Kiribati Designates Large MPA, to Be Funded by Endowment

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Kiribati Designates Large MPA, to Be Funded by Endowment Vol. 7, No. 9 April 2006 International News and Analysis on Marine Protected Areas Kiribati Designates Large MPA, to Be Funded by Endowment The Pacific island nation of Kiribati (pronounced Kee- nation) has historically ree-bahss) has designated one of the world’s largest insulated the area from The 2006 Subscriber Survey MPAs in a bid to guard against overfishing and climate outside pressures. But change. The nearly uninhabited Phoenix Islands foreign fleets have What do you think of MPA News? Protected Area (PIPA), encompassing 184,700 km2 expressed growing interest with eight atolls and two submerged reef systems, covers in fishing there and the MPA News is designed to serve the global field of an area more than half the size of Germany. Located threat of climate change MPA professionals. To make sure it is doing that midway between Fiji and Hawai’i in the Central Pacific, looms: a bleaching event effectively, we need your feedback. What is MPA the PIPA contains near-pristine coral ecosystems, with occurred in the Phoenix News doing well? How could it be improved? more than 120 species of coral and hundreds of species Islands for the first time in Please tell us. of fish, including the world’s highest population 2003. “With recent The 2006 MPA News Subscriber Survey, consisting densities of Napoleon wrasse, according to scientists. advances in the fishing of 10 quick questions, is available online at industry and impacts of The protected area will be funded through an endow- http://www.mpanews.org global climate change, ment being initiated with private funding from isolation can no longer be Please help us to serve you better. We look Conservation International, a NGO. The endowment relied on to conserve these forward to your comments. Thank you. will finance administration of the protected area and atolls,” says Kiribati also compensate the Kiribati government for lost Sincerely, Environment Minister revenue suffered from cancellation of fishing licenses to Martin Puta Tofinga. foreign fleets. Although a management plan for the site is not expected to be set for another year or so, it is To launch the develop- John B. Davis, Editor anticipated that commercial inshore reef fishing, ment of a management including by foreign vessels, will be banned in the PIPA. plan and the endowment, the Kiribati government signed a memorandum of Subsistence reef fishing by the fewer than 50 residents understanding with two organizations: Conservation of the Phoenix Islands archipelago will be allowed to International (CI) and the New England Aquarium. continue. The PIPA also includes deep water, and it is CI, through its Global Conservation Fund, is financing unclear yet whether commercial fishing for offshore the initiation phase of the PIPA and is beginning Table of Contents pelagics, like tuna, will be allowed. The endowment is capitalization of the endowment, to be expanded with projected to last in perpetuity, assuming management of matching funds from private and public institutions. Kiribati Designates Large the protected area is administered in good faith by the The size of the endowment will depend on the value of MPA, to Be Funded by Kiribati government. the fisheries to be closed, as well as projected PIPA Endowment ................. 1 “If the coral and reefs are protected, then the fish will administration costs; the final figure is being researched. MPA Perspective thrive and grow and bring us benefit,” said Kiribati The New England Aquarium, based in Boston, New Zealand Seafood President Anote Tong, announcing the PIPA designa- Massachusetts, USA, has conducted biological surveys Industry Proposes Huge tion in March in conjunction with the Eighth Confer- in the Phoenix Islands since 2000, and was first to Closures — Cynicism or ence of the Parties to the Convention on Biological initiate talks with the Kiribati government regarding Pragmatism? ............... 3 Diversity (CBD), held in Curitiba, Brazil. “In this way, protection of the ecosystem. The aquarium will all species of fish can be protected so none become depleted continue to provide research support for the PIPA and MPA Perspective or extinct.” The PIPA announcement was accompanied assist with developing its management plan. MPA Management by commitments from other island nations at the CBD Policies in West Africa: Greg Stone, vice president of global marine programs meeting to expand protection for their coastal waters Recommended Guide- for the New England Aquarium, says creating the PIPA (see box, “The Micronesia Challenge”, next page). lines for Balancing is the only way to mitigate and protect reefs from Conservation and climate change. “With climate change, there’s not Development ............... 4 The endowment much you can do for reefs to mitigate on-the-ground The geographic isolation of Kiribati and its Phoenix impacts except for removing all other existing threats,” Notes & News .............. 