The Rational Game

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Rational Game FIBAEUROPE COACHES - OFFENSE THE RATIONAL GAME by Tamas Sterbenz Tamas Sterbenz is a former player of the RATIONALITY should be multiplied by 0.44 to get the cor- Hungarian National Team. He was A behavior is considered rational if it rect number of possessions for a whole appointed head coach of the Hungarian helps achieve a definite goal. So, first we season (for fast post game analysis 0.5 Women’s National Team in 2004. He tea- need to determine the goals in basketball. can be used). ches economics and management at the For example, the goal can be to win a Hungarian University of Physical championship, to beat a specific oppo- Possession = Field Goal + (Free-Throw Education. His Ph.D. topic was “Bounded nent, or in the short term, to score a 0.44) + Turnover - Offensive Rebound Rationality in Decision Making in Sports basket. These goals are simple but they Management”. are not the same. Therefore, we need to Offensive rebounds have to be deducted select one unit to analyze the rationality. from the equation, because they are still Smart play is a goal of coaches and In competitive basketball this unit should part of the same possession; only the players in every sport. The winner is be the game because performance can be offensive time starts over. This ensures always proud of his strategy and emphasi- best compared at the game level. During that both teams have equal number of zes the correct execution. The loser criti- the game the teams alternate possession opportunities to score. This does not cizes the game plan or blames the coach of the ball. Both teams have equal oppor- mean that offensive rebounds are not or players for neglecting that. Indeed, do tunity to score points and the team that important, as is described in the next sec- the sportspeople know what should they scores more will win the game. We can tion. have done? Do they know how rational see the better performance within a strategy should be built the next time? game, but if we want to compare several CRUCIAL FACTORS Unfortunately, in most cases they do not games we need to look at the ratio That team that wins is one whose offensi- know. In this short article, I will analyze between points made and number of pos- ve rating is higher than its own defensive the rationality of basketball and describe sessions. To analyze the performance, rating, which is equal to the opponent’s some strategic principles. final score itself is not good indicator. The offensive rating. Both offensive and score should be weighted by defensive ratings are good tools for analy- the total number of attempts, sis by the coach. Yet, to make the best which also shows the rhythm rational strategic decision, the coach of the game. needs to find which elements are the most critical to increase the offensive rating EFFICIENCY and decrease the defensive rating. To measure efficiency of According to Dean Oliver, the four basic defense and offense, methods aspects of a game include: have been created and used for several decades. Histo- 1. Shooting percentage from the field. rically, famous coaches such 2. Offensive rebounding. as Dean Smith and Frank 3. Committing turnovers. McGuire and analysts like 4. Going to the foul line a lot and making Dean Oliver and John the shots. Hollinger have worked on developing a measure of To better understand these crucial offensive rating: aspects, a good guide is that in professio- nal men’s basketball the offensive rating is Offensive Rating = Score around 1, so a team usually makes 1 point Points / Possession in average per possession (in 1991-92, the NBA’s Chicago Bulls reached the highest Current statistics do not keep seasonal offensive score of 1.155 in). count of the number of pos- sessions, but this can easily 1. If the team finishes all its offenses with be counted or estimated. a 2-point shot, a 50% shooting percen- Offense ends with either a tage ensures an offensive score that is field goal or a free-throw higher than 1. In case of 3-point shots, attempt or turnover. Obviously, the team has to have a 33% shooting a free-throw will not count for percentage to reach the same. 1 possession. According to the 2. Increasing the number of free-throws NBA’s estimation, a free-throw helps the team reach an offensive PAGE 20 | 20 2006 | FIBA ASSIST MAGAZINE Time: there are 24 seconds to finish the possession, and the quarters are 10 minutes long. The remaining time left in the 24-second period or the quarter will always influence the decisions. Rational behavior must take this into considera- tion. The same shot in the beginning of the possession is irrational compared to the shot at the end of the period, which is necessary. Space: moves are differentiated by where they take place on the court. Shooting percentage depends on how far the