DOCSLIB.ORG

This Document Is Made Available Electronically by the Minnesota Legislative Reference Library As Part of an Ongoing Digital Archiving Project

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
This Document Is Made Available Electronically by the Minnesota Legislative Reference Library As Part of an Ongoing Digital Archiving Project This document is made available electronically by the Minnesota Legislative Reference Library as part of an ongoing digital archiving project. http://www.leg.state.mn.us/lrl/lrl.asp The Minnesota DNR Trail Plan: A Discovery Process Prepared by members of the Trail Planning staff of the Trails and Waterways Unit Minnesota Department of Natural Resources St. Paul, MN 55155 September 4, 1984 ABSTRACT The DNR trail program, which began in 1967, includes 9,700 miles of grants-in-aid, state, and DNR unit trails. Survey results indicate that more trails are desired, but awareness of existing opportunities is low. A process is established whose aim is to provide the public with an appropriate level of trail opportunities utilizing existing trails and public land wherever possible. A period of intensive use-monitoring is proposed to ensure greater cost-effectiveness and user satisfaction. The DNR's role in a comprehensive trail system is defined. Recommendations are presented to eliminate or minimize design, development and management problems. Funding, access for disabled persons, off-road vehicles, youth hostels and other concerns are discussed. "We shall not cease from exploration, and the end of all our exploring will be to arrive where we started and know the place for the first time." T. S. Eliot ii TabIe of Contents x Executive Summary I Chapter One. The Minnesota Trail Scene 2 Why Trails? 6 History of the DNR Trail Program 10 The DNR Trail Program Today II Other Trails in Minnesota 12 Trail Related Organizations 17 Chapter Two. Scope of Plan 18 Purpose and Scope 21 Development of the Plan 26 DNR Trail Policies and Guidelines 30 Other Applicable Constraints 31 Chapter Three. Supply and Demand 32 Trail Distributiorl 39 Trail Use 45 Discussion: How Much is Enough? 49 Supply and Demand Indicators 60 Conclusions 63 Chapter Four. Trail Location 65 Location Criteria 84 Trail Suitability Map 86 Location Alternatives Generation 91 Recommendations 93 Chapter Five. State Trails: Role and Recommended Allocation 94 Policy Perspective 97 Determining the Complexion of the State Trail System 108 State Trail System Recommendations 110 State Trail Allocation 127 Building Blocks of the State Trail System 129 Chapter Six. Grants-in-Aid Trails: Role and Recommendations Allocation 130 Role of Grants-in-Aid Trails 133 Recommended Allocation of Grants-in-Aid Trails 139 Chapter Seven. DNR Unit Trails: Role and Recommendated Allocation 140 Role of Unit Trails 142 Recommended Allocation of Unit Trails 145 Procedure for Determining Unit Trail Budgets 147 Chapter Eight. Design, Development, and Management Options and Recommendations 148 Design, Development, and Management Issues and Concerns 154 Alternatives and Recommendations for Resolving Trail-Related' Concerns 193 Integrating Trails into Communities iii Chapter Nine. Special Topics 197 Explore Minnesota Trails: A Collection of Trails and An Affiliation of Agencies 202 Multiple Use of Trails 205 Allocating Mileage by Trail Type 207 Design Preferences 210 Bicycle Trails vs. On-Road Bikeways 212 Grant-in-Aid vs. Permanent Trails 214 Use of Trails by People with Physical Disabilities 216 Hostels 219 Involvement in Federal Trail Initiatives 222 Monitoring 223 Advertising Trails 227 Interpretation 229 A Trail Volunteer Program 231 User Fees 234 Hunting on State Trails 240 Off-Road Vehicles 249 A Directional Routing System for Snowmobile TraiIs 251 Adequately Funding Ongoing Trail Rehabilitation and Maintenance 253 Right to Occupy Chapter 10. Irnplementation 258 Implementation 260 Evaluation Appendix* A Sufficiency and Locational Indicators B The User's Map and Handbook C The Landowner's Handbook D Staffing Projection Formula