The Works of Thomas Carlyle in Thirty Volumes
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Baptist M.P.'S in the Sixteenth and Eighteenth Centuries
Baptist M.Pes in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries HE primary purpose of this article is not to give full studies or T even biographical outlines of early Baptist M.P.s, but rather to attempt to identify which M.P.s were Baptists. 1 Accordingly the chief detail in the lists of M.P.s at the end refers to their religious allegiance. Each entry includes a man's dates of birth and death, where known; a list of the occasions on which he sat in parliament; a few general biographical data; an assessment of the evidence for his Baptist convictions; and often reference to a place where fuller information on his career may be found. The entries are arranged in two lists for each century. The main list includes those who were certainly or probably Baptists. The supplementary list includes those who were certainly not Baptists (although they have previously been supposed to· be) and those who were probably not Baptists. The criteria for determining who is and who is not a Baptist are notoriously problematic in our own day. How do we classify an unbaptized member of an open-membership Baptist church? What do we call someone who has been baptized as a believer in a Baptist church but worships elsewhere? The problem is aggravated for the seventeenth century by the fluidity of denominational identity. Churches were often still moving towards a Baptist position. Indi viduals might change their convictions, especially in the 1650s, with bewildering frequency. In consequence the attempt to decide which M.P.s should be called Baptists verges on treating men anachronistic ally. -
His Excellency Sir Thomas Fairfax Major-General
The New Model Army December 1646 Commander: His Excellency Sir Thomas Fairfax Major-General: Philip Skippon Lt General of Horse: Oliver Cromwell Lt General of the Ordnance: Thomas Hammond Commissary-General of Horse: Henry Ireton The Treasurers-at-War: Sir John Wollaston kt, Alderman Thomas Adams Esq, Alderman John Warner Esq, Alderman Thomas Andrews Esq, Alderman George Wytham Esq, Alderman Francis Allein Esq Abraham Chamberlain Esq John Dethick Esq Deputy-Treasurer-at-War: Captain John Blackwell Commissary General of Musters: Stane Deputy to the Commissary General of Musters: Mr James Standish Mr Richard Gerard Scoutmaster General: Major Leonard Watson Quartermaster-General of Foot: Spencer Assistant Quartermaster-General of Foot: Robert Wolsey Quartermaster-General of Horse: Major Richard Fincher Commissioners of Parliament residing with the Army: Colonel Pindar Colonel Thomas Herbert Captain Vincent Potter Harcourt Leighton Adjutant-Generals of Horse: Captain Christopher Flemming Captain Arthur Evelyn Adjutant-General of Foot: Lt Colonel James Grey Comptroller of the Ordnance: Captain Richard Deane Judge Advocate: John Mills Esq Secretary to the General and Soucil of War: John Rushworth Esq Chaplain to the Army: Master Bolles Commissary General of Victuals: Cowling Commissary General of Horse provisions: Jones Waggon-Master General: Master Richardson Physicians to the Army: Doctor Payne Doctor French Apothecary to the Army: Master Webb Surgeon to the General's Person: Master Winter Marshal-General of Foot: Captain Wykes Marshal-General -
Ellis Wasson the British and Irish Ruling Class 1660-1945 Volume 2
Ellis Wasson The British and Irish Ruling Class 1660-1945 Volume 2 Ellis Wasson The British and Irish Ruling Class 1660-1945 Volume 2 Managing Editor: Katarzyna Michalak Associate Editor: Łukasz Połczyński ISBN 978-3-11-056238-5 e-ISBN 978-3-11-056239-2 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License. For details go to http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/. © 2017 Ellis Wasson Published by De Gruyter Open Ltd, Warsaw/Berlin Part of Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston The book is published with open access at www.degruyter.com. