DOCSLIB.ORG

Graph Theory

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Graph Theory PRIMES Circle: Graph Theory Tal Berdichevsky and Corinne Mulvey May 17, 2019 Contents 1 Introduction to Graphs 2 1.1 Basics . .2 1.2 Common Types of Graphs . .3 2 Planar Graphs 6 3 Graph Colorings 8 3.1 Introduction to Vertex Coloring . .8 3.2 Four and Five Color Theorems . 10 1 1 Introduction to Graphs How can we model Facebook friends? Here's a diagram of some friends. We can let each point represent an individual person and each line drawn between two points represent a friendship between two people. Abby Bob Clara Dan Eva Fiona Gal Figure 1: Graph of Facebook Friends 1.1 Basics Let's formalize what we just said. The representation we created is an example of a graph. Each friend, represented by the points, can be thought of as a vertex of the graph and the friendships, represented by the lines drawn between points, are edges of the graph. More specifically, Definition 1.1. A graph G is a set of vertices V (G) and edges E(G). Each edge is a \connection" between two vertices, and can be represented as a pair of vertices (u; v). Each edge is said to be incident to the two vertices it connects. Example 1.1. In Figure 1, the vertices are people and edges represent friendships. Abby, Bob, Clara, Dan, Eva, Fiona, and Gal are all vertices and make up the vertex set of the graph. Definition 1.2. Two edges u and v are adjacent if there is an edge between them; in other words, (u; v) 2 E(G). Example 1.2. In Figure 1, any two adjacent vertices, or people, are friends. Definition 1.3. The order and size of a graph G is the cardinality of its vertex set jV (G)j and the cardinality of its edge set jE(G)j, respectively. Example 1.3. The size of the graph in Figure 1 representing Facebook friends is the number of friendships in the network or edges in the graph. The order of graph G is the number of friends in the group. The order and the size of the graph are therefore both equal to 7. Definition 1.4. For a graph G and vertex v 2 V (G), the degree degG(v) of v is the number of edges incident with v. We denote the minimum degree of all vertices in G as δ(G), and the maximum degree we denote as ∆(G). Example 1.4. In Figure 1, a person's degree is the number of friends (s)he has. Clara has two friends and therefore degG(Clara) = 2. The numbers δ(G) and ∆(G) of the social network in Figure 1 represent the people with the least and most friends, respectively. Dan has five friends which is the most friends of anyone in the social network, therefore ∆(G) = 5. Fiona, Gal, and Eva, all each have only one friend, which is the least number of friends anyone in the network has. Therefore δ(G) = 1. Theorem 1.1. For any graph G of size m, X degG(v) = 2m: v2V (G) Proof. When we count the degrees of each vertex in the set V (G), we account for each edge twice, once for each of its two incident vertices. 2 1.2 Common Types of Graphs What happens if Bob and Clara are enemies? Fakebook is an additional social network much like Facebook except that it connects its users if they are enemies instead of friends. As shown in Figure 1.2, we can represent this Fakebook with a graph similarly to how we represented Facebook. We make each person a vertex of the graph and draw an edge between them if they are enemies. Bob Clara Dan Eva Fiona Gal Abby Figure 2: Graph of Fakebook Enemies Say that you wanted to have a party and want to only invite people who do not hate one another. You would need to divide the people into groups so that no \hatred connections" exist in each group. In other words, you would need sets of people who are not adjacent in the Figure 2. Is this possible? As it turns out, this is possible. Dividing the Fakebook enemies into two sets where Fiona, Gal, and Bob are in one set and Clara, Eva, Dan, and Abby are in the other yields a partition where no one hates another person in their respective set. Asking whether these sets exists is the equivalent of asking whether the Fakebook graph is bipartite. Definition 1.5. A bipartite graph is a graph G whose vertex set V (G) can be partitioned into two subsets U and W where no edges of G exist between any two vertices in U or two vertices in W . Definition 1.6. The partite sets of a graph G are the subsets of V (G) in which no vertex is adjacent to another vertex in its respective subset. Example 1.5. The partite sets in the Fakebook example can be described as the sets of people who don't hate one another. As mentioned before, Fiona, Gal, and Bob would make up one partite set and Clara, Eva, Dan, and Abby would make up the other. Therefore, we can say the graph of these Fakebook enemies is a bipartite graph. The graph can be redrawn so these two sets can be seen more clearly. The two partite sets of people who do not hate one another are circled. Notice that in Figure 3 every edge of