.96% 928 Sanford Housing Authority NC035 741 80.19% 183 19.81% 924 Twin Rivers Opportunities, Inc. NC151 880 100.00% 0 0.00% 880 City of Hickory Public Housing Authority NC056 449 52.89% 400 47.11% 849 Housing Authority of the City of Goldsboro NC015 237 30.31% 545 69.69% 782 Lexington Housing Authority NC039 521 71.76% 205 28.24% 726 Rowan County Housing Authority NC102 668 97.09% 20 2.91% 688 Monroe Housing Authority NC065 318 46.29% 369 53.71% 687 Eastern Carolina Human Services Agency, Inc. NC144 664 100.00% 0 0.00% 664 Western Carolina Community Action, Inc. NC140 646 100.00% 0 0.00% 646 Johnston County Housing Assistance Payments Program NC164 619 100.00% 0 0.00% 619 Thomasville Housing Authority NC071 100 16.89% 492 83.11% 592

Page 176 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. North Carolina

NC-503 North Carolina Balance of State CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Mid-East Regional Housing Authority NC087 537 91.48% 50 8.52% 587 Nash-Edgecombe Economic Development, Inc. NC137 585 100.00% 0 0.00% 585 Franklin-Vance-Warren Opportunity, Inc. NC155 579 100.00% 0 0.00% 579 Sandhills Community Action Program, Inc. NC149 567 100.00% 0 0.00% 567 City of Albemarle Department of Public Housing NC075 333 65.68% 174 34.32% 507 Redevelopment Commission of the Town of Tarboro NC017 0 0.00% 499 100.00% 499 Choanoke Area Development Association, Inc. NC139 483 100.00% 0 0.00% 483 Chatham County Housing Authority NC120 470 100.00% 0 0.00% 470 Four Square Community Action, Inc. NC146 469 100.00% 0 0.00% 469 Columbus County Public Housing Agency NC138 467 100.00% 0 0.00% 467 Washington Housing Authority NC032 370 81.50% 84 18.50% 454 Coastal Community Action, Inc. NC141 444 100.00% 0 0.00% 444 Four County Community Services, Inc. NC150 437 100.00% 0 0.00% 437 The New Reidsville Housing Authority NC098 220 53.14% 194 46.86% 414 Bladenboro Housing Authority NC089 232 58.73% 163 41.27% 395 Rockingham Housing Authority NC025 62 15.82% 330 84.18% 392 Madison County Housing Authority NC175 191 49.48% 195 50.52% 386 Hertford Housing Authority NC031 0 0.00% 383 100.00% 383 Roanoke Rapids Housing Authority NC117 0 0.00% 378 100.00% 378 Elizabeth City Housing Authority NC026 0 0.00% 377 100.00% 377 Williamston Housing Authority NC077 157 45.24% 190 54.76% 347 Hot Springs Housing Authority NC045 0 0.00% 336 100.00% 336

Page 177 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. North Carolina

NC-503 North Carolina Balance of State CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Valdese Housing Authority NC055 0 0.00% 311 100.00% 311 Ayden Housing Authority NC082 0 0.00% 290 100.00% 290 Greene County Public Housing Agency NC163 286 100.00% 0 0.00% 286 Whiteville Housing Authority NC037 0 0.00% 268 100.00% 268 Caswell County Housing Assistance Program NC160 267 100.00% 0 0.00% 267 Maxton Housing Authority NC048 0 0.00% 250 100.00% 250 The New Randleman Housing Authority NC063 0 0.00% 249 100.00% 249 Pembroke Housing Authority NC114 0 0.00% 247 100.00% 247 Mount Olive Housing Authority NC105 0 0.00% 243 100.00% 243 Town of East Spencer Housing Authority NC134 239 100.00% 0 0.00% 239 Southern Pines Housing Authority NC052 0 0.00% 230 100.00% 230 Mooresville Housing Authority NC024 0 0.00% 225 100.00% 225 Macon Program For Progress NC165 224 100.00% 0 0.00% 224 The New Edenton Housing Authority NC068 0 0.00% 203 100.00% 203 Marshall Housing Authority NC080 0 0.00% 200 100.00% 200 Lenoir Housing Authority NC074 0 0.00% 200 100.00% 200 Ahoskie Housing Authority NC085 0 0.00% 197 100.00% 197 Housing Authority of the City of Salisbury NC016 0 0.00% 193 100.00% 193 Wadesboro Housing Authority NC050 131 72.38% 50 27.62% 181 Morganton Housing Authority NC049 0 0.00% 175 100.00% 175 Hendersonville Housing Authority NC027 0 0.00% 173 100.00% 173 Mars Hill Housing Authority NC058 0 0.00% 170 100.00% 170

Page 178 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. North Carolina

NC-503 North Carolina Balance of State CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Oxford Housing Authority NC073 0 0.00% 158 100.00% 158 Elizabethtown Housing Authority NC093 0 0.00% 151 100.00% 151 Farmville Housing Authority NC076 0 0.00% 150 100.00% 150 Plymouth Housing Authority NC078 0 0.00% 143 100.00% 143 Madison Housing Authority NC054 0 0.00% 121 100.00% 121 Housing Authority of the Town of Mount Airy NC023 0 0.00% 106 100.00% 106 Andrews Housing Authority NC051 0 0.00% 101 100.00% 101 Robersonville Housing Authority NC067 0 0.00% 100 100.00% 100 Housing Authority of the Town of Beaufort NC061 0 0.00% 100 100.00% 100 Roxboro Housing Authority NC060 0 0.00% 100 100.00% 100 Robeson County Housing Authority NC084 0 0.00% 100 100.00% 100 Forest City Housing Authority NC095 0 0.00% 100 100.00% 100 Burlington Housing Authority NC066 0 0.00% 100 100.00% 100 Housing Programs of the Town of Murphy NC030 0 0.00% 85 100.00% 85 Star Housing Authority NC029 0 0.00% 84 100.00% 84 Smithfield Housing Authority NC040 0 0.00% 82 100.00% 82 Waynesville Housing Authority NC062 0 0.00% 80 100.00% 80 Princeville Housing Authority NC169 0 0.00% 75 100.00% 75 Mount Gilead Housing Authority NC044 0 0.00% 60 100.00% 60 Troy Housing Authority NC043 25 45.45% 30 54.55% 55 Selma Housing Authority NC036 0 0.00% 54 100.00% 54 Brevard Housing Authority NC090 0 0.00% 52 100.00% 52

Page 179 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. North Carolina

NC-503 North Carolina Balance of State CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Hamlet Housing Authority NC053 0 0.00% 50 100.00% 50 Dunn Housing Authority NC079 0 0.00% 50 100.00% 50 Vance County Housing Authority NC174 0 0.00% 40 100.00% 40 Benson Housing Authority NC028 0 0.00% 26 100.00% 26 Clarkton Housing Authority NC092 0 0.00% 26 100.00% 26 Fairmont Housing Authority NC047 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Harnett County Housing NC158 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

NC-504 Greensboro, High Point CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of the City of Greensboro NC011 3022 67.83% 1433 32.17% 4455 Housing Authority of the City of High Point NC006 1434 48.36% 1531 51.64% 2965

NC-505 Charlotte/Mecklenburg County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of the City of Charlotte NC003 4998 87.53% 712 12.47% 5710

Page 180 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. North Carolina

NC-506 Wilmington/Brunswick, New Hanover, Pender Counties CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of the City of Wilmington NC001 1958 59.93% 1309 40.07% 3267 Brunswick County Public Housing Agency NC147 472 100.00% 0 0.00% 472 Pender County Housing Department NC173 217 100.00% 0 0.00% 217

NC-507 Raleigh/Wake County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of the City of Raleigh NC002 3869 53.24% 3398 46.76% 7267 Housing Authority of the County of Wake NC021 422 37.15% 714 62.85% 1136 North Carolina Commission of Indian Affairs NC901 936 100.00% 0 0.00% 936

NC-509 Gastonia/Cleveland, Gaston, Lincoln Counties CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Gastonia Housing Authority NC057 1255 96.39% 47 3.61% 1302 Lincolnton Housing Authority NC070 275 51.40% 260 48.60% 535 City of Shelby, Department of Housing NC034 0 0.00% 446 100.00% 446 Kings Mountain Housing Authority NC064 0 0.00% 206 100.00% 206 City of Mount Holly, Dept. of Housing NC119 0 0.00% 83 100.00% 83 Belmont Housing Authority NC088 0 0.00% 76 100.00% 76

Page 181 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. North Carolina

NC-511 Fayetteville/Cumberland County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Fayetteville Metropolitan Housing Authority NC009 1913 72.38% 730 27.62% 2643

NC-513 Chapel Hill/Orange County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Orange County Housing Authority NC104 623 100.00% 0 0.00% 623 Town of Chapel Hill Department of Housing NC046 0 0.00% 50 100.00% 50

NC-516 Northwest North Carolina CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Northwestern Regional Housing Authority NC167 1945 97.49% 50 2.51% 1995 North Wilkesboro Housing Authority NC069 0 0.00% 249 100.00% 249 Spruce Pine Housing Authority NC033 0 0.00% 172 100.00% 172

Page 182 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. North Dakota

ND-500 North Dakota Statewide CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Nelson County Housing Authority ND058 0 0.00% 2706 100.00% 2706 Grand Forks Housing Authority ND012 1265 93.63% 86 6.37% 1351 Fargo Housing and Redevelopment Authority ND014 1294 97.00% 40 3.00% 1334 Burleigh County Housing Authority ND021 1074 95.55% 50 4.45% 1124 Minot Housing Authority ND017 882 96.92% 28 3.08% 910 Ramsey County Housing Authority ND013 183 24.05% 578 75.95% 761 Morton County Housing Authority ND010 648 100.00% 0 0.00% 648 HOUSING AUTHORITY OF STUTSMAN COUNTY, ND ND011 569 100.00% 0 0.00% 569 Housing Authority of Cass County ND001 386 75.10% 128 24.90% 514 Stark County Housing Authority ND031 340 100.00% 0 0.00% 340 Traill County Housing Authority ND019 39 11.89% 289 88.11% 328 Eddy County Housing Authority ND016 55 17.41% 261 82.59% 316 Barnes County Housing Authority ND022 212 100.00% 0 0.00% 212 Pembina County Housing Authority ND044 178 100.00% 0 0.00% 178 Housing Authority of the City of Williston ND002 81 54.36% 68 45.64% 149 Richland County Housing Authority ND035 124 100.00% 0 0.00% 124 Walsh County Housing Authority ND049 100 86.96% 15 13.04% 115 Rolette County Housing Authority ND003 64 70.33% 27 29.67% 91 Housing Authority of Foster County ND028 60 70.59% 25 29.41% 85 Housing Authority of Mountrail County ND026 74 100.00% 0 0.00% 74 McHenry/Pierce County Housing Authority ND055 57 100.00% 0 0.00% 57 Housing Authority of the County of Ransom ND025 55 100.00% 0 0.00% 55

Page 183 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. North Dakota

ND-500 North Dakota Statewide CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Dickey/Sargent Counties ND052 53 100.00% 0 0.00% 53 Housing Authority of the City of Cooperstown ND040 52 100.00% 0 0.00% 52 Cavalier County Housing Authority ND024 50 100.00% 0 0.00% 50 Dunn County Housing Authority ND037 49 100.00% 0 0.00% 49 Northwest Regional Housing Authority ND070 46 100.00% 0 0.00% 46 McIntosh County Housing Authority ND039 41 100.00% 0 0.00% 41 LaMoure County Housing Authority ND038 31 79.49% 8 20.51% 39 McKenzie County Housing Authority ND036 33 100.00% 0 0.00% 33 Emmons County Housing Authority ND054 4 13.79% 25 86.21% 29 Housing Authority of the County of Wells ND057 25 100.00% 0 0.00% 25 Towner County Housing Authority ND009 20 100.00% 0 0.00% 20 Mercer County Housing Authority ND015 17 100.00% 0 0.00% 17 Benson County Housing Authority ND030 16 100.00% 0 0.00% 16 North Dakota Housing & Finance Agency ND901 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Page 184 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Ohio

OH-500 Cincinnati/Hamilton County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units CINCINNATI METROPOLITAN HOUSING AUTHORITY OH004 11376 80.54% 2749 19.46% 14125

OH-501 Toledo/Lucas County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Lucas Metropolitan Housing Authority OH006 4391 50.39% 4323 49.61% 8714

OH-502 Cleveland/Cuyahoga County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Cuyahoga Metropolitan Housing Authority OH003 14926 73.77% 5307 26.23% 20233 PARMA PUBLIC HOUSING AGENCY OH073 742 100.00% 0 0.00% 742 Emerald Development and Economic Network OH882 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 New Avenues to Independence, Inc. OH880 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

OH-503 Columbus/Franklin County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Columbus Metropolitan Housing Authority OH001 13370 91.31% 1272 8.69% 14642

Page 185 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Ohio

OH-504 Youngstown/Mahoning County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Youngstown Metropolitan Housing Authority OH002 2259 18.30% 10082 81.70% 12341

OH-505 Dayton, Kettering/Montgomery County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units DAYTON METROPOLITAN HOUSING AUTHORITY OH005 3937 58.92% 2745 41.08% 6682

OH-506 Akron/Summit County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Akron Metropolitan Housing Authority OH007 4975 80.20% 1228 19.80% 6203

OH-507 Ohio Balance of State CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Mansfield Metropolitan Housing Authority OH016 1735 40.53% 2546 59.47% 4281 Lorain Metropolitan Housing Authority OH012 2999 81.45% 683 18.55% 3682 BROWN METROPOLITAN HOUSING AUTHORITY OH081 38 1.22% 3073 98.78% 3111 Portsmouth Metropolitan Housing Authority OH010 616 30.03% 1435 69.97% 2051 Jefferson Metropolitan Housing Authority OH014 818 41.67% 1145 58.33% 1963 LAKE METROPOLITAN HOUSING AUTHORITY OH025 1457 75.26% 479 24.74% 1936 Zanesville Metropolitan Housing Authority OH009 939 51.45% 886 48.55% 1825

Page 186 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Ohio

OH-507 Ohio Balance of State CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Portage Metropolitan Housing Authority OH031 1567 89.75% 179 10.25% 1746 CITY OF MIDDLETOWN OH065 1662 100.00% 0 0.00% 1662 Springfield Metropolitan Housing Authority OH021 1299 78.25% 361 21.75% 1660 Trumbull Metropolitan Housing Authority OH008 985 59.37% 674 40.63% 1659 ERIE METROPOLITAN HOUSING AUTHORITY OH028 1047 65.36% 555 34.64% 1602 GREENE METROPOLITAN HOUSING AUTHORITY OH022 1436 93.49% 100 6.51% 1536 Licking Metropolitan Housing Authority OH043 1030 80.66% 247 19.34% 1277 Allen Metropolitan Housing Authority OH044 1041 88.07% 141 11.93% 1182 BUTLER METROPOLITAN HOUSING AUTHORITY OH015 1111 100.00% 0 0.00% 1111 WAYNE METROPOLITAN HOUSING AUTHORITY OH036 954 87.93% 131 12.07% 1085 CLERMONT METROPOLITAN HOUSING AUTHORITY OH038 916 84.74% 165 15.26% 1081 Fairfield Metropolitan Housing Authority OH070 979 90.73% 100 9.27% 1079 Athens Metropolitan Housing Authority OH041 833 77.42% 243 22.58% 1076 Belmont Metropolitan Housing Authority OH020 275 26.04% 781 73.96% 1056 MIAMI METROPOLITAN HOUSING AUTHORITY OH062 985 100.00% 0 0.00% 985 HURON METROPOLITAN HOUSING AUTHORITY OH030 572 65.22% 305 34.78% 877 Cambridge Metropolitan Housing Authority OH033 695 85.49% 118 14.51% 813 Ironton Metropolitan Housing Authority OH019 84 10.47% 718 89.53% 802 Chillicothe Metropolitan Housing Authority OH024 530 66.58% 266 33.42% 796 HANCOCK METROPOLITAN HOUSING AUTHORITY OH082 789 100.00% 0 0.00% 789 MEDINA METROPOLITAN HOUSING AUTHORITY OH027 530 70.01% 227 29.99% 757 Pickaway Metropolitan Housing Authority OH059 650 87.01% 97 12.99% 747

