DOCSLIB.ORG

Environment Plan Stokes Bay-1, Point Torment-1 And

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Environment Plan Stokes Bay-1, Point Torment-1 And ENVIRONMENT PLAN STOKES BAY-1, POINT TORMENT-1 AND WEST KORA-1 AND ASSOCIATED INFRASTRUCTURE, CARE AND MAINTENANCE AND CLEAN-UP ACTIVITIES REY RESOURCES LIMITED COPYRIGHT STATEMENT Except as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth), no part of or the whole of this document is permitted to be reproduced by any process, electronic or otherwise, without the specific written permission of Focused Vision Consulting Pty Ltd. This includes photocopying, scanning, microcopying, photocopying or recording of any parts of the document. Focused Vision Consulting Pty Ltd ABN 25 605 804 500 Please direct all enquiries to: Focused Vision Consulting Pty Ltd 8/83 Mell Rd, SPEARWOOD, WA 6163 : (08) 6179 4111 : [email protected] Document History Rev. Author Reviewed Approved Date Patricia Aylmore Mimi d’Auvergne A Senior Environmental Senior Environmental 26/10/2018 Consultant Advisor Patricia Aylmore Mimi d’Auvergne Kellie Bauer-Simpson B Senior Environmental Senior Environmental Principal Ecologist/ 01/11/2018 Consultant Advisor Environmental Manager Patricia Aylmore Mimi d’Auvergne Kellie Bauer-Simpson C Senior Environmental Senior Environmental Principal Ecologist/ 02/11/2018 Consultant Advisor Environmental Manager Patricia Aylmore Art Malone Kellie Bauer-Simpson D Senior Environmental Rey Resources Projects Principal Ecologist/ 19/11/2018 Consultant Manager Environmental Manager Patricia Aylmore Kellie Bauer-Simpson Art Malone E Senior Environmental Principal Ecologist/ Rey Resources Projects 07/01/2019 Consultant Environmental Manager Manager Ashley Fertch Kellie Bauer-Simpson Art Malone F Senior Environmental Principal Ecologist/ Rey Resources Projects 06/03/2019 Consultant Environmental Manager Manager REY RESOURCES, ENVIRONMENT PLAN - STOKES BAY- 1, POINT TORMENT - 1, WEST KORA- 1 ii Table of Contents 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................................................ 8 1.1 Overview ............................................................................................................................................................................................ 8 1.2 Scope ................................................................................................................................................................................................... 8 1.3 Licence Holder and Operator Details ..................................................................................................................................... 9 1.4 Environmental Management Framework .............................................................................................................................. 9 2 Description of the Activity .................................................................................................................................................................. 14 2.1 Location ............................................................................................................................................................................................ 14 2.2 Description of Infrastructure .................................................................................................................................................... 15 2.3 Timeframes ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 1 2.4 Care, Maintenance and Clean-up Activities ......................................................................................................................... 1 3 Description of the Environment .......................................................................................................................................................... 5 3.1 Climate ................................................................................................................................................................................................ 5 3.2 Geology, Landform and Soils ..................................................................................................................................................... 5 3.3 Hydrogeology .................................................................................................................................................................................. 8 3.4 Terrestrial Flora and Vegetation ............................................................................................................................................. 29 3.5 Fauna ................................................................................................................................................................................................. 31 3.6 Environmentally Sensitive Areas ............................................................................................................................................. 36 3.7 Cultural Heritage ........................................................................................................................................................................... 36 4 Environmental Risk Assessment and Management .................................................................................................................. 37 4.1 Identification of Activities, Events and Associated Environmental Aspects ........................................................... 37 4.2 Evaluation of Impacts and Risks ............................................................................................................................................. 