5 Islands archipelago (one of three island groups in the continued on next page MPA News he says. He adds that because of the healthy fish considering pursuing listing of the Phoenix Islands as a populations and lack of direct human impacts in the UNESCO World Heritage site. Editor-in-Chief Phoenix Islands, the reefs there are recovering quickly Depending on how one defines “marine protected John B. Davis from the 2003 bleaching event. In their excellent area”, the PIPA could be considered the world’s third Project Assistant condition, he says, the Phoenix Islands are essentially a largest MPA, behind only the Great Barrier Reef Maggie Ostdahl baseline reef — a control site. “They offer a valuable Marine Park (Australia) and Northwestern Hawaiian reference point for measuring the impact of climate Editorial Board Islands Coral Reef Ecosystem Reserve (USA). The list change on reef systems there and elsewhere,” he says. Chair - David Fluharty, Ph.D. would exclude areas closed to certain fishing gear, some U.W. School of Marine Affairs The endowment will be similar to ones enacted by CI of which are several times larger. Patrick Christie, Ph.D. to protect South American rainforests. In an essay in The PIPA includes a 60-nm boundary around each of U.W. School of Marine Affairs the October 2005 issue of MPA News, CI personnel its atolls, which in most cases rise no more than Michael Murray described the application of this tool — termed 2 meters above sea level. The protected area comprises Channel Islands National “conservation incentive agreements” — to MPAs 5% of the entire EEZ of Kiribati, the largest atoll nation Marine Sanctuary through the provision of continuous, long-term in the world. Kiribati includes two other, more- Direct correspondence to: MPA financial incentives to conserve marine resources rather populated island groups in addition to the Phoenix News, School of Marine Affairs, than exploit them for short-term gain (“Conservation University of Washington, 3707 Islands. Incentive Agreements As a Tool for Developing and Brooklyn Ave. NE, Seattle, WA 98105, USA. Tel: +1 206 685 1582; Managing MPAs”, MPA News 7:4). The PIPA Websites with more information on the PIPA include: endowment will be overseen by a board of managers Fax: +1 206 543 1417; E-mail: http://neaq2.securesites.net/special/phoenixislands/ [email protected] including CI, the government of Kiribati, and others. http://www.conservation.org/xp/frontlines/protectedareas/ ........ Funding is contingent upon proper PIPA management 03280601.xml MPA News is published monthly by Kiribati. “If protection ever stops, the money goes by Marine Affairs Research and For more information Education (MARE), a 501(c)(3) away,” says Stone. It is anticipated that other national not-for-profit corporation, in governments will assist with management. New Greg Stone, New England Aquarium, Central Wharf, Boston, MA association with the School of Zealand, for example, has indicated its willingness to 02110, USA. Tel: +1 617 973 5229; E-mail: [email protected] Marine Affairs, Univ. of Washington. provide flyovers by enforcement aircraft to guard against All content has been written by the Tukabu Teroroko, Chair, Kiribati Interagency Phoenix Islands MPA News editorial staff unless illegal activity in the Phoenix Islands. Committee, Kiribati. Tel: +686 28507; E-mail: otherwise attributed. dddddd The PIPA will help Kiribati meet international treaty [email protected] Financial support for MPA News is provided in part by grants from: obligations, including the Convention on Biological Sue Miller Taei, Marine Program Manager, Pacific Islands, • David and Lucile Packard Diversity’s protected area goal to create comprehensive, Conservation International, Western Samoa. Tel: +685 21593; E- Foundation; effectively managed, and ecologically representative mail: [email protected] • Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management, National systems of MPAs by 2012. The government is also Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Silver Spring, MD (USA), under the Federal Coastal Zone Management Act; and • Washington Sea Grant The Micronesia Challenge Program, Univ. of Washington, Government leaders in the Micronesia region, spread over 3 achieve, and surpass, having at least 10% of each of its pursuant to NOAA Award No. NA16RG1044. million miles of the Western Pacific, have joined together to ecological regions effectively conserved. Guam Governor pledge to protect 30% of their nearshore marine ecosystems Felix Camacho said conservation would be the key to The views expressed herein are those of the author(s) and should by 2020. Termed “The Micronesia Challenge”, the establishing Micronesia as a world-class tourism destination, not be interpreted as representing commitment is being led by Palau, the Federated States of and would set an example for the rest of the world. Also at the opinions or policies of the Micronesia, the Marshall Islands, and the US territories of the CBD meeting, the Caribbean island nation of Grenada Packard Foundation, NOAA, or NOAA’s sub-agencies. Guam and Northern Marianas Islands. It was formally pledged to put 25% of its nearshore marine resources under announced at the Eighth Conference of the Parties to the effective conservation by 2020.