Page 187 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Ohio

OH-507 Ohio Balance of State CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Pike Metropolitan Housing Authority OH060 525 75.00% 175 25.00% 700 Knox Metropolitan Housing Authority OH050 674 100.00% 0 0.00% 674 TUSCARAWAS METROPOLITAN HOUSING AUTHORITY OH063 574 90.54% 60 9.46% 634 COLUMBIANA METROPOLITAN HOUSING AUTHORITY OH026 487 85.14% 85 14.86% 572 Marion Metropolitan Housing Authority OH076 549 100.00% 0 0.00% 549 ASHTABULA METROPOLITAN HOUSING AUTHORITY OH029 489 100.00% 0 0.00% 489 Hocking Metropolitan Housing Authority OH032 306 62.83% 181 37.17% 487 City of Marietta OH077 487 100.00% 0 0.00% 487 Coshocton Metropolitan Housing Authority OH037 253 53.60% 219 46.40% 472 Delaware Metropolitan Housing Authority OH079 441 95.87% 19 4.13% 460 WARREN METROPOLITAN HOUSING AUTHORITY OH049 448 100.00% 0 0.00% 448 SANDUSKY METROPOLITAN HOUSING AUTHORITY OH054 334 75.57% 108 24.43% 442 Perry County Metropolitan Housing Authority OH034 218 49.32% 224 50.68% 442 ADAMS METROPOLITAN HOUSING AUTHORITY OH046 288 66.67% 144 33.33% 432 Gallia Metropolitan Housing Authority OH047 184 46.94% 208 53.06% 392 London Metropolitan Housing Authority OH023 0 0.00% 387 100.00% 387 Logan County Metropolitan Housing Authority OH072 296 83.15% 60 16.85% 356 Shelby Metropolitan Housing Authority OH061 219 63.29% 127 36.71% 346 CLINTON METROPOLITAN HOUSING AUTHORITY OH053 293 85.92% 48 14.08% 341 CRAWFORD METROPOLITAN HOUSING AUTHORITY OH039 324 100.00% 0 0.00% 324 DARKE COUNTY METROPOLITAN HOUSING AUTHORITY OH045 314 100.00% 0 0.00% 314 Fayette Metropolitan Housing Authority OH056 297 100.00% 0 0.00% 297

Page 188 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Ohio

OH-507 Ohio Balance of State CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units HARRISON METROPOLITAN HOUSING AUTHORITY OH067 265 90.44% 28 9.56% 293 Jackson County Metropolitan Housing Authority OH040 208 74.55% 71 25.45% 279 GEAUGA METROPOLITAN HOUSING AUTHORITY OH042 171 63.10% 100 36.90% 271 Henry Metropolitan Housing Authority OH071 228 100.00% 0 0.00% 228 SENECA METROPOLITAN HOUSING AUTHORITY OH075 203 100.00% 0 0.00% 203 Vinton Metropolitan Housing Authority OH078 196 100.00% 0 0.00% 196 Morgan Metropolitan Housing Authority OH066 140 73.68% 50 26.32% 190 Noble Metropolitan Housing Authority OH069 92 48.94% 96 51.06% 188 Monroe Metropolitan Housing Authority OH058 179 100.00% 0 0.00% 179 Williams Metropolitan Housing Authority OH074 161 100.00% 0 0.00% 161 Meigs Metropolitan Housing Authority OH035 125 100.00% 0 0.00% 125 Bowling Green Housing Agency OH085 119 100.00% 0 0.00% 119 Morrow Metropolitan Housing Authority OH083 102 100.00% 0 0.00% 102 HIGHLAND METROPOLITAN HOUSING AUTHORITY OH086 100 100.00% 0 0.00% 100 PREBLE METROPOLITAN HOUSING AUTHORITY OH080 52 100.00% 0 0.00% 52 Fulton Metropolitan Housing Authority OH084 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

OH-508 Canton, Massillon, Alliance/Stark County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units STARK METROPOLITAN HOUSING AUTHORITY OH018 1577 86.27% 251 13.73% 1828

Page 189 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Oklahoma

OK-500 North Central Oklahoma CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of the City of Stillwater OK146 656 96.33% 25 3.67% 681 Housing Authority of the City of Ponca City OK111 134 87.01% 20 12.99% 154 Housing Authority of Osage County OK123 0 0.00% 121 100.00% 121 Housing Authority of the City of Bristow OK033 87 74.36% 30 25.64% 117 Housing Authority of the City of Oilton OK022 0 0.00% 46 100.00% 46 Housing Authority of the City of Drumright OK010 0 0.00% 40 100.00% 40 Housing Authority of the Town of Cushing OK132 0 0.00% 34 100.00% 34 Housing Authority of the City of Newkirk OK056 0 0.00% 26 100.00% 26 Housing Authority of the City of Yale OK120 0 0.00% 18 100.00% 18 Housing Authority of the City of Pawnee OK060 0 0.00% 16 100.00% 16

OK-501 Tulsa City & County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of the City of Tulsa OK073 4829 98.98% 50 1.02% 4879

OK-502 Oklahoma City CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units OKLAHOMA HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY OK901 10739 100.00% 0 0.00% 10739 Housing Authority of the City of Oklahoma City OK002 4287 99.17% 36 0.83% 4323

Page 190 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Oklahoma

OK-503 Oklahoma Balance of State CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of the City of Shawnee OK095 497 84.67% 90 15.33% 587 Housing Authority of the City of Seminole OK032 189 54.31% 159 45.69% 348 Housing Authority of the City of Watonga OK023 0 0.00% 275 100.00% 275 Housing Authority of the City of Wewoka OK096 154 87.50% 22 12.50% 176 Housing Authority of the City of Tecumseh OK148 31 34.07% 60 65.93% 91 Housing Authority of the Town of Prague OK011 0 0.00% 78 100.00% 78 Housing Authority of the City of Konawa OK105 0 0.00% 60 100.00% 60 Housing Authority of the City of Guthrie OK055 0 0.00% 46 100.00% 46 Housing Authority of the City of Del City OK150 0 0.00% 40 100.00% 40 Housing Authority of the City of Geary OK057 0 0.00% 38 100.00% 38 Housing Authority of the City of Waynoka OK103 0 0.00% 38 100.00% 38 Housing Authority of the City of Maud OK083 0 0.00% 36 100.00% 36 Housing Authority of the Town of Seiling OK064 0 0.00% 28 100.00% 28 Housing Authority of the City of Langston OK106 0 0.00% 16 100.00% 16 Housing Authority of the City of Stroud OK050 0 0.00% 12 100.00% 12

OK-504 Norman/Cleveland County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of the City of Norman OK139 1185 95.95% 50 4.05% 1235

Page 191 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Oklahoma

OK-505 Northeast Oklahoma CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units The Housing Authority of the City of Fort Smi AR003 1527 62.87% 902 37.13% 2429 Crawford Co. Public Facilties Board AR194 432 100.00% 0 0.00% 432 Housing Authority of the City of Miami,Oklaho OK027 243 91.01% 24 8.99% 267 Housing Authority of the City of Alma AR096 0 0.00% 248 100.00% 248 Housing Authority of the City of Stilwell OK067 29 56.86% 22 43.14% 51 Housing Authority of the City of Picher OK012 0 0.00% 36 100.00% 36 Housing Authority of the City of Afton OK119 0 0.00% 30 100.00% 30 Housing Authority of the City of Commerce OK063 0 0.00% 14 100.00% 14 Housing Authority of the City of Van Buren AR029 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

OK-506 Southwest Oklahoma Regional CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of the Town of Mountain View OK154 0 0.00% 546 100.00% 546 Housing Authority of the Town of Granite OK092 0 0.00% 442 100.00% 442 Housing Authority of the Town of Cheyenne OK097 0 0.00% 400 100.00% 400 Housing Authority of the City of Lawton OK005 92 39.66% 140 60.34% 232 Housing Authority of the Town of Roosevelt OK042 0 0.00% 226 100.00% 226 Housing Authority of the Town of Cache OK026 0 0.00% 225 100.00% 225 Housing Authority of the City of Comanche OK003 0 0.00% 200 100.00% 200 Housing Authority of the Town of Mountain Park OK108 0 0.00% 177 100.00% 177 Housing Authority of the Town of Indiahoma OK053 0 0.00% 159 100.00% 159

Page 192 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Oklahoma

OK-506 Southwest Oklahoma Regional CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of the City of Anadarko OK008 0 0.00% 148 100.00% 148 Housing Authority of the City of Pauls Valley OK149 0 0.00% 100 100.00% 100 Housing Authority of the City of Snyder OK018 0 0.00% 82 100.00% 82 Housing Authority of the Town of Hydro OK046 0 0.00% 70 100.00% 70 Housing Authority of the Town of Tipton OK116 0 0.00% 64 100.00% 64 Housing Authority of the Town of Lone Wolf OK147 0 0.00% 63 100.00% 63 Housing Authority of the Town of Ryan OK085 0 0.00% 61 100.00% 61 Housing Authority of the City of Walters OK017 0 0.00% 56 100.00% 56 Housing Authority of the Town of Sterling OK037 0 0.00% 53 100.00% 53 Housing Authority of the City of Minco OK084 0 0.00% 53 100.00% 53 Housing Authority of the City of Sayre OK040 0 0.00% 46 100.00% 46 Housing Authority of the Town of Tuttle OK071 0 0.00% 44 100.00% 44 Housing Authority of the City of Waurika OK079 0 0.00% 42 100.00% 42 Housing Authority of the Town of Mangum OK039 0 0.00% 39 100.00% 39 Housing Authority of the City of Wynnewood OK065 0 0.00% 36 100.00% 36 Housing Authority of the Town of Stratford OK086 0 0.00% 36 100.00% 36 Housing Authority of the Town of Apache OK034 0 0.00% 34 100.00% 34 Housing Authority of the Town of Temple OK016 0 0.00% 32 100.00% 32 Housing Authority of the Caddo Electric Cooperativ OK134 0 0.00% 32 100.00% 32 Housing Authority of the City of Elk City OK015 0 0.00% 30 100.00% 30 Housing Authority of the City of Hobart OK089 0 0.00% 30 100.00% 30 Housing Authority of the Town of Cyril OK036 0 0.00% 24 100.00% 24

Page 193 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Oklahoma

OK-506 Southwest Oklahoma Regional CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of the Town of Fort Cobb OK113 0 0.00% 22 100.00% 22 Housing Authority of the City of Grandfield OK021 0 0.00% 22 100.00% 22 Housing Authority of the Town of Cement OK035 0 0.00% 20 100.00% 20 Housing Authority of the Town of Terral OK070 0 0.00% 18 100.00% 18 Housing Authority of the Town of Ringling OK041 0 0.00% 8 100.00% 8

OK-507 Southeastern Oklahoma Regional CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of the City of Hartshorne OK072 0 0.00% 2505 100.00% 2505 Housing Authority of the City of Muskogee OK099 868 97.97% 18 2.03% 886 Housing Authority of the City of Idabel OK004 0 0.00% 297 100.00% 297 Housing Authority of the City of Keota OK121 0 0.00% 282 100.00% 282 Housing Authority of the Town of Valliant OK061 0 0.00% 274 100.00% 274 Housing Authority of the City of Henryetta OK142 115 46.00% 135 54.00% 250 Housing Authority of the City of Broken Bow OK006 217 88.57% 28 11.43% 245 Housing Authority of the City of Hugo OK044 178 91.75% 16 8.25% 194 Housing Authority of the City of Ada OK024 110 56.70% 84 43.30% 194 Housing Authority of the Choctaw Electric Cooperat OK137 0 0.00% 173 100.00% 173 Polk County Housing Authority AR117 125 77.64% 36 22.36% 161 Housing Authority of the City of Stigler OK013 0 0.00% 150 100.00% 150 Housing Authority of the City of Atoka OK124 0 0.00% 130 100.00% 130

Page 194 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Oklahoma

OK-507 Southeastern Oklahoma Regional CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of the City of Wetumka OK031 0 0.00% 120 100.00% 120 Housing Authority of the City of McAlester OK062 73 68.22% 34 31.78% 107 Housing Authority of the City of Krebs OK078 0 0.00% 95 100.00% 95 Housing Authority of the Cookson Hills Electric Co OK136 0 0.00% 84 100.00% 84 Housing Authority of the Town of Tishomingo OK066 0 0.00% 80 100.00% 80 Housing Authority of the City of Heavener OK007 0 0.00% 80 100.00% 80 Housing Authority of the Town of Talihina OK088 0 0.00% 78 100.00% 78 Housing Authority of the Town of Fort Gibson OK118 44 68.75% 20 31.25% 64 Housing Authority of the City of Madill OK030 0 0.00% 59 100.00% 59 Housing Authority of the City of Greenwood AR171 0 0.00% 50 100.00% 50 Housing Authority of the City of Wilburton OK029 0 0.00% 44 100.00% 44 Housing Authority of the City of Holdenville OK048 0 0.00% 44 100.00% 44 Housing Authority of the Kiamichi Electric Coop OK131 0 0.00% 40 100.00% 40 Housing Authority of the City of Coalgate OK020 0 0.00% 40 100.00% 40 Housing Authority of the Town of Antlers OK025 0 0.00% 36 100.00% 36 Housing Authority of the Town of Weleetka OK028 0 0.00% 36 100.00% 36 Housing Authority of the City of Kingston OK076 0 0.00% 36 100.00% 36 Housing Authority of the Town of Wister OK087 0 0.00% 32 100.00% 32 Housing Authority of the City of Haileyville OK068 0 0.00% 30 100.00% 30 Housing Authority of the City of Boswell OK101 0 0.00% 29 100.00% 29 Housing Authority of the City of Beggs OK075 0 0.00% 20 100.00% 20 Housing Authority of the Town of Clayton OK069 0 0.00% 12 100.00% 12

Page 195 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Oklahoma

OK-507 Southeastern Oklahoma Regional CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of the City of Boley OK052 0 0.00% 8 100.00% 8

Page 196 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Oregon

OR-500 Eugene, Springfield/Lane County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority & Comm Svcs of Lane Co OR006 3028 96.25% 118 3.75% 3146

OR-501 Portland, Gresham/Multnomah County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of Portland OR002 8964 98.30% 155 1.70% 9119

OR-502 Medford, Ashland/Jackson County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of Jackson County OR015 2057 100.00% 0 0.00% 2057

OR-503 Central Oregon CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Central Oregon Regional Housing Authority OR034 1189 21.82% 4261 78.18% 5450

OR-505 Oregon Balance of State CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of the City of Salem OR011 2978 99.87% 4 0.13% 2982 Linn-Benton Housing Authority OR019 2486 97.95% 52 2.05% 2538

