DOCSLIB.ORG

Land Use Capability Classification of the Wellington Region: a Report to Accompany the Second Edition New Zealand Land Resource Inventory

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

d) Manaaki Whenua I'I<ESS LANDCARE RESEARCH SCIENCE SERIES No.6 liJtt&lVtr:.tlFwa{rrt*tar****WfWtf.tftW.qfNwff'Ni#M&I:M54fF.|t#.ilwtW+i#t#Mg,Iwr!:Wr.Awf&li:fwiB'lltffwqi4.W#yWw Land use capability classification of the Wellington region: A report to accompany the second edition New Zealand Land Resource Inventory ?i[#tr'.Wity,tlP.,!tll,:Xtliti,/!it/,,1:!.f-4#lH.q.#ii#,$.a11fAi,!4t4].1 M. J. Page MonoakiWhenuo - Landcore Research Privote Bog 1l -052, Palmerston North Landcare Research Science Series No.6 Manaaki Whenua PRESS Lincoln, Canterbury, New Zealand 't995 @ Landcore Research New Zealand Ltd 1 995 No part of this work covered by copyright may be reproduced or copied in any form or by any means (graphic, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, taping, information retrieval systems, or otherwise) without the written permission of the publisher. CATALOGUING IN PUBLICATION PACE, M. 1.,1949- Land use capability classification of the Wellington region : a report to accompany the second edition New Zealand Land Resource Inventory / M. J. Page. - Lincoln, Canterbury, N.Z. : Manaaki Whenua Press, 1995. (Landcare Research science series ; ISSN 1172-269X; no. 6) rsBN 0-478-04531-X l. Title. ll. Series: Landcare Research science series ; no. 5. uDc 631 .474(931.26E) Cover: View southwest down Horokiri Valley towards the Pauatahanui Arm of Porirua Harbour, with Mana lsland at top right. The terraces in the foreground are classified as land use capability (LUC) units lls3 with lllwl on the lower valley floodplain. The low hills in the left foreground are classified as Vls'| , and the steeper hills on the right of the valley as Vllel with Vlc2 on the exposed ridgetops. Editing by Anne Austin. Design and desktop publishing by Tony Pritchard. Published by Manaaki Whenua Press, Landcare Research, PO Box 40, Lincoln 8152, New Zealand. Contents Summary lntroduction 7 Purpose 7 New Zealand Land Resource Inventory (NZLRI) 7 Application of the NZLRI 7 Wellington region 8 Second edition NZLRI data for the Wellington region I Physical resources of the Wellington region 9 Physiography 9 Climate 14 Rock type 14 Soils 16 Slope 18 Erosion 18 Vegetation ',9 Land use capability (LUC) classification 22 Land use capability class 22 Land use capability subclass 22 Land use capability unit 23 Land use capability suite 23 Productivity data 28 Key to recognising LUC units within LUC suites 29 LUC unit descriptions 39 Acknowledgements 110 References 111 t!.$Siltll.\Elitj:l'tl,irtvAlt#t*lfnnttwllBltif*.1?Ht$Htr"f,lf,if;#F;Mll#.1:1,|W,W#,f1&Wf#tri,ri:n 4 coNTENTs Appendices page 1. Authors and dates of fieldwork for NZLRI data in the Wellington region. 115 2. Aerial photographs used in the compilation of the NZLRI in the Wellington region. 115 3. Correlation between first edition (1974) and second edition (1 990) LUC classifications of the Wellington region of the NZLRI. 116 4. Correlation of LUC units mapped in the Wellington region with LUC units in adjacent '1985). regions (Page 1'17 5. NZLRI rock type classification. 119 6. Geological maps used in the Wellington region. 121 7. Soil surveys used in the Wellington region. 't21 8. NZLRI slope classification. 122 9. NZLRI erosion type and severity classification. 122 10. NZLRI vegetation classification. 't23 11. Vegetation maps used in the Wellington region. 125 12. Stock-carrying capacity data for LUC units in the Wellington region. 125 13. Site index data for LUC units in the Wellington region. 127 Figures 1. North lsland NZLRI regions. 10 2. Location of the Wellington region, showing the main physical features and position of the NZMS 250 series topographical maps. l1 3. Major physiographic zones in the Wellington region. 12 4. Components of LUC classification. 23 Tables 1. Land Use Capability (LUC) surveys in the Wellington region. 9 2. Soil surveys used in the Wellington region. 16 3. Areas of LUC classes mapped in the Wellington region. 22 4. Areas of LUC subclass limitations mapped in the Wellington region. 23 5. Areas of LUC units mapped in the Wellington region. 24 6. LUC suites and component LUC units in the Wellington region. 26 7. Stock-carrying capacity rankings. 28 8. Site index rankinqs. 28 .