DOCSLIB.ORG

NEWLY MINTED CRIMINAL LAWS HON. ELSA ALCALA Texas Court

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
NEWLY MINTED CRIMINAL LAWS HON. ELSA ALCALA Texas Court NEWLY MINTED CRIMINAL LAWS HON. ELSA ALCALA Texas Court of Criminal Appeals 201 W. 14th Street Austin, Texas 78701 State Bar of Texas 41ST ANNUAL ADVANCED CRIMINAL LAW COURSE July 27-30, 2015 San Antonio CHAPTER 29 Judge Elsa Alcala Judge Elsa Alcala is a judge on the Court of Criminal Appeals, the highest court for criminal cases in Texas. Before joining the Court, Judge Alcala was a justice on the First Court of Appeals for nine years and a judge on the 338th District Court in Houston for over three years. Before becoming a judge, she was an assistant district attorney for the Harris County District Attorney’s Office for nine years. She is a specialist both in criminal law and criminal appellate law as certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization. Newly Minted Criminal Laws Chapter 29 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. THE PENAL CODE ............................................................................................................................................... 1 A. SB 344 – Amended Felony, Online Solicitation of a Minor ........................................................................... 1 1. The Law Before 9/1/15 ............................................................................................................................ 1 2. The Problem with the Current Law ......................................................................................................... 1 3. The Law On and After 9/1/15 .................................................................................................................. 1 B. SB 1828 – New Felony, Cargo Theft .............................................................................................................. 2 1. The Law Before 9/1/15 ............................................................................................................................ 2 2. The Problem with the Current Law ......................................................................................................... 2 3. The Law On and After 9/1/15 .................................................................................................................. 2 C. SB 835 – New Misdemeanor, False Military Record ...................................................................................... 2 1. The Law Before 9/1/15 – Offense is a Class C Misdemeanor................................................................. 2 2. The Problem With the Current Law ........................................................................................................ 2 3. The Law On and After 9/1/15 – Offense is a Class B Misdemeanor ...................................................... 2 D. SB 461 – New Misdemeanor, Abusable Synthetic Substances ....................................................................... 2 1. The Law Before 9/1/15 ............................................................................................................................ 2 2. The Problem with the Current Law ......................................................................................................... 3 3. The Law On and After 9/1/15 .................................................................................................................. 3 E. HB 975 – New Misdemeanor, Misconduct Related to Charitable Raffles ...................................................... 3 1. The Law Before 1/1/16 ............................................................................................................................ 3 2. The Problem with the Current Law ......................................................................................................... 3 3. The Law On and After 1/1/16 .................................................................................................................. 3 F. HB 207 – New Offense, Voyeurism ................................................................................................................ 3 1. The Law Before 9/1/15 ............................................................................................................................ 3 2. The Problem with the Current Law ......................................................................................................... 3 3. The Law On and After 9/1/15 .................................................................................................................. 3 G. HB 511 – Relating to Offenses Committed Against Persons in Custody........................................................ 4 1. The Law Before 9/1/15 ............................................................................................................................ 4 2. The Problem with the Current Law ......................................................................................................... 4 3. The Law On and After 9/1/15 .................................................................................................................. 4 H. HB 896 – Relating to Offense of Breach of Computer Security ..................................................................... 4 1. The Law Before 9/1/15 ............................................................................................................................ 4 2. The Problem with the Current Law ......................................................................................................... 4 3. The Law On and After 9/1/15 .................................................................................................................. 4 I. SB 473 – New Defense to Possession of Prohibited Explosive Weapons, Firearms, and Related Items........ 4 1. The Law Before 9/1/15 ............................................................................................................................ 4 2. The Problem with the Current Law ......................................................................................................... 4 3. The Law On and After 9/1/15 .................................................................................................................. 4 J. HB 1396 – Changing Punishment Ranges for Certain Offenses ..................................................................... 4 1. Law Before 9/1/15 ................................................................................................................................... 4 2. The Law On and After 9/1/15 .................................................................................................................. 