DOCSLIB.ORG

QUASI-EUCLIDEAN SUBRINGS of Q[X] 3

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
QUASI-EUCLIDEAN SUBRINGS of Q[X] 3 QUASI-EUCLIDEAN SUBRINGS OF Q[x] PETR GLIVICKY´ AND JAN SAROCHˇ Abstract. Using a nonstandard model of Peano arithmetic, we show that there are quasi-Euclidean subrings of Q[x] which are not k-stage Euclidean for any norm and positive integer k. These subrings can be either PID or non-UFD, depending on the choice of parameters in our construction. In both cases, there are 2ω such domains up to ring isomorphism. Although Euclidean and principal ideal domains have been intensively studied for almost a century, examples of non-Euclidean PIDs are still rather scattered throughout the literature, and thought of as more or less singular, non-frequent objects. The oldest of these examples are arguably the rings of integers of Q(√d) for d = 19, 43, 67, 163. However, these are the only cases for negative d’s, and the results− − from− [12]− and [7] indicate that it is almost surely the case of positive values of d, too. Another type of examples was given by Samuel in his famous paper [11]. Leut- becher (in [8]) capitalized on his approach several years later, and proved that there are non-Euclidean PIDs which are even quasi-Euclidean (this was not the case of the four rings of integers mentioned above, as Cohn observed in [4]). Throughout this paper, by a quasi-Euclidean domain, we mean a commutative domain R for which there is a function φ : R2 ω such that, for all (a,b) R2 with b = 0, there exists q R with φ(b,a →bq) < φ(a,b). The definition∈ is similar to6 the one of classical∈ Euclidean norm,− with the important difference that by the norm function here, we do not measure elements of the ring but pairs of those. Also, unlike in the case of Euclidean domains, ω can be equivalently replaced by some/any infinite ordinal in the definition; see Preliminaries section (in particular Proposition 1.1) for this and further equivalent definitions of quasi- Euclidean domain, and related concepts. There are a few more published results on non-Euclidean PIDs. Unfortunately, they do not usually present a coherent class of these domains, or some sort of characterization of rings which are non-Euclidean PIDs in some distinguished class of domains. Nice attempts in this direction can be found in [1] and [6]. arXiv:1410.6746v1 [math.RA] 24 Oct 2014 In this paper, we present a parametric construction which is in some sense a generalization of the approach used in [6]. While studying certain models of Peano arithmetic, we noticed that there are many discretely ordered non-Euclidean (even non-k-stage Euclidean in the sense of Cooke [5]) subrings of Q[x] which are quasi- Euclidean. In fact, for each τ Jp, where Jp denotes the ring of p-adic ∈ p∈P integers, we define one such subring. Moreover, we observe that the set J Q p∈P p splits into two parts of full cardinalities, depending on whether the resulting ring Q Date: July 8, 2018. 2010 Mathematics Subject Classification. 13F07 (primary), 13F10, 13F20, 03H15 (secondary). Key words and phrases. k-stage division chain, quasi-Euclidean domain, PID. First author supported by the grant GAUK 4372/2011. Second author supported by the grant ECCˇ 301-29/248001. 1 2 PETR GLIVICKY´ AND JAN SAROCHˇ is PID or non-UFD. Since each quasi-Euclidean ring is B´ezout (Proposition 1.1), there are no inbetween cases, i.e. non-PID and UFD at the same time. Acknowledgements. The authors would like to thank Josef Mlˇcek and Jan Trlifaj for reading parts of this text and giving several valuable comments. 1. Preliminaries Throughout this paper, all rings are (commutative integral) domains. Further, we denote by P the set of all primes in N. For each p P, Jp stands for the ∈ ring of p-adic integers, while Zp denotes the field Z/pZ. Since Jp = lim Zpk , we ∞ ∼ shall view Jp as a subring of k=1 Zpk , and denote, for a positive integer←−k, by πk the canonical projection from Jp to Zpk . It will not cause any confusion that the Q notation πk does not reflect the prime p. Moreover, for technical reasons, we put π0 : Jp 0 ; again, regardless of the prime p. If we→{ deal} with elements from the ring Q[x], we define deg 0 = 1, and we denote by lc(q) the leading coefficient of a polynomial q. − 1.1. Quasi-Euclidean and k-stage Euclidean domains. Various generaliza- tions of the concept of a Euclidean domain were proposed and studied in the past. The one we find very natural, is the concept of quasi-Euclidean (used in [8] and [3]) or the equivalent notion of ω-stage Euclidean domain (used by Cooke in [5]). Given a ring R and a partial order on R2, we say that is quasi-Euclidean if it has the descending chain condition≤ (dcc), and for any pair≤ (a,b) R2 with b = 0, there exists an element q in R such that (b,a bq) < (a,b).