ENVIRONMENT PLAN

STOKES BAY-1, POINT TORMENT-1 AND WEST KORA-1 AND ASSOCIATED INFRASTRUCTURE, CARE AND MAINTENANCE AND CLEAN-UP ACTIVITIES

REY RESOURCES LIMITED

COPYRIGHT STATEMENT Except as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth), no part of or the whole of this document is permitted to be reproduced by any process, electronic or otherwise, without the specific written permission of Focused Vision Consulting Pty Ltd. This includes photocopying, scanning, microcopying, photocopying or recording of any parts of the document. Focused Vision Consulting Pty Ltd ABN 25 605 804 500

Please direct all enquiries to: Focused Vision Consulting Pty Ltd 8/83 Mell Rd, SPEARWOOD, WA 6163 : (08) 6179 4111 : [email protected]

Document History

Rev. Author Reviewed Approved Date

Patricia Aylmore Mimi d’Auvergne A Senior Environmental Senior Environmental 26/10/2018 Consultant Advisor

Patricia Aylmore Mimi d’Auvergne Kellie Bauer-Simpson B Senior Environmental Senior Environmental Principal Ecologist/ 01/11/2018 Consultant Advisor Environmental Manager

Patricia Aylmore Mimi d’Auvergne Kellie Bauer-Simpson C Senior Environmental Senior Environmental Principal Ecologist/ 02/11/2018 Consultant Advisor Environmental Manager

Patricia Aylmore Art Malone Kellie Bauer-Simpson D Senior Environmental Rey Resources Projects Principal Ecologist/ 19/11/2018 Consultant Manager Environmental Manager

Patricia Aylmore Kellie Bauer-Simpson Art Malone E Senior Environmental Principal Ecologist/ Rey Resources Projects 07/01/2019 Consultant Environmental Manager Manager

Ashley Fertch Kellie Bauer-Simpson Art Malone F Senior Environmental Principal Ecologist/ Rey Resources Projects 06/03/2019 Consultant Environmental Manager Manager

REY RESOURCES, ENVIRONMENT PLAN - STOKES BAY- 1, POINT TORMENT - 1, WEST KORA- 1 ii

Table of Contents 1 Introduction ...... 8 1.1 Overview ...... 8 1.2 Scope ...... 8

1.3 Licence Holder and Operator Details ...... 9 1.4 Environmental Management Framework ...... 9 2 Description of the Activity ...... 14 2.1 Location ...... 14 2.2 Description of Infrastructure ...... 15

2.3 Timeframes ...... 1 2.4 Care, Maintenance and Clean-up Activities ...... 1 3 Description of the Environment ...... 5 3.1 Climate ...... 5

3.2 Geology, Landform and Soils ...... 5 3.3 Hydrogeology ...... 8 3.4 Terrestrial Flora and Vegetation ...... 29 3.5 Fauna ...... 31 3.6 Environmentally Sensitive Areas ...... 36

3.7 Cultural Heritage ...... 36 4 Environmental Risk Assessment and Management ...... 37 4.1 Identification of Activities, Events and Associated Environmental Aspects ...... 37 4.2 Evaluation of Impacts and Risks ...... 38

4.3 Risk Acceptance Criteria ...... 44 4.4 Performance Objectives, Standards and Measurement Criteria ...... 44 4.5 Summary of Environmental Risk Assessment ...... 45 5 Implementation Strategy ...... 45 5.1 Systems, Practices and Procedures...... 45

5.2 Chain of Command ...... 45 5.3 Roles and Responsibilities ...... 47 5.4 Emergency Response ...... 48 5.5 Environmental Training ...... 50

REY RESOURCES, ENVIRONMENT PLAN - STOKES BAY- 1, POINT TORMENT - 1, WEST KORA- 1 III

5.6 Monitoring, Auditing, Management of Non-Conformance and Review ...... 50 5.7 Environmental Reporting ...... 53

6 Consultation ...... 58 6.1 Indigenous Consultation ...... 59 6.2 Private and Government Stakeholder Consultation ...... 59 6.3 Ongoing Stakeholder Consultation ...... 59

7 References ...... 60

REY RESOURCES, ENVIRONMENT PLAN - STOKES BAY- 1, POINT TORMENT - 1, WEST KORA- 1 IV

Figures

Figure 1: Location of the Title Areas and Well Sites ...... 18 Figure 2: Mean Monthly Rainfall, Maximum and Minimum Temperatures at Derby Aero (BoM 2018) ...... 5 Figure 3: The Onshore Canning Basin (Crostella 1988; Geological Survey of Western Australia 2007) ...... 6 Figure 4: Generalised Geological Section for the Broader Derby Area (Smith 1992; Harrington et al. 2011) ...... 7 Figure 5: Structural Setting of the Fitzroy Trough ...... 8 Figure 6: Stratigraphy and Aquifer Potential for the Derby Area (from Smith (1992))...... 28 Figure 7: ALARP Decision Support Framework ...... 40 Figure 8: Chain of Command ...... 46

Tables

Table 1: Titleholder Details ...... 9 Table 2: Rey Resources Ltd Contact Details ...... 9 Table 3: Well Co-ordinates and Status ...... 15 Table 4: Summary of Site Work Activities to be Undertaken as a Result of the 2016 DMP Inspection ...... 3 Table 5: Database Searches Conducted ...... 29 Table 6: Priority Flora Records within 40 km of the Well Sites (DEC 2007a; DBCA 2018a) ...... 30 Table 7: Potential Impacts to Conservation-Significant Fauna Species ...... 33 Table 8: Aboriginal Heritage Sites in Close Proximity to the Well Sites Area ...... 36 Table 9: Hazard identification process and risk assessment and relevant legislation ...... 38 Table 10: Consequence Descriptions ...... 39 Table 11: Likelihood descriptions used in the risk assessment ...... 42 Table 12: Risk Analysis Matrix ...... 42 Table 13: Risk Rating and Mitigation Level ...... 44 Table 14: Roles and Responsibilities ...... 47 Table 15: Credible Spill Scenarios during Care and Maintenance Activities ...... 48 Table 16: Definitions of Spills ...... 48 Table 17: Summary of Reporting Requirements and Commitments ...... 55 Table 18: Relevant Stakeholder List ...... 58 Table 19: Stakeholder Engagement Register ...... 58

Appendices

Appendix A - Rey Resources Limited Environment Policy ...... A1

Appendix B – Operational procedures for care and maintenance activities for the well sites and associated infrastructure ...... B1 Appendix C - Stratigraphic units in the Derby area with groundwater potential (from Smith (1992)) ...... C1 Appendix D – Conservation-Significant Fauna Species with the Potential to Occur Within the Well Sites Area .. D1

Appendix E - Risk Assessment and ALARP Justification ...... E1

REY RESOURCES, ENVIRONMENT PLAN - STOKES BAY- 1, POINT TORMENT - 1, WEST KORA- 1 V

Acronyms

Acronym Detail

AH Act Aboriginal Heritage Act 1972

AHIS Aboriginal Heritage Inquiry System

ALARP as low as reasonably practicable

APPEA Australian Petroleum Production and Exploration Association

BF Act Bush Fires Act 1954

BoM Bureau of Meteorology

BTEX Benzene, Toluene, Ethylbenzene and Xylene

CAMBA China and Australia Migratory Bird Agreement

CS Act Contaminated Sites Act 2003

DAA Department of Aboriginal Affairs

DBCA Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions

DEC Department of Environment and Conservation

DoEE Department of the Environment and Energy

DoW Department of Water

DMIRS Department of Mines, Industry Regulation and Safety

DMP Department of Mines and Petroleum

DWER Department of Water and Environmental Regulation

DPaW Department of Parks and Wildlife

DRF Declared Rare Flora

EP Environment Plan / Exploration Permit

EP Act Environment Protection Act 1986

EPBC Act Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999

EMP Environmental Management Plan

EMS Environmental Management System

EPA Environmental Protection Authority

EPP Environmental Protection Policy

ESA Environmentally Sensitive Area

IBRA Interim Biogeographic Regionalisation of Australia

JAMBA Japan and Australia Migratory Bird Agreement

MNES Matters of National Environmental Significance

MRWA Main Roads Western Australia

MSDS Material Safety Data Sheet

NATA National Association of Testing Authorities

NEPM National Environment Protection Measures

REY RESOURCES, ENVIRONMENT PLAN - STOKES BAY- 1, POINT TORMENT - 1, WEST KORA- 1 VI

Acronym Detail

NOPSEMA National Offshore Petroleum, Safety and Environmental Management Authority

NT Act Native Title Act 1993

OGUK Oil and Gas UK

OSCAR Online System for Comprehensive Activity Reporting

OSCP Oil Spill Contingency Plan

PDWSA Public Drinking Water Supply Area

PEC Priority Ecological Communities

PGER Act Petroleum and Geothermal Energy Resources Act 1967

PGERR Petroleum and Geothermal Energy Resources Regulations 2012

PGER(E)R Petroleum and Geothermal Energy Resources (Environment) Regulations 2012

RIWI Act Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914

ROKAMBA Republic of Korea and Australia Migratory Bird Agreement

Rey Rey Resources Limited

RLS RLS Lennard Shelf Pty Ltd

SMS Safety Management System

TDS Total Dissolved Solids

TEC Threatened Ecological Communities

TRH Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons

WC Act Wildlife Conservation Act 1950

REY RESOURCES, ENVIRONMENT PLAN - STOKES BAY- 1, POINT TORMENT - 1, WEST KORA- 1 VII

1 I NTRODUCTION

1.1 OVERVIEW Rey Resources Limited (Rey) is an ASX-listed company (ASX.REY) focused on exploring and developing energy resources in Western Australia’s Canning and Perth Basins.

Rey recently acquired the Gulliver Productions Pty Ltd (Gulliver) assets of Stokes Bay-1 and Point Torment-1 well sites in Retention Lease R1 and the West Kora-1 well site in Production Licence L15 (Figure 1) and now proposes to conduct some care and maintenance and clean-up activities (based on an inspection undertaken by the then Department of Mines and Petroleum (DMP), (now known as Department of Mines, Industry Regulation and Safety (DMIRS)) in April 2016) on the sites. Accordingly, this Environment Plan (EP) is required to address the proposed activities.

1.2 SCOPE This EP has been prepared for the proposed care and maintenance and clean-up activities for the West Kora-1, Stokes Bay-1 and Point Torment-1 wells and their associated infrastructure and has been developed in accordance with the Department of Mines and Petroleum (DMP) publication ‘Guideline for the Development of Petroleum and Geothermal Environment Plans in Western Australia’ (DMP guideline, DMP November 2016) under the Petroleum and Geothermal Energy Resources (Environment) Regulations 2012 (PGER(E)R).

Further, this EP provides Rey with a practical environmental performance tool for these activities.

The care and maintenance and clean-up activities proposed to be conducted include:

• Re-establishment of roads/tracks for access to the well sites and associated infrastructure • Annual well site inspection • Well integrity assessments to ensure all wells and infrastructure are functional and secure • Collecting soil samples to confirm absence of elevated hydrocarbon levels and contamination • General clean-up around each of the well sites to remove corroded and obsolete infrastructure, and the infilling of existing cuttings and flare pits at the Stokes Bay-1 and Point Torment 1 sites, respectively

This EP has been developed to identify the key risks and potential environmental impacts during the proposed activities at Stokes Bay-1, Point Torment-1, West Kora-1 and the West Kora Tank Farm and to provide detailed management and mitigation strategies to minimise environmental impacts during the activities.

The activities specifically excluded from the scope of this EP are:

• pre-commissioning activities, including hydrotesting and dewatering • activities associated with in-well servicing and maintenance • infill well development.

These activities will not be undertaken as part of the care and maintenance and clean-up activities. If there is a requirement to undertake these activities at a later date, a separate EP will be prepared addressing these activities.

REY RESOURCES, ENVIRONMENT PLAN - STOKES BAY- 1, POINT TORMENT - 1, WEST KORA- 1 8

1.3 LICENCE HOLDER AND OPERATOR DETAILS Rey Resources Limited is the registered operator of R1 and L15 under the PGER(E)R. Table 1 and Table 2 outline the Titleholder and Operator Contact details. Table 1: Titleholder Details

Titles Details Titleholders Operator Address Suite 2 Petroleum Production L15 Rey Resources Limited Rey Resources Limited 3b Macquarie Street Licence Sydney NSW 2000 Suite 2 R1 Retention Lease Rey Resources Limited Rey Resources Limited 3b Macquarie Street Sydney NSW 2000

Table 2: Rey Resources Ltd Contact Details

Company Name Rey Resources Limited

Nominated Liaison Person Art Malone

Position Projects Manager

Business Address Lvl 6, Suite 2, “Blue Tower” 12 Creek Street, Brisbane QLD 4000

Telephone Number +61 411 781 207

Email Address [email protected]

If the operator or contact details change, Rey Resources Limited will notify the Western Australian Department of Mines, Industry Regulation and Safety (DMIRS) (formerly Department of Mines and Petroleum) in accordance with the PGER(E)R.

1.4 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK 1.4.1 Rey Resources Limited Environmental Policy Rey Resources Limited’s Environmental Policy is provided as Appendix A. 1.4.2 Legislative Framework DMIRS under the Petroleum and Geothermal Energy Resources Act 1967 (PGER Act) has regulatory jurisdiction for exploration and development of all onshore petroleum resources in Western Australia. The PGER Act requires that onshore petroleum operators meet all applicable Commonwealth and State environmental laws and regulations. 1.4.2.1 State Legislation The key State legislation that applies to this EP includes:

• Petroleum and Geothermal Energy Resources Act 1967 (PGER Act) • Petroleum and Geothermal Energy Resources Regulations 2012 (PGERR) • Petroleum and Geothermal Energy Resources (Environment) Regulations 2012 (PGER(E)R) • Schedule of Onshore Petroleum Exploration and Production Requirements 1991 (Onshore Schedule) • Environmental Protection Act 1986 (EP Act) • Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act)

REY RESOURCES, ENVIRONMENT PLAN - STOKES BAY- 1, POINT TORMENT - 1, WEST KORA- 1 9

• Environmental Protection (Clearing of Native Vegetation) Regulations 2004 (Clearing Regulations) • Environmental Protection (Noise) Regulations 1997 (Noise Regulations) • Aboriginal Heritage Act 1972 (AH Act) • Bush Fires Act 1954 (BF Act) • Wildlife Conservation Act 1950 (WC Act) • Contaminated Sites Act 2003 (CS Act) • Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914 (RIWI Act). 1.4.2.2 Petroleum and Geothermal Energy Resources Act The DMIRS regulates all petroleum and geothermal activities under the following environmental regulations:

• PGER Act • Petroleum (Submerged Lands) (Environmental) Regulations 2012 • Petroleum Pipelines (Environmental) Regulations 2012.

The purpose of these regulations is to ensure that any petroleum or geothermal activity is carried out in a manner consistent with the principles of ecologically sustainable development and in accordance with an EP that:

• demonstrates the environmental impacts and risks of the activity will be reduced to ALARP • has appropriate environmental performance objectives and environmental performance standards • has appropriate measurement criteria for determining whether objectives and standards have been met.

Rey is required to submit an EP to DMIRS and obtain approval under the PGER Act, as enforced under the PGER(E)R, prior to commencing activities associated with the care and maintenance and clean-up activities for the well sites and associated infrastructure. 1.4.2.3 Schedule of Onshore Petroleum Exploration and Production Requirements 1991 The Onshore Schedule details the legislative requirements for conducting onshore petroleum site inspection activities in Western Australia. The purpose of the Onshore Schedule is to ensure activities are conducted in a professional, safe and environmentally responsible manner. Rey will abide by all relevant aspects of the Onshore Schedule throughout the care and maintenance and clean-up activities undertaken in R1 and L15. 1.4.2.4 Environmental Protection Act 1986 (EP Act) The EP Act provides for the prevention, control, and abatement of pollution and environmental harm, for the conservation, preservation, protection, enhancement, and management of the environment.

Under the EP Act, the regulations that apply to this EP include Environmental Protection Regulations 1987, Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste) Regulations 2004, Environmental Protection (Clearing of Native Vegetation) Regulations 2004 and Environmental Protection (Noise) Regulations 1997. 1.4.2.5 Environmental Protection (Clearing of Native Vegetation) Regulations 2004 In accordance with section 20 of the EP Act, DMIRS has been delegated authority, under the Clearing Regulations, for the administration of applications to clear native vegetation for petroleum activities regulated under the Petroleum and Geothermal Energy Resources Act 1967. These regulations set out certain clearing exemptions, which apply across the State except in environmentally sensitive areas.

Removal of vegetation for the re-establishment of access tracks and clearing to enable access to the West Kora Tank Farm will be conducted in accordance with exemptions under the Environmental Protection (Clearing of Native Vegetation) Regulations 2004.

REY RESOURCES, ENVIRONMENT PLAN - STOKES BAY- 1, POINT TORMENT - 1, WEST KORA- 1 10

1.4.2.6 Aboriginal Heritage Act 1972 The Aboriginal Heritage Act 1972 (AH Act) provides protection for places and objects in Western Australia that are important to Aboriginal people because of connections to their cultures. These places and objects are regarded as Aboriginal sites (DPLH 2018a). Approval is required under Section 18 of the AH Act to disturb an Aboriginal heritage site.

There are no indigenous heritage sites within the project area that are registered on the Department of Aboriginal Affair’s (DAA) Aboriginal Heritage Inquiry System (AHIS).

Sampling of cuttings and flare pits will be conducted within pre-existing built up or man-made areas and will therefore not impact the natural ground surface. 1.4.2.7 Wildlife Conservation Act 1950 The WC Act provides for the conservation and legal protection of flora and fauna species and ecological communities that are considered to be Threatened or otherwise in need of special protection. The ‘taking’ of flora, fauna or ecological communities listed under the WC Act is an offence unless done in accordance with the appropriate licences/permits.

There are no potential impacts to Threatened flora and fauna within the well sites area.

1.4.2.8 Bush Fires Act 1954 The Bush Fires Act 1954 (BF Act) provides for the prevention and management of bush fires.

A number of specific management actions have been committed to for the proposed activity in order to mitigate risks against site and bush fires, including designated smoking locations, disposal of butts in designated butt bins only, fire training for all site staff and vehicle and equipment compliance requirements for fire safety. 1.4.2.9 Environmental Protection (Noise) Regulations 1997 The Noise Regulations set out assigned/allowable noise levels for various types of premises that receive noise from other premises. These assigned levels are set to provide a good level of protection for the noise receiver. However, there are many activities that occur in the community that cannot meet those assigned levels but retain a degree of acceptance either due to their temporary nature or the perceived community benefit. The Regulations make special provision for such activities.

The noise levels expected from the proposed care and maintenance and clean-up activities are not expected to impact on the community due to their nature and the considerable distance from the nearest residential community in Derby. 1.4.2.10 Contaminated Sites Act 2003 The Contaminated Sites Act 2003 (CS Act) provides for the identification, recording, management and remediation of contaminated sites. The CS Act complements the EP Act and addresses contamination and legacy issues not regulated under the EP Act. The CS Act requires that known or suspected contamination is reported to DWER, investigated and, if necessary, remediated.

No contaminated sites are known to occur or have been recorded within the project area. However, if contaminated sites are encountered, or result from the activities, these will be reported to DMIRS and DWER immediately and appropriately remediated. 1.4.2.11 Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914

REY RESOURCES, ENVIRONMENT PLAN - STOKES BAY- 1, POINT TORMENT - 1, WEST KORA- 1 11

The Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914 (RIWI Act) relates to rights in water resources, to make provision for the regulation, management, use and protection of water resources, and for related purposes.

The well sites are located within the Canning-Kimberley groundwater proclamation area, but are not located in a Surface Water Proclamation Area. As such, approvals would be required to abstract groundwater, if required, however water is not specifically required to undertake the care and maintenance and clean-up activities.

1.4.3 Commonwealth Legislation The relevant Commonwealth legislation that may apply to the well sites project area are as follows:

• Native Title Act 1993 (NT Act) • Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act) • National Greenhouse and Energy Reporting Act 2007 • Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Heritage Protection Act 1984. 1.4.3.1 Native Title Act 1993 Under the Native Title Act 1993 (NT Act), Native Title is extinguished on freehold land that has been granted on or before 23 December 1996.

The sites are located within a pastoral lease which has been utilised for farming and grazing activities since the late 1800s. 1.4.3.2 Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 Under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act), an 'action' requires the approval of the Commonwealth Minister for the Department of the Environment and Energy (DoEE) if the action has, will have, or is likely to have significant impact on any of the following matters of National Environmental Significance (MNES):

• World Heritage properties • National Heritage places • RAMSAR wetlands of international importance • Nationally threatened animal and plant species and ecological communities • Migratory species protected under international agreements • The Great Barrier Reef Marine Park • Commonwealth marine environment • Nuclear actions • A water resource, in relation to coal seam gas development and large coal mining developments.

There are currently no known MNES in the vicinity of the project area that may be affected by the care and maintenance and clean-up activities.

1.4.3.3 National Greenhouse and Energy Reporting Act 2007 The National Greenhouse and Energy Reporting Act 2007 (NGER Act) requires organisations that meet or exceed either of the following thresholds to report annually on energy produced, energy consumed and greenhouse gas emissions:

• Corporate (i.e., company-wide) threshold: 50 kt CO2-e emitted or 100 TJ of energy consumed • Facility (i.e., project) threshold: 25 kt CO2-e emitted or 100 TJ of energy consumed.

REY RESOURCES, ENVIRONMENT PLAN - STOKES BAY- 1, POINT TORMENT - 1, WEST KORA- 1 12

An aspect of the activities that may result in emissions to air contributing to greenhouse gas emissions includes the combustion of diesel fuel to power vehicles and equipment during site inspections and works.

Rey does not anticipate emissions resulting from the care and maintenance and clean-up activities will meet or exceed the NGER thresholds given the relatively short-duration and frequency of the proposed activities and expected relatively low volumes of emissions generated. However, if emissions were to exceed these values (based on estimates, measurements and projections), Rey will submit emissions data as required under the Act on the Online System for Comprehensive Activity Reporting (OSCAR) as detailed in Table 17. 1.4.4 Codes of Practice The industry code of practice that applies to these care and maintenance and clean-up activities is the Australian Petroleum Production and Exploration Association (APPEA) Code of Environmental Practice (APPEA 2008).

The Codes of Practice that apply to the site inspection activities include AS 1678: Emergency Procedure Guides and ASNZS ISO 31000: 2009 Risk Management.

Rey has considered this code of practice in the development of this EP.

1.4.5 International Agreements and Conventions The international agreements and conventions that are of relevance to onshore care and maintenance and clean- up activities include:

• Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals 1983 (commonly known as the Bonn Convention) • Agreement between the Government of Australia and the Government of the People’s Republic of China for the Protection of Migratory Birds and their Environment (commonly referred to as the China Australia Migratory Bird Agreement (CAMBA)) • Agreement between the Government of Australia and the Government of Japan for the Protection of Migratory Birds and Birds in Danger of Extinction and their Environment (commonly referred to as the Japan Australia Migratory Bird Agreement (JAMBA)) • Agreement between the Government of Australia and the Government of the Republic of Korea on the Protection of Migratory Birds (commonly referred to as the Republic of Korea Australia Migratory Bird Agreement (ROKAMBA)) • Convention on Wetlands of International Importance Especially as Waterfowl Habitat (Ramsar Convention) • Vienna Convention for the Protection of the Ozone Layer and the Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer • Basel Convention on the Control of Transboundary Movements of Hazardous Wastes and their Disposal • United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.

The proposed care and maintenance and clean-up activities will not significantly impact migratory birds, wildlife or wetlands. Any hazardous and other wastes generated will be placed in designated bins with lids and disposed of off-site at appropriately registered facilities within the State.

REY RESOURCES, ENVIRONMENT PLAN - STOKES BAY- 1, POINT TORMENT - 1, WEST KORA- 1 13

2 D ESCRIPTION OF THE A CTIVITY To meet the requirements of Part 2 Division 3, Regulation 14(1) of the PGER(E)R, Description of the Activity, this Section describes the activities associated with the care and maintenance and clean-up of the three wells and their associated infrastructure within Production Licence 15 (L15) and Retention Licence 1 (R1), specifically:

• Re-establishment of the access roads / tracks into the site, to enable movement of vehicles to site. This re-establishment of the track will involve slashing of vegetation growing within the track. The vegetation will be cut down to ground level with no removal of root material. • Inspection of the roads / tracks for erosion and subsequent repair, if required • Facility inspections and where required, maintenance and repair • Annual well integrity assessments to ensure all wells and infrastructure are functional and secure • General well intervention activities not requiring down-hole chemicals, such as wire line operations, pulling and replacing a completion and snubbing • Removal of existing infrastructure in accordance with the DMP Environmental Inspection Report (DMP 2016) (e.g. above ground piping, perimeter fences, deteriorated flare pipe, waste polypipe, flowlines, concrete remnants no longer required for future operations • Final soil sampling to confirm the absence of elevated hydrocarbon levels / contamination around the wells and associated infrastructure • Infill the cuttings pit and remove the pit bund at Stokes Bay-1 • Infill the flare pit at Point Torment-1 and remove any associated bunding • Removal of empty tanks from West Kora Tank Farm offsite for refurbishment and subsequent replacement of tanks once refurbished.

Rey will commission inGauge Energy Pty Ltd (inGauge), a well engineering and project management company, as well as a civil contractor, to undertake the care and maintenance and clean-up activities for the three well sites and their associated infrastructure.

2.1 LOCATION The well sites are located within both L15 and R1, approximately 20 km north east of Derby within the Lennard North Province in Western Australia’s Canning Basin. Figure 1 shows the location of the old EP104 area, now comprising R1 and L15 and the West-Kora-1, Stokes Bay-1 and Point Torment-1 well sites.

Stokes Bay-1 and Point Torment-1 are both located on raised pads accessed via raised causeways in R1. Stokes Bay-1 is located approximately 20 km north-east of Derby. Point Torment-1 is located approximately 4 km south- east of Stokes Bay-1. West Kora-1 is located approximately 12 km south south-east of Point Torment-1 on a pastoral paddock within L15. The coordinates of the West Kora-1, Stokes Bay-1 and Point Torment-1 well sites are provided in Table 3.

Due to ground conditions, physical access is restricted to the dry season (May to October) only.

The well sites are located within the Shire of Derby/West Kimberley, which has a total population of approximately 7,400 people. The town of Derby is the closest population centre to the well sites.

REY RESOURCES, ENVIRONMENT PLAN - STOKES BAY- 1, POINT TORMENT - 1, WEST KORA- 1 14

Table 3: Well Co-ordinates and Status

Well Site Easting (mE) Northing (mN) Latitude Longitude Status Date Stokes Bay-1 575414 8104830 -17.1399 123.7090 Suspended 05/12/2009 Point Torment-1 578567 8102079 -17.1647 123.7388 Suspended 28/03/1995 West Kora-1 586958 8093139 -17.2451 123.8180 Shut-In 04/01/1990

2.2 DESCRIPTION OF INFRASTRUCTURE The care and maintenance and clean-up activities detailed in this EP relate to the currently idle infrastructure previously used to support production at West Kora-1. This idle infrastructure includes:

• Stokes Bay-1 Well (suspended), well pad, Cuttings Pit, Water Bore and Causeway (Section 2.2.1) • Point Torment- 1 Well (suspended), Well Pad, Flare Pit and Causeway (Section 2.2.2) • West Kora-1 Well (shut-in), concrete pad and access track (Section 2.2.3) • West Kora Tank Farm, evaporation pond, above ground piping network and access track (Section 2.2.4).

2.2.1 Stokes Bay-1 The Stokes Bay-1 site includes the access causeway to the established well pad. The causeway is in good condition with no areas of potential inundation by high tides. It contains some culverts to assist with tidal flow and is frequently used by third parties (4WD only) to access the broader drill pad and surrounding area for fishing and similar activities. There are several parts of the causeway with vegetation establishment along the banks and into the flats. Dependent on erosion as a result of cyclonic activities, sections of the causeway may require repair.

The Stokes Bay-1 well pad is large, and it is assumed it previously supported some amenity buildings. It is surrounded by a wire perimeter fence which has failed in certain sections. There is vegetation establishment along the banks of the well-pad and the northern part of the pad is adjacent to the creek.

There is an old cuttings pit approximately 30 m x 30 m in size, which also contains the remnants of a perimeter fence and the original black plastic liner along the southern edge is exposed and torn in places. The gradient of the pit walls is adequate for fauna egress.

The Stokes Bay-1 water bore is located in the north-west corner of the well pad. The bore is capped and locked to prevent third party access.

The handles of the Stokes Bay-1 wellhead have been chained and locked to prevent third-party interference. 2.2.2 Point Torment-1 The Point Torment-1 site includes the causeway to the established well pad. The causeway is generally of low relief and aligned with the mudflats and access track and is only accessible by 4WD during the dry season. There are no culverts and the low areas of the causeway assist with tidal flow. Dependent on erosion as a result of cyclonic activities, sections of the causeway may require repair.

The Point Torment-1 well pad has a higher relief than the causeway. There is significant native vegetation establishment along the banks of the pad, with a creek adjacent to the pad on the north-western and north- eastern edges. The gradient is gentle from the pad onto the flats and creek. There is a rusted and fragmented steel flowline from the wellhead to an old flare pit which is approximately 10 m x 15 m in size. There is considerable vegetation establishment within the flare pit and along the banks of the pit.

The Point Torment-1 well is secured by a fence, with the handles of the wellhead being chained and locked to prevent third party interference.

REY RESOURCES, ENVIRONMENT PLAN - STOKES BAY- 1, POINT TORMENT - 1, WEST KORA- 1 15

2.2.3 West Kora-1 West Kora-1 has no formed access track or causeway to the site. Access is via a station track at the edge of the tidal area and then across the tidal area during the dry season and low tide, which is only accessible by 4WD. The access track may require repair in some sections to enable the transport of equipment to site for the maintenance and clean-up activities.

There is no formed well pad at West Kora-1. However, a large concrete pad is in place where a beam pump (nodding donkey) would have been placed during production activities. There are slight signs of erosion on the edges of the concrete block.

The wellhead is secured by a fence and the handles, lower outlet valve and needle valve are secured by chains and lockboxes to prevent third party interference. Above ground junked flowlines are still evident in the area.

2.2.4 West Kora Tank Farm The West Kora Tank Farm is accessed by the northern pastoral lease track which joins the Derby-Gibb River Road. The Tank Farm is largely overgrown, but the tanks and flowlines are in sound condition, although empty, and the gate valves on the storage tanks and ball valves on the flowlines are closed and secured.

The bund wall surrounding the storage tanks is intact, with no areas of wall failure. The gradient of the wall is suitably gentle for fauna movement.

REY RESOURCES, ENVIRONMENT PLAN - STOKES BAY- 1, POINT TORMENT - 1, WEST KORA- 1 16

Figure 1: Location of the Title Areas and Well Sites

REY RESOURCES, ENVIRONMENT PLAN - STOKES BAY- 1, POINT TORMENT - 1, WEST KORA- 1 18

2.3 TIMEFRAMES

2.4 IT IS ANTICIPATED THAT THE CARE AND MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES WILL BE UNDERTAKEN ANNUALLY DURING THE DRY SEASON TO ENABLE ACCESS TO THE WELL SITES AND ASSOCIATED INFRASTRUCTURE, WITH THE NEXT CAMPAIGN SCHEDULED FOR JUNE 2019. EACH ANNUAL CAMPAIGN (INCLUDING THE PLANNED 2019 PROGRAM) IS COMPRISED OF SEVERAL WEEKS BUT MAY BUT LONGER IF ADDITIONAL WORKS ARE REQUIRED. IN ADDITION TO ENSURING PRIORITY ASSET INTEGRITY ACTIVITIES ARE COMPLETED DURING THE 2019 PROGRAM, REY WILL FOCUS ON ADDRESSING THE 2016 DMIRS INSPECTION FINDINGS (TABLE 4). CARE, MAINTENANCE AND CLEAN-UP ACTIVITIES

Rey and their contractors will undertake inspection and monitoring activities of the West Kora-1, Stokes Bay-1, Point Torment-1 well sites and the West Kora-1 Tank Farm on an annual basis to prevent deterioration or failure of equipment and to maintain reliable and safe access to the sites.

In addition, clean-up activities as outlined in Section 2.4.3, identified during an inspection by DMP -Gulliver Productions Pty Ltd Environmental Compliance Inspections INSPECTION No.AU-15/16-4697 - West Kora-1, Stokes Bay-1 and Point Torment-1 Well Sites (2016), will be completed. 2.4.1 Annual Site Inspection Activities Inspection and maintenance activities are currently planned to be conducted on an annual basis prior to the wet season at each well site and the associated infrastructure. Any actions arising from the inspection and maintenance activities will be tracked to closure. 2.4.1.1 Clean-up of Access Tracks to Well Sites and Infrastructure Slashing of vegetation regrowth along the access roads and tracks will be necessary prior to mobilisation of vehicles for the care and maintenance and clean-up activities at each of the well sites. The vegetation will be cut to ground level using a raised dozer blade 10-30cm above the ground, with no root material being removed in accordance with Rey’s Vegetation Line Clearing Procedure REY_EMS_PRO_002_Rev_0 (Appendix B) which was used for a previous seismic operation within the vicinity of this area. This removal of vegetation is exempt from requiring a Clearing Permit under Regulation 5, Item 22 of the Environmental Protection (Clearing of Native Vegetation) Regulations 2004, as it is clearing within an existing transport corridor. The tracks will be inspected for any signs of erosion from cyclonic events and repaired, if required. In the case of wash-outs of causeways, clean fill will be imported from Derby for the repairs.

Photographic evidence will be provided in the annual reports. 2.4.1.2 Visual Inspections of Well Site Infrastructure and Access Tracks Existing well site infrastructure such as the elevated well pads, surrounding cleared areas, fences, gates, locks and signage will be visually inspected to ensure integrity of the infrastructure. The well site areas and access tracks will also be visually inspected for the presence of vegetation regrowth, weeds, hydrocarbon leaks / contamination, dumped rubbish and erosion. Any rubbish will be collected and disposed of offsite, appropriately.

Findings from the inspections will be included in the annual report.

2.4.1.3 Wellhead and Tree Integrity Inspections and Testing

REY RESOURCES, ENVIR ONMENT PLAN - STOKES BAY - 1, POINT TORMEN T - 1, WEST KORA - 1 B 73

During wellhead integrity inspections of Stokes Bay-1, Point Torment-1 and West Kora-1, a visual inspection of each wellhead and tree will be performed and photographs taken.

Wellhead and tree integrity checks will include greasing of valves, production tree body pressure tests, production tree valves pressure tests and production annulus pressure tests. Wellhead and tree testing will not require the use of any downhole chemicals

2.4.2 Service and Maintenance Service and maintenance activities will be undertaken on an as-needed basis, normally as an outcome of the planned inspections and testing works. Service and maintenance may include wellhead and/or tree repair, infrastructure repair and replacement, and general site works. If maintenance is not undertaken at the time of the inspection, it will be scheduled for a future date and reported in the annual report.

2.4.2.1 Wellhead and/or Tree Repair If wellhead and tree integrity inspections and testing identify wear, corrosion or damage to the wellhead or tree, Rey will undertake appropriate servicing and maintenance to remediate or rectify identified issues and will be reported on in accordance with Section 5.7.4.2 of this EP. 2.4.2.2 Infrastructure Repair and Replacement If visual inspections identify wear, corrosion or damage of well site infrastructure, service and maintenance operations will be undertaken, which may include repair or replacement of fences, gates, locks and signage. Signage will clearly identify the presence of the gas well, detailing the name of the well and emergency contact information.

2.4.3 Clean-up Activities – resulting from 2016 DMP Inspection An inspection undertaken by DMP (2016) identified several opportunities for improved environmental management at all of the well sites and associated infrastructure. The then operator, Gulliver Productions, addressed the majority of these inspection findings with activities conducted on site in August 2017 (Gulliver Productions 2017). The remaining activities required to be undertaken on site are summarised in Table 4.

REY RESOURCES, ENVIR ONMENT PLAN - STOKES BAY - 1, POINT TORMEN T - 1, WEST KORA - 1 B 73

Table 4: Summary of Site Work Activities to be Undertaken as a Result of the 2016 DMP Inspection

Site Activity

Access track Cut overgrowing vegetation to ground level without removing root material to re-establish access tracks from Gibb River and to enable truck and vehicle access to the sites for maintenance and clean-up activities (exempt from Road and access requiring a Clearing Permit under Regulation 5, Item 22, of the Environmental Protection (Clearing of Native tracks to the Vegetation) Regulations 2004 – ‘Clearing to maintain existing transport corridors’) well sites (where Undertake any erosion repairs to tracks which have resulted from cyclonic activity over the past twelve required) months.

Remove perimeter fence and cuttings pit fence Remove the entirety of the black plastic liner from the cuttings pit in accordance with the Petroleum and Geothermal Energy Resources Act rehabilitation requirements Stokes Bay-1 Fill in cuttings pit with imported fill to average well-pad height, remove pit bund and consolidate area Undertake final soil sampling of cuttings pit to confirm absence of contamination in accordance with NEPM guidelines. Analyses for Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons (TRH) and Benzene, Toluene, Ethylbenzene and Xylenes (BTEX) to be undertaken by a NATA approved laboratory.

Remove deteriorated flare pit pipe, any other poly pipe and concrete remnants. Infill the flare pit, remove any associated bunding and consolidate the area Point Torment-1 Undertake final soil sampling within the flare pit to confirm absence of contamination in accordance with NEPM guidelines. Analyses for Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons (TRH) and Benzene, Toluene, Ethylbenzene and Xylenes (BTEX) to be undertaken by a NATA approved laboratory.

Remove any waste poly pipe and above-ground steel pipe Undertake final soil sampling around base of well to confirm absence of contamination in accordance with West Kora-1 NEPM guidelines. Analyses for Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons (TRH) and Benzene, Toluene, Ethylbenzene and Xylenes (BTEX) to be undertaken by a NATA approved laboratory.

Remove flowlines and associated gate/ball valves Remove perimeter fencing and any other steel items (including any underground piping, if present, deemed unsuitable for future use) West Kora Tank Clear any vegetation necessary for access and removal of tanks (exempt from requiring a Clearing Permit Farm under Regulation 5, Item 15, of the Environmental Protection (Clearing of Native Vegetation) Regulations 2004 – ‘Clearing to maintain existing cleared areas around infrastructure’) Remove tanks offsite for refurbishment

All locations Remove any household waste

2.4.4 Vehicles and Equipment to be Used on Site Vehicles and equipment used for maintenance, repairs and clean-up are expected to include a float truck (for mobilisation of a bulldozer or grader), a bulldozer or grader for re-establishment of access tracks, two light vehicles for personnel transport and support; a truck equipped with a Hiab crane for lifting equipment for removal offsite, a service truck containing service fluids, a generator and a range of hand tools.[ 2.4.5 Chemicals and Other Substances Chemicals and other substances to be used during the planned activities will include diesel, grease and lubricants (e.g. hydraulic oil). Herbicides may also be used on an as needed basis for weed management as part of service and maintenance. These chemicals and other substances will be used above ground and will be stored in mobile tanks on light vehicles/service trucks. 2.4.6 Refuelling of Mobile Equipment

REY RESOURCES, ENVIR ONMENT PLAN - STOKES BAY - 1, POINT TORMEN T - 1, WEST KORA - 1 B 73

Refuelling of mobile equipment on site will be undertaken using a mobile fuel tanker trailer, in accordance with inGauge’s Refuelling Equipment Procedure (Appendix B). All light vehicles will be refuelled off-site.

2.4.7 Waste Management Expected waste generated during planned activities includes:

• General/operation waste (rags, containers etc.) • Putrescible waste (food scraps and associated rubbish) • Chemical and hydrocarbon waste (grease, lubricants, cleaning products).