5 K. SB 11 – Defenses Related to Campus Carry ................................................................................................... 5 1. The Law Before 8/1/16 ............................................................................................................................ 5 2. The Problem with the Current Law ......................................................................................................... 5 3. The Law On and After 9/1/15 .................................................................................................................. 5 L. SB 825 – Creating Additional Penalties for Prostitution ................................................................................. 6 1. The Law Before 9/1/15 ............................................................................................................................ 6 2. The Problem with the Current Law ......................................................................................................... 6 3. The Law On and After 9/1/15 .................................................................................................................. 6 M. HB 910 – Open Carry ...................................................................................................................................... 6 II. THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE .......................................................................................................... 6 A. SB 487 – Alters Standard for Post-Conviction DNA Testing ......................................................................... 6 1. The Law Before 9/1/15 ............................................................................................................................ 6 2. The Problem with the Current Law ......................................................................................................... 6 3. The Law On and After 9/1/15 .................................................................................................................. 6 i Newly Minted Criminal Laws Chapter 29 B. SB 888 – Interlocutory Appeal of Certification of Juvenile for Prosecution as an Adult ............................... 6 1. The Law Before 9/1/15 ............................................................................................................................ 6 2. The Problem with the Current Law ......................................................................................................... 6 3. The Law On and After 9/1/15 .................................................................................................................. 7 C. HB 10 – Concerning Compelling Prostitution and Human Trafficking .......................................................... 7 1. The Law Before 9/1/15 ............................................................................................................................ 7 2. The Problem with the Current Law ........................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Texas Law Judicial Clerks List
    Texas Law Judicial Clerks List This list includes Texas Law alumni who reported their clerkships to the Judicial Clerkship Program – or whose names were published in the Judicial Yellow Book or Martindale Hubbell – and includes those who clerked during the recent past for judges who are currently active. There are some judges and courts for which few Texas Law alumni have clerked – in these cases we have listed alumni who clerked further back or who clerked for judges who are no longer active. Dates following a law clerk or judge’s name indicate year of graduation from the University of Texas School of Law. Retired or deceased judges, or those who has been appointed to another court, are listed at the end of each court section and denoted (*). Those who wish to use the information on this list will need to independently verify the information being used. Federal Courts U.S. Supreme Court ............................................................................................................. 2 U.S. Circuit Courts of Appeals ............................................................................................. 3 First Circuit Second Circuit Third Circuit Fourth Circuit Fifth Circuit Sixth Circuit Seventh Circuit Eighth Circuit Ninth Circuit Tenth Circuit Eleventh Circuit Federal Circuit District of Columbia Circuit U.S. Courts of Limited Jurisdiction ...................................................................................... 9 Executive Office for Immigration Review U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces U.S. Court of Appeals for Veteran Claims U.S. Court of Federal Claims U.S. Court of International Trade U.S. Tax Court U.S. District Courts (listed alphabetically by state) ............................................................ 10 State Courts State Appellate Courts (listed alphabetically by state) ........................................................ 25 State District & County Courts (listed alphabetically by state) ..........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Texas Death Penalty Developments in 2016: the Year in Review
    Texas Death Penalty Developments in 2016: The Year in Review Executive Summary The Texas Coalition to Abolish the Death Penalty (TCADP) – a statewide advocacy organization based in Austin, Texas – publishes this annual report to inform citizens and elected officials about issues associated with the death penalty in the past year. The report cites these recent death penalty developments in Texas: • In 2016, new death sentences remained at their lowest level since the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the state’s revised capital punishment statute in 1976. Jurors condemned three individuals to death, but rejected the death penalty in a fourth case. • Application of the death penalty remains racially biased. Over the last five years, 80% of death sentences have been imposed on people of color. • Use of the death penalty also remains geographically isolated. Just seven counties account for approximately two-thirds of all new death sentences in Texas since 2012. • For the second consecutive year, there were no new death sentences in Harris or Dallas Counties. • The State of Texas put seven people to death in 2016, the lowest number of executions in two decades. Texas accounted for more than one-third of all U.S. executions. • Of the seven men put to death by the State of Texas in 2016, two were Hispanic and five were white. It was the first time since 1984, and only the second year since the resumption of executions in 1982, that no African-Americans were executed in Texas. • Nearly half of the individuals executed by the State of Texas over the last two years had a significant impairment.
