Juvenile Justice Total Monthly Admissions to Detention January 2016 – July 2019*

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Juvenile Justice Total Monthly Admissions to Detention January 2016 – July 2019* 1 Child Care Children Using Vouchers for Child Care January 2016 – July 2019 (End of Month) 70,000 68,418 60,000 64,751 50,000 40,000 30,000 Number of Children of Number 20,000 10,000 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2016 2017 2018 2019 2 Child Protection SCR Intakes January 2016 – July 2019 8,000 7,000 6,000 5,000 4,201 (2019) 4,156 (2018) 4,000 3,000 2,000 CY 2016 Total = 64,993 CY 2017 Total = 68,676 1,000 CY 2018 Total = 68,010 CY 2019 YTD = 39,274 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec 2016 2017 2018 2019 See Pages 26 through 29 of the Appendix for supporting data. 3 Child Protection SCR Consolidated Investigations January 2016 – July 2019 7,000 6,000 5,000 3,579 (2019) 4,000 3,518 (2018) 3,000 2,000 CY 2016 Total = 57,154 CY 2017 Total = 59,812 1,000 CY 2018 Total = 58,263 CY 2019 YTD = 33,418 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec 2016 2017 2018 2019 4 Child Protection Percent of Investigations that Found Some Credible Evidence of Abuse or Neglect January 2016 – May 2019 45% 40% 37.3% 36.0% 35% 30% CY 2016 Total = 38.1% CY 2017 Total = 39.5% CY 2018 Total = 37.3% CY 2019 YTD = 37.4% 25% Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec 2016 2017 2018 2019 5 Child Protection Average Child Protection Caseload* May 2018 – July 2018 and May 2019 – July 2019 15.9 16.0 15.5 15.6 13.9 13.7 13.6 13.6 13.3 13.3 2018 11.7 11.6 11.9 11.1 11.5 10.6 10.2 9.3 May-18 Jun-18 July-18 10.8 10.8 10.7 10.7 10.1 9.5 9.7 10.1 9.6 10.3 10.0 10.6 2019 8.9 8.3 8.2 7.6 8.0 7.6 7.1 7.1 7.2 May-19 Jun-19 July-19 NYC Bronx Brooklyn Manhattan Queens Staten Island OSI 6 *Prior to December 2018 caseloads are of Protective/Diagnostic Unit (Child Protection, School Based, Sex Abuse and Hospital Units) caseworkers only. Beginning December 2018, all caseload carrying Child Protection Specialists (CPS) in investigative and Family Assessment Response Units are included. Includes CPS in Primary and Case Manager roles only. Child Protection OSI Foster Care and Day Care* Investigations July 2018 – July 2019 75 74 37 58 54 54 70 61 49 54 67 52 53 164 151 148 146 146 133 141 142 137 140 120 130 96 Jul-18 Aug-18 Sep-18 Oct-18 Nov-19 Dec-18 Jan-19 Feb-19 Mar-19 Apr-19 May-19 Jun-19 Jul-19 Foster Care Day Care Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul 2018 2018 2018 2018 2018 2018 2019 2019 2019 2019 2019 2019 2019 Number of Investigations 226 187 172 197 195 201 206 149 196 207 220 201 195 *Day Care investigations include alleged abuse or maltreatment of children perpetrated by someone who cares for children in a setting that is not the child’s familial home and that requires state or local government approval and is subject to state laws, regulations, and oversight. This includes, but is not limited to, ACS Early Care and 7 Education programs. Child Protection Article 10 Filings and Initial Hearing Outcomes, Children CY 2016 – July 2019 11.7% 11.5% 13.7% 15.3% 15.6% 14.0% 12.1% 12.7% 16.6% 15.5% 20.3% 22.4% 18.9% 16.8% 18.4% 23.1% 22.6% 19.0% 20.5% 19.9% 68.2% 65.9% 67.5% 65.7% 67.6% 67.6% 64.9% 64.7% 63.0% 64.6% CY 2016 CY 2017 CY 2018 Jan-19 Feb-19 