Page 197 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Oregon

OR-505 Oregon Balance of State CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of Yamhill County OR016 1343 95.79% 59 4.21% 1402 Northwest Oregon Housing Authority OR028 1107 89.56% 129 10.44% 1236 Housing Authority of Lincoln County OR005 497 41.28% 707 58.72% 1204 Marion County Housing Authority OR014 1182 100.00% 0 0.00% 1182 Coos-Curry Housing Authority OR020 763 75.84% 243 24.16% 1006 Housing Authority of Douglas County OR003 746 86.14% 120 13.86% 866 Klamath Housing Authority OR017 815 100.00% 0 0.00% 815 Housing and Urban Renewal Agency of Polk County OR008 703 86.68% 108 13.32% 811 Josephine Housing Community Development Council OR031 794 100.00% 0 0.00% 794 Northeast Oregon Housing Authority OR032 729 100.00% 0 0.00% 729 Housing Authority of the County of Umatilla OR007 329 46.60% 377 53.40% 706 CRESCENT CITY HSG AUTH CA061 590 100.00% 0 0.00% 590 Mid-Columbia Housing Authority OR026 551 100.00% 0 0.00% 551 Housing Authority of Malheur County OR027 374 100.00% 0 0.00% 374 North Bend Housing Authority OR009 0 0.00% 307 100.00% 307 Columbia Gorge Housing Authority WA013 271 100.00% 0 0.00% 271

OR-506 Hillsboro, Beaverton/Washington County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of Washington County OR022 2780 98.58% 40 1.42% 2820

Page 198 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Oregon

OR-507 Clackamas County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of Clackamas County OR001 1555 42.53% 2101 57.47% 3656

Page 199 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Pennsylvania

PA-500 Philadelphia CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Philadelphia Housing Authority PA002 19433 93.75% 1295 6.25% 20728 1260 Housing Development Corporation PA889 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

PA-501 Harrisburg/Dauphin County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Harrisburg Housing Authority PA008 1345 45.41% 1617 54.59% 2962 Housing Authority of the County of Dauphin PA035 1072 65.53% 564 34.47% 1636

PA-502 Upper Darby, Chester, Haverford/Delaware County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Chester Housing Authority PA007 1566 47.57% 1726 52.43% 3292 Housing Authority County of Delaware PA023 2814 88.43% 368 11.57% 3182

PA-503 Wilkes-Barre, Hazleton, Luzerne County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of the County of Luzerne PA057 1115 87.93% 153 12.07% 1268 Wilkes Barre Housing Authority PA047 876 84.72% 158 15.28% 1034 The Housing Authority of the City of Hazleton PA044 347 54.99% 284 45.01% 631 Housing Authority of the City of Pittston PA042 147 25.97% 419 74.03% 566

Page 200 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Pennsylvania

PA-503 Wilkes-Barre, Hazleton, Luzerne County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units The Housing Auth of the City of Nanticoke PA043 51 14.57% 299 85.43% 350

PA-504 Lower Merion, Norristown, Abington/Montgomery County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Montgomery County Housing Authority PA012 2822 60.31% 1857 39.69% 4679

PA-505 Chester County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of the County of Chester PA046 1838 68.10% 861 31.90% 2699

PA-506 Reading/Berks County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Reading Housing Authority PA009 604 57.20% 452 42.80% 1056 Housing Authority of the County of Berks PA071 682 91.30% 65 8.70% 747

PA-508 Scranton/Lackawanna County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Scranton Housing Authority PA003 1016 47.32% 1131 52.68% 2147

Page 201 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Pennsylvania

PA-508 Scranton/Lackawanna County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Lackawanna County Housing Authority PA038 886 62.75% 526 37.25% 1412 The Housing Auth of the City of Carbondale PA030 171 24.19% 536 75.81% 707

PA-509 Eastern Pennsylvania CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Snyder County Housing Authority PA092 292 10.08% 2606 89.92% 2898 Allentown Housing Authority PA004 1499 64.11% 839 35.89% 2338 Housing Authority of the County of Lycoming PA021 675 38.20% 1092 61.80% 1767 Lehigh County Housing Authority PA081 1652 100.00% 0 0.00% 1652 JOHNSTOWN HOUSING AUTHORITY PA019 935 59.07% 648 40.93% 1583 Schuylkill County Housing Authority PA016 631 40.97% 909 59.03% 1540 Housing Authority of the City of Pottsville PA037 371 25.00% 1113 75.00% 1484 Housing Authority of the County of Cumberland PA075 1331 92.62% 106 7.38% 1437 Bethlehem Housing Authority PA011 497 44.65% 616 55.35% 1113 ALTOONA HOUSING AUTHORITY PA031 933 89.03% 115 10.97% 1048 Housing Authority of the County of Lebanon PA052 740 70.68% 307 29.32% 1047 Housing Authority of the County of Franklin PA034 311 29.99% 726 70.01% 1037 Tioga County Housing Authority PA050 213 24.74% 648 75.26% 861 Northampton County Housing Authority PA076 853 100.00% 0 0.00% 853 Easton Housing Authority PA024 562 73.75% 200 26.25% 762 Housing Auth of the County of Northumberland PA060 464 61.87% 286 38.13% 750

Page 202 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Pennsylvania

PA-509 Eastern Pennsylvania CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units The Housing Authority of Monroe County PA028 475 68.25% 221 31.75% 696 HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE COUNTY OF BLAIR PA069 470 69.22% 209 30.78% 679 Wayne County Housing Authority PA078 675 100.00% 0 0.00% 675 Centre County Housing Authority PA088 624 96.89% 20 3.11% 644 HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE COUNTY OF HUNTINGDON PA027 307 50.58% 300 49.42% 607 Adams County Housing Authority PA091 600 100.00% 0 0.00% 600 Housing Authority of the County of Union PA082 499 87.70% 70 12.30% 569 The Housing Auth of the County of Mifflin PA041 220 42.15% 302 57.85% 522 Carbon County Housing Authority PA067 432 83.72% 84 16.28% 516 The Housing Authority of Montour County PA032 156 31.01% 347 68.99% 503 Susquehanna Co Housing/Redevelopment Auth PA074 253 54.76% 209 45.24% 462 Bradford County Housing Authority PA064 264 59.46% 180 40.54% 444 Columbia County Housing Authority PA083 413 94.72% 23 5.28% 436 SOMERSET COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY PA029 91 20.92% 344 79.08% 435 Sunbury Housing Authority PA053 240 57.83% 175 42.17% 415 The Wyoming Co Housing & Redevelopment Auth PA073 397 100.00% 0 0.00% 397 HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE COUNTY OF BEDFORD PA085 307 88.47% 40 11.53% 347 Shamokin Housing Authority PA055 221 68.63% 101 31.37% 322 The Housing Authority of Clinton County PA040 0 0.00% 279 100.00% 279 Sullivan County Housing Authority PA068 36 100.00% 0 0.00% 36 FULTON COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY PA072 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Page 203 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Pennsylvania

PA-510 Lancaster City & County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units The Housing Auth of the City of Lancaster PA036 1003 66.29% 510 33.71% 1513 Lancaster County Housing Authority PA090 868 100.00% 0 0.00% 868

PA-511 Bristol, Bensalem/Bucks County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Bucks County Housing Authority PA051 3410 89.43% 403 10.57% 3813

PA-512 York City & County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of the City of York PA022 1517 69.68% 660 30.32% 2177

PA-600 Pittsburgh, McKeesport, Penn Hills/Allegheny County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of the City of Pittsburgh PA001 7146 32.42% 14895 67.58% 22041 ALLEGHENY COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY PA006 5732 87.75% 800 12.25% 6532 HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF MCKEESPORT PA005 545 15.11% 3061 84.89% 3606

Page 204 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Pennsylvania

PA-601 Western Pennsylvania CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units WESTMORELAND COUNTY HSG AUTHORITY PA018 1804 54.42% 1511 45.58% 3315 HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE COUNTY OF BUTLER PA010 1444 49.83% 1454 50.17% 2898 WASHINGTON COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY PA017 999 35.45% 1819 64.55% 2818 FAYETTE COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY PA015 1082 63.99% 609 36.01% 1691 HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF FRANKLIN PA056 128 8.65% 1352 91.35% 1480 MERCER COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY PA020 383 45.01% 468 54.99% 851 CONNELLSVILLE HOUSING AUTHORITY PA025 0 0.00% 843 100.00% 843 HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE COUNTY OF MCKEAN PA080 468 61.82% 289 38.18% 757 Housing Authority of the County of Armstrong PA039 264 36.62% 457 63.38% 721 HOUSING AUTH CO OF LAWRENCE PA026 392 55.52% 314 44.48% 706 HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF DUBOIS PA063 192 32.43% 400 67.57% 592 HOUSING AUTHORITY OF INDIANA COUNTY PA048 569 100.00% 0 0.00% 569 HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE COUNTY OF CLARION PA086 361 64.93% 195 35.07% 556 COUNTY OF POTTER HOUSING AUTHORITY PA077 295 55.77% 234 44.23% 529 HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF MEADVILLE PA033 155 29.75% 366 70.25% 521 HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE COUNTY OF WARREN PA079 65 13.51% 416 86.49% 481 BRADFORD CITY HOUSING AUTHORITY PA049 0 0.00% 458 100.00% 458 HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE COUNTY OF JEFFERSON PA061 263 60.18% 174 39.82% 437 HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE COUNTY OF VENANGO PA089 394 90.78% 40 9.22% 434 HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE COUNTY OF ELK PA054 221 52.25% 202 47.75% 423 HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF OIL CITY PA059 167 45.50% 200 54.50% 367 HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE COUNTY OF GREENE PA045 30 8.93% 306 91.07% 336

Page 205 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Pennsylvania

PA-601 Western Pennsylvania CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units TITUSVILLE HOUSING AUTHORITY PA058 126 45.99% 148 54.01% 274 CLEARFIELD COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY PA065 122 100.00% 0 0.00% 122

PA-603 Beaver County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE COUNTY OF BEAVER PA014 746 36.00% 1326 64.00% 2072

PA-605 Erie City & County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF ERIE PA013 1134 38.12% 1841 61.88% 2975 HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE COUNTY OF ERIE PA087 895 97.81% 20 2.19% 915 HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF CORRY PA066 159 50.96% 153 49.04% 312

Page 206 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Puerto Rico

PR-502 Puerto Rico Balance of Commonwealth CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units PUERTO RICO DEPT OF HOUSING RQ901 9426 100.00% 0 0.00% 9426 MUNICIPALITY OF SAN JUAN RQ006 4664 100.00% 0 0.00% 4664 PUERTO RICO HOUSING FINANCE CORP RQ911 2238 100.00% 0 0.00% 2238 MUNICIPALITY OF BAYAMON RQ011 2213 100.00% 0 0.00% 2213 PUERTO RICO PUBLIC HOUSING ADMINISTRATION RQ005 0 0.00% 1407 100.00% 1407 MUNICIPALITY OF ARECIBO RQ020 928 100.00% 0 0.00% 928 MUNICIPALITY OF CAROLINA RQ014 805 100.00% 0 0.00% 805 MUNICIPALITY OF GUAYNABO RQ016 383 100.00% 0 0.00% 383 MUNICIPALITY OF VEGA BAJA RQ032 277 100.00% 0 0.00% 277 MUNICIPALITY OF TOA BAJA RQ022 244 100.00% 0 0.00% 244 Municipality of Utuado RQ033 197 100.00% 0 0.00% 197 MUNICIPALITY OF TOA ALTA RQ053 181 100.00% 0 0.00% 181 Municipality of Barranquitas RQ060 180 100.00% 0 0.00% 180 MUNICIPALITY OF CAMUY RQ040 156 100.00% 0 0.00% 156 MUNICIPALITY OF COROZAL HOUSING AUTHORITY RQ023 139 100.00% 0 0.00% 139 MUNICIPALITY OF VEGA ALTA RQ056 126 100.00% 0 0.00% 126 MUNICIPALITY OF BARCELONETA RQ054 125 100.00% 0 0.00% 125 MUNICIPALITY OF NARANJITO RQ064 123 100.00% 0 0.00% 123 MUNICIPALITY OF COMERIO RQ034 118 100.00% 0 0.00% 118 MUNICIPALITY OF CIALES RQ052 74 100.00% 0 0.00% 74 MUNICIPALITY OF LARES RQ065 73 100.00% 0 0.00% 73 MUNICIPALITY OF AIBONITO RQ059 58 100.00% 0 0.00% 58

Page 207 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Puerto Rico

PR-502 Puerto Rico Balance of Commonwealth CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units MUNICIPALITY OF MOROVIS RQ024 53 100.00% 0 0.00% 53 MUNICIPALITY OF OROCOVIS RQ080 47 100.00% 0 0.00% 47 MUNICIPALITY OF FLORIDA RQ072 45 100.00% 0 0.00% 45

PR-503 South-Southeast Puerto Rico CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units VIRGIN ISLANDS HOUSING AUTHORITY VQ901 1745 100.00% 0 0.00% 1745 MUNICIPALITY OF PONCE RQ008 1574 100.00% 0 0.00% 1574 MUNICIPALITY OF CAGUAS RQ007 1325 100.00% 0 0.00% 1325 MUNICIPALITY OF MAYAGUEZ RQ009 842 100.00% 0 0.00% 842 MUNICIPALITY OF TRUJILLO ALTO RQ013 501 100.00% 0 0.00% 501 MUNICIPALITY OF HUMACAO RQ025 276 100.00% 0 0.00% 276 MUNICIPALITY OF AGUADILLA RQ012 265 100.00% 0 0.00% 265 MUNICIPALITY OF GUAYAMA RQ017 264 100.00% 0 0.00% 264 MUNICIPALITY OF PENUELAS RQ019 240 100.00% 0 0.00% 240 MUNICIPALITY OF CAYEY RQ018 239 100.00% 0 0.00% 239 MUNICIPALITY OF CIDRA RQ062 190 100.00% 0 0.00% 190 MUNICIPALITY OF MANATI RQ028 182 100.00% 0 0.00% 182 MUNICIPALITY OF AGUAS BUENAS RQ082 161 100.00% 0 0.00% 161 MUNICIPALITY OF SABANA GRANDE RQ048 156 100.00% 0 0.00% 156 MUNICIPALITY OF GUAYANILLA RQ021 146 100.00% 0 0.00% 146

Page 208 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Puerto Rico

PR-503 South-Southeast Puerto Rico CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units MUNICIPALITY OF GURABO RQ041 143 100.00% 0 0.00% 143 The Municipality of Quebradillas RQ031 141 100.00% 0 0.00% 141 MUNICIPALITY OF SAN SEBASTIAN RQ026 139 100.00% 0 0.00% 139 VIRGIN ISLANDS HOUSING AUTHORITY VQ001 0 0.00% 134 100.00% 134 MUNICIPALITY OF LAS PIEDRAS RQ063 125 100.00% 0 0.00% 125 MUNICIPALITY OF NAGUABO RQ047 121 100.00% 0 0.00% 121 MUNICIPALITY OF AGUADA RQ073 121 100.00% 0 0.00% 121 MUNICIPALITY OF YABUCOA RQ045 117 100.00% 0 0.00% 117 MUNICIPALITY OF JUANA DIAZ RQ038 115 100.00% 0 0.00% 115 MUNICIPALITY OF VIEQUES RQ074 115 100.00% 0 0.00% 115 Anasco Housing Authority RQ043 110 100.00% 0 0.00% 110 Municipality of San Lorenzo RQ037 107 100.00% 0 0.00% 107 MUNICIPALITY OF CABO ROJO RQ061 107 100.00% 0 0.00% 107 MUNICIPALITY OF HORMIGUEROS RQ035 103 100.00% 0 0.00% 103 MUNICIPALITY OF SALINAS RQ069 97 100.00% 0 0.00% 97 MUNICIPALITY OF YAUCO RQ083 95 100.00% 0 0.00% 95 MUNICIPALITY OF ARROYO RQ068 95 100.00% 0 0.00% 95 MUNICIPALITY OF SAN GERMAN RQ030 88 100.00% 0 0.00% 88 MUNICIPALITY OF ISABELA RQ066 86 100.00% 0 0.00% 86 MUNICIPALITY OF VILLALBA RQ049 84 100.00% 0 0.00% 84 MUNICIPALITY OF PATILLAS RQ057 83 100.00% 0 0.00% 83 MUNICIPALITY OF FAJARDO RQ036 79 100.00% 0 0.00% 79

