For Peer Review

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

For Peer Review Manuscripts submitted to Integrative and Comparative Biology Neuroendocrinology of sex-role reversal Journal: Integrative and Comparative Biology Manuscript ID Draft Manuscript Type: Symposium article Date Submitted by the Forn/a Peer Review Author: Complete List of Authors: Lipshutz, Sara; Indiana University Bloomington, Biology Rosvall, Kimberly; Indiana University Bloomington, Biology sex-role reversal, female competition, neural sensitivity, testosterone, Keywords: sex steroid http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/icbiol Page 1 of 27 Manuscripts submitted to Integrative and Comparative Biology 1 2 3 1 Neuroendocrinology of sex-role reversal 4 2 Sara E. Lipshutz1,*, Kimberly A. Rosvall1,2 5 3 6 4 1. Department of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, 47405 7 5 2. Center for the Integrated Study of Animal Behavior, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, 8 47405 9 6 10 7 11 8 *Corresponding author 12 9 Full address: Department of Biology, Jordan Hall Rm. 142, 1001 E. 3rd St., Indiana University, 13 10 Bloomington, IN 47405-7005, USA 14 11 Email address: [email protected] 15 12 Phone number: (812) 855-4555 16 13 Fax: (812) 855-6705 17 14 18 15 Running title: Neuroendocrinology of sex-role reversal 19 16 For Peer Review 20 17 Word count: 4,349 21 18 22 23 19 Abstract 24 25 20 Females of some species are considered sex-role reversed, meaning that they face stronger 26 27 competition for mates compared to males. While much attention has been paid to behavioral 28 21 29 30 22 and morphological patterns associated with sex-role reversal, less is known about its 31 32 23 physiological regulation. Here, we evaluate activational and organizational hypotheses relating 33 34 24 to the neuroendocrine basis of sex-role reversal. We refute the most widely tested activational 35 36 25 hypothesis for sex differences in androgen secretion; sex-role reversed females do not have 37 38 26 higher levels of androgens in circulation than males. However, we find some evidence that the 39 40 27 activational effects of androgens may be sex-specific; circulating androgen levels correlate with 41 42 28 some competitive phenotypes in sex-role reversed females. Organizational effects may explain 43 44 29 these relationships, considering that early exposure to sex steroids can shape later sensitivity to 45 46 30 hormones, often in sex-specific ways. We review evidence that sex-role reversed females have 47 48 49 31 higher tissue-specific sensitivity to androgens than males, at least in some species and tissues. 50 51 32 Moving forward, experimental and correlative studies on the ontogeny and expression of sex- 52 53 33 role reversal will help reveal the mechanisms that generate sex-specific behaviors and sex 54 55 34 roles. 56 57 58 1 59 60 http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/icbiol Manuscripts submitted to Integrative and Comparative Biology Page 2 of 27 1 2 3 35 “Why are males masculine, females feminine and occasionally vice-versa?” 4 5 36 – GC Williams, 1975 6 7 37 8 9 10 38 An Introduction to Sex-Role Reversal 11 12 39 Why are females and males different? Biologists have been trying to answer this question 13 14 40 since Darwin first postulated that ‘instinct’ (behavior) may be shaped by natural selection (1859). 15 16 41 In his Victorian era, male animals were considered dominant and promiscuous, whereas female 17 18 42 animals were thought to be coy and subdued. In the intervening years, we have learned a lot 19 For Peer Review 20 43 about ‘sex roles’ across the animal kingdom. For many species, as Darwin and his 21 22 44 contemporaries observed, males face stronger competition for mating opportunities than females, 23 24 45 and females tend to conduct the majority of parental care (Darwin 1871; Clutton-Brock 1991; 25 26 46 Andersson 1994). Whereas territorial aggression and promiscuity were historically considered 27 28 male traits, however, behavioral ecologists now recognize that intrasexual competition and 29 47 30 31 48 multiple-mating are adaptive and widespread behaviors in females of many species (Clutton- 32 33 49 Brock 2009; Rosvall 2011; Hare and Simmons 2018). Sex-role reversal (SRR) occurs when 34 35 50 sexual selection among females is stronger than sexual selection acting among males (Vincent 36 37 51 et al. 1992; Kvarnemo and Ahnesjo 1996). SRR females are characterized by phenotypes 38 39 52 typically associated with males, including morphological traits like heavier body mass, larger 40 41 53 weaponry, and more ornamentation, as well as behavioral traits like higher territorial aggression 42 43 54 or more intense courtship rituals. These traits are thought to facilitate female-female competition 44 45 55 for mates and breeding territories (Emlen and Oring 1977; Gwynne 1991). 