Recommended publications
  • 5. Ecological Impacts of the 2015/16 El Niño in the Central Equatorial Pacific
    5. ECOLOGICAL IMPACTS OF THE 2015/16 EL NIÑO IN THE CENTRAL EQUATORIAL PACIFIC RUSSELL E. BRAINARD, THOMAS OLIVER, MICHAEL J. MCPHADEN, ANNE COHEN, ROBErtO VENEGAS, ADEL HEENAN, BERNARDO VARGAS-ÁNGEL, RANDI ROtjAN, SANGEETA MANGUBHAI, ELIZABETH FLINT, AND SUSAN A. HUNTER Coral reef and seabird communities in the central equatorial Pacific were disrupted by record-setting sea surface temperatures, linked to an anthropogenically forced trend, during the 2015/16 El Niño. Introduction. In the equatorial Pacific Ocean, the El Niño were likely unprecedented and unlikely to El Niño–Southern Oscillation substantially affects have occurred naturally, thereby reflecting an anthro- atmospheric and oceanic conditions on interannual pogenically forced trend. Lee and McPhaden (2010) time scales. The central and eastern equatorial earlier reported increasing amplitudes of El Niño Pacific fluctuates between anomalously warm and events in Niño-4 that is also evident in our study nutrient-poor El Niño and anomalously cool and region (Figs. 5.1b,c). nutrient-rich La Niña conditions (Chavez et al. 1999; Remote islands in the CEP (Fig. 5.1a), including Jar- McPhaden et al. 2006; Gierach et al. 2012). El Niño vis Island (0°22′S, 160°01′W), Howland Island (0°48′N, events are characterized by an eastward expansion of 176°37′W), Baker Island (0°12′N, 176°29′W), and the Indo-Pacific warm pool (IPWP) and deepening Kanton Island (2°50′S, 171°40′W), support healthy, of the thermocline and nutricline in response resilient coral reef ecosystems characterized by excep- to weakening trade winds (Strutton and Chavez tionally high biomass of planktivorous and piscivorous 2000; Turk et al.
