GM 66922 NEW DEVELOPMENTS IN GRENVILLE GEOLOGY AND REMOTE SENSING, GUIDEBOOK FIELD TRIP B3, FORT-COULONGE REGION, WESTERN QUEBEC NEW DEVELOPMENTS IN GRENVILLE GEOLOGY AND REMOTE SENSING FORT-COULONGE REGION, WESTERN QUEBEC
GM 6 692 2 By
Kamal N.M. Sharma', Vernon H. Singhroy2 Louis Madore', Josée Lévesque2 Emmanuelle Giguère', Jules Cimon'
1 - Ministère des Ressources naturelles du Québec 2 - Canada Centre for Remote sensing
GUIDEBOOK FIELD TRIP B3 OTTAWA '97 GAC/MAC Annual Meeting
Ressources naturelles et Faune, Québec
1 3 MARS 2013
DIR. INFORM. GÉOL. 2 INTRODUCTION
Due to its geographic location, the Fort-Coulonge region (Figure 1) stretching from the Ottawa River in the south to the Cabonga Reservoir in the north, occupies a structurally unique and interesting position within the western part of the Grenville Province in Québec. It includes parts of two major lithotectonic domains : the western portion of the Central Metasedimentary Belt (CMB), and west of it, an extensive portion of the Central Gneiss Belt (CGB). The nomenclature used is the one introduced by Wynne-Edwards (1972). The Cayamant Lineament (Sharma et al. 1992) marks the limit between the Grenville Supergroup supracrustal rocks of the CMB to the east and the tonalitic - dioritic - granodioritic - granitic gneiss complexes and amphibolites of the CGB to the west. The Baskatong-Desert Lineament subdivides the CGB into two terranes, the Baskatong-Dozois Terrane and the Pythonga Terrane, respectively to the north and to the south of the lineament (Sharma, 1991 and Sharma et al., 1992. The present level of erosion lies very close to the surface or surfaces along which the supracrustal sequence of the CMB was transported towards NW and overthrust upon the adjacent gneissic terranes of the CGB. The sectors situated west of the Cayamant Lineament are thus dominated by the gneiss complexes of the CGB overlain by the metasedimentary rocks once part of the main body of the CMB. Consequently, the metasedimentary rocks and associated anorthositic rocks are present to the west of the Cayamant Lineament only as parts of the thrust nappes and in numerous small bodies representing the erosional relics of nearly entirely eroded nappes. The larger nappes consisting of supracrustal rocks are exemplified by the Fort-Coulonge and Cabonga nappes. During the northwest overthrusting of the metasedimentary pile over the adjacent gneissic terranes, the gneiss complexes composing these terranes did not remain unaffected, nor did they behave passively. In fact, these gneisses suffered intense deformation and were themselves thrust towards NW along subhorizontal to gently dipping decollements within the gneiss complexes, resulting in numerous thrust nappes consisting of gneiss complex rocks. It is within these deformation zones that numerous tectonic slivers of ultramafic rocks have been observed in the Fort-Coulonge area, as well as further northwestward in the Temiscaming region. 1
3 4 The field excursion is devoted to the observations of the structural and lithological characteris- tics of the Cayamant Lineament, Pythonga Terrane, thrust nappes consisting of the supracrustal rocks and of the gneiss complex rocks, and the occurrence of the ultramafic rocks.
PREVIOUS WORK
The earliest geological observations made in the area were in 1845 by Sir William Logan (1847) who examined the rocks along the Ottawa river during the reconnaissance work between Bytown (Ottawa) and Lake Temiscamang (Témiscamingue). In 1876, Henry G. Vennor and his assistant Lewis R. Ord carried out investigations along the Ottawa river and the southern portions of the Coulonge and Black (Noire) rivers. R.W. Ells (1907) made longer traverses along the Black (Noire) and Coulonge rivers up to a distance of about 70 miles northward from their junction with the Ottawa river.