46 47 Classic work by Bateman (1948) and Trivers (1972) attributed the evolution of sex roles 48 56 49 50 57 to anisogamy, although this has proven challenging to reconcile with sex-role reversal. In 51 52 58 general, male gametes (sperm) are smaller and more numerous than nutrient-rich female 53 54 59 gametes (ova), and so males may be more available to mate than females, who may be 55 56 60 predisposed to caring for their offspring based on this initial asymmetry in parental investment. 57 58 2 59 60 http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/icbiol Page 3 of 27 Manuscripts submitted to Integrative and Comparative Biology 1 2 3 61 For decades, this anisogamy argument dominated theory on the evolution of sex roles: sex 4 5 62 differences in initial parental investment drive the degree of mating competition and direction of 6 7 63 sexual selection (reviwed in Hoquet, 2020). However, anisogamy cannot explain the evolution of 8 9 10 64 SRR because SRR-females are nonetheless female; they always produce the larger gamete, 11 12 65 even when they compete more than males. Recent theoretical work indicates that additional 13 14 66 factors including multiple paternity, adult mortality, and sex ratios may generate co-evolutionary 15 16 67 feedbacks that influence the strength and sex-specificity of sexual selection (Kokko and 17 18 68 Jennions 2008; Fromhage and Jennions 2016). Despite these advances to our understanding of 19 For Peer Review 20 69 the ultimate drivers of SRR, much less is known about the proximate mechanisms that give rise 21 22 70 to SRR. 23 24 71 Sex steroids are logical candidates for the physiological regulation of SRR, because 25 26 72 these hormones are associated with many sexually dimorphic traits, especially those related to 27 28 mating and mating competition (Adkins-Regan 2005). Sex steroids act in two main ways, the 29 73 30 31 74 first of which operates early in life during a critical period when exposure to a hormone (or lack 32 33 75 thereof) can permanently organize tissue structure and function i.e. organizational effects 34 35 76 (Phoenix et al. 1959; Arnold and Breedlove 1985), which determine whether later exposure to a 36 37 77 hormone can bring about a phenotypic effect. One of the primary modes of action for 38 39 78 organizational effects is to change the anatomical distribution and/or abundance of sex steroid 40 41 79 receptors, early in the life and often lasting into adulthood (Moore et al. 1998). Activational 42 43 80 effects typically occur during adulthood, when animals change aspects of their phenotype in 44 45 81 response to changing hormone levels in circulation. For sex steroids, hormone secretion is 46 47 regulated by the hypothalamic-gonadal-pituitary (HPG) axis, when external stimuli prompt the 48 82 49 50 83 hypothalamus to secrete gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH). GnRH then stimulates the 51 52 84 pituitary to release gonadotropins luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle-stimulating hormone 53 54 85 (FSH) into the bloodstream. These gonadotropins signal to the gonads to initiate gametogenesis 55 56 86 as well as produce sex steroids including estrogen, progesterone, and testosterone, as well as 57 58 3 59 60 http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/icbiol Manuscripts submitted to Integrative and Comparative Biology Page 4 of 27 1 2 3 87 11-ketotestosterone in fishes (Schulz et al. 2010). Many researchers have found important 4 5 88 connections between sex steroids, their cellular mechanisms of action, and the evolution of 6 7 89 sexually selected traits, linking the physiological origins of diversity in mating phenotypes across 8 9 10 90 animals (Wingfield et al. 1990; Soma 2006; Fuxjager and Schuppe 2018; Lipshutz et al. 2019; 11 12 91 Cox 2020). Critically, these mechanisms operate in both sexes (Staub and De Beer 1997), 13 14 92 providing the opportunity to investigate how variation in sex steroid signaling may contribute to 15 16 93 the origin and expression of SRR. 17 18 94 Here, we evaluate two key hypotheses on the role of sex steroids in the evolution of 19 For Peer Review 20 95 SRR. First, we examine the evidence that SRR is explained by activational effects of sex steroid 21 22 96 secretion, focusing on sex differences in levels of androgens in circulation, as well as co- 23 24 97 variation between androgens and competitive phenotypes in SRR species. Next, we assess 25 26 98 hypotheses relating to the organizational basis of SRR, asking whether androgen exposure 27 28 early in development may explain SRR behavior and morphology, and/or sex differences in 29 99 30 31 100 tissue-level sensitivity to androgens (e.g. androgen receptor abundance). We focus primarily on 32 33 101 SRR birds and fishes, which have received the most attention to date, and we draw inferences 34 35 102 from species with conventional sex roles. 