Please ask for: Fiona Harbord Telephone: 01482 613154 Fax: 01482 614804 Email: [email protected] Text phone: 01482 300349 Date: Wednesday, 09 November 2016
Dear Councillor,
Energy and Infrastructure Overview and Scrutiny Commission
The next meeting of the Energy and Infrastructure Overview and Scrutiny Commission will be held at 10:00 on Wednesday, 16 November 2016 in Room 77 .
The Agenda for the meeting is attached and reports are enclosed where relevant.
Please Note: It is likely that the public, (including the Press) will be excluded from the meeting during discussions of exempt items since they involve the possible disclosure of exempt information as describe in Schedule 12A of the Local Government Act 1972.
Yours faithfully,
Scrutiny Officer for the Town Clerk
Town Clerk Services, Hull City Council, The Guildhall, Alfred Gelder Street, Hull, HU1 2AA www.hullcc.gov.uk Page 1 of 92 Tel: 01482 300300
Energy and Infrastructure OSC
To: Membership: Councillors Allen, Craker, Dad, Fareham, Gardiner, Herrera-Richmond, Hewitt, Langley, Petrini (C), Quinn (DC) and Thompson D
Portfolio Holders: Councillor Mancey, Portfolio Holder for Energy City Councillor A Clark, Portfolio Holder for Neighbourhoods and Communities
Officers: Trish Dalby, Deputy Chief Executive Mark Jones, Director of Regeneration Andy Burton, City Streetscene Manager Malcolm Relph, City Economy Manager Graham Hall, Assistant City Manager Fiona Harbord, Scrutiny Officer (6)
For Information: Councillor Sumpton, Chair of Overview and Scrutiny Management Committee Councillor J Korczak Fields, Deputy Chair of Overview and Scrutiny Management Committee Reference Library (Public Set)
Page 2 of 92
Energy and Infrastructure Overview and Scrutiny Commission
10:00 on Wednesday, 16 November 2016
Room 77
A G E N D A PROCEDURAL ITEMS
1 Apologies To receive apologies for those Members who are unable to attend the meeting.
2 Declarations of Interest To remind Members of the need to record the existence and nature of any Personal and Discloseable Pecuniary interest in items on the agenda, in accordance with the Member Code of Conduct.
(Members Code of Conduct - Part D1 of the Constitution)
3 Minutes of the meeting held 14 September 2016 5 - 24 To approve the minutes as a true and correct record
4 Minutes of the meeting held 5 October 2016 25 - 38 To approve the minutes as a true and correct record
NON-EXEMPT ITEMS
5 Director of Regeneration Presentation 39 - 46 To update the Commission on any service, policy or strategy developments that fall within the remit of the Commission:- Flood Risk Planning, A63 Castle Street Improvement and Main Line Electrification.
Page 3 of 92
6 Hull City Council Annual Carbon Emissions 2015/16 47 - 60 To update the Commission on the Council’s progress in reducing its carbon emissions and its environmental management system Investors in the Environment.
7 Conversion of Street Lighting Lanterns to LED Technology 61 - 62 To advise the Commission on the progress made to date on the programme to replace street lighting lanterns with more energy efficient LED lanterns.
8 Highway Performance Update to 31 October 2016 63 - 90 To update the Commission on the performance of the highway services managed by Streetscene.
9 Energy and Infrastructure OSC Action List 2016/17 91 - 92 To ensure that the Commission’s actions are resolved in a timely manner.
EXEMPT ITEMS
Page 4 of 92
Energy and Infrastructure Overview and Scrutiny Commission
10:00 a.m. – 1.20 p.m. Wednesday 14 th September 2016, Room 77, The Guildhall, Alfred Gelder Street, Hull, HU1 2AA
Present:
Councillors P. Allen, D. Craker, J. Dad, J. Fareham, A. Gardiner, H. Herrera-Richmond, J. Hewitt, L. Petrini (Chair), C. Quinn and D. Thompson.
In attendance: G. Hall (Assistant City Manager, Streetscene) Minute 13 P. Wright (Network Rail) Minute 13 P. Stephenson (Balfour Beatty) Minute 13 W. Spencer (ARUP) Minute 13 A. Jordan (Senior Flood Risk Manager) Minute 14 S. Dyas (Asset Project Development Engineer) Minute 15 M. Jones (Director Of Regeneration) Minute 16 Councillor A. Clark (Portfolio Holder for Neighbourhoods and Communities) Minute 17 Councillor M. Mancey (Portfolio Holder for Energy City) Minute 18 G. Brentnall (Disability Access Officer) Minute 19
Page 5 of 92
A. Umpleby( (Contract Manager, Parking Enforcement) Minute 20 A. Burton (City Streetscene Manager) Minute 21 F, Harbord (Scrutiny Officer) Minutes 22 & 23 Apologies:
Minute Number Action to be Taken by
11 DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST Ray Teal
No declarations of interest were made in relation to the following agenda items.
Recommendations: Reasons for Recommendations:
N/A N/A
12 MINUTES OF THE MEETING HELD ON WEDNESDAY 13 JULY, a. N/A 2016
The Scrutiny Officer submitted the draft minutes from the meeting held on Wednesday, 13 July, 2016. Councillor Hewitt asked that the minute be amended to include his comment regarding the Paragon Interchange being open at one end and acting as wind tunnel.
Recommendations: Reasons for Recommendations:
a) That the Scrutiny Officer will amend the minutes to a) No amendment was necessary as the member’s comment had been include Cllr Hewitt’s comments regarding the openness of included. the Paragon Interchange and how the wind blowing
Page 6 of 92 P a g e 2
through the building could be prevented.
NON EXEMPT ITEMS
Minute Number Action to be Taken by a) Paul Wright/ Fiona Harbord 13 PRESENTATION ON THE PARK STREET BRIDGE STRENGTHENING SCHEME
Graham Hall, Assistant City Manager, Streetscene, Paul Wright, Network Rail, Paul Stephenson, Balfour Beatty, and Will Spencer, ARUP attended the Commission to deliver a presentation informing of how the Park Street Bridge strengthening works would take place, and their impact. The Commission was told of: i. Why and how the works were commissioned ii. Work done to date iii. The technical aspects of the works iv. Issues that would restrict the window for delivery of the works, such as Hull Fair and Christmas v. The timeline for the completion of the project vi. Road closures that would take place from early January to early March 2017 vii. Weekend work which would be restricted to one weekend in six. viii. Restrictions that would result from the need to move trains
The Commission discussed: i. The lack of agreement needed to allow Network Rail access. ii. Whether the bridge was high enough to allow electrified trains to pass under; that it was believed to be high enough; and, that reassurance was needed as it seemed pointless strengthening a bridge that might need major works in the coming years to make it
Page 7 of 92 P a g e 3
higher. iii. Accessibility issues and that the Accessibility Officer was being consulted; that pavements would be kept open as much as possible; and whether the possibility of bad weather had been considered when drawing up the works timeline. iv. Concerns about the increased traffic post-works from Anlaby Road; whether HGVs would have the space to turn onto and off Park Street; and, whether the traffic signals at the junction would change to accommodate increased traffic from Park Street. v. Whether closures were being co-ordinated with the City of Culture team.
Recommendations: Reasons for Recommendations:
a) That Paul Wright of Network Rail will feed back to the a) The Commission wanted reassurance that the scheme was Commission details of investigatory work carried out into encompassing a long-term view, and that further work would not be whether Park Street Bridge will be high enough to needed when the City's rail lines were electrified accommodate electrification of the line, and any
assurances that can be offered that this will be so.
a) Laura Scholes/ Rachel Glossop 14 KINGSTON UPON HULL CITY COUNCIL - PURCHASE OF LAND b) Laura Scholes/ Rachel Glossop c) Laura Scholes/ Rachel Glossop ALONGSIDE HOLDERNESS DRAIN FOR A FLOOD d) Laura Scholes/ Rachel Glossop ALLEVIATION SCHEME
Adam Jordan, Senior Flood Risk Manager, attended the Commission to present a report seeking approval for Hull City Council to purchase land alongside Holderness Drain for the purpose of creating flood storage to reduce the risk of flooding to 1750 properties in East Huill.
The Commission was informed that: i. The East Riding of Yorkshire and other agencies were working towards the target of purchasing the land. ii. Until the land was purchased the full Business Case and additional detail would not be produced.
Page 8 of 92 P a g e 4
The Commission discussed: i. Where the 1750 residents detailed in the report lived; that a model had been drawn up that estimated the figure as being between 1,000 and 2,000; that those residents would live between the East Carr and North Carr plains, with benefits for the arable land in East Yorkshire; and, that the water would be prevented from flowing down Holderness Drain. ii. Concerns about part 6 of the report and the possibility of the Council losing money on the transaction in the long-term; that a balance within the Issues for Consideration was needed, such as against the costs of the flooding of 2007; that, as at point 6.6, a condition should be put on the land that if it had to be re-sold it should only be for a worthwhile use; and, that the risk was as a result of the unknown feasibility work and how much would be recouped should the land need to be resold. iii. That, if the feasibility study went well, the works would commence in 2018; that the Environment Agency would provide funding for the infrastructure of the scheme; and, that there was the potential to sublease for the managing of the habitat. iv. The cost of the land being £2.4m, with the opportunity to scale back the contribution should the modelling show that the risk of flooding was being reduced for fewer than 1,750 properties; that another organisation had offered a higher amount of money for the land so that it could be land-banked, but that the Director of Regeneration had persuaded the seller to sell to HCC. v. That timescales had meant that the feasibility had not been completed; that the cost to the Council was high, but that it was balanced by the potential cost to residents, and the Council, should flooding occur; that two previous schemes had proved successful; and, that this scheme needed to be put in place as quickly as possible as flooding could occur at any time.
Recommendations: Reasons for Recommendations:
a. That the Commission supports the recommendation as a) The Commission supported the work as it would contribute to flood detailed at part 2.1 of the officer report. alleviation.
b. That it is recommended that the scheme be progressed b) Flooding could happen at any time so the members wanted the promptly to ensure the flood protection is in place as soon scheme in place as quickly as possible in case flooding took place. as possible.
c. That the Issues for Consideration at section 6 of the report c) Self explanatory. are mostly negative and could have included the cost to the Council of the floods of 2007, and the positive issue that the land purchase would contribute to the prevention of this spend in the future.
Page 9 of 92 P a g e 5
d. It is recommended that, taking into consideration the risks of purchasing the land, and that there is a possibility the land d) There are many examples of land and property being bought by may need to be sold on at a future date, the end of part 6.6 private buyers and then left undeveloped - it was hoped that a of the report “to ensure the land is brought into worthwhile clause could be included to ensure that this did not happen to this use” be included as a condition for any future sale, so that land should it have to be disposed of. the land is not as attractive to a purchaser wishing to buy it but not put it to use.
a) Laura Scholes/ Sheila Henley 15 POLICY FOR DEALING WITH VIBRATION RELATED ISSUES b) Andy Burton/ Sheila Henley/ Graham Hall WITHIN THE CARRIAGEWAY c) Ian Anderson d) Paul Rawcliffe
Steve Dyas, Asset Project Development Engineer, attended the Commission to deliver a report seeking approval to establish a policy to deal more effectively with local complaints and concerns regarding vibration issues associated with the highway and traffic.
The Commission was informed: i. The policy was to lay out a process for dealing with vibrations resulting from traffic on the highway. ii. That historically Hull’s highways were built on a concrete base due to the poor ground conditions. iii. That eventually faith concrete footings fail, resulting in cracks that lead to traffic induced vibration. iv. That, although the vibrations were felt from settled concrete cracks and traffic calming measures, they rarely led to damage. v. That there was limited funding to deal with vibration issues, Calming issues, cracking due to settling of concrete, and the policy needed to set out that repair work would be carried out where it was needed, but not where it was not.
The Commission discussed: i. The need to improve the highways in the City or otherwise those that have the means would move out of Hull. ii. The need for regular reporting and mapping of the underlying state of the roads and complaints from residents regarding vibration issued. iii. With reference to the Town Clerk’s comment in the report, the need to address issues around poor in-fill work by utility companies, and the recouping of monies from them. iv. How traffic calming measures could be altered to prevent vibration.
Page 10 of 92 P a g e 6
v. That structural damage to buildings was most likely a problem with the buildings’ footings, rather than as the result of the vibration itself; and, that the Planning Committee should be approached to see if plans could take into account the strength of footings to help mitigate vibration. vi. Whether a map of vibration complaints could be tied in with Highways’ condition survey; that the condition survey was only carried out on main roads, and the sight inspection was only carried out in one in five years; and, that eventually the mapping and surveys could be tied in. vii. That ten per cent of cuttings out and the use of dowels were inspected, and, that Bowlalley Lane was now being addressed viii. That the new policy would not be applicable to unadopted residential and industrial roadways.
Recommendations: Reasons for Recommendations:
a) That the Commission supports the recommendations as a) An updated policy was needed. detailed at section 2 of the officer report.
b) That the Commission wishes to see mapping of complaints b) Members were keen to see that there were no underlying causes of about vibrations, when those complaints were made and any vibration that resulted in clusters of reports and that had not been action taken, and that a report on that mapping be included in addressed. the Highways monitoring report that is to be presented to the Commission on a six monthly basis.
c) That, with reference to part 10.1 of the report, the Town Clerk is asked to feed back to the Commission why, under S. 72 c) The members wanted to know why, when the law was on the New Roads and Streetworks Act 1991, enforcement action has Council's side, utility companies had not been pursued through the not previously been taken against Utility companies. courts in order to recoup monies that the Council was owed as compensation for poor highways works. d) That Planning Committee be asked to consider taking into account the strength of the foundations of proposed housing d) The officer explained to the Commission that vibration in homes was developments to ensure that they are strong enough to usually more to do with the strength of the foundations than the withstand damage or movement from road vibration. strength of the vibration.
Page 11 of 92 P a g e 7
a) N/A 16 DIRECTOR OF REGENERATION PRESENTATION b) Cllr Petrini/ Fiona Harbord
Mark Jones, Director Of Regeneration, attended the Commission to update members on Flood Risk Planning, A63 Castle Street Improvement and Main Line Electrification.
Flood Risk Planning The Commission was informed that works were imminent on the lower River Hull and had been approved by the EA, and Hull City Council were looking to enhance the improvements with EU funding and government capital funding.
The Commission raised concerns that the improvements were centrally funded; and questioned what was being done to recoup the funding from the private owners of the river frontages. The Director advised that contributions would be sought from the private sector, but that sometimes the value of the frontage land was negative, and some pockets of land remained from an industrial heritage. Members observed that they would like to see a plan for the recovery of funding from the private sector.
The Commission discussed the historical situation in Liverpool where greater powers were in place, enabling compulsory purchase, enforcement and recovery.
The Director advised that consideration could be given to increasing Hull’s powers of recovery and that that would be raised with the Environment Agency. The Commission discussed whether weight could be brought to bear through planning enforcement; that this was possible in terms of planning consent; and, where the legal obligation onus was totally on the owners legal action to recover funds was the only way forward and that this would be discussed with the EA.
The Director informed the Commission that the next priority was on the Humber frontage; work had taken place at St Andrew Quay and Paull, and there was a rolling programme which would take in Victoria Dock frontage and the Humber. The Commission discussed that Paull had had glass flood barriers erected, but that height was a consideration at St Andrews Quay.
A63 Castle Street Improvement The Commission was informed that the Chief Executive had written to Highways England to ask for an update on progress with the schemes; and, HE were being pushed for confirmation of the temporary crossing that was to be completed by 31 December 2017.
The Commission discussed how much after 2017 the iconic bridge was to be built, that this was one of the schemes that assurance was
Page 12 of 92 P a g e 8
being sought for; that scheduling depended on financial constraints and planning of the delivery other schemes; that the Garrison Road plans had fallen off due to finances, and this was another scheme for which reassurance was being sought; that HE had attended a Commission meeting where they had promised delivery of the Garrison Road scheme; that the funding pot for the scheme was different to that of the Castle Street works and they were not co-ordinated; that it was pointless delivering the Castle Street scheme if the Garrison Road scheme was not delivered, as the congestion on the road would just continue; and, once the A63 works commenced that would be the tiem to press harder for the delivery of the Garrison Road works.
The Director commented that there had been much investment in the East of the City, and that the government policy regarding Enterprise Zones had been followed, but that that did not seem to fit with Highways England.
Main Line Electrification The Commission was informed that feasibility and design works for electrification had been carried out; electrification was now dependent on Network Rail investments; and, Hull Trains had brought hybrid engines in anticipation.
The Commission discussed whether Hull was the beginning, end or middle of the line with regard to its place in the transport chain; that there was no role for Hull in terms of international transportation if the City could not move freight by rail; what MPs were doing to promote the need for transportation improvements in Hull; that MPs should be invited to attend the Commission so that members could be informed of what the strategy was for Hull and how Scrutiny could feed in; what support Hull was receiving from MPs from neighbouring areas, which would be affected by transportation issues in Hull; that many MPs were lobbying for electrification; that MPs should be invited to attend the Commission, or if not submit a summary of what they were doing to promote Hull and the City’s transportation needs; and, that an invitation should be issued to Andrew Percy, and that issues to be discussed should include the Garrison Road scheme and the need to push for its delivery.