All waste products generated will be stored in appropriate waste receptacles with fitted lids. Waste will be segregated, separating hazardous and chemical wastes from general wastes. All waste will be removed from site and disposed of at appropriate facilities on completion of each care and maintenance activity campaign. Recycling of appropriate materials will occur where reasonably practicable to do so.

Waste management will be undertaken in accordance with inGauge’s Waste Management Procedure (Appendix B).

REY RESOURCES, ENVIR ONMENT PLAN - STOKES BAY - 1, POINT TORMEN T - 1, WEST KORA - 1 B 73

3 DESCRIPTION OF THE E NVIRONMENT This section is a review of the existing environment in the broader project area and surrounds, including the physical environment, biological environment, heritage and conservation environment and socioeconomic environment through the use of historical data and desktop research.

The well sites are located within existing cleared land where there are no identified Cultural Heritage sites, European Heritage sites, Threatened flora or fauna or any direct impact on an Environmentally Sensitive Area (ESA) or an Environmental Protection Policy (EPP) Lake.

3.1 CLIMATE The climate of the project area is classified as tropical with hot, humid summers and warm winters. The average maximum temperature at Derby ranges from 30.4°C in June, to 38.2°C in November. The average minimum temperature at Derby ranges from 14.7°C in July to 26.3°C in December. The mean annual rainfall in Derby is 694.7mm with the highest average rainfall occurring in January (204.3 mm) and the lowest average in September (1.0mm). The mean number of rain days for Derby is 38 days per year, with the majority falling in the months of December, January, February and March.

Figure 2 illustrates mean monthly rainfall, mean maximum and mean minimum temperature at Derby Aero, the nearest meteorological station to the well sites.

45 250

Average Rainfall at Derby [mm]

40 Average Minimum Temperature at Derby [°C]

Average Maximum Temperature at Derby [°C] 200 35

30

150 C] ° 25

20 Rainfall(mm) Temperature [ 100

15

10 50

5

0 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec

Figure 2: Mean Monthly Rainfall, Maximum and Minimum Temperatures at Derby Aero (BoM 2018)

3.2 GEOLOGY, LANDFORM AND SOILS The Canning Basin is a large, predominantly onshore sedimentary basin, ranging in age from the early Ordovician (490M years ago) to the Cretaceous (80M years ago). The Canning Basin is subdivided into a series of troughs, sub-basins, platforms, shelves and terraces bounded by generally northwest–southeast trending syn-depositional fault systems (Figure 3). The wells are situated in the Fitzroy Trough which contains the thickest sedimentary deposits of the Canning Basin, with inferred depths of up to 15 km. The most active period of fault movement and subsidence in the Fitzroy Trough was during the Devonian-Carboniferous period (300-400 M years ago). Known stratigraphy (shown in Figure 4), from samples from the deepest wells drilled in the Fitzroy Trough, show thick marine Devonian to Early Carboniferous strata, overlain by shallow marine to deltaic Carboniferous

REY RESOURCES, ENVIR ONMENT PLAN - STOKES BAY - 1, POINT TORMEN T - 1, WEST KORA - 1 B 73

Anderson Formation. Regional unconformities separate this part of the succession from the mostly non-marine Reeves Formation and Grant Group of Late Carboniferous – Early Permian age, the latter being partly glacigenic in origin. Further phases of marine and fluvial sedimentation took place in the latter part of the Permian to early Triassic and during the Jurassic–Cretaceous. The deeper stratigraphy of the Fitzroy Trough is poorly known, being beyond penetration by exploration wells to date, but it is assumed to include older Devonian strata and equivalents of the Ordovician to Silurian shallow marine and overlying salt bearing successions that are widespread elsewhere in the Canning Basin (Geological Survey of Western Australia 2007).

The Fitzroy Trough has long been considered one of the most prospective parts of the Canning Basin for petroleum because of its substantial sedimentary section, carbonate build-up/reefal developments along the half-graben hingeline in the north, and structural development in the southwest (Geological Survey of Western Australia 2007). Sandstone horizons in the Laurel, Anderson, and Reeves Formations, the Grant Group, and various Mesozoic units all have the potential to act as reservoirs, depending on burial depths and the presence of overlying seals. Devonian carbonate reservoirs may also be present.

Figure 3: The Onshore Canning Basin (Crostella 1988; Geological Survey of Western Australia 2007)

REY RESOURCES, ENVIR ONMENT PLAN - STOKES BAY - 1, POINT TORMEN T - 1, WEST KORA - 1 B 73

Figure 4: Generalised Geological Section for the Broader Derby Area (Smith 1992; Harrington et al. 2011)

Structurally, the major geological feature of the broader Derby area is a synform of late Devonian to Triassic sedimentary rocks, plunging northwest and overlain unconformably by westward-dipping Jurassic sedimentary rocks (Smith 1992). Within the synform occurs gentle folding of the sedimentary rocks, and an early Jurassic unconformity appears gently folded over two en-echelon anticlines located beneath, and to the east of the Derby peninsula. Several regional-scale northwest-trending faults cross the broader Derby area, with Permian rocks cut by the Beagle Bay Fault system north of Derby (Figure 5) and by the Pinnacle Fault System southwest of Sisters Plateau. Near Sisters Plateau, the Triassic Erskine Sandstone is faulted against the Blina Shale (Triassic) and Livaringa Group (Permian). The Fenton Fault crosses the southwest corner of the Derby area (Smith 1992).

REY RESOURCES, ENVIR ONMENT PLAN - STOKES BAY - 1, POINT TORMEN T - 1, WEST KORA - 1 B 73

Figure 5: Structural Setting of the Fitzroy Trough

The well sites area falls within the Dampierland IBRA region (Interim Biogeographic Regionalisation of Australia, DoEE 2018a). Dampierland is further split into two subregions, Pindanland, and the Fitzroy Trough. The well sites lie within the Fitzroy Trough subregion. This semi-arid subregion forms the northern edge of the Canning Basin, comprising the middle and lower catchments of the Fitzroy River. Landforms of the Fitzroy Trough include alluvial plains from the Fitzroy River, sandstone and eroded dune surfaces, coastal mudflats surrounding the Fitzroy Delta, Pindan, Boab and Eucalypt woodlands, with patches of rainforest and hummock grassland on limestone in the north and east. The total area of the Fitzroy Trough subregion comprises 3,614,096 ha. The dominant land uses are grazing on native pastures, unallocated crown land and crown reserves and conservation.

3.3 HYDROGEOLOGY 3.3.1 Surface Water The well sites lie in the Fitzroy River catchment, which covers an area of approximately 85,000 km2. The Fitzroy River is the major river system in the basin, rising in the King Leopold and Mueller Ranges, with vast alluvial floodplains and extensively braided river channels throughout. Flows occur between November and May following the seasonal rainfall. High tides in the Derby area are up to ten metres high, requiring high drainage. The Fitzroy River drains to the ocean at King Sound.

As access to some of the well sites is on the edges of tidal areas, all track re-establishment activities and movements across these areas will be reduced to ALARP and driving across these areas will be kept to a minimum (avoidance of backtracking) and undertaken at low speeds, to avoid disturbance to soil in these areas, where possible.

REY RESOURCES, ENVIR ONMENT PLAN - STOKES BAY - 1, POINT TORMEN T - 1, WEST KORA - 1 B 73

As activities will be conducted during the dry season, or prior to the full onset of the wet season, no disturbance to water flow or sedimentation is expected.

3.3.2 Groundwater The Canning Basin covers six regional aquifers whose distribution largely determines the groundwater salinity pattern. Major groundwater resources in these aquifers cover about half of the Derby area (the area within this section referred to as ‘the Derby area’ refers to the Derby 1:250 000 hydrogeological map area mapped by the Geological Survey of Western Australia and described by Smith (1992). Minor fresh groundwater resources cover a further third of the area and about a tenth of the area is underlain by saline groundwater only, or by thick non- water-bearing formations. Groundwater provides almost all water used in the area but has been most intensively developed on the Derby peninsula, primarily from the Erskine Sandstone. Groundwater abstraction around the town of Derby has led to saltwater intrusion and a consequent rise in salinity levels.

Seventeen stratigraphic units, including six with major groundwater potential and five with minor groundwater potential, occur in the Derby area (Smith 1992). All are overlain by widespread unsaturated Tertiary or Quaternary sediments, which are generally Aeolian or residual sands (Smith 1992). The aquifers contain unconfined or confined groundwater resources and are only locally interconnected. Groundwater flow in the area is generally away from the outcrops of the older units towards the major rivers and coast (Smith 1992). These seventeen units and their groundwater potential are summarised in Figure 6, with full descriptions given in Appendix B – Operational procedures for care and maintenance activities for the well sites and associated infrastructure

REY RESOURCES, ENVIR ONMENT PLAN - STOKES BAY - 1, POINT TORMEN T - 1, WEST KORA - 1 B 73

.

Figure 6: Stratigraphy and Aquifer Potential for the Derby Area (from Smith (1992)) Fresh groundwater (< 1000 mg/L) occurs in the Fairfield Group, Betty Formation, Carolyn Formation, Poole Sandstone (except where confined in the south), the Liveringa Group (in the north only), the Erskine Sandstone, the Wallal Sandstone - Alexander Formation (except where confined in the west), the Broome Sandstone, and in the Quaternary sediments.

REY RESOURCES, ENVIRONMENT PLAN - STOKES BAY- 1, POINT TORMENT - 1, WEST KORA- 1 28

Brackish groundwater (1000 - 3000 mg/L) occurs in the Liveringa Group in the southeast (including a large area where the Liveringa Group is confined by the Blina Shale), the Erskine Sandstone of the Sisters Plateau, and the Quaternary sediments in parts of the May and Fitzroy River valleys.

Saline groundwater (3000 – 10,000 mg/L) occurs in the Liveringa Group in the east (where it is mainly confined by the Noonkanbah Formation), locally in the Blina Shale in the southeast and central part of the Derby area, and the Wallal Sandstone in the west (where confined by the Jarlemai Siltstone).

Saltwater occurs at different levels in the Erskine Sandstone along the coast from south of Derby to the May River, in the Wallal Sandstone on the Derby and Black Rocks peninsulas and in Quaternary fluvial sediments near the coast.

No public drinking water supply areas (PDWSA) occur at the well sites or within close proximity to the area. The nearest is the Priority 1 Broome Water Reserve, located 12 km north-east of Broome and approximately 150 km south-west of the well sites (Landgate 2018).

3.4 TERRESTRIAL FLORA AND VEGETATION A desktop flora review of the Stokes Bay-1 well site and surrounding area was conducted by Woodman Environmental in February 2007 and a field survey undertaken in April 2007. A database search using NatureMap (DBCA 2018a) was undertaken in September 2018, to determine whether any priority flora taxa not previously listed when the original searches were undertaken in 2007, may have the potential to occur within the area. 3.4.1 Flora and Vegetation Desktop Assessment Assessments were undertaken of the flora and vegetation values of conservation significance as listed under the EPBC Act, the WC Act and EP Act. Buffer areas were applied to each of the database searches, to ensure all records in the vicinity were captured. Database searches that were undertaken are listed in Table 5. Table 5: Database Searches Conducted

Database Search

Department of Parks and Wildlife (DPaW) Threatened (Declared Rare) Flora Database (TPFL) (DPaW 2007a)

Department of Parks and Wildlife Declared Rare and Priority Flora List (TP list) (DPaW 2007a)

Western Australian Herbarium Specimen Database (Western Australian Herbarium 2007)

Department of Parks and Wildlife Threatened and Priority Ecological Community Database (DPaW 2007a)

DoEE EPBC Protected Matters Database (DoEE 2018b)

Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions NatureMap (DBCA 2018a)

No flora taxa listed as Critically Endangered, Endangered, Conservation Dependent, Extinct, or Extinct in the Wild under the EPBC Act have previously recorded in the well sites area (DoEE 2018b).

No Threatened or Declared Rare taxa under the WC Act have previously been recorded in the well sites area.

Ten Priority flora were identified from the 2007 WA Herbarium database (WA Herbarium 2007) and 2018 NatureMap (DBCA 2018a) searches as occurring within a 40km radius of the well sites, including three Priority one and seven Priority three taxa. Table 6 lists these species and their likelihood of occurrence.

REY RESOURCES, ENVIRONMENT PLAN - STOKES BAY- 1, POINT TORMENT - 1, WEST KORA- 1 29

Table 6: Priority Flora Records within 40 km of the Well Sites (DEC 2007a; DBCA 2018a)

Status Taxon Location Habitat Likelihood

Acrostichum aureum Meda Station. Freshwater drainage sumps Unlikely

Bold Bluff, East of Derby, Usually found in stony Fimbristylis pilifera Calder, Chamley and Isdell environments or along Unlikely Priority 1 Rivers riverbanks

King Leopold Ranges, Barnett Usually found on stony ground Rhynchosia rostrata River, Drysdale River National Unlikely and in sandstone environments Park

Corchorus sp. Fitzroy Found on alluvial or clay soils or Crossing (AJ Ewart sn Unlikely along riverbanks PERTH 01526790)

Usually found on river levees Eriochloa fatmensis Cooyapooya, Derby, Wyndham Unlikely and floodplains

Derby, King Sound, Port Usually found in red sandy loam, Gomphrena cucullata Unlikely Hedland, Lennard River clayey sand, open floodplains

Derby, Lake Argyle, Robinson Goodenia sepalosa var. Usually found in red sand or River, Fitzroy Crossing, Yeeda Unlikely glandulosa loam Station Priority 3 Usually found on the edges of Dampier Peninsular, Beagle permanent waterholes or in Nymphoides beaglensis Bay, Lake Campion, Unlikely seasonally inundated claypans Yabbagoody Clay Pan and depressions

Derby, Keep River National Found in scanty sandy soils Tephrosia valleculata Park, Northern Territory, amongst sandstone rocks in Unlikely Mount Agnes, Moran River creeks and gorges

Drysdale River, Cape Leveque, Found growing in river levees, Derby, Prince Regent River, Triodia acutispicula pindan plains, rocky hillslopes Unlikely Beverley Springs Station, and outcrops Mitchell Plateau

None of these priority species are considered likely to occur within the vicinity of the well sites, due to the absence of suitable habitat. 3.4.2 Introduced Flora Two weed species of concern, Cenchrus ciliaris (Buffel Grass) and Parkinsonia aculeata were identified as being 'species or species habitat may occur within the area' (DoEE 2018). 3.4.3 Ecological Communities Ecological communities are naturally occurring biological assemblages located in a particular type of habitat. At a national level, Threatened Ecological Communities (TECs) are protected under the EPBC Act and are listed as either ‘Critically Endangered’, ‘Endangered’ or ‘Vulnerable’. The Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions (DBCA) also maintains a list of TECs endorsed by the Minister for Environment (DBCA 2018b) that are classified as being either ‘Presumed Totally Destroyed’, ‘Critically Endangered’, ‘Endangered’ or ‘Vulnerable’.

REY RESOURCES, ENVIRONMENT PLAN - STOKES BAY- 1, POINT TORMENT - 1, WEST KORA- 1 30

In addition to this, DBCA also maintains an additional list of Priority Ecological Communities (PECs), for communities that could potentially be classified as TECs, but are not currently adequately defined or surveyed. Communities are placed in this category whilst consideration can be given to their declaration as a TEC.

A search of the EPBC Act Protected Matters Database was undertaken in September 2018 (DoEE 2018b) (including a 50 km buffer around the well sites area) and a search of the Parks and Wildlife Threatened and Priority Ecological Communities Database was conducted in 2007 (including a 50 km buffer around the Stokes Bay-1 well site).

No TECs listed on the EPBC Act Protected Matters Database were known to occur within 50 km of the well sites area. One TEC, listed as Vulnerable by the State Minister of Environment, is known to occur within the 50 km buffer of the well sites area; ‘Assemblages of Big Springs organic mound springs’ (DBCA 2018b). This TEC is approximately 27 km north-east of the well sites area, and is therefore unlikely to be impacted by the proposed care and maintenance activities.

3.5 FAUNA A series of database searches were undertaken to determine fauna of conservation significance as listed under the EPBC Act and WC Act that may occur within the well sites area (DoEE 2018b; DPaW 2007b). A buffer of up to 50 km was applied to the searches to ensure all records in the vicinity were captured.

The database searches indicate that 75 conservation significant terrestrial vertebrate fauna species have the potential to occur inside or within 50 km of the well sites area, based on either physical records of the species, secondary evidence or potentially suitable habitat occurring within the wells site area (DoEE, 2018b; DPaW 2007b).

This list comprises of:

• 14 mammal species • 60 bird species (42 of which are migratory listed) • one reptile species.

A number of coastal, marine and wetland migratory bird species were identified in the database searches; however, due to the lack of available habitat within the well sites area, these species are considered unlikely to occur and thus have not been addressed further in this EP.

The likelihood of these 75 conservation significant species being present within the well sites area was determined by considering the provision of suitable habitat. The likelihood of occurrence of each conservation significant species is summarised in Appendix D.

The major habitat for fauna in the area is the savannah woodland with dominant trees including Corymbia, Eucalyptus, Baobab and Acacia. There are no wetland habitats or floodplain communities present in the immediate vicinity of the well sites. 3.5.1 Mammals There are 14 species of terrestrial mammals of conservation significance that have the potential to occur within the project area (Appendix D). These species were identified from the DBCA Threatened Fauna database and NatureMap (DBCA 2018a). Of these 14 species, four species had a medium to high likelihood of occurrence within the well sites area. The potential impacts to and management of these conservation significant species is summarised in Table 7. 3.5.2 Amphibians

REY RESOURCES, ENVIRONMENT PLAN - STOKES BAY- 1, POINT TORMENT - 1, WEST KORA- 1 31

There are no amphibian species of conservation significance likely to be found in the well sites area.

3.5.3 Reptiles There are no reptiles of conservation significance likely to be found in the well sites area.

3.5.4 Birds Sixteen bird species of conservation significance have the potential to occur in the wells site area. These species are listed in Table 7, together with the potential impacts that are predicted could arise during the care and maintenance and clean-up activities.

3.5.5 Impacts to Potentially Occurring Significant Fauna From the database searches, 21 conservation significant fauna species, comprising of five mammals and 16 birds, are expected to have a medium or high likelihood of occurrence, when considering the presence of suitable habitat within the well sites area (Table 7). The conservation significant species identified as having a medium or high likelihood of occurrences are bird species or mammals that inhabit a range of habitats, and therefore their habitats are not restricted to the well sites area.

REY RESOURCES, ENVIRONMENT PLAN - STOKES BAY- 1, POINT TORMENT - 1, WEST KORA- 1 32

Table 7: Potential Impacts to Conservation-Significant Fauna Species

Conservation Status Likelihood Potential Habitat Species EPBC WC of Potential Impact DBCA within the Area Act Act Occurrence

MAMMALS

Any temporary disturbance associated with the care and maintenance and Greater Bilby - Macrotis lagotis VU S3 VU Acacia shrubland Medium clean-up activities is expected to have minimal impact to this species

Kimberley Brush-tailed phascogale - Any temporary disturbance associated with the care and maintenance and VU S3 VU Medium Phascogale tapoatafa kimberleyensis clean-up activities is expected to have minimal impact to this species

This species is known to have a broad habitat range including open tussock and hummock grassland, acacia shrubland, and savanna woodland, on Short-tailed Mouse - Leggadina Grassy savannah / P4 Medium alluvial clay or sandy soils, and therefore any temporary disturbance lakedownensis Acacia shrubland associated with the care and maintenance and clean-up activities is expected to have minimal impact to this species.

Spectacled Hare-Wallaby (Mainland) P4 Medium Lagorchestes conspiciallatus leichardti

BIRDS

Gouldian Finch - Erythrura gouldiae EN P4 Grassy savannah High No breeding habitat is likely to occur within the well sites area and therefore, if at all, the area is only likely to be used for foraging by this Red knot - Calidris canutus EN + MI IA + VU High species. Given this and the highly mobile nature of this species the Abbott’s Booby – Papasula abbotti EN +MI High potential impact to this species is expected to be minimal.

This species is considered highly mobile. The well sites and access tracks do Partridge Pigeon (western) - Geophaps Grassy savannah/ VU S3 VU Medium not provide suitable nesting habitat, therefore any disturbance / impact is smithii blaauwi Acacia shruband likely to be minimal.

REY RESOURCES, ENVIRONMENT PLAN - STOKES BAY- 1, POINT TORMENT - 1, WEST KORA- 1 33

Conservation Status Likelihood Potential Habitat Species EPBC WC of Potential Impact DBCA within the Area Act Act Occurrence

The Rainbow Bee-eater has been delisted as a migratory bird under the EPBC Act and is now listed as only a marine bird, and therefore only impacts to Commonwealth marine areas are applicable to this species under the EPBC Act. The Rainbow Bee-eater is still listed under Schedule 5 of the WC Act. This species is known to have a broad habitat range including grassy savannah, Listed Grassy savannah/ Rainbow Bee-eater - Merops ornatus S5 Medium open savannah woodland, acacia shrubland and ephemeral wetlands, and Marine* Acacia shruband therefore the temporary disturbance associated with the care and maintenance and clean-up activities is expected to have minimal impact to this species. This species breeds largely in areas with exposed sandy substrate where it builds tunnels for nests, hence it is not expected to be found breeding in the well sites area.

Grassy savannah/ Oriental Cuckoo - Cuculus optatus MI S5 IA Medium Acacia shruband Given the migratory nature of these species, they are considered highly Grassy savannah/ mobile and therefore the potential impacts are expected to be minimal. Red-rumped Swallow – Cecropis daurica MI S5 IA Medium Acacia shruband

Grassy savannah/ Little Curlew - Numenius minutus MI S5 IA Medium Acacia shruband

Grassy savannah/ Barn Swallow - Hirundo rustica MI S5 IA Medium Acacia shruband

Eastern Yellow Wagtail - Motacilla Grassy savannah/ Given the migratory nature of these species, they are considered highly MI S5 IA Medium tschutschensis [listed as Motacilla flava] Acacia shruband mobile and therefore the potential impacts are expected to be minimal.

Grassy savannah/ Pacific Golden Plover -Pluvialis fulva MI S5 IA Medium Acacia shruband

Grassy savannah/ Grey Plover - Pluvialis squatarola MI S5 IA Medium Acacia shruband

REY RESOURCES, ENVIRONMENT PLAN - STOKES BAY- 1, POINT TORMENT - 1, WEST KORA- 1 34

Conservation Status Likelihood Potential Habitat Species EPBC WC of Potential Impact DBCA within the Area Act Act Occurrence

Listed Grassy savannah/ Eastern Great Egret - Ardea modesta High Marine* Acacia shruband These species are considered largely marine species, highly mobile and do Listed Grassy savannah/ Cattle Egret - Ardea ibis High not nest in burrows, and therefore the potential impact to these species is Marine* Acacia shruband expected to be minimal. White-bellied Sea-Eagle - Haliaeetus Listed Grassy savannah/ High leucogaster Marine* Acacia shruband

*only of EPBC Act interest if the project occurs within a Commonwealth marine area. Should any EPBC listed fauna species be encountered during the care and maintenance and clean-up activities, the sighting will be reported to the Site Supervisor immediately and all movements and works within a 50 m buffer of the sighting will cease until actions to mitigate harm to the species have been implemented. Any sightings of these species will be documented in accordance with Sections 5.7.4.1 and 5.7.4.2 of this EP.

REY RESOURCES, ENVIRONMENT PLAN - STOKES BAY- 1, POINT TORMENT - 1, WEST KORA- 1 35

3.6 ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREAS Environmentally Sensitive Areas (ESAs) are protected under the EP Act and include, among other things; ‘defined’ wetlands and the area within 50 m of the wetland boundary, vegetation within 50 m of rare flora and areas covered by Threatened Ecological Communities.

The activities involved in the care and maintenance and clean-up activities will not impact any ESAs as the nearest ESA is approximately 30 km to the north-east (Landgate 2018).

3.7 CULTURAL HERITAGE 3.7.1 Aboriginal Heritage A current Native Title claim exists over the project area. The Native Title claimants are the Mawadjala Gadjidgar people (WC2011/003). This claim was filed in April 2011.

Aboriginal cultural heritage artefacts are a record of the past occupation of the landscape by Aboriginal people. There is the potential for isolated Aboriginal archaeological artefacts (e.g., stone tools) or surface scatters (e.g., shell middens) to be present on land within the well sites.

A search of the Department of Aboriginal Affairs (DAA) Aboriginal Heritage Inquiry System (AHIS) (DPLH 2018) was conducted and identified no registered Aboriginal heritage sites as defined by Section 5 of the Aboriginal Heritage Act 1972 within close proximity to the well sites.

Two registered Aboriginal heritage sites and one Other Heritage Place were identified in proximity to the well sites area, however none of these are located within a 1 km buffer of the well sites (Table 8). Table 8: Aboriginal Heritage Sites in Close Proximity to the Well Sites Area

Site ID Name Site Type Type Distance from Well Sites Area

Located approximately 1.5 km NW 17097 TEA1 Other Heritage Place Shell midden/scatter of Stokes Bay-1

Artefacts/Scatter. Grinding Located approximately 1.5 km SW 17443 Meda Dune Registered site Patches/ Grooves of West Kora-1

Ceremonial, Modified Tree, Located off Bungarun Road, about 13240 Derby Leprosarium Registered site Mythological 9 km SW of West Kora-1

These Aboriginal heritage sites will not be impacted by the proposed care and maintenance and clean-up activities. 3.7.2 European Heritage There were no heritage places identified by the EPBC Protected Matters Database Search Tool within close proximity to the well sites. A search of the InHerit database of the WA State Heritage Office (Heritage Council 2018) identified no registered heritage places within close proximity of the well sites.

REY RESOURCES, ENVIRONMENT PLAN - STOKES BAY- 1, POINT TORMENT - 1, WEST KORA- 1 36

4 ENVIRONMENTAL R ISK A SSESSMENT AND M ANAGEMENT This section details the methodology applied, and outcomes of the environmental risk assessment for the proposed care and maintenance activities associated with the three well sites and associated infrastructure.

An updated environmental risk assessment was undertaken in September 2018 to address the change in operator and identify any additional environmental risks associated with the care and maintenance and clean-up activities for the three well sites and associated infrastructure.

4.1 IDENTIFICATION OF ACTIVITIES, EVENTS AND ASSOCIATED ENVIRONMENTAL ASPECTS

The environmental risk assessment process identifies aspects of the care and maintenance and clean-up activities that require management and assigns a level of risk to each activity. This risk assessment process applied to the care and maintenance and clean-up activities has been based on the principles of Australian Standards HB 203:2006 Environmental Risk Management and AS/NZS ISO 31000:2009 Risk Management – Principles and Guidelines.

All components of care and maintenance relevant to the scope of this EP are described in detail in Section 2. 4.1.1 Identification of Environmental Values and Sensitivities The environment that may be affected by care and maintenance and clean-up activities is described in Section 3. Receptors that are sensitive or locally or regionally important that may be affected by the activities and events in the scope of this EP were identified using literature and publicly available databases. Based on the DMIRS Guideline for the Development of Petroleum and Geothermal Environment Plans in Western Australia (DMIRS 2016), receptors considered to be sensitive include:

• Areas of protected or rare and endangered flora and fauna • Areas of significant habitat (including wetlands and mangroves) • Areas of temporal significance (including breeding grounds, migration routes and resting and aggregation areas) • Cultural and heritage sites • Marine and terrestrial protected areas • Groundwater.

4.1.2 Identification of Relevant Environmental Aspects In this risk assessment, aspects are defined as an element of the proposed operation that has the potential to interact with the environment at present or later. An assessment was undertaken to identify potential interactions between the care and maintenance and clean-up activities proposed and the receiving environment.

4.1.3 Identification of Relevant Hazards In this risk assessment, a hazard is defined as a chemical or physical condition with the potential for causing damage or injury to people, property or the environment. The aspects identified were used to determine environmental hazards associated with the care and maintenance and clean-up activities that had the potential to cause environmental damage. The results of this assessment are included in Table 9. This information was then used to undertake the environmental risk assessment.

Key steps in this process and relevant standards and legislation are summarised in Table 9.

REY RESOURCES, ENVIRONMENT PLAN - STOKES BAY- 1, POINT TORMENT - 1, WEST KORA- 1 37

Table 9: Hazard identification process and risk assessment and relevant legislation

Hazard Identification Process Relevant Standards and Legislation

Identifying aspects of the project that may impact the environment

Describing potential environmental impacts PGER(E)R 2012 Part 2 Division 3 - Regulation 14 (2, 3 and 4) Assessing the likelihood of the impact (AS/NZS ISO 31000:2009)

Determining the level of risk with and without mitigation measures

PGER(E)R 2012 Part 2 Division 3 - Regulation 14 (5) Assigning a consequence rating to the impact (AS/NZS ISO 31000:2009)

PGER(E)R 2012 Part 2 Division 3 - Regulation 14 (5) and Identifying practical management strategies Regulation 15 (AS/NZS ISO 31000:2009)

4.2 EVALUATION OF IMPACTS AND RISKS 4.2.1 Consequences After identifying the potential hazards, the potential consequences were assessed and evaluated. The level of consequence is determined by the potential level of impact based on:

• The spatial extent of potential hazards of the environmental aspect within the receiving environment • The nature of the receiving environment including proximity to sensitive receptors, relative importance and sensitivity or resilience to change • The impact mechanisms of the environmental hazard within the receiving environment (e.g. persistence, toxicity, mobility, bioaccumulation potential) • The duration and frequency of potential effects and time for recovery • The potential degree of change relative to the existing environment or to criteria of acceptability.

Examples of the level of consequence ratings utilised for the environmental risk assessment are presented in Table 10.

REY RESOURCES, ENVIRONMENT PLAN - STOKES BAY- 1, POINT TORMENT - 1, WEST KORA- 1 38

Table 10: Consequence Descriptions

Consequence Examples

<1% of a non-significant species / vegetation community in the local population affected No significant addition to background levels, non-detectable change Insignificant Spill of hydrocarbons <10 L in permeable disturbed surface Loss/damages of <$5,000 No complaints from public/stakeholders

<15% of a non-significant species / vegetation community in the local population affected Spill of hydrocarbons 10-100 L in permeable disturbed surface Minor Spill of hydrocarbons <10 L in flowing water / undisturbed native vegetation Loss/damages of $5,000 - $40,000 Complaint from public/stakeholder

15-30% of a non-significant species / vegetation community in the local population affected <10% of a conservation significant species / vegetation community in the local population affected Spill of hydrocarbons 100-1,000 L in permeable disturbed surface Moderate Spill of hydrocarbons 10-100 L in flowing water / undisturbed native vegetation Loss/damages of $40,000 – $150,000 Public complaint or media attention

>30% of a non-significant species / vegetation community in the local population affected Extinction of a non-significant species locally >10% of a conservation significant species / vegetation community in the local population affected >10% of available habitat of conservation significant fauna in the local area affected Major Spill of hydrocarbons >1,000 L in permeable disturbed surface Spill of hydrocarbons 100-1,000 L in flowing water / undisturbed native vegetation Loss/damages of $150,000 - $1 million Damage to reputation

Extinction of a non-significant species regionally Loss of a conservation significant species locally Loss of ecosystem function across >50% of seismic survey area Catastrophic Spill of hydrocarbons >1,000 L in flowing water / undisturbed native vegetation Loss/damages of >$1 million Contamination of aquifer Third party legal action/irreversible damage to reputation

REY RESOURCES, ENVIRONMENT PLAN - STOKES BAY- 1, POINT TORMENT - 1, WEST KORA- 1 39

4.2.2 Control Measures and ALARP The process for identifying control measures depends on the ‘as low as reasonably practicable’ (ALARP) decision context set for that particular hazard and aspect. Regardless of the process, control measures are assigned according to defined environmental performance outcomes, with the objective to eliminate, prevent, reduce, or mitigate consequences associated with each identified environmental impact and risk.

Rey has adopted the ALARP principle in line with the NOPSEMA Guidance Note N-04300-GN0166 Rev 6 (NOPSEMA 2015) and recognised industry best practice. The framework described by NOPSEMA (2015) considers impact severity and several guiding factors in determining to which level control measure analysis and evaluation is required. These include:

• activity type • risk and uncertainty • stakeholder influence.

This framework is based on the Oil and Gas UK guidelines (OGUK 2014). The framework takes the form of three decision contexts (A, B and C). A summary of the framework is presented in Figure 7.

Figure 7: ALARP Decision Support Framework A Type A decision is made if the risk is relatively well understood, the potential impacts are low, activities are well practised, and there is no significant stakeholder interest. However, if good practice is not sufficiently well- defined, additional assessment may be required.

A Type B decision is made if there is greater uncertainty or complexity around the activity and/or risk, the potential impact is moderate, and the risk generates several concerns from stakeholders. In this case, established good

REY RESOURCES, ENVIRONMENT PLAN - STOKES BAY- 1, POINT TORMENT - 1, WEST KORA- 1 40

practice is not considered sufficient and further assessment is required to support the decision and ensure the risk is ALARP.

A Type C decision typically involves sufficient complexity, high potential impact, uncertainty, or stakeholder interest to require a precautionary approach. In this case, relevant good practice still has to be met, additional assessment is required, and the precautionary approach is applied for those controls that only have a marginal cost-benefit.

In accordance with the regulatory requirement to demonstrate that environmental impacts and risks are ALARP, Rey has considered the above decision context in determining the level of assessment required, and applied it to each aspect identified.

The assessment techniques considered include:

• good practice (Section 4.2.2. 1) • engineering risk assessment (Section 4.2.2.2) • precautionary approach (Section 4.2.2.3). 4.2.2.1 Good Practice Oil and Gas UK (2014) defines ‘Good Practice’ as: ‘The recognised risk management practices and measures that are used by competent organisations to manage well-understood hazards arising from their activities.’

‘Good Practice’ can also be used as the generic term for those measures that are recognised as satisfying the law. For this EP, sources of good practice include:

• requirements from Commonwealth and State legislation and regulations • relevant Commonwealth and State policies • relevant Commonwealth and State guidance • relevant industry standards • relevant international conventions.

If the ALARP technique is determined to be ‘Good Practice’, further assessment (‘Engineering Risk Assessment’) is not required to identify additional controls. However, additional controls that provide a suitable environmental benefit for an insignificant cost are identified. 4.2.2.2 Engineering Risk Assessment All potential impacts and risks that require further assessment are subject to an engineering risk assessment. Based on the various approaches recommended by Oil and Gas UK (2014), Rey believes the methodology most suited to this activity is a comparative assessment of risks, costs, and environmental benefit. A cost–benefit analysis should show the balance between the risk benefit (or environmental benefit) and the cost of implementing the identified measure, with differentiation required such that the benefit of the risk reduction measure can be seen and the reason for the benefit understood. 4.2.2.3 Precautionary Approach Oil and Gas UK (2014) state that if the assessment, taking into account all available engineering and scientific evidence, is insufficient, inconclusive, or uncertain, then a precautionary approach to hazard management is needed. A precautionary approach means that uncertain analysis is replaced by conservative assumptions that result in control measures being more likely to be implemented.

REY RESOURCES, ENVIRONMENT PLAN - STOKES BAY- 1, POINT TORMENT - 1, WEST KORA- 1 41

That is, environmental considerations are expected to take precedence over economic considerations, meaning that a control measure that may reduce environmental impact is more likely to be implemented. In this decision context, the decision could have significant economic consequences to an organisation.

The ALARP decisions for each identified hazard and aspect are summarised in Appendix E.

4.2.3 Likelihood The likelihood (probability) of a defined consequence occurring was determined, taking into account the confirmed control measures in place. The likelihood of a particular consequence occurring was ranked using one of the five likelihood categories shown in Table 11. Table 11: Likelihood descriptions used in the risk assessment

Likelihood Descriptions Used in Risk Assessment

1 May occur only in exceptional circumstances; Unheard of Rare Reasonable to expect the consequences / event will not occur - with a frequency of occurrence estimated to be at least once in 15 years at the facility

2 The incident could occur at some time during the life of the project; Unexpected Unlikely Reasonable to expect the consequences / event will not occur - with a frequency of occurrence estimated to be at least once in 10 years at the facility

3 Might occur at some time; Could occur but not often Possible Reasonable to expect the consequences / event will occur - with a frequency of occurrence estimated to be at least once in 3 years at the facility

4 Will probably occur in most circumstances; There is at least 50% chance that it may happen Likely Conditions may allow the consequence / event to occur - with a frequency of occurrence estimated to be once per year at the facility.

5 Common repeating occurrence, ongoing; Will occur often or planned occurrence/action Almost Conditions may allow the consequence / event to occur- with a frequency of occurrence estimated to certain be more than once per year at the facility.

4.2.4 Quantification of the Level of Risk Following the application of the appropriate levels of consequence and likelihood to each aspect of the care and maintenance and clean-up activities, a risk value has been assigned using the risk matrix presented in Table 12. The matrix uses consequence and likelihood rankings of 1 to 5, which when combined result in a risk level between 1 (lowest risk) and 25 (highest risk). Table 12: Risk Analysis Matrix

Consequence (C) Likelihood (L) Insignificant Minor Moderate Major Catastrophic (1) (2) (3) (4) (5)

Almost Certain (5) 5 10 15 20 25

Likely (4) 4 8 12 16 20

Possible (3) 3 6 9 12 15

REY RESOURCES, ENVIRONMENT PLAN - STOKES BAY- 1, POINT TORMENT - 1, WEST KORA- 1 42

Consequence (C) Likelihood (L) Insignificant Minor Moderate Major Catastrophic (1) (2) (3) (4) (5)

Unlikely (2) 2 4 6 8 10

Rare (1) 1 2 3 4 5

REY RESOURCES, ENVIRONMENT PLAN - STOKES BAY- 1, POINT TORMENT - 1, WEST KORA- 1 43

4.3 RISK ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA Impacts and risks are only deemed acceptable once all reasonably practicable alternatives and additional measures have been taken to reduce the potential consequence and likelihood to the ALARP.

The environmental impacts and risks associated with implementing the activities described in this plan were determined to be acceptable if:

• the level of environmental risk is assessed to be between 1 and 12 on the risk matrix; or • the level of environmental risk is assessed to be ALARP; or • the activity (and associated potential impacts and risks) complies with relevant legislation, industry standards/guidelines and corporate policies, standards and procedures specific to the operational environment.

Table 13 presents the level of mitigation to be applied depending on the residual risk rating. Table 13: Risk Rating and Mitigation Level

Risk Score (R) Risk Rating Mitigation Level

Manage risk utilising prevention and/or additional mitigation strategies with the highest 15-25 High priority. Promote issue to appropriate management level with commensurate risk assessment detail.

Manage risk using standard mitigation controls, but evaluate further to minimise adverse 5-12 Medium effects on the environment.

1-4 Low Standard mitigation controls required.

Mitigation strategies have been considered and the residual risk (risk rating remaining after control measures have been put in place) has been calculated for each aspect of the care and maintenance and clean-up activities.

4.4 PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVES, STANDARDS AND MEASUREMENT CRITERIA In addition to identifying raw risks, adequate control measures and the resultant residual risks, a risk assessment must also define the following:

• environmental performance objectives the operator is required to achieve • environmental performance standards the operator is required to work within • measurement criteria the operator will apply to determine whether objectives and standards have been met.

Performance standards are specific documents or legislative requirements, and measurement criteria are auditable actions to demonstrate compliance with the standard and the objective.

REY RESOURCES, ENVIRONMENT PLAN - STOKES BAY- 1, POINT TORMENT - 1, WEST KORA- 1 44

4.5 SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT The results of the risk assessment, detailing the various activities carried out during a care and maintenance and clean-up campaign, their risks and performance objectives, standards and measurement criteria are detailed in Appendix E.

5 I MPLEMENTATION S TRATEGY This section details the strategy to ensure that environmental impacts and risks associated with the Stokes Bay- 1, Point Torment-1 and West Kora-1 wells and associated infrastructure care and maintenance activities are continuously reduced to ALARP and that the environmental performance objectives and standards established in Section 4 of this EP are met.