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data A CIP catalog record for this book has been applied for at the Library of Congress. Managing Editor: Katarzyna Michalak Associate Editor: Łukasz Połczyński www.degruyteropen.com Cover illustration: © Thinkstock/bwzenith Contents The Entries VII Abbreviations IX List of Parliamentary Families 1 Bibliography 619 Appendices Appendix I. Families not Included in the Main List 627 Appendix II. List of Parliamentary Families Organized by Country 648 Indexes Index I. Index of Titles and Family Names 711 Index II. Seats of Parliamentary Families Organized by Country 769 Index III. Seats of Parliamentary Families Organized by County 839 The Entries “ORIGINS”: Where reliable information is available about the first entry of the family into the gentry, the date of the purchase of land or holding of office is provided. When possible, the source of the wealth that enabled the family’s election to Parliament for the first time is identified. Inheritance of property that supported participation in Parliament is delineated. -
The New Model Army April-May 1645 Commander: His Excellency Sir Thomas Fairfax Major-General: Philip Skippon Lt General of Horse
The New Model Army April-May 1645 Commander: His Excellency Sir Thomas Fairfax Major-General: Philip Skippon Lt General of Horse: Vacant Lt General of the Ordnance: Thomas Hammond Commissary-General of Horse: Henry Ireton The Treasurers-at-War: Sir John Wollaston kt, Alderman Thomas Adams Esq, Alderman John Warner Esq, Alderman Thomas Andrews Esq, Alderman George Wytham Esq, Alderman Francis Allein Esq Abraham Chamberlain Esq John Dethick Esq Deputy-Treasurer-at-War: Captain John Blackwell Commissary General of Musters: Stane Deputy to the Commissary General of Musters: Mr James Standish Mr Richard Gerard Scoutmaster General: Major Leonard Watson Quartermaster-General of Foot: Spencer Assistant Quartermaster-General of Foot: Robert Wolsey Quartermaster-General of Horse: Major Richard Fincher Commissioners of Parliament residing with the Army: Colonel Pindar Colonel Thomas Herbert Captain Potter Harcourt Leighton Adjutant-Generals of Horse: Captain Christopher Flemming Captain Arthur Evelyn Adjutant-General of Foot: Lt Colonel James Grey Comptroller of the Ordnance: Captain Richard Deane Judge Advocate: John Mills Esq Secretary to the General and Soucil of War: John Rushworth Esq Chaplain to the Army: Master Bolles Commissary General of Victuals: Orpin Commissary General of Horse provisions: Captain Cooke Waggon-Master General: Master Richardson Physicians to the Army: Doctor Payne Doctor Strawhill Apothecary to the Army: Master Webb Surgeon to the General's Person: Master Winter Marshal-General of Foot: Captain Wykes Marshal-General of -
The Resurrection of John Lilburne, Quaker
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Goldsmiths Research Online The resurrection of John Lilburne, Quaker The resurrection of John Lilburne, Quaker Ariel Hessayon Goldsmiths, University of London ‘A contentious, disloyal, commonplace man; little distinguished save by his ill nature, his blindness to superior worth, and the dark internal fermentation of his own poor angry limited mind, does not seem to me an apt hero’ Thomas Carlyle to Thomas Wise (Chelsea, 21 February 1848)1 On Saturday, 29 August 1657 John Lilburne, being ‘very sicke and weake in bed’, passed away while on parole at Eltham, Kent. His heavily pregnant wife Elizabeth, perhaps with their three surviving children, was with him during his final moments in a house he had recently rented so that she might be near her friends when she gave birth.2 A Quaker source lamenting that he had died a prisoner, ‘Beareing a Testimony for Truth’, identified Lilburne’s place of death as the ‘Kings house’.3 If so, then this was the royal palace at Eltham then in the possession of Colonel Nathaniel Rich, a Parliamentarian army officer who had also purchased the royal parks and keeper’s lodge at Eltham.4 Lilburne had once railed against Rich, calling him a ‘juggling paltry, base fellow’, although by this time Rich – who had attended a Quaker meeting in Cheapside – had likewise been imprisoned by Cromwell for associating with Fifth Monarchist opponents of the Protectorate.5 1 Friends House Library, London, Portfolio 40/109, printed in Journal of Friends Historical Society, 27 (1930), pp. -
To the Right Honourable the Lord Mayor, Aldermen, and Common Council of the City of London: These. Royston, 10Th June, 1647
