Appendix 4: Heritage Area Reports

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Appendix 4: Heritage Area Reports Appendix 4: Heritage area reports 1. Armour Avenue 2. Doctors Common 3. Elizabeth Street 4. Ellice Street 5. Lower Hawker Street 6. Moir Street 7. Porritt Avenue 30 Armour Avenue Heritage Area Mt Victoria, Wellington June 2017 Contents 1 Executive summary (or brief statement of significance) 1 2 Description of area 2 2.1 Area – contents and boundaries 2 2.2 Other features 2 2.3 Archaeology 2 2.4 Setting 2 2.5 Area plan 3 3 Historic context 4 3.1 History of area 4 3.2 History and description of key structures 5 4 Assessment of heritage significance 14 5 Sources 18 1 Executive summary (or brief statement of significance) The area consists of a continuous group of eight houses on the northern side of Armour Avenue in Mt Victoria. The street was formed following the 1894 subdivision of a Brougham Street property owned by local resident Catherine Gray. The area’s close proximity to town meant the sections were snapped up by those wanting to build their own homes as well as speculative builders. All the houses were built between 1897 and 1903, highlighting how colonial suburbs grew streets at a time. This was at the tail of the suburb’s original development; subsequent growth was mainly through land-use intensification. In common with most housing in Mt Victoria, the Armour Avenue group comprise a mix of one and two-storey timber structures, of varying sizes and sited on rectangular sections with narrow street frontages. A few of the houses were architecturally-designed, but most came from pattern books. What marks this group out from those in other streets is their architectural integrity. All are designed in the late-Victorian villa style and, as was common in this period, some feature elaborate architectural treatments. Subsequent renovations to their external fabric have been largely sympathetic to the villa idiom. This is rare in the Mt Victoria context and significantly increases the group’s architectural importance. The group highlights the 20th century history of Mt Victoria. In 1900 it was a socially-diverse community and most houses were single-unit dwellings occupied by homeowners and renters. This changed from the 1920s as many middle class residents left the area for more fashionable peri-urban suburbs. Many houses were converted into flats or boarding houses and the area became more working class and transient in nature. From the late 1970s, middle class house buyers returned to Mt Victoria, attracted by its heritage values and central location. By 2000 the suburb’s gentrification was largely complete. Armour Avenue illustrates this process at a street or micro-level. Some dwellings housed their owners, others were rented; some remained single dwellings, others became flats; a few residents had long occupation periods, many others were short. Common to all the houses has been their gentrification. In 2017 owner-occupiers outnumbered renters. The Armour Avenue houses stand out for not only their architectural integrity but for the way they embody or represent urban history. In the course a few metres they tell a story that not only reveals much about Mt Victoria’s past but that of New Zealand’s other inner city suburbs as well. 1 2 Description of area 2.1 Area – contents and boundaries This area incorporates a set of eight residential buildings on the northern side of Armour Avenue. This set is bookended by Brougham Street and Porritt Avenue and interrupted on the northern side by Albany Avenue. List of buildings 1 Armour Avenue 7 Armour Avenue 9 Armour Avenue 11 Armour Avenue 13 Armour Avenue 15 Armour Avenue 17 Armour Avenue 19 Armour Avenue 2.2 Other features Not applicable. 2.3 Archaeology Subdivision of this area was relatively late in the suburban development of Mt Victoria so it is likely that the area is not of potentially high archaeological value. 2.4 Setting Armour Avenue is located in the suburb of Mount Victoria in Wellington. It runs west-east, connecting Brougham Street with Porritt Avenue. The street sits in a dip between ridges on the western side of Mt Victoria. The eight houses identified for inclusion in this area are on the northern side of the street, interrupted, about halfway along by Albany Avenue, a short dead-end street perpendicular to Armour Avenue. The area has an established feel with some mature trees and established gardens adding to the general ambience, although no.s 1, 7, 9 and 11 are close to the street. 