11.2 Relative Ages of Rocks

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

11.2 Relative Ages of Rocks 11.2. Relative Ages of Rocks www.ck12.org 11.2 Relative Ages of Rocks Lesson Objectives • Explain Steno#8217;s laws of superposition and original horizontality. • Based on a geological cross-section, identify the oldest and youngest formations. • Explain what an unconformity represents. • Know how to use fossils to correlate rock layers. Vocabulary • biozone • cross-cutting relationships • geologic time scale • key bed • lateral continuity • microfossil • original horizontality • relative age • superposition • unconformity • uniformitarianism Introduction Something that we hope you have learned from these lessons and from your own life experience is that the laws of nature never change. They are the same today as they were billions of years ago. Water freezes at 0o C at 1 atmosphere pressure; this is always true. Knowing that natural laws never change helps scientists understand Earth#8217;s past because it allows them to interpret clues about how things happened long ago. Geologists always use present-day processes to interpret the past. If you find a fossil of a fish in a dry terrestrial environment did the fish flop around on land? Did the rock form in water and then move? Since fish do not flop around on land today, the explanation that adheres to the philosophy that natural laws do not change is that the rock moved. Fossils were Living Organisms In 1666, a young doctor named Nicholas Steno dissected the head of an enormous great white shark that had been caught by fisherman near Florence, Italy. Steno was struck by the resemblance of the shark#8217;s teeth to fossils found in inland mountains and hills (Figure 11.14). Most people at the time did not believe that fossils were once part of living creatures. Authors in that day thought that the fossils of marine animals found in tall mountains, miles from any ocean could be explained in one of two ways: • The shells were washed up during the Biblical flood. (This explanation could not account for the fact that 328 www.ck12.org Chapter 11. HS Evidence About Earth’s Past FIGURE 11.14 Fossil Shark Tooth (left) and Modern Shark Tooth (right). fossils were not only found on mountains, but also within mountains, in rocks that had been quarried from deep below Earth#8217;s surface.) • The fossils formed within the rocks as a result of mysterious forces. But for Steno, the close resemblance between fossils and modern organisms was impossible to ignore. Instead of invoking supernatural forces, Steno concluded that fossils were once parts of living creatures. He then sought to explain how fossil seashells could be found in rocks and mountains far from any ocean. This led him to the ideas that are discussed below. Superposition of Rock Layers Steno proposed that if a rock contained the fossils of marine animals, the rock formed from sediments that were deposited on the seafloor. These rocks were then uplifted to become mountains. Based on these assumptions, Steno made a remarkable series of conjectures that are now known as Steno#8217;s Laws. These laws are illustrated below in (Figure 11.15). Other scientists observed rock layers and formulated other principles. Geologist William Smith (1769-1839) identi- fied the principle of faunal succession, which recognizes that: • Some fossil types are never found with certain other fossil types (e.g. human ancestors are never found with dinosaurs) meaning that fossils in a rock layer represent what lived during the period the rock was deposited. • Older features are replaced by more modern features in fossil organisms as species change through time; e.g. feathered dinosaurs precede birds in the fossil record. • Fossil species with features that change distinctly and quickly can be used to determine the age of rock layers quite precisely. Scottish geologist, James Hutton (1726-1797) recognized the principle of cross-cutting relationships. This helps geologists to determine the older and younger of two rock units (Figure 11.16). The Grand Canyon provides an excellent illustration of the principles above. The many horizontal layers of sedi- mentary rock illustrate the principle of original horizontality (Figure 11.17). • The youngest rock layers are at the top and the oldest are at the bottom, which is described by the law of superposition. • Distinctive rock layers, such as the Kaibab Limestone, are matched across the broad expanse of the canyon. These rock layers were once connected, as stated by the rule of lateral continuity. 