81 Homology Mapping of the Primitive Archosaurian Reptile Palate on The

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

81 Homology Mapping of the Primitive Archosaurian Reptile Palate on The JO 81 Homology Mapping of the Primitive Archosaurian Reptile Palate on the Palate of Birds* Sam McDowell, Department of Zoology and Physiology, Rutgers University, Newark, New Jersey, 07102. Received October 6, 1978 ABSTRACT: The bone called "palatine" in birds, along with the bone called "pterygoid", together represent the homologue of the rep- tirlian pterygoid. The reptilian pterygoid has become divided by a hinge in birds as part of increased kinesis, just as the nasal bone has been divided into two bones by a hinge in many birds, as part of this same kinesis. In some birds (Phasiani, Anseres) there is a single division of the pterygoid, associated with Pfannenstiel- kinesis (primarily transverse rotation of the quadrate to broaden the gape), but most birds follow this division of the pterygoid with a second division after the nestling stage, this second di- vision being associated with Versluys-kinesis (primarily longitud- inal rotation of the quadrate, lifting the upper jaw when the lower jaw is depressed). The true homologue of the palatine in birds is the "maxillo-palatine" of "maxillary bone". Modern birds have pro- bably lost the true maxillary bone in the process of losing teeth. The parasphenoidal process called "basipterygoid process" in modern birds is not the homologue of the reptilian basipterygoid process (formed from the basitrabecular process with a ventral investment of parasphenoid); the true basipterygoid process is present in birds, however, as a vertical lamina between the orbital and tym- panic cavities, usually forming the lateral wall of a presphenoid air sinus. Because the dermal pterygoid of birds has become almost entirely free of (and ventral to) the endochondral palato-quadrate arcade ("orbital process of the quadrate"), the true basipterygoid process does not approach the pterygoid, but may (e.g. Spheniscidae) make a glancing contact with the orbital process of the quadrate. The pila antotica spuria is a morphologically extracranial support- ing strut for the part of the cranial wall giving origin to the levator pterygoideus muscle and is only one of several extracranial struts in this region that support the levator origin and define foramina for the oculomotor, abducens, trochlear, and various tri- geminal nerves that do not correspond to the primary (dural) for- amina for these nerves. It is possible that the pattern and con- tents of these foramina could be of taxonomic value in birds. ***************************$************************$*$**$****** -This communication is part of an unsolicited, handwritten letter I received from Sam McDowell in November 1976, with instructions to use any of the ideas contained therein as I saw fit. Having subsequently been impressed with the fact that much of systematic ornithology is based on unsubstantiated traditions, I realized McDowell's hypothesis, that the avian homologues of the elements of the reptilian palate were misidentified, to have a better than average chance of being correct. I have therefore submitted the pertinent portions of the text of McDowell's letter as received, with illustrations supplied later by McDowell, in the expectation that if nothing else, avian anatomists will be forced to produce a more rigorous justification for the nomenclature now in use for the avian palate than presently exists. Storrs L. Olson, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20560 Evolutionary Theory 4: 81-94 (December, 1978) The editors thank R. Carroll and M. Jollie for help in evaluating this paper. <g) 1978, the author 82 s. MCDOWELL At the time when Huxley, Kitchen Parker, Pycraft et al. were forming the traditions for labelling parts of the bird skull, little was known of the details of skull structure of fossil Archo- sauria or even of Crocodilia; the relationships of skeletal elements, bony protruberences, foramina and cavities to soft structures was largely unknown; and no attempt was made to catalogue which points on an archosaurian skull roust enlarge, which must be reduced, and which remain the same in a gradual transformation into the skull of a bird. The names of various structures of the bird skull (e, g, basipterygoid process, palatine bone, maxillopalatine process) reflect this period of imprecision. As more knowledge of the