The Role of Political Parties At

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Role of Political Parties At THE ROLE OF POLITICAL PARTIES AT EUROPEAN LEVEL ON THE DEMOCRATIC DEFICIT: CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES The role of political parties at European Level on the democratic deficit of the European Union in the aftermath of the 2019 European Parliament elections. Word count: 38421 Hanne Bauters Student number: 01504141 Supervisor: Prof. Dr. Erwan Lannon Co-supervisor: Jolien Timmermans A dissertation submitted to Ghent University in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Law Academic year: 2019 – 2020 2 Acknowledgments It took me a lot of time, energy and a lot of cups of coffee to finally be at this point, writing the acknowledgments. This master thesis is made as a completion of my master education at Ghent University. I am about to finish five interesting years. Several persons have contributed academically, practically and with support to this master thesis. First, I wish to thank my promoter, Prof. Dr. Erwan Lannon, for the opportunity to work on this interesting and challenging study about the role of political parties at European level on the democratic deficit of the European Union. I am grateful that Prof. Dr. Erwan Lannon made time to meet up with me, it was an honour to work under his guidance. Besides, I also have to be grateful that I could write my master thesis in English. It has been a struggle, but it really improved my English skills. Secondly, I wish to thank my co-supervisor, Jolien Timmermans for her justified remarks on the preliminary version of my master thesis, especially regarding the democratic deficit. Furthermore, I wish to thank my parents and my sister for their immense and unquestionable support throughout the entire process of writing this master thesis. 3 List of Abbreviations AFCO Committee on Constitutional Affairs ALDE Alliance for Liberals and Democrats for Europe Party EC European Community ECC European Economic Community ECR European Conservatives and Reformists Party ECSC European Community for Steal and Coal EFA European Free Alliance EFGP European Federation of Green Parties EGP European Green Party ELDR European Liberal Democrat and Reform Party EPP European People’s Party EU European Union MEP Member of the European Parliament PES Party of European Socialists TEU Treaty on European Union 4 Table of Contest Acknowledgments ..................................................................................................................................... 3 List of Abbreviations ................................................................................................................................. 4 Table of Contest ........................................................................................................................................ 5 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................... 8 Chapter I: Political Parties at European Level .......................................................................................... 10 1. The History of Political Parties at European Level..................................................................... 10 1.1 The Evolution of Party Politics at European Level Since 1951. ............................................ 10 1.2. The Long Path Towards Direct Elections of the European Parliament. ................................ 12 1.3. The Evolution of the Political Parties at European level Since the Maastricht Treaty ........... 16 2. The Internal Organisation and Financing of Political Parties at European Level ......................... 23 2.1. The Internal Organisation of Political Parties at European Level ......................................... 24 2.2. The Financing of Political Parties at European Level .......................................................... 24 2.3. The European Political Foundations ................................................................................... 26 3. Conclusion ................................................................................................................................ 28 Chapter II: The Democratic Deficit of the European Union ...................................................................... 29 1. The institutional deficit ............................................................................................................. 30 2. The Social Deficit ..................................................................................................................... 33 3. Conclusion ................................................................................................................................ 34 Chapter III: What can be done by the Political Parties at European Level? ............................................... 35 1. The Spitzenkandidat Procedure ................................................................................................. 39 1.1. The evolution of the appointment mechanisms for the Presidency of the European Commission and an overview of the former Presidents of the European Commission. ................................... 41 1.2. The Nomination of the President of the Commission since the Lisbon Treaty ..................... 44 1.3. The Spitzenkandidat Procedure in the 2019 European Parliament Elections ........................ 47 1.4. The Candidates Selection by the European Political Parties at European level for the 2019 European Parliament Elections .................................................................................................. 49 1.5. The Appearances of the Spitzenkandidaten in the 2019 Electoral Campaign. ...................... 