    [Show full text]
  • ISO Country Codes
    COUNTRY SHORT NAME DESCRIPTION CODE AD Andorra Principality of Andorra AE United Arab Emirates United Arab Emirates AF Afghanistan The Transitional Islamic State of Afghanistan AG Antigua and Barbuda Antigua and Barbuda (includes Redonda Island) AI Anguilla Anguilla AL Albania Republic of Albania AM Armenia Republic of Armenia Netherlands Antilles (includes Bonaire, Curacao, AN Netherlands Antilles Saba, St. Eustatius, and Southern St. Martin) AO Angola Republic of Angola (includes Cabinda) AQ Antarctica Territory south of 60 degrees south latitude AR Argentina Argentine Republic America Samoa (principal island Tutuila and AS American Samoa includes Swain's Island) AT Austria Republic of Austria Australia (includes Lord Howe Island, Macquarie Islands, Ashmore Islands and Cartier Island, and Coral Sea Islands are Australian external AU Australia territories) AW Aruba Aruba AX Aland Islands Aland Islands AZ Azerbaijan Republic of Azerbaijan BA Bosnia and Herzegovina Bosnia and Herzegovina BB Barbados Barbados BD Bangladesh People's Republic of Bangladesh BE Belgium Kingdom of Belgium BF Burkina Faso Burkina Faso BG Bulgaria Republic of Bulgaria BH Bahrain Kingdom of Bahrain BI Burundi Republic of Burundi BJ Benin Republic of Benin BL Saint Barthelemy Saint Barthelemy BM Bermuda Bermuda BN Brunei Darussalam Brunei Darussalam BO Bolivia Republic of Bolivia Federative Republic of Brazil (includes Fernando de Noronha Island, Martim Vaz Islands, and BR Brazil Trindade Island) BS Bahamas Commonwealth of the Bahamas BT Bhutan Kingdom of Bhutan
    [Show full text]
  • Occurrence of the Genus Sargassum (Phaeophyta) on Two Pacific Atolls'
    Occurrence of the Genus Sargassum (Phaeophyta) on Two Pacific Atolls' ROY T. TSUDA Marine Laboratory, University of Guam, P. 0. Box EK, Agana, Guam 969/0 In a discussion of the distribution of Sargassum on Pacific islands, Doty (I 954) hypothesized that the genus Sargassum may be restricted to only high islands, i. e., islands of igneous origin. The hypothesis was based on the few records of this genus from low islands, i. e., islands of limestone composition, in the literature and from personal observations in the field as well as from studies of herbarium specimens. The only records were the presence of Sargassum on two low islands in the leeward Hawaiian Islands. Reinbold (1899) and Lemmerman (1905) report S. polyphyllum J. Ag. from Laysan Islands. Howe (1934) reports both S. vulgare J. Ag. and S . piluliferum (Turn.) C. Ag. from Pearl and Hermes Reef. Since 1954, floristic accounts have appeared in the literature based on algae collected from Pacific atolls. Sargassum was not among the algae collected from six atolls in the Gilbert Islands (Tsuda, 1964). Dawson (1956, 1957) did not report Sargassum from any of the atolls in the Marshall Islands. Trono (1969) reported Sargassum only from the high islands of Palau, Truk, Ponape and Kusaie; none was reported from any of the atolls in the Caroline Islands. Sargassum is quite abundant in the high islands of Guam (Tsuda, 1972) and the other northern Mariana Islands (William J. Tobias, personal communications). Sargassum was not found on Johnston Atoll (Buggeln and Tsuda, 1969) nor was it found on Howland Island and Baker Island (Tsuda and Trono, 1968).
    [Show full text]
  • Download 84.16 KB
    ASIAN DEVELOPMENT BANK TAR: KIR 37374 TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE TO THE REPUBLIC OF KIRIBATI FOR SUPPORTING LAND USE MANAGEMENT ON KIRITIMATI (CHRISTMAS) ISLAND December 2003 CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (as of 31 October 2003) Currency Unit – Australian dollar (A$) A$1.00 = $0.721 $1.00 = A$1.387 ABBREVIATIONS ADB – Asian Development Bank AusAID – Australian Agency for International Development DLUP – detailed land use plan GIS – geographic information system GLUP – general land use plan KLLPB – Kiritimati Local Land Planning Board LAPLIS – Line and Phoenix Land Information System LINNIX − Line and Phoenix (group islands) LMDK – Land Management Division, Kiritimati MCIC – Ministry of Commerce, Industry and Cooperatives MELAD – Ministry of Environment, Lands and Agricultural Development TA – technical assistance NOTES (i) The fiscal year (FY) of the Government ends on 31 December. FY before a calendar year denotes the year in which the fiscal year ends, e.g., FY2000 ends on 31 December 2000. (ii) In this report, "$" refers to US dollars. This report was prepared by E. Brotoisworo, Pacific Department. I. INTRODUCTION 1. Advisory technical assistance (TA) for supporting land use management on Kiritimati (Christmas) Island was included in the Asian Development Bank (ADB) 2003 nonlending program for Kiribati after the country consultation mission in May 2003 and the Government confirmed its request to include the TA grant from ADB.1 The TA will promote the development of the island as a new growth center in the eastern part of the country. A Fact-Finding Mission visited Kiritimati Island during 13-19 October and Tarawa during 26-29 October 2003 and held consultations with Government officials, the private sector, and an assistance agency (Australian Agency for International Development [AusAID]).
