DOCSLIB.ORG

The Evolution of Close Binaries with White Dwarf Components

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Evolution of Close Binaries with White Dwarf Components The evolution of close binaries with white dwarf components Proefschrift ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor aan de Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen op gezag van de rector magnificus prof. mr. S.C.J.J. Kortmann, volgens besluit van het college van decanen in het openbaar te verdedigen op maandag 7 oktober 2013 om 12.30 uur precies door Silvia Gerarda Martina Toonen geboren op 31 mei 1984 te Nijmegen Promotoren: Prof. dr. G. Nelemans KU Leuven Prof. dr. P.J. Groot Manuscriptcommissie: Prof. dr. N. de Groot Prof. dr. B.T. Gaensicke University of Warwick Prof. dr. D. Maoz Tel-Aviv University Prof. dr. S. Portegies Zwart Leiden University dr. O.R. Pols c 2013, Silvia Toonen The evolution of close binaries with white dwarf components Thesis, Radboud University Nijmegen Illustrated; with bibliographic information and Dutch summary ISBN: 978-94-6191-884-0 Optimism is the faith that leads to achievement. Nothing can be done without hope and confidence. Helen Keller Contents 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Stars....................................... 1 1.2 Stellar evolution of low- and intermediate-mass stars . ........... 1 1.3 Binaryevolution ................................ 2 1.3.1 Rochelobegeometry .......................... 2 1.3.2 Masstransfer .............................. 4 1.3.3 Accretionontowhitedwarfs . 5 1.3.4 Common-envelopeevolution . 6 1.4 SupernovaeTypeIa............................... 7 1.5 Binarypopulationsynthesis . ... 8 1.6 Thisthesis.................................... 9 2 The effect of common-envelope evolution on the visible population of post-common-envelope binaries 13 2.1 Introduction................................... 14 2.2 Method ..................................... 15 2.2.1 SeBa - a fast stellar and binary evolution code . ..... 15 2.2.2 Theinitialstellarpopulation. ... 16 2.2.3 Common-envelopeevolution . 16 2.2.4 Galacticmodel ............................. 17 2.2.5 Magnitudes ............................... 17 2.2.6 Selectioneffects............................. 18 2.3 Results...................................... 18 2.3.1 TheSDSSPCEBsample........................ 25 2.3.2 VariableCEefficiency ......................... 31 2.4 Discussionandconclusion . .. 32 2.A Population synthesis code SeBa . ... 35 i Contents 2.B Thespectraltype-massrelation . ... 36 3 The single degenerate supernova type Ia progenitors: Studying the influ- ence of different mass retention efficiencies 39 3.1 Introduction................................... 40 3.2 Evolution of single degenerate SNIa progenitors . ......... 42 3.2.1 Globalevolution ............................ 42 3.2.2 Commonenvelopephase . 43 3.2.3 Growthofthewhitedwarf . 45 3.3 Method ..................................... 47 3.3.1 Retentionefficiencies .. .. .. 48 3.3.2 Islands.................................. 49 3.4 Results: SNIa rates and delay times . .... 51 3.5 Discussion.................................... 54 3.6 Conclusions ................................... 55 3.A Retentionefficiencies . .. .. .. 57 3.A.1 Retention efficiencies based on Nomoto et al. 2007 . ..... 57 3.A.2 Retention efficiencies based on Ruiter et al. 2009 . ..... 58 3.A.3 Retention efficiencies based on Yungelson 2010 . ..... 59 4 The influence of mass-transfer variability on the growth of the mass of white dwarfs in accreting systems 61 4.1 introduction................................... 62 4.2 Mass-transfervariability . .... 63 4.2.1 Theoreticalconsiderations . .. 64 4.2.2 Observations .............................. 65 4.3 Model ...................................... 66 4.3.1 Mass-transfervariability . .. 66 4.3.2 Integrated retention efficiency . .. 69 4.4 Application to binary stellar evolution . ....... 71 4.5 BinarypopulationSynthesis . ... 74 4.6 Resultsanddiscussion . .. .. .. 75 4.7 Conclusions ................................... 77 5 Supernova Type Ia progenitors from merging double white dwarfs: Using a new population synthesis model 83 5.1 Introduction................................... 