A Strategy for Monitoring Glaciers

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Strategy for Monitoring Glaciers A STRATEGY FOR MONITORING GLACIERS U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1132 COVER PHOTOGRAPH: Glaciers near Mount Shuksan and Nooksack Cirque, Washington. Photograph 86R1-054, taken on September 5, 1986, by the U.S. Geological Survey. A Strategy for Monitoring Glaciers By Andrew G. Fountain, Robert M. Krimmel, and Dennis C. Trabant U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CIRCULAR 1132 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Gordon P. Eaton, Director The use of firm, trade, and brand names in this report is for identification purposes only and does not constitute endorsement by the U.S. Government U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE : 1997 Free on application to the U.S. Geological Survey Branch of Information Services Box 25286 Denver, CO 80225-0286 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publications Data Fountain, Andrew G. A strategy for monitoring glaciers / by Andrew G. Fountain, Robert M. Krimmel, and Dennis C. Trabant. p. cm.--(U.S. Geological Survey circular ; 1132) Includes bibliographical references (p. - ). Supt. of Docs, no.: 119.4/2: 1132 1. Glaciers-United States. I. Krimmel, Robert M. II. Trabant, Dennis. III. Title. IV. Series. GB2415.F68 1997 551.31'2-dc21 96-51837 CIP ISBN 0-607-86638-1 CONTENTS Abstract........................................................................_ 1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................................................^ 1 Goals..............................................................................................................^ 3 Previous Efforts of the U.S. Geological Survey.................................................................................................................... 3 Methods of Assessing Glacier Mass Balance........................................................................................................................ 6 Monitoring Strategy.....................................................................^ 7 Benchmark Glacier Network................................................................................................................................................. 8 Primary Measurements................................................................................................................................................ 9 Mass Balance..................................................................................................................................................... 9 Geometry........................................................................................................................................................... 11 Meteorology and Streamflow ............................................................................................................................ 12 Supplementary Measurements..................................................................................................................................... 12 Observation Summary................................................................................................................................................. 13 Reports................................................................. 13 Secondary Glacier Network................................................................................................................................................... 14 Primary Measurements................................................................................................................................................ 14 Observation Summary................................................................................................................................................. 15 Reports..........................................................................................................................................^ 15 Remote-Sensing Inventory.................................................................................................................................................... 15 Primary Measurements................................................................................................................................................ 15 Supplementary Data.................................................................................................................................................... 15 Observation Summary................................................................................................................................................. 16 Reports......................................................................................................................................................................... 16 Summary................................................................................................................................................................................ 16 References Cited....................................................................... 16 FIGURES 1-2. Graphs showing: 1. Effect of glacier cover on runoff variability ...................................................................................................... 1 2. Effect of the melting of alpine glaciers worldwide on global sea level............................................................. 2 3. Diagram showing processes that link meteorology with glacier mass balance and their effect on landscape........... 2 4. Map showing major glacierized regions of the United States.................................................................................... 