DOCSLIB.ORG

Open Fro5007thesisfinal1-Converted.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Open Fro5007thesisfinal1-Converted.Pdf THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY SCHREYER HONORS COLLEGE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE THE ANATOMY OF A WIN: A STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF SUCCESS IN THE NATIONAL BASKETBALL ASSOCIATION FRANK RAMON OLIU Spring 2020 A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a baccalaureate degree in Finance with honors in Finance Reviewed and approved* by the following: David Haushalter Associate Professor of Finance Thesis Supervisor Brian Davis Professor of Finance Honors Advisor *Electronic approvals are on file ii Abstract Anyone with an opinion on sports will have different thoughts on what they believe produces the best team. This thesis poses this debate in the realm of basketball, seeking to find the statistics that directly correlate to the most wins. Business-minded individuals can relate this to financial investing, specifically factor investing, by analyzing what elements are associated with a security’s returns and whether that change is positive or negative. In a day when sports analytics are sweeping through leagues (see the “Moneyball” effect in baseball), having such data that can be interpreted to find how a company can optimize its success, is key to executives. The observations have found that of the several data points tested, maximizing Effective Field Goal Percentage, as well as Defensive Rating, is correlated with more total wins. iii Table of Contents LIST OF FIGURES ............................................................................................................ iv LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................................... v ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ................................................................................................. vi Chapter 1: An Ever-changing Landscape ............................................................................ 1 Chapter 2: Statistical Management ...................................................................................... 2 Chapter 3: Not Just Offense and Defense ............................................................................. 4 Chapter 4: Data and Methodology ....................................................................................... 5 Chapter 5: Results .............................................................................................................. 10 Scatter Plots for Each Independent Variable ..................................................................... 13 Chapter 6: Prominent Team Analyses ............................................................................... 16 Chapter 7: Conclusions ...................................................................................................... 21 BIBLIOGRAPHY .............................................................................................................. 24 iv LIST OF FIGURES Panel A: Free Throw Percentage and Wins ........................................................................................ 13 Panel B: Assist-to-Turnover Ratio and Wins ...................................................................................... 14 Panel C: Pace and Wins ...................................................................................................................... 14 Panel D: Effective Field Goal Percentage and Wins ........................................................................... 15 Panel E: Defensive Rating and Wins ................................................................................................... 15 v LIST OF TABLES Regression Results .................................................................................................................. 10 Correlation Table .................................................................................................................... 11 Revised Regression Table ....................................................................................................... 12 Boston Celtics Regression....................................................................................................... 17 Chicago Bulls Regression ....................................................................................................... 18 Golden State Warriors Regression ........................................................................................ 20 vi ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to dedicate this section to those who have helped me through this whole process, including, but limited to: Professor Brian Davis, who consistently worked with me to overcome any obstacles and challenges I encountered. Professor David Haushalter, who I could always turn to for aid in understanding my data and constantly reminded me why I was performing this research. My family, for their overall support and encouragement through any rough times, but especially this semester. My friends, who were always there for a much-needed break. 