Page 209 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Puerto Rico

PR-503 South-Southeast Puerto Rico CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units MUNICIPALITY OF RIO GRANDE RQ050 78 100.00% 0 0.00% 78 MUNICIPALITY OF HATILLO RQ039 73 100.00% 0 0.00% 73 MUNICIPALITY OF SANTA ISABEL RQ058 70 100.00% 0 0.00% 70 MUNICIPALITY OF LAJAS RQ071 69 100.00% 0 0.00% 69 MUNICIPALITY OF LUQUILLO RQ081 69 100.00% 0 0.00% 69 MUNICIPALITY OF MOCA RQ010 67 100.00% 0 0.00% 67 MUNICIPALITY OF COAMO RQ042 60 100.00% 0 0.00% 60 MUNICIPALITY OF JUNCOS RQ077 55 100.00% 0 0.00% 55 MUNICIPALITY OF GUANICA RQ044 54 100.00% 0 0.00% 54 MUNICIPALITY OF ADJUNTAS RQ055 52 100.00% 0 0.00% 52 MUNICIPALITY OF CEIBA RQ070 41 100.00% 0 0.00% 41 MUNICIPALITY OF LAS MARIAS RQ046 40 100.00% 0 0.00% 40 MUNICIPALITY OF MARICAO RQ029 35 100.00% 0 0.00% 35 MUNICIPALITY OF RINCON RQ067 34 100.00% 0 0.00% 34 MUNICIPALITY OF CANOVANAS RQ075 34 100.00% 0 0.00% 34 MUNICIPALITY OF LOIZA RQ027 5 100.00% 0 0.00% 5 MUNICIPALITY OF JAYUYA RQ076 4 100.00% 0 0.00% 4

Page 210 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Rhode Island

RI-500 Rhode Island Statewide CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Tiverton Housing Authority RI027 51 0.09% 54610 99.91% 54661 Housing Authority Providence RI001 2334 68.35% 1081 31.65% 3415 Housing Authority of the City of Pawtucket RI002 686 36.14% 1212 63.86% 1898 Rhode Island Housing RI901 1835 100.00% 0 0.00% 1835 Central Falls Housing Authority RI004 553 42.09% 761 57.91% 1314 The Housing Authority of the City of Newport RI005 507 45.43% 609 54.57% 1116 Woonsocket Housing Authority RI003 734 69.18% 327 30.82% 1061 Cumberland Housing Authority RI010 384 42.57% 518 57.43% 902 Cranston Housing Authority RI006 257 38.13% 417 61.87% 674 East Providence Housing Authority RI007 445 78.35% 123 21.65% 568 Coventry Housing Authority RI016 278 65.57% 146 34.43% 424 North Providence Housing Authority RI017 168 40.00% 252 60.00% 420 Warwick Housing Authority RI011 349 83.29% 70 16.71% 419 Johnston Housing Authority RI009 205 53.81% 176 46.19% 381 Westerly Housing Authority RI008 198 56.09% 155 43.91% 353 Burrillville Housing Authority RI014 84 25.15% 250 74.85% 334 Lincoln Housing Authority RI018 124 39.24% 192 60.76% 316 East Greenwich Housing Authority RI024 292 97.01% 9 2.99% 301 Bristol Housing Authority RI019 251 83.39% 50 16.61% 301 West Warwick Housing Authority RI015 97 33.22% 195 66.78% 292 Warren Housing Authority RI022 224 88.89% 28 11.11% 252 Narragansett Housing Authority RI026 182 80.18% 45 19.82% 227

Page 211 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Rhode Island

RI-500 Rhode Island Statewide CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units South Kingstown Housing Authority RI012 138 77.53% 40 22.47% 178 Portsmouth Housing Authority RI013 85 52.80% 76 47.20% 161 Jamestown Housing Authority RI021 0 0.00% 153 100.00% 153 Smithfield Housing Authority RI020 53 60.23% 35 39.77% 88 Gateway Healthcare, Inc. RI029 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Kent County Mental Health Center RI028 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Page 212 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. South Carolina

SC-500 Charleston/Low Country CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF CHARLESTON SC001 1528 41.66% 2140 58.34% 3668 HOUSING AUTHORITY OF N CHARLESTON SC057 2026 97.36% 55 2.64% 2081 CHARLESTON CO HSG & REDEV AUTH SC056 1079 77.57% 312 22.43% 1391 HOUSING AUTHORITY OF BEAUFORT SC026 562 42.58% 758 57.42% 1320

SC-501 Greenville, Anderson, Spartanburg / Upstate CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units THE GREENVILLE HOUSING AUTHORITY SC004 2756 94.25% 168 5.75% 2924 HOUSING AUTHORITY OF SPARTANBURG SC003 1827 75.75% 585 24.25% 2412 SC REGIONAL HOUSING AUTHORITY NO 1 SC008 1653 93.23% 120 6.77% 1773 HOUSING AUTHORITY OF GREENWOOD SC030 975 80.91% 230 19.09% 1205 HOUSING AUTHORITY OF ANDERSON SC037 500 78.13% 140 21.88% 640 HOUSING AUTHORITY OF GREER SC016 280 50.54% 274 49.46% 554 HOUSING AUTHORITY OF EASLEY SC053 0 0.00% 399 100.00% 399 HOUSING AUTHORITY OF UNION SC019 274 70.98% 112 29.02% 386 HOUSING AUTHORITY OF GAFFNEY SC017 0 0.00% 299 100.00% 299 HOUSING AUTHORITY OF ABBEVILLE SC012 0 0.00% 154 100.00% 154 HOUSING AUTHORITY OF LAURENS SC011 0 0.00% 129 100.00% 129 HOUSING AUTHORITY OF WOODRUFF SC040 0 0.00% 125 100.00% 125

Page 213 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. South Carolina

SC-502 Columbia/Midlands CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF COLUMBIA SC002 3444 75.34% 1127 24.66% 4571 HOUSING AUTHORITY OF AIKEN SC007 875 39.75% 1326 60.25% 2201 SC STATE HOUSING AUTHORITY SC911 2064 100.00% 0 0.00% 2064 SC REGIONAL HOUSING AUTHORITY NO 3 SC024 572 68.75% 260 31.25% 832 HOUSING AUTHORITY OF ROCK HILL SC022 500 60.46% 327 39.54% 827 HOUSING AUTHORITY OF CHESTER SC020 269 41.77% 375 58.23% 644 Housing Authority of Lancaster SC032 247 56.01% 194 43.99% 441 HOUSING AUTHORITY OF FORT MILL SC036 154 35.57% 279 64.43% 433 HOUSING AUTHORITY OF NEWBERRY SC035 235 62.33% 142 37.67% 377 HOUSING AUTHORITY OF YORK SC046 233 87.27% 34 12.73% 267 Housing Authority of the City of Cayce SC061 0 0.00% 23 100.00% 23

SC-503 Myrtle Beach, Sumter City & County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units HOUSING AUTHORITY OF SUMTER SC023 925 54.13% 784 45.87% 1709 HOUSING AUTHORITY OF FLORENCE SC027 772 72.35% 295 27.65% 1067 HOUSING AUTHORITY OF MYRTLE BEACH SC034 750 70.42% 315 29.58% 1065 HOUSING AUTHORITY OF CONWAY SC025 368 55.67% 293 44.33% 661 HOUSING AUTHORITY OF LAKE CITY SC018 311 52.01% 287 47.99% 598 HOUSING AUTHORITY OF MARION SC021 153 29.31% 369 70.69% 522 HOUSING AUTHORITY OF HARTSVILLE SC029 210 48.50% 223 51.50% 433

Page 214 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. South Carolina

SC-503 Myrtle Beach, Sumter City & County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units HOUSING AUTHORITY OF DARLINGTON SC005 93 26.88% 253 73.12% 346 HOUSING AUTHORITY OF CHERAW SC031 180 56.25% 140 43.75% 320 HOUSING AUTHORITY OF GEORGETOWN SC028 163 61.98% 100 38.02% 263 MARLBORO CO HSG & REDEV AUTHORITY SC059 253 100.00% 0 0.00% 253 HOUSING AUTHORITY OF BENNETTSVILLE SC015 64 25.60% 186 74.40% 250 HOUSING AUTHORITY OF MCCOLL SC048 0 0.00% 100 100.00% 100 HOUSING AUTHORITY OF KINGSTREE SC039 0 0.00% 100 100.00% 100 HOUSING AUTHORITY OF MULLINS SC033 60 100.00% 0 0.00% 60 HOUSING AUTHORITY OF ATLANTIC BEACH SC060 0 0.00% 41 100.00% 41

Page 215 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. South Dakota

SD-500 South Dakota Statewide CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Meade County Housing and Redevelopment Commission SD047 245 7.69% 2942 92.31% 3187 Sioux Falls Housing and Redevelopment Commission SD016 1849 98.77% 23 1.23% 1872 Pennington County Housing and Redevelopment Commissi SD045 1329 94.32% 80 5.68% 1409 Watertown Housing and Redevelopment Commission SD043 315 38.65% 500 61.35% 815 Aberdeen Housing & Redevelopment Commission SD034 503 90.96% 50 9.04% 553 Brookings Housing & Redevelopment Commission SD056 366 100.00% 0 0.00% 366 Lawrence County Housing & Redevelopment Commi SD048 294 100.00% 0 0.00% 294 Huron Housing Authority SD036 258 100.00% 0 0.00% 258 Vermillion Housing and Redevelopment Commissi SD055 258 100.00% 0 0.00% 258 Pierre Housing & Redevelopment Commision SD035 218 100.00% 0 0.00% 218 Yankton Housing & Redevelopment Commission SD058 160 100.00% 0 0.00% 160 Mobridge Housing & Redevlopment Commission SD057 150 100.00% 0 0.00% 150 City of Mitchell Housing and Redevolpment Commission SD014 116 82.27% 25 17.73% 141 Madison Housing and Redevelopment Commission SD011 111 84.73% 20 15.27% 131 City of Lennox Housing and Redevelopment Commission SD010 30 24.19% 94 75.81% 124 Howard Housing and Redevelopment Commission SD013 0 0.00% 113 100.00% 113 Milbank Housing & Redevelopment Commission SD037 64 62.75% 38 37.25% 102 Volga Housing and Redevelopment Commission SD031 0 0.00% 100 100.00% 100 Canton Housing & Redevopment Commission SD039 68 68.00% 32 32.00% 100 Lake Andes Housing and Redevelopment Commission SD018 0 0.00% 100 100.00% 100 Webster Housing and Redevelopment Commision SD040 0 0.00% 85 100.00% 85 Hot Springs Housing and Redevelopment Commission SD019 0 0.00% 73 100.00% 73

Page 216 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. South Dakota

SD-500 South Dakota Statewide CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Redfield Housing and Redevelopment Commission SD026 67 100.00% 0 0.00% 67 Wessington Springs Housing and Redevelopment Commiss SD021 17 33.33% 34 66.67% 51 Lake Norden Housing and Redevelopment Commission SD024 0 0.00% 43 100.00% 43 Kennebec Housing & Redevelopment Commission SD008 0 0.00% 35 100.00% 35 Martin Housing & Redevelopment Commission SD022 0 0.00% 32 100.00% 32 De Smet Housing & Redevelopment Commission SD009 0 0.00% 29 100.00% 29 Parker Housing & Redevelopment Commission SD017 0 0.00% 24 100.00% 24 Sisseton Housing & Redevelopment Commission SD020 0 0.00% 23 100.00% 23 Butte County Housing Authority SD059 20 100.00% 0 0.00% 20 Miller Housing & Redevelopment Commision SD038 0 0.00% 20 100.00% 20 Murdo Housing and Redevelopment Commission SD023 0 0.00% 18 100.00% 18 Burke Housing and Redevelopment Commission SD007 0 0.00% 17 100.00% 17 Lemmon Housing & Redevelopment Commission SD025 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Page 217 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Tennessee

TN-500 Chattanooga/Southeast Tennessee CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Chattanooga Housing Authority TN004 3578 39.86% 5399 60.14% 8977 Franklin County Housing Authority TN125 0 0.00% 1929 100.00% 1929 South Pittsburg Housing Authority TN037 0 0.00% 672 100.00% 672 Dayton Housing Authority TN062 354 59.10% 245 40.90% 599 Cleveland Housing Authority TN054 208 39.10% 324 60.90% 532 Etowah Housing Authority TN026 122 34.46% 232 65.54% 354 Southeast Tennessee Human Resource Agency TN117 227 100.00% 0 0.00% 227 Athens Housing Authority TN015 52 24.76% 158 75.24% 210 Grundy Housing Authority TN092 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

TN-501 Memphis/Shelby County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Millington Housing Authority TN045 0 0.00% 296 100.00% 296 Shelby County Housing Authority TN095 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

TN-502 Knoxville/Knox County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Knoxville's Community Development Corp. TN003 3818 60.35% 2508 39.65% 6326 East Tennessee Human Resource Agency TN113 784 100.00% 0 0.00% 784

Page 218 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Tennessee

TN-503 Central Tennessee CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Pulaski Housing Authority TN011 0 0.00% 1116 100.00% 1116 Dickson Housing Authority TN079 694 100.00% 0 0.00% 694 Lewisburg Housing Authority TN032 0 0.00% 580 100.00% 580 Fayetteville Housing Authority TN014 0 0.00% 441 100.00% 441 Manchester Housing Authority TN028 0 0.00% 427 100.00% 427 Franklin Housing Authority TN035 42 10.29% 366 89.71% 408 Hohenwald Housing Authority TN059 0 0.00% 403 100.00% 403 Tullahoma Housing Authority TN024 116 35.58% 210 64.42% 326 Mt. Pleasant Housing Authority TN047 0 0.00% 303 100.00% 303 The Clarksville Housing Authority TN010 0 0.00% 214 100.00% 214 Springfield Housing Authority TN036 0 0.00% 202 100.00% 202 Shelbyville Housing Authority TN039 0 0.00% 120 100.00% 120 Columbia Housing and Redevelopment Corporatio TN046 0 0.00% 116 100.00% 116 Gallatin Housing Authority TN029 0 0.00% 70 100.00% 70 Hartsville Housing Authority TN071 0 0.00% 70 100.00% 70 Lawrenceburg Housing Authority TN048 0 0.00% 62 100.00% 62 Portland Housing Authority TN073 0 0.00% 60 100.00% 60

TN-504 Nashville-Davidson County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Metropolitan Development & Housing Agency TN005 6854 92.83% 529 7.17% 7383

Page 219 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Tennessee

TN-504 Nashville-Davidson County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Tennessee Housing Development Agency TN903 6131 100.00% 0 0.00% 6131