for State Trails E Amending N.R. 20--Rules and Regulations of the Department of Natural Resources F Off-Road Vehicles Bibliography G Development Status of Existing Trails H List of Public and Agency Meetings I DNR Personnel Meeting Results - Fall 1980 J Methodology for Computing Trail Use and Trail Capacity K Registry of Recreational Trail Mileages L Candidate "Explore MN Trails" M DNR State Trail Policy N Survey Instrurnents and Statewide Tabulations o Minnesota Trails Policy Plan P Synopsis of State Trail System Plans from Other States * Not includede Available through DNR Trails and Waterways Unit. iv List of Figures Figure Description I. Authorized State Trails and their Planning Status. 7 2. Summary of State Agency Roles. 15 3. Minnesota Trails: What People Want. 22-23 4. Determinants of the Plan. 30 5. Primary Contributors of Trail Mileage, by DNR Region (Map). 33 6. Distribution of Trail Miles by Administrative Unit. 35 7. Minnesota Bikeways (Map). 37 8. Recreational Land Trails (Map). 38 9. Distribution of Snowmobiling (Map). 40 10. Distribution of Cross-Country Skiing (Map). 41 II. Distribution of Bicycling (Map). 42 12. Distribution of Hiking and BackPacking (Map). 43 13. Distribution of Horseback Riding (Map). 44 14. 1980 Trail Mileage and 1978 Levels of Use. 48 15. Responses to Questionnaire on Supply and Demand for Statewide Trails. 50 16. SCaRP Projections of Recreation Occasions Occurring Within Economic Development Regions Between 1978 and 1990. 53 17. 1978 SCORP Indicators of Relative Need for Trail Activities. 55 18. Yearly Snowmobile Registrations. 58 19. Summary of Supply and Demand Indicators. 60 20. Importance of Location. 65 21 •Topographic Roughness (Map). 68 22. Proximity to Water (Map). 69 23. Vegetation by Forest Cover TyPe (Map). 70 24. Agricultural Productivity (Map). 73 v List of Figures (cont'd) Figure Description 25. Historic Travel Routes (Map). 75 26. Location of Services: Resorts and Campgrounds (Map). 77 27. Public Transportation: Location and Frequency (Map). 79 28. Population (Map). 81 29. Public Lands (Map). 83 30. Generalized Levels of Relative Trail Suitability (Map). 85 31. Alternative A: Trail Priorities Based on Public Land (50%) and Trail Suitability (50%) (Map). 88 32. Alternative B: Trail Priorities Based on Population (50%) and Trail Suitability (50%) (Map). 89 33. Alternative C: Trail Priorities Based on Public Land (25%), Population (25%), and Trail Suitability (50%) (Map). 90 34. Minnesota's Recreational Landscapes for Trails (Mqp). 103 35. Essential Characteristics of Minnesota's Recreational Landscapes for Trails.. 104 36. Guidelines for Minimum Trail Length. 106 37. Number of Existing Long-distance Trails in Each Recreatjonal Landscape for Trails. 112 38. Three Recreational Landscapes for Trails Portrayed. 113 39. Proposed Evaluation Framework for Candidate State Trails. 114 40. Horseback Riding. 116-117 A. Trail Suitability (Map). 116 B. Existing Use (Map). 116 C. Projected Additional Demand (Map). 117 D. Priority Group (Map). 117 41. Snowmobiling. 118-119 A. Trail Suitability (Map). 118 B. Existing Use (Map). 118 vi List of Figures (cont'd) Figure Description C. Projected Additional Demand (Map). 119 D. Priority Group (Map). 119 42. Cross-Country Skiing. 118-119 A. Suitabi1ity (Map). 118 B. Existing Use (Map). 118 C. Projected Additional Demand (Map). 119 D. Priority Group (Map). 119 43. Hiking and Backpacking. 120-121 A. Suitabi Iity (Map). 120 B. Existing Use (Map). 120 C. Projected Additional Demand (Map). 121 D. Priority Group (Map). 121 44. Biking. 120-121 A. Trail Suitability (Map). 120 B. Existing Use (Map). 120 C. Projected Additional Demand (Map). 121 D. Priority Group (Map). 121 45. Trail Priority of Recreational Landscapes for Trails (independent of existing trail opportunities) 122 46. State Trails may serve as Building Blocks for a Larger Minnesota Network. 126-127 47. Elements Contributing to the Funding Priorities of Grant-in-Aid Development. 135 48. Funding Priorities for Grant-in-Aid Development of Snowmobile Trails. 