38 4.3 Risk Acceptance Criteria ............................................................................................................................................................ 44 4.4 Performance Objectives, Standards and Measurement Criteria ................................................................................ 44 4.5 Summary of Environmental Risk Assessment .................................................................................................................... 45 5 Implementation Strategy .................................................................................................................................................................... 45 5.1 Systems, Practices and Procedures........................................................................................................................................ 45 5.2 Chain of Command ...................................................................................................................................................................... 45 5.3 Roles and Responsibilities ......................................................................................................................................................... 47 5.4 Emergency Response .................................................................................................................................................................. 48 5.5 Environmental Training .............................................................................................................................................................. 50 REY RESOURCES, ENVIRONMENT PLAN - STOKES BAY- 1, POINT TORMENT - 1, WEST KORA- 1 III 5.6 Monitoring, Auditing, Management of Non-Conformance and Review ................................................................ 50 5.7 Environmental Reporting .......................................................................................................................................................... 53 6 Consultation ............................................................................................................................................................................................. 58 6.1 Indigenous Consultation ........................................................................................................................................................... 59 6.2 Private and Government Stakeholder Consultation ....................................................................................................... 59 6.3 Ongoing Stakeholder Consultation ....................................................................................................................................... 59 7 References ................................................................................................................................................................................................. 60 REY RESOURCES, ENVIRONMENT PLAN - STOKES BAY- 1, POINT TORMENT - 1, WEST KORA- 1 IV Figures Figure 1: Location of the Title Areas and Well Sites ....................................................................................................................... 18 Figure 2: Mean Monthly Rainfall, Maximum and Minimum Temperatures at Derby Aero (BoM 2018) ....................... 5 Figure 3: The Onshore Canning Basin (Crostella 1988; Geological Survey of Western Australia 2007) ....................... 6 Figure 4: Generalised Geological Section for the Broader Derby Area (Smith 1992; Harrington et al. 2011) ............ 7 Figure 5: Structural Setting of the Fitzroy Trough ............................................................................................................................. 8 Figure 6: Stratigraphy
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Establishing Priorities for Wetland Conservation and Management in the Kimberley
    ESTABLISHING PRIORITIES FOR WETLAND CONSERVATION AND MANAGEMENT IN THE KIMBERLEY Final Report WWF-Australia March 2007 © WWF-Australia. All Rights Reserved. Author: Tanya Vernes WWF-Australia Head Office GPO Box 528 Sydney, NSW, Australia 2001 Tel: +612 9281 5515 Fax: +612 9281 1060 wwf.org.au Published March 2007 by WWF-Australia. Any reproduction in full or in part of this publication must mention the title and credit the above-mentioned publisher as the copyright owner. The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of WWF. Cover image: Wetland in the Paruku IPA, Kimberley © Tanya Vernes World Wide Fund for Nature ABN: 57 001 594 074 Executive Summary "Establishing priorities for wetland conservation and management in the Kimberley" was funded by WWF-Australia and the Natural Heritage Trust through the Rangelands NRM Coordinating Group. The project was developed to collate existing knowledge of wetlands across the Kimberley region and generate a baseline of information on current threats, uses, cultural and biological values in conjunction with land owners and managers. This project also aimed to provide recommendations on a way forward for planning and management of wetlands in the Kimberley. This is the final project report, and includes: • A summary of the major activities completed under the contract milestones; • A summary of the major findings of the project; • Future recommendations for wetland planning and management in the Kimberley. Information regarding values and threats associated with wetlands in the Kimberley are collated and discussed for each of the 12 catchments. Engaging local people, including Aboriginal custodians, in two way information sharing and problem solving, assisted to build regional and specific information on wetlands.
