NO. 13-461 In The Supreme Court of the United States AMERICAN BROADCASTING COMPANIES, et al., Petitioners, –v– AEREO, INC., f/k/a BAMBOOM LABS, INC., Respondent. On Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit BRIEF OF AMICUS CURIAE THE PATENT, TRADEMARK, & COPYRIGHT SECTION OF THE BAR ASSOCIATION OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA IN SUPPORT OF NEITHER PARTY BRYCE MAYNARD KELU SULLIVAN BUCHANAN INGERSOLL & COUNSEL OF RECORD ROONEY PC BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP 1737 KING STREET 1050 CONNECTICUT AVE. NW SUITE 500 SUITE 1100 ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314 WASHINGTON, DC 20036 (703) 838-6625 (202) 861-1532
[email protected] MARCH 3, 2014 COUNSEL FOR AMICUS CURIAE SUPREME COURT PRESS ♦ (888) 958-5705 ♦ BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS i TABLE OF CONTENTS Page TABLE OF AUTHORITIES ....................................... ii STATEMENT OF INTEREST OF AMICUS CURIAE ................................................................ 1 SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT .................................... 2 ARGUMENT ............................................................... 3 I. EBAY REJECTED CATEGORICAL PRESUMPTIONS OF IRREPARABLE HARM .............................................................. 3 II. THE COURTS SHOULD CONSIDER WHETHER THE BROADCASTERS’ ALLEGED IRREPARABLE INJURIES COULD BE COMPENSATED FULLY THROUGH MONETARY DAMAGES ............ 6 III. THE EFFECTS OF AN INJUNCTION ON AEREO SHOULD BE BALANCED AGAINST THE BROADCASTERS’ ALLEGED INJURIES ................................. 12 IV. THE PUBLIC’S INTEREST NEEDS TO BE FULLY CONSIDERED ........................... 14 CONCLUSION .......................................................... 18 ii TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Page TABLE OF AUTHORITIES CASES American Broadcasting Co. v. Aereo, Inc., 874 F.Supp.2d 373 (S.D.N.Y. 2012) .... 6, 8, 14, 16 Apple Computer, Inc. v. Franklin Computer Corp., 714 F.2d 1240 (3d Cir. 1983) .................. 10 Autoskill Inc. v. Nat’l Educ. Support Sys., Inc., 994 F.2d 1476 (10th Cir. 1993) ...........................