DOCSLIB.ORG

AOL Inc. Form 10-K Annual Report Filed 2012-02-24

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
AOL Inc. Form 10-K Annual Report Filed 2012-02-24 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION FORM 10-K Annual report pursuant to section 13 and 15(d) Filing Date: 2012-02-24 | Period of Report: 2011-12-31 SEC Accession No. 0001193125-12-076633 (HTML Version on secdatabase.com) FILER AOL Inc. Mailing Address Business Address 22000 AOL WAY 770 BROADWAY CIK:1468516| IRS No.: 204268793 | State of Incorp.:DE | Fiscal Year End: 1231 DULLES VA 20166 4TH FLOOR Type: 10-K | Act: 34 | File No.: 001-34419 | Film No.: 12635695 NEW YORK NY 10003 SIC: 7374 Computer processing & data preparation 703-265-1000 Copyright © 2014 www.secdatabase.com. All Rights Reserved. Please Consider the Environment Before Printing This Document Table of Contents UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K (Mark One) x ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011 OR ¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from to Commission File Number 001-34419 AOL INC. (Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware 20-4268793 (State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer incorporation or organization) Identification No.) 770 Broadway New York, NY 10003 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) Registrants telephone number, including area code: 212-652-6400 Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Name of each exchange on which Title of each class registered Common Stock, $0.01 par value New York Stock Exchange Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes x No ¨ Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ¨ No x Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨ Copyright © 2013 www.secdatabase.com. All Rights Reserved. Please Consider the Environment Before Printing This Document Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulations S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨ Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendments to this Form 10-K. x Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. Large accelerated filer x Accelerated filer ¨ Non-accelerated filer ¨ Smaller reporting company ¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x The aggregate market value of the registrants common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant (based upon the closing price of such shares on the New York Stock Exchange on June 30, 2011) was approximately $2.1 billion. As of February 17, 2012, the number of shares of the Registrants common stock, par value $0.01 per share, outstanding was 94,779,540. DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE Certain information required by Part III of this report is incorporated by reference from the Registrants proxy statement to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A with respect to the Registrants 2012 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. Copyright © 2013 www.secdatabase.com. All Rights Reserved. Please Consider the Environment Before Printing This Document Table of Contents AOL INC. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Number Part I. Cautionary Statement Concerning Forward-Looking Statements 1 Item 1. Business 2 Item 1A. Risk Factors 15 Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments 26 Item 2. Properties 26 Item 3. Legal Proceedings 27 Part II. Item 5. Market for Registrants Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities 28 Item 6. Selected Financial Data 30 Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 32 Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk 59 Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data 60 Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure 100 Item 9A. Controls and Procedures 101 Item 9B. Other Information 103 Part III. Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance 104 Item 11. Executive Compensation 104 Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters 104 Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence 104 Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services 104 Part IV. Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules 105 Signatures 106 Exhibit Index 108 i Copyright © 2013 www.secdatabase.com. All Rights Reserved. Please Consider the Environment Before Printing This Document Table of Contents AOL INC. INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA Page Number Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 61 Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 62 Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2011 and 2010 63 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 64 Consolidated Statements of Equity for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 65 Note 1: Description of Business, Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies 66 Note 2: Income (Loss) Per Common Share 75 Note 3: Goodwill and Intangible Assets 76 Note 4: Business Acquisitions, Dispositions and Other Significant Transactions 79 Note 5: Long-term Debt and Other Financing Arrangements 83 Note 6: Income Taxes 84 Note 7: Stockholders Equity 87 Note 8: Equity-Based Compensation and Employee Benefit Plans 88 Note 9: Restructuring Costs 93 Note 10: Commitments and Contingencies 94 Note 11: Accrued Expenses and Other Current Liabilities 96 Note 12: Related Party Transactions 96 Note 13: Segment Information 97 Note 14: Selected Quarterly Financial Data (unaudited) 98 Schedule IIValuation and Qualifying Accounts 99 ii Copyright © 2013 www.secdatabase.com. All Rights Reserved. Please Consider the Environment Before Printing This Document Table of Contents CAUTIONARY STATEMENT CONCERNING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS This Annual Report on Form 10-K (Annual Report) contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 regarding business strategies, market potential, future financial and operational