84 5.2 SeBa - a fast stellar and binary evolution code . ....... 87 5.2.1 Impact on the population of double white dwarfs . .... 88 5.3 Two models for common-envelope evolution . ..... 90 ii Contents 5.3.1 Impact on the population of double white dwarfs and type Ia super- novaprogenitors ............................ 91 5.4 Evolutionary paths to supernova type Ia from the double degenerate channel 93 5.4.1 common-envelopechannel . 95 5.4.2 Stablemasstransferchannel . 97 5.4.3 Formationreversalchannel. 99 5.5 Delaytimedistribution. .. 99 5.6 Population of merging double white dwarfs . ...... 103 5.7 Conclusion and discussion . 107 5.A Most important changes to the population synthesis code SeBa. 110 5.A.1 Treatmentofwindmass-loss . 110 5.A.2 Accretionontostellarobjects . 112 5.A.3 Stabilityofmasstransfer. 115 6 PopCORN: Hunting down the differences between binary population syn- thesis codes 121 6.1 Introduction................................... 122 6.2 Binaryevolution ................................ 124 6.2.1 Rochelobeoverflow. .. .. .. 124 6.3 Binary population synthesis codes . ..... 128 6.3.1 binary_c/nucsyn ............................ 128 6.3.2 TheBrusselscode............................ 129 6.3.3 SeBa................................... 130 6.3.4 StarTrack ................................ 130 6.4 Method ..................................... 131 6.4.1 Assumptionsforthisproject . 132 6.4.2 Normalisation.............................. 134 6.5 Results...................................... 135 6.5.1 Singlewhitedwarfsystems. 135 6.5.2 Doublewhitedwarfs .. .. .. 170 6.6 Summary of critical assumptions in BPS studies . ....... 184 6.7 Conclusion.................................... 187 6.A BackbonesoftheBPScodes . 189 6.A.1 Singlestarprescriptions . 191 6.A.2 Stabilityofmasstransfer. 191 6.A.3 Stablemasstransfer .. .. .. 193 6.A.4 Windmassloss ............................. 194 6.A.5 Angular momentum loss from winds . 195 6.A.6 Evolutionofheliumstars. 195 6.A.7 Generating the initial stellar population . ...... 196 iii Contents 6.B Typical variable assumptions in BPS codes . ...... 196 6.B.1 Accretionefficiency . .. .. .. 198 6.B.2 Angular momentum loss during RLOF . 198 6.B.3 Commonenvelopeevolution . 199 6.B.4 Windaccretion ............................. 200 6.B.5 Tides................................... 200 6.B.6 Magneticbraking ............................ 200 6.B.7 Initialpopulation ............................ 201 Bibliography 203 Summary 213 Chapter 2: Common-envelope evolution . ..... 213 Chapter 3: Mass retention efficiency of accreting white dwarfs .......... 214 Chapter 4: Mass transfer variability towards accreting whitedwarfs . 215 Chapter 5: Double white dwarf binaries as supernovae Type Ia progenitors . 215 Chapter 6: Binary population synthesis . ...... 216 Conclusion....................................... 217 Samenvatting 219 Introductie ...................................... 219 Hetlevenvaneenster... ............................ 219 ..metzijntweeën................................ 220 SupernovaevantypeIa............................. 223 Ditproefschrift .................................... 223 Hoofdstuk 2: Instabiele massa-overdracht . ..... 225 Hoofdstuk 3: Hoe efficiënt kan een witte dwerg groeien door accretie?................................. 226 Hoofdstuk 4: Variabiliteit van de snelheid van massa-overdracht naar witte dwergen ................................. 226 Hoofdstuk 5: Supernovae van type Ia veroorzaakt door samensmeltende dubbelewittedwergen . 227 Hoofdstuk 6: Het simuleren van dubbelsterpopulaties . ....... 228 Curriculum vitæ 229 List of Publications 231 Acknowledgements 233 iv Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 Stars A star is a sphere of gas and plasma that holds its shape through hydrostatic and thermal equilibrium. Hydrostatic equilibrium in a star is achieved by a balance between the force of gravity and the pressure gradient force. The force of gravity pushes the stellar material towards the center of the star, while the gas pressure pushes the material outwards into space. The combination of the pressure, density, temperature and chemical composition enforces that stars are gaseous throughout. When a star is in thermal equilibrium, the tem- perature of the gas is constant over time for a given radius. The temperature is maintained by energy production inside the star. Many energy sources are available, e.g. gravitational, chemical and thermonuclear energy, but only thermonuclear energy can account for the stellar luminosities and lifetimes. In a thermonuclear reaction (‘burning’), energy is pro- duced by the fusing of two nuclei into a more massive nucleus. Energy losses at the surfaces of stars is what we as observers on Earth perceive as starlight. 