the graph connects a vertex of one partite set to the vertex of the other partite set. The idea of a bipartite graph can be extended to include graphs which have multiple partite sets or multiple sets of people who don't hate one another. Definition 1.7. A k-partite graph (or a k-colorable graph) is a graph with k partite sets. If every person in each partite set hated every person from the other partite set, then we would have another special type of partite graph. Definition 1.8. A complete bipartite graph is a graph G where every vertex of G is adjacent to every vertex of the other partite set. These graphs are denoted by KU;W with U and W being the cardinality of each partite set. We could also imagine a situation where each person hates everyone else. A graph of this situation on Fakebook would be a graph in which every two vertices (people) are adjacent. In other words, each person hates everyone else in the group. 3 Eva Gal Dan Bob Clara Fiona Abby Figure 3: The Bipartite Graph of Fakebook Enemies Definition 1.9. A complete graph is a graph G where every vertex v 2 V (G) is adjacent to every other vertex u 2 V (G). A complete graph is denoted by Kn where n is the order of graph. Example 1.6. Here is the complete graph of order 4, K4: Definition 1.10. A path Pn is a sequence of n vertices where every two consecutive vertices have an edge between them. Example 1.7. The path P = a; b; c; d; e with E(P ) = ab; bc; cd; de as shown. b d a c e Every vertex in path P has a degree of two except for the first and last vertices a and e which only have a degree of one. If an edge ae was added to P making every vertex have a degree of two, then the resulting graph would no longer be a path. Definition 1.11. A cycle is a graph G similar to a path except the first and last vertices of the path form an edge in G. A cycle of order n is denoted by Cn and can be referred to as a n-gon. Example 1.8. The cycle of order five C5 or the 5-gon, which is simply a pentagon. We might also want to have a new graph H that was a \piece" of another graph G, consisting of some of the vertices and edges of G. 4 Definition 1.12. A graph H = (V 0;E0) is a subgraph of the graph G = (V; E) if V 0 ⊆ V , E0 ⊆ E, and every edge e 2 E0 has its endpoints in V 0. If a subgraph G0 of a graph G is just the graph G with one edge e 2 E(G) or vertex v 2 V (G) missing, then G0 can be denoted as G − e or G − v, respectively. Example 1.9. For example, the path P from before could have a subgraph P 0 with vertex set V (P 0) = a; b; c and edge set E(P 0) = ab; bc . The edge set of P 0 is a subset of P 's edge set and the vertex set of P 0 is a subset of P 's vertex set. Example 1.10. Subgraphs can be formed from some or all of the vertices of a graph. The subgraph H0 of H has the same vertex set as H but only some of the edges of H. H: H0: In most of the graphs we have described, every vertex is \connected" to every other vertex of the graph through some sequence of vertices of edges. Sometimes this connection is just an edge, as when two vertices are adjacent, and sometimes it is a series of adjacent vertices. In a connected graph, there is a path between every two vertices.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • On Treewidth and Graph Minors
    On Treewidth and Graph Minors Daniel John Harvey Submitted in total fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy February 2014 Department of Mathematics and Statistics The University of Melbourne Produced on archival quality paper ii Abstract Both treewidth and the Hadwiger number are key graph parameters in structural and al- gorithmic graph theory, especially in the theory of graph minors. For example, treewidth demarcates the two major cases of the Robertson and Seymour proof of Wagner's Con- jecture. Also, the Hadwiger number is the key measure of the structural complexity of a graph. In this thesis, we shall investigate these parameters on some interesting classes of graphs. The treewidth of a graph defines, in some sense, how \tree-like" the graph is. Treewidth is a key parameter in the algorithmic field of fixed-parameter tractability. In particular, on classes of bounded treewidth, certain NP-Hard problems can be solved in polynomial time. In structural graph theory, treewidth is of key interest due to its part in the stronger form of Robertson and Seymour's Graph Minor Structure Theorem. A key fact is that the treewidth of a graph is tied to the size of its largest grid minor. In fact, treewidth is tied to a large number of other graph structural parameters, which this thesis thoroughly investigates. In doing so, some of the tying functions between these results are improved. This thesis also determines exactly the treewidth of the line graph of a complete graph. This is a critical example in a recent paper of Marx, and improves on a recent result by Grohe and Marx.
