Nicotine Therapy Sampling to Induce Quit Attempts Among Smokers Unmotivated to Quit a Randomized Clinical Trial

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Nicotine Therapy Sampling to Induce Quit Attempts Among Smokers Unmotivated to Quit a Randomized Clinical Trial ORIGINAL INVESTIGATION Nicotine Therapy Sampling to Induce Quit Attempts Among Smokers Unmotivated to Quit A Randomized Clinical Trial Matthew J. Carpenter, PhD; John R. Hughes, MD; Kevin M. Gray, MD; Amy E. Wahlquist, MS; Michael E. Saladin, PhD; Anthony J. Alberg, PhD, MPH Background: Rates of smoking cessation have not abstinence at any time during the study (ie, floating changed in a decade, accentuating the need for novel ap- abstinence) and at the final follow-up assessment. proaches to prompt quit attempts. Results: Compared with PQA intervention, nicotine Methods: Within a nationwide randomized clinical therapy sampling was associated with a significantly higher trial (N=849) to induce further quit attempts and ces- incidence of any quit attempt (49% vs 40%; relative risk sation, smokers currently unmotivated to quit were [RR], 1.2; 95% CI, 1.1-1.4) and any 24-hour quit at- randomized to a practice quit attempt (PQA) alone or tempt (43% vs 34%; 1.3; 1.1-1.5). Nicotine therapy sam- to nicotine replacement therapy (hereafter referred to pling was marginally more likely to promote floating ab- as nicotine therapy), sampling within the context of a stinence (19% vs 15%; RR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.0-1.7); 6-month PQA. Following a 6-week intervention period, partici- point prevalence abstinence rates were no different be- pants were followed up for 6 months to assess out- tween groups (16% vs 14%; 1.2; 0.9-1.6). comes. The PQA intervention was designed to increase motivation, confidence, and coping skills. The combi- Conclusion: Nicotine therapy sampling during a PQA nation of a PQA plus nicotine therapy sampling added represents a novel strategy to motivate smokers to make samples of nicotine lozenges to enhance attitudes a quit attempt. toward pharmacotherapy and to promote the use of additional cessation resources. Primary outcomes Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: included the incidence of any ever occurring self- NCT00706979 defined quit attempt and 24-hour quit attempt. Sec- ondary measures included 7-day point prevalence Arch Intern Med. 2011;171(21):1901-1907 ESPITE ADVANCES IN and understudied target for public clinical care and policy, health. rates of smoking cessa- tion have held constant in the past decade,1 indi- See Invited Commentary Dcating a need for novel approaches.2 at end of article Strategies to further prompt quitting must increase quit attempts or the likeli- For smokers unmotivated to quit, the hood that each quit attempt succeeds.3 immediate goal is to promote quit at- Author Affiliations: Most strategies focus on the latter, leav- tempts, a strategy referred to as cessation Departments of Psychiatry and ing few options for smokers who have induction. Cessation induction studies2,7,8 Behavioral Sciences differ from traditional cessation trials in at (Drs Carpenter and Gray) and Health Sciences and Research See also pages 1887, 1894, least the following 2 ways: (1) the target (Dr Saladin), Division of 1950, and 1956 population is smokers without current in- Biostatistics and Epidemiology, tention to quit (smokers unmotivated to Department of Medicine little interest in quitting in the near quit) and (2) the studies primarily focus on (Drs Carpenter and Alberg and future. Many smokers say they want to prompting quit attempts (abstinence is the Ms Wahlquist), and Hollings quit eventually,4 but in any given year, eventual goal but is secondary). Cancer Center (Drs Carpenter approximately 60% do not try to quit5 In contrast to policy interventions,9-11 and Alberg), Medical University and less than 10% of smokers plan to quit clinical interventions for promoting quit at- of South Carolina, Charleston; 6 and Department of Psychiatry, in the next month. Therefore, most tempts have received less attention, and the University of Vermont, and smokers are ambivalent about or resistant options are narrow. The most common Fletcher Allen Health Care, to quitting in the near future. These method of increasing motivation to quit is Burlington (Dr Hughes). unmotivated smokers are an important physician-delivered brief advice.3 A more ARCH INTERN MED/ VOL 171 (NO. 21), NOV 28, 2011 WWW.ARCHINTERNMED.COM 1901 ©2011 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. Downloaded From: https://jamanetwork.com/ on 09/25/2021 time-intensive clinical option is motivational interviewing.12 have no Food and Drug Administration contraindications for Both physician advice and motivational interviewing rely nicotine lozenge use, (6) have no previous NT use, and (7) have onrepeatedcounseling,whichcouldovertimefrustrateboth no quit attempt longer than 1 week in the past year. smokers and clinicians. Furthermore, many physicians lack To recruit smokers who were unmotivated to quit, eligible confidence in smoking counseling.13 New strategies that do participants were offered the following 2 comparable study op- tions: one for smokers wanting to quit