player is from the basket. Rational strategy should increase the expected value of the shooting. The opponent’s position on defense affects what the offense should do (rational strategy must differ when playing against press or zone defense). Personal fouls: the offense must be aware of how the defense can stop the team from scoring. If the defensive team has less than 4 personal fouls, the offen- sive team should know that rational deci- sion might be to commit a foul. Result: at all times the actual score will influence tactical decision. Rationality of all tactical decision depends on how it impacts the final score. Decisions throu- ghout the game can be evaluated based on time and score, and risk taking must consider the same factors. RISK AND UNCERTAINTY All decision contains risk and uncer- tainty. Nothing is certain, situations are ambiguous, decisions depend on multiple criteria, and execution depends on the whole team. Even though all these are score higher than 1. Other than extre- were missed on purpose, the team rational factors, there will be the oppo- me cases, all players make free- would have a chance to make a 2- nent that will impact the outcome. throws above 50% success rate. or 3-point shot. 3. High number of field scoring attempts In basketball, there are only rational deci- shows that the team does not commit BOUNDARIES IN BASKETBALL sions, but not optimal decisions. One turnovers. Also, low number of turno- Every sport is surrounded by rules to must know that success is relative, and it vers decreases the defensive rating, make the game more difficult and intere- is often affected by good fortune. because the opponent could not sting. These rules, or boundaries, impact Rational strategy ensures only long-term make many easy baskets. the strategies and the decisions in the efficiency but single actions depend on 4. Increase in offensive rebounds will execution. The following boundaries exist intuition and anticipation. In a game, both lead to more chances to make a in basketball. teams have 80 to 90 possessions and close attempt or to get to the free- sometimes even irrational behavior can throw line. Often at the end of the Opponent: in basketball, the goal is not lead to success. game, following an offensive to make many baskets, but to make rebound, the team will get a new 24- more baskets than the opponent. The During practices, coaches should build seconds on the shot clock, which moves don’t have to be fast, but faster boundaries into the drills to teach players can lead to winning the game. than the opponent. In decision making, to be rational. If both teams play smart Offensive rebounds would also can’t neglect the opponent. Success and use correct strategy, there still will increase the offensive rating, and doesn’t only depend on a team’s deci- be a winner and a loser, but basketball save the game. If the free throws sion, but also on the opponent’s choice. will advance! FIBA ASSIST MAGAZINE | 20 2006 | PAGE 21 .
Recommended publications
  • Offensive and Defensive Plus–Minus Player Ratings for Soccer
    applied sciences Article Offensive and Defensive Plus–Minus Player Ratings for Soccer Lars Magnus Hvattum Faculty of Logistics, Molde University College, 6410 Molde, Norway; [email protected] Received: 15 September 2020; Accepted: 16 October 2020; Published: 20 October 2020 Abstract: Rating systems play an important part in professional sports, for example, as a source of entertainment for fans, by influencing decisions regarding tournament seedings, by acting as qualification criteria, or as decision support for bookmakers and gamblers. Creating good ratings at a team level is challenging, but even more so is the task of creating ratings for individual players of a team. This paper considers a plus–minus rating for individual players in soccer, where a mathematical model is used to distribute credit for the performance of a team as a whole onto the individual players appearing for the team. The main aim of the work is to examine whether the individual ratings obtained can be split into offensive and defensive contributions, thereby addressing the lack of defensive metrics for soccer players. As a result, insights are gained into how elements such as the effect of player age, the effect of player dismissals, and the home field advantage can be broken down into offensive and defensive consequences. Keywords: association football; linear regression; regularization; ranking 1. Introduction Soccer has become a large global business, and significant amounts of capital are at stake when the competitions at the highest level are played. While soccer is a team sport, the attention of media and fans is often directed towards individual players. An understanding of the game therefore also involves an ability to dissect the contributions of individual players to the team as a whole.