    [Show full text]
  • Graph Varieties Axiomatized by Semimedial, Medial, and Some Other Groupoid Identities
    Discussiones Mathematicae General Algebra and Applications 40 (2020) 143–157 doi:10.7151/dmgaa.1344 GRAPH VARIETIES AXIOMATIZED BY SEMIMEDIAL, MEDIAL, AND SOME OTHER GROUPOID IDENTITIES Erkko Lehtonen Technische Universit¨at Dresden Institut f¨ur Algebra 01062 Dresden, Germany e-mail: [email protected] and Chaowat Manyuen Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science Khon Kaen University Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand e-mail: [email protected] Abstract Directed graphs without multiple edges can be represented as algebras of type (2, 0), so-called graph algebras. A graph is said to satisfy an identity if the corresponding graph algebra does, and the set of all graphs satisfying a set of identities is called a graph variety. We describe the graph varieties axiomatized by certain groupoid identities (medial, semimedial, autodis- tributive, commutative, idempotent, unipotent, zeropotent, alternative). Keywords: graph algebra, groupoid, identities, semimediality, mediality. 2010 Mathematics Subject Classification: 05C25, 03C05. 1. Introduction Graph algebras were introduced by Shallon [10] in 1979 with the purpose of providing examples of nonfinitely based finite algebras. Let us briefly recall this concept. Given a directed graph G = (V, E) without multiple edges, the graph algebra associated with G is the algebra A(G) = (V ∪ {∞}, ◦, ∞) of type (2, 0), 144 E. Lehtonen and C. Manyuen where ∞ is an element not belonging to V and the binary operation ◦ is defined by the rule u, if (u, v) ∈ E, u ◦ v := (∞, otherwise, for all u, v ∈ V ∪ {∞}. We will denote the product u ◦ v simply by juxtaposition uv. Using this representation, we may view any algebraic property of a graph algebra as a property of the graph with which it is associated.
    [Show full text]
  • Counting Independent Sets in Graphs with Bounded Bipartite Pathwidth∗
    Counting independent sets in graphs with bounded bipartite pathwidth∗ Martin Dyery Catherine Greenhillz School of Computing School of Mathematics and Statistics University of Leeds UNSW Sydney, NSW 2052 Leeds LS2 9JT, UK Australia [email protected] [email protected] Haiko M¨uller∗ School of Computing University of Leeds Leeds LS2 9JT, UK [email protected] 7 August 2019 Abstract We show that a simple Markov chain, the Glauber dynamics, can efficiently sample independent sets almost uniformly at random in polynomial time for graphs in a certain class. The class is determined by boundedness of a new graph parameter called bipartite pathwidth. This result, which we prove for the more general hardcore distribution with fugacity λ, can be viewed as a strong generalisation of Jerrum and Sinclair's work on approximately counting matchings, that is, independent sets in line graphs. The class of graphs with bounded bipartite pathwidth includes claw-free graphs, which generalise line graphs. We consider two further generalisations of claw-free graphs and prove that these classes have bounded bipartite pathwidth. We also show how to extend all our results to polynomially-bounded vertex weights. 1 Introduction There is a well-known bijection between matchings of a graph G and independent sets in the line graph of G. We will show that we can approximate the number of independent sets ∗A preliminary version of this paper appeared as [19]. yResearch supported by EPSRC grant EP/S016562/1 \Sampling in hereditary classes". zResearch supported by Australian Research Council grant DP190100977. 1 in graphs for which all bipartite induced subgraphs are well structured, in a sense that we will define precisely.
    [Show full text]
  • Additive Non-Approximability of Chromatic Number in Proper Minor
    Additive non-approximability of chromatic number in proper minor-closed classes Zdenˇek Dvoˇr´ak∗ Ken-ichi Kawarabayashi† Abstract Robin Thomas asked whether for every proper minor-closed class , there exists a polynomial-time algorithm approximating the chro- G matic number of graphs from up to a constant additive error inde- G pendent on the class . We show this is not the case: unless P = NP, G for every integer k 1, there is no polynomial-time algorithm to color ≥ a K -minor-free graph G using at most χ(G)+ k 1 colors. More 4k+1 − generally, for every k 1 and 1 β 4/3, there is no polynomial- ≥ ≤ ≤ time algorithm to color a K4k+1-minor-free graph G using less than βχ(G)+(4 3β)k colors. As far as we know, this is the first non-trivial − non-approximability result regarding the chromatic number in proper minor-closed classes. We also give somewhat weaker non-approximability bound for K4k+1- minor-free graphs with no cliques of size 4. On the positive side, we present additive approximation algorithm whose error depends on the apex number of the forbidden minor, and an algorithm with addi- tive error 6 under the additional assumption that the graph has no 4-cycles. arXiv:1707.03888v1 [cs.DM] 12 Jul 2017 The problem of determining the chromatic number, or even of just de- ciding whether a graph is colorable using a fixed number c 3 of colors, is NP-complete [7], and thus it cannot be solved in polynomial≥ time un- less P = NP.