136 49. Allocating Unit Trails: A Two-Step Process. 143 50. Living Along Trails -- What People Expect and Find. 152 51. Signing of Support Facilities. 154 vii List of Figures (cont'd) Figure Description Page 52. Public Access - Alternatives. 155 53. Access Crossings - Alternatives. 156 54. How Trails Might Limit Access of a Landowner to Adjoining Property. 157 55. Trail Crossing for Farm Equipment 158 56. Trail Underpass for Cattle. 158 57. How Trail Use Might Invade Privacy. 161 58. Invasion of Privacy - Alternatives. 162 59. Locating a Trail to Preserve Privacy. 163 60. One Homeowner's Solution: A Privacy Fence. 163 61. Vandalism/Trespass - Alternatives. 164 62. Two Solutions to Keep Trail-Users on the Treadway. 165 63. Reducing Land Use Conflicts. Modifying Width of Right-of-Way. 168 64. Trail Conflicts with Agricultural Land Use. 169 65. Trail Land Exchange. 169 66. Encroachment of Field onto R.O.W. 170 67. Physical Barriers Installed along Right-of-Way. 171 68. Land-Use Conflict in Agriculture: Alternatives. 172 Encroachment - Alternatives. 173 70. Land-Use Conflict in Logging and Mining: Alternatives. 174 71. Dual Treadways to Minimize Use Conflict. 177 72. User Conflict - Alternatives. 179 Unauthorized Use of Treadway. 180 74. Unauthorized Use of Treadway - Alternatives. 181 75. Trail Entrance Baffle Gate to Prevent Unauthorized Use. 182 Land-Use Conflict in Vegetation Management: Alternatives. 184 viii List of Figures (cont'd) Figure Description 77. Disturbing Desired Vegetation: Alternatives. 184 78. Trail Users May Disturb Livestock. 185 79. Disturbing Wildlife/Farm Animals: Alternatives. 186 80. Preventing Livestock Disturbance. 187 81. Litter - Alternatives. 188 82. Camp Fires and Controlled Burns - Alternatives. 189 83. Integrating Trail into Communities - Alternatives. 192 84. How
Load more

Recommended publications
  • National Retailer & Restaurant Expansion Guide Spring 2016
    National Retailer & Restaurant Expansion Guide Spring 2016 Retailer Expansion Guide Spring 2016 National Retailer & Restaurant Expansion Guide Spring 2016 >> CLICK BELOW TO JUMP TO SECTION DISCOUNTER/ APPAREL BEAUTY SUPPLIES DOLLAR STORE OFFICE SUPPLIES SPORTING GOODS SUPERMARKET/ ACTIVE BEVERAGES DRUGSTORE PET/FARM GROCERY/ SPORTSWEAR HYPERMARKET CHILDREN’S BOOKS ENTERTAINMENT RESTAURANT BAKERY/BAGELS/ FINANCIAL FAMILY CARDS/GIFTS BREAKFAST/CAFE/ SERVICES DONUTS MEN’S CELLULAR HEALTH/ COFFEE/TEA FITNESS/NUTRITION SHOES CONSIGNMENT/ HOME RELATED FAST FOOD PAWN/THRIFT SPECIALTY CONSUMER FURNITURE/ FOOD/BEVERAGE ELECTRONICS FURNISHINGS SPECIALTY CONVENIENCE STORE/ FAMILY WOMEN’S GAS STATIONS HARDWARE CRAFTS/HOBBIES/ AUTOMOTIVE JEWELRY WITH LIQUOR TOYS BEAUTY SALONS/ DEPARTMENT MISCELLANEOUS SPAS STORE RETAIL 2 Retailer Expansion Guide Spring 2016 APPAREL: ACTIVE SPORTSWEAR 2016 2017 CURRENT PROJECTED PROJECTED MINMUM MAXIMUM RETAILER STORES STORES IN STORES IN SQUARE SQUARE SUMMARY OF EXPANSION 12 MONTHS 12 MONTHS FEET FEET Athleta 46 23 46 4,000 5,000 Nationally Bikini Village 51 2 4 1,400 1,600 Nationally Billabong 29 5 10 2,500 3,500 West Body & beach 10 1 2 1,300 1,800 Nationally Champs Sports 536 1 2 2,500 5,400 Nationally Change of Scandinavia 15 1 2 1,200 1,800 Nationally City Gear 130 15 15 4,000 5,000 Midwest, South D-TOX.com 7 2 4 1,200 1,700 Nationally Empire 8 2 4 8,000 10,000 Nationally Everything But Water 72 2 4 1,000 5,000 Nationally Free People 86 1 2 2,500 3,000 Nationally Fresh Produce Sportswear 37 5 10 2,000 3,000 CA
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2020