    [Show full text]
  • Insights from the Remote Phoenix Islands Protected Area by Lillian
    Governing Large Marine Protected Areas: Insights from the Remote Phoenix Islands Protected Area by Lillian Mitchell A thesis presented to The University of Guelph In partial fulfillment of requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Geography Guelph, Ontario, Canada © Lillian Mitchell, May, 2017 ABSTRACT Governing Large Marine Protected Areas: Insights from the Remote Phoenix Islands Protected Area Lillian Mitchell Advisor: University of Guelph, 2017 Dr. Noella Gray Scholars and practitioners have increasingly identified large marine protected areas (LMPAs) as an effective means of protecting marine life. But despite this recognition, some scientists argue that the political emphasis of LMPAs is undermining the ecological value of these sites and leading to poor social justice outcomes. In attendance to these discourses, this research explores the decision-making processes of LMPAs through a case study analysis of the Phoenix Islands Protected Area (PIPA). In the summer of 2016 I conducted participant observation, document analysis and interviewed 48 actors about PIPA’s governance structure and its outcomes. Through this process, key themes regarding sovereignty, use of science in decision-making, the role of non-state actors, and communication of benefits emerged. Findings indicate that although PIPA is a remote, uninhabited area, even in remote spaces it is important to consider social benefits. As such, this case signals LMPAs are not the low-hanging fruit of conservation. Keywords: large marine protected areas, Kiribati, Phoenix Islands, oceans governance, sovereignty, benefits, conservation. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS My first acknowledgement is duly dedicated to the people who took part in this study. These next 100+ pages are filled with their thoughts, struggles and feelings and as such this thesis would not exist without their willingness to share their experiences and knowledge with me.
    [Show full text]
  • Coral Reef Condition Status Report for the Pacific Remote Islands
    Coral reef condition: 2018 A status report for the GOOD PACIFIC REMOTE ISLANDS Coral reefs are important Healthy coral reefs are among the most biologically diverse, culturally significant, and economically valuable ecosystems Biodiversity is a measure of the variety of living on Earth. They are nursery grounds for fish and other organisms. High biodiversity of corals, fish, and other organisms, provide food and jobs for people, and protect organisms helps keep the ecosystem in balance and coasts against erosion around the world. makes it resilient to environmental impacts. Although we measure biodiversity, the science is not yet The U.S. Pacific Remote Islands encompass seven islands mature enough to score biodiversity in an area. As the and atolls scattered across the central Pacific Ocean science and analysis progress, we will look to include that represent relatively pristine, beautiful, and wild coral biodiversity scores in future status reports. reef ecosystems. Howland, Baker, and Jarvis Islands are geographically situated near the equator. Kingman Reef and Palmyra Atoll are north of Jarvis Island, and Wake Atoll and Johnston Atoll are farther north and west of Kingman Reef. Each of the islands has a different land area, reef area, and population (see figure below). In general, the Pacific Remote Islands are just that—remote, relatively unimpacted islands with diverse coral and fish populations and low human influence. The condition of the reefs can be used as a baseline from which to draw conclusions about potential impacts, such as coral bleaching, overfishing, and climate change. These islands present an opportunity to study how sea level rise, ocean acidification, and warming waters affect coral reefs in the absence of substantial human influence.
