Operation Inherent Resolve, Report to Congress

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Operation Inherent Resolve, Report to Congress LEAD INSPECTOR GENERAL FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS OPERATION INHERENT RESOLVE REPORT TO THE UNITED STATES CONGRESS APRIL 1, 2016‒JUNE 30, 2016 LEAD INSPECTOR GENERAL MISSION The Lead Inspector General for Overseas Contingency Operations coordinates among the Inspectors General specified under the law to: • develop a joint strategic plan to conduct comprehensive oversight over all aspects of the contingency operation • ensure independent and effective oversight of all programs and operations of the federal government in support of the contingency operation through either joint or individual audits, inspections, and investigations • promote economy, efficiency, and effectiveness and prevent, detect, and deter fraud, waste, and abuse • perform analyses to ascertain the accuracy of information provided by federal agencies relating to obligations and expenditures, costs of programs and projects, accountability of funds, and the award and execution of major contracts, grants, and agreements • report quarterly and biannually to the Congress and the public on the contingency operation and activities of the Lead Inspector General (Pursuant to sections 2, 4, and 8L of the Inspector General Act of 1978, as amended) FOREWORD We are pleased to submit the Lead Inspector General (Lead IG) quarterly report to the United States Congress on Operation Inherent Resolve (OIR). This is our sixth quarterly report on this overseas contingency operation (OCO), discharging our individual and collective agency oversight responsibilities pursuant to sections 2, 4, and 8L of the Inspector General Act of 1978, as amended. OIR is dedicated to countering the terrorist threat posed by the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) in Iraq, Syria, the region, and the broader international community. The U.S. strategy to counter ISIL includes support to military operations associated with OIR, as well as diplomacy, governance, security programs and activities, and, separately, humanitarian assistance. This quarterly report provides information on key events involving OIR as well as an update on the nine Strategic Lines of Effort to Counter ISIL, covering the period from April 1, 2016, through June 30, 2016. This report also features oversight work completed during the quarter by the Lead IG Offices of Inspector General and partner oversight agencies, as well as ongoing and future oversight work. We remain committed to providing effective oversight and timely reporting on OIR to the United States Congress, U.S. government agencies, and U.S. taxpayers. Our collective efforts, and its summation in this report, demonstrate our collaborative approach to providing oversight regarding the OIR contingency operation. We would like to thank the Department of Defense, Department of State, and the U.S. Agency for International Development for their contributions to this report. Glenn A. Fine Steve A. Linick Ann Calvaresi Barr Acting Inspector General Inspector General Inspector General U.S. Department of Defense U.S. Department of State and the U.S. Agency for International Broadcasting Board of Governors Development On the cover: (clockwise from top left) An Iraqi soldier with the 35th Iraqi Army Brigade prepares machine gun ammo belts during a T-72 machine gun live-fire exercise (U.S. Army photo); a Syrian man sits amid rubble of destroyed buildings (AFP/ABD photo); an Iraqi soldier with the Security Battalion, Nineveh Operations Command, crawls under barbed wire during an obstacle course at Camp Taji, Iraq (U.S. Army photo); a U.S. soldier stacks a package of cement for use in constructing a well at Al Taqaddum Air Base, Iraq (U.S. Air Force photo); Iraqi soldiers practice their sitting firing position (U.S. Army photo); aviation boatswain’s mate directs an F/A-18E Super Hornet on the flight deck of the aircraft carrier USS Harry S. Truman (U.S. Navy photo). MESSAGE FROM THE LEAD INSPECTOR GENERAL I am pleased to present to the United States Congress the sixth report on Operation Inherent Resolve (OIR) and the U.S. strategy to counter the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL). This report summarizes the quarter’s key events and describes completed, ongoing, and planned Lead Inspector General (Lead IG) and partner agency oversight work relating to this activity. As our report discusses in more detail, since April 1, 2016, U.S.