    [Show full text]
  • Planar Graph Theory We Say That a Graph Is Planar If It Can Be Drawn in the Plane Without Edges Crossing
    Planar Graph Theory We say that a graph is planar if it can be drawn in the plane without edges crossing. We use the term plane graph to refer to a planar depiction of a planar graph. e.g. K4 is a planar graph Q1: The following is also planar. Find a plane graph version of the graph. A B F E D C A Method that sometimes works for drawing the plane graph for a planar graph: 1. Find the largest cycle in the graph. 2. The remaining edges must be drawn inside/outside the cycle so that they do not cross each other. Q2: Using the method above, find a plane graph version of the graph below. A B C D E F G H non e.g. K3,3: K5 Here are three (plane graph) depictions of the same planar graph: J N M J K J N I M K K I N M I O O L O L L A face of a plane graph is a region enclosed by the edges of the graph. There is also an unbounded face, which is the outside of the graph. Q3: For each of the plane graphs we have drawn, find: V = # of vertices of the graph E = # of edges of the graph F = # of faces of the graph Q4: Do you have a conjecture for an equation relating V, E and F for any plane graph G? Q5: Can you name the 5 Platonic Solids (i.e. regular polyhedra)? (This is a geometry question.) Q6: Find the # of vertices, # of edges and # of faces for each Platonic Solid.
    [Show full text]
  • Forbidding Subgraphs
    Graph Theory and Additive Combinatorics Lecturer: Prof. Yufei Zhao 2 Forbidding subgraphs 2.1 Mantel’s theorem: forbidding a triangle We begin our discussion of extremal graph theory with the following basic question. Question 2.1. What is the maximum number of edges in an n-vertex graph that does not contain a triangle? Bipartite graphs are always triangle-free. A complete bipartite graph, where the vertex set is split equally into two parts (or differing by one vertex, in case n is odd), has n2/4 edges. Mantel’s theorem states that we cannot obtain a better bound: Theorem 2.2 (Mantel). Every triangle-free graph on n vertices has at W. Mantel, "Problem 28 (Solution by H. most bn2/4c edges. Gouwentak, W. Mantel, J. Teixeira de Mattes, F. Schuh and W. A. Wythoff). Wiskundige Opgaven 10, 60 —61, 1907. We will give two proofs of Theorem 2.2. Proof 1. G = (V E) n m Let , a triangle-free graph with vertices and x edges. Observe that for distinct x, y 2 V such that xy 2 E, x and y N(x) must not share neighbors by triangle-freeness. Therefore, d(x) + d(y) ≤ n, which implies that d(x)2 = (d(x) + d(y)) ≤ mn. ∑ ∑ N(y) x2V xy2E y On the other hand, by the handshake lemma, ∑x2V d(x) = 2m. Now by the Cauchy–Schwarz inequality and the equation above, Adjacent vertices have disjoint neigh- borhoods in a triangle-free graph. !2 ! 4m2 = ∑ d(x) ≤ n ∑ d(x)2 ≤ mn2; x2V x2V hence m ≤ n2/4.