More recently, the geological mapping done within parts of the area covered by the excursion include : reconnaissance mapping at 1:253 440 scale along Coulonge and Black (Noire) rivers by Retty (1933).
j mapping of Portage-du-Fort and lac Saint-Patrice area at 1:F6 720 scale by Katz (1976).
excellent detail mapping of Fort-Coulonge - Otter lake - Kazabazua area at 1:63 360 scale by Kretz (1977). MAJOR STRUCTURES AND TECTONIC SUBDIVISIONS
We started our field observations in the Fort-Coulonge region in 1989 with the objective to revise and reinterpret the pre-existing geological maps. Between 1989 and 1992, an equivalent of about two summer's work was devoted to a vast reconnaissance program to familiarize ourselves with the area and to outline the problems. At the same time we undertook a detailed structural interpretation of the satellite SEASAT-RADAR images covering 200 km x 100 km, 5 and of the Airborne - RADAR images covering 200 km x 18 km (Figure 2). The high-reso- lution Airborne-RADAR images were flown especially for us in 1989 by the Canada Centre for Remote Sensing to study the nature of the limit between the supracrustal rocks of the CMB and the gneiss complexes of the CGB. These interprations (Figure 3) provided high quality structural information, and have been instrumental to bring out several major structures, of fundamental importance, and which were previously unknown, e.g. Cayamant Lineament, Baskatong-Desert Lineament, NW-trending nappe structures, rare NE-trending nappe structure, brittle fractures related to the Ottawa-Bonnechère graben system etc. All these structures were well understood by 1991 (Lévesque and Sharma, 1991 ; Sharma, 1991).
Following these studies, a systematic mapping program has been in progress since 1993 to present involving K.N.M. Sharma, Louis Madore, Emmanuelle Giguère, Jules Cimon, Josée Lévesque, and Vernon H. Singhroy. Between 1993 and 1996 an area covering approximately 10 000 km2 has been systematically mapped from the Ottawa River in the south to the Baskatong-Desert Lineament towards north (Figure 1).
Cavamant Lineament
The two major lithotectonic domains - the Central Metasedimentary Belt and the Central Gneiss Belt - are juxtaposed along the Cayamant Lineament or the Cayamant Shear Zone (Figures 1 and 3). This lineament is significant for several reasons, the most important being that in addition to marking the western limit of the main body of the CMB, it also represents a major shear zone resulting from the overthrusting, towards W and NW, of the supracrustal pile, transported from the CMB, on top of the adjacent gneissic terranes (Pythonga and Baskatong- Dozois Terranes, subdivisions of the CGB). The Cayamant- Lineament thus constrains the western side of the «Central Metasedimentary Belt Boundary». This term must be reserved exclusively for the limits of the main body of the CMB. The southern side of the CMB Boundary is mostly hidden beneath the Paleozoics in Ontario. Our task now is to constrain the northern and eastern sides of the CMB Boundary which are not well understood at the present time. 6 7 8 Most importantly, as a major shear zone, the Cayamant Shear Zone is the first visible manifes- tation of the Basal Thrust Zone. The erosional remnants of this zone are well preserved in numerous exposures all along the Cayamant Lineament. Although the individual exposures may show minor local variations, the Waltham-type Zone is quite representative of the Basal Thrust Zone. Its upper part is composed of strongly tectonized straight-banded diverse litholo- gies including calc-silicate rocks, carbonate injections, and pegmatitic injections. The carbonate injections originate as a result of the remobilization and migration of the marbles originally present within the overlying tectonic pile. The lower part of the zone is characterized by straight-banded lithologies with diverse protoliths, such as granite, pegmatite, tonalite, diorite etc. and only little carbonate injections and calc-silicate rocks. Elsewhere, in its simplest form, the Basal Thrust Zone may simply consist of strongly tectonized metasedimentary rocks above and the gneiss complex rocks below, with a sharp contact between the two. In such cases the gneiss complexes usually show considerable migmatization.
Because of erosion it is difficult to estimate as to what could have been the total thickness of the Basal Thrust Zone. The field observations suggest that it must be in the order of several hundred metres.