-backed forces have liberated territory in Iraq and Syria from ISIL and have degraded their military and financial resources. Despite this progress, terror attacks were launched in Iraq, Syria, and abroad, with ISIL claiming credit or Glenn A. Fine considered to be responsible. This quarter, the Lead IG agencies and oversight partners released nine reports related to OIR and opened 12 new investigations of fraud, waste, and abuse related to the OIR mission. This report gives detailed information on these released reports and 46 ongoing and planned oversight projects. Completed oversight activity includes a Department of Defense Office of Inspector General audit of U.S. Air Force accountability of funds supporting OIR, as reported in the statutorily required Cost of War. This audit found that the information in the reports was unreliable and outdated. The Department of State Office of Inspector General issued reports related to operations of U.S. Embassies under threat by ISIL in the Middle East, including an audit of the contract for support services such as food, water, and fuel to the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad, Iraq. The U.S. Agency for International Development Office of Inspector General continued an investigation into fraud schemes by non-governmental organization procurement staff and vendors in Turkey related to humanitarian aid for Syria. During the quarter, the investigation resulted in partially suspending two programs, and the termination, resignation, or debarment of several individuals. My Lead IG colleagues and I remain committed to our mission of conducting effective oversight of OIR. We especially thank the oversight and investigative teams from across the IG community for their work. Glenn A. Fine Lead Inspector General for Operation Inherent Resolve Acting Inspector General U.S. Department of Defense An Iraqi soldier with the Security Battalion, Nineveh Operations Command, crawls under barbed wire during an obstacle course at Camp Taji, Iraq. (U.S. Army photo) CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 OPERATION INHERENT RESOLVE 15 Funding of Activities in Iraq and Syria 16 Spotlight on Treasury’s Work to Disrupt ISIL Finances 26 The Coalition Versus ISIL 29 The Status of ISIL 41 Governance in Iraq 44 Stabilization in Iraq 46 Syrian Civil War (non-OIR) 49 HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE 59 Iraqi Crisis 63 Syrian Crisis 72 COMPLETED OVERSIGHT ACTIVITY 83 Lead IG Staffing 84 Outreach 84 Completed Audit, Inspection, and Evaluation Projects 85 Investigations 92 Hotline Activity 98 ONGOING AND PLANNED OVERSIGHT ACTIVITIES 101 Strategic Planning 102 Ongoing Projects 104 Planned Projects 110 APPENDIXES 113 Acronyms and Definitions 124 Endnotes 125 APRIL 1, 2016‒JUNE 30, 2016 • REPORT TO THE U.S. CONGRESS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This quarterly report is issued pursuant to section 8L of the Inspector General Act of 1978, as amended, which requires that the designated Lead IG provide a quarterly report, available to the public, on a contingency operation. The Department of Defense (DoD) Inspector General is the designated Lead IG for Operation Inherent Resolve (OIR). The Department of State (DoS) is the Associate Lead Inspector General for OIR. This report contains information from the three Lead IG agencies—DoD, DoS, and U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID)—as well as from partner oversight agencies. This OIR report covers the period from April 1, 2016, through June 30, 2016. The U.S.-led Coalition to counter the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) continued to liberate territory in Iraq and Syria, even as deadly terrorist attacks claimed or inspired by ISIL struck the region and abroad. In the last two years, Coalition-backed forces have regained nearly half of the territory in Iraq and 20 percent of the territory in Syria once held by the terrorist group.1 In a hearing before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee on June 28, Brett McGurk, the Special Presidential Envoy for the Global Coalition to Counter ISIL, testified that the situation had improved considerably: “In July 2014, I testified before this committee as ISIL was expanding its territory, threatening Baghdad, and appeared unstoppable. The situation today is measurably different. ISIL has not launched a significant offensive in over a year; it is losing cities–Tikrit, Ramadi, Falluja, Hit, Shadadi, and soon, Manbij–that were central to its rise; and the Coalition-backed forces arrayed against it are increasingly confident and on offense, with our support.”2 In April, Secretary of Defense Ashton Carter announced additional resources to accelerate support for the campaign against ISIL in Iraq and Syria, including sending more U.S. Special Operations Forces and financial assistance to the Kurdish Peshmerga in Iraq.3 Military operations backed by the U.S.-led Global Coalition to Counter ISIL resulted in the seizure of strategically important locations in Anbar province during the quarter, including Falluja—the first major Iraqi city to fall to ISIL—which was declared fully liberated on June 28, 2016. In addition, operations to isolate Mosul in Iraq and ISIL’s self-proclaimed capital of Raqqa in Syria continued. A campaign is underway to seize the Manbij pocket in Syria, the last remaining open border to Turkey readily available to ISIL. Coalition airstrikes continued to eliminate key ISIL leaders, oil convoys, and financial targets.4 Despite these losses, ISIL, under pressure, remained deadly. This quarter, the organization launched a wave of bombings in Iraq and Syria: at least 6 attacks killed around 80 people in April; 11 attacks left approximately APRIL 1, 2016‒JUNE 30, 2016 • REPORT TO THE U.S. CONGRESS 1 LEAD IG FOR OPERATION INHERENT RESOLVE U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry with Special Presidential Envoy for the Global Coalition to Counter ISIL Brett McGurk on April 8, 2016, at the U.S.
