DOCSLIB.ORG

Luminant a - Coastal Site

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Luminant a - Coastal Site Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant, Units 3 & 4 COL Application Part 3 - Environmental Report CHAPTER 9 ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED ACTION TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Title Page 9.0 ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED ACTION ....................................................... 9.0-1 9.1 NO-ACTION ALTERNATIVE ...................................................................................... 9.1-1 9.1.1 IMPLICATIONS AND EFFECTS OF TAKING NO ACTION.................................. 9.1-1 9.2 ENERGY ALTERNATIVES......................................................................................... 9.2-1 9.2.1 ALTERNATIVES NOT REQUIRING NEW GENERATING CAPACITY ............... 9.2-1 9.2.1.1 Power Purchases ............................................................................................ 9.2-2 9.2.1.2 Plant Reactivation or Extended Service Life ................................................... 9.2-2 9.2.1.3 Conservation (Energy Efficiency) .................................................................... 9.2-3 9.2.1.4 Combination of Alternatives ............................................................................ 9.2-3 9.2.2 ALTERNATIVES REQUIRING NEW GENERATING CAPACITY ........................ 9.2-4 9.2.2.1 Wind ................................................................................................................ 9.2-7 9.2.2.2 Solar Thermal Power and Photovoltaic Cells ................................................ 9.2-10 9.2.2.3 Hydropower................................................................................................... 9.2-12 9.2.2.4 Geothermal.................................................................................................... 9.2-14 9.2.2.5 Biomass, including Wood Waste and Energy Crops..................................... 9.2-16 9.2.2.6 Municipal Solid Wastes ................................................................................. 9.2-19 9.2.2.7 Petroleum Liquids and Synthetic Fuels......................................................... 9.2-21 9.2.2.8 Fuel Cells ...................................................................................................... 9.2-23 9.2.2.9 Coal............................................................................................................... 9.2-25 9.2.2.10 Natural Gas ................................................................................................... 9.2-28 9.2.2.11 Alternatives Requiring New Generation in Combination with Energy Storage.......................................................................................................... 9.2-30 9.2.2.11.1 Available Alternatives Requiring New Generation in Combination with Energy Storage ............................................................................................. 9.2-31 9.2.2.11.2 Energy Storage Options ................................................................................ 9.2-32 9.2.2.11.2.1 Pumped Hydropower Storage ........................................................... 9.2-33 9.2.2.11.2.2 Compressed Air Energy Storage (CAES).......................................... 9.2-33 9.2.2.11.2.3 Batteries ............................................................................................ 9.2-34 9.2.2.11.2.4 Hydrogen ........................................................................................... 9.2-35 9.2.2.11.2.5 Molten Salt......................................................................................... 9.2-35 9.2.2.11.2.6 Flywheels........................................................................................... 9.2-36 9.2.2.11.2.7 Supercapacitors................................................................................. 9.2-36 9.2.2.11.2.8 Other Storage Options....................................................................... 9.2-36 9.2.2.11.3 New Generation and Energy Storage Combinations .................................... 9.2-37 9.2.2.11.3.1 Wind Power Generation in Combination with CAES ......................... 9.2-37 9.2.2.11.3.2 Solar Power Generation in Combination with Molten Salt Storage ... 9.2-41 9-i Revision 2 Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant, Units 3 & 4 COL Application Part 3 - Environmental Report TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) Section Title Page 9.2.2.11.4 Renewable Energy Sources Combined with Storage and Natural Gas Power Generation ......................................................................................... 9.2-44 9.2.2.11.4.1 Renewable Energy Sources Combined with Storage and Supplemented by Natural Gas Power Generation ............................ 9.2-45 9.2.2.11.4.2 Natural Gas Power Generation Supplemented by Renewable Energy Sources Combined with Storage........................................... 9.2-47 9.2.2.11.5 Conclusions of Combining New Generation Power Sources with Storage ... 9.2-50 9.2.3 ASSESSMENT OF ALTERNATIVE SOURCES AND SYSTEMS....................... 9.2-50 9.2.3.1 Coal-Fired Generation................................................................................... 9.2-51 9.2.3.1.1 Environmental Costs ..................................................................................... 9.2-51 9.2.3.1.1.1 Air Quality .......................................................................................... 9.2-51 9.2.3.1.1.2 Land Use ........................................................................................... 9.2-52 9.2.3.1.1.3 Ecology.............................................................................................. 