    [Show full text]
  • An Update on the Four-Color Theorem Robin Thomas
    thomas.qxp 6/11/98 4:10 PM Page 848 An Update on the Four-Color Theorem Robin Thomas very planar map of connected countries the five-color theorem (Theorem 2 below) and can be colored using four colors in such discovered what became known as Kempe chains, a way that countries with a common and Tait found an equivalent formulation of the boundary segment (not just a point) re- Four-Color Theorem in terms of edge 3-coloring, ceive different colors. It is amazing that stated here as Theorem 3. Esuch a simply stated result resisted proof for one The next major contribution came in 1913 from and a quarter centuries, and even today it is not G. D. Birkhoff, whose work allowed Franklin to yet fully understood. In this article I concentrate prove in 1922 that the four-color conjecture is on recent developments: equivalent formulations, true for maps with at most twenty-five regions. The a new proof, and progress on some generalizations. same method was used by other mathematicians to make progress on the four-color problem. Im- Brief History portant here is the work by Heesch, who developed The Four-Color Problem dates back to 1852 when the two main ingredients needed for the ultimate Francis Guthrie, while trying to color the map of proof—“reducibility” and “discharging”. While the the counties of England, noticed that four colors concept of reducibility was studied by other re- sufficed. He asked his brother Frederick if it was searchers as well, the idea of discharging, crucial true that any map can be colored using four col- for the unavoidability part of the proof, is due to ors in such a way that adjacent regions (i.e., those Heesch, and he also conjectured that a suitable de- sharing a common boundary segment, not just a velopment of this method would solve the Four- point) receive different colors.
    [Show full text]
  • The Labeled Perfect Matching in Bipartite Graphs Jérôme Monnot
    The Labeled perfect matching in bipartite graphs Jérôme Monnot To cite this version: Jérôme Monnot. The Labeled perfect matching in bipartite graphs. Information Processing Letters, Elsevier, 2005, to appear, pp.1-9. hal-00007798 HAL Id: hal-00007798 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00007798 Submitted on 5 Aug 2005 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. The Labeled perfect matching in bipartite graphs J´erˆome Monnot∗ July 4, 2005 Abstract In this paper, we deal with both the complexity and the approximability of the labeled perfect matching problem in bipartite graphs. Given a simple graph G = (V, E) with |V | = 2n vertices such that E contains a perfect matching (of size n), together with a color (or label) function L : E → {c1, . , cq}, the labeled perfect matching problem consists in finding a perfect matching on G that uses a minimum or a maximum number of colors. Keywords: labeled matching; bipartite graphs; NP-complete; approximate algorithms. 1 Introduction Let Π be a NPO problem accepting simple graphs G = (V,E) as instances, edge-subsets E′ ⊆ E verifying a given polynomial-time decidable property Pred as solutions, and the solutions cardinality as objective function; the labeled problem associated to Π, denoted by Labeled Π, seeks, given an instance I = (G, L) where G = (V,E) is a simple graph ′ and L is a mapping from E to {c1,...,cq}, in finding a subset E verifying Pred that optimizes the size of the set L(E′)= {L(e): e ∈ E′}.
    [Show full text]
  • Grade 7/8 Math Circles Graph Theory the Seven Bridges of Königsberg
    Faculty of Mathematics Centre for Education in Waterloo, Ontario N2L 3G1 Mathematics and Computing Grade 7/8 Math Circles Graph Theory October 13/14, 2015 The Seven Bridges of K¨onigsberg In the mid-1700s the was a city named K¨onigsberg. Today, the city is called Kaliningrad and is in modern day Russia. However, in the 1700s the city was a part of Prussia and had many Germanic influences. The city sits on the Pregel River. This divides the city into two main areas with the river running between them. In the river there are also two islands that are a part of the city. In 1736, a mathematician by the name of Leonhard Euler visited the city and was fascinated by the bridges. Euler wondered whether or not you could walk through the city and cross each bridge exactly once. Take a few minutes to see if you can find a way on the map of K¨onigsberg below. 1 The Three Utilities Problem Suppose you have a neighbourhood with only three houses. Now, each house needs to be connected to a set of three utilities (gas, water, and electricity) in order for a family to live there. Your challenge is to connect all three houses to each of the utilities. Below is a diagram for you to draw out where each utility line/pipe should go. The catch is that the lines you draw to connect each house to a utility can't cross. Also, you can't draw lines through another house or utility plant. In other words, you can't draw House 1's water line through House 2 or through the electricity plant.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:2006.06067V2 [Math.CO] 4 Jul 2021
    Treewidth versus clique number. I. Graph classes with a forbidden structure∗† Cl´ement Dallard1 Martin Milaniˇc1 Kenny Storgelˇ 2 1 FAMNIT and IAM, University of Primorska, Koper, Slovenia 2 Faculty of Information Studies, Novo mesto, Slovenia [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Treewidth is an important graph invariant, relevant for both structural and algo- rithmic reasons. A necessary condition for a graph class to have bounded treewidth is the absence of large cliques. We study graph classes closed under taking induced subgraphs in which this condition is also sufficient, which we call (tw,ω)-bounded. Such graph classes are known to have useful algorithmic applications related to variants of the clique and k-coloring problems. We consider six well-known graph containment relations: the minor, topological minor, subgraph, induced minor, in- duced topological minor, and induced subgraph relations. For each of them, we give a complete characterization of the graphs H for which the class of graphs excluding H is (tw,ω)-bounded. Our results yield an infinite family of χ-bounded induced-minor-closed graph classes and imply that the class of 1-perfectly orientable graphs is (tw,ω)-bounded, leading to linear-time algorithms for k-coloring 1-perfectly orientable graphs for every fixed k. This answers a question of Breˇsar, Hartinger, Kos, and Milaniˇc from 2018, and one of Beisegel, Chudnovsky, Gurvich, Milaniˇc, and Servatius from 2019, respectively. We also reveal some further algorithmic implications of (tw,ω)- boundedness related to list k-coloring and clique problems. In addition, we propose a question about the complexity of the Maximum Weight Independent Set prob- lem in (tw,ω)-bounded graph classes and prove that the problem is polynomial-time solvable in every class of graphs excluding a fixed star as an induced minor.