Recommendations: Reasons for Recommendations:
a) That the Director of Regeneration Presentation is noted. a) N/A
b) That the Chair will issue an invitation to Andrew Percy MP to b) The Commission was keen to know what MPs were doing to attend a future meeting of the Commission so that members lobby on behalf of Hull and the surrounding area and promote can discuss with him what he is doing to promote Hull and the the City's transport infrastructure needs. development of the City’s transport infrastructure, to specifically include the progress of the Garrison Road
Page 13 of 92 P a g e 9
Roundabout scheme..
a) N/A 17 PORTFOLIO HOLDER PRIORITIES - NEIGHBOURHOODS & COMMUNITIES (INCLUDING EMERGENCY PLANNING)
Councillor A. Clark, Portfolio Holder for Neighbourhoods and Communities, attended the meeting to update on his Portfolio Holder Priorities for 2016/17.
The Portfolio Holder referred to the area within his remit that related to the Commission, this being flood management and planning. The Portfolio Holder update on:
Aquagreens That previous greens had proved very successful and the PH would have liked to see more developed; that they had had additional outcomes to just flood prevention, such as prevention of travellers settling, and the drainage of sports pitches.
Embedding the Water Culture That this was Blue Sky thinking, but it was important that it was left on the agenda.
Flood Storage Holderness Drain is the current priority, but flood storage schemes are something that will run on into the future. The PH and Councillor Fraser from ERYC were planning a trip to look at the Holderness Drain site. The PH had been to visit a nature reserve at Doncaster, which combined flooding and nature conservation. The site was larger than Hull but was a vision for the future for Holderness Drain as it had a visitor centre and was just breaking even financially, so was not a burden to taxpayers.
Sewers Pressure was being placed on Yorkshire Water to make drains bigger and better so that sewers were capable of taking flood water to pumping stations or out to the river or sea. There were no tentative timescales for the commencement of such a scheme, and that members should continue to push YW. Once agreed, the project would be a massive infrastructure project, which, unless adjacent sewers could be built, would mean large scale disruption.
Page 14 of 92 P a g e 10
The Commission discussed: a) The expectation of additional pumping stations being built; that mobile pumping units for incidents and events nationwide were to be bought in to be moved across the country; that time was taken before the water got to a level where pumps kicked in; and, that intermediate pumps were needed so that pumping kicks in before the level was reached that may result in problems. b) The timeline for the flood alleviation scheme in conjunction with ERYC; that the Derringham scheme took seven years; that this was due to contractual issues as well as technical ones; that the Holderness scheme would take less time as it was a single buyer/ single seller transaction; that once the land was bought the feasibility study would take place and designs drawn up; that modelling would take place to see that the scheme works by considering different scenarios; and, that project managers and an architect was in place and had started work; and, that the PH was pushing for the scheme.
Recommendations: Reasons for Recommendations:
a) That the Portfolio Holder for Neighbourhoods & Communities’ a) N/A priorities are noted.
a) N/A 18 PORTFOLIO HOLDER PRIORITIES - ENERGY CITY b) Cllr Mancey/ Emma Tindall c) Andy Burton/ Adam McArthur d) Fiona Harbord/ Cherie Wiles e) Cllr Petrini/ Fiona Harbord Councillor Martin Mancey, Portfolio Holder for Energy City, attended the Commission meeting to update on his Portfolio Holder Priorities for 2016/17.
The Portfolio Holder advised that his priorities were the same as those discussed at the Commission’s April 2016 meeting: i. Castle Street works – that these had been discussed at length earlier in the meeting. ii. Making Savings and the Austerity Budget – that in 2009/10 the Council received £336m in government grants to deliver services, but in 2016/17 grants would total only £159m. Council Tax only covered one third of the Council’s budget. That VET was impacting on services and, although the Portfolio Holder wished to be able to address all issues around highways etc, he had concerns about the
Page 15 of 92 P a g e 11
ability of the Council to meet all demands. iii. Public Realm works - were progressing and delivering those on time were another priority. iv. Air Quality - remained a priority. The public were becoming more aware of air quality and health issues and the priority was to try and resolve those issues. A draft of a report considering what the Council would do was to be commented on and would be brought to the Commission
The Commission discussed: i. What was to be done about the problem of chewing gum on the new sets; that at the point of handover from Eurovia the pavements would be subject to a deep clean by the contractor; that in the long-term officers would be looking at methods of removing the gum, including chemicals and machinery; and, in the longer-term there was talk of chewing gum becoming bio-degradable. ii. Whether, as with some continental cities, diesel cars were to be banned from the city centre to improve air quality; that the air quality report that would be coming to Scrutiny would include options for managing diesel output; that many disabled people used diesel cars and removing them from the City centre would put them at a disadvantage; that many delivery vehicles and buses also used diesel the wish to see included in the report information about the effect of poor air quality on childhood asthma and other ailments; and, that poor air quality could shorten life by up to ten years.
The Portfolio Holder continued with his priorities: i. Highways Maintenance – that, despite observations that maintenance was not being carried out outside the City centre, of the 69 schemes being carried out at that time, 54 were outside the City centre. 55 of the 69 schemes had been completed. The 29 footway schemes were mostly in the City centre. But Hull’s Highways service received 50% less funding than was actually needed to maintain highways to an acceptable level. ii. Litter and fly-tipping – that, since the Portfolio Holder had last updated on his priorities, two campaigns had been launched that were aimed at cutting levels of fly-tipping and littering - Stop the Drop and Love Hull, Hate Litter. The campaigns were intended to tackle the problem at source. The Portfolio Holder had also asked for a report on maximising penalties for littering and fly-tipping.
The Commission discussed the need to monitor the litter and fly-tipping campaigns and prosecution methods and rates; whether the reduction in the opening hours of the Household Waste Recycling Centres had affected fly-tipping levels; and, that it had not as Hull was well provided for with tipping facilities.
The Portfolio Holder continued: i. Traffic Congestion – that a report would be brought to the October meeting of the Commission; that Professor David Begg would also attend the meeting to deliver his report on greener journeys; works were taking place outside of hull Royal Infirmary; a preliminary
Page 16 of 92 P a g e 12
report on the Stoneferry Corridor had been produced and early proposals were to be consulted on, although progress depended on funding availability. ii. Strategic Transport Network – The Portfolio Holder was a member of the Transport for the North Partnership Board. An enormous amount of resource had been put into TfN by various agencies, and a government grant had also been given, so it was unfortunate that a large amount of time was being spent talking about processes rather than delivering schemes – this was an issue that the commission may wish to address with Andrew Percy, should he attend a future meeting. iii. LED Lighting Scheme – that a 3 year programme of replacement of 33,000 lights with LED lighting was due to commence in October 2016, and would result in a saving of £1m per annum in electricity charges. iv. That Hull City Council had won a silver Yorkshire in Bloom award.
Recommendations: Reasons for Recommendations:
a) That the Portfolio Holder for Energy City’s priorities are noted. a) N/A
b) That, at an appropriate time, the Commission will receive a b) Councillor Mancey advised the Commission that he had report exploring options around what the Council will do to received a report and once he had read it and commented on it address air quality issues, to include options for the use of would likely go to Cabinet and to the Scrutiny Commission. Cllr diesel fuelled vehicles and information around the health Hewitt raised issues round diesel fuelled vehicles, especially issues resulting from poor air quality. those for people with disabilities, and Cllr Herrera-Richmond raised health issues, especially childhood asthma. c) That the Commission be kept informed on developments c) Cllr Mancey had advised that various methods of clearing around tackling the problem of chewing gum on the City’s chewing gum and preventing it from littering pathways were pathways. being considered.
d) Although this subject falls within the remit of P&C, this d) That a referral be made to the People and Communities OSC Commission also felt it was relevant to the Streetscene remit of that consideration be given to the outcomes of the Love Hull, E&I. Hate Litter campaign and the Stop the Drop anti-fly tipping
campaigns, and the associated prosecution methods and rates, and that any briefings received by P&C also be circulated off-agenda to the members of Energy and Infrastructure OSC.
Page 17 of 92 P a g e 13
e) That the lack of progress of Transport for the North, and the e) The Commission felt that TfN was an important scheme, on-going debate being about process rather than delivery of needed to support the progress of the City's transport specific schemes, be raised with Andrew Percy MP when he infrastructure, leading to economic growth. attends a Commission meeting.
a) N/A 19 HULL CITY COUNCIL STREET CHARTER – ENFORCEMENT BRIEFING
George Brentnall, Disability Access Officer, attended the meeting to present a briefing in response to a previous request from the Commission with regards to how the Hull Street Charter would be enforced.
The Commission discussed : i. That the Disability Access Officer needed support in what he was doing to enable access for people with disabilities. ii. That there was a lot within the Charter that may not be enforceable, but that members could support the training of waste collection operatives to ensure awareness of waste bin positioning, that time had been allocated for that training; and, that it would be interesting to see if the training made a difference. iii. The standardising of road crossings, including ensuring that beeps were heard at every crossing. iv. Shared spaces; that Grimsby was looking to remove them; and, that there were no plans for shared spaces in Hull city centre.
Recommendations: Reasons for Recommendations:
a) That the briefing is noted. a) N/A
a) N/A 20 CAR PARKING AND TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT IN THE VICINITY OF b) – e) Laura Scholes f) Andy Umpleby
Page 18 of 92 P a g e 14
SCHOOLS
Andy Umpleby, Contract Manager, Parking Enforcement, attended the Commission to inform members options for the enforcement of parking restrictions around schools.
The Commission discussed: i. That current enforcement was ineffective and should be either stopped or given back to the Police to enforce; why schools were not dealing with the parking problem themselves; whether there was any linking with PCSOs to move drivers on; and, the possibilities of camera enforcement.
The Commission was informed that: i. Both Area Committees and schools worked with PCSOs, and there was much joined up working between schools through PTAs and Civil Enforcement Officers. ii. There were restrictions on the use of cameras, but schools could use cameras themselves. That a camera car was a possibility, but that the movement of such a car would be restricted by the issues around schools parking themselves. iii. It was difficult to enforce schools parking by the use of cameras or CEOs as there could be upto 3 or 4 entrances to the schools so upto 4 cameras or CEOs would be needed to monitor them.
The Commission discussed: i. That schools should be targeted for full weeks, so that drivers did not just return to bad habits after one day of enforcement; that parents would learn that the parking could be enforcedl; that children were entitled to be protected; and, that a list of schools should be worked through. ii. That Cabinet should introduce a policy to enforce on a weekly rotational basis or should not enforce at all. iii. That funds raised from enforcement should be used on a spend to save basis to invest in increased enforcement. iv. That consideration should be given to the financial level of the penalties, and whether they are high enough to ensure that they are enforceable.
The Commission was informed that: i. That there were currently 16 CEOs, but that a recruitment process was underway to increase that number.. ii. That when CEOs had previously targeted schools, but that as soon as the CEOS moved away drivers returned to the restricted areas. iii. That most service requests were for where parking blocked roads and caused congestion. iv. That the enforcement of zigzag lines meant that there was not the manpower available to enforce double yellow lines.
Page 19 of 92 P a g e 15
v. Drivers were subsequently displaced to other residential streets, but parking could only be enforced in the vicinity of the schools.
The Commission discussed: i. The futility of only enforcing outside of schools occasionally; the number of accidents outside schools; that this number was low as the vehicles could only travel slowly due to the congestion. ii. Discretion when issuing penalty tickets; that the law allowed Hull City Council some discretion when issuing tickets; that cars were given two minutes, vans were given five minutes as they were more likely to be delivering, but tickets were issued immediately when vehicles were parked on zigzag lines, as these were in place for the protection of children.
Recommendations: Reasons for Recommendations:
a) That the briefing is noted. a) N/A
b) That a recommendation be made to Cabinet that each primary b) It was felt that it was better that all schools were covered for a school in the City is targeted by Civil Enforcement Officers for single week rather than ad hoc enforcement. one full week on a recurring basis, with a list of the schools being worked through on rotation.
c) That Cabinet also consider the levels of penalties paid as a c) As per the action. result of enforcement, and whether they can be increased to create a greater deterrent.
d) That a recommendation also be made that funds that are d) The funding could (and should) be used to employ additional raised through enforcement be invested in additional enforcement officers rather than being used for alternative enforcement officer resources. services.
e) That, if Cabinet do not support the previous recommendations, e) The Commission agreed that it the changes were not made then consideration be given to withdrawing from enforcement of then it was not worth trying to enforce at all, and the parking at schools, as in its current state it is not working. enforcement officers could be used more productively
Page 20 of 92 P a g e 16
elsewhere. f) That any progress made on the resolution of issues around parking at schools will be reported back to this Commission. f) To keep the Commission informed.
a) Andy Burton 21 HIGHWAY PERFORMANCE REPORTING TO ENERGY AND b) Ian Anderson INFRASTRUCTURE COMMISSION Andy Burton, City Streetscene Manager, attended the Commission to confirm the desired performance requirements for a future Highways Performance report.
Members raised concerns that the report did not include information that had been previously asked for at the related workshop and meeting with the 2015/16 Chair and Deputy, and at the lack of content in the briefing.
Recommendations: Reasons for Recommendations:
a) That the Commission will receive to its October 2016 meeting a a) The Commission wished to receive the monitoring report that full written report detailing Highway performance, to include had been previously requested. statistics and a narrative covering all aspects of performance that were requested via the Commission’s workshop and the meetings with the Chair and Deputy of the Commission.
b) That it be recommended that the Town Clerk work with officers b) Concerns were raised that this report was not what was to ensure that the Chairs of Overview and Scrutiny expected, and if the report had been seen by the Chair before it Commissions receive copies of reports and briefings in was published then the officer would have been told that. advance of upload to CMIS to ensure that papers on agenda contain what has been asked for by the Commission.
Page 21 of 92 P a g e 17
a) Fiona Harbord 22 CITY OF CULTURE - QUESTIONS FOR REFERRAL TO OSMC Fiona Harbord, Scrutiny Officer, presented an item requesting that members identify any questions or discussion points relating to Hull City of Culture so that relevant issues could be raised by the Overview and Scrutiny Management Committee when the City of Culture company attended the 3 October 2016 meeting.
The Commission discussed: i. Whose lives had been enhanced; consideration of people with disabilities; the legacy of 2017; the impact of the handover of the Public Realm on Streetscene, the comeback for snagging problems, ; the maintenance of the City centre; the provision of information in the Interchange; and, whether there were safety implications for events held in Queens Gardens. ii. That, rather than the Scrutiny Officer collating all issues within the meeting, it would give members more thinking time if thee issues could be collated via email.
Recommendations: Reasons for Recommendations:
a) That the Commission will receive, off-agenda, a list of the a) As the CoC company only attends the OSMC all Scrutiny questions that members wish the Chair to ask of the City of Commissions have to address queries to the CoC via OSMC. Culture representatives at the October meeting of OSMC. Any additional questions that they wish to be raised will be forwarded to the Scrutiny Officer for collation. .
a) N/A 23 ENERGY AND INFRASTRUCTURE OSC DRAFT WORK PROGRAMME 2016/17
Fiona Harbord, Scrutiny Officer, presented the Commission’s work programmed for the members to consider and agree.
Recommendations: Reasons for Recommendations:
Page 22 of 92 P a g e 18
a) That the Energy and Infrastructure OSC Draft Work a) N/A Programme 2016/17 is noted.
Page 23 of 92 P a g e 19
Page 24 of 92
Energy and Infrastructure Overview and Scrutiny Commission
10:00 a.m. – 12.45 p.m. Wednesday 5th October 2016, Room 77, The Guildhall, Alfred Gelder Street, Hull, HU1 2AA
Present:
Councillors J. Abbott (substituting for Cllr J. Fareham), P. Allen, D. Craker, J. Dad, , A. Gardiner, H. Herrera-Richmond, J. Hewitt, R. Langley, L. Petrini (Chair), C. Quinn and D. Thompson.
In attendance: A. Burton (City Streetscene Manager) Minute 24 K. Ryan (Senior Transport Manager) Minutes 24–27 G. Hall (Assistant City Streetscene Manager) Minutes 24 & 26 Councillor M. Mancey (Portfolio Holder) Minute 25 Professor D. Begg (Owner, Transport Times) Minute 25 P. Shipp (Chief Executive, East Yorkshire Motor Services) Minute 26 J. Donnelly (Commercial Manager, Stagecoach East Midlands) Minute 26 M. Hargreaves (Managing Director, Stagecoach East Midlands) Minute 26 A. Fowler (Community Environment Officer, CHEF) Minute 26 D. Sharp (Assistant City Streetscene Manager) Minute 27
Page 25 of 92
A. Umpleby (Parking Enforcement Contract Manager) Minute 27 Apologies:
Cllr J. Fareham, substituted by Cllr J. Abbott.
Minute Number Action to be Taken by
23 DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST Ray Teal
No declarations of interest were made in relation to the following agenda items.
