DOCSLIB.ORG

Amymy Lleeee ’82’82

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

November 2013 ISSN: 0219 - 6441 law link EMBRACEMBRACEE YOURYOUR CHALLCHALLEENGNGEESS AAMYMY LLEEEE ’82’82 WALKINGWALKING WITHWITH GIANTSGIANTS TPTPBB MENMENOONN ’61’61 AFFAIRSAFFAIRS OFOF THTHEE HHEEART-ART- MEMEDIATIONDIATION && PROPRO BONOBONO GGEEOORRGGEE LIMLIM ’81’81 AAPPPPLYINGLYING THTHEE LLEESSONSSSONS LLEEARNTARNT ININ RREEALAL LIFLIFEE TETEOO GGUANUAN SIEWSIEW ’04’04 AWFULLYAWFULLY INSINSPPIRINGIRING lynlyn LEELEE ’96’96 THE ALUMNI MAGAZINE OF THE NATIONAL UNVERSITY OF SINGAPORE FACULTY OF LAW LawLink / 2013 CONTENTS 2 aLAWMNUS features 18 Dean’s Diary TPB Menon ’61, 10 Walking with Giants Law School Highlights Amy Lee ’82, Embrace Your Challenges Reunions 4 14 Students Drive 20 Pro Bono Activities George Lim ’81, NUS Law Reunion in Hong Kong Affairs Of The Heart – 5 21 Mediation & Pro Bono Law Alumni NUS Law Reunion in Shanghai Mentorship Programme 15 22 Appreciation Evening Teo Guan Siew ’04, A Family Night Out Applying the Lessons 6 Learnt in Real Life 23 Class of 2013 Farewell Dinner & Commencement 16 Class of ‘83 Reunion Lyn Lee ’96, 8 24 Awfully Inspiring Launch of Centre for Class of ’93 Reunion Law & Business 1 dean’s diarY LawLink / 2013 elcome to the annual print edition of LawLink! WOne of the great privileges of being at NUS Law is the tremendous history of which we are so proud. Our alumni have gone on to occupy the highest legal offices in the land – including the current and former Chief Justices, Attorneys-General, and Ministers for Law. We can also claim partners in all the major law firms in Singapore, as well as in New York and London, Hong Kong and Shanghai. We celebrate the achievements of all our alumni who achieve significant milestones in the legal profession. In these pages you can learn more about our advisory council member Amy Lee ’82, former Law Society President George Lim ’81, and member of the first graduating class from NUS Law TPB Menon ’61. Other alumni follow paths less travelled. Some move into the public sector, such as Teo Guan Siew ’04, who directs the enforcement division at the Monetary Authority of Singapore. Or they start private ventures, as Lyn Lee ’96 did, when she launched Awfully Chocolate. Their stories are also to be found in this edition of LawLink. This year’s ceremony received even more media attention than normal. This was partly due to the honorary doctor of laws degree that was But NUS Law graduates achieve in so many fields. For example, I was conferred upon Singapore’s founding prime minister, Mr Lee Kuan especially pleased this year to see our alumni featured so prominently Yew. The award recognised Mr Lee’s extraordinary contributions in the National Day Parade. Selena Tan ’94 was the creative director to Singapore, but also the important role that law has played in and Rani Singam ’94 led one of the most moving renditions of Majulah Singapore’s development. Singapura that I have ever heard. There was also considerable interest in our graduate Darren Tan ’13, In their own way, all our alumni contribute to the multifaceted history of who had spent more than ten years in prison before being admitted NUS Law. to NUS Law. Through his industry and dedication, he earned himself a second chance at being a productive member of society — a chance And, every year, we add to that history with a new graduating class. that he has embraced. But to me, the most moving part of this year’s ceremony was the fact that the Class of 2013 became our first to create a class gift as part of their graduation festivities. They explained this as an example of “paying it forward”— passing on good fortune from which they had benefitted to others needier than themselves. None of the students were yet earning salaries, but I know that this support will be enormously significant to the students that it helps, and to all those who see it as an example of dedication to others. Source: The Straits Times © Singapore Press Holdings Ltd. Permission required for reproduction. If you would like to explore how you can help future generations of students, please do not hesitate to contact Trina Gan ’04 or myself. This could take the form of your own class gift, a scholarship in the name of a loved one, or a professorship in an area in which you would like to have a lasting legacy. DEAN’S I hope you enjoy reading in these pages about the many activities going on at NUS Law. Do consider dropping by to DIARY learn more in person. SIMON CHESTERMAN Dean, NUS Law 2 3 LAW SCHOOL HIGHLIGHTS LawLink / 2013 LAW ALUMNI MentoRSHIP PROGRAMME APPRECIATION Pro Bono Group President Denise Tay ’16 and Vice-President Wilson Koh ’16 explain Pro Bono Group EVENING activities to NUS President Prof Tan Chorh Chuan, NUS Board of Trustees Chairman Mr Wong Ngit Liong STUDENTS and Prime Minister Mr Lee Hsien Loong Oct 2013 was a memorable 3 evening when about 140 mentors DRIVE PRO BONO and mentees networked at Nine Thirty by Awfully Chocolate at