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Mariana Islands Drug Threat Assessment
    If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov. October 2003 Northern Mariana Islands Drug Threat Assessment National Drug Intelligence Center 319 WASHINGTON STREET • 5TH FLOOR • JOHNSTOWN, PA 15901-1622 • (814) 532-4601 U.S. Department of Justice NDIC publications are available on the following web sites: ADNET http://ndicosa LEO home.leo.gov/lesig/ndic RISS ndic.riss.net INTERNET www.usdoj.gov/ndic 092503 U.S. Department of Justice National Drug Intelligence Center Product No. 2003-S0388MP-001 October 2003 Northern Mariana Islands Drug Threat Assessment National Drug Intelligence Center 319 Washington Street, 5th Floor Johnstown, PA 15901-1622 (814) 532-4601 Preface This report is a strategic assessment that addresses the status and outlook of the drug threat to the Northern Mariana Islands. Analytical judgment determined the threat posed by each drug type or category, taking into account the most current quantitative and qualitative information on availability, demand, production or cultivation, transportation, and distribution, as well as the effects of a particular drug on abusers and society as a whole. While NDIC sought to incorporate the latest available information, a time lag often exists between collection and publication of data, particularly demand-related data sets. NDIC anticipates that this drug threat assessment will be useful to policymakers, law enforcement personnel, and treatment providers at the federal, state, and local levels because it draws upon a broad range of information sources to describe and analyze the drug threat to the Northern Mariana Islands. Cover Photo © Stockbyte National Drug Intelligence Center Northern Mariana Islands Drug Threat Assessment Executive Summary Illicit drugs are smuggled into the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands (CNMI) for local distribution.
    [Show full text]
  • A Brief History of Human Activities in the US Pacific Remote Islands
    MARINE CONSERVATION INSTITUTE A Brief History of Human Activities in the US Pacific Remote Islands Shelly Magier Lance Morgan Glen Ellen, California August 2012 1 Table of Contents Preface ................................................................................................................................................... 5 Terms of Reference .............................................................................................................................. 5 Acknowledgments ................................................................................................................................ 6 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................... 7 Early human expansion into the Pacific Remote Islands Area ......................................................... 8 European expeditions across the Pacific Remote Islands Area .......................................................10 Whaling comes to the central Pacific Ocean .................................................................................... 11 Guano rush .......................................................................................................................................... 13 Millinery feather trade ........................................................................................................................ 15 United States colonization of the Equatorial Islands .....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • L:\0400 Hts with Chile and Singapore\Statannx.Wpd
    Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (2004) Annotated for Statistical Reporting Purposes STATISTICAL ANNEXES Annex A -- Schedule C, Classification of Country and Territory Designations for U.S. Import Statistics Annex B -- International Standard Country Codes Annex C -- Schedule D, Customs District and Port Codes Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (2004) Annotated for Statistical Reporting Purposes ANNEX A Schedule C - Classification of Country and Territory Designations for U.S. Foreign Trade Statistics Schedule C contains the country and territory designations for use in compiling the U.S. export and import statistics. These designations should be shown in all cases where statistical information is required. The first part of this schedule contains the country designations arranged in numeric order by continent and listed in sequence within each continent generally from north to south and west to east. Abbreviated country designations, which are used in lieu of complete country names in some foreign trade reports, are also shown. The second part contains a listing in alphabetical arrangement of the countries, territories, etc., with their numeric codes. The names of the entities listed are generally the conventional spellings as approved by the U.S. Board on Geographic Names. Revisions to Schedule C will be announced in the form of "special notices" to data users, as Public Bulletins to Schedule B, Statistical Classification of Domestic and Foreign Commodities Exported from the United States, and as supplements to the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States Annotated for statistical purposes (HTS). HTS also includes a list of International Standard (ISO) Country Codes to be used by importers to report country of origin.
