DOCSLIB.ORG

A Different Approach to Cosmology: from a Static Universe Through the Big Bang Towards Reality F

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Different Approach to Cosmology: from a Static Universe Through the Big Bang Towards Reality F Cambridge University Press 0521019265 - A Different Approach to Cosmology: From a Static Universe through the Big Bang towards Reality F. Hoyle, G. Burbidge and J. V. Narlikar Frontmatter More information A DIFFERENT APPROACH TO COSMOLOGY This is a different kind of book about cosmology, a ®eld of major interest to professional astronomers, physicists, and the general public. All research in cosmology adopts one model of the universe, the hot big-bang model. But Fred Hoyle, Geoffrey Burbidge and Jayant Narlikar take a different approach. Starting with the beginnings of modern cosmology, they then conduct a wide ranging and deep review of the observations made from 1945 to the present day. Here they challenge many conventional interpretations. The latter part of the book presents the authors' own account of the present status of observations and how they should be explained. The controversial theme is that the dependency on the hot big-bang model has led to an unwarranted rejection of alternative cosmological models. Writing from the heart, with passion and punch, these three cosmologists make a powerful case for viewing the universe in a different light. Sir Fred Hoyle held the Plumian Chair of Astronomy at the University of Cambridge 1958±72. Geoffrey Burbidge is at the Center for Astrophysics and Space Sciences, University of California, San Diego. He has held positions at the California Institute of Technology, the University of Chicago, and Harvard University and was Director of the Kitt Peak National Observatory 1978±84. Jayant Narlikar is with the Inter-University Centre for Astronomy and Astrophysics, Pune, India. © Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 0521019265 - A Different Approach to Cosmology: From a Static Universe through the Big Bang towards Reality F. Hoyle, G. Burbidge and J. V. Narlikar Frontmatter More information A DIFFERENT APPROACH TO COSMOLOGY From a staticuniverse through the big bang towards reality F. HOYLE G. BURBIDGE Center for Astrophysics and Space Sciences, University of California, San Diego AND J. V. NARLIKAR Inter-University Centre for Astronomy and Astrophysics, Pune © Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 0521019265 - A Different Approach to Cosmology: From a Static Universe through the Big Bang towards Reality F. Hoyle, G. Burbidge and J. V. Narlikar Frontmatter More information CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS Cambridge, New York, Melbourne, Madrid, Cape Town, Singapore, São Paulo Cambridge University Press The Edinburgh Building, Cambridge CB2 2RU, UK Published in the United States of America by Cambridge University Press, New York www.cambridge.org Information on this title: www.cambridge.org/9780521662239 © F. Hoyle, G. Burbidge and J.V. Narlikar 2000 This publication is in copyright. Subject to statutory exception and to the provisions of relevant collective licensing agreements, no reproduction of any part may take place without the written permission of Cambridge University Press. First published 2000 Reprinted 2000(twice), 2001 This digitally printed first paperback version 2005 A catalogue record for this publication is available from the British Library Library of Congress Cataloguing in Publication data Hoyle, Fred, Sir. A different approach to cosmology: from a static universe through the big bang towards reality / F. Hoyle, G. Burbidge and J.V. Narlikar. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references. ISBN 0 521 66223 0 1. Cosmology. I. Burbidge, Geoffrey, R. II. Narlikar, Jayant Vishnu, 1938– . III. Title. QB981.H754 2000 523.1–dc21 99-15821 CIP ISBN-13 978-0-521-66223-9 hardback ISBN-10 0-521-66223-0 hardback ISBN-13 978-0-521-01926-2 paperback ISBN-10 0-521-01926-5 paperback © Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 0521019265 - A Different Approach to Cosmology: From a Static Universe through the Big Bang towards Reality F. Hoyle, G. Burbidge and J. V. Narlikar Frontmatter More information Contents page Preface vii Acknowledgements x Chapter 1 Introduction 1 Chapter 2 Early relativisticcosmology 5 Chapter 3 The observational revolution 17 Chapter 4 The observational trail 1931±56, the determination of Ho and the age dilemma 27 Chapter 5 Changing times, 1945±65: new techniques and new people 45 Chapter 6 The extension of the redshift±apparent magnitude diagram to faint galaxies 1956±95 55 Chapter 7 The