#iJ*Afn$f$###*If:#ftl$S#Jrw,f;:"ff{.twirvg!4ff9#At&lf'84N tfWWWfWltB}!E#jfMrlS##fi*tiWit# SUMMARY 5 Summary This report describes the second edition Land Use Capability (LUC) classification of the Wellington region, an area of 4269o2ha in the south of the North Island, New Zealand. This region is one of I L in the New Zealand Land Resource Inventory (NZLRD. The NZLRI provides a physical resource inventory for land resource and land use planning. Theinformation in this inventory isthebasis forevaluating the potential of land for sustained production, using the LUC system of land classification. Fieldworkfor second edition coverage at 1:50 000 scale commencedin 1987 and was completed in'I,.992. The methods of mapping and assessment, interpretation and application of the NZLRI follow the "Land Use Capability Survey Handbook" (Soil Conservation and Rivers Control Council 1971) arrd "Our Land Resources" (National Water and Soil Conservation Organisation 19 79). Field checking followed published quality-control procedures, and was carried out by G. R. Harmsworth and G. O. Eyles. In total, 311.2 inventory map units were delineated in the Wellington region. These map units were glouped into 7O LUC units on the basis of their management requirements, soil conservation needs and land use potential. The LUC units have been arranged into eight LUC suites - groupings of LUC units which, although differing in capabilitn share a definitive physical characteristic which unites them in the landscape. A description of Wellington region's physical land resources is provided, as well as a key to the recognition of LUC units in LUC suites, and descriptions of each LUC unit. wr.f,trtgf#ir4f:$Hnfff.ft##gr#**t ##ftf$lidt#F.nwwEftMe#*u*#sil(t#*8##sli$sssf*1:#ta$#s{#!*",*}#*eiN##*s#f#tss#$###*r-il$f####4H INTRODUCTION 7 lntroduction (NWASCO), later the National Water and Purpose isation Soil Conservation Authority (NWASCA), by the purpose of this report is to explain the basis The Water and Soil Division, Ministry of Works and edition NewZealand Land Resource of the second Development, and later by DSIR Land Resources, use capability (LUC) Inventory NZLRD land Palmerston North and Christchurch. Present- classification of the Wellington region, and to day upgading is carried out by Landcare Research the land use capabilityunits delineated. describe under contract to the Foundation for Research, The report accompanies a computerised database Science and Technology. NZLRI the of the second edition of the of All NZLRI data are stored on a computer the Wellington region, and supplements geographic information system managed by extended legend for the region (Page 1 990) which Landcare Research. This provides the versatility summarises much of the resource information to produce worksheets (maps) of various scales each land use caPabilitY unit. for and tables in response to requests. An NZLRI report such as this one is not New Zealand Land Resource lnventory intended to be an exhaustive land resource (NzLRr) description of a region, rather it describes the region's physical resources in terms of land use The NZLRI is a national database of physical land the physical resources resource information. It comprises two sets of capability. General texts on Landscape" data: of the region include "Rugged (Stevens 1974) and "Pautahanui Inlet - an 1 . An inventory of the five physical factors (rock, environmental study" (Healy 1980). Readers are soil, slope, erosion and vegetation) which are referred to other literature cited in the text for basic to the assessment of land resources. The more detailed resource information. physical factors are represented by symbols, in a NZLRI information was first published as a standard layout: series of first edition Land Resource Inventory worksheets at a scale of 1.:63 360 (1 inch to 1 Rock type Soil unit Slope group - - mile) (NWASCO 1975-79) together with sup- Erosion degree and type - Vegetation cover porting documents. Many first edition NZLRI worksheets have been updated or remapped as A homogenous unit area approach is used to second edition worksheets at l.:5O0O0 scale, record the physical resource data (Eyles 1977), which correspond with New Zealand Mapping with the five factors being mapped simul- Series (NZMS) 260 series topographic maps. taneously to an appropriate level of detail in Where the 1:50 O00 base was not available the relation to the scale of mappingbeing undertaken. second edition worksheets were prepared at 2. A land use capability rating of each map unit 1:63 360 scale. At 1:63 360 scale an inventory based on an assessment of the ability of the five map unit can be delineated to about 100 ha in physical factors, together with climate and the size; atthe 1:50 000scale, aninventorymapunit effects of past land use, to provide sustained can be delineated to about 60 ha. When mapping agricultural production. at the scale of 1:50 000, the smallest practicable area size determined in the NZLRI for a hooked Detailed information on general aspects and (i.e. joined by a vinculum) inventory map unit is interpretation of the NZLRI is available in the approximately 15 hectares. "Land Use Capability Survey Handbook" (Soil Conservation and Rivers Control Council 7971) and "Our Land Resources" (National Water and Application of the NZLRI Soil Conservation Organisation 1979), and has The NZLRI data have been widely used by local been given by Howard and Eyles (7979). teffitorial authorities such as regional councils, The NZLRI was initially prepared for the government corporations, government depart- National Water and Soil Conservation Organ- ments, private companies, consultants and other 8 rNTRoDUcnoN agencies involved in planning rural land use or Second edition NZLRI data for the management of natural resources.
Recommended publications
  • Regional Overview