TN-506 Upper Cumberland CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Crossville Housing Authority TN042 334 62.08% 204 37.92% 538 McMinnville Housing Authority TN053 0 0.00% 434 100.00% 434 Smithville Housing Authority TN068 0 0.00% 298 100.00% 298 Livingston Housing Authority TN056 0 0.00% 265 100.00% 265 Rockwood Housing Authority TN018 0 0.00% 199 100.00% 199 Oliver Springs Housing Authority TN078 0 0.00% 125 100.00% 125 Lebanon Housing Authority TN017 0 0.00% 124 100.00% 124 Highlands Residential Services TN033 0 0.00% 122 100.00% 122 South Carthage Housing Authority TN072 0 0.00% 120 100.00% 120 Woodbury Housing Authority TN077 0 0.00% 114 100.00% 114 Lafayette Housing Authority TN090 0 0.00% 110 100.00% 110 Sparta Housing Authority TN044 0 0.00% 90 100.00% 90 Harriman Housing Authority TN055 0 0.00% 66 100.00% 66

Page 220 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Tennessee

TN-507 Jackson/West Tennessee CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Jackson Housing Authority TN007 1419 87.86% 196 12.14% 1615 Union City Housing Authority TN009 0 0.00% 508 100.00% 508 Brownsville Housing Authority TN013 216 43.90% 276 56.10% 492 Huntingdon Housing Authority TN052 0 0.00% 423 100.00% 423 Newbern Housing Authority TN075 0 0.00% 326 100.00% 326 Covington Housing Authority TN041 0 0.00% 318 100.00% 318 Ripley Housing Authority TN057 0 0.00% 318 100.00% 318 Paris Housing Authority TN008 0 0.00% 286 100.00% 286 Lexington Housing Authority TN040 0 0.00% 244 100.00% 244 Milan Housing Authority TN031 0 0.00% 220 100.00% 220 Dyersburg Housing Authority TN021 0 0.00% 150 100.00% 150 Parsons-Decaturville Housing Authority TN051 0 0.00% 148 100.00% 148 Erin Housing Authority TN074 0 0.00% 145 100.00% 145 Trenton Housing Authority TN025 0 0.00% 136 100.00% 136 Gallaway Housing Authority TN084 0 0.00% 128 100.00% 128 Savannah Housing Authority TN049 0 0.00% 119 100.00% 119 Waverly Housing Authority TN030 0 0.00% 100 100.00% 100 Humboldt Housing Authority TN027 0 0.00% 70 100.00% 70 Bolivar Housing Authority TN050 0 0.00% 68 100.00% 68 McKenzie Housing Authority TN082 0 0.00% 60 100.00% 60 Martin Housing Authority TN069 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Page 221 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Tennessee

TN-509 Appalachian Regional CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Johnson City Housing Authority TN002 627 15.10% 3525 84.90% 4152 Kingsport Housing and Redevelopment Authority TN006 1242 60.53% 810 39.47% 2052 Bristol Housing TN066 200 52.36% 182 47.64% 382 Elizabethton Housing and Development Agency TN076 215 68.25% 100 31.75% 315 Rogersville Housing Authority TN043 0 0.00% 162 100.00% 162 Erwin Housing Authority TN081 0 0.00% 148 100.00% 148 Greeneville Housing Authority TN058 0 0.00% 116 100.00% 116

TN-510 Murfreesboro/Rutherford County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Murfreesboro Housing Authority TN020 659 56.76% 502 43.24% 1161

TN-512 Morristown/Blount, Sevier, Campbell, Cocke Counties CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Morristown Housing Authority TN038 424 50.36% 418 49.64% 842 Maryville Housing Authority TN065 356 50.14% 354 49.86% 710 LaFollette Housing Authority TN012 328 74.04% 115 25.96% 443 Loudon Housing Authority TN064 0 0.00% 400 100.00% 400 Oak Ridge Housing Authority TN088 295 74.31% 102 25.69% 397 Sweetwater Housing Authority TN016 0 0.00% 354 100.00% 354

Page 222 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Tennessee

TN-512 Morristown/Blount, Sevier, Campbell, Cocke Counties CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Jefferson City Housing Authority TN019 0 0.00% 336 100.00% 336 Lenoir City Housing Authority TN061 0 0.00% 302 100.00% 302 Jellico Housing Authority TN034 0 0.00% 290 100.00% 290 Clinton Housing Authority TN022 0 0.00% 270 100.00% 270 Newport Housing Authority TN060 0 0.00% 138 100.00% 138 Sevierville Housing Authority TN063 0 0.00% 121 100.00% 121

Page 223 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Texas

TX-500 San Antonio/Bexar County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units San Antonio Housing Authority TX006 13495 94.81% 738 5.19% 14233 Bexar County Housing Authority TX452 1926 96.35% 73 3.65% 1999 Alamo Area Council of Governments TX564 98 100.00% 0 0.00% 98

TX-503 Austin/Travis County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Austin Housing Authority TX001 5749 48.51% 6103 51.49% 11852 Texas Department of Housing & Community Affairs TX901 1591 100.00% 0 0.00% 1591 Housing Authority of Travis County TX480 568 88.20% 76 11.80% 644

TX-600 Dallas City & County, Irving CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of the City of Dallas, Texa TX009 19487 95.58% 902 4.42% 20389 Dallas County Housing Assistance Program TX559 4369 100.00% 0 0.00% 4369 Grand Prairie Housing & Neighborhood Services TX434 2701 100.00% 0 0.00% 2701 Garland Housing Authority TX435 1526 100.00% 0 0.00% 1526 City of Mesquite Housing Office TX436 1404 100.00% 0 0.00% 1404 Housing Authority of Plano TX128 908 97.84% 20 2.16% 928 Housing Authority of McKinney TX027 355 72.01% 138 27.99% 493 Housing Authority of Farmersville TX221 0 0.00% 280 100.00% 280

Page 224 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Texas

TX-600 Dallas City & County, Irving CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of Princeton TX133 0 0.00% 142 100.00% 142 Balch Springs Housing Authority TX533 42 100.00% 0 0.00% 42 Housing Authority of the City of Frisco TX144 0 0.00% 10 100.00% 10 McKinney Housing Authority TX489 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Lancaster Housing Authority TX437 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

TX-601 Fort Worth, Arlington/Tarrant County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of Fort Worth TX004 5397 60.70% 3495 39.30% 8892 Arlington Housing Authority TX433 3758 100.00% 0 0.00% 3758 Tarrant County Housing Assistance Office TX431 2569 100.00% 0 0.00% 2569 Weatherford Housing Authority TX349 518 87.21% 76 12.79% 594 Housing Authority of Grapevine TX291 83 89.25% 10 10.75% 93 Housing Authority of Haltom City TX153 0 0.00% 28 100.00% 28

TX-603 El Paso City & County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of the City of El Paso, TX TX003 5515 80.16% 1365 19.84% 6880 Housing Authority of Anthony TX439 453 100.00% 0 0.00% 453 El Paso County Housing Authority TX432 125 100.00% 0 0.00% 125

Page 225 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Texas

TX-603 El Paso City & County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units El Paso County Housing Authority TX538 0 0.00% 20 100.00% 20

TX-604 Waco/McLennan County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of the City of Waco TX010 2426 70.94% 994 29.06% 3420 Housing Authority of Coolidge TX228 0 0.00% 333 100.00% 333 Housing Authority of Wortham TX086 0 0.00% 289 100.00% 289 Mexia Housing Authority TX354 0 0.00% 150 100.00% 150 Housing Authority of Hubbard TX405 0 0.00% 100 100.00% 100 Housing Authority of Whitney TX218 0 0.00% 80 100.00% 80 Housing Authority of Teague TX273 0 0.00% 51 100.00% 51 Housing Authority of Lott TX252 0 0.00% 50 100.00% 50 Housing Authority of Mart TX333 0 0.00% 50 100.00% 50 Housing Authority of Rosebud TX255 0 0.00% 49 100.00% 49 Housing Authority of Marlin TX246 0 0.00% 48 100.00% 48 Housing Authority of City of Moody TX116 0 0.00% 46 100.00% 46 Housing Authority of Meridian TX276 0 0.00% 44 100.00% 44 Housing Authority of Clifton TX339 0 0.00% 36 100.00% 36 Housing Authority of McGregor TX102 0 0.00% 17 100.00% 17 Housing Authority of Groesbeck TX219 0 0.00% 6 100.00% 6 Hill County Housing Authority TX476 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Page 226 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Texas

TX-607 Texas Balance of State CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Corpus Christi Housing Authority TX008 1352 28.63% 3370 71.37% 4722 Brownsville Housing Authority TX007 2163 54.09% 1836 45.91% 3999 Central Texas Council of Governments TX482 3402 100.00% 0 0.00% 3402 Housing Authority of Port Arthur TX034 2949 96.97% 92 3.03% 3041 Housing Authority of the City of Galveston TX017 2109 85.21% 366 14.79% 2475 Housing Authority of the City of Beaumont TX023 2067 91.50% 192 8.50% 2259 Deep East Texas Council of Governments TX512 1945 100.00% 0 0.00% 1945 Housing Authority of the City of Abilene TX327 1550 96.88% 50 3.13% 1600 Denton Housing Authority TX392 1526 95.73% 68 4.27% 1594 Ark-Tex Council of Governments Housing Authority TX499 1585 100.00% 0 0.00% 1585 Housing Authority of the City of Laredo TX011 1383 91.41% 130 8.59% 1513 Housing Authority of Lubbock TX018 1010 66.80% 502 33.20% 1512 McAllen Housing Authority TX028 1269 84.88% 226 15.12% 1495 Housing Authority of Odessa TX455 1219 94.28% 74 5.72% 1293 Housing Authority of the City of Brownwood TX021 501 44.53% 624 55.47% 1125 Edinburg Housing Authority TX062 970 86.61% 150 13.39% 1120 Del Rio Housing Authority TX016 661 59.50% 450 40.50% 1111 Housing Authority of the City of Nacogdoches TX486 1025 94.47% 60 5.53% 1085 Cameron County Housing Authority TX509 1006 95.54% 47 4.46% 1053 Hidalgo County Housing Authority TX497 716 69.11% 320 30.89% 1036 Tyler Housing Authority TX456 999 100.00% 0 0.00% 999 Housing Authority City of Orange TX037 868 90.42% 92 9.58% 960

Page 227 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Texas

TX-607 Texas Balance of State CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Pharr Housing Authority TX073 828 86.61% 128 13.39% 956 San Angelo Housing Authority TX470 816 88.60% 105 11.40% 921 Longview Housing Authority TX459 871 100.00% 0 0.00% 871 Harlingen Housing Authority TX065 798 91.72% 72 8.28% 870 Mission Housing Authority TX046 749 91.01% 74 8.99% 823 Eagle Pass Housing Authority TX019 485 61.78% 300 38.22% 785 Mercedes Housing Authority TX029 420 56.30% 326 43.70% 746 Housing Authority of the City of Texas City TX032 422 57.65% 310 42.35% 732 Housing Authority of Texarkana TX014 616 85.56% 104 14.44% 720 Kingsville Housing Authority TX114 649 97.16% 19 2.84% 668 Texoma Council of Governments TX542 667 100.00% 0 0.00% 667 Weslaco Housing Authority TX051 484 73.33% 176 26.67% 660 Housing Authority of Marshall TX457 651 100.00% 0 0.00% 651 The Housing Authority of the City of Gainesvi TX072 416 63.90% 235 36.10% 651 Alamo Housing Authority TX064 120 19.54% 494 80.46% 614 Greenville TX522 609 100.00% 0 0.00% 609 Brazoria County Housing Authority, TX TX484 586 100.00% 0 0.00% 586 San Benito Housing Authority TX025 362 64.41% 200 35.59% 562 Donna Housing Authority TX177 296 54.92% 243 45.08% 539 Beeville Housing Authority TX152 370 71.15% 150 28.85% 520 Housing Authority of Corsicana TX033 188 38.37% 302 61.63% 490 South Plains Regional Housing Authority TX514 484 100.00% 0 0.00% 484

Page 228 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Texas

TX-607 Texas Balance of State CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of the City of Bay City TX035 266 56.60% 204 43.40% 470 Hale County Housing Authority TX537 380 82.61% 80 17.39% 460 Terrell Housing Authority TX493 458 100.00% 0 0.00% 458 Midland County Housing Authority TX534 458 100.00% 0 0.00% 458 Victoria Housing Authority TX085 347 83.61% 68 16.39% 415 Housing Authority of Sweetwater TX061 0 0.00% 394 100.00% 394 Anderson County Housing Authority TX488 393 100.00% 0 0.00% 393 Housing Authority of Waxahachie TX015 0 0.00% 391 100.00% 391 Marble Falls Housing Authority TX263 227 58.96% 158 41.04% 385 Housing Authority of Commerce TX024 175 45.57% 209 54.43% 384 Housing Authority of Paris TX048 293 76.50% 90 23.50% 383 Housing Authority of Montgomery County TX560 382 100.00% 0 0.00% 382 Big Spring Housing Authority TX485 366 100.00% 0 0.00% 366 Housing Authority of Beckville TX232 331 93.24% 24 6.76% 355 Cleburne Housing Agency TX495 355 100.00% 0 0.00% 355 Grayson County Housing Authority TX458 353 100.00% 0 0.00% 353 New Braunfels Housing Authority TX343 292 90.68% 30 9.32% 322 Seguin Housing Authority TX303 286 89.38% 34 10.63% 320 Housing Authority of Borger TX036 0 0.00% 311 100.00% 311 Housing Authority of Walker County TX461 251 83.39% 50 16.61% 301 Housing Authority of the City of Winters TX329 0 0.00% 300 100.00% 300 Housing Authority of Ballinger TX077 0 0.00% 298 100.00% 298

Page 229 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Texas

TX-607 Texas Balance of State CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of Wolfe City TX104 0 0.00% 288 100.00% 288 Crystal City Housing Authority TX105 215 74.91% 72 25.09% 287 Liberty County Housing Authority TX505 275 100.00% 0 0.00% 275 Housing Authority of Canyon TX045 0 0.00% 270 100.00% 270 Housing Authority of Floydada TX189 140 53.23% 123 46.77% 263 Robstown Housing Authority TX163 177 67.30% 86 32.70% 263 Housing Authority of Clarendon TX162 0 0.00% 260 100.00% 260 Alice Housing Authority TX178 154 63.11% 90 36.89% 244 Uvalde Housing Authority TX421 217 89.67% 25 10.33% 242 San Marcos Housing Authority TX087 228 95.80% 10 4.20% 238 Housing Authority of Dublin TX047 0 0.00% 234 100.00% 234 Gregory Housing Authority TX302 39 17.18% 188 82.82% 227 Athens Housing Authority TX519 224 100.00% 0 0.00% 224 Elsa Housing Authority TX224 132 60.55% 86 39.45% 218 Brackettville Housing Authority TX239 0 0.00% 218 100.00% 218 Taylor Housing Authority TX031 142 65.74% 74 34.26% 216 Falfurrias Housing Authority TX201 182 84.26% 34 15.74% 216 Starr County Housing Authority TX396 214 100.00% 0 0.00% 214 Yoakum Housing Authority TX326 0 0.00% 213 100.00% 213 Aransas Pass Housing Authority TX313 211 100.00% 0 0.00% 211 Jacksonville Housing Authority TX516 207 100.00% 0 0.00% 207 Housing Authority City of Alpine TX284 123 60.59% 80 39.41% 203

