DOCSLIB.ORG

Stabilization of the Dungeness Ruins Environmental Assessment 2004

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Stabilization of the Dungeness Ruins Environmental Assessment 2004 Stabilization of the Dungeness Ruins Cumberland Island National Seashore DRAFT Environmental Assessment February 2004 EDAW Prepared for: The National Park Service i TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................................ ii 1.0 PURPOSE OF AND NEED FOR ACTION ............................................................................. 6 1.1 Purpose and Significance of the Park .................................................................................... 6 1.2 Project Background and Scope .............................................................................................. 6 1.3 Relationship to Other Planning Projects ................................................................................ 7 1.4 Issues and Impact Topics ....................................................................................................... 8 Issues Evaluated in Detail ....................................................................................................... 8 Derivation of Impact Topics ................................................................................................... 8 Impact Topics Included in This Document ............................................................................. 8 Impact Topics Dismissed from Further Analysis ................................................................... 9 2.0 PREFERRED ACTION AND ALTERNATIVES ............................................................... 11 Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 11 2.1 Description of Alternatives .................................................................................................. 11 Alternative A (No Action) .................................................................................................... 11 Alternative B (Preferred) ...................................................................................................... 11 Alternative C (Comprehensive) ............................................................................................ 12 Environmentally Preferred Alternative ................................................................................. 13 2.2 Staging Area ........................................................................................................................ 14 2.3 Mitigation Measures of the Preferred Alternative ............................................................... 15 Natural Resources ................................................................................................................. 15 Cultural Resources ................................................................................................................ 15 2.4 Sustainability ....................................................................................................................... 15 2.5 General Construction Schedule and Costs ........................................................................... 16 2.6 Alternatives Considered, But Dismissed ............................................................................. 17 2.7 Impact Comparison Matrix .................................................................................................. 17 3.0 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT .............................................................................................. 19 3.1 General Environmental Setting ........................................................................................... 19 3.2 Natural Resources ................................................................................................................ 19 Vegetation and Wildlife ........................................................................................................ 19 Threatened and Endangered Species .................................................................................... 21 Field Definitions ................................................................................................................... 23 Attribute Definitions ............................................................................................................. 24 Soils....................................................................................................................................... 25 3.3 Visitor Use and Experience ................................................................................................. 25 Visitation Patterns ................................................................................................................. 25 Visitor Experience/Activities ................................................................................................ 26 Interpretation ......................................................................................................................... 26 3.4 Cultural, Historic, and Archeological Resources ................................................................ 27 Historic, Archeological and Ethnographic Resources .......................................................... 27 Cultural Landscapes .............................................................................................................. 27 Listed Properties on the National Register of Historic Places .............................................. 27 3.5 Seashore Operations ............................................................................................................ 28 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES ............................................................................. 29 4.1 General Environmental Effect ............................................................................................. 29 ii 4.2 Natural Resources ................................................................................................................ 30 Vegetation & Wildlife........................................................................................................... 