    [Show full text]
  • Lethally Deficient Direct Appeals in Texas Death Penalty Cases Cover: Texas Department of Criminal Justice
    Lethally Deficient Direct Appeals in Texas Death Penalty Cases Cover: Texas Department of Criminal Justice First edition © 2016, Texas Defender Service. All rights reserved, except as follows: Free copies of this report may be made for personal use. Reproduction of more than five (5) copies for personal use and reproduction for commercial use are prohibited without the written permission of the copyright owner. The work may be accessed for reproduction pursuant to these restrictions. B WWW.TEXASDEFENDER.ORG ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Texas DefenDer serviCe is graTeful To The many people who workeD Tirelessly on This project, inCluDing Jodie Anderson, Rebecca Bernhardt, Anna Chestnut, Amelia Gerson, Eugene Haller, Rhiannon Hama, Daniel Hatoum, Brandon-Rashad Kenny, Jim Marcus, Catherine Morton, Julie Pennington, Ian Peterson, Raoul Schonemann, Ashley Steele, Jordan Steiker, and Brian Stull. TDS sent Public Information Act requests to district attorney, county clerk, county treasurer, and county auditor offices across Texas and reviewed extensive records on file at the Court of Criminal Appeals. The cooperation of these institutions and their employees with TDS’ research is appreciated. The Initiative for Public Interest Law at Yale provided support to Fellow Ashley Steele to research and assist in drafting this report. TDS also received general support for policy work from Atlantic Philanthropies, Open Society Foundation, and Vital Projects Fund during the research and writing of this report. TDS thanks these institutions for their investment in its vital work. LETHALLY DEFICIENT: DIRECT APPEALS IN TEXAS DEATH PENALTY CASES i ii WWW.TEXASDEFENDER.ORG TEXAS DEFENDER SERVICE Texas Defender Service (TDS) is a nonprofit law firm with offices in Houston and Austin.
    [Show full text]
  • The STATE of the JUDICIARY in Texas
    The STATE OF THE JUDICIARY in Texas Chief Justice Nathan L. Hecht Presented to the 85th Legislature February 1, 2017 Austin, Texas THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS NATHAN L. HECHT Chief Justice Justices PAUL W. GREEN PHIL JOHNSON DON R. WILLETT EVA M. GUZMAN DEBRA H. LEHRMANN JEFFREY S. BOYD JOHN P. DEVINE JEFFREY V. BROWN THE TEXAS COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS SHARON KELLER Presiding Judge Judges MICHAEL E. KEASLER BARBARA PARKER HERVEY ELSA ALCALA BERT RICHARDSON KEVIN YEARY DAVID NEWELL MARY LOU KEEL SCOTT WALKER The STATE OF THE JUDICIARY in Texas Chief Justice Nathan L. Hecht Presented to the 85th Legislature February 1, 2017 Austin, Texas Lieutenant Governor Patrick, Speaker Straus, Members of the 85th Legislature, former Chief Justice Phillips, former Chief Justice Jefferson, Members of the Judiciary, distinguished guests, ladies and gentlemen: I have the honor to report to you on the state of the Judiciary. I begin with a story. Late on a Friday evening, a young man—let’s call him Will—drives his mom home from a high school football game—a Texas ritual in the fall. A trash bag blocks the driveway, so he gets out to move it. Suddenly, silently, a figure emerges from the darkness, raises a gun, then shoots through the car window at Will’s mother. Glass explodes. Shrapnel and bullet fragments rip her body. Another blast. And another. And another. I’m going to die, she thinks; my life as a mom, wife, and sister is over because of what I do for a living, because I’m a judge.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report for the Texas Judiciary