Mar-19 Apr-19 May-19 Jun-19 Jul-19 Court Ordered Supervision Remand Other/Unspecified CY CY CY Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July 2016 2017 2018 2019 2019 2019 2019 2019 2019 2019 Children with Article10 Filings 10,973 15,975 13,319 1,092 1,056 1,040 1,127 1,080 1,002 1,021 8 Note: The category “Other/Unspecified” includes released with no supervision, no order issued and no outcome specified. Child Protection Remands Approved at Initial Article 10 Hearing by Removal Status July 2018 – July 2019 Jul-19 40.9% 59.1% Jun-19 54.1% 45.9% May-19 59.0% 41.0% Apr-19 48.5% 51.5% Mar-19 55.9% 44.1% Feb-19 49.5% 50.5% Jan-19 57.1% 42.9% Dec-18 51.8% 48.2% Nov-18 50.9% 49.1% Oct-18 45.5% 54.5% Sep-18 41.1% 58.9% Aug-18 44.0% 56.0% Jul-18 50.9% 49.1% Pre-Filing Emergency Removals (court approved at initial hearing) Post-Filing Removals (court ordered at initial hearing) Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul 2018 2018 2018 2018 2018 2018 2019 2019 2019 2019 2019 2019 2019 Children Remanded 173 259 151 297 167 193 184 194 211 260 244 205 203 9 Preventive Services New Child Welfare Prevention Cases* January 2016 – July 2019 1,200 1,000 838 800 808 600 New Cases New 400 CY 2016 Total = 10,326 200 CY 2017 Total = 9,306 CY 2018 Total = 9,603 CY 2019 YTD = 5,858 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec 2016 2017 2018 2019 *New prevention cases do not include cases transferred from one preventive program to another. See Pages 30 and 31 of the Appendix for supporting data. 10 Preventive Services New Child Welfare Prevention Cases by Program Type * July 2018 – July 2019 2.2% 2.7% 3.7% 3.0% 2.4% 2.2% 2.2% 3.4% 2.6% 1.5% 3.4% 3.0% 3.1% 28.0% 27.0% 27.2% 30.6% 26.7% 30.2% 28.1% 33.6% 32.3% 35.2% 31.9% 28.9% 32.8% 12.3% 14.1% 15.4% 17.2% 17.4% 14.6% 15.4% 16.4% 17.6% 18.0% 15.9% 16.2% 14.4% 57.5% 53.0% 52.7% 53.5% 52.9% 53.3% 52.3% 53.9% 45.7% 47.3% 46.7% 48.5% 49.6% Jul-18 Aug-18 Sep-18 Oct-18 Nov-18 Dec-18 Jan-19 Feb-19 Mar-19 Apr-19 May-19 Jun-19 Jul-19 General Preventive FT/R EBM Special Medical Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul 2018 2018 2018 2018 2018 2018 2019 2019 2019 2019 2019 2019 2019 Number of New Preventive Cases 808 892 751 856 787 847 875 767 891 844 842 801 838 * New preventionOffice cases of do Research not include & cases Analysis transferred from one prevention program to another. 11 11 Foster Care Average Daily Children’s Center Population July 2018 – July 2019 1.2% 3.7% 1.3% 0% 1.3% 0% 3.2% 8.2% 7.5% 8.5% 10.4% 10.0% 5.7% 15.0% 13.8% 17.8% 17.1% 17.5% 22.1% 37.2% 42.7% 40.2% 47.1% 49.3% 41.3% 20.7% 52.6% 22.5% 20.5% 20.7% 18.8% 19.5% 17.9% 13.4% 12.2% 29.9% 22.9% 15.1% 23.8% 36.3% 32.9% 32.5% 15.8% 17.1% 19.5% 35.6% 27.3% 19.2% 17.8% 14.3% 14.3% 17.1% 9.8% 11.0% 19.5% 7.7% 14.6% 14.3% 5.5% 4.8% 11.0% 12.5% 16.3% 7.1% 5.3% 15.9% 13.4% 10.3% 16.7% 12.3% 12.7% 6.8% 6.3% 6.1% 6.5% 5.0% 8.6% 7.9% Jul-18 Aug-18 Sep-18 Oct-18 Nov-18 Dec-18 Jan-19 Feb-19 Mar-19 Apr-19 May-19 Jun-19 Jul-19 Newborn - 3 years old 4-6 years old 7-10 years old 11-13 years old 14-18 years old 19+ years old Newborn - 1 year old 2-6 years old 7-12 years old 13-15 years old 16-17 years old 18+ years old Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul 2018 2018* 2018 2018 2018 2018 2019 2019 2019 2019 2019 2019 2019 Average Number of Children 82 82 73 80 82 77 80 87 78 70 76 73 63 Notes: 1) August 2018 includes data from August 1st to August 28th. 2) Different age groups were used from September 2018 to February 2019. 