DOCSLIB.ORG

Quantum Fields and Probability

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Quantum Fields and Probability Quantum Fields and Probability Antti Kupiainen September 3, 2018 Contents 1 Introduction5 1.1 Background . .5 1.2 Overview . .5 2 Quantum Fields7 2.1 Examples . .7 2.1.1 Harmonic oscillator . .7 2.1.2 Phonon field theory - an infrared divergence . 10 2.1.3 Vibrating string - an ultraviolet divergence . 13 2.2 Second quantization . 15 2.2.1 Examples . 19 2.2.2 Free scalar field . 20 2.3 Interacting Fields . 22 3 Euclidean Quantum Field Theory 25 3.1 Wiener Measure . 26 3.2 Feynman-Kac formula . 27 3.3 Harmonic oscillator - Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process . 28 3.4 The free field . 29 4 Random Fields 31 4.1 The Ginzburg-Landau model . 31 4.2 Gaussian Integrals . 32 4.3 The Gaussian Ginzburg-Landau model . 33 4.4 Measures on s0 .................................. 35 4.4.1 Bochner's Theorem . 35 4.4.2 Cylinder measures . 36 4.4.3 Minlos Theorem . 37 4.5 Measures on S0 .................................. 41 4.6 Gaussian measures . 44 4.6.1 The Euclidean Free Feld . 44 4.6.2 Wick Formula . 45 5 From Random Fields to Quantum Fields 48 5.1 Reflection positivity . 48 5.2 Reflection positive Gaussian measures . 50 5.2.1 Example: harmonic oscillator and free field . 50 5.3 Reconstruction for Free Field . 51 5.3.1 Time zero fields . 51 5.3.2 Harmonic oscillator once more . 51 5.3.3 Free field . 53 5.3.4 Fock space . 53 2 6 Perturbation Theory 55 6.1 Regularization . 55 6.1.1 Momentum space regularization . 55 6.1.2 Scaling limit . 56 6.1.3 Lattice Regularization . 57 6.2 Gaussian critical point . 57 6.2.1 Massless case . 58 6.2.2 Massive case . 59 6.3 Perturbation Theory for the GL model . 60 6.3.1 Measures . 60 6.3.2 Perturbation Theory . 61 6.3.3 Feynman graphs . 61 6.3.4 Momentum space representation . 67 6.4 Infrared and Ultraviolet Divergences . 69 6.4.1 Infrared divergences . 70 6.4.2 Ultraviolet . 72 7 The renormalization group 76 7.1 The Block-spin Transformation . 76 7.1.1 Gaussian fixed point . 78 7.2 Transformations on Measures . 78 7.3 Transformations on Hamiltonians . 79 7.4 Fixed Points of RL ................................ 81 7.5 Linear Analysis around a Fixed Point: Critical Exponents . 83 7.6 Effective Field Theories . 84 7.7 Scaling limit . 86 7.8 Non-Scale Invariant Theories . 87 7.9 The Gaussian Fixed Point . 89 7.9.1 Block spin fixed point . 89 7.9.2 RG in Momentum Space . 90 8 Hierarchical model 93 8.1 Local RG transformation . 93 8.2 Linearization . 94 8.3 Perturbative analysis of the hierarchical RG . 95 8.4 d > 4: Gaussian critical point . 96 8.5 d = 4: Infrared asymptotic freedom . 97 8.5.1 Susceptibility divergence . 98 8.6 d < 4: Wilson-Fisher fixed point . 99 8.7 d < 4: Superrenormalizable QFT . 99 8.7.1 d =2 ................................... 101 8.7.2 d =3 ................................... 101 8.7.3 Infinite Volume Limit . 102 8.7.4 d " 4.................................... 102 8.7.5 d = 4: Triviality . 103 8.8 Nonperturbative analysis . 103 9 RG analysis of the Ginzburg Landau Model 107 9.1 Linear RG . 107 9.2 The space of local Hamiltonians . 109 9.3 Perturbative analysis of RV ........................... 112 9.4 Iteration . 114 9.4.1 d > 4................................... 115 9.4.2 d =4................................... 116 3 9.4.3 d = 4 − : anomalous scaling . 117 9.4.4 Other fixed points for d < 4....................... 119 9.5 Quantum Field Theories . 119 9.5.1 Effective Field Theories . 119 9.5.2 Polchinski equation . 121 9.5.3 Superrenormalizable QFT . 122 9.5.4 d < 4: nontrivial fixed points . 122 9.5.5 Asymptotic Freedom . 123 10 Stochastic PDE's with Rough Noise 125 10.1 Stochastic Differential Equations and Stochastic Quantization . 