    [Show full text]
  • WA Marine Oil Pollution Risk Assessment: Kimberley
    Western Australia Marine Oil Pollution Risk Assessment Kimberley Zone Report Prepared for Department of Transport by Navigatus Consulting March 2019 This page is intentionally blank. Navigatus Consulting March 2019 Prepared for: Department of Transport Western Australia Prepared by: Navigatus Consulting Limited 347 Parnell Road PO Box 137249 Parnell, Auckland 1052 +64 9 377 4132 www.navigatusconsulting.com Quality Control Prepared by: Celia Cunningham, Jessica Spinetto Reviewed by: Kevin Oldham, Geraint Bermingham Revision Date Authorised By Draft 13 Feb 19 Kevin Oldham Rev 0 27 March 19 Kevin Oldham WAMOPRA Kimberley Zone Report Rev0 i of 68 Navigatus Consulting March 2019 This page is intentionally blank. WAMOPRA Kimberley Zone Report Rev0 ii of 68 Navigatus Consulting March 2019 Contents Outputs in this Series ...................................................................................................................... iv 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 5 1.1. Overview ........................................................................................................................... 5 1.2. Programme Background ................................................................................................... 5 2. Scope ........................................................................................................................................ 6 2.1. Kimberley Zone ................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • King Sound and the Tide-Dominated Delta of the Fitzroy River: Their Geoheritage Values
    Journal of the Royal Society of Western Australia, 94: 151–160, 2011 King Sound and the tide-dominated delta of the Fitzroy River: their geoheritage values V Semeniuk1 & M Brocx2 1 V & C Semeniuk Research Group 21 Glenmere Rd, Warwick, WA 6024 2 Department of Environmental Science, Murdoch University, South St, Murdoch, WA 6150 Manuscript received November 2010; accepted April 2011 Abstract There are numerous geological and geomorphic features in King Sound and the tide-dominated delta of the Fitzroy River that are of International to National geoheritage significance. Set in a tropical semiarid climate, the delta of the Fitzroy River has the largest tidal range of any tide- dominated delta in the World. Within King Sound, the Quaternary stratigraphy, comprised of early Holocene gulf-filling mud formed under mangrove cover and followed by middle to late Holocene deltaic sedimentation, and the relationship between Pleistocene linear desert dunes and Holocene tidal flat sediment are globally unique and provide important stratigraphic and climate history models. The principles of erosion, where sheet, cliff and tidal creek erosion combine to develop tidal landscapes and influence (mangrove) ecological responses also provide a unique global classroom for such processes. The high tidal parts of the deltaic system are muddy salt flats with groundwater salinity ranging up to hypersaline. Responding to this, carbonate nodules of various mineralogy are precipitated. Locally, linear sand dunes discharge freshwater into the hypersaline salt flats. With erosion, there is widespread exposure along creek banks and low tidal flats of Holocene and Pleistocene stratigraphy, and development of spits and cheniers in specific portions of the coast.
    [Show full text]
  • Seismic Survey
    EP 487 Meda 2016 2D Seismic Survey Environment Plan - Public Disclosure Document Prepared for Rey Lennard Shelf Pty Ltd by Strategen March 2017 Rev 3 Strategen is a trading name of Strategen Environmental Consultants Pty Ltd Level 1, 50 Subiaco Square Road Subiaco WA 6008 ACN: 056 190 419 March 2017 ! This report (“the report”) has been prepared by Strategen Environmental Consultants Pty Ltd (Strategen) in accordance with the scope of services set out in the contract, or as otherwise agreed, between the Client and Strategen. In some circumstances, a range of factors such as time, budget, access and/or site disturbance constraints may have limited the scope of services. This report is strictly limited to the matters stated in it and is not to be read as extending, by implication, to any other matter in connection with the matters addressed in it. " In preparing the report, Strategen has relied upon data and other information provided by the Client and other individuals and organisations, most of which are referred to in the report (“the data”). Except as otherwise expressly stated in the report, Strategen has not verified the accuracy or completeness of the data. To the extent that the statements, opinions, facts, information, conclusions and/or recommendations in the report (“conclusions”) are based in whole or part on the data, those conclusions are contingent upon the accuracy and completeness of the data. Strategen has also not attempted to determine whether any material matter has been omitted from the data. Strategen will not be liable in relation to incorrect conclusions should any data, information or condition be incorrect or have been concealed, withheld, misrepresented or otherwise not fully disclosed to Strategen.