    ANNUAL REPORT FOR THE TEXAS JUDICIARY FISCAL YEAR 2011 ANNUAL REPORT FOR THE TEXAS JUDICIARY FISCAL YEAR 2011 Published By OFFICE OF COURT ADMINISTRATION CARL REYNOLDS, ADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTOR 205 WEST 14TH STREET, SUITE 600 POST OFFICE BOX 12066 AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711-2066 (512) 463-1625 FAX: (512) 463-1648 WWW.TXCOURTS.GOV MARCH 2012 Table of Contents TEXAS COURTS: A DESCRIPTIVE SUMMARY Court Structure and Function Court Structure Chart .....................................................................................................................................2 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................................3 Funding of the Texas Judicial Branch ...........................................................................................................3 Court Structure and Function ........................................................................................................................5 Judicial Administration ..................................................................................................................................9 Court Reorganization Bill ...............................................................................................................................10 Notes ..................................................................................................................................................................10 Information About Texas Judges Judicial Qualifications
    [Show full text]
  • Interim Report to the 86Th Texas Legislature
    Interim Report to the 86th Texas Legislature HOUSE COMMITTEE ON CRIMINAL JURISPRUDENCE January 2019 HOUSE COMMITTEE ON CRIMINAL JURISPRUDENCE T EXAS H OUSE OF R EPRESENTATIVES INTERIM REPORT 2018 Report & Recommendations for the 86th Texas Legislature Rep. Joe Moody Chair Ellic Sahualla Rachel Wetsel Bray Bergstrom Ellie Fossier Policy Director Committee Clerk Legal Intern Legal Intern C OMMITTEE ON C RIMINAL J URISPRUDENCE T EXAS H OUSE OF R EPRESENTATIVES J OE MOODY TODD HUNTER Chair Vice Chair January 23, 2019 The Honorable Joe Straus Speaker, Texas House of Representatives and Honorable Members of the Texas House of Representatives Texas Capitol, Rm. 2W.13 | Austin, TX 78701 re: Criminal Jurisprudence Interim Report 2018 Dear Mr. Speaker & Members: The House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence for the 85th Texas Legislature is proud to submit this interim report for the 86th Texas Legislature’s consideration. Respectfully, JOE MOODY Chair TODD HUNTER TERRY CANALES V ice-Chair BARBARA GERVIN-HAWKINS COLE HEFNER MIKE LANG TERRY WILSON C LERK: R ACHEL W ETSEL PO B OX: 2910 A USTIN, TX 78768 T ABLE OF C ONTENTS Preface ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 Committee & Charges --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2 Charge 1—Hurricane Harvey ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 4 Hearing --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    [Show full text]
  • Court of Criminal Appeals Judges
    COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS JUDGES Presiding Judge Sharon Keller was elected Presiding Judge in 2000 after serving as Judge on the Court of Criminal Appeals since 1995. From 1987 to 1994 she served as Assistant District Attorney in the Dallas County District Attorney's Office. She is a graduate of Rice University and Southern Methodist University School of Law. Presiding Judge Keller was the first woman on the Court of Criminal Appeals and the first to serve as Presiding Judge of the Court. Judge Michael Keasler was elected to the Court in 1998. In 1969 he was appointed Assistant District Attorney for Dallas County, where he served for twelve years. In 1981 he was appointed Judge of the 292nd District Court in Dallas, where he served for seventeen years. He is a graduate of the University of Texas and the University of Texas School of Law and served as Chair of the State Bar Judicial Section and the Texas Center for the Judiciary. COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS Judge Barbara Hervey was elected to the Court in 2000 after serving as an Assistant Criminal District SITTING AT Attorney in the Bexar County District Attorney's Office, Appellate Section, for sixteen years. She is a graduate of the University of North Carolina at Greensboro and St. Mary's University School of Law. TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW She currently serves as the Court’s liaison to the State Bar of Texas and was a Commissioner on the FORT WORTH, TEXAS National Commission on Forensic Science. Judge Elsa Alcalá was elected to the Court in 2012 after being appointed to the Court in 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • General Election by Precinct
    ----·- - ·---- 0 0 ELECTION DAY & EARLY CHAltlERS COUNTY. TEXAS OFFICIAL GENERAL ELECTION NOVElf!ER 7. 2006 RUN OATE:ll/14/06 06 : 12 PH REPORT ·EL30A PAGE 0001·01 0001 WALLISVILLE • 1 TOTAL VOTES t ELECTION DAY EARLY VOTING HAIL & MANUAL REGISTERED VOTERS · TOTAL • 676 BALLOTS CAST • TOTAL. 254 206 43 5 VOTER TURNOUT · TOTAL 37 .57 Straight Party VOTE Fill 1 REPUBLICAN PARTY (REP) 34 47 .B9 30 3 1 DEl«RATIC PARTY (OEM) 36 50 .70 33 3 0 LIBERTARIAN PARTY CLIBJ . 1 1.41 1 0 0 Total . 71 64 6 1 United States Senator CHAltlERS COUNTYWIOE VOTE Fill 1 Kay Bailey Hutchison (REPJ. 160 65 .31 123 32 5 Barbara Ann Radnofsky (OEH) 79 32.24 72 7 0 Scott Lanier Jameson (LIB). 6 2.45 4 2 0 Total . 245 199 41 5 US Representative . District 14 CHAM!ERS COUNTYWIDE VOTE FOR 1 Ron Paul CREPJ . 106 44 .92 B3 lB 5 Shane Sklar (OEM). 130 55 .08 108 22 0 Total • 236 191 40 5 Govenor CHAM!ERS COUNTYWIDE VOTE FOR 1 Rick Perry CREPJ . 74 29 . 72 56 16 2 Chris Be 11 CDEHJ . 66 26 .51 53 13 0 James Werner CLIBJ 1 .40 1 0 0 Richard "Kinky" Friedman 66 26 .51 57 8 1 Caro 1e Keeton Strayhorn. 42 16 .87 34 6 2 WRITE· IN Janes"Patriot" Dillon 0 0 0 0 Total • 249 201 43 5 Lieutenant Governor CHAMBERS COUNTYWIDE VOTE FOR 1 David Dewhurst (REP) . 153 63 .22 116 32 5 Maria Luisa Alvarado (OEHJ. 73 30 .17 67 6 0 Judy Baker (LIB) 16 6.61 13 3 0 Total .
    [Show full text]
  • Summer 2002 Inside This Issue ! 2002–2003 Leadership Nominations ! Welcome to Jury Duty ! Reflections While in the Zone
    The Official Publication of the Texas Center for the Judiciary Volume 29, Number 2 Summer 2002 Inside this Issue ! 2002–2003 Leadership Nominations ! Welcome to Jury Duty ! Reflections While in the Zone Plus Departments ! Making News ! Judge Mentality ! In Memoriam Recognize this judge? For answer, see PAGE 9. table of contents In Chambers Volume 29, Number 2 features Summer 2002 2002–2003 Leadership Nominations . 13 Editorial Board Chief Justice Marilyn Aboussie Resolutions & Bylaw Amendments . 13 3rd Court of Appeals, Austin Judge Manuel Banales Opinion About Opinion Writing . 15 105th District Court, Corpus Christi Welcome to Jury Duty . 06 Chief Justice Scott Brister 14th Court of Appeals, Houston First Texas College a Success . 16 Senior District Judge Sam W. Callan Dublin Castle Draws Women Judges to Ireland . 17 El Paso Justice Molly Francis Family Violence Training Requirements . 18 5th Court of Appeals, Dallas Name That Judge . 19 Texas Center for Judicial Campaign Speeches . 11 the Judiciary Staff Mari Kay Bickett Reflections While in the Zone . 12 Executive Director [email protected] Texas’ Newest Administrators of Justice . 13 Tana J. Petrich Associate Director departments [email protected] Betty Ann Hernandez Making News . 04 Administrative Assistant [email protected] Judge Mentality Shirley Irvin How do past experiences influence a judge’s ability to rule fairly? . 10 Assistant to the Director [email protected] In the Library . 12 Lacy Jemmott In Memoriam . 14 Registrar [email protected] Contributions and Memorials . 15 Carolyn Cheu Mitchel Program Attorney Looking Ahead . 16 [email protected] Cover photography courtesy of the San Antonio Convention & Visitors Bureau, Steve Moore.