59 1.6. The Election of Ursula von der Leyen and the Fall of the Spitzenkandidat Procedure .......... 65 1.7. Conclusion and Discussion ............................................................................................ 68 2. Transnational lists ..................................................................................................................... 69 2.1 What are Transnational Lists? ............................................................................................. 69 2.2. Debate on the transnational lists 2018 ................................................................................. 72 2.3. Can transnational lists possibly be an answer to the democratic deficit of the European Union? 74 2.4. Conclusion ......................................................................................................................... 77 Chapter IV: Further recommendations ..................................................................................................... 78 1. Recommendations Regarding the Spitzenkandidat Procedure ........................................................ 79 5 1.1. The Nomination of the Leading Candidates ........................................................................ 79 1.2. Increased Visibility of the Leading Candidate ................................................................ 81 2. Developing Individual Membership .......................................................................................... 81 2.1 Political Parties at European Level and Individual Membership ........................................... 82 2.2. Individual membership as the link between European institutions and European Citizens.... 84 2.3. Conclusion .................................................................................................................... 86 Conclusion .............................................................................................................................................. 86 Bibliography............................................................................................................................................ 88 6 Figure 1 Source: The Economist Newspaper 7 Introduction Today’ s nature of European Union displays a fascinating, but at the same time highly demanding research object. While the European’s integration proceeds constantly and more rights are transferred to the supranational level, the European Union is criticized for lagging as regards to the development and expansion of democratic values and principles. The multifaced democratic flaws of the European Union are a highly discussed topic among many scholars and add up to the larger debate on the democratic deficit of the European Union. One possible answer to the democratic deficit lies in the role of political parties at European level. Since classical antiquity, political participation is universally acknowledged as the core element of democracy. Modern democracy, SCHATTSCHNEIDER asserted, is unthinkable in terms of political parties. 1 Political parties are widely seen to be a sine qua non for the organization of modern democracy. Given the importance attributed to political parties in a modern democracy, one would easily think political parties at European level are vibrant, coherent and of interest. But, in reality, the opposite occurs. Political parties at European level are perceived to be incapable of performing those functions which are of vital interest to the healthy functioning of a democracy. Political parties at European level should connect the policy preferences of the electors to the European institutions. Still, this linkage seemed to be lost at the level of the European Union. However, in 2014, with the introduction of the Spitzenkandidat procedure, political parties at European level demonstrated their potential. They
Recommended publications
  • How Transnational Party Alliances Influence National Parties' Policies
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by ZORA Zurich Open Repository and Archive University of Zurich Main Library Strickhofstrasse 39 CH-8057 Zurich www.zora.uzh.ch Year: 2021 How Transnational party alliances influence national parties’ policies Senninger, Roman ; Bischof, Daniel ; Ezrow, Lawrence Abstract: Previous research reports that parties in established European democracies learn from and em- ulate the successful election strategies of foreign incumbents, i.e., successful parties are influential abroad. We theorize that—in addition to incumbency (or success)—exchange takes place through transnational party alliances in the European Union. Relying on party manifesto data and spatial econometric analyses, we show that belonging to the same European Parliament (EP) party group enhances learning and em- ulation processes between national political parties. Estimated short- and long-term effects are approxi- mately two and three times greater when foreign incumbents are in the same EP party group compared to other foreign incumbents. Our results have implications for our understanding of how transnational party groups influence national parties’ policy positions. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2020.55 Posted at the Zurich Open Repository and Archive, University of Zurich ZORA URL: https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-196868 Journal Article Accepted Version The following work is licensed under a Creative Commons: Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) License. Originally published at: Senninger, Roman; Bischof, Daniel; Ezrow, Lawrence (2021). How Transnational party alliances influence national parties’ policies. Political Science Research and Methods:Epub ahead of print.
