DOCSLIB.ORG

Math 443/543 Graph Theory Notes 5: Planar Graphs and Coloring

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Math 443/543 Graph Theory Notes 5: Planar Graphs and Coloring Math 443/543 Graph Theory Notes 5: Planar graphs and coloring David Glickenstein September 6, 2012 1 Planar graphs The Three Houses and Three Utilities Problem: Given three houses and three utilities, can we connect each house to all three utilities so that the utility lines do not cross. We can represent this problem with a graph, connecting each house to each utility. We notice that this graph is bipartite: De…nition 1 A bipartite graph is one in which the vertices can be partitioned into two sets X and Y such that every edge has one end in X and the other in Y: The partition (X; Y ) is called a bipartition.A complete bipartite graph is one such that each vertex of X is joined with every vertex of Y: The complete bipartite graph such that the order of X is m and the order of Y is n is denoted Km;n or K (m; n) : It is easy to see that the relevant graph in the problem above is K3;3: Now, we wish to embed this graph in the plane such that no two edges cross except at a vertex. De…nition 2 A planar graph is a graph that can be drawn in the plane such that no two edges cross except at a vertex. A planar graph drawn in the plane in a way such that no two edges cross except at a vertex is called a plane graph. Note that it says “can be drawn”not “is drawn.”The problem is that even if a graph is drawn with crossings, it could potentially be drawn in another way so that there are no crossings. Thus the Three Houses and Three Utilities Problem is whether or not K3;3 is a planar graph. A planar graph divides the plane into regions. That is, if we remove the vertices and edges from the plane, there are a number of disconnected pieces, each of which we call a region. The boundary of a given region is all of the edges and vertices incident on the region. Notice that there is always one exterior region which contains all of the unbounded parts of the plane. 1 Look at examples. Notice that p q + r = 2: A theorem of Euler says that this is always true. For the following theorem, we will need the de…nition of a tree. De…nition 3 A connected graph with no cycles is called a tree. Note the following fact about trees. Proposition 4 A tree with p vertices and q edges satis…es p = q + 1: Proof. This can be proven by induction on the number of edges, since each time a new edge is attached, it must come with a new vertex. This is because if we attach two vertices with an edge, since the tree in the previous step is connected, we had a path between the two vertices and are hence introducing a cycle. Theorem 5 (Euler’sTheorem) Let G be a connected plane graph with p ver- tices, q edges, and r regions. Then p q + r = 2: We remark that the number 2 has to do with the plane, and will become important when we look at topology. Proof. We induct on q: If q = 0; then we must have p = 1 and r = 1: Thus p q + r = 1 0 + 1 = 2: Now suppose it is true for all graphs with k or fewer edges. Consider a connected graph G with k + 1 edges. If G is a tree, then we know that p = q + 1 = k + 2: Furthermore, since there are no cycles in a tree, r = 1: Thus p q + r = (k + 2) (k + 1) + 1 = 2: If G is not a tree, then it contains a cycle. Let e G be an edge on a cycle. If 2 we look at G0 = G e; it has k edges, and p0 = p; q0 = k = q 1; and by the inductive hypothesis, p0 q0 + r0 = 2: We see that r0 = r 1 since removing the edge e joins the regions on either side of the e: Thus p q + r = p0 (q0 + 1) + (r0 + 1) = 2: Notice the following corollary: Corollary 6 Any representation of a planar graph as a plane graph has the same number of regions. We can now solve the Problem of Three Houses and Three Utilities. Theorem 7 The graph K3;3 is not planar. 2 Proof. Suppose we can represent K3;3 as a plane graph. We know that p = 6 and q = 9; so we need to understand something about r: Since K3;3 is bipartite, we see that all regions have boundaries with at least 4 edges. Suppose the graph divides the plane into regions R1;R2;:::;Rr: Let B (R) be the number of edges in the boundary of region R: Consider the number r N = B (Ri) : i=1 X Since all regions have boundaries with at least 4 edges, we have N 4r: However, since each edge is counted twice, we have that N = 2q = 18: Thus 4r 18 or r 4:5: However, that would mean that p q + r = 6 9 + r 1:5; which is impossible if the graph is a plane graph. One might ask about other non-planar graphs. Another important one is K5: Here is a theorem that allows us to show this. Theorem 8 Let G be a connected, planar graph with p vertices and q edges, with p 3: Then q 3p 6: Proof. The proof is quite similar to that of the previous theorem. For p = 3; we certainly have q 3: For p 4; we consider a representation of G as a plane graph, which gives us r regions. Denote the regions as R1;R2;:::;Rr: We compute again r N = B (Ri) : i=1 X This time, we note that B (R) 3 for each region, and a similar argument give us that 3r N 2q: Using Euler Theorem, we have that 2 = p q + r 2 1 p q + q = p q 3 3 3 or q 3p 6: Corollary 9 The complete graph K5 is not planar. 