Legacies of the Ford Sociological Department

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Legacies of the Ford Sociological Department Western Michigan University ScholarWorks at WMU Dissertations Graduate College 6-2004 Deconstructing Fordism: Legacies of the Ford Sociological Department Georgios Paris Loizides Western Michigan University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/dissertations Part of the Sociology Commons Recommended Citation Loizides, Georgios Paris, "Deconstructing Fordism: Legacies of the Ford Sociological Department" (2004). Dissertations. 1122. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/dissertations/1122 This Dissertation-Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate College at ScholarWorks at WMU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at WMU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. DECONSTRUCTING FORDISM: LEGACIES OF THE FORD SOCIOLOGICAL DEPARTMENT by Georgios Paris Loizides A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of The Graduate College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Sociology Western Michigan University Kalamazoo, Michigan June 2004 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. DECONSTRUCTING FORDISM: LEGACIES OF THE FORD SOCIOLOGICAL DEPARTMENT Georgios Paris Loizides, Ph.D. Western Michigan University, 2004 Institutional theories of organizations state that organizations reflect society’s wider values and norms. Less attention has been placed on the questions of whether and how private interest organizations influence wider societal values and norms. This study examines archival material, as well as published primary and secondary sources, relating to the history of the Ford Motor Company, in particular its Sociological Department, in an effort to assess the company's progressive era project to instill in its workforce a particular set of values and attitudes, which were seen by Ford as healthy, and appropriate. Though we are used to seeing Henry Ford and his Ford Motor Company as makers of automobiles, in at least its early history, the company also engaged in “human engineering” through its Sociological Department. Ford was “making men” as much as he was making cars. The company's sociological project attempted to engineer American, working-class (family) men out of the thousands of mainly Southern and Eastern European immigrants that flocked to Detroit. This study pays particular attention to the implications of the Ford sociological project for race, ethnic, class, and gender relations. Therefore, the questions that this research answers revolve aroxmd what may be called the social dimensions of early Fordism, and are answered through an examination of the discourse and actions of the Ford Motor Company as a case study, imder the light of institutionalization and structuration theories. Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. NOTE TO USERS This reproduction is the best copy available. UMI Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. UMI Number: 3130610 Copyright 2004 by Loizides, Georgios P. All rights reserved. INFORMATION TO USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleed-through, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. UMI UMI Microform 3130610 Copyright 2004 by ProQuest Information and Learning Company. All rights reserved. This microform edition is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest Information and Learning Company 300 North Zeeb Road P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Copyright by Georgios Paris Loizides 2004 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to acknowledge, and express my gratitude, to the Chair and members of the dissertation committee for their continuing help and support. In particular, I would like to thank the Chair, Dr. Vyacheslav Karpov, for his confidence and indispensable advice. His editorial comments and guidance have been invaluable to this study. Dr. Gerald Markle provided me with personal help in organizing this work, for which I am grateful. Furthermore, I foimd his work on the Holocaust, Meditations of a Holocaust Traveler, in particular his use of “snapshots” to tell a story, to be inspiring and at least in an indirect way influenced this study. Dr. David Hartmann was always available for advice, and has helped myself and others survive graduate school through working at the Kercher Center for Social Research. I am also indebted to Dr. Sonnad for sharing his wisdom so freely, and for his specialized help regarding the applied sociological aspects of this study. The historian of my committee. Dr. Kristin Szylvian, greatly helped in putting this study in historical context. Furthermore, she provided me with editorial comments for which I am thankful. Secondly, I would like to recognize the Western Michigan University Chapter of the American Association of University Professors (AAUP) for awarding me the 2002 A. Robert Kleiner Memorial Scholarship, and thus greatly aiding in the expenses relating to the data collection for this study. The data collection of this study was also facilitated by the Department of Sociology at Western Michigan University, which in the summer of 2001 granted me university-sponsored transportation to and from the Benson Ford Research Center, for which I am grateful. Furthermore, I must ii Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Acknowledgments—continued acknowledge the help of the Graduate College for awarding me the Dissertation Completion Fellowship, thus faeilitating my physical survival through the last year of dissertation writing. Finally, I would like to acknowledge the valuable assistance of my friends and colleagues at the Department of Sociology for their support and comments. Georgios Paris Loizides 111 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS............................................................................................. ii LIST OF TABLES.......................................................................................................... viii CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION............................................................................................. 1 Theoretical Statement of the Problem .................................................... 