9.2-53 9.2.3.1.1.4 Water Use and Quality ...................................................................... 9.2-53 9.2.3.1.1.5 Waste Management .......................................................................... 9.2-53 9.2.3.1.2 Health Effects................................................................................................ 9.2-54 9.2.3.1.3 Additional Impacts ......................................................................................... 9.2-54 9.2.3.1.3.1 Socioeconomics ................................................................................ 9.2-54 9.2.3.1.3.2 Aesthetics .......................................................................................... 9.2-55 9.2.3.1.3.3 Historic and Archaeological Resources............................................. 9.2-55 9.2.3.1.3.4 Environmental Justice ....................................................................... 9.2-55 9.2.3.1.4 Design Alternatives ....................................................................................... 9.2-55 9.2.3.1.5 Conclusion for Coal-Fired Generation........................................................... 9.2-56 9.2.3.2 Natural Gas Generation ................................................................................ 9.2-56 9.2.3.2.1 Environmental Costs ..................................................................................... 9.2-56 9.2.3.2.1.1 Air Quality .......................................................................................... 9.2-56 9.2.3.2.1.2 Land Use ........................................................................................... 9.2-57 9.2.3.2.1.3 Ecology.............................................................................................. 9.2-58 9.2.3.2.1.4 Water Use and Quality ...................................................................... 9.2-58 9.2.3.2.1.5 Waste Management .......................................................................... 9.2-59 9.2.3.2.2 Health Effects................................................................................................ 9.2-59 9.2.3.2.3 Additional Impacts ......................................................................................... 9.2-59 9.2.3.2.3.1 Socioeconomics ................................................................................ 9.2-60 9.2.3.2.3.2 Aesthetics .......................................................................................... 9.2-60 9.2.3.2.3.3 Historic and Archaeological Resources............................................. 9.2-60 9.2.3.2.3.4 Environmental Justice ....................................................................... 9.2-61 9.2.3.2.4 Design Alternatives ....................................................................................... 9.2-61 9.2.3.2.5 Conclusion for Gas-Fired Generation............................................................ 9.2-61 9.2.3.3 Combination of Alternatives .......................................................................... 9.2-61 9.2.3.3.1 Determination of Alternatives ........................................................................ 9.2-62 9.2.3.3.2 Environmental Impacts.................................................................................. 9.2-63 9.2.3.3.3 Health Effects................................................................................................ 9.2-64 9.2.3.3.4 Economic Comparison .................................................................................. 9.2-64 9.2.3.3.5 Summary....................................................................................................... 9.2-64 9-ii Revision 2 Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant, Units 3 & 4 COL Application Part 3 - Environmental Report TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) Section Title Page 9.2.4 CONCLUSION .................................................................................................... 9.2-64 9.2.5 REFERENCES...................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Luminant 101 WHO WE ARE WHAT WE DO
    Luminant 101 www.Luminant.com WHO WE ARE WHAT WE DO Luminant is the largest competitive Luminant’s generating power generation company in Texas. capacity consists of a Our activities include power plant, diverse mix of plants. mining, wholesale marketing and trading, • Nuclear- and and development operations. coal-fueled plants generate the bulk • We have more than 15,400 megawatts of of the energy and existing electric generation in Texas, including generally operate 2,300 MW fueled by nuclear power and continuously at 8,000 MW fueled by coal. capacity. They are • Almost 2,200 MW of our coal fleet is new high performing in safety and efficiency. generation. • Natural gas units help meet variable consumption • We have restored more than 73,000 acres as because they can more readily be ramped up or part of our lignite coal mining operations and down as demand warrants. planted more than 33 million trees. • We are a leading purchaser of wind-generated Our Generating Capacity 1 electricity in Texas and the United States. Total: 15,427 MW • We are a subsidiary of Energy Future Nuclear Holdings Corp. EFH is a Dallas-based 15% Coal energy holding company. For more 52% information, visit www.Luminant.com or www.energyfutureholdings.com. Natural Gas 33% Our 2012 Energy Production2 Total: 70,490 GWh Nuclear 28% FORT WORTH DALLAS TYLER Natural Gas Coal MIDLAND 2% 70% ODESSA WACO LUFKIN BRYAN/COLLEGE STATION AUSTIN HOUSTON SAN ANTONIO 1 Includes four mothballed units (1,655 MW) not currently available for dispatch 2 Excludes purchased power Mines Power Plants Gas Coal Nuclear Updated March 2013 Luminant 101 Our mining operations supply a portion of the fuel for the coal-fueled generation plants from more than 1,000 million tons of owned or leased Texas lignite coal reserves.