These observations eloquently point out an important fact that the present level of erosion lies very close to the surface or surfaces along which the supracrustal sequence of the CMB was transported towards W and NW and overthrust upon the adjacent gneissic terranes of the CGB. During this event, and at this level, both groups of rocks underwent upper amphibolite to granulite grade metamorphic conditions. This would mean that the present level of observation corresponds to the depth where once the conditions of upper amphibolite to granulite facies predominated. In other words, we are now able to examine quite a deep section — mid-crustal or deeper — through the Grenvillian crust. Such an inference is nothing new. It was already postulated by Wynne-Edwards more than two decades ago : « ... the Grenville Province is a deep section part of an orogenic belt eroded to a level at which reworked sialic basement is the dominant rock-type exposed. » — Wynne-Edwards, 1972. Essentially the same message has been reiterated by Hanmer (1988), Davidson (1986) and others. 9 Now let us move westward from the Cayamant Lineament into the CGB.
Central Gneiss Belt and « Tectonic outliers » of supracrustal and anorthositic rocks
The presence of the Cayamant Lineament, marking the western side of the CMB Boundary, does not imply that there are no metasedimentary rocks present west of this lineament. In fact, we do find small and large, isolated to somewhat continuous, occurrences of metasediments with or without the associated anorthositic rocks west of the Cayamant Lineament for several tens of kilometres. The larger examples of these are represented by the Fort-Coulonge and Cabonga nappes, both composed of supracrustal and associated anorthositic rocks. In all these cases it can easily be proven that the metasedimentary rocks are tectonically overlying the gneiss complexes of the Pythonga and Baskatong-Dozois terranes of the CGB situated west of the CMB. Even where no visible remnant exposures of metasediments are preserved overlying the gneiss complex, the proof of the proximity of the earlier (before erosion) metasediments on top of the gneiss complexes is demonstrated by the occurrence of pinkish carbonate injections into the underlying gneiss complexes, and in places by the presence of unusually strong tectonic banding, intense deformation and/or migmatization within the gneiss complex.
We believe that during the overthrusting of the metasedimentary sequence on top of the gneiss complexes, under the prevailing metamorphic conditions of amphibolite to granulite grade, the marbles were highly mobile, and found their way as injections into the underlying gneisses in the form of pink carbonates which were also accompanied by a large amount of fluid activity which facilitated the development of unusually abundant skarns in their vicinity. In places such skarns have developed quite extensively. At the same time, in such zones variable portions of the originally tonalitic composition gneisses have become transformed into « scapolite gneisses » by the wholesale alteration of their plagioclase into scapolite, but at the same time perfectly preserving their original textures. Such cases may also be characterized by the development of diopside, sphene, apatite etc. to varying degrees. Furthermore, in areas where the metasedimentary rocks outcrop rather extensively, it is possible to observe the tectonically underlying rocks of the gneiss complexes due to the presence of erosional windows. 10 There is ample evidence that during the overthrusting of the supracrustal pile, transported from the CMB, over the adjacent gneissic terranes, towards W and NW, the gneiss complexes composing these terranes did not remain unaffected nor did they behave passively. In fact, these gneisses suffered as strong deformation as the once overlying metasedimentary rocks, developed a strong foliation and tectonic banding in the process, and were themselves transpor- ted towards W and NW along with their overriding load of metasediments. These phenomena are spectacularly evident in the structural interpretations of RADAR data, and confirmed by field studies, where the existence of several NW-trending nappes (rarely NE-trending) and their erosional remnants, hitherto unrecognized, has been demonstrated. Thus, during the thrusting event, packages of gneiss complexes were themselves thrust towards NW along subhorizontal to gently dipping decollements within the gneiss complexes. It is within these deformation zones that numerous tectonic slivers of ultramafic rocks have been observed in the Fort-Coulonge region, as well as further northwestward in the Temiscaming region.