12 Foster Care New Placements of Children into Foster Care January 2016 – June 2019 500 400 343 300 286 200 CY 2016 Total = 3,770 100 CY 2017 Total = 4,255 CY 2018 Total = 3,817 CY 2019 YTD = 1,859 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec 2016 2017 2018 2019 13 Foster Care Reason for New Placements of Children into Foster Care June 2018 – June 2019 16 15 7 15 7 21 17 4 4 12 6 18 27 9 23 13 20 19 11 15 3 9 5 6 4 20 20 15 2 32 20 12 10 12 24 12 11 11 6 7 10 8 9 6 5 5 6 3 7 2 5 5 366 327 298 285 288 255 269 237 225 226 234 238 233 Jun-18 Jul-18 Aug-18 Sep-18 Oct-18 Nov-18 Dec-18 Jan-19 Feb-19 Mar-19 Apr-19 May-19 Jun-19 Article 10 PINS JD Voluntary Other Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun 2018 2018 2018 2018 2018 2018 2018 2019 2019 2019 2019 2019 2019 Number of 343 291 367 271 411 255 275 309 315 289 333 327 286 Placements 14 Foster Care New Placements of Children into Foster Care* by Age CY 2016 - June 2019 100% 90% 22.6% 24.6% 30.1% 28.4% 26.5% 30.1% 26.6% 26.3% 28.1% 80% 70% 30.3% 23.6% 60% 24.4% 23.9% 23.4% 24.1% 23.1% 28.0% 27.2% 50% 40% 30% 49.1% 49.8% 51.8% 46.5% 47.5% 46.8% 47.1% 45.4% 44.8% 20% 10% 0% CY2016 CY2017 CY2018 Jan-19 Feb-19 Mar-19 Apr-19 May-19 June-19 Number of children 0-5 Number of children 6-11 Number of children 12+ CY CY CY Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun 2016 2017 2018 2019 2019 2019 2019 2019 2019 Number of 3,557 4,097 3,724 299 310 282 327 324 280 Placements 15 *Excludes CTH placements.
Recommended publications
  • What Is Your Client's
    Strength Since 1906 Midland National Midland National’s story is a classic example of American perseverance and ingenuity. Since 1906, Midland National has survived and thrived through two world wars, the Great Depression, the Dust Bowl, Products At-A-Glance and multiple recessions. Now with over 100 years under its belt, Midland National holds over one million life insurance and annuity policies with assets of over $44 billion. Source: Midland National 2015 Annual Report. • A+ (Superior) A.M. Best A.M. Best is a large third‐party independent reporting and rating company that rates an insurance company on the basis of the company’s financial strength, operating performance and ability to meet its obligations What is your client’s to policyholders. A+ is the second highest rating out of 15 categories and was affirmed for Midland National Life Insurance Company as part of Sammons Financial Group on July 14, 2016. For the latest rating, access www.ambest.com. • A+ (Strong) Standard & Poor’s Standard and Poor’s awarded its “A+” (Strong) rating for insurer financial strength on February 26, 2009 and affirmed on July 2, 2015 to Midland National Life Insurance Company, as part of Sammons Financial Group. The “A+” (Strong) rating is the fifth highest out of 22 available ratings. FOCUS? Questions? Need illustration help? Call our Sales Support team at 800-843-3316 ext. 32150. Protection...Growth...Flexibility... Midland National has a product for every focus. Administrative Office • One Sammons Plaza • Sioux Falls, SD 57193 MidlandNational.com
    [Show full text]
  • What Amounts to a Surrender by Operation of Law?