∈ We call R quasi-Euclidean6 provided there exists a quasi-Euclidean− partial order on R2. Let (a,b) R2 and k be a non-negative integer. A k-stage division chain starting from the pair∈ (a,b) is a sequence of equations in R a = q1b + r1 b = q2r1 + r2 r1 = q3r2 + r3 . rk−2 = qkrk−1 + rk. Such a division chain is called terminating if the last remainder rk is 0 (rk−1 is then easily seen to be the GCD of a and b). Notice that a k-stage division chain is determined by its starting pair and the sequence of quotients q1,...,qk. For the sake of compactness, in what follows, we shall denote this chain also by a q ... q 1 k . b r ... rk 1 Given such a division chain, we define its 0-th remainder r0 as b. In the following proposition, On denotes the class of all ordinal numbers. Proposition 1.1. ([3], [5], [8]) For a commutative domain R, the following condi- tions are equivalent: (1) There exists a function φ : R2 On (with Rng(φ) ω) such that, for all (a,b) R2 with b =0, there exists→ q R such that φ⊆(b,a bq) < φ(a,b). (2) R is quasi-Euclidean.∈ 6 ∈ − (3) R is a B´ezout domain, and the group GL2(R) of regular 2 2 matrices over R is generated by matrices of elementary transformations.× (4) Every pair (a,b) R2 with b =0 has a terminating k-stage division chain for some positive∈ integer k. 6 QUASI-EUCLIDEAN SUBRINGS OF Q[x] 3 Proof. (1) = (2) is trivial, we just put (a,b) < (a′,b′) if φ(a,b) < φ(a′,b′). (2) = (4)⇒ follows directly by the dcc. The equivalence⇒ of (3) and (4) was proved already in [9, 14.3]. (4) = (1): We put φ(a, 0) = 0 for all a R. If b = 0, we define φ(a,b) as the minimal⇒k ω for which the pair (a,b) has∈ a terminating6 k-stage division chain. (So we even∈ manage to find φ with the range in ω.) Notice that no notion of a norm is involved in the definition of a quasi-Euclidean domain. However, given a norm N on R (i.e. a function N : R N with N(a)=0 iff a = 0), we can measure how far N is from being Euclidean:→ as in [5], for 0 < k ω, we say that R is a k-stage Euclidean domain with respect to N provided that, for≤ every (a,b) R2 with b = 0, there exists a positive integer l k such that ∈ 6 ≤ for some l-stage division chain starting from (a,b) it is N(rl) < N(b). As usual, we say that R is k-stage Euclidean if there exists such a norm N on R. So, in our notation, 1-stage Euclidean means Euclidean (in the classic sense). On the other hand, by Proposition 1.1, R is ω-stage Euclidean (with respect to some/any norm) if and only if it is quasi-Euclidean. Finally, observe that a quasi-Euclidean domain, being B´ezout, is UFD if and only if it is PID. An example of non-UFD 2-stage Euclidean domain was given already by Cooke in [5], at the end of 1. It is at this place, where he admits that he does not know of any example of quasi-Euclidean§ domain which is not 2-stage Euclidean. Interestingly, all examples, we are going to construct, have got this property. 1.2. Peano arithmetic and weak saturation. Although our construction will be purely algebraic, we are going to give also a description derived from a nonstan- dard model of Peano arithmetic (PA). There are several reasons to do this: the description is very natural, only basic logical tools are needed, and it sheds more light at the entire situation. Our models of PA are thought of as models in the language L = (0, 1, +, , ). The fact that it is an extension of the language of rings will make it more convenient· ≤ for us to work with. In particular, we can immediately say that any model of PA is a (discretely ordered) commutative semiring with 0 and 1. We will say that = PA is weakly saturated if every 1-type in without M | M parameters is realized in , i.e. given any set Y = ϕi(x) i I of L-formulas M { | ∈ } with one free variable x, there is m M such that = ϕi[m] for all i I, ∈ M | ∈ provided that, for each finite subset S of I, one has = ( x) i∈S ϕi(x).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 7. Euclidean Domains Let R Be an Integral Domain. We Want to Find Natural Conditions on R Such That R Is a PID. Looking at the C
    7. Euclidean Domains Let R be an integral domain. We want to find natural conditions on R such that R is a PID. Looking at the case of the integers, it is clear that the key property is the division algorithm. Definition 7.1. Let R be an integral domain. We say that R is Eu- clidean, if there is a function d: R − f0g −! N [ f0g; which satisfies, for every pair of non-zero elements a and b of R, (1) d(a) ≤ d(ab): (2) There are elements q and r of R such that b = aq + r; where either r = 0 or d(r) < d(a). Example 7.2. The ring Z is a Euclidean domain. The function d is the absolute value. Definition 7.3. Let R be a ring and let f 2 R[x] be a polynomial with coefficients in R. The degree of f is the largest n such that the coefficient of xn is non-zero. Lemma 7.4. Let R be an integral domain and let f and g be two elements of R[x]. Then the degree of fg is the sum of the degrees of f and g. In particular R[x] is an integral domain. Proof. Suppose that f has degree m and g has degree n. If a is the leading coefficient of f and b is the leading coefficient of g then f = axm + ::: and f = bxn + :::; where ::: indicate lower degree terms then fg = (ab)xm+n + :::: As R is an integral domain, ab 6= 0, so that the degree of fg is m + n.