KINEMATICS
There is an overwhelming accumulated evidence from the studies carried out, in Québec and in Ontario within equivalent terranes, by Harmer and Ciesielski (1984), Hanmer (1988), Madore and Sawyer (1992), Davidson (1986), Easton (1986, 1991), Hanmer and McEachern (1992), and from our own work, to suggest that the major tectonic transport took place towards W and NW during the compressive phase of the Grenvillian Orogenic Cycle. As a result, all the major fabrics observed in the rocks are attributed to this important phase of deformation and meta- morphism. However, in addition, we find evidence everywhere of a later phase of movements in extension (attributable to factors such as tectonic readjustment, back-sliding, collapse of a thickly stacked pile, stress release, etc.) in the form of low-temperature mylonites, cataclasites, lateral displacements, SE-verging folds, normal faults, etc. The observable displacements along these structures are of the order of millimetres, centimetres, metres to up to a few metres. We have not observed any single structure developed in extension to which we may attribute enormous displacements of the order reported, from isotope studies, by Van der Pluijm and Carlson (1989). Although the accumulative displacements resulting from the various individual 11 structures developed in extension could possibly add up to a large amount, but up until now we have not observed any single structure which would suggest a large displacement.
CENTRAL METASEDIMENTARY BELT FORELAND ZONE
It is important to understand this terminology intended to clearly express the tectonic relationships existing and observable between the metasedimentary rocks and the gneiss com- plexes. Because the thrusting event synchronously affects and involves not only the supracrus- tal sequence transported from the CMB, but also the gneiss complexes of the CGB, we have always preferred, since 1992, to designate the whole thrust zone as the « Central Metasedimen- tary Belt Foreland Zone », and have provided a clear definition of this terminology as follows :
« Central Metasedimentary Belt Foreland Zone »
Applicable to such an extent' within the gneiss complex terranes where the gneisses have suffered strong deformation and transport synchronously with their once tectonically overriding load of metasedimentary rocks during the main thrusting event attributed to the Grenvillian Orogenic Cycle (Sharma et al. 1992).
Obviously, the CMB Foreland Zone must extend for more than 100 km westward from the Cayamant Lineament where the whole thrusting event was initiated. This is due to the fact that our systematic mapping now extends to about 100 km from the Cayamant Lineament and we have not yet observed the termination of the effects of the thrusting event.
We stated in 1992 (Sharma et al. 1992) that we prefer the use of this recommended term to adequately designate the whole thrust zone. An alternative, which to us seemed much less favourable, was to at least modify the existing term as follows :
The amount of space or surface that something occupies or the distance over which it extends - Webster's Ninth New Collegiate Dictionnary, pp. 440. 12 « Central Metasedimentary Belt Boundary Thrust Zone »
During the same period Harmer and McEachern proposed exactly the same name.
BASKATONG-DESERT LINEAMENT
Another major structure identified from the interpretation of RADAR-images and confirmed by field studies is the Baskatong-Desert Lineament (Figure 1 and 3, Sharma, 1991) which is a steeply dipping to subvertical dextral shear zone of kilometric thickness. To date it has been traced from north of Baskatong Reservoir through Lac Désert, and along the Temiscaming Road to west of Lac Brodtkorb - a distance of about 70 km.
Near Baskatong Reservoir its orientation is NNE (parallel to the western limit of the CMB), then continuing westward, it swings to a NE direction near Lac Désert and finally becomes ENE to nearly E-W. It is a steeply dipping to subvertical structure manifested by straight gneisses, porphyroclastic gneisses (definitions of Harmer, 1988), mylonites, banded gneisses and strongly gneissic rocks. The lithologies involved in this deformation zone are tonalitic gneisses, dioritic gneisses, amphibolites, granitic gneisses (earlier granites-pegmatites) which have all been strongly transposed. In general, the structure dips toward E or SE, but where it becomes subvertical northwesterly to northerly dips are also observed, particularly in its western parts. Everywhere it shows excellent subhorizontal mineral lineations and extension lineations. The kinematic indicators suggest a dextral displacement.
The recognition of the Baskatong-Désert Lineament led us to subdivide the CGB of this region into two terranes : Baskatong-Dozois Terrane north of the lineament, and the Pythonga Terrane south of the lineament.