30 Threatened and Endangered Species .................................................................................... 30 Soils....................................................................................................................................... 31 4.3 Visitor Use and Experience ................................................................................................. 31 Visitation Patterns ................................................................................................................. 31 Visitor Experience/Activities ................................................................................................ 32 Interpretation ......................................................................................................................... 33 Human-Caused Sound .......................................................................................................... 34 4.4 Cultural, Historic, and Archeological Resources ................................................................ 35 Historic, Archeological and Ethnographic Resources .......................................................... 35 Cultural Landscapes .............................................................................................................. 35 Listed Properties on the National Register of Historic Places .............................................. 36 Section 106 Assessment ........................................................................................................ 36 4.5 Seashore Operations ............................................................................................................ 37 5.0 LIST OF PREPARERS........................................................................................................... 38 6.0 CONSULTATION AND COORDINATION ........................................................................ 38 Public Review ....................................................................................................................... 38 Agency Consultation List ..................................................................................................... 38 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 Map of Cumberland Island Figure 2 Map of Dungeness Historic District LIST OF TABLES Table 1 Preferred Action Table 2 Comprehensive Action Table 3 Summary of Direct and Indirect Impacts for Alternatives Considered Table 4 Plants Table 5 Animals Table 6 Federal Status Attribute Definitions Table 7 State Status Attribute Definitions Table 8 GA-DNR Global Rank Table 9 GA-DNR State Rank Table 10 Dungeness Historic Structures Table 11 National Register Information System iii This Draft Environmental Assessment (EA) evaluates alternatives and associated environmental impacts arising out of the proposed stabilization of the Dungeness Ruins located at Cumberland Island National Seashore (CUIS). Comments and Availability Comments on this draft EA for the Stabilization of the Dungeness Ruins on Cumberland Island National Seashore must be delivered or postmarked no later than April 15, 2004. If you wish to comment on this draft EA, you may mail comments to the name and address below. Our practice is to make comments, including names and home addresses, available for public review during regular business hours. Individual respondents may request that we withhold their names and/or home address from the record, which we will honor to the extent allowable by law.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Gaust75003.Pdf
    COPYRIGHT 1975 By Hilburn 0. Hillestad and John R. Bozeman THE ECOLOGY OF THE CUMBERLANDISLAND NATIONAL SEASHORE CAMDEN COUNTY' GEORGIA By 1 Hilburn 0. Hillestad 2 John R. Bozeman 1 A. Sydney Johnson 3 C. Wayne Berisford 4 J. I. Richardson May 1975 Report to National Park Service under contract number 1910P2ll57 to the Institute of Natural Resources The U. S. Government is authorized to produce and distribute reprints for governmentalpurposes not withstanding any copyright notation that may appear hereon. 1 Institute of Natural Resources,University of Georgia, Athens 2 Department of Biology, Georgia Southern College, Statesboro 3 Department of Entomology, University of Georgia, Athens 4 Department of Zoology, University of Georgia, Athens PREFACE A study of this scope must draw upon a variety of disciplines and requires the cooperation of numerous agencies and their personnel. We gratefully acknowledge the organizations which provided equipment and services and those persons who generously contributed in various ways to this report. The National Park Service initiated the study with a grant Contract Number 1910P21157! to the Institute of Natural Resources, University of Georgia. This grant supported much of the field work. Primary financial support was provided by the Institute of Natural Resources. This report is published as a part of the Georgia Marine Science Center's Technical Report series under Sea Grant ¹04-5-158-4, issued by the Georgia Sea Grant Program. The U. S. Government is authorized to pro- duce and distribute reprints for governmental purposes notwithstanding any copyright notation that may appear hereon. S. P. Weems, R. Herman and J.
    [Show full text]
  • A Thatched Cabin on Cumberland Island, Georgia Mary R