performance and other matters. Words such as anticipates, estimates, expects, projects, forecasts, intends, plans, will, believes and words and terms of similar substance used in connection with any discussion of future operating or financial performance identify forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are based on managements current expectations and beliefs about future events. As with any projection or forecast, they are inherently susceptible to uncertainty and changes in circumstances. Except as required by law, we are under no obligation to, and expressly disclaim any obligation to, update or alter any forward-looking statements whether as a result of such changes, new information, subsequent events or otherwise. Various factors could adversely affect our operations, business or financial results in the future and cause our actual results to differ materially from those contained in the forward-looking statements, including those factors discussed in detail in Item 1ARisk Factors. In addition, we operate a web services company in a highly competitive, rapidly changing and consumer- and technology- driven industry. This industry is affected by government regulation, economic, strategic, political and social conditions, consumer response to new and existing products and services, technological developments and, particularly in view of new technologies, the continued ability to protect intellectual property rights. Our actual results could differ materially from managements expectations because of changes in such factors. Achieving our business and financial objectives, including growth in operations and maintenance of a strong balance sheet and liquidity position, could be adversely affected by the factors discussed or referenced in Item 1ARisk Factors as well as, among other things: changes in our plans, strategies and intentions; continual decline in market valuations associated with our cash flows and revenues; the impact of significant acquisitions, dispositions and other similar transactions; our ability to attract
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Our Comments to the FCC on the NTIA Petition for Rulemaking On
    Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, DC 20554 In the Matter of ) ) National Telecommunications ) RM – 11862 and Information Administration ) ) Petition for Rulemaking to ) Clarify provisions of Section 230 ) Of the Communications Act of 1934 ) COMMENTS OF TECHFREEDOM (CORRECTED) 110 Maryland Ave NE Suite #205 Washington, DC 20002 Dated: September 2, 2020 Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, DC 20554 In the Matter of ) ) National Telecommunications ) RM – 11862 and Information Administration ) ) Petition for Rulemaking to ) Clarify provisions of Section 230 ) Of the Communications Act of 1934 ) COMMENTS OF TECHFREEDOM: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Section 230 is the law that made today’s Internet possible. The law has allowed websites to host content created by users without, as the bill’s author, Rep. Chris Cox (R-CA), warned in 1995, “spending vast sums of money trying to define elusive terms that are going to lead to a flood of legal challenges.” Without the broad protections of 230(c)(1) in particular, websites would face “death by ten thousand duck-bites” in the form of massive litigation risks. NTIA asks the FCC to turn this law on its head, but the FCC has no authority to reinterpret the statute. The plain language and the legislative history of Section 230 demonstrate that Congress did not intend to grant any regulatory authority to the FCC. Instead, as Rep. Cox declared, Congress did “not wish to have a Federal Computer Commission with an army of bureaucrats regulating the Internet.” Under the statute’s express terms, the “interactive computer service” providers protected by Section 230 are not “information service providers,” nor are they otherwise subject to the FCC’s jurisdiction.
    [Show full text]
  • Cruising the Information Highway: Online Services and Electronic Mail for Physicians and Families John G
    Technology Review Cruising the Information Highway: Online Services and Electronic Mail for Physicians and Families John G. Faughnan, MD; David J. Doukas, MD; Mark H. Ebell, MD; and Gary N. Fox, MD Minneapolis, Minnesota; Ann Arbor and Detroit, Michigan; and Toledo, Ohio Commercial online service providers, bulletin board ser­ indirectly through America Online or directly through vices, and the Internet make up the rapidly expanding specialized access providers. Today’s online services are “information highway.” Physicians and their families destined to evolve into a National Information Infra­ can use these services for professional and personal com­ structure that will change the way we work and play. munication, for recreation and commerce, and to obtain Key words. Computers; education; information services; reference information and computer software. Com m er­ communication; online systems; Internet. cial providers include America Online, CompuServe, GEnie, and MCIMail. Internet access can be obtained ( JFam Pract 1994; 39:365-371) During past year, there has been a deluge of articles information), computer-based communications, and en­ about the “information highway.” Although they have tertainment. Visionaries imagine this collection becoming included a great deal of exaggeration, there are some the marketplace and the workplace of the nation. In this services of real interest to physicians and their families. article we focus on the latter interpretation of the infor­ This paper, which is based on the personal experience mation highway. of clinicians who have played and worked with com­ There are practical medical and nonmedical reasons puter communications for the past several years, pre­ to explore the online world. America Online (AOL) is one sents the services of current interest, indicates where of the services described in detail.