4 5. Diagram showing correspondence between physical processes that determine glacier change and the processes measured by the different surveillance levels............................................................................................. 9 6. Map showing idealized monitoring strategy for a glacierized region ........................................................................ 10 TABLE 1. Frequency of aerial photographic surveys for glacierized mountain regions of the United States......................... 16 Contents CONVERSION FACTORS Multiply By To obtain kilometer (km) 0.6214 mile millimeter (mm) 0.03937 inch square kilometer (km2) 0.3861 square mile Other abbreviations used in this report: millibar (mb) Sea level: In this report "sea level" refers to the National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929 (NGVD of 1929) a geodetic datum derived from a general adjustment of the first-order level nets of both the United States and Canada, formerly called Sea Level Datum of 1929. IV Contents A Strategy for Monitoring Glaciers By Andrew G. Fountain, Robert M. Krimmel, and Dennis C. Trabant Abstract Glaciers are important features in the EXPLANATION O Washington hydrologic cycle and affect the volume, variability, A Southeast Alaska and water quality of runoff. Assessing and predicting ® Mean Predicted coefficient of variation the effect of glaciers on water resources require a monitoring program to provide basic data for this understanding. The monitoring program of the U.S. Geological Survey employs a nested approach whereby an intensively studied glacier is surrounded by less intensively studied glaciers and those monitored solely by remote sensing. Ideally, each 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 glacierized region of the United States would have PERCENT OF BASIN COVERED BY GLACIERS such a network of glaciers. The intensively studied Figure 1. Effect of glacier cover on runoff variability. ~^he coefficient of variation is the standard deviation dividec1 by glacier provides a detailed understanding of the the mean. physical processes and their temporal changes that control the mass exchange of the glaciers in that contributed to the rise in global sea level (fig. 2) region. The less intensively studied glaciers are used (Meier, 1984; Oerlemans andFortuin, 1992). Glaciers to assess the variability of such processes within the also present special hydrologic hazards, such as floods region. (Post and Mayo, 1971; Driedger and Fountain, 19°9; Mayo, 1989; O'Connor and Costa, 1993) and debris flows (Osterkamp and others, 1986; Walder and INTRODUCTION Driedger, 1994). In addition, glaciers are recognized as sensitive indicators of climate change because their Glaciers are an important water resource of size changes in accordance with variations in mas^ Alaska and a number of Western States because they gain or loss (Johannesson and others, 1989; Meier and are naturally regulated reservoirs that reduce the Roots, 1982; Moss andLins, 1989; Paterson, 1981). runoff variability by increasing flow during hot, dry However, the relation between climate change and periods and by storing water as ice and snow during response of an individual glacier is only generally cool, wet periods (fig. 1) (Meier and Tangborn, 1961; understood and not clearly known for large glacierized Meier, 1962; Krimmel and Tangborn, 1974; Fountain regions. and Tangborn, 1985). The mass wastage of glaciers Understanding the effects of glaciers on ruroff during this century has diminished the volume of requires a long-term program (Benson and others, water stored as ice in the natural reservoirs and has 1986; Fountain and others, 1991) to define the natural reduced the capacity of runoff from the glaciers to variability of the processes that control glacier mass limit annual variations in streamflow. As demands on change (fig. 3). A long-term program also captures water resources continue to increase,
Recommended publications
  • Dustin M. Schroeder
    Dustin M. Schroeder Assistant Professor of Geophysics Department of Geophysics, School of Earth, Energy, and Environmental Sciences 397 Panama Mall, Mitchell Building 361, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305 [email protected], 440.567.8343 EDUCATION 2014 Jackson School of Geosciences, University of Texas, Austin, TX Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.) in Geophysics 2007 Bucknell University, Lewisburg, PA Bachelor of Science in Electrical Engineering (B.S.E.E.), departmental honors, magna cum laude Bachelor of Arts (B.A.) in Physics, magna cum laude, minors in Mathematics and Philosophy PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE 2016 – present Assistant Professor of Geophysics, Stanford University 2017 – present Assistant Professor (by courtesy) of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University 2020 – present Center Fellow (by courtesy), Stanford Woods Institute for the Environment 2020 – present Faculty Affiliate, Stanford Institute for Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence 2021 – present Senior Member, Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology 2016 – 2020 Faculty Affiliate, Stanford Woods Institute for the Environment 2014 – 2016 Radar Systems Engineer, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology 2012 Graduate Researcher, Applied Physics Laboratory, Johns Hopkins University 2008 – 2014 Graduate Researcher, University of Texas Institute for Geophysics 2007 – 2008 Platform Hardware Engineer, Freescale Semiconductor SELECTED AWARDS 2021 Symposium Prize Paper Award, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Society 2020 Excellence in Teaching Award, Stanford School of Earth, Energy, and Environmental Sciences 2019 Senior Member, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers 2018 CAREER Award, National Science Foundation 2018 LInC Fellow, Woods Institute, Stanford University 2016 Frederick E. Terman Fellow, Stanford University 2015 JPL Team Award, Europa Mission Instrument Proposal 2014 Best Graduate Student Paper, Jackson School of Geosciences 2014 National Science Olympiad Heart of Gold Award for Service to Science Education 2013 Best Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • A Strategy for Monitoring Glaciers