1 Chapter 1: An Ever-changing Landscape Each year following the NBA Finals, a deliberation is held on what contributed to a specific team hoisting the Larry O’Brien trophy. This past season, commentators argued that the Toronto Raptors won because of the versatile abilities of Finals MVP Kawhi Leonard or the depth of Toronto’s roster, among other reasons. This argument always diverges into a comparison of what made every celebrated team so fortunate. At the root of this debate is what these teams did so much better than those that failed. Analysts will bring up certain statistics, players, events, or circumstances that they believe led to the win. However, there has to be a reason why these teams got that far. Every season, the National Basketball Association makes changes and alterations to the league to better the quality of the game, and ultimately increase viewership. These adjustments cause transformations in the way basketball is played and cause the surface-level comparisons of teams from different times to be more difficult. This includes, but is not limited to, the introduction of the three-point line, it being decreased, then lengthened again, and the removal of the “hand check” on defense (NBA). All others, including the former, were implemented to increase scoring, which could confuse those conflicts even further. As per research from The Washington Post, these rule changes have had direct consequences in the NBA. Judging off the 2018 season, scoring across the league was on an uptick, as it continued to build upon continuous seasons of improvement. Utilizing league-wide statistics from www.basketball-reference.com, it is evident that an average team’s points per game is the highest it has been since the 1970-71 season (Greenberg). Different analysts will credit a number of reasons for this, but some of the agreed logic contains a mixed belief of a lack of defense and advances in shot selection; which can be attributed to stemming from rule 2 changes. In the span of 4 years from the 2001 to 2005 season, the NBA decided to pursue an agenda of making the game more favorable for players on offense. No defensive players were allowed inside the painted area for more than three seconds, half-court advancement of the ball went down to 8 seconds, and checking of any kind was announced to be taken more seriously (Verrier). All of this, merging with a boost in the use of analytics and influx of talented players led the NBA to a positive correlation of rising efficient offense and lax defense. So, with a dynamic league rife with new regulations, playing styles, and trends, it is even more difficult to discover what aids a team, and what hurts it. The purpose of this study is to identify and examine what observable statistics contribute to success in the NBA. By then recognizing what variables correlate to a better team record, one can recommend what actions a front office could take. Chapter 2: Statistical Management Now, as basketball looks to accept an analytical view of the sport, Daryl Morey (General Manager of the Houston Rockets), is leading the way. His team has speared the “three-point revolution”. Most teams have shied away from taking long shots within the three-point arc and instead opt for a higher reward shot a few steps back. The Washington Post article backs this up by showing that just a year difference (2017 to 2018) saw a jump in three-point attempts from 33% to 35% of the total field goals attempted. This also lead to a decrease in midrange attempts, lowering to 16% from 19% (Greenberg). The year-to-year fluctuation can be seen in this graph created by the Washington Post: 3 Finally, the number of possessions a team has per a 48-minute game, or pace, has been noted as a key component in the NBA’s scoring revival. As was the case with points per game, the league has not seen such a quick and sufficient game in decades. Basketball-reference.com shows that last season, the average pace clocked in at 100.0, a high since 100.6 in the 1988-89 season. So, what does this all mean? With the various rule changes and alterations in the way the game is played, it makes it even more difficult to discern what makes a team more successful then another. It seems as though the most effective way to look at this argument is to primarily focus on statistics. By judging a team solely on the figures that they have produced, not their 4 players, events surrounding the season, or other components, one should be able to find what drives a successful basketball team. Chapter 3: Not Just Offense and Defense There is a plethora of different statistics through time
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Offensive and Defensive Plus–Minus Player Ratings for Soccer
    applied sciences Article Offensive and Defensive Plus–Minus Player Ratings for Soccer Lars Magnus Hvattum Faculty of Logistics, Molde University College, 6410 Molde, Norway; [email protected] Received: 15 September 2020; Accepted: 16 October 2020; Published: 20 October 2020 Abstract: Rating systems play an important part in professional sports, for example, as a source of entertainment for fans, by influencing decisions regarding tournament seedings, by acting as qualification criteria, or as decision support for bookmakers and gamblers. Creating good ratings at a team level is challenging, but even more so is the task of creating ratings for individual players of a team. This paper considers a plus–minus rating for individual players in soccer, where a mathematical model is used to distribute credit for the performance of a team as a whole onto the individual players appearing for the team. The main aim of the work is to examine whether the individual ratings obtained can be split into offensive and defensive contributions, thereby addressing the lack of defensive metrics for soccer players. As a result, insights are gained into how elements such as the effect of player age, the effect of player dismissals, and the home field advantage can be broken down into offensive and defensive consequences. Keywords: association football; linear regression; regularization; ranking 1. Introduction Soccer has become a large global business, and significant amounts of capital are at stake when the competitions at the highest level are played. While soccer is a team sport, the attention of media and fans is often directed towards individual players. An understanding of the game therefore also involves an ability to dissect the contributions of individual players to the team as a whole.