    [Show full text]
  • Texas Supreme Court Historical Society Journal Is Proud to Publish Judge Elizabeth Ray’S Personal Remembrances of an American Icon, the Incredible Judge Sarah T
    Journal of the TEXAS SUPREME COURT HISTORICAL SOCIETY Summer 2015 Vol. 4, No. 4 General Editor Lynne Liberato Executive Editor David A. Furlow Columns Letter from the Outgoing President Fellows Column Executive Editor’s Page By Marie R. Yeates By David J. Beck By David A. Furlow I leave the presidency Seven Justices from the This issue of the Journal with a new appreciation Texas Supreme Court chronicles the evolution for the scope and impact joined the Fellows at the of women’s rights in of our programs and the third annual Fellows Texas over five centuries. people who make them Dinner for a wonderful Read more... David A. Furlow successful. Read more... Marie R. Yeates evening of art, dinner, David J. Beck and conversation. Read more... Reflections on the Message from the 2015-16 President By Ben L. Mesches Texas Equal Rights Amendment An Essay The Society will remain Photo Highlights from the Third Annual by Lynne Liberato keenly focused on The first time I voted projects that preserve the Fellows Dinner Photos by Mark Matson in a national election, I Court’s history, educate The Blanton Museum of voted for the Texas Equal the public, and encourage Art in Austin proved a Rights Amendment. lawyers to connect with delightful setting for this Read more... our collective history. Ben L Mesches year’s Fellows Dinner. Fellows Dinner Read more... Lynne Liberato Read more... attendees Executive Director’s Page By Pat Nester Under the leadership of David Furlow, the Society again presented compelling talks and materials at the Texas State Historical Association annual Pat Nester conference.
    [Show full text]
  • Lawyers Keep Texas Appeals Judges on Retainer
    Lowering the Bar: Lawyers Keep Texas Appeals Judges on Retainer ©Texans for Public Justice May 2003 Pamela Fridrich, the main researcher of this report, was assisted by Matthew Connolly, Bill Medaille and Andrew Wheat. Illustration and layout by Jason Stout. Copies of this report are available from: Texans for Public Justice 609 W. 18th St., Ste. E Austin, TX 78701 (512) 472-9770 [email protected] www.tpj.org Lowering the Bar: Lawyers Keep Texas Appeals Judges on Retainer I. Summary 1 II. Introduction: Appeals Courts Go Republican 2 III. Appeals Court Contributions At A Glance 4 A. Contributions By Election Cycle 4 B. Contributions By District 5 C. Contributions By Party 6 D. Candidates With More Money Usually Win 7 E. Competition Drives Contributions 9 F. Biggest War Chests 11 IV. Who Bankrolls the Justices? 12 A. Contributions By Donor Size 12 B. Lawyer Money Dominates 12 1. Dependency on Lawyer Money Is Increasing 13 2. Lawyer Dependency By District 13 3. Lawyer Dependency By Party 14 4. Lawyer-Dependency Rankings of Justices 15 5. Top Law Firm Donors 17 C. Contributions By Other Economic Interests 18 D. Top Non-Lawyer Donors 19 V. Appendix: Profiles of the 14 Districts 21 I. Summary The Elected Justices • Republicans—who had 44 of Texas’ 80 intermediate appeals court judges in 1997—held 61 of these posts by January 2003. Republicans benefited from: a conservative swing among Texas voters; having GOP governors appointing justices to fill uncompleted electoral terms; and having a Texas home boy lead the Republican presidential ticket in 2000.
    [Show full text]
  • Texas Law Judicial Clerks List
    Texas Law Judicial Clerks List This list includes Texas Law alumni who reported their clerkships to the Judicial Clerkship Program – or whose names were published in the Judicial Yellow Book or Martindale Hubbell – and includes those who clerked during the recent past for judges who are currently active. There are some judges and courts for which few Texas Law alumni have clerked – in these cases we have listed alumni who clerked further back or who clerked for judges who are no longer active. Dates following a law clerk or judge’s name indicate year of graduation from the University of Texas School of Law. Retired or deceased judges, or those who has been appointed to another court, are listed at the end of each court section and denoted (*). Those who wish to use the information on this list will need to independently verify the information being used. Federal Courts U.S. Supreme Court ............................................................................................................. 2 U.S. Circuit Courts of Appeals ............................................................................................. 3 First Circuit Second Circuit Third Circuit Fourth Circuit Fifth Circuit Sixth Circuit Seventh Circuit Eighth Circuit Ninth Circuit Tenth Circuit Eleventh Circuit Federal Circuit District of Columbia Circuit U.S. Courts of Limited Jurisdiction ...................................................................................... 9 Executive Office for Immigration Review U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces U.S. Court of Appeals for Veteran Claims U.S. Court of Federal Claims U.S. Court of International Trade U.S. Tax Court U.S. District Courts (listed alphabetically by state) ............................................................ 10 State Courts State Appellate Courts (listed alphabetically by state) ........................................................ 24 State District & County Courts (listed alphabetically by state) ..........................................
    [Show full text]