    COVER PHOTOGRAPH: Glaciers near Mount Shuksan and Nooksack Cirque, Washington. Photograph 86R1-054, taken on September 5, 1986, by the U.S. Geological Survey. A Strategy for Monitoring Glaciers By Andrew G. Fountain, Robert M. Krimme I, and Dennis C. Trabant U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CIRCULAR 1132 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Gordon P. Eaton, Director The use of firm, trade, and brand names in this report is for identification purposes only and does not constitute endorsement by the U.S. Government U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE : 1997 Free on application to the U.S. Geological Survey Branch of Information Services Box 25286 Denver, CO 80225-0286 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publications Data Fountain, Andrew G. A strategy for monitoring glaciers / by Andrew G. Fountain, Robert M. Krimmel, and Dennis C. Trabant. P. cm. -- (U.S. Geological Survey circular ; 1132) Includes bibliographical references (p. - ). Supt. of Docs. no.: I 19.4/2: 1132 1. Glaciers--United States. I. Krimmel, Robert M. II. Trabant, Dennis. III. Title. IV. Series. GB2415.F68 1997 551.31’2 --dc21 96-51837 CIP ISBN 0-607-86638-l CONTENTS Abstract . ...*..... 1 Introduction . ...* . 1 Goals ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Previous Efforts of the U.S. Geological Survey ...................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ice News Bulletin of the International
    ISSN 0019–1043 Ice News Bulletin of the International Glaciological Society Number 172 3rd Issue 2016 Contents 2 From the Editor 18 Presentation of Honorary Membership to 4 Blog: New Chief Editor for the Professor Keiji Higuchi International Glaciological Society 19 New office for the IGS 5 International Glaciological Society 20 Second Circular: International Symposium 5 Journal of Glaciology on Polar Ice, Polar Climate, Polar Change, 7 Creative Commons licensing Boulder, CO, USA, August 2017 8 Report on the IGS Symposium La Jolla, CA, 32 First Circular: International Symposium on July 2016 Cryosphere and Biosphere, Kyoto, Japan, 13 Report on the British Branch Meeting, March 2018 Southampton, September 2016 36 Glaciological diary 15 News 39 New members 15 Report from the Summer School, McCarthy, Alaska, June 2016 Cover picture: Glacier de Gébroulaz, Vanoise, France, August 2015. Measurements of flow velocity, thickness variation and mass balance are taken several times a year on this glacier by Glacioclim (Laboratoire de Glaciologie et Géophysique de l’Environnement, Grenoble, France). Photo by Coline Bouchayer. EXCLUSION CLAUSE. While care is taken to provide accurate accounts and information in this Newsletter, neither the editor nor the International Glaciological Society undertakes any liability for omissions or errors. 1 From the Editor Dear IGS member Welcome to the third and last issue of ICE breaks (as opposed to running across the for 2016. In this editorial I would like to street looking for a Starbucks and once discuss IGS symposia and in particular our there waiting in line for half an hour) so registration fees. We are regularly criticized this is an excellent opportunity to grab the for setting the registration fees too high and speakers from the previous session and told that people will be unable to attend discuss their presentations.
    [Show full text]
  • Non-Gaussian Statistical Analysis of Polarimetric Synthetic Aperture Radar Images
    FACULTY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT OF PHYSICS AND TECHNOLOGY Non-Gaussian Statistical Analysis of Polarimetric Synthetic Aperture Radar Images Anthony Paul Doulgeris A dissertation for the degree of Philosophiae Doctor February 2011 Abstract This thesis describes general methods to analyse polarimetric synthetic aperture radar images. The primary application is for unsupervised image segmentation, and fast, practical methods are sought. The fundamental assumptions and statistical modelling are derived from the phys- ics of electromagnetic scattering from distributed targets. The physical basis directly leads to the image phenomenon called speckle, which is shown to be potentially non- Gaussian and several statistical distributions are investigated. Speckle non-Gaussianity and polarimetry both hold pertinent information about the target medium and methods that utilise both attributes are developed. Two distinct approaches are proposed: a local feature extraction method; and a model-based clustering algorithm. The local feature extraction approach creates a new six-dimensional description of the image that may be used for subsequent image analysis or for physical parameter extraction (inversion). It essentially extends standard polarimetric features with the addition of a non-Gaussianity measure for texture. Importantly, the non-Gaussianity measure is model independent and therefore does not unduly constrain the analysis. Unsupervised image segmentation is demonstrated with good results. The model-based approach describes a Bayesian clustering algorithm for the K- Wishart model, with fast moment based parameter estimation, and incorporates both non-Gaussianity and polarimetry. The initial implementation requires the number of classes, and initial segmentation, and the effective number of looks (an important model parameter) to be given in advance.