    [Show full text]
  • 1. Debbie Abrahams, Labour Party, United Kingdom 2
    1. Debbie Abrahams, Labour Party, United Kingdom 2. Malik Ben Achour, PS, Belgium 3. Tina Acketoft, Liberal Party, Sweden 4. Senator Fatima Ahallouch, PS, Belgium 5. Lord Nazir Ahmed, Non-affiliated, United Kingdom 6. Senator Alberto Airola, M5S, Italy 7. Hussein al-Taee, Social Democratic Party, Finland 8. Éric Alauzet, La République en Marche, France 9. Patricia Blanquer Alcaraz, Socialist Party, Spain 10. Lord John Alderdice, Liberal Democrats, United Kingdom 11. Felipe Jesús Sicilia Alférez, Socialist Party, Spain 12. Senator Alessandro Alfieri, PD, Italy 13. François Alfonsi, Greens/EFA, European Parliament (France) 14. Amira Mohamed Ali, Chairperson of the Parliamentary Group, Die Linke, Germany 15. Rushanara Ali, Labour Party, United Kingdom 16. Tahir Ali, Labour Party, United Kingdom 17. Mahir Alkaya, Spokesperson for Foreign Trade and Development Cooperation, Socialist Party, the Netherlands 18. Senator Josefina Bueno Alonso, Socialist Party, Spain 19. Lord David Alton of Liverpool, Crossbench, United Kingdom 20. Patxi López Álvarez, Socialist Party, Spain 21. Nacho Sánchez Amor, S&D, European Parliament (Spain) 22. Luise Amtsberg, Green Party, Germany 23. Senator Bert Anciaux, sp.a, Belgium 24. Rt Hon Michael Ancram, the Marquess of Lothian, Former Chairman of the Conservative Party, Conservative Party, United Kingdom 25. Karin Andersen, Socialist Left Party, Norway 26. Kirsten Normann Andersen, Socialist People’s Party (SF), Denmark 27. Theresa Berg Andersen, Socialist People’s Party (SF), Denmark 28. Rasmus Andresen, Greens/EFA, European Parliament (Germany) 29. Lord David Anderson of Ipswich QC, Crossbench, United Kingdom 30. Barry Andrews, Renew Europe, European Parliament (Ireland) 31. Chris Andrews, Sinn Féin, Ireland 32. Eric Andrieu, S&D, European Parliament (France) 33.
    [Show full text]
  • European Security, Turkish Foreign Policy and Article 5 of the NATO Treaty
    sallux ECPM FOUNDATION European security, Turkish foreign policy and Article 5 of the NATO Treaty JOHANNES DE JONG & CHRISTIAAN MEINEN Do NATO member states have a duty to protect Turkey while Turkey at the same time threatens NATO and European security and stability? This publication clarifies that NATO members can withhold (Article 5) protection without changing the NATO Treaty or expelling Turkey from NATO. European, Canadian and American citizens can be informed that the military of their countries will not protect Turkey and the Erdogan government. The question Source: periodista.gr is if European, Canadian and US politicians have the courage to do so. sallux European security ECPM FOUNDATION 3 Key takeaways from this paper 1. The EU, US, Canada and NATO are struggling with the question of how to deal with Turkey. This publication of- fers an overview of Turkish behaviour since 2013 and a viable way forward in how to counter it. The strategy that this publication suggests is that NATO Member States, backed by their Parliaments or Congress, will state that Turkey can no longer count on protection based on Article 5 of the NATO Treaty until Turkey changes its behaviour. 2. This publication maintains that Turkish external behav- iour since 2013 is based on the ideological agenda of President Erdogan’s AKP government. The domestic oppression of Kurds, opposition, and all forms of free Diyanet minister Ali Erbaş holding a sword, ‘neo-Ottomanism’. Turning Hagia Sofia speech mirrors that agenda as well. in the Ottoman tradition, as he gives the into a mosque symbolised and clarified 3.
    [Show full text]
  • A Look at the New European Parliament Page 1 INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMITTEE (INTA)
    THE NEW EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT KEY COMMITTEE COMPOSITION 31 JULY 2019 INTRODUCTION After several marathon sessions, the European Council agreed on the line-up for the EU “top jobs” on 2 July 2019. The deal, which notably saw German Defence Minister Ursula von der Leyen (CDU, EPP) surprisingly designated as the next European Commission (EC) President, meant that the European Parliament (EP) could proceed with the election of its own leadership on 3 July. The EPP and Renew Europe (formerly ALDE) groups, in line with the agreement, did not present candidates for the EP President. As such, the vote pitted the S&D’s David-Maria Sassoli (IT) against two former Spitzenkandidaten – Ska Keller (DE) of the Greens and Jan Zahradil (CZ) of the ACRE/ECR, alongside placeholder candidate Sira Rego (ES) of GUE. Sassoli was elected President for the first half of the 2019 – 2024 mandate, while the EPP (presumably EPP Spitzenkandidat Manfred Weber) would take the reins from January 2022. The vote was largely seen as a formality and a demonstration of the three largest Groups’ capacity to govern. However, Zahradil received almost 100 votes (more than the total votes of the ECR group), and Keller received almost twice as many votes as there are Greens/EFA MEPs. This forced a second round in which Sassoli was narrowly elected with just 11 more than the necessary simple majority. Close to 12% of MEPs did not cast a ballot. MEPs also elected 14 Vice-Presidents (VPs): Mairead McGuinness (EPP, IE), Pedro Silva Pereira (S&D, PT), Rainer Wieland (EPP, DE), Katarina Barley (S&D, DE), Othmar Karas (EPP, AT), Ewa Kopacz (EPP, PL), Klara Dobrev (S&D, HU), Dita Charanzová (RE, CZ), Nicola Beer (RE, DE), Lívia Járóka (EPP, HU) and Heidi Hautala (Greens/EFA, FI) were elected in the first ballot, while Marcel Kolaja (Greens/EFA, CZ), Dimitrios Papadimoulis (GUE/NGL, EL) and Fabio Massimo Castaldo (NI, IT) needed the second round.