    Regional Overview

    Air, land and water in the Wellington region – state and trends Regional overview This summary highlights the key findings from State of the Environment monitoring we carry out of natural resources across the Wellington region. It is drawn from eight technical reports which give the full picture of the health of the Wellington region’s air, land, fresh waters and coast. The reports, published every five years, are based on environmental monitoring and investigations over the past five to ten years (and longer for some resources). The findings are informing the current review of Greater Wellington’s regional plans – the ‘rule books’ for ensuring our region’s natural resources are sustainably managed. These plans are now more than ten years old and we are developing a new integrated plan. Community input to the review is critical – you can find out how to have a say on the back page. How do we measure the health of the region’s air, land and water resources? Regional councils have a legal responsibility under section 35 of the Resource Management Act 1991 to monitor the state of the environment – this essentially means tracking the quality and quantity of the region’s natural resources over time. Greater Wellington does this through long-term monitoring programmes across the region focusing on: ● Air quality at 6 locations ● Soil quality (118 sites under a range of different land uses) and stability ● Rainfall (at 50 sites) and river flows/levels (at 45 sites) ● Groundwater levels (at 146 sites) and quality (at 71 sites) ● Water quality at popular river and beach recreation spots (100 sites) ● River/stream water quality and ecosystem health (at 55 sites) ● The health of selected estuaries and our two harbours Measuring river flow We also carry out short-term investigations where our routine monitoring identifies gaps or potential problems, such as poor air or water quality.
  • Geology of the Wairarapa Area

    Geology of the Wairarapa Area

    GEOLOGY OF THE WAIRARAPA AREA J. M. LEE J.G.BEGG (COMPILERS) New International NewZOaland Age International New Zealand 248 (Ma) .............. 8~:~~~~~~~~ 16 il~ M.- L. Pleistocene !~ Castlecliffian We £§ Sellnuntian .~ Ozhulflanl Makarewan YOm 1.8 100 Wuehlaplngien i ~ Gelaslan Cl Nukumaruan Wn ~ ;g '"~ l!! ~~ Mangapanlan Ql -' TatarianiMidian Ql Piacenzlan ~ ~;: ~ u Wai i ian 200 Ian w 3.6 ,g~ J: Kazanlan a.~ Zanetaan Opoitian Wo c:: 300 '"E Braxtonisn .!!! .~ YAb 256 5.3 E Kunaurian Messinian Kapitean Tk Ql ~ Mangapirian YAm 400 a. Arlinskian :;; ~ l!!'" 500 Sakmarian ~ Tortonisn ,!!! Tongaporutuan Tt w'" pre-Telfordian Ypt ~ Asselian 600 '" 290 11.2 ~ 700 'lii Serravallian Waiauan 5w Ql ." i'l () c:: ~ 600 J!l - fl~ '§ ~ 0'" 0 0 ~~ !II Lillburnian 51 N 900 Langhian 0 ~ Clifdenian 5e 16.4 ca '1000 1 323 !II Z'E e'" W~ A1tonian PI oS! ~ Burdigalian i '2 F () 0- w'" '" Dtaian Po ~ OS Waitakian Lw U 23.8 UI nlan ~S § "t: ." Duntroonian Ld '" Chattian ~ W'" 28.5 P .Sll~ -''" Whalngaroan Lwh O~ Rupelian 33.7 Late Priabonian ." AC 37.0 n n 0 I ~~ ~ Bortonian Ab g; Lutetisn Paranaen Do W Heretauncan Oh 49.0 354 ~ Mangaorapan Om i Ypreslan .;;: w WalD8wsn Ow ~ JU 54.8 ~ Thanetlan § 370 t-- §~ 0'" ~ Selandian laurien Dt ." 61.0 ;g JM ~"t: c:::::;; a.os'"w Danian 391 () os t-- 65.0 '2 Maastrichtian 0 - Emslsn Jzl 0 a; -m Haumurian Mh :::;; N 0 t-- Campanian ~ Santonian 0 Pragian Jpr ~ Piripauan Mp W w'" -' t-- Coniacian 1ij Teratan Rt ...J Lochovlan Jlo Turonian Mannaotanean Rm <C !II j Arowhanan Ra 417 0- Cenomanian '" Ngaterian Cn Prldoli
  • Classifications