    [Show full text]
  • Report November 1996
    International Council of Scientific Unions No13 report November 1996 Contents SCAR Group of Specialists on Global Change and theAntarctic (GLOCHANT) Report of bipolar meeting of GLOCHANT / IGBP-PAGES Task Group 2 on Palaeoenvironments from Ice Cores (PICE), 1995 1 Report of GLOCHANTTask Group 3 on Ice Sheet Mass Balance and Sea-Level (ISMASS), 1995 6 Report of GLOCHANT IV meeting, 1996 16 GLOCHANT IV Appendices 27 Published by the SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE ON ANTARCTIC RESEARCH at the Scott Polar Research Institute, Cambridge, United Kingdom INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL OF SCIENTIFIC UNIONS SCIENTIFIC COMMITfEE ON ANTARCTIC RESEARCH SCAR Report No 13, November 1996 Contents SCAR Group of Specialists on Global Change and theAntarctic (GLOCHANT) Report of bipolar meeting of GLOCHANT / IGBP-PAGES Task Group 2 on Palaeoenvironments from Ice Cores (PICE), 1995 1 Report of GLOCHANT Task Group 3 on Ice Sheet Mass Balance and Sea-Level (ISMASS), 1995 6 Report of GLOCHANT IV meeting, 1996 16 GLOCHANT IV Appendices 27 Published by the SCIENTIFIC COMMITfEE ON ANT ARCTIC RESEARCH at the Scott Polar Research Institute, Cambridge, United Kingdom SCAR Group of Specialists on Global Change and the Antarctic (GLOCHANT) Report of the 1995 bipolar meeting of the GLOCHANT I IGBP-PAGES Task Group 2 on Palaeoenvironments from Ice Cores. (PICE) Boston, Massachusetts, USA, 15-16 September; 1995 Members ofthe PICE Group present Dr. D. Raynaud (Chainnan, France), Dr. D. Peel (Secretary, U.K.}, Dr. J. White (U.S.A.}, Mr. V. Morgan (Australia), Dr. V. Lipenkov (Russia), Dr. J. Jouzel (France), Dr. H. Shoji (Japan, proxy for Prof. 0. Watanabe). Apologies: Prof. 0.
    [Show full text]
  • Five Decades of Radioglaciology
    Annals of Glaciology Five decades of radioglaciology Dustin M. Schroeder1,2, Robert G. Bingham3, Donald D. Blankenship4, Knut Christianson5, Olaf Eisen6,7 , Gwenn E. Flowers8 , Nanna B. Karlsson9 , Michelle R. Koutnik5, John D. Paden10 and Martin J. Siegert11 Article 1Department of Geophysics, Stanford University, Stanford, USA; 2Department of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, USA; 3School of GeoSciences,University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK; 4Institute for Cite this article: Schroeder DM et al. (2020). Geophysics, University of Texas, Austin, USA; 5Department of Earth and Space Sciences, University of Washington, Five decades of radioglaciology. Annals of 6 Glaciology 61(81), 1–13. https://doi.org/ Seattle, USA; Alfred-Wegener-Institut, Helmholtz-Zentrum für Polar- und Meeresforschung, Bremerhaven, 7 8 10.1017/aog.2020.11 Germany; University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany; Department of Earth Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, Canada; 9Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland, Copenhagen, Denmark; 10Center for the Received: 2 December 2019 Remote Sensing of Ice Sheets, University of Kansas, Lawrence, USA and 11Grantham Institute, and Department Revised: 11 February 2020 of Earth Science and Engineering, Imperial College London, London, UK Accepted: 11 February 2020 First published online: 9 March 2020 Abstract Keywords: Radar sounding is a powerful geophysical approach for characterizing the subsurface conditions glaciological instruments and methods; ground-penetrating radar; radio-echo of terrestrial and planetary ice masses at local to global scales. As a result, a wide array of orbital, sounding; remote sensing airborne, ground-based, and in situ instruments, platforms and data analysis approaches for radioglaciology have been developed, applied or proposed. Terrestrially, airborne radar sounding Author for correspondence: has been used in glaciology to observe ice thickness, basal topography and englacial layers for five Dustin M.