the Esplanade. It was a night of appreciation for the ACTIVITIES outgoing mentors and a warm welcome for the incoming mentors. NUS Law Students (from left) James Kwong ’17, Jerrold Soh ’18 and Clement Lin ’17 The NUS Law Alumni Mentorship Programme (LAMP) is a collaboration he term pro bono publico, or as it goals are to involve, inform, inspire, and schools. At NUS Law, the programme between the Career Centre@Law and is commonly known, pro bono, is a give back with the opportunities they takes the form of a second year module the NUS Law Alumni Office and it links T Latin phrase used for professional have been blessed with. that requires students to do 20 hours of first and second year NUS Law students work provided voluntarily as a form of pro bono work. Students have already with alumni mentors who can share The PBG is only part of the pro bono public service. Common in the legal embraced the programme by initiating first hand experiences, provide insights story at NUS Law, which is one of the profession, NUS Law has a long tradition new projects and expanding on existing to the legal profession as well as few law schools in the world to offer of voluntary student involvement in PBG and CJC projects. practical guidance, encouragement and pro bono placements as part of first pro bono that helps the disadvantaged, support. Student mentees will have the year orientation, organized through and opportunities will only get better with For example, three first year students, opportunity to become better equipped the Freshmen Orientation Central the Mandatory Pro Bono Programme. Clement Lin ’17, Jerrold Soh ’18 and to make well-informed decisions about Committee. The Criminal Justice Club James Kwong ’17, have already embarked their professional development. Organised pro bono activities began at (CJC), another student-driven group, has on their personal project to help the elderly NUS Law in 2005 when the student- been instrumental in focusing attention with legal issues. When asked how they NUS Law Club President, Danial Hakim ’16, initiated Pro Bono Group (PBG) was on the criminal justice system. Formed intend to go about this initiative, Clement shares “LAMP is undoubtedly beneficial, formed to create pro bono opportunities in September 2009, the CJC initiated says “Right now we are getting in touch as it enables students to get up close and for law students and raise awareness of two key activities: the Innocence Project with organisations to find out more about personal with current practitioners from the professional obligation to serve the developed with the support of the the common problems they face with a diversity of fields. The experiences and community. Since then, PBG members Attorney General’s Chambers, aims to regards to the elderly and using that challenges shared by the mentors will have consistently taken leadership roles promote just outcomes by examining information, we will figure out how best give an insight into the profession and in pro bono activities, including winning possible cases of wrongful convictions; we can help them. If possible, we will put what life will be like after graduation and the annual Student Volunteer Award for and the annual Criminal Justice them in touch with the people who are the options available within the industry”. Subordinate Court volunteers. Current Conference exposes secondary school empowered to assist.” The students hope activities include assisting at legal clinics, and tertiary students to criminal justice to produce an information package which If you are willing to share your valuable teaching legal concepts to secondary issues. In development is the Courts details information important to the elderly, experiences with our students and school students in the home grown Legal Martial Project, which aims to render legal such as the Central Provident Fund and would like to be updated on next year’s Education and Awareness Programme assistance to military servicemen. The housing matters. They intend to support LAMP, please do not hesitate to drop us (LEAP), and participating in research CJC also supports several pro bono clinics, lawyers who want to do pro bono work an email at [email protected] projects that support Singapore non- including HELP Centre and Remand Clinic, but who hesitate because information is profit organisations such as AWARE, in collaboration with the Subordinate not easily accessible. HOME and Project Law Help. The PBG’s Courts of Singapore. activities were recently highlighted when Congratulations to all these students, they were selected to present their work Since 2012, the NUS Pro Bono Office who put their legal knowledge to use to the Prime Minister at the Student has been established to provide students for the community from an early stage in Showcase for the UTown Opening on with more support to develop and their education, and who truly embody Thursday, 17 October 2013.
Recommended publications
  • 2018 ANNUAL MEETING from Imitation to Innovation