329 11.2. Relative Ages of Rocks www.ck12.org FIGURE 11.15 (a) Original Horizontality: Sediments are deposited in fairly flat, horizontal layers. If a sedimentary rock is found tilted, the layer was tilted after it was formed. (b) Lateral continuity: Sediments are deposited in continuous sheets that span the body of water that they are deposited in. When a valley cuts through sedimentary layers, it is assumed that the rocks on either side of the valley were originally continuous. (c) Superposition: Sedimentary rocks are deposited one on top of another. The youngest layers are found at the top of the sequence, and the oldest layers are found at the bottom. • The Colorado River cuts through all the layers of rock to form the canyon. Based on the principle of cross- cutting relationships, the river must be younger than all of the rock layers that it cuts through. Determining the Relative Ages of Rocks Steno#8217;s and Smith#8217;s principles are essential for determining the relative ages of rocks and rock layers. In the process of relative dating, scientists do not determine the exact age of a fossil or rock but look at a sequence of rocks to try to decipher the times that an event occurred relative to the other events represented in that sequence. The relative age of a rock then is its age in comparison with other rocks. If you know the relative ages of two rock layers, (1) Do you know which is older and which is younger? (2) Do you know how old the layers are in years? An interactive website on relative ages and geologic time is found here: http://www.ucmp.berkeley.edu/education/e xplorations/tours/geotime/gtpage1.html In some cases, it is very tricky to determine the sequence of events that leads to a certain formation. Can you figure out what happened in what order in (Figure 11.18)? Write it down and then check the following paragraphs. The principle of cross-cutting relationships states that a fault or intrusion is younger than the rocks that it cuts through. The fault cuts through all three sedimentary rock layers (A, B, and C) and also the intrusion (D). So the 330 www.ck12.org Chapter 11. HS Evidence About Earth’s Past FIGURE 11.16 If an igneous dike (B) cuts a series of metamorphic rocks (A), which is older and which is younger? In this image, A must have existed first for B to cut across it. FIGURE 11.17 The Grand Canyon, with the Kaibab Lime- stone marked with arrows. fault must be the youngest feature. The intrusion (D) cuts through the three sedimentary rock layers, so it must be younger than those layers. By the law of superposition, C is the oldest sedimentary rock, B is younger and A is still younger. The full sequence of events is: 1. Layer C formed. 2. Layer B formed. 331 11.2. Relative Ages of Rocks www.ck12.org FIGURE 11.18 A geologic cross section: Sedimentary rocks (A-C), igneous intrusion (D), fault (E). 3. Layer A formed. 4. After layers A-B-C were present, intrusion D cut across all three. 5. Fault E formed, shifting rocks A through C and intrusion D. 6. Weathering and erosion created a layer of soil on top of layer A. Earth#8217;s Age During Steno#8217;s time, most Europeans believed that the Earth was around 6,000 years old, a figure that was based on the amount of time estimated for the events described in the Bible. One of the first scientists to question this assumption and to understand geologic time was James Hutton. Hutton traveled around Great Britain in the late 1700s, studying sedimentary rocks and their fossils (Figure 11.19). Often described as the founder of modern geology, Hutton formulated uniformitarianism: The present is the key to the past. According to uniformitarianism, the same processes that operate on Earth today operated in the past as well. Why is an acceptance of this principle absolutely essential for us to be able to decipher Earth history? Hutton questioned the age of the Earth when he looked at rock sequences like the one below. On his travels, he discovered places where sedimentary rock beds lie on an eroded surface. At this gap in rock layers, or unconformity, some rocks were eroded away. For example, consider the famous unconformity at Siccar Point, on the coast of Scotland (Figure 11.20). 1. A series of sedimentary beds was deposited on an ocean floor. 2. The sediments hardened into sedimentary rock. 3. The sedimentary rocks are uplifted and tilted, exposing them above sea level. 4. The tilted beds were eroded to form an irregular surface. 5. A sea covered the eroded sedimentary rock layers. 6. New sedimentary layers were deposited. 7. The new layers hardened into sedimentary rock. 332 www.ck12.org Chapter 11. HS Evidence About Earth’s Past FIGURE 11.19 A drawing by James Hutton. "Theory of the Earth, FIGURE 11.20 Hutton 8. The whole rock sequence was tilted. 9. Uplift occurred, exposing the new sedimentary rocks above the ocean surface. Since he thought that the same processes at work on Earth today worked at the same rate in the past, he had to account for all of these events and the unknown amount of missing time represented by the unconformity, Hutton realized that this rock sequence alone represented a great deal of time.