36 37 103 38 39 104 H1: SRR stems from activational effects of sex steroids 40 41 105 Do females and males differ in androgen levels in circulation? 42 43 106 Two decades ago, Eens and Pinxten (2000) reviewed studies from field endocrinology to 44 45 107 evaluate the hypothesis that SRR females have male-typical physiological mechanisms, 46 47 specifically that testosterone secretion may be higher in SRR females, a reversal from the 48 108 49 50 109 conventional pattern.
Recommended publications
  • Criteria for the Conservation Status Assessment of the Marine Habitats
    ARTYKUŁ PRZEGLĄDOWY Bulletin of the Maritime Institute in Gdańsk Criteria for the conservation status assessment of the marine habitats. Case study: habitat 1160 ‘Large, shallow inlets and bays’ Kryteria oceny stanu ochrony siedlisk morskich na przykładzie siedliska 1160 ‘Duże płytkie zatoki’ Authors’ Contribution: EF E A – Study Design Monika Michałek , Lidia Kruk - Dowgiałło B – Data Collection C – Statistical Analysis D – Data Interpretation Maritime Institute in Gdańsk, Długi Targ 41/42, 0-830 Gdańsk E – Manuscript Preparation F – Literature Search G – Funds Collection Article history: Received: 30.10.2015 Accepted: 20.11.2015 Published: 31.03.2016 Abstract: Planning effective conservation measures in relation to particular habitats and species, which are the subjects of protection, require, above all, assessing their conservation status and identifying factors that have influenced this state. Although the scope of monitoring and the number of investigated species and habitats from Annex I, II, IV and V of the Habi- tats Directive is gradually increasing, no formal assessment of 1160 habitat has been performed so far. Methodological guide- lines don’t include any assumptions to investigation and valuation of this habitat. In Europe the habitat 1160 is protected in 462 Natura 2000 sites. Due to its significant structural and functional diversity in particular European countries, there is a necessity of working out specific site indices for the state assessment. The aim of this work was the review of methods used in the ‘Large, shallow inlets and bays’ state assessment in selected Euro- pean countries and presentation the assumptions for the assessment in Polish special area of conservation: PLH220032 Puck Bay and Hel Peninsula.
    [Show full text]
  • Gap Analysis on the Biology of Mediterranean Marine Fishes
    RESEARCH ARTICLE Gap analysis on the biology of Mediterranean marine fishes Donna Dimarchopoulou1, Konstantinos I. Stergiou1,2, Athanassios C. Tsikliras1* 1 Laboratory of Ichthyology, Department of Zoology, School of Biology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece, 2 Institute of Marine Biological Resources and Inland Waters, Hellenic Centre for Marine Research, Athens, Greece * [email protected] a1111111111 a1111111111 Abstract a1111111111 a1111111111 We estimated the current level of knowledge concerning several biological characteristics a1111111111 of the Mediterranean marine fishes by carrying out a gap analysis based on information extracted from the literature, aiming to identify research trends and future needs in the field of Mediterranean fish biology that can be used in stock assessments, ecosystem modeling and fisheries management. Based on the datasets that emerged from the literature review, OPEN ACCESS there is no information on any biological characteristic for 43% (n = 310) of the Mediterra- Citation: Dimarchopoulou D, Stergiou KI, Tsikliras nean fish species, whereas for an additional 15% (n = 109) of them there is information AC (2017) Gap analysis on the biology of about just one characteristic. The gap between current and desired knowledge (defined Mediterranean marine fishes. PLoS ONE 12(4): here as having information on most biological characteristics for at least half of the Mediter- e0175949. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. pone.0175949 ranean marine fishes) is smaller in length-weight relationships, which have been studied for 43% of the species, followed by spawning (39%), diet (29%), growth (25%), maturity (24%), Editor: Dennis M. Higgs, University of Windsor, CANADA lifespan (19%) and fecundity (17%). The gap is larger in natural mortality for which informa- tion is very scarce (8%).
