Searching for Songs of the People: the Ideology of the Composers’
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
SEARCHING FOR SONGS OF THE PEOPLE: THE IDEOLOGY OF THE COMPOSERS’ COLLECTIVE AND ITS MUSICAL IMPLICATIONS Abigail Chaplin-Kyzer Thesis Prepared for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS May 2018 APPROVED: Mark McKnight, Major Professor Hendrik Schulze, Committee Member Peter Mondelli, Committee Member Benjamin Brand, Interim Chair of the Division of Music History, Theory and Ethnomusicology John Richmond, Dean of the College of Music Victor Prybutok, Dean of the Toulouse Graduate School Chaplin-Kyzer, Abigail. Searching for Songs of the People: The Ideology of the Composers’ Collective and Its Musical Implications. Master of Arts (Music), May 2018, 133 pp., 5 figures, bibliography, 39 primary source titles, 46 secondary source titles. The Composers' Collective, founded by leftist composers in 1932 New York City, sought to create proletarian music that avoided the "bourgeois" traditions of the past and functioned as a vehicle to engage Americans in political dialogue. The Collective aimed to understand how the modern composer became isolated from his public, and discussions on the relationship between music and society pervade the radical writings of Marc Blitzstein, Charles Seeger, and Elie Siegmeister, three of the organization's most vocal members. This new proletarian music juxtaposed revolutionary text with avant-garde musical idioms that were incorporated in increasingly greater quantities; thus, composers progressively acclimated the listener to the dissonance of modern music, a distinctive sound that the Collective hoped would become associated with revolutionary ideals. The mass songs of the two Workers' Song Books published by the Collective, illustrate the transitional phase of the musical implementation of their ideology. In contrast, a case study of the song "Chinaman! Laundryman!" by Ruth Crawford Seeger, a fringe member of the Collective, suggests that this song belongs within the final stage of proletarian music, where the text and highly modernist music seamlessly interact to create what Charles Seeger called an "art-product of the highest type." Copyright 2018 by Abigail Chaplin-Kyzer ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I am deeply appreciative of the advice and patience of my major professor, Dr. Mark McKnight, over the many years it took to complete this project, as well as the invaluable feedback from committee members Dr. Hendrik Schulze and Dr. Peter Mondelli. I am indebted to the Kurt Weill Foundation for Music for their kind permission to include the sources found in the personal papers of Marc Blitzstein and to Carl Fischer on behalf of Theodore Presser Inc. for granting me license to reproduce score excerpts from Ruth Crawford Seeger’s “Chinaman, Laundryman.” I am thankful for the persistent encouragement of my husband, Daniel Kyzer, and the abiding support from my parents who never doubted me or what I could accomplish. Finally, my heartfelt gratitude is extended to the indomitable Dr. Kristen Stauffer Todd, who first showed me how exciting the field of musicology could be. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ........................................................................................................... iii LIST OF FIGURES ........................................................................................................................ v CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................... 1 CHAPTER 2. REVOLUTIONARY IDEOLOGY: THE COMPOSERS’ COLLECTIVE AND THE SOCIAL FUNCTION OF MUSIC ........................................................................................ 9 What is Proletarian Music? ................................................................................................. 9 Radical Philosophy and the Ivory Tower.......................................................................... 20 The Control of Music and “Art for Art’s Sake” ............................................................... 27 Crafting a “New Musical Life” ......................................................................................... 33 CHAPTER 3. THE NEW PROLETARIAN MUSIC ................................................................... 38 Creating Proletarian Music ............................................................................................... 40 Why Avant-Garde Music? ................................................................................................ 44 Distancing the Present from the Past ................................................................................ 51 “Form and Content” and the Importance of Text ............................................................. 56 CHAPTER 4. CRAFTING AN IDEAL: THE WORKERS’ SONG BOOKS AND RUTH CRAWFORD SEEGER’S “CHINAMAN, LAUNDRYMAN!” ................................................. 66 Purpose and Background of the Workers’ Song Books .................................................... 70 Blending Old and New Techniques in the Workers’ Song Books .................................... 74 Songs for the Advanced Revolutionary Chorus................................................................ 83 Music for the Proletariat ................................................................................................... 85 “Chinaman! Laundryman!” and the Final Phase of Proletarian Music ............................ 88 The Collaboration of Music and Text ............................................................................... 97 CHAPTER 5. RECEPTION AND LEGACY ............................................................................ 106 APPENDIX: MUSICAL EXAMPLES....................................................................................... 118 BIBLIOGRAPHY ....................................................................................................................... 128 iv LIST OF FIGURES Page Figure 1: L.E. Swift “A Song for May Day,” Daily Worker, April 27, 1935. .............................. 14 Figure 2: Lyrics by Robert Gessner in L.E. Swift’s “A Song for May Day” ............................... 14 Figure 3: Poem “Chinaman! Laundryman!” by H.T. Tsiang. The words of the boss are in italics. ....................................................................................................................................................... 90 Figure 4: Three Rhythmic Patterns in the Piano Accompaniment of “Chinaman! Laundryman!” ....................................................................................................................................................... 99 v CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION Art, then, is always and inevitably a social function. It has social significance. It is a social force. It is propaganda: explicit, positive; implied, negative. The better the art, the better propaganda it makes: the better propaganda, the better art it is. Charles Seeger Charles Seeger’s words on the social implications of music aptly illustrate the leading viewpoint of the Composers’ Collective, an organization in which Seeger was an early member and integral participant. The Composers’ Collective emerged in New York City in 1932 as a response to the expressed need for a forum in which to discuss modern music as a vehicle for engaging Americans in a political dialogue. This thesis explores the writings, compositions, and history of the Collective and provides an extensive look at the ideology of its members and their thoughts on music and its function in American society. As a result, the study of primary sources forms a crucial component of my research and excerpts from editorials and articles published in the Daily Worker, New Masses, Modern Music, Music Vanguard, and numerous other periodicals as well as unpublished materials found in the Marc Blitzstein Papers appear throughout this project. Furthermore, I examine the musical compositions of Collective members and consider how they applied their ideological views to the compositional process in examples from the mass songs of the Workers Song Books and in Ruth Crawford Seeger’s solo song “Chinaman! Laundryman!” The mass and solo song genres typify different stages within the Collective’s output, and Crawford’s solo song, I believe, exemplifies the final stage in which 1 musical technique and revolutionary text seamlessly interact to create what Charles Seeger called an “art-product of the highest type.”1 Active members of the Collective included Lan Adomian, Marc Blitzstein, Norman Cazden, Henry Leland Clarke, Henry Cowell, Robert Gross, Herbert Haufrecht, George Maynard, Ashley Pettis, Wallingford Riegger, Earl Robinson, Jacob Schaefer, Charles Seeger, and Elie Siegmeister. Prominent composers Aaron Copland, Ruth Crawford Seeger, and Hanns Eisler were not official members, but they occasionally interacted with the organization and certainly sympathized with the Collective’s aims.2 This roster boasted the names of America’s leading composers, most of whom were highly educated intellectuals actively involved in the musical modernist movement. Though an educational and economic divide existed between Collective members and the average worker, the unmistakable hardship of the Great Depression on America’s lower classes caused great concern among individuals of all backgrounds. The impetus for the formation of the Collective was not only musical but social. Seeger described the mood of the group in retrospect: “We felt urgency in those days. …‘The economic and social system is going to hell over here. Music might be able to