    [Show full text]
  • Difference-Based Analysis of the Impact of Observed Game Parameters on the Final Score at the FIBA Eurobasket Women 2019
    Original Article Difference-based analysis of the impact of observed game parameters on the final score at the FIBA Eurobasket Women 2019 SLOBODAN SIMOVIĆ1 , JASMIN KOMIĆ2, BOJAN GUZINA1, ZORAN PAJIĆ3, TAMARA KARALIĆ1, GORAN PAŠIĆ1 1Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, University of Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina 2Faculty of Economy, University of Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina 3Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, University of Belgrade, Serbia ABSTRACT Evaluation in women's basketball is keeping up with developments in evaluation in men’s basketball, and although the number of studies in women's basketball has seen a positive trend in the past decade, it is still at a low level. This paper observed 38 games and sixteen variables of standard efficiency during the FIBA EuroBasket Women 2019. Two regression models were obtained, a set of relative percentage and relative rating variables, which are used in the NBA league, where the dependent variable was the number of points scored. The obtained results show that in the first model, the difference between winning and losing teams was made by three variables: true shooting percentage, turnover percentage of inefficiency and efficiency percentage of defensive rebounds, which explain 97.3%, while for the second model, the distinguishing variables was offensive efficiency, explaining for 96.1% of the observed phenomenon. There is a continuity of the obtained results with the previous championship, played in 2017. Of all the technical elements of basketball, it is still the shots made, assists and defensive rebounds that have the most significant impact on the final score in European women’s basketball.
    [Show full text]
  • International Journal of Computer Science in Sport a Comprehensive
    International Journal of Computer Science in Sport Volume 18, Issue 1, 2019 Journal homepage: http://iacss.org/index.php?id=30 DOI: 10.2478/ijcss-2019-0001 A comprehensive review of plus-minus ratings for evaluating individual players in team sports Lars Magnus Hvattum Faculty of Logistics, Molde University College, Molde, Norway Abstract The increasing availability of data from sports events has led to many new directions of research, and sports analytics can play a role in making better decisions both within a club and at the level of an individual player. The ability to objectively evaluate individual players in team sports is one aspect that may enable better decision making, but such evaluations are not straightforward to obtain. One class of ratings for individual players in team sports, known as plus-minus ratings, attempt to distribute credit for the performance of a team onto the players of that team. Such ratings have a long history, going back at least to the 1950s, but in recent years research on advanced versions of plus-minus ratings has increased noticeably. This paper presents a comprehensive review of contributions to plus- minus ratings in later years, pointing out some key developments and showing the richness of the mathematical models developed. One conclusion is that the literature on plus-minus ratings is quite fragmented, but that awareness of past contributions to the field should allow researchers to focus on some of the many open research questions related to the evaluation of individual players in team sports. KEYWORDS: RATING SYSTEM, RANKING, REGRESSION, REGULARIZATION IJCSS – Volume 18/2019/Issue 1 www.iacss.org Introduction Rating systems, both official and unofficial ones, exist for many different sports.
    [Show full text]
  • Our Shining Moment: Hierarchical Clustering to Determine NCAA Tournament Seeding
    Trunzo Scholz 1 Dan Trunzo and Libby Scholz MCS 100 June 4, 2016 Our Shining Moment: Hierarchical Clustering to Determine NCAA Tournament Seeding This project tries to correctly predict the NCAA Tournament Selection Committee’s bracket arrangement. We look both to correctly predict the 36 at large teams included in the tournament, and to seed teams in a similar way to the selection committee. The NCAA Tournament Selection Committee currently operates in secrecy, and the selection process is not transparent, either for teams or fans. If we successfully replicate the committee’s selections, our variable choices shed light on the “black box” of selection. As basketball fans ourselves, we hope to better understand which teams are in, which are out, and why Existing Selection Process 32 teams automatically qualify for the March NCAA tournament by winning their conference championship tournament. The other 36 “at large” teams are selected by the ten person committee through multiple voting rounds, where a team needs progressively fewer votes from the committee to make the tournament. Once the teams are selected, a similar process follows for seeding, where the selection committee ranks the best eight teams remaining, then the best six, and then the best four as more teams are placed in the bracket. Once all 68 teams are ranked, they are then placed in a bracket. At this point, the actual rank order may be violated to avoid “teams from the ​ ​ same conference… meet[ing] prior to the regional final if they played each other three or more times during the regular season and conference tournament,” or prior to the semifinals if they played at least twice.