    [Show full text]
  • Abstract Algebra: Monoids, Groups, Rings
    Notes on Abstract Algebra John Perry University of Southern Mississippi [email protected] http://www.math.usm.edu/perry/ Copyright 2009 John Perry www.math.usm.edu/perry/ Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States You are free: to Share—to copy, distribute and transmit the work • to Remix—to adapt the work Under• the following conditions: Attribution—You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licen- • sor (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work). Noncommercial—You may not use this work for commercial purposes. • Share Alike—If you alter, transform, or build upon this work, you may distribute the • resulting work only under the same or similar license to this one. With the understanding that: Waiver—Any of the above conditions can be waived if you get permission from the copy- • right holder. Other Rights—In no way are any of the following rights affected by the license: • Your fair dealing or fair use rights; ◦ Apart from the remix rights granted under this license, the author’s moral rights; ◦ Rights other persons may have either in the work itself or in how the work is used, ◦ such as publicity or privacy rights. Notice—For any reuse or distribution, you must make clear to others the license terms of • this work. The best way to do this is with a link to this web page: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/us/legalcode Table of Contents Reference sheet for notation...........................................................iv A few acknowledgements..............................................................vi Preface ...............................................................................vii Overview ...........................................................................vii Three interesting problems ............................................................1 Part .
    [Show full text]
  • Unit and Unitary Cayley Graphs for the Ring of Gaussian Integers Modulo N
    Quasigroups and Related Systems 25 (2017), 189 − 200 Unit and unitary Cayley graphs for the ring of Gaussian integers modulo n Ali Bahrami and Reza Jahani-Nezhad Abstract. Let [i] be the ring of Gaussian integers modulo n and G( [i]) and G be the Zn Zn Zn[i] unit graph and the unitary Cayley graph of Zn[i], respectively. In this paper, we study G(Zn[i]) and G . Among many results, it is shown that for each positive integer n, the graphs G( [i]) Zn[i] Zn and G are Hamiltonian. We also nd a necessary and sucient condition for the unit and Zn[i] unitary Cayley graphs of Zn[i] to be Eulerian. 1. Introduction Finding the relationship between the algebraic structure of rings using properties of graphs associated to them has become an interesting topic in the last years. There are many papers on assigning a graph to a ring, see [1], [3], [4], [5], [7], [6], [8], [10], [11], [12], [17], [19], and [20]. Let R be a commutative ring with non-zero identity. We denote by U(R), J(R) and Z(R) the group of units of R, the Jacobson radical of R and the set of zero divisors of R, respectively. The unitary Cayley graph of R, denoted by GR, is the graph whose vertex set is R, and in which fa; bg is an edge if and only if a − b 2 U(R). The unit graph G(R) of R is the simple graph whose vertices are elements of R and two distinct vertices a and b are adjacent if and only if a + b in U(R) .