5 Proof. We see that K5 has p = 5 and q = 2 = 10; and so q = 10 > 15 6 = 3p 6: 2 Kuratowski’stheorem This exposition is mainly from BM-9.5. We saw that K5 and K3;3 are not planar. It easily follows that any graph containing one of these as a subgraph (technically, any graph with a subgraph isomorphic to one of these two graphs) is not planar either. In fact, we can do slightly better by seeing that any graph with a subgraph isomorphic to a subdivision of K5 or K3;3 is not planar. De…nition 10 A subdivision of a graph G is a new graph obtained by adding vertices inside the edges. (The new vertices are all of degree 2.) It is then clear that : Proposition 11 If a subdivision of G is planar, then G is planar. Proof. Given a representation of the subdivision of G as a plane graph, simply remove the vertices which form the subdivision and we arrive at a plane graph representation of G: Stated another way, if G is not planar, then any subdivision is not planar. Thus any subdivision of K5 and K3;3 is nonplanar. Proposition 12 If G is planar, then every subgraph is planar. Proof. Represent G as a plane graph, then the subgraphs are also plane graphs. Thus if a subgraph of G is a subdivision of K5 or K3;3; then it is not planar, and thus G is not planar. Kuratowski’stheorem is the converse: Theorem 13 (Kuratowski) If a graph is not planar, then it contains a sub- graph isomorphic to a subdivision of K5 or K3;3: Proof is in BM. We may do it later in the semester. 4 3 Topology comments Plane graphs are also graphs on spheres. Using stereographic projection, one can convert any plane graph to a graph on the sphere with no vertex at the north pole. Stereographic projection is a map from the sphere except the north pole to the plane which is a homeomorphism (i.e., a bijection which is continuous with continuous inverse). The map is de…ned as follows. Consider the plane in R3 and the xy-plane, R2: For any point P on the sphere, draw a line in R3 2 from the north pole to that point. It will intersect the plane R at a point P 0: Stereographic projection is the map P P 0: With some basic geometry, one can explicitly write down the map, which! is x y (x; y; z) = ; : 1 z 1 z The inverse map can also be written explicitly, as 2 2 1 2x 2y x + y 1 (x; y) = ; ; : x2 + y2 + 1 x2 + y2 + 1 x2 + y2 + 1 We have the following: Proposition 14 Let v V (G) for a planar graph G: There is a plane graph representing G such that2v is in the boundary of the exterior region. Proof. Take a plane graph representing G: Map it by inverse stereographic projection to the sphere. Some region contains v in its boundary. Rotate the sphere so that a point in that region is at the north pole, then use stereographic projection to project it back to the plane. Recall that our proof of nonembeddability of K3;3 and K5 used Euler’sthe- orem, which is essentially a theorem about topology. We can replace the use of Euler’stheorem with a di¤erent topological theorem, the Jordan curve theorem.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Grade 7/8 Math Circles Graph Theory the Seven Bridges of Königsberg
    Faculty of Mathematics Centre for Education in Waterloo, Ontario N2L 3G1 Mathematics and Computing Grade 7/8 Math Circles Graph Theory October 13/14, 2015 The Seven Bridges of K¨onigsberg In the mid-1700s the was a city named K¨onigsberg. Today, the city is called Kaliningrad and is in modern day Russia. However, in the 1700s the city was a part of Prussia and had many Germanic influences. The city sits on the Pregel River. This divides the city into two main areas with the river running between them. In the river there are also two islands that are a part of the city. In 1736, a mathematician by the name of Leonhard Euler visited the city and was fascinated by the bridges. Euler wondered whether or not you could walk through the city and cross each bridge exactly once. Take a few minutes to see if you can find a way on the map of K¨onigsberg below. 1 The Three Utilities Problem Suppose you have a neighbourhood with only three houses. Now, each house needs to be connected to a set of three utilities (gas, water, and electricity) in order for a family to live there. Your challenge is to connect all three houses to each of the utilities. Below is a diagram for you to draw out where each utility line/pipe should go. The catch is that the lines you draw to connect each house to a utility can't cross. Also, you can't draw lines through another house or utility plant. In other words, you can't draw House 1's water line through House 2 or through the electricity plant.