    [Show full text]
  • Case Study: Internet Explorer 1994..1997
    Case Study: Internet Explorer 1994..1997 Ben Slivka General Manager Windows UI [email protected] Internet Explorer Chronology 8/94 IE effort begins 12/94 License Spyglass Mosaic source code 7/95 IE 1.0 ships as Windows 95 feature 11/95 IE 2.0 ships 3/96 MS Professional Developer’s Conference AOL deal, Java license announced 8/96 IE 3.0 ships, wins all but PC Mag review 9/97 IE 4.0 ships, wins all the reviews IE Feature Chronology IE 1.0 (7/14/95) IE 2.0 (11/17/95) HTML 2.0 HTML Tables, other NS enhancements HTML <font face=> Cell background colors & images Progressive Rendering HTTP cookies (arthurbi) Windows Integration SSL Start.Run HTML (MS enhancements) Internet Shortcuts <marquee> Password Caching background sounds Auto Connect, in-line AVIs Disconnect Active VRML 1.0 Navigator parity MS innovation Feature Chronology - continued IE 3.0 (8/12/96) IE 3.0 - continued... IE 4.0 (9/12/97) Java Accessibility Dynamic HTML (W3C) HTML Frames PICS (W3C) Data Binding Floating frames HTML CSS (W3C) 2D positioning Componentized HTML <object> (W3C) Java JDK 1.1 ActiveX Scripting ActiveX Controls Explorer Bars JavaScript Code Download Active Setup VBScript Code Signing Active Channels MSHTML, SHDOCVW IEAK (corporations) CDF (XML) WININET, URLMON Internet Setup Wizard Security Zones DocObj hosting Referral Server Windows Integration Single Explorer ActiveDesktop™ Navigator parity MS innovation Quick Launch, … Wins for IE • Quality • CoolBar, Explorer Bars • Componetization • Great Mail/News Client • ActiveX Controls – Outlook Express – vs. Nav plug-ins
    [Show full text]
  • Browsers Supported
    System and Browser Requirements for Online Bill Pay (Revised June, 2013) The following list describes systems and browsers that are classified as “Supported” and “Allowed” for PayLynx online bill pay. While the billpay application functions properly with other browser and platform combinations, PSCU recommends only those on the following list: Microsoft Windows: Windows 8: Supported - IE 10*, Firefox & Chrome – Current Stable Release Allowed - JAWS 14, IE 9* Windows 7: Supported - IE 9*, Firefox & Chrome – Current Stable Release Allowed – IE 10, JAWS 14.0 * Internet Explorer 9 supported when used in Compatibility Mode http://windows.microsoft.com/en-US/internet-explorer/use-compatibility-view#ie=ie-9 Macintosh: OS X 10.7 – Safari 6.x, Allowed - Firefox & Chrome – Current Stable Release OS X 10.6 – Safari 6.x, Allowed - Firefox & Chrome – Current Stable Release Browser Notes: • JavaScript – is required for the application to function optimally. • Cookies – the browser must be set to allow cookies and/or explicitly allow 3rd party cookies. • Screen Resolution – 800 x 600 VGA or higher • Windows Display Properties Settings – should be 96 dpi (Windows default) • Browser Text Size – should be Medium Blocked Browsers: The following browsers are programmatically blocked from use: • Microsoft Windows – CompuServe, Netscape • Macintosh – Microsoft IE Macintosh Screen Capture: • Apple/Shift/3 – Captures the entire screen • Apple/Shift/4 – Click and drag the pointer and release mouse button to capture a portion of the screen. Links for Browsers: • Microsoft http://windows.microsoft.com/en-US/windows/products/internet-explorer • Apple http://www.apple.com/downloads/ • Mozilla http://www.mozilla.org/products/firefox/ • Google http://www.google.com/chrome/ • JAWS http://sales.freedomscientific.com/ProductInfo.aspx?productid=340014-001 Browser Category Definitions: • Supported – All functionality of the product has been tested and successfully meets functional and design requirements.