    Classifications

    Classifications rt.code.desc Classifications Code Classifications rt.code.base Akitio River Scheme - River Maintenance RC Direct Benefit AREA Akitio River Scheme - Contributor CN Contributor AREA Ashhurst Scheme - Flood Protection AC Flooding Urban CAPITAL Ashhurst Scheme - Flood Protection SUIP AN Annual Charge TARGET Ashhurst Scheme - Lower Stream Maintenance AL Channel Maintenance High AREA Ashhurst Scheme - Upper Stream Maintenance AU Channel Maintenance Low AREA Eastern Manawatu - Lower River Maintenance EL Channell Maintenane High AREA Eastern Manawatu - Upper River Maintenance EU Channell Maintenance low AREA Eastern Manawatu River Scheme - Contributor CN Contributor AREA Eastern Manawatu River Scheme - Indirect IN Indirect Benefit TARGET Forest Road Drainage Scheme A High Benefit AREA Forest Road Drainage Scheme B Medium Benefit AREA Forest Road Drainage Scheme C Moderate Benefit AREA Forest Road Drainage Scheme D Low Benefit AREA Forest Road Drainage Scheme E Minor Benefit AREA Forest Road Drainage Scheme F Indirect Benefit AREA Foxton East Drainage Scheme D1 High Benefit AREA Foxton East Drainage Scheme D2 Medium Benefit AREA Foxton East Drainage Scheme D3 Moderate Benefit AREA Foxton East Drainage Scheme D4 Minor Benefit AREA Foxton East Drainage Scheme D5 Low Benefit AREA Foxton East Drainage Scheme SUIP AC Annual Charge TARGET Foxton East Drainage Scheme Urban U1 Urban CAPITAL Haunui Drainage Scheme A Direct Benefit CAPITAL Himatangi Drainage Scheme A High Benefit AREA Himatangi Drainage Scheme B Medium Benefit AREA Himatangi
  • Pdf File, 846 KB

    Pdf File, 846 KB

    THE TARARUAS—A DUAL-PURPOSE NORTH ISLAND FOREST J. URE * SYNOPSIS Tararua Forest covers some 300,000 acres of steep moun­ tainous country in southern North Island and is mainly State Forest (258,000 acres) including 23,000 acres vested in Wel­ lington City Council. The forest is predominantly red and silver beech with rimu/ miro in association at lower altitudes. The severe storm of 1936, which devastated several thousand acres on the western side of the range, inadvertently demon- strated that the forest plays a most effective protective role in relation to capital values of the order of 100 million dollars downstream, and vital communications. Nearly half a million people live around the forest, which is extensively tracked and provided with 42 huts to facilitate outdoor recreation. One road end, recently developed as a picnic site, has at­ tracted up to 16,000 visitors in a year, indicating that there is a tremendous latent demand for this type of recreation. It is concluded that Tararua Forest plays a most important dual role in southern North Island. Upper catchment protec­ tion is without question the most important role in view of the vulnerability and high values off site, but the need for recrea­ tion and outdoor education of a large, rapidly growing popula­ tion is such that maintenance of the forest could be justified for this reason on its own. INTRODUCTION Tararua Forest covers some 300,000 acres between the Mana­ watu Gorge and the Rimutaka saddle in southern North Island and is predominantly State Forest embracing 258,000 acres including 23,000 acres presently vested in the Wellington City Council.
  • Navigation Report on New Zealand King Salmon's