Recommended publications
  • Khabarnama 806.Qxd
    RAI LAW OFFICE Barrister Soliciter Notary Public For All Immigration Matters REAL ESTATE Family Law & Criminal Cases Sales, Purchase, Lease, Mortgages of Residential pjM fbI vIklI & Commercial Properties KHABARNAMA PUNJABI WEEKLY (owned and operated by Khabarnama Inc.) Tel: 905-791-9292 11 Squirreltail Way, Brampton, Ont., L6R 1X4 2565 Steeles Ave East, Unit #4, Brampton Balbir Singh Rai Vol 17, No. 806 Friday Feb. 20-2015 Ph: 905-793-5072 Fax: 905-488-1821 Website: www.khabarnama.com email : [email protected] Khabarnama and people associated with it are not responsible for any claims of its advertisers and do not endorse products/services advertised in it. Please consult your lawyer before buying through the advertisements published in Khabarnama. We sell space in the paper, and claims are those of the advertisers. riw Kaf mqM rI vlNo ierfk ierfk, kru d aq y amrIkf kr knY zy f n y bxfeI ‘smfrt imsnL `c vfDf krn df skM qy hfeI-ttkY ’ asflt rfeIPl rh y hn vzw y hml y dI iqafrI aftvf, 19 PrvrI :- kYnzfy dy rwiKaf mMqrI PYzrl mMqrI mMzl imsLn dI smIKsLf krygf vfisLgtn, 19 PrvrI :- ierk, kurd aqy tU hfAUs” lVfeI hovygI ijs ivwc eyar Pors aftvf, 19 PrvrI :- kYnzfy ny nvIN ‘smfrt hiQafr “lIQl, PlYksIbl jnrl prpjL vloN ierfk imsLn `c vfDf krn df sMkyq idwqf aqy PYslf krygf ik imsLn dI imafd vDfAux amrIkf agly kuJ mhIinaF ivwc ieslfimk df rlo bhuq sImq hovygf. kurd POjI ajy ies hfeI-tYk’ asflt rfeIPl bxfeI hY ijs dI plytPfrm” hY. ieh hr iksm dIaF hflqF igaf hY.
    [Show full text]
  • International Activity Report 2017
    INTERNATIONAL ACTIVITY REPORT 2017 www.msf.org THE MÉDECINS SANS FRONTIÈRES CHARTER Médecins Sans Frontières is a private international association. The association is made up mainly of doctors and health sector workers, and is also open to all other professions which might help in achieving its aims. All of its members agree to honour the following principles: Médecins Sans Frontières provides assistance to populations in distress, to victims of natural or man-made disasters and to victims of armed conflict. They do so irrespective of race, religion, creed or political convictions. Médecins Sans Frontières observes neutrality and impartiality in the name of universal medical ethics and the right to humanitarian assistance, and claims full and unhindered freedom in the exercise of its functions. Members undertake to respect their professional code of ethics and to maintain complete independence from all political, economic or religious powers. As volunteers, members understand the risks and dangers of the missions they carry out and make no claim for themselves or their assigns for any form of compensation other than that which the association might be able to afford them. The country texts in this report provide descriptive overviews of MSF’s operational activities throughout the world between January and December 2017. Staffing figures represent the total full-time equivalent employees per country across the 12 months, for the purposes of comparisons. Country summaries are representational and, owing to space considerations, may not be comprehensive. For more information on our activities in other languages, please visit one of the websites listed on p. 100. The place names and boundaries used in this report do not reflect any position by MSF on their legal status.