To the Right Honourable the Lord Mayor, Aldermen, and Common Council of the City of London: These. Royston, 10th June, 1647. RIGHT HONOURABLE AND WORTHY FRIENDS, Having, by our Letters and other Addresses presented by our General to the Honourable House of Commons, endeavoured to give satisfaction of the clearness of our just Demands; and 'having' also, in Papers published by us remonstrated the grounds of our proceedings in prosecution thereof;-all which being published in print, we are confident 'they' have come to your hands, and received at least a charitable construction from you. The sum of all these our Desires as Soldiers is no other than this: Satisfaction to our undoubted Claims as Soldiers; and reparation upon those who have, to the utmost, improved all opportunities and advantages, by false suggestions, misrepresentations and otherwise, for the destruction of this Army with a perpetual blot of ignominy upon it. Which 'injury' we should not value, if it singly concerned our own particular 'persons;' being ready to deny ourselves in this, as we have done in other cases, for the Kingdom's good: but under this pretence, we find, no less is involved than the overthrow of the privileges both of Parliament and People;-and that rather than they shall fail in their designs, or we receive what in the eyes of all good men, is 'our' just right, the Kingdom is endeavoured to be engaged in a New War. 'In a new War,' and this singly by those who, when the truth of these things shall be made to appear, will be found to be the authors of those 'said' evils that are feared;-and who have no other way to protect themselves from question and punishment but by putting the Kingdom into blood, under the pretence of their honour of and their love to the Parliament. -
Collective Biography and the Interpretative Challenge of Early-Stuart Parliamentary History*
bs_bs_banner Parliamentary History, Vol. 32, pt. 3 (2013), pp. 531–554 REVIEW ARTICLE Collective Biography and the Interpretative Challenge of Early-Stuart Parliamentary History* NICHOLAS TYACKE University College London The History of Parliament: The House of Commons, 1604–1629. Edited by Andrew Thrush and John P. Ferris. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2010. 6 vols. 4,686 pp. £460.00. ISBN 97811070022589 [the set]. Volume I. Introductory Survey and Appendices. lvi, 611 pp. Volume II. Constituencies. xxvii, 586 pp. Volume III. Members A–C. xxv, 795 pp. Volume IV. Members D–J. xxv, 933 pp. Volume V. Members K–Q. xxv, 813 pp. Volume VI. Members R–Z and Appendix. xxv, 948 pp. King James VI and I and his English Parliaments: The Trevelyan Lectures Delivered at the University of Cambridge 1995. By Conrad Russell. Edited by Richard Cust and Andrew Thrush. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2011. ix, 195 pp. £62.00. ISBN 9780198205067. With the appearance of The History of Parliament: The House of Commons, 1604–1629, edited by Andrew Thrush and the late John Ferris, a grand project as first conceived back in the 1930s and subsequently resuscitated in the 1950s, is nearly complete. Thirty-seven volumes have, to date, been published on the period 1386 to 1832, with only the years 1422–1504 and 1640–1660 remaining to be covered. The approach from the outset has been mainly biographical, focusing on the individual lives and political * Most history writing is a collaborative process and the parliamentary variety probably more so than most. In the present context I am especially grateful to Christopher Thompson, for making available his extensive collection of unpublished research theses relating to early Stuart parliaments, and to Brett Usher, who shared with me his remarkable knowledge of puritan genealogy especially as regards the Culverwell family. -
The Attack on Lord Chandos FINAL