classical steady-state cosmological model and its observational tests 65 Chapter 8 The cosmic microwave background ± an historical account 79 Chapter 9 The origin of the light elements 95 Chapter 10 A new primordial calculation of Y and of D/H 107 Chapter 11 The new observational evidence and its interpretation: (a) quasi-stellar objects and redshifts 117 Chapter 12 The new observational evidence and its interpretation: (b) ejection phenomena and energetics 163 Chapter 13 Modern Friedmann cosmology 169 Chapter 14 Standard cosmology 175 Chapter 15 New cosmological models 189 Chapter 16 The observations explained in terms of the quasi-steady-state model 197 v © Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 0521019265 - A Different Approach to Cosmology: From a Static Universe through the Big Bang towards Reality F. Hoyle, G. Burbidge and J. V. Narlikar Frontmatter More information vi Contents Chapter 17 The intrinsicredshift problem 229 Chapter 18 Creation centers and black holes 239 Chapter 19 Modern observations of faint galaxies and related objects 251 Chapter 20 The large-scale distribution of matter 275 Chapter 21 A brief account of the radiation ®elds in the universe ± the observations and their interpretation 303 Chapter 22 A summary of the material contained in the previous chapters 311 Chapter 23 Some unsolved problems 321 References 339 Index 351 © Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 0521019265 - A Different Approach to Cosmology: From a Static Universe through the Big Bang towards Reality F. Hoyle, G. Burbidge and J. V. Narlikar Frontmatter More information Preface This is a different kind of book about cosmology. In the past 10 or 15 years, there has been a great spate of textbooks, monographs and popular books on this subject. There is no question but that cosmology has developed into a major topicof study for astronomers, physicistsand laymen alike. The reasons for this are not hard to ®nd. We are all keenly interested in where we came from and where we are going, and cosmology, the study of the whole universe, is supposed to give us the answers to these basicquestions. In this sense it has much the same attraction for many as does religion. Both have been dominated in the past by a small number of facts and large mea- sures of belief. Some genuine progress in cosmology has come, however, mostly from advances in observational astronomy leading to new informa- tion being obtained at an increasing rate in the past 40 years. These advances have nearly all come from advances in technology at opti- cal wavelengths, and investigations of the universe at radio, infrared, and ultraviolet frequencies, and at X-ray and -ray energies. Naturally this has led to a huge increase in the number of scientists in the ®eld, and to much larger sums of money being required. This is inevitable, but it has a downside. For example, physicists with no background in astronomy have moved into cosmology in large numbers. However, without knowledge of what has gone before, there is always a lack of perspective, and this shows up very strongly when any attempt is made to consider alternative explanations of what are often considered to be well-established facts. Also, astrophysics and cosmology is now big science, which requires large sums of money to support it. The major sources of funds are National Government Agencies, such as the National Science Foundation and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration in the USA. The agencies providing the money then make a considerable impact on the way we do science. For example, if you are funded by NASA, you are vii © Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 0521019265 - A Different Approach to Cosmology: From a Static Universe through the Big Bang towards Reality F. Hoyle, G. Burbidge and J. V. Narlikar Frontmatter More information viii Preface expected to engage in a great deal of publicity and media hype. A fact of life which is well known to the professionals, but which has probably not yet been digested by the world at large, is that the effort and propaganda required to get a major instrument funded ± say the Hubble Space Telescope, or the Cosmic Background Explorer Satellite (COBE) ± requires that before the instruments can be built, extravagant claims must be made about what we shall ®nd. Not surprisingly, when these instruments eventually work, we get a succession of even stronger claims to the effect that what was expected has indeed been found. Some of the claims are amazing even to those who work in the ®eld, e.g. about the microwave background radiation and its ¯uctuations: `They have found the Holy Grail of