    [Show full text]
  • Energy Future Holdings and Mining Reclamation Bonds in Texas (Pdf)
    Energy Future Holdings and Mining Reclamation Bonds in Texas By Tom Sanzillo Director of Finance Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis A Report Prepared For: The Sierra Club Public Citizen Austin, Texas October, 2013 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Energy Future Holdings (EFH) Company is publicly reported to be on the brink of a major financial reorganization. The financial problems of EFH and its subsidiaries stem from an ill-conceived buyout of TXU Corporation (the predecessor company) by the EFH management. The debt incurred for the buyout far exceeded the ability of the assets to pay for it. The company has stated that its top priority is debt management and most of its actions appear to be concerned with payment of debt service. 1 Energy Future Competitive Holdings (EFCH) is a subsidiary of EFH, which in turn has various subsidiaries that create a complex corporate structure. EFCH subsidiary Luminant Mining Company LLC, using Luminant Generation, also known as GENCO, as a third party insurer, has utilized a provision in Texas law that allows for a third party entity to guarantee the performance bond of the mining company. Luminant Mining and Luminant Generation have made multiple applications for such proposals amounting to $1.01 billion in self-bonding authority. 2 This report presents the case that recent applications made by Luminant Mining, using Luminant Generation as a third party guarantor to the Railroad Commission of Texas (RRC) for self- bonding authority, creates a misleading impression regarding Luminant Generation’s financial condition. Luminant Mining and Luminant Generation are subsidiaries of EFCH and EFH.
    [Show full text]
  • Declaration of Ken Smith, Vice President of Construction Management, Luminant Generation Company LLC
    Case: 16-60118 Document: 00513405270 Page: 63 Date Filed: 03/03/2016 Declaration of Ken Smith, Vice President of Construction Management, Luminant Generation Company LLC 60 Case: 16-60118 Document: 00513405270 Page: 64 Date Filed: 03/03/2016 DECLARATION OF KEN SMITH 1. I am vice president of construction management at Luminant, a competitive power generation subsidiary of Energy Future Holdings Corp. I will use “Luminant” in this declaration to refer to all Luminant entities that are petitioners in this matter. I make this declaration in support of Luminant’s motion to stay the Texas regional haze rule issued by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. See Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Texas and Oklahoma; Regional Haze State Implementation Plans; Interstate Visibility Transport State Implementation Plan To Address Pollution Affecting Visibility and Regional Haze; Federal Implementation Plan for Regional Haze, 81 Fed. Reg. 296 (Jan. 5, 2016) (“Final Rule”). This declaration is based on my personal knowledge and opinions which I am qualified to provide based on my education, training, and extensive experience in the power generation industry as discussed below. 2. As discussed in more detail below, the Final Rule, if not stayed by the Court, will cause immediate and irreparable harm to Luminant. The Final Rule imposes a massive build-out requirement on the majority of Luminant’s coal-fueled electric generating units. The harm from the Final Rule includes unrecoverable costs and expenditures, in the hundreds of millions of dollars, which Luminant would incur in the near term in order to begin work on the additional equipment and upgrades that EPA is requiring at Luminant’s generating units.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Annual Sustainability Report CONTENTS
    2018 Annual Sustainability Report CONTENTS Our People ..................................................................................................2 Environmental Sustainability ...............................................................6 Our Products............................................................................................. 11 Our Governance ......................................................................................14 Our Headquarters and Regional Offices ....................................... 17 United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals ...................... 18 Our Possibilities ...................................................................................... 19 Vistra Energy Power Plants* Natural Gas Coal Nuclear Solar / Batteries Oil Batteries (under development) Retail Operations Plant Operations Retail and Plant Operations Regional Office Company Headquarters *Note: Does not include plants previously announced to be retired. CEO’S MESSAGE As an integrated energy company, Vistra Energy operates an innovative, customer-centric retail business and a generation fleet focused on safely, reliably, and efficiently generating power in the communities we serve. Electricity is an irreplaceable product that is critical to everyday life, whether it be for residences or businesses. We understand and take very seriously our role to provide cost-effective, reliable power to our customers and help fuel the economy. We also understand and take very seriously that our business has an environmental footprint.