    [Show full text]
  • European Political Foundations
    Directorate-General for Finance Directorate for Political Structures Financing and Resources Political Structures Financing Unit Grants from the European Parliament to political foundations at European level per foundation per year February 2020 Maximum grant Final grant** ( € Foundation 4 Address Country Website Year* awarded ( € ) ) 2008/2 106.608 106.608 2009 147.929 146.575 2010 212.544 155.801 2011 252.450 249.940 2012 259.134 199.585 2013 249.695 226.802 Coppieters Foundation (former Centrum Boomwekereijstraat 1 European Free Alliance Belgium www.cmc-foundation.eu 2014 267.388 216.380 Maurits Coppetiers) B-1000 Brussels 2015 297.500 240.601 2016 324.930 318.411 2017 457.035 365.038 2018 479.887 388.702 2019 534.179 2020 567.165 2008/2 233.750 172.187 2009 725.200 609.356 2010 818.438 658.097 2011 942.819 804.634 2012 1.075.703 995.300 Alliance of Liberals and Democrats 2013 1.270.187 1.107.696 for Europe Party Rue des Deux Eglises 37/39 B- European Liberal Forum Belgium www.liberalforum.eu 2014 1.362.890 941.281 (before European Liberal Democrat 1000 Brussels 2015 984.981 879.840 and Reform Party) 2016 1.391.869 1.126.430 2017 1.487.768 1.164.869 2018 1.761.857 1.650.538 2019 1.798.601 2020 2.710.157 2008/2 1.208.700 1.208.436 2009 1.950.000 1.946.131 2010 2.150.000 2.136.476 2011 2.714.798 2.709.255 2012 2.802.702 2.794.525 2013 2.839.002 2.762.310 Foundation for European Progressive rue Montoyer 40 Party of European Socialists Belgium www.feps-europe.eu 2014 3.086.695 3.086.695 Studies B-1000 Brussels 2015 4.089.429 3.847.808
    [Show full text]
  • Yearbook 2016
    YEARBOOK 2016 FOR A EUROPE OF DIGNITY , FREEDOM AND RESPONSIBILITY We want to thank all our partners for their cooperation in the past year. A special word of gratitude for the VOE foundation and the FICDD who have supported several of our events. We also thank our colleagues from Sallux for all their assistance and support. contents European Christian Political Movement | design joanne.vanbeuse.com | © ECPM 2017 YEARBOOK 2016 EUROPEAN CHRISTIAN POLITICAL MOVEMENT “we believe that the Christian culture embeds fundamental freedoms that are virtuous for European societies” CONTENTS ABOUT ECPM 7 WORD FROM THE PRESIDENT 11 REFLECTION ON 2016 13 ADVISORY COUNCIL REPORT 15 INTRODUCTION OF 2016 EVENTS & CONFERENCES 17 FIRST QUARTER • Freedom of Religion or Belief Intergroup/Launch of Open Doors’ 2016 Watch List 19 • The Rights of Parents and Children belonging to Religious Minorities 19 • National Prayer Breakfast, Washington DC 20 • Europartners in Jerusalem 20 • Prayer meeting 20 • Sallux roundtable Response to the asylum crisis along the refugee route 21 • Finnish Prayer Breakfast 21 • Christian Social Congress 22 SECOND QUARTER • ECPM KD event, Helsinki/Stockholm 25 • The role of Christian communities in a new Middle East 25 • ChristenUnie Congress 26 • Ukrainian National Prayer Breakfast and Forum 26 • ECPM General Assembly 27 • Crossing the border: Giving direction to the refugee debate in a divided Europe 27 • FoRB Intergroup. Presentation of the Report on the State of Religion or Belief in 28 the World 2015-2016 THIRD QUARTER • Economic
    [Show full text]
  • Political Groups in the European Parliament Since 1979: Key Facts and Figures
    Political groups in the European Parliament since 1979 Key facts and figures STUDY EPRS | European Parliamentary Research Service Author: Christian Salm Historical Archives Unit PE 637.958 – June 2019 EN Political groups in the European Parliament since 1979: Key facts and figures EPRS | European Parliamentary Research Service AUTHOR Christian Salm, Historical Archives Unit, EPRS To contact the author, please email: [email protected] ABOUT THE PUBLISHER This paper has been drawn up by the Historical Archives Unit of the Directorate for the Library, within the Directorate-General for Parliamentary Research Services (EPRS) of the Secretariat of the European Parliament. LINGUISTIC VERSIONS Original: EN Manuscript completed in June 2019. DISCLAIMER AND COPYRIGHT This document is prepared for, and addressed to, the Members and staff of the European Parliament as background