    [Show full text]
  • Frontier Groundwater Investigations in the West Kimberley.Pdf
    Frontier groundwater investigations in the west Kimberley (Fitzroy) Region: Preliminary assessment of groundwater resource potential and the salinity hazard to proposed irrigation developments Presented at the ASEG PESA AIG 2016 25th Geophysical Conference and Exhibition Adelaide, South Australia August 2016 Frontier groundwater investigations in the west Kimberley (Fitzroy) Region: preliminary assessment of groundwater resource potential and the salinity hazard to proposed irrigation developments Alastair Hoare* Ken Lawrie Neil Symington Ross S. Brodie WA Water for Food Geoscience Australia Geoscience Australia Geoscience Australia Department of Water GPO Box 378 GPO Box 378 GPO Box 378 Perth, Australia ACT 2601, Australia ACT 2601, Australia ACT 2601, Australia [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Kok Piang Tan Larysa Halas Ross C. Brodie John Magee Geoscience Australia Geoscience Australia Geoscience Australia Geoscience Australia GPO Box 378 GPO Box 378 GPO Box 378 GPO Box 378 ACT 2601, Australia ACT 2601, Australia ACT 2601, Australia ACT 2601, Australia [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Celine Stocker Norman Mueller Wayne Tingey WA Water for Food Geoscience Australia WA Water for Food Department of Water GPO Box 378Address Department of Water Perth WA 6000 ACT 2601, Australia Perth, WA 6000 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] SUMMARY A regional reconnaissance AEM survey in the west Kimberley region (lower Fitzroy River valley and May-Meda Catchments) has successfully mapped the extent of regional Canning Basin aquifers (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Mowanjum Irrigation Trial
    Department of Water Department of Regional Development Department of Lands Department of Agriculture and Food Derby Broome Mowanjum irrigation trial Perth The Mowanjum irrigation trial is a joint research and funding partnership between the State Government and Mowanjum Aboriginal Corporation, a 350 people strong community • Groundwater located on the outskirts of Derby. investigation While Mowanjum’s 55 000 hectare pastoral lease contains large tracts of prime grazing land on the doorstep of • Development of stand and feed Derby, it requires a dry-season feeding capability to realise and silage farm model its aspiration of reaching its initial target of 10 000 to 15 000 head. • Pastoral station development Using local groundwater, an initial 38 hectare centre and productivity gains pivot irrigation area will be established for grazing and silage operation, with additional pivots being installed as • Year round fattening of steers Mowanjum’s productivity increases. for live export markets As well as increasing numbers of its own branded cattle, the project will allow Mowanjum to run stock from nearby • Aboriginal education, training stations, which would otherwise be isolated from markets and employment opportunities during the wet season. The trial will also serve as a demonstration model for other • Demonstration project for Aboriginal pastoral stations in the Kimberley, and provide a other Aboriginal stations host of social and economic benefits to the region. Social and economic benefits Mowanjum trial area The intensive grazing operation resulting from the Mowanjum irrigation trial will provide sustainable economic growth and employment opportunities for both Mowanjum and Derby residents. MA MEDA STATION Y MED Working in collaboration with local education providers, MEDA STATION A RIVER the project will provide relevant training and meaningful DERBY work opportunities that will allow participants to be employable in the pastoral and irrigation industries.
    [Show full text]
  • Habitat Use of the Freshwater Sawfish (Pristis Microdon) and Northern River
    Utility of a multi-faceted approach in determining the habitat use of endangered euryhaline elasmobranchs in a remote region of northern Australia Jeff M. Whitty This thesis is presented for the degree of Master of Philosophy of Murdoch University 2011 DECLARATION I declare that this thesis is my own account of my research and contains as its main content work that has not previously been submitted for a degree at any tertiary education institution. ………………………………………………… Jeff M. Whitty 2011 Frontispiece: P. microdon and G. garricki photos by Dean Thorburn 2 Abstract The overriding aim of this thesis was to explore the habitat use of the critically endangered freshwater sawfish (Pristis microdon) and northern river shark (Glyphis garricki) in the remote Kimberley region of northern Western Australia. This information has been largely lacking and is critical for the management and conservation of these species. Habitat use of these species was documented through the use of long-term catch, environmental and tagging (conventional, acoustic and satellite) data, which was acquired between 2005 and 2009 in the Fitzroy River and King Sound, Western Australia. Monitoring of the various environmental parameters demonstrated that the study area is extremely dynamic, with significant seasonal changes in abiotic variables such as water flow, depth, temperature, turbidity and salinity. Catch data demonstrated that juvenile P. microdon inhabit the Fitzroy River for three to five years, at which time individuals begin to emigrate from the river, prior to maturation. Catch data also demonstrated that juvenile and adult male G. garricki inhabit highly turbid nearshore waters throughout the upper King Sound.
