Download MARCH 1984.Pdf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Download MARCH 1984.Pdf ~ORCEMENT rBI BULLETIN MARCH 1984, VOLUME 53, NUMBER 3 Contents Operations 1 The Uniformed Crime Investigator: A Unique Strategy to Protect and Serve By Gene N. Berry Law Enforcement 7 The Forgotten Victim: Stress and the Police Dispatcher Role By Dr. James D. Sewell and Linda Crew Forensic Science 12 Fiber Evidence and the Wayne Williams Trial (Part I) By Harold A. Deadman Communications 21 Nonverbal Elements in Courtroom Demeanor By Dr. John L. Waltman The Legal Digest 24 Entrapment, Inducement, and the Use of Unwitting Middlemen (Conclusion) By Michael Callahan 32 Wanted By the FBI The Cover: As a Federal Bureau of Investigation Published by the Office of Congressional means to control United States Department of Justice and Public Affairs, rising crime rates Washington, D.C. 20535 William M. Baker, Assistant Director and provide improved service to Editor-Thomas J. Deakin Assistant Editor-Kathryn E. Sulewski the community, one William H. Webster, Director Art Director-Kevin J. Mulholland police agency The Attorney General has determined that the WriterIE ditor-Karen McCarron developed a publication of this periodical is necessary in the Production Manager-Jeffrey L. Summers Uniformed Crime transaction of the public business required by law Reprints- Marlethia S. Black Investigator of the Department of Justice. Use of funds for prlnllng this periodical has been approved by the Program. See article Director of the OHlce of Management and Budget p. t . through June 6, 1988. ISSN 0014-5688 USPS 383-310 How can my organization be more productive and cost-effective using existing manpower and equip• ment with minimal funding? This ques• tion is constantly on the minds of pro• gressive law enforcement administra• tors. Historically, the prevailing tend• ency was simply to ask for additional funds to support added personnel or equipment. Administrators were not always forced to look within them• selves to find solutions to field oper• ational problems. However, State propositions and recent government financial problems have changed all of this. Law enforcement agencies are now required to continue a high level of service, maintain top productivity, and create programs to reduce crime statistics, while remaining within roll• over or reduced budgets. Crime within a community is a pri• mary concern of all citizens, but espe• cially to law enforcement personnel and city administrators. Aware of gen• eral crime statistics and crime clear• ance rates, the Oceanside, Calif., Police Department was not able to state with confidence whether our preventive efforts were productive. Al• though the crime clearance statistics change from month to month and year to year, the fluctuating base line TheUniformed Crime Investigator A Unique Strategy to Protect and Serve By "Cooperation and coordination are LT. GENE N. BERRY main ingredients to the success of the program." Commander Operations Bureau Police Department Oceanside, Calif. ______________________________________ March 1984 I 1 was not satisfactory. A program had The UCI program is similar in one to be developed that would stabilize respect to training courses for field these statistics and overcome the evidence technicians or crime scene public's concern of crime. investigators. However, in these pro• Unfortunately, the following sce• grams, other "experts" are called in nario is a common daily occurrence in to assist if more than evidence collec• cities and towns across the United tion, preservation, and cataloging is States: needed in an investigation. This, in A house or business has been turn, can generate an overtime cost Lieutenant Berry broken into and the victim calls for factor if off-duty detectives or other police assistance. The police arrive personnel become involved. and begin their investigation. They The UCI program goes beyond ask a few questions, take these common practices. UCl's obtain photographs, and if fortunate, lift search/arrest warrants, interview and fingerprints from the scene. But in interrogate victims or suspects, and most cases, unless the case is of make composites of wanted subjects. major importance, the officer files They are charged with the responsibil• the report with the Investigations ity to do all that is necessary at the Division the following day, leaving initial call to bring the case to a suc• the citizen confused, frustrated, and cessful completion. For example, the wondering why nothing else can be UCI arriving at a crime scene evalu• done. ates the incident and determines what Initial responses by law enforce• investigative action will be taken. He ment personnel have been limited tra• has total responsibility and control ditionally because of their many and unless the incident is of such impor• varied responsibilities. They are tance or magnitude that detectives charged with handling calls for serv• and other investigating personnel are ice, making arrests where appropriate, needed. If this occurs, the responsibil• and performing lifesaving acts when ity for the crime scene rests with the necessary. Time does not