DOCSLIB.ORG

Accotink Creek Stressor Analysis

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Volume I Stressor Analysis Report for the Benthic Macroinvertebrate Impairments in the Accotink Creek Watershed, Fairfax County, Virginia Prepared for Virginia Department of Environmental Quality Prepared by Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin Revised June 21, 2017 Cover Photo Accotink Creek near Hooes Road, Virginia. 2008. Photo by Virginia Department of Environmental Quality Disclaimer The opinions expressed in this report are those of the authors and should not be construed as representing the opinions or policies of the United States government or the signatories or Commissioners to ICPRB. Revised: 06/21/2017 Table of Contents List of Tables........................................................................................................................................................................ iv List of Figures....................................................................................................................................................................viii Acronyms ............................................................................................................................................................................xiii Units of Measure ............................................................................................................................................................... xv Executive Summary..........................................................................................................................................................ES-1 1 Introduction................................................................................................................................................................. 1-1 1.1 Applicable Water Quality Standards........................................................................................................ 1-3 1.1.1 Designated Uses ...................................................................................................................................... 1-3 1.1.2 Water Quality Criteria .......................................................................................................................... 1-3 1.1.3 Aquatic Life Use....................................................................................................................................... 1-4 1.2 Impairment Listings........................................................................................................................................ 1-4 1.3 Goals of Stressor Identification Analysis................................................................................................ 1-8 2 Watershed Description............................................................................................................................................ 2-1 2.1 Watershed Description and Identification ............................................................................................ 2-1 2.1.1 Topography............................................................................................................................................... 2-3 2.1.2 Hydrogeomorphic Regions................................................................................................................. 2-4 2.1.3 Soils .............................................................................................................................................................. 2-5 2.1.4 Land Use..................................................................................................................................................... 2-9 2.1.5 Population and Households .............................................................................................................2-16 2.2 Permitted Facilities .......................................................................................................................................2-16 2.2.1 Facilities with Individual Permits..................................................................................................2-17 2.2.2 Facilities with General Permits.......................................................................................................2-20 2.2.3 Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4s).................................................................2-23 2.2.5 Sewers.......................................................................................................................................................2-26 3 Analysis of Monitoring Data .................................................................................................................................. 3-1 3.1 Analysis of Biological Monitoring Data................................................................................................... 3-2 3.1.1 DEQ Benthic Monitoring...................................................................................................................... 3-2 3.1.2 EPA Biological Monitoring................................................................................................................3-11 3.1.3 Fairfax County Biological Monitoring ..........................................................................................3-14 3.1.4 Volunteer Monitoring .........................................................................................................................3-23 Stressor Identification Analysis for Accotink Creek Watershed i Revised: 06/21/2017 3.1.5 Summary of Biological Monitoring in the Accotink Creek Watershed...........................3-27 3.2 Habitat Assessment.......................................................................................................................................3-27 3.2.1 DEQ Habitat Assessment...................................................................................................................3-27 3.2.2 FCDPWES Habitat Assessment and Infrastructure Inventory...........................................3-31 3.3 Geomorphic Assessment.............................................................................................................................3-37 3.3.1 DEQ Geomorphic Assessment.........................................................................................................3-37 3.3.2 Fairfax County SPA Geomorphic Assessment...........................................................................3-41 3.3.3 EPA Particle Size Analysis.................................................................................................................3-43 3.4 Flow .....................................................................................................................................................................3-44 3.5 Analysis of Conventional Water Quality Monitoring Data ............................................................3-48 3.5.1 Temperature...........................................................................................................................................3-55 3.5.2 pH................................................................................................................................................................3-61 3.5.3 Dissolved Oxygen..................................................................................................................................3-64 3.5.4 Specific Conductance...........................................................................................................................3-69 3.5.5 Total Dissolved Solids.........................................................................................................................3-75 3.5.6 Chloride ....................................................................................................................................................3-79 3.5.7 Turbidity ..................................................................................................................................................3-84 3.5.8 Total Suspended Solids and Suspended Sediment .................................................................3-90 3.5.9 Ammonia..................................................................................................................................................3-96 3.5.10 Nitrate .......................................................................................................................................................3-98 3.5.11 Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen...................................................................................................................3-100 3.5.12 Total Nitrogen.....................................................................................................................................3-103 3.5.13 Total Orthophosphate......................................................................................................................3-105 3.5.14 Total Phosphorus...............................................................................................................................3-107 3.5.15 Summary of Conventional Water Quality Data .....................................................................3-110 3.5.16 FCDPWES Water Quality Monitoring ........................................................................................3-113 3.5.17 EPA Water Quality Monitoring ....................................................................................................3-114 3.6 Analysis of Metals and Toxics Monitoring Data..............................................................................3-116
Recommended publications
  • Table of Contents