125 10.2 Linear case: Gaussian Process . 125 10.3 Nonlinear SDE: Local existence . 125 10.4 Perturbation Theory . 125 10.5 Rough SPDE's . 125 10.5.1 Dimensionless variables . 126 10.5.2 Hierarchical SPDE . 127 10.5.3 Effective equations . 127 10.5.4 Dimensionless formulation . 128 10.5.5 RG for SPDE . 128 10.5.6 Linearized RG map . 131 10.5.7 RG iteration, d =2............................ 133 A Some functional analysis 135 B Perron-Frobenius theorem 136 4 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 Background Quantum Field Theory (QFT) has become a universal framework to study physical systems with infinite number of degrees of freedom. Originally developed for high energy physics it lead to the explanation of universality in phase transitions using the Renormalization Group (RG), a powerful method to study scale invariant problems. QFT and RG ideas were thereafter applied to noisy systems, dynamical systems, non-equilibrium systems and many other problems. Early on QFT was also acknowledged as an interesting problem for mathematicians. This lead first to axiomatic characterizations of what sort of mathematical object QFT is and in then to Constructive QFT and the use of probabilistic methods to produce concrete examples of QFT. These techniques were then used in rigorous statistical mechanics and disordered systems. Following the pioneering work of Belavin, Polyakov and Zamoldchikov [?] a beautiful class of QFTs was uncovered by physicists, the two dimensional Conformal Field Theories (CFT). They have inspired a lot of new ideas in mathematics: the Schramm-Loewner Evolution (SLE) and Liouville Quantum Gravity and the theory of random surfaces. In Stochastic Partial Differential Equations (SPDE) physicists had also used QFT to study universality, a notable example being the Kardar-Parisi-Zhang (KPZ) equation where exact non-conventional scaling behavior was uncovered. KPZ and related equations posed hard problems for analysis due to the combination of a very singular noise and nonlinearity. Decisive progress was achieved here by Martin Hairer who introduced QFT ideas on renormalization to their mathematical analysis [?]. 1.2 Overview In quantum mechanics, a system is determined by giving all its possible states, observables and the time evolution. The possible states form a Hilbert space H, while the observables are given by self-adjoint operators A on this space. These operators evolve in time as eitH=~Ae−itH=~ for some positive opertaor H, called the Hamiltonian. In quantum field theory, one considers fields '(t; ~x) that are operators1 on the Hilbert d−1 space H. Here t 2 R is the time component and ~x 2 R is a point in space (d = 4 being the physical case). In general, these fields can be spinors, vectors etc., but we will mostly consider scalar fields: '(t; ~x) 2 R. The fields evolve in time as '(t; ~x) = eitH=~'(0; ~x)e−itH=~ (1.1) Additionally, one postulates the existence of a vacuum vector 0 2 H by H 0 = 0. The 1in fact operator valued distribution, see Sect.?? 5 basic objects of an axiomatic approach to QFT are then the Wightman functions: Wn(z1; :::; zn) = ( 0;'(z1):::'(zn) 0) for zi = (ti; ~xi). Finally, H carries a representation of the symmetries of the system: e.g. in a relativistic theory the Poincar´egroup. The positivity of the Hamiltonian and the time evolution (1.1) allow to analytically continue the Wightman functions to `imaginary time'. The substitution τ ! −iτ gives the so-called Schwinger functions Sn: Sn (τ1; ~x1); :::; (τn; ~xn) = Wn (−iτ1; ~x1); :::; (−iτn; ~xn) The point of this substitution is that the Schwinger functions can be written as correlation functions: Sn (τ1; ~x1); :::; (τn; ~xn) = E '(τ1; ~x1):::'(τn; ~xn) where '(τ; ~x) is a random field on some probability space Ω. This viewpoint also leads to constructive QFT: construct nontrivial random fields and the reconstruct the quantum fields by analytic continuation. The latter turns out to be possible under a condition on the random fields, so-called reflection positivity, see Section5. The imaginary time formulation of QFT is called Euclidean QFT. Finally, there is a deep connection between Euclidean quantum field theory and sta- tistical physics. In statistical physics, one often considers.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory
