DOCSLIB.ORG

Report of the Committee to Develop the Singapore Legal Sector

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Report of the Committee to Develop the Singapore Legal Sector REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE TO DEVELOP THE SINGAPORE LEGAL SECTOR _________________________________________ FINAL REPORT SEPTEMBER 2007 Report of the Committee to Develop the Singapore Legal Sector Table of Contents 1 BACKGROUND....................................................................................................... 1 2 LEGAL EDUCATION ............................................................................................. 2 (A) Legal Academia............................................................................................ 3 (I) Changing Legal Education Landscape......................................... 3 (II) Synergy between Academia and Industry .................................. 5 (III) Recommendations........................................................................... 5 (B) ‘A’ Level Law................................................................................................ 7 (I) Potential Benefits of Introducing ‘A’ Level Law......................... 8 (II) Costs of Implementing ‘A’ Level Law.......................................... 8 (III) Recommendation............................................................................. 9 (C) Restructuring the Present Legal Education System.............................. 9 (I) Admission Criteria for Law Schools............................................. 9 (II) Structure of the LLB Course..........................................................10 (III) Review of Content..........................................................................12 (IV) Recommendations..........................................................................13 (D) Admission to the Legal Profession .........................................................16 (I) Practical Law Course .....................................................................16 (II) Diploma in Singapore Law ...........................................................17 (III) Pupillage..........................................................................................17 (IV) Recommendations..........................................................................18 (E) Continuing Legal Education ....................................................................21 (I) Compulsory CLE............................................................................21 (II) Recommendations..........................................................................22 (F) Promotion of Singapore as a Legal Education Hub.............................23 (I) Initiatives Pioneered by the NUS Law Faculty ..........................23 (II) Recommendations..........................................................................24 3 THE LEGAL PROFESSION ..................................................................................26 (A) The Criminal/Civil Litigation Bar...........................................................26 (I) The Present Situation .....................................................................26 (II) Recommendations..........................................................................27 (B) Access to Justice..........................................................................................30 (I) The Role of the Profession in Ensuring Access to Justice .........30 (II) Contingency Fee Arrangements...................................................30 (III) Class Actions...................................................................................31 (IV) Recommendations..........................................................................32 (C) Specialist Accreditation.............................................................................35 (I) Increasing Specialisation ...............................................................35 (II) Recommendation............................................................................36 (D) Sufficiency Concerns of the Legal Profession ......................................36 (I) A Decline in the Number of Practising Lawyers .......................36 (II) Recommendations of the Third Committee on the Supply of Lawyers.........................................................................................................44 (III) Recommendations..........................................................................44 4 MAINTAINING AND ENFORCING ETHICAL STANDARDS IN THE PROFESSION FAIRLY AND PROMPTLY .....................................................................47 (A) Delays in the Disciplinary Process .........................................................47 (I) Current Problems with the Disciplinary Process.......................47 (II) Stakeholders’ Views.......................................................................48 (III) Recommendations..........................................................................49 (B) Initiating the Disciplinary Process..........................................................51 (I) Concerns about Veracity of Complaints .....................................51 (II) Recommendations..........................................................................51 (C) Managing the Disciplinary Process ........................................................52 (I) Current Difficulties ........................................................................52 (II) Recommendations..........................................................................54 5 ARBITRATION AND MEDIATION ..................................................................59 (A) The Singapore Mediation Centre and the Singapore International Arbitration