    Table of Contents

    Photo by King Montgomery. by Photo Table of Contents 7 Foreword 8 Fly Fishing Virginia 11 Flies to Use in Virginia 17 Top Virginia Fly Fishing Waters 19 Accotink Creek 21 Back Creek 25 Big Wilson Creek 29 Briery Creek Lake 33 Chesapeake Bay Islands Beasley. Beau by Photo 37 Conway River 41 Dragon Run 43 Gwynn Island 47 Holmes Run Beasley. Beau by Photo 51 Holston River, South Fork 53 Jackson River, Lower Section 59 Jackson River, Upper Section 63 James River, Lower Section 67 James River, Upper Section 71 Lake Brittle 75 Lynnhaven River, Bay, & Inlet 79 Maury River 4 Photo by Eric Evans. Eric by Photo 83 Mossy Creek 87 New River, Lower Section 91 New River, Upper Section 95 North Creek 97 Passage Creek 99 Piankatank River 101 Rapidan River, Lower Section Beasley. Beau by Photo 105 Rapidan River, Upper Section 109 Rappahannock River, Lower Section 113 Rappahannock River, Upper Section 117 Rivanna River 121 Rose River 125 Rudee Inlet 129 Shenandoah River, North Fork Photo by Beau Beasley. Beau by Photo 133 Shenandoah River, South Fork 137 South River 141 St. Mary’s River 145 Whitetop Laurel Creek Chris Newsome. by Photo 148 Private Waters 151 Resources 155 Conservation 156 Other No Nonsense Guides 158 Fly Fishing Knots 5 Arlington 81 66 Interstate South U.S. Highway River 95 State Highway 81 Other Roadway 64 64 Richmond Virginia Boat Launch 64 460 Fish Hatchery Roanoke Hampton 81 95 To Campground 77 58 Hermitage 254 To Grottoes To 340 Staunton ay rkw n Pa ema Hop 254 ver Ri 250 h ut So 340 340 1 Waynesboro To 2 Staunton 2 3 664 64 624 To Charlottesville 250 er iv R h ut 64 So 624 To 1 Constitution Park–Home of Charlottesville Virginia Fly Fishing Festival 2 Good Wading 3 Low water dam South River 136 South River outh River is one of the most underrated fisheries in the Old Dominion.
  • Chesapeake Bay Nontidal Network: 2005-2014

    Chesapeake Bay Nontidal Network: 2005-2014

    Chesapeake Bay Nontidal Network: 2005-2014 NY 6 NTN Stations 9 7 10 8 Susquehanna 11 82 Eastern Shore 83 Western Shore 12 15 14 Potomac 16 13 17 Rappahannock York 19 21 20 23 James 18 22 24 25 26 27 41 43 84 37 86 5 55 29 85 40 42 45 30 28 36 39 44 53 31 38 46 MD 32 54 33 WV 52 56 87 34 4 3 50 2 58 57 35 51 1 59 DC 47 60 62 DE 49 61 63 71 VA 67 70 48 74 68 72 75 65 64 69 76 66 73 77 81 78 79 80 Prepared on 10/20/15 Chesapeake Bay Nontidal Network: All Stations NTN Stations 91 NY 6 NTN New Stations 9 10 8 7 Susquehanna 11 82 Eastern Shore 83 12 Western Shore 92 15 16 Potomac 14 PA 13 Rappahannock 17 93 19 95 96 York 94 23 20 97 James 18 98 100 21 27 22 26 101 107 24 25 102 108 84 86 42 43 45 55 99 85 30 103 28 5 37 109 57 31 39 40 111 29 90 36 53 38 41 105 32 44 54 104 MD 106 WV 110 52 112 56 33 87 3 50 46 115 89 34 DC 4 51 2 59 58 114 47 60 35 1 DE 49 61 62 63 88 71 74 48 67 68 70 72 117 75 VA 64 69 116 76 65 66 73 77 81 78 79 80 Prepared on 10/20/15 Table 1.
  • River Watch Spring 2010