material to assist them in their parliamentary work. The content of the document is the sole responsibility of its author(s) and any opinions expressed herein should not be taken to represent an official position of the Parliament. Reproduction and translation for non-commercial purposes are authorised, provided the source is acknowledged and the European Parliament is given prior notice and sent a copy. Brussels © European Union, 2019. PE 637.958 ISBN: 978-92-846-4858-0 DOI:10.2861/23770 CAT: QA-01-19-517-EN-N [email protected] http://www.eprs.ep.parl.union.eu (intranet) http://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank (internet) http://epthinktank.eu (blog) Political groups in
    [Show full text]
  • Wandel Verstehen. Rechte Schützen. Zukunft Gestalten
    Friedrich Naumann STIFTUNG FÜR DIE FREIHEIT Wandel verstehen. Rechte schützen. Zukunft gestalten. www.freiheit.org 1963 bis 2013 Jubiläumsschrift Herausgegeben vom Bereich Internationale Politik der Friedrich-Naumann-Stiftung für die Freiheit Gemeinsames Vorwort Internationale Projekte 84 Dr. Wolfgang Gerhardt MdB, Vorsitzender des Vorstandes Nord-Süd-Dialogprogramm am Sitz der Vereinten Nationen, New York 85 Prof. Dr. Jürgen Morlok, Vorsitzender des Kuratoriums 4 Internationale Akademie für Führungskräfte (IAF) 87 Geleitworte Internationale Konferenzen 91 Dr. Guido Westerwelle, Bundesminister des Auswärtigen 6 Internationale Programme 99 Dirk Niebel, Bundesminister für wirtschaftliche Zusammenarbeit und Entwicklung 7 Internationale Kooperation und Vernetzung 100 Wie alles begann. 10 Die bedeutende Rolle der Kooperationspartner 101 Entstehung und Aufbau der internationalen Arbeit Interview mit Dr. Barthold C. Witte 11 Intensive Vernetzung mit nationalen, regionalen und globalen Akteuren 102 Pionierprojekte der Aufbauphase 18 Weltweite Bilanz und künftige Herausforderungen 104 Regionale Schwerpunkte und Projektentwicklungen 24 Bilanz eines halben Jahrhunderts internationaler Arbeit Autor: Dr. h.c. Rolf Berndt, Geschäftsführendes Vorstandsmitglied 105 Südliche Mittelmeerländer (Naher und Mittlerer Osten) 25 Neue Herausforderungen und strategische Ziele für die Auslandsarbeit Subsahara-Afrika 31 Autor: Ulrich Niemann, Bereichsleiter Internationale Politik 111 Lateinamerika 39 Südost- und Ostasien 46 Südasien 54 Mittel-, Südost- und Osteuropa,
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Specifications I. Introduction Ii. Applicable
    Annex 1 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS I. INTRODUCTION 1. The European Parliament needs audit reports including an audit opinion on annual accounts and on the statement of expenditure eligible for European Union funding of European political parties and European political foundations (hereinafter "parties" or "foundations"), as well as on their compliance with rules and regulations applicable to funding. The reports have to be provided starting with the parties’ and foundations’ financial year 2020. 2. The parties and foundations can apply to the European Parliament and can be awarded funding (“contributions” for parties and “grants” for foundations) from the budget of the European Union to cover part of their expenditure. II. APPLICABLE LEGISLATION 3. The legal framework of funding applicable for the financial year 2020 onwards is as follows: Regulation (EU, EURATOM) No 1141/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2014 on the statute and funding of European political parties and European political foundations1, as subsequently amended (hereinafter 'Regulation (EU, EURATOM) No 1141/2014'); Decision of the Bureau of the European Parliament of 1 July 2019 laying down the procedures for implementing Regulation No 1141/20142 (hereinafter 'Bureau decision of 1 July 2019'); Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 July 2018 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union, amending Regulations (EU) No 1296/2013, (EU) No 1301/2013, (EU) No 1303/2013, (EU) No 1304/2013, (EU) No 1309/2013, (EU) No 1316/2013, (EU) No 223/2014, (EU) No 283/2014, and Decision No 541/2014/EU and repealing Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/20123 (hereinafter 'Financial Regulation') III.