5.1 SYSTEMS, PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES This section outlines the proposed practices, management strategies, procedures and mitigation measures that Rey and their contractors will implement to ensure environmental hazards and impacts caused by the activities associated with the well sites care and maintenance and clean-up remain as low as reasonably practical and to ensure all legal and corporate obligations are met.

Management strategies for all potential environmental risks for the well sites area include:

• RLS Environmental Management System (RLS_EMS_SYS_001) • RLS Induction and Training Procedure (RLS_CMS_PRO_009_Rev_0) • RLS Environmental and Heritage Management Plan (RLS_EMS_MPL_001_REV_A) • RLS Stakeholder Engagement Plan (RLS_CMS_MPL_001) • RLS Stakeholder Engagement Register (RLS_CMS_REG_007) • RLS Spill Response Procedure (RLS_CMS_PRO_011) • inGauge Audit and Inspection Procedure (ING__PRO_AI_01) • RLS Audit and Inspection Register (RLS_CMS_REG_008) • RLS Hygiene and Weed Inspection Procedure (RLS_EMS_PRO_001) • Rey Resources Emergency Response Procedure (RLS_CMS_PRO_006_Rev_0) • inGauge Equipment Refuelling Procedure (ING_PRO_ER_01) • inGauge Waste Management Procedure.

Roles and responsibilities of key personnel for the identified management strategies are also outlined in Section 5.3.

5.2 CHAIN OF COMMAND To meet the requirements of Regulation 15(4) of the PGER(E)R, a clear chain of command for the implementation of the petroleum activity is outlined in Figure 8. Detailed roles and responsibilities are described in Section 5.3.

REY RESOURCES, ENVIRONMENT PLAN - STOKES BAY- 1, POINT TORMENT - 1, WEST KORA- 1 45

Figure 8: Chain of Command

REY RESOURCES, ENVIRONMENT PLAN - STOKES BAY- 1, POINT TORMENT - 1, WEST KORA- 1 46

5.3 ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES This EP and all of its controls and commitments will be implemented and managed by Rey. In accordance with this EP, all site activities will be conducted in the field under the direct supervision of a Rey Site Supervisor or approved delegate. Roles and Responsibilities of key personnel for the identified management strategies are defined in Table 14. Table 14: Roles and Responsibilities

Role Responsibility

Ensure the EP is implemented to the satisfaction of the DMIRS and in accordance with all legal requirements Provide resources for the effective implementation of this EP Identify and support implementation of risk-based environmental improvement plans Ensure appropriate and effective emergency response capability Facilitate communication with company personnel, government and the public in the event of Rey Operations Manager (or an incident and undertakes full investigation of the incident delegate) Ensure all personnel receive environmental training, induction and awareness programs applicable to their position Update and maintain induction materials and records Conduct (or coordinate) and review environmental audits to assess compliance with environmental requirements Undertake internal auditing on completion of care and maintenance and clean-up activities Undertake internal, external reporting requirements as defined in Section 5.7

Implement this EP and ensure compliance with the EP as relates to the care and maintenance activities for the well sites and associated infrastructure Ensure that Rey and contracting company’s environmental procedures and emergency response procedures are communicated and understood by all personnel Ensure appropriate induction and environmental education of the workforce Site Supervisor - Care and Maintain clear communications between Rey and the workforce Maintenance Campaign Ensure that Rey and the Contractor’s work procedures are compliant with this EP Visits Ensure site inspections are carried out as required Ensures emergency response and spill response is carried out in accordance with this EP and relevant procedures Report incidents immediately to Rey (e.g. all spills of hydrocarbons and/or chemicals) Ensure procedures are carried out correctly

Effectively apply work procedures General Workforce (all Actively seek and participate in appropriate training and induction contractors and Rey Identify hazards and encourage improvement and risk reduction wherever possible employees) Immediately report any incidents or near misses to supervisor

REY RESOURCES, ENVIRONMENT PLAN - STOKES BAY- 1, POINT TORMENT - 1, WEST KORA- 1 47

5.4 EMERGENCY RESPONSE The Rey Emergency Response Procedure will provide guidance for personnel on what needs to be done in the event of an emergency whilst on the work site. It provides organisational structures, management processes, and the tools necessary to respond to emergencies and to prevent or mitigate emergency and/or crisis situations; respond to incidents in a safe, rapid, and effective manner; and, restore or resume affected operations.

The three well sites and associated infrastructure are unmanned facilities in care and maintenance. Therefore, the following description of emergency response applies only when care and maintenance campaigns are being undertaken and personnel are on site.

5.4.1 Oil Spill Response Plan Hydrocarbon and chemical spills considered during the risk assessment are discussed in Appendix E and summarised in Table 15. Although a release of reservoir fluids from a leaking well was considered, this event was not deemed credible as the Stokes Bay-1 and Point Torment- 1 wells are suspended and West Kora-1 is shut-in. Based upon estimated reservoir pressures and as all wells have multiple temporary barriers in place and given the nature of the barriers (with contingency), the risk of a spill / leak from these wells is not credible and not considered further.

Spill response will be undertaken in accordance with the Rey Resources Spill Response Procedure (RLS_CMS_PRO_011_REV_0) which is included in Appendix B. Table 15: Credible Spill Scenarios during Care and Maintenance Activities

Spill Scenario Maximum Credible Volume

Diesel or Petrol spill during transport 100 L

Diesel or Petrol spill during refuelling 20 L

Release of fluid during well maintenance 50 L

Definitions of spill levels are provided in Table 16.

Table 16: Definitions of Spills

Magnitude of Spill Definition

Spill contaminates the surface of the ground not in excess of 0.50 m2 in area and 0.50 cm in depth. The Minor spill spill can be effectively contained and cleaned up by a single department or team using the containment kit, plastic packets and / or a pressure hose.

A spill that would require the assistance of other departments or teams to contain and clean up (i.e. use Moderate spill of additional clean up kits, personnel or equipment).

A spill that cannot effectively be contained or cleaned up with the resources available on-site. External Major spill contractor or emergency services help is required.

Immediate action by all personnel in the event of a spill is containment to the best of their ability given equipment available to them, and as long as there is no risk to safety. Containment must be attempted prior to any other actions, including notification.

The first point of contact for all staff reporting a spill is the Site Supervisor. Depending on the severity of the incident, Rey’s management may also be contacted.

REY RESOURCES, ENVIRONMENT PLAN - STOKES BAY- 1, POINT TORMENT - 1, WEST KORA- 1 48

The Site Supervisor (or most senior person on-site at the time of the spill) assesses the spill to determine severity and implements the appropriate response according the clean-up response (i.e. ‘minor to moderate spill pathway’ clean-up process or ‘major spill pathway’ clean-up process).

When containing and cleaning up spills, personnel are to ensure all safety precautions are in place i.e. PPE, chemical PVC gloves, and ensuring fire extinguishers are readily available, no one is smoking and all vehicle engines are switched off.

All efforts must be aimed at rapidly deploying the containment kit, which will be stored on the service vehicle, and/or sand so as to reduce the spillage area as much as possible, and always work up hill and up wind from the spill.

Following any spill, every effort should be made to restore the affected area to its original condition, ensuring all contaminants are removed and disposed of correctly.

In the event of a minor to moderate spill:

• Personnel must immediately obtain the emergency response clean‐up/containment kit • Contain spread by constructing a bund around the spill area (i.e. with rocks or sand) • For ground spills, use spill kit material to absorb maximum amount of fluid possible, then transfer fluid- soaked materials into plastic contaminated waste bags • Use a shovel to dig up and remove any contaminated sand, gravel or rocks and also transfer into plastic contaminated waste bags • Label all plastic contaminated waste bags with type and estimated quantity of spilt material place in the designated contaminated soils / solid waste bins on site, which are to be removed off site at the end of each care and maintenance campaign • Restore the terrain to its original condition (using earth-moving equipment to back blade the site, or shovels to fill in any holes as required).

In the event of a major spill:

• Cordon off the area and make it safe • If on a major road, immediately call the local police and/or Emergency Services so that they may control the scene and coordinate the clean‐up, and also advise of the most appropriate action prior to their arrival • If an associated fire hazard, evacuate the area immediately to a minimum distance of 500 m and await the arrival of the Emergency Services • Until the police or Emergency Services arrive, the Site Supervisor and/or most senior staff member at the site of the spill will be in charge of the scene, assigning personnel/resources to area as necessary • Notify a licensed spill response company about the required clean-up • Personnel should be safely positioned to warn, slow down, and if necessary redirect traffic around the hazard pending the arrival of Emergency Services or Police • Vehicles are to be parked on the side of the road, uphill and up‐wind, well away from the spill, with beacon lights and emergency hazard lights on • A licensed third party will undertake the spill clean‐up, with the assistance of site crew, as required.

All spills are to be reported to the Site Supervisor and in accordance with Event and Feedback Reporting and Investigation Procedure (RLS_CMS_PR_007).

REY RESOURCES, ENVIRONMENT PLAN - STOKES BAY- 1, POINT TORMENT - 1, WEST KORA- 1 49

Rey’s management will ensure any hydrocarbon or chemical spills are reported to the appropriate contacts within the DMIRS, in accordance with Section 5.7.4.

During care and maintenance campaigns, weekly audits and inspections of all spill kits will be undertaken by the Site Supervisor or delegate in order to ensure that kits are complete, located on the service vehicle and ready for use in case of a spill. Audits and inspections of spill kits will also be undertaken by the Site Supervisor or delegate following any spill incidents. All inspection reports will be kept and maintained in Rey’s Inspection and Audit Register (RLS_CMS_REG_008).

5.5 ENVIRONMENTAL TRAINING The RLS HSE Induction [RLS_CMS_IND_001]) that addresses environmental matters will be provided to all Rey employees and contractors prior to commencing work. Environmental induction training of the workforce will include:

• Information referred to in the RLS Induction and Training Procedure (RLS_CMS_PRO_009) • knowledge of the relevant environmental legislation and responsibilities.

The environmental induction will include an overview of environmental issues and management procedures relating to the care and maintenance activities. This will include information on the following activities and topics:

• inspections and audits • incident reporting • Aboriginal heritage • significant fauna – including Conservation significant species relevant to the activity • vegetation clearing and demarcation • surface water • hydrocarbon and chemical management • hydrocarbon and chemical spills management • waste management • bushfire control.

For each of the roles of site personnel, employee and contractors alike, a checklist for competencies and training will be prepared. This will include project specific training such as inductions and ‘fit for work’ declarations, general training considered a pre-requisite of engagement in the role and other role specific competencies. The checklist will be completed for each member of project personnel by the respective manager as a means of ‘signing-off’ on that specific person as meeting all requirements of the position before commencing work. The checklist, along with evidence of having met requirements (e.g. copies of certificates) will be entered into the record keeping/document control system in RLS Integrated Management System and RLS Health and Safety Management System. This will allow Rey and their contractor’s management to ensure that each employee will have the appropriate competencies and training for their responsibilities during the activity.

5.6 MONITORING, AUDITING, MANAGEMENT OF NON-CONFORMANCE AND REVIEW Environmental monitoring and auditing will be undertaken by Rey in accordance with the PGE(E)R and the Onshore Schedule, and the Schedule of Geothermal Exploration and Production Requirements 2009, as well as requirements under the PGER Act.

REY RESOURCES, ENVIRONMENT PLAN - STOKES BAY- 1, POINT TORMENT - 1, WEST KORA- 1 50

In outlined in the Guideline for the Development of Petroleum and Geothermal Environment Plans in Western Australia (DMIRS 2016), auditing and reporting is required to be undertaken regularly to assess environmental performance and compliance, and to review the effectiveness of the environmental management system.

Rey commits to undertaking internal monitoring, auditing and inspections as detailed in Appendix E, based on the environmental risk aspects, Rey’s performance objectives, standards and measurement criteria.

REY RESOURCES, ENVIRONMENT PLAN - STOKES BAY- 1, POINT TORMENT - 1, WEST KORA- 1 51

5.6.1 Monitoring Monitoring and inspections that will be undertaken on a routine and opportunistic basis to feed into reporting requirements as detailed in the PGE(E)R and the PGER Act, include:

• Routine site inspections carried out by contractors utilising their procedures, forms and schedules as appropriate, to ensure all mitigation measures and implementation strategies are being correctly implemented on site • planned impacts • unplanned impacts (incidents) outside of routine operations. 5.6.2 Auditing and Management of Non-Conformance Internal environmental auditing is required under Regulation 15(6) of the PGE(E)R, which requires operators to have an EP that contains an implementation strategy which includes monitoring, auditing and management of non-compliance and performance. Results of these internal audits are to be used in annual or closeout reporting for the activity in order to demonstrate compliance with the approved EP. Auditing of the care and maintenance and clean-up activities will be undertaken by Rey’s Operations Manager or delegate in accordance with Rey’s Audit and Inspection Procedure (RLS_CMS_PRO_004).

During the audit, findings are to be recorded on the Internal Audit and Inspection Observation Form (RLS_CMS_FRM_004) by the auditor. Upon completion of the audit, the auditor is to review the findings and determine all items listed to be one of the following:

• Major non-conformance – a non-conformance that indicates an aspect of the management system is non-existent or not being utilised, may affect the services provided to clients, or multiple instances of the same minor non-conformance indicating a systematic failure. Actionees have 30 days to rectify. • Minor non-conformance – a non-conformance that is not likely to cause the failure of the management system or a single observed lapse in procedures or processes. Actionees have 90 days to rectify. • Observation – A situation or condition of an aspect of the management system that may be weak, cumbersome, redundant or overly complex. Observations do not require action, however should be seriously considered by management to assist in the continual improvement cycle.

An audit summary report is to be prepared by the internal auditor, using the Internal Report Form (RLS_CMS_FRM_003). The summary is to comment generally on the degree of conformance identified, itemise any findings raised during the audit, and at the auditor’s discretion, make recommendations for corrective action and/or improvement.

The audit summary report shall be discussed with management and be retained and filed appropriately. Further information raised within the audit summary meeting or report may then be entered into the Event and Feedback Register. 5.6.3 Record Keeping Rey will manage and maintain a number of internal auditing and reporting systems for all relevant activities undertaken within the well sites and surrounding infrastructure area during mobilisation, care and maintenance activities and demobilisation. These include:

• Induction and Training Register (RLS_CMS_REG_006) • Audit and Inspection Register (RLS_CMS_REG_008) • Event and Feedback Register (RLS_CMS_REG_002)

REY RESOURCES, ENVIRONMENT PLAN - STOKES BAY- 1, POINT TORMENT - 1, WEST KORA- 1 52

• Stakeholder Engagement Register (RLS_CMS_REG_007) • RLS Internal Auditing Reports: o Internal Audit Report Form (RLS_CMS_FRM_003) o Event and Feedback Report Form (RLS_CMS_FRM_002)

5.7 ENVIRONMENTAL REPORTING As required by legislation (PGER(E)R; Onshore Schedule; and the PGER Act, operators are to report various environmental aspects of their operations to DMIRS, and all environmental reports are to be submitted electronically to: [email protected].

Environmental reporting will include:

• activity reporting (annual) • incident reporting (as required). • emissions and discharges reporting (quarterly)

A summary of reporting requirements and commitments is presented in Table 17 and described below.

Environmental reporting requirements on compliance, emissions/discharges and incidents are listed below. 5.7.1 Pre-Start and Cessation Notifications Rey will inform DMIRS of the start date prior to commencement of the care and maintenance activities (i.e. date of first mobilisation to site) and provide notification of the completion date within one week from cessation of the care and maintenance activities (i.e. demobilisation from site).

5.7.2 Routine Activity Reporting Regulation 16 of the PGE(E)R requires a report to be submitted to DMIRS at least annually, to ensure compliance with the environmental performance objectives in the EP.

Rey will submit an annual care and maintenance report to DMIRS, within three months of the end of the care and maintenance and clean-up activities. 5.7.3 Monitoring and Reporting on Emissions and Discharges Regulation 34 of the PGER(E)R requires the monitoring and reporting of all emissions and discharges to any land, air, or surface water/groundwater environment. Rey will provide a written report detailing all emissions and discharges that occur during the course of the care and maintenance activities. This report must be submitted to DMIRS within 15 days after the end of the care and maintenance and clean-up activities.

The report will address any emissions or discharges during the survey, including but not necessarily limited to:

• vehicle and equipment emissions • details of any emission resulting from environmental incidents (e.g. spills) (refer also to Appendix E) • waste (e.g. general, recyclable and hazardous). 5.7.4 Incident Reporting 5.7.4.1 Reportable Incidents Reportable incidents (an unplanned event identified as having a risk rating greater than 12 during the risk assessment process) must be reported to the DMIRS. Under Regulation 28 and 29 of the PGER(E)R the DMIRS must be verbally notified of the reportable incident as soon as practicable, and no later than two hours after

REY RESOURCES, ENVIRONMENT PLAN - STOKES BAY- 1, POINT TORMENT - 1, WEST KORA- 1 53

becoming aware of the reportable incident. Reportable incidents should be reported to the DMIRS via the 24- hour duty phone 0419 960 621, and under Regulation 29, a written report is to be submitted to DMIRS ([email protected]) as soon as practicable, and no later than three days after the initial incident.

Reportable incidents include but are not limited to:

• A death or serious injury related to the care and maintenance activities; • Loss, damage or destruction of property with a value exceeding $20,000; • Any significant spills of hydrocarbons (defined as any spill greater than 80L); • Death or injury to fauna of conservation significance; and • Unplanned impacts to a matter of NES during the care and maintenance activities (as per the EPBC Act).

A copy of the DMIRS Reportable Incident Report Form is available for download on the DMIRS website. The report will include the following details:

• all material facts and circumstances concerning the reportable incident that the operator knows or is able, by reasonable search or enquiry, to find out. • any action taken to avoid or mitigate any adverse environmental impacts of the reportable incident, and • any action taken, or proposed to be taken, to prevent a similar reportable incident.

Any environmental incident, near miss or newly identified hazard will be reported under this procedure.

The Site Supervisor is to maintain the incident reporting system to minimise environmental harm and to encourage the prevention of more serious incidents. All personnel are encouraged to report all events to act as an alert to environmental risks and to maintain a program of continual improvement. 5.7.4.2 Recordable Incidents Recordable incidents (an activity that breaches an environmental performance objective or environmental performance standard defined in the Environment Plan and is not a reportable incident), must be reported to DMIRS.

Recordable incidents include but are not limited to:

• Introduction or spread of listed weed species • Excessive erosion • Fauna deaths • Noise disturbances to neighbouring properties • Disturbance to existing native vegetation and • Unacceptable reinstatement following site inspection activities.

A copy of DMIRS’ Recordable Environmental Incident Report Form listing all recordable incidents each calendar month, will be completed by Rey and submitted to DMIRS ([email protected]), as soon as practicable, and within 15 days after the end of the month to which it relates, under Regulation 30 of the PGE(E)R. The report will include details of each occurrence of a recordable incident, including:

• all material facts and circumstances concerning the incident • actions taken to avoid or mitigate any adverse environmental impacts occurring from the incident • any actions taken, or proposed to be taken, to prevent similar recordable incidents.

Where no recordable incidents have occurred during the month, a nil report will still be submitted to DMIRS.

REY RESOURCES, ENVIRONMENT PLAN - STOKES BAY- 1, POINT TORMENT - 1, WEST KORA- 1 54

5.7.5 Storage of Records Under Regulation 31 of the PGER(E)R, records must be stored and maintained for a period of five years and in such a way that retrieval of the document is reasonably practicable. Records to be kept and maintained include:

• this EP • revisions and proposed revisions of this EP • written reports (including monitoring, audit and review reports) about environmental performance, or about the implementation strategy, under the EP • all records and copies of: o notifications to DMIRS of reportable incidents on site (as defined in Section 5.7.4.1) o written reports of reportable incidents on site o written reports of recordable incidents on site. Rey maintains a document control system for identification and filing of all documents for easy retrieval. All environmental reports and records (including correspondence) will be kept and maintained in the RLS Audit and Inspection Register (RLS_CMS_REG_008), Stakeholder Engagement Register (RLS_CMS_REG_007) and where necessary, RLS Event and Feedback Register (RLS_CMS_REG_002). 5.7.6 Making records available Under Regulation 32 of the PGER(E)R, all records must made available to the Minister or an Inspector upon request. This includes:

• a delegate of the Minister • an Inspector • an agent, operating under a delegate of the Minister or an Inspector.

Records should be made available upon request in hard copy, unless agreed upon by the Minister or Inspector, records may be provided in electronic format.

All ongoing statutory reporting through the publication of quarterly reports, half yearly reports, annual reports and ASX announcements are issued and publicly available on the Rey website: http://www.reyresources.com.

REY RESOURCES, ENVIRONMENT PLAN - STOKES BAY- 1, POINT TORMENT - 1, WEST KORA- 1 55

Table 17: Summary of Reporting Requirements and Commitments

ROUTINE REPORTING ROUTINE REPORTING (Regulation 16 and 34 of the PGER(E)R; Clause 720 Onshore Schedule) Action Timing

Greenhouse gas emissions Every three Greenhouse gas emissions and energy data will be calculated using the methods, criteria and formulas as defined in the National Greenhouse and Energy months Reporting (Measurement) Determination 2008. A quarterly Emissions and Discharge report will be submitted to DMIRS.

Discharges Emissions and Reportable discharges from the care and maintenance activities include: Discharges • solid waste Every three • liquid waste spills months • chemical spills Volumes of all discharges will be recorded every three months and reported to the DMIRS via the DMIRS Emissions and Discharge report

From the date Rey will submit an annual report detailing the following: this EP is • care and maintenance activities undertaken during the reporting period accepted, the Annual • a statement of compliance for each objective and standard identified in the EP Environmental • a summary of audits undertaken, including the findings and corrective actions, if relevant Performance Annual Report • a summary of any incidents (recordable and reportable) that occurred Report is to be • a summary of all emissions and discharges submitted annually • details of any new or increased environmental impacts or risks identified during the reporting period within three • details of all training undertaken months • details of all stakeholder engagement and consultation undertaken during the reporting period following the 1-year period

REY RESOURCES, ENVIRONMENT PLAN - S TOKES BAY- 1, POINT TORMENT- 1, WEST KORA- 1 55

INCIDENT REPORTING

REPORTABLE INCIDENTS (Regulation 28 and 29 of the PGER(E)R)

A reportable incident has a risk rating greater than 12. Action Timing

There were no environmental impacts identified during the risk assessment with a Raw Risk consequence rating of medium to Notification of reportable incidents will be in accordance with Regulations 28 and 29 of high requiring reporting as a reportable incident. the Petroleum and Geothermal Energy Resources (Environment) Regulations 2012, i.e.: A number of additional incidents require reporting as soon as • initial notification provided to the Director of Petroleum, DMIRS (or equivalent) possible, regardless of whether or not they have been classified either verbally or in writing as having a risk rating greater than 12, in accordance with the • the initial notification will specify all facts and circumstances concerning the Notification of the reportable Guideline for the Development of Petroleum and Geothermal reportable incident that is known or could reasonably be known by Rey along with incident verbally as soon as Environment Plans in Western Australia. These include: actions taken to avoid or mitigate any adverse environmental impacts. practicable, but within two hours; • spills of hydrocarbons or hazardous materials to water in These incidents will be reported on the DMIRS form and Rey’s Incident/Non-Conformance Reportable Incident report form excess of 80 L Report Form submitted to the DMIRS within • spills of hydrocarbons or hazardous materials to land in three days of the incident first excess of 500 L in other areas Verbal (preferable) and written notification (mail, fax or email) to the DMIRS providing as occurring. • spills of hydrocarbons or hazardous materials that affect much preliminary information as available about the incident (i.e. operator, location, type a ground surface area greater than 100 m2 of incident, initial response and mitigation response to incident). • An unplanned gaseous release to atmosphere of 500 m3 or more Monitoring of environmental conditions following an incident will be instigated following • injury or death of State or Commonwealth listed fauna agreement with the relevant regulators, including scope, extent, frequency and duration. • unplanned impact caused to a MNES during an activity

REY RESOURCES, ENVIRONMENT PLAN - S TOKES BAY- 1, POINT TORMENT- 1, WEST KORA- 1 56

RECORDABLE INCIDENTS (Regulation 30 of the PGER(E)R)

Recordable incidents can include negative environmental Action Timing impacts and breaches of approval conditions. Accordingly, an environmental incident is any planned or unplanned event during the activity, and associated activities that results in, or has the potential to result in, pollution or environmental harm. Environmental incidents will be reported to the Onsite Supervisor, in the first instance. Examples include: The Onsite Supervisor will then: • fire; • undertake an immediate inspection and assessment of the incident to determine • inappropriate waste disposal the most appropriate response; • complaints from the public. • implement corrective actions; Reported monthly, and no later • hydrocarbon spills • report to management as per internal reporting requirements; and than 15 days after the end of the • contaminated sites • investigate the causes of the incident, and if appropriate, develop and implement reporting month. • introduction or spread of listed weed species preventative actions that will ensure the situation does not recur. • excessive erosion Incidents will be reported via DMIRS’ Reportable Environmental Incident Report Form • fauna deaths Monitoring of environmental conditions following an incident may be instigated following • noise disturbances to neighbouring properties agreement with the relevant regulators, including scope, extent, frequency and duration. • disturbance to existing native vegetation and • unacceptable reinstatement following site inspection activities

REY RESOURCES, ENVIRONMENT PLAN - S TOKES BAY- 1, POINT TORMENT- 1, WEST KORA- 1 57

6 CONSULTATION Rey is in the process of developing a formal Stakeholder Engagement Register (RLS_CMS_REG_007), and a Stakeholder Engagement Plan (RLS_CMS_MPL_001) has been prepared in order to undertake and maintain an auditable structured source of information for all ongoing consultation associated with the care and maintenance and clean-up activities.

A range of stakeholders have been consulted to date by the previous title holders, regarding the care and maintenance activities at the well sites area. Rey will continue consultation with relevant stakeholders. The stakeholders previously identified include the Shire of Derby/West Kimberley, Department of Parks and Wildlife (part of the now DBCA), Department of Water, DMP (now DMIRS), Jumbuck Pastoral Office (Holder of Meda Station Pastoral Lease), Department of Transport (Marine Division) and relevant Aboriginal Community Leaders.

In accordance with Regulation 17 of PGER(E)R, Rey Resources consider the stakeholders detailed in Table 18 to be relevant to the activities within this plan. Table 18: Relevant Stakeholder List

Stakeholder Relevance Justification Relevant to this plan

Shire of Derby/West The activity is located within this shire thus they are Yes Kimberley considered a relevant stakeholder

Department of The activities are not within / nor near lands that No Biodiversity, Conservation are managed by DBCA with the closes reserve and Attractions located over 72 km away.

Department of Water end There are no licences in place, nor planned No Environmental Regulation emissions to land or waters associated with this activity that meet licence thresholds.

Jumbuck Pastoral Office The petroleum titles overlay the Meda station thus Yes (Holder of Meda Station activities have the potential to interfere with their Pastoral Lease) activities thus are considered a relevant stakeholder.

Department of Transport Given that these activities are solely onshore, with No (Marine Division) no spill risk to the marine environment, this stakeholder is not considered relevant

Aboriginal Community Given a current Native Title claim exists Yes Leaders over the area, and as heritage objects have been previously discovered (Section 3.7), Aboriginal community leaders are considered relevant stakeholders. A summary of the stakeholder engagement register to date for relevant stakeholders associated with the proposed care and maintenance activities is presented in Table 19. This will be maintained and updated regularly by Rey following all external consultation relating to the activity. Table 19: Stakeholder Engagement Register

Name and Date of Stakeholder Consultation Activity Related Issue Objection / Claim? Consultation

Troy Haslet (Station Proposed care and Meda Station manager) Email None raised maintenance activities 13/11/18

REY RESOURCES, ENVIRONMENT PLAN - STOKES BAY - 1, POINT TORMEN T - 1, WEST KORA - 1 58

Shire of Derby/West Stephen Gash (Shire Kimberley CEO) Proposed care and Martin Cuthbert Email None raised maintenance activities (Shire EMSC) 25/02/2019

Anthony Watson Kimberley Land Proposed care and (Chairman) Email None raised Council maintenance activities 25/02/2019

6.1 INDIGENOUS CONSULTATION As the well sites area is located on freehold land that was granted on or before 23 December 1996, Native Title is currently extinguished from the area. A Native Title application was lodged over the area in 2011 by the Mawadjala Gadjidgar people (WC2011/003) (NNTT 2018).

Rey Resources has not had any requirement to undertake consultation with the Traditional Owners since the acquisition of the Gulliver assets.

6.2 PRIVATE AND GOVERNMENT STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATION Private and government stakeholders (including the Shire of Derby/West Kimberley, DFES, Main Roads Western Australia and pastoralists) have been formally notified of the proposed care and maintenance activities. Further and ongoing liaison will be held with each stakeholder as required following approval of the EP and a clearer understanding of project timeframes and commencement dates.

6.3 ONGOING STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATION Due to the nature and scale of this activity, the level of ongoing consultation is planned to be minimal. Based upon those stakeholders identified in Section 6.1 and based upon the feedback from stakeholder engagement, Rey Resources commits to:

• Providing updates to stakeholders where planned activities differ from those described in this Plan (and thus are subject to management under another EP); and • Notifying Meda Station prior to mobilising to site.

REY RESOURCES, ENVIRONMENT PLAN - STOKES BAY - 1, POINT TORMEN T - 1, WEST KORA - 1 59

7 REFERENCES

APPEA 2008, Code of Environmental Practice, October 2008.

AS/NZS 2009, Risk Management – Principles and Guidelines (ISO 31000:2009).

Bureau of Meteorology. 2018. Climate Data Online.

Crostella, A., Western Australia Geological Survey. 1988. A review of oil occurrences within the Lennard Shelf, Canning Basin, Western Australia: Western Australia Geological Survey.

Department of Biodiversity, Conservations and Attractions (DBCA). 2018a. NatureMap: Mapping Western Australia's Biodiversity.

Department of Biodiversity, Conservations and Attractions (DBCA) 2018b List of Threatened Ecological Communities Endorsed by the Western Australian Minister for the Environment, June 2018

Department of the Environment and Energy (DoEE) 2008. National Greenhouse and Energy Reporting (Measurement) Determination. Australian Government Department of the Environment and Energy, Canberra, ACT.

Department of the Environment and Energy. (DoEE) 2018a. Interim Biogeographic Regionalisation for Australia (IBRA), Version 7. Australian Government Department of the Environment and Energy, Canberra, ACT.

Department of the Environment and Energy. (DoEE) 2018b. EPBC Act Protected Matters Search Tool. Accessed 30/09/2018. http:// http://www.environment.gov.au/webgis-framework/apps/pmst/pmst.jsf

Department of Mines and Petroleum (DMP) 2016. Environmental Inspection Report AU-15/16-4697. Gulliver Productions Pty Ltd Environmental Compliance Inspections. West Kora-1, Stokes Bay-1 and Point Torment- 1 Well Sites. 14 April 2016.

Department of Mines Industry Regulation and Safety (DMIRS) 2016. Guideline for the Development of Petroleum and Geothermal Environment Plans in Western Australia. Department of Mines, Industry Regulation and Safety. Government of Western Australia.

Department of Parks and Wildlife (DPaW). 2007a. Threatened and Priority Flora Database Search.

Department of Parks and Wildlife (DPaW). 2007b. Threatened Fauna Database Search

Department of Planning, Lands and Heritage (DPLH) 2018a https://www.daa.wa.gov.au/about-the- department/legislation/ Accessed October 2018

Department of Planning, Lands and Heritage (DPLH) 2018b Aboriginal Heritage Inquiry System https://maps.daa.wa.gov.au/AHIS/ Accessed October 2018

Department of Water (DoW). 2013. Hydrogeological Atlas. Department of Water, Government of Western Australia.

Geological Survey of Western Australia,. 2007. Prospectivity of State Acreage Release Area L07-1, Fitzroy Trough and Lennard Shelf, Canning Basin.

REY RESOURCES, ENVIRONMENT PLAN - STOKES BAY - 1, POINT TORMEN T - 1, WEST KORA - 1 60

Gulliver Productions 2017. Environment Report. Care and Maintenance Production Licence L15, Retention Licence R1. Document Number GP/ER170919-KP. October 2017.

Harrington, G.A, Stelfox, L., Gardner, W.P., Davies, P., Doble, R., Cook, P.G. CSIRO: Water for a Healthy Country National Research Flagship 2011. Surface Water - Groundwater Interactions in the Lower Fitzroy River, Western Australia. 54

Heritage Council (2018) inHerit Database http://inherit.stateheritage.wa.gov.au/Public/. Accessed September 2018

Landgate 2018 Locate V4 – Environmentally Sensitive Areas Layer

National Native Title Tribunal (NNTT) 2018 Register of Native Title Claims Search Accessed September 2018

NOPSEMA 2015. ALARP, Guidance Note N-04300-GN0166 Rev 6, June 2015

Oil and Gas UK 2014 Oil and Gas UK Guidelines

Smith, R. A. 1992. Derby, Western Australia. Explanatory notes on the Derby 1:250 000 hydrogeological sheet. Geological Survey of Western Australia, Perth.

Western Australian Herbarium. 2007. FloraBase - The Western Australian Flora. Government of Western Australia Department of Parks and Wildlife. Available at: http://florabase.dpaw.wa.gov.au/

Woodman Environmental Consulting. 2006 Arc Energy Ltd Stokes Bay-1 Well Site Flora and Vegetation survey

REY RESOURCES, ENVIRONMENT PLAN - STOKES BAY - 1, POINT TORMEN T - 1, WEST KORA - 1 61

APPENDIX A - REY RESOURCES LIMITED ENVIRONMENT POLICY

REY RESOURCES, ENVIRONMENT PLAN - STOKES BAY - 1, POINT TORMENT - 1, WEST KORA - 1 A 1

REY RESOURCES, ENVIRONMENT PLAN - STOKES BAY - 1, POINT TORMENT - 1, WEST KORA - 1 A 2

APPENDIX B – OPERATIONAL PROCEDURES FOR CARE AND MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES FOR THE WELL SITES AND ASSOCIATED INFRASTRUCTURE

REY RESOURCES, ENVIRONMENT PLAN - STOKES BAY - 1, POINT TORMENT - 1, WEST KORA - 1 B 1

REY LENNARD SHELF PTY LTD ENVIRONMENTAL AND HERITAGE MANAGEMENT PLAN CANNING BASIN OPERATIONS

RLS_EMS_MPL_001_REV_A

Rey Lennard Shelf Pty Ltd (RLS)

Environmental and Heritage Management Plan

Canning Basin Operations

REVISION DETAILS

Revision Reviewed/ Prepared/Revised by Issued Date Change Notes Number Approved by

A K. Bauer‐Simpson M. Harrison 31/08/2016 Initial draft C. Krens

0 K. Bauer‐Simpson M. Harrison 22/09/2016 Final for implementation C. Krens M. Dixon

ENVIRONMENTAL AND HERITAGE MANAGEMENT PLAN - RLS_EMS_MPL_001_Rev_0

Contents 1.0 Introduction and Purpose ...... 4

1.1 Context ...... 4

1.2 Scope ...... 5

1.3 Objectives ...... 5

2.0 Organisation Resources and Responsibilities ...... 7

2.1 Responsibilities ...... 7

2.1.1 RLS Site Supervisor Responsibilities ...... 8

2.1.2 Employee/Contractor Responsibilities...... 9

3.0 Current Activity ...... 10

3.1 Activity Responsibilities ...... 10

4.0 Leadership commitments ...... 11

4.1 Policies ...... 11

4.1.1 Environment Policy ...... 11

3.1.7 ...... Error! Bookmark not defined.

4.2 Environmental and Heritage Objectives ...... 14

5.0 Training and Communications...... 15

5.1 Inductions ...... 15

5.2 Training ...... 16

5.3 Meetings ...... 16

5.3.1 Toolbox Meetings ...... 16

5.3.2 Daily Meetings ...... 16

5.4 Other Communications ...... 16

5.5 Records ...... 16

6.0 Risk Management and Incident Reporting ...... 17

6.1 Reporting Hazards ...... 17

6.2 Job Hazard and Environmental Analysis ...... 17

ENVIRONMENTAL AND HERITAGE MANAGEMENT PLAN - RLS_EMS_MPL_001_Rev_0

6.3 Risk Assessments ...... 17

6.4 Internal Incident and Event Reporting ...... 18

6.5 Incident Investigation ...... 18

7.0 Environmental Emergency Response ...... 19

7.1 Emergency Contacts ...... 20

8.0 Contractor Management ...... 21

9.0 Aspects, Impacts and Management Controls ...... 22

10.0 Monitoring, Inspections, Auditing and Reporting ...... 26

10.1 Summary of Routine and Incident Reporting ...... 31

ENVIRONMENTAL AND HERITAGE MANAGEMENT PLAN - RLS_EMS_MPL_001_Rev_0

1.0 INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE

Rey Lennard Shelf Pty Ltd. (RLS) is committed to sustainable and environmentally responsible outcomes, with respect for and acknowledgement of indigenous cultural heritage matters, for all of its operations. Every endeavour will be made to avoid significant and detrimental impact to the natural environmental and cultural heritage values. Impacts that are unavoidable shall be appropriately managed and environmental and heritage performance shall be monitored throughout operations.

Exploration projects require a partnership with mutual goals between all involved parties, which may include contractors, suppliers, regulatory authorities and the local public. To achieve operational outcomes that are sensitive to environmental and cultural values, effective operating systems of work are required at all levels and the full participation of all parties is necessary.

This management plan describes how potential impacts to environmental and heritage values will be managed during RLS seismic projects in the Canning Basin in Western Australia.

1.1 CONTEXT AND PURPOSE

RLS has developed an Integrated Management System (IMS) comprising an environmental management system (EMS), health and safety management system (SMS), and fundamental elements of a corporate management system (CMS). This system includes:

 Policies  Procedures  Management Plans  Registers  Forms  Indexes and lists of relevant references, legislation and other relevant documents and information.

The IMS is audited, monitored and reviewed regularly to ensure that it is continuously being improved and conforms with relevant legislative authorities’ and internal policies and procedures.

This management plan is designed to be implemented in the context of this broader system (IMS), with specific details relating to seismic exploration activities in the Canning Basin that have the potential to impact on the environment or on heritage values.

In late 2016, RLS plans to undertake a 2D seismic exploration program along 70 km of seismic lines on Exploration Permit 487. RLS has engaged Terrex Seismic, a subsidiary of Terrex Group (Terrex), to provide all equipment and personnel for seismic exploration operations conducted by RLS in the Canning Basin, including the proposed 2016 program. Terrex will in effect control such operations. RLS personnel will be present on site as operator representatives to oversee and support as required. Terrex’s environmental management system is accredited to ISO 14001 and the Terrex Health, Safety, Security and Environmental (HSSE) Plan (TS‐PLN‐001) is a live document used to manage environmental risks across all projects. Terrex’s Environmental Control Procedure (TS‐PRO‐11) is also an element of the accredited system, which further

ENVIRONMENTAL AND HERITAGE MANAGEMENT PLAN - RLS_EMS_MPL_001_Rev_0

ensures identification of potential environmental and heritage impacts arising from Terrex’s seismic exploration actives, with suitable control measure to avoid or minimise these impacts.

Furthermore, an Environment Plan (EP) has been prepared (Strategen 2016) which addresses the potential environmental impacts and required management actions relevant to the activities associated with the proposed 2D seismic survey prior to, during and after survey activities. The EP will ensure that the proposed seismic exploration activities are carried out in an ecologically sustainable manner, by reducing environmental risks and impacts of petroleum activities to a level considered to be as low as reasonably practicable (ALARP). The EP has been prepared in accordance with Petroleum and Geothermal Energy Resources (Environment) Regulations 2012 and the document also addresses the management of environmental and heritage values provided in this management plan.