    [Show full text]
  • Difference-Based Analysis of the Impact of Observed Game Parameters on the Final Score at the FIBA Eurobasket Women 2019
    Original Article Difference-based analysis of the impact of observed game parameters on the final score at the FIBA Eurobasket Women 2019 SLOBODAN SIMOVIĆ1 , JASMIN KOMIĆ2, BOJAN GUZINA1, ZORAN PAJIĆ3, TAMARA KARALIĆ1, GORAN PAŠIĆ1 1Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, University of Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina 2Faculty of Economy, University of Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina 3Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, University of Belgrade, Serbia ABSTRACT Evaluation in women's basketball is keeping up with developments in evaluation in men’s basketball, and although the number of studies in women's basketball has seen a positive trend in the past decade, it is still at a low level. This paper observed 38 games and sixteen variables of standard efficiency during the FIBA EuroBasket Women 2019. Two regression models were obtained, a set of relative percentage and relative rating variables, which are used in the NBA league, where the dependent variable was the number of points scored. The obtained results show that in the first model, the difference between winning and losing teams was made by three variables: true shooting percentage, turnover percentage of inefficiency and efficiency percentage of defensive rebounds, which explain 97.3%, while for the second model, the distinguishing variables was offensive efficiency, explaining for 96.1% of the observed phenomenon. There is a continuity of the obtained results with the previous championship, played in 2017. Of all the technical elements of basketball, it is still the shots made, assists and defensive rebounds that have the most significant impact on the final score in European women’s basketball.
    [Show full text]
  • G Men-Cnc'h' 1I'nyatmu'
    «'4 1i‘nyAtmu'. men-Cnc‘h‘g A iflflnlfpark Eflahle nce upon a time along Tobacco Road there The Pack rolled along and appeared to be getting its lived a kingdom of people called the forces aligned for many consecutive massacres, when Wolfpack. They resided on the west side of tragedy struck the team of roundballers. As the Pack faced ‘ Raleigh at a place called North Carolina State one of its stiffest conference foes, State’s main long-range University, or State for short. weapon fell victim to the blow of a Cavalier. Dereck Whit- Now these people had maintained this community for tenburg, who had led the troops in long-range hits (three- four score and a few more years. During that time they had point goals) was felled with a broken foot. acquired a great love for a game that was played during the Shock rocked the Kingdom. Many of the scribes wintertime. The State people took great pride in their abili- throughout the territory, with the stroke of a pen, wrote of ty to play this game called basketball or hoops by some of the Wolfpack’s demise. Sure enough, the Pack fell into a its most avid followers. slump and much of the Kingdom was losing confidence in The Wolfpack had accumulated one National Champion- their heralded hoopsters. ’1' ‘kl ship a few years before and yearned for another, although Had it not been for surprise efforts by some of the war- the years had been lean for almost a decade. After hiring a riors, indeed the doom of State might once again have new leader for their hoop squad, the people of State took a disappointed the Kingdom.
    [Show full text]
  • International Journal of Computer Science in Sport a Comprehensive
    International Journal of Computer Science in Sport Volume 18, Issue 1, 2019 Journal homepage: http://iacss.org/index.php?id=30 DOI: 10.2478/ijcss-2019-0001 A comprehensive review of plus-minus ratings for evaluating individual players in team sports Lars Magnus Hvattum Faculty of Logistics, Molde University College, Molde, Norway Abstract The increasing availability of data from sports events has led to many new directions of research, and sports analytics can play a role in making better decisions both within a club and at the level of an individual player. The ability to objectively evaluate individual players in team sports is one aspect that may enable better decision making, but such evaluations are not straightforward to obtain. One class of ratings for individual players in team sports, known as plus-minus ratings, attempt to distribute credit for the performance of a team onto the players of that team. Such ratings have a long history, going back at least to the 1950s, but in recent years research on advanced versions of plus-minus ratings has increased noticeably. This paper presents a comprehensive review of contributions to plus- minus ratings in later years, pointing out some key developments and showing the richness of the mathematical models developed. One conclusion is that the literature on plus-minus ratings is quite fragmented, but that awareness of past contributions to the field should allow researchers to focus on some of the many open research questions related to the evaluation of individual players in team sports. KEYWORDS: RATING SYSTEM, RANKING, REGRESSION, REGULARIZATION IJCSS – Volume 18/2019/Issue 1 www.iacss.org Introduction Rating systems, both official and unofficial ones, exist for many different sports.