    [Show full text]
  • An Aquaculture Perspective
    biology Review Salmonid Antibacterial Immunity: An Aquaculture Perspective Shawna L. Semple and Brian Dixon * Department of Biology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-519-888-4567 Received: 23 September 2020; Accepted: 8 October 2020; Published: 11 October 2020 Simple Summary: Capture fisheries are reaching their limit, so the increasing demand for fish protein can only be met through aquaculture. One attractive sector within this industry is the culture of salmonids, which are a) uniquely under pressure due to overfishing and b) the most valuable finfish per unit of weight. The culture of these animals is threatened by many diseases, some caused by bacteria, which can result in large financial losses for fish farmers. Unfortunately, the current methods for the control of aquatic bacterial diseases are either unsustainable (antibiotics) or not very effective (vaccines). This is primarily due to a lack of knowledge surrounding the successful immune function of fish. To improve vaccine design and other methods of control, a deeper understanding of fish immunology is essential. This review highlights the current understanding of fish antibacterial immunity in the context of salmonid culture. Additionally, the successes and shortcomings of current methods used to combat bacterial diseases in salmonid aquaculture will be addressed. Improving our understanding of the salmonid immune system will help to reduce aquaculture losses in the future. Abstract: The aquaculture industry is continuously threatened by infectious diseases, including those of bacterial origin. Regardless of the disease burden, aquaculture is already the main method for producing fish protein, having displaced capture fisheries.
    [Show full text]
  • The Baltic Sea – Discovering the Sea of Life
    TheBaltic Sea Discovering the sea of life Helena Telkänranta HELSINKI COMMISSION Baltic Marine Environment Protection Commission The Baltic Sea – Discovering the sea of life The DiscoveringBaltic the sea of life Sea Helena Telkänranta HELSINKI COMMISSION Baltic Marine Environment Protection Commission Photographers: Agnieszka and Włodek Bilin’scy p. 7, 32 top, 47, 58, 77, 87, 91 Finn Carlsen p. 38 top Bo L. Christiansen p. 18 top, 30–31 Per-Olov Eriksson p. 21, 35 bottom, 39 bottom, 72–73, 96 Mikael Gustafsson p. 27, 35 bottom, 56–57, 97 Antti Halkka / LKA p. 14, 15 Visa Hietalahti covers, p. 5, 10–11, 13, 16, 17 top, 22 top, 23, 32 bottom, 33 bottom, 36, 37 top, 37 bottom, 40–41, 49 top, 49 bottom, 51 bottom, 53, 60, 61, 71 top, 78, 79 top, 81, 89, 95 Kerstin Hinze p. 28 top, 28 bottom, 29 bottom, 42 top, 43 top, 69, 74, 76, 80, 85, 94 Ingmar Holmåsen p. 33 top, 84, Radosław Janicki p. 70 Seppo Keränen p. 8, 20, 26, 43 bottom, 59, 62, 66, 68 Czesław Kozłowski p. 88 Rami Laaksonen p. 67 Łukasz Łukasik p. 86, 92 Johnny Madsen p. 18 bottom, 24–25 Jukka Nurminen p. 48, 51 top, 52, 54, 55 top, 55 bottom, 71 bottom, 99 Tom Nygaard Kristensen p. 35 top Jukka Rapo p. 42 bottom Poul Reib p. 6 Paweł Olaf Sidło p. 82–83, 90 Olavi Stenman p. 44–45 Raimo Sundelin p. 9, 19, 29 top, 38 bottom, 39 top, 46 top, 46 bottom, 50, 63, 64–65, 75, 100–101 Juhani Vaittinen p.