Radiometric work carried out by Guo and Dickin (1992, and personal communications, 1992, 1993 and 1994) of McMaster University shows Archean Sm/Nd model ages for the gneisses of the Baskatong-Dozois Terrane, and Proterozoic Sm/Nd model ages for the Pythonga Terrane. 13 Thus, a difference of about 1000 million years in the model ages of these two terranes confirms the importance of the Baskatong-Désert Lineament as a major structure within the Grenville Province. 14
FORT-COULONGE REGION
FIELD-LOG
15 DAY-1 — JIM LAKE ROAD
KM
0.0 Proceed W on Route 148 starting in front of the Fort-Coulonge covered bridge.
2.00 Turn right on Route du lac Jim (Chemin du Bois-Franc).
0.0 Reset the odometer to zero here at the beginning of the Route du lac Jim.
9.2 STOP-1 Long, fresh road-cut outcrops for about 500 m. Near the southern part very good straight-banded, fine to medium grained amphibolites with tabular habit, oriented NE with gentle SE dip, and SE lineations. Observe the intense deformation in the transpo- sed pinkish leucocratic granitic-pegmatitic material. The degree of deformation is not so
3 evident in the amphibolites, except for the strong tabular nature. The amphibolites possess good granoblastic texture. It contains plagioclase and hornblende in roughly
i x equal proportions with minor amounts of clinopyroxene, orthopyroxene and biotite. The v l etLAPY accessories include iron oxides, sulphides and apatite. The iron oxides and sulphides are .11 distributed in tiny grains near; grain mmargins of other minerals. Sulphides also form coatings on joint planes. ;: ~ p_D n
f Further north, outcrop on E side of the road. Chondrodite - olivine - diopside - sphene - phlogopite bearing marble with good tectonic banding. Bands of garnet-sillimanite gneiss, with pale purple garnet. Bands of deformed pegmatite, some with rusty surface. Bands rich in diopside-scapolite. Large patches of phlogopite and coarsely crystalline diopside, scapolite and pink calcite.
Still further north long cliff on W side of the road. Gently dipping amphibolites, amphibolitized diopside - scapolite - sphene - apatite bearing calc-silicate rocks, gameti- gerous deformed pink pegmatite-granite bands. Coarse sulphides associated with peg- matite and as coatings on joint planes. Locally large allanite crystals in pegmatites.
17.2 STOP-2 Large outcrops west of road. Pegmatite with large diopside crystals and patches rich in diopside. Minor pinkish carbonate zones containing diopside-phlogopite. Patches rich in phlogopite books. Calc-silicate gneisses amphibolitized to varying degrees.
17.6 STOP-3 Large cliff on W side of road. Banded sequence consisting of marble or carbonate injections, calc-silicate gneisses, and strongly deformed pegmatite-granite bands. Gently dipping towards SE, with a SE lineation. The{carbona a,contains diopside, scapolite, 1-' sphene, phlogopite, apatite etc. The deformed pegmatite-granite bands were subjected to considerable grain-size reduction and contain diopside, sphene, apatite and disseminated sulphides. f ~✓,~ (Aa4L AOC+C_R`.,. r.) ,,,`.mow.` " , 20.1 STOP-4 '''`. to Large, long outcrops west of road. Leucocratic, pink pegmatites-granite's with large ,• 20.3 diopside crystals, and patches and masses of varying size, find shape)rich in diopside. '` (diopsidite) or diopside - scapolite - sphene - apatite. There may be theoccasional G presence of patches and pickets of pinkish coarse carbonate. The pegmatite-granite also P \()A_ contain, biotite and allanite crystals. The pegmatite-granite or devoid of quartz in the vicinity of diopside and calc-silicate minerals rich patches. The silica being largely consumed in the formationiopside.
The close ass c of pegmatite and diopside - scapolite - sphene - carbonate bearing patches test `le proximity to marbles which were part of the overriding tectonic pile during the thrusting event as explained earlier. 30.8 STOP-5 Large road-cut outcrop west of road. Leucocratic pegmatite-granite, diopsidite, calc- silicate rocks and banded granitic gneisses with SE dips. The calc-silicate rocks contain diopside, scapolite, phlogopite, sphene, apatite etc. Excellent large prismatic crystals of scapolite. Pinkish carbonate coarse to very coarse grained, also containing diopside, greenish-bluish apatite crystals, phlogopite-biotite etc. )