Leyland Cypress and the Shifting Spectrum of Names

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Leyland Cypress and the Shifting Spectrum of Names Leyland cypress and the shifting spectrum of names Derrick Rooney1 The late Alan Mitchell, dendrologist picked off a Nootka cypress. The Despite the unusual appearance for the British Forestry Commission, seedlings were sent to Haggerston and vigorous growth of the seedlings called it a silvicultural event on Castle, in Northumberland, for they attracted scant interest until a par with the invention of the planting in 1892. The clone later 1926, when they were brought to spade. A British judge called it the named ‘Haggerston Grey’ is one of the attention of William Dallimore, biggest single cause of litigation those seedlings. curator of the British National Pinetum between neighbours in Britain. Many at Bedgebury, who described them In 1911 two similar seedlings were New Zealand farmers who need and arranged for the ‘Haggerston raised at Leighton Hall from seed shelter in difficult situations regard it Grey’ and ‘Leighton Green’ clones collected off a Monterey cypress. as the best thing since sliced bread. to be propagated. ‘Naylor’s Blue’, These were later named ‘Leighton which grew near ‘Leighton Green’ on “It” is the Leyland cypress, the Green’ (Fig. 1A–B) and ‘Naylor’s a hillside behind Leighton Hall, was archetypal Cinderella tree, which Blue’. propagated only after it was felled by arose as a hybrid in England in the a freak windstorm in 1954. A fourth 1880s, was not recognised as special The name “Leyland” commemorates clone, ‘Green Spire’, remains less well until the 1920s, and did not become the family who owned the known. widely known even in Britain until the Haggerston and Leighton estates when the original seedlings were 1960s. The hybrid was a centenarian raised and propagated. C. J. Naylor Dallimore recognised the seedlings by the time the mass-production was managing the Leighton part as that uncommon occurrence, an techniques developed in the 1980s of the estates when the first batch intergeneric cross. The parents were made it available at an affordable of seedlings was raised in the determined to be the Monterey and price for shelter belts in New Zealand. 1880s. In 1892, after inheriting Nootka cypresses. This meant that both the estates, which had been under the international rules then Within the last 20 years, thanks to entailed under the will of his great- in force, a new name, incorporating its vigorous growth and its tolerance great-uncle Thomas Leyland, he moved to Haggerston (taking the bits of both generic names, had of exposure and a wide range of soil hybrid cypresses with him) and to be erected. This was to lead to and climatic conditions, the Leyland changed his surname to Leyland. considerable disruption and confusion cypress has become probably the Subsequently, he sold his lifetime later. second most often planted tree interest in Leighton Hall to his (behind radiata pine) in New Zealand. brother John Naylor, who died in 1906. John Naylor’s son, Captain Some of the clones available have J. M. Naylor, took over Leighton Hall even been talked about as possible in 1909 and remained there until sources of high-quality plantation 1931. He was probably the Naylor of timber. ‘Naylor’s Blue’. Unfortunately, it has another, less desirable, claim to fame. In the last two decades its shifting spectrum of scientific names has caused more confusion for nurseries, farmers, and Fig. 2 Storm-battered macrocarpa growing foresters than any other tree. A on the shoreline, South Bay, Kaikoura. Photo: Derrick Rooney. Leyland cypresses have been in New Zealand only about 60 years, At that time, the Monterey cypress which makes their popularity and was known to taxonomists as rapid spread all the more remarkable, Cupressus macrocarpa. This species given that they can only be is a native to California and is propagated vegetatively. commonly called “macrocarpa” in New Zealand (Fig. 2). The Nootka The Leyland cypress originated in cypress, also popularly known in the 1883 according to some accounts and American Pacific North-west as yellow 1888 according to others, at Leighton B spruce or yellow cedar, was classified Hall, Welshpool, Wales, as a chance Fig. 1 ×Cuprocyparis ‘Leighton Green’. in the same false-cypress genus as seedling in a batch raised from cones A, shoot. B, foliage. Photos: Derrick Rooney. the better-known Lawson cypress, 1 PO Box 43, Hororata, Canterbury, New Zealand; [email protected] New Zealand Garden Journal, 2013, Vol. 16(1) 23 and was known as Chamaecyparis nootkatensis. Nootka cypress is native to the west coast of North America, from Alaska to northernmost California. Dallimore coined the compound generic name ×Cupressocyparis and the specific name leylandii for the Leyland hybrids (Jackson and Dallimore, 1926). The name ×Cupressocyparis was subsequently used for all crosses between the Nootka and other