in the next 30 days and not rely exclusively on verbal counseling could provide an another for smokers who wanted to quit at some later time but alternativetosmokerswhohavenotrespondedtophysician- not in the next 30 days. Self-selection into either option de- delivered brief advice in the past. noted motivation to quit; only those who chose the latter study Committing to quit is difficult for many smokers be- option were included in this study. cause they have failed in the past and fear embarrassment if unsuccessful.14 An alternative is to have smokers engage GENERAL PROCEDURES in less-threatening cessationlike activities, such as a prac- tice quit attempt (PQA) (eg, attempting to not smoke for Eligible participants were mailed an informed consent form a few hours or days, without pressure to permanently quit). and were asked to return a signed copy if they wished to A successful PQA experience could increase self-efficacy participate. Participants were then randomized to treatment and teach coping skills for quitting. Practice quit attempts groups in a 1:1 ratio using a random number generator with have been recommended15,16 but have not been empiri- block randomization. Research staff then made calls to initi- cally tested. In addition, if smokers unmotivated to quit ate formal study enrollment. Of 943 who initially signed and returned consent forms, 94 (10.0%) could not be reached by sample cessation medication such as nicotine replace- telephone (Figure 1). The remaining 849 participants com- ment therapy (NT) (hereafter referred to as nicotine therapy) prised the final study sample. during a PQA, its therapeutic benefits could empower them Blinding study staff and participants to study group was in- to make a quit attempt. Despite strong evidence that NT is feasible because the intervention was behaviorally based. The efficacious,3,17 52% to 78% of smokers never use these prod- intervention consisted of 3 telephone calls during 6 weeks. Both ucts.18-20 Underuse of cessation pharmacotherapy in part treatment conditions were matched for duration. Approxi- reflects misperception and doubt,21-24 which could be re- mately 5% of telephone calls were randomly recorded and moni- versed through real-world NT sampling. tored regularly for treatment fidelity against semiscripted pro- A 2008 study25 of one-time NT use demonstrated a posi- tocols. At the last treatment telephone call, participants in both tive shift in attitudes but did not test for effects on cessation groups were given brief advice to quit smoking. Follow-up tele- phone contacts were made at weeks 4, 12, and 26 following behavior. Offering NT to motivated smokers (eg, callers to the end of treatment to ascertain study outcomes. Across 5094 a quitline) has been shown to increase quit attempts and (849ϫ6) scheduled telephone calls, 90% were completed; 73% 26-28 abstinence. This provides indirect support for the poten- of participants completed all 6 telephone calls, without signifi- tial efficacy of NT sampling, but it is unknown whether a cant group differences in retention. similar intervention would influence smokers unmotivated to quit. This article reports on a randomized trial of NT sam- INTERVENTIONS pling during PQAs as a novel method to induce quit attempts among smokers unmotivated to quit. Primarily, we hypoth- The primary focus of the study was NT sampling. This was em- esizedthatNT-aidedPQAswouldresultinahigherincidence bedded within the behavioral exercise of a PQA. of subsequent attempts to permanently quit smoking com- pared with PQAs alone. Secondarily, we hypothesized that Practice Quit Attempt NT sampling would result in higher 7-day point prevalence abstinence at the 6-month final follow-up assessment. The PQA was designed with the intent to pause from smoking and to reflect on the process of quitting. We discussed with the smoker that quitting often requires practice before succeeding and METHODS that a PQA can be a good opportunity to practice and build con- fidence. The central theme of the PQA was to remove pressure Trial methods and a detailed rationale for the study design have of trying to permanently quit smoking. Telephone counselors been reported elsewhere.29 In this randomized 2-group study worked collaboratively with each participant to establish a PQA design, smokers who were unmotivated to quit were assigned plan that lasted a few hours or a few days or simply to see how (1) to a PQA alone or (2) to NT sampling within the context long he or she could go without smoking. Participants were not of a PQA. The study was approved by the Institutional Review required to engage in a PQA. At the second intervention tele- Board of the Medical University of South Carolina. phone call (week −3), the success and barriers of the first PQA were reviewed, and a second PQA was solicited. After both in- PARTICIPANTS tervention telephone calls, support materials were mailed, in- cluding further rationale for the PQA and coping strategies. The Participants were recruited from January 5, 2009, to February third and final treatment telephone call (week 0) reviewed over- 10, 2010, via the Internet using an e-mail database of potential all progress and changed the focus to permanently quitting.