    [Show full text]
  • Reduced Sexual Size Dimorphism in a Pipefish Population Where Males Do Not Prefer Larger Females
    Received: 21 May 2019 | Revised: 26 August 2019 | Accepted: 25 September 2019 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.5760 ORIGINAL RESEARCH Reduced sexual size dimorphism in a pipefish population where males do not prefer larger females Mário Cunha1 | Nídia Macedo1 | Jonathan Wilson2,3 | Gunilla Rosenqvist4,5 | Anders Berglund6 | Nuno Monteiro1,7,8 1CIBIO/InBIO, Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Abstract Genéticos, Universidade do Porto, Vairão, Within a species' distribution, populations are often exposed to diverse environ‐ Portugal ments and may thus experience different sources of both natural and sexual selec‐ 2CIIMAR, Centro Interdisciplinar de Investigação Marinha e tion. These differences are likely to impact the balance between costs and benefits to Ambiental, Universidade do Porto, Porto, individuals seeking reproduction, thus entailing evolutionary repercussions. Here, we Portugal 3Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, look into an unusual population (Baltic Sea) of the broadnosed pipefish, Syngnathus Ontario, Canada typhle, where males do not seem to select females based on size and hypothesize 4 Department of Biology, CBD, NTNU, that this pattern may derive from a reduction in direct benefits to the male. We fur‐ Trondheim, Norway ther hypothesize that if larger females do not persistently secure a higher reproduc‐ 5Department of Earth Sciences, Blue Centre Gotland, Uppsala University, Uppsala, tive success, either through pre‐ or postcopulatory sexual selection, a decrease in Sweden sexual size dimorphism in the Baltic population should be apparent, especially when 6Department of Ecology and Genetics/ Animal Ecology, Uppsala University, contrasted with a well‐studied population, inhabiting similar latitudes (Swedish west Uppsala, Sweden coast), where males prefer larger females. We found that, in the Baltic population, 7 Departamento de Biologia, Faculdade de variation in female quality is low.
    [Show full text]
  • D077p149.Pdf
    Vol. 77: 149–158, 2007 DISEASES OF AQUATIC ORGANISMS Published September 14 doi: 10.3354/dao01833 Dis Aquat Org OPENPEN ACCESSCCESS Infection of wild fishes by the parasitic copepod Caligus elongatus on the south east coast of Norway P. A. Heuch1,*, Ø. Øines1, J. A. Knutsen2, T. A. Schram3 1National Veterinary Institute, Section for Parasitology, PO Box 8156 Dep., 0033 Oslo, Norway 2Institute for Marine Research, Flødevigen Research Station, 4017 His, Norway 3Department of Biology, University of Oslo, PO Box 1066 Blindern, 0316 Oslo, Norway ABSTRACT: Natural Caligus elongatus Nordmann infections of wild coastal fishes on the Norwegian south east coast were monitored at various times of the year from 2002 to 2004. The prevalence for all coastal fish (n = 4427) pooled was 15%, and there were great differences between fish species and seasons. Lumpfish Cyclopterus lumpus L.spawners were the most infected fish, with a prevalence of 61% and a median intensity of 4 lice fish–1, whereas gadids had a mean prevalence of 19% and a median infection of 1 to 2 lice fish–1. Sea trout Salmo trutta L. and herring Clupea harengus L. carried C. elongatus at prevalence values of 29 and 21%, respectively. The results were compared with infec- tion data for immature North Sea lumpfish. Lumpfish spawners caught on the coast in March to April had fewer lice than North Sea lumpfish in July. Spawners carried mostly adult lice, as did coastal fish hosts in May to June. The low development rates of lice at low spring temperatures and new genetic data suggest that the May to June adult lice could not have been offspring of the March to April lice, indicating transfer of adult lice to coastal fish.