    African Diaspora Archaeology Newsletter Volume 13 Article 4 Issue 3 September 2010 9-1-2010 A Thatched Cabin on Cumberland Island, Georgia Mary R. Bullard Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/adan Recommended Citation Bullard, Mary R. (2010) "A Thatched Cabin on Cumberland Island, Georgia," African Diaspora Archaeology Newsletter: Vol. 13 : Iss. 3 , Article 4. Available at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/adan/vol13/iss3/4 This Articles, Essays, and Reports is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in African Diaspora Archaeology Newsletter by an authorized editor of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Bullard: A Thatched Cabin on Cumberland Island, Georgia Omer Cooper J (1971) September 2010 Newsletter A Thatched Cabin on Cumberland Island, Georgia By Mary R. Bullard* I wait for the Lord, my soul waits, and in his word I hope; My soul waits for the Lord more than watchmen for the morning. -- Psalm 130, verse 6 Contents 1. A Thatched Cabin 6. Primus‟s Religion 2. Primus Mitchell 7. Interpretation of a Stereoview 3. Cumberland‟s Great Inland Swamp 8. Conclusion 4. Cumberland in Wartime References Cited 5. Post-War Problems Appendix A 1. A Thatched Cabin It all started with the scene shown in Figure 1. While viewing photographs in the Print Department of the New-York Historical Society, in October 1987, I came across an eye-catching, undated stereoview. Handwritten on its reverse side was “Camden County, off Georgia Coast” and “Thatched Cabin, Cumberland Island.” No photographer was credited; the photo bears two different handwritings, one in ink, and one in pencil (Wendy Shadwell, Curator of Prints, New- York Historical Society, pers.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Coastal Water Resources and Watershed Conditions at Cumberland Island National Seashore, Georgia
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Water Resources Division Technical Report NPS/NRWRD/NRTR-2005/332 Natural Resource Program Center ASSESSMENT OF COASTAL WATER RESOURCES AND WATERSHED CONDITIONS AT CUMBERLAND ISLAND NATIONAL SEASHORE, GEORGIA Merryl Alber, Janice Flory, and Karen Payne The National Park Service Water Resources Division is responsible for providing water resources management policy and guidelines, planning, technical assistance, training, and operational support to units of the National Park System. Program areas include water rights, water resources planning, regulatory guidance and review, hydrology, water quality, watershed management, watershed studies, and aquatic ecology. Technical Reports The National Park Service disseminates the results of biological, physical, and social research through the Natural Resources Technical Report Series. Natural resources inventories and monitoring activities, scientific literature reviews, bibliographies, and proceedings of technical workshops and conferences are also disseminated through this series. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use by the National Park Service. Copies of this report are available from the following: National Park Service (970) 225-3500 Water Resources Division 1201 Oak Ridge Drive, Suite 250 Fort Collins, CO 80525 National Park Service (303) 969-2130 Technical Information Center Denver Service Center P.O. Box 25287 Denver, CO 80225-0287 ii Assessment of Coastal Water Resources
    [Show full text]
  • Notes to Pages 2–16
    Abbreviations and Short Citations CINS Cumberland Island National Seashore, St. Marys, Ga. CPSU Cooperative Park Studies Unit DSC Denver Service Center of the National Park Service, Denver Ga. Archives Georgia Archives, Atlanta NA National Archives, College Park, Md. NPS National Park Service SERO Southeast Regional Office of the National Park Service, Atlanta Thornton Morris Papers Thornton Morris Papers, Morris Law Firm, Atlanta UGa University of Georgia, Athens Introduction 1. The concept of “biography of place” is a useful means by which historical geographers focus on place as a complex entity formed by diverse processes that dynamically changes through time. An early example of this term’s use can be found in Marwyn S. Samuels, 1979, “The Biography of Landscape,” in Ordinary Places, ed. Donald W. Meinig (New York: Oxford Univ. Press), 51–88. Later works include William Wyckoff, 1988, The Developer’s Frontier: The Making of the West- ern New York Landscape (New Haven: Yale Univ. Press), and Gay M. Gomez, 1998, A Wetland Biography: Seasons on Louisiana’s Chenier Plain (Austin: Univ. of Texas Press). 2. A voluminous literature exists on the national park system and its man- agement. Classic overviews include Ronald A. Foresta, 1984, America’s National Parks and Their Keepers (Washington, D.C.: Resources for the Future); Alfred Runte, 1987, National Parks: The American Experience, 2d ed. (Lincoln: Univ. of Nebraska Press); Richard West Sellars, 1997, Preserving Nature in the National Parks: A History (New Haven: Yale Univ. Press); and Conrad L. Wirth, 1980, Parks, Politics, and People (Norman: Univ. of Oklahoma Press). More specific works on managing preexisting land uses, private holdings, and park threats include John C.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Fire Management Plan
    Cumberland Island National Seashore North Cut Rx, July 2019 Fire Management Plan January 2015 Updated 2021 1 2 FIRE MANAGEMENT PLAN (FMP) ANNUAL UPDATE CHECKLIST PARK NAME: Cumberland Island National Seashore YEAR OF UPDATE: 2021 National Park Service (NPS) Policy Requirement. Fire management plans do not expire and remain in effect until superseded by a new or revised plan. However, annual updates are required in order for the plan to be valid for the current year. Changes in the step-up plan, FMP terminology, cooperative agreements and the multi- year fuels treatment plan are examples of FMP sections that are often updated through the annual review process. Directions. Please ensure that you are reviewing and updating the current signed FMP. Review the items in the Annual FMP Update Checklist. Where no update is required, check “No Update Needed: Reviewed and Current”. If there are updates needed, check “Update Needed: Changes made in FMP” and describe the changes made in the space provided in each row of the checklist and include FMP section/appendix. Notify the Regional Fire Planner when the Annual FMP Update Checklist and FMP revisions are completed. Once the Annual Update Checklist is completed and all suggested changes have been vetted through the appropriate fire management and park staff, the Superintendent must sign the FMP Annual Update Checklist. All approved changes must then be incorporated in the FMP and the Annual Update Checklist must be added to the FMP immediately following the cover-page. The revised FMP, including the signed Annual Update Checklist, must be uploaded to the IN2 Managing Fire - Fire Management Plans and Compliance Documents - All Documents (sharepoint.com).