    [Show full text]
  • NOTES on UNIQUE FACTORIZATION DOMAINS Alfonso Gracia-Saz, MAT 347
    Unique-factorization domains MAT 347 NOTES ON UNIQUE FACTORIZATION DOMAINS Alfonso Gracia-Saz, MAT 347 Note: These notes summarize the approach I will take to Chapter 8. You are welcome to read Chapter 8 in the book instead, which simply uses a different order, and goes in slightly different depth at different points. If you read the book, notice that I will skip any references to universal side divisors and Dedekind-Hasse norms. If you find any typos or mistakes, please let me know. These notes complement, but do not replace lectures. Last updated on January 21, 2016. Note 1. Through this paper, we will assume that all our rings are integral domains. R will always denote an integral domains, even if we don't say it each time. Motivation: We know that every integer number is the product of prime numbers in a unique way. Sort of. We just believed our kindergarden teacher when she told us, and we omitted the fact that it needed to be proven. We want to prove that this is true, that something similar is true in the ring of polynomials over a field. More generally, in which domains is this true? In which domains does this fail? 1 Unique-factorization domains In this section we want to define what it means that \every" element can be written as product of \primes" in a \unique" way (as we normally think of the integers), and we want to see some examples where this fails. It will take us a few definitions. Definition 2. Let a; b 2 R.
    [Show full text]
  • Euclidean Quadratic Forms and Adc-Forms: I
    EUCLIDEAN QUADRATIC FORMS AND ADC-FORMS: I PETE L. CLARK We denote by N the non-negative integers (including 0). Throughout R will denote a commutative, unital integral domain and K its fraction • field. We write R for R n f0g and ΣR for the set of height one primes of R. If M and N are monoids (written multiplicatively, with identity element 1), a monoid homomorphism f : M ! N is nondegenerate if f(x) = 1 () x = 1. Introduction The goal of this work is to set up the foundations and begin the systematic arith- metic study of certain classes of quadratic forms over a fairly general class of integral domains. Our work here is concentrated around that of two definitions, that of Eu- clidean form and ADC form. These definitions have a classical flavor, and various special cases of them can be found (most often implicitly) in the literature. Our work was particularly motivated by the similarities between two classical theorems. × Theorem 1. (Aubry, Davenport-Cassels) LetP A = (aij) be a symmetric n n Z matrix with coefficients in , and let q(x) = 1≤i;j≤n aijxixj be a positive definite integral quadratic form. Suppose that for all x 2 Qn, there exists y 2 Zn such that q(x − y) < 1. Then if d 2 Z is such that there exists x 2 Qn with q(x) = d, there exists y 2 Zn such that q(y) = d. 2 2 2 Consider q(x) = x1 + x2 + x3. It satisfies the hypotheses of the theorem: approxi- mating a vector x 2 Q3 by a vector y 2 Z3 of nearest integer entries, we get 3 (x − y )2 + (x − y )2 + (x − y )2 ≤ < 1: 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 Thus Theorem 1 shows that every integer which is the sum of three rational squares is also the sum of three integral squares.
    [Show full text]
  • Section IX.46. Euclidean Domains
    IX.46. Euclidean Domains 1 Section IX.46. Euclidean Domains Note. Fraleigh comments at the beginning of this section: “Now a modern tech- nique of mathematics is to take some clearly related situations and try to bring them under one roof by abstracting the important ideas common to them.” In this section, we take the idea of the division algorithm for integral domain Z and generalize it to other integral domains. Note. Recall: 1. Division Algorithm for Z (Theorem 6.3). If m is a positive integer and n is any integer, then there exist unique integers q and r such that n = mq + r and 0 ≤ r < m. 2. Division Algorithm for [x] (Theorem 23.1). n n−1 Let F be a field and let f(x)= anx + an−1x + ··· + a1x + a0 and g(x)= n m−1 bnx + bm−1x + ···+ b1x + b0 be two elements of F [x], with an and bm both nonzero elements of F and m > 0. Then there are unique polynomials q(x) and r(x) in F [x] such that f(x) = g(x)q(x)+ r(x), where either r(x)=0or the degree of r(x) is less than the degree m of g(x). Note. We now introduce a function which maps an integral domain into the nonnegative integers and use the values of this function to replace the ideas of “remainder” in Z and “degree” in F [x]. IX.46. Euclidean Domains 2 Definition 46.1. A Euclidean norm on an integral domain D is a function v mapping the nonzero elements of D into the nonnegative integers such that the following conditions are satisfied: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Linear Algebra's Basic Concepts
    Algebraic Terminology UCSD Math 15A, CSE 20 (S. Gill Williamson) Contents > Semigroup @ ? Monoid A @ Group A A Ring and Field A B Ideal B C Integral domain C D Euclidean domain D E Module E F Vector space and algebra E >= Notational conventions F > Semigroup We use the notation = 1; 2;:::; for the positive integers. Let 0 = 0 1 2 denote the nonnegative integers, and let 0 ±1 ±2 de- ; ; ;:::; { } = ; ; ;::: note the set of all integers. Let × n ( -fold Cartesian product of ) be the set { } S n { S } of n-tuples from a nonempty set S. We also write Sn for this product. Semigroup!Monoid!Group: a set with one binary operation A function w : S2 ! S is called a binary operation. It is sometimes useful to write w(x; y) in a simpler form such as x w y or simply x · y or even just x y. To tie the binary operation w to S explicitly, we write (S; w) or (S; ·). DeVnition >.> (Semigroup). Let (S; ·) be a nonempty set S with a binary oper- ation “·” . If (x · y) · z = x · (y · z), for all x, y, z 2 S, then the binary operation “·” is called associative and (S; ·) is called a semigroup. If two elements, s; t 2 S satisfy s · t = t · s then we say s and t commute. If for all x; y 2 S we have x · y = y · x then (S; ·) is a commutative (or abelian) semigroup. Remark >.? (Semigroup). Let S = M2;2(e) be the set of 2 × 2 matrices with en- tries in e = 0; ±2; ±4;::: , the set of even integers.