1.2 SCOPE

The scope of this environmental and heritage management plan is designed to cover:

 all activities for RLS seismic exploration  environmental and indigenous heritage policies, objectives and responsibilities  planning environmentally responsible and culturally sensitive operations  environmental and heritage training, induction and communication  environmental and heritage monitoring and reporting  environmental and heritage audits and the review process for continuous improvement.

The applicable legislation includes:

 Petroleum and Geothermal Energy Resources Act 1967 (PGER Act)  Petroleum and Geothermal Energy Resources (Environment) Regulations 2012 (PGER(E)R)  Environmental Protection Act 1986 (EP Act)  Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act)  Environmental Protection (Clearing of Native Vegetation) Regulations 2004  Aboriginal Heritage Act 1972 (AH Act)  Bush Fires Act 1954  Wildlife Conservation Act 1950 (WC Act)  Biosecurity and Agricultural Management Act 2007  Biosecurity and Agriculture Management Regulations 2013  National Greenhouse and Energy Resources Act 2007  Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914.

1.3 OBJECTIVES

Through implementation of this management plan, the following objectives will be achieved:

 to minimise impacts on the environment, including through vegetation clearing

ENVIRONMENTAL AND HERITAGE MANAGEMENT PLAN - RLS_EMS_MPL_001_Rev_0

 to ensure no impacts to known sites or values of indigenous heritage significance  to avoid impacts on matters of environmental and heritage significance in the survey area  to avoid the introduction or spread of weeds  to ensure minimal disturbance along drainage lines  to undertake exploration activities in a manner which minimises adverse impacts to fauna  to ensure that any adverse impacts to threatened and protected species is avoided.

ENVIRONMENTAL AND HERITAGE MANAGEMENT PLAN - RLS_EMS_MPL_001_Rev_0

2.0 ORGANISATION RESOURCES AND RESPONSIBILITIES

RLS is a subsidiary company within the economic entity of Rey Resources Limited (Rey). Rey is an ASX‐listed company (ASX: REY) focused on exploring and developing energy resources in Western Australia’s Canning and Perth Basins.

The organisational structure of RLS is shown below.

2.1 RESPONSIBILITIES

The promotion and maintenance of environmental and social responsibility is primarily the responsibility of RLS senior management. Social responsibility covers, in this context, regard for indigenous cultural heritage. Senior management, with the support of all management and employees will implement and maintain the environmental management system, which forms part of the RLS IMS. The function of the environmental elements of RLS’s IMS will minimise environmental and heritage risks for RLS.

RLS senior management team responsibilities include:

 ensuring that environmental and heritage policies and procedures are known and followed by all personnel by leading from the top, and empowering all personnel to strive for improvement in everything they do  ensuring human, technical and financial resources are utilised effectively to develop, implement, measure, maintain and improve suitable systems of work for appropriate management of adverse impacts to environmental and heritage values  ensuring that activities that have the potential to result in adverse impacts to environmental and heritage values are assessed with management controls developed and implemented to prevent impact as much as practicable

ENVIRONMENTAL AND HERITAGE MANAGEMENT PLAN - RLS_EMS_MPL_001_Rev_0

 ensuring that activities in areas of environmental or heritage significance are assessed with appropriate approvals sought, legislative conditions met and management controls developed and implemented to prevent adverse impact as much as practicable  any unforeseen adverse environmental or heritage impacts (incidents) or high‐potential incidents are thoroughly investigated and actions taken to minimise their recurrence or prevent the impact from occurring in the first place  encouraging and enabling employees to contribute to the making of decisions affecting their environmental performance at work  ensuring that environmental and heritage monitoring and reporting records are generated and maintained in accordance with applicable legislation  managing compliance with environmental and heritage approvals, systems and legislation  ensuring that all contractors taking the lead on site activities have suitable systems, relevant environmental and heritage approvals and all other mechanisms that ensure that the requirements of legislation and of RLS’s systems and policies are achieved as a minimum.

2.1.1 RLS Site Supervisor Responsibilities

Where present on site, the RLS Site Supervisor’s responsibilities include:

 continually promoting company culture regarding environmental and heritage management by personal example  ensuring appropriate implementation of the IMS, including the EMS, and including policies and procedures  ensure all people working in the exploration operation are adequately trained, are competent and qualified to perform their work in a manner that is sensitive to environmental and heritage values  ensure all employees and contractors receive an appropriate induction and are aware of environmental and heritage information  ensure all required and commitments to monitoring and inspections are conducted and appropriate records are kept on site  encouraging the reporting and documentation of all environmental and heritage incidents or unforeseen impacts to RLS management and the contractor’s Exploration Manager.  report all incidents which are notifiable to the relevant government agency and any serious breaches of the applicable Acts and/or Regulations are reported immediately to RLS Senior Management and the relevant regulatory authority, such as the Department of Mines and Petroleum (DMP)  ensuring compliance with the relevant sections of the Petroleum and Geothermal Energy (Environment) Regulations 2012  ensuring that all personnel and contractors on site comply with RLS’s Environmental and Heritage Management Plan.  consulting with employees and contractors in the development and management of exploration operations, safety, environmental and heritage issues.

ENVIRONMENTAL AND HERITAGE MANAGEMENT PLAN - RLS_EMS_MPL_001_Rev_0

Where a RLS Site Supervisor is not present on site, delegation of the above responsibilities will be made to a suitable Site Supervisor within the lead contactor team (Terrex), or with another suitably capable contractor. Assurance of meeting these responsibilities will be achieved through implementation of the Contractor Assurance Procedure (RLS_CMS_PRO_008).

2.1.2 Employee/Contractor Responsibilities

Responsibilities of all personnel include:

 complying with company policies, procedures and rules  reporting incidents and potential or actual adverse impacts on environmental or heritage values  actively identifying and reporting potential risks to environmental or heritage values  participating in inspections, audits, meetings and promotions as directed  cooperating with management to ensure legislative requirements relating to the environmental and heritage approvals and management are met  not interfering with or impacting the environment or potential heritage values in any way that is in contravention to the workplace methods and procedures  not deliberately creating a risk to the integrity of environmental or heritage values.

ENVIRONMENTAL AND HERITAGE MANAGEMENT PLAN - RLS_EMS_MPL_001_Rev_0

3.0 CURRENT ACTIVITY

This management plan is specifically applicable to seismic exploration activities on Exploration Permit (EP) 487, the Derby Block. The Derby Block covers an area of 5,466 km2 and is situated in the north‐west margin of the Fitzroy Trough, in the northern periphery of the Canning Basin. The Canning Basin covers an area of ~ 530,000 km2 in central north Western Australia and extends offshore for a total basin area of ~ 640,000 km2.

RLS plans to undertake a total of 70 km of 2D seismic acquisition in order to better define the Laurel sedimentary facies and select optimal well sites for testing the potential of the Laurel basin centred gas.

RLS have engaged Terrex, a suitably experienced and credible contractor to conduct the 2D seismic survey within EP 487. Terrex’s environmental management system is accredited to ISO 14001 and the Terrex Health, Safety, Security and Environmental (HSSE) Plan (TS‐PLN‐001) is used to manage environmental risks across all projects. Terrex’s Environmental Control Procedure (TS‐PRO‐11) (Appendix A) is also an element of the accredited system, which further ensures identification of potential environmental and heritage impacts arising from Terrex’s seismic exploration actives, with suitable control measure to avoid or minimise these impacts. 3.1 ACTIVITY RESPONSIBILITIES

Position Responsibilities

RLS Management and Ensure that adequate measures are in place to identify, avoid, manage and monitor Supervisors any impacts on environmental or cultural heritage values, from actions of both RLS and any contractor personnel on seismic exploration sites.

Ensure that contractor’s systems, licences, insurances and environmental performance adequately fulfil legislative and RLS requirements and continue to remain valid and acceptable.

RLS Personnel Conform to all environmental and indigenous heritage policies and procedures relevant to seismic sites which they are attending or working at.

Contractor Management Ensure that their internal policies and procedures are in place and maintained in accordance with RLS and relevant requirements.

Provide RLS with operational procedures for activities specific to all contracted work.

ENVIRONMENTAL AND HERITAGE MANAGEMENT PLAN - RLS_EMS_MPL_001_Rev_0

4.0 LEADERSHIP COMMITMENTS

Strong visible management, leadership and commitment are critical to the successful implementation, assessment and continuous improvement of this Environmental and Heritage Management Plan, to ensure that necessary resources and focus are provided to attain the environmental and heritage objectives set. Top‐down commitment to a culture of responsible site operations is essential to the success of the plan. The Managing Director and senior management of RLS are committed to providing the leadership and resources necessary to operate and maintain the plan in order to achieve the corporate environmental and heritage objectives. Full account will be taken of environmental and heritage policy requirements and full support will be given to local actions to protect the environment in which the company operates.

4.1 POLICIES

RLS is committed to diligently conducting operations, including joint ventures it may manage or be a part of, so as to responsibly protect the environment, having regard to safety, social and economic factors.

To achieve this, corporate policies, objectives and targets with respect to these shall be produced, distributed and continually reviewed and improved. These policies promote the company’s conviction that all unforeseen impacts to the environmental and to all known sites and matters of heritage significant can be avoided, to achieve the following goals:

 zero unforeseen environmental impacts  zero impacts on known sites and values of heritage significance  protect the environment in operational areas.

4.1.1 Environment Policy

RLS commits to conducting its business in a responsible manner, balancing social, economic and environmental aspects of its work. RLS directors, employees and contractors shall undertake their duties in accordance with this Policy. This Policy applies to all RLS activities of exploration, mining, processing and transport of its products.

In order to fulfil this commitment, RLS will:  Provide management leadership to the organisation supporting this Policy.  Act diligently and responsibly to protect the environment in which it operates ‐ meeting or exceeding applicable legal requirements.  Establish, act to achieve and periodically review environmental performance objectives, targets and outcomes, seeking opportunities for improvement.  Integrate environmental objectives with safety, social and economic considerations when planning.  Identify, evaluate and control environmental risks of activities, to levels as low as reasonably practicable.

ENVIRONMENTAL AND HERITAGE MANAGEMENT PLAN - RLS_EMS_MPL_001_Rev_0

 Promote the efficient use, reuse and recycling of resources, and the minimisation of waste and emissions.  Rehabilitate disturbed areas in accordance with regulations and site specific plans.  Ensure that providers of services and materials share the responsibility of achieving the required standards of environmental performance.

4.1.2 Indigenous Policy

RLS recognises that special factors are involved when its operations impinge upon Aboriginal communities.

RLS’s policy in this regard is:

 to respect traditions, customs, culture and dignity of Aboriginal communities with whom the Company comes into contact  to consult with Aboriginal communities on field operations which could affect their culture, social and economic well‐being and their ability to enjoy their traditional way of life. Sites of Cultural Heritage Significance

Where it can be established that an Aboriginal community has a continuing traditional link with the land on which RLS intends to undertake activities, RLS will endeavour to identify any nearby sites of special cultural heritage significance. The integrity of all identified sites of cultural or religious significance will be respected.

Aboriginal Employment and Contract Services

In development projects which take place on land on or near Aboriginal communities, RLS will consider employing suitably qualified Aboriginal people from that community in positions for which they are competent and willing to fill. RLS will also consider providing training programs to enable Aboriginals who seek employment and have the necessary aptitude to acquire appropriate skills.

Community Development, Social Infrastructure and Welfare

The primary responsibility for community development, social infrastructure, health and welfare rests with government and the communities themselves. However, RLS will cooperate with government and non‐government agencies, where appropriate, to help Aboriginal communities close to the Company’s operations who wish to undertake social and other development projects. Such help could include financial, technical and managerial assistance.

Compensation for Land Disturbance and Rehabilitation of Land Disturbed

RLS acknowledges its obligations to pay industry standard compensation to a landholder whose land is disturbed by operations, where such compensation is provided for by law or statute. Rehabilitation and restoration of land which is disturbed will be carried out in accordance with RLS policy, government requirements, and in consultation with any Aboriginal communities concerned.

ENVIRONMENTAL AND HERITAGE MANAGEMENT PLAN - RLS_EMS_MPL_001_Rev_0

RLS will use its best endeavours to ensure these policy guidelines apply in any joint venture in which it has an interest.

ENVIRONMENTAL AND HERITAGE MANAGEMENT PLAN - RLS_EMS_MPL_001_Rev_0

4.2 ENVIRONMENTAL AND HERITAGE OBJECTIVES

Environmental and heritage objectives are set to establish a benchmark in terms of how impacts are avoided, minimised and managed. RLS is committed to ensuring best practice management of the natural environment within which operations take place.

The following is a list of environmental and heritage objectives for exploration projects:

 Avoid all adverse impacts to known environmental and heritage values where possible.  Minimise environmental damage in operational areas by developing and implementing environmentally sensitive working methods.  Where impacts to the environment are unavoidable, ensure minimal effect by adhering to appropriate environmental management measures.  Undertake monitoring of the implementation of management measures, to ensure optimal outcomes for environmental and heritage values.  Meet all reporting requirements, both internally and externally, for both routine monitoring and incident related events.  Provide suitable guidance to all site personnel, both employees and contractors, on the environmental management system, management plans, procedures and standards to be applied.  Maintain compliance with environmental and heritage legislation, and RLS project environmental and heritage requirements.  Ensure continual improvement of the EMS and related plans and procedures through scheduled reviews and where incidents or changes in legislation prompt reviews.

ENVIRONMENTAL AND HERITAGE MANAGEMENT PLAN - RLS_EMS_MPL_001_Rev_0

5.0 TRAINING AND COMMUNICATIONS

5.1 INDUCTIONS

All personnel attending RLS worksites are to be inducted in the following prior to commencement of work:

 RLS policies  Relevant environmental and heritage legislation  site location  project scope and objectives  site environmental values  native title and heritage matters  camp rules (if applicable)  project‐specific environmental and heritage management matters, including: o environmentally sensitive values specific to the site (e.g. conservation significant flora) o sites of indigenous cultural heritage significance o appropriate management measures for avoiding or minimising impacts on the above, and on all aspects of environmental and heritage relevance  environmental and heritage inspections, monitoring and audits  environmental and heritage impact awareness and reporting  environmental emergency procedures.

Upon completion of inductions, the Induction and Training Register (RLS_CMS_REG_006) will be updated for relevant personnel by RLS management.

5.2 QUICK REFERENCE HANDBOOK

As an adjunct to the induction, a ‘Quick Reference Handbook’ shall be prepared and a copy issued to all site personnel. Copies will also be available in all vehicles and site facilities (if applicable). The handbook will include key information provided in the induction, as a reminder and reference for personnel on site, including:

• site personnel contact details

• emergency contact numbers

• Take 5 Procedure

• example photographs of Aboriginal artefacts and significant sites

• photos of conservation significant fauna relevant to the region

• photos of the Priority Flora previously recorded in the area

• a copy of the Oil Spill Contingency Plan flowchart/spill pathway map.

ENVIRONMENTAL AND HERITAGE MANAGEMENT PLAN - RLS_EMS_MPL_001_Rev_0

5.3 TRAINING

It is the responsibility of each individual contractor group to ensure that staff are suitably skilled and provided with the required training or instruction to meet legislative requirements (including holding current, relevant licences and permits) and be able to carry out their roles without risk to the environment, or to their own or others health and safety.

5.4 MEETINGS

5.4.1 Toolbox Meetings

During site activities, Toolbox meetings shall be held weekly and cover issues including environmental and heritage management, as well as safety issues and alerts, new or revised job safety and environmental analyses) JSEAs and review of any incidents. Records of Toolbox meetings will be kept on file.

5.4.2 Daily Meetings

Daily meetings at the start of shifts shall focus on current status of the job, cautions in view of environmental or climatic considerations, safety matters and general daily information. No minutes are taken. These meetings are informal and usually happen as a “matter of course” to keep the day focussed on immediate outcomes. It is noted in the Daily Activity Report that the daily meeting has taken place.

5.5 OTHER COMMUNICATIONS

The effective implementation of this Environment and Heritage Management Plan relies upon the involvement of all employees. Policies, objectives, desired outcomes and general environmental and heritage information must be communicated effectively to all, whilst efficient processes must ensure that employee feedback is promptly received and acted upon.

This Environmental and Heritage Management Plan provides a means to communicate RLS management’s commitment to employees and contractors. The most important form of communication occurs between the supervisor and employees.

Additional methods of communication to be utilised throughout the project include:

 verbal communication of hazards to supervisors  completion of a Hazard and Risk Report Form (RLS_CMS_FRM_001)  relevant sections of the Event and Feedback Report Form (RLS_CMS_FM_002).

5.6 RECORDS

Training and relevant communication records will be maintained on site and in the Induction and Training Register as well at the RLS head office.

ENVIRONMENTAL AND HERITAGE MANAGEMENT PLAN - RLS_EMS_MPL_001_Rev_0

6.0 RISK MANAGEMENT AND INCIDENT REPORTING

6.1 REPORTING HAZARDS

Where a hazard in the workplace, including any environmental hazard is identified, efforts to rectify and/ or remove the hazard (where they have the appropriate qualifications and competencies to do so) without putting themselves or others at risk, should be made, and then the hazard shall be reported using a Hazard and Risk Report Form (RLS_CM_FRM_001).

6.2 JOB HAZARD AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS

A Job Hazard and Environmental Analysis (JHEA) analyses a task by describing the work to be undertaken, stating the hazards and risks to health, safety and environment of that work, assessing the level of risk of each step of the task and sufficiently describing measures to control the hazards and risks using the hierarchy of control.

A JHEA must be completed for all non‐routine activities and copies of JHEAs for routine tasks are kept on file and are available to all employees at all times.

Employees shall acknowledge that they have read and understood relevant JHEAs prior to starting work by signing the completed JHEA Form.

6.3 RISK ASSESSMENTS

The level of risk of a task is assessed based on the severity of the consequences and the likelihood of the event or loss to occur. A detailed risk assessment for environmental risks has been carried out for the project and a copy is available within the Environment Plan (EP). The likelihood and consequence parameters are subjective estimates rated by the management representatives from the RLS and/or contractor teams, using a 5 x 5 Consequence and Likelihood risk matrix as per the AS/NZS 4360 Risk Management Standard, as shown below.

Consequence (C) Insignificant Minor Moderate Major Catastrophic (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) Likelihood (L)

Almost Certain (5) 5 10 15 20 25

Likely (4) 4 8 12 16 20

Possible (3) 3 6 9 12 15

Unlikely (2) 2 4 6 8 10

Rare (1) 1 2 3 4 5

ENVIRONMENTAL AND HERITAGE MANAGEMENT PLAN - RLS_EMS_MPL_001_Rev_0

The team has determined risk control actions (management measures) to manage the risks to a level that is acceptable or tolerable ‐ that is, as low as reasonably practicable (ALARP). The resulting management measures are summarised in Section 9 of this management plan and in more detail on the EP.

6.4 INTERNAL INCIDENT AND EVENT REPORTING

All incidents that occur on site will be reported to the contractor’s Site Supervisor and the RLS Supervisor (if present) or RLS management immediately, as long as it is safe to do so. This includes all incidents that have or could have caused harm/damage to the environment (near‐misses). Reporting shall be in accordance with Event and Feedback Reporting and Investigation Procedure (RLS_CMS_PRO_007).

Incidents and accidents involving a contractor shall also be recorded in accordance with that contractor’s relevant procedure/s and using relevant forms and reporting mechanisms, in addition to RLS procedures and using the RLS Event and Feedback Report Form (RLS_CMS_FRM_002). This is so that RLS receives all reports in a consistent format.

Following an incident, after actions have been taken to prevent further adverse impact or other effects such as damage to the environment, the general and relevant area shall not be disturbed without permission from personnel undertaking an investigation, if investigation is required.

6.5 INCIDENT INVESTIGATION

The goal of incident investigations is to identify any underlying system inadequacies and human errors that caused the incident to occur or failed to prevent its occurrence and identify corrective actions. These actions, when implemented, will assist in preventing further occurrences of similar incidents.

All incidents involving RLS personnel shall be investigated as per the Event and Feedback Reporting and Investigation Procedure (RLS_CMS_PRO_007) by an investigation team determined by management. RLS employees will conduct or participate in investigations as necessary.

Incidents involving contractors may be investigated using the contractor’s procedures, which will have been reviewed and approved by RLS via the Contractor Evaluation Procedure (RLS_CMS_PRO_008).

The lessons learned from the investigation must be communicated to the wider organisation (and contractors if appropriate) so that all employees can benefit from the investigation findings and outcomes. Management is responsible for ensuring incident recommendations and close‐out actions as detailed in the incident investigation have been completed within the nominated time frames.

ENVIRONMENTAL AND HERITAGE MANAGEMENT PLAN - RLS_EMS_MPL_001_Rev_0

7.0 ENVIRONMENTAL EMERGENCY RESPONSE

RLS’s seismic contractor, Terrex, has in place an Emergency Response Plan (ERP) (TS‐PLN‐002) (Appendix B) which is specific to the seismic program and site. All personnel, including RLS and Terrex personnel are required to be familiar with this plan prior to mobilisation to site. This will ensure that site specific emergency situations are appropriately addressed.

The key potential environmental emergency identified in the Terrex ERP is hydrocarbon spills. Such spills shall be addressed in accordance with the Terrex response plan, provided below and /or the RLS Spill Response Procedure (RLS_CMS_PRO_011), as well as the Oil Spill Contingency Plan, included in the EP. A summarised instruction for spill response is provided in the ‘Quick Reference Handbook’ issued to site personnel.

ENVIRONMENTAL AND HERITAGE MANAGEMENT PLAN - RLS_EMS_MPL_001_Rev_0

7.1 EMERGENCY CONTACTS

For all Emergencies in the Canning Basin Call 000 (or 112 from mobile phones) Town Hospital Ambulance Police FESA SES

000 000 132 500 000 Broome 08 9194 222 131 444 08 9158 3200 08 9193 5999 08 9192 2533 08 9194 0200 0409 442 259 0417 937 073

000 000 132 500 08 9193 3333 As above Derby Ambulance at 131 444 089191 1501 089193 9990 089193 1194 hospital 08 9191 1444 0418 922 112

RFDS

Derby 08 9191 0200

Perth Operations 1800 625 800

Shire Councils

Broome 08 9191 3456

Derby 08 9191 8018

Cyclone Information

Cyclone Recorded Information 1300 659 210

ENVIRONMENTAL AND HERITAGE MANAGEMENT PLAN - RLS_EMS_MPL_001_Rev_0

8.0 CONTRACTOR MANAGEMENT

The RLS Contractor Evaluation Procedure (RLS_CMS_PRO_008) details RLS’s approach for working with contractors and for ensuring that they have suitable systems in place that meet or exceed the requirements of relevant legislation and of RLS. This procedure provides for the methodical management of associated risks to remove or reduce them to an acceptable level.

All contractors approved to work on RLS projects shall either:

 prepare and submit a project‐specific Environmental and Heritage Management Plan including risk assessments and measures for avoiding or minimising adverse impacts; or  work according to RLS Policies and Procedures and requirements outlined in this Environmental and Heritage Management Plan and the broader EMS; and  complete or review a JHEA for each particular task that they are undertaking.

Contractors will play a leading role in updating, maintaining and working to task‐specific risk assessments and JHEAs.

RLS management (or delegates) shall review the contractor’s documentation. Any required amendments will need to be incorporated by the contractor. Contractors will not be able to start work until RLS management has approved their Environmental and Heritage Management Plan (or equivalent documentation).

Contractors are bound by the provisions of this Environmental and Heritage Management Plan. RLS management may audit and inspect contractors’ environmental management measures and controls at any time.

Any accidents or incidents (near misses) shall be documented and reported to RLS management.

ENVIRONMENTAL AND HERITAGE MANAGEMENT PLAN - RLS_EMS_MPL_001_Rev_0

9.0 ASPECTS, IMPACTS AND MANAGEMENT CONTROLS

ENVIRONMENTAL AND HERITAGE MANAGEMENT PLAN - RLS_EMS_MPL_001_Rev_0 Page 22 of 39

Aspect Impact Management/Control Measure Responsibility Timing/Frequency Obtain information relating to known sites of Aboriginal heritage significance and ensure this is rationalised with access Management Activity planning/EP preparation required onsite. Arrange for and undertake suitable clearance surveys prior to site activities. Management Activity planning/EP preparation Accidental entry to known sites of indigenous cultural heritage Only impact on, enter or pass through sites of Aboriginal heritage significance with appropriate approvals. Management Activity planning/EP preparation significance Ensure the presence of (if applicable) and exclusion zones around sites of Aboriginal heritage significance are understood by Activity planning/EP preparation/ Site Supervisor all site personnel and communicated via inductions and other site awareness material. inductions Maintain exclusion zones around Aboriginal heritage sites during site operations. All personnel At all times Ensure the potential appearance of sites of indigenous cultural heritage significance is understood by all site personnel and Activity planning/EP preparation/ Site Supervisor communicated via inductions and other site awareness material, including the ‘Quick Reference Handbook’. inductions In the event of chance finds of Accidental impact on unknown Ensure unforeseen impacts are reported appropriately in accordance with internal and external requirements. Refer to the Indigenous Cultural Site Supervisor sites of indigenous cultural sites of indigenous cultural heritage Event and Feedback Reporting and Investigation Procedure (RLS_CMS_PRO_007). Heritage significance heritage significance In the event of chance finds of Ensure immediate departure from the area if suspected to be a site of indigenous cultural heritage significance, to avoid any All personnel sites of indigenous cultural impact of further impact potentially resulting. heritage significance Ensure the potential appearance of chance find of artefacts of indigenous cultural heritage significance is understood by all Activity planning/EP preparation/ site personnel and communicated via inductions and other site awareness material, including the ‘Quick Reference Site Supervisor inductions Handbook’. Accidental impact on chance finds In the event of chance finds of Ensure chance finds of artefacts of indigenous cultural heritage significance are reported appropriately in accordance with of artefacts of indigenous cultural Site Supervisor artefacts of indigenous cultural internal and external requirements. Refer to the Event and Feedback Reporting and Investigation Procedure. heritage significance heritage significance In the event of chance finds of Ensure immediate departure from the area and no interference with objects therein if chance finds of suspected artefacts of All personnel artefacts of indigenous cultural indigenous cultural heritage significance are made. heritage significance Only utilise the approved raised blade method of clearing for seismic lines (refer to the Vegetation Line Clearing Procedure Site Supervisor or When clearing seismic lines (RLS_EMS_PRO_002), to ensure minimal or no damage to root material and minimal disruption to topsoil. delegated operators Minimise clearing to within the approved clearing limits and ensure seismic lines are no wider than 4.5m. Avoid clearing Site Supervisor or When clearing seismic lines Loss of native flora and vegetation mature trees or stands of trees where practicable. delegated operators Vehicles to only be driven along existing tracks and approved seismic lines. Off‐road traversing is strictly prohibited. All personnel At all times Avoid or minimise clearing within riparian zones, including adjacent to streams, wetlands and other drainage lines. Clearing Site Supervisor or When clearing seismic lines on slopes leading to drainage lines should also be avoided. delegated operators Flora and All personnel to familiarise themselves with Priority flora relevant to the exploration area, as described in the ‘Quick Activity planning/EP preparation/ vegetation All personnel Reference Handbook’. Ensure vehicles carry a copy of the ‘Quick Reference Handbook’. inductions

Accidental clearing or damage to Ensure that field personnel are familiar with the appearance of Priority flora that may be encountered (Gomphrena Activity planning/EP preparation/ All personnel priority flora cucullata, Goodenia sepalosa var. glandulosa, Isolepis humillima and Triodia caelestialis) prior to commencing clearing. inductions In the event of potential Priority Avoid (where possible) interaction with any plants which may potentially be Priority flora. All personnel flora occurring Line clearing shall use the approved raised blade methodology and minimise slashing of vegetation where possible. Unexpected failure to rehabilitate Site Supervisor or When clearing and rehabilitating Vegetation should be pushed down and aside during line clearing so that it is able to be pushed back into the area of cleared seismic lines delegated operators seismic lines clearing as soon as seismic surveying is complete. Solid surfaces should also be left rough to minimise erosion.

ENVIRONMENTAL AND HERITAGE MANAGEMENT PLAN - RLS_EMS_MPL_001_Rev_0 Page 23 of 39

Aspect Impact Management/Control Measure Responsibility Timing/Frequency

Adhere to site rules and procedures relating to driving, including remaining on existing tracks and cleared seismic lines, All personnel At all times adhering to speed limits and driving to conditions (e.g. slowing in poor visibility due to dust).

Avoid driving during times of high fauna activity (e.g. at dawn and dusk) and at night. All personnel At all times

Ensure any injured native fauna are removed and transported to the nearest wildlife shelter by a licensed fauna handler, In the event that native fauna is Injury or death to native fauna or where practicable. Local wildlife carers may need to attend the site in the case of large species. Pouches of injured Fauna handler injured livestock mammals should be checked for young. Contact details for wildlife carers and handlers are available in the ‘Quick Reference Handbook’. Injuries to fauna shall be reported to supervisors immediately.

Slow down when approaching livestock and leave enough room for livestock to move away from vehicles before proceeding. When driving in proximity of Do not get out of vehicles and approach livestock. Take extra caution around areas where livestock may be present such as All personnel livestock or locations where they dams, streams and water tanks. may occur

Avoid walking through vegetation, and disturbing any logs, rocks or rubbish (i.e. snakes may be present under these). If All personnel At all times handling vegetation, gloves are to be used and long trousers and boots must be worn at all times.

If a snake is encountered, stand still until snake moves away or slowly move away from snake. Do not attempt to catch or Injury to personnel from In the event that a snake is harm the snake. Ensure all vehicles have first aid kits with snake bite bandages and all personnel are trained in snake bite All personnel Fauna and habitats interaction with native fauna encountered treatment.

If snakes are found within equipment, a snake handler is required to remove the snake. Only personnel who are licensed In the event that a snake is Fauna handler fauna handlers are allowed to handle and relocate snakes. encountered

Ensure all vehicles carry a ‘Quick Reference Handbook’ and that all personnel familiarise themselves with the appearance of Activity planning/EP preparation/ conservation significant fauna which may occur (i.e. Greater Bilby, Northern Quoll, Australian Painted Snipe and Gouldian All personnel inductions Finch). Disturbance of conservation Ensure that field personnel understand the appearance of conservation significant fauna which may occur. Any species In the event potential significant fauna species encountered which may possibly be such species are to be avoided and not disturbed. Personnel shall report conservation All personnel conservation significant fauna are significant fauna sightings to their supervisor. encountered

Domestic pets are not permitted on site. All personnel are to avoid approaching, feeding or interfering with native fauna. All personnel At all times

Avoid or minimise clearing of potential Greater Bilby habitat where possible. All personnel Prior to clearing

Loss or disturbance of significant Within areas mapped as suitable Greater Bilby habitat, prior to clearing, a zoologist, ecologist or suitably qualified fauna habitat environmental specialist is to walk the proposed lines to clear them from the presence of Greater Bilby burrows and signs of Zoologist or ecologist Prior to clearing Greater Bilby activity. If burrows or evidence of Greater Bilbies are encountered these areas will be avoided.

Prior to entry to the site, all vehicles and equipment are to be inspected and if required, brushed down to ensure plant, weed and soil matter is not present, in accordance with the Hygiene and Weed Inspection Procedure (RLS_EMS_PRO_001). Incorrect vehicle hygiene practices All personnel Upon entry to site The procedure shall be repeated if the vehicle has left site and has traveled off sealed roads outside the project area. Ensure vehicle hygiene activities are conducted away from surface water features (i.e. streams and dams). Weeds All personnel are to familarise themselves with the Environmental Weeds listed in the ‘Quick Reference Handbook’ so that Introduction and spread of weeds sightings of large infestations can be reported to supervisors. Any areas with large patches of weeds, especially All personnel At all times by vehicles and equipment Environmental Weeds are to be avoided to minimise the spread of weeds throughout the site. No plants, soil or topsoil are to be brought onto site. All personnel At all times

ENVIRONMENTAL AND HERITAGE MANAGEMENT PLAN - RLS_EMS_MPL_001_Rev_0 Page 24 of 39

Aspect Impact Management/Control Measure Responsibility Timing/Frequency

Ensure no significant disruption to natural drainage flows, including whilst traversing seismic lines (i.e. avoid running seismic All personnel At all times Disturbance to surface water and lines through drainage lines where practicable). Surface water and groundwater Ensure any clearing of slopes or in areas leading to drainage lines is avoided where practicable. All personnel At all times groundwater Contamination of surface water Ensure any spills of chemicals or hydrocarbons adjacent to surface water bodies, or upslope are contained and cleaned up In the event of a chemical or oil All personnel and groundwater immediately. spill

Reduce speed on seismic lines and drive slowly through cleared areas or areas with minimal vegetation to minimise the During line clearing and whilst Excessive amount of dust impacting All personnel Dust management visual amenity and health of amount of dust created. traversing along seismic lines vegetation Avoid driving the seismic lines in very windy conditions. All personnel During times of high winds

All waste and rubbish generates on site must be taken off‐site and disposed of at a suitable location (i.e. the waste facility in Waste All personnel At all times Disposal of waste Broome). management Ensure rubbish is secured in containers or bags to reduce the risk of it blowing out of vehicles or off equipment. All personnel At all times

No open fires (i.e. campfires or BBQs) are permitted on site. Responsible disposal of cigarette butts is to be strictly adhered to, including complete extinguishment and inclusion in waste to be removed off site and disposed of in Broome at the waste All personnel At all times Accidental ignition of bushfire facility. Ensure all vehicles have fire extinguishers. If a small fire is encountered and it is safe to fight the fire with fire extinguisher All personnel In the event of a fire Bushfire control using the P.A.S.S. method (see “Quick Reference Handbook’). Do not commence survey if smoke is seen in the area and evacuate the area immediately if smoke is seen or smelt. Ensure In the event of visible smoke or All personnel Potential or actual bushfire in the there is a clear path back along seismic lines in case of evacuation. the smell of smoke survey area impacting on the Check weather reports before commencing survey. If thunder or lightning is present or forecast do not commence survey In the event of inclement environment All personnel and evacuate immediately. weather

Ensure hydrocarbons and chemicals are stored appropriately and containers appropriate for road conditions spills are used. All personnel At all times All chemicals must be labelled clearly and accompanied by a SDS. Accidental hydrocarbon or chemical spill Ensure all vehicles are to be fitted with spill kits and shovels. Spills must be cleaned up as quickly as possible, especially Hydrocarbons and during rainfall. All hydrocarbon/chemical spill waste to be placed in plastic contaminated waste bags, sealed and disposed of All personnel At all times chemicals off‐site. Oil spill response shall be in accordance with the Oil Spill Contingency Plan (OSCP), a copy of which is available in the ‘Quick Reference Handbook’.

Contamination from cleaning of All vehicles to be washed down off‐site (e.g. in Broome) to avoid oil and hydrocarbon run‐off. All cleaning or degreasing of All personnel At all times vehicles and equipment vehicles and equipment to occur off‐site. Contamination from improperly All waste chemicals and hydrocarbons (including containers and cleaned up spills) to be appropriately disposed of at a disposed of chemicals or All personnel At all times licensed waste facility in Broome. hydrocarbons

ENVIRONMENTAL AND HERITAGE MANAGEMENT PLAN - RLS_EMS_MPL_001_Rev_0 Page 25 of 39

10.0 MONITORING, INSPECTIONS, AUDITING AND REPORTING

Environmental auditing and reporting will be undertaken on site by the RLS Supervisor or relevant delegate in the contractor (Terrex) team. Auditing and reporting will be in accordance with the Petroleum and Geothermal Energy Resources (Environment) Regulations 2012, as well as requirements under the Petroleum and Geothermal Energy Act 1967. In accordance with the Auditing and Reporting Requirements for Petroleum Activities in Western Australia (DMP 2012), auditing and reporting is required to be undertaken regularly to assess environmental performance and compliance, and to review the effectiveness of the EP. Monitoring, inspections, auditing and internal reporting will also be carried out in accordance with the RLS EMS, within the wider IMS. External reporting to DMP that is required annually for many aspects and activities will be reported by RLS in the Close Out report, given that the proposed site program is only expected to have a duration of approximately eight days. A summary of the site monitoring, inspections, auditing and reporting is provided below.

Aspect/ Monitoring, Inspections, Auditing and Internal Audit Frequency External Reporting Action Reporting/Documentation

Completion of environmental components of site induction Audited at completion of field personnel Annually to DMP (in (RLS_CMS_IND_001) prior to mobilisation to site initial mobilisation and monthly thereafter Close Out Report)

Event and Feedback Register (RLS_CMS_REG_002) to be maintained Audited weekly and at the completion of site Annually to DMP (in including recording of all incidents and near misses activity Close Out Report)

Environmental Management System (RLS_EMS_SYS_001) to be Annual audits of completion of Management Annually to DMP (in audited for currency and to allow for continuous improvement Review including EMS review Close Out Report) All Daily site audits and inspections conducted by site supervisors or Audited weekly and at the completion of site Annually to DMP (in delegates, recorded in the Worksite Inspection Form activity Close Out Report) (RLS_CMS_FRM_007)

Records made for each event of stakeholder consultation and Audited annually Annually to DMP (in recorded in the Stakeholder Engagement Register Close Out Report) (RLS_CMS_REG_007)

ENVIRONMENTAL AND HERITAGE MANAGEMENT PLAN - RLS_EMS_MPL_001_Rev_0

Aspect/ Monitoring, Inspections, Auditing and Internal Audit Frequency External Reporting Action Reporting/Documentation

The amount of clearing along lines to be recorded in the Vegetation Site Supervisor to audit vegetation clearing Annually to DMP (in Clearing Register (RLS_EMS_REG_002) and completed register and totals and methodology daily. Close Out Report) clearing carried out audited to ensure over‐clearing of vegetation is not occurring and to ensure that clearing is being conducted in accordance with the Vegetation Line Clearing Procedure (RLS_EMS_PRO_002).

Observations of any conservation significant flora or fauna reported Site Supervisor or delegate to review Observed to supervisor immediately, and reported in accordance with the incident (event) reports upon receipt, or at conservation Event and Feedback Reporting and Investigation Procedure least daily. significant flora or (RLS_CMS_PRO_007). fauna on seismic lines reported Flora, immediately to DMP vegetation and and DPaW. fauna Other opportunistic sightings reported to DMP in Close Out report and as soon as practicable to DPaW.

Any injuries to fauna or relevant near misses to be recorded as they In the event of fauna injury or fatalities, Site Annually to DMP (in occur in accordance with the Event and Feedback Reporting and Supervisor or delegate to review incident Close Out Report) Investigation Procedure (RLS_CMS_PRO_007). (event) reports upon receipt, or at least daily to determine if changes to speed limits and if time range of seismic survey requires reviewing.

ENVIRONMENTAL AND HERITAGE MANAGEMENT PLAN - RLS_EMS_MPL_001_Rev_0

Aspect/ Monitoring, Inspections, Auditing and Internal Audit Frequency External Reporting Action Reporting/Documentation

Zoologist or suitably qualified environmental specialist to survey Audit of clearance surveys in Greater Bilby Identified Greater proposed seismic lines within Greater Bilby habitat prior to clearing, habitat to be conducted daily whilst clearing Bilby burrows or to check for burrows or evidence of Greater Bilby activity. in relevant habitat areas. activity on seismic Completion of clearance surveys to be recorded in the Vegetation lines reported Clearing Register (RLS_EMS_REG_002). immediately to DMP and DPaW. Flora, Any record of burrows or evidence of activity to be recorded in vegetation and accordance with the Event and Feedback Reporting and Investigation fauna (cont.) Procedure (RLS_CMS_PRO_007) and adjustments to seismic line alignment to be made to avoid sensitive locations with a minimum 50 m buffer.