American cypress species. Another two leylandii clones were selected in 1940 from a different source: seedlings from a macrocarpa growing at the small East Dorset town of Ferndown. The seed was raised at Fig. 3 ×Cuprocyparis ‘Silver Dust’, a variegated sport of ‘Leighton Green’. Photo: Derrick Rooney. the Barthelemy nursery at a nearby village, Stapehill, and although no A more recently named Leyland The “original” Leyland clones thrive Nootka cypress was known to be clone, ‘Silver Dust’ (Fig. 3), was almost anywhere in New Zealand growing in the vicinity two unusual raised in the United States from a below the treeline. In the United seedlings were determined to be of the branch sport on ‘Leighton Green’. Its States they are rated for USDA same parentage as Leyland cypress. green foliage is speckled with creamy Hardiness Zone 5 (hardy to -23°C, For many years these seedlings were white variegation at the tips. ‘Silver perhaps lower). known only under the Stapehill code Dust’ is available in New Zealand ‘Leighton Green’ was the first clone numbers, 20 and 21. but it’s not to everyone’s taste. It established in New Zealand. Although can be eye-catching as a specimen In 1956 the research division of it was grown commercially in Britain tree in the right context of other dark the British Forestry Commission from the 1930s little is known evergreen trees but does not make an sent a genetics team to Leighton about early attempts to import it to attractive hedge. Park to collect seed in the hope New Zealand. The first known attempt that new Leyland hybrids could A slower-growing, bright yellow clone, at acclimatisation was made in 1949 be raised from the original source. ‘Robinson’s Gold’, was released in by the North Otago Tree Planting They were unsuccessful in this, the mid-1970s. This was a chance Association, but the plants failed to but seed collected from an Arizona seedling, found in a rhododendron survive. The association’s minutes, cypress, then known as Cupressus garden near Belfast, Northern held in the North Otago Museum, glabra, growing about 20 metres Ireland. The older ‘Castlewellan Gold’ contain no record of a second attempt from the Nootka cypress that had originated after severe snowstorms in by them. An importation in 1952 by produced the original Leyland clones, the 1962–63 winter snapped a branch the then Department of Agriculture yielded two seedlings that displayed from a golden macrocarpa growing was successful, and the cultivar was unusual adult foliage. These were in the forest park at Castlewellan, in established at a research station at subsequently propagated and named County Down. A local nurseryman Rukuhia, near Hamilton, from where ×Cupressocyparis ‘Notabilis’. who sowed seed collected from the propagating material was presumably In 1961 a Mr Howard Ovens, from Tan- fallen branch selected a golden- distributed. coloured seedling that proved to be y-Cae, Dyfed, in Wales, collected seed Harry Hart obtained six plants, via a Leyland-type hybrid. ‘Castlewellan from a Mexican cypress, then known the then Forest Research Institute Gold’ was first marketed in Ireland as Cupressus lusitanica, near a grove (FRI) at Rotorua, for planting in in 1970 and has been available in of Nootka cypresses at the Westonbirt the H. E. Hart Arboretum at Lake New Zealand since the early 1980s. Arboretum in Gloucestershire. Two of Coleridge in 1961, but recorded in his Since 1980 numerous other clones the resultant seedlings were clearly notebook2 that the material supplied and sports of Leyland cypress crossed with Nootka cypress. One of had “weak root systems”. Three have been named in Great Britain, these, commonly known as ‘Ovensii’, plants died in his garden nursery. including some with coloured foliage. is grown in New Zealand and has The remaining three were planted Today, more than 40 Leyland cypress become popular, particularly in the as group No. 80 in the arboretum in cultivars have been named. Many North Island, where it seems to grow September, 1961, but two of them of these are almost certainly branch better than it does in the South Island died soon afterwards and the third sports. and produces timber of good quality. was removed in September, 1962. 2 Hart kept a bound notebook in which he recorded, from 1934 until shortly before he died in 1979, detailed observations of acquisition dates, sources, and planting dates of all the trees in the arboretum at Lake Coleridge. His notebook is currently held by the Central Canterbury Farm Forestry Association. 24 New Zealand Garden Journal, 2013, Vol. 16(1) Three replacement plants obtained only about 15 years old and the fact These seedlings, with their obvious from Lincoln University (then Lincoln that logs had been harvested from affinity to the Arizona cypress, were College) were planted as group some of them indicated rapid growth an interesting development, because No. 81 in September, 1962, at which because of the fertility of the site.