The final, definitive version of this paper has been published in Midland History , 35, 1 (2010), pp. 71-88 by Maney Publishing. © The Departments of Medieval and Modern History, the University of Birmingham. It is available online at: http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/maney/mdh/2010/00000035/00000001/ art00004 By kind permission of the editors of Midland History and Maney Publishing Maney Publishing , I am also allowed to reproduce this post-print version. The attack on Lord Chandos: popular politics in Cirencester in 1642 Abstract: On 15 August 1642, Lord Chandos attempted to execute Charles I’s Commission of Array in Cirencester. He was met by a large crowd who demanded that he sign an oath that he would not execute the Commission. After doing so, Chandos fled and the crowd destroyed his coach. This incident has traditionally been interpreted as an attack by cloth workers motivated by economic distress, rather than more ideological motives. This article suggests a different interpretation. It argues that the social and cultural ecology of Cirencester supported the development of a popular parliamentarianism in the early 1640s. It suggests that the Protestation provided an ideological, parliamentarian language which united working people, middling sort and gentry to oppose Chandos. While the attack on Chandos was violent, it was a targeted use of violence through which the crowd was able to discredit Chandos and exercise significant political agency. Key words: Cirencester, cloth trade, gentry, Gloucestershire, Giffard, Chandos, middling sort, popular politics, Protestation On 15 August 1642 George Brydges, the sixth Baron Chandos, set out for the Gloucestershire town of Cirencester with about thirty companions.1 His intention was to execute Charles I’s Commission of Array: an order to Lords Lieutenant to assemble troops for the king’s service. -
[Insert Your Title Here]
Political Patents of Monopoly: Parliamentary and Public Discourse of Economic Policy, 1628-1648 by Clinton Douglas Crum A thesis submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Auburn University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in History Auburn, Alabama August 2, 2014 Copyright 2014 by Clinton Douglas Crum Approved by Rupali Mishra, Chair, Assistant Professor of History Donna Bohanan, Joseph A. Kicklighter Professor of History Christopher Ferguson, Assistant Professor of History Abstract Discussion of patents of monopoly during the reign of Charles I reflected the changing political environment from the 1620s through the 1640s. Members of parliament and merchant pamphleteers described monopolies as representative of excessive regulation of trade. For tradesmen authors of printed pamphlets in the 1640s, monopolies oppressed by restricting subjects’ rights to participate in trade, and abused the commonwealth by concentrating wealth for a few people at the expense of the rest of the state. Parliamentary representatives attributed to monopolies such varied effects as arbitrary government, abuses to subjects’ personal and property rights, excesses of the crown, and attempts to collect revenue without the approval of parliament. This study complicates existing historical literature by illustrating how patents of monopoly tie together existing debates on economic history, pre-civil war narrative, and the public sphere. ii Acknowledgments I am deeply appreciative of my advisor Dr. Rupali Mishra, who for years has patiently guided me, offered encouragement, and constructive criticisms of my research. Despite my best efforts, her tireless effort kept me on track and focused on the thesis. I would like to thank Drs. -
Cromwellian Altar of Faith in What Was for Him the Long Aftermath of Defeat
The Cromwell Association CROMWELLIANA 2004 President: Professor BARRY COWARD, l1lln, PRH.iscS Editor Jane A. Mills Vice Presidents: Rt Hon MICHAEL FOOT, PC Rt Hon the LORD NASEBY, PC CON1ENTS Rt Hon FRANK DOBSON, MP Professor JOHN MORRILL, Dl>hil, FBA, l~lu:!]stS Editor's Note 2 Professor IV AN ROOTS, MA, FSA, FRI·UstS Professor AUSTIN WOOLRYCH; :MA, Dlitt, F:BA Cromwell Day, 2003. The Improbable Cromwellian: Sir Charles Wolseley. 3 Professor BLAIR WORDEN, FBA By John Sutton . · PAT BARNES TREWIN COPPLESTONE, FRGS "To create a little world out of chaos": The Establishment of the 29 Chairman: Dr PETER GAUNT, PhD, FRHistS Protectorate, 1653-4. Honorary Secretary: MICHAEL BYRD By Dr Peter Gaunt 5 Town Farm Close, Pinchbeck, near Spalding, Lincolnshire, PE 11 3SG Godly Governors: the Rule of Cromwell's Major Generals. 52 By Professor Christopher Durston · Houoi:m:y Treasurer: DAVID SMITH 3 Bowgrave Copse, Abingdon, Oxon, OX14 2NL The Experience of English Towns During the Cromwellian Protectorate~ 65 'l'l lB f:llnMWH'l.l. ASSOCIATION was founded in 1935 by the late Rt Hon By Dr Stephen Roberts 1•11111' 1111(11 1111d olhcrn rn commemorate Oliver Cromwell, the great Puritan The End of Cromwell's Protectorate, 1656-58. •l11l11m11111 ltllil 111 111W11u111110 the 8l1ld)' of the history of his times, his achievements 73 1 By Professor Barry Coward 111111 1td1t11:11 n•, :ti l" 1111l1h!111 yollticul. no:i: s~ct11~fa11,. its a~s being essenti~lly l1l•l111H·111 .lh111 l\u1uh1th111 ~!'l!ilM lo 11llv11111:0 llM Ullllll lJl n vanety of ways, which h1w1• lrn·lmlt11l1 ~~rseas Despatches I. -