development of the vertebrate skull and of the skull structure of earlier archosaurs accumulated, no attempt was made to bring the naming of bird skull structures into conformity with that of reptiles. This has no serious consequences for most comparisons of birds with other birds, but it does confuse comparison of birds with reptiles and thus makes difficult the determination of what characters in birds are primitive (i.e., retentions of reptilian features) and what characters are spec- ialisations. The braincase and palate of early archosaurs was remarkably similar in details to that of lizards, except for the lack of a Squamatan peculiarity (separation of the vomer from the pterygoid by the palatine), and the contents of the cranial foramina, canals, and grooves can be inferred from those of lizards with at least as much confidence as the contents of the cranial foramina of a dog skull can be inferred from dissection of the head of a cat. This is important, because the only living (and dissectable) archosaurian reptiles, the Crocodilia, have departed more from the primitive archosaurian pattern in attachment of the palate to the braincase than have birds, and less is known about develop- ment of the crocodilian head. Sphaenodon [J.E. Gray's original spelling] is even better for Interpreting the skull of early fossil archosaurs, but adds very little that cannot be learned from lizards. The usual naming of bones in the palate of birds suggests a most remarkable transformation from the reptiles; the pterygoid flange and most of the muscles originating on the pterygoid of reptiles have been transferred to the palatine bone. I believe the "palatine" of birds is merely the anterior portion of the reptilian pterygoid, separated from the posterior part of the pterygoid by a new joint that has developed in the waist of the pterygolds, just behind the pterygoid flanges(Figure 1). The *+**********************$************************************** Figure 1 (to right). Homo1ogles here proposed for palatal struc- tures between (on left) the primitive thecodont archosaur Protero- suohus (after Cruickshank) and (on right) a modern bird, Dlomedea. Abbreciations: bpp, true basipterygoid process, formed from basl- trabecular process of chondrocranium with parasphenoid addition; ept, ectopterygoid ("os lachrymopalatinum" or "os uncinatum" of Dlomedea); iral, intermuscular lamina of pterygoid (pre-pterygoid) of birds, without homologue in Proterosuchus; iof, infraorbltal fenestra; ipth, intra-pterygoid hinge, without homologue in rep- tiles; jug, jugal bone (fused to adjacent bones in birds); lpf, lateral end of pterygoid flange; m, maxilla (lost in modern birds); mpf, medial end of pterygoid flange; opf, orbital process of quad- PALATE OF BIRDS AND REPTILES 83 rate bone; pal, palatine bone ("maxillopalatine" of birds); pttr, middle pterygoid tooth row of Proterpsuchus, represented in Dio- medea by the edge of the nasopharyngial duct opening; qj, quadrato- jugal bone (fused to jugal in birds); qrpt, quadrate raraus of pterygoid bone (post-pterygold of birds, "pterygoid bone" of birds according to other authors); vom, vomer (separate in Proterpsuchus, but partially fused to its fellow In birds and most archosaurs ); vpt, vomerine process of pterygoid; zpp, zygomatic process of palatine, forming lateral border of infraorbital fenestra in Proterpsuchus, fused to jugal in birds. 84 s. MCDOWELL "palatine"-pterygoid joint of birds is functionally linked to the Versluys-kinesis [i shall explain this term below] of the skull that elevates the upper beak when the lower end of the quadrate and palate slide forwards in opening the mouth. The other major joint involved in Versluys-kinesis is across the nasal bones. In most birds, the nasal hinge involves only an histological change in the bone, a transverse zone of fibrous and elastic bone across the nasals; but in parrots, boobies, and some other birds, the nasal bone becomes completely divided into anterior and posterior parts by joint capsule. I suggest that the reptilian pterygoid has been similarly divided into anterior and posterior portions by a joint capsule in birds (the fusion of "palatine" and ptery- goid in some birds, such as the hawfinch, is probably secondary). Even conventional ornithology accepts this for the majority of birds. Pycraft showed (most succinctly in Journal of the Linnean Society, London, Zoology, vol. 28: pp. 3^3-357, pis. 31, 32) that the definitive ^palatine"-pterygoid joint of