Cosmology', Dr Michael Turner, University of Chicago. `Well, if you are a religious person, it's like seeing the face of God', Dr George Smoot, University of California, Berkeley. In an era when serious scientists can take such an approach, there is no room for the discovery of phenomena which are not already expected. Those few scientists who want to look for things that they may not be able to explain simply cannot get telescope time. The people who assign observing time on the telescopes using the so-called peer review system demand that you explain beforehand what you will ®nd. And those who do ®nd such phenomena by accident mostly can be relied on to be so conformist that they put them aside. And, of course, if you know little of the history of science, and particularly if you are a particle physicist, you are con®dent that there is nothing to learn from astronomy about fundamental physics.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Professor Margaret Burbidge Obituary Trailblazing Astronomer Hailed As ‘Lady Stardust’ Who Became the First Woman Director of the Royal Greenwich Observatory
    OBITUARY Professor Margaret Burbidge obituary Trailblazing astronomer hailed as ‘Lady Stardust’ who became the first woman director of the Royal Greenwich Observatory Wednesday April 08 2020, 12.01am, The Times Margaret Burbidge showed how heavier elements are produced from lighter ones in stars AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF PHYSICS/SCIENCE PHOTO LIBRARY In August 1944 Margaret Burbidge, then a young astronomer driven by a thirst for knowledge that would later define her, was studying for her PhD thesis. Her subject was a star called Gamma Cassiopeiae and she was not going to allow the Second World War to stand in her way. Each evening she would travel from the family home close to Hampstead Heath to the University of London Observatory at Mill Hill Park and open up the telescope named after its donor, JG Wilson. She would then spend hours sitting in the cramped and cold space below it, alone with her view of the stars. At that time the Luftwaffe was sending doodlebug flying bombs across the Channel to terrorise the capital but Burbidge ignored the danger. On the night of August 3, her log notes that shortly before 10pm, just after she had opened up the telescope, a flying bomb exploded so close to the observatory that the reverberations from the impact shifted the star out of the telescope’s field of vision. Undeterred she started her observations again a few minutes later only for another doodlebug to explode, this time farther away. Although the star was temporarily lost again she quickly recovered it and completed her observations. “Those nights, standing or sitting on the ladder in the dome of the Wilson reflector .
    [Show full text]
  • William A. Fowler Papers
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/kt2d5nb7kj No online items Guide to the Papers of William A. Fowler, 1917-1994 Processed by Nurit Lifshitz, assisted by Charlotte Erwin, Laurence Dupray, Carlo Cossu and Jennifer Stine. Archives California Institute of Technology 1200 East California Blvd. Mail Code 015A-74 Pasadena, CA 91125 Phone: (626) 395-2704 Fax: (626) 793-8756 Email: [email protected] URL: http://archives.caltech.edu © 2003 California Institute of Technology. All rights reserved. Guide to the Papers of William A. Consult repository 1 Fowler, 1917-1994 Guide to the Papers of William A. Fowler, 1917-1994 Collection number: Consult repository Archives California Institute of Technology Pasadena, California Contact Information: Archives California Institute of Technology 1200 East California Blvd. Mail Code 015A-74 Pasadena, CA 91125 Phone: (626) 395-2704 Fax: (626) 793-8756 Email: [email protected] URL: http://archives.caltech.edu Processed by: Nurit Lifshitz, assisted by Charlotte Erwin, Laurence Dupray, Carlo Cossu and Jennifer Stine Date Completed: June 2000 Encoded by: Francisco J. Medina. Derived from XML/EAD encoded file by the Center for History of Physics, American Institute of Physics as part of a collaborative project (1999) supported by a grant from the National Endowment for the Humanities. © 2003 California Institute of Technology. All rights reserved. Descriptive Summary Title: William A. Fowler papers, Date (inclusive): 1917-1994 Collection number: Consult repository Creator: Fowler, William A., 1911-1995 Extent: 94 linear feet Repository: California Institute of Technology. Archives. Pasadena, California 91125 Abstract: These papers document the career of William A. Fowler, who served on the physics faculty at California Institute of Technology from 1939 until 1982.