    [Show full text]
  • How Far Can Isis Go in Afghanistan?
    CAPS In Focus 12 September 2016 www.capsindia.org 94/16 HOW FAR CAN ISIS GO IN AFGHANISTAN? Radhika Halder Research Associate, CAPS During his recent visit to New Delhi, former commander Hafez Saeed Khan as its “governor”. Most Afghans who swore allegiance to IS Caliph, President of Afghanistan, Hamid Karzai conveyed Abu Bakr al Baghdadi comprise of disaffected an important message regarding the presence of Taliban commanders who found an the Islamic State (IS) in the country. Karzai has impressionable alternative in what IS has to made it clear that IS is not indigenous in offer.2 Both groups (Taliban and IS) are bitterly Afganistan and its objectives are far more divided over leadership and strategy, despite “sinister” than any other radical extremist sharing the same will to impose a harsh version elements in the region, mainly Taliban.1 of Islamic rule in the territory. The Taliban has While the global franchise of the IS has focused mainly on Afghanistan whereas, the IS been seen to expand beyond Iraq and Syria by aims to establish a Global Caliphate. In a video influencing pre-existing home-grown groups in released soon after the declaration of the Nigeria, Libya and Southeast Asia, the Taliban in Khorasan province, an IS jihadi threatened the Afghanistan doesn’t seem to follow suit. IS seeks Taliban, indirectly comparing Baghdadi with to establish a Global Caliphate, under the leader of Afghan Taliban, Mullah Omar. The leadership of a “Caliph” and the enforcement of speech rejected the existence of two caliphs and Sharia law. It is this very ideology of IS that has could be seen as a call to eliminate Omar.
    [Show full text]
  • Interventions by Sub-District (July 2019) Protection 1
    Syria Protection Cluster (Turkey): Response Snapshot (as of 31 July 2019) Progress against Progress by Indicator 2019 HRP targets Interventions by Sub-District (July 2019) Turkey Hub 1.1.2 # of people reached through 3.1.1 # of communities/neighborhoods community-based protection services, that have at least one type of 98 including individual targeted assistance 261,986 specialized GBV services for persons with specific protection needs 1.2.1 # of people receiving legal 3.2.1 # women, men, girls and boys counselling or assistance, including 32,524 reached by GBV prevention and 235,785 civil documentation and HLP issues Legend Protection empowerment activities Gender Based Violence Not covered 500 501-1000 5.1.1 # of girls and boys engaging in 4.1.1 # of people who received risk 1001-5000 structured, sustained child 144,700 education from humanitarian 433,823 >5000 protection programmes, including Risk-Education actors psychosocial support 219,199 Interventions # of girls and boys who are # of people trained to conduct 8 Governorates 5.2.1 receiving specialized child 4.1.2 1,502 3,943 risk education 58 Organizations Child Protection protection services through case Mine Action management 57 Implementing partners Response In July 2019, 17 Protection Cluster members provided emergency response services for civilians recently displaced from Northern Hama and Southern Idleb due to the ongoing Interventions by Sub-Cluster (July 2019) hostilities. Cluster members provided 28,680 protection services to IDPs and affected host community members in 82 communities within 23 sub-districts in Idleb and Aleppo reaching 15,862 individuals (6005 girls, 6,115 boys, 2,687 women, and 1,055 men).
