DOCSLIB.ORG

Unit 1: Introduction to Ethics

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Unit 1: Introduction to Ethics Unit One: Introduction to Ethics Unit Information 3 Unit Overview 3 Unit Aims 3 Unit Learning Outcomes 3 Unit Interdependencies 3 Key Readings 4 Further Readings 5 References 6 Multimedia 7 1.0 Why study ethics? 8 Section Overview 8 Section Learning Outcomes 8 1.1 What is ‘philosophy’? 8 1.2 What is ‘ethics’? 11 1.3 Moral intuitions and critical reasoning 13 1.4 Environmental and development ethics 16 Section 1 Self Assessment Questions 20 2.0 Normative ethical traditions: identifying right and wrong 21 Section Overview 21 Section Learning Outcomes 21 2.1 Western ethical theories 21 2.2 Deontological ethics 23 2.3 Teleological ethics 26 2.4 Limitations of traditional normative theories 29 Section 2 Self Assessment Questions 30 3.0 Key ethical issues: whose arguments count? 31 Section Overview 31 Section Learning Outcomes 31 3.1 Meta-ethics 31 3.2 Ethical monism, relativism and pluralism 32 Section 3 Self Assessment Questions 38 Unit Summary 39 Unit Self Assessment Questions 40 Key Terms and Concepts 41 P563 Ethics for Environment and Development Unit 1 UNIT INFORMATION Unit Overview This unit provides an introduction to the study of ethics and a brief overview of some of the main branches of philosophical thought about ethics. As well as introducing the central ideas that relate to environmental and development ethics and how these two areas of ethical study are interrelated, this unit shows why ethics as a discipline can provide useful tools for clarifying arguments, for understanding a range of viewpoints in a debate, and for justifying one’s own ethical positions more clearly. Key conceptual frameworks and some key terms are introduced and explained. Unit Aims • To introduce some key terms relating to the study of ethics. • To introduce some key ethical ideas, principles and frameworks. • To explain the rationale for studying environmental and development ethics and to examine how these areas of study are interrelated. Unit Learning Outcomes By the end of this unit, students should be able to: • define the terms ‘philosophy’, ‘ethics’, and ‘morality’ • outline the rationale for studying ethics, particularly in relation to environmental and development concerns • explain the difference between deontological and teleological ethics • define and briefly explain some of the key terms relating to ethical monism, relativism and pluralism Unit Interdependencies This unit provides a concise introduction to the study of ethics. It introduces key ethical terms and concepts that recur throughout the other units of the module. Therefore it is recommended that you study this unit before attempting the other units, as it provides useful knowledge and understanding of those key terms and concepts. © SOAS CeDEP 3 P563 Ethics for Environment and Development Unit 1 KEY READINGS Section 1 Traer R (2013) Moral philosophy: an adventure in reasoning. In: Doing Environmental Ethics, 2nd edn. Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado, pp. 3–20. This chapter introduces the field of moral philosophy, from which much scholarly knowledge and understanding of ethics derives. It explains that ethics answers the question, ‘How should we live?’ The chapter considers some fundamental themes, including ideas about what is ‘right’ and ‘good’, and it examines ways of reasoning critically about our feelings. The field of environmental ethics is introduced, but the account presented in this chapter is also relevant to the theme of development ethics. A variety of key terms are introduced and defined in this chapter. Section 2 Wolf S (1982) Moral saints. Journal of Philosophy 79(8) 419–439. In this thought-provoking article, Susan Wolf argues that moral perfection, in the sense of moral ‘saintliness’, is not a particularly rational, good or desirable model of personal well-being toward which people should strive. In doing so, she presents a range of interesting and provocative ideas about normative ethics. In particular, she argues that, at some point, ‘we must be willing to raise normative questions from a perspective that is unattached to a commitment to any particular well-ordered system of values.’ Section 3 Traer R (2013) Ethics and science: moral consideration. In: Doing Environmental Ethics, 2nd edn. Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado, pp. 21–39. This chapter considers the relation between ethics and science, focusing on the evolution of scientific knowledge. The problematic area of valuing nature is introduced. The chapter shows that, far from being detached from questions of values and ethics, science plays a key role in those questions, because what we value depends on what we believe and that, in turn, is heavily influenced by science. 