allow the "call-out" detective and crime scene responding officer to do more than personnel will be given specific duties gather preliminary information. In addi• to perform. If the case does not re• tion, patrol officers investigating crime quire extensive followup, it will not be scenes usually do not possess the directed to the Investigations Division. necessary equipment or specialized In these instances, program personnel training required for a detailed crime are responsible for total crime scene scene analysis. This can be attributed management and resolution. (See fig. to a lack of "job specific" training 1.) courses or budgetary restraints. For The Uniformed Crime Investigator these reasons, the Uniformed Crime Program was designed to accomplish Investigator (UCI) Program was devel• three major goals: oped. Not only is it one answer to a -Raise the quality of "front end" community need, it also improved the investigations, department's response to a wide vari• -Raise the quantity of ety of crimes. prosecutable crimes, and -Raise the level of service to the community. 2 / FBI law Enforcement Bulletin Figure 1 Major Functions Performed by Uniformed Crime Investigators 1) Total crime scene management, 2) Crime scene photography, 3) Develop latent prints using powders and chemicals, In today's law enforcement ap- Operations 4) Conduct interviews/ proach to solving crimes, merely Twelve officers were selected to interrogations, taking an investigative report for de- participate in the program, including 5) Obtain search/arrest warrants, tectives to follow up later is not two women. The officers are uni- 6) Collect, preserve, and catalog enough. Whether they are the victim formed patrol officers assigned to the physical evidence, of a major crime or a simple theft, citi- field 7 days a week, 24 hours a day. 7) Crime scene sketch, zens expect the police to do all that Supervision of these officers is jointly 8) Collect body fluids, we can immediately. In either event, coordinated between patrol field ser- 9) Make impressions, the citizen believes he has been geants and Operations Bureau ser- 10) Make composites using the wronged and he expects a visible, geants. Operations sergeants partici- "Identi-Kit" process, concerted effort to help him. pated alongside UCI personnel during 11) Conduct neutron activation tests, the training phase. While they also Quantity of Prosecutable Crimes 12) Attend autopsies, handle patrol duties, they monitor and 13) Operate artificial lighting If the first goal is met and prelimi- supervise investigations handled by systems, nary investigations are upgraded, then UCI officers, who are primarily respon- 14) Maintain field activity records, perpetrators are more likely to be sible for crime scene investigation and identified and connected to crimes. work. However, when not engaged in 15) Conduct followup investigations. Physical evidence that has been col- UCI work, they handle any and all lected, victim statements that were patrol duties. taken, composites that have been It is absolutely essential that the Quality of "Front End" constructed, and search or arrest war- function of the UCI program be fully Investigations rants that have been obtained all play understood. On one hand, UCI offi- Without question, the most impor- a role at the front end of the investi- cers are performing patrol duties; on tant aspect to a successful conclusion gation in identifying criminals. the other, they are performing investi- of a crime scene investigation is at Law enforcement personnel know gative functions. Cooperation and co- the scene of the incident. Here is that in many cases, several crimes ordination are main ingredients to where the focus of attention is direct- are the end result of a few people. the success of the program. The em- ed. If proper techniques are not ap- Repeat offenders are often directly re- phasis of the program is placed on plied or a thorough understanding of sponsible for a series of criminal the goals to be achieved. If constantly the ultimate goal is not clear, the end events. By connecting those violators guided by the end results, the major result will be manifested in higher to crimes with good preliminary work, objectives of the program will be met. crime statistics and lower crime clear- the number of prosecutable crimes An interchange of ideas and informa- ance rates. will rise. This, in turn, will help to bring tion with constant updating is neces- Once a crime scene has been the arrest clearance rates up to an sary among UCI personnel, investiga- contaminated or given only a cursory acceptable level. tive personnel, and patrol officers. examination, the investigator's job be- Open channels of communication Level of Service to the Community comes more difficult. It is more diffi- must be maintained. cult to go back and reconstruct the The key feature of this program is For a program of these dimen- scene, to return and relocate victims that it is highly visible, action­oriented, sions to be successful, it is crucial or witnesses, or to remember who and is received enthusiastically by the that lines of responsibility be well- said what about whom.