Recommendations: Reasons for Recommendations:
N/A N/A
24 CITY MANAGER’S UPDATE a. N/A b. Cllr. Mancey
Andy Burton, City Streetscene Manager, attended the Commission to update on developments within the Streetscene service that fell within the remit of the Commission. The Commission was advised that: i. The Streetscene staffing structure would be altering as Graham Hall was leaving the service as a result of VET, and other officer were leaving on VET and one officer had resigned. Discussions were taking place to cover the posts via honoraria to increase capacity until such time as a restructure could take place. ii. Strategic transportation roles and links with Regeneration were to be strengthened, as were links with the operational side, to ensure more joined up working. iii. Off the shelf schemes were to be prioritised ready for when funding became available. iv. Flexible and appropriate enforcements were to be prioritised to ensure smooth traffic flow, including the enforcement of parking outside
Page 26 of 92 P a g e 2
schools and on verges. v. A meeting with the Director regarding restructures was to be held and consultation was about to commence with Trade Unions. vi. A network traffic review was to commence with a view to improving traffic flows as a result of live traffic information.
The Commission discussed: i. Whether more live times units in bus stops were to be installed; and, that a procurement process was currently being undertaken to acquire additional units. ii. The closure of lanes for works on Ferensway; that, due to safety issues and timeframes, it had not been possible to narrow the lanes and keep them open; it had become obvious that the amount of Northbound traffic, especially HGVs; the contractors had been approached about having the merge point earlier on Ferensway, but that could have led to tailbacks on the A63; and, additional signage was to be placed on Hessle Road advising drivers to avoid Ferensway if possible. iii. That there would be no overlap of the Anlaby Road works and the Park Street Bridge works. iv. Whether there were plans to introduce more box junctions; that only the Police could enforce box junctions; that the Council was looking to move enforcement powers from the Police to the local authority; and, that only if the Council had enforcement powers would it look to installing cameras at box junctions. v. Whether anything could be done to resolve tailback issues outside the Guildhall; that tailbacks were due to the Guildhall being on a major junction; that keep clear signs for drives and tenfoots were provided, so they should be used on Holderness Road and others to enable drivers to join the main routes; and, that where traffic was moving freely keep clear signs were not used as their use could make traffic flow worse.
The Commission was informed that: i. A bid was being prepared for a Network Automated Management Signage System ready for when funding became available from the Department for Transport; this would mean that diversions would automatically come into force early; the intelligence of bus companies and Streetscene would be used which would enable more informed decisions around planning; close working with Highways England would be needed to enable additional signage on the A63; and, surplus funding from bus lane enforcement could be used for projects such as this. ii. The City Streetscene Manager and Director of Regeneration were looking at Traffic Modelling; that the Director was talking to Hull University around work on the modelling; the City Streetscene Manager and the Assistant City Streetscene Manager had visited Leeds to see how Leeds, Birmingham and Sheffield were modelling for the coming five years; and, traffic modelling was hugely expensive, but the surplus funding from bus lane enforcement could be used. iii. The Portfolio Holder and the City Streetscene Manager and his team had met to consider how live traffic information on road accidents and other incidents could be shared; and, York and Nottingham were to be visited to consider lessons learned by them.
Page 27 of 92 P a g e 3
The Commission discussed: i. Whether it could be gauged through the modelling when goods vehicles dropped off on double yellow lines as this caused problems on the City’s roads; and, that this would be the kind of thing that could be done, but that it would probably not be useful as something such as a change of use of building would void the information. ii. Progress with the Highways England A63/Castle Street schemes; that it was hoped that the funding for the schemes would become available quickly; that Highways England was carrying out a technology review; that no new signage would be in place until after 2019; and, that pressure was being placed on Highways England to carry out the Castle Street/A63 works through lobbying by the Portfolio Holder and the local MPs. iii. The need for additional Park and Ride sites, so that the travel situation around York could be replicated.
Recommendations: Reasons for Recommendations:
a) That the City Manager’s Presentation is noted. a) N/A
b) The Commission welcomes continued lobbying of b) At previous meetings HE had indicated that the schemes would be completed earlier than current indications. Highways England to ensure prompt delivery of the schemes previously discussed at Commission meetings with Highways England, such as the A63/Castle Street works, Garrison Road roundabout and advance warning signage.
NON EXEMPT ITEMS
Minute Number Action to be Taken by a) Andy Burton/ Graham Hall/ Mark Jones/ Malcolm 25 THE IMPACT OF CONGESTION ON BUS PASSENGERS Relph b) Andy Burton/ Graham Hall/ Doug Sharp/ Kerry
Page 28 of 92 P a g e 4
Ryan/ Bus Partnership Professor David Begg, owner of Transport Times, attended the Commission to discuss a report he had written on the impact of traffic congestion on bus passengers. Councillor Martin Mancey was also in attendance.
Professor Begg spoke about his report “The Impact of Congestion on Bus Passengers”: i. That bus passengers tended to be financially poor, with little voices regarding the transport agenda; as the economy increases car ownership increases; much was heard from those who do not want bus lanes rather than those who do; and, the job of the public sector was to represent bus passengers. ii. The challenge in Hull was to make less use of cars; each car on the road equalled more journeys by car; traffic gridlock and associated poor air quality was the result of affluence and improved economy; in other cities such aa London, Edinburgh, Cambridge, Brighton and Oxford the more affluent the resident the fewer cars were used and the more public transport was used; the opposite of this was occurring in Hull, where users of public transport were looked down on; and, that Hull had low bus use and high cycle use. iii. Cheap car parking in Hull made it difficult to grow bus use; there were immediate transport challenges, but a need for long term planning; this planning should not be anti-car, but about more efficient use of a resource; there was a national efficiency pf motoring, with car occupancy typically being 1 to 2 people; buses made more efficient use of roads; the country was physically limited in the road space it had; congestion would get worse; and, Hull had a congestion problem that would get worse. iv. There had not been a marked increase in car ownership but the biggest growth was in delivery vans; Hull was to be commended on its massive growth in bus journeys over the previous decade, but in the last three years that growth had slowed; bus journey times were increasing; that this was in part due to internet shopping making city centres no longer retail centres; and, this resulted in increases in delivery vehicles and their stop-start-park journeys, which were an inefficient use of the road. v. Nationally there had been a 10% decline in bus use over the previous decade; that there were peaks such as Gloucester and Cheltenham where the decline was 20%; the decline in bus use had been greatest in London; and, that Hull should look at London to see how the City’s bus services could look. vi. That, whilst the Council had a good partnership with bus operators, that relationship could be improved on; that the dwell time of buses at bus stops needed to be reduced; the Hull Card would help make that reduction; holders of Oystercards took only 0.5 Seconds to board buses; and, the exchange of money and change with a boarder took 9 seconds. vii. Passengers should be engaged with and operators should get to know them through communication such as via emails and via the phone; newspapers thought they reflected the community but mostly they represented car drivers who resented buses; politicians
Page 29 of 92 P a g e 5
should engage with bus passengers; Councillors could mobilise passengers; pressure was felt from car drivers to improve bus services but bus passengers should be asked their views; and, that was what bus operators should do. viii. As a Council, Hull had good bus priorities; that it must be ensured that restrictions were enforceable; box junctions needed to be enforced; and, that car restraint was difficult. ix. That changes to driving had to be looked at over the next 10 years; some cities were looking at work restrictions, such as Workplace Parking Levies; driver-less cars would result in a shift from owning to renting cars; and, City Car Clubs would be introduces as a result of city living, where there would be free parking on the street and cars would be rented by the hour, with more people using buses. x. That the growth in the City’s economy was a positive; Hull was one of the top 4 cities in terms of job growth; and, that there was likely to be a negative impact in terms of an associated growth in car ownership and delivery transportation; and, that this increase in traffic needed to be planned for.
The Commission discussed: i. Whether the closure of railways had impacted on increased road traffic; whether investment in rail would alleviate the traffic issues; that the best use of funding would be to make bus journeys easier; that the issue for bus users was not just congestion, but also the time taken to get in and out of the City centre; the need for transport hubs outside of the City centre and cross City bus services; delivery vans and the need for companies to change their hours of delivery so they would be allowed to park and drop off and so that multiple calls to houses did not have to be made; and the need to engage with people not using buses so that they could be engaged with. ii. The impact of school-based journeys; how children and parents should be encouraged to walk to school; whether data was available on the impact of school journeys; that changes in peak times were in part attributable to changes in school hours; that society had changed so that some children did not walk due to fear, plus schools were further away from homes; that schools needed traffic plans, leading to shared teacher cars, shared parent cars and increased walking, including walking buses; this would lead to huge health benefits; Hull had a good starting base in terms of the number of cyclists and cycle lanes; and, in the US yellow buses were encouraged, and there were road rules in place, such as no overtaking of parked buses. iii. That delivery van companies had to be persuaded to change their times, rather than being dictated to; and, that at some point the government would have to address the problems created by delivery drivers. iv. The need to improve hull’s ring road; that this would only work in conjunction with the East Riding; that when new ring roads were built over the first two to three years there would be a reduction in traffic going into city centres, but the ring road itself would fill up; and, whether copying Amsterdam in terms of cycling priorities would work in Hull.
Page 30 of 92 P a g e 6
v. The role of planning in creating congestion; that out of town retail complexes meant that residents travelled there by car or taxi or did not visit them at all; that planning was important, and decisions made in the present would impact for many years; that current planning needed to be scrutinised closely; and, that it was planned that all delivery vehicles were to be banned form York centre.
Jon Donnelly of Stagecoach advised the Commission that the dispersal of companies to the City’s suburbs had increased journeys to work; historically Hull residents had taken 2 bus journeys to work; that that journey was now taking longer in the city centre due to congestion; and, that the journeys on outlying routes, such as Clough Road, were becoming congested as cars travelled from homes in the East to work in the West and North, and vice versa.
Peter Shipp, of East Yorkshire Motor Services, advised the Commission that: i. He supported all that Professor Begg had raised; and, he had written to Stephen Fidler, the deputy director of the buses and taxis division of the Department for Transport, asking for clarification on the powers available to local authorities with regard to yellow box junction enforcement. ii. That bus companies were struggling as a result of fuel duty increases of 59% whilst car owners had not had their duty increased; that lobbying was needed with regard to the need for improvements on the A63, as incidents on the A63 were almost a daily occurrence; and, the Police were responsible for incidents on the A63, not Highways England;. iii. That the DfT had reported that there were around 600,000 more cars on the road annually; the need for traffic signals to be linked to ensure the free flow of traffic, so that vehicles were not stuck at red lights when lights ahead were green; and, that more across city services were not run as congestion stopped the free-flow of traffic and meant that services ran late. iv. That passenger engagement was carried out by EYMS in many forms, including through forums, via Twitter and by email; and, that EYMS worked jointly with the Council to get information out to passengers, such as through leaflet drops.
Mr Shipp was asked what the average age range of bus users was, and responded that school and college buses brought the age range down, but that 40% of EYMS service users were concessionary pass holders, although there were families who also used the buses. The Commission agreed that buses needed to be made more attractive to young people so that they continued to use them when they were older.
Michelle Hargreaves of Stagecoach advised that Stagecoach also engaged with their customers through Twitter, their web-site and through an App; that that week was national meet the customer week; that in Manchester a ticket could be bought via the app, and it was hoped that
Page 31 of 92 P a g e 7
that would be pushed out in other cities; that the reasons for the falling number of bus users was being looked at, and that congestion and the drop in off-peak travel needed to be considered and explained; and, that, in order to make bus travel more appealing, there needed to be a drop in fuel and insurance costs in order to make bus travel more affordable.
Professor Begg advised that, in the face of growing car ownership, how to make bus travel more appealing to car drivers needed to be made a priority.
The Commission discussed Hull’s cheap day bus tickets in comparison to other areas; that car parking costs needed to be increased to make bus travel more financially appealing; and, that bus travel patterns could have major impacts, such as the moving of a bus station in Lincoln where the footfall in some shops fell by 40%.
Recommendations: Reasons for Recommendations:
a) That consideration be given as to how the negative a) Professor Begg advised that economic growth would result in more impact of increased traffic on the City’s roads resulting car ownership, increased deliveries as people had more purchase from the current economic growth and investment can be power, and investment in industry would result in increased HGV planned for. and other commercial traffic.
b) Professor Begg suggested ways of making bus travel more b) That the Council, along with its public transport partners, appealing to car drivers, although the majority were aspirational. will consider working towards long-term planning to meet the challenge of reducing the use of cars and making bus travel more appealing, to include the consideration of the limiting of vehicles in the city centre; changes to the charging structure for parking in Council owned and private car parks; how the planning department can be
worked with so that the correlation between out of town
shopping and business parks and the increase in car
Page 32 of 92 P a g e 8
journeys and decrease of bus travel is considered under planning applications; the establishment of city car clubs; introducing work place parking levies; the increasing of
cross-city bus services and non-city centre bus hubs, how
van delivery patterns can be changed; the writing of schools traffic plans to encourage car sharing and increased walking to schools; how the attitudes of affluent travellers towards bus travel can be changed; and, how to increase engagement with those who are not already bus passengers.
a) Jane Price/ Nikki Stocks/ Dorinda Guy/ Graham Hall 26 TRAFFIC CONGESTION IN HULL b) Jane Price/ Nikki Stocks/ Dorinda Guy/ Graham Hall c) Peter Shipp/ Dave Skepper/ Kerry Ryan/ Graham Hall d) Kerry Ryan e) Andy Burton/ Graham Hall f) Andy Burton/ Graham Hall Graham Hall, Assistant City Streetscene Manager, attended the Commission to deliver a briefing outlining issues around traffic congestion in the City, including causes and measures that might mitigate it, and considering the formulation of an action plan to reduce it. Peter Shipp, Chief Executive, East Yorkshire Motor Services, Jon Donnelly, Commercial Manager, Stagecoach East Midlands, Michelle Hargreaves, Managing Director, Stagecoach East Midlands, and Adam Fowler, Community Environment Officer, CHEF, were also in attendance.
The Commission was informed that: i. There had been changes to the use of the City centre and the City’s roads; office space had moved to areas such as Priory Park; out of town retail parks had increased; school hours had altered; this had led to a change in peak hours and a change in the routes that people took; that historical traffic counts had reflected traffic moving from the City centre to arterial routes; and, that traffic continued to increase.
Following questions around the number of workers coming into Hull from outlying areas, what work could be done to reduce congestion from the
Page 33 of 92 P a g e 9
North and East, and progress with new park and ride sites, the Commission was further informed that: i. The problem with establishing additional park and ride facilities was cost; some years previously Streetscene had looked at extending the P&R offer; consideration was still being given to a Northern P&R; that it was unlikely an Eastern P&R would get planning permission at the preferred site at Hedon Aerodrome; and, that current austerity measures were a constraint on any development, especially as the numbers likely to use a P&R did not make it cost effective. ii. The Hull travel to work area was large; the Hull Card reflected the wide area; that it was hoped that in the future the covered area would include the West Hull villages; the natural break to the North was the A1079; and, that more would be done to promote the Card in the West.
Adam Fowler informed the Commission that: i. Increased passenger engagement was needed in order to find out what would encourage bus use; there were issues around the number of delivery vans on the road, but also in the number parking overnight in residential streets and driving to and from those streets; traffic would further increase should the Humber Bridge park be developed; the train offer from Hull was poor; the medical offer in the City centre was also decreasing as Castle Hill hospital was increasingly developed, which increased cross-City travel; and, there was a need for lobbying on behalf of bus travel, as there appeared in Hull, unlike other areas of the country, to be a social stigma against bus use.
A Member raised queries around pinch-points in the City, such as at the Calvert Lane/ Willerby Road roundabout and the need to monitor pinch- points across the City, and the need for radial, across City bus services.
The Commission was informed that: i. The Calvert Lane/ Willerby Road roundabout had been a problem for years and a study such as the one on Stoneferry was needed; some roundabouts in the City could be changed to traffic lights, and some traffic lights could be changed to roundabouts to ensure a balanced flow, a lot of funding would be needed to make those changes; that off the shelf schemes needed to be prepared ready for when funding became available; that pinch-point priorities needed to be identified by the bus companies and Members; and, the identified pinch-points should include future pinch-points, where changes in road usage could be predicted, such as where new buildings were planned.
The Commission discussed: i. Point 4.6 of the report; the timescale of the Siemens Intelligence Transport System update; that an action plan was being agreed; whether bus companies could use the information generated; that the bus companies had real time sharing and strategic sharing; and, much of the data was combined to improve vehicle flows. ii. Point 4.8 of the report; how commuters could be encouraged to change their travel arrangements; that when North Bridge was closed the message was got across because bus use increased, but it decreased again once the bridge reopened; and, that Car Clubs came at a
Page 34 of 92 P a g e 10
cost but could be considered as City centre living increased; that Car Clubs and Travel Plans were being considered. iii. That it was hoped to increase real-time bus shelters, but that funding was needed to do so. iv. That bus travel and buses needed to be made “cool” in order to make them attractive to new passengers; that live tracking could be used on smart phones; the need for employers to introduce workplace travel plans to encourage bus use rather than providing parking; and, the promotion of Hull Card to employers, with the possibility of purchasing one through salary sacrifice. v. Whether more bus lane penalties were issued at peak times or off-peak times; that issue of penalties varied on different days and different times of the day; whether buses were more punctual; that the buses were tracked to trace where they were; that EYMS would like to see bus lane times extended; and, in order to extend the hours of operation a TRO would have to be in place which could lead to objections and could result in an enquiry.