    [Show full text]
  • Lower Fitzroy River Groundwater Review
    Lower Fitzroy River Groundwater Review A report prepared for Department of Water W.A. FINAL Version 15 May 2015 Lower Fitzroy River Groundwater Review 1 How to cite this report: Harrington, G.A. and Harrington, N.M. (2015). Lower Fitzroy River Groundwater Review. A report prepared by Innovative Groundwater Solutions for Department of Water, 15 May 2015. Disclaimer This report is solely for the use of Department of Water WA (DoW) and may not contain sufficient information for purposes of other parties or for other uses. Any reliance on this report by third parties shall be at such parties’ sole risk. The information in this report is considered to be accurate with respect to information provided by DoW at the time of investigation. IGS has used the methodology and sources of information outlined within this report and has made no independent verification of this information beyond the agreed scope of works. IGS assumes no responsibility for any inaccuracies or omissions. No indications were found during our investigations that the information provided to IGS was false. Innovative Groundwater Solutions Pty Ltd. 3 Cockle Court, Middleton SA 5213 Phone: 0458 636 988 ABN: 17 164 365 495 ACN: 164 365 495 Web: www.innovativegroundwater.com.au Email: [email protected] 15 May 2015 Lower Fitzroy River Groundwater Review 2 Executive Summary Water for Food is a Royalties for Regions initiative that aims to lift agricultural productivity and encourage capital investment in the agricultural sector in a number of regions across Western Australia. In the West Kimberley region, the lower Fitzroy River valley is seen as a priority area where water resources can be developed to support pastoral diversification.
    [Show full text]
  • Land Tenure Facts
    Mowanjum / Knowsley / Fitzroy Valley Mowanjum irrigation The project will: • Underpin the community’s aspiration to become a viable trial – Derby pastoral operation This project will be driven through a research • Provide a field-training facility for Derby TAFE’s Pastoral Management agreement and funding partnership between Studies program for both Mowanjum and Derby students the State Government and Mowanjum MEDA STATION Aboriginal Corporation (MAC), a 350-strong • Provide vocational training opportunities for Derby High community on the outskirts of Derby. MEDA STATION School students DERBY The intensive grazing trial will use local • Assist Mowanjum to negotiate approvals for a land tenure change groundwater for an initial 38 hectare centre on parts of the lease to a more flexible land use tenure and attract CONCEPTUAL BOREFIELD pivot grazing and silage operation to support third party investment May and Meda M the community’s vision to establish itself AY MED Investigation Areas DERB as a cattle fattening and beef breeding centre. Y GIBB RI Derby Airport VER RD A RIVER It is envisaged that additional pivots will be Land tenure project installed as Mowanjum’s productivity increases. POTENTIAL Mowanjum Field Trials This initiative aims to add value to pastoral leases, attract investment KNOWSLEY The trial will serve as a demonstration model and allow diversification into irrigated agriculture by improving land DEVELOPMENT MOWANJUM STATION for other Aboriginal pastoral stations MEDA STATION tenure options. AREA in the Kimberley with access to water. DE R B The policy framework developed in the West Kimberley will support Y H While Mowanjum’s 55,000 hectare pastoral W economic development across all of the State’s rangelands.
    [Show full text]
  • Conceptual Models of Australia's Estuaries And
    Geoscience Australia Record 2003/09 CONCEPTUAL MODELS OF AUSTRALIA’S ESTUARIES AND COASTAL WATERWAYS APPLICATIONS FOR COASTAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT David A. Ryan1, Andrew D. Heap2, Lynda Radke1, and David T. Heggie1 1 CRC for Coastal Zone, Estuary and Waterway Management, Geoscience Australia, GPO Box 378, Canberra ACT 2601 2 CRC for Coastal Zone, Estuary and Waterway Management, Geoscience Australia & Department of Geography and Environmental Studies, GPO Box 252-78, Hobart, TAS 7001 i GEOSCIENCE AUSTRALIA Chief Executive Officer: Neil Williams Department of Industry, Tourism & Resources Minister for Industry, Science & Resources: Senator The Hon. Ian Macfarlane MP Parliamentary Secretary: The Hon. Warren Entsch, MP Secretary: Mark Patterson © Commonwealth of Australia 2003 This work is copyright. Apart from any fair dealings for the purposes of study, research, criticism or review, as permitted under the Copyright Act, no part may be reproduced by any process without written permission. Inquiries should be directed to the Communications Unit, Geoscience Australia, GPO Box 378, Canberra City, ACT, 2601 ISSN: 1039-0073 ISBN: 0 642 46766 8 GeoCat No. 47336 Bibliographic reference: Ryan, D. A., Heap, A. D., Radke, L., and Heggie, D. T., (2003) Conceptual models of Australia’s estuaries and coastal waterways: applications for coastal resource management. Geoscience Australia, Record 2003/09, 136 pp. Correspondence for feedback: David Ryan Geoscience Australia GPO Box 378 Canberra ACT 2601 [email protected] www.ozestuaries.org Geoscience Australia has tried to make the information in this product as accurate as possible. However, it does not guarantee that the information is totally accurate or complete. Therefore, you should not rely solely on this information when making a commercial decision.