    [Show full text]
  • Krista Marie Soderlund the University of Texas at Austin Institute for Geophysics, John A
    Krista Marie Soderlund The University of Texas at Austin Institute for Geophysics, John A. & Katherine G. Jackson School of Geosciences J.J. Pickle Research Campus, Bldg. 196 (ROC), 10100 Burnet Rd. (R2200), Austin, TX 78758-4445 [email protected], Office: 512-471-0449, Cell: 218-349-3006, FAX: 512-471-8844 Research Interests Geophysical Fluid Dynamics, Magnetohydrodynamics, Planetary Science, Cryosphere Education University of California, Los Angeles Ph.D., Geophysics and Space Physics, 2011 M.S., Geophysics and Space Physics, 2009 Florida Institute of Technology B.S., Double major in Physics & Space Science, 2005, Summa Cum Laude Employment University of Texas at Austin, Institute for Geophysics Research Associate, September 2014-Present UTIG Postdoctoral Fellow, October 2011-September 2014 University of California, Los Angeles, Department of Earth and Space Sciences Graduate Student Researcher, Advisor: Dr. Jonathan M. Aurnou, 2006-2011 California Institute of Technology, Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences Summer Undergraduate Research Fellow, Dr. Joann M. Stock, 2005 NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, CA Consultant, Dr. Bonnie J. Buratti, 2006 Planetary Geology & Geophysics Undergrad Research Program, Dr. B.J. Buratti, 2004 Florida Institute of Technology, Department of Physics and Space Science Undergraduate Researcher, Dr. Niescja E. Turner, 2004-2005 Naval Oceanographic Office, Hydrology Code, Stennis Space Center, MS Physical science aid, 2003 Mission Experience Saturn Probe Interior and aTmosphere Explorer (SPRITE)
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 16 Glaciers As Landforms: Glaciology
    Chapter 16 j Glaciers as Landforms: Glaciology Of all thewater near the surface of the earth, only about by the rheidity of ice (p. 13), important differences are 2 percent is on the land, in the solid state as glacier ice to be noted whether flow is confined or unconfined. (Figure 2-5). Even this small fraction is sufficient to Glaciers originate in regions where snow accumu­ cover entirely one continent (Antarctica) and most of lation exceeds loss, and they flow outward or down­ the largest island (Greenland) with ice to an average ward to regions where losses exceed accumulation thickness of 2.2 km over Antarctica and 1.5 km over (Figure 16-2). The terminus, or downglacier extremity, Greenland. At the present time, about 10 percent of the represents the line where losses by all causes (melting, earth's land area is ice covered. An additional 20 per­ sublimation, erosion, and calving into water: collec­ cent has been ice covered repeatedly during the glacia­ tively termed ablation) equal the rate at which ice can tions of the Pleistocene Epoch, much of it as recently as be supplied by accumulation and forward motion. 15,000 to 20,000 years ago. Glaciation has been the Some valley glaciers have steep ice faces at their ter­ dominant factor in shaping the present landscape of mini, but others end deeply buried in transported rock North America northward of the Ohio and Missouri debris, so that the exact location of the terminus is rivers and of Eurasia northward of a line from Dublin uncertain.
    [Show full text]
  • Evidence for Possible New Subglacial Lakes Along a Radar Transect Crossing the Belgica Highlands and the Concordia Trench
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Earth-prints Repository Terra Antartica Reports 2008, 14, 000-000 (4 pp - 2 colour p) Evidence for Possible New Subglacial Lakes along a Radar Transect Crossing the Belgica Highlands and the Concordia Trench A. FORIERI1*, I.E. TABACCO1, L. CAFARELLA2, S. URBINI2, C. BIANCHI2, A. ZIRIZZOTTI2 1Università degli Studi di Milano, Sez. Geofi sica, Via Cicognara 7, 20129 Milano - Italia 2Istituto Nazionale Geofi sica e Vulcanologia, Via di Vigna Murata 605, 00143 Roma - Italia *Corresponding author ([email protected]) INTRODUCTION Subglacial lakes are of great interest to the scientifi c community, and more than 140 lakes have been identifi ed in Antarctica and catalogued (Siegert et al., 2005, Cafarella et al., 2006). We report on the possible existence of 5 new subglacial lakes in the area between the Belgica HighLands and the Concordia Trench. Analysis of radar data collected during the 2003 Antarctic fi eld survey reveals particularly strong radar echoes coming from the subglacial interface. As radar surveys are only one of the methods used to identify subglacial lakes, the presence of these 5 new lakes must be discussed and confi rmed through other geophysical investigations. DATA COLLECTION AND PROCESSING During the Italian Antarctic fi eld survey in 2003, airborne radar measurements were made around Dome C (Fig. 1) to better defi ne geological structures such as the Concordia and Aurora trenches and the Concordia, Aurora and Vincennes subglacial lakes (Forieri et al., 2004). Data were collected with a radar system operating at 60 MHz frequency and acquiring 10 traces s-1 with a pulse length of 1 μs.