4 © SOAS CeDEP P563 Ethics for Environment and Development Unit 1 FURTHER READINGS Crocker D (1996) International Development Ethics. Available from: http://www.bu.edu/wcp/Papers/OApp/OAppCroc.htm Gasper D (2009) Development Ethics and Human Development. HD Insights, HDR Networks Issue 24, United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). Available from: http://hdr.undp.org/en/media/HD_Insights_January2009.pdf 5 © SOAS CeDEP P563 Ethics for Environment and Development Unit 1 REFERENCES Callicott JB (1990) The case against moral pluralism. Environmental Ethics 12(2) 99– 124. Crane A, Matten D (2007) Business Ethics: Managing Corporate Citizenship and Sustainability in the Age of Globalization, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford. DesJardins J (2006) Business, Ethics and the Environment: Imagining a Sustainable Future. Pearson, Harlow. FAO (2004) The Ethics of Sustainable Agricultural Intensification. FAO Ethics Series 3, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Rome. Gasper D (2004) The Ethics of Development. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh. LSULife (2007) What is Ethics? Video. Duration 1.36 minutes. Available from: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZIaHxC7BT0A [Accessed 05 August 2013] NatureServe (2010) Biodiversity Insights: Ten Reasons to Save the Diversity of Life. Available from: http://www.natureserve.org/consIssues/tenReasons.jsp [Accessed 05 August 2013] Popkin RH, Stroll A (1969) Philosophy Made Simple. WH Allen, London. Smith MJ, Pangsapa P (2008) Environment and Citizenship: Integrating Justice, Responsibility and Civic Engagement. Zed Books, London. Traer R (2009) Doing Environmental Ethics. Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado. Traer R (2013) Doing Environmental Ethics, 2nd edn. Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado. UN (2012) The Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Available from: http://www.un.org/en/documents/udhr/ [Accessed 05 August 2013] Worldwatch Institute (2012) State of the World 2012: Moving Toward Sustainable Prosperity. Worldwatch Institute, Washington DC. Wraight CD (2011) Ethics of Trade and Aid: Development, Charity or Waste? Continuum, London. 6 © SOAS CeDEP P563 Ethics for Environment and Development Unit 1 MULTIMEDIA Carnegie Council (2009) Joel Rosenthal: Pluralism & Ethics. Video. Duration 4.12 minutes. Available from: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E6oc9JFUxEU This video clip, featuring the President of the Carnegie Council, Joel Rosenthal, focuses on ethical pluralism. It addresses the question, ‘Where do we draw the line when deciding whose ethics are legitimate?’ LSULife (2007) What is Ethics? Video. Duration 1.36 minutes. Available from: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZIaHxC7BT0A This short video clip shows a selection of university students attempting to define the term ‘ethics’. TED (2009) Gordon Brown on Global Ethic vs. National Interest. Video. Duration 17.03 minutes. Available from: http://www.ted.com/talks/lang/en/gordon_brown_on_global_ethic_vs_national_inter est.html This video clip shows the former UK Prime Minister, Gordon Brown, answering questions about the ‘global ethic’ he called for. The video addresses the question of whether the interests of an individual nation can be reconciled with the greater good of humanity. 7 © SOAS CeDEP P563 Ethics for Environment and Development Unit 1 1.0 WHY STUDY ETHICS? Section Overview The study of ethics belongs primarily within the discipline of philosophy, in the sub- discipline of ‘moral philosophy’, and so our account begins there. Philosophical study concerns the systematic and rational consideration of human systems of belief. The process of asking and answering questions about belief systems is therefore fundamental to philosophical study – it is not sufficient merely to ‘learn’ the answers that have been proposed by other philosophers! The branch of philosophy called ‘ethics’ is concerned with questions concerning how human beings ought to live their lives, and about what is ‘right’ or ‘wrong’. In this section we look at how philosophers attempt to answer such questions in a systematic and rational way. This section also introduces the fields of environmental and development ethics, and consider how these two fields of study are interrelated. Section Learning Outcomes By the end of this section, students should be able to: • define the terms ‘philosophy’, ‘ethics’, and ‘morality’ • outline the rationale for studying ethics, particularly in relation to environmental and development concerns 1.1 What is ‘philosophy’? What do philosophers do? What do you think philosophers do? How do they spend their time? Spend a few minutes thinking about what you know about philosophers past and present; if possible, try to identify some of the advances in knowledge that they have made. Try to write a brief definition of philosophy. What is the purpose of ‘doing’ philosophy? As human beings live their lives, they
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Retracing Augustine's Ethics: Lying, Necessity, and the Image Of