    2018 ANNUAL MEETING from Imitation to Innovation

    2018 ANNUAL MEETING From Imitation to Innovation NOVEMBER 10 – 12, 2018 DOHA, QATAR HOSTED BY INDEX WELCOME ………………………………………………………………………… 3 AGENDA …………………………………………………………………………... 4 GROUP BREAKOUTS …………………………………………………………… 10 GOVERNING BOARD …………………………………………………………… 13 DOCTRINAL STUDY GROUPS ………………………………………………… 14 UNIVERSITIES ATTENDING …………………………………………………… 15 BOARD OF GOVERNORS ATTENDEES ……………………………………... 17 QATAR UNIVERSITY, COLLEGE OF LAW ATTENDEES …………………. 21 JUDICIAL ATTENDEES …………………………………………………………. 25 ATTENDEES ……………………………………………………………………… 29 SECRETARIAT …………………………………………………………………… 58 SINGAPORE DECLARATION ………………………………………………….. 59 MADRID PROTOCOL ……………………………………………………………. 61 JUDICIAL STANDARDS OF A LEGAL EDUCATION ……………………….. 62 SELF-ASSESSMENT REPORT ………………………………………………… 63 EVALUATION, ASSISTANCE, AND CERTIFICATION PROGRAM ……….. 66 2 WELCOME On behalf of all the members of the International Association of Law Schools Board of Governors, we want to welcome each and every one of you to our 2018 Annual Meeting. This is our eleventh annual meeting where over 115 law teachers from more than 30 countries have gathered together to discuss and formulate new strategies to improve legal education globally. Almost half of our participants are senior law school leaders (deans, vice deans and associate deans). We warmly welcome all the familiar faces from these many years – welcome and thank you for your continued engagement in advancing the cause of improving legal education globally. For those who are new, a special warm welcome from our community. Please meet your colleagues from around the world. We look forward to working with you in this challenging and engaging effort. The IALS is a non-political, non-profit learned society of more than 160 law schools and departments from over 55 countries representing more than 7,500 law faculty members. One of our primary missions is the improvement of law schools and conditions of legal education throughout the world by learning from each other.
  • [Webinar] SAL Annual Review Series 2021 Singapore Cases in 2020