2.5 Structures and features There are eight houses in this area, all on one side of the street. They were all built within a short period around the turn of the 19th century. They do comprise something of a mixture of housing; there are two single-storey villas and six two- storey houses, with three being somewhat grander dwellings. By the standards of the time, none can be considered truly working class but Armour Avenue did have a range of occupants from different socio-economic groups. Most of the houses retain 2 notable levels of integrity, as well as original or appropriately designed boundary fences and the like. 2.6 Area plan 3 3 Historic context 3.1 History of area In December 1893 a major subdivision, including a private right of way, originally called Brougham Avenue, was prepared for Catherine Gray and son David Gray by surveyor Thomas Ward. The land was bought by William Gray in 1870. He and his wife Catherine arrived from Aberdeen on the Simlah in 1852 and initially settled in New Plymouth where William Gray was appointed Postmaster. After stints in Nelson, Dunedin and Auckland he was appointed Secretary of the General Post Office and Inspector of Post Offices, based in Wellington. He died in 1873 and Catherine Gray inherited his holdings. She later (1905) built a large house on the corner of Brougham Street and Brougham Avenue that still stands. Another of her sons, Alex Gray, built a house next door on Brougham Street and this also still stands. The Armour Avenue subdivision was part of a larger subdivision affecting Town Acres 318 to 329, land bounded on three sides by Brougham Street, Ellice Street and Austin Street. It came at a time when Mt Victoria was rapidly filling with houses and pressure was increasing to open up vacant land close to town. The Gray’s subdivision was approved on 27 February 1894. Roads were formed and parcels of land sold. Construction of the houses contained in this area began in 1897 and all eight had been built by 1903. In 1905, Armour (Brougham) Avenue became a public road. Houses on the other side of the street came later, after the sale of the land at the rear of Catherine Gray’s house in 1919, the year that she died.1 This was one of the last substantial subdivisions in Mt Victoria. In 1911, in an unexplained arrangement, the Wellington City Council’s Finance Committee determined that ‘application be made to the Government for the variation of the exemption of Brougham Avenue, so as to provide that no new building shall be erected within 10 feet [3.048 metres] of its southern boundary, between certain points.’2 So, with the exception of 34 Porritt Avenue (and 6 Armour Avenue, built in 1956), none of the houses on the southern side of the street were built within three metres of the street, or close to it, a considerable contrast with the north side. In 1969, the name of the street was changed from Brougham Avenue to Armour Avenue, after WA Armour, who was made the fifth principal of Wellington College in 1928. The purpose of this change was to remove the duplication of names, which caused problems for emergency services. 1 New Zealand Times, 4 October 1919, p.12 2 Dominion, 22 September 1911, p.7 4 The owner and occupants have been a mixture of middle and working class families, individuals and widows. In more recent decades the street has become somewhat gentrified, along with the usual changes to house interiors and alterations to rear elevations. However, this has had no dramatic effect on most of the street elevations of the houses. 3.2 History and description of key structures 1 Armour Avenue This two-storey villa was built for HC Petersen by Mr Dixon (possibly Robert Dixon, also the builder of 7 and 9) in 1899. The house has had a number of largely working class occupants, notably, from 1903, Linnaeus Partridge. Partridge was a jeweller who arrived in Wellington in 1898 and, despite the early setback of a fire at his workshop in Willis Street, went on to establish a well-known Wellington partnership with jeweller George Jenness. They soon gained a reputation for quality workmanship and undertook a number of important commissions which included medals and Prime Ministerial gifts. Street directories show that subsequent occupants included an assortment of working class men and several married (possibly widowed) women. Annie Bird was an early occupant; her son died in the wreck of the SS Penguin in 1909.3 Other occupants included, in 1913, Francis Beamish, a clerk, in 1921, William Perry, solicitor, in 1929, John William Knight, builder, and then in 1955, Joyce Seddon. By 1961/62 Stan Horsfield, an assistant manager shared the house with John Gowans, a stereotyper. To date, there has been a wide assortment of occupants. The building has undergone several important alterations. The upstairs extension and glazing of the verandah was most likely added in the 1920s. In 1944 the owner, builder JW Knight, undertook the work to convert the house into two separate flats.
