Add. 1 Scrubber Sweeper Inventory Exh a REV.Xlsm
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Directions to Boston - Local Parking
Directions to Boston - Local Parking GENERAL INFORMATION Logan Express (Recommended) The Back Bay Logan Express runs from all airport terminals directly to St. James Street in Copley Square in Back Bay diagonally across the street from the hotel. Departures occur at :00, :20, and :40 from 5am to 9pm daily. Fares are $7.50 per passenger – payment is by Visa, MasterCard, American Express and Diners Club (NO CASH). All buses are wheelchair accessible. Subway The closest subway stations are Copley Station (on the Green Line) and Back Bay Station (on the Orange Line). Both stations are within 1 block of the hotel. The MBTA runs daily from 6:00 AM to 1:00 AM. The schedule varies based on line, day of week, and reliability of the service. The cost is $2.75 per ride. Cab Transportation Green transportation is available through Lifestyle Transportation International (LTI) and Boston Cabs. Both transportation companies offer hybrid and Flex-Fuel vehicles in their fleet. Taxi fares from the airport to the hotel range from $40-50. PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION From Airport via Subway From airport terminal take a MassPort shuttle bus to the Airport subway station. Take the inbound Blue Line train to Government Center. Then, transfer to any outbound Green Line train to go to Copley station. Make a right onto Dartmouth Street - the hotel is 300 feet down the block on the same side of the street. The fare is $2.75. OR From airport terminal take any Silver Line bus to South Station. Change to an “Alewife” bound Red Line to Park Street. -
A National Colloquium May 3 -4, 2012, Boston, MA
Arresting Demand: A National Colloquium May 3 -4, 2012, Boston, MA Frequently Asked Questions 1. What is the location of the colloquium? We are hosting the colloquium at the Westin Copley Place, located at 10 Huntington, Avenue Boston, MA 02116. Please visit their website at www.westin.com/Boston. 2. I have already registered but cannot attend. Can I cancel or transfer my registration? Yes, you may transfer your registration to a colleague in order to take your place at the conference. However, you will be responsible for any fees related to changes made to your travel arrangements. 3. Can I invite a guest to the conference? If you would like to invite a guest or suggest a colleague that should be added to our list please contact Alyssa Ozimek-Maier. 4. When is the registration deadline? Friday, April 6, is the registration deadline for the colloquium. If there is a circumstance that will prevent you from completing your registration by that time please contact Alyssa Ozimek-Maier. 5. What meals will be provided during the conference? All meals (breakfast, lunch, and dinner) will be provided during the two day colloquium. Please be sure to notify us of any dietary preferences, via registration and we will work diligently to make sure that each request is respected. 6. I have questions about my travel arrangements. Who should I contact? Any questions regarding your personal travel arrangements should be directed to Travel Collaborative at [email protected]. 7. Will parking be available? Parking at the hotel will be available through valet service only courtesy of Hunt Alternatives Fund. -
Building a Better T in the Era of Covid-19
Building a Better T in the Era of Covid-19 MBTA Advisory Board September 17, 2020 General Manager Steve Poftak 1 Agenda 1. Capital Project Updates 2. Ridership Update 3. Ride Safer 4. Crowding 5. Current Service and Service Planning 2 Capital Project Updates 3 Surges Complete | May – August 2020 Leveraged low ridership while restrictions are in place due to COVID-19 directives May June July August D Branch (Riverside to Kenmore) Two 9-Day Closures C Branch (Cleveland Circle to Kenmore) E Branch (Heath to Symphony) Track & Signal Improvements, Fenway Portal Flood 28-Day Full Closure 28-Day Full Closure Protection, Brookline Hills TOD Track & Intersection Upgrades Track & Intersection Upgrades D 6/6 – 6/14 D 6/20 – 6/28 C 7/5 – 8/1 E 8/2 – 8/29 Blue Line (Airport to Bowdoin) Red Line (Braintree to Quincy) 14-Day Closure Harbor Tunnel Infrastructure Upgrades On-call Track 2, South Shore Garages, Track Modernization BL 5/18 – 5/31 RL 6/18 -7/1 4 Shuttle buses replaced service Ridership Update 5 Weekday Ridership by Line and Mode - Indexed to Week of 2/24 3/17: Restaurants and 110 bars closed, gatherings Baseline: limited to 25 people Average weekday from 2/24-2/28 100 MBTA service reduced Sources: 90 3/24: Non-essential Faregate counts for businesses closed subway lines, APC for 80 buses, manual counts at terminals for Commuter Rail, RIDE 70 vendor reports 6/22: Phase 2.2 – MBTA 6/8: Phase 2.1 60 increases service Notes: Recent data preliminary 50 5/18-6/1: Blue Line closed for 40 accelerated construction Estimated % of baseline ridership -
KEEPING on TRACK Our Second Progress Report on Reforming and Funding Transportation Since Passage of the Massachusetts Transportation Finance Act of 2013