    [Webinar] SAL Annual Review Series 2021 Singapore Cases in 2020

    [Webinar] SAL Annual Review Series 2021 Singapore Cases in 2020 In conjunction with the Singapore Academy of Law's Annual Review of Singapore cases 2020, this series of webinars will evaluate the decisions of the Singapore Courts in 2020 as well as highlight the developments in the principal areas of the law that have taken place since. L I FTED by Legal Practitioner Specialisms Webinar In-House Counsel Specialisms Legal Support Specialisms SAL Annual Review Series 2021 Annual Review of 2020 Cases on: Wed, 23 Jun Land Law Register here 1.5 CPD 4pm - 5.30pm Wed, 30 Jun Confidential Information and Data Protection Register here 1.5 CPD 4pm - 5.30pm Mon, 19 Jul Criminal Law Register here 1.5 CPD 4pm - 5.30pm Thu, 22 Jul Competition Law Register here 1.5 CPD 4pm - 5.30pm Tue, 27 Jul Tort Law Register here 1.5 CPD 4pm - 5.30pm Wed, 28 Jul Intellectual Property Law Register here 1.5 CPD 4pm - 5.30pm Wed, 11 Aug Muslim Law Register here 1.5 CPD 4pm - 5.30pm Registration All prices indicated include GST. Annual Review Series 2021 Bundle A: SGD 385.20 SGD 267.50 1. Confidential Information and Data Protection 2. Competition Law 3. Tort Law 4. Intellectual Property Law Annual Review Series 2021 Bundle B: SGD 385.20 SGD 267.50 1. Land Law 2. Criminal Law 3. Tort Law 4. Muslim Law Price per session SGD 96.30 SAL Associate Student Member (To apply, click here) SGD 32.10 per session SAL Annual Review Series 2021 Tue, 23 June Annual Review of 2020 Cases on Land Law This session will encompass a discussion on selected cases decided in the past 5 years up to December 2020.
  • YOU, the PEOPLE the United Nations, Transitional Administration, and State-Building

    YOU, the PEOPLE the United Nations, Transitional Administration, and State-Building

    International Peace Academy YOU, THE PEOPLE The United Nations, Transitional Administration, and State-Building Project on Transitional Administrations Final Report Simon Chesterman November 2003 About the Project on Transitional Administrations The International Peace Academy’s Project on Transitional Administrations is funded by Carnegie Corporation of New York, with additional funding from the Ford Foundation and the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation. Many thanks to David M. Malone, Neclâ Tschirgi, Sebastian von Einsiedel, Dino Kritsiotis, and Kimberly Marten for their comments on an earlier version of this text. The views expressed are those of the author alone. Themes explored in this report are treated more fully in You, the People: The United Nations, Transitional Administration, and State-Building (Oxford University Press, forthcoming). For further information, visit <http://www.ipacademy.org>. About the Author Simon Chesterman is a Senior Associate at the International Peace Academy in New York. He is the author of Just War or Just Peace? Humanitarian Intervention and International Law (Oxford University Press, 2001) and the editor (with Michael Ignatieff and Ramesh Thakur) of Making States Work: State Failure and the Crisis of Governance (United Nations University Press, 2004) and of Civilians in War (Lynne Rienner, 2001). YOU THE PEOPLE Executive Summary • First, the means are inconsistent with the ends. Benevolent autocracy is an uncertain foundation for legitimate and sustainable national • Transitional administrations represent the most governance. It is inaccurate and, often, counter- complex operations attempted by the United productive to assert that transitional administra- Nations. The missions in Kosovo (1999—) and East tion depends upon the consent or ‘ownership’ of Timor (1999–2002) are commonly seen as unique the local population.
  • Mixed Response from Lawyers to Proposal for Third Law School

    Mixed Response from Lawyers to Proposal for Third Law School

    Publication: Channel NewsAsia Date: 29 May 2013 Headline: Mixed response from lawyers to proposal for third law school Mixed response from lawyers to proposal for third law school By S Ramesh POSTED: 29 May 2013 4:16 PM A proposal to set up a third law school in Singapore to address the shortage of community lawyers has received mixed response from the Association of Criminal Lawyers. SINGAPORE: A proposal to set up a third law school in Singapore to address the shortage of community lawyers has received mixed response from the Association of Criminal Lawyers. Its president Subhas Anandan believes the problem can be addressed through other ways and that the third law school should only be considered a last resort. The Fourth Committee on the Supply of Lawyers, led by Judge of Appeal Justice VK Rajah which released its report on Tuesday, observed that there's a shortage of lawyers practising community law which includes family law and criminal law. The report said that if no measures are taken to address the situation, the shortage will be exacerbated. But president of the Association of Criminal Lawyers Subhas Anandan said the solution is not found in having another law school. Publication: Channel NewsAsia Date: 29 May 2013 Headline: Mixed response from lawyers to proposal for third law school "To me, criminal law is a passion that you enjoy doing it, you don't care for the money, you believe in protecting a person's liberty, his life, so you have the passion. You cannot instil passion in the people. So what you have to do is try and throw them into the pool and hope that after a few years, they will enjoy it and they will have the passion.
  • Compromising on Consideration in Singapore: Gay Choon Ing V Loh Sze Ti Terence Peter Goh Yihan*