    [Show full text]
  • Chemical Elements in the Universe: Origin and Evolution
    J. Astrophys. Astr. (2020) 41:31 Ó Indian Academy of Sciences https://doi.org/10.1007/s12036-020-09662-7Sadhana(0123456789().,-volV)FT3](0123456789().,-volV) Editorial Chemical elements in the Universe: Origin and evolution The year 1869 is considered as the year of formulation determine the composition of this matter in terms of of the Periodic System by Dmitri Mendeleev. The the elements and their isotopes from helium to ura- year 2019 was the 150th anniversary of the Periodic nium? Is the history of the matter hidden in the Table of Chemical Elements and has therefore been abundance distribution of the observed stellar yields? proclaimed the ‘International Year of the Periodic What is the history of the peculiar and abnormal Table of Chemical Elements (IYPT 2019)’ by the abundances observed in some stars? United Nations General Assembly and UNESCO. As stated in ‘Synthesis of the Elements in Stars’, a An international conference was organized by landmark scientific paper written by Margaret Bur- Indian Institute of Astrophysics (IIA) for four days, bidge, Geoffrey Burbidge, William A. Fowler and starting 16 December 2019, to celebrate the 150 years Fred Hoyle, published in Reviews of Modern Physics of the Periodic Table. The objective of the conference in 1957, to attempt to understand the sequence of titled ‘Chemical elements in the Universe: Origin and events leading to the formation of the elements it is evolution’ was to explore and explain the origin, necessary to study the so-called universal or cosmic evolution, and abundance of all the chemical elements abundance curve. Is this abundance curve universal? in the universe, thus celebrating 150 years of the What is the main source of elements that we observe? Periodic Table.
    [Show full text]
  • Radio Astronomy Institute"-Radioscience Laboratory, Stanford Univefsity - Frank D
    Up 1h~ {~Ji()}Oec41.,! t;7/JI~,.rt5 vel ,J-~cpt:fT ~)11. I ~ SqP1~ /? /lA.f "'6~n~ ~ 6V"C~Mk';, .-.If?t)J M4fer Z,I/ lCJop.r - ~.t'1 ..r I'e-t ".r . !l4'C~1/ ,-1"1/}'/ , 70. f!ql'~ ~ N.~ - 1. .. I. r--/,./r ~ ~ J ! "c ~r~1H ,-~/~ POT- SHors NO · IISI Don't take the -Pr'esent m oment too sertousld;J gt ~"n' be h ere for to~. :TABLE b: SCORECARD ;1Lt. ,A. ,Never /yery REPORT Numbel' of Number i* Operation Number in operation Number eventually Number 'eventually unlikely Identifiable ~ 15 yr *fter report ,;;; 15 yr after report built with built with Items with mostly federal with mostly other ' mostly federal mostly other Requested funding , fundingCs tate, funding funding ptiyate, foreign) Whitford 13 6 0 0 , 1 6 Greenstein 21 5 (+1 similar) 2' 4 1 8 Fie ld 21 3 (+2 similar) 2 3 2 9 Baheall 29 11 6 5 () 7 McKee-Taylor 23 8 1 5 3 6 TOTAL 106 33 (::t, 3 similar) 11 17 7 36 /" PANEL ON ASTRONOMICAL FACILITIES A. E. W bittw:d.. Chairman, Lick ObsefvatofY, University of California R. N. lJrqcewell, Radio Astronomy Institute"-Radioscience Laboratory, Stanford Univefsity - Frank D. Drake, Department of Astronomy, Cornell Univefsity Frederick T. Haddock, Jr., Radio Astronomy Observatory, University of Michigan ,..-----William Liller, Department of Astronomy, Harvard University W. W. Morgan, Yerkes Observatory, University of Chicago Bruce H. Rule, California Institute of Technology · ·-~\llan R. Sandage, Mt. Wilson and Palomar Observatories, California Institute of Technology, Carnegie Institution of Washington Whit£ODd - publ .
    [Show full text]
  • Stellar Nucleosynthesis
    Stellar nucleosynthesis Stellar nucleosynthesis is the creation (nucleosynthesis) of chemical elements by nuclear fusion reactions within stars. Stellar nucleosynthesis has occurred since the original creation of hydrogen, helium and lithium during the Big Bang. As a predictive theory, it yields accurate estimates of the observed abundances of the elements. It explains why the observed abundances of elements change over time and why some elements and their isotopes are much more abundant than others. The theory was initially proposed by Fred Hoyle in 1946,[1] who later refined it in 1954.[2] Further advances were made, especially to nucleosynthesis by neutron capture of the elements heavier than iron, by Margaret Burbidge, Geoffrey Burbidge, William Alfred Fowler and Hoyle in their famous 1957 B2FH paper,[3] which became one of the most heavily cited papers in astrophysics history. Stars evolve because of changes in their composition (the abundance of their constituent elements) over their lifespans, first by burning hydrogen (main sequence star), then helium (red giant star), and progressively burning higher elements. However, this does not by itself significantly alter the abundances of elements in the universe as the elements are contained within the star. Later in its life, a low-mass star will slowly eject its atmosphere via stellar wind, forming a planetary nebula, while a higher–mass star will eject mass via a sudden catastrophic event called a supernova. The term supernova nucleosynthesis is used to describe the creation of elements during the explosion of a massive star or white dwarf. The advanced sequence of burning fuels is driven by gravitational collapse and its associated heating, resulting in the subsequent burning of carbon, oxygen and silicon.