1.2 Stellar evolution of low- and intermediate-mass stars The equilibrium structure of a star slowly (and sometimes rapidly) changes in time as the energy production in the star changes. The long-term evolution of the star is driven by successive phases of nuclear burning. Initially stars mainly consist of hydrogen, which is fused into helium in the stellar core. This phase is known as the main-sequence phase. It 10 −2.8 lasts for about 90% of the stellar lifetime, which is approximately 10 (M/M⊙) yr, where 1 M is the mass of the star and M⊙ the mass of the Sun . When hydrogen is exhausted in the core, the star increases in size and becomes a giant. Core burning ceases, however, 1This is called the nuclear evolution timescale. 1 Chapter 1 : Introduction hydrogen burning continues in a shell around the inert core. Since the core is no longer supported by enough
Load more

Recommended publications
  • White Dwarf Compact Binary Model for Long Gamma-Ray Bursts
    MNRAS 000, 1–5 (0000) Preprint 6 October 2018 Compiled using MNRAS LATEX style file v3.0 A Black Hole - White Dwarf Compact Binary Model for Long Gamma-ray Bursts without Supernova Association Yi-Ze Dong, Wei-Min Gu ⋆, Tong Liu, and Junfeng Wang Department of Astronomy, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian 361005, China 6 October 2018 ABSTRACT Gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) are luminous and violent phenomena in the universe. Tra- ditionally, long GRBs are expected to be produced by the collapse of massive stars and associated with supernovae. However, some low-redshift long GRBs have no detection of supernova association, such as GRBs 060505, 060614 and 111005A. It is hard to classify these events convincingly according to usual classifications, and the lack of the supernova implies a non-massive star origin. We propose a new path to produce long GRBs without supernova association, the unstable and extremely violent accretion in a contact binary system consisting of a stellar-mass black hole and a white dwarf, which fills an important gap in compact binary evolution. Key words: accretion, accretion discs – stars: black holes – binaries: close gamma-ray burst: general – white dwarfs 1 INTRODUCTION X-ray binaries (UCXBs) (Nelemans & Jonker 2010) and the repeating fast radio burst (FRB 121102) (Gu et al. 2016). It is generally believed that long gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) In addition, the gravitational wave emission originating originate from the collapse of massive stars and are accom- from the merger of double BHs was detected by LIGO panied with supernovae (Woosley 1993; Woosley & Bloom (Abbott et al. 2016a,b).
    [Show full text]
  • Eclipsing Binary Pulsars
    Binary Radio Pulsars ASP Conference Series, Vol. 328, 2005 F. A. Rasio and I. H. Stairs Eclipsing Binary Pulsars Paulo C. C. Freire Arecibo Observatory, HC 3 Box 53995, Arecibo, PR 00612, USA Abstract. The ¯rst eclipsing binary pulsar, PSR B1957+20, was discovered in 1987. Since then, 13 other eclipsing low-mass binary pulsars have been found; 12 of these are in globular clusters. In this paper we list the known eclipsing bi- nary pulsars and their properties, with special attention to the eclipsing systems in 47 Tuc. We ¯nd that there are two fundamentally di®erent groups of eclipsing binary pulsars, separated by their companion masses. The less massive systems (M 0:02 M¯) are a product of predictable stellar evolution in binary pulsars. c » The systems with more massive companions (Mc 0:2 M¯) were formed by ex- change encounters in globular clusters, and for that»reason are exclusive to those environments. This class of systems can be used to learn about the neutron star recycling fraction in the globular clusters actively forming pulsars. We suggest that most of these binary systems are undetectable at radio wavelengths. 