    [Show full text]
  • Mathematical Concepts Within the Artwork of Lewitt and Escher
    A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of Alfred University More than Visual: Mathematical Concepts Within the Artwork of LeWitt and Escher by Kelsey Bennett In Partial Fulfillment of the requirements for the Alfred University Honors Program May 9, 2019 Under the Supervision of: Chair: Dr. Amanda Taylor Committee Members: Barbara Lattanzi John Hosford 1 Abstract The goal of this thesis is to demonstrate the relationship between mathematics and art. To do so, I have explored the work of two artists, M.C. Escher and Sol LeWitt. Though these artists approached the role of mathematics in their art in different ways, I have observed that each has employed mathematical concepts in order to create their rule-based artworks. The mathematical ideas which serve as the backbone of this thesis are illustrated by the artists' works and strengthen the bond be- tween the two subjects of art and math. My intention is to make these concepts accessible to all readers, regardless of their mathematical or artis- tic background, so that they may in turn gain a deeper understanding of the relationship between mathematics and art. To do so, we begin with a philosophical discussion of art and mathematics. Next, we will dissect and analyze various pieces of work by Sol LeWitt and M.C. Escher. As part of that process, we will also redesign or re-imagine some artistic pieces to further highlight mathematical concepts at play within the work of these artists. 1 Introduction What is art? The Merriam-Webster dictionary provides one definition of art as being \the conscious use of skill and creative imagination especially in the production of aesthetic object" ([1]).
    [Show full text]
  • Characterizations of Restricted Pairs of Planar Graphs Allowing Simultaneous Embedding with Fixed Edges
    Characterizations of Restricted Pairs of Planar Graphs Allowing Simultaneous Embedding with Fixed Edges J. Joseph Fowler1, Michael J¨unger2, Stephen Kobourov1, and Michael Schulz2 1 University of Arizona, USA {jfowler,kobourov}@cs.arizona.edu ⋆ 2 University of Cologne, Germany {mjuenger,schulz}@informatik.uni-koeln.de ⋆⋆ Abstract. A set of planar graphs share a simultaneous embedding if they can be drawn on the same vertex set V in the Euclidean plane without crossings between edges of the same graph. Fixed edges are common edges between graphs that share the same simple curve in the simultaneous drawing. Determining in polynomial time which pairs of graphs share a simultaneous embedding with fixed edges (SEFE) has been open. We give a necessary and sufficient condition for when a pair of graphs whose union is homeomorphic to K5 or K3,3 can have an SEFE. This allows us to determine which (outer)planar graphs always an SEFE with any other (outer)planar graphs. In both cases, we provide efficient al- gorithms to compute the simultaneous drawings. Finally, we provide an linear-time decision algorithm for deciding whether a pair of biconnected outerplanar graphs has an SEFE. 1 Introduction In many practical applications including the visualization of large graphs and very-large-scale integration (VLSI) of circuits on the same chip, edge crossings are undesirable. A single vertex set can be used with multiple edge sets that each correspond to different edge colors or circuit layers. While the pairwise union of all edge sets may be nonplanar, a planar drawing of each layer may be possible, as crossings between edges of distinct edge sets are permitted.
    [Show full text]