    Annual Report 2020 Electrolux Professional Food, Beverage and Laundry Contents Introduction Goals and strategies Our industry Our business Sustainability Corporate Financial GRI report Share and report governance reports supplement Shareholders Contents This is Electrolux Professional 1 The year in brief 2 Key figures 3 CEO comments 4 The pandemic impact & response 6 How we create value 8 Read more on page Goals and strategies 10 37 Strategic goals 11 Markets Financial targets and dividend policy 14 Read more on page Our commercial activities focus Sustainability strategy and targets 15 4 on three geographical regions – Our industry 16 ALBERTO ZANATA, Europe, Americas, and Asia Pacific PRESIDENT AND CEO: Global trends 17 & Middle East and Africa (APAC & “ We are strong and well MEA). Global industry 18 positioned for the future” Key growth drivers 20 Our business 23 The OnE approach 24 Food & Beverage 26 Laundry 28 Customers 30 Sales and marketing 33 Our markets 37 Our production 41 Research and development 45 Our people 46 Sustainability report 49 Read more on page Mission, our commitment and framework 50 24 Targets and 2020 achievements 52 Our offering - the OnE OnE is our global product and service offering, with both single and full Sustainable Development Goals 53 solutions and services across Food, Beverage and Laundry – under one The Climate challenge 54 brand – allowing customers to manage their operations through connectivity Our value chain 55 and a digital ecosystem. Sustainable solutions 56 Sustainable operations 58 Ethics and relationships 61 Read more on page Corporate governance 64 Chairman’s comments 65 26 Corporate governance report 66 Board of Directors 74 Executive Management Team 76 Remuneration report 78 Risk and risk management 80 Read more on page 28 Financial reports 84 Administration report 87 Food & Beverage Laundry Financial statements 94 A wide range of professional food A wide range of equipment for Notes 102 service and beverage solutions.
    [Show full text]
  • June 2019 Safe Harbor Statement
    Investor Presentation – June 2019 Safe Harbor Statement During this presentation management may discuss certain forward-looking statements concerning FEMSA’s future performance that should be considered as good faith estimates made by the Company. These forward-looking statements reflect management expectations and are based upon currently available data. Actual results are subject to future events and uncertainties, which could materially impact FEMSA’s actual performance. 2 Overview Ownership 47%(1) 100% 15% Coca-Cola’s largest Market leader and The world’s most franchise bottler in fastest growing retail international brewer the world by volume chain in Mexico 3 1 Represents 56% of shares with voting rights. Leading Consumer Company in Latin America FEMSA Comercio Coca-Cola Logistics/ Proximity Health Fuel FEMSA Refrigeration Division Division Division Mexico Brazil Colombia Argentina Venezuela Chile Panama Costa Rica Uruguay Guatemala Nicaragua Peru Ecuador 4 Internal company data, YTD. Creating Economic Value in the Last Decade KOF Market Cap Evolution Financial Highlights1 (US$ MM) 2018 2008 2 CAGR % Revenue 469,744 130,122 14% EBIT 41,576 17,290 9% 31,794 EBIT Margin 8.9% 13.3% EBITDA 60,458 22,035 11% EBITDA Margin 12.9% 16.9% CAPEX 22,192 7,522 11% 1 Amounts expressed in millions of Mexican Pesos 2 Figures for 2008 are the arithmetical sum of Coca Cola FEMSA and FEMSA Comercio, therefore figures exclude sold businesses. 10,317 • Consistently strengthening our competitive position. • Ability to operate in a rapidly changing economic environment. • Strong brand portfolio and exceptional operational 2008 June capabilities. CAGR 08 – June 19: 11% Source: Bloomberg, as of June, 5, 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • Convenience Matters Serving the New Mexican Consumer
    The Retail and Consumer Industry in Mexico May 2016 Convenience matters Serving the new Mexican consumer In this report 2 Mexico: Stability amidst global volatility 4 More than just tequila: Significance of the retail and consumer sector 8 More pesos in the pocket: The sector takes off 12 Convenience matters 16 In the shadows: The vast informal market 22 Building capability muscles and aligning your operating model 29 The winning concoction: Local knowledge, global expertise 31 Unlocking the enablers for growth www.pwc.com/gmc Foreword As the world’s developing markets face a Arguably, retail and consumer reflects There are excellent examples of such time of volatility, Mexico