1. Introduction The ¯rst eclipsing binary pulsar, PSR B1957+12, was discovered in 1987 (Fruchter, Stinebring, & Taylor 1987). Since its discovery, 13 other eclipsing binary pulsars with low-mass companions have been found, these are listed in Table 1, with relevant refer- ences. Of these systems, 12 are found in globular clusters (GCs). To these we add a list of binary systems with companion masses smaller than 0:02 M¯ that are, as we will see, intimately related to a subset of the eclipsing binary systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Luminous Blue Variables
    Review Luminous Blue Variables Kerstin Weis 1* and Dominik J. Bomans 1,2,3 1 Astronomical Institute, Faculty for Physics and Astronomy, Ruhr University Bochum, 44801 Bochum, Germany 2 Department Plasmas with Complex Interactions, Ruhr University Bochum, 44801 Bochum, Germany 3 Ruhr Astroparticle and Plasma Physics (RAPP) Center, 44801 Bochum, Germany Received: 29 October 2019; Accepted: 18 February 2020; Published: 29 February 2020 Abstract: Luminous Blue Variables are massive evolved stars, here we introduce this outstanding class of objects. Described are the specific characteristics, the evolutionary state and what they are connected to other phases and types of massive stars. Our current knowledge of LBVs is limited by the fact that in comparison to other stellar classes and phases only a few “true” LBVs are known. This results from the lack of a unique, fast and always reliable identification scheme for LBVs. It literally takes time to get a true classification of a LBV. In addition the short duration of the LBV phase makes it even harder to catch and identify a star as LBV. We summarize here what is known so far, give an overview of the LBV population and the list of LBV host galaxies. LBV are clearly an important and still not fully understood phase in the live of (very) massive stars, especially due to the large and time variable mass loss during the LBV phase. We like to emphasize again the problem how to clearly identify LBV and that there are more than just one type of LBVs: The giant eruption LBVs or h Car analogs and the S Dor cycle LBVs.
    [Show full text]
  • The Endpoints of Stellar Evolution Answer Depends on the Star’S Mass Star Exhausts Its Nuclear Fuel - Can No Longer Provide Pressure to Support Itself
    The endpoints of stellar evolution Answer depends on the star’s mass Star exhausts its nuclear fuel - can no longer provide pressure to support itself. Gravity takes over, it collapses Low mass stars (< 8 Msun or so): End up with ‘white dwarf’ supported by degeneracy pressure. Wide range of structure and composition!!! Answer depends on the star’s mass Star exhausts its nuclear fuel - can no longer provide pressure to support itself. Gravity takes over, it collapses Higher mass stars (8-25 Msun or so): get a ‘neutron star’ supported by neutron degeneracy pressure. Wide variety of observed properties Answer depends on the star’s mass Star exhausts its nuclear fuel - can no longer provide pressure to support itself. Gravity takes over, it collapses Above about 25 Msun: we are left with a ‘black hole’ Black holes are astounding objects because of their simplicity (consider all the complicated physics to set all the macroscopic properties of a star that we have been through) - not unlike macroscopic elementary particles!! According to general relativity, the black hole properties are set by two numbers: mass and spin change of photon energies towards the gravitating mass the opposite when emitted Pound-Rebka experiment used atomic transition of Fe Important physical content for BH studies: general relativity has no intrisic scale instead, all important lengthscales and timescales are set by - and become proportional to the mass. Trick… Examine the energy… Why do we believe that black holes are inevitably created by gravitational collapse? Rather astounding that we go from such complicated initial conditions to such “clean”, simple objects! .