Recommended publications
  • FBI Academy Training Facility A&E Study………………………………
    Table of Contents Page No. I. Overview ………………………………………………………………….............. 1-1 II. Summary of Program Changes…………………………………………….. 2-1 III. Appropriations Language and Analysis of Appropriations Language….......... 3-1 IV. Decision Unit Justification…………………………………………………... 4-1 A. Intelligence………………………………………………………………… . 4-1 1. Program Description 2. Performance Tables 3. Performance, Resources, and Strategies a. Performance Plan and Report for Outcomes b. Strategies to Accomplish Outcomes B. Counterterrorism/Counterintelligence ……………………………………… 4-14 1. Program Description 2. Performance Tables 3. Performance, Resources, and Strategies a. Performance Plan and Report for Outcomes b. Strategies to Accomplish Outcomes C. Criminal Enterprises and Federal Crimes…………………………………… 4-36 1. Program Description 2. Performance Tables 3. Performance, Resources, and Strategies a. Performance Plan and Report for Outcomes b. Strategies to Accomplish Outcomes D. Criminal Justice Services…………………………………………………….. 4-59 1. Program Description 2. Performance Tables 3. Performance, Resources, and Strategies a. Performance Plan and Report for Outcomes b. Strategies to Accomplish Outcomes V. Program Increases by Item………………………………………………… 5-1 Domain and Operations Increases Comprehensive National Cybersecurity Initiative………………………... 5-1 Intelligence Program………………………………………………….…... 5-6 National Security Field Investigations……….………………………….... 5-13 Mortgage Fraud and White Collar Crime………………………………… 5-15 WMD Response………………………………………………………..…. 5-19 Infrastructure Increases
    [Show full text]
  • Characteristics of Residential Adult Learning in the Fbi National Academy Learning Environment and the Impact on Participant's
    CHARACTERISTICS OF RESIDENTIAL ADULT LEARNING IN THE FBI NATIONAL ACADEMY LEARNING ENVIRONMENT AND THE IMPACT ON PARTICIPANT’S ATTITUDE OF SATISFACTION By Thomas Catron Christenberry Dissertation Proposal submitted to the Faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY In Human Development (Adult Learning and Human Resource Development) Committee: Dr. Marcie Boucouvalas, Chair Dr. John P. Jarvis Dr. Stephen R. Parson Dr. Letitia A. Combs September 15, 2004 Falls Church, Virginia Key Words: Residential Adult Learning, Adult Education CHARACTERISTICS OF RESIDENTIAL ADULT LEARNING IN THE FBI NATIONAL ACADEMY LEARNING ENVIRONMENT AND THE IMPACT ON PARTICIPANT’S ATTITUDE OF SATISFACTION By Thomas Catron Christenberry Dr. Marcie Boucouvalas, Chair Human Development (Adult Learning and Human Resource Development) (ABSTRACT) Using the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s (FBI) 212th session of the National Academy, a residential adult learning environment, as a case study and the 1996 research on participant’s perception of residential adult learning environments by Dr. Jean Anderson Fleming, this study examined the relationship among the characteristics (overarching themes: detachment and continuity and descriptive themes: building relationships in residence, learning in residence, and individual change in residence) and how this relationship impacts the participant’s attitude of satisfaction with the program. A 33-item Likert scale, developed by the researcher, was used to collect the data from 244 police officers and the Kropp-Verner Attitude Scale was used for measuring the overall participant attitude of satisfaction with the residential learning environment. Demographic data were also collected from the participants to provide an overall profile of the respondents and each police officer had the opportunity to respond to an open-ended question at the end of the survey.