2 Empirical Statement of the Problem....................................................... 3 Research Questions ................................................................................... 5 Description of the Ford Sociological Department................................. 6 General Chapter hy Chapter Overview.................................................. 7 II. THEORY............................................................................................................ II Institutions and Institutionalization: Organizations in Institutionalist Discourse .......................................................................... 12 Conceptualizing Norms and Values: Structure, Aetion, Agency, and Power................................................................................................... 20 Structuration ............................................................................................... 23 Use of Theory ............................................................................................. 24 Conclusions ................................................................................................ 25 III. M ETHOD........................................................................................................... 28 Comparative and Historieal Sociology.................................................. 28 Case Studies ............................................................................................... 31 Archival Research..................................................................................... 35 Sources ........................................................................................................ 36 Limitations................................................................................................. 38 iv Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Table of Contents—continued IV. REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE................................................................. 40 Primary Sources ......................................................................................... 42 Secondary Sources .................................................................................... 45 Archival Sources ........................................................................................ 52 V. THE
Recommended publications
  • Rebecca Swenson Dissertation March 27 2012 Ford Times FINAL
    Brand Journalism: A Cultural History of Consumers, Citizens, and Community in Ford Times A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA BY Rebecca Dean Swenson IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Advisor : Dr. John Eighmey March 2012 © Rebecca Dean Swenson 2012 Acknowledgements This dissertation would not have been completed without the assistance, support, love of many people. Thank you to my committee: Dr. John Eighmey, Dr. Mary Vavrus, Dr. Kathleen Hansen and Dr. Heather LaMarre for your input, wise guidance, and support. John Eighmey and Mary Vavrus, I am grateful for your encouragement and enthusiasm for my work from the kitchen (Betty Crocker Masters Thesis) to the garage (this dissertation on Ford.) You both cheered me on during my time in graduate school, and I always left our meetings feeling energized and ready the return to the project ahead. Kathy Hansen and Heather LaMarre both stepped in towards the end of this process. Thank you for your willingness to do so. Thank you to Dr. Albert Tims, who offered much support throughout the program and an open door for students. I appreciate all of the institutional support, including the Ralph Casey award, which allowed me to dedicate time to research and writing. Thank you to Dr. Hazel Dicken-Garcia for encouraging me to apply for the Ph.D. program, and to Dr. Jisu Huh and Sara Cannon, who very kindly helped me navigate a mountain of paperwork my last semester. Thank you to my fellow Murphy Hall graduate students for the encouragement, feedback, study dates, play dates, and fun.
    [Show full text]
  • Wall Didactics Accessible Fonts
    LUSTER Realism and Hyperrealism in Contemporary Automobile and Motorcycle Painting Produced by David J. Wagner, L.L.C. Art Work Labels Accessible Fonts Premiere: Museum of Arts and Sciences in conjunction with Daytona Bike Week Daytona Beach, FL Throughout the 20th and 21st centuries, cars and motorcycles have not only been ubiquitous on the nation’s streets and highways, but also in film, top forty hits, and in painting. With the emergence of photo-realism in the 1960’s, motor vehicles assumed a special place of distinction as subject matter in the iconography of American art. LUSTER: Realism and Hyperrealism in Contemporary Automobile and Motorcycle Painting, is a traveling museum exhibition comprised of over 55 paintings by 15 leading photorealists and hyperrealists who specialize in automobiles and motorcycles as their primary subject of choice. Exhibiting artists include (in alphabetical order): A.D. Cook (Las Vegas, NV), Randy Ford (Eastampton, NJ), Allan Gorman (West Orange, NJ), Marc G. Jones (Loveland, CO), Cheryl Kelley (Northern California), Richard Lewis (Los Angeles, CA), Lory Lockwood (New Orleans, LA), Robert Petillo (Hardyston, NJ), Kris Preslan (Lake Oswego, OR), Joseph Santos (Buena Park, CA), Ken Scaglia (Weston, CT), John E. Schaeffer (La Grange, TX), Guenevere "Moto Painter" Schwien (Portland, OR), and Harold D. Zabady (Camp Hill, PA). The birth of the modern car occurred in Germany over 150 years ago. The first internal combustion, petroleum-fueled motorcycle came out of Germany 25 years later. In the United States, Henry Ford Company was established in 1901. A year later it morphed into Cadillac Motor Company which Ford left, along with the rights to his name.