    [Show full text]
  • A Rigorous Comparison of Sexual Selection Indexes Via Simulations of Diverse Mating Systems
    A rigorous comparison of sexual selection indexes via simulations of diverse mating systems Jonathan M. Henshawa,1,2, Andrew T. Kahna, and Karoline Fritzscheb,1 aDivision of Evolution, Ecology and Genetics, Research School of Biology, The Australian National University, Canberra ACT 0200, Australia; and bInstitute of Zoology, University of Graz, Graz 8010, Austria Edited by Sarah P. Otto, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada, and approved December 7, 2015 (received for review September 10, 2015) Sexual selection is a cornerstone of evolutionary theory, but measur- mating success, respectively, whereas the use of partial selection ing it has proved surprisingly difficult and controversial. Various gradients allows one to control for indirect selection via corre- proxy measures—e.g., the Bateman gradient and the opportunity for lated traits (13, 15). Unfortunately, trait-based estimates serve sexual selection—are widely used in empirical studies. However, poorly in comparative studies of sexual selection, because there we do not know how reliably these measures predict the strength is no a priori method to determine which traits are sexually se- of sexual selection across natural systems, and most perform poorly lected (2, 16). Failure to include the primary targets of sexual in theoretical worst-case scenarios. Here we provide a rigorous com- selection in analyses will bias conclusions, particularly when the parison of eight commonly used indexes of sexual selection. We ease of identifying such traits covaries systematically with other simulated 500 biologically plausible mating systems, based on the factors of interest. As an example, human researchers may iden- templates of five well-studied species that cover a diverse range tify visually based targets of sexual selection more easily than of reproductive life histories.
    [Show full text]
  • ASFIS ISSCAAP Fish List February 2007 Sorted on Scientific Name
    ASFIS ISSCAAP Fish List Sorted on Scientific Name February 2007 Scientific name English Name French name Spanish Name Code Abalistes stellaris (Bloch & Schneider 1801) Starry triggerfish AJS Abbottina rivularis (Basilewsky 1855) Chinese false gudgeon ABB Ablabys binotatus (Peters 1855) Redskinfish ABW Ablennes hians (Valenciennes 1846) Flat needlefish Orphie plate Agujón sable BAF Aborichthys elongatus Hora 1921 ABE Abralia andamanika Goodrich 1898 BLK Abralia veranyi (Rüppell 1844) Verany's enope squid Encornet de Verany Enoploluria de Verany BLJ Abraliopsis pfefferi (Verany 1837) Pfeffer's enope squid Encornet de Pfeffer Enoploluria de Pfeffer BJF Abramis brama (Linnaeus 1758) Freshwater bream Brème d'eau douce Brema común FBM Abramis spp Freshwater breams nei Brèmes d'eau douce nca Bremas nep FBR Abramites eques (Steindachner 1878) ABQ Abudefduf luridus (Cuvier 1830) Canary damsel AUU Abudefduf saxatilis (Linnaeus 1758) Sergeant-major ABU Abyssobrotula galatheae Nielsen 1977 OAG Abyssocottus elochini Taliev 1955 AEZ Abythites lepidogenys (Smith & Radcliffe 1913) AHD Acanella spp Branched bamboo coral KQL Acanthacaris caeca (A. Milne Edwards 1881) Atlantic deep-sea lobster Langoustine arganelle Cigala de fondo NTK Acanthacaris tenuimana Bate 1888 Prickly deep-sea lobster Langoustine spinuleuse Cigala raspa NHI Acanthalburnus microlepis (De Filippi 1861) Blackbrow bleak AHL Acanthaphritis barbata (Okamura & Kishida 1963) NHT Acantharchus pomotis (Baird 1855) Mud sunfish AKP Acanthaxius caespitosa (Squires 1979) Deepwater mud lobster Langouste
    [Show full text]
  • THE IUCN RED LIST of SEAHORSES and PIPEFISHES in the MEDITERRANEAN SEA © Edwin Van Den Sande / Guylian Seahorses of the World Pregnant Male Guttulatus Hippocampus