Centre ...................................................................................................59 Page ii (I) The Growing Importance of Arbitration and Mediation..........59 (II) Recommendations..........................................................................63 6 PROMOTING SINGAPORE AS A KEY LEGAL SERVICES HUB...............67 (A) Making Singapore a More Attractive Base for Foreign Law Firms ..70 (I) The Current Incentives and Potential Refinements...................71 (II) Recommendations..........................................................................73 (B) Helping Singapore Law Firms to Expand into the Region.................73 (I) Pushing Singapore Law Firms Overseas ....................................73 (II) Recommendations..........................................................................75 (C) Promoting Singapore as a Legal Destination to Foreign Lawyers ....78 (I) Increasing Visibility .......................................................................78 (II) Recommendations..........................................................................78 7 LIBERALISATION OF THE PROFESSION ......................................................81 (A) Establishing a Regional Legal Centre.....................................................81 (B) The Current Practice of Law in Singapore.............................................83 (C) Steps to Becoming a Regional Legal Centre..........................................86 (I) Free Markets and Open Policies...................................................87 (II) Opening Singapore’s Legal Market .............................................89 (III) Recommendations..........................................................................92 8 CONCLUSION ........................................................................................................98 9 ANNEX A - List of Working Group Members................................. 99 10 ANNEX B - List of Parties Consulted.............................................. 103 11 ANNEX C - Table of Differences Between Current JLV and Proposed Enhanced JLV ........................................................................................... 107 12 ANNEX D - Glossary of Terms ......................................................... 113 Page iii Report of the Committee to Develop the Singapore Legal Sector 1 BACKGROUND 1.1 On 17 August 2006, the Deputy Prime Minister and Minister for Law appointed Justice V K Rajah, Judge of Appeal, Supreme Court of Singapore, to chair a committee (“the Committee”) to undertake a comprehensive review of the entire legal services sector, particularly in relation to exportable legal services, to ensure that Singapore remains at the cutting edge as an international provider of legal services both in the short-term as well as in the long-run. 1.2 In addition to Justice Rajah, who served as chairperson, the Committee comprised the following members:1 (a) Mr Chan Seng Onn, Solicitor-General, the Attorney-General’s Chambers;2 (b) Mr Sundaresh Menon, Judicial Commissioner, Supreme Court of Singapore;3 (c) Mrs Koh Juat Jong, Registrar, Supreme Court of Singapore; (d) Mr Michael Hwang, Senior Counsel, Sole Proprietor, Michael Hwang; (e) Mr Alvin Yeo, Senior Counsel, Managing Partner, Wong Partnership and Joint Managing Director, Clifford Chance Wong; (f) Mr Cavinder Bull, Director, Drew & Napier LLC; (g) Mr Lee Eng Beng, Partner, Rajah & Tann; (h) Mr Kwek Mean Luck, Senior Assistant Registrar, Supreme Court of Singapore.4 1 The Secretariat to the Committee comprised: (a) Mr David Lee Yeow Wee, Assistant Registrar, Supreme Court; (b) Ms Tammy Low Wan Jun, Assistant Registrar, Supreme Court; (c) Mr Paul Tan Beng Hwee, Justices’ Law Clerk, Supreme Court (until 31 May 2007); and (d) Mr Goh Yihan, Justices’ Law Clerk, Supreme Court. 2 Appointed Judge, Supreme Court of Singapore, on 3 July 2007. Mr Soh Tze Bian, Senior State Counsel, Attorney-General’s Chambers, was alternate
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Annual Report 2010 - 2011 Contents
    Annual Report 2010 - 2011 Contents 2 Foreword by the Attorney-General 6 Remembrance and Congratulations 10 Our Mission, Vision and Core Values 13 Our Roles 15 Our Corporate Structure A. AGC’s Management Team B. Six Legal Divisions and Two Non-Legal Divisions 29 Our Key Milestones A. As The Government’s Chief Legal Adviser and Counsel i. AGC’s Advisory Work ii. AGC’s Involvement in Litigation iii. AGC in Negotiations iv. AGC as Legislative Draftsman B. As Public Prosecutor C. In Performing Other Assigned Duties of a Legal Character D. Our Corporate Resources 61 Our Training, Development and Outreach 67 The Ties that Bind Us 71 Key Figures for 2010-2011 A. Corporate Awards B. Performance Indicators C. Financial Indicators for FY2010-FY2011 Attorney-General’s Chambers ANNUAL REPORT 2010 - 2011 1 FOREWORD BY THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL As we look back on these past years, the taxation policies and policies concerning adjust to these changes so that we can function perceptible increase in the complexity of our casino regulation. Cross-Divisional teams effectively. work is particularly striking. This growing were also engaged to deal with cases before complexity has in turn given rise to two the Singapore Courts when we were required With this in mind, I have intensified the consequences, which I elaborate on below. to address constitutional challenges and also commitment of my Chambers to the training, to defend Singapore’s judiciary in the face of development and specialisation of our officers contempt. so that we are well placed to support the THE NEED FOR Government with the highest level of legal iNTER-dIVISIONAL This is perhaps a reality that is ultimately to be services.