Recommended publications
  • Seiridium Canker of Cypress Trees in Arizona Jeff Schalau
    ARIZONA COOPERATIVE E TENSION AZ1557 January 2012 Seiridium Canker of Cypress Trees in Arizona Jeff Schalau Introduction Leyland cypress (x Cupressocyparis leylandii) is a fast- growing evergreen that has been widely planted as a landscape specimen and along boundaries to create windbreaks or privacy screening in Arizona. The presence of Seiridium canker was confirmed in Prescott, Arizona in July 2011 and it is suspected that the disease occurs in other areas of the state. Seiridium canker was first identified in California’s San Joaquin Valley in 1928. Today, it can be found in Europe, Asia, New Zealand, Australia, South America and Africa on plants in the cypress family (Cupressaceae). Leyland cypress, Monterey cypress, (Cupressus macrocarpa) and Italian cypress (C. sempervirens) are highly susceptible and can be severely impacted by this disease. Since Leyland and Italian cypress have been widely planted in Arizona, it is imperative that Seiridium canker management strategies be applied and suitable resistant tree species be recommended for planting in the future. The Pathogen Seiridium canker is known to be caused by three different fungal species: Seiridium cardinale, S. cupressi and S. unicorne. S. cardinale is the most damaging of the three species and is SCHALAU found in California. S. unicorne and S. cupressi are found in the southeastern United States where the primary host is JEFF Leyland cypress. All three species produce asexual fruiting Figure 1. Leyland cypress tree with dead branch (upper left) and main leader bodies (acervuli) in cankers. The acervuli produce spores caused by Seiridium canker. (conidia) which spread by water, human activity (pruning and transport of infected plant material), and potentially insects, birds and animals to neighboring trees where new Symptoms and Signs infections can occur.
    [Show full text]
  • Tennessee Christmas Tree Production Manual
    PB 1854 Tennessee Christmas Tree Production Manual 1 Tennessee Christmas Tree Production Manual Contributing Authors Alan B. Galloway Area Farm Management Specialist [email protected] Megan Bruch Leffew Marketing Specialist [email protected] Dr. David Mercker Extension Forestry Specialist [email protected] Foreword The authors are indebted to the author of the original Production of Christmas Trees in Tennessee (Bulletin 641, 1984) manual by Dr. Eyvind Thor. His efforts in promoting and educating growers about Christmas tree production in Tennessee led to the success of many farms and helped the industry expand. This publication builds on the base of information from the original manual. The authors appreciate the encouragement, input and guidance from the members of the Tennessee Christmas Tree Growers Association with a special thank you to Joe Steiner who provided his farm schedule as a guide for Chapter 6. The development and printing of this manual were made possible in part by a USDA specialty crop block grant administered through the Tennessee Department of Agriculture. The authors thank the peer review team of Dr. Margarita Velandia, Dr. Wayne Clatterbuck and Kevin Ferguson for their keen eyes and great suggestions. While this manual is directed more toward new or potential choose-and-cut growers, it should provide useful information for growers of all experience levels and farm sizes. Parts of the information presented will become outdated. It is recommended that prospective growers seek additional information from their local University of Tennessee Extension office and from other Christmas tree growers. 2 Tennessee Christmas Tree Production Manual Contents Chapter 1: Beginning the Planning ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Cypress Species Choice and Minimising the Risk of Canker
    GROWING CYPRESSES FOR TIMBER Species choice and minimising the risk of canker Information Note 1 Cypresses have long been a favourite alternative to radiata pine for New Zealand’s farm foresters, small-scale plantation owners, and some large-scale growers. IN GENERAL, CYPRESSES: • Are a versatile species with proven performance both as a timber producer and as a shelter species. • Produce versatile timber of relatively high value (compared with radiata pine) that is very easy to saw and dry, and has many end uses. • Grow best on moderately fertile, well- drained, sheltered sites, but with careful species and genotype (seedlot) selection will perform well on a reasonably wide range of sites. • Produce their best timber on sheltered sites. 