    [Show full text]
  • The Foreign Military Presence in the Horn of Africa Region
    SIPRI Background Paper April 2019 THE FOREIGN MILITARY SUMMARY w The Horn of Africa is PRESENCE IN THE HORN OF undergoing far-reaching changes in its external security AFRICA REGION environment. A wide variety of international security actors— from Europe, the United States, neil melvin the Middle East, the Gulf, and Asia—are currently operating I. Introduction in the region. As a result, the Horn of Africa has experienced The Horn of Africa region has experienced a substantial increase in the a proliferation of foreign number and size of foreign military deployments since 2001, especially in the military bases and a build-up of 1 past decade (see annexes 1 and 2 for an overview). A wide range of regional naval forces. The external and international security actors are currently operating in the Horn and the militarization of the Horn poses foreign military installations include land-based facilities (e.g. bases, ports, major questions for the future airstrips, training camps, semi-permanent facilities and logistics hubs) and security and stability of the naval forces on permanent or regular deployment.2 The most visible aspect region. of this presence is the proliferation of military facilities in littoral areas along This SIPRI Background the Red Sea and the Horn of Africa.3 However, there has also been a build-up Paper is the first of three papers of naval forces, notably around the Bab el-Mandeb Strait, at the entrance to devoted to the new external the Red Sea and in the Gulf of Aden. security politics of the Horn of This SIPRI Background Paper maps the foreign military presence in the Africa.
    [Show full text]
  • US Military Policy in the Middle East an Appraisal US Military Policy in the Middle East: an Appraisal
    Research Paper Micah Zenko US and Americas Programme | October 2018 US Military Policy in the Middle East An Appraisal US Military Policy in the Middle East: An Appraisal Contents Summary 2 1 Introduction 3 2 Domestic Academic and Political Debates 7 3 Enduring and Current Presence 11 4 Security Cooperation: Training, Advice and Weapons Sales 21 5 Military Policy Objectives in the Middle East 27 Conclusion 31 About the Author 33 Acknowledgments 34 1 | Chatham House US Military Policy in the Middle East: An Appraisal Summary • Despite significant financial expenditure and thousands of lives lost, the American military presence in the Middle East retains bipartisan US support and incurs remarkably little oversight or public debate. Key US activities in the region consist of weapons sales to allied governments, military-to-military training programmes, counterterrorism operations and long-term troop deployments. • The US military presence in the Middle East is the culmination of a common bargain with Middle Eastern governments: security cooperation and military assistance in exchange for US access to military bases in the region. As a result, the US has substantial influence in the Middle East and can project military power quickly. However, working with partners whose interests sometimes conflict with one another has occasionally harmed long-term US objectives. • Since 1980, when President Carter remarked that outside intervention in the interests of the US in the Middle East would be ‘repelled by any means necessary’, the US has maintained a permanent and significant military presence in the region. • Two main schools of thought – ‘offshore balancing’ and ‘forward engagement’ – characterize the debate over the US presence in the Middle East.
    [Show full text]
  • PKK Attack’ Kills Two Police Well As Individual NATO Allies, the European Union and the UN.— AP Al-Qaeda Attacks As Tensions Boil in Turkey US-Trained Rebels
    INTERNATIONAL SATURDAY, AUGUST 1, 2015 Two of four Indians held in Libya released NEW DELHI: Two Indian teachers who Moamer Kadhafi-in the jihadist group’s first were detained in an area of Libya that the such military gain in Libya. They have since Islamic State group claims to control have claimed to control the whole of the city. been released but two of their colleagues Ministry spokesman Vikas Swarup said the are still being held, the New Delhi govern- Indian mission in Tripoli “came to know that ment said yesterday. four Indian nationals who were returning to India’s foreign ministry said it was able India, via Tripoli and Tunis, were detained at to “secure the release” of the two after the a checkpoint” around 11 pm Thursday. group was detained at a checkpoint around “We are in regular touch with the fami- 30 miles Sirte late Thursday and taken to lies concerned and all efforts are being the southern coastal city. The teachers, who made to ensure (their) well-being and ear- had been working at Sirte university, were ly release,” Swarup told journalists earlier heading for Tripoli where they intended to yesterday in New Delhi. Indian media catch a flight out of the country. “I am hap- reported that the IS group may be holding py we have been able to secure the release the teachers. A senior ministry official said of Lakshmikant and Vijay Kumar. Trying for no individual or group had yet tried to (the) other two,” Foreign Minister Sushma make contact or issue a ransom demand.