    [Show full text]
  • The Lion and the Tiger
    Trade & investment Cover story The lion and the tiger Singapore is seeking to enhance its standing as India’s business hub for Asia. Yet as India’s legal and financial markets mature, its reliance on offshore expertise and capital may be falling Vandana Chatlani reports elcome to Singapore – India’s most efficient city. a partner at Clifford Chance. It may be working: “A number At least that’s how the Singaporean government of Indians joke that Singapore is India’s fifth metro,” says W would like its equatorial republic to be perceived. Narayan Iyer, a partner at Linklaters. “The biggest metro ... Singapore has worked hard to strengthen ties with India and and everything works!” promote the city as a base for inbound and outbound Indian Indians comprise Singapore’s third-largest ethnic group investment. The Comprehensive Economic Cooperation and have played a prominent role in its political and economic Agreement signed between the two countries on 1 August development. Ethnic Indians such as Singapore’s sixth and 2005 focuses on bilateral investment, trade, security and edu- current president, SR Nathan, continue to hold high office. It is cational interests and is the first such extensive agreement even believed that the Sanskrit words simha and puram – lion between India and any of its trading partners. city – gave the island its name. “The Singapore government is encouraging people to think “Singapore has a significant and very successful Indian of Singapore as another state of India,” says Rahul Guptan, population, throughout the Singaporean legal community, November 2009 India Business Law Journal 19 Cover story Trade & investment The Singapore government is International legal hub encouraging people to think Most foreign law firms operating in Singapore provide of Singapore as another English, US or Australian law advice.
    [Show full text]
  • This Paper Has Been Published in the Journal of Business Law and The
    Supreme Court of Singapore, 1 Supreme Court Lane, Singapore 178879, t: (65)-6332-1020 _________________________________________________________________________________________________ This paper has been published in the Journal of Business Law and the Supreme Court Library Queensland gratefully acknowledges the permission of the editor, Professor Robert Merkin, to reprint it in the Yearbook. A version of this essay was delivered at the Current Legal Issues Seminar in the Banco Court on 12 September 2013. I would like to express my deepest appreciation to Ms Andrea Gan and Mr Jonathan Yap, Justices’ Law Clerks, Supreme Court of Singapore, as well as to Asst Prof Goh Yihan of the Faculty of Law, National University of Singapore, for their helpful comments and suggestions. I would also like to dedicate this essay to all the participants who displayed an extraordinary (and, I might add, rare) degree of enthusiasm and (above all) friendship. All errors remain mine alone. Further, all views expressed in this essay are personal views only and do not reflect the views of the Supreme Court of Singapore. Andrew Phang Our Vision: Excellence in judicial education and research. Our Mission: To provide and inspire continuing judicial learning and research to enhance the competency and professionalism of judges. The Challenge of Principled Gap-Filling — A Study of Implied Terms in a Comparative Context by The Honourable Justice Andrew Phang Boon Leong* There has been a veritable wealth of literature on implied terms — ranging from doctoral theses1 to book chapters,2 articles3 and (more recently) a book.4 What accounts for this interest? Perhaps the simplest explanation is that it is an extremely important topic with at least two important functions — one substantive, the other theoretical.
    [Show full text]
  • 7. Civil Procedure
    (2008) 9 SAL Ann Rev Civil Procedure 143 7. CIVIL PROCEDURE Cavinder BULL SC MA (Oxford), LLM (Harvard); Barrister (Gray’s Inn), Attorney-at-Law (New York State); Advocate and Solicitor (Singapore). Jeffrey PINSLER SC LLB (Liverpool), LLM (Cambridge), LLD (Liverpool); Barrister (Middle Temple), Advocate and Solicitor (Singapore); Professor, Faculty of Law, National University of Singapore. Appeals Leave to appeal 7.1 In Blenwel Agencies Pte Ltd v Tan Lee King [2008] 2 SLR 529, the Court of Appeal held that where the High Court has refused leave to appeal against a decision of the District Court, there can be no further recourse after the High Court has adjudicated on the matter. This case was an extension of the Court of Appeal’s previous judgment in SBS Transit Ltd v Koh Swee Ann [2004] 3 SLR 365, which concerned an application for leave to appeal against the decision of a Magistrate’s Court. 7.2 Andrew Phang JA reiterated the fundamental principle that where a legal decision cannot be appealed against as of right but requires express permission from a named authority before it can be appealed against, the decision of that authority as to whether or not to grant leave to appeal is final (Blenwel Agencies Pte Ltd v Tan Lee King [2008] 2 SLR 529 at [14]). It is clear from s 21(1) of the Supreme Court of Judicature Act (Cap 322, 2007 Rev Ed) that the High Court is the authority with the final say as to whether to grant or refuse leave to appeal against a decision of the Subordinate Courts.