    [Show full text]
  • The Present and Future Sun & the S-Process
    The Present and Future Sun & the s-Process Brian Fields U. of Illinois TALENT School, MSU, May 2014 The pp-II, pp-III Chains Other main pp chains: different 3He fate 7Be branching key: e capture rate ∼ 1000× p capture rate • 7Be: 15% of ν production • 8B ∼ 0.02% of ν production The CNOThe Cycle CNO Cycle pre-existing C, N, O act as 4p→4He catalyst + 12 (p,γ) 13 e νe 13 C → N → C (p, α) ↑↓(p, γ) + 15 e νe 15 (p,γ) 14 N ← O ← N Coulomb barriers high (Z =6, 7, 8): need high T to go 13 c ⇒ CNO cycle minor in Sun (CNO →1.6% L() > but main H-burner for M ∼ 1.5M( Testing the Nuclear-Powered Sun: Solar Neutrinos StandardSolar Solar Neutrino Neutrino Production Production Total SSM Flux 10 −2 −1 Rxn Eν,max = Q !Eν" Φν (10 ν cm s ) pp→deν 0.420 MeV 0.265 MeV 6.0 gs 7Be e→7Li ν lines: 7Li =0.861MeV;7Li∗ =0.383MeV 0.47 8B→8Be e ν 17.98 MeV 9.63 MeV 5.8 × 10−4 Q: Why are the 7Be neutrinos monoenergetic? www: Bahcall neutrino spectrum pp neutrinos largest flux, but low energies 7 8 Be neutrinos monoenergetic, strong ∼ Tc dependence 8 20 B neutrinos continuum, ultrastrong ∼ Tc dep 2 What should this mean for production vs radius? www: Bahcall fig of production vs R StandardSolar Solar Neutrino Neutrino Production Production Total SSM Flux 10 −2 −1 Rxn Eν,max = Q !Eν" Φν (10 ν cm s ) pp→deν 0.420 MeV 0.265 MeV 6.0 gs 7Be e→7Li ν lines: 7Li =0.861MeV;7Li∗ =0.383MeV 0.47 8B→8Be e ν 17.98 MeV 9.63 MeV 5.8 × 10−4 Q: Why are the 7Be neutrinos monoenergetic? www: Bahcall neutrino spectrum pp neutrinos largest flux, but low energies 7 8 Be neutrinos monoenergetic,
    [Show full text]
  • Wallace L. W. Sargent 1935–2012
    Wallace L. W. Sargent 1935–2012 A Biographical Memoir by Charles C. Steidel ©2021 National Academy of Sciences. Any opinions expressed in this memoir are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Academy of Sciences. WALLACE L. W. SARGENT February 15, 1935-October 29, 2012 Elected to the NAS, 2005 Wallace L. W. Sargent was the Ira S. Bowen Professor of Astronomy at the California Institute of Technology, where he was a member of the astronomy faculty for 46 years, beginning in 1966. By any measure, Sargent— known to colleagues and friends as “Wal”—was one of the most influential and consistently productive observa- tional astronomers of the last 50 years. His impact on the field of astrophysics spanned a remarkably wide range of topics and was seminal in more than a few: the primor- dial helium abundance, young galaxies, galaxy dynamics, supermassive black holes, active galactic nuclei (AGN), Technology. Institute of Photography by California and, particularly, the intergalactic medium (IGM). Wal was 77 at the time of his death in 2012; he had maintained a full complement of teaching and research until just weeks By Charles C. Steidel before succumbing to an illness he had borne quietly for more than 15 years. Generations of students, postdocs, and colleagues benefited from Wal’s rare combination of scientific taste and intuition, intellectual interests extending far beyond science, irreverent sense of humor, and genuine concern about the well-being of younger scientists. Education and Early Influences Wal was born in 1935 in Elsham, Lincolnshire, United Kingdom—a small village roughly equidistant from Sheffield and Leeds in West Lincolnshire—into a working-class family.