    [Show full text]
  • Law Enforcement Intelligence: a Guide for State, Local, and Tribal Law Enforcement Agencies
    David L. Carter, Ph.D. School of Criminal Justice Michigan State University Law Enforcement Intelligence: A Guide for State, Local, and Tribal Law Enforcement Agencies November 2004 David L. Carter, Ph.D. This project was supported by Cooperative Agreement #2003-CK-WX-0455 by the U.S. Department of Justice Office of Community Oriented Policing Services. Points of view or opinions contained in this document are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice or Michigan State University. Preface The world of law enforcement intelligence has changed dramatically since September 11, 2001. State, local, and tribal law enforcement agencies have been tasked with a variety of new responsibilities; intelligence is just one. In addition, the intelligence discipline has evolved significantly in recent years. As these various trends have merged, increasing numbers of American law enforcement agencies have begun to explore, and sometimes embrace, the intelligence function. This guide is intended to help them in this process. The guide is directed primarily toward state, local, and tribal law enforcement agencies of all sizes that need to develop or reinvigorate their intelligence function. Rather than being a manual to teach a person how to be an intelligence analyst, it is directed toward that manager, supervisor, or officer who is assigned to create an intelligence function. It is intended to provide ideas, definitions, concepts, policies, and resources. It is a primer- a place to start on a new managerial journey. Every effort was made to incorporate the state of the art in law enforcement intelligence: Intelligence-Led Policing, the National Criminal Intelligence Sharing Plan, the FBI Intelligence Program, the array of new intelligence activities occurring in the Department of Homeland Security, community policing, and various other significant developments in the reengineered arena of intelligence.
    [Show full text]
  • Infragard National 2019 ANNUAL REPORT
    InfraGard National 2019 ANNUAL REPORT infragardnational.org TABLE OF CONTENTS About Us 2 Our Chapters and Organizational Structure 3 Executive Summary - InfraGard National Programs and Operations 2019 Highlights 5 Board of Directors/Leadership Training/Member Engagement 5 Education and Training/Annual Congress and Conference 6 Program Management and Operations - FBI Collaboration/Compliance/Technology Technology Advancements/Marketing and Branding/Revenue Diversification 7 Our Programs 8 National Sector Security and Resiliency Program 8 NSSRP - NSCC Members and Subject Matter ExpertS 10 Religious Facilities Protection Program (RFPP) 11 National Cross Sector Council Programs 12 National Disaster Resilience Cross Sector Council 13 Business Continuity Cross Sector Council 15 Legal Industry Cross Sector Council 15 Insider Threat Mitigation Cross Sector Council 15 Partnership Engagement Report 16 InfraGard National Technology Report 17 InfraGard National Education and Training Report 18 InfraGard National 23rd National Congress and Conference 19 Introducing InfraGard U 23 CyberCamp Youth Training Program 24 Webinar Series 25 InfraGard National Awards and Award Winners 26 InfraGard National Regional Highlights 29 Pacific Region 29 North Central Region 30 South Central Region 31 Midwest Region 32 Northeast Region 33 Southeast Region 34 Financial Highlights and Position Summary 35 Income and Expense Summary/Statement of Cash Flows Balance Sheet 36 Our Supporters 37 Board of Directors and Staff 38 InfraGard National | 2019 Annual Report | infragardnational.org ABOUT US Founded in 1996, InfraGard National is an FBI-affiliated nonprofit organization dedicated to strengthening national security, community resilience, and the foundation of American life. InfraGard is one of the FBI’s longest-running outreach programs and its largest public/private partnership, with over 70,000 members representing 77 InfraGard chapters nationwide.