    [Show full text]
  • Planar Graphs Lecture 10A: Properties
    CS 163 & CS 265: Graph Algorithms Week 10: Planar graphs Lecture 10a: Properties David Eppstein University of California, Irvine Winter Quarter, 2021 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License Examples of planar and nonplanar graphs The three utilities problem Input: three houses and three utilities, placed in the plane https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:3_utilities_problem_blank.svg How to draw lines connecting each house to each utility, without crossings (and without passing through other houses or utilities)? There is no solution! If you try it, you will get stuck::: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:3_utilities_problem_plane.svg But this is not a satisfactory proof of impossibility Other surfaces have solutions If we place the houses and utilities on a torus (for instance, a coffee cup including the handle) we will be able to solve it https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:3_utilities_problem_torus.svg So solution depends somehow on the topology of the plane Planar graphs A planar graph is a graph that can be drawn without crossings in the plane The graph we are trying to draw in this case is K3;3, a complete bipartite graph with three houses and three utilities It is not a planar graph; the best we can do is to have only one crossing Examples of planar graphs: trees and grid graphs Examples of planar graphs: convex polyhedra Mostly but not entirely planar: road networks https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:High_Five.jpg [Eppstein and Gupta 2017] Properties Some properties of planar graphs I Euler's formula: If a connected planar graph has n = V vertices, m = E edges, and divides the plane into F faces (regions, including the region outside the drawing) then V − E + F = 2 I Simple planar graphs have ≤ 3n − 6 edges ) their degeneracy is ≤ 5 I Four-color theorem: Can be colored with ≤ 4 colors (Appel and Haken [1976]; degeneracy-based greedy gives ≤ 6) p I Planar separator theorem: treewidth is O( n) (Lipton and Tarjan [1979]; ) faster algorithms for many problems, e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Planar Graphs and Coloring
    Math 443/543 Graph Theory Notes 5: Planar graphs and coloring David Glickenstein October 10, 2014 1 Planar graphs The Three Houses and Three Utilities Problem: Given three houses and three utilities, can we connect each house to all three utilities so that the utility lines do not cross. We can represent this problem with a graph, connecting each house to each utility. We notice that this graph is bipartite: De…nition 1 A bipartite graph is one in which the vertices can be partitioned into two sets X and Y such that every edge joins one vertex in X with one vertex in Y: The partition (X; Y ) is called a bipartition.A complete bipartite graph is one such that each vertex of X is joined with every vertex of Y: The complete bipartite graph such that the order of X is m and the order of Y is n is denoted Km;n or K (m; n) : It is easy to see that the relevant graph in the problem above is K3;3: Now, we wish to embed this graph in the plane such that no two edges cross except at a vertex. De…nition 2 A planar graph is a graph that can be drawn in the plane such that no two edges cross except at a vertex. A planar graph drawn in the plane in a way such that no two edges cross except at a vertex is called a plane graph. Note that it says “can be drawn”not “is drawn.”The problem is that even if a graph is drawn with crossings, it could potentially be drawn in another way so that there are no crossings.
    [Show full text]
  • Competition Problems
    THIS IS FUN! OLGA RADKO MATH CIRCLE ADVANCED 2 MARCH 14, 2021 1. Graphs Disclaimer: All graphs in this section are taken to be simple graphs. This means that between any two vertices there is at most one edge, and there are no edges between a vertex and itself. Definition 1. Given a graph G, we define its compliment, denoted G¯. G¯ is a graph with the same vertex set as G but a different edge set. Two vertices have share an edge in G¯ if and only if they do not share an edge in G. Problem 1. (1)( 5 points) Let G be the graph with V = f1; 2; 3; 4; 5g and E = f(1; 2); (1; 4); (2; 3); (2; 5); (3; 4); (4; 5)g: Draw G and G¯. (2)( 5 points) Let G be a graph with n vertices and m edges. How many edges does G¯ have? (3)( 10 points) Prove that if G is a planar graph with 11 or more vertices then either G or G¯ is not planar. (Hint: Problem 6 on the planar graphs handout might be useful) Problem 2. (1)( 10 points) Prove that if G is disconnected, then G¯ is connected. (Being connected means that there is a path between any two vertices) (2)( 5 points) Is the converse true? That is, if G is connected does that mean that G¯ is disconnected? If true, prove it. If not, give a counterexample. Problem 3. (10 points) Recall the three utilities problem (Problem 2 in Planar graphs worksheet).