    [Show full text]
  • Origin(?) of the Universe ---J\I\Aarv
    SERIES I ARTICLE Origin(?) of the Universe 6. Present Challenges in Cosmology Jayant V Narlikar The final article in the series reviews the strengths and weaknesses of the big bang cosmology, conceptual as well as observational. It is argued that despite its many successes there are enough question marks against this cosmology to keep the issue open. In particular, an Jayant V Narlikar, Director, alternative view-point developed by the author and his Inter·University Centre colleagues is described. In this the universe has always for Astronomy and been in existence. Known as the Quasi-Steady State Astrophysics, works on action at a distance in Cosmology it combines some good features of the big bang physics, new theories of cosmology with new ideas which may help resolve some of gravitation and new the outstanding questions of today. models of the universe. He has made strong efforts to promote teaching and Strengths and Conceptual Weaknesses of the Big research in astronomy in Bang Cosmology the universities and also writes extensively in English and Marathi for a In this concluding part of the series on cosmology we shall wider audience on science take a critical look at the big bang models and then make and other topics. some projections for the future. To begin with, we consider the strengths of these models. Recall from Part 3 of the series that Einstein's general theory of relativity led Alexander Friedmann to expanding world models in 1922, and seven years later Hubble's law that received a simple interpretation This six-part series will wi thin the Friedmann models was discovered.
    [Show full text]
  • Geoff-Burbidge-History
    ANRV320-AA45-01 ARI 12 August 2007 11:6 Access provided by 86.180.70.91 on 05/06/20. For personal use only. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 2007.45:1-41. Downloaded from www.annualreviews.org ANRV320-AA45-01 ARI 12 August 2007 11:6 An Accidental Career Geoffrey Burbidge Center for Astrophysics and Space Sciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California, 92093; email: [email protected] Access provided by 86.180.70.91 on 05/06/20. For personal use only. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 2007.45:1-41. Downloaded from www.annualreviews.org Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 2007. 45:1–41 The Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics is online at astro.annualreviews.org This article’s doi: 10.1146/annurev.astro.45.051806.110552 Copyright c 2007 by Annual Reviews. All rights reserved 0066-4146/07/0922-0001$20.00 1 ANRV320-AA45-01 ARI 12 August 2007 11:6 EARLY DAYS I was born in September 1925 in Chipping Norton Oxfordshire, a small market town in the Cotswolds roughly midway between Oxford and Stratford-on-Avon. The families of both of my parents had lived in Chipping Norton for many generations. My father, Leslie Burbidge, who had served in the First World War in Serbia and Greece, was a partner with his two brothers, Fred and Percy, in a small building firm, Burbidge and Sons, which covered a large rural area, building, renovating, and repairing many kinds of Cotswold buildings using Cotswold stone, etc. I was an only child, but my father had five brothers, one of whom had died during the war, and two sisters.
    [Show full text]
  • Readingsample
    Fifty Years of Quasars From Early Observations and Ideas to Future Research Bearbeitet von Mauro D'Onofrio, Paola Marziani, Jack W. Sulentic 1. Auflage 2012. Buch. xxxii, 584 S. Hardcover ISBN 978 3 642 27563 0 Format (B x L): 15,5 x 23,5 cm Gewicht: 1082 g Weitere Fachgebiete > Physik, Astronomie > Astronomie: Allgemeines > Astronomische Beobachtung: Observatorien, Instrumente, Methoden Zu Inhaltsverzeichnis schnell und portofrei erhältlich bei Die Online-Fachbuchhandlung beck-shop.de ist spezialisiert auf Fachbücher, insbesondere Recht, Steuern und Wirtschaft. Im Sortiment finden Sie alle Medien (Bücher, Zeitschriften, CDs, eBooks, etc.) aller Verlage. Ergänzt wird das Programm durch Services wie Neuerscheinungsdienst oder Zusammenstellungen von Büchern zu Sonderpreisen. Der Shop führt mehr als 8 Millionen Produkte. Chapter 2 Quasars in the Life of Astronomers Contributions by Mauro D’Onofrio, Paola Marziani, Jack W. Sulentic, Suzy Collin, Giancarlo Setti, Martin Gaskell, Joe Wampler, Martin Elvis, Iraida Pronik, Vladimir Pronik, Sergey Sergeev, Aleksander Volvach, Julian Krolik, Hagai Netzer, Alfonso Cavaliere, Paolo Padovani, Halton Arp, and Jayant Narlikar M. D’Onofrio Dipartimento di Astronomia, Universita` degli Studi di Padova, Vicolo Osservatorio 3, I35122 Padova, Italy e-mail: [email protected] P. Marziani INAF, Osservatorio Astronomico di Padova, Vicolo Osservatorio 5, IT35122 Padova, Italy e-mail: [email protected] J.W. Sulentic () Instituto de Astrof´ısica de Andaluc´ıa (CSIC), Granada, Spain e-mail: [email protected] S. Collin LUTH, Observatoire de Paris-Meudon, Section de Meudon, 92195 Meudon, France e-mail: [email protected] G. Setti INAF-Istituto di Radioastronomia, Via P. Gobetti, 101 40129 Bologna, Italy e-mail: [email protected] M.