Recommendations: Reasons for Recommendations:
a. That it is requested that each of the Area Committees a) Graham Hall advised that Highways needed schemes to be drawn include on their agenda an item to enable Ward members to up so that if DfT funding was made available off the shelf schemes identify the current traffic pinch-points in their Areas which were ready to immediately put in place. they wish to be prioritised should funding become available.
b. That the Area Committees should also consider any future b) If new development schemes were in the pipeline any future impact pinch-points that may result from planned retail, industrial or on the transport infrastructure needed to be identified. housing developments.
c. That local bus operators are asked to identify any pinch- c) It was recognised that bus companies were aware of problems that points that they consider a priority for future work should the impacted on services. funding become available.
d. That a summary of work currently taking place to secure d) The officer advised that she was working to secure funding for additional real-time signage in bus stops will be circulated to additional real-time signs and members wished to see the detail the members of the Commission, along with an update on behind that work, in additional to the Hull Card update that was the take up and marketing of the Hull Card. scheduled to be circulated off-agenda.
e. That consideration will continue to be given to possible e) The bus operators believed that the afternoon rush hour had
Page 35 of 92 P a g e 11
changes to the hours of operation of the City’s bus lanes. extended due to changes such as altered school hours, and that bus lane times should be altered accordingly. EYMS representative f. That the Commission supports continued efforts to establish also wanted to see bus lane times extended to 7am to 7pm an additional Park and Ride site, should the funding f) The Commission agreed that the Priory Park P&R was a great become available. success and continued to agree that more should be being done to establish additional P&Rs.
a) Doug Sharp/ Andy Umpleby/ Fiona Harbord 27 UPDATE ON THE FIRST YEAR OF OPERATION OF BUS LANE b) Andy Burton/ Doug Sharp c) Andy Burton ANPR CAMERAS d) Andy Umpleby/ Doug Sharp
Doug Sharp, Assistant City Streetscene Manager, and Andy Umpleby, Parking Contract Manager, attended the meeting to provide an update and assessment of the first year following Automatic Number Plate Recognition (ANPR) bus lane camera installation.
The Commission discussed: i. Unpermitted use of bus lanes had reduced by about 94%; and; the importance of considering what the situation was before the use of the bus lane cameras. ii. The process of fining and appealing against fines. iii. Bus lane grace periods before fines were issued for the use of the lanes. iv. The inability to trace vehicles not registered with the DVLA; that, due to data protection laws, the details of unregistered vehicles could not be passed to the Police unless they were requested; and, that the Police were being worked with, as they wanted to assess how the bus lane cameras were working. v. That the restrictions on Brook Street were not working well in their current form, but APNRs could only be used on bus lanes; and, that restrictions would be reviewed once public realm works were completed on Carr Lane and the surrounding area. vi. Concerns that hyperlinks were sent to appellants and those appellants may not have access to computers. vii. That the number of appeals was decreasing, but that new cameras had been introduced; that the cameras would be moved to other sites, resulting in varying levels of appeals and tickets; and, that cameras may only be switched on for a single day so that they acted as a deterrent. viii. Whether there was any way of monitoring whether penalty notices sent through the post were received, as the recipient may not have time to appeal if the letter was not received; that the DVLA was informed if the letter was not delivered, so if the driver was traced they would also be prosecuted for not being registered; and, that the letter would be re-sent once the driver was traced, so there would be
Page 36 of 92 P a g e 12
no extra charge to the driver. ix. How the surplus funding from bus lane penalties could be used by the Council; that the overall strategic picture had to be considered to assess where the funding would be best used, whether that be on increased information or investment in park and rides; that the funding should have been used to continue to subsidise bus routes; that discussions would also consider reducing car parking and increasing parking charges; and, that a complicated piece of strategic work would be undertaken.
Recommendations: Reasons for Recommendations:
a) That officers will report back to the Commission the a) Members were concerned that residents had to travel to reasons why hearings related to outstanding fines for Northampton in order to attend court, should that be necessary. breaches of parking regulations and bus lanes are heard at Northampton Magistrates Court rather than locally, and advise of the possibility of them being heard in Hull.
b) That at an appropriate time officers will report back to the b) Currently there is a profiled surplus, although this may be an Commission on decisions around how any surplus bus overestimate as penalties may reduce as more residents recognise lane enforcement funding is to be spent. bus lanes. The surplus can be spent on anything that supports bus travel. c) That at an appropriate time officers will report back to the c) It was acknowledged that the use of cars within the city centre Commission on the outcomes of discussions around needed to be deterred. reductions in the car parking offer and an increase in car parking charges.
d) That the Commission will receive an off-agenda six- d) To keep members aware of the situation with regards to offences monthly update on the use of the APNR bus lane and surplus funds. cameras in April 2017, with a full update to be brought to the meeting in October 2017.
Page 37 of 92 P a g e 13
Page 38 of 92 MARK JONES DIRECTOR OF REGENERATION Energy and Infrastructure Overview and Scrutiny Commission
16 th November 2016
Page 39 of 92 Flood Risk Planning
Schemes Ongoing:
• River Hull defences – in construction
• River Hull + - contracting with DCLG for EU funding
• Humber: Hull Frontages – feasibility
• Willerby and Derringham FAS (surface water) – completed
• Cottingham and Orchard Park FAS (surface water)- seeking planning consent
• Anlaby and East Ella FAS (surface water)- in construction
• Holderness Drain FAS/nature reserve – land purchase ongoing
Page 40 of 92 Flood Risk Planning
• Hull Aquagreens- Howdale Road- Sutton, Barbara Robson- Sutton, Bellfield Avenue- Ings, Willerby Carr culvert completed. Bristol Road- Derringham, Willerby and Wymersley Road – Derringham and Kingfisher Close- Sutton to be completed December to April.
Page 41 of 92 Flood Risk Planning
• Howdale Road- provision of swale and dry detention basin planted with wildflower meadow seed. Spoil used to raise football pitch.
Page 42 of 92 Flood Risk Planning
• Willerby Carr Culvert daylighting. Problem- at capacity blocked culvert and maintenance issues Solution – create open watercourse in community neighbourhood garden/orchard, dog walking routes, habitat creation, reduced flood risk. Nominated for National CIRIA award.
Page 43 of 92 A63 Castle Street Improvement
• Traffic and Environmental appraisals (due to be completed 2016).
• ‘Iconic’ bridge postponed (after 2017).
• Highways England public exhibition delayed until 2017 pending review of business case.
• Meeting arranged early December with Alan Johnson MP, Andrew Percy (Northern Powerhouse Minister), and Chris Grayling (Secretary of State for Transport) to lobby for earliest possible delivery.
• Development Consent Order application to Government expected May 2017.
• Works start (late 2018), finish (2022)
• Scheme forms vital part of:- - Government’s Road Investment Strategy - Transport for the North’s Northern Transport Strategy - Humber LEP’s Strategic Economic Plan - The City Plan - The emerging Hull Local Plan
Page 44 of 92 A63 Castle Street Improvement
• Needed to offset worsening:- - Congestion - Air quality - Road safety - Severance
• Needed to realise full potential of:- - The Port of Hull - Enterprise Zones - City Centre - Waterfront / Fruit Market regeneration
• Short term improvement to existing Castle Street crossing at Humber Dock Street in time for 2017 (work underway).
• A63 / A1165 Garrison Roundabout needs to also be improved (awaiting funding).
Page 45 of 92 Hull to East Coast Main Line Rail Electrification
• First Hull Trains outline business case submitted to DFT (Autumn 2015) still awaiting approval.
• If approved earliest start of works 2018/19 (earliest opening 2022).
• If not approved likely to be delivered by Network Rail (2022-25).
• Case for electrification supported by Transport for the North and National Infrastructure Commission.
• Needs to form part of a package of improvements including:- - Increased service frequency Hull/Leeds. - Direct services to Manchester Airport. - Faster more frequent service to York and Sheffield. - More late night/early morning and weekend services.
Page 46 of 92
Briefing Note to the Energy and Infrastructure Overview and Scrutiny Commission – 16th November 2016
Hull City Council Annual Carbon Emissions 2015/16
Report of the Director of Regeneration
1. Purpose of the Briefing Note and Summary
1.1 This paper updates the Commission on the Council’s progress in reducing its carbon emissions and its environmental management system Investors in the Environment.
1.2 The Council reports on its carbon emissions under two statutory requirements; greenhouse gas reporting and CRC Energy Efficiency Scheme as well as for the Councils carbon reduction target. In addition the Council reports on wider energy use and performance through Investors in the Environment.
1.3 The Council has seen its carbon emissions reported through Greenhouse Gas emissions drop by 22.9% since 2007/8. The CRC Energy Efficiency Scheme is an additional cost for Councils for each tonne of carbon emitted. The continued reduction in carbon emissions reduces the Councils liability against the increasing costs of carbon allowances set by the Government.
1.4 The Council continues to make good progress in achieving its carbon reduction target. The Council’s carbon emissions are currently 20.6% below the 2005 baseline. The target is to reduce emissions to 34%-45% below the baseline by 2020/2.
1.5 The Council has again been reaccredited at the highest Green Accreditation by Investors in the Environment for its environmental performance across 76 of the Councils highest energy consuming buildings.
Page 47 of 92 1
2. Issues for Consideration
Single Indicator List Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reporting
2.1 The Council submitted its statutory requirement for Greenhouse Gas Emissions reporting under the Governments Single Indicator List by the 31 st July deadline. The Report has been published on the Councils web site alongside those from previous years (http://www.hullcc.gov.uk/portal/page?_pageid=221,1639109&_da d=portal&_schema=PORTAL ) as is attached as Appendix 1.
2.2 The submission showed that the Councils emissions have decreased by 15.9% from last year. This was as a result of a significant drop in electricity use over the year as well as another mild winter that continued to suppress gas use.
2.3 The Council has seen a reduction of 22.9% in greenhouse gas emissions from the 2007/8 baseline.
Corporate Carbon Emissions
2.4 The Council’s target is to reduce its carbon emissions by 34-45% by 2020 from a 2005 baseline. The emissions for the Council during 2015/16 showed a reduction of 20.6% from our 2005 baseline and a decrease of 2% from last year (see Table 1). The fall was assisted by a warm winter which suppressed gas use.
2.5 Electricity use in buildings showed an increase of 1% on 2014/15. Gas use in buildings has seen a decrease of 10% on 2014/15 and liquid fuel, which is primarily oil, saw a 51% reduction.
2.6 The warmer winters experienced in the last four years have significantly suppressed fuel for space heating and consequent carbon emissions arising. However, there has been a persistent and stubborn increase in electricity use across buildings over the last three years.
2.7 The new building work currently underway at the Ferens, New Theatre and Woodford Leisure Centre are expected to result in increased energy use and carbon emissions.
2.8 These developments will require the remainder of the estate to make deeper and swifter cuts in energy use so the Council can meet the target. At the current rate of carbon emissions reduction we are projected to fall short of our 2020/21 target by 3%.
Page 48 of 92 2
Table 1 Council Carbon Emissions (tonnes of Carbon dioxide)
Year Bu ildings Streetlights Transport Total % (inc CCTV (Fleet Emissions change & street Vehicles from furniture) and Grey 2005/6 Fleet) 2005/6 50,468 7,218 2,719 60,405 -
2006/7 46,629 7,297 2,719 56,645 -6.2%
2007/8 44,588 7,578 2,719 54,885 -9.1%
2008/9 44,755 7,564 2,719 55,038 -8.8% 2009/10 45,026 7,609 3,080 55,715 -7.7% 2010/11 45,312 7,636 3,149 56,097 -7.1% 2011/12 40,576 7,459 3,392 51,428 -14.8% 2012/13 41,489 7,478 3,382 52,349 -13.3% 2013/14 39,869 7,822 2,705 50,396 -16.5% 2014/15 38,319 8,444 2,399 49,163 -18.6% 2015/16 37,824 7,789 2,325 47,938 -20.6%
2.9 Graph 1, below, shows the Councils current carbon reduction performance and projected emissions reduction based on the average achieved to date. This will leave a shortfall of 2,096 tonnes of carbon and would equate to a 31% reduction on our 2005/6 baseline. The dotted line represents a 34% linear reduction in carbon emissions and the dashed line is the 45% linear reduction. The arrow shows performance to date.
2.10 The Council needs to achieve a further 13.4% reduction between now and 2020/21 to achieve its 34% target. This requires a minimum average annual reduction of 2.68% per year an increase of 0.12% per year from last year.
Graph 1
Page 49 of 92 3
2.11 Buildings account for 79% of the Councils carbon emission, a decrease of 5% from the baseline (Graph’s 2 and 3) but an increase of 1% as a proportion from last year. However, this is a reduction of 12,664 tonnes from the baseline year and is the lowest since we started recording the data.
2.12 Street lighting (including street furniture and CCTV) continues to represent a significant percentage of the Councils overall carbon emissions. This year representing 16% of our total emissions, a decrease of 1% from last year as a proportion of total emissions (Graph 3). However, this is a 14% decrease from the baseline year and is now at the lowest level of carbon emissions since we started recording the data. The LED replacement programme commencing in 2016/17 will see significant reductions in this area over the next three years
2.13 Fleet emissions have remained, as last year, at 5% of the Councils total emissions. The emissions continue to be at the lowest level in terms of tonnes of carbon emitted since recording began.
2.14 The introduction of eight electric vans into the fleet in September 2016 will being to reduce emissions in this sector alongside wider improvements in engine efficiency as vehicles are replaced. Increasing the number of electric and other low emission vehicles in the fleet where appropriate can make significant impact in carbon emission reduction.
Graph 2
Page 50 of 92 4
Graph 3
CRC Energy Efficiency Scheme (CRC)
2.15 This year was the second year of Phase 2 of the CRC. For Phase 2, emissions from the Councils buildings and street lighting are declared.
2.16 The Council reported CRC carbon emissions for 2015/16 of 24,929 tonnes which carried a financial liability of £401,356.
2.17 Compared to last year’s figures this year saw a reduction of 2,162 tonnes of carbon equivalent to £34,808.
2.18 The Council is able to purchase carbon allowances for CRC at a cheaper level in a “forecast” window based on emissions projections. Through this process the Council is able to limit some of the financial impact of the CRC.
2.19 The price for CRC allowances are linked to RPI and are announced each year in the Budget.
Legislative and Policy Changes
2.20 In the 2015 Autumn Statement the Government of David Cameron announced that CRC would come to an end once the second phase has run its course in 2018/19 as part of the red tape challenge. However, the removal of CRC would be cost neutral to the Treasury and additional costs will be applied to electricity bills through the Climate Change Levy. The Council therefore will not see any financial benefit from the removal of CRC.
2.21 At this time it is unclear how the additional charge through the Climate Change Levy will be calculated and if it will still be based on a rising costs of carbon emissions. It is assumed that the new
Page 51 of 92 5
Government of Teresa May will continue with the removal of CRC and to date there has been no information to the contrary.
Investors in the Environment (IIE)
2.22 The Councils environmental management system (EMS) covers the performance of 76 of the highest energy consuming corporate buildings.
2.23 The temporary closure of Ferens Art Gallery and Hull New Theatre during the 2015/16 period has artificially reduced energy use at these buildings. The closure of Woodford Leisure Centre in September 2016 will also affect the data next year.
2.24 The Council, following an audit in September 2014, was awarded Green Accreditation under the scheme the highest level. This was retained in September 2015 and October 2016.
2.25 To achieve the highest award within the EMS “Green Accreditation” the Council has adopted the following performance targets:
• 2% annual reduction in electricity and gas use measured in kWh • 2% annual reduction in water use measured in m 3 • Monitoring fleet/grey fleet kilometres travelled • Adopting an Environmental Policy • Monitoring paper use • An office recycling system in place • Calculate carbon footprint • Use of recycled/FSC certified paper • Adapting to climate change policy • Sustainable purchasing policy • The production of a Travel Plan for the authority
2.26 Table 2 below shows the detailed performance figures for the first three years of IIE. Comparing performance in 2015/16 with our baseline year it can be seen that the Council has achieved its performance targets of achieving a 2% linear reduction in electricity, gas and water use. However, electricity use has been declining slower than the other utilities and has, therefore, been flagged as amber in the table as the Council will need to increase action to ensure we meet the target for 2016/17. Graphs 4, 5 and 6 show performance against the linear reduction target for the utilities.