Recommended publications
  • Rethinking Arboreal Heritage for Twenty-First-Century Aotearoa New Zealand
    NATURAL MONUMENTS: RETHINKING ARBOREAL HERITAGE FOR TWENTY-FIRST-CENTURY AOTEAROA NEW ZEALAND Susette Goldsmith A thesis submitted to Victoria University of Wellington in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Victoria University of Wellington 2018 ABSTRACT The twenty-first century is imposing significant challenges on nature in general with the arrival of climate change, and on arboreal heritage in particular through pressures for building expansion. This thesis examines the notion of tree heritage in Aotearoa New Zealand at this current point in time and questions what it is, how it comes about, and what values, meanings and understandings and human and non-human forces are at its heart. While the acknowledgement of arboreal heritage can be regarded as the duty of all New Zealanders, its maintenance and protection are most often perceived to be the responsibility of local authorities and heritage practitioners. This study questions the validity of the evaluation methods currently employed in the tree heritage listing process, tree listing itself, and the efficacy of tree protection provisions. The thesis presents a multiple case study of discrete sites of arboreal heritage that are all associated with a single native tree species—karaka (Corynocarpus laevigatus). The focus of the case studies is not on the trees themselves, however, but on the ways in which the tree sites fill the heritage roles required of them entailing an examination of the complicated networks of trees, people, events, organisations, policies and politics situated within the case studies, and within arboreal heritage itself. Accordingly, the thesis adopts a critical theoretical perspective, informed by various interpretations of Actor Network Theory and Assemblage Theory, and takes a ‘counter-’approach to the authorised heritage discourse introducing a new notion of an ‘unauthorised arboreal heritage discourse’.
    [Show full text]
  • A Diachronic Study of Unparliamentary Language in the New Zealand Parliament, 1890-1950
    WITHDRAW AND APOLOGISE: A DIACHRONIC STUDY OF UNPARLIAMENTARY LANGUAGE IN THE NEW ZEALAND PARLIAMENT, 1890-1950 BY RUTH GRAHAM A thesis submitted to the Victoria University of Wellington in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Applied Linguistics Victoria University of Wellington 2016 ii “Parliament, after all, is not a Sunday school; it is a talking-shop; a place of debate”. (Barnard, 1943) iii Abstract This study presents a diachronic analysis of the language ruled to be unparliamentary in the New Zealand Parliament from 1890 to 1950. While unparliamentary language is sometimes referred to as ‘parliamentary insults’ (Ilie, 2001), this study has a wider definition: the language used in a legislative chamber is unparliamentary when it is ruled or signalled by the Speaker as out of order or likely to cause disorder. The user is required to articulate a statement of withdrawal and apology or risk further censure. The analysis uses the Communities of Practice theoretical framework, developed by Wenger (1998) and enhanced with linguistic impoliteness, as defined by Mills (2005) in order to contextualise the use of unparliamentary language within a highly regulated institutional setting. The study identifies and categorises the lexis of unparliamentary language, including a focus on examples that use New Zealand English or te reo Māori. Approximately 2600 examples of unparliamentary language, along with bibliographic, lexical, descriptive and contextual information, were entered into a custom designed relational database. The examples were categorised into three: ‘core concepts’, ‘personal reflections’ and the ‘political environment’, with a number of sub-categories. This revealed a previously unknown category of ‘situation dependent’ unparliamentary language and a creative use of ‘animal reflections’.
    [Show full text]
  • "Unfair" Trade?
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Garcia, Martin; Baker, Astrid Working Paper Anti-dumping in New Zealand: A century of protection from "unfair" trade? NZ Trade Consortium Working Paper, No. 39 Provided in Cooperation with: New Zealand Institute of Economic Research (NZIER), Wellington Suggested Citation: Garcia, Martin; Baker, Astrid (2005) : Anti-dumping in New Zealand: A century of protection from "unfair" trade?, NZ Trade Consortium Working Paper, No. 39, New Zealand Institute of Economic Research (NZIER), Wellington This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/66072 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen
    [Show full text]
  • No 44, 23 May 1940, 1119
    .,flumb. 44 1119 THE NEW ZEALAND GAZETTE WELLINGTON, THURSDAY, MAY 23, 1940. Doolaring Land ae,quired for a Government Wark, and not Declaring Land acquired for a Government Wark, and not required for that Purpose, to be Crown Land. required for that Purpose, to be Crown Land. [L.S.] GALWAY, Governor-General. [L.S,] GALWAY, Governor-General. A PROCLAMATION. A PROCLAMATION. N pursuance and exercise of the powers and authorities N pursuance and exercise of the powers and authorities I vested in me by the Public Works Act, 1928, and of I vested in me by the Public Works Act, 1928, and of every other power and authority in anywise enabling me in every other power and authority in anywise enabling me in this behalf, I, George Vere Arundell, Viscount Galway, this behalf, I, George Vere Arundell, Viscount Galway, Governor-General of the Dominion of New Zealand, do Governor-General of the Dominion of New Zealand, do herebv hereby declare the land described in the Schedule hereto to declare the land described in the Schedule hereto to be Crown be Crown land subject to the Land Act, 1924. land subject to the Land Act, 1924. SCHEDULE. SCHEDULE. APPROXIMATE area of the piece of land declared to be Crown APPROXIMATE area of the piece of stopped Government land : 28·68 perches. road declared to be Crown land: 1 rood 7·3 perches. Being part Lot 701 on D.P. 19, being part Subdivision A, Adjoining or passing through part Section 23, Mang:i,nui Manchester Block. District, and Lot 1, D.P.