Recommended publications
  • Primary Care & Tobacco Cessation Handbook: a Reference for Providers
    Primary Care & Tobacco Cessation Handbook A Resource for Providers Primary Care & Tobacco Cessation Handbook A Resource for Providers Acknowledgements The provider manual Primary Care & Tobacco Cessation and the accompanying My Tobacco Cessation Workbook were developed by Julianne Himstreet, Pharm.D., BCPS. The author’s primary goal was to develop materials promoting tobacco cessation interventions, based on published principles of evidence- and consensus- based clinical practice, for use by primary care providers treating patients who use tobacco. With permission from the HIV and Smoking Cessation (HASC) Working Group, several materials used in the Primary Care & Tobacco Cessation provider manual were modified from HIV Provider Smoking Cessation Handbook. The U.S. Public Health Service Clinical Practice Guideline (Fiore, 2000) and the treatment model described by Richard Brown (2003) provided the foundation for their work and therefore indirectly ours as well.1 Many thanks to Kim Hamlett- Berry, Director of Tobacco & Health Policy in VHA Office of Mental Health Services for supporting this project and Leah Stockett for editing the manual and the workbook. In addition, much appreciation needs to be given to Dana Christofferson, Kim Hamlett- Berry, Pam Belperio, and Tim Chen for their editing and content contributions.1 1 Brown, R. A. (2003). Intensive behavioral treatment. In D. B. Abrams, R. Niaura, R. Brown, K. M. Emmons, M. G. Goldstein, & P. M. Monti, The tobacco dependence treatment handbook: A guide to best practices (pp. 118 -177). New York, NY: Guilford Press. Fiore, M. C., Bailey, W. C., Cohen, S. J., Dorfman, S. F., Goldstein, M. G., Gritz, E. R., Heyman, R.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of Product Characteristics 1. Name Of
    SUMMARY OF PRODUCT CHARACTERISTICS 1. NAME OF THE MEDICINAL PRODUCT Nicorette Mint 2 mg Compressed Lozenge 2. QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE COMPOSITION Each lozenge contains 2 mg nicotine (as nicotine resinate) For a full list of excipients, see section 6.1 3. PHARMACEUTICAL FORM Compressed Lozenge An oval, white to off-white tablet imprinted with an “n” on one side and “2” on the other side 4. CLINICAL PARTICULARS 4.1 Therapeutic Indications Nicorette Mint 2 mg Lozenges are to be used for the treatment of tobacco dependence by relief of nicotine withdrawal symptoms and cravings in smokers 18 years and above. Permanent cessation of tobacco use is the eventual objective. Nicorette Mint 2 mg Lozenges should preferably be used in conjunction with a behavioural support programme. Use of Nicorette Mint 2 mg Lozenge in smokers 12 – 17 years inclusive is at the discretion of a doctor: See section 4.2. 4.2 Posology and Method of Administration Posology Selecting the strength of lozenge to be used will depend on the smoking habits of the individual. Adults Nicorette Mint 2 mg Lozenges are suitable for smokers with low nicotine dependency e.g. those smoking their first cigarette of the day more than 30 minutes after waking up or those who smoke fewer than 20 cigarettes per day. Lozenges should not be used for more than 9 months. If users still feel the need for treatment, a physician should be consulted. Behavioural therapy advice and support will normally improve the success rate. 1/9 Paediatric population Children and adolescents Nicorette Mint 2 mg Lozenges should only be used by adolescents (12-17 years inclusive) with advice from a doctor.