most "Neognathae" lies entirely within the pterygoid of the nestling and the anterior end of the nestling pterygoid is thus cut off as a "hemipterygoid" to fuse with the palatine. In Anatidae and (according to Pycraft) Phasiani this does not occur, and Pycraft interpreted the "paleo- gnathous" or "dromeognathous" palate as a consequence of either fusion of the hemipterygoid with the vomer (a later interpretation) or failure of the pterygoid to segment into hemipterygoid and de- finitive pterygoid. Jollie (1957, Journal of Morphology, vol. 100, pp. 389-436) showed that in Phasiani (at least Gallus) the condition is not as in Anatidae; rather, the "pterygoid" has its anterior ("hemipterygoid") portion separated off at the inception of ossification from the rest of the pterygoid and is
Recommended publications
  • D Inosaur Paleobiology
    Topics in Paleobiology The study of dinosaurs has been experiencing a remarkable renaissance over the past few decades. Scientifi c understanding of dinosaur anatomy, biology, and evolution has advanced to such a degree that paleontologists often know more about 100-million-year-old dinosaurs than many species of living organisms. This book provides a contemporary review of dinosaur science intended for students, researchers, and dinosaur enthusiasts. It reviews the latest knowledge on dinosaur anatomy and phylogeny, Brusatte how dinosaurs functioned as living animals, and the grand narrative of dinosaur evolution across the Mesozoic. A particular focus is on the fossil evidence and explicit methods that allow paleontologists to study dinosaurs in rigorous detail. Scientifi c knowledge of dinosaur biology and evolution is shifting fast, Dinosaur and this book aims to summarize current understanding of dinosaur science in a technical, but accessible, style, supplemented with vivid photographs and illustrations. Paleobiology Dinosaur The Topics in Paleobiology Series is published in collaboration with the Palaeontological Association, Paleobiology and is edited by Professor Mike Benton, University of Bristol. Stephen Brusatte is a vertebrate paleontologist and PhD student at Columbia University and the American Museum of Natural History. His research focuses on the anatomy, systematics, and evolution of fossil vertebrates, especially theropod dinosaurs. He is particularly interested in the origin of major groups such Stephen L. Brusatte as dinosaurs, birds, and mammals. Steve is the author of over 40 research papers and three books, and his work has been profi led in The New York Times, on BBC Television and NPR, and in many other press outlets.
    [Show full text]
  • HOVASAURUS BOULEI, an AQUATIC EOSUCHIAN from the UPPER PERMIAN of MADAGASCAR by P.J
    99 Palaeont. afr., 24 (1981) HOVASAURUS BOULEI, AN AQUATIC EOSUCHIAN FROM THE UPPER PERMIAN OF MADAGASCAR by P.J. Currie Provincial Museum ofAlberta, Edmonton, Alberta, T5N OM6, Canada ABSTRACT HovasauTUs is the most specialized of four known genera of tangasaurid eosuchians, and is the most common vertebrate recovered from the Lower Sakamena Formation (Upper Per­ mian, Dzulfia n Standard Stage) of Madagascar. The tail is more than double the snout-vent length, and would have been used as a powerful swimming appendage. Ribs are pachyostotic in large animals. The pectoral girdle is low, but massively developed ventrally. The front limb would have been used for swimming and for direction control when swimming. Copious amounts of pebbles were swallowed for ballast. The hind limbs would have been efficient for terrestrial locomotion at maturity. The presence of long growth series for Ho vasaurus and the more terrestrial tan~saurid ThadeosauTUs presents a unique opportunity to study differences in growth strategies in two closely related Permian genera. At birth, the limbs were relatively much shorter in Ho vasaurus, but because of differences in growth rates, the limbs of Thadeosau­ rus are relatively shorter at maturity. It is suggested that immature specimens of Ho vasauTUs spent most of their time in the water, whereas adults spent more time on land for mating, lay­ ing eggs and/or range dispersal. Specilizations in the vertebrae and carpus indicate close re­ lationship between Youngina and the tangasaurids, but eliminate tangasaurids from consider­ ation as ancestors of other aquatic eosuchians, archosaurs or sauropterygians. CONTENTS Page ABREVIATIONS . ..... ... ......... .......... ... ......... ..... ... ..... .. .... 101 INTRODUCTION .