    [Show full text]
  • Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses ISSN 2382-6444 | Volume 9, Issue 5 | May 2017
    Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses www.rsis.edu.sg ISSN 2382-6444 | Volume 9, Issue 5 | May 2017 A JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR POLITICAL VIOLENCE AND TERRORISM RESEARCH The Islamic State’s Northward Expansion in the Philippines Rohan Gunaratna The Revival of Al Qaeda’s Affiliate in Southeast Asia: the Jemaah Islamiyah Bilveer Singh IS Footprint in Pakistan: Nature of Presence, Method of Recruitment, and Future Outlook Farhan Zahid Islamic State’s Financing: Sources, Methods and Utilisation Patrick Blannin The Islamic State in India: Exploring its Footprints Mohammed Sinan Siyech Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses Volume 9, Issue 4 | April 2017 1 Building a Global Network for Security Editorial Note The Islamic State (IS) terrorist group that (AQ) return to the top of the jihadi pyramid and emerged victorious in Iraq in 2014 has lost its merger between the two old jihadi allies. Iraqi eminence. Presently, it is on the defensive, Vice President Ayad Allawi recently stated that struggling to retain its strongholds in Iraq and ‘discussions and dialogue’ have been taking Syria. This contrasts with the situation in 2014 place between Abu Bakr Al Baghdadi’s when the group was on the rise. It was representatives and AQ chief Ayman Al expanding territorially, producing shockingly Zawahiri. Any rapprochement between the two brutal videos with cinematic flare, and rivals is likely to further complicate the jihadi proclaiming its revival of the so-called landscape in Iraq, Syria and beyond. ‘caliphate’ and implementation of Sharia to beguile local and foreign Muslims and fellow Against this backdrop, the latest issue of CTTA jihadists.
    [Show full text]
  • The Future of Naval Aviation November 2014
    The Evolving Future for Naval Aviation By Robbin Laird and Ed Timperlake Second Line of Defense November 2014 http://www.sldinfo.com h The Evolving Future of Naval Aviation 1 Table of Contents LESSONS LEARNED AT FALLON: THE USN TRAINS FOR FORWARD LEANING STRIKE INTEGRATION .......................................................................................................................... 2 REAR ADMIRAL MANAZIR, DIRECTOR OF AIR WARFARE (OPNAV N98) ..................................... 7 THE ROLE OF LIVE VIRTUAL TRAINING ................................................................................................. 8 THE IMPACT OF 5TH GEN ON FIGHTING IN THE EXPANDED BATTLESPACE .................................................. 12 RE-THINKING THE SEA BASE ............................................................................................................ 13 THE CARRIER AND JOINT AND COALITION OPERATIONS: SHAPING INVESTMENTS FOR THE FUTURE ............... 14 VICE ADMIRAL WILLIAM MORAN, DEPUTY CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS, (N1), FORMER DIRECTOR OF AIR WARFARE (OPNAV N98) ............................................................................. 15 THE TRANSITION ............................................................................................................................ 15 SHAPING INNOVATION .................................................................................................................... 16 THE COMING OF THE F-35 .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Lead IG for Overseas Contingency Operations
    LEAD INSPECTOR GENERAL FOR OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS OPERATION INHERENT RESOLVE REPORT TO THE UNITED STATES CONGRESS OCTOBER 1, 2016‒DECEMBER 31, 2016 LEAD INSPECTOR GENERAL MISSION The Lead Inspector General for Overseas Contingency Operations will coordinate among the Inspectors General specified under the law to: • develop a joint strategic plan to conduct comprehensive oversight over all aspects of the contingency operation • ensure independent and effective oversight of all programs and operations of the federal government in support of the contingency operation through either joint or individual audits, inspections, and investigations • promote economy, efficiency, and effectiveness and prevent, detect, and deter fraud, waste, and abuse • perform analyses to ascertain the accuracy of information provided by federal agencies relating to obligations and expenditures, costs of programs and projects, accountability of funds, and the award and execution of major