    [Show full text]
  • Minlaw) Invited Applications for the Second Round of Qualifying Foreign Law Practice (QFLP) Licences on 1 July 2012
    PRESS RELEASE AWARD OF THE SECOND ROUND OF QUALIFYING FOREIGN LAW PRACTICE LICENCES The Ministry of Law (MinLaw) invited applications for the second round of Qualifying Foreign Law Practice (QFLP) licences on 1 July 2012. Twenty-three applications were received by the closing date of 31 August 2012. 2 QFLP licences will be awarded to the following four firms (listed in alphabetical order): Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher; Jones Day; Linklaters, and Sidley Austin. 3 The firms will have up to six months from 1 April 2013 to commence their operations as QFLPs, and their licences will be valid for an initial period of five years from the respective start dates. Background 4 The QFLP scheme was introduced in 2008 following the recommendations of the Committee to Develop the Legal Sector chaired by Justice V K Rajah. The Committee, which included senior lawyers from top local firms, assessed that local firms and local lawyers would benefit from the increased foreign presence and competition over time. 5 The QFLP licences allow Foreign Law Practices (FLPs) to practise in permitted areas of Singapore law1. The scheme seeks to support the growth of key economic sectors, grow the legal sector, as well as to offer additional 1 Permitted areas are all areas except domestic areas of litigation and general practice, for example, criminal law, retail conveyancing, family law and administrative law. The QFLPs can practise the permitted areas through Singapore-qualified lawyers with practising certificates or foreign lawyers holding the foreign practitioner certificate. 1 opportunities for our lawyers. A total of six FLPs2 were awarded QFLP licences in the first round in 2008.
    [Show full text]
  • The Development of Singapore Law: a Bicentennial Retrospective1
    (2020) 32 SAcLJ 804 (Published on e-First 8 May 2020) THE DEVELOPMENT OF SINGAPORE LAW: A BICENTENNIAL RETROSPECTIVE1 The present article reviews (in broad brushstrokes) the status of Singapore law during its bicentennial year. It is not only about origins but also about growth – in particular, the autochthonous or indigenous growth of the Singapore legal system (particularly since the independence of Singapore as a nation state on 9 August 1965). The analysis of this growth is divided into quantitative as well as qualitative parts. In particular, the former constitutes an empirical analysis which attempts – for the very first time − to tell the development of Singapore law through numbers, building on emerging techniques in data visualisation and empirical legal studies. Andrew PHANG Judge of Appeal, Supreme Court of Singapore. GOH Yihan Professor of Law, School of Law, Singapore Management University. Jerrold SOH Assistant Professor of Law, School of Law, Singapore Management University; Co-Founder, Lex Quanta. I. Introduction 1 The present article, which reviews (in broad brushstrokes) the status of Singapore law during its bicentennial year since the founding of Singapore by Sir Stamford Raffles in 1819, is of particular significance as English law constitutes the foundation of Singapore law. The role of Raffles and his successors, therefore, could not have been more directly 1 All views expressed in the present article are personal views only and do not reflect in any way the views of the Supreme Court of Singapore, the Singapore Management University or Lex Quanta. Although this article ought, ideally, to have been published last year, the immense amount of case law that had to be analysed has led to a slight delay.
    [Show full text]
  • Reporter Issue 02 (2019)
    Reporter Issue 02 (2019) Dentons Rodyk Dialogue 2019 Privacy in the Age of Social Data privacy, data IN THIS ISSUE Media and Data Breaches security, and cyber Dentons Rodyk Dialogue 2019 1 After more than a decade of security Singapore Ministry of Health 4 individuals giving up their publishes fee benchmarks for personal data for the It seems that every breath we surgical procedures in the convenience and utility of take leaves a trace in the ether. private sector networking and messaging at no The volume of data collected Business Bulletin cost, the perils and dangers of every day is mind-boggling. Singapore Budget 2019: Tax 6 doing so have been brought Developments home by scandals over how In his Opening Address, Dr personal data has been exploited Puthucheary delineated three Inward Re-domiciliation – 10 for political and commercial gain, areas for discussion: data Practical Pointers as well as multiple serious data privacy, data security and cyber IP Edge security. First, data privacy raises breaches. Governments, The “new” 2014 Geographical 12 regulators and business need to the question of whether the use Indications Act respond to this crisis, and the of personal data collected by Litigation Briefs question of how best to do so private companies is sufficiently was the subject of the Dentons controlled by the mechanism of Need for Speed: Get your 16 Anti-Suit Injunction Fast! Rodyk Dialogue 2019. requiring consent from users, given that many users would Legal Update: Delayed 19 The Dentons Rodyk Dialogue neither read nor necessarily detection of lung cancer – 2019 marked the third year of the understand the lengthy terms and a patient’s suit against a partnership between Dentons conditions they agree to.