Page 52 of 92 6
Table 2
Target Target Target Target Linear Actual Actual Linear Actual Actual Linear Actual Actual Absolute Direction Linear Baseline Baseline Reduction Year 1 Year 1 Reduction Year 2 Year 2 Reduction Year 3 Year 3 Percentag of Travel Reductio Resourc Absolute Efficiency Year 1 Absolute Efficiency Year 2 Absolute Efficiency Year 3 Absolute Efficiency e Change from n Year 4 e Use Measure Measure Absolute Measure Measure Absolute Measure Measure Absolute Measure Measure Baseline Baseline Absolute 2012/13 2012/13 Measure 2013/14 2013/14 Measure 2014/15 2014/15 Measure 2015/16 2015/16 to 2015/16 (RAG) Measure 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17
15,710,768 16,031,3 97.59 15,692,6 95.53 15,396,552 15,169,7 92.35 14,786,84 Electricity 2 kWh 2 2 15,088,622 15,033,5 91.51 -6.20% A 96 kWh kWh/m 57 kWh kWh/m kWh 76 kWh kWh/m 9 kWh 86 kWh kWh/m 2 43,344,4 263.86 42,477,608 38,654,1 235.31 41,628,055 36,426,6 221.75 39,979,58 Gas 2 2 2 40,795,495 35,278,8 214.76 -18.60% G 98 kWh kWh/m kWh 89 kWh kWh/m kWh 21 kWh kWh/m 4 kWh 67 kWh kWh/m 2 31.26 m 3 29.61 m3 27.91 m3 3 G 162,395 3 139,892 3 126,350 34.11 m 149,787 Water 3 per 159,147 m 3 per 155,964 m 3 per 152,845 -20.20% m m m 129,456 per m3 employee employee employee m3 employee G Corporat 4,449,74 742 km per 4,425,46 937 km per 610 km per 4,104,302 reduction reduction 2,762,18 reduction -15% e Fleet 4 km employee 7 km employee employee 3,768,82 993 km per km 7 km 8 km employee G Grey 2,817,70 470 km per 2,537,62 537km per 511 km per 2,598,957 reduction reduction 2,317,04 reduction -29% Fleet 0 km employee 9 km employee employee 1,991,42 524 km per km 7 km 2 km employee G A4 - 2.57 A4 A4 - 2.35 A4 A4 – 1.77 boxes 2.02 boxes A4 –7672 15,413 boxes per reduction 11,141 boxes per reduction 8016 per reduction per -50.20% Recording Boxes Boxes employee Boxes employee Boxes employee employee method changed Paper G new A3 – 0.29 A3 A3 – 0.41 reams A3 – 0.27 reams baseline 1,764 reams per reduction 1,966 per reduction 1,239 per reduction A3 - 0.41 boxes -12% 2016/17 Reams employee Reams employee Reams employee 1,561 per Boxes employee
Page 53 of 92 7
Graph 4 Electricity 16,500,000 16,000,000 15,500,000 15,000,000
kWh 14,500,000 2% Reduction target 14,000,000 Actual Performance 13,500,000 13,000,000
Graph 5 Gas 50,000,000 45,000,000 40,000,000 35,000,000 30,000,000 25,000,000 kWh 20,000,000 2% Reduction Target 15,000,000 Actual Performance 10,000,000 5,000,000 0
Graph 6
Page8 54 of 92
2.27 The Council set no specific targets for paper use and fleet and grey vehicle travel instead aiming for a year on year reduction.
2.28 Fleet kilometres have reduced by 15% from the baseline and grey fleet by 29%. While grey fleet has shown a year on year reduction and has fallen by just over 800,000 kilometres in the last three years, fleet kilometres have increased from last year by almost 1m kilometres. However, this does still represent a reduction of 680,000 kilometres from the baseline year. We are undertaking a more detailed look at the figures to understand the variation in the 2014/15 and 2015/16 figures.
2.29 Paper use from A4 has continued to drop in absolute terms and is now 50.2% lower than the baseline and A3 has shown a 12% drop. The availability of better data from the multi-function devices enables the Council to better monitor actual paper use rather than using paper purchased as a proxy for paper use.
2.30 Therefore paper use will be re-baselined in 2016/17 using a new measure of recorded photocopying from the multi-function devices.
2.31 While IIE performance for accreditation is based on absolute reduction figures, performance is also presented as an efficiency measure. This relates gas and electricity consumption to the total internal floor area of the buildings and the other measures in relation to the total full time equivalent staff. Gas and electricity have both shown an improved efficiency measure reducing by 6.08kWh/m 2 for electricity and 49.1kWh/m 2 for gas since 2012/13.
2.32 However, efficiency for the other elements have decreased alongside decreasing staff numbers. The Council’s water efficiency has dropped with each employee using 2.85m 3 more than in 2012/13. Grey fleet mileage has also seen reduced efficiency with each employee now travelling on average 54km more than in 2012/13; likewise the corporate fleet travels 251km more. The corporate fleet figures do need to be tempered though as although staff numbers have reduced the services that the fleet vehicles provide has remained the same. As noted above further analysis needs to be undertaken into the fleet figures.
2.33 The Environmental Policy Statement is available on the internet and staff intranet.
2.34 Discussions with the IIE auditor in October 2016 agreed that because the Council has come out of or sold 14 of the original 76 buildings that for 2016/17 these should be removed from the list and the period form 2012/13 to 2015/16 be frozen.
2.35 Therefore for 2016/17 onwards the figures back to 2012/13 will be recalculated based on the reduced list of 62. The auditor also Page9 55 of 92
requested that the Council create a separate list for any new buildings that are added to the Councils estate that have a significant energy impact. Therefore Endeavour Education and Training Centre, Warehouse 9 and KREATE will form a new list from 2016/17.
2.36 The Council was audited for the Third year of IIE (2015/16) in October 2016 and retained its Green Accreditation.
3. Conclusions and Next steps
3.1 The Council is making god progress in reducing its energy consumption and carbon emissions. The continued development of energy/ carbon reducing activity such as LED street lighting, electric vehicles in the fleet and improvements to corporate buildings will continue the current progress.
3.2 Over the coming year the Council will continue to develop energy reducing projects to both reduce carbon emissions as well as reduce pressure on budgets. Staff will continue to be engaged in “doing their bit” to reduce energy use in the Council by good housekeeping measures.
3.3 An update report wil be produce in November 2017 so that the Commission can continue to see the Councils progress in this area.
Report of the Director of Regeneration
Contact Officer: Martin Budd Telephone No. : 01482 613098
Officer Interests: None
Background Documents: -
(i) Annual Carbon Report 2014/15 (ii) Council Environment Policy http://www.hullcc.gov.uk/portal/page?_pageid=221,710564&_dad=portal&_schema=P ORTAL
Page10 56 of 92
Glossary:
CRC Energy Efficiency Scheme:
The Council has a statutory requirement under the CRC legislation to submit a report by the 31 st July each year with its carbon dioxide emissions from gas and electricity use by its buildings and schools. Alongside this the Council is required to purchase carbon “allowances” at a cost of £16.10 per tonne at present to cover the carbon emitted and then surrender these by the end of October. There are significant fines for non compliance.
Investors in the Environment:
This is an environmental management systems (EMS) developed by Yorkshire Energy partnership (formally the Energy Saving Trust in Yorkshire). This is a low cost EMS available to the voluntary, public and private sectors. There are three levels of accreditation Bronze, Silver and Green.
Single Indicator List Greenhouse Gas Reporting:
The Government replaced the set of National Indicators (NI) with a revised Single Indicator List. As part of this the Council has a statutory requirement to report on its greenhouse gas emissions by the 31 st July each year. The Council must place the information on its website and confirm the web address to DCLG.
Page11 57 of 92
Appendix 1
Kingston upon Hull City Council
Carbon Emissions Report 2015/16
Introduction
The City Council adopted the Cities carbon reduction targets in the Environment and Climate Change Strategy 2010-2020. The Council is aiming to reduce its carbon emissions by 34-45% by 2020 from a 2005 baseline. The data in this report though has a baseline of 2007/8 because this is the date we have accurate information across our buildings and transport. Previous to this date information is only available for our buildings.
The data in the tables covers the Councils emissions from 95% of our buildings, including schools and street lighting and 100% of our staff mileage in their own cars while undertaking Council business.
Climate change poses a significant risk to the City Council and its administrative boundary. The Council has recognised these risks and this is an increasing part of the Councils risk assessment process. The Council has entered into several working relationships with lead companies in carbon reduction technologies and solutions.
In the last few years we have invested in photovoltaic installations at one of our libraries, car park and sports stadium to reduce energy use from the grid and carbon emissions. We also have an extensive programme of secondary school refurbishment which has seen the installation of biomass boilers.
The period 2015/16 will see the implementation of further energy spend to save projects and the continuation of the replacement of all the street lights in the City with LED.
GHG emissions data for period 1st April 2015 to 31 st March 2016 Global tonnes of CO 2e 201 5/16 2014/15 Base Year 2007/08 Scope 1 17,185 18,932 24,599 Scope 2 24,625 30,748 29,699 Scope 3 555 749 683 Total gross emissions 42,365 50,429 54,981 Carbon offsets 0 0 0 Green tariff 0 0 0 Total annual net 42,365 50,429 54,981 emissions
Company Information Hull City Council is a Unitary Local Authority responsible for the geographical area of the City of Hull. The authority is based at The Guildhall, Alfred Gelder Street, Kingston upon Hull HU1 2AA. Questions about this data can emailed to [email protected] Page12 58 of 92
Reporting Period This report covers the period 1 st April 2015 – 31 st March 2016
Change in Emissions The total emissions have decreased by 15.9% from last year which has been experienced across all three Scope areas. This equates to a decrease in carbon emissions of 8,064 tonnes of CO 2e.
The Council’s total carbon emissions represent a 22.9% reduction from our baseline year of 2007/8.
Approach We have followed the Governments Guidance on how to measure and report greenhouse gas emissions.
Organisational boundary The emissions are those generated as a direct result of the activities of the City Council in the delivery of its local authority function including emissions from schools.
Operational scopes We have measured our Scope 1, 2 and significant element of Scope 3.
GHG emissions State specific exclusions 2015/16 in tonnes of and % this represents CO 2e for relevant scope (excluding geographic exclusions) Scope 1 Heating fuel consumption 15,833 Owned transport 1,352 Process emissions 0 Fugitive emissions 0 Excluded, due to cost of data collection. These are expected to be <0.1% of total Scope 1 emissions Total Scope 1 17,185 Scope 2 Purchased Electricity 24,625 Total Scope 2 24,625 Significan t Scope 3 Business travel 555 Employee commuting 0 Not recorded Waste Disposal 0 Not recorded Total significant scope 3 555
Base Year We have established a baseline year of 2007/8 for reporting under this framework. While the Council has accurate data for emissions from its buildings back to 2000 this level of data is not available for our grey fleet and therefore would not provide an accurate baseline year across all Scope’s using this framework. Page13 59 of 92
Targets Our emissions reduction target is to reduce our carbon emissions by 34-45% by 2020 from a 2005 baseline across the Scope elements recorded above.
Intensity Measurement We have used the Department of Climate Change approved methodology for establishing the carbon intensity of the different fuel types used by the Council. We have expressed this is tonnes of carbon.
External Assurance Statement We have not undertaken an external assessment of our carbon emission declaration.
Carbon offsets The Council has not purchased any carbon credits for its emissions during the period of the report.
Green tariffs The Council has not purchased any of its energy from green tariffs during the period of the report
Page14 60 of 92
Briefing Paper to the Energy and Infrastructure Overview Wards : All and Scrutiny Commission
16 November 2016
Conversion of Street Lighting Lanterns to LED Technology
Briefing Paper of the City Streetscene Manager
1. Purpose of the Paper and Summary
This briefing paper advises members of the Commission on the progress made to date on the programme to replace street lighting lanterns with more energy efficient LED lanterns. There are circa 42,000 street lights in the city which have a current operating cost of £1.723 million per year, comprising £1.6 million in energy consumption and £123,000 in carbon tax. Once completed the replacement programme will make energy savings of £865,000 per annum
2. Background
The Council is about to commence a two year programme costing £6.9 million to replace circa 33,000 street lighting lanterns with LED lanterns following an earlier £1m City Plan scheme to replace 2140 existing street lighting lanterns in the city centre and arterial roads. This scheme is now 95% complete with a small number of lanterns to replace in the city centre mainly where the existing lighting columns clashes with new columns are provided as part of the City Centre Public Realm improvement scheme. All arterial roads are completed except for a small number of lighting columns on Anlaby Road which should be completed shortly.
3. Issues for Consideration
Following a tender process a contract for the provision of lanterns was awarded to Urbis Schreder on 15 th August 2016. An order for 6000 lanterns, sufficient for the first six months of the replacement programme was placed on 28 th September 2016. Delivery of the first batch of lanterns is due to be delivered during week commencing 14 th November 2016. KWL will commence installation during week commencing 5 th December 2016.
Author: Page 61 of 92 Status: Date: 08/11/2016 Page 1 of 2 Targeting higher energy consumption lanterns in the first six months which are on major distributer roads, the programme will then target residential streets at a conversion rate of circa 1600 lanterns per month. Energy savings will not start to be realised until March 2017 due to the protracted and lengthy processes of the Council’s energy provider however, it is envisaged months 1 and 2 will be possessed by March 2017 which will equate to a saving of £2,500 per month in energy costs. Further savings will be made in carbon reduction and maintenance. Full savings of circa £865,000 will not be realised until May / June 2019.
4. Next steps
To keep members of the Commission fully aware of the progress of the conversion programme a briefing paper will be submitted on a six monthly basis giving details of the number of lanterns converted and the energy and carbon savings made.
Andy Burton City Streetscene Manager
Contact Officer: Graham Hall Telephone No. : 614872
Officer Interests: None
Background Documents: None
Author: Page 62 of 92 Status: Date: 08/11/2016 Page 2 of 2
Briefing Paper to the Energy and Infrastructure Scrutiny Commission
16 November 2016
Highway Performance Update to 31 October 2016
Briefing Paper of the City Streetscene Manager 1. Purpose
1.1. To update the Commission on the performance of the highway services managed by Streetscene.
2. Summary
2.1. Overall, the highway service remains on course to deliver the agreed scheduled capital works for this financial year including the works required by Housing through the Housing Revenue Account.
2.2. The original capital programme was amended to reflect Anlaby Road and Park Street Bridge adjustments which were outside of the control of the Council. The programme has also taken account of the public realm works, major events and the need to minimise the impact of the highway repairs on major traffic routes.
2.3. The budget forecast for both income and expenditure indicates that the budget will be as required at the financial year end, as it is now - but with the usual caveat of being dependent on a routine winter from a weather aspect.
2.4. There has been a 16% increase in reactive repairs undertaken against the same period the previous year without additional resources.
2.5. Customer complaints have dropped by over 42% compared to the same time period for the previous year.
Page 63 of 92 Page 1 of 7
3. Scope
3.1. This briefing outlines the performance of highway services relating to;
• Highway schemes planned and delivered against the agreed Highway Capital Programme; • Highway Inspections; • Reactive Works; • Budget Management; and • Customer Feedback
3.2. The public realm works are not under the auspices of Streetscene Services until they are handed back to highways once the work has been completed and signed off as acceptable however, the influence of these works undertaken in the City Centre are reflected upon in this briefing where appropriate.
4. Highway schemes planned and delivered against the agreed Highway Capital Programme
4.1. Appendix 1 and 2 show the list of carriageway and footway schemes identified and agreed as part of this year’s highway capital programme. It forms part of a rolling three-year programme which is re-prioritised resulting from technical, mechanical and visual inspections throughout each year plus the use of local intelligence.
4.2. The programme is prioritised as part of the Highway Asset Management Plan to obtain the most cost effective life span for each individual asset such as, carriageway, footpath, bridge, street light or redundant technology. The treatment usually reflects where the asset is in its life cycle.
4.3. A scheme may also be part of an infrastructure improvement or a new asset such as LED lighting or a new cycle path.
4.4. Progress is good against the capital programme and every indication that the agreed works will be completed in full within the financial year 16/17.
Page 64 of 92 Page 2 of 7
4.5. It is extremely usual for the timings of schemes to be fluid until the scheme is fully designed. This is because of the availability of materials, procurement of contractors, utility asset information requests, co-ordination with other city developer works e.g. Public Realm, UTC etc, market conditions, prices. This makes the promising of scheme timings extremely difficult in the early stages however, once known, they can be more accurately firmed up and communicated. This does not mean however that approximate timings cannot be communicated in the early stages.
4.6. The highway asset programme manager adjusts the programme in accordance with the above. The main adjustments have been to the previously reported following schemes;
• Anlaby Road – will still complete before Christmas. The start of this scheme was delayed due to negotiations relating to the additional land that needed to be purchased to allow the scheme to progress and to accommodate the delays in completing their phase of the works by a utility company.
• Park Street Bridge – this will now commence in January 2017 as per the requirement of Network Rail however, this have proved beneficial to some of the Public Realm works.
4.7. The priority list for next financial year will be reviewed shortly and the list of schemes confirmed once capital allocations are known towards February/March 2017.
4.8. Appendix 3 indicates the streets identified to have the new LED lighting implemented over the coming months. The streets have been prioritised around those currently using high wattage and therefore reductions in energy costs as well as carbon taxes will be realised more quickly. KWL will install the lighting.
4.9. The bridge routine maintenance programme is on track. Currently this is managed through an older “Bridge Master” software system which is screen read only until the new update is installed early next year. A small team manages both the planned maintenance and reactive works. Failures on bridges can be more visible and have a major impact on the highway network and therefore the undertaking of planned maintenance is vital and is being carried out. This sometimes results in planned bridge closures – usually overnight or Sunday’s to minimise traffic congestion.
4.10. The painting of Drypool Bridge is on target to complete before 31 December 2016
Page 65 of 92 Page 3 of 7
5. Highway Inspections
5.1. The highway inspection team has been at its full establishment since a re- shuffle in Streetscene in early 2016. This included merging the inspection processes of routine inspection along with inspection of utility works as part of the existing New Roads and Streetworks Act (NRSWA).