    [Show full text]
  • "Populist" Politics at EU Level Morijn, John
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by University of Groningen University of Groningen Responding to "populist" politics at EU level Morijn, John Published in: International Journal of Constitutional Law DOI: 10.1093/icon/moz030 IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from it. Please check the document version below. Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Publication date: 2019 Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database Citation for published version (APA): Morijn, J. (2019). Responding to "populist" politics at EU level: Regulation 1141/2014 and beyond. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 17(2), 617-640. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moz030 Copyright Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Take-down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum. Download date: 11-12-2019 © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non- Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of the Financial Crisis on European Solidarity
    FUTURE OF EUROPEAN INTEGRATION: THE IMPACT OF FINANCIAL CRISIS ON EUROPEAN SOLIDARITY A conference organised by the European Liberal Forum asbl (ELF) with the support of the Friedrich Naumann Foundation for Freedom (Germany), the Centre for Liberal Studies (Czech Republic). With the special support of the Association for International Affairs (Czech Republic). Funded by the European Parliament. Official media coverage by EurActiv.cz. Prague, 6 September 2012 Venue: Kaiserstein Palace, Malostranské náměstí 23/37, 110 00 Prague 1, Czech Republic Contents Synopsis ...................................................................3 Panel #1 ...................................................................4 Panel #2 ...................................................................5 Panel #3 ...................................................................6 Programme .................................................................7 Speakers ...................................................................9 Team ......................................................................14 European Liberal Forum .......................................................15 Friedrich Naumann Foundation for Freedom .......................................17 Association for International Affairs ...............................................18 Logos of organizers and partners . .19 2 Synopsis Although the ongoing crisis in the EU is primarily depicted by the media as an economic one (the “Greek Crisis” or, more precisely, the “Sovereign Debt Crisis”),
    [Show full text]
  • Local Newsletter of the Embassy of Belgium in Islamabad Issue 10 – April 2016
    Local Newsletter of the Embassy of Belgium in Islamabad Issue 10 – April 2016 Message from the Ambassador On March 22, Belgium was struck by a series of violent attacks targeting innocent civilians, marking the darkest day in our contemporary history. Much has been said and written about the events, and about how terrorism has become a worldwide plague. About the bravery shown by the emergency services personnel, as well as by some people who simply happened to be present during the attacks. About how to react in unity and face this threat firmly, without compromising our values of freedom, openness and tolerance. Surely, this is a grave test for Belgium, and indeed the European Union. Overcoming it will require hard work, ingenuity and patience. It is, however, my firm belief that our society and its values will prevail over violence fuelled by bigotry and ignorance. In the past days, the embassy has received countless messages of support and solidarity. Pakistani people know the suffering brought about by terrorism all too well, as we were again reminded following the recent suicide attack in a Lahore park. As you read these lines, I humbly request that you spare a thought for the persons who lost their lives following the attacks. Innocent lives, lives of commuters, travelers or simply passers-by, from all origins, walks of life and religions. They deserve that much. Frédéric Verheyden Ambassador of Belgium Sacred Heart Cathedral celebrated in Lahore… On November 28th, Ambassador Verheyden awarded the Prize for Belgian Heritage Abroad to the Sacred Heart Cathedral in Lahore, built more than hundred years ago by the Belgian missionaries in Pakistan.
    [Show full text]