    [Show full text]
  • Luminant 101 WHO WE ARE WHAT WE DO
    Luminant 101 www.Luminant.com WHO WE ARE WHAT WE DO Luminant is the largest competitive Luminant’s generating power generation company in Texas. capacity consists of a Our activities include power plant, diverse mix of plants. mining, wholesale marketing and trading, • Nuclear- and and development operations. coal-fueled plants generate the bulk • We have more than 13,700 megawatts of of the energy and existing electric generation in Texas, including generally operate 2,300 MW fueled by nuclear power and continuously at 8,000 MW fueled by coal. capacity. They are • Almost 2,200 MW of our coal fleet is new high performing in safety and efficiency. generation. • Natural gas units help meet variable consumption • We have restored more than 73,000 acres as because they can more readily be ramped up or part of our lignite coal mining operations and down as demand warrants. planted more than 33 million trees. • We are a leading purchaser of wind-generated Our Generating Capacity 1 electricity in Texas and the United States. Total: 15,427 MW • We are a subsidiary of Energy Future Nuclear Holdings Corp. EFH is a Dallas-based 15% Coal energy holding company. For more 52% information, visit www.Luminant.com or www.energyfutureholdings.com. Natural Gas 33% Our 2012 Energy Production2 Total: 70,490 GWh Nuclear 28% FORT WORTH DALLAS TYLER Natural Gas Coal MIDLAND 2% 70% ODESSA WACO LUFKIN BRYAN/COLLEGE STATION AUSTIN HOUSTON SAN ANTONIO 1 Includes four mothballed units (1,655 MW) not currently available for dispatch 2 Excludes purchased power Mines Power Plants Gas Coal Nuclear Updated July 2015 Luminant 101 Our mining operations supply a portion of the fuel for the coal-fueled generation plants from more than 1,000 million tons of owned or leased Texas lignite coal reserves.
    [Show full text]
  • News Release for IMMEDIATE RELEASE
    News Release FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Luminant Announces Facility Closures, Job Reductions in Response to EPA Rule Company Forced to Take Difficult Steps; Files Suit to Protect Jobs, Reliability DALLAS – September 12, 2011 – In employee meetings today across its Texas operations, Luminant leadership announced the need to close facilities to comply with the Environmental Protection Agency’s Cross-State Air Pollution Rule, which will cause the loss of approximately 500 jobs. The rule, which the EPA released earlier this summer, requires Texas power generators to make dramatic reductions in emissions beginning January 1, 2012. While Luminant is making preparations to meet the rule’s compliance deadline, this morning it also filed a legal challenge in an effort to protect facilities and employees, and to minimize the harm this rule will cause to electric reliability in Texas. To meet the rule’s unrealistic deadline and requirements, Luminant reluctantly must take the difficult steps of idling two generating units and ceasing mining Texas lignite at three mines. Luminant will also implement several other actions to reduce emissions, including making substantial investments in its facilities. Luminant supports continued efforts to improve air quality across the state and nation. Since 2005, for example, Luminant has achieved a 21 percent reduction in SO2 emissions, while at the same time increasing generation by 13 percent. CEO Statement “As always, Luminant is committed to complying fully with EPA regulations. We have spent the last two months identifying all possible options to meet the requirements of this new rule, and we are launching a significant investment program to reduce emissions across our facilities,” said David Campbell, Luminant’s chief executive officer.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Review ABOUT LUMINANT
    2012 Environmental Review ABOUT LUMINANT GENERATING PLANTS AND MINES UNITS CAPACITY (MW) COUNTY NUCLEAR Comanche Peak 2 2,300 Somervell COAL Big Brown 2 1,150 Freestone Big Brown Freestone Among the most beautiful and prized birds, wood Turlington Freestone ducks were on the verge of extinction. Today, Martin Lake 3 2,250 Rusk they are a success story of proper protection and Beckville Panola/Rusk management. Luminant’s restored wildlife habitat, Oak Hill Rusk which includes nesting boxes and extensive water resources, helps the ducks thrive, and Tatum Panola their presence is a great indicator of sound land Monticello 3 1,880 Titus management and a healthy habitat. Thermo Hopkins Winfield Titus/Franklin Oak Grove 2 1,600 Robertson Kosse Limestone/Robertson Luminant, a subsidiary of Sandow 2 1,137 Milam Three Oaks Lee/Bastrop Energy Future Holdings Corp. NATURAL GAS1 competitive power generation DeCordova 4 CTs 260 Hood business, including mining, Graham 2 630 Young wholesale marketing and Lake Hubbard 2 921 Dallas trading,A and development operations, Morgan Creek 6 CTs 390 Mitchell Luminant has more than 15,400 Permian Basin 1, 5 CTs 865 Ward megawatts of generation in Texas, Stryker Creek 2 685 Cherokee including 2,300 MW fueled by Trinidad 1 244 Henderson nuclear power and 8,000 MW fueled Valley 3 1,115 Fannin by coal. The company is also one NUCLEAR COAL MINES NATURAL GAS CTs COMBUSTION TURBINES of the largest purchasers of wind- generated electricity in Texas and the nation. EFH is a Dallas-based energy holding company that has a portfolio GENERATION SUMMARY of competitive and regulated energy FUEL TYPE CAPACITY (MW) PLANTS UNITS subsidiaries, primarily in Texas.