Recommended publications
  • Lithologic Description Checklist
    GY480 Field Geology Lithologic Description Checklist When describing outcrops you should attempt to determine the following at the exposure: 1. Rock name and/or Formation name (Granite, Cap Mt. Limestone member, etc.) 2. Color or color variations at outcrop (pink granite, vari-colored shale, etc.) 3. Mineralogy (estimate percentages if possible; try to distinguish between primary and secondary minerals) 4. texture: size, shape and arrangement of mineral grains (aphanitic, rhyolite porphyry, idioblastic, porphyroblastic, grain-supported, coarse sandstone, foliated granite, etc.). 5. Primary features: crossbeds, ripple marks, sole marks, igneous flow foliation, pillow basalt, vesicular basalt, etc.) Examples of well-written descriptions Sandstone (quartz arenite): white and very pale orange, weathers light brown and moderate reddish brown; very fine grained; subangular; well-sorted; laminated; locally cross-bedded; bedding thickness as much as a foot (30 cm), mostly covered with rubble; forms steep, rounded slope. Bolsa Quartzite. Granite, light gray or light pink, usually deeply weathered to light brown. Typically coarse- grained, containing large phenocrysts of pale-pink orthoclase up to 3 inches (7.6 cm) long. Coarse-grained groundmass consists of pale-pink orthoclase, chalky plagioclase (albite or andesine), quartz, and books of black biotite. Probably underlies diabase and sedimentary formations in most of the region. Ruin Granite. Schist, light to dark gray, weathers brown to greenish-brown. Comprised of a variety of types from coarse-grained quartz-sericite schist to fine-grained quartz-sericite-chlorite schist. Low- grade metamorphism greenschist facies; higher-grade occurs locally. Relict bedding of sedimentary protolith is generally recognizable in outcrop; plunging overturned tight to isoclinal folding is pervasive.
    [Show full text]
  • How Old Is Old? (.Pdf)
    How Old is Old? Purpose: This lesson will help students visualize the geologic time scale and identify when and where regional features were formed in the Rogue Valley. Objectives: Time Required: 1.5 hours (can be Students will: broken into 2 class periods) Identify the point in time when their assigned Appropriate grades: 6th-8th geological formation was formed by calculating NGSS and Common Core Standards: how many centimeters from the end of the MS-ESS2-2: Construct an explanation based ribbon their tag should be placed. on evidence for how geoscience processes Teach the class about their assigned geological have changed Earth's surface at varying time formations by conducting research about when and spatial scales. they were formed, how they were formed, CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.SL.6-8.4: Present claims where they are located, and what they are made and findings, emphasizing salient points in a of, and preparing visual presentations in small focused, coherent manner with pertinent groups. descriptions, facts, details, and examples; use appropriate eye contact, adequate Materials: volume, and clear pronunciation. CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.SL.6-8.5: Include Time scale ribbon (1) multimedia components and visual displays Time period tags (19) in presentations to clarify claims and “Geology of Jackson County, Oregon” booklets findings and emphasize salient points. (5) Geological formation half sheets (1 for each group with the name of their formation on it) Poster boards (not provided) Markers (not provided) Activity: Introduction Prep: cut the geological formation half sheets along the solid line in the middle of the page. Each group of students will get a half sheet with the name of their geological formation.