Vegetation Clearing Register (RLS_EMS_REG_002) to be verified Within two weeks of completion of clearing Annually to DMP (in against approved clearing plans. activities. Close Out Report)

Record any significant weed infestations, and occurrences of Site Supervisor or delegate to review Annually to DMP (in Environmental Weeds using the Event and Feedback Reporting and incident (event) reports upon receipt, or at Close Out Report) Investigation Procedure (RLS_CMS_PRO_007). least daily. Weeds Weed inspections of vehicles and equipment to be conducted upon Vehicle inspections upon entry to Annually to DMP (in entry to site and upon re‐entry if they have left sealed surfaces whilst be supervised by Site Supervisor Close Out Report) off‐site, in accordance with the Hygiene and Weed Inspection and opportunistically thereafter, Procedure (RLS_EMS_PRO_001). as required.

In the event that any Aboriginal artefacts or sites are identified at any Site Supervisor or delegate to review Immediately to DMP time, in any location, cease work and report to the Site Supervisor incident (event) reports upon receipt, or at and Department of Heritage immediately, and in accordance with the Event and Feedback least daily. Identified Aboriginal artefacts or Aboriginal Affairs Reporting and Investigation Procedure (RLS_CMS_PRO_007). sites to be addressed immediately. (DAA)

ENVIRONMENTAL AND HERITAGE MANAGEMENT PLAN - RLS_EMS_MPL_001_Rev_0

Aspect/ Monitoring, Inspections, Auditing and Internal Audit Frequency External Reporting Action Reporting/Documentation

Visually monitor dust generated on site, notify Site Supervisor if Site Supervisor or delegate to review Annually to DMP (in excessive dust is observed and report dusty events in accordance with incident (event) reports upon receipt, or at Close Out Report) the Event and Feedback Reporting and Investigation Procedure least daily to determine if changes to Dust (RLS_CMS_PRO_007). clearing methodology or speed limits requires reviewing, or if dust suppression (water) is required.

Report any fires caused by vehicles or equipment in accordance with Site Supervisor or delegate to review Annually to DMP (in the Event and Feedback Reporting and Investigation Procedure incident (event) reports upon receipt, or at Close Out Report) (RLS_CMS_PRO_007). least daily. Bushfire emergencies to be reported immediately to Emergency Services (local fire brigade, Fire via 000).

Verification of site personnel fire‐fighting training records in Audited at contractor engagement, prior to Annually to DMP (in accordance with the Induction and Training Procedure mobilisation to site. Close Out Report) (RLS_CMS_PRO_009) and the Contractor Assurance Procedure (RLS_CMS_PRO_008).

Inspections of fire‐fighting equipment currency, location and Audited by Site Supervisor or delegate at Annually to DMP (in condition in accordance with the Worksite Inspection Form least weekly. Close Out Report) (RLS_CMS_FRM_007).

Record areas of surface water (i.e. drainage lines or streams) Site Supervisor to audit vegetation clearing Annually to DMP (in Water features traversed by the seismic lines or cleared using the Vegetation daily. Close Out Report) and landforms Clearing Register (RLS_EMS_REG_002).

ENVIRONMENTAL AND HERITAGE MANAGEMENT PLAN - RLS_EMS_MPL_001_Rev_0

Aspect/ Monitoring, Inspections, Auditing and Internal Audit Frequency External Reporting Action Reporting/Documentation

Report all spills as soon as possible, in accordance with the Event and All spill incidents and clean‐up to be audited Report to authorities Feedback Reporting and Investigation Procedure by the Site Supervisor in accordance with in accordance with (RLS_CMS_PRO_007). Spills to be cleaned up as soon as possible in the Spill Response Procedure requirements of the accordance with the Spill Response Procedure (RLS_CMS_PRO_011). (RLS_CMS_PRO_011). Oil Spill Contingency Plan within the Environment Plan.

Spill kits inspected weekly to ensure appropriate content and storage Audited by Site Supervisor or delegate at Annually to DMP (in locations in accordance with the Worksite Inspection Form least weekly. Close Out Report) Hydrocarbons/ (RLS_CMS_FRM_007). chemicals Report known or suspected contaminated sites using the Event and Site Supervisor or delegate to review Annually to DMP (in Feedback Reporting and Investigation Procedure incident (event) reports upon receipt, or at Close Out Report) (RLS_CMS_PRO_007). least daily. Report contaminated sites to Department of Environment Regulation (DER) as soon as practicable

Rehabilitated seismic lines to be visually inspected to ensure Incrementally inspected by the Site Annually to DMP (in Rehabilitation vegetation has been appropriately replaced and that topsoil is left in Supervisor or delegate, as cleared lines are Close Out Report) a rough fashion, moon‐scaped if required. rehabilitated.

ENVIRONMENTAL AND HERITAGE MANAGEMENT PLAN - RLS_EMS_MPL_001_Rev_0

10.1 SUMMARY OF ROUTINE AND INCIDENT REPORTING

The routine and incident reporting required to be provided to DMP, that does not arise from site monitoring, auditing or inspections or resulting reports is summarised below.

Routine Reporting

Action Timing

Greenhouse gas emissions Every three months (or at Greenhouse gas emissions and energy data will be calculated using the methods, criteria and formulas as defined in the National Greenhouse and Energy Reporting (Measurement) Determination 2008. Greenhouse emissions from the completion of planned seismic activities will include emissions from the combustion of fuel for motor vehicles and equipment. the activity, and Greenhouse emissions from fuel usage will be calculated based on quantity of fuel burnt over the activity period (up to within three‐ three months as applicable) for vehicles and equipment. Gases will be calculated based on volume of gas utilised over months of the activity period (up to three months as applicable). conclusion of the activity) Emissions and A DMP quarterly Emissions and Discharge report will be submitted. Discharges Discharges Every three months (or at Reportable discharges from the seismic survey will include: completion of  Solid waste the activity, and  Liquid waste within three‐  Used chemical waste months of Volumes of all discharges will be recorded and reported to the DMP via the DMP Emissions and Discharge Report. conclusion of the activity)

ENVIRONMENTAL AND HERITAGE MANAGEMENT PLAN - RLS_EMS_MPL_001_Rev_0

Routine Reporting

Action Timing

Close Out Report RLS will submit a Close Out Report detailing the following: No later than  Name and location of the survey three months  Dates of commencement and termination of the survey after  Names of the contractors used to carry out the survey completion of  Particulars of the operations carried out the seismic  Particulars of the system and equipment used for positioning and mapping of the survey survey  Particulars of the methods and equipment used for the survey  Particulars of the processing of the data obtained as a result of the survey  Particulars of the interpretations made as a result of the survey together with maps and sections drawn on the basis of the interpretations made  Particulars of rehabilitation activities and initial results six‐months post‐survey  Summary of the costs of the survey  Lists of magnetic tapes with index of content and format  Summaries of all reporting outputs from internal inspections, monitoring and audits, as well as incidents and near misses reported.

ENVIRONMENTAL AND HERITAGE MANAGEMENT PLAN - RLS_EMS_MPL_001_Rev_0

Incident Reporting

Action Timing

A reportable incident has a consequence rating of medium or high. Notification of reportable incidents will be in Notification of the accordance with Regulation 28 and 29 of the reportable incident Environmental impacts with a Raw Risk consequence rating of medium to Petroleum and Geothermal Energy Resources verbally as soon as high require reporting as a reportable incident. Those identified during the (Environment) Regulations 2012, i.e.: practicable, but risk assessment for the project (refer to project Environment Plan) were: within two hours of  Initial notification provided to the Director of  Contamination of soil or surface water; injury or death of fauna from occurrence. Petroleum, DMP (or equivalent) in writing, via ingestion of hydrocarbons and impacts to vegetation and flora from the DMP submissions portal, or via email to Reportable incident spills from spill/loss of containment of hydrocarbons during [email protected] report form transport.  The initial notification will specify all facts and submitted to DMP  Any clearing of native vegetation affecting an area greater than or circumstances concerning the reportable within three days of contrary to that described in the EP (i.e. clearing limits, line widths) incident that is known or could reasonably be the incident first  Clearing otherwise in accordance with the approved clearing known by RLS along with actions taken to occurring. methodology (i.e. raised blade clearing) that results in the avoid or mitigate any adverse environmental permanent loss of vegetation (i.e. total removal of vegetation impacts. rootstock) These incidents will be reported using the DMP form  Loss of conservation significant fauna (e.g. from vehicle collisions) and RLS Event and Feedback Reporting and Investigation Procedure (RLS_CMS_PRO_007).  Loss or damage to heritage areas during seismic line clearing  Damage to buried services (e.g. gas, power, water and telecoms) during seismic line clearing  Impact to vegetation or fauna habitat; deterioration of water quality or removal of vegetation or topsoil as part of clean‐up as a result of poor waste management This list of incidents is not exhaustive and any other incident with a moderate or higher consequence will also be reported.

ENVIRONMENTAL AND HERITAGE MANAGEMENT PLAN - RLS_EMS_MPL_001_Rev_0

ENVIRONMENTAL AND HERITAGE MANAGEMENT PLAN - RLS_EMS_MPL_001_Rev_0

Incident Reporting

Action Timing

A number of additional incidents require reporting as soon as possible, Notification of reportable incidents will be in Notification of the regardless of whether or not they have been classified within the ‘moderate accordance with Regulation 28 and 29 of the reportable incident or more serious than moderate’ impact category, in accordance with the Petroleum and Geothermal Energy Resources verbally as soon as Guidelines for Preparation and Submission of an Environment Plan. These (Environment) Regulations 2012, i.e.: practicable, but include: within two hours of  Initial notification provided to the Director of occurrence.  spills of hydrocarbons or hazardous materials in excess of 80 L Petroleum, DMP (or equivalent) either  spills of hydrocarbons or hazardous materials in excess of 500 L in verbally or in writing Reportable incident other areas  The initial notification will specify all facts and report form  spills of hydrocarbons or hazardous materials that affect a ground circumstances concerning the reportable submitted to DMP 2 surface area greater than 100 m incident that is known or could reasonably be within three days of 3 known by RLS along with actions taken to  An unplanned gaseous release to atmosphere 500 m or more the incident first  injury or death of State or Commonwealth listed fauna species avoid or mitigate any adverse environmental occurring.  unplanned impact caused to a matter of National Environmental impacts. Significance (NES) during an activity. These incidents will be reported using the DMP form and RLS Event and Feedback Reporting and Investigation Procedure (RLS_CMS_PRO_007).

ENVIRONMENTAL AND HERITAGE MANAGEMENT PLAN - RLS_EMS_MPL_001_Rev_0

Recordable Incidents

Action Timing

Recordable incidents can include adverse environmental impacts and Environmental incidents will be reported to the Site Reported monthly, breaches of approval conditions. Accordingly, an environmental incident is Supervisor in the first instance. The Site Supervisor and no later than 15 any planned or unplanned event during the activity, and associated activities will then: days after the end of that results in, or has the potential to result in, pollution or environmental  undertake an immediate inspection and the reporting month. harm. assessment of the incident to determine the Examples include: most appropriate response  implement corrective actions  hydrocarbon spills  report to RLS management as per internal  fire reporting requirements  unauthorised clearing of native vegetation;  investigate the causes of the incident, and if  death of native fauna, particularly threatened or priority species appropriate, develop and implement  inappropriate waste disposal preventative actions that will ensure the  complaints from the public. incident does not recur. Incidents will be reported via DMP’s Reportable Environmental Incident Report Form. Monitoring of environmental conditions following an incident may be instigated following agreement with the relevant regulators, including scope, extent, frequency and duration.

ENVIRONMENTAL AND HERITAGE MANAGEMENT PLAN - RLS_EMS_MPL_001_Rev_0

APPENDIX A – TERREX HEALTH, SAFETY, SECURITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL (HSSE) PLAN (TS‐PLN‐001)

ENVIRONMENTAL AND HERITAGE MANAGEMENT PLAN - RLS_EMS_MPL_001_Rev_0

APPENDIX B – EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLAN (ERP) (TS‐ PLN‐002)

ENVIRONMENTAL AND HERITAGE MANAGEMENT PLAN - RLS_EMS_MPL_001_Rev_0

REY LENNARD SHELF PTY LTD STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT PLAN CANNING BASIN OPERATIONS

RLS_CMS_MPL_001_REV_0

Rey Lennard Shelf Pty Ltd (RLS)

Stakeholder Consultation Management Plan

Canning Basin Operations

REVISION DETAILS

Revision Prepared/ Revised Reviewed/ Issued Date Change Notes Number by Approved by

A K. Bauer‐Simpson C. Moro 30/08/2016 Initial draft

C. Moro 0 K. Bauer‐Simpson 22/09/2016 Final for implementation S. Fu K. Wilson

STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT PLAN - RLS_CMS_MPL_001_Rev_0 Page 1 of 21

Contents 1.0 Introduction, Purpose and Objectives ...... 3

1.1 Context of this Management Plan ...... 3

1.2 Scope of this Management Plan ...... 4

2.0 Organisation Resources and Responsibilities ...... 5

2.1 Responsibilities ...... 5

2.1.1 RLS Site Supervisor Responsibilities ...... 6

2.1.2 Employee/Contractor Responsibilities...... 6

3.0 Current Activity ...... 7

3.1 Activity Responsibilities ...... 7

4.0 Stakeholder Levels of Influence and Engagement ...... 8

5.0 Consultation Protocols ...... 9

6.0 Relevant Stakeholders ...... 10

7.0 Engagement Approaches and Schedule ...... 12

8.0 Reporting and Documentation ...... 16

8.1 Stakeholder Consultation Register ...... 16

8.2 External Reporting Requirements ...... 16

8.2.1 Workplace Health and Safety Incidents ...... 16

8.2.2 Monthly Health and Safety Status Report to DMP ...... 17

8.2.3 Environmental Reporting ...... 17

8.3 Internal Reporting ...... 19

8.3.1 Incident Reporting ...... 19

8.4 Emergency Contacts ...... 19

9.0 Evaluation of Engagement Process ...... 20

STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT PLAN - RLS_CMS_MPL_001_Rev_0 Page 2 of 21

1.0 INTRODUCTION, PURPOSE AND OBJECTIVES

Rey Lennard Shelf Pty Ltd. (RLS) is committed to engaging with all appropriate stakeholders for all planned and implemented operations and project activities, in order to obtain necessary approvals, maintain compliance with approvals, to seek endorsement from relevant stakeholders regarding planned activities, and to provide opportunity for stakeholders to provide input into and feedback on planned and implemented actions.

RLS understands the importance of stakeholder consultation and recognises that approvals of key stakeholders, as well as the buy‐in of other stakeholders are crucial to the success of programmed activities and projects.

The benefits of effective stakeholder engagement are:

 Relationship‐building with stakeholders from early on in project life cycles, to promote effective and efficient engagement throughout  Stakeholder support for activities leading to approvals  Expeditious approvals, avoiding project delays  Cost efficiencies achieved via the removed need to act on negative feedback retrospectively, or due to delays in project programs  Obtaining optimal results via stakeholder feedback and suggestions  Positive contributions to the community  Building and maintenance of a positive company reputation  Positive follow‐on effects for future stakeholder engagement on future projects and activities.

The purpose of this management plan is to outline the required and intended consultation that RLS plans to undertake specifically for onshore seismic exploration activities in the Canning Basin in Western Australia. This plan addresses identification of relevant stakeholders, contact details, mechanisms and schedule for engagement and evaluation of the engagement process.

The objectives of this plan are to undertake stakeholder engagement in a timely, organised and respectful fashion, and to provide consistent information to stakeholders regarding planned activities, in such a way that activities can proceed unimpeded, and with the support of all relevant stakeholders. RLS is also committed to ensuring that relevant stakeholders are positively engaged and have the opportunity to provide input and feedback, so that they have ownership for relevant aspects of RLS activities.

1.1 CONTEXT OF THIS MANAGEMENT PLAN

RLS has developed an Integrated Management System (IMS) comprising a health and safety management system, environmental management systems and fundamental elements of a corporate management system.

STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT PLAN - RLS_CMS_MPL_001_Rev_0 Page 3 of 21

This system includes:

 policies  procedures  registers  forms  indexes and lists of relevant references, legislation and other relevant documents and information.

The system is audited, monitored and reviewed regularly to ensure that it is continuously being improved and is continuing to provide conformance with relevant legislative authorities and internal policies and procedures.

This plan is designed to be implemented in the context of this broader system, where specific activities relating to seismic exploration in the Canning Basin are carried out.

This plan is supported by all elements of the RLS IMS, particularly including:

 Company Policies  Environmental and Heritage Management Plan (RLS_EMS_MPL_001)  Health and Safety Management Plan (RLS_SMS_MPL_001)  Communication and Consultation Procedure (RLS_CMS_PRO_003)  Monitoring and Measurement of Performance Procedure (RLS_CMS_PRO_002)  Event and Feedback Reporting and Investigation Procedure (RLS_CMS_PRO_007)  Contractor Assurance Procedure (RLS_CMS_PRO_008)  Event and Feedback Report Form (RLS_CMS_FRM_002)  Event and Feedback Register (RLS_CMS_REG_002)  Stakeholder Engagement Register (RLS_CMS_REG_007).

1.2 SCOPE OF THIS MANAGEMENT PLAN

The scope of this stakeholder engagement plan addresses:

 consultation required and relevant stakeholders for seismic exploration of Exploration Permit (EP) 487 in the Canning Basin, including contact details  types of and mechanisms for consultation with the various stakeholders  schedule for engagement and consultation  procedures and methods for ensuring relevant information relating to site activities is reported internally (enabling relevant information to be passed onto relevant stakeholders) and externally as required  evaluation of the engagement process.

STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT PLAN - RLS_CMS_MPL_001_Rev_0 Page 4 of 21

2.0 ORGANISATION RESOURCES AND RESPONSIBILITIES

RLS is a subsidiary company within the economic entity of Rey Resources Limited (Rey). Rey is an ASX‐listed company (ASX: REY) focused on exploring and developing energy resources in Western Australia’s Canning and Perth Basins.

The organisational structure of RLS is shown below.

2.1 RESPONSIBILITIES

Appropriate consultation with stakeholders is a priority for RLS senior management, and one of their core responsibilities.

Senior management, with the support of all management will implement and maintain this Stakeholder Engagement Plan, that forms part of the RLS IMS.

RLS management team responsibilities include:

 identification of relevant stakeholders, including regulatory authorities with whom consultation regarding seismic exploration activities is required  determination of necessary approvals, licences, permits and other legislative and related requirements that enable planned activities to proceed  allocation of resources to the acquisition of necessary approvals and other legislative requirements, and to appropriate consultation with all stakeholders  allowing for adequate time in project schedules for the acquisition of approvals and consultation with relevant stakeholders  ensuring that staff and contractors understand stakeholder engagement requirements and commitments  ensuring that RLS meets all regulatory requirements, is complaint with approvals and meets other commitments made to stakeholders.

STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT PLAN - RLS_CMS_MPL_001_Rev_0 Page 5 of 21

2.1.1 RLS Site Supervisor Responsibilities

Where present on site, the RLS Site Supervisor’s responsibilities include:

 continually promoting company culture by personal example  ensuring appropriate implementation of this plan and other elements of the IMS, including policies and procedures  ensure all people working in the exploration operation are aware of reporting and stakeholder engagement requirements  report all incidents which are notifiable to a government agency and any serious breaches of the applicable Act and/or Regulations are reported immediately to RLS Senior Management and the Department of Mines and Petroleum (DMP)  ensuring that all incidents are reported to the Site Supervisor and RLS Senior Management immediately once it is practical to do so

Where a RLS Site Supervisor is not present on site, delegation of the above responsibilities will be made to a suitable Site Supervisor with the lead contactor team (Terrex), and assurance of meeting these responsibilities will be achieved through implementation of the Contractor Assurance Procedure (RLS_CMS_PRO_008).

2.1.2 Employee/Contractor Responsibilities

Responsibilities of all personnel include:

 complying with company policies, procedures and rules  reporting incidents and accidents  participating in inspections, audits, meetings and promotions as directed  cooperating with management to ensure legislative requirements relating to consultation and stakeholder engagement are met.

STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT PLAN - RLS_CMS_MPL_001_Rev_0 Page 6 of 21

3.0 CURRENT ACTIVITY

This management plan is specifically applicable to seismic exploration activities on Exploration Permit (EP) 487, the Derby Block. The Derby Block covers an area of 5,466 km2 and is situated in the north‐west margin of the Fitzroy Trough, in the northern periphery of the Canning Basin. The Canning Basin covers an area of ~ 530,000 km2 in central north Western Australia and extends offshore for a total basin area of ~ 640,000 km2.

RLS plans to undertake a total of 70 km of 2D seismic acquisition in order to better define the Laurel sedimentary facies and select optimal well sites for testing the potential of the Laurel basin centred gas.

RLS has engaged Terrex Seismic, a subsidiary of Terrex Group (Terrex) who will provide all equipment and personnel for seismic exploration operations conducted by RLS in the Canning Basin. Terrex will in effect control such operations, with RLS personnel present on site as operator representatives, to oversee and support as required. Terrex’s environmental and safety management systems are accredited to ISO14001 and AS/NZS:4801 / OSHAS18001, respectively. 3.1 ACTIVITY RESPONSIBILITIES

Position Responsibilities

RLS Management Ensure that required stakeholder engagement has taken place and that necessary approvals have been obtained, prior to the commencement of site activities. Ensure that adequate resources have been allocated and measures are in place to ensure effective implementation of this plan. Ensure that contractor’s systems, licences, insurances and health and safety performance adequately fulfil legislative, stakeholder and RLS requirements and continue to remain valid and acceptable.

Supervisors Ensure adequate communication of the requirements of this plan to site personnel. Ensure appropriate implementation of this plan on site.

RLS Personnel/ Contractors Ensure adherence to this plan on site.

Contractor Management Ensure that the internal policies and procedures of contractors are in place and maintained in accordance with RLS and relevant requirements. Provide RLS with operational procedures for activities specific to all contracted work.

STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT PLAN - RLS_CMS_MPL_001_Rev_0 Page 7 of 21

4.0 STAKEHOLDER LEVELS OF INFLUENCE AND ENGAGEMENT

The International Association for Public Participation (Australasia) (IAP2) has developed the Spectrum of Participation, which assists in identifying, defining and committing to various levels of engagement for various stakeholders.

In order to utilise the spectrum, it is helpful to first identify each stakeholder’s level of influence; high, medium or low. Levels of engagement are commensurate with levels of influence. For example, for stakeholders with a high level of influence, the ‘Collaborate’ level of engagement is usually most suitable, or occasionally, ‘Empower’ (usually only when that stakeholder is the project owner/developer/operator), or at the very least, ‘Involve’. The level of engagement increases along the spectrum and the impact of decisions becomes greater.

The Spectrum of Participation (IAP2 2014) is summarised below and the levels of influence and engagement for each of the relevant stakeholder are provided in Section 6.

Level of Engagement

INFORM CONSULT INVOLVE COLLABORATE EMPOWER

To provide clear, To obtain To work directly To partner with To place final well‐balanced feedback on with stakeholders stakeholders in all decision making information to information to ensure concerns aspects of in the hands of Goal of assist stakeholders provided to assist and aspirations are decisions, including the public. Consultation in understanding with decisions. understood and the development of the problem, considered alternatives and the alternatives, identification of the opportunities preferred solution. and/or solutions. .

We will keep you We will inform We will work with We will work We will informed. you, then listen you to ensure that together with you implement and acknowledge your concerns and to formulate what you your feedback aspirations are solutions and decide. Commitment and keep you directly reflected in incorporate your to informed how the alternatives advice and Stakeholders your feedback developed and recommendations was addressed. provide feedback into the decisions on how your input to the maximum influenced the extent possible. decision.

STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT PLAN - RLS_CMS_MPL_001_Rev_0 Page 8 of 21

5.0 CONSULTATION PROTOCOLS

Consultation with all stakeholders shall be respectful and genuinely engaging in order to appropriately uphold the reputation of RLS.

Where possible, engagement with key stakeholders (those with a high level of influence) shall be in person, as opposed to over the telephone or via email. Due notice shall be given when requesting in‐person meetings, and as much flexibility as possible allowed to meet availability constraints of the stakeholder/s.

As a rule, all consultation with regulatory and other key stakeholders shall be carried out by RLS management, or delegates. Delegation of consultation may be made to suitably qualified and experienced representatives, such as consultants of RLS where appropriate. However, all consultation carried out by non‐ RLS management personnel must be approved by RLS management, with the content of communication endorsed.

Where possible, information disseminated to multiple stakeholders of the same type shall be identical in content, e.g. letters to landholders. If appropriate, ‘communications kits’ may be prepared to facilitate this consistency, which will enable multiple personnel to carry out the same type of consultation. This will also provide RLS management with detailed insight into the content of information provided.

All consultation shall aim to have confirmation of receipt (in the case of emails or letters), and accordingly, requests shall be kindly made that stakeholders respond to correspondence to confirm receipt and to provide endorsement or feedback. Where confirmation is not received, the need to follow‐up shall be considered.

STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT PLAN - RLS_CMS_MPL_001_Rev_0 Page 9 of 21

6.0 RELEVANT STAKEHOLDERS

The various relevant stakeholders, their contact details, their levels of influence and engagement, as well as the context of their interest (purpose of consultation) is summarised below. Consultation carried out to date is presented in the Stakeholder Consultation Register (RLS_CMS_REG_007).

Contact Name and Role Stakeholder Level of Influence Level of Engagement Contact Details Purpose of Consultation (if available) Regulatory Stakeholders

Department of Mines and Petroleum High Collaborative Officer TBA (08) 9222 3333 Approvals are required to be obtained for planned activities. (DMP) – Environment Branch (08) 9358 8198 Department of Mines and Petroleum High Collaborative Negar Amirabadi To provide endorsement of the safety management system in 0428 092 721 (DMP) – Dangerous Goods and (Safety and Risk Analyst) meeting requirements of the PaGER (OSH) Regulations and the Petroleum Safety, Resources Safety [email protected] PaGER (MoS) Regulations.

Department of Environment Medium Collaborative (as required) NA [email protected] Advice and endorsement may be required as advised by DMP. Regulation (DER) (08) 6467 5000 Require approval if clearing is required, outside of acceptable low impact petroleum activities (as per Schedule 1 (2) of the PGER(E) Regulations 2004 Petroleum and Geothermal Energy Resources (Environment) Regulations 2012) Metro: (08)9442 0300 Department of Parks and Wildlife Medium Collaborative (as required) NA Advice and endorsement may be required as advised by DMP. (DPaW) Derby: (08) 9193 1411 Broome: (08) 9195 5500

Department of Water Medium Collaborative (as required) Karis Tingey (DoW Kununurra) [email protected] In the event that access to water via DoW bores is required, (08) 9168 4100 approvals under a 5C License to Take Water would be required. Other Government Stakeholders

Shire of Derby / West Kimberley Medium Consult Martin Cuthbert (Executive Manager [email protected] Notification of intended activities, areas of activities, duration, safety Corporate Services) systems/emergency response procedures (courtesy) Stephen Gash (CEO) [email protected] (08) 9191 5355

Department of Fire and Emergency Low Inform Anne Adcock Broome: (08) 9158 3200 Notification of intended activities, areas of activities, duration, safety Services (DFES) Kununurra: (08) 9169 1373 systems/emergency response procedures (in the event of a fire or emergency)

Main Roads WA Low Inform Anthony Petrusma Derby: [email protected] Notification of intended activities, areas of activities, duration, safety systems/emergency response procedures (courtesy) (08) 9158 4333

Western Australia Police (WAPOL) Low Inform David Dench Derby: (08) 9191 1444 Notification of intended activities, areas of activities, duration, safety Broome: (08) 9194 0200 systems/emergency response procedures (for awareness in the event of calls from the public, or in case of emergency) Indigenous Stakeholders

Warrwa Traditional Owners High Collaborative Hopgood Ganim (lawyers) (08) 9211 8111 Ongoing consultation regarding access to land of the Traditional Owners (via Hopgood Ganim, legal representation)

STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT PLAN - RLS_CMS_MPL_001_Rev_0

Contact Name and Role Stakeholder Level of Influence Level of Engagement Contact Details Purpose of Consultation (if available) Stakeholder Organisations

Derby Veterinary Clinic Low Inform Helen Mooney (08) 9191 1471 Notification of intended areas of activities and duration in case of fauna injury and required support

Broome Wildlife Carers & Associates – Low Inform Jan Martin [email protected] Notification of intended areas of activities and duration in case of fauna Kimberley Wildlife Consultancy (08) 9193 7489 injury and required support Landholder and Community Stakeholders As required under the Petroleum and Geothermal Energy Resources Act Meda Station Medium Involve Jamie Laurisson (08) 8223 1516 1967, land access agreements with all affected landholders are required. Mowanjum Pastoral Lease Medium Involve Eddie Bear c/o Indigenous Land Corporation As required under the Petroleum and Geothermal Energy Resources Act 1967, land access agreements with all affected landholders are 1800 818 490 required. Service Providers

Water Corporation Low Inform N/A (08) 9420 2420 Consult if services could be affected (refer to Dial-Before-You-Dig results) regarding intended activities, areas of activities, duration (for awareness in the event of potential impact to water infrastructure)

Telstra Low Inform N/A 13 22 03 Consult if services could be affected (refer to Dial-Before-You-Dig results) regarding intended activities, areas of activities, duration (for awareness in the event of potential impact to fibre optic infrastructure)

Derby Waste Management Facility Low Inform Melanie Houghton [email protected] Consult to confirm availability to receive previously tested contaminated soils and other waste, in the event of a spill, etc. (08) 9191 0999

Toxfree Low Inform Scott Collins (Regional Manager, [email protected] Confirm availability to provide emergency response and spill clean-up, Industrial Services) as well as contaminated soil testing and disposal, should it be required. (08) 9185 5333

STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT PLAN - RLS_CMS_MPL_001_Rev_0

7.0 ENGAGEMENT APPROACHES AND SCHEDULE

The approach/contact methods to be employed for each of the identified stakeholders and the approximate timing of contact is summarised below.

Approximate Responsible for Stakeholder Consultation Method Purpose of Consultation Timing of Contact Consultation Regulatory Stakeholders

Department of Ongoing face to face Commenced, Approvals are required to be obtained for planned Consultants, Strategen, Mines and meetings, submission of ongoing activities. accompanied by or with documentation for approval, Petroleum (DMP) Ongoing reporting requirements as per various the endorsement of RLS ongoing email and Environment Branch regulations and schedules; and as per management telephone discussions system commitments.

Department of Face to face meetings as Commenced, Endorsement of safety management system required Consultants, Focused Mines and required, submission of ongoing to be obtained for planned activities to proceed. Vision Consulting, documentation for approval, Petroleum (DMP) Ongoing reporting requirements as per various accompanied by or with ongoing email and the endorsement of RLS Dangerous Goods regulations and schedules; and as per management telephone discussions and Petroleum system commitments. Safety, Resources Safety Branch

Department of TBD, depending on advice Only if and as Advice and endorsement may be required as advised RLS management or Environment required required by DMP. nominated specialist Regulation (DER) Require approval if clearing is required, outside of consultants, accompanied acceptable low impact petroleum activities (as per by or with the Schedule 1 (2) of the PGER(E) Regulations 2004 endorsement of RLS (if

Petroleum and Geothermal Energy Resources required) (Environment) Regulations 2012)

STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT PLAN - RLS_CMS_MPL_001_Rev_0 Page 12 of 21

Approximate Timing Responsible for Stakeholder Consultation Method Purpose of Consultation of Contact Consultation Regulatory Stakeholders (cont.)

Department of TBD, depending on advice Only if and as Advice and endorsement may be required as advised RLS management or Parks and Wildlife required required by DMP. nominated specialist (DPaW) consultants, accompanied by or with the endorsement of RLS (if required)

Department of Via 5C Licence mechanisms Only if a Water In the event that access to water via DoW bores is RLS management or Water (if required) Abstraction Permit is required, approvals under a 5C License to Take nominated delegate required Water would be required. Other Government Stakeholders

Shire of Derby / Email or phone call, ensuring Approx. 2‐6 weeks Notification of intended activities, areas of activities, RLS management or West Kimberley response or reply is received prior to planned site duration, safety systems/emergency response nominated delegate activities (optimally procedures (courtesy) 3‐4 weeks prior)

Department of Fire Email or phone call, ensuring Approx. 2‐6 weeks Notification of intended activities, areas of activities, RLS management or and Emergency response or reply is received prior to planned site duration, safety systems/emergency response nominated delegate Services (DFES) activities (optimally procedures (in the event of a fire or emergency) 3‐4 weeks prior)

Main Roads WA Email or phone call, ensuring Approx. 2‐6 weeks Notification of intended activities, areas of activities, RLS management or response or reply is received prior to planned site duration, safety systems/emergency response nominated delegate activities (optimally procedures (courtesy) 3‐4 weeks prior)

Western Australia Email or phone call, ensuring Approx. 2‐6 weeks Notification of intended activities, areas of activities, RLS management or Police (WAPOL) response or reply is received prior to planned site duration, safety systems/emergency response nominated delegate activities (optimally procedures (for awareness in the event of calls from 3‐4 weeks prior) the public, or in case of emergency)

STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT PLAN - RLS_CMS_MPL_001_Rev_0 Page 13 of 21

Approximate Timing Responsible for Stakeholder Consultation Method Purpose of Consultation of Contact Consultation Indigenous Stakeholders

Warrwa Traditional Face to face meetings, Commenced and Ongoing consultation regarding access to land of the RLS management or Owners including on‐site, plus other ongoing Traditional Owners nominated delegate (via Hopgood required communication Ganim, legal including formal written, representation) phone calls and emails Stakeholder Organisations

Derby Veterinary Email or phone call, ensuring Approx. 2‐6 weeks Notification of intended areas of activities and RLS management or Clinic response or reply is received prior to planned site duration in case of fauna injury and required support nominated delegate activities (optimally 3‐4 weeks prior)

Broome Wildlife Email or phone call, ensuring Approx. 2‐6 weeks Notification of intended areas of activities and RLS management or Carers & Associates response or reply is received prior to planned site duration in case of fauna injury and required support nominated delegate – Kimberley activities (optimally Wildlife 3‐4 weeks prior) Consultancy Landholder and Community Stakeholders

Meda Station Written (letter) request for Commenced and As required under the Petroleum and Geothermal RLS management or land access permission. ongoing Energy Resources Act 1967, land access agreements nominated delegate Complimented with phone with all affected landholders are required. calls, emails or face to face meetings as appropriate.

Mowanjum Written (letter) request for Commenced and As required under the Petroleum and Geothermal RLS management or Pastoral Lease land access permission. ongoing Energy Resources Act 1967, land access agreements nominated delegate Complimented with phone with all affected landholders are required. calls, emails or face to face meetings as appropriate.

STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT PLAN - RLS_CMS_MPL_001_Rev_0 Page 14 of 21

Approximate Timing Responsible for Stakeholder Consultation Method Purpose of Consultation of Contact Consultation Infrastructure and Service Providers

Water Corporation Email or phone call, ensuring ASAP, or at least 4 Consult if services could be affected (refer to Dial‐ RLS management or response or reply is received weeks prior to Before‐You‐Dig results) regarding intended activities, nominated delegate (if required) planned site areas of activities, duration (for awareness in the activities event of potential impact to water infrastructure)

Telstra Email or phone call, ensuring ASAP, or at least 4 Consult if services could be affected (refer to Dial‐ RLS management or response or reply is received weeks prior to Before‐You‐Dig results) regarding intended activities, nominated delegate (if required) planned site areas of activities, duration (for awareness in the activities event of potential impact to fibre optic infrastructure)

Telstra Email or phone call, ensuring ASAP, or at least 4 Consult if services could be affected (refer to Dial‐ RLS management or response or reply is received weeks prior to Before‐You‐Dig results) regarding intended activities, nominated delegate (if required) planned site areas of activities, duration (for awareness in the activities event of potential impact to fibre optic infrastructure)

Derby Waste Email or phone call, ensuring ASAP, or at least 4 Consult to confirm availability to receive previously RLS management or Management response or reply is received weeks prior to tested contaminated soils and other waste, in the nominated delegate Facility planned site event of a spill, etc. activities

Toxfree Email or phone call, ASAP, or at least 4 Confirm availability to provide emergency response RLS management or ensuring response weeks prior to and spill clean‐up, as well as contaminated soil nominated delegate or reply is received planned site testing and disposal, should it be required. activities

STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT PLAN - RLS_CMS_MPL_001_Rev_0 Page 15 of 21

8.0 REPORTING AND DOCUMENTATION

8.1 STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATION REGISTER

All consultation carried out with external stakeholders shall be documented in the Stakeholder Engagement Register (RLS_CMS_REG_007). The register entries are to include:

 the stakeholder group/organisation  company  the specific contact’s name  the contact’s role  type of consultation carried out (e.g. telephone call, email, meeting in‐person)  who carried out the consultation (e.g. RLS staff member’s name, or name of RLS delegated representative such as a consultant)  the date of the consultation  the content of communications or information provided  the resolution, outcome or next steps required (e.g. “Received reply email to confirm receipt of information”, “To meet in person when next on site”).

8.2 EXTERNAL REPORTING REQUIREMENTS

The externals reporting and consultation requirements are summarised below.

8.2.1 Workplace Health and Safety Incidents

Under the Petroleum and Geothermal Energy Resources Act 1967, Petroleum Pipelines Act 1969 and Petroleum (Submerged Lands) Act 1982 and related regulations, a dangerous occurrence must be reported to the relevant department.

A dangerous occurrence is defined in the Petroleum and Geothermal Energy Resources (Management of Safety) Regulations 2010 to be an occurrence that:

 did not cause, but could reasonably have been expected to cause: o the death of, or serious personal injury to, a person engaged in the operation or other protected person or;  a member of the workforce to be incapacitated from performing work for the period of one or more days  was, or resulted in, or could have potentially resulted in, any of the following: o a fire or explosion o the release of an amount of geothermal or hydrocarbon vapour that is likely to constitute a hazard o the release of an amount of petroleum liquid or geothermal fluid that is likely to constitute a hazard

STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT PLAN - RLS_CMS_MPL_001_Rev_0 Page 16 of 20

o an unplanned event that required the emergency response plan to be implemented o damage to safety‐critical equipment  a reasonable operator would consider to require an immediate investigation.

Following a Dangerous Occurrence, RLS management must ensure that the occurrence has been reported to DMP within three days of the incident.

This may be done via the online occurrence report form found on the DMP website or by filling out the form offline and emailing it to [email protected]

8.2.2 Monthly Health and Safety Status Report to DMP

RLS management must ensure that a monthly occurrence report form is submitted (including the total hours worked by employees or contractors and the number of employees and contractor personnel) to DMP for each month, following the end of the month (no later than 15 days after the end of the month) whether or not there has been a reportable accident during the month.

For further information regarding these reporting requirements, refer to:

 Guide to Petroleum Occurrence Report Forms and Petroleum Monthly Report Forms  Definitions and Coding used in Petroleum Occurrence Report Forms and Petroleum Monthly Status Report Forms.

8.2.3 Environmental Reporting

As required by legislation (Petroleum and Geothermal Energy Resources (Environment) Regulations 2012; Schedule of Onshore Petroleum and Production Requirements 1991; and the Petroleum and Geothermal Energy Act 1967), operators are to report various environmental aspects of their operations to the DMP, and all environmental reports are to be submitted electronically to: [email protected]

Environmental reporting includes:

 compliance reporting (annual)  emissions and discharges reporting (quarterly)  incident reporting (as required).

A summary of reporting requirements and commitments, in accordance with the Auditing and Reporting Requirements for Petroleum Activities in Western Australia (DMP 2012), is described below.

Annual Compliance Reporting (or Close Out Reporting)

Regulation 16 of the Petroleum (Environment) Regulations requires a report to be submitted to the DMP at least annually, this is to ensure compliance with the environmental performance objectives in the EP. A close out report may be submitted in the place of an annual report if the activity is of short duration (i.e. less than a year, as defined in the Auditing and Reporting Requirements for Petroleum Activities in Western Australia (DMP 2012)). As seismic activities will be of short duration, approximately eight days), a close out report will be provided to the DMP no later than three months following completion of the activity, in accordance with Part VIII 801 (1)(b) of the Schedule of Onshore Petroleum Exploration and Production Requirements 1991.

STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT PLAN - RLS_CMS_MPL_001_Rev_0 Page 17 of 20

The close out report shall include all monitoring and environmental information and records kept throughout the program that will enable the minister to determine whether the environmental performance objectives and environmental performance standards in the EP have been met, as well as determining if the implementation strategy in the EP has been complied with.

Monitoring and Reporting on Emissions and Discharges

Regulation 34 of the Petroleum (Environment) Regulations requires the monitoring and reporting of all emissions and discharges to any land, air, or surface water/groundwater environment. Emissions and discharges expected from seismic survey activities, that will be internally monitored and reported on include greenhouse emissions that shall be monitored, as per the National Greenhouse and Energy Reporting Act 2007, calculated using the methods, criteria and formulas as defined in the National Greenhouse and Energy Reporting (Measurement) Determination 2008, as relevant from the combustion of fuel for vehicles and other machinery utilised in the seismic program.

Reporting is required quarterly, and shall be completed within three months of approvals of the EP and every three months thereafter, if applicable.

Reportable Environmental Incidents

Reportable environmental incidents (an unplanned event identified as having a ‘moderate or more serious than moderate’ consequence level during the risk assessment process) must be reported to the DMP.

The DMP must be verbally notified of the reportable incident as soon as practicable, and no later than two hours after becoming aware of the reportable incident. Reportable incidents should be reported to the DMP via the 24‐hour duty phone 0419 960 621, and a written report is to be submitted to [email protected] as soon as practicable, and no later than three days after the initial incident. A copy of the DMP Reportable Incident Report Form is available for download on the DMP website.

Recordable Incidents

Recordable incidents (unplanned impacts; an activity that breaches an environmental performance objective or environmental performance standard defined in the EP), must be reported to the DMP. A copy of DMP’s Recordable Environmental Incident Report Form listing all recordable incidents each calendar month, will be completed by RLS and submitted to the DMP ([email protected]), as soon as practicable, and within 15 days after the end of the month to which it relates. Where no recordable incidents have occurred during the month, a nil report is still required to be submitted to the DMP.

STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT PLAN - RLS_CMS_MPL_001_Rev_0 Page 18 of 20

8.3 INTERNAL REPORTING

8.3.1 Incident Reporting

Reporting, investigating and addressing incidents on site is important for numerous reasons, including preventing the likelihood of recurrence and also reducing the likelihood of stakeholder involvement in a negative context, should the incident recur or eventuate (in the event of near misses).

All accidents and incidents that occur on site will be reported to the contractor’s Site Supervisor and the RLS Supervisor or management immediately, as long as it is safe to do so. This includes all incidents that have or could have caused harm/damage to personnel/plant or the environment (near misses). Reporting shall be in accordance with Event and Feedback Reporting and Investigation Procedure (RLS_CMS_PRO_007).

Incidents and accidents involving a contractor shall also be recorded in accordance with that contractor’s relevant procedure/s and using relevant forms and reporting mechanisms.

All accidents or incidents involving RLS employees and contractors shall be internally reported using the Event and Feedback Report Form and recorded on the Event and Feedback Register.

8.4 EMERGENCY CONTACTS

For all Emergencies in the Canning Basin Call 000 (or 112 from mobile phones) Town Hospital Ambulance Police FESA SES 000 000 132 500 000 Broome 08 9194 222 131 444 08 9158 3200 08 9193 5999 08 9192 2533 08 9194 0200 0409 442 259 0417 937 073

000 000 132 500 08 9193 3333 As above Derby Ambulance at 131 444 089191 1501 089193 9990 089193 1194 hospital 08 9191 1444 0418 922 112 RFDS Derby 08 9191 0200 Perth Operations 1800 625 800 Shire Councils Broome 08 9191 3456 Derby 08 9191 8018 Cyclone Information Cyclone Recorded Information 1300 659 210

STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT PLAN - RLS_CMS_MPL_001_Rev_0 Page 19 of 20

9.0 EVALUATION OF ENGAGEMENT PROCESS

The stakeholder engagement process will be evaluated as a matter of course, via the ongoing evaluation and continual improvement of the IMS within which it resides. Monitoring and measurement of performance of the IMS is carried out in accordance with the Monitoring and Measurement of Performance Procedure (RLS_CMS_PRO_002).

Monitoring and management of performance is achieved via processes of:

 internal monitoring and auditing  collation of feedback (including complaints if applicable)  analysis of results of performance  development and implementation of corrective actions  continual improvement.

In the context of stakeholder engagement, it is important that any feedback (both positive and negative) received either during the consultation process, or any other time (e.g. unscheduled contact with members of the public) is documented using the Event and Feedback Report Form (RLS_CMS_FRM_002) and the Event and Feedback Register (RLS_CMS_REG_002).

Complaints are classified in the RLS IMS as ‘non‐conformances’ and therefore shall be addressed via the application of corrective actions, as per the Monitoring and Measurement of Performance Procedure.

Continual improvement of the IMS (which shall include this plan) is achieved in a variety of ways, including ad‐hoc improvements made as a result of suggestions or identified non‐conformances (with corrective actions applied), or as part of the management review, as per the Communication and Consultation Procedure (RLS_CMS_PRO_003).

The engagement process shall be evaluated during the management review, with any areas for improvement identified. A lack of feedback or IMS data relating to the poor performance of this plan will be accepted as indicative that the plan has been/is effective in its implementation.

STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT PLAN - RLS_CMS_MPL_001_Rev_0 Page 20 of 20

INDUCTION AND TRAINING PROCEDURE – RLS_CMS_PRO_009_REV_0

1.0 PURPOSE

The purpose of this document is to describe how training needs are managed and provided within the RLS Lennard Shelf Pty Ltd (RLS). This will help ensure that all personnel working within or on behalf of RLS have the appropriate skills and training to achieve tasks to a level that conforms to the regulatory and company standards.

2.0 SCOPE

This procedure addresses the training and inductions requirements and how these requirements are to be met for all RLS employees and contractors.

3.0 RESPONSIBILITIES

Position Responsibilities

Management Ensure resources are allocated to ensure that all personnel conducting work on RLS sites have the appropriate skills and training to conduct their role in compliance with RLS and regulatory requirements. Ensure that all contractors are appropriately trained and skilled to fulfil the role they are engaged for and that they are inducted to work on RLS projects and sites.

Supervisors Ensure that personnel under their supervision complete and remain current for all training that has been identified as required for their role, and for inductions relevant to projects and sites.

Personnel Complete all training required for the completion of their role. This includes maintaining currency where applicable. Complete all inductions for project and site work when required.

INDUCTION AND TRAINING PROCEDURE Page 1 of 4 RLS_CMS_PRO_009_Rev_0

4.0 PROCEDURE

4.1 INDUCTION OF NEW STAFF/CONTRACTORS AND VISITORS

Upon commencement of work, all personnel are to have been made familiar with the company’s policies and procedures that are relevant to them. Once they have been made familiar with these documents, the inductee, along with the supervisor, are to sign off an induction checklist. This checklist will be stored in personal files along with all current qualifications and memberships. This will be reviewed every two years to ensure all qualifications and memberships remain current.

Site inductions will be conducted prior to deployment to ensure all personnel are aware of site specific requirements and emergency procedures whilst deployed.

Refresher training every two years for all personnel will be conducted to ensure that they continue to be aware of policies and procedures within the company. Any changes to these policies and procedures will be communicated to personnel in a timely manner.

Any visitors to work sites shall also be required to complete the relevant site induction prior to arrival on site.

Any behaviour or performance which fails to adhere to any legislative or company requirements relating to health, safety, environment, heritage or any other aspect, whilst on RLS sites may result in written advice (detailing the reason for the advice) which may attract a formal warning or a request to leave the site.

4.2 IDENTIFYING TRAINING NEEDS

Each position/role for personnel employed by RLS has a defined set of qualifications and training requirements defined within the position description for the role. These requirements will be entered into the Induction and Training Register (RLS_CMS_REG_006) along with requirements that are common for all personnel. This will enable relevant management staff to easily identify training needs.

Opportunities for further personal and professional training will be discussed and identified during performance review meetings or on an ad‐hoc basis as required.

If specific training requirements arise that have not been covered previously, arrangements will be made for the required training to be completed prior to commencement of work requiring that training. For RLS personnel, any required training will be at RLS’s expense, however, sub‐contractors shall ensure that their employees are adequately and suitably trained to conduct the work, unless other arrangements have been made with RLS.

4.3 TRAINING AND INDUCTION MATERIALS AND DELIVERY

All internal training and induction requirements shall be considered on a project by project basis, and reassessed annually, to ensure that all legislative and industry standards are met in terms of staff training. Project inductions shall ensure that as a minimum, staff and contractors are provided with adequate

INDUCTION AND TRAINING PROCEDURE Page 2 of 4 RLS_CMS_PRO_009_Rev_0

information to perform their roles in a safe and environmentally responsible manner, that ensures best practice outcomes for RLS.

INDUCTION AND TRAINING PROCEDURE Page 3 of 4 RLS_CMS_PRO_009_Rev_0

All internal training and induction materials shall be developed and delivered by appropriately trained facilitators with a minimum Certificate IV Training and Assessment qualification or equivalent work experience. Supervisor shall determine who meets such competence and if required, shall provide Certificate IV in Workplace Training and Assessment training to personnel, or engage a suitably qualified contractor.

Any external training must be conducted with Registered Training Organisations.

4.4 TRAINING RECORDS

Training records will be stored within the employees/sub‐contractors personal file. This will include certificates and other proof that training has been conducted. A summary of all training achievements and currency will be listed in the Induction and Training Register.

5.0 RELATED DOCUMENTS

 Induction and Training Register ‐ RLS_CMS_REG_006  Induction Packages.

6.0 REVIEW

This procedure shall be reviewed annually as part of the management review as required.

7.0 REVISION DETAILS

Revision Prepared / Revised Reviewed/ Issued Date Change Notes Number by Approved by

A W Bauer‐Simpson B. van der Pols 05/08/2016 Initial draft

B W. Bauer‐Simpson S. Fu 10/08/2016 Reviewed by RLS

0 W. Bauer‐Simpson S. Fu 25/08/2016 Approved for implementation

INDUCTION AND TRAINING PROCEDURE Page 4 of 4 RLS_CMS_PRO_009_Rev_0

Uncontrolled if Printed Audit, Inspection and Monitoring Register Issued 25/08/2016

Date Ref# Type System Description Auditor Auditee Event Numbers Conducted 0001 0002 0003 0004 0005 0006 0007 0008 0009 0010 0011 0012 0013 0014 0015 0016 0017 0018 0019 0020 0021 0022 0023 0024 0025 0026 0027 0028 0029 0030 0031 0032 0033 0034 0035 0036 0037 0038 0039 0040 0041 0042 0043 0044 0045 0046 0047 0048 0049 0050

Audit and Inspection Procedure

Version Description Date Author(s) 1.0 Issued for Use 25 June 2016 Dan Gallagher

Audit and Inspection Procedure

Contents

1. Purpose ______3

2. Scope ______3

3. Roles and Responsibilities ______3 3.1 Managing Director ...... 3 3.2 All Personnel ...... 3

4. Requirements – Internal Audits ______4 4.1 Auditor Selection and Competencies ...... 4 4.2 Audit Type and Scope ...... 4 4.3 Audit Frequency ...... 4 4.4 Audit Process ...... 5 4.4.1 Planning 5 4.4.2 Conduct 5 4.4.3 Report 5 4.4.4 Review 5

5. Requirements - Inspections ______6 5.1 Inspection Types ...... 6 5.2 Corrective Actions ...... 6

InGauge Audit & Inspection Procedure ING_PRO_AI_01 Page 2 Audit and Inspection Procedure

1. Purpose

The internal audit and inspection procedure will; identify gaps in the management systems, determine the effectiveness of the corporate manuals, and ensure compliance with policy. This document defines the requirements in relation to internal audits and inspections within inGauge Energy. This procedure covers the minimum requirements for Quality, Health, Safety and Environmental Management Systems. 2. Scope

This procedure applies to all inGauge Energy employees, contractors and visitors working on projects or site.

3. Roles and Responsibilities

3.1 Managing Director

The inGauge Energy Managing Director must:

• Ensure all inGauge Energy personnel (including employees and contractors) are trained in and comply with this procedure.

• Ensure that resources are available to comply with the requirements within this procedure.

3.2 All Personnel

All inGauge Energy personnel (including employees and contractors) must participate and adhere to the requirements as defined within this procedure and/or as requested by the Managing Director.

InGauge Audit & Inspection Procedure ING_PRO_AI_01 Page 3 Audit and Inspection Procedure

4. Requirements – Internal Audits

4.1 Auditor Selection and Competencies

The Managing Director and QHSE Representative select internal auditors that are sufficiently qualified, competent and experienced to perform QHSE Management System audits. Where the internal auditor(s) are not sufficiently qualified, competent and experienced, the internal auditor(s) may be supported by other experts to enable them to perform audits competently. When determining the suitability of internal auditors, the Managing Director is to take into account the following criteria:

• Relevant tertiary qualifications of the auditor;

• Auditors knowledge of current Workplace Health & Safety legislation; and

• Successful completion of auditor training course and/or recent experience in an OHS role.

4.2 Audit Type and Scope

Audit Audit Type Scope Audit Areas Responsibility Criteria 1. Conformance to key elements of AS/NZS 4801/ISO9001/ISO14001 2. Assess the Central AS 4801 Management implementation of the QHSE Administration ISO 9001 QHSE System Audit Management System. and sampled ISO 14001 Representative 3. Verify the implementation worksites and effectiveness of the QHSE Management System policies and procedures. Verification of contractor Supplier/Contract management systems to Contractor Contractor QHSE or Qualification applicable legislation and Premises MS Representative Audit client requirements

4.3 Audit Frequency

The QHSE Representative, in consultation with the Managing Director, is to determine the internal audit frequency and review with respect to key hazards, incidents, or areas of concern. The audit frequency will be planned, taking into consideration of the following:

• The level of risk associated with the activity/s, policy or procedure being audited;

InGauge Audit & Inspection Procedure ING_PRO_AI_01 Page 4 Audit and Inspection Procedure

• The OHS importance of the specific element of the QHSE management system being audited;

• The results of previous audits;

• The significance of problems which may be encountered in the areas to be audited.

The management system audit as a whole should be conducted every 12 months, with all the requirements of AS/NZS 4801, ISO 14001 and ISO 9001 to be checked throughout the audit. Legal compliance is to be evaluated every 12 months, which can be conducted separately or as part or other audits.

4.4 Audit Process

4.4.1 Planning The Internal Audit Schedule shall be developed on an annual frequency and shall consider the following in determining the frequency of audits across the processes and areas to be audited;

1. The status and importance of the area and process to be audited;

2. Past performance of the area and process which may be derived from corrective and preventive actions, non-compliances, customer complaints, incidents & accidents, risk analysis, previous audit results, and as a result of significant changes to activities/plant/location.

The Internal Audit Schedule may be amended as a result of any of the above at any given time and in accordance with the document control procedure. 4.4.2 Conduct Prior to the audit date the Internal Auditor shall advise the applicable persons of the pending audit and make a suitable time to conduct the audit. The Internal Auditor reviews the appropriate Management System documentation, records of completed corrective and preventive actions, and past audit findings for the activities to be audited. 4.4.3 Report Audit findings shall be documented using the Audit Checklist and shall identify the evidence sighted during the audit. Any non-conformances identified during the audit shall be discussed with the auditee and documented within the Audit Checklist. The non-conformance shall be then entered into the inGauge Energy Non- Conformance register. 4.4.4 Review The results of the Internal Audit shall be presented to top management during the next scheduled Management Review meeting. Should there be any need to alter the Internal Audit Schedule (frequency) as a result of the findings of the audit, this shall be done in conjunction with the QHSE Representative.

InGauge Audit & Inspection Procedure ING_PRO_AI_01 Page 5 Audit and Inspection Procedure

5. Requirements - Inspections

The purpose of workplace inspections is to observe and verify the compliance within the QHSE Management System for the following areas:

• Electrical Equipment

• Fire Extinguishers

• Workplace Inspection

• First Aid Equipment

A number of the inspections require a certified third party to conduct however workplace inspections will be conducted internally with a workplace inspection checklist is available on the InGauge Energy shared drive for managers and supervisors to complete.

5.1 Inspection Types

Tag Competent Responsible Type Nature Frequency Register Required Person Person Electrical Certified Managing Equipment External 5 yearly Yes No provider Director (Office)

Fire Certified Managing External 6 Monthly Yes Yes Extinguishers provider Director

Workplace Office Managing Internal Quarterly No Yes Inspection Personnel Director

First Aid Certified Managing External Annually No Yes Equipment provider Director

5.2 Corrective Actions

Remedial or Corrective actions identified during the inspection process will be recorded in the inGauge Energy Action Register. Actions will be assigned to a responsible person, and the due date provided. Actions are tracked until completion. The inGauge Energy Managing Director will review the action register on a weekly basis to check status updates on outstanding actions. On close out of the action, the responsible person will sign the action off.

InGauge Audit & Inspection Procedure ING_PRO_AI_01 Page 6

Biosecurity Hygiene Procedure

Version Description Date Author(s) 1.0 Issued for Use 26 September 2018 Dan Gallagher

Biosecurity Hygiene Procedure

Contents

1. Purpose ______3

2. Scope ______3

3. Roles and Responsibilities ______3 Managing Director ...... 3 All Personnel ...... 3

4. Requirements ______4 Specific Requirements ...... 4 Moving Materials & Equipment Through Pest Quarantine Areas ...... 4 Travelling on Client sites ...... 4 4.3.1 Travelling to Site 4 4.3.2 While on Site 5 4.3.3 Leaving a Project Site 5 Biosecurity Hygiene Declarations for Vehicles & Equipment ...... 5 4.4.1 When a Biosecurity Hygiene Declaration is Valid 5 4.4.2 When a Biosecurity Hygiene Declaration is Invalid 6 Biosecurity Hygiene Declaration for Loads and Materials ...... 6 Vehicle & Equipment Cleaning Procedure...... 7 4.6.1 Requirements 7 4.6.2 Procedure 7 Inspection Process ...... 8 Contractors ...... 8

5. Training ______8 Biosecurity Hygiene Awareness ...... 8 Authorised Inspectors...... 9

6. Record Keeping ______9

7. Assurance ______9

InGauge Biosecurity Hygiene Page 2 Biosecurity Hygiene Procedure

1. Purpose

This procedure outlines the ways in which biosecurity hygiene measures are to be implemented at inGauge Energy. This procedure requires that all inGauge Energy activities are conducted in a manner that prevents and minimises the introduction and spread of biosecurity matter, including weeds, pest animals and diseases. This procedure covers the minimum requirements for Quality, Health, Safety and Environmental Management Systems.

2. Scope

This procedure applies to all inGauge Energy employees, contractors and visitors working on projects or site. This procedure specifically includes biosecurity hygiene measures for:

• vehicles and equipment

• personnel

• loads and materials.

This procedure specifically excludes:

• marine biosecurity management. This procedure allows for the access to a client approved site in which the biosecurity hygiene requirements have been identified by the client and communicated to the contractor and or third parties. All site-specific biosecurity management plans are to be documented and forwarded to the relevant Client for consideration.

3. Roles and Responsibilities

Managing Director

The inGauge Energy Managing Director must:

• Ensure all inGauge Energy personnel (including employees and contractors) are trained in and comply with this procedure;

• Ensure that resources are available to comply with the requirements within this procedure.

All Personnel

InGauge Biosecurity Hygiene Page 3 Biosecurity Hygiene Procedure

All inGauge Energy personnel (including employees and contractors) must participate and adhere to the requirements as defined within this procedure and/or as requested by the Managing Director.

4. Requirements

Specific Requirements

All inGauge Energy personnel (including employees and contractors) must follow specific requirements listed below:

1. All vehicles requiring access to a Client site or property must have a valid biosecurity hygiene declaration unless an exemption applies. A vehicle is exempt when:

1. the vehicle is travelling exclusively to major facilities, administration areas, camps, lay down areas (excluding those on private landholder properties) exclusively along formed/sealed roads; or

2. the vehicle is an emergency or authorised vehicle responding to an emergency; or 3. there are other effective biosecurity hygiene control measures in place which are documented within an approved site or property specific biosecurity plan. 2. All personnel are required to consider their personal biosecurity risk and ensure that personal protective equipment (PPE) is not a carrier for biosecurity matter. 1. Your PPE – Boots and clothing must be clean and free from potential pest material before travelling to and from site to all regional and interstate areas up to and including international flights to and from Australia. 3. All vehicles/equipment carrying loads of high-risk materials must also have a valid biosecurity hygiene declaration for that load. 4. Biosecurity hygiene declarations are to be issued only by an authorised inspector.

Moving Materials & Equipment Through Pest Quarantine Areas

A number of pest quarantine areas apply to the movement of plant material into or within Western Australia. Care must be exercised when moving vehicles and equipment to ensure that pests are not transported with the vehicle, mobile plant or equipment. If soil, soil related products, plant material, or vehicles/equipment is to be moved, ensure that the requirements of this section are met. Refer to the Western Australian Government website land management page.

Travelling on Client sites

4.3.1 Travelling to Site

InGauge Biosecurity Hygiene Page 4 Biosecurity Hygiene Procedure

Unless the vehicle is exempt, the operator of the vehicle must ensure that a valid biosecurity hygiene declaration is within the vehicle/mobile plant at all times. 4.3.2 While on Site Personnel must not enter areas of known weed infestation (e.g. areas fenced or signed as weed zones) without prior approval from the Client environmental advisor or HSE advisor responsible for the area. Additional conditions to this entry may be required. 4.3.3 Leaving a Project Site If there is a reasonable expectation that a vehicle/equipment has come into contact with biosecurity matter including weeds, pests or diseases (i.e. the vehicle has traversed an area not subject to a biosecurity site inspection/survey, or it has accessed an area with known weeds):

 Re-inspect and, where necessary, clean down the vehicle/equipment prior to travelling to an area not known to be contaminated or infested with biosecurity matter; or  Inspect the vehicle/equipment plant at the nearest suitable area; or  Use mobile/ temporary clean down facilities, if provided in high risk or biosecurity contaminated areas; and dispose of all weed and pest material in accordance with the particular client’s requirements and where applicable, landholder requirements;  Dispose of all weed and pest material in accordance with the client’s requirements and where applicable, landholder requirements.

Biosecurity Hygiene Declarations for Vehicles & Equipment

1. Biosecurity hygiene declarations are only to be issued by an authorised inspector that is satisfied that the vehicle is free of biosecurity matter and carriers (e.g. organic materials including plant matter, seeds, dirt and mud). 2. A biosecurity hygiene declaration must include: 1. The driver’s name, phone number, affiliated organisation and signature 2. Identification details of the vehicle or thing inspected (e.g. registration, vehicle make and model);

3. Declaration that an inspection has been conducted and that the vehicle/thing is clean and free of biosecurity matter and carriers;

4. Date the inspection occurred; 5. Name, phone number and training certificate number of the authorised inspector issuing the declaration;

6. The organisation with which the authorised inspector is affiliated. 3. A biosecurity hygiene declaration may be in any of the following forms, provided it meets the requirements of Point 2 as above: 1. a Weed Hygiene declaration issued by a certified third party 2. any other biosecurity hygiene declaration. 4.4.1 When a Biosecurity Hygiene Declaration is Valid

InGauge Biosecurity Hygiene Page 5 Biosecurity Hygiene Procedure

A biosecurity hygiene declaration for a vehicle/equipment remains valid when the vehicle/equipment is clean (i.e. free of biosecurity matter including weeds, pests and diseases, and biosecurity carriers). The vehicle remains clean when:

 It does not travel off sealed/formed roads; or  It does not come into direct contact with an area that contains actual or potential biosecurity matters including weeds, pest animals and diseases as determined by a biosecurity survey/inspection. If conducting work on a given property, the biosecurity hygiene declaration remains valid for the duration that the vehicle is operating on that property, provided that the vehicle does not come into contact with known areas of biosecurity matter infestation, and does not travel onto another property during that time. 4.4.2 When a Biosecurity Hygiene Declaration is Invalid A biosecurity hygiene declaration becomes invalid when:

1. Any conditions or notes on the hygiene declaration have been breached or exceeded; or 2. The vehicle becomes contaminated with biosecurity materials such as weeds, pest animals, diseases, and/or biosecurity carriers (e.g. soil). A vehicle may become contaminated when:

1. The vehicle/equipment has come into contact with known biosecurity matters such as weeds, pest animals or diseases; or 2. The vehicle/equipment leaves a formed road where the biosecurity matter status is not known (e.g. parking on a vegetated road verge); or s3. It i not known where the vehicle/equipment has been previously used, or if the vehicle/equipment has deviated from its intended route or area of operation.

Biosecurity Hygiene Declaration for Loads and Materials

1. Biosecurity hygiene declarations are only to be issued by authorised inspectors that are satisfied that the load of high risk materials is free of biosecurity matter and carriers. 2. A biosecurity hygiene declaration may be in any of the following forms: 3. a Weed Hygiene declaration issued by a certified third party 4. any other biosecurity hygiene declaration Requirements:

 All high-risk loads must have a valid biosecurity hygiene declaration.  The biosecurity hygiene declaration must be completed by the supplier and carried within the vehicle from the commencement of the journey.  The biosecurity hygiene declaration must be provided to the client prior to unloading or travelling within land owned, managed or accessed by the client.  The vehicle must have a valid biosecurity hygiene declaration unless the vehicle is an exempt vehicle.

InGauge Biosecurity Hygiene Page 6 Biosecurity Hygiene Procedure

Vehicle & Equipment Cleaning Procedure.

4.6.1 Requirements Cleaning activities should be undertaken at facilities with effective environmental controls to prevent the spread of biosecurity matter. Wash water, mud/ silt, weed material and other contaminants must be managed/ disposed of in a manner that prevents harm to the environment and prevents their spread. Where possible, high pressure water spray should be used. This is the preferred method. If this is impractical, (such as at a site location) the minimum requirement is to use a suitable stick or shovel, brooms/ brushes and compressed air to remove contaminants (dry cleaning). Where cleaning is performed on site with no permanent bund or wash water retention facility, consider building bund or soak to which wash water can be directed. 4.6.2 Procedure 1. Secure the vehicle/mobile plant on a suitable level area, free of obstructions. Apply the handbrake and ensure the vehicle/ mobile plant is stable. 2. Place implements, where fitted (e.g. blades, buckets, slashers), in a suitable position to be washed. Ensure raised implements are suitably secured/ chocked. 3. Switch the engine off. 4. Where an automated drive-through wash down facility is used, follow the manufacturer’s directions for use. 5. If the vehicle/mobile plant is heavily contaminated with soil/ mud, remove this using a suitable shovel or bar: 1. Check and clean on top of chassis rails, booms, blades, inside wheel rims, between dual wheels, crawler tracks and drive/ idler wheels, implement attachment bars/ beams, axle casings, gearboxes and transfer cases;

2. If necessary, remove belly plates and other guards; 3. Remove visible green material by hand and place in a bag suitable for disposal; 4. Move the soil/ mud aside prior to washing with a high pressure cleaner. 6. Identify areas that may require cleaning with compressed air rather than water — do these first. 1. The use of compressed air is an identified hazard and is required to have the appropriate controls in place as per the risk assessment. 7. Use compressed air to blow debris out of any area that could potentially include biosecurity matter, such as the cabin, tool boxes, battery box, radiator and oil cooler cores. 8. Use a high pressure cleaner on the remainder of the vehicle/mobile plant, working from the top down. Carefully move the vehicle/ mobile plant forward or back to clean areas not accessible during the first pass. 9. Replace any guards or belly plates removed for the cleaning process. 10. Move the vehicle directly off the wash area, avoiding recontamination. 11. Carry out a final inspection to ensure all areas have been cleaned. Clean again if required 12. Clean the wash bay hard stand.

InGauge Biosecurity Hygiene Page 7 Biosecurity Hygiene Procedure

Inspection Process

1. For a biosecurity hygiene declaration to be issued, the vehicle/equipment or load with high risk materials will need to be inspected by an authorised inspector. 2. To conduct the inspection, the authorised inspector will: 1. Inspect the vehicle/equipment or load with high risk materials to ensure all areas are free of contamination;

2. Inspect the work boots and clothing of occupant to ensure all items are free of contamination. 3. If the authorised inspector deems any part of the vehicle/equipment/load to fail the inspection, further cleaning or decontamination will be required to prior to pre-inspection. 4. Following a successful inspection, the authorised inspector may issue a biosecurity hygiene declaration.

Contractors inGauge Energy Contractors may develop and implement their own biosecurity procedures that:

 Meet the applicable legislative requirements; and  Meet or exceed the requirements of this biosecurity Hygiene procedure. The Contractor must submit any proposed alternative procedures to inGauge Energy and implement any comments received from inGauge Energy prior to implementation of the alternative procedure. Upon request, the Contractor is to provide inGauge Energy with results of any assurance actions conducted to ensure the implementation of the biosecurity hygiene procedure. inGauge Energy may at any time audit the contractor against their procedure and require corrective actions to be implemented. This procedure may be used by the Contractor in lieu of their own biosecurity hygiene procedure.

5. Training

Biosecurity Hygiene Awareness

Personnel accessing client sites and properties must be made familiar with this procedure and the potential biosecurity matters present in the work area. This information is to be communicated to personnel by the Business Unit, for example during site inductions, toolbox talks or through the site handover notes. Information on the biosecurity status of the site may be obtained from the documents issued with the disturbance approval or from the Business Unit HSE or environment advisor. The Business Unit, or their delegate, is responsible for collating and presenting the biosecurity hygiene training material.

InGauge Biosecurity Hygiene Page 8 Biosecurity Hygiene Procedure

Authorised Inspectors

An authorised inspector is a person that has completed nationally recognised training and achieved one of the following units of competency:

1. RTD 2312A Inspect machinery for plant, animal and soil material and RTD 2313A Clean machinery of plant, animal and soil material; or

2. AHCBIO201A Inspect and clean machinery for plant, animal and soil material. The authorised inspector must maintain the validity of their training by completing an inspection of vehicles/equipment at least every 12 months.

6. Record Keeping

Biosecurity Hygiene Declaration

1. The authorised inspector is responsible for keeping a copy of all biosecurity hygiene declarations issued for vehicles/equipment and loads and materials for a period of 5 years. 2. The driver/operator of the vehicle/equipment is required to keep a copy of the biosecurity hygiene declarations obtained for their vehicle for a period of 5 years. 3. A copy of the biosecurity hygiene declarations for loads and materials must be kept and filed by the Brisbane QHSE Department. 4. All copies of the biosecurity hygiene declaration are to be stored for a period of 5 years in accordance with the Client requirements.

7. Assurance

On a day to day basis, inGauge Energy and contractor representatives, site supervisors, or their delegates, are responsible for ensuring their teams implement this procedure. Contractors are required to conduct their own assurance activities to ensure implementation of their legal and contractual obligations. The results of the assurance activities are to be provided to the client at a frequency determined by the contract, or as requested. Audits & Field Inspections inGauge Energy may be audited on a regular basis by the client to ensure that inGauge Energy is compliant and maintain competency to this procedure and in the application of the biosecurity hygiene declaration. The client may conduct field inspection audits to ensure that inGauge Energy vehicles and mobile plant comply with the requirements of this procedure. Field Supervisors are to adhere to and monitor the compliance of this procedure in the field.

InGauge Biosecurity Hygiene Page 9

HYGIENE AND WEED INSPECTION PROCEDURE – RLS_EMS_PRO_001_REV_0

1.0 PURPOSE

This procedure provides an internal process for inspecting and cleaning vehicles and equipment for weed hygiene on Rey Lennard Shelf Pty Ltd (RLS) sites. The purpose of this procedure is to outline actions that have been developed to meet commitments made to regulators.

2.0 SCOPE

The procedure is designed to cover all areas of compliance relevant to RLS and its operations and applies to all RLS personnel, contractors and visitors to any RLS work site locations.

3.0 RESPONSIBILITIES

Position Responsibilities

Management Ensure personnel are aware of the relevant legal requirements.

Obtain and hold all appropriate approvals and legislative requirements.

Maintain records appropriately.

Supervisors Ensure personnel are aware of the relevant legal requirements.

Ensure review of changes and determine areas of applicability

Ensure vehicle inspections are undertaken as required and recorded in the Audit and Inspection Register (RLS_CMS_REG_008).

Ensure training requirements are met by all personnel, including how to undertake weed inspections and how to report incidents and near‐ misses.

Personnel Ensure all hygiene inspections are carried out as required, in accordance with this procedure, and recorded in the in the Audit and Inspection Register.

Ensure all incidents and near‐misses are reported in the Event and Feedback Register (RLS_CMS_REG_002)

HYGIENE AND WEED INSPECTION PROCEDURE Page 1 of 4 RLS_EMS_PRO_001_Rev_0

4.0 PROCEDURE

Prior to first entry to site, all vehicles and equipment shall be inspected for the presence of vegetation or soil in accordance with this procedure.

All light and heavy vehicles travelling from interstate or areas with possible weeds shall be carefully inspected.

Vehicles will only be required to carry out hygiene procedures upon return to site if they have exited the project area and left sealed roads prior to re‐entering site.

If inspections detect any soil or vegetative matter, brush‐down cleaning shall take place at a designated hygiene station.

Designated hygiene stations shall be determined during project planning, should be indicated in the project specific Environment Plan (EP) or equivalent document and should meet the following criteria:  Are in existing cleared areas  Are in locations at or close to the project area boundary, so that hygiene procedures can be implemented before vehicles or equipment enter into the inner sections of the site.

The hygiene procedure is as follows: 1. Drive the vehicle onto a tarpaulin pegged to the ground with tent pegs, at a designated hygiene station location 2. Using the stiff brush designated for the hygiene brush‐down, thoroughly brush all over the tyres, wheels, wheel arches and safely accessible under‐body, to remove all plant and soil matter. 3. Following brush‐down, vehicles shall be inspected again to ensure they are “clean”. Then the vehicle will be driven off the tarpaulin which will be folded or swept with a broom to collect any plant matter removed from the vehicle. 4. Collected plant matter shall be transferred into plastic contaminated waste bags and sealed with a zip tie or knot to ensure seeds cannot escape. The bags will be disposed of in suitable bins at camp (if relevant) or off‐site at a licensed waste facility. 5. All weed hygiene inspections, regardless of results or outcomes, will be recorded in the Audit and Inspection Register (RLS_CMS_REG_008).

Other sources of weeds and weed seed may include imported materials, boots, clothing or other equipment and tools. All such items brought onto site should also be cleaned prior to mobilisation.

5.0 RELATED DOCUMENTS

 Audit and Inspection Register (RLS_CMS_REG_008)  Event and Feedback Report Form (RLS_CMS_FRM_002)  Event and Feedback Register (RLS_CMS_REG_002)  Project‐specific Environment Plan (EP).

HYGIENE AND WEED INSPECTION PROCEDURE Page 2 of 4 RLS_EMS_PRO_001_Rev_0

HYGIENE AND WEED INSPECTION PROCEDURE Page 3 of 4 RLS_EMS_PRO_001_Rev_0

6.0 REVIEW

This procedure shall be reviewed every two years or as part of the management review as required.

7.0 REVISION DETAILS

Revision Reviewed/ Revised by Issued Date Change Notes Number Approved by

A K. Bauer‐Simpson G. Martinez 29/08/2016 Initial draft

S. Fu B K. Bauer‐Simpson 15/09/2016 Reviewed by RLS and third party M. Dixon S. Fu 0 K. Bauer‐Simpson 08/09/2016 Approved for implementation M. Dixon

HYGIENE AND WEED INSPECTION PROCEDURE Page 4 of 4 RLS_EMS_PRO_001_Rev_0

VEGETATION LINE CLEARING PROCEDURE – REY_EMS_PRO_002_REV_0

1.0 PURPOSE

This procedure provides an internal process for vegetation clearing along seismic lines and associated access tracks for Rey Lennard Shelf Pty Ltd (RLS). The purpose of this procedure is to outline actions that have been developed to meet commitments made to regulators, to prevent accidental over‐clearing and to minimise and control potential environmental impacts that result from clearing activities undertaken at all RLS work sites.

2.0 SCOPE

This procedure is designed to cover all areas of compliance relevant to RLS vegetation clearing activities for the purposes of seismic lines and associated access tracks, as approved for clearing. This procedure applies to all RLS personnel and their contractors for relevant (approved) activities and work sites.

3.0 RESPONSIBILITIES

Position Responsibilities

Management Ensure all personnel and contractors are aware of the relevant legal requirements and penalties related to clearing as per approvals.

Ensure all personnel are aware of areas of environmental/biological importance prior to clearing commencing.

Supervisors Ensure clearing is undertaken in accordance with this procedure.

Ensure clearing is entered into the Vegetation Clearing Register (RLS_EMS_REG_002).

Site Ecologist Be present on site during all line clearing is previously identified environmentally significant areas.

Undertake suitable inspection of proposed lines prior to clearing.

Ensure clearing is undertaken in accordance with this procedure.

VEGETATION LINE CLEARING PROCEDURE Page 1 of 5 RLS_EMS_PRO_002_Rev_0

Position Responsibilities

Personnel Ensure understanding of the legislative requirements appropriate to their position.

Ensure vegetation clearing is only undertaken for approved purposes in approved locations and that any non‐conformances are reported to their supervisor immediately.

4.0 PROCEDURE

4.1 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

Before clearing activities commence in undisturbed areas, approval for clearing will be sought from the relevant regulatory authority (e.g. Department of Mines and Petroleum). All vegetation clearing is to be carried out only in accordance with the project‐specific clearing area and on‐ground demarcations as detailed in the approved Environment Plan (EP) or equivalent document.

Once on site, clearing activities shall not commence until they are approved by a manager, supervisor or delegate.

All vegetation clearing is to be carried out only in accordance with approved project‐specific Clearing Plans (as presented in the EP or equivalent document) and on‐ground demarcations. If demarcations are ambiguous, clearing is not to be carried out.

All clearing is to be recorded by the operator who undertook the clearing, in the Vegetation Clearing Register (RLS_EMS_FRM_002).

Only authorised clearing is to be undertaken, with any accidental clearing beyond approved limits to be reported using an Event and Feedback Report Form (RLS_CMS_FRM_002) and recorded as such in the Vegetation Clearing Register.

All clearing is to avoid impacts to pastoral and public infrastructure.

Alignment of seismic lines shall avoid clearing of mature trees where practicable and deviate/weave lines as necessary around vegetation and terrain.

Clearing vegetation on slopes that are near or leading to any drainage lines shall be avoided, and stockpiling is not to occur up‐gradient of surface water features.

Cleared vegetation is to be “stockpiled” adjacent to the temporarily cleared seismic lines, at a minimum of 150 m from major drainage lines or obvious sheet‐flow (surface water run‐off) areas, for later replacement and rehabilitation, in accordance with the Rehabilitation Procedure (RLS_EMS_PRO_004).

During clearing activities, off‐road traversing is prohibited and vehicles and machinery are to only use designated access tracks (existing tracks and seismic lines), driving to set speed limits around site.