    [Show full text]
  • SOL LLM Brochure 2021 Copy
    SMU – Right in the Heart of Asia’s Hub, Singapore Masters of Laws In the dynamic, cosmopolitan hub that is Singapore, you will find a vibrant city-state that pulses with the diversity of both East and West. LL.M. in Judicial Studies Situated at the cross-roads of the world, Singapore is home to multinational companies and thousands of small and medium-sized LL.M. in Cross-border Business and Finance Law in Asia enterprises flourishing in a smart city renowned for its business excellence and connectivity. With its strong infrastructure, political Dual LL.M. in Commercial Law (Singapore & London) stability and respect for intellectual property rights, this City in a Garden offers you unique opportunities to develop as a global citizen. Thorough. Transnational. Transformative. Tapping into the energy of the city is a university with a difference — the Singapore Management University. Our six schools: the School of Accountancy, Lee Kong Chian School of Business, School of Computing and Information Systems, School of Economics, Yong Pung How School of Law, and School of Social Sciences form the country’s only city campus, perfectly sited to foster strategic links with businesses and the community. Modelled after the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School, SMU generates leading-edge research with global impact and produces broad-based, creative and entrepreneurial leaders for a knowledge-based economy. Discover a multi-faceted lifestyle right here at SMU, in the heart of Singapore. The SMU Masters Advantage GLOBAL RECOGNITION SMU is globally recognised as one of the best specialised universities in Asia and the world.
    [Show full text]
  • 331KB***Administrative and Constitutional
    (2016) 17 SAL Ann Rev Administrative and Constitutional Law 1 1. ADMINISTRATIVE AND CONSTITUTIONAL LAW THIO Li-ann BA (Oxon) (Hons), LLM (Harvard), PhD (Cantab); Barrister (Gray’s Inn, UK); Provost Chair Professor, Faculty of Law, National University of Singapore. Introduction 1.1 In terms of administrative law, the decided cases showed some insight into the role of courts in relation to: handing over town council management to another political party after a general election, the susceptibility of professional bodies which are vested with statutory powers like the Law Society review committee to judicial review; as well as important observations on substantive legitimate expectations and developments in exceptions to the rule against bias on the basis of necessity, and how this may apply to private as opposed to statutory bodies. Many of the other cases affirmed existing principles of administrative legality and the need for an evidential basis to sustain an argument. For example, a bare allegation of bias without evidence cannot be sustained; allegations of bias cannot arise when a litigant is simply made to follow well-established court procedures.1 1.2 Most constitutional law cases revolved around Art 9 issues. Judicial observations on the nature or scope of specific constitutional powers were made in cases not dealing directly with constitutional arguments. See Kee Oon JC in Karthigeyan M Kailasam v Public Prosecutor2 noted the operation of a presumption of legality and good faith in relation to acts of public officials; the Prosecution, in particular, is presumed “to act in the public interest at all times”, in relation to all prosecuted cases from the first instance to appellate level.
    [Show full text]
  • SCL (Singapore) Annual Construction Law Conference 2021 HOPE and FEARS - the Built Environment in the Next Decade Thursday, 23 September 2021 • 9.00 A.M
    SCL (Singapore) Annual Construction Law Conference 2021 HOPE AND FEARS - the Built Environment in the Next Decade Thursday, 23 September 2021 • 9.00 a.m. to 5.30 p.m. Hybrid Conference Option of Attending In-Person (Limited Places & Subject to Government Approvals) or Via Zoom Webinar GUEST OF HONOUR & REGISTER HERE KEYNOTE SPEAKER OR SCAN QR CODE Ms Indranee THURAI RAJAH Minister, the Prime Minister’s Office; ABOUT THIS CONFERENCE Second Minister for Finance and National Development; Member of Parliament for Tanjong Hopes and fears – the built environment in the next decade Pagar GRC Business sectors including the built environment have had to and will continue to remould themselves in the shifting sands of the COVID-19 pandemic – there is no certainty that the old normal will ever return. Ms Indranee Rajah is the Minister in the Prime Minister’s This year’s SCL (Singapore) Annual Conference kicks off with Office. She is also Second Minister for Finance, and Second a discussion on transformative technologies and sustainable Minister for National Development. Ms Rajah has been the solutions during project execution before what is hopefully Member of Parliament for the Tanjong Pagar Group an invigorating yet light-hearted debate takes place on Representation Constituency (GRC) since 2001. She was in whether the next decade will bring forth a more collaborative practice as a lawyer and Senior Counsel before joining the working style in the built environment or will a culture of Government. Under her law portfolio from 2012 - 2018, she blame be the prevailing approach. After lunch, various co-chaired the Committees on Family Justice, the formation stakeholders provide their intriguing insights into what could of the Singapore International Commercial Court as well as perhaps be seen as a generational change in the conduct of the Committee to Strengthen Singapore as an International virtual dispute resolution hearings in a post-COVID-19 world.