    [Show full text]
  • Adec Preview Generated PDF File
    R('( H'C\f AWfHw 1990.141(4): 527-545 A collection of freshwater fishes from the Kimberley region of Western Australia Gerald R. Allen* and Ray Leggettt Abstract Collections of freshwater fishes from the Kimberley region of northwestern Australia are reported. A series of 51 sites were sampled mainly with various types of nets. An annotated list of the 27 species collected is presented. Discussion concerning the composition, origin, and high percentage of endemism of the Kimberley iehthyofauna is included. Introduction Until recent times a knowledge of the freshwater fish fauna of Australia was far from complete. Thanks to important revisions of certain key groups this problem is partially rectified. Notable in this regard are reviews of Galaxiidae (McDowall and Frankenburg 1981), Atherinidae (Ivantsoff 1978), Melanotaeniidae (Alien and Cross 1982), Pseudomugilidae (Said, Ivantsoff, and Alien in press), Ambassidae (Alien and Burgess in press), Terapontidae (Vari 1978), and certain eleotridid genera (Hoese and Alien 1983 and 1987). In addition two recent books (Merrick and Schmida 1984; Alien 1989) summarised the entire Australian fauna. Nevertheless there remains a need for detailed regional studies, particularly in remote areas of the far north. There is still much to learn concerning the distributional limits of the northern species and especially 'lbout their biology. Moreover, there are probably a few undescribed species that await discovery, judging from recent collections. The Kimberley region of north-western Australia is one area in particular that is worthy of study. Previous expeditions to the Prince Regent, Drysdale, and Mitchell rivers have resulted in the discovery of 15 new species (Alien 1975c; Hutchins 1977 and 1981).
    [Show full text]
  • Habitat Associations of Freshwater Sawfish (Pristis Microdon) and Northern River Sharks (Glyphis Sp
    Habitat associations of Freshwater Sawfish (Pristis microdon) and Northern River Sharks (Glyphis sp. C): including genetic analysis of P. microdon across northern Australia Report to May 2008 by J.M. Whitty, N.M. Phillips, D.L. Morgan, J.A. Chaplin, D.C. Thorburn & S.C. Peverell This report is divided into two sections; the suggested referencing style is given below: Section I Whitty, J.M., Morgan, D.L., Thorburn, D.C., Fazeldean, T. & Peverell, S.C.1 (2008). Tracking the movements of Freshwater Sawfish (Pristis microdon) and Northern River Sharks (Glyphis sp. C) in the Fitzroy River. In J.M. Whitty, N.M. Phillips, D.L. Morgan, J.A. Chaplin, D.C. Thorburn & S.C. Peverell (eds). Habitat associations of Freshwater Sawfish (Pristis microdon) and Northern River Shark (Glyphis sp. C): including genetic analysis of P. microdon across northern Australia. Centre for Fish & Fisheries Research (Murdoch University) report to the Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts, Australian Government. Section II Phillips, N.M, Chaplin, J.A., Morgan, D.L., Peverell, S.C.1 & Thorburn, D.C. (2008). Genetic diversity and population structure of the Freshwater Sawfish (Pristis microdon) in Australian waters. In J.M. Whitty, N.M. Phillips, D.L. Morgan, J.A. Chaplin, D.C. Thorburn & S.C. Peverell (eds). Habitat associations of Freshwater Sawfish (Pristis microdon) and Northern River Shark (Glyphis sp. C): including genetic analysis of P. microdon across northern Australia. Centre for Fish & Fisheries Research (Murdoch University) report to the Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts, Australian Government. 1 Stirling Peverell is with the Queensland Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries Acknowledgements We would like to acknowledge the Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts for providing the necessary funds for the project.
    [Show full text]