    [Show full text]
  • Hclassification
    Form No. 10-306 (Rev. 10-74) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR NATIONAL PARK SERVICE NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES INVENTORY -- NOMINATION FORM m is FOR FEDERAL PROPERTIES SEE INSTRUCTIONS IN HOW TO COMPLETE NATIONAL REGISTER FORMS TYPE ALL ENTRIES -- COMPLETE APPLICABLE SECTIONS [NAME CUMBERLAND ISLAND NATIONAL SEASHORE MUIiTIPLE RESOURCE AREA (COMPLETE INVENTORY: HISTORIC PROPERTIES, PARTIAL INVENTORY: HISTORIC ARCHE&EOGICAL SITES) AND/OR COMMON STREET & NUMBER AS DEFINED BY CONGRESS —NOT FOR PUBLICATION CITY, TOWN CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT CUMBERLAND ISLAND _X . VICINITY OF ST. MARYS STATE CODE COUNTY CODE GP.ORGIA 13 CAMDEN ° 39 HCLASSIFICATION CATEGORY OWNERSHIP STATUS PRESENT USE —DISTRICT XPUBLIC .^OCCUPIED _ AGRICULTURE —MUSEUM _ BUILDING(S) ^PRIVATE -XUNOCCUPIED —COMMERCIAL _?PARK _ STRUCTURE —BOTH -XWORK IN PROGRESS —EDUCATIONAL J&PRIVATE RESIDENCE —SITE PUBLIC ACQUISITION ACCESSIBLE —ENTERTAINMENT —RELIGIOUS —OBJECT _JN PROCESS -XYES. RESTRICTED —GOVERNMENT —SCIENTIFIC _ BEING CONSIDERED — YES: UNRESTRICTED _ INDUSTRIAL —TRANSPORTATION MULTIPLE RESOURCE NOMINATION _NO _ MILITARY —OTHER: AGENCY REGIONAL HEADQUARTERS: (If applicable) -SERVICE-, STRETT& NUMBER 75 SPRING STREET, S.W. CITY. TOWN STATE ATLANTA VICINITY OF GEORGIA 30303 LOCATION OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION COURTHOUSE, REGISTRY OF DEEDS,ETC. CAMDEN COUNTY COURTHOUSE STREET & NUMBER CITY. TOWN STATE WOODBINE GEORGIA REPRESENTATION IN EXISTING SURVEYS TITLE HISTORIC AMERICAN BUILDINGS SURVEY (DUNGENESS ONLY) DATE 1958 XFEDERAL _STATE —COUNTY —LOCAL DEPOSITORY FOR SURVEY RECORDS LIBRARY OF CONGRESS CITY. TOWN STATE WASHINGTON D.C. DESCRIPTION CONDITION CHECK ONE CHECK ONE *L.E4BBRNl» ' HH|» ^DETERIORATED ^.UNALTERED ^ORIGINAL SITE ?LGOOD BRUINS FALTERED MOVED DATF ?LFAIR ^LUNEXPOSED DESCRIBETHE PRESENT AND ORIGINAL (IF KNOWN) PHYSICAL APPEARANCE The Cumberland Island National Seashore Multiple Resource Area includes all of the property on Cumberland Island owned by the National Park Service (see map).