    [Show full text]
  • Laryngology and Otology
    The Journal of Laryngology and Otology {Founded in 1887 by MORRELL MACKENZIE OK^NORRIS WOI.FF.NDFN) November 1978 Infratemporal fossa approach to tumours of the temporal bone and base of the skull* By U. FISCH (Zurich) IN spite of the translabyrinthine and middle cranial fossa approaches, tumours situated in the infralabyrinthine and apical regions of the pyramid and surrounding portions of the base of the skull remain a surgical chal- lenge for neurosurgeons and otolaryngologists as well. The transpalatal- transpharyngeal route proposed by Mullan et al. (1966) and the trans- cochlear approach of House and Hitselberger (1976) do not provide adequate exposure for large glomus jugulare tumours, clivus chordomas, cholesteatomas and carcinomas invading the pyramid tip and skull base. The proper management of these lesions requires a larger approach per- mitting exposure of the internal carotid artery from the carotid foramen to the cavernous sinus (Fig. 1). The infratemporal fossa exposure presented in this paper is a possible solution to this problem. The basic features of the proposed lateral approach to the skull base are: (a) the permanent anterior displacement of the facial nerve, (b) the subluxation or permanent resection of the mandibular condyle, (c) the temporary displacement of the zygomatic arch, and (d) the subtotal petrosectomy with obliteration of the middle ear cleft. Three different types of infratemporal fossa approach have developed from the experience gained in 51 patients. They will be described and illustrated with typical cases. Surgical technique The realization of the infratemporal fossa approach to the pyramid tip and base of the skull has been hampered by difficulties in handling the following structures (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Biology of the Rabbit
    Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science Vol 45, No 1 Copyright 2006 January 2006 by the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science Pages 8–24 Historical Special Topic Overview on Rabbit Comparative Biology Biology of the Rabbit Nathan R. Brewer Editor’s note: In recognition of Dr. Nathan Brewer’s many years of dedicated service to AALAS and the community of research animal care specialists, the premier issue of JAALAS includes the following compilation of Dr. Brewer’s essays on rabbit anatomy and physiology. These essays were originally published in the ASLAP newsletter (formerly called Synapse), and are reprinted here with the permission and endorsement of that organization. I would like to thank Nina Hahn, Jane Lacher, and Nancy Austin for assistance in compiling these essays. Publishing this information in JAALAS allows Dr. Brewer’s work to become part of the searchable literature for laboratory animal science and medicine and also assures that the literature references and information he compiled will not be lost to posterity. However, readers should note that this material has undergone only minor editing for style, has not been edited for content, and, most importantly, has not undergone peer review. With the agreement of the associate editors and the AALAS leadership, I elected to forego peer review of this work, in contradiction to standard JAALAS policy, based on the status of this material as pre-published information from an affiliate organization that holds the copyright and on the esteem in which we hold for Dr. Brewer as a founding father of our organization.
    [Show full text]
  • Craniofacial Morphology of Simosuchus Clarki (Crocodyliformes: Notosuchia) from the Late Cretaceous of Madagascar
    Society of Vertebrate Paleontology Memoir 10 Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology Volume 30, Supplement to Number 6: 13–98, November 2010 © 2010 by the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology CRANIOFACIAL MORPHOLOGY OF SIMOSUCHUS CLARKI (CROCODYLIFORMES: NOTOSUCHIA) FROM THE LATE CRETACEOUS OF MADAGASCAR NATHAN J. KLEY,*,1 JOSEPH J. W. SERTICH,1 ALAN H. TURNER,1 DAVID W. KRAUSE,1 PATRICK M. O’CONNOR,2 and JUSTIN A. GEORGI3 1Department of Anatomical Sciences, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, 11794-8081, U.S.A., [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; 2Department of Biomedical Sciences, Ohio University College of Osteopathic Medicine, Athens, Ohio 45701, U.S.A., [email protected]; 3Department of Anatomy, Arizona College of Osteopathic Medicine, Midwestern University, Glendale, Arizona 85308, U.S.A., [email protected] ABSTRACT—Simosuchus clarki is a small, pug-nosed notosuchian crocodyliform from the Late Cretaceous of Madagascar. Originally described on the basis of a single specimen including a remarkably complete and well-preserved skull and lower jaw, S. clarki is now known from five additional specimens that preserve portions of the craniofacial skeleton. Collectively, these six specimens represent all elements of the head skeleton except the stapedes, thus making the craniofacial skeleton of S. clarki one of the best and most completely preserved among all known basal mesoeucrocodylians. In this report, we provide a detailed description of the entire head skeleton of S. clarki, including a portion of the hyobranchial apparatus. The two most complete and well-preserved specimens differ substantially in several size and shape variables (e.g., projections, angulations, and areas of ornamentation), suggestive of sexual dimorphism.