VEGETATION LINE CLEARING PROCEDURE Page 2 of 5 RLS_EMS_PRO_002_Rev_0

4.2 SEISMIC LINE CLEARING

The specific procedure for seismic line clearing is as follows:

 All seismic line clearing activity in the field is to be conducted under the direct supervision of the Site Supervisor or equivalent.  A qualified ecologist (or suitably qualified alternative environmental specialist) must be present during clearing of vegetation for seismic lines in conservation significant areas (e.g. Greater Bilby habitat), as identified in the project‐specific EP.  In sensitive areas, such as adjacent to drainage lines and dense vegetation, the dozer driver should walk sections of the line before clearing, to ensure the path of least resistance (least vegetation impact) is taken, and that drainage lines are not impacted.  Seismic lines will not necessarily be straight; they can and should weave through the landscape somewhat, as guided by the relevant Supervisor. Non‐straight lines will rehabilitate faster.  Vegetation is to be cleared using a raised dozer blade method or alternative method, provided that alternatives do not result in greater impact to vegetation and soil substrate.  Operators are to ensure blades are raised 10‐30cm above ground,  No greater than a 4.5 m wide corridor will be cleared for each seismic line or track.  Cleared/loose vegetation is to be pushed over to the side of the cleared seismic lines (temporarily “stockpiled”), for later replacement as part of rehabilitation.  Upon completion of seismic activity along each line, loose vegetation is to be immediately pushed back into the area of clearing in accordance with the RLS Rehabilitation Procedure (RLS_EMS_PRO_003). 4.3 INSPECTIONS, MONITORING, AUDITING AND REPORTING

Clearing plans will be submitted to the RLS management representative (if present) or the Site Supervisor or delegate for approval before clearing work begins.

Planned and completed clearing will be entered by the Site Supervisor into the Vegetation Clearing Register.

The Site Supervisor or delegate will regularly inspect operational areas to ensure that only authorised clearing is undertaken. Any clearing beyond approved limits will be reported using the Event and Feedback Report Form and recorded in the Vegetation Clearing Register.

5.0 RELATED DOCUMENTS

 Relevant Clearing Plans  Vegetation Clearing Register (RLS_EMS_FRM_002)  Event and Feedback Report Form (RLS_CMS_FRM_002)  Rehabilitation Procedure (RLS_EMS_PRO_004)  Project‐specific Environment Plan (EP).

VEGETATION LINE CLEARING PROCEDURE Page 3 of 5 RLS_EMS_PRO_002_Rev_0

VEGETATION LINE CLEARING PROCEDURE Page 4 of 5 RLS_EMS_PRO_002_Rev_0

6.0 REVIEW

This procedure shall be reviewed every two years or as part of the management review as required.

7.0 REVISION DETAILS

Revision Reviewed/ Revised by Issued Date Change Notes Number Approved by

A K Bauer‐Simpson G. Martinez 29/08/2016 Initial draft

S. Fu B K. Bauer‐Simpson 15/09/2016 Reviewed by RLS and third party M. Dixon S. Fu 0 K. Bauer‐Simpson 08/09/2016 Approved for implementation M. Dixon

VEGETATION LINE CLEARING PROCEDURE Page 5 of 5 RLS_EMS_PRO_002_Rev_0

Refuelling Equipment Procedure

Version Description Date Author(s) 1.0 Issued for Use 26 September 2018 Dan Gallagher

Refueling Equipment Procedure

Contents

1. Purpose ______3

2. Scope ______3

3. Roles and Responsibilities ______3 Managing Director ...... 3 All Personnel ...... 3

4. Requirements ______4 Risk Assessment ...... 4 Personal Protective Equipment ...... 4 Process Steps ...... 4

InGauge Refuelling Equipment Procedure Page 2 Refueling Equipment Procedure

1. Purpose

The purpose of this Procedure is to identify the process steps, hazards involved with each process step and the control measures implemented for Refueling Equipment. Hazards that are not included in this procedure but become identified must be documented and a formal Job Hazard Analysis (JHA) carried out.

2. Scope

This procedure applies to all inGauge Energy employees, contractors and visitors working on projects or site.

3. Roles and Responsibilities

Managing Director

The inGauge Energy Managing Director must:

• Ensure all inGauge Energy personnel (including employees and contractors) are trained in and comply with this procedure;

• Ensure that resources are available to comply with the requirements within this procedure.

All Personnel

All inGauge Energy personnel (including employees and contractors) must participate and adhere to the requirements as defined within this procedure and/or as requested by the Managing Director.

InGauge Refuelling Equipment Procedure Page 3 Refueling Equipment Procedure

4. Requirements

Risk Assessment

Complete site assessment is required to identify actual or potential hazards and to undertake risk assessment in order to determine appropriate control measures and required resources. Each site's Emergency Plan will detail potential hazards and planned responses.

Personal Protective Equipment

All inGauge Energy personnel (including employees and contractors) must wear the following PPE that will provide a maximum level of protection:

Personal Protective Equipment

Safety glasses/goggles; Hearing protection; Safety helmet;

Protective gloves; Protective clothing. Safety boots;

Process Steps

All inGauge Energy personnel (including employees and contractors) must follow the process for refueling equipment:

Refuelling Equipment Process • ENSURE SPILL KIT IS PROPERLY MAINTAINED & EASILY ACCESSIBLE. 1. Special Notes • DO NOT FILL TANK TO ABSOLUTE FULL, AS THERMAL EXPANSION WILL CAUSE LEAKS AT CAP & BREATHER Responsible Process Step Potential Hazards Control Measures Person/s

. Toolbox Meeting

1. Notify other . Fire and explosion . Locate emergency shut off personnel of your Refueler button locations for fuel intentions. . Spills pumping prior to refuelling.

. Spill kit available 2. Select parking . Fuming location and . Refuelling shall not take Refueler securely park the . Uncontrolled Vehicle place in a confined space; vehicle or Movement ensure fuelling car is at a

InGauge Refuelling Equipment Procedure Page 4 Refueling Equipment Procedure

equipment to be safe distance of 2 meters refuelled on level . Other people and from fuelling point. ground, apply park equipment brake and shut down . Ensure equipment to be engine. refuelled is parked on level ground

. Park brake applied.

. All other vehicles not involved in fuel transfer to be well clear of fuelling facility.

. The ideal location for parking is well ventilated, outside the class 1, zone 1 areas

. The parking area should not obstruct vehicle/personnel movement, emergency exits etc.

. The site selected should be even, solid ground which does not interfere with personnel/ vehicle movement or obstruct emergency equipment, exits etc. If in doubt, consult with the rig manager and determine the correct parking site.

. If reversing carefully check before and during the reversing process

REFUELLING EQUIPMENT

. Sources of ignition . No Smoking or Naked e.g. exhaust turbo Flames manifolds. 1. Clean around fuel . PPE/ rubber gloves cap if necessary and Refueler . Skin contact / dermal remove cap. irritation . Engines shut down

. Fuel contamination . Clean around fuel cap prior (dirt) to removal . Perform before dips to 2. Dip tanks or check . Spills determine fuel quantity to Refueler levels be delivered without . Overfilling overfilling

InGauge Refuelling Equipment Procedure Page 5 Refueling Equipment Procedure

. Slips, trips & falls . 3 points of contact to be used while climbing

. Fire and explosion . No person shall remain in

the vehicle during refuelling 3. Discharge static by . Static can create tiny operations. Refueler applying earth lead. sparks of electricity

which could ignite . Ground equipment vapours and cause a flash fire . Connect correctly, Positive . Incorrectly to positive and negative to 4. Attach the fuel connecting the negative pump leads to the battery lead Refueler Battery Terminal . Connect fuel pump to the . Sparks from poor battery outside the 15m battery connections exclusion zone . Check that all fuel hoses and couplings are in good . Defatting of the skin condition and not leaking. may occur with continued and . Do not leave fuel pumping prolonged contact. into tanks unattended. Irritation and burning sensation . Ensure the fuel delivery line may occur on does not come into contact exposure to diesel or with hot surfaces. mists. . Clothing contaminated with . Contaminated diesel should be removed Clothes and laundered before reuse. Items which cannot be . Inhalation laundered should be 5. Unroll fuel delivery discarded. Allow hose and place fuel . Eye contact contaminated items to air nozzle into tank, Refueler dry or hang in a well squeeze trigger and . Fire and explosion / ventilated area. fill the tank. Static Electricity Spontaneous combustion or fire may result from . Accidental spills contaminated materials being placed together . Other vehicles before drying. running over transfer hose, causing . Absorb spilled diesel with damage and possible non-combustible materials spills such as cat litter, dirt, sand, or petroleum sorbent . Overfilling pads/pillows. Do not use combustible materials like . Slips, trips & falls rags, wood chips, or saw dust. Report the spill to . Nip points on nozzle Supervisor

InGauge Refuelling Equipment Procedure Page 6 Refueling Equipment Procedure

. Avoid entering vehicle whilst refuelling, if you must enter the vehicle, ensure you exit the vehicle touching metal as you close the door, prior to removing the nozzle.

. Check that all fuel hoses and

couplings are in good 6. Ensure fuel lines are . Slips, trips & falls condition and not leaking. Refueler completely closed

off, rolled up. . Spills . Roll up hoses, remove tripping hazards

7. Ensure all fuel caps . Fuel contamination are securely . Pre start Checks Refueler

replaced back on . Spills equipment.

. Disconnect fuel pump to the

8. Disconnect the fuel battery outside the 15m . Sparks while pump leads to the exclusion zone Refueler disconnecting the Battery Terminal battery connections and roll up . Disconnect in a controlled manner

9. Relocate bulk fuel . Slips, trip and falls . Pre start Checks supply to designated Refueler area prior to . Unwanted source of . Housekeeping restoring equipment flammable or to working order. explosive vapour

InGauge Refuelling Equipment Procedure Page 7

Vehicle Operations Procedure

Version Description Date Author(s) 1.0 Issued for Use 25 September 2016 Dan Gallagher

Vehicle Operations Procedure

Contents

1. Purpose ______3

2. Scope ______3

3. Definitions ______3

4. Roles and Responsibilities ______4 Managing Director ...... 4 All Personnel ...... 4

5. Requirements ______4 Driver and Occupant Safety ...... 4 Vehicle Selection ...... 5 5.2.1 Pre-operational Inspection 6 5.2.2 Load Security 6 5.2.3 Breakdowns 7 Driver Management ...... 7 5.3.1 Driver Competence 7 5.3.2 Client Controlled Sites 8 5.3.3 Parking 8 5.3.4 Mobile Phones 8 5.3.5 Cruise Control 8 5.3.6 Night Driving 8 5.3.7 Environment and Road Conditions 8 5.3.8 Driver Accountability 9 5.3.9 Vehicle Incident 9 Journey Management ...... 10 High Risk Journey Management ...... 10

InGauge_Vehicle Operations Procedure.docxING_PRO_VEHICLE Page 2 Vehicle Operations Procedure

1. Purpose

The purpose of this document is to define the requirements in relation to vehicle operations within inGauge Energy workplaces (including client sites).

2. Scope

This procedure applies to all inGauge Energy light and heavy vehicles being used for inGauge Energy related business activities including hire vehicles and contractor vehicles. This procedure applies to all inGauge Energy employees, contractors and visitors working on projects or site.

3. Definitions

Aggregate ATM, of a heavy trailer, means the total maximum mass of the trailer, as stated by Trailer Mass the manufacturer, together with its load and the mass imposed on the towing (ATM) vehicle by the trailer when the towing vehicle and trailer are on a horizontal surface Usually a length of pipe placed over the operating lever of a dog so as to extend its Cheater Bar length (the use of these extensions is not approved by any manufacturer and can be dangerous)

Gross Vehicle The GVM or vehicle capacity is defined as the maximum permissible mass, specified by the manufacturer, of a loaded vehicle. GVM is shown on the vehicle’s Mass (GVM) compliance plate Heavy Vehicle A motor vehicle with a GVM or ATM of more than 4.5t A motor vehicle of not more than 4.5t GVM, built or fitted to carry a maximum of 12 Light Vehicle passengers including the driver, with or without a trailer Work conducted at a location that is more than 30 minutes away from emergency services. Remote travel or work may also include travel: • off primary and secondary road network • where communication coverage or reception with standard radio or Remote Work mobile phone is poor • where work in isolation for lengthy periods (>2 hours) requires monitoring for personal safety • where likely to encounter conditions such as undulating ground, possible creek and/or river crossings Routine Journey A low risk journey that is a daily or routine and is made to the same destination

InGauge_Vehicle Operations Procedure.docxING_PRO_VEHICLE Page 3 Vehicle Operations Procedure

4. Roles and Responsibilities

Managing Director

The inGauge Energy Managing Director must:

• Ensure all inGauge Energy personnel (including employees and contractors) are aware of and comply with this procedure;

• Ensure that resources are available to comply with the requirements within this procedure;

• Ensure they are always seeking to eliminate the need for the journey (e.g. through video or phone conference);

• Ensure every effort is made to reduce the total kilometres driven especially those driven in hazardous environments (e.g. extreme weather, low visibility, etc.);

• Where driving use unavoidable, alternatives such as combining journeys shall always be explored;

• Ensure all vehicles are maintained according to manufacturer’s specifications;

• Ensure location is known of all staff working under their direction at all times;

• Authorising the use of vehicles under their control.

All Personnel

All inGauge Energy personnel (including employees and contractors) must participate and adhere to the requirements as defined within this procedure and/or as requested by the Managing Director.

5. Requirements

Driver and Occupant Safety

The driver of a vehicle is at all times responsible for the safe operation of the vehicle. The driver of a vehicle must:

• Obey all local speed limits and road regulations;

• Report and record all incidents, including collisions;

• Ensure all occupants of all vehicles wear a seatbelt whenever the vehicle is in motion;

• Ensure no persons ride in the back of a utility at any time;

InGauge_Vehicle Operations Procedure.docxING_PRO_VEHICLE Page 4 Vehicle Operations Procedure

• Not tow equipment unless the vehicles is engineered to do so;

• Ensure that headlights are on at all times in rural and remote areas, as well as at times of low visibility;

• Only transport the number of passengers in a vehicle that can be seated in accordance with the manufacturer’s design so that each person has their own seat belt;

• Assess route hazards and select the safest route;

• Minimise night driving where possible;

• Reassess the route hazards before each journey, including changed road, traffic, and weather conditions;

• Drive appropriately when encountering unanticipated road and weather conditions;

• Avoid driving where flight and work schedule are likely to cause jet-lag or drowsiness;

• Complete a Journey Management Plan for any identified high-risk journeys and implement all required controls;

• Engage four 4WD when driving off-road or on designated field roads;

• Not exceed 80 kilometres per hour or the indicated speed limit, whichever is lower, when driving on unsealed roads;

• Be aware of road side hazards presented by animals in some areas such as rural and remote regions, particularly when driving at dusk, dawn and night;

• Where possible, park the vehicle so that the first motion when resuming the trip is forward (i.e. reverse park), and also in such a way that it will not roll if the brakes fail (i.e. wheel chocks must be used whenever there is potential for vehicles to roll forward or backwards when parked).

Vehicle Selection

The selection of vehicles must take into account the intended purpose and use of the vehicle. All vehicles (including inGauge Energy and non-inGauge Energy vehicles) must be:

• Subject to a pre-operational inspection by the driver using the InGauge Energy Vehicle Inspection Checklist;

• Fitted with seat belts for the driver and all passengers;

• Be suitable for the task;

• Registered according to the relevant legislation.

InGauge_Vehicle Operations Procedure.docxING_PRO_VEHICLE Page 5 Vehicle Operations Procedure

5.2.1 Pre-operational Inspection The driver is to perform the following preoperational inspection prior to or as near as practical to the beginning of the journey by using the InGauge Energy Vehicle Inspection Checklist (FOR-014):

• Inspection of safety critical components including (but not limited to):

ο Tyres - visual inspection for wear and inflation (when re-fuelling check all tyre pressures including the spare);

ο Wheels - for security;

ο Oil - for correct levels;

ο Fuel (as recommended by the manufacturer of the vehicle).

• Perform a functional test of safety critical components including (but not limited to):

ο Brakes;

ο Lights;

ο Horn;

ο Two-way radio (if fitted).

• All vehicles are to be fitted with an ‘Emergency Kit’ which shall include but not limited to:

ο High visibility vest;

ο Safety triangles;

ο Torch with spare battery;

ο First aid kit;

ο Fire extinguisher.

As per procedures relating to all equipment, if a defect is identified the equipment is to be tagged and documented as out of service. If any critical fault is identified with the vehicle the Managing Director is to be immediately notified and a JSA is to be performed to quantify the issue/risk. 5.2.2 Load Security Materials and loads carried on or within vehicles should be undertaken in accordance with the following:

• It is the responsibility of the vehicle driver to ensure that the vehicle is appropriate for the load being carried and that the load is adequately secured (within or external to the vehicle) as per the requirements of the NHVAS Load Restraint Guide;

• Materials or loads transported on a vehicle must be undertaken in such a way that the materials/load do not present a hazard to personnel within the vehicle or any other personnel;

InGauge_Vehicle Operations Procedure.docxING_PRO_VEHICLE Page 6 Vehicle Operations Procedure

• Legal requirements in relation to Gross Vehicle Mass (GVM), maximum rated load and allowable overhang must be adhered to. This applies to vehicles, roof-mounted carrier systems and trailers;

• Only tow a trailer if the loaded mass of the trailer does not exceed the load capacity of the towbar and trailer coupling and is within the vehicle manufacturer’s prescribed towing limits;

• Consider the forces acting on the load during acceleration, braking and cornering both during normal operations and emergency actions. Ensure the load will remain secure throughout each of these manoeuvres;

• Ropes, tie-down straps or chains must be in good condition and of sufficient strength to restrain the load in all conditions. As a general rule the combined strength of load restraints should be capable of holding twice the weight of the load in the forward direction, and the weight of the load in a sideways and rearward direction (e.g. a 50kg load should be secured by restraints capable of holding 100kg in the forward direction and 50kg in each of the other directions);

• apply tarpaulin covers or nets over the top of any cargo or load liable to be blown off during transport;

• Both the load and load restraints should be periodically checked for tension and security particularly when travelling over rough surfaces or long distances;

• Never use extension or cheater bars to increase leverage.

5.2.3 Breakdowns In the event of a vehicle breakdown:

• Where possible park vehicle in a safe, level location;

• Turn on hazard lights and parking lights and place hazard beacons/triangles to warn other vehicles;

• Where safe, remain in the vehicle. If there is a possibility that another vehicle could collide with the breakdown vehicle, then move more than 50m away downstream from the breakdown or away from the road to a safe location;

• Where the breakdown occurs during travel to or from site – contact the Managing Director. Where the breakdown occurs on site – follow the site specific instructions on management of a vehicle breakdown and contact the nominated client representative.

Driver Management

5.3.1 Driver Competence The driver of the vehicle must be competent to operate the vehicle safely at all times. This means that the driver must:

InGauge_Vehicle Operations Procedure.docxING_PRO_VEHICLE Page 7 Vehicle Operations Procedure

• Comply with the inGauge Energy Fitness for Work Procedure;

• Carry a current open or unrestricted driving licence for the vehicle type in use;

• Report any change to the condition of this licence to the supervisor at the next shift or scheduled working day;

• Pass a medical assessment within the previous two years;

• If relevant, comply with client Fitness for Work, Drug and Alcohol and Driving-related Policies and procedures.

5.3.2 Client Controlled Sites Client sites may require vehicles to have specific safety equipment installed and site certification/approval. If so, a client controlled site vehicle or a hire vehicle that has a current client certification may be required to be utilised. At client controlled sites specific site traffic rules may apply. The Driver is to review, understand and adhere to all clients’ site traffic rules whilst on the client site. 5.3.3 Parking Where possible, all light vehicles are to be parked in such a way that it allows the vehicle to be driven forward when leaving the parked position. In most cases this will entail the vehicle reversing into the parking position. When following a vehicle which is about to be parked, right of way should be given to the parking vehicle. Secure the vehicle when left unattended.

• Ensure that all valuables including personal items are locked away or removed from the vehicle;

• When parking at motels position vehicle in a well-lit area;

• Avoid parking at site entrances or exits where it could block emergency vehicle access.

5.3.4 Mobile Phones Drivers shall not use a mobile phone (including satellite phones) whilst the vehicle is in motion – this includes ‘hand-free operations’. In order for a driver to speak on the phone, the vehicle must first be parked on a safe area, set out of gear and with the hand break fully engaged. 5.3.5 Cruise Control The use of cruise control is prohibited when driving in adverse weather and road conditions, as well as on unsealed roads, irrespective of vehicle type. 5.3.6 Night Driving Night driving shall not take place unless specifically authorised in writing by the Managing Director. 5.3.7 Environment and Road Conditions Driving to the road conditions is mandatory. Verify road conditions prior to travel by contacting any/all of the following:

• RACQ/NRMA road assistance to verify road condition;

InGauge_Vehicle Operations Procedure.docxING_PRO_VEHICLE Page 8 Vehicle Operations Procedure

• The site contact;

• The nearest police station.

Drivers must not drive: • Drive through flooded areas or fast-flowing water; or

• Drivers must not drive into fire affected areas unless they are part of a suitably trained and equipped emergency response unit or it is an emergency situation and there is no practical alternative.

5.3.8 Driver Accountability Management may enact the InGauge Energy Disciplinary and Grievance Procedure for breaches of the following zero-tolerance driving behaviours:

• Driving under the influence of prohibited/illegal drugs or alcohol (Blood Alcohol Concentration > 0.00);

• Speeding 15km/h or more above the posted speed limit;

• Driver use of a mobile phone, including hands-free, while the vehicle is in motion;

• Failure to wear a seat belt while the vehicle is in motion;

• Driving more than two-and-a-half hours without a 15-minute continuous rest period or changing drivers; or

• Tampering with an IVMS or ‘driver key swapping’.

5.3.9 Vehicle Incident Drivers involved in an incident involving their vehicle must:

• Stop their vehicle immediately;

• Determine whether anyone is injured, render all possible assistance and call emergency services if required;

• Exchange details with the other driver or drivers (name, address and vehicle registration);

• Report the incident immediately to police if anyone is killed, injured or if the total damage is estimated at more than $1000; and

• Report the incident to the Managing Director as soon as practicable. Drivers must not:

• Admit fault or liability to any party; or

• Attempt to drive vehicles that may be un-roadworthy.

InGauge_Vehicle Operations Procedure.docxING_PRO_VEHICLE Page 9 Vehicle Operations Procedure

Journey Management

All non-routine and remote travel by road must have a Journey Management Plan. All drivers and the Managing Director must review and plan their journey to ensure that:

• Driver has completed a journey management plan;

• Managing Director or representative has approved the journey management plan;

• The planned route is as per client requirements (where relevant);

• The risks of the journey are adequately controlled and managed;

• Personnel can be tracked and crisis and emergency management procedures can be implemented where required;

• The journey is conducted safely;

If you are driving, you must adhere to the following driving hours and rest periods:

• A 15-minute, or longer, rest break every two hours;

• A 30-minute rest break after five hours of driving;

• Driving for no more than 10 hours in a single 24-hour period;

• Driving for no more than 120 hours in a continuous 14-day period.

High Risk Journey Management

High Risk Journeys for InGauge Energy are defined as:

• Single journeys with a duration of Four (4) hours or more (including rest breaks);

• Night driving with a single journey duration of two (2) hours or more;

• Transport of hazardous materials or dangerous goods;

• Transport of oversize loads;

• Remote work; and

• Travel where local travel advisories are in place (i.e. floods and fires).

Drivers undertaking high-risk journeys must:

• Make sure that their mobile phones are charged and working and contact numbers are recorded;

• Contact the Managing Director or representative, or delegate:

ο At departure, with expected break and arrival times;

InGauge_Vehicle Operations Procedure.docxING_PRO_VEHICLE Page 10 Vehicle Operations Procedure

ο At each scheduled driver break;

ο At arrival; and

ο If there is any deviation from their planned journey.

For Drivers undertaking high-risk journeys the Managing Director or representative must attempt to contact the driver if they are more than 15 minutes overdue for a break or arrival at their destination. For Drivers undertaking high-risk journeys the Managing Director or representative must notify Client management if no contact has been made within 30 minutes of scheduled contact.

InGauge_Vehicle Operations Procedure.docxING_PRO_VEHICLE Page 11

Waste Management Procedure

Version Description Date Author(s) 1.0 Issued for Use 26th June 2016 Dan Gallagher

Waste Management Procedure

Contents

1. Purpose ______3

2. Scope ______3

3. Roles and Responsibilities ______3 Managing Director ...... 3 All Personnel ...... 3

4. Requirements ______3 Waste Streams ...... 4

InGauge_Waste Management Procedure.docxING_PRO_WASTE_01 Page 2 Waste Management Procedure

1. Purpose inGauge Energy aim to ensure environmentally sound and effective management of all waste streams generated by our operations. The objective of this procedure is to define the accountabilities.

2. Scope

This procedure applies to all inGauge Energy employees and contractors.

3. Roles and Responsibilities

Managing Director

The inGauge Energy Managing Director must:

• Ensure all inGauge Energy personnel are aware of and comply with this procedure;

• Ensure they are aware of waste management processes taking place in the workplace and take action when required as per this procedure;

• Ensure that all site waste management processes are followed;

• Ensure that resources are available to comply with the requirements within this procedure;

• Ensure when disposing of waste that suitable waste disposal methods/contractors are used and that appropriate waste records are kept, e.g. receipts from waste disposal company.

All Personnel

All inGauge Energy personnel (including employees and contractors) must participate and adhere to waste management requirements as defined within this procedure and/or as requested by the Manager Director.

4. Requirements

Within inGauge Energy a number of different waste streams are generated in office areas as well as on site. Waste, if not managed, has the potential to adversely affect the environment. All employees, when working at our client sites, have a duty to ensure that all waste generated is disposed of in accordance with the client site waste management procedure or this procedure.

InGauge_Waste Management Procedure.docxING_PRO_WASTE_01 Page 3 Waste Management Procedure

Waste Streams

Within inGauge Energy, the following are the current waste streams which are managed:

Waste Type Disposal Method Office Waste Paper Sensitive documents to be shredded. Other office waste paper to be place in paper recycling bins to be collected by waste collection contractor. Kitchen Waste Recyclable waste to be placed in recycled bins and disposed of through waste collection contractor. Cardboard Re-used internally where possible or disposed of through waste collection contractor. Used Vehicle Batteries Disposed of by specialist waste contractor e.g. Runabout Metal Recyclers. Used Lithium Batteries Recycled through a specialist waste contractor e.g. MRI Australia. Condensate, Oil, Grease, Produced Managed by the mechanics who service the vehicles. Condensate, oil, Water and produced water, which results from any operation will be handled and disposed of by appropriately certified subcontractors. The subcontractor’s procedures shall also be adhered to for specific circumstances and substances. These waste substances shall be stored in bunded areas away from other hazardous substances whilst awaiting collection. Chemical containers, Paint Disposed of through waste collection contractor. These waste containers, Aerosols substances shall be stored in bunded areas away from other hazardous substances whilst awaiting collection. Packing containers Re-used internally where possible or disposed of through waste collection contractor. Plastic Re-used internally where possible or disposed of through waste collection contractor. Tyres Disposed of by tyre suppliers e.g. Fennel Tyres, Tyre Power Fire Extinguishers Disposed of/reused by Chubb Fire

InGauge_Waste Management Procedure.docxING_PRO_WASTE_01 Page 4

EMERGENCY RESPONSE PROCEDURE – RLS_CMS_PRO_006_REV_0

1.0 PURPOSE

The purpose of this procedure is to provide guidance for RLS Lennard Shelf Pty Ltd (RLS) personnel on what needs to be done in the event of an emergency whilst travelling to and from work sites.

2.0 SCOPE

This procedure applies to RLS personnel conducting site work. Management of safety on specific worksites will be the responsibility of the contractor conducting the work as it will be more tailored to that environment and to the operations.

3.0 RESPONSIBILITIES

Position Responsibilities

Management Provide resources to enable effective response to emergency situations which may be encountered on by RLS personnel, whilst travelling to and from worksites.

Supervisors Ensure subordinate personnel are aware of emergency procedures and how they relate to them.

Personnel Carry out procedures and report if required.

4.0 PROCEDURE

4.1 EMERGENCY PROCEDURES ON WORKSITES

RLS personnel will make themselves familiar with the contractor’s Emergency Response Plan (TS‐PLN‐002) and other relevant procedure prior to entering a worksite. This will ensure that site specific emergency situations are appropriately addressed.

EMERGENCY RESPONSE PROCEDURE Page 1 of 7 RLS_CMS_PRO_006_Rev_0

4.2 COMMUNICATIONS

All workplace emergencies must be communicated immediately and directly (where possible) to RLS management, or any nominated person who will direct other emergency contacts into action.

If required personnel are to contact emergency authorities in the first instance on ‘000’ (or 112 from mobile phones and +61 8 9395 9395 from satellite phones).

Each work party will be provided with a satellite phone and GPS unit, and vehicles should be fitted with a UHF two‐way radio where possible.

4.3 REPORTING

All emergency events are to be reported using an Event and Feedback Report Form (RLS_CMS_FRM_002) and entered into the Event and Feedback Register (RLS_CMS_REG_002). All emergency events shall be reported to management, DMP and other relevant authorities in accordance with the Event and Feedback Reporting and Investigation Procedure (RLS_CMS_PRO_007)

4.4 INVESTIGATIONS

Investigation of the emergency event shall be conducted in accordance with the Event and Feedback Reporting and Investigation Procedure.

4.5 GENERAL MEDICAL EMERGENCY

In the event of a medical emergency the following steps should be carried out:

1. Assess the area for any dangers that may pose further threat to you, the casualty or others in the area. If safe to do so, remove the danger. When the area is safe, attend to the casualty (see step 2). If it is not possible to remove the danger or to access the casualty without placing your own life at risk, call ‘000’ for help and explain the dangers as well as the medical emergency. 2. Assess the casualty. Determine if the casualty is conscious, by asking their name or seeking a response. If there is no response use first aid training techniques to check airways and position casualty appropriately. If responding apply first aid to any life threatening injuries that need immediate attention. If someone else is present, ask them to call ‘000’ for ambulance assistance. 3. Check Breathing. If the casualty is breathing, place in recovery position and call ‘000’. If the casualty isn’t breathing call ‘000’ for medical assistance, then begin CPR and continue until medical assistance arrives. 4. Continue to manage casualty. Follow the advice and instructions provided by the emergency services. Try to keep the casualty comfortable and calm until medical assistance arrives. If there is someone else present, ask them to contact the RLS management to notify them of the situation. 5. If in a location where access is difficult or it is hard to find, arrange for someone to meet the ambulance or medical assistance at an appropriate location to guide them to the casualty.

EMERGENCY RESPONSE PROCEDURE Page 2 of 7 RLS_CMS_PRO_006_Rev_0

4.6 FIRE EMERGENCY

In the event of a fire, the following steps should be carried out:

1. If a fire starts in your presence and you are able to safely put the fire out using portable fire extinguishers, then attempt to fight the fire while raising an alarm by loudly calling out “fire, fire, fire!” 2. If you are unable to safely fight the fire, then immediately call ‘000’ and depart to a safe area. 3. If at a campsite, move to emergency assembly points and await instructions, management will alert emergency services appropriately. 4. Personnel may return to work when given the all clear by relevant authorities.

4.7 WEATHER EVENTS

Weather forecasts should be checked regularly and any radical changes in weather forecasts or conditions should be investigated.

4.7.1 Flooding

In the event of flooding, personnel should find high ground as soon as possible. Personnel should not attempt to cross any flood water under any circumstances.

4.7.2 Cyclones

Site supervisors shall keep updated as to the current cyclone alert status for the area during relevant seasons. If a cyclone has been predicted to impact the work site, then all personnel shall be evacuated to a suitably safe area until the “all clear” has been given.

4.8 HEAT RELATED ILLNESS

The following procedures shall be followed when it is established that a person is suffering from thermal heat related illness.

4.8.1 First Aid Treatment for Heat Rash:

 remove the person from the heat, if possible to a cool environment with low humidity  keep the affected area dry  baby powder may be used to increase comfort  seek medical attention if rash does not subside.

4.8.2 First Aid Treatment for Heat Cramps:

 Cease activity and sit quietly in a cool place  increase fluid intake  massage muscles to ease spasms or cramps and apply ice packs  rest for a few hours before returning to activity

EMERGENCY RESPONSE PROCEDURE Page 3 of 7 RLS_CMS_PRO_006_Rev_0

 hydration test to be completed by affected person prior to returning to work  seek medical attention if heat cramps do not subside in one hour.

4.8.3 First Aid Treatment for Heat Stress and Heat Exhaustion:

 get the person to a cool or shady area  lay them down with legs supported and slightly elevated  remove or loosen clothing and wet skin with water or wrap in wet cloths, fanning continuously  cool the person by: o immersing in a cool bath o sponging with cool water o spraying gently with water o giving small sips of water  hydration test to be completed by affected person prior to returning to work  monitor the body temperature if possible and continue cooling efforts until the body temperature drops below 38°C  seek medical attention if symptoms worsen or last longer than one hour.

4.9 HEAT STROKE

Heat stroke may appear similar to heat exhaustion, but the skin is likely to be dry with no sweating and the person’s mental condition worsens. They may stagger, appear confused, enter into fits, collapse and become unconscious.

Warning signs of heat stroke vary but may include:

 very high body temperature  red, hot, dry skin (no sweating)  dry swollen tongue  rapid pulse  throbbing headache  dizziness, confusion, nausea  collapse  fits  eventual unconsciousness

4.9.1 First Aid Treatment for Heat Stroke

Heat stroke is a serious medical condition and requires immediate professional medical treatment. Follow the following steps in the event of suspected heat stroke:

 call triple zero (000, of 112) for an ambulance or medical assistance  get the person to a cool or shady area

EMERGENCY RESPONSE PROCEDURE Page 4 of 7 RLS_CMS_PRO_006_Rev_0

 if the person is conscious lay them down with legs supported and slightly elevated  remove clothing and wet their skin with water or wrap in wet cloths, fanning continuously  cool the person by: o immerse in cool bath, but only if conscious o apply ice packs to groin and armpits o sponge with cool water o spray with water (can use a garden hose, although be aware that if the hose has been in the sun it will be hot water to begin with)  monitor the body temperature if possible and continue cooling efforts until the body temperature drops below 38°C  if the person is unconscious check the airway and breathing  position an unconscious person on their side and clear their airway (recovery position)  wait for the medical assistance or urgently transport the person to hospital, where more intensive cooling and support can be given  if medical attention is delayed, seek further instructions from emergency medical staff.

4.10 SNAKE BITES

All snakes encountered are to assumed as venomous.

4.10.1 First aid for snake bites:

 call emergency services  do not panic, try to remain calm, lie down and immobilise the bitten area  apply a bandage but do not block circulation. Take a broad bandage and bind along the limb starting at the bite area, at the same pressure as for a sprain. Then bandage down the limb and continue back up the entire limb over and above the bite area. This will help prevent the spread of the venom through the body. Do not remove the bandage. It is often easier to go over the top of clothing rather than remove it. In an emergency, strips of clothing or pantyhose can be used instead of a bandage  immobilise the limb with a splint. Lie down and keep the limb completely still until help arrives  do not elevate the limb or attempt to walk or run; movement will encourage the spread of the venom through the body  do not attempt to catch the snake. All too often, the snake will bite again if an attempt is made to catch it. Identification of the snake species can be obtained through samples of the patient's blood or urine, and from venom around the bite area. If the species of snake still remains uncertain, a poly‐ anti‐venom may be used, which is suitable for treatment of all venomous snake bites.  do not wash the wound; venom left on the skin will help doctors identify the snake and administer the appropriate anti‐venom  do not cut the wound, as this will spread the venom into the bloodstream and can cause more serious injuries than the snake bite itself

EMERGENCY RESPONSE PROCEDURE Page 5 of 7 RLS_CMS_PRO_006_Rev_0

4.11 SPILLS

For emergency spill response, refer to the Spill Response Procedure (RLS_CMS_PRO_011).

4.12 EVACUATION

In the event of an alarm being raised on site:

 Leave worksite immediately using the safest route  Proceed to the assembly point as designated  Remain at assembly point and follow instructions.

5.0 RELATED DOCUMENTS

 Safety Management Plan ‐ RLS_SMS_MPL_001  Event and Feedback Report Form ‐ RLS_CMS_FRM_002  Event and Feedback Register ‐ RLS_CMS_REG_002  Event and Feedback Reporting and Investigation Procedure ‐ RLS_CMS_PRO_007  Spill Response Procedure ‐ RLS_CMS_PRO_011  Terrex Health Safety Security & Environmental (HSSE) Plan – TS‐PLN‐001  Terrex Emergency Response Plan ‐TS‐PLN‐002.

6.0 REVIEW

This procedure shall be reviewed every two years or as part of the management review as required.

7.0 REVISION DETAILS

Revision Reviewed/ Revised by Issued Date Change Notes Number Approved by

A W. Bauer‐Simpson B. van der Pols 19/08/2016 Initial draft

B W. Bauer‐Simpson S. Fu 23/08/2016 Reviewed by RLS

0 W. Bauer‐Simpson S. Fu 25/08/2016 Approved for implementation

EMERGENCY RESPONSE PROCEDURE Page 6 of 7 RLS_CMS_PRO_006_Rev_0

EMERGENCY RESPONSE PROCEDURE Page 7 of 7 RLS_CMS_PRO_006_Rev_0

SPILL RESPONSE PROCEDURE – RLS_CMS_PRO_011_REV_0

1.0 PURPOSE

This procedure outlines the commitments of RLS Lennard Shelf Pty Ltd (RLS) and the regulatory and environmental requirements applicable in the event of a hydrocarbon, chemical or oil spill incident. The purpose of this procedure is ensure that all action is taken to minimise the impact of hydrocarbons and chemicals on the environment and personnel safety by ensuring hydrocarbon chemicals are properly contained, treated, transported and disposed of.

2.0 SCOPE

This procedure applies to all personnel and contractors conducting business on RLS sites.

3.0 RESPONSIBILITIES

Position Responsibilities

Management Ensure personnel and contractors are aware of the project/site‐specific Spill Clean Up Procedure and Oil Spill Contingency Plans.

Ensure all spills and associated incidents are reported to the relevant authorities.

Supervisors Ensure that personnel operate within the appropriate legislative requirements, and the project/site‐specific Spill Clean Up Procedure and Oil Spill Contingency Plans (found in the Environment Plan).

Oversee and audit spill responses, in the interests of continual improvement.

Personnel Ensure all spills, incidents and near misses are responded to appropriately and reported to RLS Management.

SPILL RESPONSE PROCEDURE Page 1 of 5 RLS_CMS_PRO_011_Rev_0

4.0 SPILL DEFINITIONS

Level Definition

Minor spill Spill contaminates the surface of the ground not in excess of 0.50 m2 in area and 0.50 cm in depth. The spill can be effectively contained and cleaned up by a single department or team using the containment kit, plastic packets and / or a pressure hose.

Moderate spill A spill that would require the assistance of other departments or teams to contain and clean up (i.e. use of additional clean up kits, personnel or equipment).

Major spill A spill that cannot effectively be contained or cleaned up with the resources available on‐ site. External contractor or emergency services help is required.

5.0 PROCEDURE

5.1 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

Immediate action by all personnel in the event of a spill is containment to the best of their ability given equipment available to them, and as long as there is no risk to safety. Containment must be attempted prior to any other actions, including notification.

The first point of contact for all staff reporting a spill is the Site Supervisor. Depending on the severity of the incident, RLS management may also be contacted.

The Site Supervisor (or most senior person on‐site at the time of the spill) assesses the spill to determine severity and implements the appropriate response according the clean‐up response (i.e. ‘minor to moderate spill pathway’ clean‐up process or ‘major spill pathway’ clean‐up process).

When containing and cleaning up spills, personnel are to ensure all safety precautions are in place i.e. PPE, chemical PVC gloves, and ensuring fire extinguishers are readily available, no one is smoking and all vehicle engines are switched off.

All efforts must be aimed at rapidly deploying the containment kit and/or sand so as to reduce the spillage area as much as possible, and always work up hill and up wind from the spill.

Following any spill, every effort should be made to restore the affected area to its original condition, ensuring all contaminants are removed and disposed of correctly.