18-year old Cupressus macrocarpa. • Produce quality timber even as young trees, unlike radiata pine. • Have a reputation of being prone to canker. However this is chiefly a problem of C. macrocarpa, and Leyland cypresses on warmer and exposed sites. Susceptibility to canker depends on site, species, and within any given species, the seedlot. Some seedlots are more resistant to canker than others of the same species. New more canker- resistant planting stock is becoming available. • Are prone to toppling on fertile sites, especially if poorly drained, and are particularly unstable on water-logged clay soils. • May cause abortion if foliage is eaten by pregnant cattle. Caution is advised. Cattle raised with access to cypresses tend not to eat the foliage. There is an established market for cypress timber based on ‘macrocarpa’ – a species widely planted throughout New Zealand for many decades, both in plantations and in farm shelter plantings.
    [Show full text]
  • Conifer Quarterly
    Conifer Quarterly Vol. 21 No. 2 Spring 2004 P hot os b y G ar y W hitt enbaugh Gary Whittenbaugh can’t resist incorporating Chamaecyparis into his Iowa garden, while at the same time he warns against becoming too attached to them. Read about these plants’ role in the Midwest on page 20. Shown here are (top) C. pisifera ‘Plumosa Compressa’ as a background plant, ‘Golden Mop’ in the fall (left) and Gary’s favorite,‘Snow.’ Grafting is an important part of conifer propagation, from the largest nurseries to the hobbyist plant collector. Review the basics of side grafting on page 30, as taught by expert George Okken. een r y G on T The Conifer Quarterly is the publication of The Conifer Society Contents Featured conifer genus: Chamaecyparis 6 Resurrecting Lawson Cypress for the 21st Century Tanya DeMarsh-Dodson 12 Seedling Conifers Offer Challenge and Variety Peter C. Jones 16 Origin, Distribution and Variation of Atlantic White-cedar Kristin Mylecraine and John Kuser 20 Reader Recommendations More features 24 Hands Across the Sea Derek Spicer 29 Obituary: Bob Tomayer 30 The Art and Science of Grafting: A Demonstration by George Okken Anne M. Brennan 38 One Acre in Rochester Gerald P. Kral Conifer Society voices 2 President’s Message 4 Editor’s Memo 15 Conifers on the Web 23 Puzzle Page 42 Central Region Builds on Past Success 43 Western Region Update 44 Northeast Region to Visit the “Flower City” 46 Southeast Region Announces Itinerary Cover photo: An unusually cold Pennsylvania winter melts away with the snow from Chamaecyparis obtusa ‘Crippsii’,just as last year’s muted foliage will soon disappear behind the glowing golden spring flush for which this cultivar is known.
    [Show full text]
  • Friends of Botanic Gardens Forum Newsletter Edition 4
    FRIENDS OF BOTANIC GARDENS FORUM NEWSLETTER EDITION 4 1 Dear Friends, The best time to plant a tree was 20 years ago. The second best time is now. (Chinese proverb) Well, here at last the 4th issue of the Friends of Botanic Gardens Forum. I have to first of all apologise for the delay in getting this out to you – but I suspect you are all doing as I have been doing these past few months – catching up with friends, family, holidays, your own gardens, considering future events – live or virtual over the forthcoming autumn/winter months and perhaps getting back to volunteering in the gardens/arboreta with whom you are associated. Next up I want to thank you all for your contributions – I have found it so interesting reading about the gardens and the activities of your groups and volunteers. The descriptions are tantalising and I look forward to visiting all of your spaces at some point in the not too distant future. You will note that a number of the gardens are celebrating significant anniversaries. We have already heard about the Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh - 350 last year, and this year, Oxford Botanic Garden – 400, but we also have Dundee Botanic Garden celebrating 50 years. The project which the Friends at Dundee have supported will be a great asset to the garden and the Dundee community. It has been difficult to mark these occasions given the variable Covid restrictions. Any of you who have visited Edinburgh in the past might have seen the Floral Clock in Princes Street Gardens – last year, the RBGE was due to feature on the clock, but a decision was made to focus on the NHS in recognition of its extraordinary work during the Pandemic.