    September 2010 Review Property @ction Welcome to the Fifth Edition of the Quarterly Review from Hammonds’ Property@ction Team. In this issue we will look at the following: (i) What amounts to a surrender by operation of law; (ii) Does it do what it says on the tin? - full repairing and insuring leases; (iii) Double trouble; (iv) Compulsory purchase orders; (v) Adverse possession; We welcome all contributions to this review and if you would like to discuss this further please contact any of the editorial team. What amounts to a surrender by operation of law? Where a landlord and tenant bring a lease to an end, they usually do so by completing a deed of surrender. However, sometimes, it may be implied that a surrender has occurred. The term commonly used for an implied surrender is a surrender “by operation of law”. In a recent case, QFS Scaffolding v Sable1 , the court considered some of the relevant principles for a surrender by operation of law to take place. Facts The landlord (Mr and Mrs Sable) granted a lease to a tenant company which eventually entered into administration. Prior to the administration, a new company (QFS) was formed with a view to taking over the tenant’s business. The Sables negotiated terms for a new lease with QFS who, in fact, went into occupation. However, the negotiations faltered and no new lease was entered into. Instead, QFS asked the administrator of the tenant to assign the lease to it and, as a result of this request, a deed of assignment was executed.
    [Show full text]
  • GOLD Package Channel & VOD List
    GOLD Package Channel & VOD List: incl Entertainment & Video Club (VOD), Music Club, Sports, Adult Note: This list is accurate up to 1st Aug 2018, but each week we add more new Movies & TV Series to our Video Club, and often add additional channels, so if there’s a channel missing you really wanted, please ask as it may already have been added. Note2: This list does NOT include our PLEX Club, which you get FREE with GOLD and PLATINUM Packages. PLEX Club adds another 500+ Movies & Box Sets, and you can ‘request’ something to be added to PLEX Club, and if we can source it, your wish will be granted. ♫: Music Choice ♫: Music Choice ♫: Music Choice ALTERNATIVE ♫: Music Choice ALTERNATIVE ♫: Music Choice DANCE EDM ♫: Music Choice DANCE EDM ♫: Music Choice Dance HD ♫: Music Choice Dance HD ♫: Music Choice HIP HOP R&B ♫: Music Choice HIP HOP R&B ♫: Music Choice Hip-Hop And R&B HD ♫: Music Choice Hip-Hop And R&B HD ♫: Music Choice Hit HD ♫: Music Choice Hit HD ♫: Music Choice HIT LIST ♫: Music Choice HIT LIST ♫: Music Choice LATINO POP ♫: Music Choice LATINO POP ♫: Music Choice MC PLAY ♫: Music Choice MC PLAY ♫: Music Choice MEXICANA ♫: Music Choice MEXICANA ♫: Music Choice Pop & Country HD ♫: Music Choice Pop & Country HD ♫: Music Choice Pop Hits HD ♫: Music Choice Pop Hits HD ♫: Music Choice Pop Latino HD ♫: Music Choice Pop Latino HD ♫: Music Choice R&B SOUL ♫: Music Choice R&B SOUL ♫: Music Choice RAP ♫: Music Choice RAP ♫: Music Choice Rap 2K HD ♫: Music Choice Rap 2K HD ♫: Music Choice Rock HD ♫: Music Choice
    [Show full text]
  • Carb on Market Business Brief
    CARBON MARKET BUSINESS BRIEF CHINA CHINA’S PILOT SYSTEMS AT A GLANCE Beijing Shanghai Shenzhen Guangdong Hubei Chongqing Tianjin Fujian Years in operation Since November Since November Since June 2013 Since December Since April 2014 Since June 2014 Since December Since September 2013 2013 2013 2013 2016 Overall cap & Around 50 million The 2019 cap was Excluding buildings, Around 465 million Around 270 million Around 97 million Around 160–170 Around 220 million trajectory tCO2e in 20181. 158 million tCO2e the cap was around tCO2e in 2019 and tCO2e in 2019 tCO2e in 2018 million tCO2e in in 2019 31.45 million tCO2e 2020 2017 in 2015 Target(s) 20.5% reduction in Carbon intensity 45% reduction in 20.5% reduction in 19.5% reduction in 19.5% reduction 20.5% reduction in 19.5% reduction carbon intensity, reduction of 20.5%, carbon intensity carbon intensity, carbon intensity by in carbon intensity carbon intensity, in carbon intensity compared to compared to 2015 compared to 2005 compared to 2015 2020, compared to compared to 2015 compared to 2015 compared to 2015 2015,and pledge by 2020 and to by 2020. The city by 2020, and 2015 levels by 2020 by 2020 and pledge by 2020 to peak its GHG peak emissions by has also pledged to pledge to peak to peak its CO2 emissions both by 2025 peak its emissions emissions before emissions by 2025 2020 by 2022 2030 ¹ It is estimated to be around this value also in 2018 and 2019, but exact number is not available. Updated May 2021 Beijing Shanghai Shenzhen Guangdong Hubei Chongqing Tianjin Fujian Sectors covered