SPILL RESPONSE PROCEDURE Page 2 of 5 RLS_CMS_PRO_011_Rev_0

5.2 MINOR TO MODERATE SPILLS

In the event of a minor to moderate spill:

 Personnel must immediately obtain the emergency response clean‐up/containment kit  Contain spread by constructing a bund around the spill area (i.e. with socks or sand)  For ground spills, use spill material to absorb maximum amount of fluid possible, then transfer fluid‐ soaked materials into plastic contaminated waste bags  Use a shovel to dig up and remove any contaminated sand, gravel or rocks and also transfer into plastic contaminated waste bags  Label all plastic contaminated waste bags with type and estimated quantity of spilt material, then bring back to camp and place in the designated contaminated soils, solid waste bins  Restore the terrain to its original condition (using earth‐moving equipment to back blade the site, or shovels to fill in any holes as required).

5.3 MAJOR SPILLS

In the event of a major spill:

 Cordon off the area and make it safe  If on a major road, immediately call the local police and/or Emergency Services so that they may control the scene and coordinate the clean‐up, and also advise of the most appropriate action prior to their arrival  If an associated fire hazard, evacuate the area immediately to a minimum distance of 500 m and await the arrival of the Emergency Services  Until the police or Emergency Services arrive, the Site Supervisor and/or most senior staff member at the site of the spill will be in charge of the scene, assigning personnel/resources to area as necessary  Personnel should be safely positioned to warn, slow down, and if necessary redirect traffic around the hazard pending the arrival of Emergency Services or Police  Vehicles are to be parked on the side of the road, uphill and up‐wind, well away from the spill, with beacon lights and emergency hazard lights on  A licensed third party will undertake the spill clean‐up, with the assistance of site crew, as required.

SPILL RESPONSE PROCEDURE Page 3 of 5 RLS_CMS_PRO_011_Rev_0

5.4 REPORTING AND AUDITING

All spills are to be reported to the Site Supervisor and in accordance with Event and Feedback Reporting and Investigation Procedure (RLS_CMS_PR_007).

RLS management will ensure any hydrocarbon or chemical spills are reported to the appropriate contacts within the Department of Mines and Petroleum (DMP), in accordance with the table below.

DMP Reporting Contacts (Incident Reporting)

DMP Environment Reportable (environmental) incidents 0419 960 621 reported ASAP, no more than 2 hours after 24 hr Duty Phone [email protected] the incident

DMP Safety All accidents and dangerous occurrences in Office hours (8.30 am to 4.30 pm) relation to petroleum, pipeline and 24 hr Officers 9358 8010 geothermal operations requiring immediate notification After hours, the following numbers in listed order:

0437 973 672, 0439 964 143, 0437 972 947, 0437 970 014.

And written email notification to [email protected]

During site projects/operations, weekly audits and inspections of all spill kits will be undertaken by the Site Supervisor or delegate in order to ensure that kits are complete, in the correct locations and ready for use in case of a spill. Audits and inspections of spill kits will also be undertaken by the Site Supervisor or delegate following any spill incidents. All inspection reports will be kept and maintained in RLS’s Inspection and Audit Register (RLS_CMS_REG_008).

6.0 RELATED DOCUMENTS

• Event and Feedback Reporting and Investigation Procedure (RLS_CMS_PR_007) • Inspection and Audit Register (RLS_CMS_REG_008).

SPILL RESPONSE PROCEDURE Page 4 of 5 RLS_CMS_PRO_011_Rev_0

7.0 REVIEW

This procedure shall be reviewed every two years or as part of the management review as a required.

8.0 REVISION DETAILS

Revision Reviewed/ Revised by Issued Date Change Notes Number Approved by

A W. Bauer‐Simpson B. van der pols 03/08/2016 Initial draft

B W. Bauer‐Simpson S. Fu 16/08/2016 Reviewed by RLS

W. Bauer‐Simpson S. Fu 25/08/2016 Approved for implementation

SPILL RESPONSE PROCEDURE Page 5 of 5 RLS_CMS_PRO_011_Rev_0

APPENDIX C - STRATIGRAPHIC UNITS IN THE DERBY AREA WITH GROUNDWATER POTENTIAL (FROM SMITH (1992))

REY RESOURCES, ENVIRONMENT PLAN - STOKES BAY - 1, POINT TORMEN T - 1, WEST KORA - 1 C 1

Appendix C Stratigraphic units in the Derby area* with groundwater potential (from Smith (1992))

Stratigraphic Units Summary

The Fairfield Group includes the Gumhole Formation, Yellow Drum Sandstone, and Laurel Formation and comprises interbedded limestone, shale, siltstone, sandstone, and dolomite. Aquifers in the group are recharged directly by rainfall and possibly by river flow in the northeast of the area, and groundwater flow is to the southwest, possibly into Permian sediments (Grant Group), with local Fairfield Group discharge sustaining pools in Hawkstone Creek. Groundwater salinities in the east of the area increase with depth. Where the aquifer is shallow (1000 – 1500 m), formation water salinities range from 600 to 16 000 mg/L total dissolved solids (TDS), but where the formation is deep (1500 – 2000 m), salinities range from 6000 to 50 000 mg/L.

The Anderson Formation comprises of sandstone, siltstone and shale, and occurs as a sub-surface layer across most of the Derby area and is thinner in the north and northeast with a maximum Anderson Formation thickness of 1058 m. Groundwater salinities are 200 to 7000 mg/L. These values are lower than occur in the Fairfield Group, so the formation is thought to be recharged east of the Derby area or by leakage from the overlying Betty Formation. The groundwater flow direction is not known.

The Betty Formation, the lowermost formation of the Grant Group, comprises sandstone and minor conglomerate and, except in the extreme northeast and two other small areas occurs in the subsurface throughout the Derby area. The formation constitutes between 30% and 60% of the Grant Group and is up to 801 m in thickness. The Betty Formation is an unconfined aquifer in the Betty Formation northeast where it is recharged directly by rainfall. Groundwater flow is southwest and the groundwater salinity in the Betty Formation near Hawkstone Peak is 250 to 400 mg/L. Salinities in the Betty Formation are 3000 to 4000 mg/L in The Sisters Plateau area to the East of Derby, and 2700 to 6400 mg/L on the Dampier Peninsula. Salinity increases to the northeast of Damper Peninsula and, with depth, to about 40 000 mg/L -70 000 mg/L in the north of the Derby area.

The Winifred Formation, consists of siltstone, and is the middle formation of the Grant Group. It has a similar distribution to that of the Betty Formation and is up to 171 m thick. It lies conformably Winifred Formation between the Betty Formation and the Carolyn Formation, forming an aquiclude between these two major aquifers.

The Carolyn Formation, the uppermost formation of the Grant Group, consists of sandstone, conglomerate and shale of up to 250 m in thickness, and the Poole Sandstone comprises sandstone and siltstone of up to 120 m in thickness. The two formations are hydraulically connected and are considered as a single aquifer. The Carolyn Formation and Poole Sandstone form an aquifer system recharged directly by rainfall where the formations outcrop in the far northeast of the Derby area (not Carolyn Formation within the seismic survey area). The aquifer sustains springs and pools along Hawkstone Creek in this and Poole Sandstone area. Artesian flows occur in bores to the northwest of the Grant Range where the aquifer is confined by the Noonkanbah Formation. Groundwater salinity in the Carolyn Formation - Poole Sandstone aquifer in the Grant Range - Camballin area is between 150 and 650 mg/L 'IDS, except near the Fitzroy River where it ranges up to 1700 mg/L. Salinity ranges from 250 to 2600 mg/L near The Sisters Plateau and from 5000 to 25 000 mg/L on the Dampier Peninsula. The salinity in the Poole Sandstone in the far northeast of the Derby area is 250 to 400 mg/L.

The Noonkanbah Formation consists of siltstone, limestone and sandstone, occurring beneath blacksoil plains in the south and northeast of the Derby area, with a distribution similar to the Noonkanbah Liveringa Group. The Formation is up to 540 m thick and lies conformably between the Poole Formation Sandstone and Liveringa Group. The Noonkanbah Formation is an aquiclude with very little potential for groundwater development. The few bores drilled in the formation, near Kimberley Downs homestead and north of the Grant Range, were unsuccessful in producing groundwater.

REY RESOURCES, ENVIRONMENT PLAN - STOKES BAY - 1, POINT TORMEN T - 1, WEST KORA - 1 C 2

Stratigraphic Units Summary

The Liveringa Group, comprising the Hardman and Lightjack Formations, consists of interbedded sandstones, siltstones, and shales. The maximum intersected thickness is 319 m. Recharge occurs mainly from rainfall on areas of outcrop and locally from surface runoff and leakage through alluvium in Le Lievre Swamp near the Fitzroy River east of Camballin.

Livaringa Group In the east of the Derby area groundwater flow is westward, in the northeast of the Derby area, groundwater is thought to flow in a north-westerly direction and discharges into the Meda River. Groundwater salinity in the Liveringa Group in the southern half of the Derby area increases westward from about 400 mg/L in outcrop areas to about 7000 mg/L. Low-salinity groundwater in the group possibly results from recharge by floodwaters.

The Blina Shale consists mainly of dark-grey shale and siltstone with minor sandy claystone and fine sandstone. The formation extends over about half of the Derby area and outcrops in the Erskine Range and The Sisters Plateau to the east and southeast. The maximum thickness intersected by a bore (Bora 2) is 462 m. The Blina Shale is thought to overlie the Liveringa Group conformably in the Blina Shale seismic survey area, but elsewhere the relationship is disconformable. It is overlain disconformably by the Erskine Sandstone and unconformably by the Wallal Sandstone and Quaternary alluvium.

The Blina Shale is a confining bed to the Liveringa Group. A few small, generally saline, groundwater supplies have been developed from the Blina Shale on in the Derby area.

The Erskine Sandstone comprises very fine to fine, grey sandstone and grey claystone with siltstone and minor black shale. About 85% of the sandstone is in the upper half of the formation and is interbedded with claystone. The lower half of the formation is predominantly claystone and is lithologically similar to the Blina Shale. The Erskine Sandstone occupies a syncline extending north- westward through the central part of Derby area beneath King Sound and the Dampier Peninsula. The Erskine Sandstone formation outcrops in The Sisters Plateau and Erskine Range in the east and southeast of the Derby area. The unit has a maximum known thickness of 265 m.

The Erskine Sandstone is currently the most important aquifer in the Derby area, as it supplies the town of Derby and surrounding developments. The aquifer contains about 60 x 109 m3 of low- salinity groundwater, and has an estimated annual through flow of about 6 x 106 m3, and is exploited over a large area by pastoral bores.

The Munkayarra Shale comprises beds of multi-coloured claystone. The formation extends 60 km southeast of Derby in two synclines, and has been completely eroded from the anticline beneath Munkayarra Shale Derby town site. The Munkayarra Shale is unconformably overlain by the Wallal Sandstone and Quaternary sediments. The Munkayarra Shale is a confining bed between the Erskine Sandstone and Wallal Sandstone.

The Wallal Sandstone consists of laminated pink and white, very fine to very coarse-grained sandstone with minor siltstone, conglomerate and lignite. The Alexander Formation comprises sandstone, siltstone and minor conglomerate. As these formations have a similar lithology, and are in hydraulic continuity, they are considered as a single aquifer. The formations occur in the subsurface in Wallal Sandstone the western half of the Derby area but only outcrop in small areas, including the west bank of the and Alexander Fitzroy River at Langey Crossing. There are two discrete groundwater systems, the western flow Formation system, derived from recharge in the Canning Basin south of the Derby area and local recharge from the Fitzroy River during floods, flows northward to discharge into the Fitzroy River and King Sound; and the eastern flow system which is recharged directly by rainfall, with groundwater flow mainly northwest toward King Sound.

REY RESOURCES, ENVIRONMENT PLAN - STOKES BAY - 1, POINT TORMEN T - 1, WEST KORA - 1 C 3

Stratigraphic Units Summary

The Jarlemai Siltstone comprises siltstone and minor limestone and sub crops in a large area southwest of King Sound where it dips west or is locally folded over the Baskerville. The maximum intersected thickness is 238 m. The Jarlemai Siltstone is conformable on the Alexander Formation and Jarlemai Siltstone is overlain conformably by the Broome Sandstone, or unconformably by Quaternary sediments. The Jarlemai Siltstone forms an aquiclude between the Alexander Formation and the Broome Sandstone, and in the core of the Baskerville Anticline acts as a barrier between flow systems in the Broome Sandstone.

The Broome Sandstone which includes the Jowlaenga Formation and Melligo Sandstone consists of a fine to coarse sandstone with a conglomerate near the base. The formation outcrops in the northwest and west of the Derby area. The unit dips and thickens westward and is conformable on the Jarlemai Siltstone. In the Derby area, the Broome Sandstone is divided into two unconfined flow systems by the Baskerville Anticline. Both flow systems are recharged directly by rainfall. In the northern flow system groundwater flows northeast and discharges into King Sound. Locally, springs occur near the Broome Sandstone coast. The hydraulic gradient is low and the water table reaches a maximum elevation of about 10 m on the western boundary of the Derby area. In the southern flow system most groundwater flows southward and south-westward across the western boundary of the Derby area. Some groundwater may also discharge into the upper reaches of east-flowing creeks at the eastern edge of the aquifer. The hydraulic gradient is steeper in this flow system, with the water table reaching a maximum elevation of about 70 m. The groundwater salinity in the few bores in the Derby area is less than 500 mg/L, consistent with groundwater salinity around Broome.

The Fitzroy Volcanics consist of a leucite lamproite, 45 m thick, intruded into the Liveringa Group. Fitzroy Volcanics The groundwater characteristics of this isolated unit are unknown.

Surficial sediments containing groundwater consist mainly of clay, with only a small proportion of sand and gravel. They are fluvial, lacustrine and tidal deposits of Quaternary age. The surficial sediments occur on the May and Meda Rivers floodplain west of Kimberley Downs homestead, on the Fitzroy River floodplain and near the coast. They form aquifers, generally less than 20 m thick, which are recharged mainly from river flow or flooding, and partly from rainfall. Gravels in the Fitzroy River Surficial Sediments floodplain form an alluvial aquifer more than 30 m thick south of Willare Bridge, at the crossing of the Fitzroy River in the south of the Derby area. Groundwater in the alluvium sustains a number of permanent and near-permanent pools in the major drainages. Shallow bores on the May and Meda Rivers floodplain obtain small supplies from above the saltwater interface which occurs near the coast and in places further inland.

*the area within this section referred to as’ the Derby area’ refers to the Derby 1:250 000 hydrogeological map area mapped by the Geological Survey of Western Australia and described by Smith (1992).

REY RESOURCES, ENVIRONMENT PLAN - STOKES BAY - 1, POINT TORMEN T - 1, WEST KORA - 1 C 4

APPENDIX D – CONSERVATION-SIGNIFICANT FAUNA SPECIES WITH THE POTENTIAL TO OCCUR WITHIN THE WELL SITES AREA

REY RESOURCES, ENVIRONMENT PLAN - S TOKES BAY - 1, POINT TORMENT - 1, WEST KORA - 1 D 1

Appendix D: Conservation-Significant Fauna Species with the Potential to Occur Within the Well Sites Area

Conservation Status Likelihood of Species EPBC Act WC Act DBCA Occurrence MAMMALS Northern Quoll -Dasyurus hallucatus EN S2 EN Low Greater Bilby - Macrotis lagotis VU S3 VU Medium Golden Bandicoot (mainland) - Isoodon auratus auratus VU S3 VU Low Water Mouse - Xeromys myoides VU Low Ghost Bat – Macroderma gigas VU S3 VU Low Kimberley Brush-tailed phascogale -Phascogale tapoatafa VU S3 VU Medium kimberleyensis Golden-backed tree-rat - Mesembriomys macrurus VU P4 Low Bare-rumped Sheathtail Bat - Saccolaimus saccolaimus VU P3 Low nudicluniatus Yellow-lipped Cave Bat - Vespadelus douglasorum P2 Low Short-tailed Mouse - Leggadina lakedownensis P4 Medium Spectacled Hare-Wallaby (Mainland) Lagorchestes P4 Medium conspiciallatus leichardti Northern marsupial mole- Notoryctes caurinus P4 Medium Orange Leaf nose bat -Rhinonicteris aurantia P4 Low Scaly-tailed possum - Wyulda squamicaudata P4 Low BIRDS Northern Siberian Bar-tailed Godwit, Bar-tailed Godwit CR S3 VU Low Limosa lapponica menzbieri Curlew Sandpiper - Calidris ferruginea CR + MI S3 VU +IA Low Australian Painted Snipe - Rostratula australis EN S2 EN Low Gouldian Finch - Erythrura gouldiae EN P4 High Purple-crowned Fairy-wren - Malurus coronatus coronatus EN S2 EN Low Night Parrot - Pezoporus occidentalis EN S1 CR Low Red knot - Calidris canutus EN + MI IA + VU High Abbott’s Booby – Papasula abbotti EN +MI High Lesser sand plover - Charadrius mongolus EN + MI S2 IA + MI Low Masked Owl (northern) - Tyto novaehollandiae kimberli VU - P1 Low Red Goshawk - Erythrotriorchis radiatus VU S3 VU Low Partridge Pigeon (western) - Geophaps smithii blaauwi VU S3 VU Medium Princess Parrot - Polytelis alexandrae VU P4 Low Bar-tailed Godwit - Limosa lapponica baueri VU S3 VU Low Grey falcon – Falco hypoleucos S3 VU Low Eastern Curlew - Numenius madagascariensis CR + MI S3 VU + IA Low Oriental Cuckoo - Cuculus optatus MI S5 IA Medium

REY RESOURCES, ENVIRONMENT PLAN - S TOKES BAY - 1, POINT TORMENT - 1, WEST KORA - 1 D 2

Conservation Status Likelihood of Species EPBC Act WC Act DBCA Occurrence Streaked Shearwater – Calonectris leucomelas MI S5 IA Low Lesser Frigatebird – Fregata ariel MI S5 IA Low Greater Frigatebird – Fregata minor MI S5 IA Low Osprey – Pandion haliaetus MI S5 IA Low Red-rumped Swallow – Cecropis daurica MI S5 IA Medium Common Noddy – Anous stolidus MI S5 IA Low Grey-tailed Tattler - Tringa brevipes MI S5 IA + P4 Low Fork-tailed Swift - Apus pacificus MI S5 IA Low Glossy Ibis - Plegadis falcinellus MI S5 IA Low Sanderling - Calidris alba MI S5 IA Low Oriental Plover - Charadrius veredus MI S5 IA Low Pin-tailed Snipe - Gallinago stenura MI S5 IA Low Swinhoe’s Snipe - Gallinago megala MI S5 IA Low Little Curlew - Numenius minutus MI S5 IA Medium Whimbrel - Numenius phaeopus MI S5 IA Low Common Sandpiper - Actitis hypoleucos MI S5 IA Low Common Greenshank - Tringa nebularia MI S5 IA Low Marsh Sandpiper - Tringa stagnatilis MI S5 IA Low Asian Dowitcher - Limnodromus semipalmatus MI S5 IA Low Wood Sandpiper - Tringa glareola MI S5 IA Low Red-necked Stint - Calidris ruficollis MI S5 IA Low Long-toed Stint - Calidris subminuta MI S5 IA Low Pectoral Sandpiper - Calidris melanotos MI S5 IA Low Sharp-tailed Sandpiper - Calidris acuminata MI S5 IA Low Ruff - Philomachus pugnax MI S5 IA Low Red-necked Phalarope - Phalaropus lobatus MI S5 IA Low Oriental Pratincole - Glareola maldivarum MI S5 IA Low Little Tern - Sternula albifrons MI S5 IA Low Caspian Tern - Hydroprogne caspia MI S5 IA Low White-winged Black Tern - Chlidonias leucopterus MI S5 IA Low Barn Swallow - Hirundo rustica MI S5 IA Medium Grey Wagtail - Motacilla cinerea MI S5 IA Low Eastern Yellow Wagtail - Motacilla tschutschensis MI S5 IA Medium [listed as Motacilla flava] Ruddy Turnstone - Arenaria interpres MI S5 IA Low Pacific Golden Plover -Pluvialis fulva MI S5 IA Medium Grey Plover - Pluvialis squatarola MI S5 IA Medium

REY RESOURCES, ENVIRONMENT PLAN - S TOKES BAY - 1, POINT TORMENT - 1, WEST KORA - 1 D 3

Conservation Status Likelihood of Species EPBC Act WC Act DBCA Occurrence Rainbow Bee-eater - Merops ornatus Listed Marine* S5 Medium Eastern Great Egret - Ardea modesta Listed Marine* High Cattle Egret - Ardea ibis Listed Marine* High White-bellied Sea-Eagle - Haliaeetus leucogaster Listed Marine* High Black-eared Cuckoo – Chrysococcyx osculans Listed Marine* Low Painted Snipe - Rostratula benghalensis Listed Marine* Low Peregrine Falcon - Falco peregrinus - S7 OS High REPTILES Salt-water Crocodile - Crocodylus porosus - S7 OS Low

REY RESOURCES, ENVIRONMENT PLAN - S TOKES BAY - 1, POINT TORMENT - 1, WEST KORA - 1 D 4

APPENDIX E - RISK ASSESSMENT AND ALARP JUSTIFICATION

REY RESOURCES, ENVIRONMENT PLAN - STOKES BAY - 1, POINT TORMENT - 1, WEST KORA - 1 E 1

Appendix E Risk Assessment and ALARP Justification

Pre- Post- Treatment Treatment

Line Potential Performance Activity Aspect Hazard Control Measure Performance Standards Measurement Criteria ALARP No. Impacts Objectives L C L C Residual Risk Inherent Risk

Rey’s Induction and Training Register will demonstrate that all personnel All personnel to have and contractors involved in the care undertaken Rey’s site induction and maintenance and clean-up which includes details relating to activities have completed the site fauna management and safety induction which includes fauna The risk of fauna strike during vehicle movement management and safety and vehicle is well understood with the use of vehicles access and speed limits. common place for onshore oil and gas activities in Movement Western Australia. Vehicle strike is not considered of vehicles Risks to fauna from vehicle strike a key threat to the conservation significant fauna No injury or death within the Rey’s Site Induction will be minimised via the A copy of the induction package identified as possibly occurring within the area, Injury or death implementation of inGauge’s of native fauna confirms that relevant aspects of according to the Recovery Plans for each of the 1a well sites Native Fauna Fauna strike 4 1 4 inGauge’s Vehicle 2 1 2 of native fauna Vehicle Operations Procedure, attributed to inGauge’s Vehicle Operations species. area and Operations Procedure by specifically: vehicle strikes Procedure are covered specifically: access Consequently, Rey believes ALARP decision roads • minimising night driving;, • minimising night driving context A applies and as such has applied good • adhering to vehicle speed • adhering to vehicle speed limits, practice control measures in accordance with the limits, and and process described in 4.2.2 Control Measures and • being aware of road side • being aware of road side hazards ALARP. hazards presented by presented by animals in some animals in some areas such areas such as rural and remote as rural and remote regions, regions, particularly when driving particularly when driving at at dusk, dawn and night dusk, dawn and night

Rey’s Induction and Training Register The risk of damaging native vegetation during will demonstrate that all personnel vehicle movement is well understood with the use All personnel to have and contractors involved in the care of vehicles commonplace for onshore oil and gas undertaken Rey’s site induction and maintenance and clean-up activities. The risk of damage to vegetation of which includes details relating to activities have completed the site conservation significance was evaluated as very flora management induction which includes flora low, given that no conservation significant species Rey’s Site Induction management have been identified within the vicinity of the well Loss of or sites area and suitable habitat to support rare or Interaction Rey’s Vegetation Line No unplanned Damage to damage to priority species within the region is not known to 1b with Native 3 1 3 Clearing Procedure 2 1 2 damage or loss of native flora native be present. In addition to this, the number of Vegetation (RLS_EMS_PRO_002_Re native flora vegetation vehicles involved in the care and maintenance and v 0) clean-up activities as stated in Section 2 is low, Audit/Inspection report will show Clearing/Slashing of vegetation clearing of vegetation confined to Consequently, Rey believes ALARP decision within designated access tracks boundaries of existing tracks and context A applies and as such has applied good /causeways only around tank farm infrastructure. practice control measures in accordance with the process described in 4.2.2 Control Measures and ALARP.

REY RESOURCES, ENVIRONMENT PLAN - STOKES BAY- 1, POINT TORMEN T - 1, WEST KORA - 1 E 2

Pre- Post- Treatment Treatment

Line Potential Performance Activity Aspect Hazard Control Measure Performance Standards Measurement Criteria ALARP No. Impacts Objectives L C L C Residual Risk Inherent Risk

Rey’s Induction and Training Register demonstrates that all personnel and contractors involved in the care and All personnel to have maintenance and clean-up activities undertaken Rey’s site induction have completed the site induction which includes an understanding which includes details relating to spill of spill management management as well as having undergone familiarisation/training with the Emergency Response Procedure for the site.

A spill kit will be readily available Site audits and inspection records to in the service vehicle in confirm a spill kit is available on site accordance with Rey’s Spill and readily available during refuelling The risk of a spill event occurring during the Response Procedure activities. transport of hydrocarbons is well understood, with (RLS_EMS_PRO_011_Rev 0) the transport of small volumes of hydrocarbons Contamination Rey’s Site Induction commonplace for onshore oil and gas activities. As of soil or Rey will control, contain and Site audit and inspection records to such, control measures for managing such a risk Rey’s Spill Response Spill / loss of surface water clean-up of all hazardous spills confirm that there is no evidence of are also well understood and implemented across Procedure containment in accordance with Rey’s Spill spills which have not been responded the industry. Injury or death (RLS_EMS_PRO_011_Re of <100L Response Procedure No loss of to. of fauna from The risk of this type of spill event is considered to Hydro- hydrocarbons v 0) containment of 1c ingestion of 3 2 6 2 2 4 be low given the low number of vehicles, short carbons during hydrocarbons hydrocarbons Waste Management All waste movement managed in duration of on-site activities and small volumes of transport and during transport Procedure accordance with inGauge’s hydrocarbons required to complete the activities refuelling on Impacts to Waste Management Procedure within the scope of this Plan. site vegetation and inGauge’s Procedure Waste register / records confirms that that requires: flora from for Refuelling in the waste generated from spill events are Consequently, Rey believes ALARP decision spills Field • Waste is segregated; segregated appropriately and context A applies and as such has applied good and disposed of by a suitably licenced practice control measures in accordance with the • disposed of by an contractor. process described in 4.2.2 Control Measures and appropriately licenced ALARP. contractor

Refuelling in the Field will be in Site audit and inspection records to accordance with inGauge’s confirm that refuelling is being Equipment Refuelling Procedure conducted in accordance with the that clearly describes the steps inGauge Refuelling of Equipment that are required to be followed procedure

All fuel hoses and couplings will Site audits and inspection records be checked to ensure they are in confirm that all fuel hoses and good condition and not leaking couplings are checked to ensure they are in good condition and not leaking during refuelling activities.

REY RESOURCES, ENVIRONMENT PLAN - STOKES BAY- 1, POINT TORMEN T - 1, WEST KORA - 1 E 3

Pre- Post- Treatment Treatment

Line Potential Performance Activity Aspect Hazard Control Measure Performance Standards Measurement Criteria ALARP No. Impacts Objectives L C L C Residual Risk Inherent Risk

The generation of dust from vehicles travelling on unsealed roads / tracks is well understood and as such control measures for managing such a risk are also well understood across the industry.

Dust The risk of this type of event is considered to be low given the low number of vehicles and short duration of on-site activities. The amount of dust generated is considered negligible. generation Health of 1d Dust from vehicles In addition, monitoring of dust impacts on vegetation for a significant development in the Pilbara over a 5 year period which involved significantly higher volumes of vehicles (heavy and light) and vegetation on unsealed earthworks, indicated that no adverse impacts occurred to plant health or vegetation communities as a result of construction dust loads (Gorgon Gas Development and Jansz Feed Gas Pipeline: Five-year roads / tracks Environmental Performance Report (August 2010–August 2015) (G1-NT-REPX0007517). Consequently, Rey do not believe that dust generation from care and maintenance activities covered under this plan will result in any health impacts to vegetation thus has not considered this further.

The generation of dust from vehicles travelling on Rey will record all complaints unsealed roads / tracks is well understood and as with regard to dust emissions in such control measures for managing such a risk the Event and Feedback Register Rey’s Induction and are also well understood across the industry. [RLS_CMS_REG_002_Rev_0]) that No complaints Annual Performance report verifies Dust Training Procedure includes the following from landowners any dust complaints have been The risk of this type of event is considered to be generation (RLS_EMS_PRO_009_RE Disturbance to information: in relation to dust appropriately managed with relevant low given the low number of vehicles and short 1d(i) Dust from vehicles 1 2 2 V_0) 1 2 2 landowners emissions details recorded in the Event and duration of on-site activities. The amount of dust on unsealed • The details of complaints Complaints generated by the Feedback Register generated is considered negligible. Consequently, roads / tracks received concerning dust, Management System activity [RLS_CMS_REG_002_Rev_0]). Rey believes ALARP decision context A applies and and as such has applied good practice control • any action taken in measures in accordance with the process response to the complaint. described in 4.2.2 Control Measures and ALARP.

The risk of introducing a weed species to site during vehicle movement around site is well understood and as such control measures for No unnatural managing such a risk are also well understood and Rey’s Site Induction Rey’s Induction and Training Register spread of existing implemented across the industry. Introduction of demonstrates that all personnel and inGauge’s Biosecurity weeds as weeds from Decline in contractors involved in the care and The risk of this type of event is considered to be and Hygiene Staff trained in awareness and demonstrated by vehicles condition of maintenance and clean-up activities low given the low number of vehicles and short 1e Weeds 3 2 6 Procedure understanding of spread of 2 2 4 all vehicles having and/or vegetation and have completed the site induction duration of on-site activities required to complete weeds undergone a imported fauna habitat Rey’s Hygiene and which includes details relating to the activities within the scope of this Plan. biosecurity materials Weed Inspection awareness and understanding of the hygiene Consequently, Rey believes ALARP decision Procedure spread of weeds inspection context A applies and as such has applied good practice control measures in accordance with the process described in 4.2.2 Control Measures and ALARP.

REY RESOURCES, ENVIRONMENT PLAN - STOKES BAY- 1, POINT TORMEN T - 1, WEST KORA - 1 E 4

Pre- Post- Treatment Treatment

Line Potential Performance Activity Aspect Hazard Control Measure Performance Standards Measurement Criteria ALARP No. Impacts Objectives L C L C Residual Risk Inherent Risk

Vehicle brush-down and inspection prior to mobilising to Biosecurity hygiene declarations are and demobilising from R1 and provided for all vehicles entering and L15 areas will be undertaken and leaving site stating all vehicles have upon return to site if vehicles been inspected and brushed down (if have exited the project area and required) in accordance with left sealed roads in accordance inGauge’s Biosecurity Hygiene with inGauge’s Biosecurity and Procedure Hygiene Procedure

Rey’s Induction and Training Register will demonstrate that all personnel and contractors involved in the care and maintenance and clean-up All personnel to have activities have completed the site undertaken Rey’s site induction induction which includes an which includes an understanding understanding of fire management on of fire management site, as well as having undergone familiarisation/training with the Emergency Response Procedure for The use and movement of vehicles within offshore the site. remote environments is commonplace for the onshore oil and gas industry. The pathways for Training will be conducted in starting a fire event from these activities is well No fires from Rey’s Site Induction accordance with the Emergency Training records confirm that understood and control measures for managing activities on site Response Procedure (ERP) that personnel are aware of the initial this risk is well understood and implemented Rey’s Emergency describes: across the industry. In the event of a actions, reporting requirements and Ignition source Response Procedure • Initial actions, fire, minimise the evacuation and assembly The risk of this type of event is considered to be from vehicles, Loss of native 1f Fire 3 4 12 Rey’s Safety • reporting requirements, and 1 4 4 impact of fire requirements in response to a fire low given the low number of vehicles, short equipment or flora and fauna Management System • Evacuation and assembly through the use of event. duration of on-site activities and limited personnel (SMS) locations fire-fighting requirement for working outside of areas that are equipment as not already cleared. inGauge’s Equipment outlined in the Refuelling Procedure All vehicles to be fitted with an Audit and Inspection records will SMS. Consequently, Rey believes ALARP decision ABE type fire extinguisher in demonstrate all vehicles contain ABE context A applies and as such has applied good accordance with Rey’s SMS fire extinguishers. practice control measures in accordance with the process described in 4.2.2 Control Measures and Smoking only permitted on-site Audit and Inspection records will ALARP. at designated areas confirm smoking areas are clearly designated, and personnel are aware of these areas.

Refuelling in the Field will be in Site audit and inspection records to accordance with inGauge’s confirm that refuelling is being Equipment Refuelling Procedure conducted in accordance with the that clearly describes the steps inGauge Refuelling of Equipment that are required to be followed procedure

REY RESOURCES, ENVIRONMENT PLAN - STOKES BAY- 1, POINT TORMEN T - 1, WEST KORA - 1 E 5

Pre- Post- Treatment Treatment

Line Potential Performance Activity Aspect Hazard Control Measure Performance Standards Measurement Criteria ALARP No. Impacts Objectives L C L C Residual Risk Inherent Risk

During refuelling:

• All other vehicles not Audit and Inspection records confirm involved in fuel transfer to that whilst refuelling: be well clear of fuelling facility; • All other vehicles not involved in • Engines will be shut-down, fuel transfer are clear of fuelling and facility; • No smoking or naked • Engines are shut-down, and flames will be permitted in • No smoking or naked flames are proximity of the refuelling in close proximity of the facility. refuelling facility.

The generation of emissions from the combustion of fuel associated with vehicles, machinery and equipment on-site is commonplace for the onshore oil and gas industry. The potential impacts are considered negligible and control Emissions of measures are well understood to quantify and Monitor exhaust fumes In accordance with the PGER(E)R, report emissions generated from this activity. Emissions Planned emissions are atmospheric Quarterly emissions report to DMIRS into the Rey will report on the volumes 1g (exhaust Air Pollution 1 2 2 monitored and 1 2 2 emissions arising include volumes of diesel combusted The risk of impacts from emissions is low given the atmosphere of atmospheric emissions in fumes) reported from these on the site for the quarter. low number of vehicles and short duration of on- during accordance with Section 5.7. activities site activities. transportation [Consequently, Rey believes ALARP decision context A applies and as such has applied good practice control measures in accordance with the process described in 4.2.2 Control Measures and ALARP.

The use of vehicles, machinery and equipment Rey Resources will record all within the scope of this plan are not expected to complaints with regard to noise result in high noise emissions. Given the proximity emissions in the Event and No complaints Annual Performance report verifies: to sensitive social receptors and the Nuisance Feedback Register Noise from landowners any noise complaints have been understanding that noise emissions are not effects of noise [RLS_CMS_REG_002_Rev_0]) that generation Complaints in relation to appropriately managed with relevant identified as a key threat to any of the 1h Noise on landholders 1 2 2 includes the following 1 2 2 from Management System noise emissions details recorded in the Event and conservation significant fauna that have the and native information: equipment generated by the Feedback Register potential to occur within the area, the risk of fauna • the details of complaints activity [RLS_CMS_REG_002_Rev_0]). impact is low. received concerning, and Consequently, Rey believes ALARP decision • any action taken in context A applies and as such has applied good response to the complaint. practice control measures.

REY RESOURCES, ENVIRONMENT PLAN - STOKES BAY- 1, POINT TORMEN T - 1, WEST KORA - 1 E 6

Pre- Post- Treatment Treatment

Line Potential Performance Activity Aspect Hazard Control Measure Performance Standards Measurement Criteria ALARP No. Impacts Objectives L C L C Residual Risk Inherent Risk

Rey’s Induction and Training Register demonstrates that all personnel and All personnel to have contractors involved in the care and undertaken Rey’s site induction maintenance and clean-up activities which includes an understanding have completed the site induction of waste management which includes details of waste management and disposal on site. The management of solid waste is a standard activity which commonplace for the onshore oil and gas industry. Good practice waste Labelled bins will be provided Audit and Inspection records confirm: management controls measures are well for recycling and segregation of • Labelled bins are available for understood and implemented across the industry. wastes No deaths or recycling and segregation of Impact to Rey’s Site Induction injuries of fauna The risk of this type of event is considered to be Inappropriate wastes fauna through resulting from low given the small amount of waste material that 2a Waste waste 4 2 8 inGauge’s Waste 2 2 4 ingestion or wastes is expected to be generated and the short management Management All windblown waste will be Audit and Inspection records confirm: entrapment Procedure No waste left on duration of on-site activities. placed in receptacles with lids • All windblown waste is placed in site after activities Consequently, Rey believes ALARP decision receptacles with lids context A applies and as such has applied good practice control measures in accordance with the All volumes of waste will be Waste register confirms all volumes of process described in 4.2.2 Control Measures and Wellhead recorded in the Waste Register waste have been recorded ALARP. and Tree Integrity Testing / All waste will be removed from No waste left on site as evidenced by Service and site at the end of each care and the demobilisation inspection and Maintenanc maintenance campaign recorded in the Audit and Inspection e Activities register.

The risk of a spill event occurring during maintenance activities is well understood, with the use of small volumes of hydrocarbons Contamination commonplace for onshore oil and gas of soil or maintenance activities. As such, control measures surface water Spills or loss of for managing such a risk are also well understood containment Injury or death and implemented across the industry. of <50L of of fauna from The risk of this type of spill event is considered to Hydrocarbon hydrocarbons ingestion of 2b See Line Item 1c be low given the low number of vehicles, short s (grease etc) spilled duration of on-site activities and small volumes of during hydrocarbons hydrocarbons required to complete the activities maintenance Deaths of within the scope of this Plan. activities native Consequently, Rey believes ALARP decision vegetation context A applies and as such has applied good from spills practice control measures in accordance with the process described in 4.2.2 Control Measures and ALARP.

REY RESOURCES, ENVIRONMENT PLAN - STOKES BAY- 1, POINT TORMEN T - 1, WEST KORA - 1 E 7

Pre- Post- Treatment Treatment

Line Potential Performance Activity Aspect Hazard Control Measure Performance Standards Measurement Criteria ALARP No. Impacts Objectives L C L C Residual Risk Inherent Risk

The use of vehicles and equipment within offshore remote environments is commonplace for the onshore oil and gas industry. The pathways for starting a fire event from these activities are well understood and control measures for managing this risk is well understood and implemented Ignition source across the industry. from vehicles, equipment or The risk of this type of event is considered to be Loss of native 2c Fire personnel See Line Item 1f low given the low number of vehicles and flora and fauna undertaking equipment, short duration of on-site activities and maintenance limited requirement for working outside of areas activities that are not already cleared.

Consequently, Rey believes ALARP decision context A applies and as such has applied good practice control measures in accordance with the process described in 4.2.2 Control Measures and ALARP.

The management of solid waste is a standard activity which is commonplace for the onshore oil See Line Item 2a See Line Item 2a and gas industry. Good practice waste management control measures are well understood and implemented across the industry.

Death / Injury No deaths, injuries The risk of this type of event is considered to be Clean-up of Inappropriate Good industry practice / Entrapment or entrapment of low given the small amount of pipe that is 3a Infrastructur Waste waste 4 2 8 to cap off any open 2 2 4 of native fauna fauna resulting expected to be generated from the care and e management pipes left onsite in waste piping from waste maintenance activities.

Consequently, Rey believes ALARP decision Any open piping left on site to Audit and Inspection records confirm context A applies and as such has applied good be capped to prevent potential that open piping left on site has been practice control measures in accordance with the entrapment of fauna capped process described in 4.2.2 Control Measures and ALARP.

REY RESOURCES, ENVIRONMENT PLAN - STOKES BAY- 1, POINT TORMEN T - 1, WEST KORA - 1 E 8

Pre- Post- Treatment Treatment

Line Potential Performance Activity Aspect Hazard Control Measure Performance Standards Measurement Criteria ALARP No. Impacts Objectives L C L C Residual Risk Inherent Risk

Emissions of exhaust fumes Emissions into the 3b (exhaust Air Pollution 1 2 2 See Line Item 1g atmosphere fumes) during transportation

REY RESOURCES, ENVIRONMENT PLAN - STOKES BAY- 1, POINT TORMEN T - 1, WEST KORA - 1 E 9