    AN INTRODUCTION TO QUANTUM FIELD THEORY By Dr M Dasgupta University of Manchester Lecture presented at the School for Experimental High Energy Physics Students Somerville College, Oxford, September 2009 - 1 - - 2 - Contents 0 Prologue....................................................................................................... 5 1 Introduction ................................................................................................ 6 1.1 Lagrangian formalism in classical mechanics......................................... 6 1.2 Quantum mechanics................................................................................... 8 1.3 The Schrödinger picture........................................................................... 10 1.4 The Heisenberg picture............................................................................ 11 1.5 The quantum mechanical harmonic oscillator ..................................... 12 Problems .............................................................................................................. 13 2 Classical Field Theory............................................................................. 14 2.1 From N-point mechanics to field theory ............................................... 14 2.2 Relativistic field theory ............................................................................ 15 2.3 Action for a scalar field ............................................................................ 15 2.4 Plane wave solution to the Klein-Gordon equation ...........................
    [Show full text]
  • Quantum Field Theory*
    Quantum Field Theory y Frank Wilczek Institute for Advanced Study, School of Natural Science, Olden Lane, Princeton, NJ 08540 I discuss the general principles underlying quantum eld theory, and attempt to identify its most profound consequences. The deep est of these consequences result from the in nite number of degrees of freedom invoked to implement lo cality.Imention a few of its most striking successes, b oth achieved and prosp ective. Possible limitation s of quantum eld theory are viewed in the light of its history. I. SURVEY Quantum eld theory is the framework in which the regnant theories of the electroweak and strong interactions, which together form the Standard Mo del, are formulated. Quantum electro dynamics (QED), b esides providing a com- plete foundation for atomic physics and chemistry, has supp orted calculations of physical quantities with unparalleled precision. The exp erimentally measured value of the magnetic dip ole moment of the muon, 11 (g 2) = 233 184 600 (1680) 10 ; (1) exp: for example, should b e compared with the theoretical prediction 11 (g 2) = 233 183 478 (308) 10 : (2) theor: In quantum chromo dynamics (QCD) we cannot, for the forseeable future, aspire to to comparable accuracy.Yet QCD provides di erent, and at least equally impressive, evidence for the validity of the basic principles of quantum eld theory. Indeed, b ecause in QCD the interactions are stronger, QCD manifests a wider variety of phenomena characteristic of quantum eld theory. These include esp ecially running of the e ective coupling with distance or energy scale and the phenomenon of con nement.