    [Show full text]
  • A Small Lepidosauromorph Reptile from the Early Triassic of Poland
    A SMALL LEPIDOSAUROMORPH REPTILE FROM THE EARLY TRIASSIC OF POLAND SUSAN E. EVANS and MAGDALENA BORSUK−BIAŁYNICKA Evans, S.E. and Borsuk−Białynicka, M. 2009. A small lepidosauromorph reptile from the Early Triassic of Poland. Palaeontologia Polonica 65, 179–202. The Early Triassic karst deposits of Czatkowice quarry near Kraków, southern Poland, has yielded a diversity of fish, amphibians and small reptiles. Two of these reptiles are lepido− sauromorphs, a group otherwise very poorly represented in the Triassic record. The smaller of them, Sophineta cracoviensis gen. et sp. n., is described here. In Sophineta the unspecial− ised vertebral column is associated with the fairly derived skull structure, including the tall facial process of the maxilla, reduced lacrimal, and pleurodonty, that all resemble those of early crown−group lepidosaurs rather then stem−taxa. Cladistic analysis places this new ge− nus as the sister group of Lepidosauria, displacing the relictual Middle Jurassic genus Marmoretta and bringing the origins of Lepidosauria closer to a realistic time frame. Key words: Reptilia, Lepidosauria, Triassic, phylogeny, Czatkowice, Poland. Susan E. Evans [[email protected]], Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, Uni− versity College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK. Magdalena Borsuk−Białynicka [[email protected]], Institut Paleobiologii PAN, Twarda 51/55, PL−00−818 Warszawa, Poland. Received 8 March 2006, accepted 9 January 2007 180 SUSAN E. EVANS and MAGDALENA BORSUK−BIAŁYNICKA INTRODUCTION Amongst living reptiles, lepidosaurs (snakes, lizards, amphisbaenians, and tuatara) form the largest and most successful group with more than 7 000 widely distributed species. The two main lepidosaurian clades are Rhynchocephalia (the living Sphenodon and its extinct relatives) and Squamata (lizards, snakes and amphisbaenians).
    [Show full text]
  • Records from the Aalenian–Bajocian of Patagonia (Argentina): an Overview
    Geol. Mag.: page 1 of 11. c Cambridge University Press 2013 1 doi:10.1017/S0016756813000058 Ophthalmosaurian (Ichthyosauria) records from the Aalenian–Bajocian of Patagonia (Argentina): an overview ∗ MARTA S. FERNÁNDEZ † & MARIANELLA TALEVI‡ ∗ División Palaeontología Vertebrados, Museo de La Plata, Paseo del Bosque s/n, 1900 La Plata, Argentina. CONICET ‡Instituto de Investigación en Paleobiología y Geología, Universidad Nacional de Río Negro, 8332 General Roca, Río Negro, Argentina. CONICET (Received 12 September 2012; accepted 11 January 2013) Abstract – The oldest ophthalmosaurian records worldwide have been recovered from the Aalenian– Bajocian boundary of the Neuquén Basin in Central-West Argentina (Mendoza and Neuquén provinces). Although scarce, they document a poorly known period in the evolutionary history of parvipelvian ichthyosaurs. In this contribution we present updated information on these fossils, including a phylogenetic analysis, and a redescription of ‘Stenopterygius grandis’ Cabrera, 1939. Patagonian ichthyosaur occurrences indicate that during the Bajocian the Neuquén Basin palaeogulf, on the southern margins of the Palaeopacific Ocean, was inhabited by at least three morphologically discrete taxa: the slender Stenopterygius cayi, robust ophthalmosaurian Mollesaurus periallus and another indeterminate ichthyosaurian. Rib bone tissue structure indicates that rib cages of Bajocian ichthyosaurs included forms with dense rib microstructure (Mollesaurus) and forms with an ‘osteoporotic-like’ pattern (Stenopterygius cayi). Keywords: Mollesaurus,‘Stenopterygius grandis’, Middle Jurassic, Neuquén Basin, Argentina. 1. Introduction all Callovian and post-Callovian ichthyosaurs, two different Early Jurassic taxa have been proposed as Ichthyosaurs were one of the main predators in the ophthalmosaurian sister taxa: Stenopterygius (Maisch oceans all over the world during most of the Mesozoic & Matzke, 2000; Sander, 2000; Druckenmiller & (Massare, 1987).