Page 230 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Texas

TX-607 Texas Balance of State CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units San Juan Housing Authority TX447 151 75.12% 50 24.88% 201 Housing Authority of Denison TX026 0 0.00% 201 100.00% 201 Port Isabel Housing Authority TX173 117 58.21% 84 41.79% 201 Los Fresnos Housing Authority TX206 102 51.52% 96 48.48% 198 Housing Authority of Wellington TX151 0 0.00% 194 100.00% 194 Housing Authority of Haskell TX053 0 0.00% 190 100.00% 190 La Joya Housing Authority TX448 128 69.57% 56 30.43% 184 Housing Authority of the City of Mineola TX060 0 0.00% 182 100.00% 182 Schertz Housing Authority TX350 153 84.53% 28 15.47% 181 Housing Authority of the City of Brenham TX330 101 55.80% 80 44.20% 181 Housing Authority of Detroit TX250 0 0.00% 180 100.00% 180 Rusk Housing Authority TX372 175 100.00% 0 0.00% 175 Carrizo Springs Housing Authority TX300 149 86.13% 24 13.87% 173 Housing Authority of Ferris TX342 0 0.00% 170 100.00% 170 Housing Authority of the City of Pearsall TX332 118 69.41% 52 30.59% 170 Floresville Housing Authority TX193 87 52.10% 80 47.90% 167 Housing Authority of the City of Killeen TX079 84 50.60% 82 49.40% 166 La Grange Housing Authority TX381 91 55.83% 72 44.17% 163 Fort Stockton Housing Authority TX500 162 100.00% 0 0.00% 162 Port Lavaca Housing Authority TX395 83 51.55% 78 48.45% 161 Devine Housing Authority TX210 50 31.65% 108 68.35% 158 Edna Housing Authority TX096 132 84.08% 25 15.92% 157

Page 231 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Texas

TX-607 Texas Balance of State CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of the City of Palacios TX378 57 36.31% 100 63.69% 157 Housing Authority of Mabank TX212 0 0.00% 156 100.00% 156 Housing Authority of Baird TX197 85 54.84% 70 45.16% 155 Housing Authority of Cisco TX042 68 44.16% 86 55.84% 154 Pleasanton Housing Authority TX208 108 70.13% 46 29.87% 154 Cotulla Housing Authority TX335 47 31.33% 103 68.67% 150 Duval County Housing Authority TX376 117 80.14% 29 19.86% 146 Housing Authority of Sherman TX078 0 0.00% 145 100.00% 145 Stockdale Housing Authority TX243 0 0.00% 145 100.00% 145 Sinton Housing Authority TX174 109 76.76% 33 23.24% 142 Mathis Housing Authority TX164 92 64.79% 50 35.21% 142 Housing Authority of Anson TX080 0 0.00% 140 100.00% 140 Georgetown Housing Authority TX264 100 71.43% 40 28.57% 140 Housing Authority of Ennis TX070 0 0.00% 140 100.00% 140 Roma Housing Authority TX449 104 77.61% 30 22.39% 134 Housing Authority of Marfa TX318 0 0.00% 130 100.00% 130 Elgin Housing Authority TX377 85 65.89% 44 34.11% 129 Housing Authority of Aspermont TX200 0 0.00% 125 100.00% 125 Housing Authority of Colorado City TX056 0 0.00% 125 100.00% 125 Cuero Housing Authority TX309 103 82.40% 22 17.60% 125 Housing Authority of Diboll TX229 0 0.00% 124 100.00% 124 Housing Authority of Newton TX223 0 0.00% 119 100.00% 119

Page 232 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Texas

TX-607 Texas Balance of State CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of Henderson TX050 0 0.00% 119 100.00% 119 Yorktown Housing Authority TX312 0 0.00% 118 100.00% 118 Housing Authority of Copperas Cove TX353 0 0.00% 117 100.00% 117 Edcouch Housing Authority TX202 54 46.55% 62 53.45% 116 Housing Authority of Temple TX030 0 0.00% 116 100.00% 116 Three Rivers Housing Authority TX176 0 0.00% 115 100.00% 115 Lamesa Housing Authority TX535 113 100.00% 0 0.00% 113 Housing Authority of De Kalb TX137 66 61.68% 41 38.32% 107 Housing Authority of Pecos TX320 0 0.00% 106 100.00% 106 Round Rock Housing Authority TX322 94 92.16% 8 7.84% 102 Boerne Housing Authority TX444 101 100.00% 0 0.00% 101 Housing Authority of Coleman TX321 0 0.00% 100 100.00% 100 Burnet Housing Authority TX358 100 100.00% 0 0.00% 100 Housing Authority of Belton TX213 0 0.00% 100 100.00% 100 Housing Authority of Livingston TX352 0 0.00% 100 100.00% 100 Housing Authority of Pittsburg TX049 25 25.00% 75 75.00% 100 Housing Authority of Tulia TX183 54 54.00% 46 46.00% 100 Housing Authority of Stamford TX167 0 0.00% 100 100.00% 100 Housing Authority of Tatum TX341 63 63.64% 36 36.36% 99 Housing Authority of Balmorhea TX316 0 0.00% 98 100.00% 98 New Boston Property Management TX054 0 0.00% 96 100.00% 96 Jim Hogg County Housing Authority TX511 75 78.95% 20 21.05% 95

Page 233 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Texas

TX-607 Texas Balance of State CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of Orange County TX113 0 0.00% 95 100.00% 95 Housing Authority of Alto TX272 51 54.84% 42 45.16% 93 Luling Housing Authority TX074 0 0.00% 93 100.00% 93 Housing Authority of Overton TX068 0 0.00% 90 100.00% 90 Housing Authority of DeLeon TX069 0 0.00% 90 100.00% 90 Housing Authority of Crosbyton TX184 0 0.00% 90 100.00% 90 Housing Authority of Rogers TX265 0 0.00% 86 100.00% 86 Housing Authority of Slaton TX257 64 74.42% 22 25.58% 86 Housing Authority of Roby TX180 0 0.00% 86 100.00% 86 Housing Authority of Bonham TX038 0 0.00% 85 100.00% 85 Housing Authority of Wills Point TX217 40 47.62% 44 52.38% 84 Granger Housing Authority TX281 0 0.00% 84 100.00% 84 Gonzales Housing Authority TX081 42 50.00% 42 50.00% 84 Housing Authority of Kirbyville TX282 0 0.00% 84 100.00% 84 Housing Authority of Fruitvale TX525 0 0.00% 80 100.00% 80 Housing Authority of Cross Plains TX172 0 0.00% 78 100.00% 78 Poteet Housing Authority TX236 24 30.77% 54 69.23% 78 Housing Authority of Avinger TX101 0 0.00% 75 100.00% 75 Ingleside Housing Authority TX317 0 0.00% 74 100.00% 74 Housing Authority of Stanton TX190 0 0.00% 74 100.00% 74 Housing Authority of Talco TX145 0 0.00% 72 100.00% 72 Housing Authority of Avery TX310 0 0.00% 72 100.00% 72

Page 234 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Texas

TX-607 Texas Balance of State CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Smithville Housing Authority TX266 45 63.38% 26 36.62% 71 Housing Authority of Wink TX160 0 0.00% 71 100.00% 71 Johnson City Housing Authority TX256 0 0.00% 70 100.00% 70 Housing Authority of Ladonia TX092 0 0.00% 70 100.00% 70 Housing Authority of Malakoff TX209 0 0.00% 70 100.00% 70 Housing Authority of Jefferson TX044 25 36.23% 44 63.77% 69 Housing Authority of the City of Huntsville TX406 0 0.00% 68 100.00% 68 Llano Housing Authority TX328 0 0.00% 68 100.00% 68 Housing Authority of City of Oglesby TX271 0 0.00% 67 100.00% 67 Hidalgo Housing Authority TX445 67 100.00% 0 0.00% 67 Housing Authority of the City of Munday TX120 0 0.00% 67 100.00% 67 Housing Authority of the City of Dayton TX168 0 0.00% 67 100.00% 67 Taft Housing Authority TX191 0 0.00% 66 100.00% 66 Housing Authority of Cooper TX076 0 0.00% 66 100.00% 66 Housing Authority of Rockwall TX095 36 54.55% 30 45.45% 66 Housing Authority of Ralls TX546 45 69.23% 20 30.77% 65 Kenedy Housing Authority TX147 34 53.13% 30 46.88% 64 Housing Authority of Bartlett TX274 0 0.00% 63 100.00% 63 Housing Authority of Edgewood TX242 34 53.97% 29 46.03% 63 Housing Authority of Crockett TX222 0 0.00% 63 100.00% 63 Housing Authority of Center TX059 0 0.00% 60 100.00% 60 Housing Authority of Rankin TX293 0 0.00% 60 100.00% 60

Page 235 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Texas

TX-607 Texas Balance of State CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of Hamilton TX083 0 0.00% 60 100.00% 60 Flatonia Housing Authority TX297 0 0.00% 60 100.00% 60 Housing Authority of Midland TX379 0 0.00% 60 100.00% 60 Housing Authority of the City of San Saba TX334 0 0.00% 60 100.00% 60 Housing Authority of Garrison TX233 0 0.00% 60 100.00% 60 Housing Authority of the City of Clarksville TX207 0 0.00% 60 100.00% 60 Housing Authority of Grandview TX347 0 0.00% 60 100.00% 60 Housing Authority of Bangs TX235 0 0.00% 60 100.00% 60 Tahoka Housing Authority TX166 0 0.00% 60 100.00% 60 Housing Authority of the City of Gladewater TX058 0 0.00% 60 100.00% 60 Bastrop Housing Authority TX259 22 37.93% 36 62.07% 58 Housing Authority of Rising Star TX170 0 0.00% 58 100.00% 58 Housing Authority of San Augustine TX383 0 0.00% 58 100.00% 58 City of La Marque Housing Authority TX530 58 100.00% 0 0.00% 58 Housing Authority of Maud TX188 0 0.00% 58 100.00% 58 Willacy County Housing Authority TX454 57 100.00% 0 0.00% 57 Housing Authority of Grand Saline TX336 0 0.00% 57 100.00% 57 Housing Authority of the City of Bellville TX304 0 0.00% 56 100.00% 56 Housing Authority of Jasper TX492 0 0.00% 55 100.00% 55 Housing Authority of Linden TX135 0 0.00% 55 100.00% 55 Housing Authority of Mount Pleasant TX244 0 0.00% 55 100.00% 55 Dilley Housing Authority TX397 34 62.96% 20 37.04% 54

Page 236 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Texas

TX-607 Texas Balance of State CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of Point TX370 0 0.00% 52 100.00% 52 Housing Authority of Mason TX261 0 0.00% 52 100.00% 52 Housing Authority of Naples TX121 0 0.00% 52 100.00% 52 Nixon Housing Authority TX175 13 25.00% 39 75.00% 52 Waelder Housing Authority TX109 0 0.00% 52 100.00% 52 Housing Authority of Whitesboro TX311 0 0.00% 52 100.00% 52 Housing Authority of Tom Bean TX115 0 0.00% 50 100.00% 50 Housing Authority of Loraine TX258 0 0.00% 50 100.00% 50 Housing Authority of Bells TX089 0 0.00% 50 100.00% 50 Runge Housing Authority TX165 0 0.00% 50 100.00% 50 Housing Authority of Gatesville TX283 0 0.00% 50 100.00% 50 Housing Authority of Alba TX241 0 0.00% 50 100.00% 50 Housing Authority of Ranger TX043 0 0.00% 50 100.00% 50 Housing Authority of Olton TX196 0 0.00% 50 100.00% 50 Housing Authority of Eden TX260 0 0.00% 50 100.00% 50 Housing Authority of Windom TX220 0 0.00% 49 100.00% 49 Housing Authority of Rotan TX182 0 0.00% 49 100.00% 49 Housing Authority of Blooming Grove TX238 0 0.00% 48 100.00% 48 Housing Authority of Brady TX251 0 0.00% 48 100.00% 48 Housing Authority of the City of Monahans TX408 0 0.00% 48 100.00% 48 Housing Authority of Howe TX108 0 0.00% 45 100.00% 45 Housing Authority of the City of Woodville TX225 0 0.00% 44 100.00% 44

Page 237 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Texas

TX-607 Texas Balance of State CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Hughes Springs TX112 0 0.00% 44 100.00% 44 Housing Authority of Merkel TX158 20 45.45% 24 54.55% 44 Housing Authority of Como TX287 0 0.00% 44 100.00% 44 Housing Authority of Goldthwaite TX269 0 0.00% 42 100.00% 42 Housing Authority of Bronte TX278 0 0.00% 40 100.00% 40 Housing Authority of Deport TX117 0 0.00% 40 100.00% 40 Housing Authority of Gorman TX192 0 0.00% 40 100.00% 40 Housing Authority of Kerens TX305 0 0.00% 40 100.00% 40 Housing Authority of Seagraves TX275 0 0.00% 40 100.00% 40 Housing Authority of Santa Anna TX204 0 0.00% 38 100.00% 38 Housing Authority of Dawson TX249 0 0.00% 36 100.00% 36 Housing Authority of Grandfalls TX267 0 0.00% 36 100.00% 36 Housing Authority of Grapeland TX295 0 0.00% 36 100.00% 36 Housing Authority of Blossom TX539 0 0.00% 35 100.00% 35 Housing Authority of Tioga TX199 0 0.00% 34 100.00% 34 Housing Authority of City of Leonard TX100 0 0.00% 32 100.00% 32 Housing Authority of Daingerfield TX106 0 0.00% 32 100.00% 32 Housing Authority of Omaha TX122 0 0.00% 32 100.00% 32 Housing Authority of Mount Vernon TX337 0 0.00% 32 100.00% 32 Falls City Housing Authority TX323 0 0.00% 32 100.00% 32 Housing Authority of Caddo Mills TX307 0 0.00% 30 100.00% 30 Housing Authority of Levelland TX171 0 0.00% 30 100.00% 30

Page 238 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Texas

TX-607 Texas Balance of State CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of Hale Center TX277 0 0.00% 30 100.00% 30 Housing Authority of Pineland TX187 0 0.00% 26 100.00% 26 Housing Authority of Granbury TX214 0 0.00% 26 100.00% 26 Housing Authority of the City of Knox City TX124 0 0.00% 24 100.00% 24 Housing Authority of McLean TX157 0 0.00% 24 100.00% 24 Housing Authority of Trenton TX127 0 0.00% 24 100.00% 24 Housing Authority of Comanche TX169 0 0.00% 22 100.00% 22 Housing Authority of Whitewright TX107 0 0.00% 22 100.00% 22 Housing Authority of Big Sandy TX356 0 0.00% 22 100.00% 22 Bowie County Housing Authority TX550 0 0.00% 20 100.00% 20 Housing Authority of Cumby TX289 0 0.00% 20 100.00% 20 Housing Authority of O'Donnell TX549 0 0.00% 20 100.00% 20 Housing Authority of Van TX344 0 0.00% 20 100.00% 20 Housing Authority of Gunter TX139 0 0.00% 20 100.00% 20 Housing Authority of Post TX179 0 0.00% 20 100.00% 20 Housing Authority of Pottsboro TX091 0 0.00% 20 100.00% 20 Housing Authority of Junction TX306 0 0.00% 20 100.00% 20 Housing Authority of Timpson TX226 0 0.00% 20 100.00% 20 Housing Authority of Hemphill TX227 0 0.00% 20 100.00% 20 Schulenburg Housing Authority TX296 0 0.00% 20 100.00% 20 Housing Authority of Lometa TX345 0 0.00% 20 100.00% 20 Housing Authority of Ector TX088 0 0.00% 19 100.00% 19