    [Show full text]
  • Feynman Diagrams, Momentum Space Feynman Rules, Disconnected Diagrams, Higher Correlation Functions
    PHY646 - Quantum Field Theory and the Standard Model Even Term 2020 Dr. Anosh Joseph, IISER Mohali LECTURE 05 Tuesday, January 14, 2020 Topics: Feynman Diagrams, Momentum Space Feynman Rules, Disconnected Diagrams, Higher Correlation Functions. Feynman Diagrams We can use the Wick’s theorem to express the n-point function h0jT fφ(x1)φ(x2) ··· φ(xn)gj0i as a sum of products of Feynman propagators. We will be interested in developing a diagrammatic interpretation of such expressions. Let us look at the expression containing four fields. We have h0jT fφ1φ2φ3φ4g j0i = DF (x1 − x2)DF (x3 − x4) +DF (x1 − x3)DF (x2 − x4) +DF (x1 − x4)DF (x2 − x3): (1) We can interpret Eq. (1) as the sum of three diagrams, if we represent each of the points, x1 through x4 by a dot, and each factor DF (x − y) by a line joining x to y. These diagrams are called Feynman diagrams. In Fig. 1 we provide the diagrammatic interpretation of Eq. (1). The interpretation of the diagrams is the following: particles are created at two spacetime points, each propagates to one of the other points, and then they are annihilated. This process can happen in three different ways, and they correspond to the three ways to connect the points in pairs, as shown in the three diagrams in Fig. 1. Thus the total amplitude for the process is the sum of these three diagrams. PHY646 - Quantum Field Theory and the Standard Model Even Term 2020 ⟨0|T {ϕ1ϕ2ϕ3ϕ4}|0⟩ = DF(x1 − x2)DF(x3 − x4) + DF(x1 − x3)DF(x2 − x4) +DF(x1 − x4)DF(x2 − x3) 1 2 1 2 1 2 + + 3 4 3 4 3 4 Figure 1: Diagrammatic interpretation of Eq.
    [Show full text]
  • An Introduction to Supersymmetry
    An Introduction to Supersymmetry Ulrich Theis Institute for Theoretical Physics, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Max-Wien-Platz 1, D–07743 Jena, Germany [email protected] This is a write-up of a series of five introductory lectures on global supersymmetry in four dimensions given at the 13th “Saalburg” Summer School 2007 in Wolfersdorf, Germany. Contents 1 Why supersymmetry? 1 2 Weyl spinors in D=4 4 3 The supersymmetry algebra 6 4 Supersymmetry multiplets 6 5 Superspace and superfields 9 6 Superspace integration 11 7 Chiral superfields 13 8 Supersymmetric gauge theories 17 9 Supersymmetry breaking 22 10 Perturbative non-renormalization theorems 26 A Sigma matrices 29 1 Why supersymmetry? When the Large Hadron Collider at CERN takes up operations soon, its main objective, besides confirming the existence of the Higgs boson, will be to discover new physics beyond the standard model of the strong and electroweak interactions. It is widely believed that what will be found is a (at energies accessible to the LHC softly broken) supersymmetric extension of the standard model. What makes supersymmetry such an attractive feature that the majority of the theoretical physics community is convinced of its existence? 1 First of all, under plausible assumptions on the properties of relativistic quantum field theories, supersymmetry is the unique extension of the algebra of Poincar´eand internal symmtries of the S-matrix. If new physics is based on such an extension, it must be supersymmetric. Furthermore, the quantum properties of supersymmetric theories are much better under control than in non-supersymmetric ones, thanks to powerful non- renormalization theorems.
    [Show full text]
  • Ergodicity and Metric Transitivity
    Chapter 25 Ergodicity and Metric Transitivity Section 25.1 explains the ideas of ergodicity (roughly, there is only one invariant set of positive measure) and metric transivity (roughly, the system has a positive probability of going from any- where to anywhere), and why they are (almost) the same. Section 25.2 gives some examples of ergodic systems. Section 25.3 deduces some consequences of ergodicity, most im- portantly that time averages have deterministic limits ( 25.3.1), and an asymptotic approach to independence between even§ts at widely separated times ( 25.3.2), admittedly in a very weak sense. § 25.1 Metric Transitivity Definition 341 (Ergodic Systems, Processes, Measures and Transfor- mations) A dynamical system Ξ, , µ, T is ergodic, or an ergodic system or an ergodic process when µ(C) = 0 orXµ(C) = 1 for every T -invariant set C. µ is called a T -ergodic measure, and T is called a µ-ergodic transformation, or just an ergodic measure and ergodic transformation, respectively. Remark: Most authorities require a µ-ergodic transformation to also be measure-preserving for µ. But (Corollary 54) measure-preserving transforma- tions are necessarily stationary, and we want to minimize our stationarity as- sumptions. So what most books call “ergodic”, we have to qualify as “stationary and ergodic”. (Conversely, when other people talk about processes being “sta- tionary and ergodic”, they mean “stationary with only one ergodic component”; but of that, more later. Definition 342 (Metric Transitivity) A dynamical system is metrically tran- sitive, metrically indecomposable, or irreducible when, for any two sets A, B n ∈ , if µ(A), µ(B) > 0, there exists an n such that µ(T − A B) > 0.