    [Show full text]
  • Geological Formation Educational Hand Sample Collection Content Last Updated 06/30/2010
    CT Geological Survey Geological Formation Educational Hand Sample Collection Content last updated 06/30/2010 TOWN Sample Numer Geological Description Formation Barkhamsted 19-9-1 Єh Cambrian "Waramaug Formation", Hoosac Schist, West Hill Road, New Hartford, 2 samples. Quartzplagioclase- biotite schist and gneissic schist. Bethel 92-4-1 Og Collected from Huntington State Park, site of large tourmaline 76-9-1 OCs Inwood? Marble from W side of stream just below Cameron's Line 76-9-2 Or Sheared Hartland? from E side of stream just above Cameron's Line Bozrah 71-5 Otay Collected from intersection of South and Bishop Rds, Bozrah Branford 97-1 Zsc & Pn Stony Creek Quarry Granite 97-6 Zp, Zsc & Pn From Red Hill Quarry, Stony Creek Preserve, Branford Bridgeport 109-1 Ohb Collected in Beardsley Park, Bridgeport Burlington 35-5-1 DSt Straits Schist, collected on road cut for entrance of side road on W side of Maine Rd Canterbury 57-6-1 Dc Canterbury Gneiss, Note Muskovite and garnet? 57-6-2 SOh Meta siltstone/Hornfels? Mapped as hCS on GQ 392, Collected just W of pond, low outcrops Canterbury is just to the W of the outcrop, inclusions of this rock and a very fine grained biotite schist are found in Canterbury. This rock is quite massive with n Chester 84-7 Dc In woods SW of Chester Elementary School, Ridge Rd, Chester 84-1 b SOh Biotite Gneiss and schist, E side of northbound entrance ramp intersection of Rt 9 and 148 84-1 c SOh Biotite Gneiss and schist, E side of northbound entrance ramp intersection of Rt 9 and 148 84-1 a SOh Biotite Gneiss
    [Show full text]
  • Document Downloaded From
    Document downloaded from: http://hdl.handle.net/10251/52433 This paper must be cited as: Fombuena Borrás, V.; Benardi, L.; Fenollar Gimeno, OÁ.; Boronat Vitoria, T.; Balart Gimeno, RA. (2014). Characterization of green composites from biobased epoxy matrices and bio-fillers derived from seashell wastes. Materials and Design. 57:168-174. doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2013.12.032. The final publication is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2013.12.032 Copyright Elsevier Characterization of green composites from biobased epoxy matrices and bio-fillers derived from seashell wastes V. Fombuena*1, L. Bernardi2, O. Fenollar1, T. Boronat1, R.Balart1 1 Instituto de Tecnología de Materiales (ITM) Universitat Politècnica de València (UPV) Plaza Ferrandiz y Carbonell 1, 03801, Alcoy (Alicante), Spain 2 Centro de Tecnologia (CT) Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) Santa Maria - RS, 97105-900, Brasil *Corresponding author: Vicent Fombuena Telephone number/fax: 96 652 84 33 Email: [email protected] Characterization of green composites from biobased epoxy matrices and bio-fillers derived from seashell wastes V. Fombuena*, L. Bernardi2, O. Fenollar1, T. Boronat1, R.Balart1 1 Instituto de Tecnología de Materiales (ITM) Universitat Politècnica de València (UPV) Plaza Ferrandiz y Carbonell 1, 03801, Alcoy (Alicante), Spain 2 Centro de Tecnologia (CT) Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) Santa Maria - RS, 97105-900, Brasil Abstract The seashells, a serious environmental hazard, are composed mainly by calcium carbonate, which can be used as filler in polymer matrix. The main objective of this work is the use of calcium carbonate from seashells as a bio-filler in combination with eco-friendly epoxy matrices thus leading to high renewable contents materials.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 8. Weathering, Sediment, & Soil
    Physical Geology, First University of Saskatchewan Edition is used under a CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 International License Read this book online at http://openpress.usask.ca/physicalgeology/ Chapter 8. Weathering, Sediment, & Soil Adapted by Karla Panchuk from Physical Geology by Steven Earle Figure 8.1 The Hoodoos, near Drumheller, Alberta, have formed from the differential weathering (weaker rock weathering faster than stronger rock) of sedimentary rock. Source: Steven Earle (2015) CC BY 4.0. Learning Objectives After reading this chapter and answering the review questions at the end, you should be able to: • Explain why rocks formed at depth in the crust are susceptible to weathering at the surface. • Describe the main processes of mechanical weathering, and the materials that are produced. • Describe the main processes of chemical weathering, and common chemical weathering products. • Explain the characteristics used to describe sediments, and what those characteristics can tell us about the origins of the sediments. • Discuss the relationships between weathering and soil formation, and the origins of soil horizons. • Describe and explain the distribution of Canadian soil types. • Explain how changing weathering rates affect the carbon cycle and the climate system. Chapter 8. Weathering, Sediment, & Soil 1 What Is Weathering? Weathering occurs when rock is exposed to the “weather” — to the forces and conditions that exist at Earth’s surface. Rocks that form deep within Earth experience relatively constant temperature, high pressure, have no contact with the atmosphere, and little or no interaction with moving water. Once overlying layers are eroded away and a rock is exposed at the surface, conditions change dramatically.