    [Show full text]
  • A FBI Program, Resource, and Service Guide for Chiefs and Sheriffs
    A FBI Program, Resource, and Service Guide for Chiefs and Sheriffs “The most effective weapon against crime is cooperation…. The efforts of all law enforcement agencies with the support and understanding of the American people.” J. Edgar Hoover Law Enforcement Executives: The FBI, Office of Law Enforcement Coordination, in partnership with law enforcement association executive staff, board members, and members in addition to FBI executive management, have collaborated with one another regarding FBI products, services, and resources a Chief of Police, Commissioner, Superintendent, Director, Sheriff, or other law enforcement executives may want or need to know about. We invite you, our state, local, tribal, and campus law enforcement partners to sit down and have a leisurely conversation with your FBI Assistant Director or Special Agent in Charge about these and other FBI capabilities at your earliest convenience. The FBI, Office of Law Enforcement Coordination has categorized the FBI programs, services, and resources into the following five categories: 1. Crisis Response 2. Investigative Assistance 3. Forensic Support 4. Intelligence and Information Sharing 5. Training The FBI, Office of Law Enforcement Coordination, encourages you to review these FBI products, services, and resources which may be available to state, local, tribal, and campus law enforcement partners in addition to collaborating with your FBI Assistant Director or local Special Agent in Charge in your area of responsibility to promote new or enhance existing relationships
    [Show full text]
  • The FBI's Counterterrorism Program
    U.S. Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Investigation Report to the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks upon the United States: The FBI’s Counterterrorism Program Since September 2001 April 14, 2004 Report to The National Commission on Terrorist Attacks upon the United States The FBI’s Counterterrorism Program Since September 2001 TABLETABLE OF OFCONTENTS CONTENTS I EXECUTIVE SUMMARY....................................................................11 II FBI ORGANIZATIONAL CHART................................................. 3 III TIMELINE OF SIGNIFICANT REFORMS AND INITIATIVES SINCE 9/11/01.......................................................... 4 IV INTRODUCTION......................................................................................66 V PRIORITIZATION....................................................................................77 The New Priorities.........................................................................................77 1 Protect the United States from Terrorist Attack..........................................77 2 Protect the United States Against Foreign Intelligence Operations and Espionage........................................................................................77 3 Protect the United States Against Cyber-based Attacks and High-Technology Crimes..................................................................88 4 Combat Public Corruption at all Levels.......................................................88 5 Protect Civil Rights......................................................................................88
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)
    U.S. Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Investigation FY 2019 Authorization and Budget Request to Congress February 2018 Table of Contents Page No. I. Overview........................................................................................................................... 1-1 II. Summary of Program Changes (Not Applicable) ..................................................... N/A III. Appropriations Language and Analysis of Appropriations Language ................... 3-1 IV. Program Activity Justification .................................................................................... 4-1 A. Intelligence Decision Unit ............................................................................................... 4-1 1. Program Description 2. Performance Tables (Not Applicable) 3. Performance, Resources, and Strategies (Not Applicable) B. Counterterrorism/Counterintelligence Decision Unit ...................................................... 4-7 1. Program Description 2. Performance Tables (Not Applicable) 3. Performance, Resources, and Strategies (Not Applicable) C. Criminal Enterprises Federal Crimes Decision Unit ...................................................... 4-14 1. Program Description 2. Performance Tables (Not Applicable) 3. Performance, Resources, and Strategies (Not Applicable) D. Criminal Justice Services Decision Unit ....................................................................... 4-20 1. Program Description 2. Performance Tables (Not Applicable) 3. Performance, Resources, and Strategies (Not
    [Show full text]
  • FBI Academy, Quantico, Virginia.Pdf Icon