    Compromising on Consideration in Singapore: Gay Choon Ing V Loh Sze Ti Terence Peter Goh Yihan*

    Supreme Court of Singapore, 1 Supreme Court Lane, Singapore 178879, t: (65)-6332-1020 _________________________________________________________________________________________________ We are grateful to the authors, editors and publishers for their kind permission granted to post the respective articles on the Singapore Judicial College website. No article posted here may be circulated or reproduced without the prior permission of the author(s), editor(s) and publisher (where applicable). Our Vision: Excellence in judicial education and research. Our Mission: To provide and inspire continuing judicial learning and research to enhance the competency and professionalism of judges. Compromising on consideration in Singapore: Gay Choon Ing v Loh Sze Ti Terence Peter Goh Yihan* Introduction It is not often that a judgment contains a reference to Aris- tal difficulties’.5 The facts that allowed the opportunity to totle’s work or a coda at its conclusion. The recent Singa- re-evaluate consideration reflected the ebb and flow of pore Court of Appeal1 judgment of Gay Choon Ing v Loh friendship, captured by Aristotle in his Nicomachean Ethics Sze Ti Terence Peter2 (delivered by Andrew Phang JA) con- (Book VIII),6 and interestingly cited by the Court in a rare tained both, the latter of which an extensive judicial expo- judicial nod to classical literature.7 The appellant in Gay sition on the difficulties (and tentative solutions) relating to Choon Ing was a close friend of the respondent and was the contractual doctrine of consideration. This re-evalua- employed by the latter’s company in Kenya, ASP, until his tion of consideration at the slightest opportunity is unsur- resignation in 2004.
  • 1 Schedule and IVLE Admin SR 4-1/ 3–6Pm Date Topic Week 1 Tue 14 Aug 1.1. Overview of Course 1.2. Introduction to Principles

    1 Schedule and IVLE Admin SR 4-1/ 3–6Pm Date Topic Week 1 Tue 14 Aug 1.1. Overview of Course 1.2. Introduction to Principles

    Schedule and IVLE Admin SR 4-1/ 3–6pm Date Topic Week 1 Tue 14 Aug 1.1. Overview of Course 1.2. Introduction to principles, concepts, and institutions necessary to understanding regional law and regional organisations (and international law and international organisations more generally) vis-à-vis ASEAN 1.3. ASEAN, the Political Creature (1967–2007) Week 2 Tue 21 Aug 2. ASEAN, the Legal Creature (2007– ) Week 3 Tue 28 Aug 3. The Rule of Law in ASEAN and the Making of ASEAN Instruments Week 4 Tue 4 Sep 4. The Rule of Institutions in ASEAN – Regional Governance at Multiple Levels Release of Mid-term Essay Assignment Week 5 Tue 11 Sep 5. Securing Compliance with ASEAN Law Week 6 Tue 18 Sep 6. ASEAN Law in National Regimes Recess Week Recess Week Week 7 Tue 2 Oct 7. ASEAN and Security (1 – Rights) (Pillars 1 and 3: Political- Security and Socio-Cultural) Mid-term Essay Due: Tue 2 Oct 2018 (9am) Week 8 Tue 9 Oct 8. ASEAN and Security (2 – Security) (Pillars 1 and 3: Political- Security and Socio-Cultural) Week 9 Tue 16 Oct 9. ASEAN Economic Community-Building (1) (Pillar 2: Economic) Week 10 Tue 23 Oct 10. ASEAN Economic Community-Building (2) (Pillar 2: Economic) Week 11 Tue 30 Oct 11. ASEAN External Relations (1) – Legal Personality, Centrality, and the Driver’s Seat Week 12 Tue 6 Nov 12. ASEAN External Relations (2) – External Trade Relations AND Revision Week 13 Reading Week Exam [Release: Wed 21 Nov 2018 (9am); Due: 3pm] 1 LL4287V/LL5287V/LL6287V ASEAN Law and Policy Overview The Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) is arguably the most important form of regional cooperation for its ten member states – Brunei, Cambodia, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia, Myanmar, Philippines, Singapore, Thailand, and Vietnam – notwithstanding other multilateral arrangements they might have.
  • International Law Asian Journal Of