stands out as the opportunities emerging from the companies in Mexico. A retailer like one of the key markets weathering the duality of the Mexican economy better FAMSA has managed to properly storm. It is doing so through sustained than any other sector: balance the risk required to serve this evolution and slow but steady growth more informal segment of consumers, in many dimensions. The retail and • Modern format retail stores and through a combination of deep consumer sector is one industry which multinational franchises such as consumer knowledge and alternative has the potential to exceed Mexico’s Walmart and Starbucks are constantly contact channels, while also leveraging average national future growth. This growing and developing, alongside its traditional stores and offerings, not will be driven by a combination of the resilient traditional ‘changarros’ just to gain access to these new economic and socio-demographic and adapted concepts such as OXXO consumers, but also to earn increased trends, the progressive implementation and Farmacias Similares.
    [Show full text]
  • Comprehensive Land
    2016 Updated by: The Murray County Comprehensive Planning Advisory Committee With Assistance from: The Southwest Regional Development Commission Adopted: December 27, 2016 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PURPOSE The County has a responsibility to protect its cultural, economic, and natural environments. Because of this, the Murray County Comprehensive Plan will identify goals, objectives, policies, and implementation strategies designed to appropriately reflect the needs of the County’s citizens and natural environment. This plan will emphasize the importance of proper planning ensuring that decisions made are best for the citizens of the County as well as the environment. COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING ADVISORY COMMITTEE Bill Post Larry Dahl Duane Spartz Bob Sandhurst Pam Schreier Doug Stewart Brian Hamilton Ralph Knapp Keith Hakeneis Burend Cuperus Ryan Verlinde Roger Steinman Craig Bangasser Todd Miller Gary Runkle Jamie Thomazin Tom Hey Troy Wehking Jason Schreier Kevin Vickerman Dale Bergman Dave Dorpinghaus AGENCY REPREPRESENTATIVES 2016 Cathi Fouchi, Minnesota DNR Planning Becky Balk, Minnesota Department of Agriculture Marcy Barritt, Murray County Assessor Jon Bloemendaal, Murray County Ag & Solid Waste Jean Christoffels, Murray County Planning & Zoning Randy Groves, Murray County Highway Department Amy Rucker, Murray County Economic Development Randy Hukriede, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Craig Christensen, Murray County SWCD Chris Hansen, Murray County Water Resources Heath Landsman, Murray County Emergency Management Janet Timmerman, Murray
    [Show full text]
  • SUSTAINABILITY, SOCIAL MEDIA… and the FUTURE of RETAIL
    THE COCA-COLA RETAILING RESEARCH Councils SUSTAINABILITY, SOCIAL MEDIA… AND THE FUTURE OF RETAIL Global Retail Summit London, August 2012 The first Coca-Cola Retailing Research Council was formed in 1978 in North America to help retail customers address industry issues through organized discussion and commissioned research. Today, the Company sponsors six Councils throughout the world: North America, NACS North America, Europe, Asia, Latin America, and Eurasia & Africa. Each Council is comprised of up to 20 retail leaders and non-voting Coca-Cola system executives. Widely considered to be among the industry’s most prestigious retail think tanks, the Coca-Cola Retailing Research Councils have published more than 50 proprietary studies on issues ranging from shopper insights and new market dynamics to technology, innovation and social media. THIS PUBLIcatION IS A COLLECTION OF PAPers PRODUCED FROM PresentatIONS at GLOBAL RetaIL SUMMIT. Panel DIscUSSIONS DURIng THE SUMMIT WERE NOT RECORDED. © 2012 THE COCA-COla EXPOrt CORPOratION, UNDER THE AUSPIces OF THE COCA-COla RetaILIng ResearcH COUncIls CONTENTS FOREWORD FACING UP TO NEW REALITIES Muhtar Kent PAGE 2 SUSTAINABILITY THE CHALLENGE FOR