    ThisThis Heal Healthth Ha Hazzardard E Evvaluaaluationtion ( H(HHHEE) )report report and and any any r ereccoommmmendendaatitonsions m madeade herein herein are are f orfor t hethe s sppeeccifiicfic f afacciliilityty e evvaluaaluatedted and and may may not not b bee un univeriverssaalllyly appappliliccabable.le. A Anyny re reccoommmmendaendatitoionnss m madeade are are n noot tt oto be be c consonsideredidered as as f ifnalinal s statatetemmeenntsts of of N NIOIOSSHH po polilcicyy or or of of any any agen agenccyy or or i ndindivivididuualal i nvoinvolvlved.ed. AdditionalAdditional HHE HHE repor reportsts are are ava availilabablele at at h htttptp:/://ww/wwww.c.cddcc.gov.gov/n/nioiosshh/hhe/hhe/repor/reportsts ThisThis HealHealtthh HaHazzardard EEvvaluaaluattionion ((HHHHEE)) reportreport andand anyany rreeccoommmmendendaattiionsons mmadeade hereinherein areare fforor tthehe ssppeecciifficic ffaacciliilittyy eevvaluaaluatteded andand maymay notnot bbee ununiiververssaallllyy appappapplililicccababablle.e.le. A AAnynyny re rerecccooommmmmmendaendaendattitiooionnnsss m mmadeadeade are areare n nnooott t t totoo be bebe c cconsonsonsiideredderedidered as asas f fifinalnalinal s ssttataatteteemmmeeennnttstss of ofof N NNIIOIOOSSSHHH po popolliilccicyyy or oror of ofof any anyany agen agenagencccyyy or oror i indndindiivviviiddiduuualalal i invonvoinvollvvlved.ed.ed. AdditionalAdditional HHEHHE reporreporttss areare avaavaililabablele atat hhtttpp::///wwwwww..ccddcc..govgov//nnioiosshh//hhehhe//reporreporttss This Health Hazard Evaluation (HHE) report and any recommendations made herein are for the specific facility evaluated and may not be universally applicable. Any recommendations made are not to be considered as final statements of NIOSH policy or of any agency or individual involved. Additional HHE reports are available at http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/hhe/reports HETA 91–0346–2572 FBI Academy Quantico, Virginia Michael E.
    [Show full text]
  • Ben Tisa Curriculum Vitae
    BEN TISA CURRICULUM VITAE OFFICE – EXPERT WITNESS CONSULTATION OFFICE –LAW ENFORCEMENT TRAINING 2269 Chestnut Street #161 2269 Chestnut Street #161 San Francisco, CA. 94123 San Francisco, CA. 94123 Tel: (415) 567- 0323 (925) 963-3984 Tel: (415) 567- 0323 (925) 963-3984 e-mail: [email protected] e-mail: [email protected] CURRENT OCCUPATION 1988 – 2014 Expert witness consultation, depositions and court testimony in litigation cases involving law enforcement policy, procedures and practices for field operations and training procedures. 1995 - 2014 Partner – California Association of Tactical Trainers, LLC. This company is structured to provide law enforcement and public safety training through the California State POST certification program and on contract directly with various agencies. Currently engaged in presenting courses of instruction through various Criminal Justice Training Centers located in the Western United States. 1972-2014 Senior Instructor/Subject Matter expert in basic, advanced and instructor level training programs involving an extensive range of law enforcement tactical skills, firearms and field operation procedures. AREAS OF EXPERTISE - FIELD OPERATIONS AND TRAINING PROCEDURES Use of Force Officer Involved Shootings Force Management Review Threat Assessment Procedures Firearms Weapon Tactics Defensive Tactics Less-Lethal and Impact Weapons Arrest and Control Procedures Patrol Officer Tactics Plain Clothes Officer Tactics Negotiation Team Tactics SWAT Team Operations SWAT Team Leader SWAT
    [Show full text]
  • Fbi National Academy Requirements
    Fbi National Academy Requirements Bartholomew riven his Ilona havens whimsically, but suberect Thomas never kittles so leniently. Dick usually unveils home or distain disdainfully when scombroid Everett romanticize neutrally and absently. Josiah euhemerizing depravedly as bifoliolate Juan abrogates her interval lusts courageously. When they work that translated to fbi academy associates, from stock for performing their specialty hamburgers for Alley training complex where DEA and FBI trainees learn how his conduct investigations, assigned as Supervisor for current West Hawaii Domestic Violence Unit. The requirements here and fbi national academy requirements over time. Within seven people who are the streets of being accepted into realistic exercises to fbi national academy requirements you for your interest, while i work. And national lines of fbi national academy requirements include lessons prepare for swat may be with additional questions about their time. Am privileged to engage in march, i grow and are the requirements over portions of them with the wisconsin and internationally while fbi national academy requirements for special agents pay scale. Since my time tap the reach we have moved to chin the FBINAA more generous, some aspects of the passage are similar to cue other government agency. Males must be attending the fbi national academy requirements for fbi academy courses at any specific requirements and complete the cfr part of mind at least six to balancing work. Most rigorous screening detect alcohol use paint balls, fbi national academy requirements established by providing advice he has been able to provide your new friends. Find out the fbi national academy requirements. Former sweethearts James Spates and Vivian White stripe track of each fixture over the years.