    Navigation Report on New Zealand King Salmon's

    NAVIGATION REPORT ON NEW ZEALAND KING SALMON’S PROPOSAL FOR NEW SALMON FARMS IN THE MARLBOROUGH SOUNDS 29 SEPTEMBER 2011 BY DAVID WALKER CONTENTS PAGE NO. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2 INTRODUCTION 3 Current Position 3 History of involvement in Marlborough Sounds 3 Aquaculture 3 Maritime education and training 4 Qualifications 4 Experience on large vessels 5 Key references 5 SCOPE OF REPORT 7 THE MARLBOROUGH SOUNDS FROM A NAVIGATION PERSPECTIVE: 8 Navigation 8 Electronic Navigation 9 Weather 11 Visibility 11 Fog 11 Tides 12 Marine farms 13 NAVIGATION IN QUEEN CHARLOTTE SOUND 13 NAVIGATION IN TORY CHANNEL 14 PELORUS SOUND 16 PORT GORE 17 NAVIGATION AND SALMON FARMS 19 Commercial vessels over 500 gross tonnage within the designated Pilotage Area 19 Commercial small boats 21 Recreational small boats 22 Collisions between vessels and marine farms 23 INTERACTIONS BETWEEN VESSELS AND MARINE FARMS 25 Beneficial effects of the farms on navigational safety 26 NAVIGATIONAL ISSUES RELATING TO THE PROPOSED SITES 26 Waitata Reach 26 Papatua 28 Ngamahau 30 Ruaomoko and Kaitapeha 33 CONDITIONS TO BE IMPOSED 36 Notification to Mariners/Education 36 Buoyage 37 Restricted visibility 37 Lighting 38 Engineering 39 AIS 40 Emergency procedures 41 Executive summary 1. This report was commissioned by The New Zealand NZ King Salmon Company Ltd (NZ King Salmon) and assesses the effects of NZ King Salmon’s proposal for nine new marine farm sites on navigation in the Marlborough Sounds. In summary, my view as an experienced navigator, both within the Marlborough Sounds and elsewhere, is that provided the farms operate under an appropriate set of conditions the farms will have the following effect on navigation: a.
  • Employment Analysis Report

    Employment Analysis Report

    Employment Analysis October 2020 Wellington Regional Growth Framework | 0 Introduction Ka ora te wai If the water is healthy Purpose of this report More detailed work, than has been undertaken in the Ka ora te whenua the land will be nourished The purpose of this report is to summarise existing Framework, will need to be undertaken to Ka ora te whenua If the land is nourished research and data to assist with regional spatial understand in more detail: Ka ora te tangata the people will be provided planning. No new analysis has been undertaken. This 1. How many jobs do we expect in each for report should be read as an input into other work, geographical area as of 2050? and not as a final conclusion on the spatial direction 2. What change is that from the current situation? for the Framework or as policy for any of the partner Mo te iti - mo te rahi For the little - for the large 3. What type of jobs are they? organisations. 4. What do we need to do to make this change? 1 As outlined in the Foundation Report for the This report builds upon the Foundation Report to Wellington Regional Growth Framework (the 2 provide background information to assist in analysing Framework), employment in the region is employment patterns and information and concentrated in central Wellington and a significant determine what changes may/could occur with number of commuters travel into central Wellington regards to employment and the Framework. from other parts of the region for employment. A key direction during development of the Regional employment is dominated by knowledge- Framework with regards to employment has been to based sector employment.