    Valparaiso University ValpoScholar Christ College Faculty Publications Christ College (Honors College) 12-1-2016 Retracing Augustine’s Ethics: Lying, Necessity, and the Image of God Matthew Puffer Valparaiso University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/cc_fac_pub Recommended Citation Puffer, M. (2016). "Retracing Augustine’s ethics: Lying, necessity, and the image of God." Journal of Religious Ethics, 44(4), 685–720. https://doi.org/10.1111/jore.12159 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Christ College (Honors College) at ValpoScholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Christ College Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of ValpoScholar. For more information, please contact a ValpoScholar staff member at [email protected]. RETRACING AUGUSTINE’S ETHICS Lying, Necessity, and the Image of God Matthew Puffer ABSTRACT Augustine’s exposition of the image of God in Book 15 of On The Trinity (De Trinitate) sheds light on multiple issues that arise in scholarly interpretations of Augustine’s account of lying. This essay argues against interpretations that pos- it a uniform account of lying in Augustine—with the same constitutive features, and insisting both that it is never necessary to tell a lie and that lying is abso- lutely prohibited. Such interpretations regularly employ intertextual reading strategies that elide distinctions and developments in Augustine’sethicsoflying. Instead, I show how looking at texts written prior and subsequent to the texts usually consulted suggests a trajectory in Augustine’s thought, beginning with an understanding of lies as morally culpable but potentially necessary, and cul- minating in a vision of lying as the fundamental evil and the origin of every sin.
    [Show full text]
  • PHIL 269: Philosophy of Sex and Love: Course Outline
    PHIL 269: Philosophy of Sex and Love: Course Outline 1. Title of Course: Philosophy of Sex and Love 2. Catalogue Description: The course investigates philosophical questions regarding the nature of sex and love, including questions such as: what is sex? What is sexuality? What is love? What kinds of love are possible? What is the proper morality of sexual behavior? Does gender, race, or class influence how we approach these questions? The course will consider these questions from an historical perspective, including philosophical, theological and psychological approaches, and then follow the history of ideas from ancient times into contemporary debates. A focus on the diversity theories and perspectives will be emphasized. Topics to be covered may include marriage, reproduction, casual sex, prostitution, pornography, and homosexuality. 3. Prerequisites: PHIL 110 4. Course Objectives: The primary course objectives are: To enable students to use philosophical methods to understand sex and love To enable students to follow the history of ideas regarding sex and love To enable students to understand contemporary debates surrounding sex and love in their diversity To enable students to see the connections between the history of ideas and their contemporary meanings To enable students to use (abstract, philosophical) theories to analyze contemporary debates 5. Student Learning Outcomes The student will be able to: Define the direct and indirect influence of historical thinkers on contemporary issues Define and critically discuss major philosophical issues regarding sex and love and their connections to metaphysics, ethics and epistemology Analyze, explain, and criticize key passages from historical texts regarding the philosophy of sex and love.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction–Plausible, Norms of Warfare: Reducing the Gap
    Introduction – Plausible, Norms of Warfare: Reducing the Gap Between the Normative and the Empirical Ariel Colonomos, Richard Beardsworth To cite this version: Ariel Colonomos, Richard Beardsworth. Introduction – Plausible, Norms of Warfare: Reducing the Gap Between the Normative and the Empirical. European Review of International Studies, CERI- Sciences Po/Canterbury Christ Church University (CCCU), 2020, 7 (2), pp.193 - 202. hal-03082964 HAL Id: hal-03082964 https://hal-sciencespo.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03082964 Submitted on 18 Dec 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. European Review of International Studies 7 (2020) 193-202 Introduction – Plausible, Norms of Warfare: Reducing the Gap Between the Normative and the Empirical Ariel Colonomos CNRS-CERI, Sciences Po, Paris, France [email protected] Richard Beardsworth Politics and International Studies (POLIS), University of Leeds, Leeds, UK [email protected] Abstract This special issue argues in favor of a new approach to the study of norms of warfare, which combines a normative analysis of ethical problems arising in war with an explanatory analysis of the use of force. Norms of warfare go as far back as Antiquity, and their study has followed a long historical path.