    River Watch Spring 2010

    The Newsletter of Potomac RiveRkeepeR, Inc. Volume 7, Issue 1, Winter 2010 495 HOT Lanes Construction Polluting In This Issue Accotink Creek Agricultural Pollution in W. Virginia page 2 s snow pummeled northern Virginia, APotomac Riverkeeper took action against a major polluter in Fairfax Stormwater Regulations Stalled County, VA. page 3 As you might know, a portion of the I- 495 High Occupancy Toll (“HOT”) Lanes From the Board construction site is severely damaging page 4 Accotink Creek, the Potomac River, and the Chesapeake Bay. Sediment pollution News in Brief is leaving the site and has entered page 5 Accotink Creek and its tributaries on numerous occasions. Potomac Riverkeeper’s 10th Anniversary Potomac Riverkeeper and two individuals page 6 sought to end this problem by notifying Fluor-Lane LLC, the HOT Lanes developers, of our intent to sue under the Clean Water Upcoming Events Act (CWA) if Fluor-Lane continues to violate page 7 Virginia law and allow the pollution to enter Accotink Creek. Coverage of our Mattawoman WWTP Permit action ran in The Washington Post. page 8 Flour-Lane has not stopped polluting despite numerous complaints from the public and inspections from state Polluted water is leaving the HOT Lanes Get the DIRT Out agencies. If Fluor-Lane does not stop the construction site and entering Accotink Creek. Photo by Kris Unger. As you just read, some developers allow polluted sludge pollution and comply with the law, legal to run into our rivers and streams, leaving taxpayers action may be one of the few remaining the stream. He also made site visits and with a hefty clean up bill.
  • Sediment TMDL Action Plan for Difficult Run and Accotink Creek Submittal to DEQ – May 1, 2020

    Sediment TMDL Action Plan for Difficult Run and Accotink Creek Submittal to DEQ – May 1, 2020

    Town of Vienna, Virginia Sediment TMDL Action Plan for Difficult Run and Accotink Creek Submittal to DEQ – May 1, 2020 Town of Vienna Department of Public Works 127 Center Street, South Vienna, Virginia 22180 Prepared with assistance by: Wood Environment & Infrastructure Solutions Chantilly, Virginia Prepared in Compliance with Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) Permit No. VAR040066 CERTIFICATION "I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnelproperly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry ofthe person or persons who managethe system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information,the information submitted is, to the best ofmy knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am awarethatthere are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowingviolations." HK, own JYIWAGER 05fer [20 “Name # / Title Datf JS Town of Vienna, Virginia Sediment TMDL Action Plan for Difficult Run and Accotink Creek May 1, 2020 Table of Contents 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................1 1.1 Purpose ...................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Chesapeake Bay TMDL Action
  • FACC Bulletin December, 2020