    [Show full text]
  • Defining Physics at Imaginary Time: Reflection Positivity for Certain
    Defining physics at imaginary time: reflection positivity for certain Riemannian manifolds A thesis presented by Christian Coolidge Anderson [email protected] (978) 204-7656 to the Department of Mathematics in partial fulfillment of the requirements for an honors degree. Advised by Professor Arthur Jaffe. Harvard University Cambridge, Massachusetts March 2013 Contents 1 Introduction 1 2 Axiomatic quantum field theory 2 3 Definition of reflection positivity 4 4 Reflection positivity on a Riemannian manifold M 7 4.1 Function space E over M ..................... 7 4.2 Reflection on M .......................... 10 4.3 Reflection positive inner product on E+ ⊂ E . 11 5 The Osterwalder-Schrader construction 12 5.1 Quantization of operators . 13 5.2 Examples of quantizable operators . 14 5.3 Quantization domains . 16 5.4 The Hamiltonian . 17 6 Reflection positivity on the level of group representations 17 6.1 Weakened quantization condition . 18 6.2 Symmetric local semigroups . 19 6.3 A unitary representation for Glor . 20 7 Construction of reflection positive measures 22 7.1 Nuclear spaces . 23 7.2 Construction of nuclear space over M . 24 7.3 Gaussian measures . 27 7.4 Construction of Gaussian measure . 28 7.5 OS axioms for the Gaussian measure . 30 8 Reflection positivity for the Laplacian covariance 31 9 Reflection positivity for the Dirac covariance 34 9.1 Introduction to the Dirac operator . 35 9.2 Proof of reflection positivity . 38 10 Conclusion 40 11 Appendix A: Cited theorems 40 12 Acknowledgments 41 1 Introduction Two concepts dominate contemporary physics: relativity and quantum me- chanics. They unite to describe the physics of interacting particles, which live in relativistic spacetime while exhibiting quantum behavior.
    [Show full text]
  • PHY 2404S Lecture Notes
    PHY 2404S Lecture Notes Michael Luke Winter, 2003 These notes are perpetually under construction. Please let me know of any typos or errors. Once again, large portions of these notes have been plagiarized from Sidney Coleman’s field theory lectures from Harvard, written up by Brian Hill. 1 Contents 1 Preliminaries 3 1.1 Counterterms and Divergences: A Simple Example . 3 1.2 CountertermsinScalarFieldTheory . 11 2 Reformulating Scattering Theory 18 2.1 Feynman Diagrams with External Lines off the Mass Shell . .. 18 2.1.1 AnswerOne: PartofaLargerDiagram . 19 2.1.2 Answer Two: The Fourier Transform of a Green Function 20 2.1.3 Answer Three: The VEV of a String of Heisenberg Fields 22 2.2 GreenFunctionsandFeynmanDiagrams. 23 2.3 TheLSZReductionFormula . 27 2.3.1 ProofoftheLSZReductionFormula . 29 3 Renormalizing Scalar Field Theory 36 3.1 The Two-Point Function: Wavefunction Renormalization .... 37 3.2 The Analytic Structure of G(2), and1PIGreenFunctions . 40 3.3 Calculation of Π(k2) to order g2 .................. 44 3.4 The definition of g .......................... 50 3.5 Unstable Particles and the Optical Theorem . 51 3.6 Renormalizability. 57 4 Renormalizability 60 4.1 DegreesofDivergence . 60 4.2 RenormalizationofQED. 65 4.2.1 TroubleswithVectorFields . 65 4.2.2 Counterterms......................... 66 2 1 Preliminaries 1.1 Counterterms and Divergences: A Simple Example In the last semester we considered a variety of field theories, and learned to calculate scattering amplitudes at leading order in perturbation theory. Unfor- tunately, although things were fine as far as we went, the whole basis of our scattering theory had a gaping hole in it.