    [Show full text]
  • Stars IV Stellar Evolution Attendance Quiz
    Stars IV Stellar Evolution Attendance Quiz Are you here today? Here! (a) yes (b) no (c) my views are evolving on the subject Today’s Topics Stellar Evolution • An alien visits Earth for a day • A star’s mass controls its fate • Low-mass stellar evolution (M < 2 M) • Intermediate and high-mass stellar evolution (2 M < M < 8 M; M > 8 M) • Novae, Type I Supernovae, Type II Supernovae An Alien Visits for a Day • Suppose an alien visited the Earth for a day • What would it make of humans? • It might think that there were 4 separate species • A small creature that makes a lot of noise and leaks liquids • A somewhat larger, very energetic creature • A large, slow-witted creature • A smaller, wrinkled creature • Or, it might decide that there is one species and that these different creatures form an evolutionary sequence (baby, child, adult, old person) Stellar Evolution • Astronomers study stars in much the same way • Stars come in many varieties, and change over times much longer than a human lifetime (with some spectacular exceptions!) • How do we know they evolve? • We study stellar properties, and use our knowledge of physics to construct models and draw conclusions about stars that lead to an evolutionary sequence • As with stellar structure, the mass of a star determines its evolution and eventual fate A Star’s Mass Determines its Fate • How does mass control a star’s evolution and fate? • A main sequence star with higher mass has • Higher central pressure • Higher fusion rate • Higher luminosity • Shorter main sequence lifetime • Larger
    [Show full text]
  • A Stripped Helium Star in the Potential Black Hole Binary LB-1 A
    A&A 633, L5 (2020) Astronomy https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201937343 & c ESO 2020 Astrophysics LETTER TO THE EDITOR A stripped helium star in the potential black hole binary LB-1 A. Irrgang1, S. Geier2, S. Kreuzer1, I. Pelisoli2, and U. Heber1 1 Dr. Karl Remeis-Observatory & ECAP, Astronomical Institute, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Sternwartstr. 7, 96049 Bamberg, Germany e-mail: [email protected] 2 Institut für Physik und Astronomie, Universität Potsdam, Karl-Liebknecht-Str. 24/25, 14476 Potsdam, Germany Received 18 December 2019 / Accepted 1 January 2020 ABSTRACT +11 Context. The recently claimed discovery of a massive (MBH = 68−13 M ) black hole in the Galactic solar neighborhood has led to controversial discussions because it severely challenges our current view of stellar evolution. Aims. A crucial aspect for the determination of the mass of the unseen black hole is the precise nature of its visible companion, the B-type star LS V+22 25. Because stars of different mass can exhibit B-type spectra during the course of their evolution, it is essential to obtain a comprehensive picture of the star to unravel its nature and, thus, its mass. Methods. To this end, we study the spectral energy distribution of LS V+22 25 and perform a quantitative spectroscopic analysis that includes the determination of chemical abundances for He, C, N, O, Ne, Mg, Al, Si, S, Ar, and Fe. Results. Our analysis clearly shows that LS V+22 25 is not an ordinary main sequence B-type star. The derived abundance pattern exhibits heavy imprints of the CNO bi-cycle of hydrogen burning, that is, He and N are strongly enriched at the expense of C and O.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of the Astro2010 Recommendations on Variable Star Science
    The Impact of the Astro2010 Recommendations on Variable Star Science Corresponding Authors Lucianne M. Walkowicz Department of Astronomy, University of California Berkeley [email protected] phone: (510) 642–6931 Andrew C. Becker Department of Astronomy, University of Washington [email protected] phone: (206) 685–0542 Authors Scott F. Anderson, Department of Astronomy, University of Washington Joshua S. Bloom, Department of Astronomy, University of California Berkeley Leonid Georgiev, Universidad Autonoma de Mexico Josh Grindlay, Harvard–Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics Steve Howell, National Optical Astronomy Observatory Knox Long, Space Telescope Science Institute Anjum Mukadam, Department of Astronomy, University of Washington Andrej Prsa,ˇ Villanova University Joshua Pepper, Villanova University Arne Rau, California Institute of Technology Branimir Sesar, Department of Astronomy, University of Washington Nicole Silvestri, Department of Astronomy, University of Washington Nathan Smith, Department of Astronomy, University of California Berkeley Keivan Stassun, Vanderbilt University Paula Szkody, Department of Astronomy, University of Washington Science Frontier Panels: Stars and Stellar Evolution (SSE) February 16, 2009 Abstract The next decade of survey astronomy has the potential to transform our knowledge of variable stars. Stellar variability underpins our knowledge of the cosmological distance ladder, and provides direct tests of stellar formation and evolution theory. Variable stars can also be used to probe the fundamental physics of gravity and degenerate material in ways that are otherwise impossible in the laboratory. The computational and engineering advances of the past decade have made large–scale, time–domain surveys an immediate reality. Some surveys proposed for the next decade promise to gather more data than in the prior cumulative history of astronomy.