    [Show full text]
  • CUIS Water Resources Assessment
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Water Resources Division Technical Report NPS/NRWRD/NRTR-2005/332 Natural Resource Program Center ASSESSMENT OF COASTAL WATER RESOURCES AND WATERSHED CONDITIONS AT CUMBERLAND ISLAND NATIONAL SEASHORE, GEORGIA Merryl Alber, Janice Flory, and Karen Payne The National Park Service Water Resources Division is responsible for providing water resources management policy and guidelines, planning, technical assistance, training, and operational support to units of the National Park System. Program areas include water rights, water resources planning, regulatory guidance and review, hydrology, water quality, watershed management, watershed studies, and aquatic ecology. Technical Reports The National Park Service disseminates the results of biological, physical, and social research through the Natural Resources Technical Report Series. Natural resources inventories and monitoring activities, scientific literature reviews, bibliographies, and proceedings of technical workshops and conferences are also disseminated through this series. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use by the National Park Service. Copies of this report are available from the following: National Park Service (970) 225-3500 Water Resources Division 1201 Oak Ridge Drive, Suite 250 Fort Collins, CO 80525 National Park Service (303) 969-2130 Technical Information Center Denver Service Center P.O. Box 25287 Denver, CO 80225-0287 ii Assessment of Coastal Water Resources
    [Show full text]
  • September 1998 Issue 3
    2 A Treasured Island: Human and Geographic Interaction on Cumberland Robert L. Stevens and Julia A. Celebi 9 Teaching History as Perspective Taking: The Colonial Convention Mac Duis and Sandra S. Duis 12 The Community as a Laboratory for Student Learning Joseph Ciaccio 14 Coming of Age Ceremonies: A Mask Project Alan Singer, Laura Gurton, Aimee Horowitz, Stephanie Hunte, Paula Broomfield, and Joanne Thomas Supplement to Social Education, September 1998 ● Issue 3 the official journal of National Council for the Social Studies A Treasured Island Human and Geographic Interaction on Cumberland Robert L. Stevens and Julia A. Celebi umberland Island National Seashore, located off southern Georgia and north- Cern Florida, is one of the southernmost barrier islands along the Atlantic sea- board. Where these barrier islands run along the coast of Georgia, they are known collectively as the Sea Islands. Cumberland Island, eighteen miles long and three miles wide, is composed of five natural ecosystems: (1) fresh water sloughs, (2) salt water marsh, (3) maritime forest, (4) dune system, and (5) the beach. Cumberland Island has supported human habitation for at least two thousand years. The list of people connected with its history includes its first known inhabit- ants, the Timucua Indians; Spanish explorer Hernando DeSoto; French explorer Jean Ribault; James Oglethorpe, founder of the English settlement at Savannah; General Nathaniel Greene of the American Revolution, and his wife, Caty; Eli Whitney, inventor of the cotton gin; planter Robert Stafford; and members of the Carnegie steel family. Many eras of development in our nation’s history are reflected on Cumberland Island, making it a good model for students to investigate both historical and con- temporary human interactions with the environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Falling to Pieces: the Preservation of Ruins in Coastal Georgia
    FALLING TO PIECES: THE PRESERVATION OF RUINS IN COASTAL GEORGIA by TRACI EUGENIA CLARK (Under the Direction of John C. Waters) ABSTRACT The purpose of this thesis is to research and evaluate ruins of former buildings managed by five different agencies in Georgia in order to determine the best approach and methods for the stabilization and preservation of ruins. INDEX WORDS: Georgia coast, ruins, Wormsloe, Savannah, Dungeness, Stafford Chimneys, Cumberland Island, Jekyll Island, Horton House, Chichota, Carpentry Shop, Retreat Plantation, Fort Frederica, St. Simons Island, historic preservation FALLING TO PIECES: THE PRESERVATION OF RUINS IN COASTAL GEORGIA by TRACI EUGENIA CLARK A.B.J., The University of Georgia, 1998 A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of The University of Georgia in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree MASTER OF HISTORIC PRESERVATION ATHENS, GEORGIA 2006 © 2006 Traci Eugenia Clark All Rights Reserved FALLING TO PIECES: THE PRESERVATION OF RUINS IN COASTAL GEORGIA by TRACI EUGENIA CLARK Major Professor: John C. Waters Committee: Mark Reinberger Burke Walker David Nichols Electronic Version Approved: Maureen Grasso Dean of the Graduate School The University of Georgia December 2006 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I want to thank everyone who supported me through this long and twisting endeavor and to my classmates that I met along the way. Great appreciation goes to Professor Waters who stressed the importance of “making my flight on time.” Despite some mild turbulence and barely missing the last leg of my flight, I made it to my final destination a-ok. Donna Gabriel has been a shoulder to cry on, a friend to lean on, and everything else I needed to make my way through this program.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Resource Condition Assessment: Cumberland Island National Seashore