    FACC Bulletin December, 2020

    Bulletin of the Proceedings of the Friends of Accotink Creek Our meeting notes serve as bulletins of our activities, interests, and discussions, supplemented by your submissions. Friends of Accotink Creek Town Meeting – December 15, 2020 Next Meeting: January 19, 2021 (Third Tuesday of each month) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Present: Dave Lincoln, Julie Chang, Beverley Rivera, Philip Latasa. Avril Garland Edward Lee – Welcome Edward! Upcoming events · Salt Management Strategy Public Meeting January 21, 2021 · Stream Monitoring Lake Accotink Park March 13, 2021 · Anti-Wisteria Expedition April 5, 2021 Read the 2020 Friends of Accotink Creek Newsletter • Lake Accotink Park Master Plan: On December 10th there was a public meeting on the status of the dredge. Planning and surveys are underway now, with dredging expected to start in early 2023 and end by late 2025. According to Philip, it seems all options have closed other than a pipeline to Braddock Road, the only questions being the precise routing and the location of the dewatering facility at the terminus. Stormwater Planning has convened a smaller stakeholders group, including FACC, FLAP, Save Lake Accotink, and some civic associations. In the first such meeting, it seemed clear Howrey Field will not be an option since no one on the County side is willing to face the ‘flag vs. forest’ issues that were raised by Howrey defenders on our Facebook page. Howrey wasn’t likely to qualify anyway, but Philip asked would Flag vs. Forest – Not a fight anyone wants to pick anyone like to reach out to the defenders in search of common ground? Philip offered one more alternative that we might appeal to have considered: • A slower dredge could accomplish the same goal over a period of years, reducing truck traffic to tolerable levels.
  • Chloride TMDL Action Plan for Accotink Creek May 1, 2021

    Chloride TMDL Action Plan for Accotink Creek May 1, 2021

    Town of Vienna, Virginia Chloride TMDL Action Plan for Accotink Creek May 1, 2021 Town of Vienna Department of Public Works 127 Center Street, South Vienna, Virginia 22180 Prepared with assistance by: Wood Environment & Infrastructure Solutions Chantilly, Virginia Prepared in Compliance with Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) Permit No. VAR040066 Town of Vienna, Virginia Chloride TMDL Action Plan for Accotink Creek May 1, 2021 Table of Contents 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Purpose ...................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Salt Management Strategy ........................................................................................................ 2 1.3 Permit Compliance Crosswalk .................................................................................................. 2 2. Chloride TMDL Action Plan ........................................................................................................................... 3 2.1 Overview of the TMDL ............................................................................................................ 3 2.2 Waste Load Allocation .............................................................................................................. 5 2.3 Identification of Significant Sources of Chloride ....................................................................
  • Recent Land Cover History and Nutrient Retention in Riparian Wetlands

    Recent Land Cover History and Nutrient Retention in Riparian Wetlands

    Environmental Management (2009) 44:62–72 DOI 10.1007/s00267-009-9313-9 Recent Land Cover History and Nutrient Retention in Riparian Wetlands Dianna M. Hogan Æ Mark R. Walbridge Received: 20 February 2008 / Accepted: 30 April 2009 / Published online: 30 May 2009 Ó Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009 Abstract Wetland ecosystems are profoundly affected by Introduction altered nutrient and sediment loads received from anthro- pogenic activity in their surrounding watersheds. Our Riparian wetlands occupy transition zones along streams objective was to compare a gradient of agricultural and and rivers between upland and aquatic environments, and urban land cover history during the period from 1949 to have the potential to provide ecosystem services that 1997, with plant and soil nutrient concentrations in, and include water quality improvement (nutrient and sediment sediment deposition to, riparian wetlands in a rapidly removal and retention), biodiversity and habitat support, urbanizing landscape. We observed that recent agricultural flood mitigation, and groundwater discharge and recharge land cover was associated with increases in Nitrogen (N) and (Johnston 1991; Walbridge 1993; Vought and others 1994; Phosphorus (P) concentrations in a native wetland plant Zedler 2003). Variations in current and historic land use species. Conversely, recent urban land cover appeared to (LU) and land cover (LC) in the surrounding watershed alter receiving wetland environmental conditions by can affect wetland hydrology and nutrient and sediment increasing the relative availability of P versus N, as reflected loads (Soranno and others 1996; Wickham and others in an invasive, but not a native, plant species. In addition, 2000; Winter and Duthie 2000; Horner and others 2001; increases in surface soil Fe content suggests recent inputs of Groffman and others 2003; Houlahan and Findlay 2004), terrestrial sediments associated specifically with increasing potentially compromising a wetland’s ability to provide urban land cover.
  • Testimony in Public Hearing of The