    THE IUCN RED LIST OF SEAHORSES AND PIPEFISHES IN THE MEDITERRANEAN SEA © Edwin van den Sande / Guylian Seahorses of the World Hippocampus guttulatus Hippocampus Pregnant male Key Facts • The Syngnathidae (or ‘Syngnathids’) are a family of fishes which includes seahorses, pipefishes, pipehorses, and the leafy, ruby, and weedy seadragons. The name is derived from the Greek word ‘syn’, meaning “fused” or “together”, and ‘gnathus’, meaning “with jaw’. • The Syngnathidae are in the Order Syngnathiformes, which has one other representative in the Mediterranean: the longspine snipefish, Macroramphosus scolopax (Linnaeus, 1758) (Family: Centriscidae), which is listed as Least Concern at the Mediterranean Sea level. • Syngnathids are unique fishes in that they exhibit male pregnancy and give birth to live young. They may be at heightened extinction risk because they produce relatively few offspring and exhibit high site fidelity. • 13 species are found in the Mediterranean Sea and all have been assessed for the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species at the Mediterranean level. None of species are endemic to the Mediterranean. • Both seahorses found in the Mediterranean (Hippocampus hippocampus and Hippocampus guttulatus) are Near Threatened because their populations are declining as a result of habitat degradation caused by coastal development and destructive fishing gears such as trawls and dredges. Seahorses and pipefishes are taken as bycatch in trawl fisheries and sometimes retained and targeted for sale to aquaria, use in traditional medicines, and as curious and religious amulets. • However more than half of the seahorses and pipefishes found in the Mediterranean Sea (seven species) are currently considered Data Deficient because there is insufficient information available to assess their extinction risk and further research is needed to understand their distribution, population trends and threats.
    [Show full text]
  • FAMILY Syngnathidae Bonaparte, 1831 - Pipefishes, Seahorses
    FAMILY Syngnathidae Bonaparte, 1831 - pipefishes, seahorses SUBFAMILY Syngnathinae Bonaparte, 1831 - tail-brooding pipefishes, seahorses [=Signatidi, Aphyostomia, Lophobranchi, Syngnathidae, Scyphini, Siphostomini, Doryrhamphinae, Nerophinae, Doryrhamphinae, Solegnathinae, Gastrotokeinae, Gastrophori, Urophori, Doryichthyina, Sygnathoidinae (Syngnathoidinae), Phyllopteryginae, Acentronurinae, Leptoichthyinae, Haliichthyinae] Notes: Signatidi Rafinesque, 1810b:36 [ref. 3595] (ordine) Syngnathus [published not in latinized form before 1900; not available, Article 11.7.2] Aphyostomia Rafinesque, 1815:90 [ref. 3584] (family) ? Syngnathus [no stem of the type genus, not available, Article 11.7.1.1] Lophobranchi Jarocki, 1822:326, 328 [ref. 4984] (family) ? Syngnathus [no stem of the type genus, not available, Article 11.7.1.1] Syngnathidae Bonaparte, 1831:163, 185 [ref. 4978] (family) Syngnathus Scyphini Nardo, 1843:244 [ref. 31940] (subfamily) Scyphius [correct stem is Scyphi- Sheiko 2013:75 [ref. 32944]] Siphostomini Bonaparte, 1846:9, 89 [ref. 519] (subfamily) Siphostoma [correct stem is Siphostomat-; subfamily name sometimes seen as Siphonostominae based on Siphonostoma, but that name preoccupied in Copepoda] Doryrhamphinae Kaup, 1853:233 [ref. 2569] (subfamily) Doryrhamphus Kaup, 1856 [no valid type genus, not available, Article 11.7.1.1] Nerophinae Kaup, 1853:234 [ref. 2569] (subfamily) Nerophis Doryrhamphinae Kaup, 1856c:54 [ref. 2575] (subfamily) Doryrhamphus Solegnathinae Gill, 1859b:149 [ref. 1762] (subfamily) Solegnathus [Duncker 1912:231 [ref. 1156] used Solenognathina (subfamily) based on Solenognathus] Gastrotokeinae Gill, 1896c:158 [ref. 1743] (subfamily) Gasterotokeus [as Gastrotokeus, name must be corrected Article 32.5.3; ever corrected?] Gastrophori Duncker, 1912:220, 227 [ref. 1156] (group) [no stem of the type genus, not available, Article 11.7.1.1] Urophori Duncker, 1912:220, 231 [ref. 1156] (group) [no stem of the type genus, not available, Article 11.7.1.1] Doryichthyina Duncker, 1912:220, 229 [ref.