    [Show full text]
  • Model T (Edited from Wikipedia)
    Model T (Edited from Wikipedia) SUMMARY The Ford Model T (colloquially known as the Tin Lizzie, Leaping Lena, or flivver) is an automobile produced by Ford Motor Company from October 1, 1908, to May 26, 1927. It is generally regarded as the first affordable automobile, the car that opened travel to the common middle-class American; some of this was because of Ford's efficient fabrication, including assembly line production instead of individual hand crafting. The Ford Model T was named the most influential car of the 20th century in the 1999 Car of the Century competition, ahead of the BMC Mini, Citroën DS, and Volkswagen Type 1. Ford's Model T was successful not only because it provided inexpensive transportation on a massive scale, but also because the car signified innovation for the rising middle class and became a powerful symbol of America's age of modernization. With 16.5 million sold it stands eighth on the top ten list of most sold cars of all time as of 2012. Although automobiles had already existed for decades, they were still mostly scarce and expensive at the Model T's introduction in 1908. Positioned as reliable, easily maintained, mass-market transportation, it was a runaway success. In a matter of days after the release, 15,000 orders were placed. The first production Model T was produced on August 12, 1908 and left the factory on September 27, 1908, at the Ford Piquette Avenue Plant in Detroit, Michigan. On May 26, 1927, Henry Ford watched the 15 millionth Model T Ford roll off the assembly line at his factory in Highland Park, Michigan.
    [Show full text]
  • Finding Aid for the Collection on Frank Johnson, 1904-1957, Accession
    Finding Aid for COLLECTION ON FRANK JOHNSON, 1904-1957 Accession 570 Finding Aid Published: January 2011 20900 Oakwood Boulevard ∙ Dearborn, MI 48124-5029 USA [email protected] ∙ www.thehenryford.org Updated: 1/10/2011 Collection on Frank Johnson Accession 570 SUMMARY INFORMATION COLLECTOR: Johnson, Russell F. TITLE: Collection on Frank Johnson INCLUSIVE DATES: 1904-1957 BULK DATES: 1904-1942 QUANTITY: 0.8 cubic ft. ABSTRACT: Collected diaries and oral interview transcripts relating to Frank Johnson’s automotive career with Leland and Faulconer, Cadillac Motor Company, Lincoln Motor Company, and Ford Motor Company. ADMINISTRATIVE INFORMATION ACCESS RESTRICTIONS: The papers are open for research ACQUISITION: Donation, 1956 PREFERRED CITATION: Item, folder, box, Accession 570, Collection on Frank Johnson, Benson Ford Research Center, The Henry Ford PROCESSING INFORMATION: Finding aid prepared by Pete Kalinski, April, 2005 2 Collection on Frank Johnson Accession 570 BIOGRAPHICAL NOTE Russell F. Johnson’s father, Frank Johnson, was born in Paris, Michigan in 1871 and attended local public schools and Michigan State College (now Michigan State University). After earning a degree in mechanical engineering in 1895, Frank Johnson worked as a tool designer and engineer with the Leland and Faulconer Company. Leland and Faulconer Company was a noted machine and tool shop started by Henry M. Leland in 1890 that supplied engines, transmission, and steering gear to the Henry Ford Company and later the Cadillac Motor Company. Leland and his son Wilfred C. Leland assumed control of Cadillac in 1902 and merged the companies. Johnson was instrumental in the key phases of early engine design at Cadillac.