    Testimony in Public Hearing of The

    Statement to Fairfax County Environmental Quality Advisory Council Betsy Martin, Friends of Little Hunting Creek and Northern Virginia Trash Action Work Force1 January 10, 2018 In Fairfax County’s new environmental vision, solid waste management is one of seven areas identified by the Board of Supervisors as priorities. Yet, EQAC’s most recent report offers only three recommendations on solid waste management (on improving recycling, illegal dumping, and a statewide container redemption fee). “Litter” is mentioned once in the report. I’m glad EQAC continues “to recommend a statewide container redemption fee to reduce litter and increase the recovery of containers in a form that can be recycled.” However, you demur, writing “This recommendation requires action at the General Assembly and cannot be addressed by County staff.” Please recommend actions the County can take on litter, not just actions it cannot. The need for action is great. The Friends of Little Hunting Creek and Senator Scott Surovell have conducted annual cleanups of the creek since 2002, as part of the Potomac Watershed Cleanup sponsored by Alice Ferguson Foundation. Since the Friends started keeping records in 2006, volunteers have picked up 3,343 bags of trash and recyclables, 258 tires, 177 shopping carts, and tons of additional bulk trash. On average, this is about 257 bags, 20 tires, and 14 shopping carts per cleanup. These figures do not include cleanups conducted by others, for example, the Boy Scouts annually pick up trash just downstream of the Route 1 bridge (60 bags this year, according to newspaper reports). Little Hunting Creek is but one of the tributaries that discharge Fairfax County’s litter into the Potomac River.
  • Benthic Tmdls for the Goose Creek Watershed

    Benthic Tmdls for the Goose Creek Watershed

    Benthic TMDLs for the Goose Creek Watershed Submitted by Virginia Department of Environmental Quality Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation Prepared by Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin March 1, 2004 Revised April 27, 2004 ICPRB Report 04-5 This report has been prepared by the staff of the Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin. Support was provided by the Virginia Department of Environment Quality and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. The opinions expressed are those of the authors and should not be construed as representing the opinions or policies of the United States or any of its agencies, the several states, or the Commissioners of the Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin. Benthic TMDLs for the Goose Creek Watershed Submitted by Virginia Department of Environmental Quality Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation Prepared by Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin March 1, 2004 Revised April 27, 2004 __________________________________________ Benthic TMDLs For the Goose Creek Watershed TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ........................................................................................................I LIST OF TABLES ................................................................................................................IV LIST OF FIGURES ..............................................................................................................VI EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...............................................................................................
  • Friends of Accotink Creek Brochure PDF File

    Friends of Accotink Creek Brochure PDF File

    YOU CAN SAVE ACCOTINK CREEK! Stop the warm, dirty water reaching and destroying life in Accotink Creek! Rain on roofs and streets heats up and rushes into the storm drain carrying GET YOUR BRAIN WET! pollution and trash directly to the stream! Join Friends of Accotink Creek, an all- Warmer water has lower oxygen than volunteer organization restoring Accotink cooler water. Aquatic life needs oxygen! Creek watershed! We all need clean drinking-water! Accotink Creek runs through one of the Find just one other person who cares! Responsibly use pesticides/ fertilizers! finest wildlife corridors in Fairfax County. ><((((º>`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.¸><((((º>¸.·´¯`·.¸. ><((((º> Only fertilize lawns in the fall and use Accotink Creek passes through Eakin, Wakefield, Lake Accotink and Accotink phosphate-free fertilizer. Encourage the VOLUNTEER! Stream Valley Parks; Ft. Belvoir and the natural predators to control your pests. Use Accotink Bay Wildlife Refuge, then drains JOIN OUR ALL VOLUNTEER boric acid or insecticidal soap; they’re less WATERSHED GROUP! into the Potomac River, affecting waters of toxic to aquatic life than pesticides. Chesapeake Bay. Additional information is PROTECT OUR STREAM! Plant native plants! at www.accotink.org and Volunteer Activities Include: Grow varieties of attractive native plants that require fewer chemicals, less http://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/parks/lake- accotink/thebay.htm maintenance and support native wildlife. Practice Good Water Stewardship! Help “Team Accotink” to conserve, restore, DIRECT DOWN SPOUTS AWAY FROM and enhance enjoyment of the flora, fauna, YOUR DRIVEWAY! Keep our stream from and natural habitat of our watershed. drowning! Use the natural cooling and Care about Accotink Creek! pollutant-filtering ability of soil & plants.
  • Attachment C Receiving Waters by Watershed