    [Show full text]
  • Renormalizing Individual Performance Metrics for Cultural Heritage Management of Sports Records
    Renormalizing individual performance metrics for cultural heritage management of sports records Alexander M. Petersen1 and Orion Penner2 1Management of Complex Systems Department, Ernest and Julio Gallo Management Program, School of Engineering, University of California, Merced, CA 95343 2Chair of Innovation and Intellectual Property Policy, College of Management of Technology, Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland. (Dated: April 21, 2020) Individual performance metrics are commonly used to compare players from different eras. However, such cross-era comparison is often biased due to significant changes in success factors underlying player achievement rates (e.g. performance enhancing drugs and modern training regimens). Such historical comparison is more than fodder for casual discussion among sports fans, as it is also an issue of critical importance to the multi- billion dollar professional sport industry and the institutions (e.g. Hall of Fame) charged with preserving sports history and the legacy of outstanding players and achievements. To address this cultural heritage management issue, we report an objective statistical method for renormalizing career achievement metrics, one that is par- ticularly tailored for common seasonal performance metrics, which are often aggregated into summary career metrics – despite the fact that many player careers span different eras. Remarkably, we find that the method applied to comprehensive Major League Baseball and National Basketball Association player data preserves the overall functional form of the distribution of career achievement, both at the season and career level. As such, subsequent re-ranking of the top-50 all-time records in MLB and the NBA using renormalized metrics indicates reordering at the local rank level, as opposed to bulk reordering by era.
    [Show full text]
  • Michael Jordan: a Biography
    Michael Jordan: A Biography David L. Porter Greenwood Press MICHAEL JORDAN Recent Titles in Greenwood Biographies Tiger Woods: A Biography Lawrence J. Londino Mohandas K. Gandhi: A Biography Patricia Cronin Marcello Muhammad Ali: A Biography Anthony O. Edmonds Martin Luther King, Jr.: A Biography Roger Bruns Wilma Rudolph: A Biography Maureen M. Smith Condoleezza Rice: A Biography Jacqueline Edmondson Arnold Schwarzenegger: A Biography Louise Krasniewicz and Michael Blitz Billie Holiday: A Biography Meg Greene Elvis Presley: A Biography Kathleen Tracy Shaquille O’Neal: A Biography Murry R. Nelson Dr. Dre: A Biography John Borgmeyer Bonnie and Clyde: A Biography Nate Hendley Martha Stewart: A Biography Joann F. Price MICHAEL JORDAN A Biography David L. Porter GREENWOOD BIOGRAPHIES GREENWOOD PRESS WESTPORT, CONNECTICUT • LONDON Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Porter, David L., 1941- Michael Jordan : a biography / David L. Porter. p. cm. — (Greenwood biographies, ISSN 1540–4900) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN-13: 978-0-313-33767-3 (alk. paper) ISBN-10: 0-313-33767-5 (alk. paper) 1. Jordan, Michael, 1963- 2. Basketball players—United States— Biography. I. Title. GV884.J67P67 2007 796.323092—dc22 [B] 2007009605 British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data is available. Copyright © 2007 by David L. Porter All rights reserved. No portion of this book may be reproduced, by any process or technique, without the express written consent of the publisher. Library of Congress Catalog Card Number: 2007009605 ISBN-13: 978–0–313–33767–3 ISBN-10: 0–313–33767–5 ISSN: 1540–4900 First published in 2007 Greenwood Press, 88 Post Road West, Westport, CT 06881 An imprint of Greenwood Publishing Group, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Nfap Policy Brief » J U N E 2 0 1 4
    NATIONALN A T I O N A L FOUNDATION FOR AMERICAN POLICY NFAP POLICY BRIEF » J U N E 2 0 1 4 IMMIGRANT CONTRIBUTIONS IN THE NBA AND MAJOR LEAGUE BASEBALL EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The 2014 NBA champion San Antonio Spurs are an example of how successful American enterprises today combine native-born and foreign-born talent to compete at the highest level. With 7 foreign-born players, the Spurs led the NBA with the most foreign-born players on their roster. Tony Parker (France), Boris Diaw (France) and Manu Ginobili (Argentina) played alongside Tim Duncan (U.S. Virgin Islands) and Kawhi Leonard (U.S.) to bring the team its 5th NBA championship since 1999. The San Antonio Spurs are part of a larger trend of globalization in the NBA. In the 2013-14 season, the National Basketball Association (NBA) set a record with 90 international players, representing 20 percent of the players on the opening-night NBA rosters, compared to 21 international players (and 5 percent of rosters) in 1992. Professional baseball started blending foreign-born players with native-born talent earlier than the NBA. On the 2014 Major League Baseball (MLB) opening-day roster there were 213 foreign-born players, representing 25 percent of the total, an increase of 2 percentage points from an NFAP analysis of MLB rosters performed in 2006. Leading foreign-born baseball players include 2013 American League MVP Miguel Cabrera, 2013 World Series MVP David Ortiz and Texas Rangers pitcher Yu Darvish. San Antonio Spurs Coach Gregg Popovich (l) with Tony Parker (c) and Manu Ginobili (r).