    [Show full text]
  • Characters of American Jurassic Dinosaurs. Part VIII. the Order Theropoda
    328 Scientific Intelligence. selves in the first spiral coil of 0. tenuissima are what constitute the essential difference between the spire of Cornuspira and that of Spirolocidina; marking an imperfect septal division of the spire into chambers, which cannot be conceived to affect in any way the physiological condition of. the contained animal, but which foreshadows the complete septal division that marks the assumption of the Peneropline stage. Again, the incipient widen- ing-out of the body, previously to the formation of the first complete septum, prepares the way for that great lateral exten­ sion which characterizes the next or Orbiculine stage ; this exten­ sion being obviously related, on the one hand, to the division of the chamber-segments of the body into chamberletted sub-seg­ ments, and, on the other, to the extension of the zonal chambers round the ' nucleus,' so as to complete them into aunuli, from APPENDIX. which all subsequent increase shall take place on the cyclical plan. "In 0. marginalia, the first spiral stage is abbreviated by the drawing-together (as it were) of the ' spiroloculine' coil into a single Milioline turn of greater thickness ; but the Orbiculine or second spiral stage is fully retained. In Q. duplex, the abbreviated. Milioline center is still retained, but the succeeding Orbiculine ART. X X X VI-I I. — Prmcvpal Characters of American spiral is almost entirely dropped out, quickly giving place to the Jurassic Dinosaurs ', by Professor 0. 0. MAESH. Part cyclical plan. And in the typical 0. complanctta the Milioline center is immediately surrounded by a complete annulus, so YIII.
    [Show full text]
  • Anatomy and Relationships of the Triassic Temnospondyl Sclerothorax
    Anatomy and relationships of the Triassic temnospondyl Sclerothorax RAINER R. SCHOCH, MICHAEL FASTNACHT, JÜRGEN FICHTER, and THOMAS KELLER Schoch, R.R., Fastnacht, M., Fichter, J., and Keller, T. 2007. Anatomy and relationships of the Triassic temnospondyl Sclerothorax. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 52 (1): 117–136. Recently, new material of the peculiar tetrapod Sclerothorax hypselonotus from the Middle Buntsandstein (Olenekian) of north−central Germany has emerged that reveals the anatomy of the skull and anterior postcranial skeleton in detail. Despite differences in preservation, all previous plus the new finds of Sclerothorax are identified as belonging to the same taxon. Sclerothorax is characterized by various autapomorphies (subquadrangular skull being widest in snout region, ex− treme height of thoracal neural spines in mid−trunk region, rhomboidal interclavicle longer than skull). Despite its pecu− liar skull roof, the palate and mandible are consistent with those of capitosauroid stereospondyls in the presence of large muscular pockets on the basal plate, a flattened edentulous parasphenoid, a long basicranial suture, a large hamate process in the mandible, and a falciform crest in the occipital part of the cheek. In order to elucidate the phylogenetic position of Sclerothorax, we performed a cladistic analysis of 18 taxa and 70 characters from all parts of the skeleton. According to our results, Sclerothorax is nested well within the higher stereospondyls, forming the sister taxon of capitosauroids. Palaeobiologically, Sclerothorax is interesting for its several characters believed to correlate with a terrestrial life, although this is contrasted by the possession of well−established lateral line sulci. Key words: Sclerothorax, Temnospondyli, Stereospondyli, Buntsandstein, Triassic, Germany.
    [Show full text]
  • Heptasuchus Clarki, from the ?Mid-Upper Triassic, Southeastern Big Horn Mountains, Central Wyoming (USA)
    The osteology and phylogenetic position of the loricatan (Archosauria: Pseudosuchia) Heptasuchus clarki, from the ?Mid-Upper Triassic, southeastern Big Horn Mountains, Central Wyoming (USA) † Sterling J. Nesbitt1, John M. Zawiskie2,3, Robert M. Dawley4 1 Department of Geosciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA 2 Cranbrook Institute of Science, Bloomfield Hills, MI, USA 3 Department of Geology, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA 4 Department of Biology, Ursinus College, Collegeville, PA, USA † Deceased author. ABSTRACT Loricatan pseudosuchians (known as “rauisuchians”) typically consist of poorly understood fragmentary remains known worldwide from the Middle Triassic to the end of the Triassic Period. Renewed interest and the discovery of more complete specimens recently revolutionized our understanding of the relationships of archosaurs, the origin of Crocodylomorpha, and the paleobiology of these animals. However, there are still few loricatans known from the Middle to early portion of the Late Triassic and the forms that occur during this time are largely known from southern Pangea or Europe. Heptasuchus clarki was the first formally recognized North American “rauisuchian” and was collected from a poorly sampled and disparately fossiliferous sequence of Triassic strata in North America. Exposed along the trend of the Casper Arch flanking the southeastern Big Horn Mountains, the type locality of Heptasuchus clarki occurs within a sequence of red beds above the Alcova Limestone and Crow Mountain formations within the Chugwater Group. The age of the type locality is poorly constrained to the Middle—early Late Triassic and is Submitted 17 June 2020 Accepted 14 September 2020 likely similar to or just older than that of the Popo Agie Formation assemblage from Published 27 October 2020 the western portion of Wyoming.