    [Show full text]
  • Brief Glossary and Bibliography of Mollusks
    A Brief Glossary of Molluscan Terms Compiled by Bruce Neville Bivalve. A member of the second most speciose class of Mollusca, generally bearing a shell of two valves, left and right, and lacking a radula. Commonly called clams, mussels, oysters, scallops, cockles, shipworms, etc. Formerly called pelecypods (class Pelecypoda). Cephalopoda. The third dominant class of Mollusca, generally without a true shell, though various internal hard structures may be present, highly specialized anatomically for mobility. Commonly called octopuses, squids, cuttles, nautiluses. Columella. The axis, real or imaginary, around and along which a gastropod shell grows. Dextral. Right-handed, with the aperture on the right when the spire is at the top. Most gastropods are dextral. Gastropod. A member of the largest class of Mollusca, often bearing a shell of one valve and an operculum. Commonly called snails, slugs, limpets, conchs, whelks, sea hares, nudibranchs, etc. Mantle. The organ that secretes the shell. Mollusk (or mollusc). A member of the second largest phylum of animals, generally with a non-segmented body divided into head, foot, and visceral regions; often bearing a shell secreted by a mantle; and having a radula. Operculum. A horny or calcareous pad that partially or completely closes the aperture of some gastropodsl. Periostracum. The proteinaceous layer covering the exterior of some mollusk shells. Protoconch. The larval shell of the veliger, often remains as the tip of the adult shell. Also called prodissoconch in bivlavles. Radula. A ribbon of teeth, unique to mollusks, used to procure food. Sinistral. Left-handed, with the aperture on the left when the spire is at the top.
    [Show full text]
  • 19 a Review on the Structure and Mechanical Properties of Mollusk Shells – Perspectives on Synthetic Biomimetic Materials
    19 A Review on the Structure and Mechanical Properties of Mollusk Shells – Perspectives on Synthetic Biomimetic Materials Francois Barthelat · Jee E. Rim · Horacio D. Espinosa∗ Key words: Mollusk shells, Biomaterials, Fracture, Microfabrication, MEMS 19.1 Introduction Natural materials can exhibit remarkable combinations of stiffness, low weight, strength, and toughness which are in some cases unmatched by manmade materials. In the past two decades significant efforts were therefore undertaken in the materials research community to elucidate the microstructure and mechanisms behind these mechanical performances, in order to duplicate them in artificial materials [1, 2]. This approach to design, called biomimetics, has now started to yield materials with remarkable properties. The first step in this biomimetic approach is the identifica- tion of materials performances in natural materials, together with a fundamental understanding of the mechanisms behind these performances (which has been greatly accelerated by recent techniques such as scanning probe microscopy). The mechanical performance of natural materials is illustrated in Fig. 19.1, a material properties map for a selection of natural ceramics, biopolymer, and their composites [3]. The upper left corner of the map shows soft and tough materials such as skin, with a mechanical behavior similar to elastomers. The lower right corner of the chart shows stiff but brittle minerals such as hydroxyapatite or calcite. Most hard biological materials incorporate minerals into soft matrices, mostly to achieve the stiffness required for structural support or armored protection [4]. These materials are seen in the upper right part of the map and show how natural materials achieve high stiffness by incorporating minerals while retaining an exceptional toughness.