    International Law Asian Journal Of

    THE JOURNAL OF THE ASIAN SOCIETY OF INTERNATIONAL LAW VOLUME 4 ISSUE 1 JANUARY 2014 ISSN 2044-2513 Asian Journal of International Law Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 170.106.40.139, on 29 Sep 2021 at 05:45:27, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2044251314000095 Asian Journal of International Law The Asian Journal of International Law is the journal of the Asian Society of International Law. It publishes peer-reviewed scholarly articles and book reviews on public and private international law. The regional focus of the journal is broadly conceived. Some articles may focus specifically on Asian issues; others will bring one of the many Asian perspectives to bear on issues of global concern. Still others will be of more general interest to scholars, practitioners, and policy-makers located in or working on Asia. The journal is published in English as a matter of practical convenience rather than political endorsement. English language reviews of books in other languages are particularly welcomed. The journal is produced for the Asian Society of International Law by the National University of Singapore Faculty of Law and succeeds the Singapore Year Book of International Law. For further information, forthcoming pieces, and guidelines on how to submit articles or book reviews, please visit www.AsianJIL.org. instructions for contributors The Asian Journal of International Law welcomes unsolicited articles and proposals for book reviews. For details, visit www.AsianJIL.org. © Asian Journal of International Law ISSN 2044-2513 E-ISSN 2044-2521 This journal issue has been printed on FSC-certified paper and cover board.

  • Two Contrasting Approaches in the Interpretation of Outdated Statutory Provisions Yihan GOH Singapore Management University, [email protected]

    Singapore Management University Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Research Collection School Of Law School of Law 12-2010 Two Contrasting Approaches in the Interpretation of Outdated Statutory Provisions Yihan GOH Singapore Management University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research Part of the Asian Studies Commons, Courts Commons, and the Legislation Commons Citation GOH, Yihan. Two Contrasting Approaches in the Interpretation of Outdated Statutory Provisions. (2010). Singapore Journal of Legal Studies. [2010], 530-545. Research Collection School Of Law. Available at: https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/1415 This Journal Article is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Law at Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Research Collection School Of Law by an authorized administrator of Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University. For more information, please email [email protected]. Singapore Journal of Legal Studies [2010] 530-545 Published in Singapore Journal of Legal Studies, [2010] pp 530-545. TWO CONTRASTING APPROACHES IN THE INTERPRETATION OF OUTDATED STATUTORY PROVISIONS WX v. WW' AAG v. Estate ofAAH, deceased2 GOH YIHAN* I. INTRODUCTION Some statutes in operation today were passed a long time ago. Inevitably, through the passage of time, social norms at the time of enactment may now be unrecognis- able. The legislative intent at the time of enactment may also seem outdated in more modem times. Judges interpreting specific provisions of these statutes may therefore encounter problems in ensuring a 'just' result in an instant case.
  • Smubrochure.Pdf