    [Show full text]
  • Measuring Production and Predicting Outcomes in the National Basketball Association
    Measuring Production and Predicting Outcomes in the National Basketball Association Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Michael Steven Milano, M.S. Graduate Program in Education The Ohio State University 2011 Dissertation Committee: Packianathan Chelladurai, Advisor Brian Turner Sarah Fields Stephen Cosslett Copyright by Michael Steven Milano 2011 Abstract Building on the research of Loeffelholz, Bednar and Bauer (2009), the current study analyzed the relationship between previously compiled team performance measures and the outcome of an “un-played” game. While past studies have relied solely on statistics traditionally found in a box score, this study included scheduling fatigue and team depth. Multiple models were constructed in which the performance statistics of the competing teams were operationalized in different ways. Absolute models consisted of performance measures as unmodified traditional box score statistics. Relative models defined performance measures as a series of ratios, which compared a team‟s statistics to its opponents‟ statistics. Possession models included possessions as an indicator of pace, and offensive rating and defensive rating as composite measures of efficiency. Play models were composed of offensive plays and defensive plays as measures of pace, and offensive points-per-play and defensive points-per-play as indicators of efficiency. Under each of the above general models, additional models were created to include streak variables, which averaged performance measures only over the previous five games, as well as logarithmic variables. Game outcomes were operationalized and analyzed in two distinct manners - score differential and game winner.
    [Show full text]
  • Successful Shot Locations and Shot Types Used in NCAA Men's Division I Basketball"
    Northern Michigan University NMU Commons All NMU Master's Theses Student Works 8-2019 SUCCESSFUL SHOT LOCATIONS AND SHOT TYPES USED IN NCAA MEN’S DIVISION I BASKETBALL Olivia D. Perrin Northern Michigan University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.nmu.edu/theses Part of the Programming Languages and Compilers Commons, Sports Sciences Commons, and the Statistical Models Commons Recommended Citation Perrin, Olivia D., "SUCCESSFUL SHOT LOCATIONS AND SHOT TYPES USED IN NCAA MEN’S DIVISION I BASKETBALL" (2019). All NMU Master's Theses. 594. https://commons.nmu.edu/theses/594 This Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Works at NMU Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in All NMU Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of NMU Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected],[email protected]. SUCCESSFUL SHOT LOCATIONS AND SHOT TYPES USED IN NCAA MEN’S DIVISION I BASKETBALL By Olivia D. Perrin THESIS Submitted to Northern Michigan University In partial fulfillment of the requirements For the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Office of Graduate Education and Research August 2019 SIGNATURE APPROVAL FORM SUCCESSFUL SHOT LOCATIONS AND SHOT TYPES USED IN NCAA MEN’S DIVISION I BASKETBALL This thesis by Olivia D. Perrin is recommended for approval by the student’s Thesis Committee and Associate Dean and Director of the School of Health & Human Performance and by the Dean of Graduate Education and Research. __________________________________________________________ Committee Chair: Randall L. Jensen Date __________________________________________________________ First Reader: Mitchell L. Stephenson Date __________________________________________________________ Second Reader: Randy R.
    [Show full text]
  • Investigating the Game-Related Statistics and Tactical Profile in NCAA Division I Men’S Basketball Games
    OriginalTechnical Paper and tactical demands in college basketball https://doi.org/10.5114/biolsport.2018.71602 Investigating the game-related statistics and tactical profile in NCAA division I men’s basketball games 1,2,3 1 2 2 AUTHORS: Daniele Conte , Antonio Tessitore , Aaron Gjullin , Dominik Mackinnon , Corrado Corresponding author: Lupo4, Terence Favero2 Daniele Conte Lithuanian Sports University Institute of Sport Science and 1 Department of Movement, Human and Health Sciences, University of Rome Foro Italico, Rome, Italy Innovations 2 Department of Biology, University of Portland, Portland, OR, USA Sporto g. 6 44221 Kaunas 3 Institute of Sport Science and Innovations, Lithuanian Sports University, Kaunas, Lithuania Lithuania 4 School of Exercise & Sport Sciences, SUISM,Department of Medical Sciences, University of Torino, Turin, Italy E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT: The aim of this study was to analyze the game-related statistics and tactical profile in winning and losing teams in NCAA division I men’s basketball games. Twenty NCAA division I men’s basketball close (score difference: 1-9 points) games were analyzed during the 2013/14 season. For each game, the game- related statistics were collected from the official teams’ box scores. Number of ball possessions, offensive and defensive ratings and the Four Factors (effective field goal percentage; offensive rebounding percentage, recovered balls per ball possession, free throw rate) were also calculated. The tactical parameters evaluated were: ball reversal, dribble in key area, post entry, on-ball screen, off-ball screen, and hand off. Differences between winning and losing teams were calculated using a magnitude-based approach. Winning teams showed a likely higher percentage of 3-point goals made, number of defensive rebounds and steals and a very likely higher number of free throws made and free throws attempted.