RETAILERS HRH Prince Charles PAGE 4 WELCOME TO THE NEW NORMAL Lord Deben PAGE 8 THE QUEST FOR CHANGE Carter Roberts PAGE 12 WHY LESS HAS TO MEAN MORE Dr Jason Clay PAGE 16 SOCIAL MEDIA BACK TO THE FUTURE? James Quarles PAGE 22 BE YOURSELF… SIMPLY FLAWSOME Wendy Clark PAGE 28 IT PAYS TO TALK. BUT KEEP IT RELEVANT… AND HONEST Richard Reed PAGE 30 THE FUTURE OF RETAILING HOW TO PREPARE FOR THE ‘PERFECT STORM’ Mark Price PAGE 34 SUMMARY THE PROMISE OF SUSTAINABLE GROWTH PAGE 38 LIST OF MEMBERS PAGE 40 CCRRC Global Retail Summit RepoRt FOREWORD FACING UP TO NEW REALITIES Muhtar Kent Chairman and Chief Executive Officer The Coca-Cola Company ince 1978, the Coca-Cola Retailing This is why I am convinced that sustaina- Research Council has generated over bility and social media will forever be con- 40 extensive, proprietary studies on nected at the hip.
    [Show full text]
  • All-Out Efforts Speed Storm Recovery
    The Daily Register VOL. 99 NO.32 SHREWSBURY, N. J. WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 11, 1976 15 CENTS All-out efforts speed storm recovery By BOB Bit AM LEY from Raritan Bay to Bamegat and inland to include Mon- mouth and Ocean Counties and a portion of Middlesei County All-night efforts by work crews in Monmouth County's Mr. Sbemtt said 4,Mt of the remaining failures were In shore areas made possible a return to near normal conditions the coastal areas from the Maiawans to Point Pleasant. yesterday after Hurricane Belle's leu-than-stellar perform- "We'll have them all in again by some time tomorrow," ance Monday night. he added "It's these (alien flees Wo have had 11 tree tnmm By yesterday afternoon, road department crewi had lag contract crews out removing the trees that (ell across chain-sawed away most of the thousands ol trees and heavy our wires. We have to clear the trees before we can repair the branches laid low by the storm's blasts, their roots under- Haas," he explained. mined by heavy rains that softened the earth. Wire repair crews from outside areas have been called in Flooding which tell short of pre-storm estimates by com- to give reskfants and N^ni—• electricity in the rimes! pot fortable margins hid subsided except for a few determinedly stole time damp spots, and all area roads were reported open to normal "Thirty-five crews came in from Pennsylvania and mon traffic, even at the state Marine Police station In Monmouth from North Jersey They didn't get hit very hard up there," Beach, where four feet of water drowned Ocean Ave.
    [Show full text]
  • Investor Presentation June 2015 Safe Harbor Statement
    Investor Presentation June 2015 Safe Harbor Statement During this presentation management may discuss certain forward-looking statements concerning FEMSA’s future performance that should be considered as good faith estimates made by the Company. These forward-looking statements reflect management expectations and are based upon currently available data. Actual results are subject to future events and uncertainties, which could materially impact FEMSA’s actual performance. 2 FEMSA Overview 48%(1) 100% 20% Coca-Cola’s largest Market leader and The world’s most franchise bottler in fastest growing retail international brewer the world chain in Mexico (1) Represents 63% of shares with voting rights. 3 Leading Consumer Company in Latin America Large Scale • ~4 Bn Unit Cases per annum. • +9 million OXXO transactions per day. Powerful Brands BUSINESS UNITS • #1 in beverages in all regions. FEMSA Comercio • OXXO one of top brands in Mexico. Coca-Cola FEMSA FEMSA Comercio y Coca-Cola FEMSA Efficient Production and Distribution • 64 beverage bottling plants. • 329 distribution facilities. Growing Beverage Consumer Base • 2.9 mm clients. • 351 mm customers. 1- Mexico Dynamic Store Platform 2- Central America (1) • +13,000 OXXO Stores Costa Rica Guatemala Nicaragua Panama 3- Colombia 4- Venezuela +215,000 Employees 5- Brazil 6- Argentina 7- Philippines (1) Number of stores as of March 31, 2015. 4 Creating economic value in the last decade FEMSA Market Cap Evolution (US$ MM) 32,321 • Consistently strengthening our competitive position. • Ability to operate in a rapidly changing economic environment. • Strong brand portfolio and exceptional 8,649 operational capabilities. 2005 May-2015 CAGR 05 – May 15: 13% Source: Bloomberg, as of May 29, 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • FEMSA Presentation