    [Show full text]
  • Letter Carrier Resource Guide
    CARRIER LETTER 2019 R ESOURCE GUIDE Dear Letter Carrier, Welcome to your job as a letter carrier. We have created this guide to help you understand many of your rights and benefits both as a city carrier assistant (CCA) and career letter carrier. Through collective bargaining, National Association of Letter Carriers (NALC) has fought for and achieved these rights and benefits over the years. This guide also covers a variety of topics regarding your job as a letter carrier, the history and structure of the NALC, and your importance to the success of our union and the United States Postal Service (USPS). Throughout this guide, you will see many references and quotes from various sources such as the NALC/ USPS National Agreement, memorandums of understanding, and USPS handbooks and manuals. The Na- tional Agreement is the contract between the NALC and the USPS that covers wages, benefits, hours and working conditions for letter carriers. Memorandums of understanding (MOUs) are enforceable, contractually binding settlements under the Na- tional Agreement signed jointly by the NALC and USPS. These documents are identified by name and an “M” followed by a five digit number. This “M” number is a number NALC uses to track documents in what is called the Materials Reference System (MRS), which may be accessed at www.nalc.org/mrs. This guide also contains many references to a jointly-developed document containing Questions-and-An- swers (Q-and-As) regarding the rights and benefits of CCAs. This document, assigned as M-01870 in the MRS, provides the mutual understanding of the national parties on issues related to the USPS/NALC National Agreement.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021-2022 A-S Grades 7&8 Reading List
    The Allen-Stevenson School Upper Division 7th and 8th Grade Required and Recommended Books 2021-2022 May 10, 2021 Dear Students, As the librarian for students in Grades 6-8, I would like to welcome those students who are new to Allen-Stevenson. The students who are here know that we at Allen-Stevenson love to read and talk with each other about our favorite books! Our library has a great collection that includes fiction and non-fiction titles that are selected specifically for our Upper School students. Beginning on May 17, 2020, when our virtual Book Fair goes live, you may purchase books online that you would like to read over the summer.* Summer is a great time to relax and escape into books. Not only that, studies have shown that students who read what they enjoy do better on standardized tests and are better at reading and writing overall! We encourage all students entering Seventh and Eighth Grade to read 5 books over the summer, including your assigned book discussion book. Read what you enjoy! Attached to this letter is a selection of our favorite books. Some are new hits; others are time-tested favorites. You will find many of these books at our virtual Book Fair. The rest can be found at public libraries. You should also go to the Allen-Stevenson Library Tech Commons website at www.ascommons.org. It has many wonderful resources, including downloadable e-books and audiobooks from Sora. BACK TO SCHOOL BOOK DISCUSSION All students entering Seventh and Eighth Grade must read the book that they will discuss with their book group when they get back to school.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Conversations: Can We Talk About the Environment? 2021 Resources
    Community Conversations: Can We Talk About the Environment? www.goffstownlibrary.com/adults/communityconversation/ 2021 Resources Books • All We Can Save: Truth, Courage, and Solutions for the Climate Crisis edited by Ayana Elizabeth Johnson & Katherine K. Wilkinson (2020) • The Arctic is Heating Up by National Geographic (09.2019) • Being the Change: Live Well and Spark a Climate Revolution by Peter Kalmus (2017) • Drawdown: The Most Comprehensive Plan Ever Proposed to Reverse Global Warming edited by Paul Hawken (2017) • The End of Ice: Bearing Witness and Finding Meaning in the Path of Climate Disruption by Dhar Jamail (2019) • The Ends of the World: Volcanic Apocalypses, Lethal Oceans, and Our Quest to Understand Earth’s Past Mass Extinctions by Peter Brannen (2017) • Enviromedics: The Impact of Climate Change on Human Health by Jay Lemery (2017) • False Alarm: How Climate Change Panic Costs Us Trillions, Hurts the Poor, and Fails to Fix the Planet by Bjørn Lomborg (2020) • Fashionopolis: The Price of Fast Fashion – and the Future of Clothes by Dana Thomas (2019) • A Furious Sky: The Five-hundred-year History of America’s Hurricanes by Eric Jay Dolin (2020) • Future Sea: How to Rescue and Protect the World’s Oceans by Deborah Rowan Wright (2020) • The Future We Choose: Surviving the Climate Crisis by Christiana Figueres (2020) • The Great Derangement: Climate Change and the Unthinkable by Amitav Ghosh (2016) • Growing Good Food: A Citizen’s Guide to Backyard Carbon Farming by Acadia Tucker (2019) • How to Avoid a Climate Disaster:
    [Show full text]
  • Hard Justice Free
    FREE HARD JUSTICE PDF Lori Foster | 384 pages | 21 Mar 2017 | Harlequin Books | 9780373799329 | English | United States Hard Justice | Halo Machinima | Fandom Its promotional trailer was released Hard Justice YouTube on September 20, Hard Justice Bernard Brown is the starring character, an ex-cop Hard Justice resigns from the Hard Justice department of Regent City after deciding Hard Justice doesn't want to be a part of or contribute to the fact that Regent City is slowly becoming a fascist police state. Unfortunately for him, Esoteria is not much of a difference. After Hard Justice to get a Hard Justice, Bernard finds a job at E. Despite having a dark theme, Hard Justice still contains plenty Hard Justice DigitalPh33r's trademark humor. Max tells Eddie to steel himself for the coming task. Eddie decides to open the door, but Max tells him "Don't split hairs with me. Why go around something when you can go through it", and blasts open the door with his rocket launcher. Entering the house, Max discovers that the occupant of the house has downloaded three tracks of music, causing Eddie to puke violently. Just then, the occupant of the Hard Justice returns, and he is placed under arrest by Max, who tells him that downloading three tracks is equivalent to killing three Hard Justice. Eddie then fires at the "offender", who flees. Max blows up his car. After failing to catch him, they taser him twice and restrain him. In the Hard Justice, Bernard arrives at Esoteria airport, and after clearing the numerous security checkpoints, getting stopped at each of them Hard Justice being nervous.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Source Used in 250350550 Series Switches 2.5.5.X
    Open Source Used In 250350550 series switches 2.5.5.x Cisco Systems, Inc. www.cisco.com Cisco has more than 200 offices worldwide. Addresses, phone numbers, and fax numbers are listed on the Cisco website at www.cisco.com/go/offices. Text Part Number: 78EE117C99-211198338 Open Source Used In 250350550 series switches 2.5.5.x 1 This document contains licenses and notices for open source software used in this product. With respect to the free/open source software listed in this document, if you have any questions or wish to receive a copy of any source code to which you may be entitled under the applicable free/open source license(s) (such as the GNU Lesser/General Public License), please contact us at [email protected]. In your requests please include the following reference number 78EE117C99-211198338 En ce qui a trait au logiciel gratuit ou à exploitation libre figurant dans ce document, si vous avez des questions ou souhaitez recevoir une copie du code source, auquel vous avez droit en vertu des licences gratuites ou d'exploitation libre applicables (telles que licences GNU Lesser/General Public), veuillez communiquer avec nous à l'adresse external- [email protected]. Dans vos demandes, veuillez inclure le numéro de référence 78EE117C99-211198338 Contents 1.1 arp-scan 1.9-40-g69b2f70-1 1.1.1 Available under license 1.2 avahi 0.6.32 1.2.1 Available under license 1.3 BOOST C++ Library 1.58.0 1.3.1 Available under license 1.4 bzip2 1.0.6 1.4.1 Available under license 1.5 curl 7.65.3 1.5.1 Available under
    [Show full text]
  • POLICY CANCELLATION (SURRENDER FORM) Any Alterations/Corrections Made in the Form Need to Be Signed by the Policy Owner
    Did you know what your policy was doing for you? Your insurance product delivers best value in the You can avail Partial Withdrawal to meet your long term emergency requirement The cost of Protection Coverage at a young age The applicable Policy Charges diminish after is cost effective the initial lock in period POLICY CANCELLATION (SURRENDER FORM) Any alterations/corrections made in the form need to be signed by the policy owner. Please use a separate request form for each policy. (Kindly fill the form in BLOCK LETTERS only.) (All fields are mandatory) Date d d m m y y y y Name of the Policy holder Title First Name Middle Name Surname Contact details/Call back number (Mandatory): Telephone (R) No. STD Code Mobile In case of address change or contact details change request, please fill up a separate Policy Service Request Form and