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.Complex System Theory in Team Sports. Example in 5 on 5
    Revista de Psicología del Deporte ISSN: 1132-239X [email protected], [email protected] Universitat de les Illes Balears España García, Javier; Ibáñez, Sergio J.; Cañadas, María; Antúnez, Antonio Complex system theory in team sports. example in 5 on 5 basketball contest Revista de Psicología del Deporte, vol. 22, núm. 1, 2013, pp. 209-213 Universitat de les Illes Balears Palma de Mallorca, España Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=235127552023 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative Revista de Psicología del Deporte 2013. Vol. 22, núm. 1, pp. 209-213 Universitat de les Illes Balears ISSN: 1132-239X Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona ISSNe: 1988-5636 Complex system theory in team sports. example in 5 on 5 basketball contest Javier García*, Sergio J. Ibáñez*, María Cañadas** and Antonio Antúnez* COMPLEX SYSTEM THEORY IN TEAM SPORTS. EXAMPLE IN 5 ON 5 BASKETBALL CONTEST KEYWORDS: Complex systems, Basketball, Offensive rating. ABSTRACT: The purpose of the study was to analyze basketball contest under complex systems framework. Control and order parameters were defined as time and offensive rating. The data was composed by 73 games from the ACB league during the 2007-08 season. Relative phase of confronting teams was calculated through Hilbert Transform. Results show stability, instability and transition periods, with coordination in-phase and anti-phase. Perturbations were found in the development of the game.
    [Show full text]
  • Giovanni Capelli
    2011 Italian Stata Users Group meeting Venice, 17-18 nov 2011 Giovanni Capelli Faculty of Sport Sciences – Department of Health and Sport Sciences, University of Cassino Sessione IV - 17 novembre 2011 ore 15.30 “Studi applicativi usando Stata” } Some of the earliest sport statistics papers in the Journal of the American Statistical Association (JASA) were about baseball and appeared in the 1950s ◦ “Sabermetrics” } Football, basketball, golf, tennis, ice hockey and track & field became to be addressed in research in sport statistics on the ‘60s,’70s and ‘80s } In 1992 the Joint Statistical Meeting (JSM) saw the creation of a new section in the ASA ◦ Section on Statistics in Sport (SIS) Dedicated to promoting high professional standards in the application of statistics to sport and fostering statistical education in sports both within and outside the ASA Albert J, Bennet J,Cochran JJ, Anthology of Statistics in Sport, ASA-SIAM, 2005 2 } Main topics ◦ Factors influencing shooting percentage (the “hot hand phenomena”) Tversky A, Gilovich T, The cold facts about the “hot hand” in Basketball, Chance, 2(1): 16-21, 1989 Larkey PD, Smith RA, Kadane JB, It’s okay to believe in the “Hot Hand”, Chance, 2(4): 22-30, 1989 Wardrop RL, Simpson’s paradox in the hot hand in Basketball, The American Statistician, 49(1): 24-28, 1995 ◦ The home advantage and intermediate game score advantage Cooper H, DeNeve KM, Mosteller F, Predicting professional sports game outcomes from intermediate game scores, Chance, 5(3-4): 18-22, 1992 ◦ Linear weights for evaluating
    [Show full text]
  • NBA LIVE 19 Xbox
    WARNING Before playing this game, read the Xbox One system, and accessory manuals for important safety and health information. www.xbox.com/support. Important Health Warning: Photosensitive Seizures A very small percentage of people may experience a seizure when exposed to certain visual images, including flashing lights or patterns that may appear in video games. Even people with no history of seizures or epilepsy may have an undiagnosed condition that can cause “photosensitive epileptic seizures” while watching video games. Symptoms can include light-headedness, altered vision, eye or face twitching, jerking or shaking of arms or legs, disorientation, confusion, momentary loss of awareness, and loss of consciousness or convulsions that can lead to injury from falling down or striking nearby