    [Show full text]
  • A Critique of the Fordism of the Regulation School
    A Critique of the Fordism of the Regulation School Ferruccio Gambino1 Introduction Some of the categories that people have used in recent years to describe the changes taking place in the world of production, such as Fordism, post-Fordism and immaterial production, have shown themselves to be rather blunt instruments.2 Here I intend to deal with the use of the concepts “Fordism” and “post-Fordism” by the regulation school, which has given a particular twist to the former term, and which coined ex novo the latter. The aim of my article is to help break the conflict-excluding spell under which the regulation school has succeeded in casting Fordism and post-Fordism. From midway through the 1970s, as a result of the writings of Michel Aglietta3 and then of other exponents of the regulation school, 1 The English version of this paper appeared in 1996 in Common Sense no. 19 and was subsequently published as a chapter in Werner Bonefeld (ed), Revolutionary Writing: Common Sense Essays In Post-Political Politics Writing, New York, Autonomedia, 2003. 2 For a timely critique of the term “immaterial production”, see Sergio Bologna, “Problematiche del lavoro autonomo in Italia” (Part I), Altreragioni, no. 1 (1992), pp. 10-27. 3 Michel Aglietta, (1974), Accumulation et régulation du capitalisme en longue période. L’exemple des Etats Unis (1870-1970), Paris, INSEE, 1974; the second French edition has the title Régulation et crises du capitalisme, Paris, Calmann- Lévy, 1976; English translation, A Theory of Capitalist Regulation: the US Experience, London and New York, Verso, 1979; in 1987 there followed a second English edition from the same publisher.
    [Show full text]
  • The Domestication of Ford Model T in Denmark
    Aalborg Universitet The Domestication of Ford Model T in Denmark Wagner, Michael Publication date: 2009 Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Link to publication from Aalborg University Citation for published version (APA): Wagner, M. (2009). The Domestication of Ford Model T in Denmark. Paper presented at Appropriating America Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands. General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. ? Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. ? You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain ? You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal ? Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us at [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Downloaded from vbn.aau.dk on: September 24, 2021 The domestication of Ford Model T in Denmark By Michael F. Wagner, Institute for History and Social Studies, Aalborg University Ford Motor Company started to operate on a commercial level in Denmark from 1907 by appointing a sales agent, Bülow & Co., as importer of Ford automobiles to the Scandinavian market. The major breakthrough for the company on a global scale came with the introduction of the Model T by the end of 1908.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of the US Automotive Industry
    The Evolution of the U.S. Automotive Industry Course No: D05-004 Credit: 5 PDH Robert P. Tata, P.E. Continuing Education and Development, Inc. 22 Stonewall Court Woodcliff Lake, NJ 07677 P: (877) 322-5800 [email protected] The Evolution of the U.S. Automotive Industry Copyright 2013 Robert Tata, B.M.S.E., P.E. All Rights Reserved Introduction The author, a licensed Professional Engineer, has also been employed in an engineering capacity by all “Big Three” automakers; GM, Ford, & Chrysler. Here he has sought to investigate the series of events that made Detroit, Michigan the automotive capital of the world. Detroit, Michigan is a place, off the beaten path, in an isolated glove-shape piece of land thrust up between two lakes, with sometimes very inclement weather. Ohio and Indiana, who were also active in the creation of the auto industry in the U.S., are in the same general area of the country as Michigan and share the same climate. How did the industry get its start in this three-state area. One would think that other parts of the country would be more conducive to the formation of such an important part of the history of this nation. Michigan, Ohio, and Indiana were not members of the original 13 states and therefore have to be considered less developed territories than the original thirteen states around the turn of the 19th century when the American gasoline powered automobile was invented. Read how the author has searched for the answers to these somewhat perplexing questions surrounding why Detroit became “The Motor City”.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Center New and Unprocessed Archival Accessions
    NEW AND UNPROCESSED ARCHIVAL ACCESSIONS List Published: April 2020 Benson Ford Research Center The Henry Ford 20900 Oakwood Boulevard ∙ Dearborn, MI 48124-5029 USA [email protected] ∙ www.thehenryford.org New and Unprocessed Archival Accessions April 2020 OVERVIEW The Benson Ford Research Center, home to the Archives of The Henry Ford, holds more than 3000 individual collections, or accessions. Many of these accessions remain partially or completely unprocessed and do not have detailed finding aids. In order to provide a measure of insight into these materials, the Archives has assembled this listing of new and unprocessed accessions. Accessions are listed alphabetically by title in two groups: New Accessions contains materials acquired 2018-2020, and Accessions 1929-2017 contains materials acquired since the opening of The Henry Ford in 1929 through 2017. The list will be updated periodically to include new acquisitions and remove those that have been more fully described. Researchers interested in access to any of the collections listed here should contact Benson Ford Research Center staff (email: [email protected]) to discuss collection availability. ACCESSION NUMBERS Each accession is assigned a unique identification number, or accession number. These are generally multi-part codes, with the left-most digits indicating the year in which the accession was acquired by the Archives. There, are however, some exceptions. Numbering practices covering the majority of accessions are outlined below. - Acquisitions made during or after the year 2000 have 4-digit year values, such as 2020, 2019, etc. - Acquisitions made prior to the year 2000 have 2-digit year values, such as 99 for 1999, 57 for 1957, and so forth.