In October 1659, a Quaker from Lancashire, William Caton, Found
The Quakers and the politics of the army in the crisis of 1659. 1 In October 1659, a Quaker from Lancashire, William Caton, found himself „moved of the Lord‟ to travel to Leith and Edinburgh.2 While he was there he reported „good service, sometimes Among the souldiers, sometimes among the Scots and often among friendes‟, and he hoped that his ministry had done some good in this 'time of tryall.‟3 Caton‟s visit to Edinburgh was undertaken at a moment of high political drama, as General George Monck was preparing to march his troops to London in the final unravelling of the British republic. Caton noted the significance of these events, commenting that the Lord was „ariseing in his almighty power, to breake his enemies to peeces like a potters vessel.‟ But this apocalyptic vision was underpinned by a more worldly assessment of the political crisis, which, as Caton stated, was 'not the Lords doeing.'4 Caton's letter, indeed, epitomised a remarkable commitment to human political intervention. Since his arrival in Edinburgh, Caton had „endeavoured to speake‟ on a number of occasions with General Monck, but because he „could not have accesse‟ to him, had spoken instead to his secretary, William Clarke, who promised to pass on Caton‟s concerns, not only to Monck, but also to his officers. Caton was so encouraged by William Clarke and his colleagues, whom he found „prettie moderate and civill towardes mee‟, that he arranged to have his address to Monck printed in Newcastle for 1 Early versions of this article were presented to a day conference on 1659 at the History of Parliament (which prompted the initial research), the early modern seminar at Keele University, and the Cambridge Early Modern British and Irish History seminar; I am grateful to participants for their suggestions. -
The Roles and Representations of Women in Religious Change and Conflict in Leinster and South-East Munster, C.1560-C.1641
The roles and representations of women in religious change and conflict in Leinster and south-east Munster, c.1560-c.1641 by Bronagh Ann McShane THESIS FOR THE DEGREE OF PHD DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF IRELAND MAYNOOTH Head of Department: Professor Marian Lyons Supervisor of Research: Professor Marian Lyons 2015 CONTENTS Contents i Dedication ii Acknowledgments iii Abbreviations v List of illustrations vi INTRODUCTION 1 CHAPTER ONE: THE ROLES AND REPRESENTATIONS OF CATHOLIC LAY WOMEN IN RELIGIOUS CHANGE AND CONFLICT, c.1560-c.1641 32 CHAPTER TWO: NEGOTIATING RELIGIOUS CHANGE AND CONFLICT: FEMALE 94 RELIGIOUS COMMUNITIES, c.1560-c.1641 CHAPTER THREE: THE ROLES AND REPRESENTATIONS OF PROTESTANT WOMEN 159 IN RELIGIOUS CHANGE AND CONFLICT, c.1560-c.1641 CHAPTER FOUR: ‘LEWD VIRAGOES’: THE ROLES AND REPRESENTATIONS OF 241 WOMEN IN THE 1641 UPRISING CONCLUSION 310 APPENDIX 325 BIBLIOGRAPHY 347 i DEDICATION Dedicated to the memory of my grandmothers; Annie McShane née Carron (1925-2008) and Mary McCabe née Earley (1919-70) ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Sincere thanks are due first and foremost to my supervisor, Professor Marian Lyons, Head of the History Department, Maynooth University. From the outset Prof. Lyons has been entirely supportive and available above and beyond what could be expected. Her extraordinary insight, guidance and encouragement were a tremendous support to me throughout this process. It was a privilege to have such an understanding, caring and dedicated supervisor and an honour to work under her mentorship. I am grateful to the lecturing staff in the Department of History, Maynooth University, for their advice and guidance. In particular I would like to thank Professor Raymond Gillespie, for his helpful insights, suggestions and encouragement, and Dr Jacinta Prunty, for her practical advice and enthusiasm.