    Smubrochure.Pdf

    SMU LAW SCHOOL The Singapore Government, in a major review of the domestic supply of lawyers, confirmed a shortage of lawyers in Singapore. 2007 hence marked a major milestone in the development of legal education in Singapore – the setting up of the nation’s second law school. SMU is honoured to be entrusted with this important responsibility. As Singapore’s first private university and the only university here with a city campus purpose-built to its pedagogy of small class size and interactive learning, SMU will be extending its unique approach to its School of Law. SMU’s undergraduate law programme aims to mould students into excellent lawyers who will contribute significantly to society. The objective is to produce law graduates who have contextualised legal expertise and the ability to think across disciplines and geographical borders. In terms of pedagogy, SMU’s seminar-style learning will be put to good effect to nurture students who are confident, articulate and analytically agile. CONTENTS 03 Dean’s Message 04 Investing In The Fundamentals // Rigorous and Challenging Curriculum // Holistic Pedagogy & Course Assessment // Optional Second Major // Wide Range of Double Degree Options // Beneficial Internship & Community Service // Internship Partners 09 Commitment To Excellence // Scholarships & Awards // National & International Competitions // International Exchange 12 Career Prospects // Raising The Bar 13 Visionary Campus // City Campus // Facilities 15 Strengthening Our Relevance // Centre for Dispute Resolution // International Islamic Law and Finance Centre // Pro Bono Centre // Asian Peace-building and Rule of Law Programme 18 Heeding The Best // Advisory Board Members 19 Top Notch Faculty // Deanery // Faculty 24 The Fun Stuff // Beyond The Classroom Dean’s Message The School of Law was started in 2007 after a major review of legal education in Singapore concluded that it was timely to have a second law school in Singapore.
  • SGCA 50 Civil Appeal No 185 of 2019 and Summons No 51 of 2020 Between Alphire Group Pte

    SGCA 50 Civil Appeal No 185 of 2019 and Summons No 51 of 2020 Between Alphire Group Pte

    IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE REPUBLIC OF SINGAPORE [2020] SGCA 50 Civil Appeal No 185 of 2019 and Summons No 51 of 2020 Between Alphire Group Pte Ltd … Applicant / Appellant And Law Chau Loon … Respondent In the matter of HC/Originating Summons No 730 of 2019 In the matter of Order 45, Rule 11 of the Rules of Court (Cap 322, Rule 5) Between Law Chau Loon … Applicant And Alphire Group Pte Ltd … Respondent EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT [Agency] — [Implied authority of agent] — [Settlement agreement] [Contract] — [Formation] — [Identifiable agreement that is complete and certain] ii This judgment is subject to final editorial corrections approved by the court and/or redaction pursuant to the publisher’s duty in compliance with the law, for publication in LawNet and/or the Singapore Law Reports. Alphire Group Pte Ltd v Law Chau Loon and another matter [2020] SGCA 50 Court of Appeal — Civil Appeal No 185 of 2019 and Summons No 51 of 2020 Andrew Phang Boon Leong JA, Woo Bih Li J and Quentin Loh J 19 May 2020 19 May 2020 Andrew Phang Boon Leong JA (delivering the judgment of the court ex tempore): 1 We first deal with the appellant’s application in Summons No 51 of 2020 (“SUM 51”) to strike out paras 19(a), 19(b), 20 and 21 of the respondent’s case, as well as certain documents exhibited under S/N 2 of the respondent’s supplementary core bundle, which consist of exhibits of the respondent’s affidavit of evidence-in-chief in Suit No 822 of 2015 (“Suit 822”).
  • Lawlink 2019 Contents Contents