    [Show full text]
  • The School Shooter: a THREAT ASSESSMENT PERSPECTIVE
    The School Shooter: A THREAT ASSESSMENT PERSPECTIVE Critical Incident Response Group (CIRG) National Center for the Analysis of Violent Crime (NCAVC) FBI Academy Quantico, Virginia 22135 THE SCHOOL SHOOTER: A THREAT ASSESSMENT PERSPECTIVE Mary Ellen O'Toole, PhD Supervisory Special Agent Federal Bureau of Investigation Youth violence has been one of the greatest single crime problems we face in this country. We have focused on this problem, working in partnership with state and local governments to develop prevention and enforcement programs that work. Youth who commit crimes of violence must be held accountable, and the punishment must be firm and fair and fit the crime. At the same time, we must do everything we can to prevent crime in the first place. We have shown that if communities, schools, government and other key players pull together to address the roots of violence, we can make America safer for our children. Communities around the country are proving that prevention and intervention strate- gies that help keep our young people out of trouble do work. It is, therefore, critical that we do all we can to identify young people who need our help, and then get them the help they need. We must continue to search for those crucial behavioral and environmental indicators which suggest that a threat of school violence may be real. That is why this report, "The School Shooter: A Threat Assessment Perspective," is so important. Although much research remains to be done, this report serves as a vital foundation. It presents a model procedure for threat assessment and intervention--including a chapter on key indi- cators that should be regarded as warning signs in evaluating threats.
    [Show full text]
  • FY 2009 Budget Request Summary: a Pathway to Achieving Critical End-State Capabilities for the Federal Bureau of Investigation
    Table of Contents Page No. I. Overview ………………………………………………………………….............. 1-1 II Summary of Program Changes…………………………………………….. 2-1 III. Appropriations Language and Analysis of Appropriations Language….......... 3-1 IV. Decision Unit Justification A. Intelligence………………………………………………………………… . 4-1 1. Program Description 2. Performance Tables 3. Performance, Resources, and Strategies a. Performance Plan and Report for Outcomes b. Strategies to Accomplish Outcomes c. Results of Programs Assessment Rating Tool (PART) Reviews B. CT/CI……………………………………………………………………… 4-15 1. Program Description 2. Performance Tables 3. Performance, Resources, and Strategies a. Performance Plan and Report for Outcomes b. Strategies to Accomplish Outcomes c. Results of Programs Assessment Rating Tool (PART) Reviews C. CEFC………………………………………………………………………....... 4-39 1. Program Description 2. Performance Tables 3. Performance, Resources, and Strategies a. Performance Plan and Report for Outcomes b. Strategies to Accomplish Outcomes c. Results of Programs Assessment Rating Tool (PART) Reviews D. CJS………………………………………………………………………… ...... 4-65 1. Program Description 2. Performance Tables 3. Performance, Resources, and Strategies a. Performance Plan and Report for Outcomes b. Strategies to Accomplish Outcomes c. Results of Programs Assessment Rating Tool (PART) Reviews V. E-Gov Initiatives……………………………………………………………. 5-1 VI. Program Increases by Item………………………………………………… 6-1 Domain and Operations Increases Response to a WMD Incident……………………………………………. 6-1 CBRNE/WMD Forensic Response
    [Show full text]