KEEPING ON TRACK Our Second Progress Report on Reforming and Funding Transportation Since Passage of the Massachusetts Transportation Finance Act of 2013 Written by Produced by Rafael Mares Kirstie Pecci FEBRUARY 2015 KEEPING ON TRACK Our Second Progress Report on Reforming and Funding Transportation Since Passage of the Massachusetts Transportation Finance Act of 2013 Rafael Mares, Conservation Law Foundation Kirstie Pecci, MASSPIRG Education Fund February 2015 ACKNOWLEDGMentS The authors thank the following MassDOT; Rani Murali, former Intern, individuals for contributing information Transportation for Massachusetts; or perspectives for this report: Jeannette Orsino, Executive Director, Andrew Bagley, Director of Research Massachusetts Association of Regional and Public Affairs, Massachusetts Transit Authorities; Martin Polera, Office Taxpayers Foundation; Paula of Real Estate and Asset Development, Beatty, Deputy Director of Budget, MBTA; Richard Power, Legislative MBTA; Taryn Beverly, Legal Intern, Director, MassDOT; Janice E. Ramsay, Conservation Law Foundation; Matthew Director of Finance Policy and Analysis, Ciborowski, Project Manager, Office MBTA; and Mary E. Runkel, Director of of Transportation Planning, MassDOT; Budget, MBTA. Jonathan Davis, Chief Financial Officer, MBTA; Thom Dugan, former Deputy This report was made possible thanks Chief Financial Officer & Director, to generous support from the Barr Office of Management and Budget, Foundation. MassDOT; Kristina Egan, Director, Transportation for Massachusetts; Adriel © 2015 Transportation for Massachusetts Galvin, Supervisor of Asset Systems Development, MassDOT; Scott Hamwey, The authors bear responsibility for any Manager of Long-Range Planning, factual errors. The views expressed in Office of Transportation Planning, this report are those of the authors and MassDOT; Dana Levenson, Assistant do not reflect the views of our funders Secretary and Chief Financial Officer, or those who provided review. -
Red / Blue Line Connector Assessment – Land Use, Population, and Ridership Memo 2 2
SUMMARY MEMORANDUM: POPULATION, LAND USE, AND RIDERSHIP CHANGES UPDATE TO THE 2010 DEIR FOR THE RED LINE/BLUE LINE CONNECTOR Published October 2018 1. Introduction In 2010, Massachusetts Department of Transportation (MassDOT) conducted a study to evaluate the connection of the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority’s (MBTA’s) Red Line and Blue Line in Boston. The Red/Blue Line Connector Project consisted of extending the Blue Line beyond its current terminus at Bowdoin Station along Cambridge Street to the Red Line at Charles/ MGH Station. In March 2010, MassDOT submitted a Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) pursuant to the Massachusetts Environmental Policy Act (MEPA). In May 2010, MEPA approved the DEIR. At the time, MassDOT had not identified funding for the construction of the Project. Recent changes in development and growth in Revere, East Boston, and Cambridge, as well as advancements in construction technologies, have generated a renewed interest in revisiting the need for the Red/Blue Line Connector. MassDOT’s Office of Transportation and Planning (OTP), working with the MBTA, has initiated a study to reassess the Project by revisiting previous assumptions developed during the 2010 DEIR. The purpose of this memorandum is to update the data and assumptions regarding population, land use, and ridership from the 2010 DEIR’s Purpose and Need. The 2010 DEIR focused primarily on four Census tracks surrounding the Cambridge Street corridor project area. However, due to their current access to the Blue and Red lines, the communities in this area would likely not have a large effect on demand for and use of the connection. -
CHAPTER 5 Priorities for Achieving a State of Good Repair
CHAPTER 5 Priorities for Achieving a State of Good Repair To achieve a state of good repair (SGR), infrastructure assets must be replaced as safety standards or obsolescence dictates. Once a state of good repair has been achieved, the most effective way to sustain the optimum performance of these assets is preventive maintenance. Deferring maintenance, even for a short time, accelerates the degradation of infrastructure assets. Proper attention to main- tenance can greatly extend useful life and reduce costs overall. In addition, proper maintenance is critical for providing safe and reliable service. The key components of a successful, ongoing preventive maintenance program include adequate personnel and the tools, equipment, and materials necessary to complete maintenance tasks within a reasonable time frame. It is imperative that these resources be made available in order for the MBTA to maintain efficient and safe operations that meet the needs of the riding public. The following discussion surveys the categories of the MBTA’s infrastructure assets, describing the status of each and highlighting the most important capital investments that will need to be made during the time frame of this PMT to bring the system into SGR. A more comprehensive list of SGR needs can be found in Appendix H. In addition to the currently identified SGR projects, it is anticipat- ed that prior to 2030 many capital assets presently in serviceable condition will reach end-of-life and require replacement. PRIORITIES FOR ACHIEVING A ST A TE OF GOOD RE pa IR 5-1 REVENUE VEHICLES Revenue vehicles are those vehicles that are used in the direct provision of services to the public. -