5.2. There is also an inspector resource paid for by Housing to inspect the highway under their management but to ensure all the information is captured in the same asset database which is part of the main system called Confirm.
5.3. A schedule of inspections is maintained to ensure duties under the NRSWA is fulfilled. In addition to planned inspections a number of reactive inspections known internally as Customer Call Outs is also undertaken by this team. Customer call outs come from a variety of sources but primarily;
• Customer Call Centre/Web • Reported via Members • Self-reporting via Streetscene/Civic and other personnel • External reports via Police and bus companies
5.4. Not all inspections result in a job being raised if no defects are found that meet intervention levels however they do record potential future works, defects to keep an eye on and as part of their record keeping, they indicate streets where no intervention defects are found as this forms part of the asset information and indicates that inspections have been undertaken.
5.5. Defects raised by the Inspectors are then assessed for risk, whether it should form part of a scheme (to avoid a patchwork quilt of repairs and to ensure value for money for the asset) or is already part of a known scheme, whether it has been caused by utility or developer works and therefore if is it possible to be re-done under warranty and check that the highway is actually Council owned.
5.6. Appendix 4 shows the number of defects raised.
5.7. The average increase of jobs raised is in line with the additional capacity added to the inspection process. The additional capacity was required to ensure the annual, quarterly and monthly inspection regime can be carried out whilst also maintaining the NRSWA inspection quota (10% of new jobs started, 10% in-progress and 10% completed jobs on a daily basis).
Page 66 of 92 Page 4 of 7
5.8. The additional capacity also makes the inspection process more robust when dealing with trip claims against the Council.
5.9. This increase has led to 16% more defects being reported however this has been matched by a 16% increase in jobs completed without any additional resources in the reactive teams albeit the starting proportion between demand and supply was greater however, please see the cautionary note at serial 6.4 in Reactive Works below.
5.10. There is greater collaboration, co-ordination and consideration of defects and how they should be dealt with between asset management team, inspectors and highway reactive teams which has led to improved planning of reactive works and hence the greater productivity.
6. Reactive Works
6.1. The highway reactive works is a small team that deals with emergency call outs raised by the inspectors and/or by Civic during night time operations.
6.2. They also then work through the list of reactive works which are smaller highway jobs such as kerbs replacements, pot holes, broken barriers and signs. They also undertake some de-cluttering works to remove redundant assets.
6.3. As has been well reported at many Scrutiny Commissions, there is a far greater demand than is possible to supply given the funding available for this reactive area however the cause has its roots in the rate of the degradation of the asset which outstrips many times the grant funding and capital available. The on-going challenge whilst there is that funding gap is to continue to make efficiency and effectiveness gains through new techniques, methodologies and wise spending decisions based on the management of assets.
6.4. Appendix 4 also shows the repairs undertaken – caution however, should be given any emphasis on the gap between the jobs raised and jobs completed as, until the new Confirm system update is installed there is little ability to remove those outstanding jobs which have been addressed by minor and major schemes – see ICT and Structure below in “Current issues being managed”.
Page 67 of 92 Page 5 of 7
7. Budget Management
7.1. The total allocation of capital budget for 2016/17 is £5.1m.
7.2. The Highway budgets are on track to meet the net budget requirement for 2016/17 as is reported in the financial returns at the end of each month.
8. Customer Feedback
8.1. Comparing 2015/16 with 16/17 YTD figures for highways, the number of complaints has fallen by 42%.
Year 15/16 (YTD) Year 16/17 (YTD)
Number of Complaints 175 102
8.2. Further detailed analysis is a little restricted due to the classifications available within the current corporate feedback system however a theme of “Customer expectation of the timeliness of repair” would be the top reason for complaint. Given the demand versus supply issue raised earlier, this is not unexpected however it is known that will issue is also linked to communication and the ability to inform the customer about the status and progress of their request. This is something that Streetscene is actively engaged in improving via the new CRM system, the new web page development and the Confirm system upgrade as mentioned earlier.
8.3. Whilst welcomed, the City Streetscene Manager is cautious about the improvement in customer complaints until the further analysis is done, correlated with other surveys and feedback mechanisms that will be undertaken later this year, to ensure that the improvements are due to the planned actions undertaken by Streetscene to improve the service or is some other factor.
Page 68 of 92 Page 6 of 7
9. Current Issues being Managed
9.1. Procurement – Streetscene officers are working with procurement officers to seek ways to increase the speed of procuring contractors and materials.
9.2. ICT – The update to the highway essential Confirm system has had its priority raised. As soon as the major systems update is complete in December 2016, ICT resource will be available to complete this work. This will aid the self-assessment submission to the Department for Transport (DfT) and increase visibility to the public about works being planned and undertaken on the network.
9.3. Structure -The City Streetscene Manager is currently consulting on a revised structure for highways. This includes simplifying reporting lines and building in capacity for additional design and grant bidding resource to foster off the shelf, costed designs that can be submitted quickly as and when bid monies become available. There will also be improved asset database management in accordance with DfT criteria.
10. Appendices
10.1. Appendix 1 – Carriage Way Programme 16/17 Financial Year 10.2. Appendix 2 – Footway Programme 16/17 Financial Year 10.3. Appendix 3 – LED Replacement Programme – First three months 10.4. Appendix 4 – Reactive works raised and completed
Andy Burton City Streetscene Manager
Contact Officer: Andy Burton Telephone No: 612742
Officer Interests: None
Background Documents: - Highway Infrastructure and Asset Management Plan
Page 69 of 92 Page 7 of 7
Page 70 of 92 Appendix 1 - Carriageway Programme Brief Development Design Procurement On Site MONTH Scheme Complete MAY JUNE JULY WEEK COMENCING Area Ward DesignerTDT No. Scheme Title Location 23rd30th 6th 13th 20th27th 4th 11th 18th 25th Riverside Drypool EH 968 Mount Pleasant / Holderness Road Holderness Rail Bridge - Mount Pleasant Jnc - Ellis St jnc - Asda Development
Park / East Longhill / Marfleet 1058 Hopewell Road Grange Road - Taylor Avenue
Park / East Longhill / Marfleet 1058 Amethyst Road Barham Road - Amethyst Road semi circle
Park Marfleet 1058 Staveley Road / Hopewell Road Roundabout
Riverside Myton RL 1029 Market Place Liberty Lane - Castle Street
Riverside Myton RL 1029 George Street Freetown Way - Wilberforce Drive - Bond Street
Riverside Myton LP 972 Carr Lane Chariot Street - South Street
Riverside Myton LP 972 Chariot Street Paragon Street - Carr Lane
Riverside Myton LP 972 Paragon Street Chariot Street - South Street
Riverside Myton LP 1067 Anlaby Road / Park Street junction Anlaby Road / Park Street junction
Riverside Myton LP 1067 Argyle Street Hospital crossing location
Riverside Myton 1090 Humber Dock Street Blanket Row - Castle Street
Wyke Newland 1062 Newland Avenue Queens Street - Cottingham Road
Wyke Bricknell ER Bricknell Avenue inbound (East Riding) Hull boundary across Strathcona Avenue junction
Northern / WykeUniversity / Newland 1062 Cottingham Road / Newland Avenue Junction
Northern University 1062 Inglemire Lane Various locations School Entrance - Cranbrook Avenue
Northern Beverley / University 1062 Beverley Road Inglemire Lane junction
West Pickering 1091 Hessle Road West Bound outside lane Priory Grove - Pickering Homes
Riverside Myton SD 1051 South Street surface dressing Jameson Street - Carr Lane
Riverside Myton SD 1051 Anlaby Road surface dressing Ferensway - Carr Lane
Riverside Myton SD 1051 Dock Street surface dressing Vernon Street - Grimston Street
Riverside Myton SD 1051 Grimstone Street surface dressing Jarratt Street - Queens Dock Avenue
Riverside Myton SD 1051 Charles Street surface dressing Jarratt Street - Freetwon Way
Riverside Myton SD 1051 John Street surface dressing Charles Street - Worship Street
Riverside Myton SD 1051 Paragon Street / Square surface dressingSouth Street - Ferensway
Riverside Myton SD 1051 Anne Street surface dressing Carr Lane - Osborne Street
Riverside Myton SD 1051 Wellington Street surface dressing Humber Dock Street - Queens Street Page 71 of 92 Riverside Myton SD 1051 West Street surface dressing King Edward Street - Cross Street
Riverside Myton SD 1051 Bond Street surface dressing Albion Street - George Street
West / Wyke Derringham / Bricknell SD 1051 County Road North surface dressing Sorrel Drive - Park footway entrance
West Pickering SD 1051 Boothferry Road surface dressing outside lanes East & Westbound 5ways Rnd Abt - Anlaby Park Road
East Ings SD 1051 Saltshouse Road surface dressing Church Street - Howdale Road & Bellfield Avenue - Dunvegan Road
Park / Riverside Holderness / Drypool SD 1051 Chamberlain Road surface dressing Stoneferry Road - James Reckitt Avenue
Park Holderness SD 1051 Leads Road surface dressing Lindengate Way - Sutton Road
Park Holderness SD 1051 Holderness Road surface dressing Hurley Close - Ings Road inside lane
Northern University SD 1051 Inglemire Lane surface dressing Hall Road - Bus Lay-by various sections
Wyke Newland SD 1051 Bank Side surface dressing Clough Road - Mini Roundabout
West Boothferry SD 1051 Lomond Road / Lockton Grove surface dressingSpring Bank West - end / Lomond Road - end
West Boothferry SD 1051 Hamlyn Avenue surface dressing Anlaby Road - House No.s 49 & 60
West Boothferry SD 906 Woodland End Micro Surfacing Park Lane East - end
West Boothferry SD 906 Southern Drive Micro Surfacing Woodland End - end
Northern University SD 906 Salmon Grove / Part Auckland Micro SurfacingAuckland Avenue - Cranbrook Avenue
Northern University SD 906 Skidby Grove Micro surfacing The Quadrant - Inglemire Lane
Riverside Myton SD 906 West Parade Micro Surfacing Londesborough Street - end
Riverside Myton SD 906 Wenlock Street Micro Surfacing Westbound Spur towards Argyle Street
Riverside Myton SD 906 College Street Micro Surfacing Beverley Road - end
Riverside Myton SD 906 Grey Street Micro Surfacing Park Street - Colonial Street
Riverside Myton SD 906 Norwood Street Spring Bank - end
Riverside Drypool SD 906 Brackley Close Micro Surfacing Ashendon Drive - end
Riverside Drypool SD 906 Sherburn Street Micro Surfacing Holderness Road - New Bridge Road
Riverside Drypool SD 906 Holland Street Micro Surfacing Holderness Road - New Bridge Road
Riverside Drypool SD 906 Balfour Street Micro Surfacing Holderness Road - end
Riverside Drypool SD 906 Maple Grove Micro Surfacing Laburnum Avenue - Elm Grove
Riverside Drypool SD 906 Whitby Street Micro Surfacing Redcar Street - end
Riverside Drypool SD 906 Bibury Close Micro Surfacing Ashendon Drive - end
Wyke Avenue SD 906 Clumber Street Micro Surfacing Princes Avenue - Hardwick Street
Wyke Avenue SD 906 Wharncliffe Street Micro Surfacing Chanterlands Avenue - Hardwick Street
Wyke Avenue SD 906 Park Avenue West Micro Surfacing Chanterlands Avenue - end
Wyke Avenue SD 906 Eldon Grove Micro Surfacing Beverley RoadPage - end 72 of 92 Wyke Newland SD 906 Adderbury Grove Micro Surfacing Beverley Road - end
Wyke Newland SD 906 Ryde Street Micro Surfacing Beverley Road - Worthing Street
Wyke Newland SD 906 Manvers Street Micro Surfacing Exmouth Street - end
Wyke Newland SD 906 Raglan Street Micro Surfacing Exmouth Street - Newland Av
Wyke Bricknell SD 906 Southfield Road micro surfacing Bricknell Av - end
Park Holderness SD 906 Lindengate Way Micro Surfacing Leads Road - Lindengate Avenue
Park Holderness SD 906 Coleridge Street Micro Surfacing Westcott Street to end Westbound
East Ings SD 906 Peckham Close Micro Surfacing Wembley Park Avenue - end
East Sutton SD 906 Saltshouse Road Micro Surfacing Church Street - dead end
East Longhill SD 906 Wansbeck Road Micro Surfacing Nith Grove - Buckland Close
East Longhill SD 906 Wansbeck Road Micro Surfacing Wenning Grove Junction
Page 73 of 92 Appendix 1 - Carriageway Programme Brief Development Design Procurement On Site MONTH Scheme Complete AUGUST SEPTEMBER OCTOBER
Area Ward DesignerTDT No. Scheme Title Location 1st 8th 15th 22nd29th 5th 12th 19th26th 3rd 10th 17th 24th Riverside Drypool EH 968 Mount Pleasant / Holderness Road Holderness Rail Bridge - Mount Pleasant Jnc - Ellis St jnc - Asda Development
Park / East Longhill / Marfleet 1058 Hopewell Road Grange Road - Taylor Avenue
Park / East Longhill / Marfleet 1058 Amethyst Road Barham Road - Amethyst Road semi circle
Park Marfleet 1058 Staveley Road / Hopewell Road Roundabout
Riverside Myton RL 1029 Market Place Liberty Lane - Castle Street
Riverside Myton RL 1029 George Street Freetown Way - Wilberforce Drive - Bond Street
Riverside Myton LP 972 Carr Lane Chariot Street - South Street
Riverside Myton LP 972 Chariot Street Paragon Street - Carr Lane
Riverside Myton LP 972 Paragon Street Chariot Street - South Street
Riverside Myton LP 1067 Anlaby Road / Park Street junction Anlaby Road / Park Street junction
Riverside Myton LP 1067 Argyle Street Hospital crossing location
Riverside Myton 1090 Humber Dock Street Blanket Row - Castle Street
Wyke Newland 1062 Newland Avenue Queens Street - Cottingham Road
Wyke Bricknell ER Bricknell Avenue inbound (East Riding)Hull boundary across Strathcona Avenue junction
Northern / WykeUniversity / Newland 1062 Cottingham Road / Newland Avenue Junction
Northern University 1062 Inglemire Lane Various locations School Entrance - Cranbrook Avenue
Northern Beverley / University 1062 Beverley Road Inglemire Lane junction
West Pickering 1091 Hessle Road West Bound outside lane Priory Grove - Pickering Homes
Riverside Myton SD 1051 South Street surface dressing Jameson Street - Carr Lane
Riverside Myton SD 1051 Anlaby Road surface dressing Ferensway - Carr Lane
Riverside Myton SD 1051 Dock Street surface dressing Vernon Street - Grimston Street
Riverside Myton SD 1051 Grimstone Street surface dressing Jarratt Street - Queens Dock Avenue
Riverside Myton SD 1051 Charles Street surface dressing Jarratt Street - Freetwon Way
Riverside Myton SD 1051 John Street surface dressing Charles Street - Worship Street
Riverside Myton SD 1051 Paragon Street / Square surface dressingSouth Street - Ferensway
Riverside Myton SD 1051 Anne Street surface dressing Carr Lane - Osborne Street
Riverside Myton SD 1051 Wellington Street surface dressing Humber Dock Street - Queens Street
Riverside Myton SD 1051 West Street surface dressing King Edward Street - Cross Street
Riverside Myton SD 1051 Bond Street surface dressing Albion Street - George Street
West / Wyke Derringham / Bricknell SD 1051 County Road North surface dressing Sorrel Drive - Park footway entrance
West Pickering SD 1051 Boothferry Road surface dressing outside lanes East & WestboundPage 5ways74 of Rnd92 Abt - Anlaby Park Road East Ings SD 1051 Saltshouse Road surface dressing Church Street - Howdale Road & Bellfield Avenue - Dunvegan Road
Park / RiversideHolderness / Drypool SD 1051 Chamberlain Road surface dressing Stoneferry Road - James Reckitt Avenue
Park Holderness SD 1051 Leads Road surface dressing Lindengate Way - Sutton Road
Park Holderness SD 1051 Holderness Road surface dressing Hurley Close - Ings Road inside lane
Northern University SD 1051 Inglemire Lane surface dressing Hall Road - Bus Lay-by various sections