    [Show full text]
  • Finite Quantum Field Theory and Renormalization Group
    Finite Quantum Field Theory and Renormalization Group M. A. Greena and J. W. Moffata;b aPerimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics, Waterloo, Ontario N2L 2Y5, Canada bDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario N2L 3G1, Canada September 15, 2021 Abstract Renormalization group methods are applied to a scalar field within a finite, nonlocal quantum field theory formulated perturbatively in Euclidean momentum space. It is demonstrated that the triviality problem in scalar field theory, the Higgs boson mass hierarchy problem and the stability of the vacuum do not arise as issues in the theory. The scalar Higgs field has no Landau pole. 1 Introduction An alternative version of the Standard Model (SM), constructed using an ultraviolet finite quantum field theory with nonlocal field operators, was investigated in previous work [1]. In place of Dirac delta-functions, δ(x), the theory uses distributions (x) based on finite width Gaussians. The Poincar´eand gauge invariant model adapts perturbative quantumE field theory (QFT), with a finite renormalization, to yield finite quantum loops. For the weak interactions, SU(2) U(1) is treated as an ab initio broken symmetry group with non- zero masses for the W and Z intermediate× vector bosons and for left and right quarks and leptons. The model guarantees the stability of the vacuum. Two energy scales, ΛM and ΛH , were introduced; the rate of asymptotic vanishing of all coupling strengths at vertices not involving the Higgs boson is controlled by ΛM , while ΛH controls the vanishing of couplings to the Higgs. Experimental tests of the model, using future linear or circular colliders, were proposed.
    [Show full text]
  • ERGODIC THEORY and ENTROPY Contents 1. Introduction 1 2
    ERGODIC THEORY AND ENTROPY JACOB FIEDLER Abstract. In this paper, we introduce the basic notions of ergodic theory, starting with measure-preserving transformations and culminating in as a statement of Birkhoff's ergodic theorem and a proof of some related results. Then, consideration of whether Bernoulli shifts are measure-theoretically iso- morphic motivates the notion of measure-theoretic entropy. The Kolmogorov- Sinai theorem is stated to aid in calculation of entropy, and with this tool, Bernoulli shifts are reexamined. Contents 1. Introduction 1 2. Measure-Preserving Transformations 2 3. Ergodic Theory and Basic Examples 4 4. Birkhoff's Ergodic Theorem and Applications 9 5. Measure-Theoretic Isomorphisms 14 6. Measure-Theoretic Entropy 17 Acknowledgements 22 References 22 1. Introduction In 1890, Henri Poincar´easked under what conditions points in a given set within a dynamical system would return to that set infinitely many times. As it turns out, under certain conditions almost every point within the original set will return repeatedly. We must stipulate that the dynamical system be modeled by a measure space equipped with a certain type of transformation T :(X; B; m) ! (X; B; m). We denote the set we are interested in as B 2 B, and let B0 be the set of all points in B that return to B infinitely often (meaning that for a point b 2 B, T m(b) 2 B for infinitely many m). Then we can be assured that m(B n B0) = 0. This result will be proven at the end of Section 2 of this paper. In other words, only a null set of points strays from a given set permanently.