objects. Immediately stop playing and consult a doctor if you experience any of these symptoms. Parents, watch for or ask children about these symptoms—children and teenagers are more likely to experience these seizures. The risk may be reduced by being farther from the screen; using a smaller screen; playing in a well-lit room, and not playing when drowsy or fatigued. If you or any relatives have a history of seizures or epilepsy, consult a doctor before playing. CONTENTS CONTROLS 4 GAME MODES 23 GAME SCREEN 10 STAY CONNECTED 27 WHAT’S NEW ON THE COURT 11 WARRANTY 28 NBA LIVE PLAYER 12 NEED HELP? 29 THE ONE 14 3 CONTROLS OFFENSIVE CONTROLS Move player L Dribble moves C Shoot X (hold and release) Layup X (hold near basket) Pass A (tap) Sprint ^ (hold)
    [Show full text]
  • The Lou Henson Award All-Decade Team
    Dec. 31, 2019 LouHensonAward.com THE LOU HENSON AWARD ALL-DECADE TEAM BOSTON, MA -- CollegeInsider.com proudly announces the Lou Henson All-Decade Team, identifying the 40 outstanding players who competed for mid-major college basketball programs between 2010 and 2019. The voting panel consisted of 21 Division I head coaches, four athletic directors and six senior members of the College Insider staff. The Lou Henson Award, named for the legendary coach who led New Mexico State and Illinois to tremendous success, is given annually to the nation’s best player from a mid-major program. Ron Baker, Wichita State A cornerstone of the Shockers’ incredible run from 2013-16, Baker elevated coach Gregg Marshall’s program into the national spotlight. The sturdy 6-4 guard scored 1,636 points and snagged 520 rebounds, helping Wichita State to a 121-24 record, a Final Four appearance in 2013 and unbeaten regular season in 2014. Keith Benson, Oakland A two-time Summit League Player of the Year, the 6-11 center dominated the lane for coach Greg Kampe from 2008 to 2011, pouring in 1,903 points, corralling 1,103 rebounds and blocking 369 shots. The Golden Grizzlies made two NCAA tournament appearances during his career. Evan Bradds, Belmont The super skilled 6-7 forward made 728 2-point baskets during four years with the Bruins, connecting on 68 percent of attempts. Such impeccable accuracy earned him two Ohio Valley Conference Player of the Year awards and sparked Belmont to 91 wins, an NCAA tournament and three NIT appearances. A.J.
    [Show full text]
  • Prediction of Efficient Player Combinations Among Members of the South Dakota State University Women's Basketball Squad
    South Dakota State University Open PRAIRIE: Open Public Research Access Institutional Repository and Information Exchange Electronic Theses and Dissertations 1976 Prediction of Efficient Player Combinations Among Members of the South Dakota State University Women's Basketball Squad Maren Elaine Michaelson Follow this and additional works at: https://openprairie.sdstate.edu/etd Recommended Citation Michaelson, Maren Elaine, "Prediction of Efficient Player Combinations Among Members of the South Dakota State University Women's Basketball Squad" (1976). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 4966. https://openprairie.sdstate.edu/etd/4966 This Thesis - Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by Open PRAIRIE: Open Public Research Access Institutional Repository and Information Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Open PRAIRIE: Open Public Research Access Institutional Repository and Information Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. PREDICITION OF EFFICIENT PLAYER COMBINATIONS AMONG MEMBERS OF THE SOUTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY WOMEN'S BASKETBALL SQUAD This the�is is approved as a creditable and independent investigation by a candidate for the degree, Master of Science, and is acceptable for meeting the thesis requirement for this degree . Acceptance of this thesis does not imply that the con- clusions reached by the candidate are necessarily the conclusions of the major department . v I ( Thesis Advisor (/ te iJ'ead,
    [Show full text]