    [Show full text]
  • Instruments and Methods an Improved Coherent Radar Depth Sounder
    Journal of Glaciology, Vol. 44, No. 148, 1998 Instruments and Methods An improved coherent radar depth sounder 2 3 1 S. GoGINENI,1 T. CHUAH, C. ALLEN,1 K. jEZEK, R. K. MooRE 1Radar Systems and Remote Sensing Laboratory, The University of Kansas, 2291 Irving Hill Road, Lawrence, Kansas 66045-2969, US.A. 2Silicon Wireless, 2025 Garcia Avenue, Mountain View, California 94043, US.A. 3 Byrd Polar Research Center, The Ohio State University, 108 Scott Hall, 1090 Carmack Road, Columbus, Ohio 43210-1002, US.A. ABSTRACT. The University of Kansas developed a coherent radar depth sounder during the 1980s. This system was originally developed for glacial ice-thickness measure- ments in the Antarctic. During the field tests in the Antarctic and Greenland, we found the system performance to be less than optimum. The field tests in Greenland were per- formed in 1993, as a part of the NASA Program for Arctic Climate Assessment ( PARCA ). We redesigned and rebuilt this system to improve the performance. The radar uses pulse compression and coherent signal processing to obtain high sensi- tivity and fine along-track resolution. It operates at a center frequency of 150 MHz with a radio frequency bandwidth of about 17 MHz, which gives a range resolution of about 5 m in ice. We have been operating it from a NASA P-3 aircraft for collecting ice-thickness data in conjunction with laser surface-elevation measurements over the Greenland ice sheet during the last 4 years. We have demonstrated that this radar can measure the thick- ness of more than 3 km of cold ice and can obtain ice-thickness information over outlet glaciers and ice margins.
    [Show full text]
  • Glaciers of México
    Glaciers of North America— GLACIERS OF MÉXICO By SIDNEY E. WHITE SATELLITE IMAGE ATLAS OF GLACIERS OF THE WORLD Edited by RICHARD S. WILLIAMS, Jr., and JANE G. FERRIGNO U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1386–J–3 Glaciers in México are restricted to its three highest mountains, all stratovolcanoes. Of the two that have been active in historic time, Volcán Pico de Orizaba (Volcán Citlaltépetl) has nine named glaciers, and Popocatépetl has three named glaciers. The one dormant stratovolcano, Iztaccíhuatl, has 12 named glaciers. The total area of the 24 glaciers is 11.44 square kilometers. The glaciers on all three volcanoes have been receding during the 20th century. Since 1993, intermittent explosive and effusive volcanic activity at the summit of Popocatépetl has covered its glaciers with tephra and caused some melting CONTENTS Page Abstract ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- J383 Introduction----------------------------------------------------------------------- 383 Volcán Pico de Orizaba (Volcán Citlaltépetl) ----------------------------- 384 FIGURE 1. Topographic map showing the glaciers on Citlaltépetl--------- 385 2. Sketch map showing the principal overland routes to Citlaltépetl, Iztaccíhuatl, and Popocatépetl ------------------ 386 3. Oblique aerial photograph of Citlaltépetl from the northwest in February 1942 --------------------------------------------- 387 4. Enlargement of part of a Landsat 1 MSS false-color composite image of Citlaltépetl and environs ---------------------------
    [Show full text]
  • Glacial Geomorphology: Towards a Convergence of Glaciology And
    Article Progress in Physical Geography 34(3) 327–355 ª The Author(s) 2010 Glacial geomorphology: Reprints and permission: sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav Towards a convergence of DOI: 10.1177/0309133309360631 glaciology and geomorphology ppg.sagepub.com Robert G. Bingham British Antarctic Survey and University of Aberdeen, UK Edward C. King British Antarctic Survey, UK Andrew M. Smith British Antarctic Survey, UK Hamish D. Pritchard British Antarctic Survey, UK Abstract This review presents a perspective on recent trends in glacial geomorphological research, which has seen an increasing engagement with investigating glaciation over larger and longer timescales facilitated by advances in remote sensing and numerical modelling. Remote sensing has enabled the visualization of deglaciated landscapes and glacial landform assemblages across continental scales, from which hypotheses of millennial-scale glacial landscape evolution and associations of landforms with palaeo-ice streams have been developed. To test these ideas rigorously, the related goal of imaging comparable subglacial landscapes and landforms beneath contemporary ice masses is being addressed through the application of radar and seismic technologies. Focusing on the West Antarctic Ice Sheet, we review progress to date in achieving this goal, and the use of radar and seismic imaging to assess: (1) subglacial bed morphology and roughness; (2) subglacial bed reflectivity; and (3) subglacial sediment properties. Numerical modelling, now the primary modus operandi of ‘glaciologists’
    [Show full text]