    [Show full text]
  • Power Plant and Mine
    Oak Grove Power Plant and Mine Economic Impact Oak Grove Power Plant and Kosse Mine are proud to be an integral part of the communities in which our employees work and live. In 2015, Luminant paid tens of millions of dollars statewide in property taxes. The company is the largest taxpayer by a wide margin in virtually all the communities where it operates plants, including Oak Grove. Community Benefit We take pride in being a good neighbor through community contributions and volunteerism. The plant and mines give tens of thousands of dollars to worthwhile projects and community organizations, such as the Robertson County Basic Facts Boys and Girls Club and area chambers of commerce. Fuel source: Lignite Employees at Oak Grove also give back to their Operating capacity and homes powered: communities through volunteerism, supporting 1,600 MW — enough to power the Robertson County Science Fair and Franklin about 800,000 homes in normal ISD mentoring programs, among others. conditions and about 320,000 homes in periods of peak demand Awards and Recognition Year began operation: Unit 1–2010; Unit 2–2010 Throughout the years, Oak Grove has been recognized as a community and corporate leader. A few significant awards include: Location: Robertson County, • Interstate Mining Compact Commission’s National Mine Reclamation Award Limestone County 2014 (Luminant) Supporting mine: Kosse • Railroad Commission of Texas’ Coal Mining Reclamation Award 2014 (Luminant) • Employee Recipients of the Brazos Valley Regional Advisory Council Lifesaving Award 2011 DALLAS Environmental Responsibility WACO Oak Grove TEMPLE Luminant is proud of its strong track record of meeting or outperforming all environmental laws, rules and regulations.
    [Show full text]
  • Luminant and Subsidiaries
    Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Units 3 and 4 COL Application Part 1 Administrative and Financial Information Revision 0 (Non-Proprietary Version) Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant, Units 3 & 4 COL Application Part 1, General and Financial Information TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................... 3 1.1 LICENSE ACTIONS REQUESTED ....................................................................................... 3 1.2 GENERAL INFORMATION 1.2.1 Applicants.................................................................................................................. 4 1.2.2 Ownership of the Applicants ..................................................................................... 5 1.2.3 Description of Business or Occupation ..................................................................... 7 1.2.4 Organization and Management................................................................................. 7 1.2.5 Regulatory Agencies with Jurisdiction over Rates and Services............................... 10 1.2.6 Trade and News Publications ................................................................................... 11 1.3 FINANCIAL QUALIFICATIONS............................................................................................. 11 1.4 DECOMMISSIONING FUNDING ASSURANCE ................................................................... 13 1.5 FOREIGN OWNERSHIP OR CONTROL..............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • David Quiram
    Mike Williams Chief Fossil Officer Mike Williams is the chief fossil officer for Luminant, a competitive power generation subsidiary of Energy Future Holdings Corp. Luminant’s activities include plant, mine, wholesale marketing and trading, and development operations. With a keen focus on operational success, Williams has over 42 years of experience in power generation, operations and maintenance, engineering and management. Williams is responsible for the safe, reliable, lean and consistent performance of Luminant’s fossil-fueled plants and lignite mines. Luminant has more than 13,000 megawatts of existing fossil generation in Texas, including 8,000 MW fueled by coal and 5,100 MW fueled by natural gas. The company’s lignite-mining operation supplies about half of the coal fleet’s fuel, with annual production totaling over 30 million tons. The remainder of the coal fuel comes from the Powder River Basin in Wyoming. In addition to overseeing fossil generation and lignite mining, Williams is also responsible for Luminant’s support functions, including safety, environmental services and construction. Before joining Luminant, Williams served as vice president of operations and maintenance for Fluor Power Services in Dallas. His unit provided services to nuclear and coal power plants for outage management, maintenance and retrofit services. Before joining Fluor, he was senior vice president of power operations for Progress Energy in Raleigh, N.C., and was responsible for fossil and hydro operations totaling more than 15,000 MW in the Carolinas and Florida. Williams joined Progress Energy in June 2000 and retired in July 2007 to return home to Texas. Prior to joining Progress Energy, he was with Central and South West Corporation and its operating subsidiaries for 28 years.