    [Show full text]
  • Atoll Restoration in the Phoenix Islands, Kiribati: 7 Survey Results in November–December 2009
    Atolll Restoration in the Phoenix Islands, Kiribati: Survey Results November–December 2009 JANUARY 2011 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION LESSONS LEARNED TECHNICAL SERIES 7 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION LESSONS LEARNED TECHNICAL SERIES Atoll Restoration in the Phoenix Islands, Kiribati: 7 Survey Results in November–December 2009 Biodiversity Conservation Lessons Learned Technical Series is published by: Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund (CEPF) and Conservation International Pacific Islands Program (CI-Pacific) PO Box 2035, Apia, Samoa T: + 685 21593 E: [email protected] W: www.conservation.org Conservation International Pacific Islands Program. 2011. Biodiversity Conservation Lessons Learned Technical Series 7: Atolll Restoration in the Phoenix Islands, Kiribati: Survey Results in November– December 2009. Conservation International, Apia, Samoa Authors: Ray Pierce, Nautonga Anterea, Glen Coulston, Clea Gardiner, Louise Shilton, Katareti Taabu, Graham Wragg Design/Production: Joanne Aitken, The Little Design Company, www.thelittledesigncompany.com Series Editors: James Atherton and Leilani Duffy, Conservation International Pacific Islands Program Conservation International is a private, non-profit organization exempt from federal income tax under section 501c(3) of the Internal Revenue Code. ISBN 978-982-9130-07-5 © 2011 Conservation International All rights reserved. OUR MISSION Building upon a strong foundation of science, partnership and field demonstration, CI empowers societies to responsibly and sustainably care for nature for the well-being of humanity This publication is available electronically from Conservation International’s website: www.conservation.org ABOUT THE BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION LESSONS LEARNED TECHNICAL SERIES This document is part of a technical report series on conservation projects funded by the Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund (CEPF) and the Conservation International Pacific Islands Program (CI-Pacific).
    [Show full text]
  • Phoenix Islands Protected Area Climate Change Vulnerability Assessment and Management
    Phoenix Islands Protected Area Climate Change Vulnerability Assessment and Management Contributing Authors: David Obura, Simon Donner, Sheila Walsh, Sangeeta Mangubhai, and Randi Rotjan Last updated: January 18, 2016 p. 2 of 35 © 2012 New England Aquarium All rights reserved. This publication may not be reproduced in whole or in part and in any form without the permission of the copyright holders. To obtain permission, contact the New England Aquarium and Conservation International. This document should be cited as: Obura D, Donner SD, Walsh S, Mangubhai S, Rotjan R. Living document. Phoenix Islands Protected Area climate change vulnerability assessment and management, Report to the New England Aquarium, Boston, USA. 35 pp. Updated January 18, 2016 p. 3 of 35 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Executive Summary ........................................................................................................ 5 2. Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 7 3. Objectives of the Study................................................................................................... 8 4. Vulnerability Assessment: .............................................................................................. 8 4.1. PIPA – status and management ................................................................................. 8 4.2. Past climate and ocean variability .............................................................................. 9 4.2.1. Climate
    [Show full text]
  • Self-Determination and Self-Governance for Communities Relocated Across International Borders: the Quest for Banaban Independence
    international journal on minority and group rights 24 (2017) 428-466 brill.com/ijgr Self-determination and Self-governance for Communities Relocated across International Borders: The Quest for Banaban Independence Jane McAdam Scientia Professor of Law, Director of the Andrew & Renata Kaldor Centre for International Refugee Law, Faculty of Law, University of Sydney, Australia Abstract In 1945, the small Banaban community of Ocean Island (Banaba) in present-day Kiri- bati was relocated to Rabi Island in Fiji. The Balabans were ostensibly moved due to irreversible damage done to Ocean Island during Japanese occupation in the Second World War. However, this was largely a convenient excuse to facilitate the wholesale phosphate mining of the island by the British Phosphate Commission, a consortium of the British, Australian and New Zealand governments. The Banaban relocation pro- vides a rare example of a whole community seeking to re-establish itself in another State. This article charts the Banabans’ bids for independence during the 1960–70s, revealing novel responses to complex questions of self-determination and governance, including legal status, nationality, political representation, and rights to land and re- sources. While their experience cannot be universalised, it is relevant to contemporary deliberations about the possible future relocation of Pacific communities impacted by climate change. * This research was funded by an Australian Research Council Future Fellowship. Thank you to Sophie Duxson, Catie Gilchrist and Henry Hawthorne
    [Show full text]