Page 239 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Texas

TX-607 Texas Balance of State CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of Corrigan TX230 0 0.00% 18 100.00% 18 Housing Authority of Hamlin TX195 0 0.00% 18 100.00% 18 Smiley Housing Authority TX103 0 0.00% 18 100.00% 18 Housing Authority of Celeste TX126 0 0.00% 17 100.00% 17 Housing Authority of the City of El Campo TX355 0 0.00% 17 100.00% 17 Lockhart Housing Authority TX211 0 0.00% 16 100.00% 16 Housing Authority of Spur TX215 0 0.00% 16 100.00% 16 Kyle Housing Authority TX367 0 0.00% 16 100.00% 16 Housing Authority of Memphis TX286 0 0.00% 16 100.00% 16 Housing Authority of Van Alstyne TX132 0 0.00% 16 100.00% 16 Housing Authority of Trinidad TX237 0 0.00% 16 100.00% 16 Housing Authority of Honey Grove TX093 0 0.00% 16 100.00% 16 Housing Authority of the City of Groveton TX231 0 0.00% 15 100.00% 15 Housing Authority of Robert Lee TX270 0 0.00% 14 100.00% 14 Housing Authority of Savoy TX097 0 0.00% 14 100.00% 14 Housing Authority of Bogata TX138 0 0.00% 12 100.00% 12 Housing Authority of Royse City TX247 0 0.00% 12 100.00% 12 Housing Authority of Spearman TX156 0 0.00% 12 100.00% 12 Housing Authority of Hico TX090 0 0.00% 11 100.00% 11 Housing Authority of Winnsboro TX288 0 0.00% 9 100.00% 9 Housing Authority of Cleveland TX198 0 0.00% 6 100.00% 6 Housing Authority of Gilmer TX071 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Page 240 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Texas

TX-607 Texas Balance of State CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Goliad Housing Authority TX510 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Housing Authority of Tenaha TX262 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Kermit Housing Authority TX391 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Housing Authority of Huntington TX348 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Housing Authority of Lockney TX552 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Atlanta Property Management TX531 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Housing Authority of Kemp TX387 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Housing Authority of Eldorado TX279 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

TX-611 Amarillo CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Panhandle Community Services TX481 1991 100.00% 0 0.00% 1991 City of Amarillo TX472 1518 100.00% 0 0.00% 1518

TX-624 Wichita Falls/Wise, Palo Pinto, Wichita, Archer Counties CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Wichita Falls Housing Assistance Program TX498 989 100.00% 0 0.00% 989 Housing Authority of Wichita Falls TX022 0 0.00% 642 100.00% 642 Housing Authority of Paducah TX084 0 0.00% 321 100.00% 321 Housing Authority the City of Mineral Wells TX298 235 74.37% 81 25.63% 316

Page 241 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Texas

TX-624 Wichita Falls/Wise, Palo Pinto, Wichita, Archer Counties CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of Breckenridge TX039 95 34.42% 181 65.58% 276 Housing Authority of Quanah TX075 110 56.70% 84 43.30% 194 Housing Authority of the City of Crowell TX308 0 0.00% 170 100.00% 170 Housing Authority of Strawn TX290 0 0.00% 98 100.00% 98 Housing Authority of Throckmorton TX325 0 0.00% 94 100.00% 94 Housing Authority of Olney TX041 0 0.00% 87 100.00% 87 Housing Authority of Archer City TX094 0 0.00% 64 100.00% 64 Housing Authority of the City of Nocona TX186 0 0.00% 64 100.00% 64 Housing Authority of Bridgeport TX067 0 0.00% 60 100.00% 60 Housing Authority of Newcastle TX216 0 0.00% 57 100.00% 57 Housing Authority of Burkburnett TX111 16 28.57% 40 71.43% 56 Housing Authority of Bryson TX099 0 0.00% 50 100.00% 50 Housing Authority of Seymour TX052 0 0.00% 50 100.00% 50 Housing Authority of Henrietta TX082 0 0.00% 38 100.00% 38 Housing Authority of Childress TX194 0 0.00% 34 100.00% 34 Electra Housing Authority TX066 0 0.00% 20 100.00% 20 Housing Authority of Vernon TX240 0 0.00% 14 100.00% 14 Electra Housing Authority TX523 12 100.00% 0 0.00% 12 Housing Authority of Decatur TX155 0 0.00% 10 100.00% 10 Burkburnett Housing Assistance Program TX502 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Page 242 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Texas

TX-700 Houston, Pasadena/Harris, Fort Bend Counties CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Houston Housing Authority TX005 17096 73.03% 6312 26.97% 23408 Harris County Housing Authority TX441 4379 100.00% 0 0.00% 4379 Housing Authority of the City of Baytown TX012 853 68.57% 391 31.43% 1244 City of Pasadena Housing Assistance Program TX440 1097 100.00% 0 0.00% 1097 Housing Authority of the City of Rosenberg TX483 453 100.00% 0 0.00% 453 Harris County-Other DHAP Only TX999 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

TX-701 Bryan, College Station/Brazos Valley CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Brazos Valley Council of Governments TX526 1902 100.00% 0 0.00% 1902 Housing Authority of the City of Bryan TX020 0 0.00% 236 100.00% 236 Housing Authority of Cameron TX134 141 73.06% 52 26.94% 193 Housing Authority of City of Navasota TX469 0 0.00% 174 100.00% 174 Housing Authority of the City of Madisonville TX245 0 0.00% 165 100.00% 165 Housing Authority of the City of Bremond TX351 0 0.00% 110 100.00% 110 Housing Authority of Rockdale TX380 0 0.00% 82 100.00% 82 Housing Authority of the City of Caldwell TX118 0 0.00% 75 100.00% 75 Housing Authority of Thorndale TX301 0 0.00% 58 100.00% 58 Housing Authority of the City of Hearne TX063 0 0.00% 44 100.00% 44 Housing Authority of the City of Franklin TX340 0 0.00% 40 100.00% 40 Housing Authority of the City of Buffalo TX357 0 0.00% 40 100.00% 40

Page 243 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Texas

TX-701 Bryan, College Station/Brazos Valley CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of the City of Calvert TX150 0 0.00% 33 100.00% 33 Housing Authority of the City of Centerville TX253 0 0.00% 24 100.00% 24

Page 244 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Utah

UT-500 Salt Lake City & County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of the County of Salt Lake UT003 2408 86.06% 390 13.94% 2798 Housing Authority of Salt Lake City UT004 2670 99.33% 18 0.67% 2688 West Valley City Housing Authority UT025 531 100.00% 0 0.00% 531 Tooele County Housing Authority UT020 215 87.76% 30 12.24% 245

UT-503 Utah Balance of State CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of the City of Ogden UT002 892 58.76% 626 41.24% 1518 Roosevelt City Housing Authority UT028 91 8.18% 1022 91.82% 1113 Davis Community Housing Authority UT009 1036 100.00% 0 0.00% 1036 Logan City Housing Authority UT026 369 100.00% 0 0.00% 369 Housing Authority of Carbon County UT016 273 92.54% 22 7.46% 295 St. George Housing Authority UT021 256 100.00% 0 0.00% 256 Beaver City Housing Authority UT006 4 1.59% 248 98.41% 252 Emery County Housing Authority UT015 68 35.98% 121 64.02% 189 Weber Housing Authority UT022 124 100.00% 0 0.00% 124 Bear River Regional Housing Authority UT030 122 100.00% 0 0.00% 122 Cedar City Housing Authority UT031 114 100.00% 0 0.00% 114 Housing Authority of Southeastern Utah UT014 73 100.00% 0 0.00% 73 Myton City Housing Authority UT029 33 100.00% 0 0.00% 33

Page 245 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Utah

UT-504 Provo/Mountainland CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of Utah County UT011 1059 97.78% 24 2.22% 1083 Housing Authority of the City of Provo UT007 883 84.82% 158 15.18% 1041

Page 246 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Vermont

VT-500 Vermont Balance of State CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Vermont State Housing Authority VT901 3646 100.00% 0 0.00% 3646 Springfield Housing Authority VT004 61 14.35% 364 85.65% 425 Barre Housing Authority VT005 185 43.74% 238 56.26% 423 Brattleboro Housing Authority VT002 187 50.68% 182 49.32% 369 Rutland Housing Authority VT003 194 59.51% 132 40.49% 326 Montpelier Housing Authority VT008 122 38.49% 195 61.51% 317 Bennington Housing Authority VT009 207 100.00% 0 0.00% 207 St. Albans City Housing Authority VT011 85 100.00% 0 0.00% 85

VT-501 Burlington/Chittenden County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Burlington Housing Authority VT001 1636 85.21% 284 14.79% 1920 Winooski Housing Authority VT006 320 84.21% 60 15.79% 380

Page 247 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Virginia

VA-500 Richmond/Henrico, Chesterfield, Hanover Counties CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Virginia Housing Development Authority VA901 9551 100.00% 0 0.00% 9551 Richmond Redevelopment & Housing Authority VA007 3358 87.36% 486 12.64% 3844

VA-501 Norfolk/Chesapeake, Suffolk, Isle of Wright, Southampton Counties CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Norfolk Redevelopment & Housing Authority VA006 3909 49.14% 4046 50.86% 7955 Chesapeake Redevelopment & Housing Authority VA012 1619 83.15% 328 16.85% 1947 Franklin Redevelopment and Housing Authority VA018 315 22.83% 1065 77.17% 1380 Suffolk Redevelopment and Housing Authority VA025 809 88.61% 104 11.39% 913

VA-502 Roanoke City & County, Salem CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Roanoke Redevelopment & Housing Authority VA011 2049 81.44% 467 18.56% 2516 Covington Redevelopment & Housing Authority VA037 58 100.00% 0 0.00% 58 Roanoke Total Action Against Poverty VA043 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

VA-503 Virginia Beach CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Va. Beach Dept. of Hsg & Neighborhood Pres. VA039 2023 100.00% 0 0.00% 2023

Page 248 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Virginia

VA-504 Charlottesville CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Charlottesville Redev & Housing Authority VA016 533 49.72% 539 50.28% 1072 County of Albemarle/Office of Housing VA036 429 100.00% 0 0.00% 429 Piedmont Housing Alliance VA880 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

VA-505 Newport News, Hampton/Virginia Peninsula CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Hampton Redevelopment & Housing Authority VA017 3053 95.32% 150 4.68% 3203 Newport News Redevelopment & Housng Authority VA003 2401 75.74% 769 24.26% 3170 Williamsburg Redevelopment & Housing Auth. VA026 0 0.00% 309 100.00% 309 James City County Office of Hsg & Comm Dev VA041 154 100.00% 0 0.00% 154

VA-507 Portsmouth CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Portsmouth Redevelopment & Housing Authority VA001 1949 82.58% 411 17.42% 2360

VA-508 Lynchburg CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Lynchburg Redevelopment & Housing Authority VA013 979 100.00% 0 0.00% 979

Page 249 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Virginia

VA-513 Harrisonburg, Winchester/Western Virginia CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Harrisonburg Redevelopment & Housing Authorit VA014 843 79.45% 218 20.55% 1061

VA-521 Virginia Balance of State CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Hopewell Redevelopment & Housing Authority VA005 403 10.39% 3475 89.61% 3878 Lee County Redevelopment & Housing Authority VA034 532 13.89% 3299 86.11% 3831 Danville Redevelopment & Housing Authority VA010 945 42.84% 1261 57.16% 2206 Bristol Redevelopment & Housing Authority VA002 264 12.69% 1817 87.31% 2081 Wise County Redevelopment & Housing Authority VA024 751 61.71% 466 38.29% 1217 Petersburg Redevelopment & Housing Authority VA020 737 77.01% 220 22.99% 957 Waynesboro Redevelopment & Housing Authority VA022 481 76.23% 150 23.77% 631 Accomack-Northampton Regional Housing Auth VA040 538 100.00% 0 0.00% 538 Norton Redevelopment & Housing Authority VA015 110 22.63% 376 77.37% 486 Martinsville Redevelopment & Housng Authority VA045 484 100.00% 0 0.00% 484 Staunton Redevelopment & Housing Authority VA023 234 54.80% 193 45.20% 427 Marion Redevelopment & Housing Authority VA030 246 68.91% 111 31.09% 357 Wytheville Redev. & Housing Authority VA021 135 41.80% 188 58.20% 323 Cumberland Plateau Regional Housing Authority VA029 0 0.00% 238 100.00% 238 Scott County Redev. & Housing Authority VA031 197 87.56% 28 12.44% 225 Abingdon Redevelopment and Housing Authority VA032 121 59.90% 81 40.10% 202 Big Stone Gap Redevelopment and Housing Auth. VA038 124 100.00% 0 0.00% 124

Page 250 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Virginia

VA-521 Virginia Balance of State CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Buckingham Housing Development Corp. Inc. VA044 112 100.00% 0 0.00% 112 People Inc. of Southwest Virginia VA042 91 100.00% 0 0.00% 91

VA-600 Arlington County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Arlington County Dept of Human Services VA028 1546 100.00% 0 0.00% 1546

VA-601 Fairfax County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Fairfax County Redevelopment & Hsg Authority VA019 3731 90.12% 409 9.88% 4140

VA-602 Loudoun County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Loudoun County Department of Family Services VA035 688 100.00% 0 0.00% 688

VA-603 Alexandria CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Alexandria Redevelopment & Housing Authority VA004 1926 80.72% 460 19.28% 2386

Page 251 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Virginia

VA-604 Prince William County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Prince William County Office of HCD VA046 2059 100.00% 0 0.00% 2059

Page 252 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Washington

WA-500 Seattle/King County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Seattle Housing Authority WA001 10070 82.83% 2088 17.17% 12158 HA OF KING COUNTY WA002 8758 98.00% 179 2.00% 8937 HA City of Renton WA011 415 68.60% 190 31.40% 605

WA-501 Washington Balance of State CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of the City of Bremerton WA003 1819 87.08% 270 12.92% 2089 HA Of Thurston County WA049 1974 100.00% 0 0.00% 1974 Housing Authority City of Bellingham WA025 1663 96.80% 55 3.20% 1718 Peninsula Housing Authority WA004 611 42.79% 817 57.21% 1428 Housing Authority City of Longview WA007 1387 100.00% 0 0.00% 1387 HA City of Kennewick WA012 975 81.73% 218 18.27% 1193 HA City of Walla Walla WA057 940 100.00% 0 0.00% 940 HA Of Island County WA024 275 34.25% 528 65.75% 803 Housing Authority of Skagit County WA061 654 100.00% 0 0.00% 654 HA Of Asotin County WA017 217 34.34% 415 65.66% 632 Kitsap County Consolidated Housing Auth WA036 374 64.04% 210 35.96% 584 HA City of Kelso WA020 281 50.09% 280 49.91% 561 HA Of Chelan Co and the City of Wenatchee WA064 537 100.00% 0 0.00% 537 HA City of Richland WA065 0 0.00% 465 100.00% 465 HA City of Pasco and Franklin County WA021 318 74.30% 110 25.70% 428