    [Show full text]
  • Omnichannel Demand- Side Platforms, Q2 2017
    FOR B2C MARKETING PROFESSIONALS The Forrester Wave™: Omnichannel Demand- Side Platforms, Q2 2017 People-Based Data, New Paths To Inventory, And Even More Transparency Drive Innovation Amidst Consolidation by Richard Joyce and Samantha Merlivat May 30, 2017 Why Read This Report Key Takeaways In our 36-criteria evaluation of omnichannel MediaMath, DataXu, Turn, Rocket Fuel, Adobe, demand-side platform (DSP) providers, we And The Trade Desk Lead The Pack identified the 11 most significant ones — Adform, Forrester’s research uncovered a market in Adobe, AOL, AppNexus, DataXu, Google, which MediaMath, DataXu, Turn, Rocket Fuel, MediaMath, Rocket Fuel, The Trade Desk, Adobe and The Trade Desk lead the pack. AOL, Turn, and Viant — and researched, analyzed, AppNexus, Adform, and Google offer competitive and scored them. This report shows how each options. Viant lags behind. provider measures up and helps marketing Marketing Pros Are Looking For Differentiated professionals make the right choice. Omnichannel DSPs Omnichannel DSPs continue to evolve because marketing professionals are challenged by omnichannel digital media buying. While differentiation is subtle, it’s clear that some vendors are better equipped to meet marketers’ increasingly complex needs. Data, Inventory, And Machine Learning Are Key Differentiators As competitive technologies approach product parity and equal scale, people-based data, nonstandard system access, and flexible and transparent machine learning will determine market leaders. Vendors that can provide these for marketers
    [Show full text]
  • Adtech Ecosystem Overview David Judd, 3Rd July 2015 the Evolution of Display Advertising Buyside
    02 – AdTech ecosystem overview David Judd, 3rd July 2015 The Evolution of Display Advertising Buyside . CPM and Direct to Publisher . Growth of publishers led to Ad Networks . The birth of fragmentation . Decrease in CPM and birth of CPC . Further decrease in CPM and CPC . Networks enabled clients to reach multiple . Concerns around buying the same audiences (unique users) audiences (unique user) 2, 3, & 4x . The birth of the Ad Exchange . Birth of the DSP and Agency Trading Desk . Mature RTB ecosystem ₋ Manage Audiences ₋ Ability to manage ₋ Bid on media • Audiences ₋ Manage multiple publishers • Bidded Buying . Ability to buy media w/o speaking to pus • Campaign Goal The Evolution of Display Advertising Sellside . Birth of the SSP allows publishers to: . CPM and Direct to Advertiser . Birth of the DSP and Agency Trading Desk adds new ₋ Allows Publishers to plug inventory into Publishing pains: multiple ad exchanges/DSP’s ₋ Greater Fragmentation ₋ Manage Yield ₋ Harder to Manage Yield and eCPM’s ₋ Manage and monitor eCPM’s ₋ Audience Buying makes booking and deliver ₋ Adjust inventory outlets more challenging The advertising space has become increasingly complex..... 4 .....followed by mobile. 5 The landscape complexity is borne out of the demand for programmatic targeting on the buy-side, and yield optimisation on the sell-side Landscape architecture 7 Value Chain: DSPs Ad Tech Platform / Channel Capabilities Shortfalls Key Players - Attribution concerns: Cookie synching - Most of the the key players in the DSP and device ID matching
    [Show full text]
  • 21 Types of News
    21 Types Of News In the fIrst several chapters, we saw media systems in flux. Fewer newspaper journalists but more websites, more hours of local TV news but fewer reporters, more “news/talk” radio but less local news radio, national cable news thriving, local cable news stalled. But what matters most is not the health of a particular sector but how these changes net out, and how the pieces fit together. Here we will consider the health of the news media based on the region of coverage, whether neigh- borhood, city, state, country, or world. Hyperlocal The term “hyperlocal” commonly refers to news coverage on a neighborhood or even block-by-block level. The tradi- tional media models, even in their fattest, happiest days could not field enough reporters to cover every neighborhood on a granular level. As in all areas, there are elements of progress and retreat. On one hand, metropolitan newspapers have cut back on regional editions, which in all likelihood means less coverage of neighborhoods in those regions. But the Internet has revolutionized the provision of hyperlocal information. The first wave of technology— LISTSERV® and other email groups—made it far easier for citizens to inform one another of what was happening with the neighborhood crime watch or the new grocery store or the death of citizens can now snap a beloved senior who lived on the block for 40 years. More recently, social media tools have enabled citizens to self-organize, and connect in ever more picture of potholes and dynamic ways. Citizens can now snap pictures of potholes and send them to send to city hall, or share city hall, or share with each other via Facebook, Twitter or email.