    [Show full text]
  • November 2017 MEDIA GUIDE
    November 2017 MEDIA GUIDE TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. ASSISTANCE TO THE NEWS MEDIA 2. MEDIA INFORMATION CONTACTS 3. COMPANY SPOKESPERSONS 4. COMANCHE PEAK FACT SHEET 5. ORGANIZATION FOR EMERGENCIES 6. EMERGENCY CLASSIFICATIONS 7. ALERTING AND INFORMING THE PUBLIC 8. BASIC INFORMATION CONCERNING RADIATION 9. GLOSSARY OF NUCLEAR TERMS 10. ACRONYMS 11. NUCLEAR POWER QUESTIONS & ANSWERS 12. MAP AND PLANT SYSTEM DRAWINGS SECTION 1 ASSISTANCE TO THE NEWS MEDIA Page 1-1 ASSISTANCE TO THE NEWS MEDIA 1. Welcome to the Comanche Peak Joint Information Center (JIC). Located at 116 W. Bridge Street in Granbury at the Granbury City Hall, the facility is designed to accommodate the news media during an emergency at Comanche Peak. If you have any needs, please ask one of the Joint Information Center Aides for assistance. 2. Your safety is important to us just as your story is important to you. We ask that you not attempt to go to any other areas or facilities unless an escort can be arranged. 3. Ample parking is provided around the Joint Information Center. 4. The Company Spokesperson is the main source of event-related information during an emergency at Comanche Peak. 5. News organizations may reach the Joint Information Center by calling 682-498-8010. 6. Please wear your Comanche Peak Press Pass at all times. Return the Press Pass to the registration desk when you leave. 7. Granbury Regional Airport (KGDJ) is the designated landing zone for helicopters. The airport is located at 400 Howard Clemmons Road in Granbury. See next page for instructions and map. Thank you for your cooperation.
    [Show full text]
  • Power Plant and Mine
    Sandow Power Plant and Mine Economic Impact Sandow Power Plant and Three Oaks Mine are proud to be major contributors to the community in which our employees work and live. In 2015, Luminant paid tens of millions of dollars statewide in property taxes. The company is the largest taxpayer by a wide margin in virtually all the communities where it operates plants, including Sandow. Community Benefit We take pride in being a good neighbor through community contributions and volunteerism. The plant and mines give tens of thousands of dollars to worthwhile projects and community organizations, such as the Rockdale Fair Association’s Annual Fair and Auction and area volunteer fire departments. Basic Facts Employees at Sandow also give back to their communities through volunteerism, supporting the Fuel source: Lignite Williamson County Special Olympics and the American Operating capacity and homes powered: Cancer Society’s Relay for Life, among others. 1,137 MW — enough to power about 570,000 homes in normal Awards and Recognition conditions and about 225,000 Throughout the years, Sandow has been recognized as a community and homes in periods of peak demand corporate leader. A few significant awards include: Year began operation: • Interstate Mining Compact Commission’s National Mine Reclamation Award 2014 Unit 4–1981; Unit 5 –2009 (Luminant) Location: Milam County, Lee • Railroad Commission of Texas’ Coal Mining Reclamation Award 2014 (Luminant) County, Bastrop County • U.S. Department of the Interior, Office of Surface Mining, Director’s Award 2009, Supporting mine: Three Oaks five-time Winner (Luminant) Environmental Responsibility Luminant is proud of its strong track record of meeting or outperforming all DALLAS environmental laws, rules and regulations.
    [Show full text]