Page 253 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Washington

WA-501 Washington Balance of State CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units HA Of Grant County WA014 237 62.86% 140 37.14% 377 HA Of Grays Harbor County WA018 223 93.31% 16 6.69% 239 HA City of Anacortes WA010 0 0.00% 222 100.00% 222 Housing Authority of Okanogan County WA071 165 100.00% 0 0.00% 165 HA City of Sedro Woolley WA030 0 0.00% 140 100.00% 140 HA City of Kalama WA019 27 21.26% 100 78.74% 127 Housing Authority of Kittitas County WA009 0 0.00% 111 100.00% 111 Housing Authority City of Othello WA026 0 0.00% 80 100.00% 80 Ferry County Joint Housing Authority WA069 28 100.00% 0 0.00% 28 HA Of Whatcom County WA041 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

WA-502 Spokane City & County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units HA City of Spokane WA055 5049 98.36% 84 1.64% 5133

WA-503 Tacoma, Lakewood/Pierce County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units HA City of Tacoma WA005 4101 93.44% 288 6.56% 4389 HA Of Pierce County WA054 2768 95.68% 125 4.32% 2893

Page 254 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Washington

WA-504 Everett/Snohomish County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of Snohomish County WA039 3398 98.18% 63 1.82% 3461 HA City of Everett WA006 2539 93.38% 180 6.62% 2719

WA-507 Yakima City & County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units HA City of Yakima WA042 895 87.57% 127 12.43% 1022 Housing Authority of Sunnyside, Washington WA035 0 0.00% 136 100.00% 136

WA-508 Vancouver/Clark County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of the City of Vancouver WA008 2502 95.79% 110 4.21% 2612

Page 255 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. West Virginia

WV-500 Wheeling, Weirton Area CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of the City of Wheeling WV003 447 32.99% 908 67.01% 1355 Housing Authority of the City of Weirton WV016 535 79.61% 137 20.39% 672 Housing Authority of Benwood and McMechen WV014 0 0.00% 209 100.00% 209 Housing Authority of the City of Moundsville WV011 0 0.00% 205 100.00% 205

WV-501 Huntington/Cabell, Wayne Counties CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of the City of Huntington WV004 1431 90.57% 149 9.43% 1580 Housing Authority of Wayne County WV WV049 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

WV-503 Charleston/Kanawha, Putnam, Boone, Clay Counties CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Charleston/Kanawha Housing Authority WV001 3014 100.00% 0 0.00% 3014 Housing Authority of Boone County WV042 497 100.00% 0 0.00% 497 Housing Authority of the City of St. Albans WV021 0 0.00% 121 100.00% 121 Housing Authority of the City of Dunbar WV024 0 0.00% 109 100.00% 109 Housing Authority of the City of South Charleston WV022 0 0.00% 101 100.00% 101

Page 256 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. West Virginia

WV-508 West Virginia Balance of State CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of the City of Parkersburg WV005 1460 81.70% 327 18.30% 1787 Housing Authority of Mingo County WV037 1443 96.01% 60 3.99% 1503 Housing Authority of Raleigh County WV039 1405 94.93% 75 5.07% 1480 Fairmont/Morgantown Housing Authority WV009 1078 92.69% 85 7.31% 1163 Housing Authority of Randolph County WV045 598 63.68% 341 36.32% 939 Housing Authority of the County of Jackson WV035 915 100.00% 0 0.00% 915 Clarksburg/Harrison Housing Authority WV027 616 90.72% 63 9.28% 679 Housing Authority of the City of Beckley WV015 503 80.48% 122 19.52% 625 Housing Authority of the City of Morgantown WV002 0 0.00% 617 100.00% 617 Housing Authority of the City of Martinsburg WV006 339 71.52% 135 28.48% 474 Housing Authority of the City of Keyser WV010 222 47.23% 248 52.77% 470 Housing Authority of the City of Bluefield WV018 384 86.88% 58 13.12% 442 Greenbrier County Housing Authority WV046 345 100.00% 0 0.00% 345 Housing Authority of the City of Spencer WV026 0 0.00% 323 100.00% 323 Housing Authority of the City of Pt. Pleasant WV017 125 43.10% 165 56.90% 290 Housing Authority of the City of Buckhannon WV013 82 31.42% 179 68.58% 261 Housing Authority of the City of Mount Hope WV007 0 0.00% 248 100.00% 248 Housing Authority of the City of Piedmont WV029 0 0.00% 149 100.00% 149 Housing Authority of the City of Williamson WV008 0 0.00% 136 100.00% 136 Housing Authority of the City of Weston WV028 0 0.00% 99 100.00% 99 Housing Authority of the City of Elkins WV020 0 0.00% 90 100.00% 90 Housing Authority of the City of Grafton WV012 0 0.00% 84 100.00% 84

Page 257 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. West Virginia

WV-508 West Virginia Balance of State CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Grant County Housing Authority WV034 46 100.00% 0 0.00% 46 Housing Authority of the City of Romney WV044 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Page 258 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Wisconsin

WI-500 Wisconsin Balance of State CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of the City of Superior WI001 169 4.52% 3574 95.48% 3743 Brown County Housing Authority WI186 3395 100.00% 0 0.00% 3395 LaCrosse County Housing Authority WI253 0 0.00% 1263 100.00% 1263 Kenosha Housing Authority WI195 1181 100.00% 0 0.00% 1181 Waukesha Housing Authority WI142 792 94.51% 46 5.49% 838 Beloit Housing Authority WI064 598 74.01% 210 25.99% 808 City of Appleton Housing Authority WI065 597 95.83% 26 4.17% 623 Menomonie Housing Authority WI004 0 0.00% 593 100.00% 593 Janesville Neighborhood Services WI219 543 100.00% 0 0.00% 543 Housing Authority of Winnebago County, WI WI213 413 82.77% 86 17.23% 499 Fond du Lac County Housing Authority WI246 430 89.77% 49 10.23% 479 Wausau Community Development Authority WI031 435 95.60% 20 4.40% 455 Walworth County Housing Authority WI244 410 100.00% 0 0.00% 410 Sauk County Housing Authority WI204 298 72.86% 111 27.14% 409 Chippewa County Housing Authority WI248 392 100.00% 0 0.00% 392 Wisconsin Rapids Housing Authority WI068 243 82.94% 50 17.06% 293 Ladysmith Housing Authority WI111 0 0.00% 278 100.00% 278 Shawano County Housing Authority WI139 0 0.00% 264 100.00% 264 Ashland Housing Authority WI131 62 23.48% 202 76.52% 264 Eau Claire County Housing Authority WI193 221 84.67% 40 15.33% 261 Sheboygan Housing Authority WI047 194 75.49% 63 24.51% 257 Door County Housing Authority WI206 255 100.00% 0 0.00% 255

Page 259 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Wisconsin

WI-500 Wisconsin Balance of State CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Portage County Housing Authority WI237 250 100.00% 0 0.00% 250 Algoma Housing Authority WI034 0 0.00% 247 100.00% 247 West Bend Housing Authority WI083 244 100.00% 0 0.00% 244 Stevens Point Housing Authority WI037 0 0.00% 242 100.00% 242 Richland Center Housing Authority WI046 0 0.00% 240 100.00% 240 Marinette County Housing Authority WI241 234 100.00% 0 0.00% 234 Trempealeau County Housing Authority WI166 222 96.52% 8 3.48% 230 Richland County Housing Authority WI256 217 100.00% 0 0.00% 217 Antigo Housing Authority WI085 149 70.62% 62 29.38% 211 La Crosse Housing Authority WI006 144 70.59% 60 29.41% 204 Osceola Housing Authority WI073 0 0.00% 204 100.00% 204 Sawyer County Housing Authority WI222 197 100.00% 0 0.00% 197 Reedsville Housing Authority WI030 0 0.00% 195 100.00% 195 Prairie du Chien Housing Authority WI067 0 0.00% 195 100.00% 195 New London Housing Authority WI048 97 56.07% 76 43.93% 173 Rhinelander Housing Authority WI070 141 83.93% 27 16.07% 168 Peshtigo Housing Authority WI129 0 0.00% 168 100.00% 168 Kaukauna Housing Authority WI043 90 54.88% 74 45.12% 164 Mauston Housing Authority WI069 113 69.33% 50 30.67% 163 Dodge County Housing Authority WI233 152 100.00% 0 0.00% 152 Oconto Housing Authority WI044 0 0.00% 146 100.00% 146 Barron County Housing Authority WI245 140 100.00% 0 0.00% 140

Page 260 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Wisconsin

WI-500 Wisconsin Balance of State CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Marshfield Community Development Authority WI011 95 68.35% 44 31.65% 139 Monroe County Housing Authority WI205 132 100.00% 0 0.00% 132 Wausaukee Housing Authority WI063 0 0.00% 131 100.00% 131 Westby Housing Authority WI117 0 0.00% 130 100.00% 130 Chilton Housing Authority WI251 0 0.00% 128 100.00% 128 Platteville Housing Authority WI208 128 100.00% 0 0.00% 128 Marinette Housing Authority WI049 0 0.00% 126 100.00% 126 Rice Lake Housing Authority WI050 93 75.61% 30 24.39% 123 Washburn Housing Authority WI127 73 64.60% 40 35.40% 113 Tomah Public Housing Authority WI096 76 68.47% 35 31.53% 111 Shawano Housing Authority WI045 48 44.44% 60 55.56% 108 Manitowoc Housing Authority WI024 0 0.00% 105 100.00% 105 River Falls Housing Authority WI060 75 72.12% 29 27.88% 104 Housing Authority of the City of Barron WI023 0 0.00% 102 100.00% 102 Spooner Housing Authority WI016 0 0.00% 102 100.00% 102 Park Falls Housing Authority WI098 0 0.00% 100 100.00% 100 Ashland County Housing Authority WI231 68 68.00% 32 32.00% 100 Dunn County Housing Authority WI160 89 100.00% 0 0.00% 89 Abbotsford Housing Authority WI026 0 0.00% 86 100.00% 86 Eau Claire Housing Authority WI207 0 0.00% 85 100.00% 85 Dodgeville Housing Authority WI091 80 100.00% 0 0.00% 80 Amery Housing Authority WI019 40 50.00% 40 50.00% 80

Page 261 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Wisconsin

WI-500 Wisconsin Balance of State CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Pulaski Housing Authority WI075 0 0.00% 80 100.00% 80 Evansville Housing Authority WI203 79 100.00% 0 0.00% 79 Burnett County Housing Authority WI242 33 43.42% 43 56.58% 76 Thorp Housing Authority WI077 0 0.00% 73 100.00% 73 Lafayette County Housing Authority WI221 52 72.22% 20 27.78% 72 Woodville Housing Authority WI059 0 0.00% 71 100.00% 71 Hudson Housing Authority WI042 0 0.00% 71 100.00% 71 Housing Authority of the City of Shell Lake WI061 0 0.00% 65 100.00% 65 Hurley Housing Authority WI040 0 0.00% 63 100.00% 63 Grantsburg Housing Authority WI071 0 0.00% 61 100.00% 61 Watertown Housing Authority WI076 0 0.00% 60 100.00% 60 Boscobel Housing Authority WI158 0 0.00% 60 100.00% 60 Luck Housing Authority WI057 0 0.00% 56 100.00% 56 Wittenberg Housing Authority WI039 0 0.00% 54 100.00% 54 Albany Housing Authority WI055 0 0.00% 53 100.00% 53 Lake Mills Housing Authority WI041 0 0.00% 51 100.00% 51 Plymouth Housing Authority WI018 0 0.00% 51 100.00% 51 Jefferson Housing Authority WI086 0 0.00% 50 100.00% 50 Merrill Housing Authority WI017 0 0.00% 50 100.00% 50 Monroe Housing Authority WI028 0 0.00% 45 100.00% 45 Housing Authority of the City of New Richmond WI020 20 45.45% 24 54.55% 44 Lincoln County Housing Authority WI226 0 0.00% 40 100.00% 40

Page 262 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Wisconsin

WI-500 Wisconsin Balance of State CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Baraboo Community Development Authority WI090 0 0.00% 40 100.00% 40 DePere Housing Authority WI102 0 0.00% 40 100.00% 40 Stanley Housing Authority WI015 0 0.00% 40 100.00% 40 Altoona Housing Authority WI033 0 0.00% 39 100.00% 39 Mondovi Housing Authority WI066 0 0.00% 39 100.00% 39 Slinger Housing Authority WI247 0 0.00% 36 100.00% 36 Greenwood Housing Authority WI032 0 0.00% 36 100.00% 36 Viroqua Housing Authority WI118 0 0.00% 36 100.00% 36 Housing Authority of the City of Oshkosh, WI WI113 0 0.00% 35 100.00% 35 Clintonville Housing Authority WI072 0 0.00% 30 100.00% 30 City of Edgerton Housing Authority WI025 0 0.00% 30 100.00% 30 Brillion Housing Authority WI021 0 0.00% 30 100.00% 30 Housing Authority of the City of Cumberland WI052 0 0.00% 29 100.00% 29 Sauk City Housing Authority WI093 0 0.00% 28 100.00% 28 Bruce Housing Authority WI029 0 0.00% 27 100.00% 27 Chetek Housing Authority WI051 0 0.00% 27 100.00% 27 Sparta Housing Authority WI058 0 0.00% 26 100.00% 26 Crawford County Housing Authority WI230 25 100.00% 0 0.00% 25 Green Bay Housing Authority WI074 0 0.00% 20 100.00% 20 Frederic Housing Authority WI056 0 0.00% 16 100.00% 16 New Berlin Housing Authority WI259 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Taylor County Housing Authority WI263 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Page 263 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Wisconsin

WI-500 Wisconsin Balance of State CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Oconto County Housing Authority WI262 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Waukesha County Housing Authority WI261 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 City of Appleton Housing Authority WI217 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 Fond du Lac Housing Authority WI038 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

WI-501 Milwaukee City & County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of the City of Milwaukee WI002 6166 89.26% 742 10.74% 6908 Milwaukee Co DHHS - Housing Division WI218 2071 100.00% 0 0.00% 2071 CDA of the City of West Allis WI201 557 100.00% 0 0.00% 557 South Milwaukee Housing Auth. WI008 0 0.00% 209 100.00% 209

WI-502 Racine City & County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of Racine County WI183 1574 98.99% 16 1.01% 1590

WI-503 Madison/Dane County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Madison Community Development Authority WI003 1839 93.73% 123 6.27% 1962

Page 264 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Wisconsin

WI-503 Madison/Dane County CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Wisconsin Housing & Economic Development Authority WI901 1693 100.00% 0 0.00% 1693 Dane County Housing Authority WI214 1211 97.74% 28 2.26% 1239 DeForest Housing Authority WI249 0 0.00% 44 100.00% 44

Page 265 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015 CoC Num CoC-PHA Crosswalk

Important Notes About This Data: The report shows PHA unit breakdown for HCV and PH units by CoC. The data are ordered in descending order by total number of ACC Units (HCV + PH Units). The first five records with the greatest number of total units are highlighted for each CoC. Wyoming

WY-500 Wyoming Statewide CoC PHA Name PHA Code HCV Units % HCV PH Units % PH Total ACC Units Housing Authority of the City of Cheyenne WY002 1912 95.03% 100 4.97% 2012 Housing Authority of the City of Casper WY004 529 91.36% 50 8.64% 579 Rock Springs Housing Authority WY003 67 47.18% 75 52.82% 142 Evanston Housing Authority WY013 86 74.14% 30 25.86% 116 Hanna Housing Authority WY010 0 0.00% 80 100.00% 80 Housing Authority of the Town of Douglas WY005 0 0.00% 20 100.00% 20 Lusk Housing Authority WY008 0 0.00% 20 100.00% 20 Housing Authority of the City of Buffalo WY015 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Page 266 of 266 Thursday, September 10, 2015