    Lawlink 2019 Contents Contents

    law link FROM ACADEMIA TO POLITICS AND BACK PROFESSOR S JAYAKUMAR ‘63 CHARTING THE NEXT CHAPTER JUSTICE ANDREW PHANG ‘82 ON LANGUAGE, LAW AND CODING STEPHANIE LAW ‘14 AN EMINENT CAREER EMERITUS PROFESSOR M. SORNARAJAH AI & THE LAW ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR DANIEL SENG ‘92 THE ALUMNI MAGAZINE OF THE NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE FACULTY OF LAW LAWLINK 2019 CONTENTS CONTENTS 02 04 10 16 22 28 Dean’s Diary Alumni Spotlight Student Features Reunions Benefactors Law School Message from the Dean Professor S Jayakumar ’63: Highlights Congratulations Class of 2019 16 Class of 1989 22 From Academia to Politics and Back 03 Michael Hwang SC Class of 1999 24 An Eminent Career 10 30 Justice Andrew Phang ’82: Emeritus Professor M. Sornarajah Delivers SLR Annual Lecture 17 Charting The Next Chapter 05 Class of 2009 25 NUS Giving The Appeal of the Moot 18 AI & the Law 11 Stephanie Law ’14: LLM Class of 2009 26 Chandran Mohan K Nair ‘76 Associate Professor Daniel Seng ’92 & Susan de Silva ‘83: On Language, Law and Coding 08 Rag & Flag 2019 20 12 Scholarship to expand Kuala Lumpur & New York 27 Key Lectures minsets about success Law Alumni Mentor Programme Law IV: Unjust Enrichment 21 14 2019 09 Book Launches Alumni Relations & Development NUS Law Eu Tong Sen Building 469G Bukit Timah Road Singapore 259776 Tel: (65) 6516 3616 Fax: (65) 6779 0979 Email: [email protected] www.nuslawlink.com www.law.nus.edu.sg/alumni Please update your particulars at: www.law.nus.edu.sg/ alumni_update_particulars.asp 1 LAWLINK 2019 ALUMNI SPOTLIGHT DEAN’S DIARY FROM ACADEMIA TO POLITICS PROFESSOR SIMON CHESTERMAN AND BACK History often makes more sense in retrospect (TRAIL).
  • Lord Phillips in Singapore SAL Annual Lecture 2006

    Lord Phillips in Singapore SAL Annual Lecture 2006

    MICA (P) No. 076/05/2006 September — October 2006 interSINGAPOREinterSINGAPORE ACADEMYACADEMY seseOFOF LAWLAW SALSAL AnnualAnnual LectureLecture 2006:2006: LordLord PhillipsPhillips inin SingaporeSingapore ChiefChief JusticeJustice ChanChan VisitsVisits thethe MalaysianMalaysian CourtsCourts InIn Summary:Summary: SAL’sSAL’s StrategicStrategic PlanningPlanning RetreatRetreat BDFQMQDPNIBTUIFTPMVUJPOUPZPVSBSDIJWJOHOFFET8JUI PVSTVQFSJPSTDBOUPGJMFTFSWJDFT ZPVOFWFSIBWFUPXPSSZ BCPVUVOXBOUFEQBQFSCVMLBHBJO 4FSWJDFTJODMVEF "UP"TJ[FQBQFSTDBO )JHI3FTPMVUJPOTDBOOJOH 4BWFUP1%'GPSNBU EJHJUBMmMFBSDIJWJOHIBTOFWFSCFFONBEFFBTJFS Powered by g Image Logic® GPSNPSFJOGPSNBUJPO WJTJUXXXBDFQMQDPNTH www.oce.com.sg [email protected] BDFQMQDPN1UF-UE FQSJOUJOHTDBOOJOHIVC 5FMFORVJSZ!BDFQMQDPNTH INTER ALIA The tragic events of 9/11 starkly remind us that the world now lives in a much more uncertain time. With this in mind, the legal profession in Singapore gathered this year, on 29 August 2006, for the 13th Singapore Academy of Law Annual Lecture delivered by The Right Honourable The Lord Phillips of Worth Matravers, Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales. The lecture titled “Terrorism and Human Rights” highlighted the struggles facing the United Kingdom in balancing the right of a sovereign state to protect those within its territory from acts of terror, with the right of every individual to free access to and due process of the law – regardless of which side of the law an individual happens to fall. Lord Phillips illustrated, through detailed references to UK legislation and case law, how the UK courts have mediated between the Government’s responses to threats to national security and the need for such responses to be sensitive to the regime of human rights law applicable in the UK. In this issue of Inter Se, we feature highlights from Lord Phillips’s timely and thoughtful lecture together with excerpts from an interview with Lord Phillips on other changes taking place in the UK legal sphere.