    [Show full text]
  • U(1) Symmetry of the Complex Scalar and Scalar Electrodynamics
    Fall 2019: Classical Field Theory (PH6297) U(1) Symmetry of the complex scalar and scalar electrodynamics August 27, 2019 1 Global U(1) symmetry of the complex field theory & associated Noether charge Consider the complex scalar field theory, defined by the action, h i h i I Φ(x); Φy(x) = d4x (@ Φ)y @µΦ − V ΦyΦ : (1) ˆ µ As we have noted earlier complex scalar field theory action Eq. (1) is invariant under multiplication by a constant complex phase factor ei α, Φ ! Φ0 = e−i αΦ; Φy ! Φ0y = ei αΦy: (2) The phase,α is necessarily a real number. Since a complex phase is unitary 1 × 1 matrix i.e. the complex conjugation is also the inverse, y −1 e−i α = e−i α ; such phases are also called U(1) factors (U stands for Unitary matrix and since a number is a 1×1 matrix, U(1) is unitary matrix of size 1 × 1). Since this symmetry transformation does not touch spacetime but only changes the fields, such a symmetry is called an internal symmetry. Also note that since α is a constant i.e. not a function of spacetime, it is a global symmetry (global = same everywhere = independent of spacetime location). Check: Under the U(1) symmetry Eq. (2), the combination ΦyΦ is obviously invariant, 0 Φ0yΦ = ei αΦy e−i αΦ = ΦyΦ: This implies any function of the product ΦyΦ is also invariant. 0 V Φ0yΦ = V ΦyΦ : Note that this is true whether α is a constant or a function of spacetime i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Vacuum Energy
    Vacuum Energy Mark D. Roberts, 117 Queen’s Road, Wimbledon, London SW19 8NS, Email:[email protected] http://cosmology.mth.uct.ac.za/ roberts ∼ February 1, 2008 Eprint: hep-th/0012062 Comments: A comprehensive review of Vacuum Energy, which is an extended version of a poster presented at L¨uderitz (2000). This is not a review of the cosmolog- ical constant per se, but rather vacuum energy in general, my approach to the cosmological constant is not standard. Lots of very small changes and several additions for the second and third versions: constructive feedback still welcome, but the next version will be sometime in coming due to my sporadiac internet access. First Version 153 pages, 368 references. Second Version 161 pages, 399 references. arXiv:hep-th/0012062v3 22 Jul 2001 Third Version 167 pages, 412 references. The 1999 PACS Physics and Astronomy Classification Scheme: http://publish.aps.org/eprint/gateway/pacslist 11.10.+x, 04.62.+v, 98.80.-k, 03.70.+k; The 2000 Mathematical Classification Scheme: http://www.ams.org/msc 81T20, 83E99, 81Q99, 83F05. 3 KEYPHRASES: Vacuum Energy, Inertial Mass, Principle of Equivalence. 1 Abstract There appears to be three, perhaps related, ways of approaching the nature of vacuum energy. The first is to say that it is just the lowest energy state of a given, usually quantum, system. The second is to equate vacuum energy with the Casimir energy. The third is to note that an energy difference from a complete vacuum might have some long range effect, typically this energy difference is interpreted as the cosmological constant.
    [Show full text]
  • Reference International Centre for C), Theoretical Physics
    IC/88/346 REFERENCE INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR C), THEORETICAL PHYSICS ZETA FUNCTION REGULARIZATION OF QUANTUM FIELD THEORY A.Y. Shiekh INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY UNITED NATIONS EDUCATIONAL, SCIENTIFIC AND CULTURAL ORGANIZATION IC/88/346 §1 Introduction International Atomic Energy Agency and United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization In generalizing quantum mechanics to quantum field theory one is generally INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR THEORETICAL PHYSICS confronted with a scheme plagued by infinities. If one is to make sense of such an ailment, one must find a way to deal with those infinities. In the usual interpretation this difficulty is viewed as stemming from not having yet accounted for the self- interactions which modify the masses and coupling constants to their observed values. A sensible strategy, in order to be useful, must result in only a finite ZETA FUNCTION REGULARIZATION number of physical constants being left, undetermined. Not all theories can be dealt OF QUANTUM FIELD THEORY * with in this way; which has the beneficial consequence of eliminating certain, otherwise prospective, theories of nature. This follows the line of reasoning that physics is more than descriptive, but predictive by virtue of being limited by the A.Y. Shiekh "" requirement of consistency. International Centra foe Theoretical Physics, Tri.fste, Ltaly, In order to proceed with such a theory, the infinities must be restrained (regulated) while the self-interactions are accounted for. Visiting a different space- time dimension is a popular way to regulate (dimensional regularization) as it explicitly maintains the theory's covariance, which may otherwise be difficult to hold on to during reckoning for the self-interactions (renormalization).
    [Show full text]