    [Show full text]
  • 4 Comparative Law and Constitutional Interpretation in Singapore: Insights from Constitutional Theory 114 ARUN K THIRUVENGADAM
    Evolution of a Revolution Between 1965 and 2005, changes to Singapore’s Constitution were so tremendous as to amount to a revolution. These developments are comprehensively discussed and critically examined for the first time in this edited volume. With its momentous secession from the Federation of Malaysia in 1965, Singapore had the perfect opportunity to craft a popularly-endorsed constitution. Instead, it retained the 1958 State Constitution and augmented it with provisions from the Malaysian Federal Constitution. The decision in favour of stability and gradual change belied the revolutionary changes to Singapore’s Constitution over the next 40 years, transforming its erstwhile Westminster-style constitution into something quite unique. The Government’s overriding concern with ensuring stability, public order, Asian values and communitarian politics, are not without their setbacks or critics. This collection strives to enrich our understanding of the historical antecedents of the current Constitution and offers a timely retrospective assessment of how history, politics and economics have shaped the Constitution. It is the first collaborative effort by a group of Singapore constitutional law scholars and will be of interest to students and academics from a range of disciplines, including comparative constitutional law, political science, government and Asian studies. Dr Li-ann Thio is Professor of Law at the National University of Singapore where she teaches public international law, constitutional law and human rights law. She is a Nominated Member of Parliament (11th Session). Dr Kevin YL Tan is Director of Equilibrium Consulting Pte Ltd and Adjunct Professor at the Faculty of Law, National University of Singapore where he teaches public law and media law.
    [Show full text]
  • JUDICIARY TIMES - Issue 01
    JUDICIARY TIMES - ISSUE 01 ISSUE 01 | MAY 2018 JUDICIARY TIMES Opening of Twelve Key Initiatives The Family Justice Legal Year 2018: Announced at Courts Workplan 2018: Towards a Future- State Courts In the Next Phase Ready Legal Sector Workplan 2018 1 JUDICIARY TIMES - ISSUE 01 CONTENTS ISSUE 01 | MAY 2018 01 03 04 OPENING OF JUDGES AND TWELVE KEY LEGAL YEAR 2018: INTERNATIONAL InitiatiVES Towards A JUDGES ATTEND ANNOUNCED at FUTURE-Ready SICC 2018 State Courts LEGAL Sector WORKPLAN 2018 05 06 07 International THE Family Court AND TRIBUNAL IT DEVELOPMENTS JUSTICE Courts Administrators AND ITS IMPACT WORKPLAN 2018: attend THE ON LAW IN THE NEXT PHASE EXECUTIVE LEADERSHIP ProGRAMME 2 JUDICIARY TIMES - ISSUE 01 07 08 08 SMU SCHOOL Volunteer TRAINING FOR OF LAW HOSTS Mediators newly recruited LUNCH FOR attend TRAINING Volunteer SUPREME COURT ProGRAMME Support PERSONS BENCH 09 09 10 State Courts State Courts THE JUDICIARY introduces launcH GIVES Back to DOCUMENTS-Only PHASE 2 SOCIETY process FOR OF THE CJTS CIVIL CASES 11-13 14 15 15 16 NotaBLE WHAT’S AWARDS & UPCOMING BEHIND THE VISITS NEW ACCOLADES EVENTS SCENES 3 JUDICIARY TIMES - ISSUE 01 HIGHLIGHTS OPENING OF LEGAL YEAR 2018: Towards A FUTURE - Ready LEGAL Sector The Opening of the Legal Year on 8 January was Chief Justice also highlighted the challenges ahead for marked by the traditional ceremony that took place the legal fraternity and the courts, which included in the morning at the Supreme Court Auditorium, the potential disruptive force of technology and the followed by the Judiciary Dinner held at the Istana.
    [Show full text]