    Attachment C Receiving Waters by Watershed

    ATTACHMENT C RECEIVING WATERS BY WATERSHED ACCOTINK CREEK ACCOTINK BAY ACCOTINK CREEK BEAR BRANCH CALAMO RUN COON BRANCH CROOK BRANCH DANIELS RUN FIELD LARK BRANCH FLAG RUN GUNSTON COVE HUNTERS BRANCH KERNAN RUN LAKE ACCOTINK LONG BRANCH MASON RUN POHICK BAY TURKEY RUN BELLE HAVEN CAMERON RUN HUNTING CREEK POTOMAC RIVER QUANDER BROOK BULL NECK RUN BLACK POND BULLNECK RUN POTOMAC RIVER BULL RUN BULL RUN CAMERON RUN BACKLICK RUN CAMERON RUN COW BRANCH FAIRVIEW LAKE HOLMES RUN INDIAN RUN LAKE BARCROFT PIKES BRANCH POPLAR RUN TRIPPS RUN TURKEYCOCK CREEK TURKEYCOCK RUN Page 1 of 12 CUB RUN BIG ROCKY RUN BULL RUN CAIN BRANCH CUB RUN DEAD RUN ELKLICK RUN FLATLICK BRANCH FROG BRANCH OXLICK BRANCH ROCKY RUN ROUND LICK ROUND RUN SAND BRANCH SCHNEIDER BRANCH UPPER OCCOQUAN SEWAGE AUTHORITY DEAD RUN DEAD RUN POTOMAC RIVER DIFFICULT RUN ANGELICO BRANCH BRIDGE BRANCH BROWNS BRANCH CAPTAIN HICKORY RUN COLVIN MILL RUN COLVIN RUN DIFFICULT RUN DOG RUN FOX LAKE HICKORY RUN LAKE ANNE LAKE AUDUBON LAKE FAIRFAX LAKE NEWPORT LAKE THOREAU LITTLE DIFFICULT RUN MOONAC CREEK OLD COURTHOUSE SPRING BRANCH PINEY BRANCH PINEY RUN POTOMAC RIVER ROCKY BRANCH ROCKY RUN SHARPERS RUN SNAKEDEN BRANCH SOUTH FORK RUN Page 2 of 12 THE GLADE TIMBER LAKE WOLFTRAP CREEK WOLFTRAP RUN WOODSIDE LAKE DOGUE CREEK ACCOTINK BAY BARNYARD RUN DOGUE CREEK DOGUE RUN GUNSTON COVE LAKE D'EVEREUX NORTH FORK DOGUE CREEK PINEY RUN POTOMAC RIVER FOUR MILE RUN CAMERON RUN FOUR MILE RUN HUNTING CREEK LONG BRANCH POTOMAC RIVER HIGH POINT BELMONT BAY GUNSTON COVE MASON NECK OCCOQUAN BAY POHICK BAY
  • An Ecological Study of Hunting Creek

    An Ecological Study of Hunting Creek

    i An Ecological Study of Hunting Creek 2013 FINAL REPORT February 2014 by R. Christian Jones Professor, Department of Environmental Science and Policy Director, Potomac Environmental Research and Education Center George Mason University Project Director Kim de Mutsert Assistant Professor Department of Environmental Science and Policy George Mason University Co-Principal Investigator & Gregory D. Foster Professor, Department of Chemistry George Mason University Co-Principal Investigator to Alexandria Renew Enterprises Alexandria, VA ii Table of Contents Table of Contents .................................................................................................... ii Executive Summary ............................................................................................... iii List of Abbreviations ...............................................................................................x The Aquatic Monitoring Program for the Hunting Creek Area of the Tidal Freshwater Potomac River ....................................................................................................1 Acknowledgements ......................................................................................2 Introduction ..................................................................................................3 Methods........................................................................................................8 A. Profiles and Plankton: Sampling Day .........................................8 B. Profiles and Plankton: Followup