    Safe Harbor Statement During this presentation management may discuss certain forward- looking statements concerning FEMSA’s future performance that should be considered as good faith estimates made by the Company. These forward-looking statements reflect management expectations and are based upon currently available data. Actual results are subject to future events and uncertainties, which could materially impact FEMSA’s actual performance. 2 The Right Business Model... Publicly Held 14.7% 31.6% 53.7% 100% 100% LTM 08 Total Revenue: US$ 14.3 bn LTM 08 EBITDA: US$ 2.7 bn 13% 29% 26% 34% 45% 53% Note: Figures in Mexican pesos converted to US dollars using the period-end exchange rate from each period. 3 Last Twelve Months information as of June 30, 2008. ... and an expanding continental footprint Large Scale • 2.2 bn unit cases of soft drinks • 40 mm hectoliters of beer Powerful Brands • #1 in soft drinks in all regions • #2 in beer in Mexico • Significant player in US imports and Brazil Efficient Production • 31 bottling plants • 14 breweries Broad Distribution • 9,000+ routes Growing Consumer Base • 1.9 mm+ retailers • 214 mm+ consumers Dynamic C-Store Platform • Over 5,800 OXXO stores 4 Integration that works Synergies Strategic Distribution Channel Scale Business Model • Beverage-based retailer • Leveraging on • Strengthening our • “Lab” for new products/Consumer procurement market position insights • Shared Service • Sharing best • Reinforcing our price architecture Centers practices 5 Delivering consistent growth Total Revenue EBIT (US$ million) (US$ million) 14,256 1,937 6,751 1,078 3,387 477 1998 2003 LTM 2008 1998 2003 LTM 2008 CAGR 98-LTM 08: 15% CAGR 98-LTM 08: 15% CAGR 03-LTM 08: 16% CAGR 03-LTM 08: 12% Note: Figures in Mexican pesos converted to US dollars using the period-end exchange rate from each period.
    [Show full text]
  • State of the Trails Final Report February 2017
    STATE OF THE TRAILS FINAL REPORT FEBRUARY 2017 ParksCounCil of & Minn TrailsESoTA CONTENTS 3 Key Findings 4 Project Overview STATE OF THE TRAILS 6 Experiental Ratngs 7 Trail Roughness Index 8 DNR Investment Groups 10 Overview of State Trail Pavement Conditons 13 Segment-by-Segment Ratngs 13 Alex Laveau State Trail 29 Harmony Preston State Trail 14 Blazing Star State Trail 31 Heartland State Trail 15 Brown’s Creek State Trail 34 Luce Line State Trail 16 Casey Jones State Trail 36 Mill Towns State Trail 17 Central Lakes State Trail 36 Preston-Forestville State Trail 20 Cuyuna Lakes State Trail 37 Minnesota Valley State Trail 21 Douglas State Trail 38 Paul Bunyan State Trail 22 Gateway State Trail 44 Root River State Trail 23 Gitchi-Gami State Trail 47 Sakatah Singing Hills State Trail 24 Glacial Lakes State Trail 49 Shootng Star State Trail 27 Goodhue Pioneer State Trail 51 Willard Munger State Trail 28 Great River Ridge State Trail RECOMMENDATIONS 54 Consistent State Trail Rehabilitaton 57 Create a State Trail Capital Improvement Plan METHODOLOGY 59 How to Understand Our Ratngs 61 Important Caveats 63 Acknowledgments Vector artwork on cover designed by Freepik 2 www.parksandtrails.org KEY FINDINGS STATE TRAIL CONDITIONS: RECOMMENDATIONS: • Minnesota State Trails are currently in good • Lawmakers and the DNR should commit to conditon. Our inventory found 79% of state rehabilitatng an average of 20 state trail miles trail miles are in either excellent or good per year, which is the level needed to maintain conditon. Minnesota State Trails long term. • Only 26 miles of Minnesota State Trails are • Lawmakers should commit to funding state currently in poor conditon, and 90 miles are in trail rehabilitaton through consistent state fair conditon.