    [Show full text]
  • The New Zealand Gazette 1891
    DEC. 12] THE NEW ZEALAND GAZETTE 1891 Murphy, John, 2 Donald Crescent, Karori, Wellington. Associates McIntosh, Graham, P.O. Box 281, Wellington. Aburn, Frederick Benjamin, Land and Income Tax Department, McKenzie, John McGregor Graham, P.O. Box 33, Featherston. Wellington. McKissock, James Lanyon, P.O. Box 1685, Wellington. Adams, Gerald William Howard, P.O. Box 1685, Wellington. Nankervis, Richard John, care of Box 348, Wellington. Adams, John Clifford, Headquarters,. No. I Training Battalion, Page, Thos. Wm., P.O. Box 674, Wellington. Military Camp, Trentham. Parsons, Geoffrey Arnold, P.O. Box 1527, Wellington. Adams, John Stanley, P.O. Box 347, Wellington. Perston, John Roberton, 80 Seatoun Heights Road, Wellington. Ahearn, Harold Hector Henry, Messrs. Peter Jackson, Ltd., Philip, William Shearer, 328 Lambton Quay, Wellington. Wellington. Phillips, Leslie Vaughan, 38 High Street, Lower Hutt. Pollock, David, P.O. Box 997, Wellington. Aitken, Frederick Richard George, care of Education Department, Wellington. Porter, Dudley Reginald, Dominion Farmers' Building, Featherston Street, Wellington. Alexander, Hugh Murray, 10 Dee Stree.t, Wellington. Alington, Edward Hugh, care of Chief Accountant, New Zealand Purdie, James Keith, Messrs. Ross, Purdie and Co., National Bank Railways, Wellington. Chambers, Wellington. Allen, Rosa Mary, P.O. Box 202, Wellington. Reid, Ian Duff, Box 1527, Wellington. Allison, Denis George, P.O. Box 41, Te Aro. Renner, Geoffrey Thomas Martyn, P.O. Box 1094, Wellington. Allman-Marchant, John Raphael, 29 Bolton Street, Petone. Richardson, Claude Ronald, P.O. Box 1685, Wellington. Anderson, Alexander, 33 Palliser Road, Wellington. Robson, William John, P.O. Box 1168, Wellington. Anderson, Donald Ian Moginie, P.O. Box 748, Wellington. Rodger, William Glendinning, care of P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • 1911 DAIMLER Restoration Swallow Doretti Marketplace
    NEW ZEALAND’S FOREMOST HISTORICAL MOTORING MAGAZINE No. 328 June/July 2014 $6.95 1911 DAIMLER reSTOraTION Behind the Wheel of a SWallOW DOreTTI cars | bikes | parts | for sale | wanted MARKETPlaCE 9 418979 000012 The photographs in this issue have been supplied by John Loudon PHOTOGRAPHS REQUIRED from Alexandra. The top image shows what is reputed to be the first Submissions of suitable prints and information (where available) are car (a Hupmobile?) to travel the Nevis Road. Note the stone dragging always welcome. behind to help the brakes on the steep descents. Please send original photographs of historical interest with any available Bottom left: P M Renton, the Owaka grocer. information to: Bottom right: Harry McRay with the fleet of trucks used for cartage Beaded Wheels, PO Box 13140, Christchurch 8141. in the ‘30s. Caversham, Dunedin is in the background. Laserprints/photocopies are not suitable. Photos will be returned as soon as practicable. management committee MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE SECRETARY/ TREASURER Ed Boyd Contact National Office for all queries Please note this information changes Michael Lavender 06 348 4547 [email protected] annually - these details are valid until regarding VICs, logbooks, historic race licences, 03 325 5704 [email protected] Tony Bartlett October 2014. lighting endorsement, registration of vehicles, REGISTRAR 06 867 9850 [email protected] address changes, subscriptions, membership PRESIDENT Rod Brayshaw Diane Quarrie John Coomber 07 549 4250 [email protected] cards, speed events. 06 876 4009 [email protected]
    [Show full text]
  • Promoting Paradise: Utopianism And
    New Zealand Journal of History, 42, 1 (2008) Promoting Paradise UTOPIANISM AND NATIONAL IDENTITY IN NEW ZEALAND, 1870–1930 A NUMBER OF COMMENTATORS have identified a correlation between aspects of utopianism and New Zealand’s past. Miles Fairburn, for example, has emphasized the power of an arcadian myth in nineteenth-century New Zealand.1 James Belich entitled the second volume of his history of New Zealand Paradise Reforged.2 And Lucy Sargisson and Lyman Tower Sargent’s work on intentional communities (or communes) argued that New Zealand ‘has a special place in the history of utopianism’.3 As Sargisson and Sargent note, though, there has not been any extended discussion of the association between utopianism and New Zealand’s national identity. Fairburn’s work comes closest, but the ‘governing category’ of his landmark study was ‘the colony’s social organisation’ rather than arcadian myths.4 