    [Show full text]
  • The Invisible Hand
    Laura Martin, CFA • [email protected] • (917) 373-3066 June 22, 2012 Dan Medina • [email protected] • (212) 705-0295 Entertainment & Internet NeedhamNeedham InsightsInsights Providing in-depth analysis of significant industry issues Martin’s Meditations The Future of TV: The Invisible Hand Since 1776, Adam Smith’s “invisible hand” has been a central intellectual tenant of markets and free enterprise. The TV ecosystem is one of the best case studies of the invisible hand at work. This report analyzes the Internet’s video ecosystem that may one day unseat the incumbent TV ecosystem. It also estimates jobs lost and consumer value destroyed if the government interferes with this transition. There are several important reasons the TV ecosystem has not suffered the same fate as music and newspapers in the digital age, including: ¾ Value Proposition. Consumers pay about $0.30 for every hour of TV they watch. ¾ Technology. Television has always embraced technology to improve its product. A media business predicated on technology is less likely to be disrupted by technology. ¾ Content. There is no hit-driven content business that can thrive unless the entire slate is funded ahead of time. If you allow consumers to pay for hits only, 80% of programming never earns money. ¾ Fierce Rivalries. The TV ecosystem consists of about two dozen enormous companies engaged in vicious negotiations every 5-7 years over who adds more value and why. Increasingly, they miss contract deadlines, but eventually negotiate how each can add more value to the TV ecosystem. ¾ Diversity Wins. AOL, MySpace and Yahoo are examples of dominant Internet platforms that were obsolete within 20 years.
    [Show full text]
  • SUMMER 2011 Ccjig.Blogspot.Com Growth of Patch, Indie Sites Shows Citizen Journalism Going Mainstream
    CIVIC and CITIZEN Journalism www.has.vcu.edu/civic-journalism INTEREST GROUP NEWS SUMMER 2011 ccjig.blogspot.com Growth of Patch, indie sites shows citizen journalism going mainstream By Jack Rosenberry June. Patch sites were CCJIG Newsletter Editor located in 11 communi- ties in New Jersey and One of the most Connecticut in late The annual convention is the highlight of in- striking recent develop- 2009 but grew to about volvement for AEJMC members, and this news- ments in the world of 100 sites in nine states letter previews CCJIG’s plans including a full online news, and citi- by August 2010 and slate of programming (page 3) and research ses- zen journalism, has approximately 800 sites sions (page 4). Also be sure to attend the mem- been the rapid expan- across 20 states by ber meeting at 6:45 p.m. Thursday Aug. 11 . sion of the Patch.com early 2011. Other convention facts to keep in mind: network of local news These local news Key Dates sites owned by AOL. sites primarily cover “Early Bird” registration deadline: July 8 Patch was started affluent bedroom com- Pre-conference sessions: Tues. Aug. 9 in 2008 by a group that munities that surround Conference: Wed. Aug. 10 to Sat. Aug. 13. included Tim Arm- large cities such as Convention Hotel: strong, a former Google New York City, Los An- The Renaissance St. Louis Grand Hotel, 800 executive. Armstrong geles, Chicago, Atlanta, Washington Ave. joined AOL in early and Washington, DC. Web site 2009, and the company http://www.aejmcstlouis.org/home/ acquired Patch that See PATCH, page 6 Online tools help educators teach selves, students By Sue Ellen Christian tal media as well as teaching the teach both the basic news writ- CCJIG Teaching Chair foundational elements of the ing and reporting and the multi- craft.