    [Show full text]
  • The Case of the Languishing Leylands
    DETECTIVE DENDRO THE DIAGNOSTIC SLEUTH By Guy Meilleur The Case of the Languishing Leylands I was installing the new screen in the “Interesting,” I said. “Let me get your e-mail address so I can back door of the office, thinking back send you a statement of our services, and you can reply with your to The Case of the Waning Waxmyrtles, address and other contact information.” where Codit and I got to the root of a Codit downloaded her reply, printed out a map and the work declining Morella hedge. The landsca- order that she agreed to, and we were on the way. The neighbor- pers learned new ways of mulching, hood was a good one, but the yards were small. Layla’s house was watering, fertilizing, and pruning to easy to spot. It was full of conifers. She met us in the backyard, and ANSI standards, so the hedge was pointed to the brown branches. A bird with a red head and a yellow looking much better. I was ruminating belly flew away as we approached. on the many benefits of screens of all types when the phone rang. “Good day, Layla,” I said. “These are Leyland cypress, × Cupres- “Hello, Detective Dendro? My name is Layla Compressa, and I socyparis leylandii ...” have a tree question. Branches in my evergreens in the backyard are “X?” Codit interrupted. “Why is there an X in the name? Are dying, and I don’t know why. We planted them five years ago and they mutants, like the X-Men, or is one of their names taken out, they have grown quite nicely in that time, but now there are brown like Malcolm X, or …” branches in one of them.
    [Show full text]
  • X Cupressocyparis Leylandii 'Naylor's Blue' 'Naylor's Blue' Leyland Cypress
    Fact Sheet ST-673 October 1994 x Cupressocyparis leylandii ‘Naylor’s Blue’ ‘Naylor’s Blue’ Leyland Cypress1 Edward F. Gilman and Dennis G. Watson2 INTRODUCTION A moderate to rapidly-growing evergreen when young, ‘Naylor’s Blue’ Leyland Cypress will easily grow three feet per year, even on poor soils, and will ultimately attain a majestic height of 50 feet or more in the west, perhaps somewhat shorter in the east (Fig. 1). Leyland Cypress forms a dense, oval or pyramidal outline when left unpruned, but the graceful, pendulous branches will tolerate severe trimming to create a formal hedge, screen or windbreak. The fine, feathery glaucous blue-green foliage is composed of soft, pointed leaves on flattened branchlets and are dark blue-green when mature. Leyland Cypress quickly outgrows its space in small landscapes and is too big for most residential landscapes unless it will be regularly trimmed. Although it can be sheared into a tall screen on small lots, Leyland Cypress should probably be saved for large-scale landscapes where it can be allowed to develop into its natural shape. GENERAL INFORMATION Scientific name: x Cupressocyparis leylandii ‘Naylor’s Blue’ Pronunciation: x koo-press-so-SIP-air-iss lay-LAN-dee-eye Common name(s): ‘Naylor’s Blue’ Leyland Cypress Family: Cupressaceae Figure 1. Middle-aged ‘Naylor’s Blue’ Leyland Cypress. USDA hardiness zones: 6 through 10A (Fig. 2) Origin: not native to North America Availability: grown in small quantities by a small Uses: hedge; recommended for buffer strips around number of nurseries parking lots or for median strip plantings in the highway; screen; specimen; Christmas tree 1.