    [Show full text]
  • PSR J1740-3052: a Pulsar with a Massive Companion
    Haverford College Haverford Scholarship Faculty Publications Physics 2001 PSR J1740-3052: a Pulsar with a Massive Companion I. H. Stairs R. N. Manchester A. G. Lyne V. M. Kaspi Fronefield Crawford Haverford College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.haverford.edu/physics_facpubs Repository Citation "PSR J1740-3052: a Pulsar with a Massive Companion" I. H. Stairs, R. N. Manchester, A. G. Lyne, V. M. Kaspi, F. Camilo, J. F. Bell, N. D'Amico, M. Kramer, F. Crawford, D. J. Morris, A. Possenti, N. P. F. McKay, S. L. Lumsden, L. E. Tacconi-Garman, R. D. Cannon, N. C. Hambly, & P. R. Wood, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 325, 979 (2001). This Journal Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Physics at Haverford Scholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of Haverford Scholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 325, 979–988 (2001) PSR J174023052: a pulsar with a massive companion I. H. Stairs,1,2P R. N. Manchester,3 A. G. Lyne,1 V. M. Kaspi,4† F. Camilo,5 J. F. Bell,3 N. D’Amico,6,7 M. Kramer,1 F. Crawford,8‡ D. J. Morris,1 A. Possenti,6 N. P. F. McKay,1 S. L. Lumsden,9 L. E. Tacconi-Garman,10 R. D. Cannon,11 N. C. Hambly12 and P. R. Wood13 1University of Manchester, Jodrell Bank Observatory, Macclesfield, Cheshire SK11 9DL 2National Radio Astronomy Observatory, PO Box 2, Green Bank, WV 24944, USA 3Australia Telescope National Facility, CSIRO, PO Box 76, Epping, NSW 1710, Australia 4Physics Department, McGill University, 3600 University Street, Montreal, Quebec, H3A 2T8, Canada 5Columbia Astrophysics Laboratory, Columbia University, 550 W.
    [Show full text]
  • Fundamental Parameters of 4 Massive Eclipsing Binaries in Westerlund 1
    Active OB stars: structure, evolution, mass loss and critical limits Proceedings IAU Symposium No. 272, 2010 c 2010 International Astronomical Union C. Neiner, G. Wade, G. Meynet & G. Peters DOI: 00.0000/X000000000000000X Fundamental Parameters of 4 Massive Eclipsing Binaries in Westerlund 1 E. Koumpia and A.Z. Bonanos † National Observatory of Athens, Institute of Astronomy & Astrophysics, I. Metaxa & Vas. Pavlou St., Palaia Penteli GR-15236 Athens, Greece [email protected], [email protected] Abstract. Westerlund 1 is one of the most massive young clusters known in the Local Group, with an age of 3-5 Myr. It contains an assortment of rare evolved massive stars, such as blue, yellow and red supergiants, Wolf-Rayet stars, a luminous blue variable, and a magnetar, as well as 4 massive eclipsing binary systems (Wddeb, Wd13, Wd36, WR77o, see Bonanos 2007). The eclipsing binaries present a rare opportunity to constrain evolutionary models of massive stars, the distance to the cluster and furthermore, to determine a dynamical lower limit for the mass of a magnetar progenitor. Wddeb, being a detached system, is of great interest as it allows determination of the masses of 2 of the most massive unevolved stars in the cluster. We have analyzed spectra of all 4 eclipsing binaries, taken in 2007-2008 with the 6.5 meter Magellan telescope at Las Campanas Observatory, Chile, and present fundamental parameters (masses, radii) for their component stars. Keywords. open clusters and associations: individual (Westerlund 1), stars: fundamental pa- rameters, stars: early-type, binaries: eclipsing, stars: Wolf-Rayet 1. Introduction Westerlund 1 (Wd1) is one of the most massive compact young star clusters known in the Local Group.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution of Helium Star Plus Carbon-Oxygen White Dwarf Binary Systems and Implications for Diverse Stellar Transients and Hypervelocity Stars
    A&A 627, A14 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201935322 Astronomy c ESO 2019 & Astrophysics Evolution of helium star plus carbon-oxygen white dwarf binary systems and implications for diverse stellar transients and hypervelocity stars P. Neunteufel1, S.-C. Yoon2, and N. Langer1 1 Argelander Institut für Astronomy (AIfA), University of Bonn, Auf dem Hügel 71, 53121 Bonn, Germany e-mail: [email protected] 2 Department of Physics and Astronomy, Seoul National University, 599 Gwanak-ro, Gwanak-gu, Seoul 151-742, Korea Received 20 February 2019 / Accepted 28 April 2019 ABSTRACT Context. Helium accretion induced explosions in CO white dwarfs (WDs) are considered promising candidates for a number of observed types of stellar transients, including supernovae (SNe) of Type Ia and Type Iax. However, a clear favorite outcome has not yet emerged. Aims. We explore the conditions of helium ignition in the WD and the final fates of helium star-WD binaries as functions of their initial orbital periods and component masses. Methods. We computed 274 model binary systems with the Binary Evolution Code, in which both components are fully resolved. Both stellar and orbital evolution were computed including mass and angular momentum transfer, tides, gravitational wave emission, differential rotation, and internal hydrodynamic and magnetic angular momentum transport. We worked out the parts of the parameter space leading to detonations of the accreted helium layer on the WD, likely resulting in the complete disruption of the WD to deflagrations, where the CO core of the WD may remain intact and where helium ignition in the WD is avoided.