    [Show full text]
  • Application Number: Nda 21-330/S-21
    CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND RESEARCH Approval Package for: APPLICATION NUMBER: NDA 21-330/S-21 Trade Name: Nicorette Generic or Proper nicotine polacrilex Name: Sponsor: GlaxoSmithKline Consumer Healthcare Approval Date: August 10, 2018 Indication: provides for a new mint flavor coated lozenge CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND RESEARCH NDA 21-330/S-21 CONTENTS Reviews / Information Included in this NDA Review. Approval Letter X Other Action Letters Labeling X REMS Summary Review Officer/Employee List Office Director Memo Cross Discipline Team Leader Review Clinical Review X Chemistry Review Environmental Assessment Pharmacology/Toxicology X Statistical Review Clinical Microbiology Clinical Pharmacology X Other Reviews X Risk Assessment and Risk Mitigation Review(s) Proprietary Name Review Administrative/Correspondence Document(s) CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND RESEARCH APPLICATION NUMBER: NDA 21-330/S-21 APPROVAL LETTER DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration Silver Spring MD 20993 NDA 021330/S-021 SUPPLEMENT APPROVAL GlaxoSmithKline Consumer Healthcare Attention: Julia Kim Senior Director, US Regulatory Affairs 184 Liberty Corner Road, Suite 200 Warren, NJ 07059 Dear Ms. Kim: Please refer to your Supplemental New Drug Application (sNDA) dated and received February 22, 2018, and your amendments, submitted under section 505(b) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FDCA) for Nicorette (nicotine polacrilex) lozenges, 2 mg and 4 mg. We acknowledge receipt of your major amendment dated June 5, 2018, which extended the goal date by two months. This “Prior Approval” sNDA provides for a new mint flavor coated lozenge which will be referred to as “Coated Ice Mint”. We have completed our review of this application, as amended.
    [Show full text]
  • Tobacco Cessation Handout
    IHS Division of Diabetes Webinar 2014 Advancements in Diabetes Seminars Three Levels of Tobacco Interventions • Minimal Intervention • Brief Intervention • Intensive Intervention 2 Brief Interventions • 3 - 10 minutes • Use 5 A Model when counseling: • Ask if they use tobacco • Advise to quit • Assess willingness to make quit attempt • Assist in making quit attempt • Arrange for follow up contact • Pharmacotherapy 3 Intensive Interventions • 4 or more visits with total contact time greater than (>) 40 minutes • More effective than brief intervention • Multiple providers • Motivational Interviewing, problem solving, social support, coping skills • Pharmacotherapy 4 Ask and Advise ASK: • Implement a system to identify all tobacco users in your healthcare setting. • YAsk EVER patient at EVERY visit about tobacco use and exposure and document status. • Keep it simple such as, “Have you ever used commercial tobacco?” ADVISE: • Your patient in a clear, strong, personalized manner to stop using commercial tobacco. 5 Assist and Arrange Follow Up If your patient is NOT READY to quit now: • conduct a Brief Motivational Intervention • provide information for the patient • repeat the message at each encounter • If your patient is READY to QUIT now: • conduct a Brief Cessation Intervention • help the patient develop a Quit Plan • refer the patient for counseling and follow up 6 Assist and Arrange If Patient is Not Ready to Quit Provide a brief Motivational Intervention utilizing the “5 R’s”: • Relevant Information • Risks of Continued Tobacco Use
    [Show full text]
  • How to Quit Using Tobacco Guide to Quitting
    cancer.org | 1.800.227.2345 How to Quit Using Tobacco Guide to Quitting Remember, tobacco addiction is both mental and physical. For most people, the best way to quit will be some combination of medicine, a method to change personal habits, and emotional support. ● Making a Plan to Quit and Planning Your Quit Day ● Quitting Smoking or Smokeless Tobacco ● Quitting E-cigarettes ● Dealing with the Mental Part of Tobacco Addiction ● Nicotine Replacement Therapy to Help You Quit Tobacco ● Prescription Medicines to Help You Quit Tobacco ● Ways to Quit Tobacco Without Using Medicines ● Staying Tobacco-free After You Quit ● Help for Cravings and Tough Situations While You're Quitting Tobacco More information and resources Quitting is the first part -- now you have to stay quit. Here are some tips that may help. ● Reasons to Quit Smoking ● Health Benefits of Quitting Smoking Over Time ● The Great American Smokeout ● 1-800-QUIT-NOW [CDC] Smoking Cessation video Learn about 3 steps that can lead to quitting smoking for good. This how-to quit 1 ____________________________________________________________________________________American Cancer Society cancer.org | 1.800.227.2345 smoking video also includes a short introduction to lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography (low-dose LDCT). Smoking Cessation - 3 Steps to Quitting Making a Plan to Quit and Planning Your Quit Day There’s no one right way to quit tobacco (known as tobacco cessation), but there are some important steps that can help make a person's decision to quit a success. These steps can help whether you or a loved one are trying to quit smoking cigarettes or smokeless tobacco (chew, dip, or snuff).