    [Show full text]
  • Biotribology Recent Progresses and Future Perspectives
    HOSTED BY Available online at www.sciencedirect.com Biosurface and Biotribology ] (]]]]) ]]]–]]] www.elsevier.com/locate/bsbt Biotribology: Recent progresses and future perspectives Z.R. Zhoua,n, Z.M. Jinb,c aSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, China bSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Xian Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China cSchool of Mechanical Engineering, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK Received 6 January 2015; received in revised form 3 March 2015; accepted 3 March 2015 Abstract Biotribology deals with all aspects of tribology concerned with biological systems. It is one of the most exciting and rapidly growing areas of tribology. It is recognised as one of the most important considerations in many biological systems as to the understanding of how our natural systems work as well as how diseases are developed and how medical interventions should be applied. Tribological studies associated with biological systems are reviewed in this paper. A brief history, classification as well as current focuses on biotribology research are analysed according to typical papers from selected journals and presentations from a number of important conferences in this area. Progress in joint tribology, skin tribology and oral tribology as well as other representative biological systems is presented. Some remarks are drawn and prospects are discussed. & 2015 Southwest Jiaotong University. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). Keywords: Biotribology; Biosurface; Joint; Skin; Dental Contents 1. Introduction ...................................................................................2 2. Classifications and focuses of current research. ..........................................................3 3. Joint tribology .................................................................................4 3.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Taroona Seashell Fauna
    Activity – Exploring Seashell Fauna (Gr 3 - 10) Overview: Different types of marine invertebrate make different types of shells. Measure and draw a range of shells and try to identify them. Comparing the size, shape and colours of seashells is a great way of exploring the diversity in molluscs that live along rocky shorelines. Looking closely at shells can reveal the type of mollusc that created it, and may provide an indication of their way of life and diet. There is also an entire tiny world of micro-molluscs, 1 – 10 mm in size, in the drifts of shells that accumulate along the strandline or in the lee of intertidal rocks. For those willing to get down on hands and knees you will be amazed at what can be learned about the local environment from a single handful of shell grit. 1 – 10 mm sized micro-molluscs found in a handful of shell grit. Image: S. Grove. TASK: Split the class into small groups and collect a range of empty shells from along the foreshore. Make sure the shells are empty, as we don’t want to displace living creatures. Materials: magnifying glass ruler flat tray with black cardboard pencil paper eraser shell ID chart - Before you undertake the DEP Discovery Trail print out a few copies of this pictorial guide to help the kids identify shells commonly found in coastal environments. This material relates to shells found in Aboriginal middens of Victoria, but is also useful for intertidal studies. http://www.dpcd.vic.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0020/35633/A_Guide_to_Shells_Augus t_2007.pdf 1.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Distribution of Utah's Hanging Gardens
    Great Basin Naturalist Volume 49 Number 1 Article 1 1-31-1989 On the distribution of Utah's hanging gardens Stanley L. Welsh Brigham Young University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn Recommended Citation Welsh, Stanley L. (1989) "On the distribution of Utah's hanging gardens," Great Basin Naturalist: Vol. 49 : No. 1 , Article 1. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn/vol49/iss1/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Western North American Naturalist Publications at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Great Basin Naturalist by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. The Great Basin Naturalist Published at Provo, Utah, by Brigham Young University ISSN 0017-3614 Volume 49 31 January 1989 No. 1 ON THE DISTRIBUTION OF UTAH'S HANGING GARDENS Stanley L. Welsh 1 Abstract. —This is a summary monograph of the hanging gardens as they occur in the Colorado River and Virgin River portions of the Colorado Plateau in Utah. Discussed in this paper are the hanging gardens, their geography, geomorphology, aspects of distribution and diversity, and principal vascular and algal plant species. Animal trapping studies and plant productivity aspects are reviewed. The sea of aridity that overlies southern tively recent origin, geologically speaking Utah and vicinity is broken by seasonal influ- (Hintze 1972). ences and by the dendritic trenches of the The geological strata are remarkably evi- Colorado River and its tributaries. The effects dent in this arid setting, where vegetative of the river are restricted to its banks and cover is thin and where rate of soil develop- adjacent alluvial terraces; the riparian vegeta- ment is exceeded by processes of erosion.