    [Show full text]
  • UCLA SSIFI C ATI ON
    Form No. 10-300 (Rev. 10-74) ^^ UNITED STATES DEPARTNfflm" OF THE INTERIOR NATIONAL PARK SERVICE NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES INVENTORY -- NOMINATION FORM SEE INSTRUCTIONS IN HOW TO COMPLETE NATIONAL REGISTER FORMS ___________TYPE ALL ENTRIES - COMPLETE APPLICABLE SECTIONS______ I NAME HISTORIC Ford River Rouge Complex________________________ AND/OR COMMON Ford River Rouge Complex___________^_________ LOCATION STREET & NUMBER 3001 Miller Road _NOT FOR PUBLICATION 16 CITY. TOWN CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT Dearborn ___. VICINITY OF STATE CODE COUNTY CODE Michigan 26 Wayne 163 UCLA SSIFI c ATI ON CATEGORY OWNERSHIP STATUS PRESENT USE ^DISTRICT _PUBLIC -XOCCUPIED —AGRICULTURE —MUSEUM _BUILDING(S) JKpRIVATE —UNOCCUPIED —COMMERCIAL —PARK _ STRUCTURE _BOTH —WORK IN PROGRESS —EDUCATIONAL _ PRIVATE RESIDENCE —SITE PUBLIC ACQUISITION ACCESSIBLE —ENTERTAINMENT —RELIGIOUS _OBJECT _JN PROCESS -XYES: RESTRICTED —GOVERNMENT —SCIENTIFIC —BEING CONSIDERED — YES: UNRESTRICTED X_ INDUSTRIAL —TRANSPORTATION _NO —MILITARY —OTHER. (OWNER OF PROPERTY (Contact: Mr. Lee A. lacocca. President) NSAME \Ford Motor Company __ STREET & NUMBER The American Road CITY, TOWN STATE Dearborn VICINITY OF Michigan LOCATION OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION COURTHOUSE. REGISTRY OF DEEDS,ETC. Register of Deeds, City-County Building STREET& NUMBER Woodward Avenue at Jefferson CITY. TOWN STATE Detroit Michigan REPRESENTATION IN EXISTING SURVEYS TITLE -Historic American Engineering Record DATE 1975-76 X_ FEDERAL —STATE —COUNTY —LOCAL DEPOSITORY FOR SURVEYRECORDS Historic American Engineering Record CITY. TOWN STATE Washington D.C. DESCRIPTION CONDITION CHECK ONE CHECK ONE —EXCELLENT _DETERIORATED —UNALTERED X_ORIGINAL SITE _JGOOD _RUINS X_ALTERED —MOVED DATE______ —FAIR _UNEXPOSED DESCRIBETHE PRESENT AND ORIGINAL (IF KNOWN) PHYSICAL APPEARANCE The Ford River Rouge Complex, one of the industrial wonders of the world and the only industrial area encompassing all the basic steps in automobile manufacturing, is situated west of Detroit in the city of Dearborn.