    [Show full text]
  • Math 6310, Fall 2017 Homework 10 1. Let R Be an Integral Domain And
    Math 6310, Fall 2017 Homework 10 1. Let R be an integral domain and p 2 R n f0g. Recall that: (i) p is a prime element if and only if (p) is a prime ideal. (ii) p is an irreducible element if and only if (p) is maximal among the proper principal ideals. Let R be a PID. (i) Show that R is a UFD. (ii) Show that every proper nonzero prime ideal in R is maximal. 2. Show that the polynomial ring Z[x] is not a PID. On the other hand, Z[x] is a UFD, as we will see in class shortly. 3. Let R be an integral domain and a; b 2 R n f0g. An element d 2 R n f0g is called a greatest common divisor of a and b if the following conditions hold: (i) d j a and d j b; (ii) if e 2 R n f0g is another element such that e j a and e j b, then also e j d. In this case we write d 2 gcd(a; b). (a) Show that d 2 gcd(a; b) () (d) is the smallest principal ideal containing (a; b). (b) Suppose d 2 gcd(a; b). Show that d0 2 gcd(a; b) () d ∼ d0. (c)( Bezout's theorem) Suppose R is a PID. Show that there exist r; s 2 R such that ra + sb 2 gcd(a; b): In an arbitrary integral domain, greatest common divisors may not exist. When they do, they are unique up to associates, by part (b).
    [Show full text]
  • Course Notes for MAT 612: Abstract Algebra II
    Course Notes for MAT 612: Abstract Algebra II Dana C. Ernst, PhD Northern Arizona University Spring 2016 Contents 1 Ring Theory 3 1.1 Definitions and Examples..............................3 1.2 Ideals and Quotient Rings.............................. 11 1.3 Maximal and Prime Ideals.............................. 17 1.4 Rings of Fractions................................... 20 1.5 Principal Ideal Domains............................... 23 1.6 Euclidean Domains.................................. 26 1.7 Unique Factorization Domains............................ 31 1.8 More on Polynomial Rings.............................. 36 1 Ring Theory 1.1 Definitions and Examples This section of notes roughly follows Sections 7.1–7.3 in Dummit and Foote. Recall that a group is a set together with a single binary operation, which together satisfy a few modest properties. Loosely speaking, a ring is a set together with two binary operations (called addition and multiplication) that are related via a distributive property. Definition 1.1. A ring R is a set together with two binary operations + and × (called addition and multiplication, respectively) satisfying the following: (i)( R;+) is an abelian group. (ii) × is associative: (a × b) × c = a × (b × c) for all a;b;c 2 R. (iii) The distributive property holds: a×(b +c) = (a×b) +(a×c) and (a+b)×c = (a×c) +(b ×c) for all a;b;c 2 R. 3 Note 1.2. We make a couple comments about notation. (1) We write ab in place a × b. (2) The additive inverse of the ring element a 2 R is denoted −a. Theorem 1.3. Let R be a ring. Then for all a;b 2 R: (1)0 a = a0 = 0 (2)( −a)b = a(−b) = −(ab) (3)( −a)(−b) = ab Definition 1.4.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 4 Factorization
    Chapter 4 Factorization 01/22/19 Throughout this chapter, R stands for a commutative ring with unity, and D stands for an integral domain, unless indicated otherwise. The most important theorem in this course, after the Fundamental The- orem of Galois Theory, can be briefly stated as follows. Theorem 4.0.1 Field ED PID UFD ID ) ) ) ) In other words, every field is an Euclidean Domain; every Euclidean Do- main is a Principal Ideal Domain; every Principal Ideal Domain is a Unique Factorization Domain; and every Unique Factorization Domain is an Inte- gral Domain. So far, we only have the definition for the first, third, and last of these expressions. In the following sections we will give the appropriate definitions of the other terms, prove each of the implications, and show, by counterexample, that all implications are strict. See Propositions 4.1.2, 4.2.1, 4.4.3, as well as Examples 4.1.1.2, 4.4.1.2, 4.4.2 and Exercise 4.6.1. 