    [Show full text]
  • Nicotine Lozenges
    Nicotine lozenges Please note: This information is not intended to replace the Consumer Medicine Information (pack insert) that may come with the nicotine lozenge. If you do not have a pack insert, ask your pharmacist for it, or for advice if one is not available. Main points about nicotine replacement therapy products • All forms of nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) products – patches, lozenges, mouth spray, gum and inhalator – have been proven to help people quit smoking.1 • Using NRT products is always safer than continuing to smoke.2 NRT products are a safe alternative to cigarettes for smokers.3 • Using NRT products will still increase your chances of quitting even if it does not completely control cravings.4 • NRT products reduce the severity of cravings but you may still have them, especially in situations in which you are used to smoking.5-7 • Using the patch plus another NRT product (combination therapy) increases your chance of stopping smoking compared to just using one NRT product, and is better at suppressing cravings.8, 9 • NRT product work better when you also reduce triggers for cravings. Boost your chance of success by making your home smokefree and, if possible, get rid of all cigarettes in your home and car.10, 11 You will also need to find new habits to take the place of smoking; for example, when you’re stressed, socialising, concentrating, filling in time or when drinking alcohol or coffee. • Research shows that people who have the best chance of stopping smoking using NRT products also get advice or support from their doctor, pharmacist or other trained advisor (such as through the Quitline).1, 12, 13 • If you slip-up and have a cigarette, it is safe to continue using NRT products and to keep trying to quit.14 • It is common for smokers to attempt to quit a number of times before they successfully stop.15 09/19 2 Is the nicotine lozenge suitable for me? The nicotine lozenge works best for addicted smokers who want to quit.1 Your doctor or pharmacist can advise you whether the nicotine lozenge is suitable for you.
    [Show full text]
  • Availability, Accessibility, Usage and Regulatory Environment for Novel and Emerging Tobacco, Nicotine Or Related Products
    EUROPE Availability, accessibility, usage and regulatory environment for novel and emerging tobacco, nicotine or related products Ellen Nolte, Annalijn Conklin, Laura Brereton, Claire Celia, Simo Goshev, Flavia Tsang, Clémence Pasmans EUROPE Availability, accessibility, usage and regulatory environment for novel and emerging tobacco, nicotine or related products Ellen Nolte, Annalijn Conklin, Laura Brereton, Claire Celia, Simo Goshev, Flavia Tsang, Clémence Pasmans December 2012 Prepared for the Executive Agency for Health and Consumers (EAHC) The research described in this report was prepared for the Executive Agency for Health and Consumers (EAHC). RAND Europe is an independent, not-for-profit policy research organisation that aims to improve policy and decisionmaking in the public interest through research and analysis. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. R® is a registered trademark. © European Union, 2013 Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. Published 2013 by the RAND Corporation 1776 Main Street, P.O. Box 2138, Santa Monica, CA 90407-2138 1200 South Hayes Street, Arlington, VA 22202-5050 4570 Fifth Avenue, Suite 600, Pittsburgh, PA 15213-2665 Westbrook Centre, Milton Road, Cambridge CB4 1YG, United Kingdom RAND URL: http://www.rand.org/ RAND Europe URL: http://www.rand.org/randeurope To order RAND documents or to obtain additional information, contact Distribution Services: Telephone: (310) 451-7002; Fax: (310) 451-6915; Email: [email protected] Preface The European Commission Health and Consumer Directorate-General (DG SANCO) commissioned RAND Europe, by way of the Executive Agency for Health and Consumers (EAHC), in the framework of the Health Programme (No SC 2010 6306), to examine the availability, accessibility, usage and regulatory environment for novel and emerging tobacco, nicotine and related products in European Union Member States.