    [Show full text]
  • Ford) Compared with Japanese
    A MAJOR STUDY OF AMERICAN (FORD) COMPARED WITH JAPANESE (HONDA) AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRY – THEIR STRATEGIES AFFECTING SURVIABILTY PATRICK F. CALLIHAN Bachelor of Engineering in Material Science Youngstown State University June 1993 Master of Science in Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering Youngstown State University March 2000 Submitted in partial fulfillment of requirements for the degree DOCTOR OF ENGINEERING at the CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY AUGUST, 2010 This Dissertation has been approved for the Department of MECHANICAL ENGINEERING and the College of Graduate Studies by Dr. L. Ken Keys, Dissertation Committee Chairperson Date Department of Mechanical Engineering Dr. Paul A. Bosela Date Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Dr. Bahman Ghorashi Date Department of Chemical and Biomedical Engineering Dean of Fenn College of Engineering Dr. Chien-Hua Lin Date Department Computer and Information Science Dr. Hanz Richter Date Department of Mechanical Engineering ACKNOWLEDGMENTS First I would like to express my sincere appreciation to Dr. Keys, my advisor, for spending so much time with me and providing me with such valuable experience and guidance. I would like to thank each of my committee members for their participation: Dr. Paul Bosela, Dr. Baham Ghorashi, Dr. Chien-Hua Lin and Dr. Hanz Richter. I want to especially thank my wife, Kimberly and two sons, Jacob and Nicholas, for the sacrifice they gave during my efforts. A MAJOR STUDY OF AMERICAN (FORD) COMPARED WITH JAPANESE (HONDA) AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRY – THEIR STRATEGIES AFFECTING SURVIABILTY PATRICK F. CALLIHAN ABSTRACT Understanding the role of technology, in the automotive industry, is necessary for the development, implementation, service and disposal of such technology, from a complete integrated system life cycle approach, to assure long-term success.
    [Show full text]
  • Ford Motor Company One American Road Dearborn, MI 48126 U.S.A
    Report Home | Contact | GRI Index | Site Map | Glossary & Key Terms This report is structured according to our Business Principles, which you can access using the colored tabs above. This report is aligned with the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) G3 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines released in October 2006, at an application level of A+. See the GRI Index ● Print this report "Welcome to our 2006/7 Sustainability Report. These are challenging times, not only for our Company but for our planet and its inhabitants. The markets for our products are changing rapidly, and there is fierce competition everywhere we operate. Collectively, we face daunting global sustainability ● Download resources challenges, including climate change, depletion of natural resources, poverty, population growth, urbanization and congestion." ● Send feedback Alan Mulally, President and CEO Read the full letter from Bill Ford, Executive Chairman Alan Mulally and Bill Ford Fast track to data: ● Products and Customers ● Vehicle Safety ● Environment ● Quality of Relationships ● Community ● Financial Health ● Workplace Safety Overview Our industry, the business environment and societal expectations continue to evolve, and so does our reporting. Learn about our Company and our vision for sustainability. Our Impacts As a major multinational enterprise, our activities have far-reaching impacts on environmental, social and economic systems. Read about our analysis and prioritization of these issues and impacts. Voices Nine people from inside and outside Ford provide their perspectives on key challenges facing our industry and how Ford is responding, including “new mobility,” good practices in the supply chain and the auto industry’s economic impact. This report was published in June 2007.
    [Show full text]
  • The Paradox of Positivism
    Dylan Riley The Paradox of Positivism The essays in The Politics of Method in the Human Sciences contribute to a historical and comparative sociology of social science by systematically com- paring the rises, falls, and absences of ‘‘methodological positivism’’ across the human sciences. Although all of the essays are of extremely high quality, three contributions develop the argument most fully: George Steinmetz’s introduction and William H. Sewell Jr.’s and Steinmetz’s contributions to the volume. My remarks focus on these three pieces, drawing on the other contributions to illustrate aspects of the argument or to suggest tensions that need exploration. What Is Positivism? What are the authors trying to explain? The term positivism has at least three meanings. It can be a commitment to social evolution in the sense of Auguste Comte and Emile Durkheim. It can refer to an articulated philosophical tra- dition: logical positivism. Or it can refer to a set of scientific research prac- tices: methodological positivism. It is the last meaning that is most relevant for Steinmetz (2005c: 109). Methodological positivism refers to a concept of knowledge, a concept of social reality, and a concept of science. First, it is an epistemology that identifies scientific knowledge with covering laws—that is, statements of the type ‘‘if A occurs, then B will follow.’’ Second, it is an ontology that equates existence with objects that are observable. Third, it is associated with a self- understanding of scientific activity in which social science is independent
    [Show full text]