    [Show full text]
  • Visual Pigments of Baltic Sea Fishes of Marine and Limnic Origin
    Visual Neuroscience ~2007!, 24, 389–398. Printed in the USA. Copyright © 2007 Cambridge University Press 0952-5238007 $25.00 DOI: 10.10170S0952523807070459 Visual pigments of Baltic Sea fishes of marine and limnic origin MIRKA JOKELA-MÄÄTTÄ,1* TEEMU SMURA,1* ANNA AALTONEN,1 PETRI ALA-LAURILA,2 and KRISTIAN DONNER1 1Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland 2Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston Massachusetts (Received October 14, 2006; Accepted April 19, 2007! Abstract Absorbance spectra of rods and some cones were measured by microspectrophotometry in 22 fish species from the brackish-water of the Baltic Sea, and when applicable, in the same species from the Atlantic Ocean ~3 spp.!, the Mediterranean Sea ~1 sp.!, or Finnish fresh-water lakes ~9 spp.!. The main purpose was to study whether there were differences suggesting spectral adaptation of rod vision to different photic environments during the short history ~Ͻ104 years! of postglacial isolation of the Baltic Sea and the Finnish lakes. Rod absorbance spectra of the Baltic subspecies0populations of herring ~Clupea harengus membras!, flounder ~Platichthys flesus!, and sand goby ~Pomatoschistus minutus! were all long-wavelength-shifted ~9.8, 1.9, and 5.3 nm, respectively, at the wavelength of maximum absorbance, lmax! compared with their truly marine counterparts, consistent with adaptation for improved quantum catch, and improved signal-to-noise ratio of vision in the Baltic light environment. Judged by the shape of the spectra, the chromophore was pure A1 in all these cases; hence the differences indicate evolutionary tuning of the opsin. In no species of fresh-water origin did we find significant opsin-based spectral shifts specific to the Baltic populations, only spectral differences due to varying A10A2 chromophore ratio in some.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution of Male Pregnancy Associated with Remodeling of Canonical Vertebrate Immunity in Seahorses and Pipefishes
    Evolution of male pregnancy associated with remodeling of canonical vertebrate immunity in seahorses and pipefishes Olivia Rotha,1, Monica Hongrø Solbakkenb, Ole Kristian Tørresenb, Till Bayera, Michael Matschinerb,c, Helle Tessand Baalsrudb, Siv Nam Khang Hoffb, Marine Servane Ono Brieucb, David Haasea, Reinhold Haneld, Thorsten B. H. Reuscha,2, and Sissel Jentoftb,2 aMarine Evolutionary Ecology, GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, D-24105 Kiel, Germany; bCentre for Ecological and Evolutionary Synthesis, Department of Biosciences, University of Oslo, NO-0371 Oslo, Norway; cDepartment of Palaeontology and Museum, University of Zurich, CH-8006 Zürich, Switzerland; and dThünen Institute of Fisheries Ecology, D-27572 Bremerhaven, Germany Edited by Günter P. Wagner, Yale University, New Haven, CT, and approved March 13, 2020 (received for review September 18, 2019) A fundamental problem for the evolution of pregnancy, the most class I and II genes (7–9) plays a key role for self/nonself-recognition. specialized form of parental investment among vertebrates, is the While in mammals an initial inflammation seems crucial for embryo rejection of the nonself-embryo. Mammals achieve immunological implantation (10), during pregnancy mammals prevent an immuno- tolerance by down-regulating both major histocompatibility com- logical rejection of the embryo with tissue layers of specialized fetal plex pathways (MHC I and II). Although pregnancy has evolved cells, the trophoblasts (11–13). Trophoblasts do not express MHC II multiple times independently among vertebrates, knowledge of (14–16) and thus prevent antigen presentation to maternal T-helper associated immune system adjustments is restricted to mammals. (Th) cells (17), which otherwise would trigger an immune response All of them (except monotremata) display full internal pregnancy, against nonself.
    [Show full text]