Furthermore, Fairburn’s work stops in the 1890s, ignores ideal visions of cities and towns, disregards utopian fiction, and does not take into account ‘race’ and politics and the impact which these had on images of arcadia. While ‘race’ and politics are central to Belich’s work his study remains first and foremost a general history. The use of the descriptor ‘paradise’, like his term ‘recolonization’ (which is used to signify New Zealand’s apparent return to the British imperial fold), works primarily as ‘a heuristic device … to give pattern’.5 Belich also overlooks utopian and science fiction (SF) literature, focuses on the printed word and skips over ‘booster’ sources, namely those civic and commercial publications produced locally to promote settlement and investment.
    [Show full text]
  • The Use of Land Value Taxation in New Zealand (1891 – 1991)
    THE USE OF LAND VALUE TAXATION IN NEW ZEALAND (1891 – 1991) By Dylan Hobbs A thesis submitted to the Victoria University of Wellington in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy School of Accounting and Commercial Law, Victoria University of Wellington 2019 Contents List of Tables ................................................................................................................................. v Abstract ........................................................................................................................................ vii List of Acronyms .......................................................................................................................... ix Acknowledgments ......................................................................................................................... xi Chapter 1: Introduction ................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Research Design .................................................................................................................. 3 1.2 Research Questions ............................................................................................................. 3 1.3 Research Justification.......................................................................................................... 5 1.4 Thesis Structure ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Muritai School
    Muritai School Eastbourne The Researcher Robin Carlyon went to Muritai School for all his Primary School Education 1946-1954 1897-1898 1897 8 Muratai Dorizac Elenor E Female £ 30.00 1898 7 Muratai Dorizac Eleanor E Female £ 26.50 House House means a dwelling was provided for by thee Wellington Education Board 30th January 1896 The chairman was requested to enquire as to the qualifications of Miss Dorizac, who was recommended to be put in charge of the Pencarrow aided school. 6th February 1896 Part of an article called Tea Table Topics I am not an advocate of cycling as an exercise for women as a rule, but I must confess that graceful ' wheel-women' may be counted by the score at Eastbourne, where everyone rides on cycles. The most fastidious person could find nothing to object to in the' appearance of the lair damsels as they skip airily along on their machines, while the costumes should delight the heart of Mrs Grundy. They invariably consist of well-made skirts, almost like a riding-habit, and just long enough to conceal the ankles, and either a neat blouse or a trim coat, the former being most usual on account of the hot weather. I have not seen one single knickerbocker costume even by way of exception. 22nd July 1897 Another piece from Tea Table Topics The residents of Muritai gave an extremely jolly dance at Thomas’ Hall last week. Muritai —for the information of those who are ignorant of a place which is rapidly growing in popularity —is situated little more than a mile south of Day’s Bay.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Plan Hearings