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Natural Resource Condition Assessment Cumberland Island National Seashore Natural Resource Report NPS/CUIS/NRR—2018/1773 ON THE COVER An aerial view of the northeast portion of Cumberland Island (NPS photo). Natural Resource Condition Assessment Cumberland Island National Seashore Natural Resource Report NPS/CUIS/NRR—2018/1773 Kathy Allen, Andy J. Nadeau, Andy Robertson GeoSpatial Services Saint Mary’s University of Minnesota 890 Prairie Island Road Winona, Minnesota 55987 October 2018 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science office in Fort Collins, Colorado, publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics. These reports are of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Report Series is used to disseminate comprehensive information and analysis about natural resources and related topics concerning lands managed by the National Park Service. The series supports the advancement of science, informed decision-making, and the achievement of the National Park Service mission. The series also provides a forum for presenting more lengthy results that may not be accepted by publications with page limitations. All manuscripts in the series receive the appropriate level of peer review to ensure that the information is scientifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and designed and published in a professional manner.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Wilderness on Cumberland Island, Georgia
    THE IMPACT OF WILDERNESS ON CUMBERLAND ISLAND, GEORGIA by CHRISTINE WARD MCCAULEY (Under the Direction of JOHN C. WATERS) ABSTRACT How has the Cumberland Island Wilderness Act of 1982 impacted the historic resources of the island? Through the Act’s restrictions on use, the National Park Service (NPS) has been restricted in its efforts to maintain the historic structures of the island. Because of the inability for the NPS to use motorized equipment within Wilderness, they are unable to transport materials via Main Road from one end of the island to the other. Although transport is possible via other means (via water), the expense and time required for that transport is prohibitive. The environment created by the Wilderness legislation on Cumberland Island is so restrictive that the maintenance of historic structures is inefficient and ineffective. Demolition by neglect of historic structures is the result. In this thesis, I examine the innate difficulties in protecting both natural and historic resources without prioritizing either and make recommendations for future action and future study. INDEX WORDS: Barrier Island, Cumberland Island, Conservation, Georgia, Historic Preservation, National Park Service, National Seashore, Preservation, Wilderness THE IMPACT OF WILDERNESS ON CUMBERLAND ISLAND, GEORGIA by CHRISTINE WARD MCCAULEY B.A., University of Georgia, 1996 A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the University of Georgia in Partial Fulfillment of Requirements for the Degree MASTER OF HISTORIC PRESERVATION ATHENS, GEORGIA 2006 © 2006 Christine Ward McCauley All Rights Reserved THE IMPACT OF WILDERNESS ON CUMBERLAND ISLAND, GEORGIA by CHRISTINE WARD MCCAULEY Major Professor: John C. Waters Committee: Eric MacDonald Ron Carroll Ethiel Garlington Electronic Version Approved: Maureen Grasso Dean of the Graduate School The University of Georgia May 2006 DEDICATION I dedicate this thesis to my mother and father, without whom I wouldn’t be who or where I am today.
    [Show full text]
  • Feasibility/Best Use Study for SMIG Property
    th February 13 , 2013 HOTEL Artie Jones, III, Director CONSULTING City of St. Marys INTERNATIONAL Department of Economic Development 400 Osborne Street St. Marys, Georgia 31558 a division of O&R Valuation Services, Inc. Proposed Development Est. 1992 St. Marys Intracoastal Gateway Project 100 Ready Street St Marys, GA 31558 Dear Mr. Jones Thomas F. O’Neill CRE, MAI, FRICS, ISHC, CHA Pursuant to your request, we herewith submit our Market/Feasibility/Highest Managing Director & Best Use Analysis pertaining to the above-captioned project. We have inspected the site and neighborhood and have analyzed the hostelry market conditions in St Marys and the region. In Chapter 3, St Marys and Environs, we evaluated the tourism resources of St Marys and Cumberland Island and the Submarine Naval Base as a demand generator and other sources of 3820 CAROLE CT MIAMI, FLORIDA 33133 lodging demand. 305-856-7560, EXT. 209 305-856-5934 FAX In Chapter 1, Nature of the Assignment, we have summarized incentives and [email protected] concessions available or under consideration; in Chapter 13, Reconciliation of Valuation Indications and Conclusions, we have commented on subsequent action taken in our analysis. Also in Chapter 13, we presented recommendations that should further motivate an investor. In Chapter 2, Description of the Land we concluded that the site is premier waterfront land that offers excellent views of the harbor, the salt-marsh and Cumberland Island. It also has a deep water harbor with boat docking privileges for 18 slips. The river represents an amenity to the SMIG project as well as an important access point for boating tourists as potential guests.
    [Show full text]