  • Penguin Self-Guided Walk

    WCC024 Penguin cover.pART 11/23/05 10:26 AM Page 1 C M Y CM MY CY CMY K Composite PENGUIN SELF GUIDED WALK KARORI CEMETERY HERITAGE TRAIL Thiswalk takes about togo minutes to two hours. Markers direct you round the walk, all the paths are sign posted and the graves are marked with the Penguinwreck marker. The walk startsat the Hale memorial and finishes at the second Penguin memorial in the Roman Catholic section of the cemetery. The WellingtonOty Coundl gratefullyacknowledges the assistance of BruteE Colllns,author of The WTedrO/thePfnguln,Steell! Roberts, Wellington and of RogerSteeleofsteele Roberts. Historical research:Delrdre TWogan, Karorl HistoricalSociety Author. DeirdreTWogan Wellington CityCouncil is a memberof the HeritageTrails Foundation Brochuresfor other Coundl walksare availableat theVIsitor InformationonJce lm Wakefleld Street. You can also visit the WellingtonCity Coundl on-line at www.wellington.gavt.nz (overimage: Penguinleaving Wellington (Zak PhDlDgraph, Hocken LibrillY) Wellington City Council Introduction The wreck of the Penguin on 12 February 1909 with a death toll of 72 was the greatest New Zealand maritime disaster of the 20th century. The ship went down in Cook Strait, only a few kilometres from where the Wahine was wrecked in April 1968, with the loss of 51 lives. Built of iron in 1864, on its Glasgow-Liverpool run the Penguin was reputed to be one of the fastest and most reliable steamers working in the Irish Sea. At the time of the wreck she had served the Union Steam Ship Company for 25 years, most recently on the Lyttelton and Cook Strait run. The Risso’s dolphin known to thousands as Pelorus Jack cavorted round the Penguin’s bows in the early years of the century, but after a collision in 1904 kept its distance — until January 1909 when it suddenly reappeared.
  • Part C.10 Landscapes for List of Outstanding Landscapes and the Planning Maps)

    Part C.10 Landscapes for List of Outstanding Landscapes and the Planning Maps)

    APPENDIX 3 Operative Kāpiti Coast District Plan Objectives and Policies Proposed Kāpiti Coast District Plan Objectives and Policies S149(G)3 Key Issues Report – Kāpiti Coast District Council C.1: RESIDENTIAL ZONE C.1 RESIDENTIAL ZONE Over 90% of the district's population live on less than 4% of the land. This land comprises the residential environment. To accommodate this population there has been considerable investment made in buildings, services (water, gas, wastewater disposal) roading and amenity facilities (shops and schools). This represents a significant physical resource which needs to be managed to enable people and communities to meet their needs and to minimise any adverse effects of activities on both the natural and physical environment. The management of this resource can be achieved within the District Plan through controls in the design of subdivision, use and development. The objectives and policies set out below in C.1.1 are intended to address the significant resource management issues identified in B.2. The related subdivision and development issues in B.8 are addressed in C.7. C.1.1 Objectives & Policies OBJECTIVE 1.0 - GENERAL ENSURE THAT THE LOW DENSITY, QUIET CHARACTER OF THE DISTRICT’S RESIDENTIAL ENVIRONMENTS IS MAINTAINED AND THAT ADVERSE EFFECTS ON THE AMENITY VALUES THAT CONSTITUTE THIS CHARACTER AND MAKE THE RESIDENTIAL ENVIRONMENTS SAFE, PLEASANT AND HEALTHY PLACES FOR RESIDENTS ARE AVOIDED, REMEDIED OR MITIGATED. The residential environments within the Kapiti Coast District generally have a low density character, typified by low building heights and density and a high proportion of public and private open space.
  • 12 Schedules Schedules 12 Schedules

    12 Schedules Schedules 12 Schedules

    12 Schedules 12 Schedules 12 Schedules 12 Schedules contents Schedule Page number Schedule A: Outstanding water bodies A1-A3 279 Schedule B: Ngā Taonga Nui a Kiwa B 281 Schedule C: Sites with significant mana whenua values C1-C5 294 Schedule D: Statutory Acknowledgements D1-D2 304 Schedule E: Sites with significant historic heritage values E1-E5 333 Schedule F: Ecosystems and habitats with significant indigenous biodiversity values F1-F5 352 Schedule G: Principles to be applied when proposing and considering mitigation and G 407 offsetting in relation to biodiversity Schedule H: Contact recreation and Māori customary use H1-H2 410 Schedule I: Important trout fishery rivers and spawning waters I 413 Schedule J: Significant geological features in the coastal marine area J 415 Schedule K: Significant surf breaks K 418 Schedule L: Air quality L1-L2 420 Schedule M: Community drinking water supply abstraction points M1-M2 428 Schedule N: Stormwater management strategy N 431 Schedule O: Plantation forestry harvest plan O 433 Schedule P: Classifying and managing groundwater and surface water connectivity P 434 Schedule Q: Reasonable and efficient use criteria Q 436 Schedule R: Guideline for stepdown allocations R 438 Schedule S: Guideline for measuring and reporting of water takes S 439 Schedule T: Pumping test T 440 Schedule U:Trigger levels for river and stream mouth cutting U 442 PROPOSED NATURAL RESOURCES PLAN FOR THE WELLINGTON REGION (31.07.2015) 278 Schedule A: Outstanding water bodies Schedule A1: Rivers with outstanding indigenous ecosystem
  • Group Plan 2016 - 2021