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.Ontogeny of the Cranial Bones of the Giant Amazon River
    Acta Scientiarum. Biological Sciences ISSN: 1679-9283 [email protected] Universidade Estadual de Maringá Brasil Gonçalves Vieira, Lucélia; Quagliatto Santos, André Luiz; Campos Lima, Fabiano Ontogeny of the cranial bones of the giant amazon river turtle Podocnemis expansa Schweigger, 1812 (Testudines, Podocnemididae) Acta Scientiarum. Biological Sciences, vol. 32, núm. 2, 2010, pp. 181-188 Universidade Estadual de Maringá .png, Brasil Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=187114387012 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative DOI: 10.4025/actascibiolsci.v32i2.5777 Ontogeny of the cranial bones of the giant amazon river turtle Podocnemis expansa Schweigger, 1812 (Testudines, Podocnemididae) Lucélia Gonçalves Vieira*, André Luiz Quagliatto Santos and Fabiano Campos Lima Laboratório de Pesquisas em Animais Silvestres, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, Av. João Naves De Avila, 2121, 38408-100, Uberlandia, Minas Gerais, Brazil. *Author for correspondence. E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT. In order to determine the normal stages of formation in the sequence of ossification of the cranium of Podocnemis expansa in its various stages of development, embryos were collected starting on the 18th day of natural incubation and were subjected to bone diaphanization and staining. In the neurocranium, the basisphenoid and basioccipital bones present ossification centers in stage 19, the supraoccipital and opisthotic in stage 20, the exoccipital in stage 21, and lastly the prooptic in stage 24. Dermatocranium: the squamosal, pterygoid and maxilla are the first elements to begin the ossification process, which occurs in stage 16.
    [Show full text]
  • Paleontological Skill and the Role of the Fossil Preparator
    Methods in Preparation Proceedings of the First Annual Fossil Preparation and Collections Symposium Edited by Matthew A. Brown, John F. Kane, and William G. Parker Petrified Forest, 2009 ISBN 1-11111-111-1 All Copyrights retained by individual authors ©2009 Cover design by Matthew Brown. Main image: A newly opened field jacket in the preparation lab. TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE v Matthew Brown and William Parker FOREWARD vi Gregory Brown ARTICLES PREPARATION IN ACTION: PALEONTOLOGICAL SKILL AND 3 THE ROLE OF THE FOSSIL PREPARATOR Caitlin Wylie WORKING FOSSIL LABORATORIES AS PUBLIC EXHIBITIONS 13 Annette Gavigan DINOSAURS, MUSEUMS, AND THE MODERNIZATION OF AMERICAN 21 FOSSIL PREPARATION AT THE TURN OF THE 20TH CENTURY Paul Brinkman FOSSIL PREPARATION TEST: AN INDICATION OF MANUAL SKILLS 35 Lisa Bergwall MICROPREPARATION: ONE SAND GRAIN AT A TIME 41 Jean Pierre Cavigelli AN INTRODUCTION TO SOLUTION AND REACTION 53 ADHESIVES FOR FOSSIL PREPARATION Amy Davidson and Samantha Alderson ROTTEN WOOD IN SAND: DIFFICULT PREPARATION OF A LARGE 63 THEROPOD Anthony Maltese HISTOLOGICAL CORE DRILLING: A LESS DESTRUCTIVE 69 METHOD FOR STUDYING BONE HISTOLOGY Koen Stein and Martin Sander CREATING A MULTI-USE POLYURETHANE MOLD WITH A 81 REPLACEABLE POUR SPOUT Michael Cherney THE USE OF LINEAR COLLAPSIBLE FOAM FOR MOLDING ICHNOFOSSILS 87 IN THE FIELD Thomas Nolan, Rob Atkinson, and Bryan Small INEXPENSIVE AND SIMPLE CONSTRUCTION OF A MANUAL 93 CENTRIFUGE FOR RESIN CASTING Daniel Erickson PACKING METHODS FOR DOMESTIC AND INTERNATIONAL 97 FOSSIL SHIPPING ReBecca
    [Show full text]