    [Show full text]
  • Primary Care & Tobacco Cessation Handbook
    Primary Care & Tobacco Cessation Handbook A Resource for Providers This page intentionally left blank. Primary Care & Tobacco Cessation Handbook A Resource for Providers Acknowledgements The provider manual Primary Care & Tobacco Cessation and the accompanying My Tobacco Cessation Workbook were developed by Julianne Himstreet, Pharm.D., BCPS. The author’s primary goal was to develop materials promoting tobacco cessation interventions, based on published principles of evidence- and consensus-based clinical practice, for use by primary care providers treating patients who use tobacco. With permission from the HIV and Smoking Cessation (HASC) Working Group, several materials used in the Primary Care & Tobacco Cessation provider manual were modified from HIV Provider Smoking Cessation Handbook. The U.S. Public Health Service Clinical Practice Guideline (Fiore, 2000) and the treatment model described by Richard Brown (2003) provided the foundation for their work and therefore indirectly ours as well.1 Many thanks to Kim Hamlett-Berry, Director of Tobacco & Health Policy in Clinical Public Health, Office of Public Health, for supporting this project and Leah Stockett for editing the manual and the workbook. In addition, much appreciation needs to be given to Dana Christofferson, Kim Hamlett-Berry, Pam Belperio, and Tim Chen for their editing and content contributions. 1 Brown, R. A. (2003). Intensive behavioral treatment. In D. B. Abrams, R. Niaura, R. Brown, K. M. Emmons, M. G. Goldstein, & P. M. Monti, The tobacco dependence treatment handbook: A guide to best practices (pp. 118-177). New York, NY: Guilford Press. Fiore, M. C., Bailey, W. C., Cohen, S. J., Dorfman, S. F., Goldstein, M. G., Gritz, E.
    [Show full text]
  • Nicotine Pouches- a Research and Regulatory Policy Agenda to Maximise Public Health Benefits and Minimise Harms
    Qeios, CC-BY 4.0 · Article, April 20, 2021 Open Peer Review on Qeios Nicotine pouches- a research and regulatory policy agenda to maximise public health benefits and minimise harms Sudhanshu Patwardhan1, Karl Fagerström2 1 Centre for Health Research and Education (CHRE) 2 Fagerstrom Consulting Funding: The authors or Centre for Health Research and Education (CHRE) did not receive any external funding for this article. Potential competing interests: Dr Sudhanshu Patwardhan (SP) is a paid Director at Centre for Health Research and Education (CHRE), an independent healthcare company, which works on projects on smoking cessation and cancer prevention globally. CHRE has received grants from Foundation for a Smoke-free World, Inc for some of its smoking cessation projects. Previously, SP was an employee of Nicoventures, a wholly owned subsidiary of British American Tobacco, till February 2019. SP does not have any financial interest in the nicotine pouches category. Dr Fagerström has received consulting fees from many companies that develop or market pharmaceutical and behavioural treatments for smoking cessation. In year 2000 he started a company Niconovum that developed the first non-tobacco nicotine pouch that was licensed as an NRT. He currently receives consulting fees from Swedish Match and has received fees in the past from tobacco companies to assist their development of less-risky tobacco products. Abstract Nicotine extracted from tobacco and purified from other constituents can be delivered in the form of nicotine replacement products for helping people move away from tobacco dependence. Nicotine pouches to be put under the upper lip are one such new category of products that are being rapidly developed and marketed as consumer goods with little research or regulatory oversight.