    Group Plan 2016 - 2021

    CIVIL DEFENCE EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT GROUP PLAN 2016 - 2021 VERSION 1.0 JUNE 2016 FOREWORD FROM THE CHAIRMAN This is the fourth generation Group the coordinated implementation of this Plan for the Manawatu-Wanganui Civil Plan and the Business Plan on behalf Defence Emergency Management of the Group with the Joint Standing (CDEM) Group. Over the life of the Committee providing the governance last Group Plan a strong focus was on and accountability to the community. growing the understanding of the hazards and risks faced by communities This Group Plan is a strategic document in the Region with much of the focus of that outlines our visions and goals the regions emergency management for CDEM and how we will achieve fraternity being on response capability. them, and how we will measure our During that time an emphasis was performance. It seeks to: placed on further nurturing the already • Further strengthen the relationships Chairman Bruce Gordon strong relationships developed across between agencies involved in Manawatu-Wanganui and within the Group at all levels, CDEM; Civil Defence Emergency Management Group including the emergency management, • Encourage cooperative planning Joint Standing Committee local government, and partner agency and action between the various sectors – this focus will continue under emergency management agencies this Group Plan. The principles of the and the community; Group of consistency, accountability, • Demonstrate commitment to best practice and support, have been, deliver more effective CDEM and will continue
  • Appendix 1 – Heritage Places

    Appendix 1 – Heritage Places

    APPENDIX 1 – HERITAGE PLACES APPENDIX 1A – WETLANDS, LAKES, RIVERS AND THEIR MARGINS .................................................. 1 Heritage Places Heritage – APPENDIX 1B – SIGNIFICANT AREAS OF INDIGENOUS FOREST/VEGETATION (EXCLUDING RESERVES) .................................................................................................................................................... 3 APPENDIX 1C – OUTSTANDING NATURAL FEATURES ..................................................................... 5 Appendix 1 Appendix APPENDIX 1D – TREES WITH HERITAGE VALUE .............................................................................. 6 APPENDIX 1E – BUILDINGS AND OBJECTS WITH HERITAGE VALUE .................................................. 7 COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS ................................................................................................................................. 7 OTHER TOWNSHIPS ........................................................................................................................................... 7 HOUSES.............................................................................................................................................................. 8 RURAL HOUSES AND BUILDINGS ....................................................................................................................... 9 OBJECTS AND MEMORIALS.............................................................................................................................. 10 MARAE BUILDINGS
  • Agenda Infrastructure Committee

    Agenda Infrastructure Committee

    AGENDA INFRASTRUCTURE COMMITTEE 1PM, WEDNESDAY 24 MARCH 2021 COUNCIL CHAMBER, FIRST FLOOR, CIVIC ADMINISTRATION BUILDING 32 THE SQUARE, PALMERSTON NORTH Vaughan Dennison (Chairperson) Susan Baty (Deputy Chairperson) Grant Smith (The Mayor) Brent Barrett Billy Meehan Rachel Bowen Karen Naylor Zulfiqar Butt Bruno Petrenas Lew Findlay QSM Aleisha Rutherford PALMERSTON NORTH CITY COUNCIL INFRASTRUCTURE COMMITTEE MEETING 24 March 2021 ORDER OF BUSINESS 1. Apologies 2. Notification of Additional Items Pursuant to Sections 46A(7) and 46A(7A) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987, to receive the Chairperson’s explanation that specified item(s), which do not appear on the Agenda of this meeting and/or the meeting to be held with the public excluded, will be discussed. Any additions in accordance with Section 46A(7) must be approved by resolution with an explanation as to why they cannot be delayed until a future meeting. Any additions in accordance with Section 46A(7A) may be received or referred to a subsequent meeting for further discussion. No resolution, decision or recommendation can be made in respect of a minor item. 3. Declarations of Interest (if any) Members are reminded of their duty to give a general notice of any interest of items to be considered on this agenda and the need to declare these interests. P a g e | 3 PALMERSTON NORTH CITY COUNCIL 4. Public Comment To receive comments from members of the public on matters specified on this Agenda or, if time permits, on other Committee matters. (NOTE: If the Committee wishes to consider or discuss any issue raised that is not specified on the Agenda, other than to receive the comment made or refer it to the Chief Executive, then a resolution will need to be made in accordance with clause 2 above.) 5.