    [Show full text]
  • Greater Minnesota Regional Parks and Trails District 1 – Northeast Strategic Plan
    This document is made available electronically by the Minnesota Legislative Reference Library as part of an ongoing digital archiving project. http://www.leg.state.mn.us/lrl/lrl.asp GREATER MINNESOTA REGIONAL PARKS AND TRAILS DISTRICT 1 – NORTHEAST STRATEGIC PLAN GREATER MINNESOTA REGIONAL PARKS AND TRAILS COMMISSION DISTRICT 2 – NORTHWEST DISTRICT 3 – WEST CENTRAL DISTRICT 4 – EAST CENTRAL DISTRICT 5 – SOUTHWEST DISTRICT 6 – SOUTHEAST Adoption Date: June 25, 2014 IT IS THE INTENT OF THE COMMISSION THAT THIS STRATEGIC PLAN BE A DYNAMIC WORKING DOCUMENT THAT WILL EVOLVE OVER TIME. THIS ADOPTED PLAN SHALL BE USED FOR FISCAL YEAR 2016 PLANNING PURPOSES. Adoption Date: June 25, 2014 Introduction and Enabling Legislation Under 2013 Minnesota Statutes 85.536, the Minnesota State Legislature created the Greater Minnesota Regional Parks and Trails Commission (Commission). Under the statute, the Commission “is created to undertake system planning and provide recommendations to the legislature for grants funded by the parks and trails fund to counties and cities outside of the seven-county metropolitan area for parks and trails of regional significance.” The commission includes 13 members appointed by the governor, with two members from each of the six regional parks and trails districts. Through the adoption of this plan, the Commission fulfills it obligation to “develop a strategic plan and criteria for determining parks and trails of regional significance that are eligible for funding from the parks and trails fund and meet the criteria under
    [Show full text]
  • CORONAVIRUS – a PERSONAL VIEW P97 Networks: Consumer Behaviour During COVID-19 Puma Energy Africa – COVID-19 Mitigation Efforts ICS Scotland Report AIUT Poland
    WWW.PETROLWORLD.COM Issue 42 2020 CORONAVIRUS – A PERSONAL VIEW P97 Networks: Consumer Behaviour During COVID-19 Puma Energy Africa – COVID-19 Mitigation Efforts ICS Scotland Report AIUT Poland INFORMING AND SERVING THE FUEL INDUSTRY GLOBALLY Introducing the Tokheim QuantiumTM 510M fuel dispenser. Designed by architects. Built by you. More options. More features. You choose. www.tokheim.com ©2019 Dover Fueling Solutions. All rights reserved. DOVER, the DOVER D Design, DOVER FUELING SOLUTIONS, and other trademarks referenced herein are trademarks of Delaware Capital Formation. Inc./Dover Corporation, Dover Fueling Solutions UK, Ltd. and their af liated entities. Introducing the Tokheim QuantiumTM 510M fuel dispenser. Designed by architects. Built by you. More options. More features. You choose. www.tokheim.com ©2019 Dover Fueling Solutions. All rights reserved. DOVER, the DOVER D Design, DOVER FUELING SOLUTIONS, and other trademarks referenced herein are trademarks of Delaware Capital Formation. Inc./Dover Corporation, Dover Fueling Solutions UK, Ltd. and their af liated entities. 2 + CONTENTS 06 THE CORONAVIRUS (COVID-19) PANDEMIC SECTION 1: FEATURES — A PERSONAL VIEW 04 WORLD VIEW Key stories from around the world 06 THE CORONAVIRUS (COVID-19) PANDEMIC — A PERSONAL VIEW 09 THE CORONAVIRUS (COVID-19) PANDEMIC — HISTORY 10 PUMA ENERGY AFRICA – COVID-19 MITIGATION EFFORTS 13 P97 NETWORKS: CONSUMER BEHAVIOUR DURING COVID-19 16 OPW 18 AIUT 19 ISTOBAL SECTION 2: NEWS OIL COMPANY AND RETAIL BRAND NEWS 21 ASIA 23 MIDDLE EAST 25 AFRICA 27 EUROPE
    [Show full text]