    [Show full text]
  • Ten Minute Conjectures in Graph Theory
    Sketchy Tweets: Ten Minute Conjectures in Graph Theory ANTHONY BONATO AND RICHARD J. NOWAKOWSKI omments by Richard Hamming in his address You Conjecture (which is discussed as our second-to-last conjec- and Your Research [16] resonated with us. On the ture in the following text), is the three-page paper [2] which, CCone hand, Hamming says, with a new way of thinking, reduced most of the published work of twenty years to a corollary of its main result! ‘‘What are the most important problems in your field?’’ Given the size of modern graph theory, with its many which suggests working on hard problems. Yet on the smaller subfields (such as structural graph theory, random other, he exhorts us to graphs, topological graph theory, graph algorithms, spectral graph theory, graph minors, and graph homomorphisms, to ‘‘Plant the little acorns from which mighty oak trees grow.’’ name a few), it would be impossible to list all, or even the Following this advice, we should look over the big bulk of the conjectures in the field. We are content instead to questions, then doodle and sketch out some approaches. focus on a few family jewels, which have an intrinsic beauty If you are an expert, then this is easy to do, but most people and have provided some challenges for graph-theorists for at do not want to wait to become an expert before looking at least two decades. There is something for everyone here, interesting problems. Graph theory, our area of expertise, from undergraduate students taking their first course in has many hard-to-solve questions.
    [Show full text]
  • Graph Theory
    Math 3322: Graph Theory Math 3322: Graph Theory Chapters 8{10 Mikhail Lavrov ([email protected]) Spring 2021 Math 3322: Graph Theory Bipartite matching The matching problem in bipartite graphs Favorite colors Five teenagers with attitude are chosen to defend the Earth from the attacks of an evil sorceress. Before they can take on their superpowers, they must each pick a color. But they're very picky about the colors they're willing to settle for: Aiden Brian Chloe Dylan Emily What is the largest team of superheroes that can be formed? Math 3322: Graph Theory Bipartite matching The matching problem in bipartite graphs Matchings in graphs A matching in a graph is a set of independent edges: edges that share no endpoints. We are often especially interested in finding a maximum matching which has the largest size possible. We write α0(G) for the size of a maximum matching in G; the 0 indicates that it's the edge version of a problem (we'll look at the vertex version of the problem later). We'll begin by looking at the maximum matching problem in bipartite graphs. Here, if G has bipartition (A; B), each edge in the matching has one endpoint in A and one in B, so the matching pairs up some vertices in A with adjacent vertices in B. This can model problems about pairing one type of object to another: workers to tasks, rooms to occupants, meetings to days, etc. Math 3322: Graph Theory Bipartite matching The matching problem in bipartite graphs Systems of distinct representatives For some sets S1;S2;:::;Sn, a system of distinct representatives is a choice of elements x1 2 S1; x2 2 S2; : : : ; xn 2 Sn that are all distinct: no two chosen elements are equal.
    [Show full text]
  • Graph Theory
    PRIMES Circle: Graph Theory Tal Berdichevsky and Corinne Mulvey May 17, 2019 Contents 1 Introduction to Graphs 2 1.1 Basics . .2 1.2 Common Types of Graphs . .3 2 Planar Graphs 6 3 Graph Colorings 8 3.1 Introduction to Vertex Coloring . .8 3.2 Four and Five Color Theorems . 10 1 1 Introduction to Graphs How can we model Facebook friends? Here's a diagram of some friends. We can let each point represent an individual person and each line drawn between two points represent a friendship between two people. Abby Bob Clara Dan Eva Fiona Gal Figure 1: Graph of Facebook Friends 1.1 Basics Let's formalize what we just said. The representation we created is an example of a graph. Each friend, represented by the points, can be thought of as a vertex of the graph and the friendships, represented by the lines drawn between points, are edges of the graph. More specifically, Definition 1.1. A graph G is a set of vertices V (G) and edges E(G). Each edge is a \connection" between two vertices, and can be represented as a pair of vertices (u; v). Each edge is said to be incident to the two vertices it connects. Example 1.1. In Figure 1, the vertices are people and edges represent friendships. Abby, Bob, Clara, Dan, Eva, Fiona, and Gal are all vertices and make up the vertex set of the graph. Definition 1.2. Two edges u and v are adjacent if there is an edge between them; in other words, (u; v) 2 E(G).