    [Show full text]
  • (Journal of the RNZIH): June 2004, Vol. 7, No. 1, P
    The changing Leyland Cypress Derrick Rooney1 Thanks to a recent discovery in Dallimore recognised the seedlings cypress, Cupressus glabra, growing Vietnam, the long arm of taxonomy as that uncommon occurrence, an about 20 metres from the Nootka is set to reach out yet again with a intergeneric cross, between the cypress that had produced the name change for the Leyland Monterey and Nootka cypresses. original Leyland clones. Two cypress, one of New Zealand's most This meant that a new name, seedlings from this tree displayed popular farm and horticultural shelter incorporating bits of both generic unusual adult foliage and were trees. names, had to be erected. subsequently propagated and named xCupressocyparis 'Notabilis'. Although it did not become widely At the time, the Monterey cypress Later still, in the early 1960s, a Mr known even in England until the was known to taxonomists, as it is Harold Ovens, from Cardiganshire, 1960s and in New Zealand until the still, as Cupressus macrocarpa. collected seed from a Mexican late 1980s and 1990s, when mass However, the Nootka cypress, also cypress, Cupressus lusitanica, propagation techniques were popularly known in the American surrounded by Nootka cypresses, at developed, the Leyland cypress was Pacific North-West as yellow spruce, the Westonbirt Arboretum. Two of first raised by chance way back in was classified in the same false- the resultant seedlings were clearly the 1880s (in 1883 according to some cypress genus as the better-known crossed with Nootka cypress. One accounts and 1888 according to Lawson cypress, and was known as of these, now known as others) at Leighton Hall, Welshpool, Chamaecyparis nootkatensis.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis and Comparison of Essential Oil Components Extracted from the Heartwoods of Leyland Cypress, Alaska Yellow Cedar, and Monterey Cypress
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Xinfeng Liu for the degree of Master of Science in Wood Science presented on March 17, 2009. Title: Analysis and Comparison of Essential Oil Components Extracted from the Heartwoods of Leyland Cypress, Alaska Yellow Cedar, and Monterey Cypress. Abstract approved: ___________________________ Joseph J. Karchesy The essential oil components of cedar heartwoods play an important role in the durability of these trees. Yet, the composition of these oils and identity of many of the compounds remains unknown, or incompletely know for some commercially important cedar heartwoods. The essential oil extracts of Alaska Yellow Cedar (Chamaecyparis nootkatensis), Monterey Cypress (Cupressus macrocarpa), and Leyland Cypress (xCupressoparis leylandii ) which is an intergenetic hybrid of the first two species is such a case. GC-MS analyses were carried out on the heartwood essential oil extracts of these three species in order to determine the chemical composition of each essential oil and to compare the composition of the intergenetic hybrid (Leyland Cypress) with its parent species. Analyses were carried out on both steam distilled (6 and 12 hour) and solvent extracted oils. For example in the 6 hour distilled oils, Carvacrol was the major component of all three oils, 27% (Alaska Cedar), 67% (Leyland Cypress) and 82% (Monterey Cypress). Terpinen-4-ol and nootkatin were also found in all three oils, but in lesser amounts (3-6%). Only the oils from Alaska cedar and Leyland cypress contained the eremophilane sesquiterpenoids valencene, nootkatene, epinootkatol, nootkatol, 13-hydroxy valencene and nootkatone. This family of compounds was completely absent in Monterey cypress oil.