11 12 CHAPTER 4. FACTORIZATION 4.1 Euclidean Domain Theorem 4.1.1 [Gallian 16.2] let F be a field, and F [x] the ring of poly- nomials with coefficients in F . For any f(x),g(x) F [x] with g(x) =0, there are unique q(x),r(x) F [x] such that 2 6 2 f(x)=q(x)g(x)+r(x)andr(x)=0or deg(r(x)) < deg(g(x). Proof. Definition 4.1.1. An Euclidean Domain consists of an integral domain D and a function δ : D 0 N,satisfyingthefollowingconditions: For any f,g D with−g{=0,thereexist}! q, r D s.t.
    [Show full text]
  • Complete Set of Algebra Exams
    TIER ONE ALGEBRA EXAM 4 18 (1) Consider the matrix A = . −3 11 ✓− ◆ 1 (a) Find an invertible matrix P such that P − AP is a diagonal matrix. (b) Using the previous part of this problem, find a formula for An where An is the result of multiplying A by itself n times. (c) Consider the sequences of numbers a = 1, b = 0, a = 4a + 18b , b = 3a + 11b . 0 0 n+1 − n n n+1 − n n Use the previous parts of this problem to compute closed formulae for the numbers an and bn. (2) Let P2 be the vector space of polynomials with real coefficients and having degree less than or equal to 2. Define D : P2 P2 by D(f) = f 0, that is, D is the linear transformation given by takin!g the derivative of the poly- nomial f. (You needn’t verify that D is a linear transformation.) (3) Give an example of each of the following. (No justification required.) (a) A group G, a normal subgroup H of G, and a normal subgroup K of H such that K is not normal in G. (b) A non-trivial perfect group. (Recall that a group is perfect if it has no non-trivial abelian quotient groups.) (c) A field which is a three dimensional vector space over the field of rational numbers, Q. (d) A group with the property that the subset of elements of finite order is not a subgroup. (e) A prime ideal of Z Z which is not maximal. ⇥ (4) Show that any field with four elements is isomorphic to F2[t] .
    [Show full text]
  • Some Aspects of Semirings
    Appendix A Some Aspects of Semirings Semirings considered as a common generalization of associative rings and dis- tributive lattices provide important tools in different branches of computer science. Hence structural results on semirings are interesting and are a basic concept. Semi- rings appear in different mathematical areas, such as ideals of a ring, as positive cones of partially ordered rings and fields, vector bundles, in the context of topolog- ical considerations and in the foundation of arithmetic etc. In this appendix some algebraic concepts are introduced in order to generalize the corresponding concepts of semirings N of non-negative integers and their algebraic theory is discussed. A.1 Introductory Concepts H.S. Vandiver gave the first formal definition of a semiring and developed the the- ory of a special class of semirings in 1934. A semiring S is defined as an algebra (S, +, ·) such that (S, +) and (S, ·) are semigroups connected by a(b+c) = ab+ac and (b+c)a = ba+ca for all a,b,c ∈ S.ThesetN of all non-negative integers with usual addition and multiplication of integers is an example of a semiring, called the semiring of non-negative integers. A semiring S may have an additive zero ◦ defined by ◦+a = a +◦=a for all a ∈ S or a multiplicative zero 0 defined by 0a = a0 = 0 for all a ∈ S. S may contain both ◦ and 0 but they may not coincide. Consider the semiring (N, +, ·), where N is the set of all non-negative integers; a + b ={lcm of a and b, when a = 0,b= 0}; = 0, otherwise; and a · b = usual product of a and b.
    [Show full text]