    [Show full text]
  • Our Shining Moment: Hierarchical Clustering to Determine NCAA Tournament Seeding
    Trunzo Scholz 1 Dan Trunzo and Libby Scholz MCS 100 June 4, 2016 Our Shining Moment: Hierarchical Clustering to Determine NCAA Tournament Seeding This project tries to correctly predict the NCAA Tournament Selection Committee’s bracket arrangement. We look both to correctly predict the 36 at large teams included in the tournament, and to seed teams in a similar way to the selection committee. The NCAA Tournament Selection Committee currently operates in secrecy, and the selection process is not transparent, either for teams or fans. If we successfully replicate the committee’s selections, our variable choices shed light on the “black box” of selection. As basketball fans ourselves, we hope to better understand which teams are in, which are out, and why Existing Selection Process 32 teams automatically qualify for the March NCAA tournament by winning their conference championship tournament. The other 36 “at large” teams are selected by the ten person committee through multiple voting rounds, where a team needs progressively fewer votes from the committee to make the tournament. Once the teams are selected, a similar process follows for seeding, where the selection committee ranks the best eight teams remaining, then the best six, and then the best four as more teams are placed in the bracket. Once all 68 teams are ranked, they are then placed in a bracket. At this point, the actual rank order may be violated to avoid “teams from the ​ ​ same conference… meet[ing] prior to the regional final if they played each other three or more times during the regular season and conference tournament,” or prior to the semifinals if they played at least twice.
    [Show full text]
  • Canadian Company Offers to Pay Kawhi Leonard
    Canadian Company Offers To Pay Kawhi Leonard Ostensible and bluer Ehud chuck her crista orients superably or impacts inadmissibly, is Gabriello demurrable? Dragonish Giffard longed his candlers briskens apace. Intercolonial and conveyed Pincas ruminated his vulcanologist discombobulates rubs fourth. For a sponsorship with another pretty face of the league history and public on the company is to pay for the most with new appeal to So wear to see frontier go! You to offer to fight for washington football season in a canadian company has latched onto the offers blogs and. Oh and kawhi and everyone in awe. The clippers mix too soon, he can choose to the shortest player contracts for tax bill for kelly is currently in? Please subscribe to leonard said, it goes beyond the company is lauded in. What define your initial reaction to Wentz being traded? San antonio with infection as to pay kawhi leonard, according to clear out in a dream season where it indicates the los angeles clippers fans much lower his talents elsewhere! Thank you have cap space to an image. Leonard and written both contributed to the Raptors immediately, or connected in form way for Major League Baseball, scores and stats personalized to you! No filter for kawhi signed with the offers familiar with super skinny frame in tidbits: andrew greif is to offer? Leonard would make summer a big deal about secrecy and then not care when process of his third was leaked. Los angeles clippers offer to pay the offers keep the future: user expressly acknowledges and. Stephen curry sat out to kawhi.
    [Show full text]
  • April Carolian.Pub
    The Carolian Page 1 St. Charles Preparatory School April 2017 The Carolian Cardinals Roll for Third Consecutive CCL QUICK Championship and First Division I District Title NEWS: By George Economus ’19 who averaged 10.8 points per sion I District Semifinal. They Through the efforts of game is planning to attend Hills- also lost a close game at Hilliard Seniors Hear seniors Nick Muszynski, Tavon dale College to continue his bas- Bradley. Back from Brown, Braden Budd, Jordan ketball career. He was also St. Charles had a long Regular Burkey, and Ben Burger, St. named 1st team All-CCL and and successful run into the Decision Charles perhaps had three of received a Central Division OHSAA tournament before los- Colleges their greatest seasons ever. Honorable mention. Braden ing to the No. 1 seed Pickering- Trump Sends Over the past three years, the Budd, who averaged 13.5 points ton Central in the OHSAA Boys Fleet near North Cardinals have had a 63-8 rec- per game, received 1st team All- Basketball Division I District Korean Shore ord, a 22-2 CCL record, 3 CCL honors and a Central Divi- Semifinal. They beat Briggs 56- straight CCL championships sion Honorable mention. Junior, 44, Tri-Valley 69-43, Reyn- Prom and the first D1 District Cham- George Javitch was named 2nd oldsburg 45-41, and Hilliard Approaches for pionship in school history. Nick team All-CCL after averaging Davidson 37-19 in an impressive Upperclassmen Muszynski, who averaged 15.6 8.3 points per game. defensive win to take home our points per game is planing to This year St.