    [Show full text]
  • December 2017 a Tree for the Holidays
    December 2017 A Tree for the Holidays For those whose holiday celebration includes a large pot while on display in the home, they can be Christmas tree then this is for you. The first decision planted in your landscape or donated for planting to make is do you want a real tree or an artificial tree. elsewhere after the holidays . Then they spend the Let’s take a look at some of the facts. Artificial trees next 50 years or more stabilizing the soil, providing look good and can be reused for multiple years. As the food and shelter for wildlife, and become part of a name implies, most artificial green oxygen-providing land- trees are made from man made scape. materials such as metal and pe- According to 2014 statis- troleum based plastic and are tics, there are around 40 Christ- non-recyclable. Additionally, 80- mas tree farms in Louisiana (over 90% are imported (mostly from half are choose and cut farms China). While they can be reused (http://www.lams-christmas- for multiple years, they will trees.org/la.html) with a gross spend the rest of eternity in a value of about $900K. With Loui- landfill when they are discarded siana-grown Christmas trees you – they are not biodegradable and can choose Leighton Green Ley- last indefinitely. land Cypress, Castlewellan Gold Real trees , on the other Leyland Cypress, Naylor’s Blue hand, are part of an agricultural Leyland Cypress, Murray Ovensii industry that provides employ- Leyland Cypress, Notabilis Ley- ment for over 100,000 people. There are over 350 mil- land Cypress, Blue Ice Arizona Cypress, Carolina Sap- lion Christmas trees currently planted in the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 LEIGHTON HALL Ref No PGW (Po) 34 (POW) OS Map 126 Grid Ref SJ
    LEIGHTON HALL Ref No PGW (Po) 34 (POW) OS Map 126 Grid Ref SJ 242046 Former County Powys Unitary Authority Powys District Montgomeryshire Community Council Forden Designations Listed building Leighton Hall, including Leighton Hall Tower and attached walls to gardens on south and south-east of Hall - Grade II*; archways, gates and forecourt walls at the principal north-west entrance to the Hall - Grade II; lodge and principal entrance to north-west of Hall - Grade II; iron gate and gate piers, north- west entrance to gardens and forecourt of Hall - Grade II, foot bridge and wall walk to south- east of serpentine pond - Grade II; statue of Icarus (presently removed from site) - Grade II; stables - Grade II; cable house (park pond) - Grade II; poultry house - Grade II; Holy Trinity church - Grade II; walls, railings, gates and gate piers at church - Grade II; Church lodge - Grade II. Tree Preservation Order Blanket order on the Charles Ackers and Naylor redwoods. Site Evaluation Grade I Primary reasons for grading Grand mid Victorian house with contemporary garden of exceptional historic interest by the well known garden designer Edward Kemp. The estate was run as a model farm and has an exceptional collection of Victorian agricultural buildings. Woodlands of high arboricultural interest, especially the Charles Ackers Grove and Naylor pinetum. The Leyland cypress was bred at Leighton. Type of Site High Victorian formal garden with ornamental 1 woodland and parkland Main Phases of Construction House c. 1840 on, garden (Edward Kemp) c. 1850. SITE DESCRIPTION Leighton Hall is situated on level ground to the east of the Leighton/ Kingswood road (B 4388), in the centre of a once large estate on the west side of the Severn valley.
    [Show full text]
  • Epidemiological History of Cypress Canker Disease in Source and Invasion Sites
    Review Epidemiological History of Cypress Canker Disease in Source and Invasion Sites Roberto Danti and Gianni Della Rocca * Institute for Sustainable Plant Protection, National Research Council, Via Madonna del Piano 10, Sesto Fiorentino, Florence 50019, Italy; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +39‐055‐522‐5663 Academic Editor: Matteo Garbelotto Received: 27 February 2017; Accepted: 12 April 2017; Published: 15 April 2017 Abstract: Seiridium cardinale is a fungal pathogen responsible for pandemic cypress canker disease (CCD). The fungus has shown the ability to infect different hosts in many areas throughout the globe, but its spread and impact were favored by conducive environmental conditions. The most severe epidemics were reported in California and the Mediterranean, the former considered the source area of the pathogen from which the Mediterranean infestation have originated. Here we reconstruct the epidemiological history of the disease in California and the Mediterranean. Evolution of the disease in the two contrasting areas was weighed in relation to differences between the two environments in terms of climate, landscape properties, and adopted management practices. In addition, differences emerged among the source and invasive populations in terms of genetic and phenotypic variability, structure, and mode of reproduction allow a few comments to be made about the environmental implications and related quarantine of new introductory events. Keywords: Seiridium cardinale; fungal pathogen; Cupressus; alien species; landscape properties; population genetic; phenotypic traits; disease management; resistance 1. Introduction The introduction of alien species ranks second only to habitat destruction as one of the major threats to native ecosystems [1,2].
    [Show full text]