submit with valid address proof. SURRENDER (All fields are mandatory) Policy number: Reason for surrender: Financial reasons (Immediate Fund requirements, Purchase of Asset, etc.) Unsatisfactory returns Personal reasons (Marriage, Education, Death, etc.) Unsatisfactory Services Purchase of Financial Instruments Others, please specify ____________________________________ Discharge Receipt: I hereby agree to accept the surrender value and declare that I understand and agree to all the conditions and information given in this form. Please affix Re. 1 Witness Name: _____________________________________ Date d d m m y y y y revenue Address: __________________________________________ Signature of Policy Holder/ stamp
    [Show full text]
  • University-Community(Ommittee Formed to Hear Mutual Problems
    l..) -:; 6 / ../ ( t e VOL. 91 NO. 50 UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE, NEWARK, DELAWARE FRIDA\'. l\IA \' ,~1. Hlti~J University-Community(ommittee Formed To Hear Mutual Problems Trr.bant said, was undertaken In a move to strengthen socio-ciVlc affairs, to think, and expand university-com­ several weeks ago out of advise, and work with us." munity relations, President concern for the welfare of the "We need the detached E.A. Trabant announced the university's neighbors in the but constructive advice of formation of a University greater Newark area. such a group," he said, "to Community Relations "The re-evaluation of our help us chart our course in Advisory Committee. planning programs is being meeting the university's The new committee, undertaken at this time," contint.Jing responsibility . to under the chairmanship of Trabant noted, "so that both the citizens of the Dr. George M. Worrilow, the Newark community and community and the state." vice-president for university the university community, by The university is preparing relations, will bring together working together, will give a University Community community leaders and basic and reliable information Design as a guide in planning university officials in an upon which to develop an future academic programs exchange of information and improved understanding of and the physical expansion of discussion of mutual the factors which :will the university over the next problems in the future strengthen and expand five and ten years. development of the u n i ve rs it y- community Members of the university. relations." community and unixersity According to Worrilow, "Our purpose," Trabant who at this time have the committee will "attempt said, "is to have a group of consented to serve with Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • No Retreat No Surrender Conflict for Survival Between Fulani Pastoralists and Farmers in Northern Nigeria
    European Scientific Journal January edition vol. 8, No.1 ISSN: 1857 – 7881 (Print) e - ISSN 1857- 7431 UDC:323.22:63-05(662.6) NO RETREAT NO SURRENDER CONFLICT FOR SURVIVAL BETWEEN FULANI PASTORALISTS AND FARMERS IN NORTHERN NIGERIA Isah Mohammed Abbass, PhD Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria Abstract: Our herd is our life because to every nomad life is worthless without his cattle. What do you expect from us when our source of existence is threatened? The encroachment of grazing fields and routes by farmers is a call to war (HameSaidu, a Pastoralist, Wuse, 2009-IRIN, 2009). The continuing Fulani Pastoralists’ militancy for the survival of their cattle makes fierce struggle and violent conflicts with farmers inevitable. As Farmers continuously encroach into the grazing routes, they leave the Fulani with no alternative to neither retreat nor surrender. The traditional practices that focus on the close integration between raising of livestock and enhanced farming have posed serious dialectics in the dynamic relationships between pastoralists and farmers in Northern Nigeria. Northern Nigeria is a plural society with the potential for conflict. However, the conflicts between Fulani pastoralists and farmers in Northern Nigeria are essentially economic in nature, irrespective of the religious, cultural and political colourations that might be diluted to advance certain objectives. Migrant pastoralists in Nigeria are made up of many ethnic groups and the largest being the Fulbe or Fulani; constituting over 90%. The Fulani are well integrated amongst the sedentary Hausa farmers, who emigrated into Northern Nigeria from the Senegambia Valley several centuries ago (Adebayo, 1995). The availability of ecological, economic, environmental as well as social factors explain the need for posture, market proximity and the reciprocal social relationship with the host community.
    [Show full text]