    [Show full text]
  • Quit Smoking Today
    Clearing the Air Quit Smoking Today U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES National Institutes of Health National Cancer Institute Table of Contents Introduction 2 How to use this booklet 3 Before You START a Smoke-Free Life 3 Why is quitting so hard? 3 Some things to think about before you START… 5 Now Let’s START 12 Set a quit date 12 Tell your family, friends, and co-workers that you plan to quit 13 Anticipate and plan for the challenges you’ll face while quitting 14 Remove cigarettes and other tobacco from your home, car, and work 15 Talk to your doctor about getting help to quit 16 The week before you quit 22 Today’s the Big Day—Your Quit Date! 23 Keep busy 23 Stay away from what tempts you 24 Plan to reward yourself 25 When you really crave a cigarette 25 Remember the instant rewards of quitting 26 Find new things to do 27 Quitting for Good 28 Stick with it 28 If you do slip up 30 A note about gaining weight 31 Finally…the long-term rewards of quitting 34 For More Information 35 1 Introduction From those of us at the National Cancer Institute1: Congratulations! You are taking the first step to quitting cigarette smoking. We wrote this booklet with the help of ex-smokers and experts. It can help you get ready to quit. It can also help you through the days and weeks after you quit. The booklet tells you about tools to help you become a non-smoker.
    [Show full text]
  • (NCTP) Smokeless Tobacco Waterpipes Cigars Pipes Jon O
    Use of Non Cigarette Tobacco Products (NCTP) Smokeless Tobacco Waterpipes Cigars Pipes Jon O. Ebbert, MD, MSc Professor of Medicine8 Nicotine Dependence Center Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN Email: [email protected] ©2011 MFMER | slide-1 Goals & Objectives • Review NCTP definitions & products • Discuss prevalence/trends of NCTP • Describe NCTP pharmacology • Discuss NCTP dependence measures/withdrawal • Review recommended treatments for NCTP ©2011 MFMER | slide-2 NCTP Definitions & Products ©2011 MFMER | slide-3 Pipes ©2011 MFMER | slide-4 Cigars Images from www.trinketsandtrash.org ©2011 MFMER | slide-5 Cigar Definition U.S. Department of Treasury (1996): Cigar “Any roll of tobacco wrapped in leaf tobacco or any substance containing tobacco.” vs. Cigarette “Any roll of tobacco wrapped in paper or in any substance not containing tobacco.” ©2011 MFMER | slide-6 NCI Monograph 9. Cigars: Health Effects and Trends. ©2011 MFMER | slide-7 ©2011 MFMER | slide-8 Smokeless Tobacco Chewing tobacco • Loose leaf (i.e., Redman) • Plugs • Twists Snuff • Moist (i.e., Copenhagen, Skoal) • Dry (i.e., Honest, Honey bee, Navy, Square) ©2011 MFMER | slide-9 “Chewing Tobacco” = Cut tobacco leaves ©2011 MFMER | slide-10 “Snuff” = Moist ground tobacco ©2011 MFMER | slide-11 Type of ST Used in U.S. Chewing Tobacco Snuff National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) ©2011 MFMER | slide-12 “Spitless Tobacco” – Star Scientific ©2011 MFMER | slide-13 RJ Reynold’s ©2011 MFMER | slide-14 “Swedish Style” ST ©2011 MFMER | slide-15 Phillip Morris (Altria) ©2011 MFMER |
    [Show full text]
  • Long Term Use of Nicotine Lozenges
    Long Term Use Of Nicotine Lozenges Aphasic Zary stultify gastronomically while Horace always humbugging his utopians cleeking someimpassibly, Oxfordshire he manured so pertly! so radically. Leerier Pincas caskets abed. Unmetrical and founded Keefe scart Effect likely have long term nicotine use of lozenges are addicted smokers attending annual conference for long term nrt product, which is recommended since. Please know little of nicotine replacements give a long term effects of. Other Issues for Consideration: Use of NRT by Adolescents and Pregnant Women Petitioners are not seeking specific changes to FDA policy related to the use of NRT in adolescents. Persistent and nicotine replacement therapy smoking in adults in early and harm reduction in decreasing doses for long term. People most successful at resisting urges to smoke use a range of coping strategies to help them. You nicotine lozenge using them how long term effects in terms of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors left for use nicotine is also be. You heard long term nicotine replacement therapy for this medication contains a quit rates by. And after the long as a dose by combined use of the pathology shows that nicotine withdrawal can they may recommend encouraging smokers would provide a long term nicotine use of lozenges can i really be. The decreased use of NRT, symptoms corresponding to heavy smoking may be seen. It is even longer than smoking provides a long term nicotine use lozenges. You deserve a life that is free of nicotine addiction. This meet may cause harm may be deadly if used or swallowed by party or pets.
    [Show full text]