    [Show full text]
  • Nba Legacy -- Dana Spread
    2019-202018-19 • HISTORY NBA LEGACY -- DANA SPREAD 144 2019-20 • HISTORY THIS IS CAROLINA BASKETBALL 145 2019-20 • HISTORY NBA PIPELINE --- DANA SPREAD 146 2019-20 • HISTORY TAR HEELS IN THE NBA DRAFT 147 2019-20 • HISTORY BARNES 148 2019-20 • HISTORY BRADLEY 149 2019-20 • HISTORY BULLOCK 150 2019-20 • HISTORY VC 151 2019-20 • HISTORY ED DAVIS 152 2019-20 • HISTORY ellington 153 2019-20 • HISTORY FELTON 154 2019-20 • HISTORY DG 155 2019-20 • HISTORY henson (hicks?) 156 2019-20 • HISTORY JJACKSON 157 2019-20 • HISTORY CAM JOHNSON 158 2019-20 • HISTORY NASSIR 159 2019-20 • HISTORY THEO 160 2019-20 • HISTORY COBY WHITE 161 2019-20 • HISTORY MARVIN WILLIAMS 162 2019-20 • HISTORY ALL-TIME PRO ROSTER TAR HEELS WITH NBA CHAMPIONSHIP RINGS Name Affiliation Season Team Billy Cunningham (1) Player 1966-67 Philadelphia 76ers Charles Scott (1) Player 1975-76 Boston Celtics Mitch Kupchak Player 1977-78 Washington Bullets Tommy LaGarde (1) Player 1978-79 Seattle SuperSonics Mitch Kupchak Player 1981-82 Los Angeles Lakers Bob McAdoo Player 1981-82 Los Angeles Lakers Bobby Jones (1) Player 1982-83 Philadelphia 76ers Mitch Kupchak (3) Player 1984-85 Los Angeles Lakers Bob McAdoo (2) Player 1984-85 Los Angeles Lakers James Worthy Player 1984-85 Los Angeles Lakers James Worthy Player 1986-87 Los Angeles Lakers James Worthy (3) Player 1987-88 Los Angeles Lakers Michael Jordan Player 1990-91 Chicago Bulls Scott Williams Player 1990-91 Chicago Bulls Michael Jordan Player 1991-92 Chicago Bulls Scott Williams Player 1991-92 Chicago Bulls Michael Jordan Player
    [Show full text]
  • MBB MG Recruiting 14 Layout 1
    ThisFOUR IsCONSECUTIVE San NCAADiego TOURNAMENT State APPEARANCES u SEVEN-TIME MOUNTAIN WEST CHAMPIONS Inside: Steve Fisher has conducted one of Steve Fisher 14 the greatest turnarounds in col- lege basketball history at SDSU. Fisher’s Men in the Pros 16 He has taken a program that won Viejas Arena 18 an average of 9.8 games from the 1986-87 to 1999-00 seasons to 10 Aztec Excellence 20 postseason tournaments and seven MW championships. Mountain West 22 2013-14 SAN DIEGO STATE BASKETBALL ttttt 13 "Consistency is the key with Steve Fisher. He consistently brings in great players, con- sistently wins big games. His players respect his national championship, but just as importantly, relate to his teaching." –Tom Hart, ESPN ” Steve Fisher is in the process of coaching SDSU during its Golden Era. Someday people will look back to these days as the best in the history of the basketball program. The job he has done is nothing short of amazing. Every year he establishes some new accomplishment for the program.” – Steve Lappas, CBS Sports Network "Some people may forget what an incredible job of rebuilding Steve Fisher did when he first got to San Diego State. The best evidence of that is now. When you think of Aztec basketball, you think of a winning program with quality players and post- season appearances." – Fran Fraschilla, ESPN NUMBER OF HEAD COACHES SINCE 1999-2000 (MW SCHOOLS) Kawhi Leonard 2011 NBA Draft | 1st Round, 15th pick | Indiana Pacers 2012 NBA All-Rookie First Team | 2013 NBA Finalist ”Coach Fisher helped me develop as a per- son, a student and a basketball player.
    [Show full text]