    [Show full text]
  • The Problem of Evil in Augustine's Confessions
    University of South Florida Scholar Commons Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate School 2011 The rP oblem of Evil in Augustine's Confessions Edward Matusek University of South Florida, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd Part of the American Studies Commons, and the Philosophy Commons Scholar Commons Citation Matusek, Edward, "The rP oblem of Evil in Augustine's Confessions" (2011). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/3733 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Problem of Evil in Augustine’s Confessions by Edward A. Matusek A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Philosophy College of Arts and Sciences University of South Florida Major Professor: Thomas Williams, Ph.D. Roger Ariew, Ph.D. Joanne Waugh, Ph.D. Charles B. Guignon, Ph.D. Date of Approval: November 14, 2011 Keywords: theodicy, privation, metaphysical evil, Manichaeism, Neo-Platonism Copyright © 2011, Edward A. Matusek i TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract iii Chapter One: Introduction to Augustine’s Confessions and the Present Study 1 Purpose and Background of the Study 2 Literary and Historical Considerations of Confessions 4 Relevance of the Study for Various
    [Show full text]
  • Social Norms and Social Influence Mcdonald and Crandall 149
    Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect Social norms and social influence Rachel I McDonald and Christian S Crandall Psychology has a long history of demonstrating the power and and their imitation is not enough to implicate social reach of social norms; they can hardly be overestimated. To norms. Imitation is common enough in many forms of demonstrate their enduring influence on a broad range of social life — what creates the foundation for culture and society phenomena, we describe two fields where research continues is not the imitation, but the expectation of others for when to highlight the power of social norms: prejudice and energy imitation is appropriate, and when it is not. use. The prejudices that people report map almost perfectly onto what is socially appropriate, likewise, people adjust their A social norm is an expectation about appropriate behav- energy use to be more in line with their neighbors. We review ior that occurs in a group context. Sherif and Sherif [8] say new approaches examining the effects of norms stemming that social norms are ‘formed in group situations and from multiple groups, and utilizing normative referents to shift subsequently serve as standards for the individual’s per- behaviors in social networks. Though the focus of less research ception and judgment when he [sic] is not in the group in recent years, our review highlights the fundamental influence situation. The individual’s major social attitudes are of social norms on social behavior. formed in relation to group norms (pp. 202–203).’ Social norms, or group norms, are ‘regularities in attitudes and Address behavior that characterize a social group and differentiate Department of Psychology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66045, it from other social groups’ [9 ] (p.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 of 3 Ethics: Consequentialism-Utilitarianism Ethics Script: Consequentialism & Utilitarianism Slide 2 {Introduction To
    Ethics Script: Consequentialism & Utilitarianism slide 2 {Introduction to the Theory of Consequentialism} There are two basic principles within the theory of consequentialism: (1) an action’s ethicality depends only on the results of that action, and (2) the more “good” (and less harmful) results an action produces, the better (or more right) the act is. You already know the basic idea behind this concept as “the end justifies the means.” slide 3 {How it Works… and Doesn’t Work} While actions tend to be brief and immediate, the consequences of those actions can have long-term—even permanent—effects. A consequentialist would expect that you (and everyone else) consider the implications of your actions in terms of a “good” or “right” outcome. Consequentialism itself doesn’t define which consequences are “good.” It’s up to you to decide what is right and wrong on a personal basis. Two consequentialists can look at the same choice and completely disagree on the action that should be taken… like in the case of an assisted suicide or how to deal with a pandemic. But they are more likely to agree on what kind of action should be taken in order to help a lost child so some actions are easier to agree on than others. slide 4 {Utilitarianism a Model of Consequentialism and Introduction to Mr. Bentham} The most popular consequentialist model, Utilitarianism, accounts for ambiguities that consequentialism alone does not. Utilitarianism emerged in the early 19th century with British philosopher and “hedonist” Jeremy Bentham, who aimed to assess whether or not Parliament was passing fair and ethical laws at the time.