    [Show full text]
  • R-Process Nucleosynthesis in Supernovae the Heaviest Elements Are Made Only in Cataclysmic Events
    R-Process Nucleosynthesis in Supernovae The heaviest elements are made only in cataclysmic events. most inevitably followed by beta decay, and the path to increasingly Finding out whether supernovae are cataclysmic enough heavy nuclear species charted by suc- requires extensive astronomical observation and cessive n captures remains close to the sophisticated computer modeling. valley of beta stability in figure 1. The figure shows how beta-decay lifetimes decrease for a given Z as the increas- John J. Cowan and Friedrich-Karl Thielemann ing neutron number N carries a nu- cleus away from the valley of stability. Isotopes involved in s-process nu- lmost all of the hydrogen and helium in the cosmos, cleosynthesis are, in general, sufficiently long lived to be Aalong with some of the lithium, was created in the first studied in the laboratory. That is not so for the r-process, three minutes after the Big Bang. Two more light ele- in which a sufficient flux of neutrons makes tn much ments, beryllium and boron, are synthesized in interstel- shorter than tb. In that case, n captures will proceed into lar space by collisions between cosmic rays and gas nuclei. the very neutron-rich and unstable regions far from the All of the other elements in nature are formed by nuclear beta-stable valley. Such high neutron fluxes are only tran- reactions inside stars. sient—coming, for example, from a supernova explosion. Over the 14-billion-year history of the universe, ele- Once the flux is exhausted, the unstable nuclei produced ments made in stars have been ejected back into space to by the r-process will beta-decay back to the valley of sta- be incorporated into new stars and planets.
    [Show full text]
  • A PANEL DISCUSSION of "MAJOR UNSOLVED PROBLEMS of COSMOLOGY' Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, MD 21044, U.S.A
    A PANEL DISCUSSION OF "MAJOR UNSOLVED PROBLEMS OF COSMOLOGY' Yoji Kondo Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, MD 21044, U.S.A. I would first like to ask my distinguished co-panelists to introduce themselves briefly. I will then ask each to make a five-minute comment on "major unsolved problems of cosmology". It will be followed by discussions among the panelists and also with the audience. [The panel consisted of Holton Arp of Max Planck Institute for Astrophysics in Munich, Geoffrey Burbidge of the University of California at La Jolla, Menas Kafatos of the George Mason University, Yoji Kondo (Chairman) and John Mather of the NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Philip Morrison of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Bruce Partridge of the Haverford College, Martin Rees of the University of Cambridge, and Michael Turner of the University of Chicago.] I will lead off the discussion by stating what, in my view, are major unsolved problems in cosmology today. Since I am the first to speak, I wish to make it clear that this is not an attempt to preempt those topics from further discussions by my co-panelists. (A) Is the universe closed or open? What is the value of omega? The resolution of this question may hinge upon the answer to the next question. (B) Does dark matter exist? If it does exist, what is it or what are they? Is it true that a substantial fraction of the matter in the universe is dark so that it is not directly observable as luminous substance? The evidence for its existence consists primarily of the following three lines of argument.
    [Show full text]