    [Show full text]
  • Feasibility Study of a Digital Platform for the Delivery of UK Independent and Specialised Films to the Home
    UK FILM COUNCIL Feasibility Study of a Digital Platform for the delivery of UK Independent and Specialised films to the Home by Screen Digest/Magic Lantern Feasibility Study for a Digital Platform for the delivery of Independent UK films and Specialised films to the Home 1 UK Film Council © 2006 UK FILM COUNCIL 1 Executive Summary .........................................................................................................................................4 Key Objectives.................................................................................................................................................... 4 Summary........................................................................................................................................................... 4 Proposals and Recommendations........................................................................................................................... 6 2. Demand for independently produced UK film and specialised titles ..................................................................9 Key findings ....................................................................................................................................................... 9 Opening up the market ...................................................................................................................................... 10 Missing opportunities?.......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Worldwide Revenue
    digitalposter08_v19_(jg).qxp 3/7/2008 5:24 PM Page 1 ADAGE.COM/DIGITALFAMILYTREES08 GO ONLINE TO EXPLORE AN INTERACTIVE VERSION WITH PROPERTY DESCRIPTIONS DIGITAL FAMILY TREES 2008 AND LINKS Interactive ventures of top media,web portal and agency companies MEDIA COMPANIES PORTALS/SEARCH AGENCY COMPANIES DIGITAL HOLDINGS OF FIVE MAJOR U.S. MEDIA COMPANIES PROPERTIES OF THE BIG THREE WORLDWIDE DIGITAL PROPERTIES OF THE TOP FOUR AGENCY HOLDING COMPANIES Key digital properties and services. See “About the Digital Family Trees” for more information. Key digital properties and services. Key digital services. Go to AdAge.com/digitalfamilytrees08 to see No. 5 Havas and No. 6 Dentsu. TIME WARNER NEWS CORP. GOOGLE OMNICOM GROUP INTERPUBLIC GROUP OF COS. U.S. UNIQUE VISITORS: 123.8 million U.S. UNIQUE VISITORS: 86.6 million U.S. UNIQUE VISITORS: 134.9 million DIGITAL SHARE OF ’07 REVENUE: 13% Ad Age estimate DIGITAL SHARE OF ’07 REVENUE: 10% Ad Age estimate WORLDWIDE REVENUE (’07): $46.5B U.S. MEDIA WORLDWIDE REVENUE (’07): $28.7B U.S. MEDIA WORLDWIDE REVENUE (’07): $16.6B U.S. MEDIA WORLDWIDE REVENUE (’07): $12.7B HOLDING COMPANY WORLDWIDE REVENUE (’07): $6.6B HOLDING COMPANY DIGITAL REVENUE (’07): $655M Ad Age est. U.S. MEDIA REVENUE (’06): $34.0B COMPANY RANK: 1 U.S. MEDIA REVENUE (’06): $15.4B COMPANY RANK: 4 U.S. MEDIA REVENUE (’06): $4.1B COMPANY RANK: 19 DIGITAL REVENUE (’07): $1.6B Ad Age estimate WORLDWIDE REV. RANK: 1 WORLDWIDE REV. RANK: 3 AOL CABLE ADVERTISING SERVICES AGENCIES AGENCIES AD NETWORKS AOL LIVING MAPQUEST BIGTENNETWORK.COM
    [Show full text]
  • Find Associated Domains Report
    Find Associated Domains Report yahoo.com Found 1224 domains Domain Company Email Sources Certainty yahoo.com Oath Inc. Base Domain 100% Redirect, SSL joystiq.com Oath Inc. Certificate, 100% Whois records visit Name match, yahoo7.com.au Yahoo! Inc. whois.ausregistry.com.au SSL Certificate, 100% for web based whois Whois records Name match, yahoowallet.com Oath Inc. [email protected] SSL Certificate, 100% Whois records Name match, domainadmin@yahoo- Redirect, SSL yahoo.de Yahoo! Inc. 100% inc.com Certificate, Whois records Yahoo Web Service India Pvt. Ltd. [email protected] Name match, Oath Inc. domainadmin@yahoo- Redirect, SSL yahoo.co.in 100% MarkMonitor inc.com Certificate, Yahoo! Inc. [email protected] Whois records Name match, domainadmin@yahoo- Oath Inc. Redirect, SSL yahoo.in inc.com 100% Yahoo! Inc. Certificate, [email protected] Whois records Name match, Redirect, yahoo.finance Oath Inc. [email protected] 100% Reverse Whois, SSL Certificate Name match, Redirect, yahoo.co Oath Inc. [email protected] 100% Reverse Whois, SSL Certificate Name match, Redirect, SSL yahoo.nf Oath Inc. [email protected] 100% Certificate, Whois records Reverse Whois, staticflickr.com Oath Inc. [email protected] 100% SSL Certificate Name match, yahoo.firm.in Oath Inc. [email protected] Redirect, 100% Reverse Whois Name match, yahoo.info Oath Inc. [email protected] Redirect, 100% Reverse Whois 1 / 58 Domain Company Email Sources Certainty Name match, yahoo.travel Oath Inc. [email protected] Redirect, 100% Reverse Whois Name match, yahoo.gen.in Oath Inc. [email protected] Redirect, 100% Reverse Whois Name match, yahoo.net Yahoo Inc.
    [Show full text]