Wyke Newland SD 1051 Bank Side surface dressing Clough Road - Mini Roundabout
West Boothferry SD 1051 Lomond Road / Lockton Grove surface Springdressing Bank West - end / Lomond Road - end
West Boothferry SD 1051 Hamlyn Avenue surface dressing Anlaby Road - House No.s 49 & 60
West Boothferry SD 906 Woodland End Micro Surfacing Park Lane East - end
West Boothferry SD 906 Southern Drive Micro Surfacing Woodland End - end
Northern University SD 906 Salmon Grove / Part Auckland Micro SurfacingAuckland Avenue - Cranbrook Avenue
Northern University SD 906 Skidby Grove Micro surfacing The Quadrant - Inglemire Lane
Riverside Myton SD 906 West Parade Micro Surfacing Londesborough Street - end
Riverside Myton SD 906 Wenlock Street Micro Surfacing Westbound Spur towards Argyle Street
Riverside Myton SD 906 College Street Micro Surfacing Beverley Road - end
Riverside Myton SD 906 Grey Street Micro Surfacing Park Street - Colonial Street
Riverside Myton SD 906 Norwood Street Spring Bank - end
Riverside Drypool SD 906 Brackley Close Micro Surfacing Ashendon Drive - end
Riverside Drypool SD 906 Sherburn Street Micro Surfacing Holderness Road - New Bridge Road
Riverside Drypool SD 906 Holland Street Micro Surfacing Holderness Road - New Bridge Road
Riverside Drypool SD 906 Balfour Street Micro Surfacing Holderness Road - end
Riverside Drypool SD 906 Maple Grove Micro Surfacing Laburnum Avenue - Elm Grove
Riverside Drypool SD 906 Whitby Street Micro Surfacing Redcar Street - end
Riverside Drypool SD 906 Bibury Close Micro Surfacing Ashendon Drive - end
Wyke Avenue SD 906 Clumber Street Micro Surfacing Princes Avenue - Hardwick Street
Wyke Avenue SD 906 Wharncliffe Street Micro Surfacing Chanterlands Avenue - Hardwick Street
Wyke Avenue SD 906 Park Avenue West Micro Surfacing Chanterlands Avenue - end
Wyke Avenue SD 906 Eldon Grove Micro Surfacing Beverley Road - end
Wyke Newland SD 906 Adderbury Grove Micro Surfacing Beverley Road - end
Wyke Newland SD 906 Ryde Street Micro Surfacing Beverley Road - Worthing Street
Wyke Newland SD 906 Manvers Street Micro Surfacing Exmouth Street - end
Wyke Newland SD 906 Raglan Street Micro Surfacing Exmouth Street - Newland Av
Wyke Bricknell SD 906 Southfield Road micro surfacing Bricknell Av - end
Park Holderness SD 906 Lindengate Way Micro Surfacing Leads Road - Lindengate Avenue
Park Holderness SD 906 Coleridge Street Micro Surfacing Westcott Street to end WestboundPage 75 of 92 East Ings SD 906 Peckham Close Micro Surfacing Wembley Park Avenue - end
East Sutton SD 906 Saltshouse Road Micro Surfacing Church Street - dead end
East Longhill SD 906 Wansbeck Road Micro Surfacing Nith Grove - Buckland Close
East Longhill SD 906 Wansbeck Road Micro Surfacing Wenning Grove Junction
Page 76 of 92 Appendix 1 - Carriageway Programme Brief Development Design Procurement On Site MONTH Scheme Complete NOVEMBER DECEMBER JANUARY
Area Ward Designer TDT No. Scheme Title Location 31st 7th 14th 21st28th 5th 12th 19th26th 2nd 9th 16th 23rd Riverside Drypool EH 968 Mount Pleasant / Holderness Road Holderness Rail Bridge - Mount Pleasant Jnc - Ellis St jnc - Asda Development
Park / East Longhill / Marfleet 1058 Hopewell Road Grange Road - Taylor Avenue
Park / East Longhill / Marfleet 1058 Amethyst Road Barham Road - Amethyst Road semi circle
Park Marfleet 1058 Staveley Road / Hopewell Road Roundabout
Riverside Myton RL 1029 Market Place Liberty Lane - Castle Street
Riverside Myton RL 1029 George Street Freetown Way - Wilberforce Drive - Bond Street
Riverside Myton LP 972 Carr Lane Chariot Street - South Street
Riverside Myton LP 972 Chariot Street Paragon Street - Carr Lane
Riverside Myton LP 972 Paragon Street Chariot Street - South Street
Riverside Myton LP 1067 Anlaby Road / Park Street junction Anlaby Road / Park Street junction
Riverside Myton LP 1067 Argyle Street Hospital crossing location
Riverside Myton 1090 Humber Dock Street Blanket Row - Castle Street
Wyke Newland 1062 Newland Avenue Queens Street - Cottingham Road
Wyke Bricknell ER Bricknell Avenue inbound (East Riding) Hull boundary across Strathcona Avenue junction
Northern / Wyke University / Newland 1062 Cottingham Road / Newland Avenue Junction
Northern University 1062 Inglemire Lane Various locations School Entrance - Cranbrook Avenue
Northern Beverley / University 1062 Beverley Road Inglemire Lane junction
West Pickering 1091 Hessle Road West Bound outside lane Priory Grove - Pickering Homes
Riverside Myton SD 1051 South Street surface dressing Jameson Street - Carr Lane
Riverside Myton SD 1051 Anlaby Road surface dressing Ferensway - Carr Lane
Riverside Myton SD 1051 Dock Street surface dressing Vernon Street - Grimston Street
Riverside Myton SD 1051 Grimstone Street surface dressing Jarratt Street - Queens Dock Avenue
Riverside Myton SD 1051 Charles Street surface dressing Jarratt Street - Freetwon Way
Riverside Myton SD 1051 John Street surface dressing Charles Street - Worship Street
Riverside Myton SD 1051 Paragon Street / Square surface dressingSouth Street - Ferensway
Riverside Myton SD 1051 Anne Street surface dressing Carr Lane - Osborne Street
Riverside Myton SD 1051 Wellington Street surface dressing Humber Dock Street - Queens Street
Riverside Myton SD 1051 West Street surface dressing King Edward Street - Cross Street
Riverside Myton SD 1051 Bond Street surface dressing Albion Street - George Street
West / Wyke Derringham / Bricknell SD 1051 County Road North surface dressing Sorrel Drive - Park footway entrance
West Pickering SD 1051 Boothferry Road surface dressing outside lanes East & Westbound 5ways Rnd Abt - Anlaby Park Road East Ings SD 1051 Saltshouse Road surface dressing Church Street - HowdalePage Road 77 & Bellfieldof 92 Avenue - Dunvegan Road Park / Riverside Holderness / Drypool SD 1051 Chamberlain Road surface dressing Stoneferry Road - James Reckitt Avenue
Park Holderness SD 1051 Leads Road surface dressing Lindengate Way - Sutton Road
Park Holderness SD 1051 Holderness Road surface dressing Hurley Close - Ings Road inside lane
Northern University SD 1051 Inglemire Lane surface dressing Hall Road - Bus Lay-by various sections
Wyke Newland SD 1051 Bank Side surface dressing Clough Road - Mini Roundabout
West Boothferry SD 1051 Lomond Road / Lockton Grove surface dressingSpring Bank West - end / Lomond Road - end
West Boothferry SD 1051 Hamlyn Avenue surface dressing Anlaby Road - House No.s 49 & 60
West Boothferry SD 906 Woodland End Micro Surfacing Park Lane East - end
West Boothferry SD 906 Southern Drive Micro Surfacing Woodland End - end
Northern University SD 906 Salmon Grove / Part Auckland Micro SurfacingAuckland Avenue - Cranbrook Avenue
Northern University SD 906 Skidby Grove Micro surfacing The Quadrant - Inglemire Lane
Riverside Myton SD 906 West Parade Micro Surfacing Londesborough Street - end
Riverside Myton SD 906 Wenlock Street Micro Surfacing Westbound Spur towards Argyle Street
Riverside Myton SD 906 College Street Micro Surfacing Beverley Road - end
Riverside Myton SD 906 Grey Street Micro Surfacing Park Street - Colonial Street
Riverside Myton SD 906 Norwood Street Spring Bank - end
Riverside Drypool SD 906 Brackley Close Micro Surfacing Ashendon Drive - end
Riverside Drypool SD 906 Sherburn Street Micro Surfacing Holderness Road - New Bridge Road
Riverside Drypool SD 906 Holland Street Micro Surfacing Holderness Road - New Bridge Road
Riverside Drypool SD 906 Balfour Street Micro Surfacing Holderness Road - end
Riverside Drypool SD 906 Maple Grove Micro Surfacing Laburnum Avenue - Elm Grove
Riverside Drypool SD 906 Whitby Street Micro Surfacing Redcar Street - end
Riverside Drypool SD 906 Bibury Close Micro Surfacing Ashendon Drive - end
Wyke Avenue SD 906 Clumber Street Micro Surfacing Princes Avenue - Hardwick Street
Wyke Avenue SD 906 Wharncliffe Street Micro Surfacing Chanterlands Avenue - Hardwick Street
Wyke Avenue SD 906 Park Avenue West Micro Surfacing Chanterlands Avenue - end
Wyke Avenue SD 906 Eldon Grove Micro Surfacing Beverley Road - end
Wyke Newland SD 906 Adderbury Grove Micro Surfacing Beverley Road - end
Wyke Newland SD 906 Ryde Street Micro Surfacing Beverley Road - Worthing Street
Wyke Newland SD 906 Manvers Street Micro Surfacing Exmouth Street - end
Wyke Newland SD 906 Raglan Street Micro Surfacing Exmouth Street - Newland Av
Wyke Bricknell SD 906 Southfield Road micro surfacing Bricknell Av - end
Park Holderness SD 906 Lindengate Way Micro Surfacing Leads Road - Lindengate Avenue
Park Holderness SD 906 Coleridge Street Micro Surfacing Westcott Street to end Westbound
East Ings SD 906 Peckham Close Micro Surfacing Wembley Park Avenue - end Page 78 of 92 East Sutton SD 906 Saltshouse Road Micro Surfacing Church Street - dead end
East Longhill SD 906 Wansbeck Road Micro Surfacing Nith Grove - Buckland Close
East Longhill SD 906 Wansbeck Road Micro Surfacing Wenning Grove Junction
Page 79 of 92 Appendix 1 - Carriageway Programme Brief Development Design Procurement On Site MONTH Scheme Complete FEBRUARY MARCH
Area Ward DesignerTDT No. Scheme Title Location 30th 6th 13th 20th27th 6th 13th 20th 27th Riverside Drypool EH 968 Mount Pleasant / Holderness Road Holderness Rail Bridge - Mount Pleasant Jnc - Ellis St jnc - Asda Development
Park / East Longhill / Marfleet 1058 Hopewell Road Grange Road - Taylor Avenue
Park / East Longhill / Marfleet 1058 Amethyst Road Barham Road - Amethyst Road semi circle
Park Marfleet 1058 Staveley Road / Hopewell Road Roundabout
Riverside Myton RL 1029 Market Place Liberty Lane - Castle Street
Riverside Myton RL 1029 George Street Freetown Way - Wilberforce Drive - Bond Street
Riverside Myton LP 972 Carr Lane Chariot Street - South Street
Riverside Myton LP 972 Chariot Street Paragon Street - Carr Lane
Riverside Myton LP 972 Paragon Street Chariot Street - South Street
Riverside Myton LP 1067 Anlaby Road / Park Street junction Anlaby Road / Park Street junction
Riverside Myton LP 1067 Argyle Street Hospital crossing location
Riverside Myton 1090 Humber Dock Street Blanket Row - Castle Street
Wyke Newland 1062 Newland Avenue Queens Street - Cottingham Road
Wyke Bricknell ER Bricknell Avenue inbound (East Riding)Hull boundary across Strathcona Avenue junction
Northern / WykeUniversity / Newland 1062 Cottingham Road / Newland Avenue Junction
Northern University 1062 Inglemire Lane Various locations School Entrance - Cranbrook Avenue
Northern Beverley / University 1062 Beverley Road Inglemire Lane junction
West Pickering 1091 Hessle Road West Bound outside lane Priory Grove - Pickering Homes
Riverside Myton SD 1051 South Street surface dressing Jameson Street - Carr Lane
Riverside Myton SD 1051 Anlaby Road surface dressing Ferensway - Carr Lane
Riverside Myton SD 1051 Dock Street surface dressing Vernon Street - Grimston Street
Riverside Myton SD 1051 Grimstone Street surface dressing Jarratt Street - Queens Dock Avenue
Riverside Myton SD 1051 Charles Street surface dressing Jarratt Street - Freetwon Way
Riverside Myton SD 1051 John Street surface dressing Charles Street - Worship Street
Riverside Myton SD 1051 Paragon Street / Square surface dressingSouth Street - Ferensway
Riverside Myton SD 1051 Anne Street surface dressing Carr Lane - Osborne Street Page 80 of 92 Riverside Myton SD 1051 Wellington Street surface dressing Humber Dock Street - Queens Street
Riverside Myton SD 1051 West Street surface dressing King Edward Street - Cross Street
Riverside Myton SD 1051 Bond Street surface dressing Albion Street - George Street
West / Wyke Derringham / Bricknell SD 1051 County Road North surface dressing Sorrel Drive - Park footway entrance
West Pickering SD 1051 Boothferry Road surface dressing outside lanes East & Westbound 5ways Rnd Abt - Anlaby Park Road
East Ings SD 1051 Saltshouse Road surface dressing Church Street - Howdale Road & Bellfield Avenue - Dunvegan Road
Park / RiversideHolderness / Drypool SD 1051 Chamberlain Road surface dressing Stoneferry Road - James Reckitt Avenue
Park Holderness SD 1051 Leads Road surface dressing Lindengate Way - Sutton Road
Park Holderness SD 1051 Holderness Road surface dressing Hurley Close - Ings Road inside lane
Northern University SD 1051 Inglemire Lane surface dressing Hall Road - Bus Lay-by various sections
Wyke Newland SD 1051 Bank Side surface dressing Clough Road - Mini Roundabout
West Boothferry SD 1051 Lomond Road / Lockton Grove surface Springdressing Bank West - end / Lomond Road - end
West Boothferry SD 1051 Hamlyn Avenue surface dressing Anlaby Road - House No.s 49 & 60
West Boothferry SD 906 Woodland End Micro Surfacing Park Lane East - end
West Boothferry SD 906 Southern Drive Micro Surfacing Woodland End - end
Northern University SD 906 Salmon Grove / Part Auckland Micro SurfacingAuckland Avenue - Cranbrook Avenue
Northern University SD 906 Skidby Grove Micro surfacing The Quadrant - Inglemire Lane
Riverside Myton SD 906 West Parade Micro Surfacing Londesborough Street - end
Riverside Myton SD 906 Wenlock Street Micro Surfacing Westbound Spur towards Argyle Street
Riverside Myton SD 906 College Street Micro Surfacing Beverley Road - end
Riverside Myton SD 906 Grey Street Micro Surfacing Park Street - Colonial Street
Riverside Myton SD 906 Norwood Street Spring Bank - end
Riverside Drypool SD 906 Brackley Close Micro Surfacing Ashendon Drive - end
Riverside Drypool SD 906 Sherburn Street Micro Surfacing Holderness Road - New Bridge Road
Riverside Drypool SD 906 Holland Street Micro Surfacing Holderness Road - New Bridge Road
Riverside Drypool SD 906 Balfour Street Micro Surfacing Holderness Road - end
Riverside Drypool SD 906 Maple Grove Micro Surfacing Laburnum Avenue - Elm Grove
Riverside Drypool SD 906 Whitby Street Micro Surfacing Redcar Street - end
Riverside Drypool SD 906 Bibury Close Micro Surfacing Ashendon Drive - end
Wyke Avenue SD 906 Clumber Street Micro Surfacing Princes Avenue - Hardwick Street Page 81 of 92 Wyke Avenue SD 906 Wharncliffe Street Micro Surfacing Chanterlands Avenue - Hardwick Street
Wyke Avenue SD 906 Park Avenue West Micro Surfacing Chanterlands Avenue - end
Wyke Avenue SD 906 Eldon Grove Micro Surfacing Beverley Road - end
Wyke Newland SD 906 Adderbury Grove Micro Surfacing Beverley Road - end
Wyke Newland SD 906 Ryde Street Micro Surfacing Beverley Road - Worthing Street
Wyke Newland SD 906 Manvers Street Micro Surfacing Exmouth Street - end
Wyke Newland SD 906 Raglan Street Micro Surfacing Exmouth Street - Newland Av
Wyke Bricknell SD 906 Southfield Road micro surfacing Bricknell Av - end
Park Holderness SD 906 Lindengate Way Micro Surfacing Leads Road - Lindengate Avenue
Park Holderness SD 906 Coleridge Street Micro Surfacing Westcott Street to end Westbound
East Ings SD 906 Peckham Close Micro Surfacing Wembley Park Avenue - end
East Sutton SD 906 Saltshouse Road Micro Surfacing Church Street - dead end
East Longhill SD 906 Wansbeck Road Micro Surfacing Nith Grove - Buckland Close
East Longhill SD 906 Wansbeck Road Micro Surfacing Wenning Grove Junction
Page 82 of 92 Appendix 2 - Footway Programme Brief Development Design & program On Site MONTH Scheme Complete MAY JUNE JULY WEEK COMENCING Area Ward Designer TDT No. Scheme Title Location 23rd 30th 6th 13th 20th 27th 4th 11th 18th 25th West Derringham 1044 Ormerod Road & Ormerod Crescent Malvern Crescent - Malvern Road West Boothferry 1048 Luton Road East side Brooklands Road - Woodgate Road West Boothferry 1048 Rutland Road Brooklands Road - Brooklands Road West Derringham 1045 Brantingham / Everingham Walk Birdsall Avenue - End Wyke Newland 1054 Raglan Street South side Exmouth Street - end Wyke Bricknell 1046 Goddard Avenue North side Chanterlands Avenue - Kirkham Drive Wyke Avenue 1059 Lynton Avenue South Side Marne Street - Aisney Street Northern University 1047 Sutherland Avenue & part of Endyke LaneEndyke Lane - Braemar Avenue Northern University 1060 5th Avenue Opposite Ada Holmes Circle Park Southcoates West 1039 Sherwood Avenue / Eskdale Avenue Full Length East Ings 1049 Winchester Close South side Opposite No. 45 - No. 49 Riverside Drypool 1061 Cherry Tree Avenue Beech Avenue - Lime Tree Avenue West Pickering Hessle Road South side Various sections Summergroves Road - Monmouth Street Northern Orchard P and Greenwood Greenwood Avenue North side Ada Holmes West entrance - East entrance Northern University Bentley Grove West side Cottingham Grove - The Quadrant Northern Beverley Forbes Avenue Compass Road - End Northern Beverley Beverley Road East side Strathmore Avenue - No. 842 Park Southcoates West Southcoates Lane West side Edgeware Avenue - Preston Road Park Marfleet 1100 Annandale Road - West side Wingfield Road - Stonebridge Avenue Park Marfleet 1098 Falkland Road North side Annandale Road - Astwood Avenue Park Marfleet 1088 Crayford Close Bamford Avenue - End Park Marfleet 1099 Hemswell Avenue West side No. 125 - No. 193 Park Marfleet 1099 Hemswell Avenue East side No. 130 - Bothwell Grove Park Marfleet 1099 Bakewell Close North side Ashwell Avenue - No. 18 Park Holderness 1055 St. Andrews Way James Reckitt Avenue to the end East Longhill 1052 Frome Road Hardington Close - Beckingham Close East Longhill 1053 Hodder Grove Douglas Road - Kennet Road Riverside Myton George Street South side Wilberforce Drive - Grimston Street Riverside Drypool Morril Street North / East side No.59 - Newbridge Road City Wide City Wide 1084 Slurry Sealing programme Various