    [Show full text]
  • Sketchy Tweets: Ten Minute Conjectures in Graph Theory
    SKETCHY TWEETS: TEN MINUTE that a good approach is to reframe the problem, CONJECTURES IN GRAPH THEORY and change the point of view. One example, from Vizing's conjecture, is the three page paper [2] which, with a new way of thinking, reduced most ANTHONY BONATO AND RICHARD J. NOWAKOWSKI of the published work of 20 years to a corollary of its main result! Given the size of modern Graph Theory with its many smaller sub¯elds (such as Comments by Richard Hamming in his ad- structural graph theory, random graphs, topo- dress You and Your Research [16] resonated with logical graph theory, graph algorithms, spectral us. On the one hand, Hamming says: graph theory, graph minors, or graph homomor- phisms, to name a few) it would be impossible to \What are the most important problems in your list all, or even the bulk of these conjectures in ¯eld?" the ¯eld. We are content instead to focus on a which suggests working on hard problems. Yet few family jewels, which have an intrinsic beauty on the other, he exhorts us to: and have provided some challenges for Graph Theorists for at least two decades. There is some- \Plant the little acorns from which mighty oak thing for everyone here, from the undergraduate trees grow." student taking their ¯rst course in Graph The- Following this advice, we should look over the ory, to the seasoned researcher in the ¯eld. For big questions, then doodle and sketch out some additional reading on problems and conjectures approaches. If you are an expert, then this is in Graph Theory and other ¯elds, see the Open easy to do, but most people do not want to wait Problem Garden maintained by IRMACS at Si- the requisite 10,000 hours before looking at in- mon Fraser University [24].
    [Show full text]
  • Graph Theory and Combinatorics 10CS42
    Graph Theory and combinatorics 10CS42 GRAPH THEORY AND COMBINATORICS Sub code: 10CS42 IA Marks: 25 Hours/Week: 04 Exam hours: 03 Total hours: 52 Exam marks: 100 UNIT-1 Introduction to Graph Theory: Definition and Examples Subgraphs Complements, and Graph Isomorphism Vertex Degree, Euler Trails and Circuits. UNIT-2 Introduction the Graph Theory Contd.: Planner Graphs, Hamiloton Paths and Cycles, Graph Colouring and Chromatic Polynomials. UNIT-3 Trees : definition, properties and examples, rooted trees, trees and sorting, weighted trees and prefix codes UNIT-4 Optimization and Matching: Dijkstra‘s Shortest Path Algorithm, Minimal Spanning Trees – The algorithms of Kruskal and Prim, Transport Networks – Max-flow, Min-cut Theorem, Matching Theory UNIT-5 Fundamental Principles of Counting: The Rules of Sum and Product, Permutations, Combinations – The Binomial Theorem, Combinations with Repetition, The Catalon Numbers UNIT-6 The Principle of Inclusion and Exclusion: The Principle of Inclusion and Exclusion, Generalizations of the Principle, Derangements – Nothing is in its Right Place, Rook Polynomials UNIT-7 Generating Functions: Introductory Examples, Definition and Examples – Calculational Techniques, Partitions of Integers, The Exponential Generating Function, The Summation Operator UNIT-8 Recurrence Relations: First Order Linear Recurrence Relation, The Second Order Linear Homogeneous Recurrence Relation with Constant Coefficients, The Non-homogeneous Recurrence Relation, The Method of Generating Functions Dept of CSE, SJBIT 1 Graph Theory and combinatorics 10CS42 INDEX Sl.No. Topics Page No. 1 Unit 1 - Introduction 1 -34 2 Unit 2 - Planar Graphs 35-67 3 Unit 3 – trees 68-80 4 Unit 4 - Optimization and Matching 81-96 5 Unit 5 - Fundamental Principles of Counting 97-134 6 Unit 6 - The Principle of Inclusion and Exclusion 135-150 7 Unit 7 – Generating Functions 151-187 8 Unit 8 - Recurrence Relations 188 - 213 Dept of CSE, SJBIT 2 Graph Theory and combinatorics 10CS42 UNIT 1 INTRODUCTION This topic is about a branch of discrete mathematics called graph theory.