    [Show full text]
  • ROCK OUTCROP SYSTEM Ros12 Southern Floristic Region Southern Bedrock Outcrop Dry, Open Lichen-Dominated Plant Communities on Areas of Exposed Bedrock
    ROCK OUTCROP SYSTEM ROs12 Southern Floristic Region Southern Bedrock Outcrop Dry, open lichen-dominated plant communities on areas of exposed bedrock. Woody vegetation is sparse, and vascular plants are restricted to crevices, shallow soil deposits, and rainwater pools. Vegetation Structure & Composition Description is based on summary of vegetation plot data (relevés), plant species lists, and field notes from surveys of approximately 50 bedrock outcrops. • Lichen and bryophyte cover is high. On exposed bedrock, crustose and foliose lichens predominate. Species include Can- delariella vitellina, Lecanora muralis, Rhi- zocarpon disporum, Dimelaena oreina, Xanthoparmelia cumberlandia, Xanthopar- melia plittii, Acarospora americana, Physcia subtilis, and Dermatocarpon miniatum. On bedrock margins and along crevices, fruti- cose species such as Cladonia pyxidata are present with the more abundant crustose and foliose species. Common bryophytes on exposed rock include Schistidium and Grim- mia species, and, along crevices, Ceratodon purpureus, Weissia controversa, and Tortula species. Mosses often form carpets in shallow rainwater-collecting bedrock hollows. • Herbaceous plant cover is sparse to patchy (5–50%); characteristic species in crevices and areas with shallow soil (< 1in [3cm] deep), where plant biomass is low, include small-flowered fameflower (Talinum parviflorum), brittle prickly pear (Opuntia fragilis), rock spikemoss (Selaginella rupestris), rusty woodsia (Woodsia ilvensis), false pennyroyal (Isanthus brachiatus), slender knotweed
    [Show full text]
  • Experimental Study on Partial Replacement of Coarse Aggregate by Seashell & Partial Replacement of Cement by Flyash
    International Journal of Latest Research in Engineering and Technology (IJLRET) ISSN: 2454-5031 www.ijlret.comǁ Volume 2 Issue 3ǁ March 2016 ǁ PP 69-76 EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON PARTIAL REPLACEMENT OF COARSE AGGREGATE BY SEASHELL & PARTIAL REPLACEMENT OF CEMENT BY FLYASH R. Yamuna Bharathi1, S. Subhashini2, T. Manvitha3, S. Herald Lessly4 1, 2&3Undergraduate student, Department of Civil Engineering, R.M.K.Engineering College, TamilNadu, India. 4Assistant Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, R.M.K.Engineering College, TamilNadu, India. ABSTRACT:The growing concern of resource depletion and global pollution has lead to the development of new materials relying on renewable resources. Many by- products are used as aggregate for concrete. Seashell waste which is a major financial and operational burden on the shellfish industry is used as an ingredient in concrete thus offering alternatives to preserve natural coarse aggregate for future generation. Seashell is mainly composed of calcium and the rough texture make it suitable to be used as partial coarse aggregate replacement which provides an economic alternative to the conventional materials such as gravel. Experimental studies were performed on conventional concrete and mixtures of seashell with concrete. The percentage of seashell, is varied from 3% to 11%. Also the cement is replaced for 25% of flyash. The mechanical properties of concrete such as compressive strength, tensile strength, flexural strength, and workability are evaluated. This research helps to access the behaviour of concrete mixed with seashell and determination of optimum percentage of combined mixture which can be recommended as suitable alternative construction material in low cost housing delivery especially in coastal areas and near fresh water where they are found as waste.
    [Show full text]