Other Public Transportation
Other Public Transportation SCM Community Transportation Massachusetts Bay Transportation (Cost varies) Real-Time Authority (MBTA) Basic Information Fitchburg Commuter Rail at Porter Sq Door2Door transportation programs give senior Transit ($2 to $11/ride, passes available) citizens and persons with disabilities a way to be Customer Service/Travel Info: 617/222-3200 Goes to: North Station, Belmont Town Center, mobile. It offers free rides for medical dial-a-ride, Information NEXT BUS IN 2.5mins Phone: 800/392-6100 (TTY): 617/222-5146 Charles River Museum of Industry and Innovation grocery shopping, and Council on Aging meal sites. No more standing at (Waltham), Mass Audubon Drumlin Farm Wildlife Check website for eligibility requirements. a bus stop wondering Local bus fares: $1.50 with CharlieCard Sanctuary (Lincoln), Codman House (Lincoln), Rindge Ave scmtransportation.org when the next bus will $2.00 with CharlieTicket Concord Town Center Central Sq or cash on-board arrive. The T has more Connections: Red Line at Porter The Ride Arriving in: 2.5 min MBTA Subway fares: $2.00 with CharlieCard 7 min mbta.com/schedules_and_maps/rail/lines/?route=FITCHBRG The Ride provides door-to-door paratransit service for than 45 downloadable 16 min $2.50 with CharlieTicket Other Commuter Rail service is available from eligible customers who cannot use subways, buses, or real-time information Link passes (unlimited North and South stations to Singing Beach, Salem, trains due to a physical, mental, or cognitive disability. apps for smartphones, subway & local bus): $11.00 for 1 day $4 for ADA territory and $5 for premium territory. Gloucester, Providence, etc. -
Improving South Boston Rail Corridor Katerina Boukin
Improving South Boston Rail Corridor by Katerina Boukin B.Sc, Civil and Environmental Engineering Technion Institute of Technology ,2015 Submitted to the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Masters of Science in Civil and Environmental Engineering at the MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY May 2020 ○c Massachusetts Institute of Technology 2020. All rights reserved. Author........................................................................... Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering May 19, 2020 Certified by. Andrew J. Whittle Professor Thesis Supervisor Certified by. Frederick P. Salvucci Research Associate, Center for Transportation and Logistics Thesis Supervisor Accepted by...................................................................... Colette L. Heald, Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering Chair, Graduate Program Committee 2 Improving South Boston Rail Corridor by Katerina Boukin Submitted to the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering on May 19, 2020, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Masters of Science in Civil and Environmental Engineering Abstract . Rail services in older cities such as Boston include an urban metro system with a mixture of light rail/trolley and heavy rail lines, and a network of commuter services emanating from termini in the city center. These legacy systems have grown incrementally over the past century and are struggling to serve the economic and population growth -
FY 2022 Capital Budget and FY 2022-2033 Capital Program Proposal
FISCAL YEAR 2022 CAPITAL BUDGET and FISCAL YEARS 2022-2033 CAPITAL PROGRAM PROPOSAL Including Reduced Funding Capital Program Scenario FY 2022 CAPITAL BUDGET AND FY 2022-2033 CAPITAL PROGRAM Proposal April 26, 2021 FY 2022 CAPITAL BUDGET AND FY 2022 - 2033 CAPITAL PROGRAM Table of Contents Executive Summary…............................................................................................................. 1 Introduction to SEPTA............................................................................................................ 4 SEPTA Forward - 5-Year Strategic Business Plan…............................................................. 8 Impacts of SEPTA's Capital Program……………………………................................................... 9 SEPTA’s Projects of Significance ……………………………………………....................................... 12 Sources of Capital Funding..................................................................................................... 15 FY 2022 Capital Budget and FY 2022-2033 Capital Program: Current Funding Level Program……..……………………………………............................ 20 Neshaminy Substation Reduced Funding Level Program……...…………………………….................................. 22 Capital Program and Project Descriptions 28 Bridge Program.............................................................................................................. 29 Communications, Signal Systems and Technology..................................................... 34 Financial Obligations..................................................................................................... -