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture Notes As A
    MAS341 Graph Theory Lecture Notes Contents Lecture 1: Introduction and Euler’s Handshaking Lemma 2 Lecture 2: Instant Insanity, Isomorphisms 4 Lecture 3: Connectedness. Walks, trails and paths 8 Lecture 4: Bridges of Konigsberg 10 Lecture 5: Hamiltonian cycles 13 Lecture 6: Trees 15 The Lost Lecture 7: Leaves, chemistry, spanning trees comments 18 Lecture 8: Prüfer code 22 Lecture 9: Spanning Trees, Kruskal’s algorithm 24 Lecture 10: Kruskal proof, Traveling Salesman 28 Lecture 11: Routing algorithmns – Dijkstra’s and A∗ 31 Lecture 12: Scheduling and longest paths 34 Lecture 13: Planar Graphs 38 Lecture 14: Kuratowski’s theorem; graphs on the torus and Mo- bius band 43 Lecture 15: Unorientable surfaces, classification of surfaces, dual graphs 51 Lecture 16: Euler’s Theorem and applications 58 1 Lecture 1: Introduction and Euler’s Handshaking Lemma Graphs Graphs usually (but not always) are thought of showing how things are set of things are connected together. Definition of a graph A graph Γ consists of: • a set V (Γ) of vertices • a set E(Γ) of edges Each edge either connects two vertices of V (Γ) together, or connects a vertex to itself. Examples See the slides for many picture examples, but here are some common examples: • cities as vertices and roads connecting them as edges • people as vertices and an edge between two people if they know each other • atoms in a molecule as vertices, with an edge between them if they are connected by a covalent bond • countries on a map as vertices, and shared borders as edges A few more definitions There are two features of graphs that are sometimes convenient to not allow.
    [Show full text]
  • Grade 7/8 Math Circles Graph Theory - Solutions October 13/14, 2015
    Faculty of Mathematics Centre for Education in Waterloo, Ontario N2L 3G1 Mathematics and Computing Grade 7/8 Math Circles Graph Theory - Solutions October 13/14, 2015 The Seven Bridges of K¨onigsberg In the mid-1700s the was a city named K¨onigsberg. Today, the city is called Kaliningrad and is in modern day Russia. However, in the 1700s the city was a part of Prussia and had many Germanic influences. The city sits on the Pregel River. This divides the city into two main areas with the river running between them. In the river there are also two islands that are a part of the city. In 1736, a mathematician by the name of Leonhard Euler visited the city and was fascinated by the bridges. Euler wondered whether or not you could walk through the city and cross each bridge exactly once. Take a few minutes to see if you can find a way on the map of K¨onigsberg below. It has been show that this problem has no solution since each land mass (A; B; C; &D) have an odd number of bridges connecting them. 1 The Three Utilities Problem Suppose you have a neighbourhood with only three houses. Now, each house needs to be connected to a set of three utilities (gas, water, and electricity) in order for a family to live there. Your challenge is to connect all three houses to each of the utilities. Below is a diagram for you to draw out where each utility line/pipe should go. The catch is that the lines you draw to connect each house to a utility can't cross.
    [Show full text]
  • Result on Topologized and Non Topologized Graphs S
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH ISSN NO : 2236-6124 RESULT ON TOPOLOGIZED AND NON TOPOLOGIZED GRAPHS #1 *2 S. Samboorna , S. Vimala #1 PG Student Department of Mathematics,*2 Assistant Professor Department of Mathematics, 1,2,Mother Teresa Women’s University Kodaikanal. #1 [email protected] *[email protected] Abstract— Topological graph theory deals with embedding the graphs in Surfaces, and the graph considered as a topological spaces. The concept topology extended to the topologized graph in[2]. This paper examines some results about the topologized and non topologized graphs and its subgraphs approach. The result were generalized and analyzed. Keywords— Complete, Path, Cycle, Cyclic, Topology. I. INTRODUCTION The topologized graphs defined to R. Diesteland D. Kuhn. [5] ―Topological Paths,Cycles in infinite graphs‖, Europ, J.Combin., 2004. Antoine Vella [3]. In 2005 Antoine Vellatried to express combinatorial concepts in topological language. As a part the investigation classical topology, pre path, path [2], pre cycle, compact space, cycle space and bond space [3], locally connectedness and ferns were defined. For Topological graph theory, more important application can be found in printing electronic circuits where the aim is to print (embed) a circuit on a circuit board without two connections crossing each other and resulting in a short circuit. The great personality of mathematics Whitney expressed planarity in terms of the existence of dual graphs. A graph is planar if and only if it has a dual. In addition to this, planarity and the other related concepts are useful in many practical situations. For example, in the design of a printed – circuit board and the three utilities problem, planarity is used.
    [Show full text]