Page 83 of 92 MONTH AUGUST SEPTEMBER OCTOBER
Area Ward Designer TDT No. Scheme Title Location 1st 8th 15th 22nd 29th 5th 12th 19th 26th 3rd 10th 17th 24th 31st West Derringham 1044 Ormerod Road & Ormerod Crescent Malvern Crescent - Malvern Road West Boothferry 1048 Luton Road East side Brooklands Road - Woodgate Road West Boothferry 1048 Rutland Road Brooklands Road - Brooklands Road West Derringham 1045 Brantingham / Everingham Walk Birdsall Avenue - End Wyke Newland 1054 Raglan Street South side Exmouth Street - end Wyke Bricknell 1046 Goddard Avenue North side Chanterlands Avenue - Kirkham Drive Wyke Avenue 1059 Lynton Avenue South Side Marne Street - Aisney Street Northern University 1047 Sutherland Avenue & part of Endyke LaneEndyke Lane - Braemar Avenue Northern University 1060 5th Avenue Opposite Ada Holmes Circle Park Southcoates West 1039 Sherwood Avenue / Eskdale Avenue Full Length East Ings 1049 Winchester Close South side Opposite No. 45 - No. 49 Riverside Drypool 1061 Cherry Tree Avenue Beech Avenue - Lime Tree Avenue West Pickering Hessle Road South side Various sections Summergroves Road - Monmouth Street Northern Orchard P and Greenwood Greenwood Avenue North side Ada Holmes West entrance - East entrance Northern University Bentley Grove West side Cottingham Grove - The Quadrant Northern Beverley Forbes Avenue Compass Road - End Northern Beverley Beverley Road East side Strathmore Avenue - No. 842 Park Southcoates West Southcoates Lane West side Edgeware Avenue - Preston Road Park Marfleet 1100 Annandale Road - West side Wingfield Road - Stonebridge Avenue Park Marfleet 1098 Falkland Road North side Annandale Road - Astwood Avenue Park Marfleet 1088 Crayford Close Bamford Avenue - End Park Marfleet 1099 Hemswell Avenue West side No. 125 - No. 193 Park Marfleet 1099 Hemswell Avenue East side No. 130 - Bothwell Grove Park Marfleet 1099 Bakewell Close North side Ashwell Avenue - No. 18 Park Holderness 1055 St. Andrews Way James Reckitt Avenue to the end East Longhill 1052 Frome Road Hardington Close - Beckingham Close East Longhill 1053 Hodder Grove Douglas Road - Kennet Road Riverside Myton George Street South side Wilberforce Drive - Grimston Street Riverside Drypool Morril Street North / East side No.59 - Newbridge Road City Wide City Wide 1084 Slurry Sealing programme Various
Page 84 of 92 MONTH NOVEMBER DECEMBER JANUARY
Area Ward Designer TDT No. Scheme Title Location 7th 14th 21st 28th 5th 12th 19th 26th 2nd 9th 16th 23rd 30th West Derringham 1044 Ormerod Road & Ormerod Crescent Malvern Crescent - Malvern Road West Boothferry 1048 Luton Road East side Brooklands Road - Woodgate Road West Boothferry 1048 Rutland Road Brooklands Road - Brooklands Road West Derringham 1045 Brantingham / Everingham Walk Birdsall Avenue - End Wyke Newland 1054 Raglan Street South side Exmouth Street - end Wyke Bricknell 1046 Goddard Avenue North side Chanterlands Avenue - Kirkham Drive Wyke Avenue 1059 Lynton Avenue South Side Marne Street - Aisney Street Northern University 1047 Sutherland Avenue & part of Endyke LaneEndyke Lane - Braemar Avenue Northern University 1060 5th Avenue Opposite Ada Holmes Circle Park Southcoates West 1039 Sherwood Avenue / Eskdale Avenue Full Length East Ings 1049 Winchester Close South side Opposite No. 45 - No. 49 Riverside Drypool 1061 Cherry Tree Avenue Beech Avenue - Lime Tree Avenue West Pickering Hessle Road South side Various sections Summergroves Road - Monmouth Street Northern Orchard P and Greenwood Greenwood Avenue North side Ada Holmes West entrance - East entrance Northern University Bentley Grove West side Cottingham Grove - The Quadrant Northern Beverley Forbes Avenue Compass Road - End Northern Beverley Beverley Road East side Strathmore Avenue - No. 842 Park Southcoates West Southcoates Lane West side Edgeware Avenue - Preston Road Park Marfleet 1100 Annandale Road - West side Wingfield Road - Stonebridge Avenue Park Marfleet 1098 Falkland Road North side Annandale Road - Astwood Avenue Park Marfleet 1088 Crayford Close Bamford Avenue - End Park Marfleet 1099 Hemswell Avenue West side No. 125 - No. 193 Park Marfleet 1099 Hemswell Avenue East side No. 130 - Bothwell Grove Park Marfleet 1099 Bakewell Close North side Ashwell Avenue - No. 18 Park Holderness 1055 St. Andrews Way James Reckitt Avenue to the end East Longhill 1052 Frome Road Hardington Close - Beckingham Close East Longhill 1053 Hodder Grove Douglas Road - Kennet Road Riverside Myton George Street South side Wilberforce Drive - Grimston Street Riverside Drypool Morril Street North / East side No.59 - Newbridge Road City Wide City Wide 1084 Slurry Sealing programme Various
Page 85 of 92 MONTH FEBRUARY MARCH
Area Ward Designer TDT No. Scheme Title Location 6th 13th 20th 27th 6th 13th 20th 27th West Derringham 1044 Ormerod Road & Ormerod Crescent Malvern Crescent - Malvern Road West Boothferry 1048 Luton Road East side Brooklands Road - Woodgate Road West Boothferry 1048 Rutland Road Brooklands Road - Brooklands Road West Derringham 1045 Brantingham / Everingham Walk Birdsall Avenue - End Wyke Newland 1054 Raglan Street South side Exmouth Street - end Wyke Bricknell 1046 Goddard Avenue North side Chanterlands Avenue - Kirkham Drive Wyke Avenue 1059 Lynton Avenue South Side Marne Street - Aisney Street Northern University 1047 Sutherland Avenue & part of Endyke LaneEndyke Lane - Braemar Avenue Northern University 1060 5th Avenue Opposite Ada Holmes Circle Park Southcoates West 1039 Sherwood Avenue / Eskdale Avenue Full Length East Ings 1049 Winchester Close South side Opposite No. 45 - No. 49 Riverside Drypool 1061 Cherry Tree Avenue Beech Avenue - Lime Tree Avenue West Pickering Hessle Road South side Various sections Summergroves Road - Monmouth Street Northern Orchard P and Greenwood Greenwood Avenue North side Ada Holmes West entrance - East entrance Northern University Bentley Grove West side Cottingham Grove - The Quadrant Northern Beverley Forbes Avenue Compass Road - End Northern Beverley Beverley Road East side Strathmore Avenue - No. 842 Park Southcoates West Southcoates Lane West side Edgeware Avenue - Preston Road Park Marfleet 1100 Annandale Road - West side Wingfield Road - Stonebridge Avenue Park Marfleet 1098 Falkland Road North side Annandale Road - Astwood Avenue Park Marfleet 1088 Crayford Close Bamford Avenue - End Park Marfleet 1099 Hemswell Avenue West side No. 125 - No. 193 Park Marfleet 1099 Hemswell Avenue East side No. 130 - Bothwell Grove Park Marfleet 1099 Bakewell Close North side Ashwell Avenue - No. 18 Park Holderness 1055 St. Andrews Way James Reckitt Avenue to the end East Longhill 1052 Frome Road Hardington Close - Beckingham Close East Longhill 1053 Hodder Grove Douglas Road - Kennet Road Riverside Myton George Street South side Wilberforce Drive - Grimston Street Riverside Drypool Morril Street North / East side No.59 - Newbridge Road City Wide City Wide 1084 Slurry Sealing programme Various
Page 86 of 92 Appendix 3 - LED Replacement Programme - First 3 months
MONTH 1 AND 2 MONTH 3
Amethyst Road Access Road From Bond Street To Albion S Annandale Road Access Road To Argyle Street Unit Factor Barham Road Access Road To Courtney Street Unit Fact Bellfield Avenue Access Road To Francis Street Car Park Buckingham Street Access Road To Hawthorn Unit Factory Est Clarence Street Access Road To Walton Street Fair Ground Dansom Lane North Anlaby Park Road North Dansom Lane South Anlaby Park Road South Diadem Grove Argyle Street Ellis Street Askew Avenue Garrison Road Boulevard Great Union Street Brighton Street Griffin Road Calvert Lane Hedon Road Chariot Street Hopewell Road County Road South James Reckitt Avenue Daltry Street Marfleet Avenue Derringham Street Marfleet Lane Fpath From Goodrich Close To Community C Marfleet Lane Fpath Railway Dock Maybury Road Henry Boot Way Mount Pleasant Hessle Road Nestor Grove Lombard Street Northern Gateway Margaret Moxon Way Parthian Road Massey Street Plimsoll Way Nelson Street Preston Road North Road Savoy Road Sainsbury Way South Bridge Road Saxon Way Southcoates Avenue St Andrews Quay Internal Roads Southcoates Lane St Georges Road St Peter Street Vane Street Staveley Road Vernon Street Tedworth Road Walton Street Tower Street Wold Road Tower Street Priory Way Wivern Road Railway Street
Page 87 of 92
Page 88 of 92 Appendix 5 Highway Jobs Summary
Page 89 of 92
Page 90 of 92 ABC D E FGHI 1 OVERVIEW & SCRUTINY WORK PROGRAMME 2016-2017 2 Energy and Infrastructure Overview and Scrutiny Commission 3 SCRUTINY CHAIR: LEAD OFFICER: Andy Burton / OFFICER: Fiona Mark Jones Harbord 4 5 Responsible Commission Action/Decision Agenda Items Officer (In Key Lines of Enquiry/Other comments Reason for submission and actions resulting Outcome/Update Info DUE DATE RAG Date Allocation 6 attendance)
Policy for dealing with Andy Burton To amend the existing policy for dealing with vibration 14/09/2016 vibration related issues within (Sheila Henley/ related issues within the carriageway and the procedures the carriageway Steve Dyas) for dealing with complaints. 20 Action List Circulated 19.09.16. Taken to 26.09.16 Cabinet. That the Commission wishes to see mapping of complaints Reminder sent to AB 08.11.16. about vibrations, when those complaints were made and any Members were keen to see that there were no underlying Steve Dyas has produced a Andy Burton/ action taken, and that a report on that mapping be included in causes of vibration that resulted in clusters of reports and Nov-16 A map, which may be circulated Graham Hall the Highways monitoring report that is to be presented to the that had not been addressed. off agenda? Commission on a six monthly basis.
22
To ensure the commission are up to date with all key/current issues in relation to the City Plan priorities and informed of any areas of concern and have the facility To update the Commission on current/key issues and City Manager Presentation - Mark Jones to raise items of concern and enable these to be dealt with for members to identify matters to be considered, and 14/09/2016 Mark Jones (Malcolm Relph) quickly where appropriate. To include any matters being raise questions and issues on the presentation, that considered by parliament that are relevant to their service may lead to further work being undertaken. area and are likely to impact on the City Council at some time in the future. 25 Action List Circulated 19.09.16. That the Chair will issue an invitation to Andrew Percy MP to Draft letter sent to the Chair attend a future meeting of the Commission so that members 18.10.16. Sent to Cllr Mancey The Commission was keen to know what MPs were doing can discuss with him what he is doing to promote Hull and the for comment. Letter may not Cllr Petrini/ Fiona to lobby on behalf of Hull and the surrounding area and Nov-16 A development of the City’s transport infrastructure, to be sent as Cllr Mancey is to Harbord promote the City's transport infrastructure needs. specifically include the progress of the Garrison Road meet with local MPs and will Roundabout scheme. broach the subject of attendance at Scrutiny. 30 F&VfM OSC meeting of 18.03.16:- That a referral be made to the Overview and Scrutiny Management Committee that the impact on the City’s highways of new and expanded schools, how that impact can be mitigated, and how parking restrictions can be enforced, be considered by an appropriate Overview and Scrutiny Commission. Andy Burton That in response to Referral 2 (from the Finance and Value Concerns were raised at the dangerous parking and (Richard Car Parking and Traffic for Money OSC), the issue of parking and parking driving of parents dropping off and picking their Townend/ Andrew 14/09/2016 Management in the Vicinity of enforcement around schools is referred to the Energy and children up from schools, and the members were Umpleby) Alex Schools Infrastructure Overview and Scrutiny Commission for keen to see a policy introduced to ensure all new Codd/ Garry further consideration. build or expanded schools include provision for drop Taylor off and pick up points within the plans, and to see Parking Enforcement Officers deployed at problem schools.
34
Page 91 of 92 ABC D E FGHI
Action List Circulated 19.09.16. Meeting of 03.10.16 - The That a recommendation be made to Cabinet that each primary Deputy Chief Executive will school in the City is targeted by Civil Enforcement Officers for It was felt that it was better that all schools were covered draft a reply which explains Nov-16 A Laura Scholes one full week on a recurring basis, with a list of the schools for a single week rather than ad hoc enforcement. that the service is exploring the being worked through on rotation. potential use of cameras and that the level of penalties is set and cannot be amended. 36
That all Scrutiny Commissions include an item on their September agenda which seeks to identify any questions or points for examination relating to Hull City of Culture to enable the Overview and Scrutiny Management Committee to raise relevant issues and ensure that any concerns are City of Culture - Questions for Ian Anderson 14/09/2016 addressed. Referral to OSMC (Fiona Harbord) In addition can you also remind your member that they are welcome to attend the Overview and Scrutiny Management Committee at any time.
40 Action List Circulated 19.09.16. Queries were taken to 03.10.16 That the Commission will receive, off-agenda, a list of the OSMC meeting, but the questions that members wish the Chair to ask of the City of As the CoC company only attends the OSMC all Scrutiny questions were not addressed Culture representatives at the October meeting of OSMC. Any Commissions have to address queries to the CoC via Nov-16 A Fiona Harbord at that meeting, but were additional questions that they wish to be raised will be OSMC. instead to be forwarded to Jon forwarded to the Scrutiny Officer for collation. Pywell and the Readiness Board. 41
That a report on plans and studies related to congestion and traffic management in the City be delivered to a future To enable the Commission to fully consider the meeting of the Commission. G, Hall phone call 03.06.16 - issues around road congestion in the City-centre. Report on the Congestion and Andy Burton requested deferred to Sept 05/10/2016 Traffic Management of the City (Graham Hall) That appropriate stakeholders and partners, including the 2016 as external information To ensure all relevant points of view and experience bus company representatives, will contribute to the not yet supplied. are included and considered within the report. writing of the report to ensure that all interested parties have feed in. 45
Action List Circulated 05.10.16. That it is requested that each of the Area Committees include Graham Hall advised that Highways needed schemes to Request to be sent to all Jane Price/ Nikki on their agenda an item to enable Ward members to identify be drawn up so that if DfT funding was made available off Members, with officers Nov/Dec-16 A Stocks/ Dorinda the current traffic pinch-points in their Areas which they wish to the shelf schemes were ready to immediately put in place. attending informal meetings Guy/ Graham Hall be prioritised should funding become available where requireed. 46
Page 92 of 92