    [Show full text]
  • What Normative Terms Mean and Why It Matters for Ethical Eory
    What Normative Terms Mean and Why It Matters for Ethical eory* Alex Silk University of Birmingham [email protected] Forthcoming in M. Timmons (Ed.), Oxford Studies in Normative Ethics, Vol. Abstract is paper investigates how inquiry into normative language can improve substantive normative theorizing. First I examine two dimensions along which normative language differs: “strength” and “subjectivity.” Next I show how greater sensitivity to these features of the meaning and use of normative lan- guage can illuminate debates about three issues in ethics: the coherence of moral dilemmas, the possibility of supererogatory acts, and the connection between making a normative judgment and being motivated to act accord- ingly. e paper concludes with several brief reections on the theoretical utility of the distinction — at least so-called — between “normative” and “non- normative” language and judgment. e discussions of these specic linguistic and normative issues can be seen as case studies illustrating the fruitfulness of utilizing resources from philosophy of language for normative theory. Get- ting clearer on the language we use in normative conversation and theorizing can help us diagnose problems with bad arguments and formulate better mo- tivated questions. is can lead to clearer answers and bring into relief new theoretical possibilities and avenues to explore. *anks to Eric Swanson and the audience at the Fih Annual Arizona Normative Ethics Work- shop for discussion, and to two anonymous referees for comments. Contents Introduction Weak and strong necessity Endorsing and non-endorsing uses Dilemmas Supererogation Judgment internalism and “the normative” Conclusion Introduction e strategy of clarifying philosophical questions by investigating the language we use to express them is familiar.
    [Show full text]
  • Eternity and Immortality in Spinoza's Ethics
    Midwest Studies in Philosophy, XXVI (2002) Eternity and Immortality in Spinoza’s Ethics STEVEN NADLER I Descartes famously prided himself on the felicitous consequences of his philoso- phy for religion. In particular, he believed that by so separating the mind from the corruptible body, his radical substance dualism offered the best possible defense of and explanation for the immortality of the soul. “Our natural knowledge tells us that the mind is distinct from the body, and that it is a substance...And this entitles us to conclude that the mind, insofar as it can be known by natural phi- losophy, is immortal.”1 Though he cannot with certainty rule out the possibility that God has miraculously endowed the soul with “such a nature that its duration will come to an end simultaneously with the end of the body,” nonetheless, because the soul (unlike the human body, which is merely a collection of material parts) is a substance in its own right, and is not subject to the kind of decomposition to which the body is subject, it is by its nature immortal. When the body dies, the soul—which was only temporarily united with it—is to enjoy a separate existence. By contrast, Spinoza’s views on the immortality of the soul—like his views on many issues—are, at least in the eyes of most readers, notoriously difficult to fathom. One prominent scholar, in what seems to be a cry of frustration after having wrestled with the relevant propositions in Part Five of Ethics,claims that this part of the work is an “unmitigated and seemingly unmotivated disaster..