    Tuesday 10 May 2016 Annual Plan Hearings Time Sub No Name Organisation Page Number 9:15 383 Alastair Smith 32 9:20 401 Murray Robert 37 9:25 431 Molly Melhuish 54 9:30 487 David Zwartz 133 9:35 Buffer 9:45 448 Tim Shannahan Renouf Tennis Centre 61 9:55 450 David Bagnall Vogelmorn Precinct Steering Group 67 10:05 323 Katherine Skipper New Zealand Institute of Architects 24 10:15 Morning tea 10:30 459 Arie Moore Lyall Bay Surf Life Saving Club Inc 126 10:40 460 Chris McDonald and Morten Gjerde Victoria University, School of Architecture 130 10:50 561 Victoria Carter Cityhop 165 11:00 458 Alexia Pickering Individual 121 Victoria University of Wellington Students’ 11:05 425 Rory Lenihan-Ikin 45 Association 11:15 523 Rhona Carson Newtown Residents' Association 148 11:25 161 Jane O'Shea 12 11:30 Buffer 11:35 564 Chris Watson C Watson Consultancy Limited 184 11:45 568 Anna Ferguson Healthy Future Families Trust 186 11:55 563 John Milford Chamber of Commence 173 12:05 700 Ralph Chapman NZ Centre for Sustainable Cities 232 12:15 443 Barry Blackett Glenside Progressive Association. 58 12:25 511 Sharon Ellis Individual 145 12:30 Lunch 13:15 708 Chris Horne and Barbara Mitcalfe Individual 236 13:20 481 Robin Boldarin Miramar/Maupuia Progressive Association Porirua Harbour Catchment and Community 13:30 370 Donna Sherlock 25 Trust board 13:40 527 Nick Mouat A2B - Active to Brooklyn 152 Sue Watt, Angela Rotherwell and 13:50 454 Mount Victoria Residents Association 112 Craig Palmer 14:00 531 Clive Anstey 162 14:10 Buffer 14:20 602 Paul Barker Living Wage
    [Show full text]
  • Faith-Based Charity and Professional Ambition in the Life of Charles Gordon O’Neill (1828-1900)
    FAITH-BASED CHARITY AND PROFESSIONAL AMBITION IN THE LIFE OF CHARLES GORDON O’NEILL (1828-1900) Submitted by Stephen Utick M.Sc.Soc. M.Litt. M.A. A thesis submitted in total fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy School of Arts and Sciences (NSW) Faculty of Arts and Sciences Australian Catholic University Graduate Research Studies PO Box 968 North Sydney New South Wales 2059 August 2012 ii STATEMENT OF AUTHORSHIP AND SOURCES This thesis contains no material published elsewhere or extracted in whole or in part from a thesis by which I have qualified for or been awarded another degree or diploma. No other person’s work has been used without due acknowledgement in the main text of the thesis. This thesis has not been submitted for the award of any degree or diploma in any other tertiary institution. All research procedures reported in the thesis received the approval of the relevant Ethics Committee (where required) or a relevant safety committee if the matter is referred to such a committee. (signed) Stephen Utick Date: 14 August 2012 iii ABSTRACT This translocational biography provides an interpretation of the life of Catholic philanthropist, colonial parliamentarian and civil engineer Charles Gordon O’Neill (1828-1900). Focusing on the two most significant elements in his life, commitment to faith-based charity and professional ambition in pursuit of an empire career in civil engineering, it also examines the balance between O’Neill’s Irish Catholic and British identities. Covering O’Neill’s life in Victorian Scotland (1828-1863), colonial New Zealand (1864-1880) and pre-Federation New South Wales (1881-1900), the biography traces the sequence and patterns of these two respective elements through a broadly chronological theme-based historiography.
    [Show full text]
  • North Kumutoto Precinct Project, Wellington: Archaeological Assessment of Proposed Redevelopment of Site
    North Kumutoto Precinct Project, Wellington: Archaeological assessment of proposed redevelopment of site Report to Willis Bond & Co Mary O’Keeffe Heritage Solutions 56 View Rd Melrose, Wellington October 2014 Contents 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................. 1 1.1 DESCRIPTION OF SITE ...................................................................................................... 1 1.2 CONTEXT AND DATA ...................................................................................................... 2 1.3 SCOPE AND LIMITATIONS OF THIS REPORT .................................................................. 3 2 ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCE .................................................................. 4 2.1 RECORDED HISTORY OF THE SITE ................................................................................. 4 2.1.1 Kumutoto sites 8 and 10 and immediate environs ........................................................ 10 2.2 STATUTORY LISTS ........................................................................................................... 14 3 CURRENT SITE ............................................................................................. 16 3.1 PROPOSED WORK, AND IMPACT OF PROPOSED WORK .............................................. 16 4 ASSESSMENT ................................................................................................. 18 4.1 ARCHAEOLOGICAL POTENTIAL ...................................................................................
    [Show full text]