contracts, grants, and agreements • report quarterly and biannually to the Congress and the public on the contingency operation and activities of the Lead Inspector General (Pursuant to sections 2, 4, and 8L of the Inspector General Act of 1978) FOREWORD We are pleased to publish the Lead Inspector General (Lead IG) quarterly report on Operation Inherent Resolve (OIR). This is our eighth quarterly report on the overseas contingency operation (OCO), discharging our individual and collective agency oversight responsibilities pursuant to sections 2, 4, and 8L of the Inspector General Act of 1978. OIR is dedicated to countering the terrorist threat posed by the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) in Iraq, Syria, the region, and the broader international community. The U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • National Museum of Aleppo As a Model)
    Strategies for reconstructing and restructuring of museums in post-war places (National Museum of Aleppo as a Model) A dissertation submitted at the Faculty of Philosophy and History at the University of Bern for the doctoral degree by: Mohamad Fakhro (Idlib – Syria) 20/02/2020 Prof. Dr. Mirko Novák, Institut für Archäologische Wissenschaften der Universität Bern and Dr. Lutz Martin, Stellvertretender Direktor, Vorderasiatisches Museum, Staatliche Museen zu Berlin Fakhro. Mohamad Hutmatten Str.12 D-79639 Grenzach-Wyhlen Bern, 25.11.2019 Original document saved on the web server of the University Library of Bern This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial-No derivative works 2.5 Switzerland licence. To see the licence go to http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ch/ or write to Creative Commons, 171 Second Street, Suite 300, San Francisco, California 94105, USA Copyright Notice This document is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial-No derivative works 2.5 Switzerland. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ch/ You are free: to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work Under the following conditions: Attribution. You must give the original author credit. Non-Commercial. You may not use this work for commercial purposes. No derivative works. You may not alter, transform, or build upon this work.. For any reuse or distribution, you must take clear to others the license terms of this work. Any of these conditions can be waived if you get permission from the copyright holder. Nothing in this license impairs or restricts the author’s moral rights according to Swiss law.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Analysis Syria
    Overview REGIONAL ANALYSIS SYRIA Total number ‘in need of assistance’: 4 million Number of governorates affected by conflict: 14 out of 14 28 January 2013 Content Part I Overview Part I – Syria Information gaps and data limitations Operational constraints This Regional Analysis of the Syria Conflict (RAS) seeks to bring together information from all sources in Humanitarian profile the region and provide holistic analysis of the overall Country sectoral analysis Syria crisis. While Part I focuses on the situation Governorate profiles within Syria, Part II covers the impact of the crisis on Forthcoming reports the neighbouring countries. The Syria Needs Analysis Annex A: Baseline Data Project welcomes all information that could complement this report. For additional information, Annex B: Definitions Humanitarian Profile comments or questions, please email Annex C: Stakeholder profile [email protected] Priority needs The priority needs below are based on known information. Little or no information is Multiple media sources available for Al-Hasakeh, Ar-Raqqa, Deir-ez-Zor, Hama, Lattakia and Tartous in the north and for As-Sweida, Damascus city, Damascus rural and Quneitra in the south. This is due to the prioritisation of other governorates, limited information sharing and to access issues. Information is being gathered on some cities and governorates (such as Aleppo, Idleb, Dar’a and Homs) although not all is available to the wider humanitarian community for a variety of reasons. Displacement: There is little clear information on the number of IDPs: ministries PROTECTION is a priority throughout the country, specifically: of the GoS report 150,000 IDPs residing in 626 collective centres and more in some 1,468 schools but no figures are available for the number residing in direct threat to life from the conflict private accommodation (with or without host families).
    [Show full text]