    [Show full text]
  • War Rights and Military Virtues: a Philosophical Re-Appraisal of Just War Theory
    The University of Notre Dame Australia ResearchOnline@ND Theses 2014 War rights and military virtues: A philosophical re-appraisal of Just War Theory Matthew T. Beard University of Notre Dame Australia Follow this and additional works at: https://researchonline.nd.edu.au/theses Part of the Philosophy Commons COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA Copyright Regulations 1969 WARNING The material in this communication may be subject to copyright under the Act. Any further copying or communication of this material by you may be the subject of copyright protection under the Act. Do not remove this notice. Publication Details Beard, M. T. (2014). War rights and military virtues: A philosophical re-appraisal of Just War Theory (Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)). University of Notre Dame Australia. https://researchonline.nd.edu.au/theses/96 This dissertation/thesis is brought to you by ResearchOnline@ND. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses by an authorized administrator of ResearchOnline@ND. For more information, please contact [email protected]. War Rights and Military Virtues A Philosophical Re-appraisal of Just War Theory Doctoral Thesis Prepared by Matthew T. Beard School of Philosophy and Theology University of Notre Dame, Australia Supervised by Christian Enemark and Hayden Ramsay Supported by The Morris Research Scholarship Declaration I, Matthew Thomas Beard, declare that this PhD thesis, entitled War Rights and Military Virtues: A Philosophical Re-appraisal of Just War Theory is no more than 100,000 words exclusive of title pages, table of contents, acknowledgements, list of figures, reference list, and footnotes. The thesis is my own original work, prepared for the specific and unique purposes of this academic degree and has not been submitted in whole or part for the awarding of any other academic degree at any institution.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Retributivism Needs Consequentialism: the Rightful Place of Revenge in the Criminal Justice System
    Louisiana State University Law Center LSU Law Digital Commons Journal Articles Faculty Scholarship 2014 Why Retributivism Needs Consequentialism: The Rightful Place of Revenge in the Criminal Justice System Ken Levy Louisiana State University Law Center, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.lsu.edu/faculty_scholarship Part of the Law Commons Repository Citation Levy, Ken, "Why Retributivism Needs Consequentialism: The Rightful Place of Revenge in the Criminal Justice System" (2014). Journal Articles. 67. https://digitalcommons.law.lsu.edu/faculty_scholarship/67 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at LSU Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal Articles by an authorized administrator of LSU Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Forthcoming in Rutgers L. Rev. (spring 2014) Why Retributivism Needs Consequentialism: The Rightful Place of Revenge in the Criminal Justice System KEN LEVY* TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction ..................................................................................................... 2 II. The Main Goals of the Criminal Justice System ....................................... 10 A. The First Primary Goal of the Criminal Justice System: Crime Minimization ................................................................................................. 11 B. The Second Primary Goal of the Criminal Justice System: Retribution ....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Greek and Latin Roots, Prefixes, and Suffixes
    GREEK AND LATIN ROOTS, PREFIXES, AND SUFFIXES This is a resource pack that I put together for myself to teach roots, prefixes, and suffixes as part of a separate vocabulary class (short weekly sessions). It is a combination of helpful resources that I have found on the web as well as some tips of my own (such as the simple lesson plan). Lesson Plan Ideas ........................................................................................................... 3 Simple Lesson Plan for Word Study: ........................................................................... 3 Lesson Plan Idea 2 ...................................................................................................... 3 Background Information .................................................................................................. 5 Why Study Word Roots, Prefixes, and Suffixes? ......................................................... 6 Latin and Greek Word Elements .............................................................................. 6 Latin Roots, Prefixes, and Suffixes .......................................................................... 6 Root, Prefix, and Suffix Lists ........................................................................................... 8 List 1: MEGA root list ................................................................................................... 9 List 2: Roots, Prefixes, and Suffixes .......................................................................... 32 List 3: Prefix List ......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Deconstruction for Critical Theory Handbook
    Deconstruction Johan van der Walt Introduction Deconstruction is a mode of philosophical thinking that is principally associated with the work of the French philosopher Jacques Derrida. Considered from the perspective of the history of philosophical thinking, the crucial move that Derrida’s way of thinking makes is to shift the focus of inquiry away from a direct engagement with the cognitive content of ideas put forward in a text in order to focus, instead, on the way in which the text produces a privileged framework of meaning while excluding others. Instead of engaging in a debate with other philosophers – contemporary or past – about the ideas they articulated in their texts, Derrida commenced to launch inquiries into the way their texts relied on dominant modes of writing (and reading) to produce a certain semantic content and intent while excluding other modes of reading and, consequently, other possible meanings of the text. By focusing on the textuality of texts – instead of on their semantic content – Derrida’s thinking endeavoured to pay attention, not only to that which the text does not say, but also that which it cannot say. The explanation that follows will show that the “method” of deconstruction does not just consist in finding that other meanings of the text are possible or plausible, but, more importantly, in demonstrating that the possibility or plausibility of other meanings – supressed by the organisation of the text – alerts one to the infinite potentiality of meaning that necessarily exceeds the margins of the text and remains unsayable. In other words, by pointing out the instability of the dominant meaning organised by the text, deconstruction alerts one to the unsayable as such, that is, to that which no text can say but on which all texts remain dependent for being able to say what they manage to say.
    [Show full text]