Cast Iron Subway Entrances Thematic District
NOMINATION OF HISTORIC DISTRICT PHILADELPHIA REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES PHILADELPHIA HISTORICAL COMMISSION SUBMIT ALL ATTACHED MATERIALS ON PAPER AND IN ELECTRONIC FORM ON CD (MS WORD FORMAT) 1. NAME OF HISTORIC DISTRICT ______________________________________________________________________Cast Iron Subway Entrances Thematic District 2. LOCATION Please attach a map of Philadelphia locating the historic district. Councilmanic District(s):_______________1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 9 3. BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION Please attach a map of the district and a written description of the boundary. 4. DESCRIPTION Please attach a description of built and natural environments in the district. 5. INVENTORY Please attach an inventory of the district with an entry for every property. All street addresses must coincide with official Board of Revision of Taxes addresses. Total number of properties in district:_______________ 52 Count buildings with multiple units as one. Number of properties already on Register/percentage of total:________/________0 0% Number of significant properties/percentage of total:____________/____________21 40% Number of contributing properties/percentage of total:___________/____________31 60% Number of non-contributing properties/percentage of total:_______/____________0 0% 6. SIGNIFICANCE Please attach the Statement of Significance. Period of Significance (from year to year): from _________1928 to _________ 1955 CRITERIA FOR DESIGNATION: The historic district satisfies the following criteria for designation (check all that apply): ✔ (a) Has significant -
C:\Users\Ed\Documents\NRHS 2018\1808 AUG PAGE 1 PHL
1935 - 2018 VOLUME49NUMBER8 DISTRICT 2 - CHAPTER WEBSITE: WWW.NRHS1.ORG AUGUST 2018 TTHE HHISISTORY OF PPHILADELPHIA''S TTRACKLESS TTROLLEYS BY JOHN CALNAN MANAGER, CITY & SERVICE PLANNING, SEPTA In the early 1920's, rubber-tired technology improved where trolley car manufacturers offered a flexible vehicle that could avoid motorists or obstacles, as well as providing transit properties a new, electric, mode that while transporting fewer passengers than a streetcar, offering frequent service without the capital outlay for trackage and equipment. Baltimore and Toronto established electric rail-less operations as experiments on two routes with the goal to spur enough development to eventually convert to streetcar operations. On October 14, 1923, the Philadelphia Rapid Transit Company (PRT) purchased 10 "Rail-Less" vehicles to test their effectiveness on newly created Route 80 which operated along Oregon Avenue from 22nd Street & Passyunk Avenue to Oregon & Delaware. The first generation of Rail-Less vehicles, also known as Trolley Coaches, or Trackless Trolleys resembled a trolley car than an electric bus. Initially, these vehicles operated from Jackson Depot, located on 16th Street, between Jackson and Wolf Streets, but the operation was relocated to Southern Depot in 1925. Southern Depot located on Johnston Street, between 19th and 20th Street , housed trolleys that served several crosstown and north-south lines and the facility had the space to store and maintain trackless vehicles. Ridership gradually grew as Route 80 connected South Philadelphia neighborhoods on either side of Broad Street and several north-south trolley routes to Center City and points north and west. These primitive vehicles were eventually retired and more modern, comfortable vehicles were acquired in November 1935. -
Project Listings
Chapter 9: Project Listings Highway Projects for the FY2021 TIP 8LMW4EKI-RXIRXMSREPP]0IJX&PERO DVRPC FY2021-2024 TIP for PA Final Version Pennsylvania - Highway Program (Status: TIP) Bucks MPMS# 12923 Bristol Road Extension SR:2025 LIMITS US 202 to Park Avenue Est Let Date: 12/8/2022 IMPROVEMENT Roadway New Capacity NHPP: MRPID:119 MUNICIPALITIES: Chalfont Borough; New Britain Borough; New Britain Township FC: 16 AQ Code:2035M PLAN CENTER: Town Center IPD: 14 PROJECT MANAGER: HNTB/N. Velaga CMP: Major SOV Capacity CMP Subcorridor(s): 8G, 12B Provide a two lane extension of Bristol Road from Business Route 202 to Park Avenue. When completed, this improvement will provide a two-lane bypass around Chalfont Borough which will eliminate trips on Business Route 202 and turning movements at the Business Route 202/PA 152 intersection. Project may involve relocation of SEPTA siding track, a bridge across the wetlands, widening the intersection at Bristol Road and Business Route 202 to provide right and left turning lanes, providing maintenance of traffic during construction, redesigning traffic signals and rail road crossing gates at Business Route 202 and Bristol Road extension and coordination with SEPTA. Project CMP (Congestion Management Process) commitments include sidewalks, signal and intersection improvements, turning movement enhancements, and coordination with SEPTA. See DVRPC’s 2016-2017 memorandum on supplemental strategies for details related to this project. TIP Program Years ($ 000) Phase Fund FY2021 FY2022 FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 FY2026