    [Show full text]
  • Stellar Evolution
    Stellar Astrophysics: Stellar Evolution 1 Stellar Evolution Update date: December 14, 2010 With the understanding of the basic physical processes in stars, we now proceed to study their evolution. In particular, we will focus on discussing how such processes are related to key characteristics seen in the HRD. 1 Star Formation From the virial theorem, 2E = −Ω, we have Z M 3kT M GMr = dMr (1) µmA 0 r for the hydrostatic equilibrium of a gas sphere with a total mass M. Assuming that the density is constant, the right side of the equation is 3=5(GM 2=R). If the left side is smaller than the right side, the cloud would collapse. For the given chemical composition, ρ and T , this criterion gives the minimum mass (called Jeans mass) of the cloud to undergo a gravitational collapse: 3 1=2 5kT 3=2 M > MJ ≡ : (2) 4πρ GµmA 5 For typical temperatures and densities of large molecular clouds, MJ ∼ 10 M with −1=2 a collapse time scale of tff ≈ (Gρ) . Such mass clouds may be formed in spiral density waves and other density perturbations (e.g., caused by the expansion of a supernova remnant or superbubble). What exactly happens during the collapse depends very much on the temperature evolution of the cloud. Initially, the cooling processes (due to molecular and dust radiation) are very efficient. If the cooling time scale tcool is much shorter than tff , −1=2 the collapse is approximately isothermal. As MJ / ρ decreases, inhomogeneities with mass larger than the actual MJ will collapse by themselves with their local tff , different from the initial tff of the whole cloud.
    [Show full text]
  • What Can Make a Contact Binary Star Explode? Evan Cook, Kenton Greene, and Prof
    What Can Make a Contact Binary Star Explode? Evan Cook, Kenton Greene, and Prof. Larry Molnar, Calvin College, Grand Rapids, Michigan, Summer 2017 Supported by the Dragt Family (EC), a VanderPlas Fellowship (KG), and the National Science Foundation (LM) Introduction Merger Mechanism What To Look For Contact binary stars orbit each other so closely that they share a common Fillout Factor: atmosphere. For millions of years, these stars orbit without significant change. L2 The degree of contact in Eventually, an as yet unknown mechanism causes them to spiral together, merge, a contact binary is called and explode. the fillout factor (Fig. 3). At the upper extreme, Three years ago, we identified a contact binary system, KIC 9832227, which we the surface approaches observe to be spiraling inwards, and which we now predict will explode in the year L (on the left in Fig. 3), 2022, give or take a year. This was the first ever prediction of a nova outburst. We 2 the point at which the are using this opportunity to try to discover the mechanism behind stellar outward centrifugal mergers. To explore this question this summer, we studied our system more Fig. 3. The black line is a cross section through force balances the intensively using both optical and X-ray telescopes. We determined a more the equator of our star. The gray lines show attractive gravitational accurate shape with the PHOEBE software package (see Fig. 1). And we began a the range of possible shapes for contact stars. Fig. 6. A Hubble Space Telescope image force. Material reaching survey of the shapes The fillout factor is a parameter from 0 to 1 of a red nova, V838 Mon, that exploded L flows away from the of other contact Fig.
    [Show full text]